text:
Friday, July 20, 2007
follow up to last post
The comments are getting ugly again.
Hmmm...I think I might have sent the wrong message in that convoluted post, so let me try to clarify what I was getting at.
Pt 2.
I'm not advocating that everyone run out and develop their own personal styles - exactly the opposite! The slavish obedience to decadent styles are our biggest handicap to creativity.
I want people to be able to draw REAL solid universal principles
and to be able to tell the difference between modern inbred stylistic habits and real human art
we should go back to our roots and start over
Most artists don't have strong styles and never will, but they do have personalities that could be translated through their drawings
The ones that do have natural style will inspire the new movements
But if everyone draws better and doesn't copy bad stylistic tricks each artist will still be able to put some of himself into the art - naturally - and all can contribute to growth and fun again
good drawing is the most powerful tool we have to create with, it gives you the control with which you can have a lot more to say
having a cheesy restrictive style based on tricks really limits what you can say with your art
you can only say what your crippled fingers can scrawl out, and you have to abandon all the thoughts you might have that are too hard to draw
If we recognize the decadence we are drowning in and decide to improve our ability to draw and observe life for real and with control,
then we can move ahead and make honest and sincere cartoons again, not just degraded copies of non-human formula cartoons
NEED some FEEDBACK TONIGHT ON BLANDNESS
I may put up my bland test post for a couple hours tonight to get some more comments and then I may revise it when I see if the message gets through clearly or not
52 comments:
- Benjamin De Schrijver said...
The comments were getting ugly? I thought they were getting interesting. No-one was insulting anyone, I felt. I did feel a bit offended by what Stephen said about me, so replied on that, but not with foul intentions. Besides that I thought we were having a good discussion.
I definitly - again - agree with this post. Instead of basing our work on past animation styles, we should be basing ourselves on life, observation and solid drawing skills.
But - I feel I have to bring it up, even I know you disagree - to me this is what the film Mind Game was doing. Don't mistake that director for not being able to draw. Some of his other work clearly shows skill, though stylewise that work is definitly based on past styles (usually it weren't his character designs to begin with). But the man can draw. However, Mind Game was based on a comic book with a very spontaneous stream-of-consciousness narrative. That's why he decided everything about the film had to feel similar to that. Sometimes there's an edited live-action shot thrown in, sometimes backgrounds are naturalistic, other times abstract, etc. Character design and animation wise, the character's shapes were always adjusted to the shot's intention. The guy knew what good drawing was, but decided to leave certain principles out a lot of the time to give that spontaneous random feeling. They even "cleaned" up certain drawings into the rough angular type used throughout the movie, so it would feel that way. The director HAD something to say with his film, and felt this way was the best way to say it. It was a specific design choice. In a way much like you decide to draw certain things more flat at times. Was it a good design choice? I guess you feel it wasn't, and I feel it was. Was it amateurish? I wouldn't say so.
It'd be great to hear your reaction on this...
- Emmett said...
David B. Levy, president of ASIFA-East, wrote a book about the animation business. One section that particularly struck me was called "It's Not about Style, It's about experimentation." His point was to try out different things and not get bogged down with having your own style. Otherwise, you run the risk of defending bland artwork. Is this close to what you are saying?
And when you say "universal objects," what are you referring to exactly? There are a lot of things I have never tried drawing.
- Raff said...
Looking at the comics you posted, I can't help but wonder if some of the freedom you see there came about because no one had to think of the limits imposed by having to animate.
Look at all that crosshatching. Look at the the background; sometimes it's complex, sometimes simple, sometimes wacky, sometimes not there at all depending on what's needed for that point in the narative.
A lot of the early animation was an attempt to translate the newspaper comics to animation, and preserve as much of the spirit in the transfer as possible.
Maybe that's the right way to go - get good drawing skills down, design freely and worry about the technical tangles after. I've seen animation taught the opposite way: technical limitations first and skills last. Dull.
- Benjamin De Schrijver said...
Oh, and my other comments on anime weren't so much about the spirit of your post, but rather about parts of it. Eg. I pointed towards some japanese tv-shows just to say how sometimes they do deverge from modelsheets. And my question/comments about Tokyo Godfathers didn't even have anything to do with the post. I've been wondering how you felt about that film for a while now (if you've seen it), if you feel perhaps even just slightly different about it than other anime, and since I was already talking about anime, I thought I'd ask.
- JohnK said...
Anime is Japan's Cal Arts
- Gabriel said...
You know something, i don't think i could copy any artist's style with much precision, even if i tried really hard. I think this is true even to those superman you talk about here. Could Rod Scribner not draw in his style, and do it as, say, Bobe Cannon would? He could probably fake to some level, but the way he drew was so much a part of his personality that he probably wouldn't be able to rid himself of his style even if he wanted to. I'm not talking about simply developing in a direction.
That leads to this: why is that disney kangaroo so boring in comparison to the kangaroo on the Felix strip? I was thinking about that today and the logical answer i figured out is that the characters must be designed bland and generic so that everyone can draw it the same way. I'm not sure it's true, but it makes sense. It's a pretty horrible thought, to think that a character might already be born insipid as not to give trouble to the artists. Maybe if a character is made too distinct or peculiar, it's unavoidable that everyone would draw it in a different way.
- Vixus said...
It is important for everyone in the animation, cartoon and comic industry to have good drawing skills. But your interpretation of good drawing skills will differ from that of someone else.
Someone may reach a certain point in their artistic education (and there's only so much you can get from a college course) and think, 'There. I am now ready to turn this into a career.' From that point forward they will begin setting their 'style' in cement.
How are good drawing skills developed in general? Incessant life drawing? Constant experimentation with a pencil in your own free time?
I've been drawing for a while, however not as stolidly as I would have liked. Otherwise I feel like I'm forcing myself. So how does one develop good drawing skills? A stupid question to be asking at this point, possibly.
When in one's drawing career/hobby can they decide to take their art in a distinct direction? It can't be good to force yourself to develop a style.
- Sant Arellano said...
Well.. even if anime is limited in detail and design, do you have any hope for it, John? Have you seen any interesting things coming out from Japan involving animation?
Also, I like all youre doing for us young animators, learning from people that didn't had anything to reference from the medium. I hate the idea of living under the shadow of WB, MGM, Disney, etc.. Thats why I think its important to use animation only as inspiration.
Are there any contemporary artists, animators, or cartoonists that you like?
- PCUnfunny said...
John I really think would like LUPIN III, it's like James Bond but cartoony. Here's a clip. Sorry I couldn't find a better dub.
- Brian B said...
Well said John, I guess I can see how it can get confusing for some, but it's exactly right. Retaining the principles that were developed that worked in animation's golden age, and adding something new/natural/specific to it should be something everyone reaches for.
It's like the grade school game where the teacher asks you to describe an object and you do it really thoroughly. Then she says pass it on, describe it to a classmate. And you do. You desribe it to the next person. Only the message gets more dilluted as it's passed on, and your original spin you put on itin your description or your personal feelings on the object is rehashed in lesser form. Loses it's meaning as well as the base description of the object
Anyway, it's simple, but it really can't be stressed enough if we're ever getting originality in this field again.
- gabriel valles said...
A good exercise that I use often is to compare my drawings or character designs to some of the great cartoonist of the past. Like Roy Nelson, Russell Patterson, Vernon Grant, Milt Gross and a number of others. If you do this you will instantly see all the shortcomings of your own drawing. If you think your drawing is still good you may be blinded by what I call "Arrogant Amaturism". I think you truly become a professional when you can pick out the faults in your own work.
To break out of your "Arrogant Amaturism" do yourself a favor and subscribe to CartoonRetro.com. Plug! Plug! There you can see how this stuff is supposed to be done and you will become a better artist for it.
- JohnK said...
Why the heck would someone who "isnt funny" and doesn't like funny cartoons wanna hang around here and argue with those who do?
"Anime is Japan's Cal Arts "
dang, spot on!
why do people think Anime is the savior of modern Animation? i love a lot of it, manga included, but it all is, at the core, the same.
i'd rather set aside my ego and learn to draw properly. there's nothing wrong with that. i believe we SHOULD go back to our roots and learn why we were seduced by cartoons in the first place. experimentation and "style" just for progress' sake dilutes the artform.
- PCUnfunny said...
"I think you truly become a professional when you can pick out the faults in your own work."
Exactly.Every time I get better by copying drawings from 40's cartoons,I look at my previous stuff and realize how much it sucks.
- This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
A lot of cartoon art I see today seems to be built solely around the artists lack of skill. So much of it looks flat and stiff, and not by choice! They're using a graphic style as a crutch or a way to mask their poor abilities. In effect, their 'style' is more like a summary of their weaknesses rather than a demonstration of skill and command over the medium.
- Benjamin De Schrijver said...
John: you replied in the wrong thread ;-)
I never said I didn't like funny. I love funny. But I wouldn't be able to create funny myself. I don't feel a personal need to either. Doesn't mean I don't love to watch and analyze it. Plus, I'd be stupid not to hang around here. Solid drawing is solid drawing, no matter what type of story you try to support. Even though I don't always agree with some of your opinions, I've learned tons from this blog, and even only the fact that you challenge the status quo has made me think about what I want to do and how I should go about it, instead of just doing what others have done before me. I mentioned that I want to be true to myself with what I do, and that's what you're doing, only in your case it's creating funny cartoons. And in order to be true to yourself, you need the skills to back that up, and this is one of the resources I'm learning that from.
Art: I would never say anime is the savior of modern animation. I just feel a few of them are doing certain things better than us, and I think it's worth noticing.
- SlashHalen said...
I completely understand what you mean when you say to not run away and make your own style. And I know it's best to train and practice doing art from classic cartoons. My only problem is being able to draw those cartoons exactly. I even sometimes have the hardest time just drawing off of a model sheet. Sometimes I feel I just can't do it.
Then again, I did only just start doing art, and nothing is perfect. But it still pisses me off when I try to draw Tom and he doesn't look exactly how he should or how I want.
It's not so much that his head is tilted to far back, or to far forward, or his thumb is bent just a centameter to much, or his ass is just a LITTLE BIT to fat. I don't care if his head is tilted just the tiniest, you would never really tell, bit forward or backward. Get or it.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that no mater how much you try.... or I try, you can never really copy the originals. You might be able to make it better or worse (Some people like Bob Dylin's Knocking on Heavens door, some like the Guns N Roses version better), But it's never exact. How many people have tried painting there own version of Da Vinci's Last Supper? How many people perfer Da Vinci's over the others?
Of course, practice makes perfect, and I gots a lot of practice to do.
- Stephen Worth said...
For the past couple of years, John has been incredibly generous, sharing his knowledge with young artists via his blog. He consistently defines his terms and provides clear examples to help folks understand his points. He's provided a million references to artists to study. He's even put together a course on drawing for animation to help young artists develop the skills they need. But still people continue to argue over silly stuff.
If you have acquired the experience and frame of reference to look back over the past 100 years of cartooning, it will be painfully obvious to you where we stand today. The need for better draftsmanship and a higher level of thought will be self evident to you. The very best of today can't even hold a candle to the average of the past. That's a fact.
You can hope and pray that John will say something nice about Anime or CGI or whatever current stuff you're a fan of, but it isn't going to happen unless the stuff you're a fan of stands up to the best of the past. (Odds are, it doesn't.) It's not a matter of personal taste or preference. John has a clear set of criteria for judging what he sees. He doesn't make excuses for lack of skill. If it's poorly drawn and badly planned and executed, he's going to call it that way.
I keep seeing people linking to their own work asking John to take a look at it. There is only one way for that to have a positive outcome. You have to have the skills John is talking about. If you are a cartoonist and you read this blog to learn, you had damn well better be doing the exercises in the Preston Blair book. If you aren't bothering to do the work and you're still here arguing, you are wasting everyone else's time. Once you've done the work, THEN you've earned the right to have an opinion.
The internet offers young cartoonists an unprecidented opportunity to learn from the top talents in the artform. These comments are your opportunity to ask questions and learn. But use the opportunity wisely. This isn't just another "Sonic The Hedgehog Fan Forum" where you troll for internet battles.
You're being judged by your comments. (Yes, spelling counts.)
See ya
- Stephen Worth said...
Gabriel Valles,
Would you consider donating high resolution scans of some of the things on your blog to the ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive? Drop me an email if you get a chance.
- elephantmarchblog said...
The thing is John, I think the average animator (I can only speak for myself, of course), agree with most of what your saying.
All the stuff about specific poses and expressions, learning drawing skills as opposed to depending on cheap style tricks. All the examples of older art that should be rightfully studied.
The problem, as I see it, is that your preaching to the choir.
We can all agree and disagree with you till our lungs implode , the problem is getting the "business" men to agree with you; people with no passion but who can afford to pay for all this. And whether or not our slanders of them are warranted, they are unlikely to go along with us on anything we're saying if all we can do is Knee-jerk them whenever we don't like there decisions.
When you put up some posts on how to sway (or more often trick) the business men into letting us apply all of these principals, then I think you'll truly be doing something to revolutionize the industry....
- pinkboi said...
The problem is bad stylistic tricks make it so easy for someone who lacks talent (or who has it but is just lazy) to feel a sense of accomplishment when in fact he made nothing new or noteworthy. When there is an easy and bad path, the good and difficult path is less likely to be taken. It's basic animal psychology
- T' said...
John, there's a common saying in English classes regarding creative writing: "show don't tell." I wonder, if you have the time, if you could show us your designs for the some or all of the Disney/Pixar characters you went through in the last post to better show us what you mean in regards to good design? Even one or two of them, say Pinocchio or Peter Pan would really help illustrate your point. And perhaps then show us why those designs would not only work better, but would connect more closely with an audience. For me, at least, it would go a lot farther towards making your point. Thanks.
- Ryan G. said...
Hey, lets stop talking about Anime. Most of us are here to learn and absorb things about animation, not the lack there of.
- elephantmarchblog said...
I would be happy to describe Remy's personality:
He's the non-degenerate version of you.
He's a snob and an outraged artist, but he's not so self-deluded he needs to go around knee-jerking everyone to make a point. Not every character should be an over-articulate snob like Brad Bird, but not every character should be a sadistic, debased loser with no attention span either. A character doesn't need to be manic and obnoxious to have a personality.
"Straight" characters can be funny and interesting. They are funny when they a frustrated by all the anarchy and stupidity surrounding them; as we all often feel when we have to be the voice of reason. That's what Kermit's personality is, and he's perfectly attainable and interesting. He's reserved to be certain, but we can see him writhing as he tries to keep himself reserved; thats what makes the "bland lead" funny.
Bird's characters have class and tact. Trait's you no doubt see as bland because you cannot relate to them in anyway whatsoever.
I like most of your stuff, but theres more to the human condition (and to life) then bitterness and anarchy.
- Gibbs Rainock said...
I've been showing this post off to a few of my artist friends and have gotten mixed opinions. Most people have gotten very defensive over their favorite characters and won't bother reading the post all the way through. I think it's important that we do experiment and break out of a bland lead mold. Mickey Mouse; as much as I love to see his animation and the line quality in wich he is drawn, his personality is a little bland. Mickey is nowhere near as interesting as Donald or Goofy. After a brief discussion with a friend of mine about this, it was mentioned that even in his blandness, a bland character can still provide a crucial role. It is to make the character broad and general enough to appeal to a larger audience. The viewer can more easily put themselves in the main characters shoes. But then you have a character like Popeye who is very entertaining, and has no ounce of bland.
- chris said...
John, what are your opinions of the Famous Artist Cartoon Course as a means to achieve the type of cartooning foundations you value?
- Tibby said...
I have been reading all the stuff you've been saying and absorbing it all as valuable lessons. Some of the things you have called out I disagree with, but others totally make sense. Although I hold Don Bluth in very high regard and I disagree with you when you go off on how "boring" Disney-esque styles are. Disney has a right to make what it does and they where the ones who invented most of the techniques many animators must learn to be able to do what they do. Sometimes to please the audience, you have to make "bland" run-of-the-mill heroes and heroines. Of course I totally agree that Disney has gotten too washed down by corporatization and marketing BS over the years. They like to do what it "safe". Something that hopefully will not get them sued and the general audience expects that. They don't understand psyco-dramas of Ren flipping out in psychotic episodes or stuff like that. They want something simple, cute (and safe) for the kids, and easy to watch.
I happen to appreciate Anime very much. Not all of it, and yes .. .I am aware that they like to use "stock emoticons" and such. The ones I am watching now - Pani Poni Dash, Ghost in the Shell, and especially Akira are absolutely brilliant. Go rent yourself a copy of Akira John ... and watch it and try to understand the brilliance and skill of it. Akira is the most highly acclaimed Anime feature film on the market in the US. Has been for years. And no - it's not a WB style cartoon with falling anvils and and dog slapping chickens. It's a serious and very intellectual story and super awesome piece of art. I know that bores you to death Mr. K - but really, not everything has to be a silly WB short with 1 shot jokes and silly pratfalls all the time. Sometimes serious and adult, and beautiful contemporary art styles are refreshing.
If the person making all the noise is who I think it is. Don't take it too personally Mr. K, he's usually very ... adamant, when he has a challenging point to get across. I've been thru it too ;)
Here is a flash animation I made, a simple walk cycle.
Walk bit
I talk about my thoughts on Flash animation in my comments area. You should think about posting your art on DeviantART Mr. K. There are some studios and animation ppl on DA, like from Ed, Edd, and Eddy ppl and Frederator and such. If you want to see lots of different stuff, get up on there! The ppl will love you and you get live feedback. It's really good, especialy if you are an established, high end artist.
- gabriel valles said...
I wasn't sure if those un-funny comments were directed at me or not but I'll clarify just incase.
I did sound kind of like a jerk. Sorry, I wrote it kind of a hurry. When I said "you" I didn't mean "you". I just realized it does sound that way. I guess in my mind I was picturing all the young artist I've meet that think they know everything and have a lot of "style" but ten years later haven't grown much as the ones with the "Arrogant Amateurism". I wish I could edit it somehow.(if you can feel free to nix it and I'll try to be more clear.) I was actually agreeing with you on using the greats of cartooning for inspiration and how by comparing ones art to them is a good way to expose ones own faults. I guess I should have said it that way the first time.
If you were directing those comments to me I'll have to work on being funny:D
Sorry for the plug gone bad Shane.
- Emmett said...
I agree with everything Tibby said.
If I may chime in, animation should be able to portray and express anything. I believe that if animation needs more of anything, it is risk. Whether it be a huge risk or a small risk, it still adds something new. Be it risky content, a most unusual story, an over-the-top art direction, it still gives a freshness to the overall product.
And I agree. Not everything can be a Warner Brothers cartoon (even though I would like to see more of it). We are all entitled to our opinions. Mr. K has given us some excellent tips on how to keep animation fluid and expressive.
But nothing can stop someone from being inspired to animated by Disney, or any so-called bland films.
- PCUnfunny said...
T':John has already illustrated his points by posting drawings of various 40's toons that have life such as Bugs and Daffy.
- Zaide said...
What's all this I keep hearing about "limitations" of animation? By nature animation is limitless. The problem is another "L" word, laziness. So, defined facial features are supposedly imposible for the modern animator... where was it that hard work and fine art lost synonymity with animation? If quality is impossible, especially when it comes to distinguishing features, personality, and identity, how can someone like Bill Plympton manage in the majority of his shorts? Is it because production limitations and time restraints only apply to heartless multinational corporations and the greedy individuals to whom such processes have become method? Maybe he is a true artist, not in the game for money and fame (although the later has become unavoidable), but the creation, not production, of art. For those of you who believe that John Smith in Disney's Pocahontas is as detailed as a man's face can get in an animated film and that facial STRUCTURE is impossible, I strongly recommend that you seek out Bill Plympton's "Your Face" and redefine your limitations. Better yet, think of each frame not as a limitation or difficulty, but as a portrait which you shall breathe life into and complete for the marvel of one's self and those about. Maybe study fine art and how even Stimpy at his worst qualifies to greater measure than whatever critically acclaimed travesty Disney releases. Here's a fun exercise, take the best picture of Bugs Bunny you can find and hold it next to the Mona Lisa. Which one is art? Which one is more appealing? The answers, for those of you consulting textbooks in a ritualistically masochistic fashion are, they're both art, but, no offence to da Vinci, Bugs Bunny is far more attractive, vibrant, and fun, and, dare I say it, human. What so many of you (both here on the comment line and more professionally) seem to miss is that in any art, you're supposed to create UPON the work set before you.
What is to animate? Literally, it means to bring to life. Countless moments have I spent wishing that a "character" had remained dead. Art is about passion, something that apparently has been forgotten. What a beautiful thing it would be if each and every one who reads this becomes passionate about their art again. What a wonderful revolution it would be. I, for one have been inspired by the hurling excuses and the falsehoods of limitation. When you all were children, did you not watch cartoons and think, "This is magic"? I have wonderful news, it is magic. Anything can be accomplished regardless of a pre-existing method. The artist dwelling within you knows this to be true. If one must conform to survive, sobeit, every artist knows that creativity isn't where the money is, but one must not live to work, but work to live. Repressing creativity will only lead to brilliant independent art, free of any employer. When talent again becomes socially acceptable, what a renaissance we shall witness.
- Operation GutterBall said...
Here's some kinetic fun stuff hope it doesn't put you to sleep!:
- Jake Thomas said...
Could you go into more depth on,
"Clampett encouraged his artists each to draw in their own way and bring their own creative ideas to the design, personality and movement of the cartoons. Avery started doing that in the mid 40s and for a decade or so we had some very individualistic cartoons that didn't follow the "rules" and "style" of animated cartoons."
You said they had the artists bring their own creative ideas to the design and personality, but how exactly? The characters, like Bugs Bunny, though animated differently by different animators is still "on -model". But you also say on-model is bad. Do you mean strictly on model is bad and that drawing on model is good but only when the artist has input on the different facial expressions and things made by the character rather then having to follow a pre-made and approved chart of mouths and such the animator is then allowed to draw?
- R. Banuelos said...
One of the things that all the old good animators agreed on was that you have to be a good draftsmen to be a good animator. You must understand everything in this world that is right. How to draw something in a natural way, style just happens it's not something you work on. It's reflected through your drawings, so in this respect you should never practice "style" simply because you can't. Certain style can and should be learned but not over the basic priniciples. It's very hard to make interesting basic drawings, this is the designer. It's easy to see a "flat" drawing and think, I can do that. The Fairly Odd parents are all about that. It's not revolutionary to draw different, very talented artist have been doing that before we were born. But they were very talented. John wishes for artist to learn how to draw well, in a natural "boring" way. It's not bland, it's natural. It makes sense to have equal porportions, and perfect perspective, and nice round features, Volume and shape. That's the natural way to do things, so we think of it as bland because it's everyday. El Tigre is bland because it's full of bad drawings and bad layout, not to mention reusing the same drawing throughout the whole cartoon.
Everyone stop mentioning Anime too, it has nothing to do with the topic. John's not attacking Animation, he just want to have more "real" cartoons on the air. Something that truley shows the best talent doing the most entertaining drawings. WB cartoons were entertaining and had the best animators doing the most entertaining drawings they could. Every aspect of those cartoons were about pleasing the audience. Today's market for cartoons want to have the most creative talents being completely lazy and redrawing the same drawing over and over again. Why? Because executives don't think people will see that Homer is still Homer if he isn't exactly how they saw him before. They believe that people are stupid and want the same drawing over and over again. I defy anyone to point out a modern cartoon series where a community disscuses individual directors, animators, and muscians. WB has all of this because they did it right. And no, not just the WB cartoons, but a slew of others as well. No one gets taught to draw real well in animation school because everyone wants to do Family Guy and Simpsons. When I was at school, animation had a big reputation for being lazy. I didn't get it, it seemed as though we should have been the most active. We're doing more and learning deeper concepts.
One more thing then I'm off the soap box. If you have a car that can do 100mph (I don't know the Canadian conversion) why do 20mph on the freeway? Animation is limitless in what it can produce, it can go beyond live action. Why stay with Fosters Home and School of 3000? There are talented artist, why not pay them for doing their best? Ren and Stimpy has personality in the drawings and you can tell the directors apart. I don't think it's by coincidence that John made a cartoon so well that it changed modern cartoons, just like the WB changed what cartoons were. John knows what he's talking about, why argue with that? If you think he's wrong about Anime or anything else then don't listen to him. But since we all respect the man and knows what he does is right, then we all got to shut up more and practice what he wants us to if we want to animate and draw better. By the way I've been working on my Bugs. It looks like shit but I'm gonna keep working on him. I would be interested if John would like to see some Bugs animation by his (I guess) students. I don't know what else to call us. Maybe Losers?
- Benjamin De Schrijver said...
Stephen: I am incredibly greatful to John for his generosity, and I'm definitly slowly reaping the benifits from it. And I do have a pretty good idea about where I stand, which is not far (especially in the drawing dept.). I've never tried to show my work to John because I know I'm simply not there yet. I won't pray John will ever like anime, but if he had the time, I would love him to go more indepth into certain aspects of it (I definitly understand why he calls it the japanese CalArts, and I agree, but there's a slightly wider range over there, and Mind Game certainly isn't your average anime). If not, ah well. I'm already glad he talked about their use of color in the past. I agree todays artists don't measure op to those of 50 years ago, and agree the 60s-90s were much more average than the times before. But that doesn't mean there's nothing to learn in those periods either. John himself has learned from it. I AM doing the work, and still have a long way to go, but I'm just not taking the cartoonist's path, rather my own path. More about film and the illustrator-type draftsman. You're not judging me by my comments, you're judging me by your assumptions of how the comment came about. Letting spelling count is silly. One, English is my second language, and two, if you're writing a comment on a blog, you're not going to spellcheck the way you would when writing a letter.
Saying you have to do the work before you can have an opinion is just plain illogical. For one, I've been perfectly able to back up my opinion, and have not seen any specific counter-argument. Two, if that were true, John wouldn't be where he is today. If he wasn't allowed to have an opinion before he did the work, he'd never have been able to pick the stuff he likes to learn from it. I believe John himself has mentioned that you should look at the artists you admire and try to learn from them.
I'm not trolling for internet battles. On the contrary, I'm trying to have an intelligent discussion about things. Nor am I wasting anyone's time but my own by writing these comments, as anyone who reads my name or the word "anime" or "japanese" can decide to skip the comment. John can decide not to reply to our comments.
I absolutely agree with the people saying that animation should be able to portray and express anything. I have very different goals from John, but many of the basic skills needed, such as drawing, are universal, and that's why I'm here and occasionally engaging in a discussion. I'd like to think that discussions are most definitly a way to learn.
Tibby: Do I know you or have you seen me around the net somewhere before? I know I'm an opinioned person, but whenever I engage in discussions, on- or offline, I'll always back my ideas up. Doesn't mean I'm adamant. Just recently I had a great discussion with a friend who's a veteran of film, theatre and opera, about the value of filmschool in a time where so much is available online and on DVD. Even Guillermo Del Toro mentioned that DVD's are the best filmschool for students today. Well, after an hour or so of discussion, my friend was able to completely throw around my opinion. That's the reason why I engage in discussions like these: other people have different opinions, and you can always learn from their insights.
Anyhow, since it was so kindly requested, I'll try to stop wasting everyone's time. Bye.
PS: Gabriel, don't worry. The unfunny comment was about me. I wrote about that in the previous thread.
- T' said...
pcunfunny: That's not what I meant. Those characters (Bugs, Daffy) are comedic ones. There are plenty of good examples of comedic characters that work. The post before this was specifically about the hero character, a dramatic leading role. What I'd like to see are John's principles of character design applied to these kinds of characters so we can better see how character design can be broadened in the ways John has said. It's fine to note that a lot of the Disney heroes are bland but without seeing how they could be made less so, the point of how to fix this is not as clear.
- JohnK said...
The way to fix it is to let someone who is good at creating distinct characters create the characters, instead of just letting any old executive or animator copy what has already been done.
- Clint said...
The decadence mentioned is so excepted now in art and other modern forms that it is hard for most of us to distinguish. I think it takes a while to recognize it much less work against it.
It is like trying to tell someone why fast food is not good, why most manufactured products are cheap, or why political correctness kills people. It comes off as cynical and snobbery, but unfortunately it is true.
There was a huge decline in quality in the last century that we are still suffering from. That lack of progress is decadence.
The rebellion to technique(learned ability) goes back as far as just after World War I with literature, art and music, but it really reaches its last usefulness in the 50's and just declines into a factory minimalism from then on. The rebellion against technique became decadence and laziness - and during that time no one bothered to teach us techniques everyone had learned to disdain.
We started with painters who knew how to draw and paint discovering new forms like cubism. (Useful and not decadent) And then we became artists who did not know how to draw and paint faking new art movements that involved peeing in jars, then lying about how great it is (not useful and stupid).
In the past couple decades there has been a growing surge of folks who want to know how things were done before the 'Modern' flood. The next cycle of rebellion hopefully will pull us out of the "do what you want" theory to the "learn how to do it and then do what you want" standard.
Then maybe schools will actually start teaching something useful. (I'm just kidding - that's not going to happen.)
These pre-decadent techniques are not the only way to do things. It's not the only style or even THE style. But to discard them for as long as we have is absurd. Any true progress should include influences learned and taught in the past, otherwise it isn't progress. A lot of what we have today isn't even part of the original rebellion - it is just a mush of pre-chewed chemical chips that we force others to admire through the threat of ridicule because we lack the learnable skills to accomplish what was done 60 years ago.
Epilogue (concerning animation)
Most animation today does suck because it lacks style and individuality, and even worse - overall humor. Its like sugar cereal - pretty and tastes good but you will die if you try to live off of it. Some Japanese animation is really good - but most is horrible. Same goes with most of what is on Cartoon Network and over 3-Dized films like Shriek. There is no individuality - because the companies funding these things want to make money and individuality is scary. (Individuality is a financial risk. Why try a new interesting dish when the same old gruel is making me money?) The 'Modern' flood works well for folks making production decisions -- they can feed the audience whatever they will eat. And right now we are mostly eating cardboard. (I am not kidding - our friends in China are making food with cardboard and we are eating it.)
- Stephen Worth said...
You won't learn anything from John unless you sit down and do the exercises he gives you. It's not good enough to just read his blog and not apply it to your drawing. Words alone won't make you a better artist. You're always ready for lesson one. Start at the beginning of John's drawing course and post your results. That's the way to learn from him.
I looked at the life drawing on your site, and I will be posting a resource for you today at the archive site that will help you if you use it. It's a book on drawing the human figure by Willy Pogany. You can find it at your local art store, right alongside the Preston Blair book.
You can't do quick gesture drawings until you've mastered the solid, careful construction of anatomy in studied life drawing. It's putting the cart before the horse to do quick sketches before you can draw at all. This isn't magical stuff that just flows out of your pencil. It requires hard work and lots of thought. Get the basics down first.
Set aside the keyboard and pick up the pencil for a while. Work on your basic drawing skills. That's my advice.
See ya
- Raff said...
>> I'd like to see are John's principles of character design applied to these kinds of characters so we can better see how character design can be broadened <<
Me too. Show it with the pencil once in a while. Sure a bunch of people will disagree with the result and say so, but it'll interesting to see demonstrations every now and again. "Flat." (original pic) "Not flat." (redrawn) "Bland" (original) "Not bland." etc.
- C. A. M. Thompson said...
I think combining the point that animation owes a lot to Messmer with your point about inbreeding was a little distracting.
I think the point is that the principles developed for 40's animation are really functional for animation. Skilled artists were able to create a lot of variety within this system. But if you look at some of modern animation "styles" there are things that do not serve a function, people are just doing it because the guy before them was doing it or because it's their "style".
One thing I think people need to realize is that you can vary the proportions of the tubes and balls and flour sacks these characters are constructed out of if you want more interesting characters and variety. They don't all have to use the same construction and proportions as the seven dwarfs. Look at characters like Popeye and Olive Oyl.
- JohnK said...
>>>> I'd like to see are John's principles of character design applied to these kinds of characters so we can better see how character design can be broadened <<<<
If the character doesn't have a personality in the first place, there isn't much to inspire a specific design.
It has to be all or nothing.
- Benjamin De Schrijver said...
Stephen: I actually have done some of the exercises he gave, but granted, not all, nor very often. I'm getting lots of opposite drawing advice from different places and people, and from looking at different draftsmen I admire and trying to find how they work, and am starting to believe there is no one way of drawing. Some construct, some kind of trace their imagination. Some do both, depending on the drawing. I'm trying to find my own way. Those lifedrawings were from the first exercices of a book called "The Natural Way To Draw" by Kimon Nicolaides (I've read somewhere Chuck Jones learned from it, but I don't know the truth behind that), and this book has definitly helped me progress. They're pretty old though, and I've definitly improved since. Whatever way you draw though, I feel the main principles are the same, so I try to always consider them while drawing (eg. construction, though I might not always draw the simple shape), and have made a list of as much drawing principles as possible I could find on this blog and Mark Kennedy's blog sevencamels.blogspot.com. Once I've "finished" the drawing I look at the drawing with a critical eye, and try to find what principles I missed, and where the drawing needs improvement. Looking forward to your archive post!
- Jim Rockford said...
"Anime is Japan's Cal Arts"
You hit the bullseye!
Anime all features the same lifeless stiff movement,generic stock expressions and design cliches.AND ITS NOT FUNNY!
It's like they are still working off the model sheets from Speed Racer. I dont see any creativity too it.
I am baffled at the grip it has on todays generation,but then again we live in a society that things 200" chrome spinning wheels with rubber band tires looks cool!
- Dooley said...
> 200" chrome spinning wheels with rubber band tires <
That would be hilarious. Monster truck sized rims on a tiny car with actual rubber bands for tires. And the looney tunes 'rubber band' song playing as this monstrosity makes its way down the street:
- Jim Rockford said...
"If you have acquired the experience and frame of reference to look back over the past 100 years of cartooning, it will be painfully obvious to you where we stand today. The need for better draftsmanship and a higher level of thought will be self evident to you. The very best of today can't even hold a candle to the average of the past. That's a fact."
Great response Mr.Worth!No truer words were ever spoken and you summed it all up so eloquently too!
I admire John K's conviction to this often maligned artform.
The fact he devotes so much of his time and incredible knowledge to these priceless lessons and insights which he offers us FREE on this blog...all in the hopes of inspiring future cartoonists to return to the inspired,funny,creative,entertaining cartoons we once had in the past speak volumes for his passion for this artform.
I couldnt agree with you more when you say that our "best" today cant compare to the "average" of our past.
Sadly this spills over into all aspects of todays life.cars and products are poorly designed and ugly,music is crap,and we dont have any real actors or comedians anymore.
Where are the Jackie Gleasons or 3 Stooges of todays society?..all this amazing talent we had in the past and the suddenly after the 60's its for the most part all gone!
I am glad John is honest about his opinions on things...he's almost always right!
- PCUnfunny said...
Benjamin: "The Natural Way To Draw" was,according to animator Emery Hawkins,nothing but gesture darwings. You'll never how to draw using that book.
- PCUnfunny said...
Jim: I think if you watch Lupin III,the secound series to be exact, you will find many cartoony drawings.
- Tibby said...
While this topic brings up Cal-Arts:
Mr. K would you like to elaborate in some finer details on what you think the "Cal-Arts" style is? You toss this term around very much and I don't have any idea what you are talking about. I've been to the school's website and viewed some of the student galleries and I saw some pretty awesome stuff. Why does you put down this school so much? I never went there, I don't even live in California so I have no idea of refference of what John K is griping about when he says it is a typical "Cal-Arts" style. Many students probably spent a butt load of money and 4+ years learning stuff there. To have their efforts and artwork shot down like that from someone they consider to be a Pro, hurts a lot. If you John K, REALLY want to make a change on what you percieve as this bad style - then you should go there and become a teacher there full time. Instead of snarking about it in your blog like you do to the rest of your clique of animator buddies from Spumco. What is typical "Cal-Arts" style? Define it in your terms so we all get a clearer idea of what you are constantly ranting about. Tell us what you percieve it is what it is and why you lump so many artists and animators into this category.
- JohnK said...
Cal Arts style is Disney, Bluth, Pixar
pretty recognizable style to cartoonists who don't draw in it.
- cemenTIMental said...
Why the heck would someone who "isnt funny" and doesn't like funny cartoons wanna hang around here and argue with those who do?
Dunno, (and don't think anyone here actually fits that description really) but some people like funny cartoons AND serious animation.
It's possible to love Marx Bros films but also love Tarkovsky films, so why is it not OK to love warner brothers films but also Akira, or any number of great animated 'art' films from around the world?
Anime is Japan's Cal Arts
That doesn't really make sense, but that's because the word 'anime' has been used in such a way that it now doesn't really have a meaning at all. Obviously there are many styles of animation in Japan, even within "anime style". Equally obviously there are cliches and derivative stuff in the majority of mainstream Japanese animation like anywhere else, and definitely just about the worst thing western animators can do is to copy the surface gloss of "anime style" while ignoring all the actually good things about the best Japanese animation...


text:
A Bloomfield woman has been arrested on suspicion of embezzling more than $800,000 from a La Plata County man.
Mary Torres, 62, was being held Wednesday in the La Plata County jail on suspicion of felony theft, said Trish Hutchens, investigator with the Durango Police Department. Her bail was set at $25,500.
Torres served as a court-appointed conservator assigned to oversee the trust of Tony Simon Archuleta, a lifelong Durango resident who was left the money by his father. In reviewing his case, the courts raised questions about particular checks, Hutchens said. The court asked that an independent review be conducted, which revealed hundreds of thousands of dollars missing, she said.
The court notified the police department, which obtained a search warrant for Torres house in Bloomfield. Working with the San Juan County Sheriffs Office, authorities arrested Torres on Friday.
The thefts occurred from 2007 through 2012, Hutchens said.
The case remains under investigation.
Were just at the tip of the iceberg, and we dont know where this case is going to go, Hutchens said.
Forensic auditors are expected to review the case and help determine if more charges should be filed.
Its a very complex case, she said. Were charging what we can prove right now.
The 6th Judicial District Attorneys Office also must review the case to determine whether formal charges will be filed.
It is unclear exactly why Torres was appointed conservator of the estate, but Archuleta was known to Durango police, who had contact with him in connection with public intoxication and causing a disturbance at his former home near East Sixth Avenue and College Drive. He has since moved outside city limits.
His father, Salomon Archuleta, who is deceased, owned several pieces of real estate in downtown Durango and throughout the county.
He also made money from natural-gas and oil royalties.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Please choose your arrival date.
Similar Properties
Reported breakdowns of amenities will be repaired ASAP;condition of amenities cannot be guaranteed 100% of the time.
View: Gulf Front
Area: Orange Beach
Apx Sq Foot: 1100
Bedrooms: 2
Sleeps: 8
Nightly Rate: Choose Date
Weekly Rate: Choose Date
Monthly Rate: Choose Date
Apx Sq Foot: 1392
Bedrooms: 3
Sleeps: 10
26802 Perdido Beach BlvdOrange Beach, AL 36561-3169
View Full Size Map (new window)


text:
Red-Winged Blackbird Comforters
Full: 79" X 79" ($119.99)
Our lightweight, warm Comforters induce sweet, sweet sleep - and take your bedding to the next level. Designs are printed onto the super-soft material for brilliant images and a dreamy, premium feel.
- Available in King, Queen, Full, Twin and Twin XL sizes
- Crafted with 100% premium microfiber polyester
- Lined with fluffy, lightweight polyfill
- Machine washable with cold water on gentle
Share art, get paid. Join our Affiliate Program and earn money just by recommending products.
Shop this artwork
About this artwork
Minimalist bird illustrations
0 Comments0 Promoters
Leave a comment
Shop all from this artist
More from this artist
Verified member since 1970
About Society6 Comforters
Made to order
Each Society6 product is individually printed and assembled when you order it, so please allow 3-5 days manufacture time for your custom product.
No-hassle returns
We want you to be stoked with your purchase, so if you're not, let us know. We offer a 100% Happiness Guarantee, which means free refunds and exchanges.
Every purchase pays an artist
Society6 artists live all over the world, and every purchase puts money right in their pockets. We've been helping artists do what they love since 2009.


text:
- Consumers
- Licensing and Education
- Regulated Entities
- Anti-Fraud Unit
- Public Information
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
OKLAHOMA CITY - Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner John D. Doak plans to ask the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) to invest in Shared Emergency Response Vehicles (SERVEs) for education and disaster response.
"These vehicles are a great way for the NAIC to highlight the benefits of state-based regulation and would show a true commitment to consumer education and assistance," said Doak. "Taking state-based educational opportunities across the United States and meeting consumers in their own community would be a defining moment for the NAIC."
Each custom-made vehicle, modeled after units currently in use by many insurance companies, would have seven workstations, a small conference room, a secure wireless modem, a flat-screen monitor, satellite phones and charging stations. Commissioner Doak's proposal includes stationing the vehicles across the country and deploying them to disaster-stricken areas when needed.
"We were able to borrow one of these vehicles after the Moore tornado," said Doak "It was vital to the success of the Insurance Village. It allowed us to issue identification badges to adjusters, meet with consumers and keep in touch with other state agencies. Oklahoma isn't alone when it comes to disasters. The Northeast had Superstorm Sandy, California experienced ferocious wildfires and we've seen devastating tornadoes in Joplin, Tuscaloosa, Hattiesburg and many more. These threats aren't going away. The NAIC needs to be prepared to respond in the best way possible."
When not deployed to a disaster zone, the units would be available for educational events such as health fairs, state fairs, Medicare enrollment events, severe weather preparedness events, visits to schools and universities and more. The SERVEs could also be sent to state capitols to promote state-based regulation.
"The NAIC has the ability to take care of consumers with this new, innovative assistance tool," said Doak. "This is also a great opportunity to partner with the industry, which has already discovered the many benefits of a rapid response vehicle."
Commissioner Doak believes, that with the NAIC's current net assets topping $100 million, now is the time for the NAIC to focus on a domestic brand identity and promote state-based consumer education and disaster assistance.
"The NAIC needs to follow the lead of the industry, which has been using disaster response vehicles very successfully for years," said Doak. "The NAIC should serve consumers when they need help the most. That effort will pay huge dividends for the NAIC by promoting the benefits of state-based regulation."
If Commissioner Doak's proposal is approved, the vehicles would be purchased with NAIC funds in 2015.
The NAIC is the U.S. standard-setting and regulatory support organization created and governed by the chief insurance regulators from the 50 states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories. Through the NAIC, state insurance regulators establish standards and best practices, conduct peer review, and coordinate their regulatory oversight.
About the Oklahoma Insurance Department
The Oklahoma Insurance Department, an agency of the State of Oklahoma, is responsible for the education and protection of the insurance-buying public and for oversight of the insurance industry in the state.
For more information contact:
Kelly Collins
(405) 522-0683


text:
Due to a high number of influenza cases and our concern for the health of our patients, visitors, and staff at Jackson General Hospital, the hospital is imposing restrictions on patient visitation effective immediately.
Due to a high number of influenza cases and our concern for the health of our patients, visitors, and staff at Jackson General Hospital, JGH is imposing the following restrictions on patient visitation effective immediately. 1. No visitors under the age of 16 will be permitted. 2. No one who is elderly, or has a compromised immune system should visit patients. 3. If you currently have or are being treated for an acute illness such as bronchitis, influenza, or other respiratory symptoms, we ask you to delay visitation until your symptoms have resolved. 4. Anyone coming into the hospital with flu or cold symptoms should wear a mask. 5. Visitors should cover their cough (cough or sneeze into your sleeve). 6. Visitors to patients in isolation rooms will be required to wear personal protective equipment such as a gown, gloves, and a mask. 7. Visitors and patients should wash their hands frequently with soap and water or use hand sanitizer, 8. Consider limiting gifts, flowers, and other personal items brought for the patient. 9. Visiting hours will be enforced You may call 372-2731 extension 1700 with visitation inquiries. Thank you for your cooperation during this time. This policy will allow us to provide a proper environment of care for our patients and help protect our visitors and employees.


text:
Blog: Louise Nevelson, Dream House XLIII (1973) and Untitled (c. early 1980s)
The art conservation practice Caryatid Conservation Services, Inc., based in Miami, Florida, will soon begin treatment of two sculptures by Louise Nevelson, Dream House XLIII (1973) and Untitled (c. early 1980s), in the collection of the Pérez Art Museum Miami (formerly the Miami Art Museum). The Museum has been awarded a Bank of America Art Conservation Project Grant, which will support the treatment and the production of a documentary film about the project by The M Network. A blog series will describe the project, as it evolves.This weekly blog will run on Wednesdays this summer and feature guest bloggers from the Pérez Art Museum Miami (PAMM), Caryatid Conservation, The M Network and ARTEX Fine Art Services. In presenting the perspectives of scholars, conservators, film makers, and shippers, detailed windows will open onto the specialized work of those involved in this project.


text:
Organic Olive Picking, Pressing for Olive Oil, Curing Olives, 22-24 November 2013
Join us this olive picking season and learn how to pick olives, make organic extra virgin olive oil and cure organic Kalamata olives. A visit to a local olive press, hot soups, fireplace and board games along with strolls in the vibrant nature of our farm.
Our olives are almost ripe so you can come down and help us pick them. Bring your smiles and we will do the rest!
The harvest weekend will include:
- Breakfast & Lunch on Saturday & Sunday
- BBQ on Saturday night
- Two nights stay at Eumelia
- Organic meals
- Tour of Eumelia
4 people sharing a house, (housing and meals) X 2 nights = 100 euro per person
*Other housing prices if you wish to have a house to yourself or share with less people.
Contact information:
For participation & information on Eumelia Organic Agrotourism Farm & Guest House please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.com, www.eumelia.com & +306959004747 or +302130369814


text:
Media tagged as 'map'
BOLDS: Map of specimen collection locations for Yamagishiella
TrustedAdd to a collection
EOL content is automatically assembled from many different content providers. As a result, from time to time you may find pages on EOL that are confusing.
To request an improvement, please leave a comment on the page. Thank you!


text:
Slow Your Roll Bath Mat
Mat Size
The perfect Bath Mats: fuzzy, foamy and finely enhanced with brilliant art. Featuring a soft, quick-dry microfiber surface, memory foam cushion and skid-proof backing. Time to lose that ratty shower rug and update your bathroom.
- Available in two sizes
- Soft, fuzzy microfiber surface
- Memory foam cushioning
- Skid-proof backing
- Machine wash on gentle cycle, hang dry
Share art, get paid. Join our Affiliate Program and earn money just by recommending products.
Shop this artwork
About this artwork
0 Comments0 Promoters
Leave a comment
Shop all from this artist
More from this artist
Verified member since 1970
About Society6 Bath Mats
Made to order
Each Society6 product is individually printed and assembled when you order it, so please allow 3-5 days manufacture time for your custom product.
No-hassle returns
We want you to be stoked with your purchase, so if you're not, let us know. We offer a 100% Happiness Guarantee, which means free refunds and exchanges.
Every purchase pays an artist
Society6 artists live all over the world, and every purchase puts money right in their pockets. We've been helping artists do what they love since 2009.


text:
lil' belle fuzzy flyaway vest - burgandy
lil' belle fuzzy flyaway vest - burgandy
Regular: $36.00
soft, great for layering, and has pockets!
100% polyester
Order Processing & Shipping:
shopBelleBoutique.com accepts Visa, Mastercard, Discover, American Express and PayPal.
We ship to the United States. We are not able to deliver to APO/FPO addresses, Canada or International Countries. Be sure to include the correct shipping address at checkout.
Customer Service Hours:
Monday - Friday 10am - 5pm
How is my order shipped and what are my shipping fees?
shopBelleBoutique.com uses USPS as our preferred shipping carrier. Standard delivery time is 3-7 business days from the time your order is confirmed and leaves our warehouse. If your order is under $30 it will be shipped USPS First Class Mail and if your order is over $30 it will be shipped USPS Priority Mail with a tracking number.
(Please note that delivery times do not include our 48-hour processing time or weekend delivery. Delivery times do not include Saturdays, Sundays or major holidays. Please be aware that holiday times may take longer than usual.)
What is the status of my order?
All orders made after 2:00 pm will not be processed until the following day. Please allow 2 business days for our processing period on all orders.
When your order has been placed you will receive an order confirmation email. When your item has shipped you will receive a delivery confirmation email. If you have chosen In-Store Pick Up, you will receive a confirmation email stating that your order has been completed when your item is ready for pickup. If any item is out of stock you will be refunded for that item only and will receive an additional email with the refund information. Please allow 2-5 business days for your refund to be completed.
You can check the status of your order anytime by logging into your account at shopBelleBoutique.com.
Make sure to add us, firstname.lastname@example.com, to your contact list to insure the confirmation and tracking emails arrive to your inbox.
Return Policy:
Download Belle - women.kids.gifts RETURN FORM
You must use the RETURN FORM to make any returns to shopBelleBoutique.com.
- - All returns MUST be made within 30 days of the original shipping date.
- - All items MUST be returned in their original, unwashed, unworn, undamaged and smoke-free condition.
- - All items MUST be returned with the original tags attached and must meet all return requirements, if not you will be subject to a restock fee of up to 50% of the original item that will be taken off the refund issued as a store credit only.
- - All Jewelry is a FINAL SALE
- - All SALE ITEMS are a FINAL SALE this includes item included in FLASH SALES AND PROMOTIONS
- - All DAMAGED ITEMS MUST be reported within 3 days of receiving shipment or they are not eligible to return
- - Gift Cards and E-Certificates are a FINAL SALE and may not be returned for a refund or exchange
- - Shoes must be in the original shoe box when returned. Please be sure to package them safely so they arrive undamaged or they will not be accepted as a return and will be returned to you
- - If you receive a damaged item, it must be reported within 3 days of receiving your package and prior to being worn or washed with the original tags still attached. If item is worn or washed it is not eligible for return
- - If you want to exchange your item for a different size, you will receive your store credit only after the item has been returned to shopBelleBoutique.com, however, we cannot guarantee that at the time we receive your return the item you want will still be available.
- - Please allow up to 2 business days for all replies on customer service inquiries.
- If you cancel your order after you have completed it online, you MUST call or email customer service within 24 hours of placing your order. You will be charged a restock fee of 20% of your purchase to do so. This will be deducted from the amount of your original purchase before the refund is made, please allow 5-7 business days for your refund. If you would like to receive Store Credit instead of a refund, you must specify at the time of cancellation
-Please allow up to 2 business days for all replies on customer service inquiries.
Instructions for Returning an Item:
1. Please be sure that your item meets the return policy requirements. If it does not and is returned to shopBelleBoutique.com you will be charged an additional shipping fee to have it returned to you. Items that DO NOT meet the requirements will NOT be accepted.
2. Download and complete the RETURN FORM for the items you are returning.
3. Return items in packaging as they were received to protect them and you include the RETURN FORM and send to:
Belle - women.kids.gifts
Online Returns
3511 SE J Street Suite 5
Bentonville, Arkansas 72712
*Be sure to use a trackable return method when sending your package back to us. When we receive your package it may take up to 5-7 business days to process. You will be notified via email when the return is complete and store credit has been applied to your account.
*Please note that the Return Label is not pre-paid, therefore, you will be responsible for the return shipping cost. In addition, return shipping is non-refundable; unless you received damaged, defective or wrong item(s).
Providing a safe and secure online shopping experience is very important to us at ShopBelleBoutique.com. When you make a purchase with ShopBelleBoutique.com your personal information collected is used to complete your order. All financial information we collect from our customers is secured by our systems and is not shared or rented for any reason. We do not sell or share your information with outside companies or third parties. We take your security very personally, so please be reassured that all measures to secure our site have been made. All orders are processed using SSL (secure socket layer) technology. SSL is the ultimate in industry-standard authentication and encryption technology to protect all of your purchases We strongly encourage you to sign-up for our e-mailing list. These emails provide you with advanced notice of store sales, new merchandise, and other store-related events. But, of course, you have the freedom to add or remove your name from our list at any time. Your credit card is completely safe.
Information Sharing:
ShopBelleBoutique.com is committed to the privacy and security of our customers. All information collected in the checkout process is secure and kept confidential. ShopBelleBoutique.com must reserve the right to provide personal information to any Court of Law, Government Agency, or Law Enforcement Agency when an authorized Court request has been made. We feel this will further help enforce your safety for your internet shopping with us.
All sales made in the state of Arkansas will be taxed based on the current rate of the City & County in which you reside.
All sales outside the state of Arkansas will not be levied a sales tax.
You, as the consumer will be responsible for any and all sales tax specific to your city/county/state.


text:
- $29.99
20% off for Members: Get the Club Price
$ 23.99
FREE Shipping for Club Members
In this action film from Marvel, Thor, the son of Norse god Odin, watches over both mortals and immortals. Thor will also reign in Marvel's upcoming THE AVENGERS.
- Format: DVD
- Color Format: Color
- Genre: Action/Adventure
- Rating: PG-13 (MPAA)
- Release Date: September 2013
Related Categories:
Movies > Action/Adventure
Related Keywords:
Theatrical Release
More Details
"Anchored by a solid performance by Hopkins, who has said the story energized him, the Asgard sections are THOR's most substantial..." - 05/06/2011 Los Angeles Times
"Under Kenneth Branagh's direction, THOR has eye-popping special effects, strong performances and, perhaps most notably, 3-D technology put to good use." - 05/06/2011 USA Today
3 stars out of 5 -- "Branagh -- poised for a career comeback with this hybrid of Shakespearean style and summer spectacle -- offers a handsomely-mounted big-screen interpretation of the God of Thunder by way of Marvel Comics..." - 05/03/2011 Box Office
"It restores the innocence of big-budget superhero mythmaking....[THOR] has a stirring emotional core as well." -- Grade: A- - 05/13/2011 Entertainment Weekly
3 stars out of 4 -- "Directed by noted Shakespearean Kenneth Branagh with a class-act grasp of how action works best when it defines character....THOR comes on like thunder, delivering epic fireworks..." - 05/27/2011 Rolling Stone
"[A] magnificent thunderclap of a movie....The picture is grand in the Wagnerian sense, an opus orchestrated by a wild man wielding a movie camera instead of a baton." - 05/05/2011 Movieline
"Chris Hemsworth makes an imposing, good-humoured Thor..." - 07/01/2011 Sight and Sound
"Mr. Hemsworth is a commanding physical presence, and a likable one whenever he's given a chance..." - 06/01/2012 Wall Street Journal


text:
Great investment opportunity, 3 bedroom 1.5 baths in Florissant. The house does need updating and is sold as-is.
Listings displaying the MARIS logo are courtesy of the participants of Mid America Regional Information Systems Internet Data Exchange. IDX information is provided exclusively for consumers' personal, non-commercial use and may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties consumers may be interested in purchasing.
Copyright © 2018 Mid America Regional Information Systems.


text:
A baker by trade, young Sage Singer welcomes her time alone each night as she makes bread and pastries for the New Hampshire retreat center where she works. Self-conscious
A baker by trade, young Sage Singer welcomes her time alone each night as she makes bread and pastries for the New Hampshire retreat center where she works. Self-conscious about the scars on her face, she is in deep mourning over the death of her mother. She joins a grief support group where she meets Josef, a kindly 95-year-old retired teacher. They seem to have an instant rapport — enough so that soon Josef confides a horrific secret from his past and asks her to do him a terrible favor. Sage, her grandmother Minka, and Josef poignantly play out the moral dilemma they face in "The Storyteller," Jodi Picoult's new novel.
By the time Dara-Lynn Weiss' daughter Bea was 7, she was 30 pounds overweight. Since Bea was an otherwise healthy girl who ate mostly the right kinds of food and was active, Weiss knew she had to put her on a diet. In April 2012, she wrote an article for Vogue about their experiences. The public outcry was immediate and scathing. Weiss found herself severely criticized for both allowing Bea to become clinically obese and for putting the child on a diet. She writes of that time and how she helped Bea reach a healthy weight in "The Heavy: A Mother, a Daughter, a Diet" (618.923).
Imagine being paid to wander around the globe and then to write about it. William Least Heat-Moon has been doing that for more than 30 years and has several best sellers to show for it. His latest book, "Here, There, Elsewhere" (910.410), brings together many of the magazine articles he has written over the course of his three decades traveling back roads into the four corners of the earth.
Of all her children, it was her son, Ezekiel, who Lillian Cooper dreamed would break free from their small Southern town and share in a world she could only imagine. For a time it looked like he would do it, too, with his scholarship to the University of Virginia. But 20 years later, Ezekiel is living in a shack on her property — working at the local factory, divorced, estranged from his daughters, and still depressed over the drowning death of his twin brother 10 years earlier. In fact, Ezekiel is planning his own death — but his journey back to Charlottesville gives him an unexpectedly different view of life. Ezekiel and Lillian tell their compelling stories in "The Lost Saints of Tennessee," Amy Franklin-Willis' fine fiction debut.
While literature abounds with great lovers, there are always a fair number of flesh-and-blood men who seem to have their pick of women. So what makes a successful Lothario? Cultural historian Betsy Prioleau called on psychologists, social anthropologists, philosophers, Harlequin Romance editors, and many more to discover the secrets of men who make females "Swoon: Great Seducers and Why Women Love Them" (155.332).
The hero of Ron Currie Jr.'s, latest novel is a writer named Ron Currie. Still mourning his father's recent death, the fictional Ron has just gotten together with Emma, the woman he has loved for more than 20 years. Then everything seems to go bad. The newly divorced Emma decides she wants some space, so Ron goes to the Caribbean where his attempt at suicide fails. However, the accident he stages leaves everyone believing he is dead and the manuscript he leaves behind becomes an overnight sensation. So what happens when Ron eventually returns home alive and well? Currie has a great time — and you will too — in "Flimsy Little Plastic Miracles."
Other new titles:
Fiction — "The First Prophet: a Bishop Files Novel," by Kay Hooper;
"Grave Sight," by Charlaine Harris;
"Raised from the Ground," by Jose Saramago;
"Touch & Go," by Lisa Gardner.
Non-fiction — "When Doctors Don't Listen: How to Avoid Misdiagnoses and Unnecessary Tests" (610.696), by Leana Wen and Joshua Kosowsky.


text:
Bicycle Maintenance 101
This informative workshop will cover all of the basics that are needed to properly maintain your bicycle. We will discuss and demonstrate proper methods of lubricating your drivetrain, adjusting your brakes, properly maintaining your tires and all of the other tricks to keep you rolling around town. Feel free to bring your bicycle and we can discuss specific questions that you may have.
Learn more at https://www.pdx.edu/bikehub/workshops-events


text:
While this isn't exactly news to anyone that follows the mobile industry, Palm announced today what has been known for some time — Verizon will be receiving PalmOS devices this year. Starting January 25, Verizon will begin offering the Palm Pre Plus and the Palm Pixi Plus.
The added "Plus" comes from the fact that the Pre Plus now features 16GB of internal memory (up from 8GB on the original model; 15GB of which is user accessible) and a Palm Touchstone battery cover which was previously an optional accessory. The Palm Pixi Plus on the other hand, bring Wi-Fi to the table — a feature that wasn't available on the original Palm Pixi.
"The Palm experience is all about helping our customers stay connected so they never miss a thing," said Palm CEO Jon Rubinstein. "We're constantly enriching this experience with new features and innovations. The Verizon Wireless launch of Pre Plus and Pixi Plus is the next phase in delivering this unique Palm experience to more people."
Another new addition offered up by Palm today is the new Palm Mobile Hotspot webOS app. The app, which is available from the Palm App Catalog, allows Verizon customers to share their 3G connection with up to five other Wi-Fi enabled devices.
The addition of two webOS devices to Verizon's network brings a well-balanced smartphone portfolio to Verizon's network. The company already has two competent Android-based smartphones with the Motorola Droid and the Droid Eris. The wireless company will also be getting its own CDMA version of Google's Nexus One in the spring. And if all of the planets align, Verizon could possibly land a fourth generation iPhone which would make its smartphone lineup a force to be reckoned with.