text: Yukon BRIDGES Academy Info If you are a human and are seeing this field, please leave it blank. Yukon Public Schools Yukon BRIDGES Academy - Day Treatment/Partial Hospitalization Program The Yukon BRIDGES Academy (Promoting Appropriate School and Social Behaviors) program is provided in conjunction with the Yukon Public School System. The program operates a minimum of six hours a day, five days a week. Youth attending this service are involved in a half day of traditional school provided by specially trained teachers provided by the Yukon School System. During the second half of the day, each youth receives a variety of treatment services by a team of qualified mental health professionals. Every client receives a minimum of one hour of Individual Counseling, one hour of Family Therapy, two hours of Group Counseling and an additional eleven hours of expressive therapies each and every week. Make A Referral


text:
IRVINE More than 3,000 Irvine students took part in Thursday's "Read for the Record" campaign, as kids nationwide worked to break the world record for reading the same book on the same day.
Team Irvine, the Unified School District and Jumpstart were joined by city, police and fire department officials who showed up at 17 elementary schools, five preschools and two community parks to read "The Very Hungry Caterpillar" to youngsters.
The local reading campaign also included a book drive that drew more than 4,500 donations.
About 4,000 of those books were donated to the Orange County Early Literacy Program, 284 were given to the Children's Hospital of Orange County, and 205 were given to the Usa River Academy Library, an organization to empower youth in developing nations.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
1 Timothy 2:1-2 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.
Yesterday, we went to the polls to vote for the leaders of this nation. We are responsible to and for those leaders, no matter whether we voted for the winning or losing candidates. The best thing we can do is to pray for those who have elected to office – from president to dog-catcher, they all need our prayers.
As we pray for them, we benefit both them and ourselves. Let's look at it. We are to give thanks for our leaders. But wait, you say. I didn't vote for that one. Why should I pray for him/her?
You pray harder for those who were not your choice than for those who were. You intercede that the Lord would be in charge of their lives exactly as he is in charge of yours.
The result of such prayer is that we may lead quiet lives, that our physical and political houses would be in order – God's order.
Father, God,
Teach us to pray for those in authority over us. Grant us the wisdom to ask your wisdom for our leaders. Help us to pray that their hearts might be in order, submitted to you.
In Jesus' most precious name.


text: A few weeks ago, I received a shipment of the Her Given Hair Kinky Curly Hair extensions after being asked by the company to test and review the hair. I received 2 bundles of the 18-inch extensions and a 16-inch closure. Once I received the hair, which came in beautiful packaging with their logo on it, I washed it right away. I used a sulfate-free shampoo for the first wash and then co-washed for the…View Post


text:
I will readily admit that I am not a trained, certified psychiatrist. I haven't even played one on TV although I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express not to mention my car insurance is with GEICO. However, when it comes to psychoanalyzing one Donald J. Trump, not that difficult a task. The only question, […]
I will readily admit that I am not a trained, certified psychiatrist. I haven't even played one on TV although I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express not to mention my car insurance is with GEICO. However, when it comes to psychoanalyzing one Donald J. Trump, not that difficult a task. The only question, really, is whether to use the term psychoanalysis or analysis of a psycho.
To quote Mitt Romney, something I never thought I would ever do, "Donald Trump is a fraud, a phony."
That he is but now for the psychoanalysis:
A few weeks back at a campaign rally in Montana, Donald J. Trump or, as I refer to him, Comrade Trump, chose to mock the "Me Too" movement, disparage 94-year-old former President George H.W. Bush by mocking his 1000 points of light statement from 1989. Oh, by the way, Comrade Donald, if you are reading this, the reference to the 1,000 points of light referred to the brightness reflected by those who volunteer and put their time and effort ahead of profiting – and attacking Senator Elizabeth Warren and her Native American Indian heritage. Apparently, Comrade Trump fears Senator Warren as a potential opponent in 2020 and wants to start the personal attacks early.
These pompous and immature rants can just be added to the long list of the mocking and offensive remarks leveled by Trump against war hero John McCain or the gold star Khan family, or a disabled reporter, or the press as a whole, or Trump's own intelligence community, or our NATO allies, or anyone who disagrees with him or doesn't "say nice things about" him. What was that about "civility" Sarah Huckabee Sanders?
In the world of Trump, civility, like loyalty, is a one-way street in the direction of Trump only.
Now, many people have concluded that Trump simply lacks a filter between what serves as his brain and his mouth. This lack of a filter, they surmise, is why what comes out of his mouth is so rude, offensive and not very well thought out. This assumption, however, would be wrong, dead wrong.
Donald J. Trump does, indeed, have a filter between what serves as his brain and his mouth. He just chooses not to use it. Why you ask? The reason is quite simple. It is because he is totally convinced that saying whatever comes to mind, or the equivalent of a mind for him, without any inhibitions, to totally disregard simple propriety, to abandon anything approaching political correctness, is "COOL" and being "cool" plays to his base, especially at his mob rallies.
Well, he is partially right that saying the absolutely offensive, rude and demeaning things he says, especially to rile up his base at a campaign rally, almost definitely does seem "cool" to a base that is comprised primarily of racists, misogynists, xenophobes, and the easily brain washed. To the rest of society, both domestic and foreign, not so cool.
The problem, of course, is this: the one thing, more than anything else, that makes someone the exact opposite of "cool" is trying so hard to be cool. Steve McQueen was cool because it came natural. Steve McQueen did not try to be cool; if he had, he wouldn't have been cool. Donald J. Trump trying so hard to be cool is pathetic and very, very uncool.
You know what else is uncool? Having to tell everyone how "smart" you are. Having to tell everyone how great you are. Having to tell everyone how your administration has done more in 18 months than any other administration in the history of this country. Having to boast about the size of your inauguration or any other blatantly false boast. Cool? Not even close. Insecure? Oh, yeah. Embarrassing? Absolutely.
You know what would be cool? As part of challenging Senator Warren to take a DNA test to prove her Native American Indian heritage, Comrade Trump offers to release his tax returns if she agrees. Putting one's money where one's mouth is, is always "cool."
Of course, that will never happen. First of all, he will never reveal tax returns that will allow the voting public to follow the money trail of his ill-gotten gains. Secondly, the heritage of Senator Warren is of absolutely no importance. No one cares, no one. Trump is only using it as an excuse to attack a potential opponent regardless of the insignificance of the issue. His only mode is attack mode and that is because he is incapable of debating issues of substance which Senator Warren assuredly can regardless of whether you agree or disagree with her positions on issues of substance.
One last observation about his mental state. He has an unfounded and unrealistic confidence that he can foster a positive relationship with adversaries such as Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-Un by simply becoming their friend without extracting any specific and verifiable conditions or requirements. Although he described the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, more commonly known as the Iran Nuclear Deal, as the worst deal in history and from which he recently withdrew the United States without a factual basis, that agreement, negotiated over an extensive period of time and by several nations, included detailed and verifiable requirements, such as scheduled inspections by a recognized body of experts, that are sorely lacking in a simple handshake with a notorious dictator such as Jong-Un. This nation and the world would be well served to craft an agreement with North Korea that was as detailed and verifiable as was the Iran Nuclear Deal from which Trump walked away simply because it was signed by President Obama.
With regard to his now famous, or, rather infamous, joint press conference with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland and the backlash that ensued as a result of it, Trump attempted to explain away his acceptance of Putin's denial of Russian meddling in the 2016 election by offering an explanation that he simply misspoke and mistakenly used the word "would" instead of the word "wouldn't". Granted, the words "would" and "wouldn't" are very similar in terms of spelling; however, they are 180 degrees different in terms of meaning. They are the exact opposites. That leaves us with only two explanations for Trumps explanation which reveals a great deal about how his mind works. Either he is a compulsive liar, which has already been well established, or he simply misread a prepared statement without any understanding of the meaning behind what he was reading. Take your pick. Neither option is comforting in a president. Moreover, the options are not mutually exclusive.


text:
Trees are extraordinary beings. They have the ability to grow almost anywhere provided the proper nourishment.
In cracks.
Through roofs.
In the hottest desert.
And in the coldest tundra.
Some of the most beautiful trees are carried on the wind, flying across borders to find a niche and grow. They sink into the soil, plant their roots and spread, often giving rise to entire forests of trees.
Trees who provide shade and comfort. Trees who protect and nourish others. Trees who have forged a life and supported whole ecosystems even though they were not planned.
There are forests of trees across our nation in danger of extinction because of gardeners in their big, orange rubber gloves who object to the chaos of unplanned beauty. They will bring their poison and their shovels and kill the trees which have left indelible marks on the American landscape.
Some trees are so deeply rooted they will never move, but those who are young, who cling to small bits of soil as they find their way in these new environments are in danger. It is for these small saplings with their fragile limbs who worry me. Their extinction, once protected by humanitarian foresight to shelter the least of these, has been removed by an orange-gloved developer in an act of cowardice and malice.
To all my tree loving friends, fight. Protect your trees. They are what make America great. And to all my trees, dig deep and stay strong. The winds of change move slowly but they always blow toward justice.


text:
The December Market Update Brings An 2% Decrease In the Median Sales Price. However, There Is No Change For Houses Staying On The Market.
If you're thinking of selling your home, the Parkland Parrot Real Estate Team can help you determine two important factors that should be part of your plan of action: 1) finding out what your home is truly worth and 2) knowing what type of house you are looking to move to. To find out what your home is worth, visit My Parkland Home Value.
Looking to sell your home for a RECORD Sale & find the next home of your dreams? Then call # 1 RE/MAX Florida Agent & Top Parkland Florida Realtor Michael Citron & the #1 Real Estate Team at: 954-609-0591.


text:
The cartoonist of seven books, including "Mid-Life," "Happy Stories About Well-Adjusted People," and "This Will All End in Tears," Joe Ollmann has not only received a Doug Wright Award, CBC Radio called him "a master of the short story" and compared him to Alice Munro. His new book, "The Abominable Mr. Seabrook," looks to continue the accolades for the accomplished creator.
The book details the life of William Seabrook, a writer best remembered for introducing the term "zombie" into the English language, though as Ollmann makes clear, Seabrook wrote about and did far, far more than most might think. Seabrook wrote about Haiti, Arabia and Africa, early plane travel, alcoholism and bondage; he was friends with Gertrude Stein, Aleister Crowley, Sinclair Lewis and Man Ray. He was the forerunner of the model of adventurer and writer that has been carried on by the likes of Hunter S. Thompson.
CBR: William Seabrook was a real character -- I don't know how else to describe him! How did you first encounter him?
Joe Ollmann: I discovered him in a zombie anthology called "Zombie." There was a short piece by Seabrook in there, which was very good. It's a true story of zombies in Haiti from his book "The Magic Island." It was a good story, and I really liked his writing, but what interested me more was the short biographical blurb before the story. The people that he'd known, the places that he traveled, and other salacious facts, like his bondage fetish, and cannibalism, and alcoholism. I'd never heard of the guy, and I felt like I should have because he had a pretty interesting, storied life. That sent me searching for more info. I was a little surprised that there wasn't more info on him. None of his eleven books were in print at the time; Dover has started to bring some of them back into print, but he was a bestselling author in his day. It seemed like people should have known about him because he had a pretty interesting life.
One person you quote in the book makes the observation that what Seabrook would have liked was to be misunderstood. He wasn't, however, and instead was a huge success.
That was Alexander King, the illustrator, who was an editor at "Life Magazine." He said that Seabrook wanted to be a misunderstood author who was deep and artistic and inscrutable, but he was this populist writer who wrote about lurid subjects, mostly. But he wrote about them very intelligently and very well. Seabrook was always torn; he wanted to be a Gertrude Stein or a James Joyce or someone like that, but he came from a trashy Randolph Hearst newspaper background, writing stories like 'Caught in the Death Grip of a Giant Clam.' He wanted to do art, and he did very good populist stuff.
At the same time -- and I couldn't help but think of this in terms of his alcoholism and self-loathing -- he sought out the company of people like Gertrude Stein and James Joyce, people who were in that Left Bank or Greenwich Village crowds.
He was very well connected. They sought him out, too, it seems, because they remembered him well enough to write about him in their autobiographies. Gertrude Stein, Sinclair Lewis, Man Ray, Aleister Crowley wrote about him. He obviously made an impression on these people. I would imagine he was quite a character, a guy who was fun to go to parties with, but not so fun to live with.
So when did you go from being curious about this writer to making a book about him?
At the beginning, I was just interested and I started to read. There was a little bit on the Internet. There were Seabrook fans on LiveJournal that had a lot of information, and that steered me towards certain books, which was quite helpful. I started buying his books and reading them. As I was reading them, I started keeping notes. I first started taking notes around 2006, so it's been more than ten years now that I've been unofficially researching. I traveled to North Carolina with my wife -- she was at an academic conference and I went with her because a collector there had a trunk of Seabrook stuff. I went to the University of Oregon for almost a week, and went through the archives of Marjorie Worthington, who was Seabrook's second wife. She was an author, and her archives were there. I was going through boxes of her stuff -- journals, letters, photos.
At that point, I'm wearing white gloves at a university archive and taking notes and I was like, "I guess you're making a book of this guy, because what else are you going do?" [Laughs] I had already invested a lot of time and travel and money, so it became apparent that I had to do something with it. It was more than just a hobby. I talked about it a lot for years with people and everybody was very intrigued by the elevator pitch of this guy's life and they never heard of him so they said, you should make a book about him. I could have just written a proper biography – a "book book" as we call real books in the comics world – but I'm a cartoonist, so I did it as a comic book biography.
I can imagine you spent part of that decade digging up visual reference and focusing on depicting those details.
I don't usually use a lot of visual reference, but I really tried to get the details as correct as possible with this book. I felt it deserved the extra time. It's set in many different time periods on different continents with many different cultures and with historical characters. I did a lot of research -- I have folders of reference material for each section. I've never really done that much research visually before, so hopefully it improved the book.
I've read other books of yours, and it's clearly your style, but it also felt very different than anything you've done before.
I think so. In a way, it's not proper nonfiction. I see any biography with dialogue in it is out of the realm of nonfiction and into "speculative nonfiction," where it's well researched but I extrapolated and made up dialogue to fill in the story. It is different, but I feel like readers of my normal depressing comics that I do which are slice of life kitchen sink dramas of normal people who are troubled and they're sad but they have humor in them, I think the Seabrook book probably has a similar feel because you know we put our stamp on everything as an artist or a writer so even though it's his story it definitely has my fingerprints all over it I would think.
Drawing things like bondage -- I've never done anything like that. I talked to cartoonist Pascal Girard years ago when I was living in Montreal, and his advice was draw the bondage stuff really frankly. Don't not show it, but don't make it sexy. I drew it very openly, not trying to make it salacious or sexed up. Hopefully that worked.
What made Seabrook fascinating wasn't that he practiced bondage, but he wrote about it and he collaborated with Man Ray on series of photographs depicting bondage.
He and Man Ray were friends for a long time. Man Ray took a lot of photos of Seabrook, like when he was arriving back from Africa on a plane. Then he did the photos of Seabrook and Lee Miller where she's wearing a collar and he's holding the collar. There's a whole other series of photos that they did, The Fantasies of Mr. Seabrook, which are pretty hardcore bondage. I think that was Seabrook trying to legitimize his kinky side by turning it into art. It could be perceived as legitimate because Man Ray was this established, respected artist at the time and collaborating with him would bring a legitimacy to it.
Seabrook is also fascinating because for his time, he was very progressive when writing about Haiti and Arabia and the people he meets.
For his time he was very progressive in writing about race and his interaction with other cultures. That what I find fascinating. He is very respectful of the cultures. He's not a detached observer like an anthropologist would be. He's living as equals with them and I think he's accepted by the Bedouins when he's living in the Middle East and again in Haiti by the Haitian people there. In Africa as well, although in Africa he's acting more like a "great white hunter" in that book. I think he was more famous, and his alcoholism had progressed to the point where he wasn't making good decisions about anything. But I agree, for his time, he was very progressive on matters of race, and very respectful of the Arab and Muslim culture.
One reason I don't think that Seabrook isn't one of the great travel writers like Thesiger or Stark is because, as you point out, Seabrook had a tendency to embellish and make things up.
He did a bit of that. Maybe I make too much of a deal about it. The famous thing he lied about -- that in Africa he ate human flesh -- which he doesn't but he does eat human flesh when he returns to Paris to make it "true." There was also people that criticized his details of the facts of the voodoo religion in "The Magic Island." Seabrook cited Zora Neale Hurston, who in her book "Tell My Horse" writes about very similar things. Hurston is a respected anthropologist and she's a black woman who has less to gain from maligning the people of Haiti, and she supported his facts, basically, in her book. As a guy that was a reporter, I think he took the facts seriously. I think he exaggerated. I think he's a typical raconteur who will exaggerate and be hyperbolic to make a better story. I hesitate to say that he was constantly lying about things in his books, although he may have -- it's hard to know.
You make an interesting observation at the end, which is that it might be best to think of him as a precursor to gonzo journalism.
I think so. The act of throwing yourself into the middle of the story and making the story about you. I couldn't find out in Hunter S. Thompson or any of that school read Seabrook, but I suspect that Thompson probably would have. They shared a lot -- the wild man, hard-drinking lifestyle, but also being a very serious writer. For all of his drinking, Seabrook was a real work horse. Even at the height of his alcoholism, he would get up in the morning at five, make coffee, work 'til noon and waste the rest of the day. I think he was a hard working reporter at heart.
Having spent all these years working on this book, what do you hope people take away from it?
My intent, really, was to serve as an introduction to the guy's life. I don't mean it to be a cautionary tale at all. If people read it, they'll come away and say, obviously, it's not a good thing to drink excessively your whole life because it will catch up with you. I just think it's an interesting story. I wanted to introduce people to his work and maybe they'll seek it out and read it. I think a lot of his stuff is still worth reading.
You mentioned that when you started, all of his books were out of print but now "Asylum" and "The Magic Island" are back in print.
Dover did those two, and I did the covers and introductions in comic form for them. "The Magic Island" is great, because they have an intro by George Romero. Seabrook is credited with bringing the word "zombie" into the English language, and "Magic Island" was the basis for the Bela Lugosi film "White Zombie," so Romero writes about how he owes a debt of gratitude to Seabrook for starting the whole genre of the zombie. Then there's an afterword by the ethnobotanist Wade Davis who wrote "The Serprent and The Rainbow." Davis confirmed a lot of the aspects of the zombie being a genuinely chemical phenomenon instead of supernatural that Seabrook posited. It's a travelogue, and it's very detailed. He's writing about the cultural history and the geopolitical history of the island and about the situation at the time in the 1920s where they were under occupation by the US. It's just good, meandering travel writing. Those first three books of Seabrook's are excellent.
Having spent a decade on this book, does it make you want to make another book along similar lines, or go back to making a slice of life story like you've done in the past?
I'm of two minds. I have a bunch of longish short story pieces that I'm ready to start on. I also have a nonfiction project about Canadian history that I'm working on. That would take a little more time. When I finished this, I was like, I don't want to do nonfiction anymore. The research is too hard. I just want to do fiction, where you can make your characters do what you want and you're not limited by what actually happened. I'm not sure what I'm going to do. Hopefully I'll live long enough to do both of them. As you get older, you start to think, how many books do I have left? Comics take so long that you want to be sure what you're doing before you commit two or three -- or five or ten -- years to a book.


text:
Michigan State 21 - 46 Indiana
Lewis accounts for six TDs as Indiana routs Michigan StateOct 28, 2006 - 8:52 PM BLOOMINGTON, Indiana (Ticker) - For a second straight week, Michigan State dug itself a huge hole. This time, Kellen Lewis did his part to ensure there would be no record-setting comeback.
Lewis threw five touchdowns and ran for another score as the resurgent Hoosiers won for the third time in four games with a 46-21 Big Ten Conference victory over the Spartans.
Last week, the Spartans pulled off the biggest comeback in Division I-A history by rallying from a 35-point third-quarter deficit for an improbable 41-38 victory at Northwestern.
Drew Stanton threw a 38-yard TD pass to Devin Thomas just under five minutes into this contest to give Michigan State (4-5, 1-4 Big Ten) a 7-0 lead. From there it was all Indiana.
The Hoosiers scored the next 46 points, sparked by Lewis, who threw four of his TD passes to standout wide receiver James Hardy.
A 30-yard strike from Lewis to Hardy with 2:16 left in the first quarter gave the Hoosiers the lead for good, 10-7. The duo connected on scoring strikes of two and seven yards in the second quarter and 13 yards in the third.
Lewis completed 15-of-26 passes for 261 yards with one interception. He also ran for 75 yards on 14 carries.
Hardy had six catches for 83 yards for Indiana (5-4, 3-2), which has lost only to No. 1 Ohio State this month.
Stanton was 10-for-22 for 100 yards for Michigan State, which gained 80 of its 215 yards on its opening drive and had only eight first downs.
No one has shouted yet.
Be the first!
Be the first!
Related News
- Michigan State defensive coordinator Barnett heading to Florida State Jan 5
- Indiana adds graduate transfer from Miami to offensive line Jan 3
- Kenny Hill, TCU rally to beat Stanford in Alamo Bowl Dec 29
- Indiana WR Cobbs to enter NFL draft Dec 21
- West Florida holds off Indiana (Pa) 27-17 in D-II semifinal Dec 9
- Wisconsin can take step toward playoff by beating Michigan Nov 16
- Spartans move on after being routed at Ohio State Nov 14
- Maryland faces challenging task to become bowl eligible Nov 14
- No. 1 Alabama beats No. 18 Mississippi State 21-24 Nov 12
- No. 11 Ohio State rebounds, routs No. 13 Michigan St 48-3 Nov 11
- Illinois, Indiana look for first Big Ten win Nov 10
- Buckeyes host Michigan St with Big Ten East up for grabs Nov 10


text:
Once you've tried the shapewear, you'll quickly wonder how your wardrobe has gone! And the more variety you have, the more you can enjoy the way you feel sexy and confident every day, no matter what you wear. As you create a shapewear collection, you may be wondering what the shelf life of these clothes is, and how much you can reasonably expect to own to have everything you need. Here's what you need to know;
How Long Should One Piece Last?
Let's start by discussing the life of your shapewear;
Although shapers or waist trainers are very strong in one way, especially their ability to sculpt and shape your figure, they are also very delicate and must be treated with care to last.
Refer to the link given for more information on the ultimate washing tips for waist trainers!
The life of your shapewear depends on how often you wear it, how you use it and what type of garment it is. For example, if you buy a garment that you only want to wear a few times a year for special occasions, you can have it in your closet for several years. If, on the other hand, you have something like a training band that you use almost daily by sweating hard and moving vigorously, you will wear out much more quickly.
In general, if you wear a shaper almost every day, it will last a few months. If you use it less frequently, such as once a week or less, you can expect its shelf life to last a year longer.
The best way to find out if it's time to replace your shaping garment is to test if it still works for you naturally. Your waist trainer corset should embrace your figure firmly and carve your figure in a flattering and confident manner. If over time, you notice that the materials are losing their elasticity and shaping power, it may be time to replace your shaper. You can also see that your body changes over time. If the shaper does not fit as before, it's time to change it.
How To Keep Your Clothes Looking & Working Like New?
It is essential to maintain your clothes to make them last properly. Here are some essentials to wash, wear and store your shapewear:
Wash Only If Necessary
We recommend that you wear a shaper at least twice before washing, because every time you wash it, the fabric is slightly worn. Unless stained or smelly, wait for washing (the obvious exception being the shape of the panties).
Look At The Latex
Although it is a powerful shaping material, it is also quite delicate. Latex waist trainer should be washed by hand in a bucket of warm water with a very mild shampoo. Try the baby shampoo! Rinse your garment thoroughly and hang it, but do not twist. Finally, do not let it dry in the sun.
Be Gentle With Latex-Free Clothes
You can wash it in a washing machine with laundry detergent. Make sure there are no dyes, perfumes, alcohol, softeners or bleach. Make a gentle cycle with cold water or do it in a bucket of cold water. Lay flat or hang to dry.
Store With Care
To keep your mother cutter in shape, place it flat in a drawer and make sure it is not exposed to light. If it hangs well, use clothes pegs or lingerie hangers. Size trainers can be hung on a velvet hanger.
How Many Pieces Of Shapewear Do You Need?
Rotating several pieces of clothing through your wardrobe will ensure that your figure is ready to dress for any occasion. The types of shapers you prefer to have in your collection will depend on your needs, your target areas and how you dress.
For training: We hope you train regularly and feel right about your sportswear.
Hence, we recommend having:
- One training tape to optimise your workouts and increase perspiration
- Combination of 2 leggings or toning shorts or more.
- Any additional compression garment that you prefer, such as other ups and downs.
To buy the perfect quality American Made Shapewear, visit our collection right away. We serve only one mission, and that is to help women create curves with our highly effective waist cincher corsets and shapewear.