text:
Masonic quotes by Brothers
Help Me Maintain OUR Website!!!!!!
Version 1.2
Article: 3187 of alt.freemasonry
(1) Where is this FAQ available?
(4) Are there any Wide World Web Masonic resources?
(5) What about CompuServe, AOL, Prodigy, Genie, Delphi, and other commercial services?
(6) What is alt.freemasonry for?
(7) What is alt.masonic.members for?
(8) What is alt.masonic.demolay for?
(9) Hey! Somebody just posted some nonsense about how Masons worship Satan and sell their soul to the Reverend Moon! What should I do about it?
(2) What is the Scottish Rite?
(6) What is DeMolay?
(7) What is Rainbow?
(8) What are some other Masonic organizations?
(10) What is Prince Hall Masonry?
(11) What is a 33rd degree Mason?
(12) Are there any Masonic functions that I can attend as a non-Mason?
(13) Who is the head of the Masons?
(14) Are there dues, fees, etc associated with being a Mason?
(15) I hear Masons refer to an "apron". What is that?
(16) What is a "Masonic Funeral"?
(1) Are Masons just a bunch of old men? Isn't Masonry dying out?
(2) Aren't Masons racist/elitist?
(3) Isn't Masonry just a place where businessmen make deals?
(4) I see titles like "Worshipful Master" and "Senior Deacon"—is this some kind of cult?
(5) Masonry is a secret society, right?
(6) Masonry is a religion, right?
(7) Are Masons really controlling the world/meeting with the Bavarian Illuminati/members of the Trilateralist? Commission/etc?
(8) Masons are anti-Catholic, right?
(9) Masonic rituals are demeaning or embarrassing to the candidate, right?
(10) I heard/read a Mason talking about a "Masonic Bible". Do Masons have their own Bible?
(11) I see that Masonic buildings are called Temples. Does that mean that Masons worship there?
(1) What are the requirements for becoming a Mason?
(3) Can homosexuals be Masons?
(4) I have a physical disability. Can I be a Mason?
(6) Do Masons accept Catholics?
(8) What if my religion does not allow the swearing of oaths?
(10) OK, I'm interested-- how do I proceed?
(1) Where did Masons come from?
(2) What US Presidents have been Masons?
(3) Was Thomas Jefferson a Mason? Patrick Henry? Abraham Lincoln?
(4) What famous people have been Masons?
(5) What famous buildings in the US have been laid Masonically?
(6) What's the difference between AF&AM and F&AM?
(7) Was Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormon Church, a Mason?
(8) What is the oldest Lodge Room in the world? In the US?
(9) Is it true that all of George Washington's generals during the Revolutionary War were Masons?
(10) Is it true that all the signers of the Declaration of Independence were Masons? The Articles of Confederation? The Constitution?
(11) George Washington turned down the title of "Grand Master of the United States"-- true?
(12) Why do some Lodges meet on a certain day of the week "following the full moon"? Are Masons some kind of moon worshippers?
(13) Did Masons suffer at the hands of the Nazis?
(14) Are Masons connected to Greek-letter college fraternities?
(15) I want information on Masonic history. What books would be good introductions?
(16) My local Library doesn't have any books on Freemasonry, where can I find them?
(17) What movies/books feature Masonry?
(1) Important Note
I compiled/authored versions of this FAQ up to this version (1.2). Unfortunately, I no longer have the time available to maintain it. Someone (singular or plural) will either step forward to maintain this FAQ or it will be frozen at this version. I propose that a version 1.3 be issued giving information on how to contact whoever will be maintaining this FAQ. In the meantime, asking on alt.freemasonry should elicit response. Please do not e-mail me with corrections or additions. If there is some major error of fact in this version, I will correct it, but only if it is truly serious.
(2) Acknowledgements
Since undertaking this project, my mailbox has literally overflowed (even overquota'd!) with helpful letters from Brothers offering to write, revise, and provide information. Many sections of this FAQ were written by brothers (and sisters) whose wisdom, experience, and knowledge is a truly wonderful resource. Thanks to ALL who've written me. I tried to acknowledge everyone personally, but if I missed you, it wasn't intentional.
Honor Roll:
Peter T. Arnold, Ron Boutwell, Denis Constales, Steven Cranmer, Earl K. Dille, Bob Dixon, Hans Prag Enator, Ed Greenberg, Bill Hickey, Roger Ingersoll, Joy Leavy, Paul Leger, Steve Lubetkin, Trevor W. McKeown, Bill Menees, Henry Miller, Stephen Morris, Roderick Morrison, Nick Oliver, Tony Olivero, Bruce Perrussel, Charles Plater, Mark Saunders, Tom Schnorrenberg, Michael Shelby, Robert H. Starr, Dave Stites, David R. B. Walker, Don Williams, Catherine Yronwode, Jeffrey Zeth, and a few others whose names I couldn't discern from their e-mail addresses. Special thanks to Roger Ingersoll, whose Masonic FTP archives provided substantial portions of this FAQ. Where possible, I have included specific credits to the authors of those files, though several are anonymous. Note that one of the sources credited here is FMBITS.TXT, which has the following disclaimer as its preface: "With apologies, the original source for the following information has been lost. It probably came from either the Philatethes or the Southern California Research Lodge. The file has been stored in my Computer for a couple of years. Enjoy!
William N. Wine (Sysop) #72435,1512 [ Masonry Forum Compuserve 07/11/93]".
Special thanks to Steve Lubetkin, who dug up the list of US Grand Lodges. Finally, thanks to the Grand Lodge of Michigan, whose lectures provided the basis of the "Famous Freemasons" list, and to many research lodges, whose work over the years has provided much of the information contained here.
(3) Introduction
This FAQ is version 1.2, which includes a number of revisions, suggestions, and reactions to version 1.1. Part (4) of this part details the changes and additions in this section. Any question you see marked with an asterisk should be considered incomplete. Finally, it should be stated without fail that no Mason, no Master, no Grand Master can speak for all of Masonry. The answers provided herein are not "authoritative" in the sense that they are universally true for all Masons everywhere and reflect the beliefs of all Masons. There are differences between each jurisdiction, and in general there are differences between US Grand Lodges and Grand Lodges in other countries. Of course, the high ideals and noble principles of Masonry remain the same the world over, but some of the fine points and details may vary. So remember: nothing here is "gospel". This FAQ is intended to provide a summation of commonly-given answers to commonly-asked questions on the net.
(4) Revisions in This Edition
In no particular order:
(5) A Note on Worldwide Masonry
An American wrote this FAQ and the majority of those who've contributed material are also Americans. This unfortunately lends a very American flavor to the material. While the tenets and noble principles of Masonry are the same everywhere, there is some difference in organizational structure, ritual work, policies, procedures, etc. in non-US GLs (and even among US GLs). I am always more than happy to include material on Masonry outside of the US and examples of how Masonry differs in non-US jurisdictions, and what I've received I've included. This is simply a disclaimer that the material herein is derived from primarily American sources and when in doubt, check with the Grand Lodge in your jurisdiction.
(1) Where is this FAQ available?
This FAQ is available by e-mail request via Roger Ingersoll's automated e-mail system. Send mail to email@example.com with a subject of GET FAQ.
This FAQ is also available by FTP from Roger Ingersoll's FTP archives (see question 3 of this section).
It is available on the AFS file system, in the /afs/umich.edu/users/a/f/afabbro/Public directory.
This FAQ can also be read on the Web. Look on ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/ds/dstites/home/masfaq/masfaq_0.html. This may not necessarily be the most current version (HTMLizing takes time!)
The latest version of this FAQ may also be obtained on Fidonet by FREQ-ing the "magic" name MASFAQ from 1:202/106, (Hiram's Valley BBS).
It is posted monthly to alt.freemasonry, alt.masonic.demolay, and alt.masonic.members.
(2) Is there a mailing list?
Yes. Send e-mail to email@example.com with a message asking to be subscribed (e.g., "Please subscribe me. My name is Benjamin Franklin and my e-mail address is firstname.lastname@example.com"). The exact syntax of your request is not important, as it will be read by a human.
(3) Are there any FTP sites?
Yes. Roger Ingersoll maintains a large collection of Masonic material at ftp.netcom.com, in the /pub/ro/rogeri/freemasonry directory.
While you're there, take a look in Dave Stites' site (say that three times fast, I dare you), which is /pub/ds/dstites/freemasonry
(4) Are there any Wide World Web Masonic resources?
Yes. Try http://www.mit.edudryfoo/Masons/Main-page.html
(5) What about CompuServe, AOL, Prodigy, Genie, Delphi, and other commercial services?
On CompuServe, type GO MASONRY to reach the Masonry forum. The CIS Masonry forum has an excellent library of files on Masonry, and the forum contains very good discussion.
On America On-Line: There are four Masonic discussion folders in two different areas. Each area has a Masonic Youth Groups section and a Freemasonry section. To get to the first area use keyword: Exchange, then press the Communities Center button, then go to the Organizations Board. In that folder are the discussion groups called Freemasonry Online and Masonic Youth Organizations. To get to the second, use keyword: Religion, then go to Other Religions, and then select Other Religions again in the new list. Masonic Youth Groups and Freemasonry should be in there somewhere (commercial providers have a habit of incorrectly placing Masonry in the "religion" section-- Genie used to do this). The first area is probably the better of the two.
You can also search the software libraries on AOL using the keyword "Mason". Also, searching the member directory using the keyword "Mason" will give you a list of many other Masons on AOL.
AOL also has a "CyberLodge". E-mail firstname.lastname@example.com for a copy of the trestleboard. The "CyberLodge" meets in the "Public Chat Room" by the name of "Freemasonry." Meetings are held at 9:00PM Eastern on the second Wednesday and 8:00PM Eastern on the fourth Sunday of each month. (Thanks to Bill Menees for the information on AOL)
(6) What is alt.freemasonry for?
Alt.freemasonry is intended for general discussion of Masonry and related topics. Almost any question regarding Masonry is welcome there. Both Masons and non-Masons are welcome.
(7) What is alt.masonic.members for?
Alt.masonic.members is intended to be a home for USENET Masons to talk about the Craft, though non-Masons are welcome to participate. The focus in a.m.m., however, is on discussion among people already familiar with Masonry or people who are Masons, so questions about becoming a Mason or what the York Rite is would be inappropriate (feel free to post such questions in alt.freemasonry instead).
Of course, neither newsgroup (or the mailing list) is considered Tiled and non-Masons read both regularly, so Brothers should not post anything that they would not normally discuss with non-Masons.
Discussion on Co-Masonry (a form of Masonry which includes both men and women) is welcome in either a.f or a.m.m.
(8) What is alt.masonic.demolay for?
A.m.d. is for discussion regarding DeMolay (shocker, huh?) See III, 6 if you don't know what DeMolay is.
(9) Hey! Somebody just posted some nonsense about how Masons worship Satan and sell their soul to the Reverend Moon! What should I do about it?
Periodically, someone will post obvious flame-bait on one of the Masonic newsgroups. Masons who read the newsgroup obviously want to post and rebut these false claims. However, keep in mind that a single bit of bait that takes 30 seconds to write ("Masons are all KKK members!") can consume hours of time in rebuttal. Half-a-dozen flame-bait posts can drown the newsgroup in meaningless flame-wars that asphyxiate any serious conversation. On the other hand, if the poster finds that his ramblings are simply being ignored, he will likely become bored and go off to alt.get-a-life and mingle with his own kind.
Some readers feel that these claims must be addressed, otherwise USENET readers will get the wrong impression about Masonry. There is some truth in this, though to be frank, if someone is willing to get his information from someone who posts unsubstantiated one-line attacks with half-a-dozen misspelled words, there is probably little hope. However, this FAQ has been created to provide an answer to these nonsense posts, so that Masons can simply say "read the FAQ" rather than having to recreate its answers every time.
Still, some people will want to reply. In descending order of desirability, here is a hierarchy of possible responses:
(a) Ignore it. The person involved obviously is trying to stir up a flame-war, or bait Masons into saying something nasty in return so he can point and say "See! Masons are name-callers!"
(b) Respond via e-mail. Point the poster to this FAQ, or write your own response.
(c) Post a follow-up designed to entertain newsgroup readers. For example, if someone posts claiming that Masons are part of a global conspiracy, a gag post about channeling Adam Weishaupt of the Bavarian Illuminati or stating that Masons receive their daily to-do lists from email@example.com would show the folly of the poster's ideas while still contributing something enjoyable to the newsgroup's readers.
(d) If the poster's flame-bait is something not covered in this FAQ and you feel that you just can't hold back from responding, please:
(1) remove any cross-posts (in both the posting and the follow-ups). Some trollers will post a bit of bait in alt.freemasonry and cross-post it to a half-dozen different groups, thus assuring that they receive at least some response somewhere, which will be echoed to all the other groups...can you say snowball?
(2) If it not covered in this FAQ, please send a copy of the original post and your reply to firstname.lastname@example.com, so it may be included future editions. No one has yet claimed that Masonry is really a secret martial art or that Master Masons have a special power to buy real estate no-money-down, but if someone does, a Q&A just for them will be added.
Finally, remember that there are people who have genuine questions or misconceptions about Masonry and are not trying to flame anyone but rather simply want answers. Just because they have misconceptions does not mean they are trying to provoke anyone. You can usually tell the difference by the tone of the post:
Those asking honest questions will usually respond with a thanks and consider the information given. Those seeking to sow the seeds of a flame-war will simply switch subjects endlessly and ignore any responses.
(1) What is Freemasonry?
Freemasonry (or simply, Masonry) is a fraternal order whose basic tenets are brotherly love, relief (philanthropy), and truth. We strive to enjoy the company of our brother Masons, assist them in times of personal trouble, and reinforce essential moral values. There is an old adage that Masonry "takes good men and makes them better", which is our goal.
It has often been observed that men are the products of everything they come into contact with during their lifetime. Masonry offers a man an opportunity to come into regular, enjoyable contact with men of good character, thus reinforcing his own personal moral development. Of course, Masonry is also meant to be enjoyed by its membership, so the order should not be viewed simply as a philosophical club, but rather a vibrant fellowship of men who seek to enjoy each other's company, a fraternity.
To maintain this fraternity, discussion of religion and politics within the Lodge is forbidden, as these subjects are those that have often divided men in the past. Masons cover the spectrum of both religious and political beliefs and encourages a man to be religious without advocating a particular religion, and to be active in his community without advocating a particular medium of political expression.
While there probably are some actual stone-workers who are Masons, Masonry does not teach is membership the literal techniques of stonework. Rather, it takes the actual "operative" work of Medieval Masons and uses it as an allegory for moral development. Thus, the symbols of Masonry are the common tools that were used by medieval stonemasons: the gavel, the rule, the compass, the square, the level, etc. Each of these has a symbolic meaning in Masonry. For example, Masons are said to meet "on the level", meaning that all Masons are brothers, regardless of social status, personal wealth, or office within the Lodge or in the world at large. Similar symbolism exists for other tools.
Masonry is distinguished from other fraternal orders by its emphasis on moral character, its ornate rituals, and its long tradition and history, which dates back to at least the 17th century in modern form, the 14th century (c. 1350-1390) in the written evidence of its precursors, and back to the mists of antiquity in its origin. Masonry has a continuously documented paper history (i.e., Lodge to Lodge) since 1717, though historical analysis shows Masonry to be much older.
There are also a great many things that Masonry is NOT: a religion, a secret society, etc., and these will be covered later in this FAQ.
There are three degrees in Masonry. Other appendant bodies confer additional degrees, up to the 32nd (or the honorary 33rd) of the Scottish Rite, but in symbolic Masonry (or Blue Lodge Masonry) proper, there are only three. At the Blue Lodge, Masons receive the degrees of Entered Apprentice (first degree), Fellowcraft (second degree), and Master Mason (third degree). Promotion generally requires the mastery of a small body of memorized material, the contents of which varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In some jurisdictions, only the signs, tokens, and grips of each degree must be learned; in others, a longer amount of material.
Of course, no Mason would ever look down upon a Brother simply because he was of a lower degree-- the degrees do not exist to create a pecking order or to confer rank. Rather, they are a system of initiation that allows men to become familiar with the august and ancient history and principles of Masonry at a comfortable pace. Proceeding from Entered Apprentice to Master Mason in the US can take as little as three months, while in England, the degrees are spaced apart by a year's interval.
Most Lodges have regular communications (meetings) once a month, that are also referred to as "business meetings". In the US, these are typically only open to Master Masons. In England, these meetings are usually opened in the first degree, and EAs may attend). Conferring of degrees is usually done at other meetings during the month.
While conferral of degrees and mundane business do take up a lot of a Lodge's time, there are a host of other activities that Masons engage in within the fraternity. Charitable work is often done, in the form of fundraisers, community volunteer work, etc. And there are also a great many things done for the simple pleasure of company: monthly breakfasts or dinners, picnics, card/chess matches, lecturers on Masonic history, you name it. Masonry is a fraternity, and its membership seeks to have fun.
Local Masonic Lodges are organized under Grand Lodges. In the United States, each state has its own Grand Lodge, which is a peer with every other Grand Lodge. There is not "Grandest Lodge"-- each Grand Lodge is supreme in its jurisdiction (e.g., in the US, in its state) but has no authority elsewhere. Of course, this does not mean that Masonry in New York is radically different than Masonry in Scotland or New Mexico. Masons are very traditional and the differences between Grand Lodges are usually minor.
The head of a Lodge is given the title Worshipful Master. This, of course, does not imply that Masons worship him; it is merely a stylish title. Masonic Lodges can be found in many cities, of all sizes, around the world. There are presently approximately 5 million Masons, half of which are in the United States.
(2) What is the Scottish Rite?
The Scottish Rite is an appendant body of Masonry, meaning that it is not part of the Blue Lodge per se, but closely associated with Masonry. It requires that a man be a Master Mason before joining the Scottish Rite. The Scottish Rite confers the 4th through 32nd degrees. The degree work may be, but is not necessarily, completed at one time. Any Master Mason is eligible to join the Scottish Rite. The degrees of the Scottish Rite continue the symbolism of the first three Masonic degrees. For a discussion of the 33rd degree, see question 9 of this section.
The above refers to the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite (AASR), not the Rectified Scottish Rite , which exists both in UGLE-recognized and non-recognized Masonic bodies in the Europe.
(3) What is the York Rite?
The York Rite, like the Scottish Rite, is an appendant body of Masonry, and confers degrees beyond the Blue Lodge's three degrees. It consists of nine degrees additional degrees: Mark Master, Past Master, Most Excellent Master, and Royal Arch Mason; the Cryptic Degrees of the Royal Master, Select Master, and Super Excellent Master; and the Chivalric Orders of the Order of the Red Cross, Order of the Knights of Malta and the Order of Knights Templar.
The Temple degrees, which comprise the top degrees of the York Rite are specifically Christian. Or at least, it can be stated that the oath is: in some Grand Lodges in the US and abroad, one need not be a Christian, but rather only be willing to take a Christian OATH. The difference here is that there are some who would willingly swear to defend the Christian faith on the grounds that they would defend any man's faith. The Chapter (or Royal Arch) and Council Of Royal And Select Masters (Cryptic Rite), which comprise the first two sections of the York Rite, are not specifically Christian.
As with most things Masonic, discuss any concerns with your local York Rite, who can advise you regarding your eligibility.
(4) What is the Shrine?
The Shrine is not an appendant body of Masonry, though the distinction would escape many. The Shrine confers no additional degrees. It was founded in 1872 (the Mecca Temple in New York City) and an Arabic theme was chosen. Hence, the distinctive red fez that Shriners wear at official functions.
Members of the Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles the Mystic Shrine for North America (AASONM is an anagram for "A MASON") are members of the Scottish Rite's 32nd degree, and/or Knights Templer of the York Rite. The Shrine is most noted for its emphasis on philanthropy and its jolly outlook on life-- it has been called "the playground of Masonry". This is expressed as "Pleasure without intemperance, hospitality without rudeness, and jollity without coarseness."
The Royal Order of Jesters is a group drawn from Shrine membership, by invitation only.
(5) What is the Eastern Star?
The Order of the Eastern Star is an adoptive rite of Freemasonry with teachings based on the Bible and objectives that are charitable and benevolent. The founder of OES was Dr. Robert Morris, a lawyer and educator from Boston, Massachusetts, who was a Master Mason and Past Grand Master of Kentucky. Dr. Morris intended his creation to become a female branch of Freemasonry, but he failed to overcome the great opposition this idea engendered. After his first published ritual in 1849-50, he became associated with Robert Macoy who wrote and published a ritual based on Morris' in 1867. The first Grand Chapter was organized in Michigan in the same year. (There is evidence for an organization of the same name founded variously in 1788 or 1793, but this group was defunct by 1867.) Subordinate (local) chapters operate under charter from state level grand chapters which are responsible to the General Grand Chapter at the International Eastern Star temple in Washington, D.C.
Members must be eighteen years or older and either Master Masons in good standing or properly related to a Master Mason in good standing. The latter category includes wives; widows; sisters; daughters; mothers; granddaughters; step-mothers; step daughters; step-sisters; and half-sisters. In 1994 this was expanded to include nieces, daughters-in-law, and grandmothers.
Each chapter has eighteen officers, some elected and others appointed. Two offices are specifically male (Patron and Associate Patron) while nine offices are specifically female (including Matron and Associate Matron). While the Worthy Matron is considered to be the presiding officer of the chapter, the degrees cannot be conferred without a presiding brother in good standing (hence the Patron and Associate Patron).
Each chapter retains the right to decide who shall be a member of the organization. Election to the degrees must be unanimous, without debate, and secret. The successful candidate must profess a belief in a Supreme Being and is initiated in five degrees, which are conferred in one ceremony. (When Eastern Star was created, it was intended to be the first of a three degree series. The second and third degrees were Queen of the South and the Order of the Amaranth, respectively.)
Interestingly enough, OES requires only the belief in a Supreme Being even though the degrees are based in both the Old and New Testaments. While non-Christians are not specifically barred from membership, it would seem to be difficult to be other than Christian and belong to the Order. (Thanks to Joy Leavy for this section)
(6) What is DeMolay?
The International Order of DeMolay is the world's largest fraternal organization for young men between the ages of 13 and 21. The Order was founded in Kansas City, Missouri on March 24, 1919 by Frank Sherman Land. DeMolay Chapters are sponsored by Masonic Lodges, and some members of the sponsoring body also serve as Advisors on the Chapter's Advisory Council. Structurally, it is similar to Masonry. The officers of a Chapter are the Master Councilor, Senior Councilor, Junior Councilor, Senior Deacon, Junior Deacon, Senior Steward, Junior Steward, Orator, Scribe, Marshal, Chaplain, Standard Bearer, Sentinel, Almoner, and seven Preceptors.
DeMolay Chapters hold monthly or bi-weekly meetings with Masonic-like Ritual. Other activities include athletic tournaments and events, social functions (joint activities with Rainbow are encouraged), fund-raising activities, Masonic service activities, and civic and philanthropic activities.
DeMolays are taught the seven cardinal virtues of the Order-- filial love, reverence for sacred things, courtesy, comradeship, fidelity, cleanness, and patriotism-- and the importance of practicing them in their daily lives.
The Order's namesake is Jacques DeMolay, who was the last Grand Master of the Knights Templar and who was executed by the Inquisition on March 18, 1314. Louis Lower, the first DeMolay, and his group of friends, when asked by Dad Land to choose a name for their group, believed that his heroic fidelity and loyalty to his fellow Templars were qualities with which they wanted their group to be identified. Mind you, Dad Land explained this to them before they chose their name.
A fascinating book about the history of the Order and the life of Frank S. Land (1890-1959), titled "Hi! Dad," is available from the DeMolay and More Store or practically any member of the Order. The phone number of the DeMolay and More Store is 1-800-DEMOLAY.
(thanks to Tom Schnorrenberg)
(7) What is Rainbow?
Rainbow is the complement to DeMolay, enrolling girls between the age of 13 and 20 if they are related to members of a Masonic Lodge or the Eastern Star. It confers two degrees, the Initiatory and the Grand Cross of Color.
(8) What are some other Masonic organizations?
Acacia: A college fraternity for Master Masons, the sons of Masons, and young men recommended by two Masons one of whom is an Acacian himself. The national governing board is composed exclusively of 32nd and 33rd degree Masons.
Order of Amaranth: Open to Masons and their wives, mothers, daughters, widows, and sisters. At least one Master Mason must be present at every initiation. It confers only one degree.
Daughters of Mokanna: An auxiliary organization of the Grotto comprised of the wives, mothers, daughters, widows, and sisters of the Master Masons in the Grotto.
Daughters of the Nile: An auxiliary organization for the wives, mothers, daughters, widows, and sisters of members of the Shrine.
Desoms: An organization for deaf Masons.
Grotto: A fun organization open to Master Masons. It imitates the Shrine to a large degree, but requires only that a member be a Master Mason rather than a 32nd degree Mason or Knight Templar. Officially known as The Mystic Order of Veiled Prophets of the Enchanted Realm (MOVPER).
High Twelve International: An organization of Master Masons that usually meet for lunch, enjoy fellowship, and support Masonic causes, with special emphasis on youth and patriotic endeavors.
Job's Daughters: Enrolls girls between the ages of 13 and 20 that have some Masonic relative. They must profess a belief in God, the Ten Commandments, and the Lord's prayer.
L.O.S. of N.A.: The Ladies' Oriental Shrine of North America. Another auxiliary for the wives, mothers, daughters, widows, and sisters of Shrine members.
National Sojourners, Inc.: Open to Master Masons which are U.S. citizens and who have served or are serving as a commissioned or warrant officer in the United States military or in any armed service of a nation allied with the US in time of war.
Philalethes: A group for Masons interested in Masonic philosophy and history.
Royal Order of Scotland: An organization for Christian Masons who have been 32nd degree Masons or Knights Templar for five or more years.
Tall Cedars of Lebanon: A fun organization for Master Masons similar to the Grotto. It confers the two degrees of the Royal Court and the Sidonian.
White Shrine of Jerusalem: For Master Masons and their wives, mothers, daughters, widows, and sisters. Members must profess a belief in the defense of the Christian religion.
(thanks to Bill Menees for providing this section)
(9) What is Co-Masonry?
Co-Masonry refers to Masonic Lodges that admit both men and women. Co-Masonry traces its heritage back to the 19th century.
There are two Grand Lodges of Co-Masonry with jurisdiction in America: Le Droit Humain, a GL based in Paris, France and the original Co-Masonic organization in the US, and the American Federation of Human Rights (aka American Co-Masonry), which is based in Larkspur, Colorado.
The degree structure differs slightly from standard Blue Lodge structure (i.e., the Scottish Rite is worked as part of the regular Lodge, not a separate organization), but in most things Co-Masonic lodges function as regular Masonic lodges.
(10) What is Prince Hall Masonry?
NOTE: This section is excerpted from the Grand Lodge of New Brunswick's annual communication. I wish there were some Prince Hall Masons who could provide better information.
"There are some schools of thought that Prince Hall (his name not a title) was born in Barbados to a free black woman and a Scottish father. He emigrated to the Colony of Boston, Mass. and acquired real estate, making him eligible to vote. It was also documented that he was a devout Christian and a leather-worker by trade. On March 6, 1775, during the American War of Independence, Prince Hall along with fourteen men of color were made Masons in Army Lodge #441 of the Irish Constitution. When Army Lodge moved on, the aforesaid brethren were issued a permit authorizing them to appear publicly as a Masonic body for the purpose of celebrating the feast of St. John and to bury their dead.
On March 2, 1784, these same brethren applied to the Grand Lodge of England for a charter, which was subsequently issued to them on September 29, 1784. They were warranted under the name of African Lodge, No. 459 on the register of the Grand Lodge of England by authority of then Grand Master, the Duke of Cumberland. Prince Hall was the first Master. That charter, which is authenticated and in safekeeping, is believed to be the only original charter issued from the Grand Lodge of England still in the possession of any Lodge in the United States.
African Lodge allowed itself to slip into arrears in the late 1790's and was stricken from the rolls after the Union of 1813, although it had attempted correspondence in 1802 and 1806. In 1827, after other unreplied-to attempts at communication, it declared its independence of any external authority and began to call itself African Grand Lodge No. 1.
It is interesting to note that when the Massachusetts lodges which were acting as a Provincial Grand Lodge declared themselves an independent Grand Lodge, and even when the present Grand Lodge of Massachusetts was formed by the amalgamation of two separate Grand Lodges, African Lodge was not invited to take part, even though it held a warrant every bit as valid as those others. This may be explained in part by this 1795 quote from John Eliot, who later became Grand Chaplain of the Gr. Lodge of Mass. He wrote, "White Masons, who are not more skilled in geometry than their black brethren, will not acknowledge them... .the truth is they are ashamed of being on an equality with blacks."
Today there are 45 Grand Lodges (the latest being the just formed "Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of the Caribbean") that trace their origin back to African Lodge #459. There are more than 5000 Prince Hall Lodges and over 300,000 members. So far as it is known, their ritual, their secrets, their procedures, their requirements, their beliefs, their tenets or fundamental principles, are all either identical with ours, or recognizably similar." (by.. W Bro. Roy Cassidy)
To add to this:
The United Grand Lodge of England has now officially recognized Prince Hall Lodges. Many US Grand Lodges have recognized PH GLs within their jurisdictions, and it has been or is being discussed in other jurisdictions. Since every Grand Lodge is autonomous and the supreme authority in its jurisdiction, this issue must be approached on a state-by-state basis.
Some have criticized Masonry as "segregated" due to the Prince Hall Lodges, but this is a ridiculous claim, since there are many black Masons in non-PH Lodges and white members in PH Lodges, and displays a fundamental ignorance of Masonic history.
(11) What is a 33rd degree Mason?
The Scottish Rite awards a special honorary degree, the 33rd, to those it feels has made an outstanding contribution to Masonry, the community as a whole, and to mankind. There is no way to "achieve" this degree or "take" it, in the sense that one takes the 4th through 32nd degrees in the Scottish Rite. It is a singular honor, rarely bestowed, and greatly admired.
(12) Are there any Masonic functions that I can attend as a non-Mason?
Yes. Many Lodges open their installation of officers to the public. Once a year, a new Worshipful Master takes office. The ceremony performed during his inauguration is public. It is not the same ceremony as would be performed in a regular Masonic ritual or degree, but it does have the flavoring of Masonic symbolism and allows the public to "get a feel for Masonry" without being Masons. NOTE: Not all jurisdictions have public installations. Call or write your local lodge for details.
In addition, many Lodges sponsor public functions throughout the year, such as dinners or charity functions, designed to allow non-Masons who are interested in Masonry the chance to talk with Masons and ask questions. For information, call your local Lodge.
(13) Who is the head of the Masons?
No one. Each Grand Lodge has its own jurisdiction and is the supreme authority within that jurisdiction. Obviously, many Grand Lodges have regular communication with each other, but official policy in one has no effect in another.
(14) Are there dues, fees, etc. associated with being a Mason?
Yes. Like all organizations, Lodges must be able to pay their light bills. Typically, there is a one-time fee for the three degrees of Masonry, as well as regular annual dues. But these vary widely depending on the number of members, cost of living (rent in Manhattan is higher than it is in rural Oklahoma), the actual physical facilities of the Lodge, etc. The fees and dues, however, are not prohibitively expensive (the author is a college student and has no problem with them). Rather than give a single figure which may be very different than your local Lodge charges, or publishing an extended table of costs, it is easiest to simply refer the interested to their local Lodge.
Incidentally, many Grand Lodge jurisdictions provide for "life membership" after a Mason has paid dues for a long period. For example, in Michigan a Mason is no longer asked to pay dues after he has been a Mason for forty years. Other jurisdictions allow members to pay a lump sum for life membership. As with almost everything in Masonry, check with your local Grand Lodge or Lodge for more information.
(15) I hear Masons refer to an "apron". What is that?
"During the ceremonies of his initiation, each Mason is presented with a white apron. It is, to him, an emblem of innocence and the badge of a Mason. It has, in all ages, been cherished by the rich, the poor, the high and the low. It is his for life. He will never receive another one and has, therefore, been cautioned to take it home and instructed in its care. While perfectly satisfactory for him to do so if he desires, he need not bring it to Lodge, as linen aprons are provided for his use meetings." (From a pamphlet, "To the Lady and Family of a Mason")
The above applies to the US. In many other countries, the Master Mason owns his regalia and brings it to the Lodge.
(16) What is a "Masonic Funeral"?
"Any member who was in good standing at the time of his death is entitled to a Masonic funeral if he or his family requests it. Such a request should be made to the Master of his Lodge who will make the necessary arrangements with the family, the mortuary, and the minister. A service is authorized by the jurisdiction in which you are located, and consists of participation at the mortuary, the beginning at the mortuary and the closing at the graveside, or graveside only. Pallbearers will be furnished at the request of the family. In general, the Lodge will do as much or as little as the nearest relative wishes it to do." (From a pamphlet, "To the Lady and Family of a Mason")
(1) Are Masons just a bunch of old men? Isn't Masonry dying out?
As regards the United States:
There is no doubt that the population of Masons is aging. There was a huge increase in membership in almost all fraternal orders after World War II, including Masonry. This peaked at sometime in the late 50s. During the social turbulence and generational strains of the 60s and 70s, new membership fell off, with the result that by the 1980s, total membership was in sharp decline.
However, there are signs that membership has leveled out, or is gaining in some areas. In many lodges, there are a great number of 50-and-up members, and a number of 30-and-under members, with a gulf in between, representing where Baby Boomers would have been. Of course, we are speaking in broad generalities here-- there is no way to know the demographics of your local Lodge without asking one of its members.
The overall point is that Masonic membership, when talking on a national scale, has probably hit a stable membership base, after a huge surge and then fall in membership.
(Please submit information on other parts of the world)
(2) Aren't Masons racist/elitist?
Regarding racism: Masonry explicitly states the equality of men, regardless of race, creed, or color. But there are some Masons who are prejudiced, and this is unfortunate, saddening, and unMasonic. However, it is not representative of Masonry as a whole, or representative of anything except a tiny minority of Masons. There are Masons of all ethnic backgrounds.
"Elitism" is harder to define. If you mean that Masons are highly selective in their membership, then yes, Masons are elitists. But just criteria is used: men of good character, of good report, who believe in God. Does the majority of the population fit that criteria? If you think not, then you could say that Masons are elitists.
The idea that Masonry is only open to the patrician class, the landed gentry, and the wealthy is incorrect. There are Masons of all economic backgrounds. Indeed, there are Lodges which are mostly or wholly made up of blue-collar workers due to local demographics.
(3) Isn't Masonry just a place where businessmen make deals?
No. In fact, most Masons believe that to trade with a Brother Mason only because he is a Mason is unMasonic. Even more importantly, anyone who attempts to join a Lodge solely for business reasons will not be given a petition.
Masons, however, are friends, and it is not surprising that many Masons do trade with Brothers. For one thing, they are dealing with people that are of good character and can be trusted, which is no small statement in the modern marketplace. But Masonry is not a "place to network". Yes, some men do view one of the benefits of membership as an additional source of customers or partners, but few would say that is the only reason they became Masons. The work involved in the degrees alone would make this a poor investment-- better to join the Rotary Club or other business group.
(4) I see titles like "Worshipful Master" and "Senior Deacon"-- is this some kind of cult?
No. The titles are simply colorful, stylish, and full of ancient symbolism. No Mason worships the Master of the Lodge, nor does a Senior (or Junior) Deacon engage in religious actions, as a Deacon of a church might.
(5) Masonry is a secret society, right?
Wrong. Secret societies are generally defined as organizations which are unknown to the public and whose existence is denied. The Bavarian Illuminati and the Mafia would be examples of secret societies.
Masonry, on the other hand, is well-known and proudly displays its existence. Masonic Temples are clearly marked as such, and many Lodges are listed in the yellow pages (usually under "Fraternal Orders"). Members often wear rings or tie-clips that identify themselves as Masons, and Masons often participate in community charity work. Finally, some Masonic functions are open to the public.
Masonry is not a secret society, but rather a society with a few secrets. These are mainly modes of recognition-- the signals, grips, signs, and phrases by which Masons recognize each other. The actual degree rituals are considered secret as well, not because there is anything that would harm Masonry by their revelation, but rather because they are more meaningful if the candidate does not know what is going to go on during them beforehand (see question 9 of this section if that makes you nervous).
It should be pointed out that many other organizations have a similar class of secrets. College fraternities (a.k.a. "Greek letter organizations") often have small secrets known only to their members, allowing them to travel from house to house and still be known.
(6) Masonry is a religion, right?
Masonry is not a religion "by the definitions most people use. Religion, as the term is commonly used, implies several things: a plan for salvation or path by which one reaches the after-life; a theology which attempts to describe the nature of God; and the description of ways or practices by which a man or woman may seek to communicate with God. Masonry does none of those things. We offer no plan of salvation. With the exception of saying that He is a loving Father who desires only good for His children, we make no effort to describe the nature of God. And while we open and close our meetings with prayer, and we teach that no man should ever begin any important undertaking without first seeking the guidance of God, we never tell a man how he should pray or for what he should pray. Instead, we tell him that he must find the answers to these great questions in his own faith, in his church or synagogue or other house of worship. We urge men not to neglect their spiritual development and to be faithful in the practice of their religion. As the Grand Lodge of England wrote in 'Freemasonry and Religion', 'Freemasonry is far from indifferent to religion. Without interfering in religious practice, it expects each member to follow his own faith, and to place above all other duties his duty to God by whatever name He is known.' Masonry itself makes only a simple religious demand on a man--he must believe that he has an immortal soul and he must believe in God. No atheist can be a Mason." (Dr. Jim Tresner, 33rd degree)
"Freemasonry has no dogma or theology. It teaches that it is important for every man to have a religion of his choice and to be faithful to it. A good Mason is made even more faithful to the tenets of his faith by membership." (Rev. Norman Vincent Peale, who was also a Mason)
(7) Are Masons really controlling the world/meeting with the Bavarian Illuminati/members of the Trilateralist Commission/etc?
Yes, not to mention the International Jewish Conspiracy, the Elders of Zion, Inver Brass, S.P.E.C.T.R.E., and the minions of Cthulhu.
Anyone who believes that Masons are the Master Puppeteers of the globe either is pulling your leg, has read too much Robert Anton Wilson, or is in need of serious psychotherapy.
(8) Masons are anti-Catholic, right?
Wrong. There is nothing anti-Catholic in Masonry, in its traditions, its rituals, or its beliefs.
(9) Masonic rituals are demeaning or embarrassing to the candidate, right?
Nothing could be further from the truth. The rituals (degrees) are designed to reinforce virtues that the Craft finds desirable, such as Justice, Brotherly Love, Truth, and the like. The rituals are actually quite beautiful and filled with ancient language and much symbolism. At no point, however, is the candidate asked to do anything that would embarrass or demean him, nor anything that would violate his obligations to his faith, country, or the law.
(10) I heard/read a Mason talking about a "Masonic Bible". Do Masons have their own Bible?
"No. The Bibles sometimes called 'Masonic Bibles' are just Bibles to which a concordance, giving the Biblical citations on which the Masonic Ritual is based, has been added. Sometimes reference material on Masonic history is included. Anyone is welcome to read one." (Dr. Jim Tresner, 33rd degree)
(11) I see that Masonic buildings are called Temples. Does that mean that Masons worship there?
No. "Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary provides a definition for the word 'temple' which is as good an explanation as any: 'a building, usually of imposing size, serving the public or an organization in some special way; as, a temple of art, a Masonic temple'". (Dr. Jim Tresner. 33rd degree)
(1) What are the requirements for becoming a Mason?
Candidates must be male, at least 21 years of age, able to profess a belief in God, and of good character.
For information on mixed-sex Masonry, see the discussion on Co-Masonry in II, 7.
Some Grand Lodges also have a residency requirement; for example, the Grand Lodge of Michigan requires candidates to have lived in its jurisdiction (Michigan) for a minimum of one year.
There are some exceptions to the age requirement. For example, in England and Virginia, the direct relatives of Master Masons in good standing are eligible to join at the age of 18. In some jurisdictions, DeMolays may join upon reaching their 18th birthday.
(2) Who can be Masons?
Any human who meets the requirements listed in question (1) of this section is eligible, regardless of race or color.
Some have speculated that while there is no official prohibition against, say, blacks or Asians from becoming Masons, there is a de facto prohibition because they would never be voted into a lodge. This is false. There are Masons of all ethnic backgrounds.
However, it is fair to state that Masons, as humans, are prone to the kinds of prejudices that all humans may succumb to. Since the vote to admit a candidate is anonymous and must be unanimous, one man's unspoken prejudice is sufficient to deny entry to a man (except, of course, in those jurisdictions which require more than one 'no' vote to deny entrance, but you get the idea). Prejudice is inexcusable and irreconcilable with Masonry, but then, it is also irreconcilable with Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, and there are certainly Christians, Jews, and Muslims who harbor prejudices.
So it is possible that a Mason, acting unMasonically, could act to keep a member out without due cause. But this is not common, nor is it representative of Masonry in general, nor does it conform to the high ideals of Masonry.
(3) Can homosexuals be Masons?
Yes, and there are homosexual Masons. Everything said in question (2) of this section holds true in this case as well. There is the consideration that some men may view homosexuality as being immoral, i.e., that homosexuals are not men of "good character". This is generally not due to any specific prejudice but rather due to religious belief (depending on how one interprets St. Paul, for example). However, judging by conversation on alt.freemasonry, it is safe to say that Masons generally would not regard homosexuality as a barrier to membership.
(4) I have a physical disability. Can I be a Mason?
The answer is almost certainly yes, provided you can attend Lodge (and meet the non-physical criteria in question (1) of this section). Paraplegics have been made Masons, as have the blind, the deaf, and others with a variety of physical handicaps. Minor modifications may need to be done to the rituals (e.g., employing sign language, modifying points where the candidate stands if the candidate is in a wheelchair, etc.) but most Lodges are willing to accommodate candidates.
In medieval times, the requirement to have a sound body free of physical defect was a serious one, since the work of stonemasonry was physically difficult. Some Grand Lodges did carry this requirement into symbolic (i.e., non-operative) Masonry. However, in recent times this has all but been eliminated. Talk to your local Lodge if you have any questions.
(5) Can atheist be a Mason?
The only religious requirement is that candidates believe in the Supreme Being. If you can in you can in good faith profess a belief in the Supreme Being, you are eligible to be a Mason. No atheists will ever knowingly be made a Mason.
There are Christian (Catholic, Protestant, Mormon), Jewish, and Muslim Masons. It would be tedious and pointless to go into a religion-by-religion (and then denomination-by-denomination) discussion. The key points to remember are the requirement of belief in the supreme being and the fact that Masonry is a fraternity, not a religion.
(6) Do Masons accept Catholics?
Catholicism is only mentioned specifically because it has generated a lot of traffic in the past on the Masonic newsgroups. There is no prohibition in any Grand Lodge jurisdiction against Catholics being made Masons.
Please bear in mind that discussion of this subject on the Masonic newsgroups invariably generates a very high noise-to-signal ratio.
(7) Can Wiccans be Masons?
This religion is specifically mentioned only because it has been often debated on alt.freemasonry. It is possible to get into very involved discussions on the nature of Wiccan beliefs and their compatibility with Masonry, but the only possible arbitrator is your Grand Lodge. To that end, it is suggested that if you have more specific questions, contact your local Lodge.
Again, the same could be said about a number of religions, and Wicca is only mentioned specifically because it has been brought up repeatedly on the Masonic newsgroups. Please bear in mind that discussion of this subject on the USENET Masonic newsgroups invariably generates more heat than light.
(8) What if my religion does not allow the swearing of oaths?
Some Grand Lodges allow affirmations to be used instead of the traditional Masonic oath. This is more common in Europe than in the United States. In all cases, it is best to check with the Grand Lodge in your jurisdiction (or your local Lodge) for more specific information.
(9) Do I have to be invited?
Don't wait to be invited-- you will die waiting. Masons are prohibited from actively recruiting or asking non-Masons to join the fraternity, to insure that candidates come of their own free will.
As with many things Masonic, there are some exceptions to this rule. Some Grand Lodges allow solicitation, provided it is low-key and with the strict provision that no pressure be applied. Still, you don't *need* to be invited in any jurisdiction, and if you're interested, act.
(10) OK, I'm interested-- how do I proceed?
If you know a Mason, ask him about membership. He will be glad to tell you all about the Craft and the local lodge, and give you a petition if you wish to join.
If you do not know a Mason, drop a letter to the local lodge, and one of the officers will call you (or call the lodge, though you may not get an answer unless someone is actually there).
Typically, the process is as follows:
(a) the applicant fills out a petition. The petition asks for two sponsors, though if you meet and talk with the officers, they can usually find sponsors or act as sponsors themselves if you do not know anyone in the lodge.
(b) the petition is read at the lodge during the next business meeting, which for many lodges is during the first week of the month. A committee is formed to investigate the candidate. The petition also asks for two character references.
(c) the committee meets with the candidate to answer questions, ascertain that he meets the criteria for membership, and find out a little about him. This is not a "grilling session", but rather a friendly and casual chat to make certain that the candidate has been properly informed about Masonry and that was not improperly solicited. The committee also contacts the character references listed on the petition (typically asking if they know any reason why the candidate should not be accepted, etc.)
(d) The committee reports back to the lodge during the next business meeting and the candidate is voted on. If accepted, someone from the lodge (often the Secretary) contacts the candidate and informs him that he has been accepted and schedules a date for the Entered Apprentice degree.
NOTE: This is based on the summation of several experiences in the U.S. Your mileage may vary.
(1) Where did Masons come from?
A fascinating question! And, alas, impossible to answer within the confines of this FAQ. There are a number of theories, a lot of debate, and a lot of musty history books. Some of the books listed in question 15 of this section should be of help. As a *very* brief overview, here is part of an essay by Henry C. Clausen, a noted Masonic author. This is, of course, just one point of view-- many other theories exist, but Cluasen nicely covers the basics:
"Our Masonic antiquity is demonstrated by a so-called Regius Manuscript written around the year 1390, when King Richard II reigned in England, a century before Columbus. It was part of the King's Library that George II presented to the British Museum in 1757. Rediscovered by James O. Halliwell, a non-Mason, and rebound in its present form in 1838, it consists of 794 lines of rhymed English verse and claims there was an introduction of Masonry into England during the reign of Athelstan, who ascended the throne in A.D. 925. It sets forth regulations for the Society, fifteen articles and fifteen points and rules of behavior at church, teaching duties to God and Church and Country, and inculcating brotherhood. While the real roots of Masonry are lost in faraway mists, these items show that our recorded history goes back well over 600 years. Further proof is furnished through English statutes as, for example, one of 1350 (25 Edward III, Cap. III) which regulated wages of a "Master...Mason at 4 pence per day." The Fabric Role of the 12th century Exeter Cathedral referred to "Freemasons."
The historical advance of science also treats of our operative ancient brethren who were architects and stonemasons of geometry. It is apparent from this portrayal that they had a very real and personal identification with the Deity and that this fervent devotion provided energy to build cathedrals. They embraced the teachings of Plato and understood and applied Pythagorean relationships. Just as there is a beauty of harmony credited to mathematical relationships on which music is based, in precisely the same way these master geometricians treated architecture. The architects and stonemasons became the personification of geometry, performing extraordinary feats with squares and compasses. Geometrical proportion, not measurement, was the rule. Their marks as stonemasons were derived from geometric constructions. The mighty works they wrought, cathedrals with Gothic spires pointing toward the heavens, and especially their "association," were not without danger and opposition, bearing in mind the Inquisition established in 1229, the Saint Bartholomew's Eve Massacre of 1572, and the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685. These historical points remind us of the need for our cautions against cowans and eavesdroppers.
Our operative Brethren of the Middle Ages thus were the builders of mighty cathedrals throughout the British Isles and continental Europe, many of which still stand. These skilled craftsmen wrote in enduring stone impressive stories of achievement, frequently chiseled with symbolic markings. With these architectural structures of these master builders there was a companion moral code. These grew up together. Out of this background modern Freemasonry was born.
Although "Lodges" had existed for centuries, four of the "old" Lodges met in London on St. John the Baptist's Day, June 24, 1717, and formed the first Grand Lodge of England, thereafter known as the Premier Grand Lodge of the world. No longer operative as of old, the Masons carried on the traditions and used the tools of the craft as emblems to symbolize principles of conduct in a continued effort to build a better world.
The American colonial Masonic organizations stemmed from this Grand Lodge of England and were formed soon after 1717. Its then Grand Master appointed Colonel Daniel Coxe as Provincial Grand Master of New York, New Jersy and Pennsylvania on June 5, 1730, and Henry Price of Boston as Provincial Grand Master of New England in April 1733." -- Henry C. Clausen
(2) What US Presidents have been Masons?
George Washington
James Monroe
Andrew Jackson
James Polk
James Buchanan
Andrew Johnson
James Garfield
William McKinley
Theodore Roosevelt
William Howard Taft
Warren G. Harding
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Harry S. Truman
(Lyndon B. Johnson)
Gerald R. Ford
Notes (in chronological order):
William McKinley's Masonic membership has not been confirmed 100%, though his name does appear on several lists. Hopefully, someone will be able to provide a definitive yes or no.
William Howard Taft was made a Mason At Sight by the Grand Master of Ohio and later raised to Grand Master of Ohio in 1909.
Harry S. Truman was also Grand Master of his home state, Missouri.
Lyndon Johnson was an Entered Apprentice, but never progressed beyond that degree.
Ronald Reagan is not a craft Mason. He was made an honorary 33rd degree Mason by the Southern Jurisdiction of the AASR and an honorary member of the Imperial Council of the Shrine, but he was never entered, passed, and raised as a Mason, nor was he ever made a Mason at sight. (Source: Robinson's _Born in Blood_)
Bill Clinton is not a Mason, though he was involved in DeMolay for a time.
Many other leaders in government have been Masons: "They have included fourteen Presidents and eighteen Vice Presidents of the United States; a majority of the Justices of the United States Supreme Court, of the Governors of States, of the members of the Senate, and a large percentage of the Congressmen. Five Chief Justices of the United States were Masons and two were Grand Masters. The five were Oliver Ellsworth, John Marshall (also Grand Master of Masons in Virginia), William Howard Taft, Frederick M. Vinson and Earl Warren (also Grand Master of Masons in California.)" -- Henry C. Clausen
(3) Was Thomas Jefferson a Mason? Patrick Henry? Abraham Lincoln?
No, no, and no. As for the first two, "an exhaustive search of Masonic records in Virginia, and elsewhere, offers no iota of evidence to make them Freemasons. Jefferson participated in the cornerstone laying of his University at Charlottesville, which was done Masonically. He praised Freemasonry and his own words proved he had never been a member of the Craft." (FMBITS.TXT)
There is some evidence that Abraham Lincoln intended to become a Mason when he returned to Springfield after his second term in office, had he not been assassinated in 1865.
(4) What famous people have been Masons?
This is by no means a complete list. This list also includes Prince Hall Masons.
FROM THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION (other than Presidents): Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, Paul Revere, John Paul Jones, LaFayette, Rufus King, James Otis, Baron von Steuben, Joseph Warren, Benedict Arnold (well, you can't win them all)
POLITICAL LEADERS: Winston Churchill, Simon Bolivar, Edmund Burke, Benito Juarez, Edward VII, George VI, Bernardo O'Higgins, Jose' de San Martin, Francisco de Paula Santander, Jose'Rizal, Jose' Marti, Pandit Nehru, Lajos Kossuth, Jonas Furrer, Guiseppe Mazzini, Eduard Benes, John A. MacDonald, Aaron Burr, George McGovern, Barry Goldwater, Estes Kefauver, Adlai Stevenson (not the governor of Illinois, but his father who was Vice President in 1892), Thomas E. Dewey, Alf Landon, Hubert H. Humphrey, Wendell Wilke, W.E.B. DuBois, William Jennings Bryant
MILITARY LEADERS: Omar Bradley, John J. Pershing, Douglas McArthur, General Winfield Scott, Captain Eddie Rickenbacker, Jimmy Doolittle, General Mark Clark, General George C. Marshall
REPUBLIC OF TEXAS: Sam Houston, Stephen Austin, Davy Crockett, Jim Bowie, William B. Travis (and, it should be added, General Santa Ana)
FINE ARTS: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (and his father, Leopold), Ludwig von Beethoven, Jean Sibelius, Franz Liszt, Josef Haydn, Irving Berlin, Gutzon Borglum, Charles W. Peale, Alfons M. Mucha, John Philip Sousa, both Gilbert & Sullivan, George Gershwin, George M. Cohen, Count Basie, Nat King Cole, Giacomo Meyerbeer, Signmund Romberg
ACTORS: John Wayne, Red Skelton, Clark Gable, W.C. Fields, Will Rogers, Burl Ives, Roy Rogers, Danny Thomas, Ernest Borgnine, Oliver Hardy, Tom Mix, Audie Murphy, Gene Autry, Wallace Beery, Eddie Cantor
INDUSTRY & LABOR: Henry Ford, Samuel Gompers, Walter P. Chrysler, John Wanamaker, S.S. Kresge, J.C. Penney, John Jacob Astor, John L. Lewis
ADVENTURERS: Lewis & Clark, Charles A. Lindberg, Kit Carson, Roald Amundsen, Adm. Richard Byrd, Commodore Robert Peary
PHILOSOPHERS: Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Gotthold E. Lessing, Voltaire (Francois Marie Arouet)
ATHLETES: Bob Feller, Tris Speaker, Ty Cobb, Paul "Dizzy" Trout, Harry Carey, Dell Rice, Jimmy Fox, Joe Tinker (of "Tinker to Evers to Chance"), Jack Dempsey, Arnold Palmer, Jack Arthur Johnson
ASTRONAUTS: Edwin E. "Buzz" Aldrin, Jr., Leroy Gordon Cooper, Donn F. Eisele, Virgil I. Grissom, Edgar D. Mitchell, Walter M. Schirra, Jr., Thomas P. Stafford, Paul J. Weitz, James B. Irwin, John Glenn.
WRITERS: Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain), Sir Walter Scott, Rudyard Kipling, Robert Burns, Wassily I. Maikow, Heinrich Heine, Jean P.C. de Florian, Leopoldo Lugoner, Antonio de Castro Alves, James Boswell, Alexander Pushkin, Arthur Conan Doyle, Johnathon Swift, Oscar Wilde
LAW: John Marshall, Earl Warren, Thurgood Marshall
MEDICINE: Drs. Alexander Fleming, Jules Bordet, Antoine DePage, Edward Jenner, Charles and William Mayo, Karl and William Menninger
SCIENCE: Hans C. Orsted, Jons Jakob Frk. von Berzelius, Alfred Edmund Brehm, Luther Burbank, Johan Ernst Gunnerus, Albert Abraham Michelson, Gaspard Monge, C.F.S. Hahnemann, Pedro N. Arata, Alexandre Gustave Eiffel, Alexander Fleming, James Smithson
...as well as Harry Houdini, Norman Vincent Peale, David Sarnoff, Thomas J. Watson, Giuseppe Garibaldi, Cecil J. Rhodes, Marvin Zindler, and many, many more.
(5) What famous buildings in the US have been laid Masonically?
The U. S. Capitol
The Smithsonian Institution
Jackson Hall
The National Education Association Building
The Army War College Building
House of Representatives Office Building
The Washington Monument
The Washington Monument is in Alexandria, Virginia, and honors our first President and Brother Mason, George Washington. (FMBITS.TXT)
(6) What's the difference between AF&AM and F&AM?
F&AM means "Free & Accepted Masons."
AF&AM means "Ancient Free & Accepted Masons".
In practical terms, there is no difference, since the jurisdictions that are termed "ancient" F&AM are no different than those that are simply F&AM. The distinction is a historical one, owing to differences in Grand Lodge names. (someone will provide more information on this topic, I hope)
(7) Was Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormon Church, a Mason?
(This section provided by Brother Bob Dixon; the use of the first person is his) "Joseph Smith was a mason, as were the following four presidents of the LDS church.
From about 1839 to about 1846 most of the members of the church gathered to Nauvoo, Illinois, and there were at least four lodges in operation there. Joseph Smith was a very flamboyant individual and had a disagreement with the Grand Lodge of Illinois over the way the Nauvoo lodges were operated. Accordingly, their charters were revoked by the Grand Lodge.
He was murdered by a mob in 1844, and Brigham Young felt it was as a result of a masonic conspiracy. He prohibited Mormons from being Masons, which remained in effect until the last ten years or so. The ill feelings went both ways, as the Grand Lodge of Utah refused to accept Mormons as members until about 1984.
There are no particular restrictions on Mormons being Masons. We are continually counselled to put our families and Christ first, which many interpret as counsel to avoid most activities outside family and church. This is a personal choice, though, and not a matter of strict doctrine.
We perform certain ordinances such as baptisms for the dead and eternal marriages in our temples, and minor portions of those ordinances bear very surface similarity to parts of the Masonic degrees. The whole scope and character is much different, though. Where (I feel, anyway) that the masonic degree work revolves around our place in God's kingdom here on the earth, our temple rituals deal with creation and our place in the eternities."
(A minor historical note: Smith was made a Mason at Sight by the Grand Master of Illinois)
(8) What is the oldest Lodge Room in the world? In the US?
"St. John's Chapel, Edinburgh, Scotland is said to be the oldest Masonic Lodge Room (1736) in the world. The oldest known Lodge Room in the U.S. is situated in Prentiss House, Marble head, Massachusetts (1760).The oldest Masonic Lodge Building is the Lodge Hall of Royal White Hart Lodge No. 2, Halltax, Northings, North Carolina (1771)." (FMBITS.TXT)
Other information disagrees with this, stating that the oldest American Lodge Room is "Masons Hall in Richmond, Virginia, the home of Richmond Randolph Lodge No. 19 and Richmond Royal Arch Chapter No. 3. The building owned by Royal White Hart Lodge wasn't built until 1821. Masons Hall was built in 1785. It was originally the home of Richmond Lodge No. 10, the first wholly new Lodge chartered by the Grand Lodge of Virginia. It was also the first permanent home of the Grand Lodge of Virginia." (from Northern Light)
(9) Is it true that all of George Washington's generals during the Revolutionary War were Masons?
No. 33 of the generals serving under Washington were Masons. A substantial number, but not "all".
(10) Is it true that all the signers of the Declaration of Independence were Masons? The Articles of Confederation? The Constitution?
No. Masons constituted ten of the signers of the Articles, nine signers of the Declaration, and thirteen signers of the Constitution.
Additionally, Edmund Randolph, Grand Master of Virginia, was an active participant at the Constitutional Convention, though he didn't sign the document. It should also be noted that four Presidents of the Continental Congresses were Freemasons: Peyton Randolph of Virginia, John Hancock of Massachusetts, Henry Laurens of South Carolina, and Arthur St. Clair of Pennsylvania. (Northern Light)
(11) George Washington turned down the title of "Grand Master of the United States"-- true?
Yes, sort of. The American Union Lodge proposed that Washington become "General Grand Master of the United States", a title to be held in the "National Grand Lodge". However, there were many others who also disagreed with the idea, so it was never a serious proposal.
Washington was Master of Alexandria Lodge No. 22 in Virginia, whose Grand Master was then Edmund Randolph. Washington was never Grand Master of Virginia (or any other jurisdiction).
(12) Why do some Lodges meet on a certain day of the week "following the full moon"? Are Masons some kind of moon worshippers?
The reason is actually simple practicality. Masonic Lodges meet at night, since their membership typically works during the day. Before street lights were available in the 19th century, men walked to Lodge in the dark of night and it was common to schedule Lodge meetings shortly after a full moon to provide maximum illumination for Brothers' walk to and from Lodge.
Obviously, this is no longer an issue, though some Lodges whose history stretches back into the 19th century or earlier still schedule their meetings by the moon's period. These are sometimes referred to as "moon Lodges".
(13) Did Masons suffer at the hands of the Nazis?
Yes. The exact numbers are unknown. Lt. Col. David Boyd wrote that 85,000 German Masons were killed by the Nazis, though other research has found that this number may be off by as much as a third. This figure does not include any of the nations the Nazis occupied.
Regardless of the actual number killed, it is clear that Hitler viewed Masonry, which exalts truth, toleration, brotherly love, and free thought, to be dangerous and a threat to his regime. Ironically, in his last days in his bunker in Berlin, Hitler had a painting of Frederick the Great in his chambers. Frederick the Great was a Mason.
(14) Are Masons connected to Greek-letter fraternities?
(15) I want information on Masonic history. What books would be good introductions?
Virtually anything by Allen Roberts.
Robinson, John J. _A Pilgrim's Path_
Robinson, John J. _Born in Blood_
Stevenson, David, PhD. _The Origins of Freemasonry: Scotland's Century 1590-1710_ (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia_ is an excellent reference.
(16) My local Library doesn't have any books on Freemasonry, where can I find them?
Many Lodges maintain their own libraries as do the Grand Lodges. Some larger public Libraries also may have a better collection than a smaller Library. Unfortunately, bookstores do not typically carry a wide assortment of Masonic related books, however, there are several sources to purchase books:
P.O. Box 9759
Richmond, VA 23228
110 Quince Ave. Drawer 70
Highland Springs, VA 23075
(17) What movies/books feature Masonry?
"The Man Who Would Be King," by Brother Rudyard Kipling. A good story, later made into an excellent film, starring Michael Caine, Sean Connery, and Christopher Plummer. Its portrayal of Masonic history is quite fanciful, of course.
"Murder by Decree" A Sherlock Holmes movie, concerning the Master Sleuth's hunt for Jack the Ripper. It does not portray Masonry in an honest, accurate, or favorable light. A good movie, but it is important to remember that no Mason would ever knowingly commit a crime for a Brother. Incidentally, Edward VII was actually a Mason. (The story is not one of Brother Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's).
The "Turmgesellschaft" in Goethe's "Wilhelm Meister" novels is certainly of Masonic origin.
In Tolstoy's "War and Peace", the Masonic initiation ritual of the character Pierre Besouchoff is described in great detail.
There is also a modest body of Masonic poetry:
[What is Freemasonry] [Leadership
Development] [Education] [Masonic
Talks] [Masonic
Magazines Online]
This site is not an official site of any recognized Masonic body in the United
States or elsewhere.
Last modified: March 22, 2014


text:
Cresado v1.3 is now live. Scroll down for details.
Cresado is responsive and retina ready theme for portfolio sites and creative agencies. Powerful options panel gives you a lot of possibilities to edit your theme easily. Over 40 color pickers will help you with creating your own color style. You can also give some personality to your pages thanks to custom title options. Theme looks great on tablets and mobile phones.
Theme features
- Responsive and Retina Ready
- Modern, flexible, multipurpose design
- Can be used for portfolios, agency sites, showcases, photography sites and can be easily adapted to other kind of sites
- Premium Revolution Slider included (value $15)
- Responsive FlexSlider
- Unlimited sliders with powerful slider managers
- Included FancyBox2 (value $19) – fully responsive lightbox plugin
- Support for photos, galleries and videos in lightbox
- Unlimited colors with ver 40 color pickers that can be used for changing you layout colors
- Custom title options – add some personality to your pages with custom titles
- Heavily tested on iPad4, iPhone5 and HTC Phone
- Advanced theme options
- Prepared for Contact Form 7 plugin
- Over 300 font icons from Font Awesome
- 600+ google fonts available with font weights, italics or even different character sets
- Google font live preview in admin area
- Over 30 useful shortcodes
- Integrated UIToTop plugin
- 8 header styles
- 3 custom post types: portfolio, slides, team members
- All custom post types can be used everywhere on the page with shortcode as many times as you need
- Portfolio paginated or filtered
- Masonry portfolio style
- Option for comments in portfolio items
- 4 portfolio item types: photo, video, audio, gallery
- 5 different portfolio thumbnail sizes that can be used to create your amazing and unique portfolio
- 7 blog post formats: standard, aside, audio, gallery, link, quote, video
- 3 custom widgets: latest posts, latest portfolio items, flickr feed
- 5 page templates: contact page, page with slider, page with sidebar, portfolio with filter, portfolio with pagination
- Supports child themes
- Supports all main browsers (IE8 too)
- Unbranded option panel
- Included XML file with demo content
- Translation ready – added po/mo files for translation
Images from demo are not included!
- jQuery Easing
- Fancybox 2
- FitVids Plugin
- FlexSlider 2 by Tyler Smith
- Isotope Plugin by Metafizzy
- Selectivizr
- Superfish
- UI to top
- Revolution Slider
- Shortcode Generator based on ZillaShortcodes
- Slightly Modified Options Framework by Syamil MJ
- AquaResizer by Syamil MJ
- Photos used in portfolio are created by MixeRBink
Version 1.3 - 9.09.2015 FIX: issue with widgets notifications in WP 4.3 UPDATE: TGM Plugin to v2.5.2 UPDATE: Revolution Slider to version 5.0.7 and updated documentation files for plugin Changed files: ~ admin/functions/functions.php ~ admin/functions/revslider/revslider.zip ~ admin/functions/tgm-plugin-activation/class-tgm-plugin-activation.php ~ functions.php ~ includes/widgets/widget-latest-posts.php ~ includes/widgets/widget-latest-projects.php ~ includes/widgets/widget-twitter.php ~ style.css

subset: commoncrawl


text:
New World Temple Building
2 Nephi 5:6, 15-16; "Wherefore, it came to pass that I, Nephi, did take my family, and also Zoram and his family, and Sam, mine elder brother and his family, and Jacob and Joseph, my younger brethren, and also my sisters, and all those who would go with me. And all those who would go with me were those who believed in the warnings and the revelations of God; wherefore, they did hearken unto my words. 15 And I did teach my people to build buildings, and to work in all manner of wood, and of iron, and of copper, and of brass, and of steel, and of gold, and of silver, and of precious ores, which were in great abundance. 16 And I, Nephi, did build a temple; and I did construct it after the manner of Solomon save it were not built of so many precious things; for they were not to be found upon the land. wherefore, it could not be built like unto Solomon's temple. But the manner of the construction was like unto the temple of Solomon; and the workmanship thereof was exceedingly fine."
1 Kings 5:13-16; "And king Solomon raised a levy out of all Israel; and the levy was thirty thousand men. 14 And he sent them to Lebanon, ten thousand a month by courses: a month they were in Lebanon, and two months at home: and Adoniram was over the levy. 15 And Solomon had threescore and ten thousand that bare burdens, and fourscore thousand hewers in the mountains; 16 Beside the chief of Solomon's officers which were over the work, three thousand and three hundred, which ruled over the people that wrought in the work."
1 Kings 6:38; "And in the eleventh year, in the month Bul, which is the eighth month, was the house finished throughout all the parts thereof, and according to all the fashion of it. So was he seven years in building it."
Let's roll up our sleeves and get started because this is an interesting story Joseph Smith wants us to buy into.
Lehi and his family came here to America and in that group we can only guess at how many people really came over, but for the sake of the argument let's say there were as many as 53 people.
Lehi and wife = 2
Lehi's daughters = 2
Lehi's 6 sons, their wives & 5 kids per couple = 42
Zoram, the family friend and his wife plus 5 kids = 7
Next we need to look at what happened.
Nephi and his brothers get into an argument and the clan is split. If half the people (26) went with Nephi this would mean as many as two-thirds of those would be women and children. This would be 18 people who would be non-laborers and that leaves us with 8 men.
Now, are all those men trained in wood-working? What about stone carving? Where are the seamstresses who will create the temple clothing and temple veil? What about those who launder the clothing, clear the fields, cook the food, and meet medical needs…
And the final focus point is time. Second Nephi tells us they built the temple in approximately 1-19 years.
Now compare those stats with Solomon's temple and his workforce.
1 Kings 5:13 – 30,000 laborers
1 Kings 5:15 – 70,000 transporters
1 Kings 5:15 – 80,000 stone hewers
1 Kings 5:16 – 3,300 deputies
Here we see that Solomon had 183,000 people who worked on the temple for 7.5 years.
Also take note of 2 Nephi 5:15 and 2 Chronicles 2:7, 9;
"15 And I did teach my people to build buildings, and to work in all manner of wood, and of iron, and of copper, and of brass, and of steel, and of gold, and of silver, and of precious ores, which were in great abundance."
"7 Send me now therefore a man cunning to work in gold, and in silver, and in brass, and in iron, and in purple, and crimson, and blue, and that can skill to grave with the cunning men that are with me in Judah and in Jerusalem, whom David my father did provide 9 Even to prepare me timber in abundance: for the house which I am about to build shall be wonderful great."
Now let's take another look at 2 Nephi 5:16; "And I, Nephi, did build a temple; and I did construct it after the manner of Solomon save it were not built of so many precious things; for they were not to be found upon the land…."
Short of the fabrics, the materials Nephi claims he used on the temple were the same materials Solomon used so why did he say the materials weren't found upon the land in verse sixteen?
Does Nephi's story make sense? Solomon used over 180,000 people for seven plus years to construct the temple and Nephi had about eight. Not eight thousand or even eight hundred. Just eight total people. What precious ores were in great abundance in the eastern part of North America? Where are the gold or silver mines?
Even if we added a dozen or so people or say even 1,000 could they have built a temple like Solomon's?


text:
Tuesday, 29 November 2005
Wednesday, 23 November 2005
Monday, 21 November 2005
Girls with guitars: The Times looks at some more up and coming all-female bands.
Guitar Intonation: What's this "intonation" malarkey all about then?
String Master automatic guitar tuner keeps your strings tight: Now I've seen everything! This device actually turns the machine heads for you.
Guitar gets refined by fire: guitarist swears that his guitar sounds better than ever having survived a house fire.
Guitar has Intel inside: Could this be what Ananova was whittering on about (below)?
Guitar surfing: A new guitar allows musicians to surf the internet and send emails while playing the instrument. Technology built into the guitar allows users to download chords from the net to play instantly reports The Sun. The Intel Concept Telecaster Guitar - currently in the design stage - is expected to cost thousands of pounds when it goes on sale. Ananova
Let Your iPod Teach You Guitar: Jam along, learn chords, scales and tune-up with iRocker.
Friday, 18 November 2005
Nashville's Guitar Art Limited Edition Book Available Now: This colorful limited edition, commemorative book highlights Nashville's popular GuitarTown Project. The book includes beautiful photographs of all of the guitar sculptures and showcase guitars. It also includes profiles of the visual artists, as well as quotes and photographs of the many Country music artists who supported this project. From Kenny Chesney to Wynonna, the book is a memoir of the project which has been recognized worldwide. Proceeds from the sale of the book benefit the Country Music Hall of Fame and Museum, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, United Way of Nashville, and The DISTRICT.
Monday, 14 November 2005
Randall Announces V2 and T2 Guitar Amps: I think they should make a white one and call it a Hopkirk. I'll go get my coat...
Kahler returns with new bass tremolos and bridges: just when you thought it was safe...
Thursday, 3 November 2005
Guitar Picker: Every guitar currently on Amazon - all on one page!
Wednesday, 2 November 2005
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


text:
Prof. Bryan Caplan
Econ 854
Week 9: Expressive Voting
I. The Instrumental Voting Assumption
A. One key assumption we made before the midterm is that voters vote instrumentally.
B. In other words, votes care about nothing except the policies they get. They aren't interested in personalities, entertainment, impressing their friends with their social conscience, etc.
1. Slightly different perspective: Is voting investment or consumption? Do people vote in order to get a later pay-off, or is voting "its own reward"?
C. Purely instrumental voting seems unrealistic. Image, symbols, faces, and so on matter at least as much to voters as policy.
D. There are many "Mom and apple pie" issues where all candidates agree; they just try to wax more poetic than their competitors.
II. Instrumental Versus Expressive Value
A. Economists usually focus on the instrumental value of products - what the products do.
B. But empirically, it is hard to ignore the fact that consumers also care about the expressive value of products - what they "say about a person," the product's "image," etc.
1. Is expressive value a means to the end of signaling desirable characteristics to other people? Or is expression an end in itself? For purposes of this week's analysis, it makes little difference, but it is an interesting question.
C. Examples to make the difference clear:
1. Cheering at a football game. Are fans cheering in order to help their team win? Or are they primarily expressing their "team spirit"?
2. Getting a get-well card for a sick friend. Are you trying to cure them, or simply express sympathy?
3. Buying perfume. Do you buy it just for the smell? Or are you also buying an "image" created by Calvin Klein's ads?
4. Joining the Million Mom March. Are you going solely to change gun policy? Or are you also "showing that you care," to express your concern for the nation's children?
D. Most products provide a mix of both instrumental and expressive value.
E. But the mix varies. When I buy a pick ax, I'm not doing it to "partake in the legend of Paul Bunyan." But most people think about "image" when they buy a car, or pick their clothes, or make many other kinds of purchases.
F. What can we learn if we extend this insight - that products provide a mix of instrumental and expressive value - to voting?
G. Geoffrey Brennan and Loren Lomasky address this question in Democracy and Decision - in my judgment, one of the five best books in public choice ever written. The following discussion relies heavily on their work.
III. Decisiveness Revisited
A. If part of the motive for voting is expressive, there is a shocking implication: People do NOT necessarily vote for the policies that they most prefer.
B. Why? Because expressive and instrumental motives could work in different directions. A person might, on instrumental grounds, prefer peace to war; but the expressive value of patriotism might outweigh this.
1. Similarly, if part of the motive for buying a car is expressive, people will not necessarily buy the car with the mechanical properties they most prefer.
C. How exactly can one weigh instrumental and expressive values against each other in an election? The critical variable to remember: the probability of decisiveness.
D. Crucial insight: your vote may not (indeed, almost certainly will not) change the electoral outcome. But you get the expressive value either way!
1. Ex: Even if your candidate loses, you can still feel smugly superior in your devotion to the homeless.
E. What then is the total value of a policy to a voter? It is the probability of decisiveness times the instrumental value, plus the expressive value.
F. Let us define one voter's as the instrumental value of policy A, as the expressive value of policy A, and as the probability of decisiveness.
G. Then when the voter chooses between policy A and policy B, he strictly prefers A to B if: .
H. Now recall that for most realistic elections, . Then the voter will choose policy A over policy B so long as: . In other words, in a typical election, expressive value is ALL that matters!
IV. Decisiveness and the Relative Prices of Instrumental and Expressive Voting
A. In markets, the logic of decisiveness reverses. The typical consumer choice in markets is almost completely decisive. When you order chicken at a restaurant, you are virtually sure to get chicken:.
B. Thus, when a diner chooses between meal A and meal B, he strictly prefers A to B if: . In others words, in a typical market transaction, instrumental and expressive value count EQUALLY.
C. Slightly different perspective: In markets, participants will be willing to give up $1 of expressive value in order to get $1 in instrumental value.
D. In politics, however, participants will be willing to give up $1 of expressive value only if they receive $1/p in instrumental value in return.
1. Ex: If p were 1-in-a-million, they would only give up $1 in expressive value for $1,000,000 in instrumental value!
E. Thus, the relative prices of instrumental and expressive value differ systematically between markets and politics. Expressive value is dramatically cheaper in politics than in markets.
F. This does not mean that we should expect no role for expressive value in markets. But it does mean that we should expect vastly more in politics.
G. Ex: When you buy a car, you might consider the personality of salesman. But are you willing to pay $1000 extra to buy your car from the "nice guy"? In contrast, suppose that one politician's policies are $1000 better for you than his rival's, but the rival has a great smile. If p=1-in-a-100,000, you will vote for the rival so long as that great smile is worth a penny to you.
V. The Hanson/Cowen Critique
A. My colleagues Robin Hanson and Tyler Cowen do not buy the preceding argument.
B. Basic objection: Why isn't expressive value adjusted for probabilities, too?
1. Ex: You do not feel like a great person when you donate a penny to charity. Why would you feel like a great person when you vote against your financial interests? The former is probably a bigger sacrifice than the latter.
C. Variant: Perhaps expressive value depends on decisiveness. You feel better when you personally "made a difference."
D. My reply: Appeal to introspection. B&L's is a more plausible description of how people really think.
1. Query: What does your introspection say?
VI. Expressive Voting as Political Pollution
A. At this point, one might say "So what if democracy counts expressive value more?" Human welfare (and efficiency) encompasses BOTH expressive and instrumental values.
B. This is a good question, but it has a good answer: In democracy, instrumental values are a public good!
C. Individual voters personally enjoy all of the expressive value of their vote, but get no personal benefit from voting for policies with high instrumental value.
D. Thus, there is a voter-on-voter externality of expressive voting.
E. Similarly, individual polluters personally enjoy all of the benefits of polluting (driving a cheap gas-guzzling car), but get no personal benefit from cutting back their emissions.
F. In both cases, there is an inefficient outcome! Polluters ignore the social benefits of clean air; voters ignore the social benefits of instrumentally valuable policies.
G. In both cases, "preaching" is unlikely to change behavior. People are optimally responding to the incentives they face.
H. At first, the idea that the instrumental and expressive value of policies can diverge is puzzling. But it is quite intuitive.
1. Is the "most likeable" politician always the one who favors the most sensible policies?
2. Is the "morally required" policy always the most effective? Ex: The minimum wage is very popular, even though it is at best a dubious way to help the poor.
I. Question: How do politicians respond to expressive voting?
J. Answer: Due to electoral competition, they have to give voters what they want. So instead of focusing on "boring" substantive issues, they emphasize personality, catchy slogans, poetic language, flag-burning, gay marriage, etc.
VII. Inefficient Unanimity
A. Surely any policy that EVERYONE votes in favor of must be efficient? Brennan and Lomasky prove, surprisingly, that the answer is NO.
B. Suppose voters get to decide whether to declare war on a hated national enemy.
C. Each voter who votes Yes feels like a brave patriot, getting $100 in expressive value.
D. But if war is actually declared, the country will be thrown into a bloody conflict that costs each voter an average of $100,000.
E. So what does each voter decide? Each person votes Yes so long as .
F. As long as , then, they vote Yes.
G. Since everyone is identical by assumption, it follows that as long as , 100% of all voters vote for war.
H. But what is the net per-capita social benefit of war? -$99,900!
I. How is this possible? There are massive externalities of expressive voting.
J. Just as all polluters can be better off if everyone polluted less, all voters can be better off if everyone voted differently – or if someone overturns the electoral result.
VIII. Application: Environmentalism
A. "Caring about the environment" is probably one of the biggest expressive issues of our time.
There are of course some instrumental values involved too: Few people
want to breath the air of
C. But most environmental issues look largely expressive:
1. Recycling
2. Preserving wild lands
3. Endangered species
4. Conservation
5. Logging
D. Moreover, even for the more instrumental-looking problems, voters are usually bizarrely hostile to "the easy way out":
1. Emissions trading, domestic and international
2. Planting trees as carbon sinks
3. Liming lakes to counter acid rain
4. Privatizing common resources
5. Geoengineering
E. An overwhelming majority of Americans prefer to hang out at malls than camp out in the wilderness for fun. But what politician would dare to advocate privatizing the national parks so Americans have more money to spend at the mall?
F. Simple explanation: Voter-on-voter externalities lead democracy to deliver a highly inefficient outcome.
IX. Answering Wittman, I
A. To my mind, expressive voting theory is the first pillar of a thoughtful reply to Wittman. It shows that to a large degree, voters aren't even trying to "make democracy work."
B. Rather, democracy's lack of incentives induces them to focus lop-sidedly on symbols, entertainment, personalities, and so on.
C. Key asymmetry between politics and markets: The low probability of being decisive leads to systematic under-valuation of instrumental concerns.
D. Expressive voting theory helps us understand why the drama of politics dominates over substance. Politicians are just competitively playing to their audience.
E. Other supply-side implications?
F. Can expressive voting theory breathe new life into old political failures?
1. Pork barrel politics
2. Concentrated interests
3. Bureaucracy
4. Political advertising and special interests


text:
4.7 stars
Product Information
Commercial Package
A commercial package in different positions to bring life to sections and elevations. Native archicad library objects to streamline your work. Colour customizable.
One time purchase for 15 devices
Licensed for home and commercial use
Your download link will be delivered by e-mail with detailed instruction for installing the product; there is no CD or DVD
Support included via technical forums and e-mail.
92 .gsm library files
Tech Specs
Internet Access: Some Features Require Internet Access
Internet Media: Download Link
Archicad 12


text:
CINCINNATI—Carol Held Knight told reporters on Wednesday that, though she was still mourning her husband Neil Armstrong's death, it was frankly a relief to finally be able to clear out all the "space hobby crap" her late husband kept lying around the house. "I loved my husband very much, but, honestly, what am I supposed to do with a pile of useless rocks, a moon man figurine of some kind, and a stack of journals he wrote about space in?" said Knight, who recalled that Armstrong once "practically threw a fit" when she tried to get rid of his little plastic space shuttles. "I'm just going put it in a box and leave it on the curb. Some kids from the neighborhood might want it, you never know." Knight confirmed she planned on giving the spacesuit Armstrong wore on the moon to a thrift store, noting that "it doesn't fit [her]."
We may earn a commission from links on this page.
This Week's Most Viral News: September 22, 2023


text:
We donate gently used adult clothing and shoes to our local Goodwill. We save almost all of our son's outgrown clothing, books, and toys for a twice annual consignment sale called "Just Between Friends."
We take hard plastics to the recycling center and soft plastics (like bread wrappers, etc.) I turn in at the grocery store in the bin where they recycle plastic shopping bags.
And though this happens only infrequently, we donate our old eyeglasses to a local chapter of The Lion's Club. And a couple of times, my wife has let her hair get long enough (I believe they need 10" min.) that she could have it cut and donated to Locks of Love.
Generally, I avoid just throwing away stuff as much as possible.


text:
Cleveland Browns
Our officially licensed NFL flags and banners are constructed of a silk-like polyester material. The flags and banners are Single/Reversed Construction; this means that the image is on both sides; it will read correctly on the front side and reversed on the back. Vibrant colors, graphics, and quality construction make these flags and banners a fan favorite.


text:
The hot word in education right now is PBL, Project Based Learning.
Chungdahm Learning is taking the lead in Korea with this kind of teaching, with the launch of The Loudest Brain and its facilitated nationwide projects. The idea is that the company will generate some kind of PBL database that will showcase students and teachers ideas on the web. In turn, this will become a place where learners and instructors can go, to grow and learn from one another.Read More


text:
The March for Science is a celebration of our passion for science and a call to support and safeguard the scientific community. Recent policy changes have caused heightened worry among scientists, and the incredible and immediate outpouring of support has made clear that these concerns are also shared by hundreds of thousands of people around the world. The mischaracterization of science as a partisan issue, which has given policymakers permission to reject overwhelming evidence, is a critical and urgent matter. It is time for people who support scientific research and evidence-based policies to take a public stand and be counted.
Please check out our webpage http://charlottemarchforscience.com/ and the National webpage at https://www.marchforscience.com/.