text:
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Your Christ is my Devil (10-18-11)
What is so despicable about the judicial system Scott and I faced and still fight is that it borrows the righteous credibility of God's righteousness buy follows the tenets of the devil. Christians foolishly allow themselves to be duped by the profession of righteousness and presume in their ignorance that God's will is being performed. I tell you the fact by the knowledge of Christ, The true Christ, that our judicial system is akin to witchcraft and none who practice its art can know the Lord. If they profess a relationship with Christ their Christ is the devil of the true gospel.
I have had friends and I will use that term loosely who have studied the word of God with me. Yet when the institutions of law merely make the cursory claims of God's authority they ignore the witness they have of me and condemn me as unjust. This is the work of the devil and true Christian love cannot practice it. So when you make the profession of Christ I am not easily moved and I will judge you by whose report you believe before I call you brother.
As for the judicial system it has made an enemy with Christ in me. I have no fear of the quantity or the size of the giants God throws at my rock. They will be defeated as Goliath because the true Christ of the gospel is more than a conjurer and is not deceived by the devil's false righteousness.
As to the battles I face I do not grow weary and have always seen the victory inherent in Christ. So if you cannot understand my determination against or contempt for all things labeled lawful fear not it is easily understood: Christ is my devil.
159 comments:
- persistancepays said...
Well, tomorrow is March 2, the day that Clif High/webbots says that event will begin cuminating what will turn out to be something that will have a greater impact on the population than 9/11 did.
Well see what happens.
And rember, tomorrow is not the big day, but the BEGINNING of the chain of events that will have a HUGE impact on everybody.
Is is the beginning of WWIII?
Is the the final collapse of the banking sytem?
Is it Berry Baals HYPEs finally payout?
Is it ????? (fill-in)
- persistancepays said...
Oh, and amlost forgot...
Is it the DG finally taste the stale mints??
- persistancepays said...
also, re: the eye rack dinner.
there was a 1/2 page ad selling dinners in the USA TODAY n/paper
it was on page c-2
have never seen an ad in the USA/T paper before!
- brassbird said...
- brassbird said...
my questions, my answers:
did kurt and scott take a great strike at the roots of banking? yes
did they encounter the rotten breath of "the court"? yes
are they, as the whole world is, on the treadmill of the need for
"money"? yes
was "money" their goal? no
was their goal selfish? no
am i wishing they could have been
successfull? ur dam rite
are they crammed into a stinking
govt pen, suffering? yes
is their effort forgotten? NO
- persistancepays said...
the iraq dinar ad was on page b-2 of the USA TODAY newspaper for march 1
sorry fo da tipo.
- mogel007 said...
There might be some redress for the Dorean Group here:
- persistancepays said...
good stuff there, only prolem is that this mibmo jomboh doesnt work in a crupt cort.
da jugs jus ignore it.
just axe scam kendy about it.
- mogel007 said...
Bella Homes about to bite the dust:
- mogel007 said...
ABC news slamming "sovereign citizens":
- judge allslop said...
On March 5,2012 while the media remembers the day Rush apologized for calling someone a slut and Republican candidates ignored the wave of history to bullshit about birth control, historians will look back on the day America gave up on its experiment with unalienable rights, rights that are natural, not given, rights independent of governments, what our Declaration explained to an unsure forming nation as "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." And that is the saddest part of a very sad day the majority of Americans "the consent of the governed" seemingly do not care what Holder said, and are even now bleating on internet forums about the need to kill more "terrorists", adding terrified, empty justifications to Holder's clever Newspeak. We did not have our freedom taken from us, we gave it away.
- OMO said...
Define "consent of the governed". Does it mean individual consent? It should. Without individual consent, no one is governed.
- Joseph said...
Excellent read.
Foreclosure Defense manual:
- Joseph said...
BEST PURCHASE MONEY LOAN FOR BUYING HOME OR BUYING COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. If you are a dorean group client, and your credit is ruined due to losing your home, don't despair.
It is a 105% loan - house has to appraise for 100% of purchase price, loan amount is 105%. With the 5%, you can pay your own closing costs and use the rest to go on vacation, replace carpet, that kind of stuff -- or -- if the seller will pay closing costs, you can do whatever you want with the entire 5%.
The closing costs and HUD (settlement) statement will look pretty much like any other HUD statement- no hidden fees -- but there won't be any loan origination because the purchaser pays that up-front. The up-front processing fee is $3,500. If for any reason you don't get the loan, you get $3,000 of that back. No one should ever NOT qualify - unless you are not forthcoming about your debt and your income. Once you submit proof of income and proof of debt, a loan commitment letter will be sent back in 4 business days. Although loan commitment takes place in 4 days, it can take up to 60 days to close, because the loans are bundled in multi-million dollar increments for the investors who buy the loans and it can take 60 days to bring that amount up to the investor's minimum.
That $3,500 is for anything from a $25,000 loan (the minimum loan) to $500,000. Above that, the fee goes up:
Fees for residential & commercial purchases
$3,500: $25,000-$500,000
$5,000: $501,000-$1,000,000
$7,500: $1,001,000-$1,500,000
$10,000: $1,501,000-$5,000,000
Above $5 million: contact your Rep
The loan approval is based entirely on debt to income -- credit score has ZERO impact.
The interest rate is a fixed 4.99% amortized over 30 years, so no need to refinance in a few years.
Although the 4.99% is higher than an FHA loan, there is no 3.5% down payment, no 1.75% up-front FHA fee which is added to the loan, and, because there is no PMI like FHA, the payment on the same amount of money is actually less through this program than it is through an FHA loan. For more info, contact me:
- OMO said...
Excellent read.
Foreclosure Defense manual:
oh my...
quiet title actions, applicable state laws, bankruptcy,
a whole lot of work for a whole lot of fraud..
- OMO said...
Legislative jurisdiction is the zip code. Try filing documents in court without a zip code. The court clerks will insert one if you don't give one. Even if you scream and shout at the fraudsters working in the court that zip codes are voluntary- they will tell you otherwise- they are not voluntary. They have no legislative jurisdiction to take your house without zip code. Try it for yourself and see.
- OMO said...
I have filed Notice of Venue, Notice of Venue opposing Venue, Notice of Venue opposing Service of Summons to no avail. They insist on sending you their fraudulent documents with zip codes.
- OMO said...
If you are sued, the only documents the court will acknowledge are documents they are required by their codes or court rules to acknowledge- like documents you may want to respond to that the plaintiff filed-- but only in their legislative format-- no common law format, and especially not common law documents without zip codes!
- OMO said...
If you are a defendant you can forget about trying to get the plaintiff to play by your rules. Plaintiff sets the rules of the game for the judge and the defendant.
It is possible to win a mortgage case in a common law court based on fraud alone-- but only by becoming the plaintiff.
Here's a quote from the book For the Love of (what passes for) MONEY by Dan Gentry
"Regarding a person's alleged obligation toward commercial bankers, on fraudulent loans/bonds, the answer is obvious. You must accuse the commercial banks of fraud to dissolve the contract. Don't worry about the police powers, for theirs is an equally stiff judgment for the "accessories after the fact" to a crime. Your complaint may include these charges."
- OMO said...
And don't forget to leave zip codes off your documents notifying the court clerks of same.
- Joseph said...
OMO said: "It is possible to win a mortgage case in a common law court based on fraud alone-- but only by becoming the plaintiff."
That statement above is simply not true.
In the case below the homeowner was the Defendant and got the foreclosure tossed out.
Florida Judge tosses foreclosure lawsuit
Homeowners dispute who owns mortgage
by Steve Patterson
St. Augustine Record
June 15, 2010
Changing stories about who owns a mortgage and seemingly fresh evidence from a long-closed bank led a judge to throw out a foreclosure lawsuit. It's the second time in as many months that Circuit Judge J. Michael Traynor has dismissed with prejudice a foreclosure case where homeowners disputed who owns the mortgage. Lawyers representing New York-based M&T Bank gave three separate accounts of the ownership, with documentation that kept changing.
"The court has been misled by the plaintiff from the beginning," the judge wrote in his order. He added that documents filed by M&T's lawyers seemed to contradict each other and "have changed as needed to benefit the plaintiff."
The latest account was that Wells Fargo owned the note, and M&T was a servicer, a company paid to handle payments and other responsibilities tied to a mortgage. To believe that, the judge wrote, the "plaintiff is asking the court to ignore the documents filed in the first two complaints." He added that Wells Fargo can still sue on its own, if it has evidence that it owns the mortgage.
More and more foreclosure cases are being argued on shaky evidence, said James Kowalski, a Jacksonville attorney who represented homeowners Lisa and Larry Smith in the fight over their oceanfront home. "I think it's very representative of what the banks and their lawyers are currently doing in court," Kowalski said.
He said lawyers bringing the lawsuits are often pressed by their clients to close the cases quickly. But it's up to lawyers to present solid evidence and arguments. "We are supposed to be better than that," Kowalski said. "We are supposed to be officers of the court."
- Joseph said...
Legislative jurisdiction is the zip code.
That's nonsense too.
- Joseph said...
Foreclosure Fraud Settlement Docs Finally Released
The foreclosure fraud settlement has been filed in federal court in Washington. The Justice Department has provided the relevant documents, over a month after the settlement was announced. So now we can finally begin to assess the settlement and what it will mean for housing policy.
It's going to take a while. The documents are long and the rules dense. I don't expect to get a handle on it for the next several days. But we can make some quick points.
First of all, as we've been documenting, these are larger releases from liability than at first contemplated. It's not just a "robo-signing" settlement. Among the elements released in the settlement include foreclosure fraud, numerous instances of varied servicer abuse, violations of the Service members Civil Relief Act, whistleblower claims of fraud in HAMP, origination errors, false documentation in court, violations of the False Claims Act, appraisal fraud at Countrywide, fair lending violations, underwriting inaccuracies on FHA loans, and more. Here's just one list from the complaint of servicing abuses found by the government:
a. failing to timely and accurately apply payments made by borrowers and failing to maintain accurate account statements;
b. charging excessive or improper fees for default-related services;
c. failing to properly oversee third party vendors involved in servicing activities on behalf of the Banks;
d. imposing force-placed insurance without properly notifying the borrowers and when borrowers already had adequate coverage;
e. providing borrowers false or misleading information in response to borrower complaints; and
f. failing to maintain appropriate staffing, training, and quality control systems.
- OMO said...
That's nonsense too.
Prove it.
- OMO said...
In the case below the homeowner was the Defendant and got the foreclosure tossed out.
Defendant most likely had a lawyer. I'm talking about defendants without lawyers. Lawyers don't file common law documents, like a Notice of Venue or Affidavit of Facts Opposing Venue, for their clients.
You are too ignorant on this subject to talk about it.
- Joseph said...
If the court ignored all of these documents, I might as well too. That's all the proof I need. Your own words proved everything I need to know to show it's all nonsense. LOL
The proof is up to you. Show one victory in the courts showing this stuff works. If it doesn't work, it's not worth my time.
- Joseph said...
Foreclosure Defense manual:
This guy is not a lawyer, and he got his foreclosure overturned and title back to his house and did it as a defendant.
You said:
"It is possible to win a mortgage case in a common law court based on fraud alone-- but only by becoming the plaintiff."
So where in that statement are you referring to defendants ONLY REPRESENTING BY AN ATTORNEY?
Not only do you expect me to be a mind reader, but you also think I am ignorant on this subject.
I think you are the one that ignorantly makes blanket statements and nonsense that carries no water.
You make a general statement, and all I have to do is find one exception to your statement to prove it false, which I have, yet you are the accusatory one that say I am the "ignorant one." LOL
Maybe you were in the wrong zipcode to understand what I was talking about.
- Joseph said...
Legislative jurisdiction is the zip code or "judicial jurisdiction" is the zip code?
Which are you talking about?
- OMO said...
The proof is up to you. Show one victory in the courts showing this stuff works. If it doesn't work, it's not worth my time.
I have proof that common law documents don't work in legislative courts. Most people are programmed legislative subjects and don't know the first thing of common law, so case victories are very rare.
- OMO said...
Legislative jurisdiction is the zip code or "judicial jurisdiction" is the zip code?
Which are you talking about?
Zip code is legislative jurisdiction.
Ms. Jane Doe
Ninth Judicial District
100 Liberty Street
Freedom City, California
- Joseph said...
You said: "a whole lot of work for a whole lot of fraud.."
Not really. You just need to prove "lack of standing" by the Plaintiff to get a foreclosure thrown out.
But then again, that shows your mentality, you are looking for a "silver bullet" with no hard work.
Good luck with that in overturning a mortgage foreclosure and putting little work into it and little work in understanding the lender's fraud.
- OMO said...
Zip code is legislative jurisdiction.
Ms. Jane Doe
Ninth Judicial District
100 Liberty Street
Freedom City, California
Actually, there is no such thing as legislative jurisdiction.
All jurisdiction is common law or not at all.
- Joseph said...
So if you live in a specific zip code, but don't acknowledge a zip code nor do you put a zip code on your documents, you are not subject to the rules or laws of the courts?
Then you say that you can't get a foreclosure overturned unless you are represented by an attorney or are a plaintiff in the case, or in other words, THERE ARE NO SUCH THING AS PRO SE VICTORIES PERIOD, yet you also say that attorneys don't file these common law documents, but you insinuate that it is important to understand the veracity & power of these common law documents in order to win a case or get a case dismissed, EVEN THOUGH YOU CAN'T CITE EVEN ONE CASE WHERE THIS HAS WORKED. You want me to disprove your silver bullet which is nothing more than a legal theory.
You say that Kurt & Scott were foolish for not having an attorney to represent them, yet you aspire to the silver bullet in documents that can and are only filed by a non-attorney. You keep changing sides that suit what you really believe is the most strategic strategy in a court.
For example you believe Kurt & Scott lost and were convicted because they didn't have an attorney representing them and you look down at them for creating their own defense. You say they were their worst enemies by doing this & were foolish to do so, yet now you espouse that these unconventional documents be filed to overturn the court which can only be filed by a non-attorney because attorneys don't file these documents.
Sorry, but I can't wrap my head around this nonsense and your inconsistencies in your beliefs and hypocritical judgments.
If I was alleged of commmitting a crime, I wouldn't want you to be in my jury pool. I couldn't count on you being fair.
- Joseph said...
All jurisdiction is common law or not at all.
The Judge in my traffic court citation, which I'm told is a "criminal court", didn't buy any of my common law argument at all. I presented the idea, of no harm, no foul, no injured party, no crime, but some say that these courts are commercial or admiralty law courts which are governed and decided upon by just statutes, and not common law. I brought common law issues into the court. The Judge & State Prosecuting Attorney and even my Public defender both mocked and laughed at my arguments & summarily disregarded all of them.
Maybe if I pleaded I lived in a different zipcode on another planet, maybe that would have worked, pleading I was in fact an extra terrestrial & then told the court to prove otherwise?
- OMO said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- OMO said...
You win some, you lose some.
The government is gambler. The entire monetary system is a gamble. They are gambling on the fact that you will never learn anything but their way of doing things.
This is deep subject and I am not going to try to teach it to you.
- OMO said...
Affidavit of Facts Opposing Pretended Summons/Complaint [in part]
In RE: Improper Process of Service / Fatally defective complaint
Case No. _____________
That I, John Doe, being first duly sworn, depose and say and declare by my signature that the following facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and information.
Plain Statement of Facts
1 My given name is John Doe, and I am acting in propria persona, in the instant affidavit;
3 My permanent place of abode is:
John Doe
Ninth Judicial District
100 Liberty Blvd
Freedom Town , California
4 I am of lawful age and otherwise competent to testify and verify the instant affidavit, and I am not made incompetent to testify under any guardianship, power of attorney or agency of another, nor am I made incompetent to testify by any such similar contrivance; and,
5 I have made California my permanent place of abode for approximately 10 years, and during that time I have made ______________ county my permanent place of abode and therefore I am a citizen thereon and,
6 I am not now, nor have I ever knowingly been, a citizen, subject inhabitant or resident of the regional district State of California or United States of America or District of Columbia, its subordinate territories, or property appertaining to, or a citizen within the meaning of the 14th Amendment, in either a legal or factual sense; and,
7 I never, knowingly or voluntarily entered into any personal, public or private agreement, contract, stipulation, account or similar civil contrivance (either implied or direct) with the plaintiff ________________ or its predecessors in interest, within the regional district State of California or United States of America or the District of Columbia, its territories or insular possessions, or any agency or affiliate created or regulated by the statutes thereof; and
8 I am not a member of the armed forces; and,
9. I have no social security account or taxpayer/employer account numbers, driver license, or any other nexus with city, county, state or federal governments or their affiliates, never having applied for or received same with full disclosure and with my consent; and
10 I have deduced from the foregoing that I am not actually or constructively, a resident, citizen, subject or inhabitant of the regional district State of California or United States of America or regional District of Columbia, its subordinate territories, affiliates or property appertaining thereto, and that I am not an internal "person" or" "employer" or similar legal character, either of the regional district State of California or the Federal government as defined in the various State or Federal Revised Statutes; and,
11 It has also been, and still is, my intention to exercise my basic rights by whatever means are lawful within the American common law, as established by the Statute of 1776 and as restated in the Preamble to the Constitution for the United States of America (1787) and the California Constitution (1849); and,
"Indeed, no more than (affidavits) is necessary to make the prima facie case." United States v. Kis, 658 F.2d , 526, 536, (7th Cir. 1981: Cert Denied, 50 US L. W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982)
This affidavit is not interposed for the purpose of delay or for any other such purpose.
Subscribed and Affirmed on the county of ____________, state of California ____________, 2012.
John Doe
Under duress
- Joseph said...
This is where you are going to get tripped up & possibly even be charged with committing perjury:
I have no social security account or taxpayer/employer account numbers, driver license, or any other nexus with city, county, state or federal governments or their affiliates,
Why don't you teach me how you can put that in your complaint and get away with it? You mean to tell me that the first paragraph holds true in your case?
Is that what you are telling me that you have never been issued a drivers license or a SS#, and you've never voted or even used the postal system & that you currently don't hold any of these documents even now? I sincerely doubt that.
Isn't it kind of crazy to try and exist without those things? You can't even incorporate or get loans, or use any of those benefits either that can create wealth for you.
You just invite problems, and then you don't get any of the benefits of those privileges. How is that smart or even financially being responsible and clever?
- OMO said...
You left off the last part of the sentence where it says, "never having applied for or received same with full disclosure and with my consent." which is the reason I have no [valid] social security account or taxpayer/employer account number. So yes I have a social security number-- it's just that it is not valid and never will be valid, even while I continue to use it, because I never received same with full disclosure and with my consent. Get it now?
I have no social security account or taxpayer/employer account numbers, driver license, or any other nexus with city, county, state or federal governments or their affiliates,
- OMO said...
Wrap your mind around this one:
I am not an entity subject to service of process by any member of the California State Bar when said service's venue is within a legislative regional district.
The California State Bar Association's ("CSBA") jurisdiction is purely territorial or legislative, and does not extend within the boundaries of the state of California. When a member/ officer of the CSBA cannot establish a territorial or regional jurisdiction to serve process, such member / officer of the court, exceeds his/her authority if the process is served;
I am serving this Notice of Venue in order to inform your office that I, ___________, am not a citizen within the regional or legislative power of United States of America or District of Columbia or the regional district State of California.
Regarding the second paragraph above, what it is saying is that the State Bar's jurisdiction is purely legislative, which exists in the mind only. If you believe it, then it is so.
Common law has no Zip codes. Zip codes were created by the legislature for legislative agencies like State Bars.
- OMO said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- OMO said...
Actually I don't think the state bar was created by the legislature, but they do have permission from the legislature to use legislative codes, which are created by lawyers anyway.
If you look closely at the complaint most lawyers will never cite a code section giving the court in personam jurisdiction over the person but only over subject matter. They sometimes have the audacity not even to cite subject matter jurisdiction- and the courts let them get away it.
But all I am saying is that the courts and lawyers can't get away with half the stuff they do
- Joseph said...
Traffic Courts don't have jurisdiction since the case involves the State. When the State is involved in a court case, the jurisdiction must be the Supreme Court in Washington D.C:
Who knew?
Don't challenge the charge, challenge the jurisdiction of the traffic court to hear the matter. Then ask for a dismissal.
If the Judge doesn't grant that he is in violation of the federal constitution.
Then threaten to go after his bond to get him disbarred.
- Joseph said...
I never, knowingly or voluntarily entered into any personal, public or private agreement, contract, stipulation, account or similar civil contrivance (either implied or direct) with the plaintiff
I think by you signing the ticket agreeing to appear in court, you have just entered into a contract unknowingly but the court isn't going to care whether you are informed or not or whether they have disclosed all things to you,or not, that is business as usual as far as the court is concerned. I think by you entering a motion into the court, you may have also agreed to contract with the court, or even by entering into the courtroom passed the "bar" or even by taking an oath. They will tell you that ignorance of the laws & procedures is no excuse. They don't care. You're not going to argue nondisclosure & win.
You're going to have to just not sign anything, give them no I.D., or registration, nothing, and hope they don't falsely arrest you if you want to do what you are suggesting. False arrest is common place.
Here's an interesting story for you I listened to today. Listen to Jason's story that happened just last week, where he was falsely arrested. He's out of jail now after spending a week in jail for a false arrest & even spent a few days in the "hole". This guy kind of reminds me of Kurt. They both have the same tenacity and temperment, a knowledge of how the system works and the laws and are both large men, and will both go out of their way to help a brother or sister in need:
- OMO said...
The trouble begins and ends with the de facto Equity jurisdiction we are all forced to live under. Because the bank prints the money, they they think it is theirs. He who has the gold, makes the rules, and the rule of the banker is lex mercatoria or law merchant. The law merchant- it is the alien de facto Equity jurisdiction that allows judges to enforce the unlawful summonses of the IRS agents, Highway Patrol Officers, City policemen, Sheriffs, FDA agents and the agents of all other equally unlawful regulatory bodies of so-called government, who attempt to impose a jurisdiction in which the Rights of freeborn American individuals are unrecognized and violated.
The only way out is learn the common law where there are no judges to get in your way. Bill Thornton teaches this. 1215.org
- Joseph said...
Isaac is also not a fan of the way the Fed's current
stress tests, which are mandated under Dodd-Frank, are being
done. Since banks are required to capitalize on a
depression-era scenario, they either have to raise capital
or slow their growth or balance sheets, which he said many
are now doing. "What they're missing here is that when
you require banks to capitalize for a depression, it's
going to be awfully hard to get this economy moving," he
said. The new banking regulations have also lead to the
tightening of lending standards, despite the fact that banks
have a lot of excess capital right now. "Loan growth has
almost been non-existent for the past three years," he
said. "It's hurting the people who need the money the
most. It's hurting small business. I think it is impeding
economic growth."
- OMO said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- Joseph said...
Dodd Frank killing small banks
Community banks have a lot to fear from the Dodd-Frank
financial reforms, which could put half of them out of
business, former FDIC Chairman Bill Isaac said yesterday.
"The bigger banks can absorb it, the smaller banks
can't," Isaac, who is now chairman of Fifth Third
Bancorp, told Larry Kudlow. "I would not be surprised to
see half of the community banks in this country go out of
business if we don't give some relief from Dodd-Frank for
them." Earlier Wednesday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben
Bernanke said most of the provisions in the 2010 law were
aimed at the largest financial institutions and not
community banks.
- OMO said...
Get it through to your head that since the Federal Reserve prints the money, they think it is theirs. Since they think it is theirs they think they can make the rules how to get it back.
The money is not theirs! They stole it from us first, so it can never be theirs! We own them nothing!
- Joseph said...
Who prints money, the FED or the Treasury?
- OMO said...
Who prints money, the FED or the Treasury?
All money is printed and controlled by the FED. Not some of it. ALL of it.
The U.S. Congress is authorized to con MONEY. What is MONEY? Money is gold. The U.S. Congress or U.S. Treasury is NOT coining money. They are coining counterfeit money.
- OMO said...
GOLD. [Saxon; golud, riches, wealth] It is called gold in our English tongue either of geel, as Scaliger says, which is in Dutch to shine; or of another Dutch word, which is gelten, and signifies in Latin valere, in English to be of price or value: hence cometh their ordinary word gelt, for money. Peacham on Drawing
1. Gold is frequently found native, and very rarely in a state of ore, but is found most frequently among ore of silver. Native gold is seldom found pure, but has constantly silver with it, and very frequently copper. Gold dust, or native gold, in small masses of hard stone, often at the depth of a hundred and fifty fathoms in the mines of Peru. Pure gold is so fixed, that Boerhaave informs us of an ounce of it set in the eye of a glass furnace for two months, without losing a single gram. Hili on Fossels
Gold hath these natures: greatness of weight, closeness of parts, fixation, pliantness or softness, immunity from rust, and the color and tincture of yellow. Bacon's Nat. History
2. Money.
3. It is used for any thing pleasing or valuable.
- judge allslop said...
Who knows, It starts with Kurt and Scott and the next thing its the whole damn country thats fed up.
From: Z A N
JPMorgan Chase
Comment No: 57019
Date: 3/14/2012
Comment Text:
Dear CFTC Staff,
Hello, I am a current JPMorgan Chase employee. This is an open letter to all commissioners and regulators. I am emailing you today b/c I know of insider information that will be damning at best for JPMorgan Chase. I have decided to play the role of whistleblower b/c I no longer have faith and belief that what we are doing for society is bringing value to people. I am now under the opinion that we are actually putting hard working Americans unaware of what lays ahead at extreme market risk. This risk is unnecessary and will lead to wide-scale market collapse if not handled properly. With the release of Mr. Smith's open letter to Goldman, I too would like to set the record straight for JPM as well. I have seen the disruptive behavior of superiors and no longer can say that I look up to employees at the ED/MD level here at JPM. Their smug exuberance and arrogance permeates the air just as pungently as rotting vegetables. They all know too well of the backdoor crony connections they share intimately with elected officials and with other institutions. It is apparent in everything they do, from the meager attempts to manipulate LIBOR, therefore controlling how almost all derivatives are priced to the inherit and fraudulent commodities manipulation. They too may have one day stood for something in the past in the client-employee relationship. Does anyone in today's market really care about the protection of their client? From the ruthless and scandalous treatment of MF Global client asset funds to the excessive bonuses paid by companies with burgeoning liabilities. Yes, we at JPMorgan that are in the know are fearful of a cascading credit event being triggered in Greece as they have hidden derivatives in excess of $1 Trillion USD. We at JPMorgan own enough of these through counterparty risk and outright prop trading that our entire IB EDG space could be annihilated within a few short days. The last ten years has been market by inflexion point after inflexion point with the most notable coming in 2008 after the acquisition of Bear.I wish to remain anonymous as of now as fear of termination mounts from what I am about to reveal. Robert Gottlieb is not my real name; however he is a trader that is involved in a lawsuit for manipulative trading while working with JPMorgan Chase. He was acquired during our Bear Stearns acquisition and is known to be the notorious person shorting in the silver future market from his trading space, along with Blythe Masters, his IB Global boss. However, with that said, we are manipulating the silver futures market and playing a smaller (but still massively manipulative) role in manipulating the gold futures market. We have a little over a 25% (give or take a percentage) position in the short market for silver futures and by your definition this denotes a larger position than for speculative purposes or for hedging and is beyond the line of manipulation.
- judge allslop said...
On a side note, I do not work directly with accounts that would have been directly impacted by the MF Global fiasco but I have heard through other colleagues that we have involvement in the hiding of client assets from MF Global. This is another fraudulent effort on our part and constitutes theft. I urge you to forward that part of the investigation on to the respective authorities.
There is something else that you may find strange. During month-end December, we were all told by our managers that this was going to be a dismal year in terms of earnings and that we should not expect any bonuses or pay raises. Then come mid-late January it is made known that everyone received a pay raise and/or bonus, which is interesting b/c just a few weeks ago we were told that this was not likely and expected to be paid nothing in addition to base salary. January is right around the time we started increasing our short positions quite significantly again and this most recent crash in gold and silver during Bernanke's speech on February 29th is of notable importance, as we along with 4 other major institutions, orchestrated the violent $100 drop in Gold and subsequent drops in silver.
As regulators of the free people of this country, I ask you to uphold the most important job in the world right now. That job is judge and overseer of all that is justice in the most sensitive of commodity markets. There are many middle-income people that invest in the physical assets of silver, gold, as well as mining stocks that are being financially impacted in a negative way b/c of our unscrupulous shorts in the precious metals commodity sector. If you read the COT with intent you will find that commercials (even though we have no business being in the commercial sector, which should be reserved for companies that truly produce the metal) are net short by a long shot in not only silver, but gold.
It is rather surprising that what should be well known liabilities on our balance sheet have not erupted into wider scale scrutinization. I call all honest and courageous JPMorgan employees to step up and fight the cronyism and wide-scale manipulation by reporting the truth. We are only helping reality come to light therefore allowing a real valuation of our banking industry which will give investors a chance to properly adjust without being totally wiped out. I will be contacting a lawyer shortly about this matter, as I believe no other whistleblower at JPMorgan has come forward yet. Our deepest secrets lie within the hands of honest employees and can be revealed through honest regulators that are willing to take a look inside one of America's best kept secrets. Please do not allow this to turn into another Enron.
Kind Regards,
-The 1st Whistleblower of Many
- judge allslop said...
Whistleblower says BofA defrauded HAMP
(No shit,wanna see my surprise face)
NEW YORK, March 7 (Reuters) – Bank of America NA prevented homeowners from receiving mortgage-loan modifications under a federal program in order to avoid millions of dollars in losses while benefitting from financial incentives for participating in the program, according to a complaint unsealed in federal court Wednesday. The suit is the second whistleblower complaint unsealed so far with apparent ties to the $1 billion False Claims Act settlement announced by Bank of America and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York on February 9. The Bank of America settlement is also part of the sweeping $25 billion agreement reached between state and federal authorities. Final settlement documents have yet to be filed in the BoA settlement, which the U.S. Attorney's Office said was the largest ever False Claims Act payout related to mortgage fraud. The settlement resolved claims that Bank of America's Countywide Financial subsidiaries defrauded the Federal Housing Administration by inflating appraisals used for government-insured home loans, as well as claims involving the Home Affordable Modification Program, a federal program to help American homeowners facing foreclosure. The complaint unsealed Wednesday was filed by whistleblower
Gregory Mackler, a Colorado resident who said he worked
alongside Bank of America executives while an employee at Urban
Lending Solutions, a company to which Bank of America contracted
some of its HAMP work. While working at Urban Lending, Mackler said he saw BofA and its loan servicing subsidiary, BAC Homes Loans Servicing LP, implement "business practices designed to intentionally prevent scores of eligible homeowners from becoming eligible or staying
eligible for permanent HAMP modification." The bank and its agents routinely pretended to have lost homeowners' documents, failed to credit payments during trial modifications and intentionally misled homeowners about their eligibility for the program, the complaint alleged. BoA let through just enough HAMP modifications to avert suspicion and allay congressional critics, while not enough to incur any substantial losses to its own bottom line, according to the complaint.
"In other words, BoA has had it both ways. BoA has continued to maximize the value of its mortgage portfolio with anti-HAMP modification practices and managed to make money by committing fraud on homeowner," the lawsuit said.
A lawyer for Mackler could neither confirm nor deny that the complaint was tied to the settlement. A spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office and a representative for Bank of America declined to comment. In February, a whistleblower complaint was unsealed from Kyle Lagow, a former employee in a Countrywide appraisal unit which detailed allegations of Countrywide's "corrupt underwriting and appraisal process." Bank of America purchased Countywide in June 2008
Under the False Claims Act, successful whistleblower complaints can earn that whistleblower up to 25 percent of the
settlement amount.
According to the docket, the U.S. Department of Justice has until March 16 to decide whether to intervene in both the Mackler and Lagow case. The case is United States of America v. Bank of America NA et al., in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of NY.
- persistancepays said...
"Under the False Claims Act, successful whistleblower complaints can earn that whistleblower up to 25 percent of the
settlement amount.
theres no such thins as a free lunge.
after yo git yo munny, yo betta wash yo back, coss it could get dirry.
they will cum afta yo discreely.
yo no, all a sudden, he haft a hot attax.
- OMO said...
As far as traffic laws are concerned, I always obey them. I don't appreciate cops, so I do my best to avoid them by obeying the traffic signs. I've had my share of speeding tickets, suspended license tickets, no car insurance tickets, no inspection sticker tickets, broken lights (fix-it) tickets, AND my share of parking tickets! Having a car in the city is NOT worth it unless you've got a ton of money to throw away! I don't have a car anymore because the lying city district attorney and his buddy (the assistant district attorney) conspired with the city's towing contractor to steal it from me! And don't ask me how that happened! Long boring story.
I 'm very glad not to have a car anymore. All they want is your money! :)
I walk almost everywhere and have a great body to show for it! :)
- OMO said...
Oh, and I do have a driver license. I use it mainly for for cashing checks and nothing else. If a cop asks for an I.D., I tell them don't have one! It's none of their business!
- Joseph said...
"The mere refusal to give one's name and address does not justify the incarceration of a citizen."
Scott v. Feilschmidt, 182 N.W. 382, 348 (1921)
"Police officers are always free to approach citizens and question them, IF THEY ARE WILLING TO STAY AND LISTEN." U.S. v. O'Neal, 17 F3d 239 (8th Cir. 1994).
"When a police officer stops a moving vehicle FOR A BRIEF DETENTION, it is SUFFICIENT TO CONSTITUTE AN ARREST."
5 Am J2d, Arrest, Sec. 1, PG. 696
Officers are justified in arresting without warrant ONLY IN CASES OF FELONY AND BREACHES OF THE PEACE. This is elementary." Tillman v. Beard, 80 N.W. 248.
"All that is necessary to constitute "false imprisonment" is that the individual be restrained of his liberty without any sufficient legal cause by words or acts which he fears to disregard."
Panisko v. Drebelbis, 124 P.2d 997, 1000.
"Impudent, abusive or offensive language addressed to a peace officer DOES NOT LEND TO BREACH THE PEACE, even though it may provoke the officer to anger."
People v. Lukowsky, 159 N.Y.S. 599 (1916); Myers v. Collett, 268 P.2d 432,434 (1954).
- judge allslop said...
Just where do you think this is going?
"If you download potentially copyrighted software, videos or music, your Internet service provider (ISP) has been watching, and they're coming for you.
Specifically, they're coming for you on Thursday, July 12.
"That's the date when the nation's largest ISPs will all voluntarily implement a new anti-piracy plan that will engage network operators in the largest digital spying scheme in history, and see some users' bandwidth completely cut off until they sign an agreement saying they will not download copyrighted materials.
"Word of the start date has been largely kept secret since ISPs announced their plans last June.
"The deal was brokered by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), and coordinated by the Obama Administration. The same groups have weighed in heavily on controversial Internet policies around the world, with similar facilitation by the Obama's Administration's State Department.
- judge allslop said...
On March 6th, Robert Stanford was convicted in a Houston federal court on 13 out of 14 counts of fraud. The jury decision was delivered three years after Stanford defrauded 30,000 investors in 113 countries in a Ponzi scheme involving $7 billion in fraudulent high-interest certificates at the Stanford International Bank located in Antigua. The corporate media has accurately reported Stanford's use of the fraudulently obtained money (e.g., purchasing mansions, jets, yachts, million dollar condominiums). However, the corporate controlled media conspicuously failed to report that much of the stolen money went to bribing corrupt members of congress on both sides of the aisle as well as their parent political parties. The illegally obtained money was given to the likes of Barack Obama, William Nelson, John (crash) McCain, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. The mainstream media also failed to mention that both the Republican and Democratic political parties accepted this fraudulently obtained money as well. The court-appointed receiver tasked with returning the money to Stanford investors obtained a federal court order last June against five Democratic and Republican campaigns. Yet, despite the court order, the leadership of both parties has still not returned the money! The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee received nearly a million dollars. The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) has accepted almost a quarter of a million dollars of Stanford's ill-gotten gains. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee have received almost $200,000 of the stolen money. The Republican National Committee $130,000, and the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) has accepted $83,345." These facts indict the entire Democratic and Republican apparatus and they are unquestionably participants in a criminal enterprise system which is benefitting from the theft of investor monies in the same fashion as did ex-New Jersey Governor and Goldman Sachs executive, John Corzine, when he stole tens of millions of dollars from MF Global investors. Stanford used his influence, using the stolen money of his investors, to block two pieces of legislation which would have made it easier to prosecute this crook with millions of dollars on political campaigns donations. The two biggest recipients of the "donations" designed to stop this bill were Senator Bill Nelson (D) and John (crash) McCain (R). Other important Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee got checks from Stanford and the reform bill never got out of the Senate.
- OMO said...
New Obama Executive Order Seizes U.S. Infrastructure and Citizens for Military Preparedness
In a stunning move, on March 16, 2012, Barack Obama signed an Executive Order stating that the President and his specifically designated Secretaries now have the authority to commandeer all domestic U.S. resources including food and water. The EO also states that the President and his Secretaries have the authority to seize all transportation, energy, and infrastructure inside the United States as well as forcibly induct/draft American citizens into the military. The EO also contains a vague reference in regards to harnessing American citizens to fulfill "labor requirements" for the purposes of national defense.
Not only that, but the authority claimed inside the EO does not only apply to National Emergencies and times of war. It also applies in peacetime.
- OMO said...
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – Sunday, March 18, 2012
Contact: Terral Croft, firstname.lastname@example.com
Skype: Terral03
MARCH 22, 2012 EARTH AXIS WILL SHIFT FIVE INCHES WITH a NINE MAGNITUDE QUAKE EXPECTED in a PACIFIC OCEAN EVENT, WHEN EARTH PASSES THROUGH A GRAVITY TROUGH CONNECTING THE SUN AND an INBOUND HEAVY-MASS OBJECT
St. Petersburg, Florida – Our researchers have discovered a pattern of seismicity going back to 1965 that has transitioned into large magnitude events including Earth axis shifts on a regular 188-day cycle. The most-recent events include the February 27, 2010 8.8 event in Chile, the September 4, 2010 7.1 event at Christchurch, New Zealand, the September 15, 2011 7.3 event in Fiji and the March 11, 2011 9.0 Japan event. The next time-line event is expected to take place according to our calculations on March 22, 2012 at 4:58:34 UTC, when Earth will pass through the gravity trough connecting the Sun and a heavy-mass object (HMO) being tracked out of the Leo Constellation. The Earth axis is expected to shift five to six inches like the four-inch shift with Japan event and the three-inch shift with the Chile event.
Saturn is currently in the Virgo Constellation next door to the Leo Constellation where the ringed planet also passed between the Sun and this HMO to develop an extra ring and the super storm now raging in the northern hemisphere. The evidence indicates that Jupiter's liquefying core, Venus' slowing rotation with Mars' and Uranus' increased seismicity are all perturbations associated with our inbound HMO. The last time Saturn experienced this storm type was thirty years ago, when the planet passed between the Sun and Leo Constellation. Our team is also tracking the U.S. Government response to these threats, which includes Presidential, NASA, DHS and FEMA Preparations.
Our research team anticipates that HAARP multi-frequency wave signatures will begin transmitting on March 19, 2012 at 4:58:34 UTC precisely seventy two hours prior to the expected event. The team also expects to see increased four to six magnitude quake swarm activity at the 'event' location. Everyone living in or around a seismic area should be warned to brace for one of the top five seismic events in recorded history on March 22, 2012 right around the equinox.
- persistancepays said...
look leek da sheet stot to hits the fans now, eh??
it 2012 like yo sayed.
funny ho noone bleef me when yo sayed it over 5 yis ago??
yo bleef yo now??
start to make yo piece with gord.
yo gonna nedd all da peaces dat yo cant get.
- persistancepays said...
you gut yo sizzers reddy??
maybe yo want to go to da bobber and let him cunt yo hare?
lots of ppls be gong to get a haircunt soon.
Thus, as anticipated by LEAP/E2020, the handling of the "Greek crisis" (9) has quickly caused the disappearance of the so-called "Euro crisis" from the media headlines and market participants' concerns. The mass hysteria maintained by the Anglo-Saxon media and the Eurosceptics during the second half of 2011 on this subject hasn't lasted long: Euroland is increasingly asserting itself as a sustainable structure (10); once again the Euro is in vogue in the markets and for emerging countries' central banks (11), the Eurogroup/ECB functioned effectively and private investors will have to accept a haircut of up to 70% on their Greek assets, thus confirming LEAP/E2020's 2010 anticipation which then spoke of a 50% haircut when almost no-one imagined such a possibility without a "catastrophe" signalling the end of the Euro (12). Ultimately, markets always yield to the law of the strongest… and the fear of losing more, whatever the students of ultra-liberalism may say. It's a lesson which political leaders will jealously guard because **there are other haircuts to come, in the United States, in Japan and in Europe. We will come back to this in this GEAB issue.
- persistancepays said...
**there are other haircuts to come, in the United States, in Japan and in Europe. We will come back to this in this GEAB issue.
gezz, a 70% haircunt!!
yo wont almose haft any hair left on yo cunt
yo be cleen shaved like a playboy bunny wit big teets.
yo sho??
dats a lot to shop off!!
yo can see yo camel toes then
- persistancepays said...
- judge allslop said...
Obama was correct to prepare for martial law, this will all end badly and violently.
More than 20,000 public school teachers in California opened their mailboxes over the last few days to find a pink slip inside as districts met the state's Thursday deadline for dispensing the dreaded news to the educators that they may not have a job in the fall. The layoff notices are preliminary, the districts' best guess at the amount of money they will get to educate kids next year after the Legislature concludes its annual budget fight this summer. But a proposed tax measure on the November ballot offers more uncertainty than usual. Districts won't know until two months into the new school year whether voters will approve a tax increase that would prevent a $4.8 billion trigger cut to education funding, as proposed in the governor's budget.
- OMO said...
Forget about the government and their so-called money. Water and food are going to be more valuable than gold. You can't eat or drink gold.
Don't BELIEVE what they tell you.
They want you to BELIEVE you need their money, they want you to believe they have the authority to use lethal force against American citizens...
yeah, they do, if you BELIEVE it too.
Demolishing Due Process
..."In what history likely will record as a turning point, Attorney General Holder bluntly explained that this administration believes it has the authority to use lethal force against Americans if the President determines them to be a threat to the nation. He tells us that this is not a violation of the due process requirements of our Constitution because the President himself embodies "due process" as he unilaterally determines who is to be targeted. As Holder said, "a careful and thorough executive branch review of the facts in a case amounts to 'due process.'" That means that the administration believes it is the President himself who is to be the judge, jury, and executioner…"
- OMO said...
I should also include jobs in the list of things to forget about. All jobs are government jobs. Work only to store up on food and water-
Depriving the government of money is the only way to kill it. Money belongs to the people not the government.
- OMO said...
Common law is Law. Statutes are not Law. That's why they are called statutes. Statutes are trial by government, and common law is trial by jury. Common law is law of the people. Jury instructions are judge's instructions to a jury. There are NO jury instructions in common law cases because the jury decides the whole case- no judge is allowed to influence the jury by his instructions.. All trials today are government trials because all juries are influenced by the judge via his instructions.
- OMO said...
"...This means that any mortgage foreclosure action can be tried only in a court of common law, and that the state legislature has no constitutional authority of provide, by statute, that mortgage foreclosure actions shall be equity actions. This means that the Sheriff's Sales as a result of these Equitable mortgage foreclosure actions are null and void." Our American Common Law by Howard Fisher and Dale Pond
Statutes are equity jurisdiction, and equity jurisdiction is jurisdiction by judge or government.
There is no appeal to a higher court in a common law trial by jury. All verdicts by a common law jury are final. No court of appeal can overturn a common law jury's verdict.
- OMO said...
"That evil and vicious equity law allows the 'judges' to have We the People arrested, jailed, and property taken away from us, or our property to be criminally trespassed upon and destroyed; all without a common law trial by jury, or just compensation, or due process of law. These violent acts by unelected dictators are committed over often simple idiocies such as "willful failure to file" a paper or failure to properly fill out a form or unknowingly not following some obscure and stupid procedure, rule or regulation. "
- judge allslop said...
What a fascinating time we live in, we now have a sliding scale for crime. we, the federal and state governments of the United States of America do hereby bless the institutionalization of servicer abuse and wrongfull foreclosure. For an interesting look into the "bank settlement", copy this link.
- OMO said...
Big quake in Mexico
- persistancepays said...
Big quake in Mexico
it 2012 rember.
dun worry, it all over prtty soon.
jug mint is cumming.
within next 7 days, a major quak to his u.s. too
- OMO said...
2012 : the year of the dragon.
The Dragon years earthquake included the biggest earthquake on record of Richter Magnitude Scale 9.2 occurred in Alaska in 1964, and the most fearful earthquake in Tangshan, China, killing over 250,000 people in 1976. As such, it is quite logical to forecast that serious earthquake will also occur in this Water Dragon year of 2012. In Chinese Metaphysics. The Term Dragon symbolizes the massive mountain range, the powerful energy of the land, and is strong earth element. So an active dragon indicates strong movement of the earth. Also Dragon and Dog are symbols of Gates to Heaven and Hell. Of the 12 animals signs, Dragon and Dog are considered as strange places, twilight zones, where "Nobleman" will not present themselves. "Noblemen" are helpful deities that can rescue people from bad luck. But in Dragon and Dog years, there is no such rescue angels coming forward to save people from tragedy, as such, the disasters usually will have higher death tolls or casualties. There are some examples of serious disasters occurred in hours of Dragon or Dog, such as the 2004 26/12 South Asia Tsunami occurred in the hour of Dragon at 8.30 am. The 911 terrorist attack on World Trade Centre, New York in 2001 also took place at 8.40 am in Dragon hour. And that the Massacre of Hong Kong tourist in Manila in 2010 took place at about 7.30 pm, hour of the Dog. So Dragon year have such strange, spiritual meaning which may bring more serious casualties perhaps caused by natural disasters.
So 2012 is definitely not even near end of the world. However, the winter solstice date 21/12/2012 is a date with presence of powerful water elements:
- judge allslop said...
Despite the huge loss taken by homeowners thus far ($13 trillion) and the even larger loss taken by the American taxpayers for fabricated bailouts of fake losses (around $25 trillion, the banks and their paid politicians (paid Judges) are presenting us with the prospect of making the last 4 years only a dress rehearsal for the big one. These must settle even if on the court house steps. The financial OTC derivatives are all flawed to FRAUD. No OTC derivative (mortgage bonds) from this period can stand the light of day. Chalk up another for the "Muppets".
Goldman loses bid to end lawsuit over risky CDO
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK | Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:17am EDT
(Reuters) – Goldman Sachs Group Inc lost its bid to dismiss a lawsuit accusing it of defrauding investors by selling risky debt linked to subprime mortgages that it planned to bet against. The decision by U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero in New York keeps alive a hedge fund's claims over a $2 billion offering of collateralized debt obligations, amid intense scrutiny over Goldman's activities before and after the 2008 financial crisis.
Marrero said the hedge fund Dodona I LLC may pursue nearly all its claims against Goldman, including that the Wall Street bank recklessly or intentionally sold the Hudson Mezzanine Funding CDOs to offload subprime risk on unsuspecting investors. "Goldman's sudden — and prescient — shift to reducing subprime risk supports the inference that it possessed some unique insight" about the "bittersweet potion" of CDOs it was selling, Marrero wrote in a 64-page decision. A Goldman spokesman, Michael DuVally, declined to comment. Richard Klapper (LOL good squid name), a lawyer for the bank and co-defendants Peter Ostrem and Derryl Herrick, who were Goldman structured finance executives, did not immediately return a call seeking comment. Lawrence Lederer, a lawyer representing Dodona, called Marrero's decision "extremely well-reasoned, measured, and very substantially supported. We are eager to ultimately try the case on behalf of our client and other investors in the Hudson CDOs."
- judge allslop said...
A meaningful conversation between two adults in different universes.
"If this were the last debt ceiling increase you could ask for, the final one, and you had to make it large enough for all current and future obligations, what would the request need to be?" Congressman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) asked Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner at a Capitol Hill hearing on Wednesday.
"I don't know how to answer that question," Geithner said to Gowdy.
After being prodded by the Congressman, Geithner eventually told him, "it would be a lot."
"It would be a lot," Geithner finally said. "It would make you uncomfortable," he added.
- OMO said...
"The government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government, but it is the government's greatest creative opportunity. The financing of all public enterprise, and the conduct of the treasury will become matters of practical administration. Money will cease to be master and will then become servant of humanity."
- OMO said...
Check out the Chilli earthquake that just happened:
- judge allslop said...
The dual passport traitors of a small middle east nation that run our country have decided to use the SWIFT global financial sysyem as a weapon of war. 2012 is the year that the US dollar will suffer from a significant drop in utilization as the international settlement currency and is the singular greatest mistake dollar managers have ever made.
Brics' move to unseat US dollar as trade currency 2012-03-25 10:00
Thandeka Gqubule and Andile Ntingi
South Africa will this week take some initial steps to unseat the US dollar as the preferred worldwide currency for trade and investment in emerging economies.
Thus, the nation is expected to become party to endorsing the Chinese currency, the renminbi, as the currency of trade in emerging markets. This means getting a renminbi-denominated bank account, in addition to a dollar account, could be an advantage for African businesses that seek to do business in the emerging markets.
The move is set to challenge the supremacy of the US dollar. This, experts say, is the latest salvo in the greatest worldwide currency war since the 1930s. In the 30s, several nations competitively devalued their currencies to give their domestic economies an advantage over others. And this led to a worldwide decline in overall trade volumes at the time.
The north will be pitted against the entire south in a historic competitive currency battle - whose terrain has moved to the Indian capital New Dehli - where the Brics (Brazil, Russia, India China and South Africa) nations will assemble next week. China seeks to find new markets for its currency and to lobby to internationalise it throughout the Brics states.
- Joseph said...
Wow...read this one! Then check out the suggested web sites!!!
Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes.
I thought that was odd. Check this out.
Shades of Krystalnacht
Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan.We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do ya'?
We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be financed by Soros!
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.
I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there.
So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.
That being said, Ill bet you didn't know this.
Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out!
Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer.
It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.
Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?
Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples:
If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.
However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution, by all means, PASS it ON!
There truly is tyranny afoot.
- OMO said...
Media blackout...US border to be removed Under new agreements. North American Union on the way.
- Joseph said...
Here's a court case that supports the Dorean Process:
A tender of the proper amount due, even if rejected, extinguishes the lien and precludes foreclosure*
( See, e.g. Winnett v. Roberts, supra, 179 Cal App.3d 909, 902; Lichtv v. Whitney, supra, 80 Cal. App.2d 696, 701; see also Code Civ. Proc. SS 2074.) In Winnett the court held that a tender of the principal amount without interest was sufficient because the note was usurious and the creditor was not entitled to receive interest.
There are two possibilties, either the banks accepted the Dorean subrogation bond or they didn't. In that case of acceptance, the debt is discharged for value given. If the banks did not accept this bond, for whatever reason, then a refusal is a termination of the debt too, and the foreclosure of the Dorean client was illegal according to the court case above.
So it's irrelevant what happened in the Civil case losses decreed by Judge Alsup, or even the criminal case of Kurt & Scott. Victory and law was pronounced even before all of this happened due to the court case already decided in Winnet vs. Roberts.
I'm reminded of the critic that recently said "he knew that the Dorean Group was a scam because the Dorean Group had no defense or company policy to instigate when the bank started the foreclosure process on a client."
The answer to that critic is that if the Court System was following the law in the first place, no defense or company policy plan would or should have been needed, but if a bulley disregards the law, and does whatever he wants, irregardless of the laws already in place, is that a reason to judge the victim and victimize the victim once again by shunning him and criticizing him since he wasn't successful on a timely basis with the company promises in a rigged system that continually violates it's own laws? Do you glorify and respect the cheater and call him the victor who doesn't play by the rules, and then kick the loser in the head because the loser/victim never had a fair chance, and then criticize the loser for losing in a rigged game? That's what all critics of the Dorean Group have in essence done. You would think that most Americans would have more compassion than that, but obviously it isn't true.
IN a football game, when a referee makes an obvious bad call, most fans will boo and become angry that an injustice has taken place. But in the case of the Dorean Group, most fans watching what has gone on seem to think that the referee is somehow excused from all the bad calls that have been going on through the entire game and that a review of all the bad calls will never take place that can reverse all of the nonsense.
I think we're even going to see the reverse of Obama Care, because he and his cronies obviously didn't care enough to put forth a constitutionally based plan of insurance for everyone.
- OMO said...
There is no such thing as a constitutionally based plan of government health insurance for everyone. Social security is unconstitutional yet the SC said it was constitutional. Obamacare is unconstitutional because the SSN will be used to force people to sign up. Obamacare is just another TAX that employers will be forced to withhold and pay over to the government in the name of health insurance- just as social security is withheld and paid over to the government in the name of social security.
- OMO said...
The SC may pass Obamacare as constitutional because the bill itself does not say how it will be collected. But we all know how it will be collected: payroll taxes and no one will be allowed to purchase it without an SSN. That's how it is done. The SC never said Social Security was a tax but they collect is as one via payroll taxes. That's how it will done if the SC gives the ok. They say one thing and do another.
- Joseph said...
The SC may pass Obamacare as constitutional because the bill itself does not say how it will be collected.
It is mandated, the issue isn't how it's collected since not all people work. Even unworking people will be forced to have insurance or be penalized according to the current Obama care law.
It's very doubtful this law will pass. It's likely the whole thing will be tossed into the trash. There's too much wrong with it in it's present form.
- Joseph said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- Joseph said...
The liberals want to say that health care is a right. They want to add this right to the constitution as a common right like the 1st amendment.
Kind of a real bad time to pass something like this when we are in debt up to our eyeballs. The income tax is unconstitutional, but an amendment to the constitution supposedly justifies it some say. It's irrelevant how it's paid for, or where the monies come from, so the liberals say. Most government may be unconstitutional if you want to be technical enough because you have to steal from some to give to others. How technical do you want to be?
Universal health care is just welfare which may be unconstitutional too, but we have plenty of unconstitutional laws already, but Obama care is much too flagrant in it's edicts. Too many States hate it. Does the federal government want to piss off most of the States? Last time they did that we had a Civil war & our country has never been the same since.
- OMO said...
yeah, there is so much wrong with it in its present form that it should have been denied juridical review (certiorari denied).
- Joseph said...
I think the Supreme Court has a tough case here because whatever they do, it's going to leave alot of people upset. They really need to minimize the bad law of Obama care as it's written, so I think they have to scrap the whole thing and the senate has to start over & put something together that is better or forget the idea of universal care in it's entirety. Why are we doing something like this now? We can't afford universal care as a nation and it's just going to raise the cost of health care anyway. What's the point? Most people are only going to be worse off anyway if it passes.
How about LA Sheriff allowing illegal immigrants to drive now without a drivers license now since they are unable to get a drivers license? Shows how stupid a law is that the authorities aren't even willing to make everyone abide by. Show's how stupid the law of legislating your right to travel anyway and converting that into a license. Talk is the State of California is going to sue the LA sheriff dept. to make them enforce the law with everyone! The State's are getting really greedy & needy for money right now and it's only going to get worse.
- persistancepays said...
the queen accused of drug trafking
- persistancepays said...
it all gunna be sposed now all da crimnals runnin da joint (the world)
da world like a big 'joint', no?
ho runs da joint?
a ho be runnin it!
- Joseph said...
I have seen many color photocopies being submitted as being the original. If one can not examine
and test it, how can one know if it is real or not?
The test is simple, feel for ridge marks on the opposite side of the pages where it was signed or initialed. If no ridge marks, test a small sample with
a clean, original, yellow magic marker and see if the
blue ink smudges. If not, it is a color photocopy.
- Joseph said...
How many people that got foreclosed upon knew this & how many Judges actually follow this?
I almost passed on this. Then I started thinking. If the original note must be sequestered with the Court to prevent further negotiation of the note, it locks in the other side pretty early. If you can convince the court that tendering the original note to the court is a condition precedent to getting judgment, then they must come up with it immediately. It also underscores the issue of the burden of proof in a "lost note" situation, which is to prove the entire path that the note took, how it came to be lost, and what assurance you can give to the court that it is not in the hands of someone who could negotiate it.
Once they offer the "original" it can be examined for authenticity. And in discovery you can find out if there are other "originals" that were used in other transactions with insurers, counterparties in credit default swaps, federal bailout, etc.
See: JAMES F. JOHNSTON and SANDRA JOHNSTON, Appellants, v. JEANNE HUDLETT, Appellee. No. 4D08-4636 [March 31, 2010]
FOURTH DISTRICT, January Term 2010
"Moreover, in the case of original mortgages and Promissory notes, they are not merely exhibits but instruments which must be surrendered prior to the issuance of a judgment. The judgment takes the place of the Promissory note. Surrendering the note is essential so that it cannot thereafter be negotiated.
See Perry v. Fairbanks Capital Corp., 888 So. 2d 725, 726 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
The judgment cancels the note."
- Joseph said...
Here's a partial answer to the mortgage fraud:
One needs to make it difficult or impossible for the banks to make forgeries.
- Joseph said...
We do it for federal reserve notes to make it almost impossible to commit forgery, why don't we do that with mortgage closing documents? And why has no one before demanded this & forced Congress to do something about this? Make it a law. Maybe we need to put watermarks in promissory notes too?
How many copies have been passed off as originals & people have illegally been foreclosed upon?
- persistancepays said...
- persistancepays said...
are yo fuken kiddin me o wha???
Insane Michigan government announces plan to destroy ranch livestock based on hair color and arrest hundreds of ranchers as felons
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/035372_Michigan_pigs_farm_freedom.html#ixzz1qi3Xd1Vq
(NaturalNews) The state of Michigan is only days away from engaging in what can only be called true "animal genocide" -- the mass murder of ranch animals based on the color of their hair. It's all part of a shocking new "Invasive Species Order" (ISO) put in place by Michigan's Department of Natural Resources (DNR). This Invasive Species Order suddenly and shockingly defines virtually all open-range pigs raised by small family farms to be illegal "invasive species," and possession of just one of these animals is now a felony crime in Michigan, punishable by up to four years in prison.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/035372_Michigan_pigs_farm_freedom.html#ixzz1qi3h1zr5
- persistancepays said...
govt way out of cuntroll.
nedd to be destroy.
- OMO said...
"We do it for federal reserve notes to make it almost impossible to commit forgery, why don't we do that with mortgage closing documents?"
The only people forging closing documents are bank employees or people hired by banks to forge for them. The general public cannot negotiate or sell a promissory note. The general public can counterfeit a federal reserve note but the note itself is a counterfeit. Again, the only counterfeiter or forgerer is the bank.
- Joseph said...
Handbook for Bank Officers first issued in 1889:
p. 68-69: "In the decision of Bank vs. Lanier (11 Wallace, 369), which was on some other point of law, the Supreme Court pronounced the following opinion as to "deposits" viz.:
"But a deposit is nothing, but a loan of money. It is well known that country banks keep on deposit in New York with bankers and merchants, a considerable amount of money for their own convenience, for which they receive more or less interest. But whether interest be obtained or not, these deposits are, equally with paper discounted over the counter of the bank, LOANS OF MONEY , and the reason of rule is EQUALLY APPLICABLE TO THEM. The banker is accountable for the deposits he receives AS A DEBTOR…….In both cases, MONEY IS BORROWED TO BE RETURNED in a greater or less period of time, according to the contract of the parties. In the view of the case, DEPOSITS ARE LOANS, and as a State bank, a private bank, a banker is either a person, a company, a corporation, or a firm, any deposit with any such person, company, corporation, or firm is regarded as a LOAN OR "MONEY BORROWED."
When you get a bank loan, there are actually two loans that take place. One loan you make to the bank SINCE THEY DEPOSIT YOUR PROMISSORY NOTE and create a bank "deposit". A bank deposit is a bank liability, MEANING THEY OWE YOU. Deposits are loans according to the Supreme Court ruling I cited, and according to the banks own handbook, SO EVEN THE BANKS CAN'T ARGUE THIS FACT. The bank DOES NOT REPAY THEIR LOAN voluntarily you gave them, AND EVEN DENY THE EXISTENCE OF YOUR DEPOSIT, but you are expected to pay your loan the bank gave you. Remember the bank check, an IOU THAT IS BACKED BY NOTHING at the bank, other than your deposit. Banks call this a loan they gave you. Without them first stealing your asset for no consideration, they could never give you a loan.
There is NOT EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW, even though the Supreme Court says so and even though the booklet above says so.
However, you can force the bank to pay the loan you gave them once the loan is written off and your home is foreclosed, or short selled and the ownership asset is given back to the bank & sold, which asset was used as collateral.
- judge allslop said...
Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612
How do you get the full and complete cooperation of government on issues that are contrary to the public's interest?
ANSWER: Give government the largest cut of the profit for doing so.
Collective government (local and federal) is the #1 investors in the majority of the mortgages. Government does so by being the #1 investor with the banks; mortgage institutions; mortgage security fund pools; etc. We are talking a few trillion-dollars in "collective" totals.
Since the bubble burst in 2008, the government investment funds have been creating specialty funds with names like: "Residential Real-estate Opportunity Fund" ; "Residential Real-estate Rollover Fund" ; "Commercial Property Opportunity Fund" ; and so on, so on into ad-nauseous. They have used these investment funds to take over residential and commercial property at pennies on the dollar (10c to 40c on the dollar). Thousands if not hundreds-of-thousands of properties each year since 2008 which they can now sell at 80c on the dollar or lease / rent out to other parties. These specialty investment funds have been "very" profitable, of which creates the LARGEST conflict of interest per the judicial or administrative cooperating with the financial institutions to kick the late pay home owner out of their houses on to the streets. Boils down to nothing other than systematic theft in a symbiotic relationship to perpetuate theft-by-taking.
It is part of the communist manifesto that all real property is to be owned by the state. The state has mover this along over the last forty-years with the first phase being the implementation of Property-Tax. Any party subject to property-tax is truly but a renter and not a true owner. If they do not pay their rent, their property will be stolen from them. The housing market bubble burst at the end of 2008 was no accident. It was a staged take-over to the tune of trillions of dollars in less than two-months at the end of 2008. Derivatives were used to pull that one off and the profits were accomplished by and through government institutional accounts positioned "Globally". Since that time government institutional investment accounts and funds have focused on buying up the real property at 10cto 40c on the dollar. Trillions of dollars of property in collective totals:
- persistancepays said...
always a good reed from jams mccccannnnny:
HUMPTY DUMPTY FALL DOWN GO BOOM !!! THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE BANKS ARE FALLING DOWN AND GOING BOOM ... the only problem is they are falling on top of the citizens of this once great land and all are going down with the ship ... THIS UN-HERALDED STORY LEADS TO OTHER PENDING DISASTERS ... FEDERAL TAX ID THEFT and fraud is skyrocketing .. yes folks the fed is stumbling all over as thieves steal billions in the name of taxpayers ... the word is that this fraud using common tax payers social security numbers is out of control and there is nothing they or you can do about it ... NOW TRANSLATE THIS INTO NATIONAL HEALTH CARE and the results are obvious (people stealing your identity and running up a huge medical bill in your name and you get stuck with the astronomical deductable) ... government ineptitude is exponentially unleashed on the unsuspecting citizen as they attempt to rectify the situation with the IRS ... the following headline can be found on the internet ... "Tax ID theft skyrockets; thieves feasting on a refund bonanza - They steal your identity and go on a spree with Uncle Sam's Debit Card" ... as people all over the USA are losing their homes and ending up with insurmountable debt to the planned "housing crisis" that has bankrupted every house owner in america ... as millions of retirement age baby boomers find themselves in insurmountable debt with the retirement benefits stolen in the pyramid scheme 401K disaster and pension fund rip offs that put their money in the stock market that ballooned and crashed ... as the average worker is paying most of their earnings in federal and state as well as the plethora of hidden taxes with the balance going to pay amortized bank interest (interest methods outlawed in the old testament) on their home and automobiles ... and as energy costs strangle our very existence ... as the banks push skyrocketing interest rates on past credit card debt and recently passed legislation prevents legal relief for citizens (enacted prior to the planned economic demise of the USA to entrap its citizens in a web of debt followed by legal blocks to any remedies) ... as the fed loans unlimited amounts of fake money to the US GOV with interest that can never be paid back but for which the pres and congress have pledged our eternal indebtedness and as new wars are planned to make the few rich even richer and our "debt" even larger ... the whole system is crumbling to a growing number of hackers who are fleecing the US GOV (and the taxpayers get nipped in the end when the IRS sends the bill to the defrauded citizen) ... con artists are filing false tax returns in the names of millions of americans ... it is so out of control ... there is no law left in this country ... and government ineptitude reigns supreme as they attempt to put more controls on this smoking ember of a country ... the biggest problem in this country (which is reflected on the situation about the world in third world countries) is the average american citizen in so clueless ... i repeat ... SO CLUELESS ... sure greedy people are going to move into government for a free ride and try to get more and more and more ... it is up to an ever vigilant citizenry to stop it before it grows from the initial seed ... but the humpty dumpty monster is here and is falling all over the place ... wake up people and get a clue ... come out of your deed sleep ... time to wake up and start to act ... the alarm has been going off for a long time now rip van american public winkle !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! jim mccanney
- OMO said...
Oh my... It's constitutional to force people to have government healthcare...
The lies coming out of this $%^&*'s mouth never ends.
- persistancepays said...
now dis fo when you nedd a laff:
- persistancepays said...
we alreddy no dat dis cunt tree is run by 1000s of BUUBs. and some are really big too!
- persistancepays said...
pretty soon, yo can really say to somenun?
"eat sh8t and die"
ever here of 'shitburgers'?? ...opps, i mean 'poopburgers'?
the gonna feed them to all da ppls the can...sound like a shitty idea to me?
- persistancepays said...
Anyone up for some poop burgers?
Japanese scientist Mitsuyuki Ikeda from the Okayama Laboratory certainly doesn't believe in human waste.
He thinks that's perfectly good protein you're sending out to sea, and he's found a way to extract it, mix it with steak sauce and create a fecal feast fit for a king.
And despite the downside of having to add soya to bind it all together, Prof Ikeda thinks there's no reason why we shouldn't all tuck into his turd burgers.
Why would he even think of it, you might ask.
Because Tokyo Sewage asked him to. Tokyo is swimming in sewage mud, it seems, and there's only one way it can save itself and that's eat it.
Prof Ikeda found the mud was loaded with protein due to the high bacteria content. Combine it with reaction enhancer and put it in a magical machine called an "exploder" and artificial steak comes out the other end.
According to Digital Trends, it's 63 percent protein, 25 percent carbohydrates, 3 percent lipids and 9 percent minerals.
It's colored red so you don't know it's poo.
"Initial tests have people saying it even tastes like beef," Digital Trends reports.
Prof Ikeda and his colleagues say it's the perfect solution for reducing waste and emissions from flatulent cows.
Which is understandable, because if someone told you that Whopper you just ate was actually made from yesterday's leftover feces, you'd probably be too traumatized to masticate meat ever again.
Of course, there's a hitch - besides the fact it's made from poo and soya. The cost of producing Prof Ikeda's stinky steaks at the moment is about "10 to 20 times" the price of carving it off a cow.
Leave it to the fast food chains to work out the economics. You can't argue the mass production side of the equation is already sorted...
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/06/17/japanese-scientists-create-meat-from-poop/?intcmp=obinsite#ixzz1rHGpBLDL
- persistancepays said...
It's colored red so you don't know it's poo.
"Initial tests have people saying it even tastes like beef," Digital Trends reports.
"even colored red so it taste like beaf"
no shit? what yo no??
- persistancepays said...
and say dat dis world is cumming to
yo rite!!
- OMO said...
Good thing I don't eat meat-- with the exception of an occasional pepperoni pizza.
- judge allslop said...
Kurt and Scott are not the only patriots who have suffered the price of whistle blower under the watch of tresonous US Presidents, DOJ and corupt Federal Judges such as Billy Alsup. Kiriakou is the sixth person to be indicted under the Espionage Act by the Obama Administration. The previous five, all targeted in the span of a year, were: former NSA employee Thomas Drake, who shared details on the agency's warrantless wiretapping program; former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling, who was charged with providing information with New York Times reporter James Risen on an operation that might have led to Iran getting information on how to build a nuclear bomb; former FBI linguist Shamai Leibowitz, who received twenty months in prison for who knows what exactly; former State Department arms expert Stephen Kim, who under assignment shared information with Fox News reporter James Rosen on North Korea's possible response to criticism of the country's nuclear program; and Pfc. Bradley Manning, who allegedly leaked classified information to WikiLeaks that included the "Collateral Murder" video, Afghan and Iraq War Logs, the US State Embassy cables, etc.
CIA Whistleblower Kiriakou Indicted for Exposing Waterboarding Practices
No one can accuse Barack Obama of not tackling our government's still-continuing torture practices. No sir. The man has made it clear – he is going to hunt, prosecute and cage those involved … in exposing them. In fact he has just tucked one under his belt. Former CIA officer John Kiriakou was indicted Thursday for allegedly disclosing classified information to journalists. The following is what triggered the administration's resolve in pursuing, hunting and finally indicting him yesterday:
In 2007, Kiriakou gave an on-camera interview to ABC News in which he disclosed that accused al-Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah was "waterboarded" and that waterboarding was torture. Kiriakou was one of the first CIA officers to label waterboarding as torture.
He is also accused of leaking classified information to reporters. This is part of his 2007 interview with ABC's Brian Ross.
John Kiriakou: "At the time, I felt that waterboarding was something that we needed to do. And as time has passed, and as September 11th has moved farther and farther back into history, I think I've changed my mind. And I think that waterboarding is probably something that we shouldn't be in the business of doing."
Brian Ross: "Why do you say that now?"
John Kiriakou: "Because we're Americans, and we're better than that."
You see, those involved in planning, sanctioning, executing, and later covering up our government's illegal (nationally and internationally) yet rampant torture practices have all been given medals, immunity, and a guaranteed lavish good life to live. However, our President wants to make sure that what happened to his predecessor – being caught and exposed in the middle of torture mayhem – will never happen to him. After all, he is not one for stopping wars-murders-torture. So how does he go about ensuring a black-out of his illegal practices today and tomorrow? Easy – he will send a strong message to deter any soul from even thinking about exposing murder, torture and other illegalities committed by this government. And how does he do that? He will hunt, persecute, prosecute, jail and torture anyone who dares to be an American and brings to light government criminal acts.
Thus, my dear friends, here you have it. The indictment of the sixth whistleblower under the Espionage Act by President Barack Obama – the man who has indicted (hunted) more whistleblowers than all previous US presidents (by that I mean 'ALL') combined.
- persistancepays said...
CIA Whistleblower Kiriakou Indicted for Exposing Waterboarding Practices
yea, i rember when he was an agnet fo DA MAN FRUM UNCLES tv show.
he was a bad dude dat ilya kuriakou.
- habakkuk said...
Micah 2
Woe to Oppressors
1 Woe to those who scheme iniquity,
Who work out evil on their beds!
[a]When morning comes, they do it,
For it is in the power of their hands.
2 They covet fields and then seize them,
And houses, and take them away.
They [b]rob a man and his house,
A man and his inheritance.
3 Therefore thus says the LORD,
"Behold, I am planning against this family a calamity
From which you cannot remove your necks;
And you will not walk haughtily,
For it will be an evil time.
4 "On that day they will take up against you a [c]taunt
And [d]utter a bitter lamentation and say,
'We are completely destroyed!
He exchanges the portion of my people;
How He removes it from me!
To the apostate He apportions our fields.'
5 "Therefore you will have no one [e]stretching a measuring line
For you by lot in the assembly of the LORD.
6 'Do not [f]speak out,' so they [g]speak out.
But if [h]they do not [i]speak out concerning these things,
Reproaches will not be turned back.
7 "Is it being said, O house of Jacob:
'Is the Spirit of the LORD impatient?
Are these His doings?'
Do not My words do good
To the one walking uprightly?
8 "[j]Recently My people have arisen as an enemy—
You strip the [k]robe off the garment
From unsuspecting passers-by,
From those returned from war.
9 "The women of My people you evict,
Each one from her pleasant house.
From her children you take My splendor forever.
10 "Arise and go,
For this is no place of rest
Because of the uncleanness that brings on destruction,
A painful destruction.
11 "If a man walking after wind and falsehood
Had told lies and said,
'I will [l]speak out to you concerning wine and liquor,'
He would be [m]spokesman to this people.
12 "I will surely assemble all of you, Jacob,
I will surely gather the remnant of Israel.
I will put them together like sheep in the fold;
Like a flock in the midst of its pasture
They will be noisy with men.
13 "The breaker goes up before them;
They break out, pass through the gate and go out by it.
So their king goes on before them,
And the LORD at their head."
- habakkuk said...
Matthew 16:13-20 ~
13 Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, He was asking His disciples, "Who do people say that the Son of Man is?" 14 And they said, "Some say John the Baptist; and others, [h]Elijah; but still others, [i]Jeremiah, or one of the prophets." 15 He *said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" 16 Simon Peter answered, "You are [j]the Christ, the Son of the living God." 17 And Jesus said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon [k]Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. 18 I also say to you that you are [l]Peter, and upon this [m]rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth [n]shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth [o]shall have been loosed in heaven." 20 Then He [p]warned the disciples that they should tell no one that He was [q]the Christ.
- mogel007 said...
RobbRyder here... I didn't know this.. but civil court case bonds and securities are filed with the county clerk... not the clerk of the court.. , might be a very interesting file to see... http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(zx4x0lephlitvs55bnvlzz45))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-Act-147-of-1901
- mogel007 said...
Ezekiel 45:9New Living Translation (NLT)
Rules for the Princes "For this is what the Sovereign Lord says:
Enough, you princes of Israel! Stop your violence and oppression and do
what is just and right. Quit robbing and cheating my people out of their land.
Stop expelling them from their homes, says the Sovereign Lord.
- persistancepays said...
- persistancepays said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- persistancepays said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- persistancepays said...
UPDATE from The Post Master General & Trustee for North America
Ed, I have been extremely busy this past week with some very exciting developments, but, wanted to address this issue and others on my blog page at http://www.notice-recipient.com/Blog.html
Very Exciting Developments
I cannot release the details yet, but, I can tell you there are some extremely exciting developments happening NOW concerning access to our private accounts, just for one!
I will have some more news in the coming days. JT
Actions speak louder than words!
When one goes into their courts and enters a plea of guilty or Not Guilty what you are stating is that you are, or are not, the responsible party.
Every action is an action against your estate and they must first determine who the proper party is responsible for settlement of this action.
When we state that we are NOT the responsible party they hold a dog and pony show and a jury determines if you are the responsible party or not. Your participation in the action establishes the evidence that you are indeed the responsible party.
When one enters into their court the parties are operating under the assumption that you are the executor of the estate which they are attempting to administrate. One must correct the false assumptions for it is the duty of the executor, trustee and/or the administrator to settle the accounts/actions. When they fail to settle they go to jail. To read more and 2 other new blogs go to http://www.notice-recipient.com/Blog.html
But, that does not satisfy the people.
Everyone demands proof, and I understand! I agree that we must all practice a great deal of discernment in all matters of our lives. We must make informed, intelligent life decisions.
I understand that the people are gun shy as concerns our freedoms and our rights as this has been a long, hard road we have traveled seeking truth. There have been casualties through the years …. many sacrifices ….. and seemingly many failures. Everyone wants to focus on this perception that all of our efforts through the years have been failures, yet we fail to see that it is only through these countless attempts and countless failures that the truth has been exposed and a remedy now available.
The countless failures, losses and casualties is the blood we have all bled in this epic adventure to reclaim our sovereignty, without firing the first shot. We have all played our part in this battle. We all carry our scars and wounds as evidence of our participation in reclaiming our Divine Right to Spiritual and physical sovereignty which is now within our reach.
Each one of us entered the frey willingly, although it may have been in a state of desperation, we each one of us CHOSE to participate! And as it is with all life choices we must accept responsibility for those choices. We chose, we entered battle, we now carry the scars of battle. Period!
- persistancepays said...
I say to you now, stop pointing the finger! Stop blaming others for your scars. Carry those scars proudly as we march to victory …..Do not reject the victory because you carry the scars of battle. If you have learned any thing it is to do your own research. Do your own homework so that you can make informed decisions. Do not sit back and demand another to prove to you some issue of fact. It is for you to take the proffered info and prove or disprove it for yourself.
Clearly, I can never offer you proof that will satisfy everyone.
I received a priceless gift and a call in the night as acknowledgement of my right and authority to act in the capacity of Postmaster General NA, under whose direction the United States operates.
But, that does not satisfy the people.
I was acknowledged as the Postmaster General by the USPS when they personally handed me two letters addressed to; 1) The Postmaster General and 2) The Office of the Postmaster General and informed me that I should inform the people to put my name on the envelope as well so they could ensure delivery to the proper Postmaster General.
But, that does not satisfy the people.
I have had absolute verification from a major bank, the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and the U.S. Secret Service that my private account had been activated; that the account held over $4 trillion dollars to facilitate the discharge of debt for the American people. I even received funds from this
- persistancepays said...
cot'd from avove
I have had absolute verification from a major bank, the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and the U.S. Secret Service that my private account had been activated; that the account held over $4 trillion dollars to facilitate the discharge of debt for the American people. I even received funds from this account as personal, physical verification of the activation of this account.
But, that does not satisfy the people.
I have discharged IRS Tax liens, auto loans, child support payments and personal debts for many, many people, but, because I cannot duplicate the process with the same results, I do not claim them as victories, and even that honesty, does not satisfy the people.
I have successfully redeemed over $120 million of property from their system, pulling it completely out of their collateral pool; where their codes and statutes do not pertain; where their courts have no jurisdiction.
But, that does not satisfy the people.
The jack booted thugs of the mighty war machine told me to my face that I do not exist in their world so they cannot even speak to me.
But, that does not satisfy the people.
The FBI refused to enter my office stating "Oh No, that is your country in there. This is mine out here."
But, that does not satisfy the people.
The FBI admitted that they could not get a warrant to enter my business or home and resorted to covert attempts to gain access to my computer, to no avail.
But, that does not satisfy the people. To read the rest of this blog and 2 other new blogs go to http://www.notice-recipient.com/Blog.html
The Office of the Postmaster General NA
James Thomas | Columbus, OH 43228
- persistancepays said...
"that my private account had been activated; that the account held over $4 trillion dollars
THATS EVEN BETTER THAN BURLY BAALS FUKEN HYPEs!!!
even bruly cant make $$$ like that!!!
holey sheet!!!!
- OMO said...
Sheriff's deputy and a civilian were shot dead while serving an eviction notice
- persistancepays said...
read fred reverse shaman Dr. Ben Bukkake comments in impeening dizaster cumming up soon.
Bernanke's Warning: We Stand on the Precipice of Economic Destruction
Earlier this week, Federal Reserve boss Ben Bernanke again warned that out of control borrowing and spending will eventually destroy the country.
Said Ben to the the Budget Committee:
Sustained high rates of government borrowing would both drain funds away from private investment and increase our debt to foreigners, with adverse long-run effects on U.S. output, incomes, and standards of living. Moreover, diminishing investor confidence that deficits will be brought under control would ultimately lead to sharply rising interest rates on government debt and, potentially, to broader financial turmoil. In a vicious circle, high and rising interest rates would cause debt-service payments on the federal debt to grow even faster, resulting in further increases in the debt-to-GDP ratio and making fiscal adjustment all the more difficult.
Read more: http://www.infowars.com/bernankes-warning-we-stand-on-the-precipice-of-economic-destruction/
- persistancepays said...
for nuns, dr. bukkake be telling da tooth
yep, dr. bukkake dun wanna gets cum all ova his face for not seeing it cumming.
- persistancepays said...
fo dose ho wan no wha bernake is:
yo dun nedd to be a dr. to figure it out like dr. ferd.
- persistancepays said...
I's land fogifs all moongag depts.
fo reel!!
Iceland Forgives Mortgage Debt for the Population. Putting Bankers and Politicians on "Bench of Accused"
Posted By: Steve [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 13-Apr-2012 12:27:19
Sherrie Questioning All
April 13, 2012
This is awesome. It shows when the people DO STAND UP they have more power and win against the corrupt bankers and politicians of a country. Iceland is forgiving and erasing the mortgage debt of the population. They are putting the bankers and politicians on the "Bench of the Accused." Which means I assume they are putting them on trial for corruption.
Now the rest of people of the world need to start doing the same thing. We all need to stand up and against all the corruption and fraud of the banks and politicians that are puppets of the banks and corporations.
- judge allslop said...
More crime syndicate bull shit.
Report: Treasury Snubs Struggling Homeowners
Important TARP funds targeted for homeowners have not been released
- Common Dreams staff
Only 3 percent of the $7.6 billion in TARP funds that are targeted for troubled homeowners facing foreclosure have been spent, according to a report by the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Fund. A house that was foreclosed by a bank, is for sale in California. (Photo: Michael Goulding, The Orange County Register) The Hardest Hit Fund was created in 2010 to help struggling homeowners, but the Treasury Department has failed to distribute the vast majority of the money in the last two years due to "a lack of comprehensive planning," the report said.
- persistancepays said...
cunt in you filling leans
A Cease and Desist Order has also been filed — to prevent the world's wealth from continuing to be stolen.
To continue reading go here: http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1047-liens
As David prefers not to have his blog reposted, here is a brief extract from his exclusive revelations outlining the details of the filing of the liens against the 12 US Federal Reserve banks:
1. The amount of gold under contract to the Federal Reserve system is 2,420,937,400 kilograms. (2,420,937.4 metric tons.)
2. The lease payments on this gold are payable at the rate of 4% per annum. The total owed, starting in 1961 through 2012, is 4,638,791,996 kilograms of pure gold.
3. Proof of the Federal Reserve Obligation is in the form of Federal Reserve Bonds, series of 1928 and series of 1934.
4. Proof of the interest obligation is further demonstrated by the issue of international currencies that have been issued to the Holders of the Gold Accounts, but against the Federal Reserve Bonds.
5. The gold was acquired through a time when gold coin and gold bullion could not be privately owned, and had to be surrendered to the State.
6. The States combined the bullion into a single, central deposit, whereby all countries would have equitable access.
7. The gold is actually owned by Governments through their Ministry of Finance.
8. In 1948, under UN Resolution MISA 81704, Operation Heavy Freedom, President Soekarno was appointed as M1, (Monetary Controller), and the entire centralized system was put under his disposal as Trustee.
9. The gold was deposited into the system by a group of Trustees appointed by Soekarno. These Trustees formed an association of Trustees now known as the Amanah, otherwise known as the Mandates.
10. The Mandates have assigned their authority over the accounts to Neil F. Keenan and Keith F. Scott.
11. The owners of the gold and other assets leased to the Federal Reserve system between 1928 and 1968, at a 4% per annum rental fee, have never received substantive payment since 1928 until today. They have been constantly tricked and deceived.
12. All persons from several organizations of persons who consider themselves to be the global elite have illegally used these assets — making fortunes for themselves, or otherwise benefitting from the illegal use of these accounts. Key among these are members of (but not limited to) :-
The Committee of 300
Skull and Bones Society
The Bilderberg Society
The Trilateral Commission
Council on Foreign Relations
13. The Federal Reserve System is a privately owned banking system. All debts of that private banking system, beyond the value held in gold, is the obligation of the Federal Reserve System only — and is not a debt obligation of the people of the United States of America.
14. Owners, Shareholders, Directors/Executive Officers and Bonding Companies of the Federal Reserve System are deemed lien debtors — collectively and severally.
To continue reading David's full story go here: http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1047-liens
Posted by John MacHaffie at 11:43 AM 0 comments
- persistancepays said...
yo alreddy nose ho dunt.
by Doug Yurchey www.world-mysteries.com (Excerpts)
What was the real story behind the sinking of the Titanic? The book 'The Secret Terrorists' printed by Truth Triumphant Ministries and reprinted by Tree of Life Resources places blame squarely on the Roman Catholic Order known as the Jesuits. 'The greatest tragedies in the last 200 years can be traced to the Jesuits.'
In 1910, seven men met on Jekyll Island just off the coast of Georgia to plan the Federal Reserve Bank. Nelson Aldrich and Frank Valderclip represented the Rockefeller financial empire. Henry Davidson, Charles Norton and Benjamin Strong represented J.P. Morgan. Paul Warberg represented the Rothschilds Banking dynasty of Europe . The Rothschilds were the banking agents for the Jesuits and hold 'the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church.'
The Morgan gang, the Rothschilds gang and the Rockefeller gang were fierce competitors yet entered joint ventures. They established the national banking cartel called the Federal Reserve System....according to G. Edward Griffin in 'The Creature From Jekyll Island (American Opinion Publishing P. 209). A review of this book stated: 'It tells a story of how bankers have lured politicians with easy money and end up in control of most of the world.'
The Rothschilds, Morgans and Rockefellers are controlled by the Jesuit Order. The most powerful of families 'do whatever is necessary to destroy constitutional liberty in America and bring the Pope to world domination.' Construction of the Titanic began in 1909; at a shipyard in Belfast , Ireland . Belfast was Protestant and hated by the Jesuits. Morgan took control of the White Star Lines. The Jesuits ordered J.P. Morgan to build the Titanic. From the very beginning of the luxury liner, the Titanic was destined for doom.
There were a number of powerful men who were NOT in favor of the Federal Reserve System. Benjamin Guggenheim, Isa Strauss and John Jacob Astor opposed the formation of a F.R.S. These men were arguably the richest men in the world and stood in the way of the Jesuits' plan. 'These three men were coaxed and encouraged to board the floating palace.' Not only were these enemies of the Jesuits against a Federal Reserve Bank, but they would have used their wealth and influence to oppose World War I.
- persistancepays said...
This was the 'maiden' voyage of the greatest ship ever built. The 'unsinkable' campaign assured passengers of comfortable safety. Many Irish, French and Italian Catholics were on board. Protestants from Belfast were also encouraged to immigrate to the United States on the Titanic. These were 'expendable' people; for the most part. But, the real reason for the ship's destruction was a game between the super rich whereby Guggenheim-Strauss-Astor could be eliminated. 'They had to be destroyed by a means so preposterous that no one would suspect they were murdered, and no one would suspect the Jesuits.'
The Captain of the Titanic was Edward Smith. He was a Jesuit and worked for J.P. Morgan. Anyone could be a Jesuit and their identity not be known. >From National Geographic 'The Secrets of the Titanic,' (1986):
When the ship departed southern England , on board was Francis Browne. He was the most powerful Jesuit in all of Ireland and the 'Jesuit Master of Edward Smith.' 'Here is Jesuit treachery at its finest. The provincial Father Francis Browne boards the Titanic, photographs the victims, most assuredly briefs the Captain concerning his oath as a Jesuit, and the following morning bids him farewell... 'Eric J. Phelps , Vatican Assassins Halcon Unified Services. P. 247.
Captain Smith believed this high-ranking 'Jesuit General' was God. Browne instructed him on what to do in the North Atlantic waters. 'Edward Smith was given orders to sink the Titanic and that's exactly what he did.' According to Jesuit secret philosophy: The innocent can be massacred for the greater good; the ends justifies the means.
Captain Smith had been traveling the North Atlantic for 26 years. He was the 'world's most experienced master' in these cold waters. The Captain knew all along that his ship was built for the enemies of the Jesuits. Its purpose was always to be a 'deathship' and sink on its first voyage. Captain Smith also knew exactly where the icebergs were. Under secret orders, he propelled the Titanic full speed at 22 knots on a moonless night and through a huge ice field 80 square miles in area! He had been 'given orders from his God in the Vatican , and nothing would turn him from his course.'
Captain Smith's actions in his last hours were not those of a strong leader. He seemed as if he was wrestling with his conscience. Should he be the brave sea captain or obey his master and sink the ship?
There were purposely not enough lifeboats. Many of the lifeboats only had a few passengers of women and children during the emergency. White distress flares were jettisoned. Passing ships thought those aboard the Titanic were having a party. The distress flares should have been red. These examples were not because of an arrogant crew who believed the Titanic was unsinkable. These shortcomings were planned.
- persistancepays said...
Those richest of men, who opposed the Federal Reserve System, were killed along with the middle and lower classes. John Jacob Astor's wife was rescued. Molly Brown was also saved. The sinking of the Titanic was possibly the greatest disaster of the 20th Century outside of the World Wars. According to 'The Secret Terrorists,' the cause of this tragedy was the Jesuit Order of the Roman Catholic Church.
'The unsinkable ship, the floating palace was created to be a tomb for the wealthy, who opposed the Federal Reserve System. On April 14th (the same date in history as the assassination of Abraham Lincoln) of 1912, the Titanic struck an iceberg and all opposition to the Federal Reserve was eliminated. In December of 1913, the Federal Reserve System came into being in the United States . Eight months later, the Jesuits had sufficient funding through the Federal Reserve Bank to begin World War I.' Notice the F.R.S. was established soon after the disaster of the Titanic.
The rich have always created unnecessary wars where the poor have to fight and die. The pages of 'The Secret Terrorists' do not specifically name the Templars, Freemasons or Illuminati. But these Secret Societies are related and do control the banks; the money system; the oil companies; corporations; governments; the politicians; the military; the police; the law and judicial system; the churches; the schools; the media, etc., etc...
The rich and powerful have always ruled the world. The elite make the news; they create the great, international events. William Randolph Hearst invented the news and printed his propaganda in his paper.
People have been pondering the mysteries of the sinking of a ship that was thought to be unsinkable since the event.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 15:51
- persistancepays said...
'The unsinkable ship, the floating palace was created to be a tomb for the wealthy, who opposed the Federal Reserve System. On April 14th (the same date in history as the assassination of Abraham Lincoln) of 1912, the Titanic struck an iceberg and all opposition to the Federal Reserve was eliminated. In December of 1913, the Federal Reserve System came into being in the United States . Eight months later, the Jesuits had sufficient funding through the Federal Reserve Bank to begin World War I.' Notice the F.R.S. was established soon after the disaster of the Titanic.
but yo alreddy no dat da feral reverse bank was put in afta dat events hoppens. they all suck off da tit nick
- persistancepays said...
dats it!!
da leans haft bin filled!!!
- persistancepays said...
All officials are required by federal, state, and municipal law to provide the name, address
and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding company and the
policy number of the bond and, if required, a copy of the policy describing the bonding
coverage of their specific job performance. Failure to provide this information
constitutes corporate and limited liability insurance fraud (15 USC) and is prim-a-facie
evidence and grounds to impose a lien upon the official personally to secure their public
oath and service of office.
Neil Keenan/Lien Claimant as Settlor for Global Accounts
Keith Scott/Lien Claimant as Settlor for Global Accounts
c/o Notary Acceptor
Box 123
Ivins, Utah [84xxx
Audacibus annue coeptis
Eric S. Rosengren/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
600 Atlantic Avenue
P.O. Box 2076
Boston, MA 02106-2076
(617) 973-3000
William Dudley/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of New York
33 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10045
(212) 720-5000
Charles I Plosser/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
10 Independence Mall
Philadelphia, PA 19106
(215) 574-6000
Sandra Pianalto/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
1455 East Sixth Street
Cleveland, OH 44114
(216) 579-2000
Jeffrey M Lacker/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
701 East Byrd Street
Richmond, VA 23219
(804) 697-8000
Dennis P. Lockhart/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
1000 Peachtree Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 30309-4470
(404) 498-8500
Audacibus annue coeptis
Charles L. Evans/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
230 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 322-5322
James B. Bullard/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
411 Locust Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
(314) 444-8444
Narayana Kocherlakota/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
90 Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55480
Mail Address: P.O. Box 291
Minneapolis, MN 55480-0291
(612) 204-5000
Esther George/Lien Debtor
dba CEO ofFederal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
925 Grand Boulevard
Kansas City, MO 64198
(816) 881-2000
Richard W. Fisher/Lien Debtor
dba CEO ofFederal Reserve Bank of Dallas
2200 North Pearl Street
Dallas, TX 75201
Mail Address: P.O. Box 655906
Dallas, TX 75265-5906
(214) 922-6000
Audacibus annue coeptis
John C. Williams/Lien Debtor
dba CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
101 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Mail Address: P.O. Box 7702
San Francisco, CA 94120
(415) 974-2000
Other PARTIES/Lien Debtor: John Does 1-20
- persistancepays said...
1. The amount of gold under contract to the Federal Reserve system
is 2,420,937,400 kilograms.
2. The lease payments on this gold is payable at the rate of 4% per annum. Total owed
starting in 1961 through 2012 is 4,638,791,996 kilograms of pure gold.
3. Proof of the Federal Reserve Obligation is in the form of Federal Reserve Bonds,
series of 1928 and series of 1934.
4. Proof of the interest obligation is further demonstrated by the issue of international
currencies that have been issued to the Holders of the Gold Accounts, but against
the Federal Reserve Bonds.
5. The gold was acquired through a time when gold coin and gold bullion could not be
privately owned and had to be surrendered to the State.
6. The States combined the bullion into a single, central deposit whereby all countries
would have equitable access.
7. The gold is actually owned by Governments through their Ministry of Finance.
8. In 1948, under UN Resolution MISA 81704, Operation Heavy Freedom, President
Soekarno was appointed as M1. (Monetary Controller) and the entire centralized
system was put under his disposal as Trustee.
Audacibus annue coeptis
9. It is deposited into the system by a group of Trustees appointed by Soekarno.
These Trustees formed an association of Trustees now known as the Amanah,
otherwise known as the Mandates.
10. The Mandates have assigned their authority over the accounts to Neil F. Keenan and
Keith F. Scott..
11. The owners of the gold and other assets leased to the Federal Reserve system
between 1928 and 1968 at a 4% per annum rental fee have never received
substantive payment since 1928 until today. They have been constantly
tricked and deceived.
12. All persons from several organizations of persons who consider themselves to
be the global elite have illegally used these assets making fortunes for themselves
or otherwise benefitting from the illegal use of these accounts. Key among these
are members of (but not limited to) :-
13. The Federal Reserve System is a privately owned banking system and all debts of
that private banking system beyond the value held in gold is the obligation of the
Federal Reserve System only and is not a debt obligation of the people of the
United States of America.
14. Owners, Shareholders, Directors/Executive Officers and Bonding Companies
of the Federal Reserve System are deemed lien debtors collectively and severally.
The Committee of 300
Skull and Bones Society.
The Bilderberg Society
The Trilateral Commission
Committee on Foreign Relations.
Proof of Allegations:
1. The amount of gold in the system is 2,420,937,400 kilograms.
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
- persistancepays said...
2. The lease payments on this gold is payable at the rate of 4% per annum.
Total owed starting in 1961 through 2012 is 4,638,791,996 kilograms of pure gold.
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
3. Proof of the Federal Reserve Obligation is in the form of Federal Reserve Bonds,
series of 1928 and series of 1934.
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
4. Proof of the interest obligation is further demonstrated by the issue of international
currencies that have been issued to the Holders of the Gold Accounts, but against the
Federal Reserve Bonds,
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
5. The gold was acquired through a time when gold coin and gold bullion could
not be privately owned and had to be surrendered to the State.
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
6. The States combined the bullion into a single, central deposit whereby all
countries would have equitable access.
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
7. The gold is actually owned by Governments through their Ministry of Finance.
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
8. In 1948, under UN Resolution MISA 81704, Operation Heavy Freedom, President
Soekarno was appointed as M1. (Monetary Controller) and the entire centralized
system was put under his disposal as Trustee.
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
Audacibus annue coeptis
9. It is deposited into the system by a group of Trustees appointed by Soekarno.
These Trustees formed an association of Trustees now known as the Amanah,
otherwise known as the Mandates.
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
10. The Mandates have assigned their authority over the accounts to
Neil F. Keenan and Keith F. Scott..
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
- persistancepays said...
11. The owners of the gold and other assets leased to the Federal Reserve system
between 1928 and 1968 at a 4% per annum rental fee have never received
substantive payment since 1928 until today. They have been constantly
tricked and deceived.
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
12. Persons from several organizations or persons who consider themselves to be the
global elite have illegally used these assets making fortunes for themselves. Key
among these are members of :-
The Committee of 300
Skull and Bones Society.
The Bilderberg Society
The Trilateral Commission
ANSWER: [If no response allegation is affirmed.]
13. All unpaid value beyond equal value of the gold leased to the Federal Reserve is the
liability and responsibility of the Federal Reserve System and their affiliated banks
Worldwide only, a privately owned banking system, and is not an obligation of the
American People or the United States of America.
ANSWER [If no response the allegation is confirmed]
Audacibus annue coeptis
14. Owners, Shareholders, Directors/Executive Officers and Bonding Agents/Companies
of the Federal Reserve System are deemed as Lien Debtors
ANSWER [If no response allegation is affirmed]
Ledgering and True Bill:
The ledger for this True Bill is based on the rate of 4% per annum of the principal amount
of leased gold which was 2,420,937,400 kilograms of pure gold the total amount since
1961 to present is as follows:
times .04
96,837,496 per annum
Times 51 years
4,638,791,996 kilograms of pure gold
Demand is now made for Lien Debtors jointly and severally to deliver over to Lien
Claimants 4,638,791,996 kilograms of pure gold.
Any and all accounts, assets, bonds, insurances, securities, profits, proceeds, fixtures and
the like owned/managed by the Federal Reserve Banks at any location under control of
Federal Reserve Banks.
Lien Debtors are granted ten days (10) upon receipt of this Affidavit of Obligation
to respond/rebut absent which this matter is stare decisis and res judicata and Lien
Debtors have created an estoppel in pais. Any and all rebuttal must rise to the level
of swearing of Lien Claimants to be held valid [no oath under Ôpains and penaltiesÕ is
Audacibus annue coeptis
Audacibus annue coeptis
I, Neil Francis Keenan, certify on my own unlimited commercial liability do state that I
have read the above Affidavit of Obligation and do know the contents to be true, correct,
complete and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and do
believe that the above described acts have been committed contrary to law
[see 18 USC 4 misprision of felony].
Neil Francis Keenan/Lien Claimant as Settlor
I, Keith Francis Scott, certify on my own full commercial liability that I have read the
above affidavit and do know the contents to be true, correct, complete, and not
misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and do believe that
the above described acts have been committed contrary to law.
[see 18 USC 4 misprision of felony].
Keith Francis Scott
- persistancepays said...
A Security (15 USC)
A USSEC Tracer Flag
Not a point of Law
Affidavit of Obligation
Commercial Lien
(This is a verified plain statements of fact)
All men and women know that the foundation of law and commerce exists in the telling of
the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Truth as a valid statement of reality is sovereign in commerce.
An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
An unrebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgement in commerce.
GuaranteedÑAll men shall have a remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy
does not exist, or if the existing remedy has been subverted, then one may create a
remedy for themselves and endow it with credibility by expressing it in their affidavit.
(Ignorance of the law might be an excuse, but it is not a valid reason for the
commission of a crime when the law is easily and readily available to anyone
making a reasonable effort to study the law.)
All corporate government is based upon Commercial Affidavits, Commercial Contracts,
Commercial Liens and Commercial Distresses, hence, governments cannot exercise the
power to expunge commercial processes.
The Legitimate Political Power of a corporate entity is absolutely dependent upon its
possession of Commercial Bonds against Public Hazard, because no Bond means no
responsibility, means no power of Official signature, means no real corporate political
power, means no privilege to operate statutes as the corporate vehicle.
The Corporate Legal Power is secondary to Commercial Guarantors. Case law is not a
responsible substitute for a Bond.
Municipal corporations which include cities, counties, states and national governments
have no commercial reality without bonding of the entity, its vehicle (statutes), and its
effects (the execution of its rulings).
In commerce, it is a felony for the Officer of a Political/Public Office to not receive and
report a Claim to its Bonding Company, and it is a felony for the agent of a Bonding
Company to not pay the Claim.
If a Bonding Company does not get a malfeasant public official prosecuted for criminal
malpractice within sixty (60) days then it must pay the full face value of a defaulted Lien
process (at 90 days)
Except for a Jury, it is also a fatal offense for any person, even a Judge, to impair or to
expunge, without a Counter-Affidavit, any Affidavit or any commercial process based
upon an Affidavit.
Judicial non-jury commercial judgments and orders originate from a limited liability
entity called a municipal corporation, hence must be reinforced by a Commercial
Affidavit and a Commercial Liability Bond.
A foreclosure by a summary judgment (non-jury) without a commercial bond is a
violation of commercial law.
Governments cannot make unbonded rulings or statutes which control commerce, free
enterprise citizens, or sole proprietorships without suspending commerce by a general
declaration of martial law.
Audacibus annue coeptis
impoundment) and rescue is a felony.
It is against the law for a Judge to summarily remove, dismiss, dissolve or diminish a
Commercial Lien. Only the Lien Claimant or a Jury can dissolve a commercial lien.
Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent.
All officials are required by federal, state, and municipal law to provide the name, address
and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding company and the
policy number of the bond and, if required, a copy of the policy describing the bonding
coverage of their specific job performance. Failure to provide this information
constitutes corporate and limited liability insurance fraud (15 USC) and is prim-a-facie
evidence and grounds to impose a lien upon the official personally to secure their public
oath and service of office.
Neil Keenan/Lien Claimant as Settlor for Global Accounts
Keith Scott/Lien Claimant as Settlor for Global Accounts
c/o Notary Acceptor
Box 123
Ivins, Utah [84xxx
- persistancepays said...
A Security (15 USC)
This is a USSEC Tracer Flag
Not a point of Law
It is tax fraud to use Courts to settle a dispute/controversy which could be settled
peacefully outside of or without the Court.
An official (officer of the court, policeman, etc.) must demonstrate that he/she is
individually bonded in order to use a summary process.
An official who impairs, debauches, voids or abridges an obligation of contract or the
effect of a commercial lien without proper cause, becomes a lien debtor and his/her
property becomes forfeited as the pledge to secure the lien. Pound breach (breach of
- persistancepays said...
so dat/dis meens dat we all gonna get da gobble accunts now $$$$$ ????
- persistancepays said...
ho do yo a cunt fo dis?
o a cunt fo dat?
eether way?
- judge allslop said...
Here's 10 most profitable tax evaders and the politicians their CEOs, employees, and PACs give the most money to.
Verizon Communications
Profits: $19.8 billion Effective tax rate: -3.8%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
President Barack Obama: $51,493
Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.): $24,450
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.): $23,700
Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio): $22,500
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.): $15,000
General Electric
Profits: $19.6 billion Effective tax rate: -18.9%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
Mitt Romney: $53,750
President Barack Obama (D): $30,493
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.): $23,900
Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.): $21,860
Rep. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.): $19,750
.Advertise on MotherJones.com
Profits: $14.8 billion Effective tax rate: -5.5%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.): $31,750
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.): $25,000
Former Sen. George Allen (R-Va.): $23,500
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.): $23,125
Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas): $20,986
NextEra Energy: North America's largest solar and wind power operator, based in Florida
Profits: $8.8 billion Effective tax rate: -2%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
George LeMieux (R-Fla.): $9,500
Mike Haridopolos (R-Fla.): $4,800
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.): $2,000
Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas): $2,000
Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.): $2,000
American Electric Power: Electric utility based in Columbus, Ohio
Profits: $8.2 billion Effective tax rate: -6.4%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio): $34,750
Rep. Steve Stivers (R-Ohio): $34,050
Rep. Bob Gibbs (R-Ohio): $21,700
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W. Va.): $19,750
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio): $18,450
Pacific Gas & Electric: California electrical utility
Profits: $6 billion Effective tax rate: -8.4%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
President Barack Obama (D): $6,250
Rep. Jim Costa (D-Calif.): $5,000
Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.): $5,500
Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.): $5,000
Rep. Jeff Denham (R-Calif.): $3,500
Apache: Houston-based oil and gas company
Profits: $6 billion Effective tax rate: -0.3%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
David Dewhurst (R-Texas): $25,000
Rep. Connie Mack (R-Fla.): $5,000
Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-La.): $2,500
Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas): $2,500
Rep. Gene Green (D-Texas): $2,500
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.): $2,500
Brendan Doherty (R-R.I.): $2,500
Consolidated Edison: New York energy company
Profits: $5.9 billion Effective tax rate: -1.3%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.): $15,050
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.): $8,000
Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.): $6,650
Then-Rep. David Wu (D-Ore.): $2,500
Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.): $1,500
Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.): $1,500
Rep. Jose Serrano (D-N.Y.): $1,500
El Paso: Houston-based energy company that operates the country's largest natural gas pipeline
Profits: $4.6 billion Effective tax rate: -0.9%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
David Dewhurst (R-Texas): $7,500
Mitt Romney (R): $5,000
Rep. John Barrow (D-Ga.): $3,000
Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.): $2,750
Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.): $2,500
Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.): $2,500
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.): $2,500
Gov. Rick Perry (R-Texas): $2,500
Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.): $2,500
Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.): $2,500
CenterPoint Energy: Electric and gas utility company based in Houston
Profits: $3.1 billion Effective tax rate: -11.3%
Top recipients, 2011-2012
David Dewhurst (R-Texas): $22,050
Gov. Rick Perry (R-Texas): $13,458
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.): $10,299
Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.): $7,000
Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas): $4,000
- persistancepays said...
nun of it may makes any diffince.
seem like we's all dummed anways....
dowlode and listhen to clip hi report.
yo wont like it.
- OMO said...
From Ucadia.org:
Belief and the Roman College of Abbreviators
It has been known by linguists and language architects for millenia that by shortening (abbreviating) old words and then combining them that new words represented compressed sentences may be created.
This is precisely what the Roman Cult College of Abbreviators under the command of Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) did in establishing a legal framework of control through the creation of thousands of new words through medieval Latin that later were transported into other manufactured languages such as Anglaise and later English, French, German, Portuguese, Spanish etc.
One of those key words was the creation of the word "be-li-ef" through the abbreviation of three Latin words:
be = bestia : animal, beast.
li = ligo : to bind, tie.
ef = efficio : to do, produce,
effect, make / bring about, cause / prove.
In other words, the true personality and meaning of Belief is "to cause the binding of animals".
To truly understand the implication of this meaning, the reader needs to understand that the Roman Cult considered all men and women, not members of the Cult to be nothing more than animals and therefore the property of the Roman Catholic Cult, like any other goods and chattel.
The clearest example of this is evidenced in the Papal Bull Unum Sanctum by Pope Boniface VIII in 1302 which stated "Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff". As this original law has never been repealed, it stands today that the Roman Catholic Church still considers all men and women not bona fide members of the Roman Cult as "creatures" and animals--hence the importance of promoting "belief".
Interview with Frank O'Collins (author of the above website Ucadia.org)
What is law?
Start listening from 11:30
- OMO said...
All law today is still spoken
Start listening at 18:00
- persistancepays said...
"....evidenced in the Papal Bull Unum Sanctum by Pope Boniface VIII in 1302
yea, ova da centries, the poop put out a lot of poopil bullshit too much to way on a scail.
if yo notice tho, lately the poop hasnt put out so much poopal bullshit
but really? ho foolows all the poopal bullshit even when he shit it out. it like da poop be on x lacks to mak him shith it all out
- OMO said...
Who follows the poopal bull? You do. You were born into a Papal Bull world.
- OMO said...
Someone else you may want to listen to : Mel Ve from Freedom Central
She says at 1:26:00 that Alex Jones Communications Network is owned by ABC Disney which in turn is owned by the CIA.
- persistancepays said...
Who follows the poopal bull? You do. You were born into a Papal Bull world.
rong. da poop can put out all da bull dat he want to. i dun listinin to it.
- judge allslop said...
Any one making a legal challenge should follow this closely, the insurer is making the case for the borrowers at the same time as they are making the case for recovery of money paid by them under false pretenses to the wrong parties, screwing both the investors and the borrowers. Like Corzine I expect another crime Don, Moynihan to perjure himself. Raise your right hand and smile for the cameras.
(Reuters) – A New York judge has ruled that Bank of America (BAC.N) CEO Brian Moynihan must testify in a lawsuit brought by bond insurer MBIA Inc.(MBI.N) which claims the bank fraudulently induced it to insure risky mortgage-backed securities.The judge said Moynihan could provide relevant testimony in the case due to his position as CEO, former president of investment banking and the fact that he oversaw the process of integrating Countrywide into Bank of America. Bank of America acquired mortgage lender Countrywide in July 2008. MBIA filed a Countrywide later that year. In 2009, MBIA claimed Bank of America was liable for Countrywide's conduct. Bank of America, the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, is fighting several legal cases following the global financial crisis and had sought to block MBIA efforts for Moynihan to give evidence. MBIA was once the largest U.S. municipal bond insurer. It announced a restructuring in 2009 after incurring large losses insuring mortgage debt. Bank of America had asked New York Supreme Court Justice Eileen Bransten to rule that Moynihan did not need to testify, arguing that MBIA was seeking his deposition only to harass the bank and that Moynihan had no unique knowledge about the case. But the judge on Wednesday denied the request, according to court papers made public on Thursday. "The knowledge Moynihan gained as part of the (Countrywide) Steering Committee is unique, and it is material and necessary to MBIA's successor liability claim," the judge said.
Moynihan was involved in "high-level decisions regarding the Countrywide transaction" and his testimony will not duplicate that of lower-level employees, she said.
MBIA declined to comment and Bank of America did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The cases is MBIA Insurance Corp v. Countrywide 602825/2008.
- Joseph said...
Interesting stuff:
There seems to be some truth to this stuff. Whether it's all true, I don't really know.
- Joseph said...
The latest on getting your debts discharged is doing an EFT:
There are successes that are happening using this system. Mortgages getting paid off, car titles being discharged and credit cards zeroed out and taxes owed to the IRS going away.
It's a legal way to discharge debt. It's well worth learning all you can about this. Fred & Nina Guiterrez are the masterminds behind this movement. They've built on necessary tools that other systems were lacking to be effective. Those that are willing to fight a bit can be effective with this program whereas about 1 in 12 are successful without a fight.
- Seth Anderson said...
a whole lot of work for a whole lot of fraud..
- Mary Jaime said...
Permit me to introduce you to LE-MERIDIAN FUNDING SERVICES. We are directly into pure loan and project(s) financing in terms of investment. We provide financing solutions to private/companies seeking access to funds in the capital markets i.e. oil and gas, real estate, renewable energy, Pharmaceuticals, Health Care, transportation, construction, hotels and etc. We can finance up to the amount of $900,000,000.000 (Nine Hundred Million Dollars) in any region of the world as long as our 1.9% ROI can be guaranteed on the projects.
Le-Meridian Funding Service.
(60 Piccadilly, Mayfair, London W1J 0BH, UK) Email Contact Info...firstname.lastname@example.com