text:
My answer to this week's challenge:
« Unwitting Revolutionary | Main | To the Atheist Who Called Jesus "The Magic Carpenter" (And a Warning to Churches) »
I agree that in discussing this issue that one answer the question of how sin relates to morality. In this video Brett distinguishes between commands and values. It is true that commands may only apply in certain situations or to certain people. Brett uses the example of traffic laws only applying to individuals within that country, but the values that underlie these laws are the same (i.e. regard for human life). Thus, these laws are expressions of the same values, but the expression will vary based on the context. I think this is a helpful distinction.
But I disagree that this solves the underlying challenge. The challenge asks about morality which corresponds more to values in Brett's scheme. This response is inadequate because the values that underlie certain commands in the OT versus in the NT do not seem to match. In some instances they seem to contradict. Brett mentioned an underlying value for various traffic laws is a regard for human life. I agree this is an important value. But some of the commands in the OT seem to disregard this basic value. The commands allowing slavery, requiring a raped woman to marry her rapist, commanding the death of children for the sin of their fathers, and inflicting genocide on a population do not express a value for human life, no matter what the specific contact.
Lack of basic reading comprehension skills seems to be quite a problem for some people.
For example, there is no command anywhere in the Bible that requires a raped woman to marry her rapist. That notion comes from sloppy reading of the text.
"The immorality of rape is immediately given in the seventh of the Ten Commandments "You shall not commit adultery." Any sexual intercourse outside the bounds of marriage is proscribed by the Bible. So rape is always regarded as immoral in the Bible. That puts a quite different perspective on things."
"There's no claim that Israel's laws were perfect or adequately expressed God's moral will. Jesus himself regarded the Mosaic law on divorce as inadequate and failing to capture God's ideal will for marriage ( Matthew 5.31-2 ). Maybe the same was true for rape laws." (William Lane Craig)
On scripture's own definition of itself, the laws on all things in the OT cannot be, on necessity, Love's Perfection. The entire landscape of the Ministry of Death is but Love's reach into hell on earth, as the fragmentation of Love's E Pluribus Unum among God-Man / Man-God is but one necessary outcome of Man's motion into Self and out of Love, out of God, just as, the other necessary fragmentation is that of any notion of E Pluribus Unum amid Mankind, Human Beings. That which is outside of Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum, that topography of one's eternally sacrificed self is, on necessity, outside of the triune singularity of unity that just is Self / Other / We and is, on God's definition, hell, the outside. Genesis 3:15 tells of the eventual solution to this vacuum, this void of Love, which is defined in Genesis 3:16. Self void of Other, that fierce imprisonment within the Isolated-Self, can never know, can never taste, the singularity of unity that is this: Self / Other / We. And this is true, on definition per scripture, both in the Vertical there in God-In-Man, Man-In-God, and in the Horizontal there in Man-Man, Person-A / Person B. Unity is, in both of these vectors, in hell on earth, in that vacuum void of love's whole, necessarily impossible.
We find Love endlessly reaching into hell on Earth and expressing to Man Command-A, and, upon Man's motioning yet further into hell, yet further away from Love's Command-A, we find Love, being Love, following Man yet further into hell and giving then, Command-A being on necessity Non-Entity by Man's motion, Command-B, and ever further in the OT we find Love's dive into Man's Self-Created hell on earth. Now, Command A being shattered in Eden, all other Commands are, on Love's definition, as defined by scripture, void of Moral Excellence on necessity, for Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum both in Man-In-God / God-In-Man and amid Mankind, Human Beings, are, on definition, shattered non-entity. It is Good to tell a man not to inject himself with cocaine. It is also Good to tell the addict to love soberness. But telling the addict to love soberness is not Love's Perfect Command. We need to think harder about what Love does inside of hell on earth. The Law is Good. Hebrews, and God Himself, all throughout the Old Testament Prophets, tell us the Law will one day be done away with, for, a more excellent some-thing will supersede, supplant, it.
We need to take Love at His Word, both in Eden and in Gethsemane. Love has but one Garden.
Mankind will never again see Unity among Men, Unity with God, short of the prophecy of Genesis 3:15's amalgamation of Seed's Seed. Juxtaposition is but enmity, that is to say, juxtaposition is but fragmentation, on definition, and in Love's E Pluribus Unum there can be no such thing. That is why Genesis 3:15, Word's Corporeal, that unthinkable business of incarnation, of Seed's Seed, is the only possible necessity here in the beauty of wisdom for it must be amalgamation that is Love's solution to hell's juxtapositions, hell's fragmentations. On definition yes, but, more so, on necessity.
Love's Start-Points are Love's End-Points, as all throughout the OT we find the radical departure from hell on earth foretold as the Wolf and the Lamb, as the Child and the Lion, as All-Nations are once again found within Love's singularity of Unity that just is that necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum. Husbands, die for your wives: Pre-Genesis 3:16 echoes, on the definitions of the God of the OT, the God of the NT, as Love's Eternally Sacrificed Self, Love's Eternal Sacrifice Of Self, is Man's fated Image. Us. E Pluribus Unum.
If we think Love does not follow Man into hell on earth in the OT, then we do not comprehend Christ in the NT.
We find Christ in the OT, incognito within the Father, and we find the Father in the NT, incognito within Christ, diving into hell on earth, as Power, necessarily void of Love's Whole within hell's geography, goes about redeeming Man, pulling Man, out of the insanity of Leviticus 18's burning daughters and sons on heaps of fires in sacrifice, found in all nations, and into Love's Means to Love's Ends, which is, and can only be, Himself. The only solution to a vacuum void of Love on definition is for Love to pour Himself into that vacuum, on definition. Love must spread His Arms wide, and pour Himself out, on definition, according to scripture's A to Z.
".....how much effort have you really made to understand these laws in the cultural context of the ancient Near East? None at all, I suspect; you probably got these passages from some free-thought publication or website and repeat them here with little attempt to understand them. By contrast, Paul Copan in his Is God a Moral Monster? (Baker: 2010) deals with these passages in their historical context, thereby shedding light on their meaning (pp. 118-119). Copan observes that there are three cases considered here:
1. Consensual sex between a man and a woman who is engaged to another man, which was a violation of marriage ( Deuteronomy 22.23 ). Both parties were to be executed.
2. Rape of a woman who is engaged to another man ( Deuteronomy 22.25 ). Only the rapist is executed; the woman is an innocent victim.
3. Seduction of a young woman who is not engaged to another man Deuteronomy 22.28 ; (cf . Exodus 22.16-17 ). The seducer is obliged to marry the young woman and provide for her, if she will have him; otherwise her father may refuse him and demand payment......"
"In short, rape was a capital crime in ancient Israel. As for Leviticus 20:13, this verse prescribes the death penalty for consensual sexual intercourse between two men; that you interpret this passage to condemn a child who is assaulted by a pedophile only shows how tendentious your exegesis is." (William Lane Craig)
Deuteronomy 22:28 is what one critic refers to, and, that only brings us back to Exodus 22:17, for no marriage need occur at all, and that only brings us back to what Love defines as hell on earth in Genesis 3:16: inequality among people, this person dominating some other person, void of what the OT prophets foretold as Love's End-Points, that beautiful Landscape found in Love's Starting Points prior to Genesis 3:16: E Pluribus Unum.
It is difficult for the skeptic, for all of us, to consider all that Love defines as the Outside, as Dark to be, on scripture's own definition, the outside. Hebrews 4 and the OT both describe Man's final Rest as something very, very different than anything Joshua could ever offer to Israel, not to mention to All-Nations, and of course both the OT and Hebrews 4 tell us that Love's Rest just is not found, cannot be found, on necessity, in the outside.
These are but a few vectors and methods whereby we apply Love's [A to Z] to definitions and fragments as we avoid one-verse-thinking applied to a few verses. All such cherry-picking of verses, all such unsophisticated fury against Love expressed by Atheists and Skeptics who apply OT landscapes quite easily suffer the same absorption into non-entity under Love's Own Self-Definitions. Some critics seem to think scripture will turn on itself and magically produce Love and Life and Sanity out of the vacuum which Love Himself has vouched can and will only yield lovelessness, death, and insanity. But of course we all know that vacuums are contingent on some larger Whole and cannot themselves explain, account for, anything. Vacuums cannot be used to explain vacuums, to account for vacuums. Hell on Earth spoken of in Genesis 3:16 by our Great Abolitionist is but the dark outside, per His definition, a vacuum void of Love's Whole, the fruits of Love's Fragmentation there in Eden, which is but Love's Execution, which, as it turns out, will be both our death (love's execution by Man there in Eden) and our hope (Love's Execution by Love there in Gethsemane), both our hell, on definition, and our emancipation, on definition. John 3:16 tells of our Great Abolitionist's Passion, the beginning of hell's undoing, which Love first speaks of in Genesis 3:15, thus defining Genesis 3:16, John 3:16, and the hell in between. Making sense out of the hell there in between Love's two executions found inside of Eden and Gethsemane requires that we take Love at His Word and embrace the Whole, the [A to Z] of Love's expressly stated Start-Points and End-Points which we find in scripture's own definitions.
The Whole is this: the singularity of Unity that just is Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum amid and among all that is Self and all that is Other and all which these Two Distincts by embrace necessarily beget, Love's Third Distinct: the Singular-Us.
That is God. That is Love. On definition and necessity. That is the Beginning. That is the Ending. On definition and necessity.
All else is, as Jesus, Word's Own Corporeal, points out, not the whole of love's marriage, not the whole of love's A to Z. And how can it be? As we look into Eden and Gethsemane we discover that while Uncreated Love never changes, Man in his fragmented disunion can never see or comprehend the Whole, nor reach the Whole, nor be given the Whole, on necessity given In-Sufficiency's non-capacity for All-Sufficiency. And that is so simply because Vacuums are not magic, and are themselves contingent on some larger whole, and thus Love must pour Himself out, and into, lovelessness should Man ever hope to find that Rest that just is E Pluribus Unum.
Such is Eden. And the only road out of Eden and into Love is Gethsemane, on definition, that eternal sacrifice of all that is Self, which we find Love Himself in and by delight doing, pouring Himself out for His beloved, which is you and I and us, on definition.
Brett says his 12 year old son Michah (2:54)& his 2 year old son Michah (3:12)at these spots in the video.
Yes, I have spent a good amount of time trying to understanding the Ancient Near-Eastern context of the Hebrew Bible, including studying at seminary.
I suggest that you read Thom Stark's book Is God a Moral Compromiser?, especially p.127-134, where Stark shows that Copan's response to the rape passages is inadequate. Even if you could show Deu.22:28-29 and Ex.22:16 do not command what they seem to clearly command, this still leaves other passages commanding the death of children for the sin of their fathers, and inflicting genocide on a population.
What do you expect to find inside of Man's Privation as it relates to Power's proximity void of Love's E Pluribus Unum? On definition, Man inside of the Dark Outside, inside of Hell on Earth, has no capacity for Unity amid Man-In-God, God-In-Man, nor for Unity amid and among Man-Man, as the very topography you desire is, on definition, shattered non-entity inside of the Outside.
You seem to think the teachings to an addict about all the ugly, hellish options available to him inside of that addiction somehow constitute teachings on running marathons.
But they are no "new teaching", and are but light upon his addiction, there inside of the addict's Outside, inside of his Hell on Earth. Love teaches, on definition, a very different Landscape than you seem to imply in your definitions. You seem to disagree with Scripture's definitions of Actuality.
We are not interested in [M, N, R].
We are interested in Love's [A to Z].
Man in Isolation does not constitute Genesis 3:15 for such cannot be mere Juxtaposition, on necessity, and must be, on necessity, Amalgamation.
All things outside of Amalgamation cannot be Moral Excellence, and can only be mere descriptions to the addict of his hellish options inside of his isolation, inside of his addiction; the ceiling and floor of which are but, on definition, Non-Love, Power void any and all Emancipation from addiction. Such is necessary by definition given Love's ontological geography within Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum there inside of Eden and Gethsemane.
Vacuums, void of X, cannot account for the Vacuum itself, nor for the X. Such things are contingent on a Larger Whole, necessarily.
You seem to mistake Commands inside of the Outside, inside of Hell, as Prescriptive.
Yet Love's topography tells us such are merely Descriptives given to an addict of his condition outside of Love's E Pleuribus Unum.
>> The commands ... commanding the death of children for the sin of their fathers, and inflicting genocide on a population do not express a value for human life, no matter what the specific contact.
The main complains of the ethos of the OT God (which is the NT God, so let us not persist in this faulty dichotomy) is structured on inconsistency. For example, little censure is given to the military campaigns of Seti I, Ramses II, and Merneptah in the 1300-1200's B.C., other than to imply that a Israelite presence could not have developed in the era of the Judges (other than this activity featured movement of Egyptian forces along the coast and into areas of northern Palestine barely under the control of the northern tribes, never advancing into the Shephelah). The war monuments spoke of the desolation, plundering, carrying off of populations and property. Merneptah's stele even spoke of his genocide of Israel (fairly inaccurate). The genocide of the Canaanites (again, as they continued to influence the Israelites in following generations, fairly inaccurate)was a divine co-opting of God of the then humanistic practice of supplanting cultures by conquest. Israel could not gain the Land of Promise by pacifist means. But the ouster of the Canaanites was yet one more historical case of a decadent culture removed (God spoke of this expulsion in Gen. 15: 16). More important than this is Israel's role in the same equation. Expulsion from the land would be that nation's fate if they engaged in the same decadence (Dt. 28: 64). The Assyrian would be the rod of God's anger (Is. 10: 5), a rod that could easily be broken (Nahum). What this is is a historical principle of rise and decline of nations, decadent Romans thrust out by vigorous barbarians.
>> commanding the death of children for the sin of their fathers.
Again, a case of not reading for understanding. This is presented in Exodus 20, as prologue to the Ten Commandments. Punishing the children for the sins of the fathers to the third and fourth generation is contrasted with showing love to a thousand generations of those who love and obey God's commands. Why the vast difference in the number of generations? The range of time in three or four generations could be the lifespan of remembrance of a single person. This would include those who would be leaving history to those entering. All these would display a disregard for God and a defiance for His decrees. Thus it would be a case of a lifestyle promoted from one generation to another, children punished for the sins of the father who taught them to refuse God. This persistent rebellion could be fostered from generation to generation into perpetuity. Yet it could be broken at any generation with the act of repentance. This understanding is lost on the critic who uses a compelling literalism that one would accuse a fundamentalist. Such a person would understand this notion of sinful lifestyles passed on from generation to generation. Why not the secularist who searches for and cherry-picks and overemphasizes such matters?
Caleb you seemed to miss both the subtext and the context.
Deuteronomy 22:28 only brings us back to Exodus 22:17, for no marriage need occur at all, and that only brings us back to what Love defines as hell on earth in Genesis 3:16: inequality among people, this person dominating some other person, void of what the OT prophets foretold as Love's End-Points, that beautiful Landscape found in Love's Starting Points prior to Genesis 3:16: Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum.
Where in the OT Law Code, that Ministry of Death, do we find the Command, the Prescriptive, for Genesis 3:15?
It doesn't exist.
And yet Moral Excellence can only be found there.
Love promises in Genesis 3:15 not Juxtaposition as the solution to this vacuum void of Love's E Pluribus Unum, the Unity He, and all of us, seek in all vectors, which Love seeks for Man, but, Love tells us the solution to what Love defines as Man inside of the Outside, as Man inside of Hell on Earth, as all that lies Post-Fall and Pre-Seed's Seed in Amalgamation, as just that: Amalgamation. Man cannot in Isolation destroy Sin, destroy Evil. If the critic reads Genesis 3:15 and thinks Scripture teaches such about Man in Privation, he discards Scripture's own definitions of Actuality. Seed's Seed will destroy Evil, and such leads to that unthinkable business of Amalgamation, on necessity, that Landscape of Man-In-God, God-In-Man, Uncreated-Created, Timelessness-Time, of Incarnation inside that Unity of E Pluribus Unum, which we find in Eden and in Gethsemane.
And yet the critic thinks to define hell on earth, void of that Amalgamation, as the promised land and simply discards Scripture's own definitions of Actuality. While [M, N, R] are helpful, we must embrace Love's [A to Z], lest we error in our thinking.
Whatever is outside of the Prescriptive for Moral Excellence is but that Descriptive of Man in his condition where we find Power telling Man, not how to achieve Genesis 3:15, but describing to him exactly what ugly and hellish options are available to him (If-Then Ceilings and Floors inside of Lovelessness) and exactly where his feet are walking there inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on Earth. The Best man will find inside of lovelessness is a few more crops, some more rain, a few less wars, and perhaps living about a hundred years or so. The critic thinks that is Immutable Love's plan for Mankind described in Let Us make Man in Our Image, in Genesis 3:15, and all throughout the OT Prophets as they describe a yet to come far more excellent set of definitions as the Child and the Lion, the Wolf and the Lamb, and all Men of all Nations actualized into what is Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum.
There is no Prescriptive for Genesis 3:15 found in the Law of Moses. Thus, Moral Excellence awaits Mankind in some other place. The Law is but Love's Descriptive to Mankind on exactly what stones he has available beneath his feet there inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on Earth, on ontological necessity.
We thirst for Love's Unity in all vectors, for Love's Plurality of Singularity, for we intuit the Whole, and the Whole is this: the singularity of Unity that just is Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum amid and among Love's first distinct, all that is Self, and amid and among Love's second distinct, all that is Other, and, finally, all which these Two Distincts by embrace necessarily beget, Love's Third Distinct: the Singular-Us that just is E Pluribus Unum. That necessarily triune topography is Love. God just is Love. That is the Beginning. That is the End. All which is outside of Love is, on definition and ontological necessity, Non-Love, the Outside, the Dark, that Lovelessness which just is Hell. That is how Scripture defines Actuality.
Any set of definitions which fail to satisfy that A and that Z are but fragments arbitrarily ripped out of the Whole and incoherently applied to actuality, and therein lead to only one thing: error. As C.S. Lewis comments, such fragments are wrenched out of Whole and then swollen to madness and incoherence by isolation. Love defines the OT topography outside of Eden as Descriptive of hell on earth in and by ontological necessity, as the Outside by definition, as Lovelessness by nature. Love defines the Amalgamation of Love's necessarily triune topography as Prescriptive in and by ontology's E Pluribus Unum. Any set of definitions which fails to define Actuality on these terms is not a scriptural definition of Love's Story.
The critic seems to discard Love's Own definitions of Actuality and then proceed to talk as if he has defined Love's definitions of Actuality. Now, that is quite nonsensical.
The problem with Man in Privation, void of Love's community that just is E Pluribus Unum, is just that: Man is in a vacuum necessarily not amalgamated within, Uncreated Love. All that is left him is God's Power, on necessary contingency in the thing we call existence. Power void of Love has only a few options at this point, there in what must on necessity follow Genesis 3:16.
1) Power can utterly forsake Man in his Privation there inside his chosen world that just is love-less-ness. Now, the technical term for that condition would be "hell". Such would be the end, perhaps, of Man, or, perhaps not of Man, but, most certainly, of Man's hope for immutable goodness.
2) Power can approach in utter proximity into that love-less-ness and, all physicality, should such occur, will simply be annihilated for In-Sufficiency wrapped up inside of All-Sufficiency cannot go on existing, for, it cannot be said of God, of All-Sufficiency, "Look, there in God, there is that in-sufficiency", and that on necessity.
3) Power can do what He did and, in proximity, void of intimacy, necessarily aggravate and hasten, by proximity, death, though, by void of intimacy, spare Man his end. Here we see all the business of Jesus reference to Marriage's Intimacy as it was prior to Genesis 3:16 and Power's necessary restraint prior to John 3:16. Scripture calls the Law of Moses the Ministry of Death for a reason. Such is death restrained, not life fashioned.
None of those motions redeems, or, changes, or saves Man from his isolation. Only one of those motions prepares Man for such.
The only option for Power which can undo, redeem, Genesis 3:16 is John 3:16. Nothing else re-creates, births, begets, amalgamates Man-In-God, God-In-Man. Man must be able to motion inward and find, not his own In-Sufficiency, but, Uncreated Love's All-Sufficiency, and in every direction. Juxtaposition can only bring death (and it did just that) whereas, Amalgamation is the only hope for Man in Privation.
Man assassinated Love there in Genesis, though, Love did not forsake Man. Man assassinated Love there in John, though, Love did not forsake Man. God did not forsake Man to his chosen Privation there in either of love's two executions at Man's hands. Nor did God draw near in utter proximity in raw, unadulterated Power void of Love and therein necessarily annihilate all physicality.
Power did something else. Something far, far better than utterly forsake, and, something far, far more merciful than kill across the board. Instead, Love draws near and incognito redeems the world to Himself, and though Power's proximity to the world can only mean, not less-death, but must mean by proximity of Power to Man's Vacuum merely more death to any Man found in Privation, which means on necessity to all Men everywhere, we find in this act of Mercy that which means, in the end, less death to all of Mankind and that which means Man's hope ultimately for we know that juxtaposition must necessarily give way to amalgamation if death is to ever give way to life. And though Love is on necessity found behind a veil, hidden atop His Mercy Seat, out of reach, such is through the repulsiveness of endless sacrifices Power's restraint of death for death, eye for eye, life for life, until in Time's fullness Love's Eternally Sacrificed Self says of all of the above, "I have no delight in any of this. Prepare for Me a Body", as He echoes His distaste for the dark outside found in Genesis 3:16, and annihilates not only Man's slavery within that hell on earth but also by His Endless Life forever fills all vacuums, forever unveils the Mystery of what Man-In-God, God-In-Man just is there within that amalgamation that just is love's E Pluribus Unum.
He told us He would thus Actualize back there in Genesis 3:15, as the hell on earth about to ensue by our own hand in Genesis 3:16 is necessarily actualized, and that is why His Actualization there in John 3:16, spoken by Love in Timelessness, is found in all its physicality here within Time. We find in our Slavery yet another example of the coherence of [Un-Willed Actualization] contained within [All-Possibilities] which is but some small part within that far wider actuality that just is [God]. Love Himself, our Great Abolitionist, pours Himself out that such vacuums need not, necessarily speaking, ever exist for any of us. If we are Slaves, it seems we are so by our own hands, though we need not be necessarily, and, if we are Free, it seems we are so only by His Hand and that necessarily.
There is no Command, no Prescriptive for Genesis 3:15 found in the Law of Moses. Thus, Moral Excellence awaits Mankind in some other place.
But then, that is the entire story of Eden and Gethsemane, of all the OT Prophets, of the book of Hebrews, and of Word's Corporeal in John chapter one. Of scripture's entire A to Z.
Non-Love, Non-Unity, is ugly. The Outside is ugly. Hell is ugly.
All the distaste we have for such is found to be in agreement with God's Own definitions of such from Genesis to Revelations.
Where in the OT Law Code do we find the Prescriptive for Genesis 3:15's Seed's Seed, Amalgamation?
It doesn't exist.
The OT defines the OT as some lesser good, and not as Excellence, just as, telling addicts about all their limited arrays of hellish options available within their addiction is Good in and of itself, yet such has nothing to do with curing the addict. The Prescriptive for his cure is something very, very different than the Descriptive of the Floor beneath his feet and the Ceiling above his head there inside of his Outside, there inside of his Hell on earth.
Scripture is clear: The Law of Moses provides no Command, no Prescriptive, for Genesis 3:15. The Law is but Love's Descriptive to Mankind on exactly what stones he has available beneath his feet there inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on Earth, on ontological necessity.
Love's Prescriptive for Life, for Moral Excellence, is found inside of His Own Means, which is Himself, and inside of His Own Ends, which is Himself.
Whatever is outside of that Prescriptive for Moral Excellence is but that Descriptive of Man in his condition of the Isolated-I, void of Love's I-You, where we find Power telling Man, not how to achieve Genesis 3:15, but describing to him exactly what ugly and hellish options are available to him (If-Then Ceilings and Floors inside of Lovelessness) and exactly where his feet are walking there inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on Earth. If-Then's inside of Death are quite, well, ugly.
What do we expect to find in hell on earth? Good crops? Full rivers? Well, let's say we have those. Okay then. We're done? Love is done with Mankind?
Well, then, if that is our definition of Love's Image, of Immutable Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum, which Love defines as Man's Final Felicity there in Eden, and in Gethsemane, then we simply disagree with God.
What do we expect from Power void of Love, on definition? Or, do we perhaps define Love's Whole as Law-Keeping and good crops? Well, if we do, then we define things differently than Love, on necessity.
But we (the critic) seem inclined to prefer that definition of Man inside of the Outside, inside of hell on earth, of Eye for Eye, of Burnt Child for Burnt Child, of Life for Life, as the Whole and as Love's Moral Excellence, on definition. Very well then. We'll disagree with God's definitions of [A to Z] and call that ugly, hellish landscape our moral excellence, though, of course, we must be made aware that while that may be our definition of "moral excellence", it is not God's, that is to say, it is not Love's definition of Moral Excellence as presented in Scripture's A to Z.
So let's go there, to our definition of moral excellence. Let's go to what Love defines as the outside, as dark, as Lovelessness, on definition, as all that lies between Post-Fall and Pre-Amalgamation, Post-Eden and Pre-Gethsemane.
Here we go…. Apologies for the word count but it's worth it to draw out the incoherence of the critics' thinking: Prescriptive-s are nowhere to be found, for Love's Excellence lies in Amalgamation and, on ontological necessity, cannot be found in mere Juxtaposition. All that is left is Power's Descriptive-s on Mankind's limited array of ugly and hellish options inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on Earth. And the best we are going to find is a few less wars, good crops, and enough water for the village. And maybe we'll live for a hundred or so years. Sound familiar? Is this Love's Final Felicity for Mankind? Mankind's own hand, that is to say, Man's Self, produces its own fruit inside of that same Self in its own isolation. The Law is given to Man in this hellish condition to shed light on his location, to show Man where his foot is actually treading, to enlighten Man and therein to describe that process of walking inside of the Outside.
That is what the Law "is". That is its function. It is not given to give life, but is given to shine a light on death's actuality. Life for Life. Death for Death. Mankind's Burnt Children yield's Mankind's Burnt Children there in hell on earth, there in Justice void Love's Grace, on definition. Life-Taken yields Life-Taken there in hell on earth, there in Justice void Love's Grace, on definition. This is promised to Israel just as it is promised to all nations, for this is, on Love's definitions, the condition, the status, of Mankind.
We find no favoritism here, unfortunately for the critic. Israel finds this very same Ceiling/Floor, time after time after time in the OT as all of Mankind is in this condition, and thus we find Israel over and over again suffering the same weight of hell as the rest of the nations, on the very same grounds.
Let's go a bit further into hell's geography. On definition. We (the critic) seem to think that this entire topography in the Law is a "new thing God is doing outside of Eden". We must take care at this juncture not to misread "promise" or "command" or "if-then". This isn't some new-some-thing which God is doing outside of Eden in Man's hell on earth, as we find no Prescriptive for Genesis 3:15's necessary Amalgamation anywhere inside of Command, inside of If-Then, as such lies only within Prophecy, within Man's future as Timelessness-Time ultimately Amalgamate. These Laws, these Promises of Burnt Child for Burnt Child, of Life for Life, of Death for Death, of If-Then, are at best some more crops and some more water and a few less wars if we stop burning our kids in fires, or, if we do what all nations where doing there in Leviticus 18's insanity and burn our kids in fires, then, fewer crops, less water, and some more wars. Life for Life. Death for Death. Adult for Adult. Child for Child. Societies which take their kids and burn them find no hope inside of Hell on Earth, because Descriptive-s offer no hope.
They, Descriptive-s, merely describe to Man his Reality, his Hell, his condition. That is what the Law "is". A Schoolmaster. Societies that burn their kids cease to exist. That is the If-Then of burning kids in fires. In Hell on Earth, when we burn our kids in fires, we eventually cease to exist. It's not hard or complex logic. It's merely descriptive. Killing our offspring equals no future…. That's not hard…. Not complex….it's just Descriptive of ceilings and floors there inside of the Outside, inside of Lovelessness.
No cure is offered. The critic looking for a "cure" in "Law" is rejecting the necessarily triune landscape of Immutable Love's I-You-Us amalgamation.
A to Z.
What about Mercy? Again, telling addicts to love soberness is good, but such is not teaching the excellence of triathlons. Mercy and Love void of justice is very, very Good "in itself", because Mercy/Love is good "in itself". Even Perfect if from Love Himself, Mercy Himself. Perfect Mercy aborts Perfect Justice on Love's Cross. Now, the critic must then deal with the reverse side of that coin: Justice void of Mercy is very, very Good "in itself", because Justice is good "in itself". Even Perfect if from Justice Himself. Perfect Justice aborts Perfect Mercy on Love's Cross.
A to Z.
But inside of Lovelessness, where can Love be found? There is but Justice available to Man there inside of what scripture defines as lovelessness, as the Outside, as Hell on Earth. Ontology's definitions.
Justice void of Love? When we find Justice void of Love we have, yet again, the Descriptive simply because all of that in the Law-Code is not a "new thing God is doing outside of Eden" and thus nothing there is new in the Law-Code, but rather, such is but the description of Mankind's very present condition outside of Eden, and, all the Law-Code does is bring the Self's Privation to light. That is to say, the Law is not a "promise of new things" outside of Eden, but is, on Scripture's own, Love's own, definitions (which the critic discards), God's description to Man in Isolation, void of E Pluribus Unum, void of Moral Excellence, of exactly where Man is and exactly what is available to Man inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on earth.
It may be worth repeating: Love defines the OT topography outside of Eden as Descriptive of hell on earth in and by ontological necessity, as the Outside by definition, as Lovelessness by nature. Love defines the Amalgamation of Love's necessarily triune topography as Prescriptive in and by ontology's E Pluribus Unum. Any set of definitions which fails to define Actuality on these terms is not a scriptural definition of Love's Story.
The critic thinks the Law-Code is supposed to be a description of Moral Excellence rather than Love's Instrument to shed light on Man's Condition, on exactly where Man is and on exactly what is available to Man inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on earth. That is because the critic discards Love's Own definitions.
And what of Moral Excellence? Well, we won't find it in Man's Privation. Yet the critic seems to think that Love describing to Man Man's own hell on earth should be offering to Man Moral Excellence.
But how can it? This is Man's hell, his Isolation, not Love's Topography. As we gaze into Eden and Gethsemane we discover that Immutable Love's necessarily trine E Pluribus Unum remains Unchanging, all the while Man's perception of such is ever changing, on necessity. Yet Love reaches into Hell there in Genesis 3:15's promise of what must be, on necessity, the Amalgamation of God-In-Man, Man-In-God, Uncreated-Created, for we all know Fallen-Man, or even Unfallen-Man, cannot defeat Evil itself in isolation (on Love's definition) for Evil is that very isolation void of Love's Whole, on definition. Yet these definitions of Love's [A to Z] the critic discards. "Sin crouches at your door and desires to have you, you will master it, or it will master you." Our Great Abolitionist tells Man of Man's enslavement there inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on Earth. The First Adam and the Last Adam must motion out of Self and into Other, for, what hope has Man's Self in Isolation?
And what of Love in Hell on earth, what of Moral Excellence?
We find Love endlessly reaching into hell on Earth and expressing to Man Command-A, and, upon Man's motioning yet further into hell, yet further away from Love's Command-A, we find Love, being Love, following Man yet further into hell and giving then, Command-A being on necessity Non-Entity by Man's motion, Command-B, and ever further into Hell on earth we spy out in the OT Love's dive into Man's Privation describing Man's ever worsening condition. Now, Command A being shattered in Eden, Gethsemane is now out of reach, Love's motion out of Self and into Other is out of reach, is non-entity, and all other Commands are, on Love's definition, as defined by scripture, void of Moral Excellence on necessity, for Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum both in Man-In-God / God-In-Man and amid Mankind, Human Beings, are, on definition, shattered non-entity. All that follows inside of the outside, inside of hell on earth, is not "new" but is simply a description of Man's Condition, of what is available to Man in his hell, of where Man is inside of the Outside.
It is Good to tell a man not to inject himself with cocaine. It is also Good to tell the addict to love soberness. It is also necessary that Lovelessness can only yield, at best, good crops and enough water for the village. And, Raw, Unadulterated, Justice is, on its own merits, by definition, Good. Justice void of Love we say? Well, that is the point of Law's Ministry of Death, on definition. It's ugly, it's dark, it's Outside of Love, and, God agrees. Hell on earth just is ugly.
But, of course, the critic discards, or ignores, Love's definitions.
"If you inject cocaine, you'll die. If you don't, you'll be healthy enough to have good crops and the land will give you food and the sky will give you water to drink." Huh? Wow. So that's it? That's Mankind's Final Felicity predicted by Love's Immutable Image? Love's Image fully actualized? The Amalgamation prophesied in Genesis 3:15? It's not even close and yet this is the critic's definition, and some of ours, but such is not God's definitions. The Law is not some "new thing God is doing outside of Eden". Such is but Love's Light to Man's Conscience on his condition. We need to think harder about what Love does inside of hell on earth. The Law is Good in so far as it goes, but describing to an addict all of his available options inside of his addiction, inside of the Outside, inside of his Hell on Earth has nothing to do with Moral Excellence, on Scripture's own definitions, which the critic ignores. Hebrews and God Himself all throughout the Old Testament Prophets tell us the Law will one day be done away with, for, a more excellent some-thing will supersede, supplant, it.
What of Leviticus 18? Well, since the critic seems to think the Law is Moral Excellence, even though Love's Own definitions disagree with him, let's take a look:
"You shall not give any of your children to pass through the fire and sacrifice them to the fire god."
Well? Inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on Earth, inside of the Self void of Other, void of Love's Amalgamation of "I-You-We" within the triune E Pluribus Unum, we find raw, unadulterated justice in brutally vivid juxtaposition to the Self in Isolation. Therein, whether it be Israel or some other Nation, burning children alive yields a lot of dead children. Life for Life. Death for Death. Eye for Eye. Descriptive. That is the Floor and the Ceiling of Lovelessness, of the Outside, of Hell on Earth.
Again, Genesis 3:15 is not Juxtaposition, it is Prescriptive of Amalgamation. All else cannot be Moral Excellence.
Raw, unadulterated Justice void of Love's Grace, on definition. But if all of mankind is inside of the Outside, inside of hell on earth, then, well, it is "Mankind" that is in play here inside of the outside, and, Power void of Love gives the addict very few options, and no fully healthy options. This set of ugly, hellish options is what Love defines as hell on earth, on ontological necessity given Love's Whole of E Pluribus Unum. The critics may feel free to define the Outside's Descriptive as Moral Excellence, but Love, God, disagrees with him.
We must be careful here. Again, it's the same lesson. This is not some "new thing God is fashioning outside of Eden". This is but Love's description to the Addict of the Addicts condition and of what is available to the Addict inside of the Outside, inside of hell on earth. Good crops and rain, or, bad crops and less rain. Life for Life, Death for Death. Men who burn, sacrifice, their sons and daughters in fires will see their sons and daughters in fires, all at Man's own hand. Man in fragmentation juxtaposed to Man, never in Unity, void of E Pluribus Unum. Those who get along will have fewer deaths and more rain and better crops. That's it. That's all that is available to Mankind. That's the Floor and the Ceiling of hell on earth. And, of course, we cannot forget to include the nuance of our Nature in all of this, that we, in isolation, never can defeat our own nature, much less Evil itself. Love gives us these definitions. Utopia? Impossible. Moral Excellence? Impossible.
Leviticus: "By all these things all the nations are defiled which I am casting out before you."
Every nation, including Israel is subject to Mankind's Condition. We find no favorites with God. When Israel burns their children in fires in some religious service to some god, they get, well, dead children, less crops, less rain. Life for Life. Death for Death. Ceiling. Floor. Void of a cure for man's condition.
We find no favorites in this simply because Mankind is Mankind, on definition. Yet the critic seems to discard Love's Own definitions, as if Israel never did fall under this Ceiling, or stand on this Floor, inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on Earth, as if Israel just went about immune to these definitions and consequences inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on earth. Well, God disagrees with the critic and defines "mankind" as, well, "mankind".
"…..therefore I visit the iniquity of it upon it, and the land itself vomits out her inhabitants…. all these abominations have the men of the land done who were before you…."
Mankind is Mankind. Floor. Ceiling. Nothing here has anything to do with Moral Excellence. How does telling a cocaine addict of his options within his addiction have anything to do with teaching him about running marathons? Cocaine addicts can't run a marathon. Telling an addict to love soberness is several steps away from instructions on how to run a marathon. All throughout the OT prophets we find Love describing the Day when the Old will pass away and the New will replace it. The OT calls the OT less than excellent. Just like the NT does. Just like we all do. Love views ugly as, well, ugly. The Outside, the Non-Love is but Hell on Earth. But the critic just waves his hand and tries to brush Love's definitions under the rug.
Love's Own definitions. Scripture's own definitions. Not [M, N, R], but, rather, Love's [A to Z]. A is this: E Pluribus Unum. Z is this: E Pluribus Unum. Man's Privation in between is but Man inside of the Outside, inside of Hell on Earth.
It's not very complex logic. Genesis 3:15 is not very complex logic.
"Do none of these things lest the land spew you (Israel) out when you defile it as it spewed out the nation that was before you."
And there it is again. No favoritism. We find no favoritism with Love's descriptions to Mankind, for, all addicts are, well, addicts, so to speak.
Floor. Ceiling.
Atheist's keep talking about this flavor of altruism as if it is our salvation, the best available for flourishing. They echo the Law Code in that thinking, as if the Ceiling and the Floor we've been describing here is THE-BEST reality has to offer: and of course inside of Atheism, inside of the Outside, void of Immutable Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum, that is exactly the case. The Atheist is, in that line of thinking, not far removed from the Law, though he claims to hate that line of thinking. But, that line of thinking is all that is available there inside of the Outside. A few more crops, some more rain, a few less wars. The epistemology of Atheism's version of course never does find coherent ontology to stand upon, unlike what we find in Scripture's set of definitions within its own self-defined [A to Z].
Genesis to Revelations presents a radically different accounting of Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum as the Beginning and the End, as the A and the Z, as the Supreme Ethic on ontological necessity, and as the Final Felicity of Mankind fashioned within Love's "Let Us Make Man in Our Image". In Scripture's self-defined Start-Points and End-Points we discover that Love is the supreme Ethic in and by ontological necessity for Love is the supreme Ethic in all possible worlds, in and by Immutable Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum. And what exactly is this God Who is Love? Such just is the singularity of Unity that just is Love's necessarily triune E Pluribus Unum amid and among Love's First Distinct, all that is Self, and amid and among Love's Second Distinct, all that is Other, and, finally, all which these Two Distincts by embrace necessarily beget, Love's Third Distinct: the Singular-Us that just is E Pluribus Unum. That necessarily triune topography is Love. God just is Love. That is the Beginning. That is the End. All which is outside of Love is, on definition and ontological necessity, Non-Unity, Non-Love, Non-Amalgamation, mere Juxtaposition in Fragmentation, the Outside, the Dark, that which is, on definition, Lovelessness. That is how Scripture defines Actuality.
The comments to this entry are closed.


text:
Question about Sharp R-1460 Microwave Oven
Posted by dmack68 on
Test the high voltage capacitor,
the rectifier diode.or the magnetron. If all this are fine, test the control board.
If it additionally does not spin and no light, then check also the door switch and fuse.
The diode and capacitors can br tested. The capacitor must be allowed discharge before testing, or you risk to get electrocuted, even if power is off. Capacitors can get discharged by shorting their two contacts.
Replace the magnetron if the checks and all of the high voltage component tests are good, but the unit still does not heat.
All locations, and description of this parts can be located using the diagram here: Counter top.
Parts must be tested to find out what is wrong.
Remember that microwaves are potentially dangerous devices if not repaired properly, the job must be done by a competent person.
A microwave energy leakage test must always be performed when the oven is serviced for any reason.
Regarding parts, contact the seller here to purchase parts. (here in UK).
Posted on Apr 27, 2009
SOURCE: I have freestanding Series 8 dishwasher. Lately during the filling cycle water hammer is occurring. How can this be resolved
Hi there,
Save hours of searching online or wasting money on unnecessary repairs by talking to a 6YA Expert who can help you resolve this issue over the phone in a minute or two.
Best thing about this new service is that you are never placed on hold and get to talk to real repairmen in the US.
Here's a link to this great service
Good luck!
Posted on Jan 02, 2017
Tips for a great answer:
Apr 13, 2012 | Sharp R-1491 Microwave Oven
Apr 06, 2012 | Sharp Microwave Ovens
Jul 04, 2011 | Sharp R-1406 Microwave Oven
May 19, 2011 | Sharp R-1492 Microwave Oven
Jun 08, 2017 | Sharp R-1491 Microwave Oven
May 30, 2010 | Sharp R-1491 Microwave Oven
Nov 13, 2009 | Sharp R-1491 Microwave Oven
Oct 24, 2009 | Sharp R-1491 Microwave Oven
Jun 11, 2009 | Sharp R-1491 Microwave Oven
Feb 07, 2008 | Sharp R-1491 Microwave Oven
Jan 12, 2014 | Sharp R-1460 Microwave Oven
76 people viewed this question
Usually answered in minutes!
Level 3 Expert
9100 Answers
Level 3 Expert
5569 Answers
Level 3 Expert
17130 Answers
Step 2: Please assign your manual to a product:

subset: commoncrawl


text:
19 films Found
Cola is the second most popular drink after water but it's sourcing has been the subject of much criticism. Karma Cola tries to turn this around, changing lives in war torn Sierra Leone.
Sierra Leone is the most dangerous place in the world to give birth. For Aminata Conteh-Biger, the shocking mortality rate of pregnant women was the only thing that could draw her back to her homeland.
Kidnapped, drugged, and brainwashed, Nathaniel Sesay aka Mash P was forced into Sierra Leone's civil war aged 9. Forced to kill, rape and pillage, Nathaniel is haunted by his past and now seeks to repent.
Determined to document those affected by Ebola, health project worker Jo Dunlop returns to Sierra Leone. She witnesses the defiant bravery of the local care units that highlight the immense gap in global health.
Following the civil war Sierra Leone's health care infrastructure has been left in tatters. "Emergency" is the country's only free hospital, funded by charitable donations and desperately trying to fill the gap.
Inside Sierra Leone's notoriously corrupt justice system there's been an explosion in female prison rates. But some are fighting the poverty and discrimination trapping these women behind bars.
The deadly haemorrhagic Ebola virus has wiped out whole villages in Sierra Leone. At the epicentre of the outbreak is Kailahun, a town where aid workers are risking their lives to deal with the crisis.
The Ebola outbreak is claiming around a hundred victims a week and spreading fast. With the death toll rising daily, we head to the heart of the crisis to reveal the human tragedy behind the headlines.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more info see our Cookies Policy


text:
Sarasota, Florida (PRWEB) August 27, 2012
Urinary incontinence is a condition that affects at least 20% percent of women in the United States alone. Some estimates bring this number up to 45% if including women who are undiagnosed. Additionally, approximately 25% of new mothers have unexpected urinary leakage after a vaginal delivery and about 16% of women have leakage following cesarean section.
InTone, from InControl Medical, is a combination therapy device designed to stop or significantly improve urinary incontinence in women who have been diagnosed with stress, urge, or mixed incontinence. InControl Medical is convinced InTone will significantly improve bladder leakage for those who have followed the recommended protocol with medical supervision and will refund the cost of the device minus a small disposal fee if the patient's condition does not improve. InControl Medical is the only company in this field with the confidence to guarantee its product.
To contact Dr. Dorothy A. Izmirlian visit http://www.gynecologistsarasota.com
Visit InControl Medical for more information on how InTone treats female urinary incontinence - http://www.incontrolmedical.com/


text:
Date: 26 January 2017 at 10:31
Subject: SMS with Andrew Scott
Tekapo 10.30 am Thurs. TOAST
Date: 26 January 2017 at 10:34
Subject: SMS with Wendy Raich
Ian has finished on his own. Shame about the drunken louts in kurow
|Last nights finishers switch to waiting duty for the riders wanting to able to see where they finish (in daylight that is). — with Michael Hoogeveen and Matt Hughes at Church Of The Good Shepherd.
Ian Huntsman rolls into Tekapo to throngs of welcoming onlookers. Well OK, Matt Hughes and Michael Hoogeveen heckling from the lawn makes is more a Great Southern Brevet greeting! — at Church Of The Good Shepherd.
Riding into Tekapo on a summers day. Finally the weather comes to the party. — with Wendy Riach, Andrew Scott and Nathan Mawkes at Church Of The Good Shepherd.


text:
A warehouse that was being demolished on Azalea Drive caught on fire Thursday night.
Firefighters reported heavy smoke and flames coming from the empty building at 2816 Azalea Drive, North Charleston Fire Department spokeswoman Bianca Sancic said.
Crews from North Charleston, Charleston and St. Andrews put out the fire.
There were no reported injuries.
The cause of the fire is under investigation.


text:
Dan Whitaker's Excellent Ventures
Valley Entrepreneur Has Fun All The Way To Market
Dan Whitaker, one of Corvallis' most active and successful entrepreneurs sits down with Jamie, Innovational Musings' intrepid reporter, for an interview. In the first of four parts, Dan discusses his views on what it takes to start a company and make it work and grow. He knows, having helped start seventeen companies and associations, virtually all of them successful.
Here's some down to earth advice from a man who has every right to be arrogant and vain – but isn't. He's a good example of Oregon charm. Smart, well-spoken and modest, he has a quick wit and an easy smile. Little wonder that when our local chamber wanted to chose the right person for Corvallis' first "Entrepreneur of the Year", Dan was a shoe-in.
Part 1 where Dan talks about:
- 1979: Software Support Services
- 1989: SAO founding
- Education of an Entrepreneur
- 1991: Evergreen and Rogue Wave Rouge Wave goes public
- Developing company values
- Having fun serving customers
We had a number of complaints about the blues harp music on our earlier videos. So we tried a new, harder, less Sesame Street intro riff. What do you think? Please browse to the top of this post to leave a comment and voice your thoughts. Also use the RSS feed button up top to subscribe to Innovational Musings, either vis email or your RSS reader. Thanks!


text:
Every year, the association holds an excellent event and brings in some of the best trainers and speakers from around the world.
Las Vegas, Nevada (PRWEB) July 09, 2013
One of the biggest events in the recruiting industry each and every year is the National Association of Personnel Services (NAPS) Conference.
This year's NAPS Conference is scheduled for Tuesday, September 10, through Friday, September 13. The location for the event is the Cosmopolitan Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hundreds of executive recruiters will gather in Las Vegas to learn new trends and techniques and also to share best practices from their recruiting desks and other business tips. There are a number of other benefits for executive recruiters who attend the NAPS recruiter conference, as well. Those benefits include the following:
- 20 of the recruiting industry's leading speakers
- CPC, CTS, and CERS certification sessions
- Networking lunches
- Fast-track speaker breakouts
- An "Owner/Manager Special Day"!
The cost to attend the conference is $795 for NAPS members and $1,195 for non-members. Recruiters are encouraged to contact NAPS about special pricing and payment plans.
Big Biller recruitment software, a product of Top Echelon, is one of the sponsors of the 2013 NAPS Conference.
"We're pleased and excited to be part of the NAPS Conference again this year," said Mark Demaree, President of Top Echelon and Big Biller. "The NAPS Conference is one of the staples of the recruiting industry. Every year, the association holds an excellent event and brings in some of the best trainers and speakers from around the world. We're definitely looking forward to this year's conference."
Since 1961, NAPS has built a reputation as being the educator for the executive search and staffing industry. The organization has accomplished this not only through its annual conference, but also through its certification program and emphasis on continuing education for search professionals.
Big Biller, the leader in online recruiting software, is referred to in many ways... as recruiter software, an applicant tracking system (ATS) or applicant tracking software, and even recruitment software. Simply put, Big Biller is a powerful recruiting software package that helps recruiters manage the relationships they have with their candidates and clients, all with one purpose and focus—making more placements.


text:
Price: $596
This item has been shown 0 times.
Magnaflow Exhaust Systems - 15625
Magnaflow Exhaust Systems
Image shown may vary from actual part, Please read "Part Number Details" or message us for questions about the product
Magnaflow Part Number 15625
Single Rear Exit
3" Pipe
4" polished, stainless steel tip
Cat-Back Exhaust
Installs behind factory catalytic convertersProduct Features
Magnaflow Exhaust Systems unleash instant horsepower and torque gains
Carefully custom engineered for your specific year, make and model
Frees your ride from the power-robbing restrictions of a stock exhaust
Built with the finest fast-flowing, restriction-free 409 stainless steel tubing for a lifetime of dependable duty
Reduces engine heat, relieves backpressure and improves exhaust scavenging for extra power and greater efficiency
Choose between single and dual exit systems (depending on vehicle)
Select from a variety of systems tuned for your driving style
Mufflers feature a steel mesh core that warms up quickly and maintains optimum temperature for exhaust movement
Dense acoustical-absorbing material inside the muffler filters out vibration and harsh noise, leaving behind a smooth, throaty growl
Sturdy 0.5" overlapped welds keep your system flowing for years to comePart Fitment
- Many products require vehicle-specific fitment
- View the Compatibility table to ensure the part fits your year, make, model and submodel
- Please reference the Submodel information located on the far left within the Compatibility table under "Notes"
- If you have any questions about an order you have placed or specific questions about an item you have received from us feel free to call us at (888)-944-3229.
- Phone Hours (all times PST):
- Monday-Thursday, 5:30am-8:00pm
- Friday, 5:30am-5:00pm
- Saturday, 6:00am-5:00pm
- Sunday, 6:00am-5:00pm
- We only accept payment via PayPal for orders
- For shipments to California addresses, we are required to collect 7.75% Sales Tax
- All items ship for free
- See the "Shipping and payments" tab above for estimated delivery times
- We do not offer shipping to APO/FPO
- We do not offer shipping to Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico or other U.S. Territories on
- We will accept a return for any reason within 30 Days of the original delivery, provided that the returned item is in a new and unused condition with the original parts, packaging, and manuals
- Some items may be subject to a Restocking Fee
- Buyer pays Return Shipping for returned items
- Refunds and Credits will be issued after AutoAnything receives a valid tracking number


text:
Hi, everybody,
I like this website very much, since not only I m a professional tour guide in Beijing, the capital city of mainland China, as a result in taking great interest on such websites, but also the nice website made by them dedicatedly, comfortablly.
I m 36 years old, was born and raised in Beijing. You might take great interest on Beijing, or even on me, pls don't hesitate to talk with me, whatever topic you ask would be much more welcomed.
I had been as a Beijing local travel guide for five years before right now. And at this moment I have been driving my private-owned car, a nice car in Beijing of Audi-A6 for several months.
If you plan to visit Beijing individually, I might be your nice escort who're willing to give you the best itenerary/dedicated introduction/professional advise/and any other faithful assistance, right here in Beijing-the capital of China.
As you might know, Beijing is a fast-growing metropolis , with a lot of miscellaneous spots and things worth of your visit. If you plan to have a guy who has a good command of English, with his private car in particular driven you to look around , exclusively from the airport greeting to sending off,.... that would be a wonderful time , I'm sure of it!
Thanks for reading. And your kindly response and any evaluations would be highly appreciated.


text:
Book a Photographer
Submit Calendar Event
Contact Us
TOPS Magazine
See More ›
Recent Event Photos
Request a Photographer
Dining Guide
In the Magazine
At Home
Eats + Entertainment
See the Current Issue
Contact Us
Toggle nav
Hot Spots
Dining Out: Napa Prime Heads Downtown
Dining Out: Napa Prime Heads Downtown
Dining Out: Napa Prime Heads Downtown
Top 5 Dining: Small Plates Big Tastes
Top 5 Dining: Worth the Drive
Hall of Tamme
TOP 5 Dining: Fried Chicken
Dining Out: Carson's Food and Drink
With more than 40 years of experience in the food industry, Mark Fichtner knows a thing or..
Top 5 Dining: Eating Right
Finding fresh food that shines a spotlight on fruit and vegetables can feel like a challenge, especially..
Dining Out: Graze
The second installment of Graze brings the same farm-fresh meats and vegetables –this time, in a historic..
Dining Al Fresco
Marikka's Restaurant and Bierstube Reopens
For the 15 months that Marikka's was undergoing its expansion, Lexingtonians craving traditional German food and beer..
Top 5 Dining: Bourbon
Given that Kentucky is the state that birthed it, it's no wonder that we're all such fans..
Bourbon on Rye
Bourbon on Rye is an intimate atmosphere serving unique drinks & small plates. Set in the historic..
Top 5 Dining: Ouita Leads Kentucky's Culinary Tourism
When Ouita Michel and her husband bought the Holly Hill Inn back in 2000, they made the..
Bluegrass Beef Boom
Kentucky, a state long associated with world-class horses, is earning a reputation for first-class beef. The terrain..
J. Alexanders: Straightforward American Food
Like the rest of his team at J. Alexander's, General Manager Harry Whitsell was drawn to the..
Top 5 Dining: Burgers
Village Idiot Of course Lexington's first gastropub has exciting burgers. Their rotating Burger of the Week has included..
Bear and the Butcher
Located near the corner of High Street and Euclid Avenue, Bear and the Butcher is a versatile..
Top 5 Dining: Salads
Louie's Wine Dive Louie's Wine Dive knows that unique touches are what makes a dining experience memorable. The..
DV8 Kitchen Life Changing Food
There are several products on the market today that were created with the goal of offering people..
Top 5 Dining: Coffee Roasters
Nate's Nate Polly is a born and bred Lexingtonian with a lifelong passion for coffee. While he was..
Top 5 Dining: Soup
Atomic Ramen In 2014, Atomic Ramen founder, Dan Wu was a MasterChef contestant who won a spot on..
The Barn: The Summit's Locavore Destination
By now, you've either visited or heard buzz about The Summit at Fritz Farm. Developed by Bayer..
West Main Crafting Company
"We treat every cocktail as a visual, aromatic, and gastronomic event," explains Head Bartender and General Manager,..
Top 5 Dining: Wine Bars
Wines on Vine This European-inspired wine bar and bistro offers a selection of over 450 wines. The staff..
Top 5 Dining: Food Trucks
J. Render's BBQ With a sandwich named the "Oh No You Didn't", you know this truck is unbelievable!..
Pie in the Sky
With its classic red-and-white gingham tablecloths, black-and-white photos of vintage Brooklyn and Tony Bennett and the like..
Top 5 Dining: Local Producers
Ruth Hunt Candies Ruth Tharpe Hunt whipped up little confections to serve her bridge club. In 1921, she..
Back to School
Sushi fans rejoice. After a two-year hiatus, the popular Japanese restaurant has relocated from Old Todd's Road..
Dining: Corto Lima
Corto Lima is located, as the Spanish name suggests, on the corner of Short and Limestone in..
Top 5 Dining: Seafood
Palmers Fresh Grill What better place to enjoy seafood than looking out across Lexington Green's lake? Palmers is..
Dining Al Fresco
Chatham's Bistro & Bar 496 E. High St., Lexington 859.229.6989 facebook.com/chathamsbistro What's new at Chatham's? We recently welcomed Chef Jason Wall, and..
Teds Montana Grill Opening in The Summit June 5th
Ted's Montana Grill, a Classic American restaurant recently voted the "No. 1 Bar and Grill" and a..
Dining: Minglewood
Located in the former A La Lucie building at 159 North Limestone and owned by Trish Tungate..
Top 5 Dining: New in Town
Corto Lima The buzz surrounding Corto Lima began well before its February 2017 opening, and has only grown...
Nice Slice
From their expansive patio overlooking the Town Branch Creek to the multilevel industrial-chic setting, Goodfellas Distillery is..
Top 5 Dining: Waffles
Wild Eggs Want to walk on the wide side with your waffles? Check out Wild Eggs. Their spicy..
Top 5 Dining: Expansive Menus
Cheesecake Factory Over 250 items grace the menu at The Cheesecake Factory. From their Glamburgers® to "super" food..
Six Ridges Farm
Locally-sourced ingredients are more important than ever to Kentuckians. One family has made producing grass-fed, ASH-Free, humanely-raised,..
Dining: Grillfish
Lexington has a new welcome addition to downtown dining. Grillfish, located in the former Atomic Cafe location..
Reading Between the Wines
Louie's Wine Dive, a regional family of restaurants with the philosophy that wine should be fun and..
Top 5 Dining: Local Foodies
Gents Original Gents was founded on the idea that the same craftsmanship, pride and care that's poured into..
Dining: Middle Fork Kitchen Bar
Mark Jensen has been around restaurants for as long as he can remember. Still, for a while..
Top 5 Dining: Mediterranean
Athenian Grill Chef Ilias Papas grew up in a small town near Athens, Greece, watching his mom cook..
Top 5 Dining: Pizza Part 2
MOD PIZZA MOD pizza: a restaurant where simplicity is everything. At MOD, one can add as few or..
Holiday Picks: The Gift Box and Tea Room
The Gift Box & Tea Room has everything you need to make the holidays merry and bright!..
Holiday Picks: Lexington Ice Sculptures
How many events fail to make a lasting impression? Don't let that happen to you! No one ever..
Holiday Picks: Seasons Catering
Seasons Catering has the perfect menu and presentation for all holiday events, corporate parties, and special occasions. For..
Uncle Maddio's: Perfect Pizza, Pronto
Located next to the Chevy Chase Kroger at 630 East Euclid Avenue, Uncle Maddio's is a modern,..
Top 5 Dining: Pizza
PIES & PINTS Pies & Pints serves an assortment of delectable specialty pies with over 30 beers on..
TOP 5 Dining: Classic Cocktails
SKYBAR Located on the penthouse floor of a high rise at Cheapside Park, Skybar's panoramic view of downtown..
Dining: Athenian Grill
Most restaurant owners build or lease space then work to attract customers. Ilias Pappas did the opposite. "We..
From Truck to Table
For Ren and Gwyn Everly, making the leap from food truck to brick-and-mortar restaurant was not exactly..
Top 5 Dining: Indian Cuisine
Masala Indian Cuisine Masala Indian Cuisine must be your next stop if you're looking to add a little..
Dupree Catering
Dupree Catering and Events is celebrating its fourth anniversary of being 2 Star certified by the Green Restaurant Association..
Top 5 Dining: Lexington Legacies
Merrick Inn For more than 40 years, Merrick Inn has been the home of Southern culture. As a..
Top 5 Dining: Pub & Grub
The Cellar Get your pub & grub fix at The Cellar, located in the lower level of the..
El Rancho Tapatio
Located at 144 Burt Road, near the intersection of Nicholasville Road and Southland Drive, El Rancho Tapatío is..
Lexington Pasta Garage
True pasta fans know that when it comes to taste and quality, nothing is better than the..
Top 5 Dining: Hidden Gems
Bad Wolf Café Formerly known as Meadowthorpe Café, Bad Wolf Café is a classic diner with breakfast, sandwiches..
Dining Al Fresco | Patios
Perfect patios for your summer outings! ..
Top 5 Dining: Movers & Shakers
Some of our favorite restaurants have moved or opened new locations. Don't miss out on the foodie favorites..
Top Dessert Trends for 2016
Fabulous desserts are the best way to end any celebration! No party is complete without a little..
Tony's: A modern steakhouse with an Italian twist
Tony Ricci and the staff at his namesake restaurant understand that many of life's most important moments..
Q & A with Chef Thomas Mazzett of Tony's Steakhouse
How old are you? 31. Are you married or single? Married. We don't have kids, but our four Great Danes..
Lexington Restaurant Week Returns
After two highly acclaimed years, Lexington Restaurant Week® has become an eagerly anticipated event for local diners..
Lexus Yes Mamm Brunch
MCF Annual Fall Celebration
ArtyParty New Street Ballet
Keeneland College Scholarship Day
Make a Wish Day at Keeneland
Big Blue Madness - Part 1
Big Blue Madness - Part 2
Logan's of Lexington
Logan's of Lexington Grand Opening
Read online ›
Grab a copy ›
Subscribe ›
Past Issues ›
Community Yoga at The Livery
Democracy and the Informed Citizen
Halloween Camp-Out (Campers Only)
Kids Art Day
Tea Tuesday at Waveland


text:
7 ways we hope Teresa Giudice changes her life around, post-prison
Since her release from prison, Teresa Giudice has wasted no time getting right back into the spotlight. The star of The Real Housewives of New Jersey apparently kept a diary during her stint at Danbury Federal Correctional Institution, and, in true Giudice fashion, released a book not long after getting out, Turning the Tables: From Housewife to Inmate and Back Again.
Giudice's book, unsurprisingly, is a massive success, almost immediately becoming a best-seller. She had a big party in New York City to celebrate the release, where her sister-in-law Melissa Gorga and fellow Housewife Dorinda Medley were in attendance. Giudice appears to be riding the high of being out and back in the public eye again. Of course, she has every right to enjoy her freedom, but let's hope that the success of her book doesn't go to her head. In fact, let's hope she's a changed woman.
More: RHONJ's Teresa Giudice & Jacqueline Laurita finally end long-standing feud
No doubt, being in prison had an effect on Giudice. How could it not? But the real question is: How long will it last? Here are seven things we're hoping to see from Giudice now that she's out of jail.
1. A true reconciliation with her sister-in-law
Giudice and Gorga have gone through their ups and downs in their relationship, but let's be honest: it's mostly been downs. Now that Giudice has been locked up for a year, let's hope that she's realized a lot of their arguments were just plain petty and the women can move on.
2. Less reality... TV
Some may argue that being on reality TV and having to keep up with the Joneses may have been the cause of a lot of the trouble Giudice and her husband got into. Hopefully, she will realize that there's much more to life than being famous and keep somewhat of a low-pro.
More: Teresa Giudice throws birthday party while under house arrest (PHOTO)
3. Less flash
And while we're at it, let's all say a small prayer that Giudice doesn't feel the need to have the latest and greatest everything. No need to step out in a $5,000 purse to be fabulous.
4. Keeping her kids out of the spotlight
No doubt, Giudice's biggest concern when heading off to prison was her four daughters — and no doubt those girls love their mother very much. That said, now that they're getting older, it really isn't necessary to see them on RHONJ. What good can come of it?
More:Teresa Giudice makes a major announcement about her future with RHONJ
5. Less work, work, work
Since she became a "Bravolebrity," Giudice hasn't stopped. She's got books, wine, desserts and a bajillion other things going on. While it's great to be business-minded, perhaps she should slow down a bit. She could scale back and work less and still have everything she needs and wants.
6. More standing up for herself
Giudice's husband Joe is set to begin his prison sentence very soon, so no doubt they're enjoying the little time they have together. That said, every once in a while, Joe kind of bosses his wife around a bit, or appears to not be listening to her at all. Not cool. Hopefully, prison gave Tre the balls to take a stand.
7. Less defensive
Perhaps the most refreshing thing we could ever see from Giudice would be her being less defensive and taking more ownership over the things she's done. Of course, she went to prison and certainly had more humility than we'd ever seen before in the months leading up to it, but we've still never really seen her fully cop to something and flat-out say, "I was wrong." That wouldn't just be nice, it would be a great example to her kids.
What changes would you like to see from Giudice now that she's a free woman?
Before you go, check out our slideshow below.


text:
It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheLieWeLive
Could someone post a transcript where Rush actually called Sandra a "slut" or "prostitute"?
Not defending Rush at all, really I can't stand him. I just see how this is being taken out of context and has been inflated beyond what it actually is. I want to see where he calls this lady the accused names. He doesn't come out and say "Sandra Fluke is a Slut" does he?
"What does it say about the college coed Susan [SIC] Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex?," he said on his radio show. "What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex."
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
I was taught that people who use foul words were too ignorant to express their thoughts without them. If Limbaugh did this to inflame others, he accomplished his mission and shot himself in the foot.
Bet he's really delighted he gave Obama an opportunity to win some support here. If he had any female listeners he probably took a hit there, too.
So much for being a media professional.
Originally posted by Skada
Is this bill really "requiring Taxpayers" to foot the bill, or just making sure that insurance companies include it in the care costs? Cause a lot of people here are saying tax payers are shelling out cash, but I don't think that is the case. Am I wrong?
Rush doesn't want the republicans to win the white house, senate, or anything...he is at his best, and in most demand when the right wing is in the minority. He does not resonate as a defender of a potus..he is all rabid attack dog, so he will want the right to fly to the most fringe part of the party and lose everything...that way he gets to spout tons of hate daily and be quite popular than that.
If I was a female
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Why would anyone want to deny women birth control?
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady
See...negativity creates sympathy and opportunity to win more support.
Just a little example of what I was saying in the other thread.
Originally posted by jibeho
I have high cholesterol!!!! Someone please help!!! I actually have to pay for my medicine. It's not right. Damn you ZOCOR!!!!!!!!! ZOOOCOOOORRRR!!!!!
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by jibeho
I have high cholesterol!!!! Someone please help!!! I actually have to pay for my medicine. It's not right. Damn you ZOCOR!!!!!!!!! ZOOOCOOOORRRR!!!!!
if you would
keep your legs togethereat healthy, then you wouldn't have a unplanned pregnancycholesterol problem.edit on 2-3-2012 by Muttley2012 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DoNotForgetMe
Reply to post by sad_eyed_lady
Rush did not shoot himself in the foot. Pay attention to your surroundings, lawyers have been on TV the last 24 hours saying she is full of it. 3K on BC is a lot of sex. What is she doing, forking her professors so she does not have to study. Typical college brat. As far as Rush's women listeners...nah...I am sure most agree with Rush. American taxpayers are fed up with these entitled spoiled brats constantly asking for more. What makes me upset the most is Rush says something I agree with. If I was a female at her school I would make sure the world knew she did not speak on my behalf. I think if I could go to lawschool I could afford BC....WITHOUT GOVERNMENTAL ASSISTANCE.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady
See...negativity creates sympathy and opportunity to win more support.
Just a little example of what I was saying in the other thread.
But it's Okay for Obama to "use" this fair young damsel as a golden opportunity to make him and his platform look good.
I watched the video, and I really don't believe the taxpayers should have to pay for her birth control. I don't believe we should have to pay for abortions either. You may not understand, but that's asking me to pay for killing a human being. I am entitled to believe this even if you disagree.


text:
Hi darlings!!!
-We will varies our item from preloved to preorder and new items. keep updated with us darls!
-Our sold item will be deleted.
-you can ask for reserved item as the reservation is done in a week before it was confirmed sold.
xoxo, daringdarlings
we are having BIG SALE on our most TOP sellinG item !
the ro0lLed HANGER at only RM25
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
balley sandle
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Clearance!!! SALE! SALE! SALE!
Clearance!!! SALE! SALE! SALE!
condition: good
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Awning Scarf
D: yellow+black E: stripey color
multi awning Scarf
ALL at RM5 each
Quick Grab!!
ALL at RM5 each
Quick Grab!!
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
the dwi color!
item: inner dwi tone
price : rm8 each
color: any color (just let us know)
here's are few samples of inner, however..if u have any color that u interested to combine...just let me know...see wheter it works or not
Posted by daringdarlings at 8:04 PM
Labels: inner dwi tone
red HOT cardie~~
English blouse~
item: English Blouse
price: rm 30
size: free
condition: NEW
*with puffy shoulder**its really attractive!!**
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
jEANS- LIKE baG~
just grab it, while stock last
item: handbag
price: rm55 *include shipping*
HOWEVER...IT IS...........negotiable!!!!
material: soft jeans
Sunday, April 18, 2010
black flat leather~
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
hang hang hang the hanger~
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


text:
A common question that often arises is whether to physically collect/copy a person's e-mail account once that person is placed on a litigation hold. Rather than copy the e-mail account, many companies will simply turn off the "auto-delete" function and issue the employee a preservation notice. By doing so, the company is essentially preserving in place. Although some may question this method of preservation, it is no different than if an employee had a box of potentially relevant documents in his office and, rather than make a copy of the box, the employee was instructed to continue to hold the box in his office until further notice. In most situations, this should be sufficient to satisfy a company's preservation obligations.
One caveat, however, relates to a custodian who may have an incentive not to preserve (e.g., the alleged harasser). In this type of situation, i.e., where you have the proverbial fox guarding the hen house, several courts have questioned the wisdom of such a protocol and have sanctioned parties when e-mails were lost. (See below.) Therefore, for those central figures in a litigation who may have an incentive not to preserve, a copy should be made of their e-mail accounts.
The following authorities are illustrative of the principles discussed above:
- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e): This newly amended rule now provided that "[i]f electronically stored information that should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation is lost because a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve it, and it cannot be restored or replaced through additional discovery, the court [may issue the following sanctions…]" One of the key points of this rule is the possibility for sanctions hinges on whether the party took "reasonable steps" to preserve information. Therefore, the rule contemplates that information can still be lost or deleted, but if reasonable – but not perfect – steps were taken to preserve, then sanctions cannot be levied for the loss of that information.
- The Sedona Principles For Electronic Document Production, Comment 6a: This comment provides that "[r]esponding parties are best situated to evaluate the procedures, methodologies and technologies appropriate for preserving and producing their own electronic data and documents." The comment cites to Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 220 FRD 212, 217 (SDNY 2003), noting there are various ways to manage electronic documents, and thus, many ways in which a party may comply with its obligations.
- Green v. Blitz U.S.A., Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20353 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2011): The court sanctioned a party who relied on custodians to self-collect relevant e-mails for preservation. Based on the insufficient and lackluster efforts taken to attempt to locate relevant documents, the court found that the party did not take reasonable steps to preserve.
- Northington v. H&M Intl., 2011 WL 663055 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 12, 2011): The court held "[i]t is unreasonable to allow a party's interested employees to make the decision about the relevance of such documents, especially when those same employees have the ability to permanently delete unfavorable email from a party's system…. Most non-lawyer employees, whether marketing consultants or high school deans, do not have enough knowledge of the applicable law to correctly recognize which documents are relevant to a lawsuit and which are not. Furthermore, employees are often reluctant to reveal their mistakes and misdeeds."
- Jones v. Bremen High School District 228, 2010 WL 2106640 (N.D. Ill. May 25, 2010): The court chastised the school district for allowing those alleged to have discriminated against the plaintiff to conduct their own review for evidence relating to her claims. Moreover, even though most of the gaps in the e-mail production were filled by finding missing e-mails in other locations, the court still sanctioned the school district, determining that it was reckless and grossly negligent in its handling of the litigation hold.
At the end of the day, if the process works and no relevant e-mails are lost, a company should not be at risk for sanctions. However, if e-mails are lost, the main question will be whether the company took reasonable steps to preserve the information.
If the lost e-mails were from a marginal employee with no meaningful stake in the litigation, then the mere fact that a litigation hold was issued to the employee should be enough to protect the company from sanctions. (In this situation, the company will want to be able to show that the employee received the hold notice, understood what it meant, etc. To this end, it will be very helpful if companies periodically issue reminder litigation hold notices.) Alternatively, if the lost emails were in the account of a key figure in the litigation, then the court will look more closely into whether the company's efforts were reasonable in that specific situation.


text:
This week, listen Tuesday night at Midnight (Wednesday @ 12 AM EDT), Friday night at 10:00 EDT, and Sunday night at 9:00 EDT.
The Weekly Feed is a one hour specialty show hosted by Kyle Meredith from the WFPK studios in Louisville, KY. Hear the newest, best, and most discussed tracks making waves on music blogs across the net, all compiled into a mixtape bent on keeping you up-to-date!
Playlist for the Week of 12/23/13: Best Of 2013, Part 3.
Part three of our dive into the biggest songs of the year brings us another bundle of aural goodness including the return of Nine Inch Nails, some remixes that were even better than the real thing, the punk rock fury of Pearl Jam, and the world dominating tracks from Arcade Fire and Haim. And more guests who dropped by!!! We've got Wayne Coyne from The Flaming Lips and Jason Isbell on, so don't miss a minute.
- Arcade Fire – Reflektor
- Nine Inch Nails – Copy of A
- Haim Interview
- Haim – The Wire
- Lorde – Royals (The Weekend Remix)
- Phoenix – Trying To Be Cool (R. Kelly Remix)
- Superchunk – Me & you & Jackie Mittoo
- Pearl Jam – Mind Your Manners
- The Flaming Lips Interview
- The Flaming Lips – Sun Blows Up Today
- Cults – I Can Hardly Make You Mine
- The Orwells – Who Needs You
- Jason Isbell Interview
- Jason Isbell – Songs That She Sang In the Shower
- Pixies – Bagboy