text:
Latent prediction
Добавить комментарий
Для отправки комментария вам необходимо авторизоваться.
Для отправки комментария вам необходимо авторизоваться.
Site "Survival in the wild nature", glad to see you. If you come to us, it means you want to get complete information about survival in a variety of extreme conditions, in emergency situations. Man, throughout the development, sought to preserve and protect themselves from the various negative factors surrounding it - cold, heat, hunger, dangerous animals and insects.
Site structure "Survival in the wild nature" is simple and logical, selecting a specific section, you will find information. You will find on our website recommendations and practical advice on survival, unique descriptions and pictures of animals and plants, turn-based scheme to trap wild animals, tests and reviews of travel gear, rare books on survival and wildlife. The site also has a large section devoted to video on survival survivalist-known professionals around the world.
The main theme of the site, "Survival in the wild nature" - is to be ready to be in the wild, and the ability to survive in extreme conditions.
The Survival in the wild nature - how correctly to behave, it having appeared in an emergency situation. Ability to find a way out from any situation: to kindle a fire, to put traps, to prepare food, to arrange dwelling and a lodging for the night; to learn to knit knots, to clear water, to be guided by districts, correctly to choose equipment, a knife. Also you can download directories to tourists, encyclopedias survivals, video Bear Grills to Survive at any cost (Man vs. Wild).

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Death Notice: Vera Lucille Nelson
Vera Lucille Nelson, 87, of Huntsville, died Friday, March 1, 2013, at the at Moberly Nursing and Rehab Center in Moberly. Funeral services will be held Monday, at 2:00 p.m., at the Patton Funeral Home in Huntsville with burial to follow in the Huntsville City Cemetery. Visitation is from 1:00 p.m. until service time, Monday, at the funeral home.


text:
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Johnny Hart and Brant Parker
I can't figure out how these cartoons ever made it into the funny papers. They are so anti-family safe. They're cynical, somewhat clever (compared to most daily comics that talk down to you) and they strip away the phony veneer of polite behavior to reveal our true ugly stuffed-with-guts interiors.
There are a million things I could say about B.C., The Wizard of Id and Crock, but need more visual material. I have almost all the pocketbooks (anyone know what pocket books are? Do they still exist?)
I have been trying to find nice color Sunday pages to show you and thanks to Ger Apeldoorn there are a small handful. Does anyone else have any they could share with the world?
So anyway, these are the complete antithesis of say - Hi and Lois, Family Circus, Fred Basset, Beetle Bailey and most mild-mannered 60s comics strips.
I liked the drawings in Hi and Lois, but felt that the artist didn't really believe the message. I could be wrong, but it seems like it was purely filling a market, rather than reflecting someones's personal outlook on life.
Family Circus' unique characteristic was to never have a joke or point to it. That way it was sure to never offend anyone. Everyone loved it. I would read it every day, and always go "Huh?" My friends and I used to eat special brownies and read them. They'd make us alternate with laughter and rage. Kids used to know how to have fun.
Fred Basset probably was the strip that made me the most mad. It also never had a joke or a point to it. I never imagined that this would become the standard for comic strips by the 1980s. Now every strip makes you go "Huh?" after the last panel.
I read almost all those polite comics but believed that many of them were written not so much from the actual heart and beliefs of the artists, but rather to please editors and the simple white bread tastes of Christian Moms and Dads. My folks used to tell me how brilliant Hi and Lois was because it was "just like real life". And that was its purpose - to make my folks think they were normal and to make me roll my eyes and swallow my own puke.
Johnny Hart's drawing style is curious too. It's crude on the surface - like Peanuts - but has some creative aspects that were new to comics and maybe cartoons in general. He could portray extreme human emotions - like pain, hate, greed, lust, ecstasy, fear, dread, revulsion better than anyone. And he did it with just a few scribbly lines as if he felt the drawing, rather than figured it out. I found this (and still do) truly impressive. I think it influenced the way I draw storyboards - fast, scribbly and all feeling.
Most comics rely on a handful of mild generic expressions that barely hint at the simplest of human emotions - happy, sad, mad, sometimes shock. Why, there was a time when comic strip artists wouldn't even draw open mouths when the characters talked! That's unbelievable to me, yet it was the general practice for decades. Did they just never think of it? It never dawned on any cartoonist that , "Hey, my character is talking, maybe I should open his mouth." I guess it took animated cartoons to cause the open mouth revolution.
But back to the uglier, less generic, more entertaining expressions of human feeling.
No one else drew distasteful ugly human emotions in comics. (maybe once in a while, on a milder level, Charles Schultz did) How the heck did Hart ever sell the first strip??
Cast Ensemble
Another thing that really influenced me in Hart's work was the characterizations and their chemistry with each other.The characters in B.C. are almost all the same character design, but they have individual personalities (except B.C. himself, who is the prototype middle of the road caveman that all the others are variations of).I like Hart's B.C. for many reasons, but I also like his second strip, "The Wizard Of Id" (that he co-produced with Brant Parker), for some of the same reasons, and for some different ones.
The B.C. characters are all the same design; the Wiz characters have more variety and are more cartoony.
The Wizard Of Id
Like B.C., "Id" is a comic that is about man's uglier sides. Unlike B.C. there isn't a single positive or admirable character in the whole strip. What we like about each character are his or her horrible flaws.
The whole strip glorifies the worst aspects of humanity.
Despite the title of the strip the main character is the King, not the Wizard. He's awful - and the hero of the strip. This King is a torturer, a warmonger, a liar and an oppressor who taxes his poverty stricken peasants mercilessly and he has a Napoleonic complex.
Rodney is a cowardly knight.He's also a great character design. I used to draw him all the time when I was a little punk.
Bung is a drunken jester.
Pettifogger is not only a drunk, but a sleazy lawyer.
Girls are either young and beautiful or old fat and ugly. (Repeating B.C. world-view) Gwen is the cute one; Blanche is the fat ugly nag - the only 2 types of women in a rat-pack world.
The Wizard is a bumbling sorcerer and henpecked husband who sometimes uses his magic to try to eliminate his nagging fattie of a wife.
The Spook is a dirty starved and beaten wretch, imprisoned and constantly tortured for merely calling the King a Fink.
These strips influenced me a lot; maybe not so obviously in the drawing style, but definitely in their fresh and honest way of portraying humanity. It made me realize that you could draw cartoons that reflect the way you see the world, rather than drawing cartoon characters that look and act the way you think cartoons are supposed to be. - It's the difference between being observant of the world, or merely observant of cartoons you like. This is something most of our business needs to learn today. We need to open our eyes and stop creating by rote.
I always wanted to animate The Wizard Of Id. I think it has a lot of the qualities that Segar's Popeye did. The characters are all fun designs; they have strong personalities and wouldn't need much monkeying with to adapt them to movement.
I talked to Johnny hart and Brant Parker's manager once, when I was making the first web cartoons. I wanted to start an online cartoon network and animate not only my own characters, but some classic comic strips too. She told me funny stories about how Hart and his crew worked.
Something really odd happened to Johnny Hart in his later years. The world's most cynical cartoonist (who used to make fun of religion in his comics) found Jesus. It's the last person you would ever imagine this happening to. But there you go. Life is crazy.
46 comments:
- Kali Fontecchio said...
I love Johnny Hart. They are fun to read, but I think I like the character designs in Wizard of Id better than BC.
- Niki said...
Surprisingly, those morons on "Family Butt" seem to hate it. I read all the "Wizard of Id" comics here! Their hilarious!
- Payo said...
Yeah, he threw a lot of religious stuff into the later B.C. strips too. It kind of bummed me out, but no more than a Bible citation on an In-n-Out cup does.
- David said...
I have a little book of the Wizard of Id too! I always liked it, thanks to you I know why!
If you are ever gonna animate it, I would be happy to help you out. They would be nice as short internetclips or clips inbetween commercials.
I'm thinking about turning an existing comic strip into an animated series too!
- Christer said...
Those comics were the only reason to pick up a Beetle Bailey comic book here in Norway. Thanks for calling my attention back to these.
Also, I've finally gotten around to make a real effort with the Preston Blair stuff (look here!) and I'd like to thank you for pointing that stuff out as well.
- A.M.Bush said...
Never got into B.C., but the Wizard of Id images were very nostalgic to me. They probably influenced me without really thinking about it.
- Ric said...
I only remember the game based on BC I knew it was based on a comic but I've never seen the actual strips. Looks like I would have enjoyed them though, I hate all the pc crap we have to put up with these days.
That reminds me of something Norm MacDonald said in an interview. He said Sam Kinison told him that the secret to doing good comedy is to talk about what ever you want, about what interests you. That's it. So if losing your luggage at the airport and doing laundry interest you, then go ahead, do routines on airport security.
So Norm says the number one thing he's interested in is death and disease, and the number two thing is the dirty dirty sex. So that's what he talks about.
That seems to be what Johnny Hart is doing.
- Kelseigh said...
Man, pocket books. Between my brother and I, we had complete collections of BC and Wizard of Id, but also a couple of the books for Crock, which Parker did with Rechin and Wilder, and wasn't too far off the spirit of the other two. We also had a fair amount of Tom Ryan's Tumbleweeds, which could be pretty cynical and bizarre in its own right, although a lot more firm in design.
I checked out Hart's strips much later, a few years before he died, and was very disappointed to see just how much of his old magic had fled. Drawings didn't have the same life, and the gags seemed like he was phoning them in. Props to him for dying in the manner of a true, lifelong cartoonist, though.
- mike f. said...
I thought Thor, Peter and B.C. were all the same character when I was a kid. (Despite that character description chart, I still can't tell the difference between them. They're pretty much interchangeable.)
Clumsy Carp looks like Eddie, doesn't he? Grog was always my favorite. Pure id, as was the sordid, Peyton Place world of the ants.
The Wizard of Id had more visual variety for me. Hart came up with the original idea for the strip by flipping through a deck of cards. As in B.C., the animals in Id are hilarious - like that cool dragon. The horses got even weirder as time went on. They usually appeared with the two sardonic stablehands. (Hart and Parker would cut to them whenever they had a "shit" joke, which was pretty often.)
The lawyer - Larson E. Pettifogger, was based on W.C. Fields' radio and movie character, Larson E. Whipsnade. Hart always had the best doctor and lawyer jokes. The doctor's name, I just found out after flipping through Strike the Sot!, was Dr. Puckerstein.
The whole strip is screaming to be animated. What a shame they chose to animate garbage like Dilbert instead. (Brant Parker had an alternate strip called Goosemeyer in the early '80s, a satire of office workers and government bureaucracy. It was short-lived, but it was a whole lot better than Dilbert.)
Bung could only have been voiced by the great Foster Brooks, no one else could have done it justice.
I have a couple of original Id strips from the sixties. In one, the Spook is shaved to look like a French poodle. In another, the King inspects Rodney's hapless troops, and asks how the white flags are holding out. Parker had a style that translated perfectly to print. His original drawings are actually looser, they tighten up when they're reduced.
Eventually, both strips got too dry for their own good. The best years were the early ones, right before the (ugh!) seventies - when American popular culture began to go south...
- Peggy said...
By the seventies, both "B.C." and "Id" seemed to have had all their fire gone. Maybe it got squeezed out by the shrinking comics pages; maybe Hart mellowed out. I've seen the early "B.C." strips but I'd never seen the early "Id"; I'm really surprised to find it had bite because it was always 'that lame strip about the king' to me.
And when Hart got religion and turned "B.C." into his pulpit, it just went straight to mawkish preachyness.
- Chris_Garrison said...
I want to hear the funny stories about Hart and his crew.
- Mike Caracappa said...
This was a great post. I have always been interested in doing a webcomic of my own. I work in the shipping department of a film lab, and one of my hobbies there is drawing comic strips for my coworkers. They are pretty cynical, but I've found the more I've actually gone out on a limb to push the cynicisim farther, the funnier the comics turn out to be. Again, it's just comics about my workplace, but I've been trying to make up stories and show my own point of view.
I also never really read Wizard of ID till you posted this. They're great! I'll have to find my own copies now.
- Simon W-H said...
Yes, I'd like to hear the funny stories too. These strips would be in certain British news papers...that's how I found them.
- Trevor Thompson said...
My friends and I used to eat special brownies and read them.
I knew it!
- trevor.
- Ted said...
That's the funniest Family Circus I've ever seen...
- Brubaker said...
Ah, I love those early BC/Wizard strips. I still have a ton of book collections with those strips.
The two strips were animated before, as matter of fact. "BC: The First Thanksgiving", directed by Abe Levitow and animated by some of Chuck Jones' former crew, came out in the seventies. Hart wrote it along with his assistant Jack Caprio.
Art-wise it was very faithful to the visuals in the strip. And it had very little dialogue, a rarity for a cartoon made in the seventies.
There was also a Christmas special made 10 years later by a different studio, but I've never seen it.
And supposidly there were Wizard of Id animated segments made for Chuck Jones' "Curiosity Shop". Never seen them, though.
And this is for Mike F. who brought up "Goosemyer". I uploaded a bunch of old Goose Sunday strips a while back on my blog. If anyone's curious, here you go:
- Elana Pritchard said...
I'll admit I find the "rat pack world" concept charming, but when taken too far it's also alienating. There's nothing wrong with kitchy fun, and I like a guy in a suit as much as the next girl, but it's seriously frustrating in real life when you feel put in a box because of your gender. I wouldn't bring it up if it wasn't a reality I have to deal with all of the time.
Sigh... I guess I'll always be the viewpoint from the other side of the teeter-totter on this subject because it's not in my nature to keep quiet and not say anything when something bugs me.
- Elana Pritchard said...
p.s. There is a special place in hell for the creator of Family Circus
- Brubaker said...
In fairness, Keane does get a thumbs up from me for linking to other comics that makes fun of "Family Circus" on his website.
And I know he's friends with Stephan Pastis, who once did a "Pearls Before Swine" storyline that featured Osama Bin Laden living with the Family Circus family and they didn't notice because they were so stuck in the past that they didn't know 9/11 happened
Pearls is probably the most cynical strip ever, since they show absolutely NOTHING positive about the world.
- Chip Butty said...
Waitaminnit, that Family Circus has a daddy-drinks joke! Family Circus used to DO that?!? Gosh, even the world's lamest comic strip used to be better...
Thanks for enlightening us on Johnny Hart, I always assumed BC and Wizard of Id had always been lame. The strip with the ants watching the whale and dinosaur fight is a perfect political cartoon - a subtle point with well rendered cartoon violence.
On the topic of newspaper strips, what did you think of Bloom County?
- Isaac said...
It's seriously frustrating in real life when you feel put in a box because of your gender
I think it's important not to alienate women. It's easy too; just portray things the way they really are.
- Larry Levine said...
Does anyone here remember Chuck Jones' strip "Crawford"? Easily the best strip of the 1970s.
- Jack Ruttan said...
One idea like "rat pack" doesn't really explain the whole era. I'd look at Jules Feiffer, the Beats, and Lenny Bruce. Also UPA cartoons, Peanuts, and what they were doing in advertising at the time.
- Ger Apeldoorn said...
What I found funny when I went through those early years of B.C. is the fact that Johnny Hrt never 'found' relegion, but that it was always there. I have many more early B.C. Sundays and it's amazing how many feature the idea or sometimes even presence of God. He just was a lot funnier about it in the early days.
I particulary like B.C. for it's pantimime humor or often dialogue-less timing. There seems to be an animation connection there. But I don;t know how it would be fun to animate. Because most of the time the characters just stand around and barely act or react.
To Elana I say that she should have a look at Keane's much funnier Channel Chuckles (on his own website) which makes his bowing down to the general taste of the public even more tragic.
And to Peggy I say, that not having lived with these strips daily in the seventies, I found it a real surprise that it was often just as good in the seventies as it was in the sixties. Especially on the Sundays.
Any theories on the change from decade to decade of comic strips, similar to your theories about cartoons in the same period?
Obviously, newspaper cartoonists weren't evolving a technique based on collaboratively developed principles as animated cartoonists were, but I'd be interested to read your observations on general trends.
- Niki said...
John, I have a problem.
I really need help on this bear, I only posted the first three I did but now all the next ones have been horrendous I'm in need. I think it's my eyes.
Preston's bear
- Kelseigh said...
I see a lot of people hating on Family Circus for it's lameness, and rightfully so. But how many of you remember Henry? By the time I was growing up in the 70's and 80's, it was sure pretty bad. About on par with Bazooka Joe.
- lastangelman said...
Now you got me digging out all my yellowed flaking BC and Wizard of Id paperbacks. I used to eat that stuff up like it was ice cream. I could ignore the Jesus thing for a while but then both strips got less funny and then after Sept 11th, he went to unfunny, religious and prejudiced. He became a character from his own strip.
I would cut out and collect Family Circus's, use my Mom's correction fluid to erase the script and write my own Family Bezerkus panels, then show 'em to classmates.
Without a doubt, I loved cowardly Rodney and Bung the drunken jester and the poor unfortunate Spook. The most useless character was The Duke. He looked funny and haughty with the big chin, but he was nothing but a straight man, nothing to like about him.
There was a few animated BC and Wizard of Id animated cartoons in the 70s that were done by Chuck Jones or Abe Levitow I think, that appeared on the Saturday mornibg kid's program, The Olde Curiosity Shoppe, mainly a live action show with puppets. Mercifully, they didn't have any of Chuck's feminine soft style that he had drifted into by that time.
- Christine Gerardi said...
John, what do you think about Calvin and Hobbes?
- Rick Roberts said...
Hey John,
I wanted to apologize about what I said to you. I took it personally because I was very depressed that day. Can you forgive me ?
- JohnK said...
It's one of the best comics of the last 25 years.
- Rick Roberts said...
I am really tired of polite Comics, they think that real humor is a bad pun. You know, I think the people who write award shows get there material from these comics.
- Niki said...
>>It's one of the best comics of the last 25 years.
Totally called it! My teacher was talking about Calvin and Hobbes one day, I answered just about all his questions! In the back of my head I was think, "John would love this!"
- Hans Flagon said...
I think it was a Fantagraphics Comics Journal interveiw with Brant Parker that revealed the beginnings of BC. Hart started playing with the idea with some caveman single panel gags he was selling.
When BC and or Id was sold as a strip, Apparently he and Parker locked themselves in an apartment with heavy supplies of liquor, knocked out a few weeks of the strip, and tricked a syndicate guy into coming up to look at the stuff.
The religion might have always have been there somewhat, via Wileys poetry and philosophy, Clumsy Carp, et al, but it did not become heavy handed where all cynicism and humor had been removed until later in the career. There is a definate switch where you see the strip simply stop being funny, stop playing off the foibles of the characters.
I think that there may have been some money troubles pushing it. He had one of the most successful strips around, but the syndicate was playing hard ball, and he started his own Creators Syndicate. Newspapers were really not giving a flying leap through a rolling donut about strips anymore anyway. Mass Market Collections stopped being made as larger trade paperbacks that could sell for a higher price became the norm, and his work became way preachy, and not funny at all.
- Brad said...
Our newspaper has B.C. and Wizard of Id in it, don't know if that's a rarity, or if they're anything like they used to be, but I've always liked those two strips.
- Peter Bernard said...
He didn't just "find Jesus" he became a full-on asshole rightwing Born Again jerkoff. Which is what he was clearly leading toward with all his backward caveman attitudes which you so lovingly admire here. It was no surprise to me seeing Jesus crap in his strips, he had always been such an Al Crapp-type in my mind. Terrible comics-- comic strips died when guys like this started making tons of money for scribbles.
- Kyle Baker said...
Johnny Hart was one of the first artists I used to swipe as a kid.I still use those proportions today, the fat nose and big belly over long skinny legs ending in flat feet. Tex Avery's Raid bugs and Sergio Aragones' cartoons also have those proportions. Great contrasts of big round shapes next to skinny angular shapes. Everybody looks like chess pieces!
- Hans Flagon said...
There is usually a time after a strip has built up its cast of characters where the creator simply doesn't seem to be able to work with them anymore.
For BC, the turning point may have been Grog, which was a more primiitive caveman type amongst the crew, then a focus on the ant and anteater strips, possibly because they were easier to draw. Grog had a preexisting analog in Id.
For Peanuts, I think the beginning of the end was when Snoopy stopped walking on all fours, and started having thought balloons. Which unfortunately coincided with Schulz starting to make handover fist money from the franchise. The nails in the coffin were probably when Peppermint Patty took over the strip for a couple of decades.
In the need to stay fresh, a lot of lovely characters get neglected forever.
- mike f. said...
He didn't just "find Jesus" he became a full-on asshole rightwing Born Again jerkoff... It was no surprise to me seeing Jesus crap in his strips, he had always been such an Al Crapp-type in my mind.
What mind? Ignorant bigots like Mr. Bernard, spitting stupidity and hatred. If you're too stupid to understand comics, Peter, then what else is there?
- mike f. said...
By the way - Capp was Jewish, idiot.
- John A said...
It's too bad they never did animate the Wizard of Id, I always thought the variety of characters lent themselves better to the half hour format like the Flintstones or the Jetsons at H-B.
While I prefer B.C. as a comic strip, it was really just a gag strip with little room for character development (B.C. has also appeared animated for a couple of commercials for the ACTION corp. back in the late seventies)
There was some talk, back around the time the Popeye movie was made,that a studio was considering a live action Wizard of Id movie. I've always hated these things, as I've never been able to figure out why a studio would want to throw out the most appealing part of a comic strip (the graphics!)It's like buying the rights to a song and throwing out the words and lyrics and just keeping the title.
- Brubaker said...
John A, as others (including myself) have pointed out, the Wizard WAS animated...by the Chuck Jones crew.
I just remembered that Jim Henson made a pilot for the Wizard of Id using puppets. It was short, only few minutes long. It was pretty funny from my understanding. Anyone have a copy?
Anyone also have a copy of the Jones-produced Wizard and BC sequences? (Dennis the Menace, Miss Peach and other strips were also animated for "Curiosity Shop")
If you do, contact me at cbrubaker at gmail dot com, will ya?
- John A said...
What I meant was that it(the Wizard of Id) was never animated for more than just a few snippets when it's obvious that the setting and the personalities of the individual characters would work in a longer(weekly half-hour TV show) format.
B.C. was animated for a Thanksgiving special with some success, but I doubt if anyone could adapt its largely panel gag-based comedy for 13 episodes or more.
- John A said...
What I meant was that it(the Wizard of Id) was never animated for more than just a few snippets when it's obvious that the setting and the personalities of the individual characters would work in a longer(weekly half-hour TV show) format.
B.C. was animated for a Thanksgiving special with some success, but I doubt if anyone could adapt its largely panel gag-based comedy for 13 episodes or more.
- Hierarchist said...
There was one Id strip that I remember. One of the characters was in the hospital, and the nurse was using the first-person plural, as an insipid caretaker's nicety: "We look like we've had a good night's sleep." "Yeah." And we haven't had any fever or coughing?" "No." "Are you ready for your enema?" "What happened to that old team spirit?"


text:
Your browser is no longer supported. For the best experience of this website, please upgrade to a newer version or another browser.
Your browser appears to have s disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable s in your browser
We'll assume we have your consent to use s, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.Learn more
17 November 2018 6:19 am
16 November 2018 4:28 pm
16 November 2018 4:22 pm
16 November 2018 2:38 pm
The high street is changing at a faster pace than ever before, and some town centres are becoming virtually unrecognisable as big-name retailers scale back their store portfolios.
Entries are now open for the Drapers Digital Awards - recognising the best of the best in ecommerce across the fashion industry in the UK and Ireland.
16 November 2018 7:00 am
14 November 2018 12:01 pm
9 November 2018 7:33 am
6 November 2018 5:42 pm
Two years after entrepreneur Mike Welch relaunched Atterley as an online network of independent fashion retailers, the business has received an injection of cash that will help fuel its expansion.
Drapers Footwear Awards 19 will recognise and celebrate the footwear's very best from across the UK and Ireland.
We have 18 exciting categories up for contest, including International Footwear Business of the Year and Best Sustainable Initiative of the Year.
15 October 2018 2:36 pm
10 October 2018 2:14 pm
9 October 2018 7:56 am
8 October 2018 4:20 pm
At Pantherella International Group, Justin Hall oversees a century of sock-making expertise.
14 November 2018 4:55 pm
14 November 2018 1:16 pm
14 November 2018 10:36 am
14 November 2018 10:02 am
Find out what's happening on fashion's social scene
Taking place on 29 November 2018, the Drapers Awards recognises and celebrates the best of the best in the fashion sector.
16 November 2018 2:01 pm
15 November 2018 10:04 am
14 November 2018 4:01 pm
14 November 2018 10:31 am
16 October 2018
By Jill Geoghegan
Oasis and Warehouse Group is promoting chief operating officer Hash Ladha to the role of chief executive, as Liz Evans steps down, Drapers can reveal.
EMAP Publishing Limited Company number
7880758 (England & Wales) Registered address:
7th Floor, Vantage London, Great West Road,
Brentford, United Kingdom, TW8 9AG
Site powered by


text:
A beautiful moissanite ring that'll take her breath away. Gleaming elegantly in 14K white gold, this lovely ring features three glittering rows of prong set round cut 3mm moissanite stones. Both stylish and sophisticated, its sure to win her affection and appreciation. What more could you ask for?
Check out the Ring Sizing Guide to find your ring size.
Created Moissanite has very high dispersion and displays 2.4 times more fire than diamond (0.044). Its inherent high refractive index gives Moissanite a dazzling sparkle, while its precisely calibrated and carefully hand-cut facet patterns intensify fire and maximize brilliance.
Moissanite is extremely durable. It is harder (more resistant to scratching) than ruby or sapphire – second only to diamond – and it is resistant to breakage.
Larger sizes of near-colorless Moissanite (6.5mm or 1 carat and larger) might appear to have a slight color. A variety of factors, such as dispersion, tint and the type of jewelry setting, can create and affect this unique color appearance. Moissanite aficionados enjoy the slight hue that results in a very natural-looking gemstone, even though it's lab-created.
Moissanite's high dispersion produces flashes of rich rainbow (spectral) colors. The appearance and degree of these tints are less noticeable when Moissanite is set in jewelry. Jewelry set in gold (yellow, rose or white) and/or set in platinum will affect the face-up appearance of Moissanite.
Nobel Prize-winning chemist Dr. Henri Moissan discovered minute quantities of natural silicon carbide (later named Moissanite in his honor) while analyzing part of Arizona's Diablo Canyon meteorite crater in 1893. Upon close inspection, he noticed the tiny crystals shimmered with brilliance and dispersion, although they were too limited in quantity and not large enough to use in jewelry.
Almost 100 years after Dr. Moissan's amazing discovery, a way to create Moissanite was developed. Appreciated for its overwhelming brilliance, Moissanite continues to take the jewelry world by storm.
Brilliance: The white light leaving a jewel, traveling upward, which is visible to the eye. Brilliance is sometimes referred to as "sparkle."
Dispersion: Flashes of rainbow colors. Also called "fire."
Hardness: Resistance to scratching. The higher the number, the more resistant.
Luster: The shininess of a jewel.
Toughness: Resistance to breakage.


text:
The U.S. Census Bureau reports that the percentage of households headed by older adults has grown significantly over the last half century. The share of householders age 75 and older grew from 6 percent in 1960 to 10 percent in 2012.
The U.S. Census Bureau reports that the percentage of households headed by older adults has grown significantly over the last half century. The share of householders age 75 and older grew from 6 percent in 1960 to 10 percent in 2012.
In 1960, 32 percent of all households in the country were headed by 30- to 44-year-olds. However, by 2012, the percentage of these households had fallen to 26 percent, after peaking at 34 percent in 1990. The share of households headed by older adults expanded as the number of 45- to 64-year-old householders shrank in the 1980s and 1990s but began growing again in 2000. These households now make up 39 percent of households in 2012.
These statistics come from America's Families and Living Arrangements: 2012, a series of tables from the 2012 Current Population Survey. The tables provide a look at the socio-economic characteristics of families and households at the national level. A series of 13 graphs showing historical trends are also available with these estimates.
"These changes are related to baby boomers, that large segment of the American population born between 1946 and 1964," said Jonathan Vespa, a demographer with the Census Bureau's Fertility and Family Statistics Branch. "As they moved through young adulthood to middle age, and now into older adulthood, we can see an accordion-like effect on the age groups as they expand and shrink."
A large proportion of older householders live alone. In 2012, more than half of householders 75 and older lived alone, compared with almost a quarter of householders under age 30.
The largest concentration of households with five or more people was among the 30 to 44 age group. These householders were likely to be living with their children who were younger than 18.
Other highlights:
The number of couples living together without being married has more than doubled since the 1990s, from 2.9 million in 1996 to 7.8 million in 2012. In 2012, 40 percent of unmarried partners had children younger than 18.The prevalence of married households continued to decline, from more than two-thirds (71 percent) of all households in 1970 to under half (49 percent) in 2012.In 2012, 27 percent of households contained only one person, up from 17 percent in 1970. On average, American households contain 2.55 people.The median age at first marriage in 2012 was 28.6 for men and 26.6 for women.The share of all U.S. households headed by a white non-Hispanic adult fell to about two-thirds (69 percent) in 2012, down from three-quarters (75 percent) in 2000.The share of households headed by 55- to 64-year-olds rose over the last two decades, from 13 percent in 1990 to 19 percent in 2012. Meanwhile, the share headed by adults who were younger than 30 fell from 16 percent to 13 percent.The percentage of married couples with both the husband and wife in the labor force declined from 56 percent in 2000 to 52 percent in 2012.Stay-at-home parents have become more common since the 1990s. Among married-couple families with children younger than 15, the percentage with stay-at-home mothers increased from 20 percent to 24 percent between 1994 and 2012. The 2012 estimate of 24 percent is not significantly different from either 2011 or 2007, before the start of the recession.Almost all stay-at-home parents (96 percent) are mothers. However, between 1994 and 2012, the percentage of stay-at-home parents who were fathers increased from 1.6 percent to 3.6 percent and their numbers more than doubled from 76,000 to 189,000.The percentage of children in 2012 living with two parents, regardless of their marital status, differs by race and Hispanic origin. Eighty-five percent of single-race Asian children lived with two parents compared with 77 percent of single-race white non-Hispanic children, 66 percent of Hispanic children and 38 percent of single-race black children.Of the 73.8 million children in the United States in 2012, approximately 7.1 million (9.7 percent) lived with a grandparent.
The latest Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey was conducted in February, March and April of 2012 for a nationwide sample of about 100,000 addresses. Statistics from surveys are subject to sampling and nonsampling error. For more information on the source of the data and accuracy of the estimates, including standard errors and confidence intervals, see Appendix G at