text:
Labor & Economy
LA Times: Layoffs, Sabotage and Suicides?
Ed Padgett was driving in the rain to a union meeting when the L.A. Times called to tell him he was fired. The pressman, a third-generation Times employee, listened in shock last December to an HR woman's voice explain he was being dismissed for "safety violations, dishonesty and suspicion of sabotage."
That last charge had a bittersweet irony. Padgett had been at the paper for more than 39 years and had done everything he could to help it prosper – even as members of the corporate wrecking crew that drove the paper into bankruptcy were still counting their money.
"It was similar to jumping into an icy cold pool of water," Padgett recalls. "I felt like crying because I'd been there so damn long, but I soon got over it." He drove on to his meeting in La Mirada, but hasn't been back to the Times printing plant on Olympic Boulevard to clean out his locker.
"I just have my work boots in it," he says, "and a knife I use to trim newsprint rolls when they get twisted up — it saves a lot of money." Padgett filed a grievance through Teamster Local 140-N, a process that may take another month. His case is complicated because the Times fired him the day his union was to ratify a new contract.
Padgett is no ordinary Times employee, but a union activist and a blogger whose Los Angeles Times Pressmens 20-Year Club site has chronicled working conditions at the Times, as well as its financial decline. This has made him a lightning rod for disciplinary actions – and the recipient of insider news. A well-placed staffer, he says, recently told him that between 20 and 25 writers are about to be terminated.
"You'll be hearing about it soon," he says.
(L.A. Times spokeswoman Nancy Sullivan declined to comment on this and other statements contained in this article, other than to say, "Ed Padgett served as a pressman for the Times and is not a spokesperson for the company nor did his position provide him with access to overall company operations.")
That news, if true, underscores problems the country's fifth-largest paper has been having, including plunging circulation.
"Circulation has been way down," Padgett says. "I asked a guy in the circulation department how many papers don't get sold and he said, 'At least 25 percent,' without blinking an eye."
Shortly after Padgett's firing there was a "Christmas purge" of workers, followed by a "New Years Purge."
"Those folks each got $20,000 in severance," Padgett claims. "Two of the fellows were let go two weeks early because they were worried about sabotage. They're so paranoid, because it's not just my department — it includes editorial."
Padgett believes it's possible there's some reality behind the company's fears. A Teamster email he posted on his blog in December warned members against engaging in sabotage — while denying such behavior. But what does that ultimately say about a company that its employees would harm the source of their livelihoods?
This all comes against a backdrop of increasing workplace despair created by the economic outlook for print publications, one deepened by the suicides of two former colleagues.
"One was 61 and the other 52," Padgett says. "The first was right after Thanksgiving and the second before Christmas." He explained that one worked in the operations plant while the other was a company truck driver. Padgett credits his large family and good friends for keeping him upbeat now that he's suddenly found himself without work.
He adds that he's not going to become a suicide statistic.
"I won't do it," he says. "It might hurt."
Labor & Economy
Report: IRS Enforcement Could Reap Billions in Unpaid Revenue
Audits of the wealthy and corporations have steeply declined at the same time the agency has begun withholding tax refunds for low-income recipients of the Earned Income Tax Credit.
Congressional analysts say that for every $2 spent on tax enforcement, the government could expect to reclaim more than $5 in unpaid taxes.
The federal government could raise more than $1 trillion in new revenue by beefing up tax enforcement and by cracking down on carbon emissions, according to congressional budget analysts. Those two moves alone could help finance progressive lawmakers' Green New Deal, or they could cover the lion's share of the cost of the massive infrastructure investment package proposed by President Donald Trump.
The data was included in a new report by the Congressional Budget Office released Thursday.
The study found that if lawmakers reversed recent budget cuts to the Internal Revenue Service, the agency could recover tens of billions of dollars in revenue that is owed to the government — but that is not being paid. If the agency's budget were increased by $20 billion over the next 10 years, the CBO says auditors would be able to reclaim more than $55 billion that could be used to shore up federal programs or reduce the deficit. Put another way, the analysts said that for every $2 spent on tax enforcement, the government could expect to reclaim more than $5 in unpaid taxes.
"Many taxpayers who are not compliant under the current tax system would pay the taxes they owe" if the enforcement budget is increased, the CBO said.
A recent ProPublica investigation found that as lawmakers have slashed the IRS enforcement budget in recent years, the agency has had far fewer resources with which to scrutinize the tax returns of corporations and high-income individuals. In all, the news organization estimated the IRS has not collected $95 billion in taxes that it may have otherwise collected, had Congress given it its previous level of enforcement resources.
Audits of the wealthy and corporations have steeply declined at the same time the agency has begun withholding tax refunds for recipients of the Earned Income Tax Credit. The decreased scrutiny of the wealthy and tougher posture toward the poor has occurred even though CBO notes that "the amounts collected from audits of higher-income taxpayers are, on average, much larger than collections from audits of taxpayers with lower income."
A 2015 Inspector General report urged the IRS to focus more of its limited enforcement resources on high-income filers.
"It appears that the IRS is spending most of its audit resources on auditing tax returns with potentially lower productivity," the report concluded.
The CBO noted that stronger enforcement would not necessarily halt tax cheating over the long haul.
"Taxpayers would gradually become aware of some of the changes in the IRS's enforcement techniques associated with the initiatives," the analysts wrote. "In response, they would shift to other, less detectible forms of tax evasion."
In a separate part of the report, the CBO says a $25 per metric ton tax on carbon emissions would raise roughly $1.1 trillion over the next 10 years. That calculation factors in both the possible costs of the tax from potentially reduced economic activity and higher fossil fuel prices, as well as positive economic effects of the tax. In the first year alone, such a tax would raise $66 billion — or more than the budget of the entire U.S. Department of Education over the same time period.
"To simplify implementation, as well as to provide incentives to deploy technologies that capture emissions generated in the production of electricity, the tax could be levied on oil producers, natural gas refiners (for sales outside the electricity sector), and electricity generators," CBO analysts wrote. "A well-designed tax that covered most energy-related emissions would be expected to reduce emissions."
In October, ExxonMobil announced that it will spend $1 million to support an advocacy group that is pushing for a carbon tax.
Copyright Capital & Main
Labor & Economy
Behind Kaiser's Mental Health Breakdown
"The best practices of psychotherapy state that patients should be seen weekly or every other week," says one clinical psychologist. But at Kaiser, his average patient must wait five weeks between appointments.
A strike by mental health professionals is impacting more than 100 Kaiser clinics and medical facilities. The union has proposed that Kaiser increase staffing and cut patient wait times.
When clinical psychologist Mickey Fitzpatrick thinks about his job, the image that comes to mind is not of a hospital or a doctor's office, but that of a conveyor belt. Since 2015, the 45-year-old has worked at a Kaiser Permanente hospital in the Northern California city of Pleasanton, where he sees an endless stream of patients dealing with serious mental illnesses: post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, bipolar disorder and anxiety. Each week he sees four to five new patients, and estimates that last year he counseled between 800 and 900 people, who represented a blur of needs that weren't always easy to keep straight.
"The best practices of psychotherapy state that patients should be seen weekly or every other week," Fitzpatrick told me. But at Kaiser, he's never been able to get anywhere near that goal. With his heavy caseload, the average patient must wait five weeks between appointments, a figure that is consistent with other Kaiser therapists I spoke to. "We're giving them the care that we can with the resources that we can, but we're not able to do what we're trained to do."
This isn't a new problem for Kaiser. In 2013, the California Department of Managed Healthcare (DMHC) fined the nonprofit medical-care giant $4 million after completing a routine medical survey and discovering what it called "serious deficiencies in providing access to mental health services" and the company's failure to promptly correct the problems. The survey found that patients often did not have timely access to appointments and that their educational materials "included inaccurate information that could dissuade an enrollee from pursuing medically necessary care."
In 2015, a follow-up report by DMHC revealed that Kaiser still regularly failed to provide mental health services as required by state law, which mandates that patients with urgent problems receive an appointment within 48 hours; those with non-urgent issues should be seen within 10 business days (or 15 business days if the appointment is with a specialist physician, such as a psychiatrist).
In a review of nearly 300 patient records, the agency found that 22 percent of cases in Kaiser's northern region failed to meet the state's requirements, along with nine percent in the southern region. Among the randomly selected files was a patient with suicidal ideation who waited 16 days for an appointment, and a therapist for another individual who wrote in their notes, "patient wants regular ongoing treatment so may look outside Kaiser."
The goal of providing "regular ongoing treatment" for Kaiser patients by hiring new therapists is one of the principal demands of mental health care professionals like Fitzpatrick, who has joined 4,000 of his colleagues this week in a five-day strike. The strike, organized by the National Union of Healthcare Workers, is impacting more than 100 Kaiser clinics and medical facilities, and comes amidst contract negotiations that began in June but have stalled. During those negotiations, the union has proposed that Kaiser increase staffing with the goal of eventually seeing returning patients within two weeks, as opposed to over stretches of time that now routinely exceed one month.
Kaiser Permanente disputes the claims that it hasn't made significant strides in providing timely access to mental health care. "We have been hiring therapists, increasing our staff by 30 percent since 2015 – that's more than 500 new therapists in California – even though there's a national shortage," said John Nelson, the vice president of communications for Kaiser Permanente, in a prepared remark. Nelson also challenged the union's assertion that the strike had anything to do with patient care, stating that one of the union's demands was to reduce the amount of time therapists spend seeing patients, which now averages 75 percent of their days.
For Clement Papazian, a licensed social worker at Kaiser for 30 years who works in Oakland, reducing the time spent seeing patients would dramatically improve the quality of care given to patients, by allowing therapists to check in on family members by phone, write up more thorough notes and create a work environment that didn't feel like a "patient mill." Papazian said that he has seen many dedicated therapists drop out due to the "relentless pressure to see more patients" — what he describes as "rapid access to no care."
Papazian acknowledges that Kaiser has hired new therapists, but argues that those new hires haven't impacted the workload, due to Kaiser's rapid growth — its number of enrolled patients in California has increased by nearly 11 percent since 2015. He also argues that Kaiser is well positioned to staff-up its mental health department, as the company made $3.8 billion in profit last year. "Kaiser is a big player that can really shape the industry," he said. "What we want is to deliver on the care that Kaiser members deserve."
Copyright Capital & Main
Labor & Economy
Lights Out, Clean Green: How Janitors Are Boosting High-Rises' Sustainability
A Los Angeles-based program—the only one like it for janitors in the country—has helped align janitorial staffs with the sustainability goals of office building owners.
"Janitors can tell you down to the tenant – to the desk – who doesn't care and just throws everything in the trash or contaminates the recycle bin."
Janitors, who are often the unseen eyes and ears of the commercial office buildings they clean, are on the front lines of an innovative effort to turn their workplaces green.
Aida Cardenas, director of the Building Skills Partnership, a labor-management funded initiative, launched the Green Janitor Education Program in 2014 at a time when building owners were increasingly seeking Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification for their properties. The widely-used LEED rating system lets owners put a green stamp of approval that indicates a building's level of conformity to green operation and maintenance standards. "Janitors weren't really part of that conversation," even though the kinds of chemicals and equipment they used were important in determining whether a building received a certification, Cardenas said.
The program began in Los Angeles with a pilot of about 120 workers in seven buildings as a collaboration between the Service Employees International Union-United Service Workers West, the Building Owners and Management Association (BOMA) of Greater Los Angeles, the U.S. Green Building Council (which developed the LEED system) and the Building Skills Partnership. (Disclosure: Several SEIU locals are financial supporters of this website.) Since then, more than 1,000 janitors have graduated from the program and are working in 65 buildings across the state.
Casilda De Jesus now unplugs her TV, radio and other appliances when she's not using them, knowing that as, "energy vampires," they are still draining power.
Janitors participate in 30 hours of classroom training, which takes place during their shifts over a 15-week period. One focus of the training is the purpose of environmental sustainability efforts, which can sometimes make work harder for janitors who must contend with "thinner trash bags that rip" and cleaning chemicals that they may not view as effective, said Cardenas.
The program—the only one like it for janitors in the country—has helped align the janitorial staff with a building owner's sustainability goals. For example, some janitors had resisted using green chemicals that did not tackle dirt as quickly as other products.
Casilda De Jesus, who graduated from the program in August, recalled co-workers sneaking Ajax to the worksite until they were discovered by supervisors. "Having a better understanding of green concepts" helps janitors buy into green practices, De Jesus said through an interpreter. The use of cleaning products that have a recognized environmental seal helps buildings receive points toward their LEED certification. De Jesus claims the switch to green cleaning detergents, made several years ago by her building, has alleviated her asthma symptoms.
Buildings that participated in the Green Janitors program used 5.6 percent less energy on average in 2016 than buildings that did not, one study found.
The janitors are "turning off the lights that people leave on," according to Cardenas. "They're sorting through bins to divert as much waste as they can. They're reporting leaks and [they] understand the urgency because they're conserving water."
The training has contributed to energy savings, said a pro-bono study conducted by seedLA, an environmental consulting group. Buildings that participated in the Green Janitors program used 5.6 percent less energy on average in 2016 than buildings that did not, the study found. The authors attribute those savings to green building maintenance practices, as well as to physical changes to the building due to energy efficiency upgrades.
"Building a low carbon economy takes workers and an awful lot of those workers are blue collar workers. They are not just engineers and highly technical professionals," points out Carol Zabin, director of the Green Economy Program, at the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education.
The Building Skills Partnership's programs—which also include English as a Second Language and digital literacy classes – are paid for by a fund created through collective bargaining between the janitors' union and janitorial firms that contract with building owners. Last year, the Green Janitors program received a $520,000 grant from a state training fund, administered by the California Workforce Development Board, intended for sectors of the economy that must undergo transformation to combat global warming.
De Jesus and other janitors have brought what they learned home about composting, energy and water conservation. De Jesus now unplugs her TV, radio and other appliances when she's not using them, recognizing that as, "energy vampires," they are still draining power. She urges her neighbors to report water leaks to their apartment manager.
De Jesus would like to see her office building's tenants benefit from the kind of training the janitors received. "I think it's really important that the tenants in the building go through this program, so that they are sharing the same practices," De Jesus said.
"Janitors can tell you down to the tenant – to the desk – who doesn't care and just throws everything in the trash or contaminates the recycle bin," noted Cardenas.
Building managers do not typically authorize janitors to talk to office tenants about profligate energy use or subpar recycling habits. But last Earth Day, the Building Skills Partnership released a video – introduced by Mayor Eric Garcetti — that educated property managers and janitorial companies about the program. It includes janitors delivering gentle reminders about how to be better environmental stewards by using public transportation, bicycling and recycling.
Rising Realty Partners owns and manages the Garland Center, the West Seventh Street building where De Jesus works, as well as several other downtown L.A. buildings whose janitorial staff are participating in the Green Janitors program. The company opted into the program so as to invest in the staff that maintains its buildings while also contributing to "building wellness," said Kayce Hawk, senior vice president of property services for the company. The janitors have only recently graduated from the program, but the reports from the building staff have all been positive, she added. "It's empowering for them to get free continuing education that benefits them in their job and in their home life."
Copyright Capital & Main
Labor & Economy
Randy Shaw on Los Angeles' Lost Housing Generation
What: Randy Shaw discusses his book, Generation Priced Out.
When/Where: Skylight Books, Los Angeles; Saturday, Nov. 17, 5 p.m.
When I began writing my new book on the pricing out of the working and middle class from urban America — Generation Priced Out: Who Gets to Live in the New Urban America — the first place I turned to after the Bay Area was Los Angeles. I grew up in Los Angeles. I try to closely follow its land-use politics but was shocked to see how even neighborhoods like Boyle Heights faced displacement and gentrification. I also learned that Venice, which I always thought of as a progressive bastion, was filled with homeowners opposed to affordable housing in their neighborhood. The deeper I looked, the more I found the reasons for Los Angeles' worsening housing and homelessness crisis: The city was not effectively protecting tenants and its rent-controlled units, nor was it building enough new housing.
Generation Priced Out tells the stories of those on the front lines of the Los Angeles housing crisis. Mariachis facing eviction from Boyle Heights describe their struggle to stay in their homes, and I defend the "by all means necessary" tactics of tenant groups battling displacement. I describe the struggle by Venice Community Housing to build housing for the homeless on a parking lot, a plan vigorously resisted by homeowners. I discuss the enormous power of the city's affluent homeowner groups, and how they aggressively stop the building of new apartments. I also assess how Mayor Eric Garcetti and other city officials have responded to the crisis and explain why they must do more.
I'll be talking about my book and the L.A. housing crisis at Skylight Books, Saturday, November 17 at 5 p.m. I look forward to a great discussion and hope to see you there.
Randy Shaw is director of San Francisco's Tenderloin Housing Clinic and the editor of BeyondChron.org. His prior books include The Activist's Handbook: Winning Social Change in the 21st Century and The Tenderloin: Sex, Crime and Resistance in the Heart of San Francisco.
Copyright Capital & Main
Election 2018
Los Angeles' Measure B Is a Moonshot Aimed at Creating a Public Bank
A baby step toward establishing municipal banking in America's second-largest city would be a giant leap for this national movement.
A ballot measure in support of creating a public bank in Los Angeles could serve as a referendum on an idea that has gained traction in cities and states across the country since the 2008 financial crisis.
"To have a resounding 'Yes' vote from Los Angeles, which is one of the most powerful opinion centers of the world, would be tremendously historic," says Trinity Tran, co-founder of Public Bank LA, an advocate for Measure B, which would amend the city charter to allow the city to establish a municipal bank.
But Measure B is a baby step in what promises to be a lengthy process to set up a municipal bank whose stated purpose is to provide the nation's second-largest city with a socially responsible and cost-effective alternative to Wall Street banks.
More Ballot Measure Stories Here
The movement for public banks draws inspiration from the success of a 99-year-old public bank in the red state of North Dakota and from Germany's network of over 400 regional public banks (or Sparkassen), which advocates say provided significant funds for the development of that country's renewable energy sector.
Since the Great Recession, over 20 U.S. states have introduced bills to establish state-owned banks or to study their economic feasibility. New Jersey Democratic Governor Phil Murphy, a former Goldman Sachs executive, successfully campaigned for his current job on the promise of creating a state-owned bank. And California's gubernatorial frontrunner Gavin Newsom has made the formation of a state bank that would fund infrastructure, student loans and housing part of his platform as well.
A lack of resources is one motivation for city and state leaders' interest in public banking, said Deborah Figart, a distinguished professor of economics at Stockton University in New Jersey.
After the Great Recession, "we really became much more aware of unmet infrastructure needs," said Figart, who conducted an economic impact study for the proposed New Jersey bank. The American Society of Civil Engineers gives the U.S. a D+ grade for the state of its roads, bridges and other infrastructure — "practically a failing grade," she noted. Meanwhile, local governments devote a significant portion of their budgets to paying interest on bonds that go to Wall Street banks and finance companies at a time when interest rates are on the rise.
In Los Angeles, the push for the bank emerged from grassroots activists who demanded that the city divest from San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, whose aggressive sales practices resulted in more than three million deposit and credit card accounts being opened without customers' knowledge.
"We knew that it wasn't really divesting if we were going to move our money to another predatory extractive bank," said Tran. "So we introduced public banking early on in the campaign as a permanent solution to housing the city's public finances."
Last year, the city paid $1.1 billion in interest to bondholders, which in turn funds "wars and pipelines and private prisons," said Tran, who would rather see tax money put to work to address city needs like housing and clean energy. Her banking advocacy began four years ago when she started meeting with fellow activists in Koreatown coffee shops. As of October 20, "Yes on B" supporters had raised $10,128 for the measure, according to the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission. No committee has been formed to oppose the measure.
There are critics, however. Rob Nichols, president and CEO of the American Bankers Association, writing in The Hill, fears that the public bank proposal would suffer from a "scattered business focus" and fall under "undue political influence" that would result in risky loans that would damage the public purse.
"It's easy to make the banks the bad guy," said Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Association. But "it's not easy to run a bank," and a municipal bank would require significant start-up capital. "This is public money, so if they lose public money, if they realize that it doesn't work, that hurts every person in L.A."
The Los Angeles Times editorialized that the measure was one of "the most ill-conceived, half-baked ballot measures in years" and urged a no vote, in part, because the measure does not articulate a vision or plan for the bank.
But if the proposal on the ballot lacks detail, it's because city officials have not wanted to invest in a business plan and feasibility study while the city is still prohibited by its charter from operating a bank, City Council President Herb Wesson told a news conference in October.
Wesson assured reporters that there was "no way on God's green earth" the city would move to create a municipal bank without a subsequent citywide vote on a more detailed plan, and the ballot argument in favor of the measure that goes to every city voter says as much. For now, voters are only being asked to remove a legal hurdle in the charter that prevents the city from establishing a municipal financial institution.
Proponents of public banking regularly point to the Bank of North Dakota as a model. The Progressive-era institution was created in 1919 out of frustration with a banking system that was putting the squeeze on farmers. The bank was initially greeted with suspicion by a national press corps anxious about a Bolshevik incursion into the finance sector. But the bank, now very much part of the state's business establishment, has seen record profits for 14 consecutive years. Because it steered clear of the volatile derivatives market, the Bank of North Dakota avoided the upheaval many financial institutions suffered when the housing market tanked in 2008.
"It's partly because you have civil servants in charge rather than folks whose paychecks depend on how much money the bank makes in a quarter," Sam Munger, director of external affairs for the State Innovation Exchange, told The American Prospect.
Considered a "banker's bank" with a $4.9 billion loan portfolio that supports agriculture, business, homeownership and higher education, the Bank of North Dakota does not compete with other financial institutions.
"It's not a bank for regular household customers, for car loans, credit cards and mortgages," said Figart. "It is a bank for accepting public deposits and lending mostly to the public sector or public-private partnerships."
Wesson has talked about L.A.'s municipal bank as a place where the cannabis industry could park its cash since pot is illegal under federal law. Such a move could restrict the bank's ability to make federal wire transfers, but the L.A. activists who back the initiative see other uses for the bank.
"For our organization, it was never about cannabis; it was always about neighborhood issues," says Gisele Mata, housing organizer of Alliance for Californians for Community Empowerment, a community-based non-profit that has been part of the coalition advocating the bank.
Public Bank LA leaders envision Los Angeles's municipal bank playing a similar role to that of the Bank of North Dakota, but focusing on the city's priorities. "It would start as a banker's bank for the city, refinancing city debt and trying to consolidate the investment away from Wall Street and harmful extractive industries," co-legislative director David Jette told KPCC-FM in October.
Public Bank LA, he added, also envisions the municipal bank "partnering with local credit unions and community banks" to fund housing, small businesses, low-interest student loans, renewable energy projects and, eventually, credit for the underbanked. The bank could also fund infrastructure projects more cheaply than commercial banks by avoiding the interest and fees that go to commercial banks, according to advocates.
Many hurdles remain before an L.A. bank could become operational. State and federal laws do not currently provide a regulatory framework for the formation of public banks, according to an August report by the city's Chief Legislative Analyst's office. The city must come up with a source of collateral for the bank and an oversight structure, and receive approval from the California Department of Business Oversight.
But a modern public bank can be made from scratch. In April, the Federal Reserve approved a public bank for American Samoa in the South Pacific, after the Bank of Hawaii abandoned the geographically remote U.S. Territory.
The North Dakota and American Samoan banks may be rare cases for now, but Figart believes that "in the next five years, there will be" more public banks, and "in the next 10 years, there certainly will be more."
Copyright Capital & Main
Election 2018
Will Proposition 11 Mean Less Rest for Ambulance Crews?
Supporters describe Proposition 11 as necessary to ensure public safety, but EMT workers describe grueling 12-hour shifts in which crew members can often go eight hours without having a chance to stop for food.
California's Proposition 11, which seeks to rewrite California's Labor Code as it relates to rest and meal breaks for private-sector ambulance employees, might appear to be a strange ballot measure, even for a state that has seen its share of odd propositions. It has no opponent listed on the state's official voter guide, and the only backer of the proposition, American Medical Response, is a company headquartered in Colorado, which has spent $22 million to secure the bill's passage. Prop. 11 seems like it must have an interesting backstory, and it does.
More Ballot Measure Stories Here
That story begins with a California Supreme Court ruling in 2016, Augustus v. ABM Security, which found that private security guards were required to be given uninterrupted rest breaks by their employer. Guards for ABM had been instructed to keep their pagers on during breaks and to respond to calls for assistance, a practice that the court ruled was in violation of state labor law.
Like security guards, the state's private sector emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics are on call during breaks — and they have filed lawsuits against private companies, including American Medical Response, over the practice. According to the California Legislative Analyst, those suits, after Augustus, are likely to be successful. The analyst's report estimates that to be in compliance with Augustus and offer uninterrupted breaks to their employees, companies would need to hire about 25 percent more ambulance crews, at a potential cost of more than $100 million per year. Then there's the class action lawsuit against AMR, which is the largest private ambulance company in California. Prop. 11 seeks to nullify the lawsuit.
Prop. 11 comes after last year's failure of Assembly Bill 263, which sought a solution to emergency workforce staffing. The bill, which was supported by the union that represents emergency medical services (EMS) workers, and opposed by AMR, would have created a carve-out in the labor code for private ambulance companies, allowing them to require workers to be on call during breaks and respond to emergencies that demand the use of sirens and emergency lights. "We wanted to create a policy that protects workers' rights, allows a little bit of [time] to get meals, but still protects public safety," said Jason Brollini, the president-executive director of United EMS Workers, a local of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. (Disclosure: AFSCME is a financial supporter of this website.)
What the proposed bill wouldn't have done was shield AMR from previously filed lawsuits now before the court. "We weren't willing, through the stroke of the pen, to take away the ability of workers to seek redress in court," Brollini said.
Supporters describe Proposition 11 as necessary to ensure public safety and provide lifesaving assistance. "If Prop. 11 does not pass, first responders will not be able to keep their radios on during breaks, putting patient care at risk," said Marie Brichetto, a Yes on Prop. 11 spokesperson. "Prop. 11 would simply continue the longstanding practice of paying private EMTs and paramedics to be on-call during breaks — just like other first responders, including police and fire."
Brollini disputed the notion that response times will increase if Prop. 11 fails, noting that such times are mandated by contracts between private companies and the counties they serve. "There is not a provider in the state that is going to turn their radios off," he said. "What we do need is some kind of relief."
Although his union didn't file paperwork in time for its opposition to Prop. 11 to be included in the state's voter guide, Brollini says his own opposition is grounded in his 25-year career as an EMT worker, most of it spent working in an AMR ambulance. He described grueling 12-hour shifts in which workers can often go eight hours without having a chance to stop for food. Unlike police or firefighters, he said, they frequently don't have stations at which to recuperate, exacerbating an already heavy workload.
In 2015, a survey published in the Journal of Emergency Medical Service found that first responders are 10 times more likely to attempt suicide than the general public. And a joint report in 2017 by the University of California, Berkeley and UCLA's Labor Center reported that one-third of California's EMTs and paramedics are low-wage workers, defined as earning less than $13.63 an hour, or two-thirds of the state median.
"We want to see our companies profitable," Brollini said, "but we don't want it to be at the expense of the worker's mental and physical health."
Copyright Capital & Main
Election 2018
Are Prop. 10's Big-Money Foes Making California's Housing Problem Worse?
Co-published by The American Prospect
Topping the list of corporate anti-rent control donors are some of the country's largest landlords — many funded by Wall Street investment dollars — whose bottom lines could be negatively affected by Prop. 10's passage.
A significant amount of No on Prop. 10's $65 million war chest comes from large, publicly traded real estate investment trusts.
Co-published by The American Prospect
One of California's most hotly contested ballot measures, Proposition 10, would repeal the 23-year-old Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act that restricts a city's ability to apply rent control to post-1995 construction and exempts single-family homes from regulation. Proposition 10's opponents claim it will worsen the state's housing crisis, which has left teachers, blue-collar workers and retirees struggling to keep roofs over their heads. To that end, the No on Prop. 10 campaign has deployed an ensemble of small property owners, non-profit housing developers and veterans as spokespeople against the measure.
More Ballot Measure Stories Here
However, topping the list of No on Prop. 10's big donors are some of the country's largest landlords — many funded by Wall Street investment dollars — whose bottom lines could be negatively affected by Prop. 10's passage. The No campaign's $65 million war chest is more than two-and-a-half times as much as the $25 million raised by Prop. 10 supporters, according to the California Secretary of State's office. A significant amount of the No funding comes from large, publicly traded real estate investment trusts like the ones highlighted on a recent tour held by tenant activists in downtown Los Angeles.
Despite their affordable housing message, some No on Prop. 10 donors have long records of opposing efforts to include affordable housing in their developments.
New York-based Blackstone Group heads the list of these donors, contributing $5.6 million to defeat the measure which, if passed, would let cities enact laws to stabilize rent increases on a broader range of buildings and limit how much a landlord could increase rents when a new tenant moves in. Invitation Homes Inc., the investment vehicle created by Blackstone in 2016, owns more than 80,000 single-family homes nationwide and kicked in almost $1.3 million.
Despite their affordable housing message, these and some other No on Prop. 10 donors have long records of opposing efforts to include affordable housing in their developments, or employ business models that critics claim exacerbate the housing crisis. Some focus on high-end rentals that tenant advocates say do little to address the affordability crisis plaguing California's job-rich urban areas. Others have been criticized for raising rents on the properties they acquire in an effort to pump up hefty returns for investors.
Also Read "California Workers and Retirees Are Unwittingly Financing an Anti-Rent-Control Campaign"
Steven Maviglio, a spokesperson for the campaign to defeat Proposition 10, claims that real estate investment trusts (REITs), which earn money for their shareholders through rental income and property value increases, only account for a tiny percentage of the state's residential rental market. "REITs own .004 percent of California's rental housing," he wrote in an email, a statistic he attributes to the California Apartment Association.
On an August call with investors, Invitation Homes CEO Fred Tuomi argued that increasing housing supply — as opposed to regulating rents — was the answer to the affordability crisis facing California, where more than half of renter households pay more than a third of their incomes toward housing. "We just need more supply when it's needed and, most importantly, where it's needed and [at] the price points that it's needed," Tuomi said.
Equity Residential CEO: "Regardless of [Proposition 10's] outcome, we will continue to fight attempts at the local level to enact rent control."
But increasing the supply is not part of the business model of Invitation Homes, which focuses on property management and acquisition. In the aftermath of the 2008 housing collapse, the company scooped up tens of thousands of foreclosed single-family homes, mainly near Sunbelt cities, crowding out mom and pop landlords, imposing steep rent increases on tenants, and skimping on maintenance in order to generate large returns for investors, according to a report released early this year by the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) and two other advocacy organizations, and a separate Reuters investigation published in July.
In a written statement to Capital & Main, Invitation Homes countered that its residents "give us high ratings for customer service" and "stay 50 percent longer compared to the apartment industry," adding that the company invests $22,000 per home in renovations. (Maviglio said that No on Prop. 10's other corporate donors had no comment for this story.)
On October 10 in downtown Los Angeles, about 60 housing activists, replete with colorful T-shirts and noisemakers, held a "tour of the housing tyrants" that included stops at luxury apartments they said were owned in whole or in part by Blackstone Group and Essex Property Trust — two companies that are helping to fund the effort to defeat the rent control measure. The marchers' "The rent is too damn high" chant attracted the attention of office workers and drivers stuck in lunchtime traffic.
Sheri Eddings, who is 55, joined the battle for rent control in response to letters she received from Invitation Homes demanding $500 rent increases after her two-year leases expired, first in 2015 and then in 2017. Each time, Invitation Homes has been willing to negotiate with her to reduce the increase, she says. But she would like to be able to count on staying in the South Los Angeles County neighborhood where her grandchildren live. "I don't know what's going to happen in 2019," she said at the tenant action.
One stop on the activists' tour was Essex Property Trust's owned Gas Company Lofts, which offers studios for about $2,000 per month and two-bedroom apartments for more than $3,500. To date, the San Mateo-based real estate investment trust has donated $4.8 million to defeat Proposition 10.
The vast majority of the company's more than 60,000 apartment units are located in the Bay Area and Southern California. During an August 2 quarterly earnings call, Essex CEO Michael Schall told investors that the company would be "favoring market rents instead of favoring occupancy" for the next year, suggesting the company is choosing to leave units vacant in the hope of locking in higher rents.
Public policies, says ACCE's Amy Schur, are only encouraging high-end housing where developers "can make the most money" instead of "ensuring that they contribute toward addressing housing needs of the state, which include housing that average working families can afford." ACCE is part of the coalition advocating for passage of the ballot measure and was an organizer of the October 10 tour.
Another big Wall Street donor, Chicago-based Equity Residential, has so far invested more than $3.7 million to the No on Proposition 10 campaign. The REIT is focused on acquiring, managing—and, to a lesser extent, developing — housing in walkable urban markets favored by millennials, according to its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The company's leadership has engaged in local and statewide rent control battles before. Equity Residential's board chair is billionaire Sam Zell, whose heavily leveraged acquisition of the Tribune Co. was followed by bankruptcy and mass layoffs. His Equity LifeStyle Properties, another real estate investment trust (formerly Manufactured Home Communities), began to acquire mobile home parks across California more than two decades ago, and proceeded to bring costly legal actions against small cities that housed the parks in an effort to do away with local rent control laws. The leadership of its sister company, Equity Residential, apparently shares that combative spirit.
These Corporate Landlords Have Each Donated
More than $2 Million to Defeat Proposition 10
|Blackstone Group*
|Essex Property Trust
|Michael K. Hayde, including Western National Group & Affiliated Entities
|Equity Residential
|AvalonBay Communities Inc.
|Geoffrey H. Palmer, owner of G.H. Palmer and Associates
Source: California Secretary of State, downloaded October 22.
*Invitation Homes Inc., created by and partially owned by Blackstone Group, contributed another $1,286,250 to the effort to defeat Proposition 10.
"Regardless of the outcome [of Proposition 10], we will continue to fight attempts at the local level to enact rent control," president and CEO David Neithercut told investors on a call this past July, during a discussion about Costa-Hawkins. About 45 percent of the company's 79,000 apartments are located in California.
Interestingly, on that same call Neithercut proposed "inclusionary zoning" as part of an alternative "basket of solutions" to the state's affordable housing crisis. Such zoning requires developers to set aside a certain number of units in their projects for low-income tenants.
Neithercut's endorsement of inclusionary zoning might signal a shift for Equity Residential, which sought to wriggle out of a requirement that it keep a portion of a downtown San Francisco building's units affordable five years ago. The company attempted to raise the rents on 33 low-income occupants of apartments on Geary Street, a move that would "almost certainly have forced many tenants from their homes," had not the city of San Francisco sued, according to a statement issued at the time by city attorney Dennis Herrera, who settled with Equity for $95,000. (The company had reneged on an agreement with the city to keep a percentage of units affordable when the complex was built in exchange for tax-exempt bond financing for the project.)
Meanwhile, No on Prop. 10 donor Geoffrey Palmer's hardball lawsuit against the city of Los Angeles resulted in a 2009 court ruling that for eight years discouraged cities from adopting inclusionary zoning laws. That prohibition ended with the so-called Palmer fix last year, a state bill that restored cities' ability to require set-asides if they also offered developers alternative ways to comply with the law. (Palmer, who is well known in Southern California for his fortress-like apartment complexes with Italianate names like the Medici and the Lorenzo, is an avid Donald Trump supporter and has given $2 million to defeat Proposition 10.)
Perhaps it's not surprising to find major landlords opposing Proposition 10. But will the ballot measure upend the housing market as they contend?
Anya Lawler, policy advocate for the Western Center on Law & Poverty, a Proposition 10 supporter, says rent control is an important tool for tenants but downplays any disruptive impact the repeal of Costa-Hawkins would immediately have in California. Proposition 10's passage won't guarantee the enactment of any local law, she says, nor will it be a cure-all for California's housing woes, which have been decades in the making.
"Rent control ordinances need to be negotiated locally because every housing market is different, and communities have different needs," says Lawler, who adds that stakeholders, including property owners, will need to be consulted. The idea that the repeal of the Costa-Hawkins law will lead to "draconian rent control policies" is not rooted in "political reality."
Lawler's sentiments are echoed by corporate housing executives, at least in their conversations with their own investors. Asked if his company would redline cities due to a rent control, Essex's Schall stressed, during his August 2 call, that "rent control is only one factor" that the company considers when making investment decisions.
"We're going to seek areas that have the best dynamic – the best supply-demand dynamic," he said. "And right now we believe that's in California, in the various markets that we're in."
Capital & Main's contributors include groups supporting Proposition 10. This website is not funded by commercial entities that stand to profit from the outcome of the ballot initiative.
Copyright Capital & Main
Labor & Economy
Video: Rising Rents Force a Choice Between Eating or Shelter
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 15 million American households experienced food insecurity at some point in 2017.
Labor & Economy
Why Many Millennials Still Live at Home
For in-depth analysis of millennials' economic dilemma, read Eric Pape's latest "Priced Out" report.
Labor & Economy
Is Goldman Sachs' New Fund Really Just Greenwashing Stocks?
Critics are questioning the motives behind a banking giant's socially responsible investment strategy.
Even as Goldman Sachs markets itself as a champion of social responsibility, it is helping CEOs block key environmental and social justice reforms proposed by their shareholders.
Co-published by The Guardian
When Goldman Sachs and billionaire Paul Tudor Jones announced a partnership three months ago to help socially conscious investors support "just business behavior," they promised that their new index fund would generate solid returns for savers while directing their investment dollars towards truly humane companies.
"Capitalism should be a positive force for change," said Jones in a press release announcing the fund, which is designed to track an index of socially responsible companies identified by his nonprofit JUST Capital. "Its future will be driven by a new definition of corporate success that is aligned with the values and priorities of the public."
Socially responsible investing (SRI) offers
Wall Street an image makeover in a time of growing public distrust in the financial system.
The partnership comes as pension funds, university endowments and other institutional investors increasingly seek to put their financial weight behind ethical and sustainable corporate behavior — and as Goldman Sachs tries to shed its reputation as a "vampire squid." So far, the rebrand seems to be working: The JUST fund debuted in June to rave reviews from the financial press and ended its first day of trading with over $250 million in assets, making its launch one of the most successful in recent history.
However, a Capital & Main review of corporate documents shows that some of JUST's largest investments are in fossil fuel firms that have been sued for suppressing global climate research, Wall Street behemoths fined for defrauding investors, a social media platform accused of helping rig elections and a tech industry giant criticized for paying its workers starvation wages.
Moreover, proxy voting records reveal that even as Goldman Sachs now markets itself as a champion of social responsibility, the firm has been using its existing stakes in many JUST fund companies to help CEOs block key environmental and social justice reforms proposed by their shareholders. Those initiatives range from gender pay gap and diversity initiatives to corporate governance reforms; from efforts to increase lobbying transparency to prohibitions on doing business with companies tied to genocide and other human rights violations.
Meanwhile, in the months before JUST fund's launch, Goldman was slammed for blocking a human rights resolution at its own company — and one of Goldman's key lobbying groups in Washington was working to shape Republican legislation that would make it far more difficult for shareholders to file environmental, human rights and other socially minded initiatives in the future.
"You shouldn't be able to, with a straight face, invest in the Dakota Access Pipeline with your left hand, and with your right hand tell people that you're doing responsible investing," Lisa Lindsley, Capital Markets Advisor for the shareholder advocacy group SumOfUs, told Capital & Main. "The compartmentalization is very hypocritical."
Through a spokesperson, Goldman Sachs declined to comment on the process by which its equity funds vote on shareholder proposals, and how that process may differ with the JUST fund — which, as a newly launched fund, has not yet participated in proxy voting for any of the companies in which it holds stock.
"Ethically Motivated Versus a More Greenwashing Approach"
Goldman's new fund spotlights socially responsible investing (SRI) — a financial strategy that represents Wall Street's more affirmative answer to negative or exclusionary "screening" tactics like divestment from fossil fuel producers and tobacco firms.
While a recent directive by the Trump administration has been viewed by some experts as an effort to limit SRI strategies, the market for such investments remains strong. According to the Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment, U.S.-based assets managed using SRI strategies more than doubled to $8.7 trillion between 2012 and 2016, and now account for more than one in five dollars under professional management in the country.
Goldman's hostility toward many SRI initiatives is illustrated by its votes on resolutions at the companies now in its JUST fund.
The rise in SRI investment comes amid questions about whether corporate boards are adequately evaluating environmental and social justice concerns when they look at their company's long-term financial prospects. PwC's 2017 survey of corporate officials found "that directors are clearly out of step with investor priorities in some critical areas" and the report added that "one of these areas is environmental issues."
High-profile initiatives like the JUST fund are a chance for the industry to tout its eagerness, as Goldman Sachs executive Timothy O'Neill put it in a press release, to "[allow] investment to flow toward a more sustainable and equitable future, while seeking to generate attractive returns for investors."
The trend has given Wall Street an opportunity for an image makeover in a time of growing public distrust in the financial system: According to a Gallup poll conducted last month, fewer than half of Americans under 30 report having a positive view of capitalism, a 12-point drop in just the past two years.
For some activists and investors, though, the rapid expansion of the market for SRI-branded financial products has raised concerns about greenwashing — the practice by which companies market themselves as socially or environmentally responsible without actually adopting business practices that meet those goals.
"Putting the word 'ethical' or 'sustainable' in the name of a fund does not make it so," said a report by British investment advisory firm Castlefield, whose recent reports documented how some environmental funds include investments in fossil fuel firms. "It is increasingly important to differentiate between those funds genuinely responding to customer demand for a sustainable approach and those which use terms like ethical, Socially Responsible Investment or stewardship in their name but include companies such as British American Tobacco or Shell in their key holdings."
Goldman's Record on Socially Responsible Investing
Amid surging interest in SRI funds, Goldman's JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF aims to convince investors that the company is serious about injecting a spirit of ethics and morality into its financial strategies. To that end, the fund says it directs money only into companies that are ranked highly by JUST Capital.
The 426 companies featured in the JUST index were selected on the basis of their performance across seven different criteria, including labor practices, customer service and environmental impacts. Goldman itself ranks in the top tenth of the JUST rankings, despite the company being attacked for supporting the fossil fuel industry and also being fined $5 billion in 2016 by the Department of Justice for "serious misconduct in falsely assuring investors that securities it sold were backed by sound mortgages, when it knew that they were full of mortgages that were likely to fail."
Whether Goldman's new JUST fund represents a step in a larger shift towards socially responsible investment remains to be seen. Baruch College's Jared Peifer says that one way to judge a firm's commitment to social responsibility is to watch how it deals with resolutions brought by shareholders, whereby investors attempt to force management to adopt socially responsible policies.
"There is variance to the degree that SRI funds are ethically motivated versus a more greenwashing approach," Peifer told Capital & Main. "Is the fund dialoguing with management? Issuing shareholder proxy votes, voting on others? If so, that seems like a more ethically motivated fund to me, because they are exerting additional effort many other funds do not bother with."
In recent years, Goldman executives have been fighting off SRI resolutions at their own company, including initiatives that have asked management to more transparently disclose their political lobbying and create a human rights committee to review the company's policies regarding doing business with governments engaged in censorship and repression. Only three months before Goldman announced the JUST fund, Goldman successfully pressed the Securities and Exchange Commission to bless its move to block shareholders from voting on a resolution asking the company to honor indigenous peoples' rights.
"The company's extraordinary no action request shows the notable lengths that the Company is willing to go, and to stretch credulity, in order to prevent its directors from shouldering fiduciary obligations on indigenous and human rights," wrote shareholder proponents at the time.
Last year, Goldman was lauded by Share Action, an SRI activist group, for switching its position and using its holdings to support a series of climate-change-related shareholder initiatives. In its proxy voting guidelines, Goldman says it will generally vote for proposals asking companies to report on "policies, initiatives and oversight mechanisms related to environmental sustainability, or how the company may be impacted by climate change."
However, those guidelines do not make the same commitment when it comes to initiatives requiring companies to actually reduce their carbon emissions. The guidelines also say the company will generally vote against "proposals requesting increased disclosure of a company's policies with respect to political contributions." The company further says it will vote to remove representatives of employees or organized labor from a company's board if they are overseeing company audits or executive compensation, and if there is no legal requirement for them to be in that position.
Goldman Votes Against Resolutions at JUST Fund Companies
Goldman's hostility toward many SRI initiatives is illustrated by its votes on resolutions at the companies now in its JUST fund.
For example, there is Chevron Corporation, which ranks as the JUST fund's 17th-largest holding as it faces accusations that it is trying to intimidate environmentalists and avoid cleaning up pollution in the Amazon rainforest.
In May, the oil giant's shareholders were asked to vote on a slate of seven proposals, including a requirement for the company's board to nominate a director with environmental experience; the preparation of a report on transitioning to a low-carbon business model; increased transparency relating to lobbying activities; and stronger prohibitions on Chevron's interests overseas from doing business with governments that are complicit in genocide or crimes against humanity.
As shareholders in Chevron, 14 different Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM) funds voted on these proposals. The majority of funds voted in support of just one, a request for the company to prepare a report on its efforts to minimize methane emissions. In every other case, the funds unanimously or overwhelmingly opposed the proposals.
Proxy-voting records from dozens of shareholder meetings reviewed by Capital & Main show a similar pattern. In rare cases, Goldman funds did vote in favor of some shareholder reforms, including the preparation of a report on the gender pay gap at Facebook and Google. At several pharmaceutical companies, including AbbVie, Amgen and Eli Lilly, Goldman funds supported increased accountability for executives regarding high drug prices.
Such votes, however, were few and far between. Of the 10 companies that make up the largest share of Goldman's JUST fund, eight considered shareholder-proposed reforms that were overwhelmingly opposed by Goldman-managed funds at their most recent annual meetings. The proposals included prohibitions on offshore tax avoidance schemes, increased transparency on lobbying activities and requirements that companies appoint an independent board chair — a governance model that advocates say leads to more responsible corporate behavior. The remaining two companies, Microsoft and Visa, did not consider any shareholder proposals.
At JPMorgan, the recipient of JUST's fourth-largest investment, Goldman funds voted unanimously against a requirement for the company to release a report on its investments in PetroChina, a firm that activists accuse of helping to fund crimes against humanity due to its ongoing business relationships with oppressive regimes in Syria and Sudan. Goldman made that move despite its own proxy voting guidelines saying the company would "generally vote for proposals requesting a report on company or company supplier labor and/or human rights standards and policies, or on the impact of its operations on society."
Eighteen of the 19 Goldman funds with shares in JPMorgan also voted against an effort to prohibit the accelerated vesting of awards for executives who enter government service, a practice often criticized for fueling the revolving door between Wall Street and financial regulators.
A shareholder proposal to the board of pharmaceutical manufacturer Johnson & Johnson, expressing concern that the company's compensation practices "may insulate senior executives from legal risks" relating to the opioids crisis, recommended that opioid-related litigation costs be factored into executive pay. All 16 Goldman funds with stock in Johnson & Johnson voted to defeat the proposal.
Goldman asserts that its fund is designed to invest in firms that rank well in JUST Capital's ratings. But even that assertion is not what it seems.
Because the index features companies ranked in the top half of their respective industries, it includes dozens of firms in sectors like energy and financial services that score poorly overall. For example, the fund invests in both National Oilwell Varco, a drilling equipment firm, and Entergy, a Louisiana utility, despite the fact that the companies rank 626th and 676th, respectively, among the 875 companies evaluated by JUST Capital.
"Every industry is represented at approximately the same weight as [in] the Russell 1000," said JUST Capital's Hernando Cortina, referring to the best-known index fund tracking the largest publicly traded companies. Cortina added that the JUST fund is designed to feature responsible companies "while providing diversified equity exposure to every industry."
Lisa Lindsley of SumOfUs said the situation spotlights how socially responsible investing is seen on Wall Street not as a values-based cause, but as yet another way to trick investors into believing that the investment industry has reformed itself a decade after the financial crisis.
"The reason they're going into this is that there's money there. It's all driven by greed," she said. "It's pretty easy to do some greenwashing and call yourself a responsible investment manager."
As Goldman now markets its JUST fund, it remains unclear whether the company will change its proxy voting or its posture towards shareholder resolutions in general. Those resolutions, though, could be more rare, if congressional Republicans pass their legislation that would make it more difficult for shareholder resolutions to qualify for a vote. Federal records show that the American Bankers Association — which lists Goldman Sachs as a member — has been lobbying on that bill, which critics say could undermine the SRI movement.
"Shareholder proposals play an important role in ensuring that owners get a say in how their companies are run, and in setting the broader agenda across the market," wrote Dimitri Zagoroff of the shareholder advisory firm Glass Lewis. "Making it harder for shareholder proposals to be resubmitted from year to year would make it that much harder for proponents to refine their ideas and build a coalition of support. This often takes several years, both to generate interest in the underlying topic, and to convince other shareholders that the specific proposal offers the appropriate means of addressing the topic."
Copyright Capital & Main
The Long March to Asylum Stalls in Tijuana
A Border in Turmoil: The Migrant Caravan Crisis
Epicenters of Refuge: A Tale of Two Cities
The Governor and the Oil Lobbyist: Report Blasts Jerry Brown's Friendship With Lucie Gikovich
Los Angeles and Oakland Teachers Rally Amid Deadlocked Contract Talks
10 Inequality Takeaways
Great Expectations: California's First Steps Toward Universal Health Care
The Golden State's Fight Against Economic Inequality
Lights Out, Clean Green: How Janitors Are Boosting High-Rises' Sustainability
Can Newsom Make a Dent in California's Affordable Housing Crisis?
Central American Caravan: Militia Members Head for the Border
Video: Rising Rents Force a Choice Between Eating or Shelter
A Law Ending Cash Bail Gives Judges Enormous Power Over Defendants
Video: Los Angeles Rejects Spy Program
Video: Make California Hate Again
Top Stories
- Labor & EconomyAugust 29, 2018
Ohio, NJ and California Pension Funds Invested $885 Million in Hedge Fund That Controls National Enquirer Parent
- Charter School DonorsNovember 1, 2018
Reed Hastings: Netflix CEO Goes Nuclear on Public Schools
- Labor & EconomyDecember 20, 2017
How a Reporter Got a Corker of a Scoop About the GOP's Tax Bill
- Labor & EconomyJanuary 11, 2018
The Most Successful Union Organizer in America Thinks Traditional Organizing Is a Lost Cause
- Labor & EconomyJuly 10, 2018
The 'Amazon Tax' Ruling: Disrupting the Disruptors?
- Deadly DetentionMarch 14, 2018
- SocietyMarch 6, 2018
Two Years of Official Silence Since a Controversial Inglewood Police Shooting
- Battery BloodMarch 21, 2018
Battery Blood: How California Health Agencies Failed Exide Workers


text:
1 or more
2 or more
4 or more
ABOUT THIS PRODUCT: They'll be back starting in January 2019 for Purim 2019!Each 30 pound case has approximately 400-420 cookies. In this mixed discount case you will receive some of these flavors: raspberry, apricot, poppy, and prune. Be Teavon!
Kosher Parve Kof-K Pas Yisroel Made in a nut-free facility, Kamach Yoshon.
Size of cookies approximately 2.5 to 3 inches on each side. Hamentashen are packed on 5 pound trays, this means you will receive 6 individually packed trays ready to serve or include in your mishloach manot.
You will receive 6 trays with hamentashen, ready to serve or repack.
To ensure that you receive hamentashen in flavors you want and quantities you need - order now and select preferred shipping date below. Hamentashen - fresh from the oven. Packaged well for transporting (won't crumble!). Shelf life 2 months.
Qualified customers may request a sample.
Make your mishloach manot packaging look professional! Now you can pack the cookies into clear bags. Each case will come with a set of bags of your choosing. Select from the options below. Complete the look with elegant hamentash labels!
It would be our pleasure to ship it to you!
Free shipping and more discounts! Chocolategelt.com is your online source for Discount Bulk Case Hamantashen 400 cookies/30lbs - MIXED FLAVORS. We serve schools, synagogues, non-profit organizations, as well as individuals. Discount Bulk Case Hamantashen 400 cookies/30lbs - MIXED FLAVORS sold retail and wholesale, you can see price break depending on quantity you buy on each product page. Our popular products are dreidels, chocolate coins also known as gelt, candles and party gifts for Chanukah. Our selection also includes wide variety of Purim supplies Thank you for shopping at our store!
- Wholesale - Contact/FAQ - Testimonials

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Chicago Metro ASA is Proud to announce AthleteX as the official sports therapy company of the Chicago Metro ASA.
Posted by Mike O'Neill on Apr 19 2017 at 05:31AM PDT
With offices in Oak Lawn and Orland Park, the Chicago Metro ASA has partnered with owner Tom Mulvey to help provide his expert services for all ASA players and coaches.
If you have a need for sports or orthopedic physical therapy, we hope you contact AthleteX and see the many ways Tom and his staff can help you.
I personally have used AthleteX over the past few years and I highly recommend them. They have been instrumental in helping me to continue in my profession of refereeing Division 1 men's basketball. Visit them at www.athletexpt.com
Tom O'Neill
There are no comments for this announcement.


text:
TCB - Lay It Down (Local Artist From The DMV Goes The Uncut Route WIth A Yungin Droppin Her Draws)
Official Video
Please click the "Report" button below if the video on this page is not working properly.
Comments will only be displayed by verified emails. No Spamming or Racism.


text:
Physical Training, Ethical Discipline, and Creative Violence: Zones of Self-Mastery in the Hindu Nationalist Movement
This essay advances understanding of how projects of self-mastery within neighborhood physical training programs associated with the Hindu Nationalist Movement produce subjects that are simultaneously ethically oriented and creatively violent. Such an analysis is contrasted with the conventional view that Hindu Nationalist volunteers are mere objects who blindly conform to a nationalist ideology or religious norms. Drawing on the author's participant observation of physical conditioning within the movement, the essay illustrates how combat training depends on an analytical sensibility by which techniques of drill are simultaneously learned and innovated by volunteers in a disciplinary zone of self-experimentation. Within such a zone, volunteers modify drill routines, enriching and refining them on an everyday basis. Thus, the evolution of physical techniques transforms training into an unfolding enterprise that is continually oriented toward attaining physical and moral self-mastery through the probing of bodily exercises. The essay underscores the social significance of such forms of physical self-exploration, in which movement volunteers understand the iterative probing of physical practice as driven by a resolve that deepens the volunteer's moral fortitude. The essay illuminates how a set of physical and moral processes are intertwined, processes through which militant subjects are culturally formed and routines of violence are sustained as a social and ethical practice. Physical training is connected to anti-Muslim pogroms in postcolonial Gujarat demonstrating how the evolving nature of physical training shapes, prolongs, and enables the improvisation of tactics of ethnic cleansing.
Editorial Overview
In the February 2010 issue of Cultural Anthropology, Arafaat A. Valiani examines projects of self-mastery within neighborhood physical training programs associated with the Hindi Nationalist Movement. He argues that these physical regimes of training produce subjects that are simultaneously ethically oriented and creatively violent. This analysis is then applied to anti-Muslim pogroms in postcolonial Gujarat. In contrast to previous scholarship on these events, Valiani argues that the pogroms cannot be understood as the simple product of people blindly following the directives of the pro-Hindu BJP party, but must rather be analyzed with reference to the more extended project in which moral selves are cultivated through physical regimes of training and improvization.
Editorial Footnotes
Cultural Anthropology has published a number of essays on the topic of violence. These include: Nils Bubandt's "From the Enemy's Point of View: Violence, Empathy, and the Ethnography of Fakes" (2009); Peter Benson's "El Campo: Faciality and Structural Violence in Farm Labor Camps" (2008); Lori Allen's "Getting By the Occupation: How Violence Became Normal During the Second Palestinian Intifada" (2008); Charles Briggs' "Mediating Infanticide: Theorizing Relations between Narrative and Violence" (2007); and Rosalind Shaw's "Displacing Violence: Making Pentecostal Memory in Postwar Sierra Leone" (2007).
Cultural Anthropology has also published a number of essays on religion. These include: Jesse Weaver Shipley's "Comedians, Pastors, and the Miraculous Agency of Charisma in Ghana" (2009); Dierdre de la Cruz's "Coincidence and Consequence: Marianism and the Mass Media in the Global Philippines" (2009); Omri Elisha's "Moral Ambitions of Grace: The Paradox of Compassion and Accountability in Evangelical Faith-Based Activism" (2008); Webb Keane's "Sincerity, 'Modernity,' and the Protestants" (2002); Saba Mahmood's "Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival" (2001); and Charles Hirschkind's "Civic Virtue and Religious Reason: An Islamic Counterpublic" (2001).
About the Author
Arafaat A. Valiani is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at Williams College.
Recent and Forthcoming works by the Author
Valiani, Arafaat A. Militant Publics: Physical Training, Guerilla-styled Protest, and 'Civic' Action in Gujarat, India (tentative title, book manuscript)
Valiani, Arafaat A. "Violence." In Darity Jr., William A., ed. The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Volume 8. 2008: 622-625.
Valiani, Arafaat A. Contribution solicited by the Social Science Research Council pertaining to the terrorist attacks which took place in Mumbai, India in 2008. In "Off the Cuff: Mumbai Revisited," in Social Sciences Resource Council. The Immanent Frame: Secularism, religion and the public sphere. 2009.
Relevant Links
The National Volunteer Organization (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh):
Head of RSS on why the term terrorism should not be applied to his organization
Related Readings
Asad, Talal. Genealogies of Religion: Descipline, and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1993.
Hansen, Thomas Blom. The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
Mahmood, Saba. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Mueggler, Erik. "The Age of Wild Ghosts: Memory, violence, and place in Southwest China." Anthropologica 45.1(2003): 450-453.
Questions for Classroom Discussion
1. What does it mean to do the type of ethnography that Valiani did for this article? How does Valiani describe the ethical and methodological dilemmas he faced? And, how would you if placed in a comparable situation?
2. How does Valiani balance the issues of authority and agency? Are these opposing terms? What is the relationship between them? How do the characters Valiani presents in this essay exercise their agency, and how is this similar or dissimilar from conventional accounts of agency?
3. What does Valiani's account of the National Volunteer organization tell us about the relationship between violence and political subjectivity? How does Valiani analyze the embodied, discursive, and affective dispositions which enable certain technologies of violence? What type of information does it reveal?
Post a Comment
Please log in or register to comment


text:
Graffiti Fonts® CDROM - Level 2
Graffiti Fonts 4.0 - Codname: BURN
Available Now
- 100 High Quality Graffiti Fonts
- 100 Graffiti & Tat style Vector Illustrations
- 100 Street Art Style Urban Photo Cut-Outs
- 100 Stock Images & Textures
- 100 Worldwide Vector Cityscapes & Skylines
- 100 Vector Paint & Ink Splatters, Drips & Streaks
- Free Software
- Free Design Templates
All of Highground's Graffiti Font CDROM]s & DVD ROMs now include high quality, open source graphic design, web development, animation, image processing & illustration &
office software. This free software works similar to leading high-end applications, like Adobe Illustrator, Photoshop, Flash, Microsoft Office & others. This
collection of reliable applications provides a complete development environment without having to spend a dime.
The Graffiti Fonts® 3.1 Font Collection is here
new CD includes over 50 of the worlds top graffiti style fonts for both Apple™ and Windows™ users as well as
over 120 Hip-Hop themed stock images & Illustrations, clip-art, templates & more. 31 Exclusive fonts in all
with 17 all new exclusive graffiti fonts and new styles from tags to burners. We have also included a fat package of advanced
design software for FREE!
The edition 2.1 CDROM features 31 fonts, including 11 new exclusive fonts, only available from Highground. Our first CDROM features 13 of the worlds top Graffiti
Fonts for Mac, PC and Linux users.
Online Graffiti Creator by Full Time Artists. On GraffWriter.com you can create an unlimited number of custom
graffiti style banners, logos & other artwork for free. Download your image to use it for printed materials or host it with us for free & post
it to your social network pages or other online space.
Graffiti Fonts® is a registered trademark of Highground Industries. All Typefaces and artwork are the property of Highground Industries
& Full Time Artists © 1991 - 2018 unless otherwise noted. Unauthorized duplication is strictly prohibited. Fonts, Art and
all other materials on this site are wholely owned by thier creators and may not be redistributed in any way, added to any website or application
or used under any other name without advance written consent from Highground.


text:
More On The Downing Street Memo
Reported by Ellen - June 21, 2005
Last night on his radio show, Alan Colmes did another hour-long segment on the Downing Street Memo. His guest for the segment was Cindy Sheehan who co-founded Gold Star Families for Peace after losing a son to the war in Iraq. Sheehan testified at Rep. John Conyers' hearing last week about the Downing Street Memo and whether or not President Bush misled the United States into war against Iraq.
Claiming that her only area of expertise is "having a broken heart" as the result of "having a child killed in an illegal and immoral war," Sheehan reported that the hearings broke into some of the mainstream media such as George Stephanopoulos' This Week and Hardball with Chris Matthews and that she thinks this story is going to be "something that sticks."
Sheehan said that she's pushing for an investigation. "We deserve to know the truth. I don't care if they're Republican or Democrat. This memo needs to be investigated... All we want is an investigation into the veracity of the documents."
As happened when Sheehan was a guest in February, the callers mostly disagreed with her views but, fortunately, they were nowhere near as vicious as they were the last time. Frank from Piscataway, NJ, said he mourns the death of "this warrior" but that he doesn't like the way "she has put a shadow over his grave already."
Sheehan answered, "Too bad my son died for cowards who wouldn't fight in a war when they had a chance to fight in their war, when they did everything they could to avoid going to Viet Nam. And they're so brave with sending other people's children to war butI don't see their children. I don't see their children fighting in a war. If their fathers believe in it so strongly, why don't they send their own kids and let the kids come home who don't believe in the war?"
Colmes brought up a recent Nation Magazine article, based on reporting from the Sunday Times of London, saying that, in an effort to provoke Saddam Hussein into war, the US and British forces dropped on Iraq double the number of bombs in the second half of 2002 as in the whole of 2001. "That got almost no attention," he said. "This was in the run-up to the war when we were still supposedly debating it."
Also mentioned was the Coalition Provisonal Authority's inability to account for 8.8 billion dollars which, according to Colmes, was reported by The New York Times on 1/31/05 and has disappeared off the media radar screen.
Sheehan commented that the media has chosen instead to cover stories like the Runaway Bride.
"I'm guilty," Colmes acknowledged, but added that the media should be able to cover both.
At the top of the next hour, Colmes continued his regular Monday reading of the names of US soldiers killed in the past week. (Comment: Go ahead and attack me but I still say this is a great segment.)
Presumably, there will be more discussion of the Downing Street Memo inquiry tomorrow night when former ambassador Joseph Wilson, who also testified at last week's hearing, is scheduled to be a guest. The program will be broadcast from Aruba so that Colmes and Hannity can bring some on-the-scene je ne sais pas quoi to the latest missing white girl story.
It'll be interesting to see which story gets more air time.


text:
1990's Retro Candy
13 Items
- Sour Triple Dip Candy - 12 / BoxSpecial Price $15.34 Regular Price $17.04
- Tootsie Pops Caramel Apple Orchard - 3 lb.$15.62Out of stock
- Warheads Sour Assorted Bags - 12 / BoxSpecial Price $16.49 Regular Price $18.32
- Reese's NutRageous - 18 / BoxSpecial Price $20.66 Regular Price $22.96
- Mini Chewy SweeTarts - 24 / BoxSpecial Price $22.35 Regular Price $24.83
13 Items
At CandyFavorites, we prize ourselves on our retro candy selections. While you may still think of the 1990's as if they happened just a few hours ago, we are sorry to say that the decade is well on its way to becoming fossilized in time.
Sure, some people define decades by historical events or scientific contributions, but here at CandyFavorites, we define decades by the candy that they engendered, and we praise the 1990's for bringing us several of our favorites.
While the 90's witnessed the birth of Dolly, the first cloned animal in history, we remember that they brought us the Reese's Nutrageous candy bar and Dubble Bubble Painterz Gumballs, bubble gum balls that paint your mouth. Now that's real innovation. Of course the 90's also brought us stem cell research, reality television, and Nelson Mandella's release from prison, but we would like to add Candy Blox and Cry Baby Sour Mini Drinks to this list of very important things.
Let our selection of candy from the 1990's take you back. Where exactly will that be for you? Have fun.


text:
COUGAR Challenger Case Review
COUGAR isn't a company that I usually think of when listing out chassis manufacturers, but as seen by the previous COUGAR cases reviewed here at OCC, they produce very competitive products. Founded back in 2007 by computer enthusiasts and professionals in Germany, COUGAR is dedicated to delivering high-performance and high-quality components for gamers. I haven't personally used anything from COUGAR, except for their cases and fans, but they have held up well to normal and even abnormal abuse.
Today I'll be taking a look at COUGAR's new Challenger case. This is a new case in the COUGAR gaming lineup that takes its inspiration from, and I quote, "the pilot unlock missile cover then fire!". If you're as confused by that as I was when reading through the features of the case, don't feel bad — but more about that when we get to it. The Challenger, at $85.99, sits firmly in the affordable category for performance mid-tower cases and looks to be large enough to house any hardware you can potentially throw at it. The styling, as you'll see in a bit, is fairly extreme and I have the feeling most will either love it or hate it — there's not much room in the middle.
Closer Look:
When this box arrived at my doorstep it was immediately obvious what had arrived. Good packaging makes its contents known at a glance and this box surely does that! The front of the box sports a zoomed-in view of the front panel of the case along with the name of the case in a large font. The side of the box reveals an isometric profile of the case along with a fairly large table detailing the various specifications and features (seen in detail on the Specifications & Features page). The back side of the box details the physical features of the case with an exploded view of the chassis. Along the bottom of the box there is a diagram explaining which GPUs will fit with the three different HDD cage configurations. The last side of the box is a mirror image of its counterpart. The whole box is printed with a single color of ink, which is always a good sign that the manufacturer hasn't wasted all of the cost on fancy packaging and not on what really matters — the contents of the box!
Slipping the COUGAR Challenger out of its packaging was a simple affair and revealed a case protected by the usual plastic bag and foam end caps. The side window of the case is clearly visible here as is an unusual hole on the side panel — as you'll see in a bit this is where the integrated side panel fan filter attaches with a fairly ingenious mounting mechanism. The packaging itself is quite sturdy and arrived with no dents, dings, or scratches. The foam end caps are a bit thicker than I usually see on less expensive cases and this is definitely a good thing!


text:
Lindsay Lohan Megazine Model Girl HD Wallpaper
Download Lindsay Lohan Megazine Model Girl HD Wallpaper. Search more high Definition 1080p, 720p, Free HD wallpaper, Widescreen, 3D, Wallpapers, Computer, Pc, Desktop, HD, Background, Android, Iphone, Mobile Wallpaper and Photos Image.
Find More HD Wallpapers OR High Resolution 1280×720, 1366×768, 1920×1080, Wallpaper about Lindsay Lohan In Stylish HD Wallpapers.
Lindsay Lohan is an American actress, model and recording artist. She began her career as a child fashion model when she was 3 years old, and was later featured on the soap opera Another World for a year when she was 10. She made her roles in Disney's motion Pictures.
Lindsay Lohan Born in July 2, 1986, New York City, New York, United States.
She has Siblings named: Ali Lohan, Ashley Kaufmann, Cody Lohan, Landon Lohan, Michael Lohan Jr.
Download Lindsay Lohan Megazine Model Girl HD Wide Lindsay Lohan Wallpapers In high Quality Photos Images for Computer Desktops, Mobiles, Apple Iphone, Android, Tablets, Widescreen, 3D Posters. Find the Best Resolutions Like (1080p, 720p, 1366×768, 1920×1080) for above Wallpaper OR Simply Click on the Image above and save it in your System or Set it as your Computer Screen and Mobile Phones Backgrounds.
Category : Lindsay Lohan
Total Download: 5262
Download Links:
Tags: Advertising, American Actresses, Celebrity, girl, Lindsay, Lohan, Megazine, model, Tamales


text:
Melbourne: Spinner Jon Holland has been replaced by Brad Young in the Adelaide Strikers squad for the ongoing Australia`s domestic Twenty20 cricket tournament, the Big Bash League (BBL).
The BBL technical committee approved the change Tuesday, said a press release.
Holland, recovering from shoulder injury, will be unavailable for the duration of the league.
Left-arm spinner Young played six One-Day Internationals (ODI) for Australia in 1998 and 1999 and has played 54 first-class matches for South Australia between 1996 and 2003. He also took a hat-trick at the 1998 Commonwealth Games against New Zealand.
Young will be available for selection in the Strikers` next match, a clash with Brisbane Heat at the Adelaide Oval Thursday night.


text: The research and development (R&D) function within chemical companies has traditionally set its sights on finding the newest material. Recently, there has been a shift to focus on two areas: developing new applications for existing molecules and new materials, and, secondly, using information and digital technologies as a foundation for new smart products and associated business models. Accenture chemical executives have considered these innovation areas and developed a viewpoint on the R&D of tomorrow—an interconnected innovation ecosystem.


text:
For six years, comedian George Lopez was co-creator, writer, producer and star of his own self-titled ABC-TV sitcom, the only show ever named after a Latino to have a successful run on network television. In the seven years since it was canceled, "George Lopez" has been in syndication on various channels.
Lopez benefited from the success, continuing a career in movies and stand-up comedy – the last of which brings him to Sands Bethlehem Event Center at 8 p.m. July 25 with his Listen to My Bass tour.
But television has continued to be a touch nut to crack for the Mexican-American Lopez.
His late-night talk show, "Lopez Tonight" on TBS was canceled in...


text: TruthVsComfort 228 Report post Posted April 5, 2013 WASHINGTON -- Nearly half a million Americans left the labor force in March, the U.S. Labor Department announced Friday, causing the unemployment rate to decline from 7.7 to 7.6 percent. Part of the reason fewer people are participating in the labor force is that the baby boomers are hitting retirement, but another part is that the economy is lousy. Employers added only 88,000 jobs in March, the fewest in any month since June. "This should be a wake-up call," Mike Evangelist, a policy analyst for worker advocacy group the National Employment Law Project, said in an interview. "We had had pretty consistent job growth the last couple months, and it just so happens the month they enacted all these austerity measures we had terrible growth." Job creation slowed in the same month federal policymakers pursued significant budget cuts known as sequestration, the latest and greatest in a series of reductions to government spending. The cuts have already resulted in layoffs and furlough notices for some federal workers. New unemployment claims rose sharply last week. The number of long-term jobless declined slightly from 4.8 million to 4.6 million in March, though the decline probably has as much to do with hiring as people giving up on their search for jobs. Workers are considered long-term unemployed if they've been looking for work for at least six months. A person who hasn't tried to find a job within four weeks of the government's survey doesn't count as unemployed at all. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/05/new-jobs-report_n_3016714.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites