text:
Johns Hopkins University
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Website: http://www.jhu.edu
Type: Private
Federal Circuit: 4th Circuit
Speech Code Rating
Johns Hopkins University has been given the speech code rating Red. A red light university has at least one policy that both clearly and substantially restricts freedom of speech. Read more here.
Johns Hopkins University: Viewpoint-Based Rejection of Pro-Life Group
April 8, 2013
Johns Hopkins University's Student Government Association Senate voted to deny recognition to pro-life student group Voice for Life (VFL) on the basis that the club's activities might make people feel "uncomfortable."» Read More
Johns Hopkins University: Student Punished for Party Invitation
November 28, 2006
Johns Hopkins University earned its Red Alert designation by suspending18 -year-old junior Justin Park for posting an "offensive" Halloween party invitation on Facebook. Because some found the invitation racially offensive, Park was charged with and found guilty of "harassment," "intimidation," and "failing to respect the rights of others." Although it was later reduced in the face of public pressure, Park's original punishment included suspension from the university for a year, completion of 300 hours of community service, an assignment to read 12 books and to write a reflection paper on each, and mandatory attendance at a workshop on diversity and […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins University: Viewpoint Discrimination Against Student Newspaper
May 19, 2006
Johns Hopkins University (JHU) dropped its investigation of a harassment complaint filed against staff members of a conservative student newspaper, The Carrollton Record. After several months of correspondence with JHU administrators, FIRE gained assurance that JHU is no longer pursuing the investigation. However, limitations on the distribution rights of campus publications remain and the university has not acted against cases of newspaper theft against The Carrollton Record. Johns Hopkins remains on FIRE's Red Alert list.» Read More
Johns Hopkins University: Disciplining of Professor for Pro-War Remarks
October 21, 2001
Soon after the September 11 terrorist attacks, Johns Hopkins University Professor Charles H. Fairbanks voiced his support, at a public forum, for an aggressive campaign against states that harbor terrorists. He said that he would "bet anyone here a Koran" that his analysis was correct. One member of the audience charged that he sought to "assist people in conducting hate crimes" with his language. Even though Fairbanks apologized for his remark about the Koran, Dean Stephen Szabo demanded a written apology and eliminated his position as director of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, claiming that Fairbanks was unfit for the job. […]» Read More
Red Light Policies
Principles for Ensuring Equity, Civility and Respect for All
Speech Code Category: Policies on Tolerance, Respect, and Civility
Last updated: February 28, 2018
Rude, disrespectful behavior is unwelcome and will not be tolerated.
Information Technology Use Policies
Speech Code Category: Internet Usage Policies
Last updated: February 28, 2018
Unacceptable use of IT Resources includes, but is not limited to: … Harassing others by sending annoying, abusive, profane, threatening, defamatory, offensive, or unnecessarily repetitive messages, or by sending e-mails that appear to come from someone other than the sender … Intentional, non-incidental acquisition, storage, and/or display of sexually explicit images, except for acknowledged, legitimate medical, scholarly, educational, or forensic purposes. Exposure and/or display of such material may be offensive, constitute sexual harassment or create a hostile work environment.
Student Conduct Code
Speech Code Category: Policies on Tolerance, Respect, and Civility
Last updated: February 28, 2018
- The physical or emotional abuse of any person or any action that threatens physical or emotional harm or endangers the physical or emotional well-being, health or safety of any person.
- Any physical or verbal threats against or harassment, bullying or intimidation of any person(s).
- Conduct or a pattern of conduct not of a sexual nature (including without limitation physical, verbal, graphic, written, or electronic) in which a person approaches or pursues another person(s) with intent to place the person(s) in fear of physical harm or with intent to harass, bully or intimidate the person(s).
Office of Institutional Equity: General Anti-Harassment Policy
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: February 28, 2018
For purposes of this policy, harassment is defined as:
- any type of behavior which is based on sex, gender, marital status, pregnancy, race, color, ethnicity, national origin, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, veteran status, that
- is so severe or pervasive that it interferes with an individual's work or academic performance or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive working or academic environment.
Harassment when directed at an individual because of sex, gender, marital status, pregnancy, race, color, ethnicity, national origin, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, personal appearance, veteran status, or any other legally protected characteristic may include, but is not limited to: unwanted physical contact; use of epithets, inappropriate jokes, comments or innuendos; obscene or harassing telephone calls, e‑mails, letters, notes or other forms of communication; and, any conduct that may create a hostile working or academic environment.
Sexual harassment, whether between people of different sexes or the same sex, is defined to include, but is not limited to, unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, sexual violence and other behavior of a sexual nature when: … such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work or academic performance or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive working or educational environment.
Student Leadership and Involvement: Policies and Procedures- Event Promotion
Speech Code Category: Posting and Distribution Policies
Last updated: February 28, 2018
Advertising must not contain material that: …
- contains a message of hate or a threat of violence
- promotes hate speech or events
The Johns Hopkins University Sexual Misconduct Policy and Procedures
Speech Code Category: Harassment Policies
Last updated: February 28, 2018
The term "sexual harassment," whether between people of different sexes or the same sex, includes, but is not limited to, unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, sexual assault and other verbal, non-verbal, electronic or physical conduct of a sexual nature when: … such conduct creates a hostile environment.
A "hostile environment" results from unwelcome and discriminatory conduct that is so sufficiently severe, pervasive, or persistent that it unreasonably interferes with, limits, or deprives a member of the community of the ability to participate in or to receive benefits, services, or opportunities from the University's education or employment programs and/or activities. The environment can be the result of acts committed by any individual or individuals, including any member of the University community. To assess whether the alleged conduct has created a hostile environment, the University considers all relevant evidence, weighs a variety of factors, and evaluates the conduct at issue from both a subjective and objective perspective.
Academic Freedom at Johns Hopkins
Speech Code Category: Advertised Commitments to Free Expression
Last updated: October 10, 2018
Academic freedom is the wellspring of an open and free university.
Academic freedom protects the right to speak and create, to question and dissent, to participate in debate on and off campus, and to invite others to do the same, all without fear of restraint or penalty. It is designed to afford members of the community the broadest possible scope for unencumbered expression, investigation, analysis, and discourse. Indeed, among the measures of an academic community is its success in creating a culture of active discussion and debate, one where its members open themselves to the views of others, even when those views are provocative or unfamiliar.
Our university is committed to the steadfast protection of the right to academic freedom. This commitment emerges from the university's time-honored role in the creation of knowledge and the sifting and winnowing of ideas. Without full and vigorous protection of this principle, the university's capacity to discharge its hallowed mission would be compromised.
Guidelines for Students in Support of Free Expression Through Protests and Demonstrations at the Homewood Campus
Speech Code Category: Protest and Demonstration Policies
Last updated: February 28, 2018
Johns Hopkins University seeks to uphold and protect the right of free expression and presents these guidelines to aid students seeking to engage in protests, demonstrations, vigils, displays, or other acts of public expression at the Homewood Campus.
Protests, demonstrations, and other acts of public expression generally will be permitted and supported until or unless members of the Provost's Office, including the Vice Provost for Student Affairs, determine that the rights of others have been significantly infringed and/or determine – in consultation with Campus Safety and Security, as needed – that there is a threat to the safety or welfare of those in attendance. Material interference with the rights of others to engage in instruction and research will be viewed as inhibiting the academic freedom of others and disruptive to the core educational mission of the University.
Disruptions raising health, safety, and welfare concerns may include but are not limited to: obstructing the passage into or out of buildings by blocking doorways; preventing University employees from entering their workplace; refusing to relocate from a building or area that is closed; preventing members of a class from being able to hear a lecture or take an exam; preventing an instructor from giving a lecture, by means of shouts or other significant interruptions; and destruction of property or vandalism.
While arrangements are not required for student protests and demonstrations, they can help make the event successful and effective by ensuring a space is not already reserved for another group, proactively ensuring the health and safety of participants and the university community, and allowing public expression to proceed without interfering with the academic mission of the University.
Colleges Still Privileging Identity Politics Over Free Speech
March 9, 2016
By Allan C. Brownfeld at Communities Digital News WASHINGTON, March 9, 2016 — American colleges and universities are eager to embrace differences in race, ethnic background, religion, and sexual orientation, as they should. But for them, that's where diversity ends. When it comes to the free expression of ideas, they think diversity is a dirty word. Read more here.» Read More
Speech Crimes on Campus
December 9, 2015
By Staff at The Wall Street Journal The student censors at Yale claimed a scalp—pardon the micro-aggression—this week when lecturer Erika Christakis resigned her teaching position on childhood education. She had been pilloried for asking in an email if students weren't too sensitive if they are offended by politically incorrect Halloween costumes. Yale's powers-that-be ducked and covered in response, but the news on campus isn't all bad, according to a forthcoming report by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (Fire). The foundation's annual survey of 440 colleges—comprising 336 four-year public and 104 private institutions—finds that the share of schools maintaining […]» Read More
Chicago School of Free Speech
November 23, 2015
By L. Gordon Crovitz at The Wall Street Journal "I'm a Liberal Professor, and My Liberal Students Terrify Me," read the headline of an essay for the liberal website Vox earlier this year. The author, who was frightened enough to write under a pseudonym, admitted that he "cut out anything I could see upsetting a coddled undergrad," including books by Mark Twain. The American Association of University Professors last year warned: "The presumption that students need to be protected rather than challenged in a classroom is at once infantilizing and anti-intellectual." The liberals who run U.S. universities can't be surprised by […]» Read More
Freedom Of Speech More Unwelcome Among Liberal Students, Faculty
November 22, 2015
By Kathryn Watson at The Daily Caller Liberal college students and faculty members are far more likely to disinvite a campus speaker than conservatives, but conservatives succeed slightly more often, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation analysis. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education database, which defends students' and professors' First Amendment rights, documented 286 efforts to disinvite scheduled campus speakers between 2000 and 2014. One hundred and sixty student groups and faculty "from the left" of the speaker tried to disinvite the individual during the period, according to FIRE. Only 96 students and faculty "from the right" of the […]» Read More
Student Activism, Race & Free Speech
November 18, 2015
By Aaron Henkin, Maureen Harvie and Connor Graham at WYPR.org The University of Missouri, Yale University, University of South Carolina, Occidental College, University of Kansas, Claremont McKenna College. The list goes on. College students across the country are leading protests and demonstrations to call attention to the issue of racial tolerance, diversity, and in some cases, the resignation of professors and high-ranking administrators. In this hour of Midday we'll view this topic through national and local lenses, and hear the points of view of academic reporters, students, a college administrator and a free speech advocate. Our guests: Scott Jaschik,editor and one […]» Read More
Yale Vs. Princeton: The Battle For Free Speech On Campus
November 13, 2015
By Karin Agness at Forbes Yale and Princeton will square off on the gridiron on Saturday. While the schools are tied in the Ivy League football standings, it is becoming clear that the Tigers are winning when it comes to free speech on campus. Yale is in the national spotlight this week as campus protests and confrontations there heat up highlighting a national trend of students stifling free speech and the free exchange of ideas on campus. At issue in New Haven is an email sent out by The Intercultural Affairs Committee on Halloween costume guidelines to discourage students from […]» Read More
Free Speech on Campus at Risk
November 3, 2015
By Staff at The Virginia Gazette Open debate or ideological conformity? This question is among the free speech issues facing institutions of higher learning nationwide, including William & Mary. To address this topic, the Society for the College, an independent non-profit alumni organization and the SFTC Student Association has engaged speaker Catherine Sevcenko, noted authority on legal issues affecting student rights, to discuss how W&M students can defend the first amendment and academic freedom on campus. Sevcenko, associate director of litigation at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, will also present some wide legal challenges affecting free speech and academic […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Adopts Academic Freedom Policy After Years of Clampdowns on Pro-Life Groups
September 24, 2015
By Micah Fleck at The College Fix After a string of free-speech controversies related to abortion in recent years, Johns Hopkins University has adopted a statement on academic freedom that's being praised at least one higher-education group. Not everyone is convinced "America's first research university," as Johns Hopkins calls itself, can live up to the statement's standards, though, given other school policies on "civility" and "offensive" language. Johns Hopkins debuted the statement earlier this month, calling it the product of "many months" of work by a 14-member task force led by a professor emeritus and expert in constitutional law. Its […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Tried To Ban 'Triggering' Display Of Fetus Development
April 17, 2015
By Rachel Stoltzfoos at The Daily Caller Johns Hopkins University tried to ban a pro-life group from displaying models showing the development of a fetus, because it might "trigger" those who see it. The North Baltimore Pro-Life Study Group has set up a display of the models at Hopkins' annual Spring Fair for 30 years, but this year the school's Arts and Crafts Committee tried to reject the display, reported the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. It "contains triggering and disturbing images and content," the committee told the pro-life group. Last year the committee instituted a policy requiring pre-approval […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Reverses Ban on Detailed Pro-Life Display
April 15, 2015
By Maxim Lott at Fox News Officials at prestigious Johns Hopkins University on Tuesday reversed a decision banning a pro-life display that had appeared for decades at the school's Spring Fair, after FoxNews.com inquired about the matter. The display, a fixture at the fair for 30 years, was sponsored by the student group JHU Voice for Life. It shows models of unborn fetuses in various stages of development, but was initially rejected this year on the grounds that it "contains triggering and disturbing images." The decision to reject the display's presence at the fair, which takes place from April 24-26, […]» Read More
Pro-life group wins approval at Johns Hopkins
April 10, 2013
Johns Hopkins University reversed course on its stance against a student pro-life group, granting the organization full recognition late Tuesday. The student judiciary unanimously overturned an earlier decision by the student senate to deny Voice for Life (VFL) recognition because its planned activities included sidewalk counseling outside abortion facilities. According to minutes of the March 12 meeting, during which the club was denied official recognition, members of the senate said they feared the group would "make people uncomfortable." They also suggested the pro-life group shouldn't get recognition because the school's pro-abortion group had disbanded. In a letter protesting the decision, the […]» Read More
Pro-lifers win recognition at Johns Hopkins
April 10, 2013
A campus judiciary committee at Johns Hopkins University granted official recognition to a pro-life student group, overturning the student senate's previous decision. The Student Government Associate Senate denied recognition to Voices For Life last month due to concerns that the group's anti-abortion activism constituted harassment. One student government representative even made an association between VFL and a white supremacist group in an email leaked to other students. But many people — including some student leaders, and free speech experts at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education–maintained that the university would be guilty of unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination if it refused to recognize the group. On Tuesday, […]» Read More
Antiabortion student group now allowed at Johns Hopkins University
April 10, 2013
The Johns Hopkins University Student Government Association's judiciary arm has overturned a March decision by the student-run senate to deny "official group status" to Voice for Life, an antiabortion advocacy and awareness group. Voice for Life now enjoys formal recognition from the student government, allowing members to host events and fundraise on campus, reserve meeting rooms, list events on university Web sites, apply for university funding and use the university's name, logo and seal, among other things, according to a statement from the judiciary committee distributed Wednesday morning. At a March 12 meeting of the Student Government Association, student leaders […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Relents, Recognizes Student Pro-Life Group
April 10, 2013
After intense national pressure and a strongly-worded letter from a pro-life legal group, Johns Hopkins University is finally recognizing a pro-life student group that had been denied official status. Voice for Life (VFL) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) has officially been granted recognized group status after members of the student government initially likened it to a white supremacist group. This unanimous decision by the Student Government Association's (SGA) Judiciary Committee overturns the SGA Senate's rejection of VFL. The pro-life group had been denied official status because the SGA had deemed sidewalk counseling "harassment" under JHU rules and because of a link on […]» Read More
Examiner Local Editorial: Muzzling free speech on campus
January 2, 2013
One New Year's resolution we'd like to see in 2013 is a renewed effort to uphold the First Amendment on college campuses. According to a new report by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, or FIRE, 62 percent of the nation's colleges and universities "maintain severely restrictive speech codes … that clearly and substantially prohibit protected speech." FIRE noted that the overwhelming majority of speech is protected. But narrow exceptions (such as "fighting words," obscenity and defamation) "are often misused and abused by universities to punish constitutionally protected speech." Restrictions intended to protect students from harassment or bullying have been […]» Read More
Don't speak: Report ranks 2012's 'Worst Colleges for Free Speech' in the country
April 2, 2012
Last week, the Foundation For Individual Rights in Education released its second-annual "Worst Colleges for Free Speech" list. The Philadelphia-based nonprofit named 12 U.S. colleges and universities that, in its view, continue to impose limits on student speech — even after intense pressure from FIRE and others. FIRE president Greg Lukianoff released the list on his Huffington Post blog. Topping the dozen was the University of Cincinnati, due to a pending civil rights lawsuit filed against them by Young Americans for Liberty, a Ron Paul-inspired activist group. In February, the officially sanctioned student organization was limited to a small "free […]» Read More
Set speech free at Hopkins
February 28, 2008
Did you know that Hopkins has been identified as one of the "worst of the worst" when it comes to the abuse of free speech on campus? That's right—Johns Hopkins University, the western hemisphere's first research institution, with a defined mission of "fostering independent and original research," has recently become the target of biting criticism from a national watchdog organization that monitors the endangerment of free speech and individual expression on campus. According to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), a non-partisan, non-profit educational foundation dedicated to protecting constitutional liberties on campus, Hopkins under President William Brody has […]» Read More
Looking back at a crisis, one year later
November 2, 2007
One year later, few substantive changes have been made within the University in response to the controversial Halloween in the 'Hood party. "Many of my constituents are upset Justin Park is back on campus," Black Student Union President Brenton Pennicooke said in reference to the ex-Sigma Chi brother who orchestrated the event. "Some feel he got off too easy. We understand he didn't serve his full time, and some of us are upset." In December, Park's sentence was "substantially reduced" according to a press release by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), which advocated for Park during his […]» Read More
Campus Alert: Hassled at Hopkins
June 18, 2007
No school demonstrated greater contempt for the rights of its students this past school year than Johns Hopkins University. In fact, Johns Hopkins nearly destroyed the academic career of one student this past fall—and all because of the student's constitutionally protected speech on an outside Web site. In November, Johns Hopkins suspended 18-year-old Korean-American junior Justin Park for a year, requiring him to complete 300 hours of community service, attend a diversity workshop and read 12 books, writing a paper on each—all before being eligible for readmission. His crime? Posting an invitation for a "Halloween in the Hood" fraternity party […]» Read More
Campus Alert: Don't laugh too hard
May 21, 2007
How would you feel if you got in trouble not for telling an off-color joke, but simply for laughing at one? Sounds inconceivable, right? Not at Drexel University in Philadelphia, where school policy prohibits not only "inconsiderate jokes" but also "inappropriately directed laughter." Not only won't they let you tell certain jokes, they promise to punish you for finding them funny. Drexel is not alone in its prohibition of what can only be described as typical college student interaction. Northeastern University in Boston, apparently the self-appointed arbiter of good taste, prohibits sending any e-mail message "which in the sole judgment […]» Read More
Facing off over Facebook
February 21, 2007
Students, be warned: the college of your choice may be watching you, and will more than likely be keeping an eye on you once you enter the hallowed campus gates. America's institutions of higher education are increasingly monitoring students' activity online and scrutinizing profiles, not only for illegal behavior, but also for what they deem to be inappropriate speech. Contrary to popular misconceptions, the speech codes, censorship, and double standards of the culture-wars heyday of the '80s and '90s are alive and kicking, and they are now colliding with the latest explosion of communication technology. Sites like Facebook and MySpace are becoming the largest […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins' 1st Amendment
January 12, 2007
Imagine for a moment the following scenario. You organize a party and invite all your friends. Then you receive notice from your school's administration that some people found the theme of the party offensive and ordered you to remove advertisements for it. You complied, but held the party anyway. Then a few days later you were informed that the party was in violation of university policy and you would be facing disciplinary action. This might sound a bit far-fetched, but it is exactly what happened to Johns Hopkins University student Justin Park. His original punishment for the "Halloween in the […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins student appeals punishment for Facebook advertisement
January 11, 2007
A Johns Hopkins University student who was punished for an allegedly offensive advertisement he placed on the social networking Web site Facebook.com has had his sentence reduced after an appeal. Advocacy group Foundation for Individual Rights in Education announced this month that Justin Park, the social chair of the local Sigma Chi fraternity chapter, was "satisfied with the results" of the appeal but wanted to keep the specific details of the appeal private. In October, Park posted an advertisement on the social networking Web site Facebook.com for Sigma Chi's "Halloween in the Hood" party. An administrator from the university's Greek […]» Read More
Hopkins cuts punishment in party case
January 9, 2007
Johns Hopkins University has reduced the punishment of a student who was suspended for a role in a Halloween party for which some materials featured images viewed as promoting racial stereotypes. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education announced that Justin Park's punishment had been reduced, but declined to offer specifics, citing Park's request for privacy. FIRE indicated that it remains concerned about the incident— in which some minority students have accused the university of not doing enough to create a welcoming environment and in which FIRE and others have said that the university was being politically correct and squelching […]» Read More
Penalty reduced over 'hood' party
January 9, 2007
Johns Hopkins University officials have substantially reduced the punishment of a student suspended for posting online a "Halloween in the Hood" fraternity party invitation, according to an education foundation group that protested the university's actions. The Philadelphia-based Foundation for Individual Rights in Education said yesterday that Justin H. Park, a junior and former Sigma Chi fraternity member, contacted it with the results of the appeal. According to Greg Lukianoff, president of FIRE, Park said that he was satisfied with the outcome but wanted it to remain private. "It's a substantial change," said Lukianoff. "But the fact that there's any punishment […]» Read More
Hopkins cuts punishment for student over 'Hood' Halloween party
January 9, 2007
A nonprofit free speech group says a Johns Hopkins University student who was suspended for a year for writing an invitation to a fraternity "Halloween in the Hood" party has had his punishment reduced after an appeal. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education has been advocating on behalf of Justin Park, who posted the invitation on the Web site Facebook. The posting described Baltimore as an "H-I-V pit" and urged guests to wear "bling bling ice ice, grills" and "hoochie hoops." A skeleton pirate with dreadlocks hanging from a noose was used as decoration at the Sigma Chi fraternity […]» Read More
Campus thought police
December 8, 2006
On October 26, Johns Hopkins University student Justin Park posted a politically incorrect flyer on the popular social-networking site Facebook.com. Today Park finds himself at the center of a brewing controversy that pits parody against a university regime bent on stamping out discourteous expression — even if it means trampling on students' rights. Park's flyer promoted an upcoming Halloween party held at his off-campus fraternity under the theme "Halloween in the Hood." Inspired by the so-called "Pimps and Hoes Party," a popular event you can find on virtually any major campus, the flyer used provocative "gangsta" talk to describe the […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins suspends student for Facebook Halloween party advertisement
December 6, 2006
Advocates are calling the suspension of Johns Hopkins University student Justin Park a serious threat to students' rights after he was disciplined for posting a controversial Halloween party advertisement online. Last month, Park posted an advertisement on the social networking Web site Facebook.com for the Sigma Chi fraternity's "Halloween in the Hood" party. An administrator from the university's Greek Affairs office asked Park to remove the posting after several students said it was offensive. Park complied, but later put up another ad after receiving inquiries whether the party would still take place, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education Director of […]» Read More
Conduct unbecoming
December 3, 2006
The indomitable Foundation for Individual Rights in Education reports that a student at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md. has been suspended for a year for posting Halloween party invitations on facebook.com that some on campus found offensive. The university found 18-year-old junior Justin Park guilty of failing to respect the rights of others, harassment, and intimidation for posting ads for a fraternity's "Halloween in the Hood" party that contained "offensive racial stereotyping." He was also charged with "failing to respect the rights of others" and engaging in "conduct or a pattern of conduct that harasses a person or group." […]» Read More
Hopkins student appeals suspension for offensive Web posting
December 1, 2006
BALTIMORE – The Johns Hopkins University student suspended for a year after posting a racially tinged Halloween party invitation on the Web site Facebook.com is appealing the ruling today with the school's dean of student life, Susan Boswell. The university's student review board, made up of three students and two faculty members, found 18-year-old junior Justin Park guilty of failing to respect the rights of others, harassment and intimidation. Park then sought help from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, the pro-free speech organization said Thursday in a written statement. According a news release by FIRE, Park currently faces […]» Read More
Student expelled for year for invitation
December 1, 2006
BALTIMORE, Dec. 1 (UPI) — A student at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore has been suspended for a year for a racially offensive fraternity party invitation that was posted online. Justin Park, an 18-year-old freshman, is banned from the school's campus until January 2008, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education said. He must perform 300 hours of community service, and read and write reports on 12 books. About 30 students protested the punishment earlier this week, the Baltimore Sun reported. "This is a violation of the university's moral right for free speech on campus," Lars Trautman, a junior, told […]» Read More
Free speech and punishment at Hopkins
December 1, 2006
Johns Hopkins University students are protesting once again about Justin Park — but this time it's on his behalf. Park was the Hopkins junior who posted Facebook invitations to Sigma Chi's "Halloween in the Hood" party, which prompted protests from black students who accused him and the fraternity of racial insensitivity. Last week, the university's Student Conduct Board suspended him until the spring of 2008, drawing criticism that the punishment was excessive and that Hopkins may be ignoring its student policy designed to "protect the university as a forum for the free expression of ideas." Park is still attending classes […]» Read More
Race debate shifts to free speech
November 30, 2006
A campus debate over race relations is evolving into one on free speech as a group of Johns Hopkins University students protested yesterday what they believe is the school's excessive punishment of a student for posting a "Halloween in the Hood" party invitation online. The students, who have launched a Web site and petition drive in support of suspended junior Justin H. Park, say the university is caving in to public pressure to protect its image, rather than protecting one of its own. "This is a violation of the school's moral obligation for free speech on campus," said Lars Trautman, […]» Read More
The new campus brownshirts
November 7, 2006
A crime wave is spreading like wildfire across our nation's campuses, and conservative students are the victims. Thefts of conservative student publications are on the rise. Even campus administrators are doing what they can to prevent the dissemination of conservative viewpoints. Whatever happened to diversity of thought and respecting the ideologies of our fellow classmates? Not too long ago, the Georgia GuardDawg reported that over 1,200 issues of its student-run conservative newspapers were stolen and their distribution bins were tagged with demeaning and disparaging remarks. Unfortunately for advocates of intellectual diversity on our nation's college campuses, this latest incident is […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins initiates new distribution policy
September 25, 2006
New policies created by Johns Hopkins University regarding where student publications can be distributed are raising concern among some students and advocates following an incident where newspapers were removed from residence halls last spring. The Carrollton Record, a conservative student newspaper at the university, published an article last May criticizing another student organization's event featuring a porn star. Copies of the paper were later found missing from distribution spots. Administrators said they removed about 300 issues from residence halls because the paper was not properly approved by the residential life department, as required by university policy. Another 700 copies also […]» Read More
'Dirty, Gorgeous' Full-Throated Unfairness
August 10, 2006
Johns Hopkins does paper collection by John McCormack National Review Online When the editors of the Carrollton Record, a student-run conservative newspaper at Johns Hopkins University, published a story about how tuition dollars had paid for pornography, they were hoping for a controversy that would spark an increase in readership. On May 17, the day after they distributed the issue, all of the copies in the dormitories had in fact been picked up — but not because fellow students had taken them; they had, instead, been seized by the university administration. "I never expected this," says Jered Ede, author of […]» Read More
FIRE Blasts Johns Hopkins for Letting Conservative Paper Be Censored
June 19, 2006
Johns Hopkins University (JHU) in Baltimore, Maryland, is being accused of condoning mob censorship. An academic freedom and individual rights watchdog group is decrying school officials' part in an apparent attempt to silence a conservative newspaper. In May, the Carrolton Record published an issue critical of a group that brought a pornographic film director to the JHU campus. Afterward, hundreds of copies of the newspaper were stolen; however, according to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), the university administration "turned a blind eye to the theft." According to the Record's editor, about half of the 600 copies that […]» Read More
Student editor says university 'doesn't care' about recent newspaper theft
May 22, 2006
by Evan Mayor Student Press Law Center MARYLAND — A student editor at Johns Hopkins University said around 900 copies of his independent, conservative publication went missing shortly after they were distributed May 13. Jered Ede, editor of The Carrollton Record, said he suspects the paper was stolen in response to the cover story in the issue titled, "Deepthroating Hopkins, How Your Tuition Hike Pays the Gay Porn Industry." The article reports on the showing of the 1972 adult film "Deep Throat" and a campus visit by gay pornography director Chi Chi LaRue, which were paid for with student fees. […]» Read More
Images offensive to Muslims are debated
March 14, 2006
Charles Mitchell sat before a full-color blowup of the most notorious of the newspaper cartoons that have roiled the Islamic world – the one that shows the Prophet Muhammad wearing a turban in the shape of a bomb – and said that how it makes Muslims feel was beside the point. "There is no right not to be offended," Mitchell, a program officer with the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, told an audience of about 80 last night at the Johns Hopkins University. "Having your most deeply held convictions questioned doesn't destroy you. It doesn't turn you into a […]» Read More
Pro or Con War, Talk's Risky on Campus
December 16, 2001» Read More
Radio Interview with Ina Jaffee (Halvorssen)
December 3, 2001» Read More
Suppression of Speech on Campus (Web exclusive)
November 6, 2001» Read More
TRB From Washington Talk Show
October 11, 2001» Read More
Thought Reform 101
March 1, 2000
At Wake Forest University last fall, one of the few events designated as "mandatory" for freshman orientation was attendance at Blue Eyed, a filmed racism awareness workshop in which whites are abused, ridiculed, made to fail, and taught helpless passivity so that they can identify with "a person of color for a day." In Swarthmore College's dormitories, in the fall of 1998, first-year students were asked to line up by skin color, from lightest to darkest, and to step forward and talk about how they felt concerning their place in that line. Indeed, at almost all of our campuses, some […]» Read More
Sexual Misconduct Policy at Johns Hopkins Creates Wide Room for Error
June 20, 2016
Elizabeth Gudgel is a rising junior at Johns Hopkins University and a FIRE summer intern. At my university, Johns Hopkins University, last fall, a campus group presented an installation called "The Monument Quilt," a vast display of fabric squares created by victims of sexual violence. The quilt nearly covered the school's largest quad, featuring 450 stories from survivors, and students added 25 more during the one day that it was displayed. The Monument Quilt came to campus this week via SARU, @CHEWatJHU, @UpsettingRape | http://t.co/1QvZVCRSC0 pic.twitter.com/ZvBUXw9zHE — JHU News-Letter (@JHUNewsLetter) September 25, 2015 Approximately a year earlier, Hopkins announced it […]» Read More
Pro-Life Group Fights for Recognition on Campus: Q&A with Andrew Guernsey
May 18, 2015
Meet Andrew Guernsey, a student at Johns Hopkins University and the founder of Voice for Life—a pro-life student organization at JHU. When Andrew set out to create Voice for Life in 2013, JHU's student government had other plans. Despite meeting all qualifications for a registered student organization, Voice for Life was denied their charter on the basis of the university's overly broad speech codes. But the group was not content to back down and be silenced. As Andrew put it, "We decided to stand up for our rights." After being contacted by Voice for Life, FIRE wrote a letter to […]» Read More
Students Unsure Whether Anatomical Models Are Appropriate at Johns Hopkins
April 15, 2015
For three decades, the North Baltimore Pro-Life Study Group has set up a display of anatomical models of fetal development as part of Johns Hopkins University's (JHU's) annual Spring Fair. This year, however, JHU's Arts and Crafts Committee decided to disallow the display because it "contains triggering and disturbing images and content." Thankfully, after pushback from student Andrew Guernsey, president of the student group Voice for Life, the Committee reversed its decision. But as Guernsey points out in emails to the student government, speakers on campus may still be subject to policies that can be used to censor a broad […]» Read More
Advocacy Groups Face Discrimination at Johns Hopkins University
August 15, 2014
Torch readers may remember that in our most recent case at Johns Hopkins University (JHU), the university's Student Government Association (SGA) put itself on the wrong side of free speech when it wrongly denied the recognition of the student group JHU Voice for Life. Unfortunately, the SGA has been at it again in recent months, and this time its actions threaten an even wider swath of student expression at JHU.» Read More
Admins at 'Red Light' Schools Claim to Value Free Speech, But Policies Suggest Otherwise
February 4, 2014
Last month, FIRE released its 2014 report on campus speech codes, which revealed that 59% of the 427 colleges and universities analyzed maintain policies that clearly and substantially restrict constitutionally protected speech. When quizzed recently by student journalists about their institution's speech codes, administrators at "red light" institutions Johns Hopkins University (JHU) and Grand Valley State University (GVSU) protested their ratings, arguing that their schools value and protect free expression. But these administrators should remember that written policies prohibiting protected speech still threaten free expression regardless of whether a school's current administration pledges to uphold First Amendment principles. Though JHU […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Student Asks School to Restore Its Reputation for Free Expression
September 18, 2013
Johns Hopkins University (JHU) student Andrew Guernsey took to The Johns Hopkins News-Letter Sunday to discuss the state of free speech at his school. Guernsey points out that although JHU is moving up the national university rankings, its rating on free speech is abysmal. FIRE has been involved in multiple cases at JHU over the years, and we currently give the university a "red light" rating for multiple policies that clearly violate students' freedom of speech. This past April, FIRE wrote to JHU's student judiciary in defense of Voice for Life, a pro-life group that was denied recognition because of worries that it […]» Read More
Liberty Requires Tough Choices: The Student Funding Dilemma
July 31, 2013
Kanisha Parthasarathy is a FIRE summer intern. Allocating money to student groups is a tricky game. For many colleges, the amount of money given to groups is not increasing at the same rate as the number of student groups vying for recognition and funding. Funding boards usually solve this problem by creating guidelines to determine how much money a student group gets. The problem arises when these rules are applied without viewpoint neutrality, a requirement for public colleges' funding boards established by the Supreme Court in Rosenberger v. Rectors of the University of Virginia (1995) and Board of Regents of the […]» Read More
Private Universities and the Conflict Between Mission and Speech
July 15, 2013
Madeline Gootman is a FIRE summer intern. When private universities send out their shiny pamphlets to high school seniors, they highlight their commitment to all things politically correct and otherwise acceptable in academia. However, these commitments to civility, respect, and social comfort are often at odds with the broad promises of free speech that universities make to their incoming students. Unfortunately for students, too many private universities want to have it both ways, promising students the right to free speech and then violating that right when someone's speech proves too unpopular or controversial. Vanderbilt University's packet for recently admitted students […]» Read More
Pro-Choice Johns Hopkins Group Turns to Harassment Policies to Silence Pro-Life Speech
May 3, 2013
Tom Cruise works as a PreCrime agent in Minority Report. Thankfully, no universities have implemented this department on campus. Recently, FIRE successfully defended the rights of the now-recognized Johns Hopkins University student group Voice for Life (VFL). As Torch readers may recall, VFL was wrongly denied recognition in March due in part to student government leaders' personal disagreements with VFL's viewpoint and activities. Members of Johns Hopkins' Student Government Association (SGA) also claimed incorrectly that the group's planned "sidewalk counseling" activities violated Johns Hopkins' harassment policies—a position the university's Office of Institutional Equity rejected. Fortunately, the SGA's judiciary committee […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Reverses Decision, Recognizes Pro-Life Group
April 10, 2013
As recounted in today's press release, the Johns Hopkins University student government's judiciary committee has unanimously reversed the decision of the university's student senate to deny recognition to the prospective student group Voice for Life (VFL) on the basis of the group's expression. FIRE has previously covered this case on The Torch, and wrote to the Student Government Association (SGA) Judiciary Committee on Monday urging this outcome in advance of VFL's Tuesday afternoon hearing. As we summarized in the letter (links below have been added), the SGA denied VFL recognition based on two improper factors related to VFL's expression: The […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Reverses Decision, Recognizes Pro-Life Group
April 10, 2013
BALTIMORE, April 10, 2013—Late yesterday, Johns Hopkins University's student judiciary committee unanimously overturned the decision of its student senate to deny official recognition to the pro-life student group Voice for Life on the basis that it might make people feel "uncomfortable." The decision means that the group will now have the ability to reserve meeting rooms, host speakers, and sponsor campus programs and activities—abilities it was denied under the student senate's previous decision. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) wrote to Johns Hopkins' student judiciary on Monday urging this result. "We are gratified that the student judiciary agreed that the student senate's […]» Read More
Is 'The Johns Hopkins News Letter' Unlearning Liberty?
April 4, 2013
Last week, FIRE's Peter Bonilla explained here on The Torch why The Johns Hopkins News-Letter editorial board was wrong to say that the refusal of Hopkins' student government to recognize Voice for Life, a pro-life student group, was "not a matter of free speech." A few days later, we noticed that this statement was not just wrong, but a complete 180 degree turn from a thoughtful defense of the expressive rights of pro-life activists written by The News-Letter's editorial board less than two years ago. I wrote an op-ed for The News-Letter to point out why this is especially disappointing: […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Pro-Life Group Fights for Recognition, with No Help From its Student Newspaper
March 29, 2013
The student government at the Johns Hopkins University has refused to recognize a pro-life student group—but that refusal doesn't raise "a question of free speech," says the editorial board of The Johns Hopkins News-Letter. By the time you're finished reading this post, the incorrectness of this statement should be clear. Voice for Life (VFL) had been a student organization at Johns Hopkins from 1995 until 2010, and has been seeking re-recognition. The Johns Hopkins Student Activities Commission (SAC) rejected its application on March 12, and the SGA Senate did the same on March 26. VFL has appealed its case to […]» Read More
Compelling 'Civility'
June 1, 2012
Earlier this week, an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription required) discussed the growing popularity on college campuses of programs aimed at promoting civility. While one might reasonably ask whether there is a connection between exorbitant tuition rates, administrative bloat, and programs such as the "transformational, saturation approach" civility projects discussed in the article, there is no problem from an individual rights standpoint with colleges promoting civility. The individual rights problem, which the article barely even hints at, is that a large number of colleges and universities actually compel civility rather than simply encouraging it. The article focuses […]» Read More
The top 12 worst colleges for free speech
March 28, 2012
Who doesn't love a good awards show? The gowns, the acceptance speeches, the brutal infringements of civil liberties … the excitement just never ends. Once again, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE, where I work), has sorted through the hundreds of colleges and universities across the nation that severely restrict the First Amendment rights of their students, and is ready to present a "dirty dozen" of colleges that have attacked freedom of speech with such zeal that we cannot help but (dis)honor them. While it was difficult to choose from such a wide talent pool, certain schools took our breath […]» Read More
FIRE's 12 Worst Colleges for Free Speech in 2012
March 27, 2012
Here's today's press release: PHILADELPHIA, March 27, 2012—The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) released its 2012 list of the 12 Worst Colleges for Free Speech in The Huffington Post today. Harvard is new to the list this year, joining Yale, Syracuse, and the University of Cincinnati at the top of the list. "These colleges and universities have deeply violated the principles that are supposed to animate higher education," said FIRE President Greg Lukianoff. "Sunlight is one of the best disinfectants, and the public needs to know which schools to watch out for." Although schools appear on the list in no particular […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins University Continues to Defend Censorship
January 23, 2012
Johns Hopkins University's utter lack of concern for its students' free speech rights is on display again, this time in comments the university's spokesman made to the Maryland Gazette last week. You may remember that in 2006, Hopkins threw the book at then-18-year-old student Justin Park for posting a Halloween party invitation deemed to be offensive on Facebook. Park's original punishment (reduced somewhat in the face of public pressure) included suspension from the university for a year, completion of 300 hours of community service, an assignment to read 12 books and to write a reflection paper on each, and mandatory […]» Read More
FIRE in 'The Huffington Post' on America's 12 Worst Schools for Free Speech
January 27, 2011
Today, The Huffington Post published FIRE's list of America's 12 Worst Schools for Free Speech. An expansion of FIRE's Red Alert List of the "worst of the worst" schools for student and faculty rights, this "dirty dozen" slideshow includes the schools that come onto FIRE's radar screen again and again for their repeated and egregious violations of fundamental rights, as well as schools whose policies are so bad that they simply had to be included. For longtime Torch readers, the presence of most of these schools on our list won't come as a surprise. But we don't want to give it all away here. Is […]» Read More
Red Alert at Johns Hopkins: No 'Rude' or 'Disrespectful' Expression Allowed
September 8, 2010
Since announcing our full-page advertisement in U.S. News & World Report's college rankings issue last week, in which we publicly shame the six colleges and universities that comprise FIRE's Red Alert list, we have been going through the schools one by one on The Torch to review why they are on our Red Alert list and what they must do to get off of the list. FIRE's Red Alert list is reserved for those institutions that are the "worst of the worst" in the nation when it comes to freedom of speech on campus. The Red Alert list consists of […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Student Government Association Asks President to Defend Free Speech
March 6, 2010
Promising news recently from Red Alert school Johns Hopkins University. Marc Perkins, President of the Student Government Association, wrote to Johns Hopkins President Ronald Daniels last month on behalf of the Undergraduate Student Government Association to ask that he uphold free speech rights at Johns Hopkins. His letter begins by asking that President Daniels support Maryland H.B. 677/S.B. 805, the Free Speech at Nonpublic Institutions of Higher Education Bill. If enacted, the bill would function much like the Leonard Law in California, requiring private institutions to afford their students free speech rights as long as the school does not have an overriding religious purpose. […]» Read More
Still Looking for a New Year's Resolution, Red Alert Schools?
January 14, 2010
Here's an easy New Year's resolution that Brandeis University, Bucknell University, Colorado College, Johns Hopkins University, Michigan State University, and Tufts University can make: get off of FIRE's Red Alert list of America's worst violators of campus liberty! This week, FIRE sent the presidents of each of the six Red Alert schools a letter reminding them of their schools' serious and ongoing violations of student and faculty rights, and just how easy it is for each of them to remedy their mistakes and reaffirm their commitment to freedom of expression. FIRE also included with each letter a copy of the […]» Read More
FIRE 2010 U.S. News Letter to JHU President Daniels
January 7, 2010
January 7, 2010 President Ronald J. Daniels Office of the President The Johns Hopkins University 3400 N. Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218 Re: Johns Hopkins University and FIRE's Red Alert list Dear President Daniels: I am writing to draw your attention to the full-page advertisement that FIRE ran in the most recent "America's Best Colleges" issue of U.S. News & World Report. The advertisement appears on page 89, immediately adjacent to the rankings of the top 100 national universities, in the same position our advertisement appeared last year. We have enclosed a copy of the issue for your information. As […]» Read More
This Month in FIRE History: Johns Hopkins Drops Harassment Investigation of Student Journalists
September 25, 2009
September is a notoriously busy time for FIRE. Looking back over the past 10 years, some of our most important cases have either started or concluded as students returned to campus. Since we just reminded our Red Alert Schools of their unenviable status, I decided to again look at a case from one of those schools. Johns Hopkins University (JHU) has the distinction of having tangled with FIRE three times over the past decade. It goes without saying that this is nothing to be proud of. In September of 2006, JHU finally dropped its harassment investigation against the conservative student newspaper, The Carrollton Record (TCR). The investigation was prompted by […]» Read More
How Can Johns Hopkins University Get Off FIRE's Red Alert List?
September 4, 2009
Following up on FIRE's full-page ad in U.S. News & World Report's "America's Best Colleges" issue, released nationwide last week, we have been explaining why each of our six Red Alert schools has been named among the worst of the worst when it comes to individual rights on campus—and what each school can do to get off the list. So far, we have outlined the cases at Brandeis University, Colorado College, Michigan State University, and Tufts University. Today, we turn our attention to Johns Hopkins University, where FIRE has placed an advertisement in its student newspaper, The Johns Hopkins News-Letter. […]» Read More
'U.S. News' Readers: FIRE's Red Alert List Exposes the Worst Violators of Campus Rights
August 25, 2009
The Story Behind FIRE's U.S. News & World Report Ad… Why does FIRE's ad in U.S. News & World Report show a book padlocked shut? One of FIRE's most shocking cases was that of Keith John Sampson, a student-employee at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) who was found guilty of racial harassment for merely reading the book Notre Dame vs. the Klan: How the Fighting Irish Defeated the Ku Klux Klan during his work breaks. Thanks to FIRE's involvement and extensive media coverage, the finding against Sampson was overturned and his school record was cleared. Such stories of censorship are […]» Read More
FIRE's Biggest Ad Campaign Ever Hits 'U.S. News'
August 25, 2009
For the second year in a row, FIRE has run a full-page advertisement in U.S. News & World Report's America's Best Colleges issue, released today, highlighting the colleges and universities that have earned FIRE's Red Alert distinction for being the "worst of the worst" when it comes to liberty on campus. Brandeis University, Colorado College, Johns Hopkins University, Michigan State University, and Tufts University are listed in the print ad, while Bucknell University, a late addition to the list, will be prominently featured in Facebook ads and in the school's own newspaper. But that's not all—in the coming weeks, FIRE will also run ads in U.S. News' bestselling guidebook, every Red Alert school's newspaper, and the papers of the top 25 largest and most prestigious universities in the nation, […]» Read More
On Speech Codes and Sodomy Laws
June 9, 2009
Over the weekend, FIRE received an e-mail from a graduate of Johns Hopkins University criticizing our decision to give Hopkins a "red light" rating for its restrictive speech codes. Like so many similar e-mails we have received since beginning our "State of Free Speech on Campus" blog series, one of the author's main points was that the speech codes on the books didn't really matter because Hopkins didn't restrict free speech in practice (in the case of Hopkins, that is categorically not true, but that doesn't matter for the discussion at hand.) The e-mail to FIRE stated that If more […]» Read More
The State of Free Speech on Campus: Johns Hopkins University
March 23, 2009
Throughout the spring semester, FIRE is drawing special attention to the state of free speech at America's top 25 national universities (as ranked by U.S. News & World Report). Today we review policies at Johns Hopkins University, which FIRE has given a red-light rating for maintaining policies that clearly and substantially restrict free expression on campus. Johns Hopkins, as those who follow FIRE's work may know, is one of only five institutions on FIRE's Red Alert List, a designation reserved for those universities that, in FIRE's estimation, have acted with severe and ongoing disregard for the fundamental rights of their […]» Read More
2008 Highlights: FIRE Places Full-Page Ad in 'U.S. News & World Report' Calling Out 'Red Alert' Schools
December 31, 2008
While FIRE works on cases from hundreds of schools in a given year, we have a special list for those schools that have shown unique intransigence in the face of criticism from FIRE for abusing student and faculty rights. We call that special list our Red Alert list, and right now five schools have earned a spot among the "worst of the worst." This summer, we decided to step up our campaign for reform at Red Alert schools by running a full-page ad in the 2009 edition of U.S. News & World Report's all-important America's Best Colleges issue, right next […]» Read More
This Month in FIRE History: Johns Hopkins Suspends Student for One Year for 'Offensive' Halloween Invitation
November 17, 2008
Few schools have been more stubborn about censoring free expression than Johns Hopkins University (JHU). JHU is on our Red Alert list for being among the "worst of the worst" when it comes to violating individual rights on campus—and the university earned this ignominious distinction in November of 2006 in one of the most egregious cases we have ever seen. The incident began with an invitation posted by student Justin Park on Facebook.com for a fraternity costume party dubbed "Halloween in the Hood." When complaints about the invitation surfaced, the Director of Greek Affairs asked Park to remove the invitation. […]» Read More
Back to School: Remember FIRE's Red Alert List
September 9, 2008
Students going back to school should be aware of the institutions that demonstrate a blatant disregard for their students' rights. FIRE's Red Alert list, recently featured in a full-page ad in the 2009 "America's Best Colleges" edition of U.S. News and World Report, is a list of the "worst of the worst" when it comes to respect for students' rights. These institutions egregiously violated their students' rights and, despite having been informed of their wrongdoing, still refuse to admit and redress the harm they have caused. Below is a list of the Red Alert schools, what they did to get […]» Read More
FIRE Exposes Unrepentant Abusers of Liberty in 'U.S. News' College Rankings Issue
August 25, 2008
PHILADELPHIA, August 25, 2008—The 2009 edition of U.S. News and World Report's America's Best Colleges issue, released today, includes a full-page advertisement from FIRE highlighting the five colleges and universities that have earned FIRE's Red Alert distinction for being the "worst of the worst" when it comes to liberty on campus. Students should think twice before choosing to attend Red Alert schools, which include Brandeis University, Colorado College, Johns Hopkins University, Tufts University, and Valdosta State University. "Every year, millions of students and parents turn to U.S. News and World Report to see the latest college rankings," said FIRE President […]» Read More
FIRE Remembers September 11
September 11, 2007
Today, FIRE joins individuals across America and around the world in reflecting upon the tragic events of September 11, 2001. As university students and professors from Maine to California host commemorations today to remember those who suffered and died six years ago, we take a moment to look back at how those events played out on campus in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, and how their legacy continues to affect us today. In the wake of the tragedy, FIRE was called on to defend liberty on campus as many universities reacted to the cataclysmic circumstances with sometimes shocking limitations […]» Read More
Oxford Spies on Students through Facebook
July 18, 2007
The United Kingdom appears to be rapidly turning into a place where Big Brother is not just a character in a book, or a reality TV show, but a reality for everyone. Britain is well-known for its abundance of closed-circuit TV cameras that record everyone walking down the streets, all the time—and sometimes, the cameras even harangue you to stop doing what you're doing. Yet the Argus-like eye of Britain is not confined to the increasingly ubiquitous security cameras—now, at least for Oxford University, Facebook.com is part of the equation. The AP reports that Oxford administrators are actively searching through […]» Read More
Today's 'Campus Alert': Hassles at Hopkins
June 18, 2007
Today's Campus Alert coincides with our press release today announcing our new Red Alert feature—an "honor" we are awarding to institutions of higher education that have shown particularly severe and ongoing disregard for their contractual or constitutional commitments to uphold the fundamental rights of students and faculty. We devoted this week's New York Post column in FIRE to one of our first Red Alert schools, Johns Hopkins University. As Campus Alert stated: No school demonstrated greater contempt for the rights of its students this past school year than Johns Hopkins University. In fact, Johns Hopkins nearly destroyed the academic career […]» Read More
FIRE Launches 'Red Alert' List of Worst Offenders Against Liberty
June 18, 2007
Today FIRE is unveiling a new tool in our fight for liberty on America's college and university campuses: FIRE's Red Alert. Red Alert is our newly developed list of campuses that pose an ongoing and serious threat to the rights of current and future students and faculty. FIRE deals with some horrendous offenses against liberty on a daily basis, and even FIRE's least serious case is an enormous problem for the person or group involved, as well as for the academic environment at the college or university where the abuse is taking place. But even so, some schools seem to […]» Read More
Update from Johns Hopkins: Student Council Still Unhappy with New Speech Code
June 7, 2007
A member of the Johns Hopkins Student Council writes in to FIRE's Campus Freedom Network with an update on the continuing travails of free speech at Johns Hopkins: Dear CFN, I thought you'd like an update on the JHU free speech debacle. First, read over President Brody's Commencement Speech. Pay attention to the final paragraphs regarding the "truth" and how one should not be afraid to speak it… . Also, tomorrow the "Committee to Implement the Principles of Civility, etc." is meeting, and our Student Council President is a member of the Committee and will report back on their activities, […]» Read More
'From the President' in 'The FIRE Quarterly'
May 24, 2007
FIRE President Greg Lukianoff's new column in the latest FIRE Quarterly explores how university administrators' try to squelch student speech acting "like the censors of the Victorian era—morally infallible, plugged into absolute truth, and engaged in saving the country's soul from incivility or impropriety. As Greg points out, FIRE's recent cases at Johns Hopkins University, San Francisco State University (SFSU), and Columbia University's Teachers College have all brought with them galling attempts by university officials to crack down on expression by a variety of different methods that seem to want to save campus communities from impropriety. These tactics range from […]» Read More
Today's 'Campus Alert': Don't Laugh Too Hard
May 21, 2007
Our weekly Campus Alert column in the New York Post focuses today on speech codes at Drexel University, Northeastern University, and Johns Hopkins University—all of which have been named FIRE's Speech Code of the Month for banning constitutionally protected expression on their respective campuses. Drexel, which was given the dubious honor of being recognized as FIRE's Speech Code of the Month for September 2006, prohibits not only "inconsiderate jokes," but also "inappropriately directed laughter." So students can be punished not only for telling a joke some may find offensive, but also merely for laughing at one. Not so funny […]» Read More
Hopkins Again Disappoints FIRE
May 11, 2007
FIRE recently received a disappointing response to our latest letter to Johns Hopkins protesting a major contraction of free speech rights on campus. Following October's "Halloween in the Hood" incident, Hopkins introduced a new speech code, the Principles for Ensuring Equity, Civility and Respect for All (the "Principles"), and President William Brody wrote a column condemning controversial speech. At the close of our letter, we stated: FIRE urges you to repeal these stifling policies and to give your students the freedom they deserve. To restrict freedom of expression is to stifle the free and open flow of ideas upon which […]» Read More
'Campus Outrage Awards' Feature Two FIRE Cases
April 25, 2007
The Collegiate Network has released their 2007 Campus Outrage Awards, an effort "to shed light on the most outrageous instances of intolerance and intimidation on the part of college officials." Out of the five awards, two went to schools for their involvement in a FIRE case. At Johns Hopkins University (JHU), The Carrollton Record (TCR), an independent student paper, ran a cover story entitled "Deepthroating Hopkins," on the use of student fees to pay for a speech by pornographic film director Chi-Chi La Rue. The JHU administration refused to condemn the theft of 600 copies of the paper, alleging […]» Read More
Why Private Schools Need to Follow Their Own Rules
April 18, 2007
While Robert's latest blog discusses the difference between public schools and private schools in relation to sectarian institutions, I'd like to discuss the dichotomy in more depth, especially in regard to the schools which Jon B. Gould mentions in his piece (subscribers only) in the Chronicle—Brown, Johns Hopkins, and Pace. FIRE's Guide to Free Speech on Campus states: Liberal arts institutions that advertise themselves as welcoming the fullest pluralism and debate too often have little time, patience, or tolerance for students who dissent from the political assumptions of the institution. Unlike many schools that openly declare a religious or […]» Read More
At Johns Hopkins, Students Voice Frustration With New Speech Code
March 2, 2007
The Johns Hopkins News-Letter reports that this past Tuesday night, Johns Hopkins University Student Council members met with university officials to air frustration and concern over the school's new speech code. Torch readers will remember that the policy, entitled "Principles for Ensuring Equity, Civility and Respect," was instituted by JHU President William Brody in response to the "Halloween in the Hood" party held by the Sigma Chi fraternity on campus. (Of course, that party also resulted in the controversial suspension of JHU junior Justin Park; the most severe punishment FIRE has ever seen for a student engaged in pure speech.) […]» Read More
FIRE Quarterly: 'From the Board of Directors'
March 2, 2007
Daphne Patai, a member of our Board of Directors, contributed to our recent edition of The FIRE Quarterly with a column reinforcing the importance of FIRE's work after a year in which we saw so many attempts to limit student speech on campus. She wrote: Where restrictions on speech must, by law, be content-neutral, universities these days have the habit of taking it upon themselves to decide which points of view are to be protected by the First Amendment and which are not. Where the law prohibits harassment only if it is "persistent and pervasive" enough to interfere with an […]» Read More
Lessons from the Communications Revolution
February 26, 2007
As Greg and Will pointed out in their Boston Phoenix cover story last week, social networking sites like Facebook.com are giving university administrators an unprecedented look into the way students actually talk to one another. This, in turn, has led to an increase in cases of students being subjected to university discipline for the content of their online speech. This past fall, for example, Johns Hopkins University subjected 18-year-old junior Justin Park to some of the harshest treatment we have ever seen from a university because of a Halloween party invitation that Park posted on Facebook. What began as […]» Read More
'Bullets and Bubbly' Party Draws Controversy at UConn
January 25, 2007
An article in today's Hartford Courant explains how University of Connecticut Law School students recently had an off-campus theme party reminiscent of Hopkins' ill-fated "Halloween in the Hood" party. The UConn students posted photos from their "Bullets and Bubbly" party on Facebook.com, upsetting many students, faculty, and administrators, who found the party's theme racially insensitive. UConn Interim Dean Kurt Strasser has scheduled a roundtable for this afternoon at 12:15 so that members of the UConn community can discuss the party. Newly minted Dean of the Law School Jeremy Paul told the Courant that "[c]learly this is an unfortunate incident," and […]» Read More
If You Can't Say Something Nice…?
January 18, 2007
Recently on Phi Beta Cons, FIRE's friend David French addressed the attempts to suppress free speech on campus in the name of civility. In part, David wrote: [S]ubjective experience is not the stuff of legal structures, and rights of free speech are too precious to place at the mercy of the offended. When it comes to the venom that so often flows on campus, the real problem is not the absence of laws that punish subjectively-perceived rudeness; the problem is a coarse and vitriolic culture that too often celebrates abuse and dismisses the most basic manners as "coddling" your ideological […]» Read More
Facebook and the Campus Communication Explosion
January 12, 2007
Looking back on FIRE's work last year, several trends stand out: the disturbing rise of student-led censorship, the increased public awareness of the importance of the right of private conscience, the continued pervasiveness of speech codes and the often willful misinterpretation of "harassment" to squelch speech. One trend, however, strikes me as being truly unique to 2006: the rise of censorship cases and other administrative abuses involving social networking websites like Facebook.com. In 2006, FIRE witnessed a dramatic increase in case submissions involving social networking websites like Facebook.com and Myspace.com. In February, we exposed an incident at the University of Central […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Still Under Fire
January 12, 2007
Even though Johns Hopkins University reduced Justin Park's punishment and he now considers the matter resolved, the university is still taking hits in the press. Today, the Indiana Daily Student published an opinion piece criticizing Hopkins for ignoring the free speech rights of its students. Columnist Edward Delp discussed the Hopkins case and other similar incidents at neighboring schools by using FIRE's Spotlight as a resource. He concluded by stating exactly why freedom of speech on college campuses is so important: Institutions of higher education are supposed to promote the free exchange of ideas, but nowadays there seems to be […]» Read More
FIRE is Committed to Free Expression, No Matter Whose Free Expression
January 10, 2007
Yesterday, FIRE received an e-mail challenging our commitment to free speech in the Johns Hopkins "Halloween in the Hood" case, in which student Justin Park was suspended for posting a supposedly racist Halloween flyer on Facebook.com. The e-mailer asked, "If it was reverse and a black student did this against white students, would you still be preaching free speech?" The answer is a resounding yes. We've helped students of every political and ideological stripe, with no regard for whether their ideas were distasteful to the majority or minority. Our guiding concern has always been the right to freedom of conscience […]» Read More
Media Coverage of Johns Hopkins 'Hood' Party Continues
January 9, 2007
The decision by Johns Hopkins University (JHU) to reduce the punishment of student Justin Park is receiving attention from national and local media. Articles from the Associated Press, The Baltimore Sun, and Inside Higher Ed discuss FIRE's efforts in this case, as well as our remaining concerns about students' rights on the JHU campus. As FIRE President Greg Lukianoff told The Baltimore Sun regarding Park's decreased reprimand, "It's a substantial change, but the fact that there's any punishment at all, we oppose." JHU's actions this year in Park's case and the attempts at censorship of The Carrollton Record, a conservative […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Resolves Facebook Case; Becomes FIRE's First-Ever 'Censor of the Year'
January 8, 2007
Today's press release announces that Johns Hopkins University has reached a final decision in its case against Justin Park, the 18-year-old junior who posted "offensive" party invitations on Facebook.com. Acting on Park's appeal, Hopkins has decided to amend its initial litany of sanctions, which included suspension for a year, 300 hours of community service, an assignment to read and write papers on 12 books, and diversity counseling. Park has elected to keep the details of the settlement private, but has told FIRE that he is satisfied with the final decision. While FIRE is pleased to have helped persuade Hopkins to […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins University Resolves 'Halloween in the Hood' Case; Students' Rights Remain in Jeopardy
January 8, 2007
BALTIMORE, January 8, 2007—After weeks of public pressure, Johns Hopkins University has reduced its draconian punishment of student Justin Park, who posted an "offensive" Halloween party invitation on Facebook.com. The university has concluded Park's appeal, and he is satisfied with the outcome. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is nonetheless troubled that any punishment remains. Moreover, FIRE believes that the university's conduct throughout this case—and throughout 2006 in general—leaves serious doubts about whether students at Hopkins have even the most minimal rights to free speech and due process. "We are obviously pleased that Justin Park is satisfied with […]» Read More
2006 and the Culture of Offense
January 5, 2007
On Monday, November 20th, the Native American Council at Dartmouth ran a two-page advertisement in The Dartmouth entitled "When Good People Do Nothing: Racism On Our Campus." The advertisement, addressed to "the Dartmouth community," begins by condemning those who "failed to respond" to a string of events the Council deemed offensive and racist. After listing the events and positing a few "Fundamental Truths," the Council begins a tirade directed at those who had not spoken out in defense of the Native American population at Dartmouth. In the "Dare to Speak, Dare to Act" portion of the advertisement, the Council writes, […]» Read More
Happy Holidays from FIRE
December 22, 2006
All of us at FIRE would like to wish our friends and supporters happy holidays. As universities wind down for winter break, students head home to their families, and we prepare for a restful holiday weekend, some students have plenty to celebrate. After a months-long wrongful suspension, the Reformed University Fellowship (RUF) at Brown University is on the verge of becoming re-affiliated, awaiting only a Brown administrator's signature to make the re-affiliation official. For others, like Johns Hopkins student Justin Park, whose "offensive" party invitation on Facebook.com gained him a one-year suspension, the holiday season is considerably less celebratory. Unless […]» Read More
William Brody Non-Responds to High School Student
December 18, 2006
Last week, I posted an e-mail sent to William Brody, President of Johns Hopkins University, by a high school student expressing his unwillingness to attend Johns Hopkins because of the deplorable manner in which the university is treating Justin Park. Below is William Brody's reply. I have received so many emails on this issue I am generally not able to respond, but in your case I thought I ought to. Firstly, thank you for your very thoughtful e-mail. I would underscore, however, that this is a matter of civil conduct and the university's obligation to promote a civil society within […]» Read More
The Consequences of "Civility": A Torch Reader's Take on Hopkins
December 18, 2006
Dr. Roy Poses—friend of FIRE, President of the Foundation for Integrity and Responsibility in Medicine, and Clinical Associate Professor at Brown University School of Medicine—has written an interesting commentary about the ramifications of the call for "civility" written last week by Dr. William R. Brody, President of Johns Hopkins University. President Brody penned his paean to civility in response to FIRE's extensive criticism of Hopkins' suspension of student Justin Park for posting Halloween party invitations online that some students found offensive. As Tara usefully explained last week, President Brody's argument is deeply flawed, thoroughly inadequate, and displays a seeming contempt […]» Read More
Mike Adams on Justin Park and Johns Hopkins
December 15, 2006
Mike Adams has written another scathing indictment of Johns Hopkins for its decision to kick a student off campus for a year (among other punishments) for writing a Halloween invitation. Adams writes: Johns Hopkins University President William Brody (410-516-8068; firstname.lastname@example.com) recently wrote a column in response to the public outcry over his university's handling of the now-infamous Hopkins Halloween controversy. His column evidences both a profound ignorance of constitutional principles and a profane indifference towards intellectual honesty. Adams also makes a crucial, yet often overlooked point: What William Brody and other college administrators fail to grasp is that speech codes […]» Read More
High School Student to Brody: I Won't Attend Johns Hopkins
December 14, 2006
FIRE was cc'd on the following e-mail sent to Johns Hopkins President William Brody. The sender is a student who was considering attending Johns Hopkins University until he received word that Johns Hopkins had suspended student Justin Park for posting party advertisements on Facebook.com that offended some students. The e-mail read as follows: I have to inform you that because of Justin Park's suspension and Johns Hopkins' obvious disregard for the students' moral freedom of expression rights, I have sadly crossed Johns Hopkins off my list of 1st choice schools. As a student with a keen interest in law (I'm […]» Read More
Brody, Mill, and the "Truth"
December 13, 2006
To add to Tara's skillful dissection of Johns Hopkins President William R. Brody's "A Civil Tongue," it's important to remember that neither the inclination to censor "crude and tasteless speech" nor the concern with this reason for censorship is new. As FIRE states in its Guide to Free Speech on Campus: [John Stuart] Mill addressed one of the major rationales for imposing constraints on free speech on campuses today, namely that speech should be "temperate" and "fair." Mill observed that while people may claim they are not trying to ban others' opinions but merely trying to banish "intemperate discussion…invective, sarcasm, […]» Read More
Remember What's Really at Stake at Johns Hopkins
December 12, 2006
In the midst of all of the discussion about free speech at Johns Hopkins, it is important to remember what is really at stake here: a young man's future. Justin Park, an 18-year-old Korean-American junior majoring in economics, entered Johns Hopkins at the age of 15 after skipping several grades in school. He has no previous disciplinary record. Until recently, he was the social chair of the Sigma Chi fraternity, and in that capacity he posted invitations to Sigma Chi's Halloween party on the popular college website Facebook.com. Like many college Halloween parties across the country, Sigma Chi's party had […]» Read More
Hopkins President Brody: Civility Trumps Free Speech
December 12, 2006
Johns Hopkins President William R. Brody addresses the university's extreme treatment of Justin Park in an article called "A Civil Tongue" that appeared in the Johns Hopkins Gazette yesterday. Brody states that expression should garner protection under principles of free speech only if it is "of a substantive and serious nature." After citing two instances in which the university was wrong to suppress substantive, serious expression—a communist speech in 1940 and a student newspaper story mocking Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s—Brody juxtaposes the current controversy involving Park's expression. He writes: But I think we all know that it stretches our […]» Read More
FIRE Discusses Johns Hopkins Case on Radio Today
December 12, 2006
Today at 12:10 p.m. ET, Samantha Harris, FIRE's Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, will speak on Washington Post Radio to discuss our recent case with Johns Hopkins junior Justin Park. Torch readers can listen online here.» Read More
Johns Hopkins' Unique Interpretation of 'Free Speech'
December 11, 2006
Last week saw the latest round of exchanges between FIRE and Johns Hopkins University regarding Hopkins' suspension of eighteen-year-old junior Justin Park. On Wednesday, December 6, Hopkins wrote FIRE a letter defending the university's overreaction to Park's two Facebook.com advertisements for Sigma Chi's "Halloween in the Hood" party. FIRE in turn wrote back to Hopkins on Friday, December 8. Hopkins Vice President and General Counsel Stephen Dunham defended Hopkins' policies and procedures in his letter, stating that "The University's vision includes an academic community where the exchange of ideas thrives, where activities are open and non-discriminatory, and where individuals respect […]» Read More
Jason Antebi on Hopkins and Facebook
December 8, 2006
Jason Antebi, a graduate of Occidental College who suffered one of the worst abuses of campus rights that FIRE has encountered, has an article in FrontPage Magazine today on Johns Hopkins' inexcusable treatment of student Justin Park. Antebi points out, disturbingly, that "Park's case is not an anomaly," and goes on to write a good review of several situations where college students have been punished for online expression. For a disturbing reminder, if one is needed, that college censorship is now spreading its reach even to the World Wide Web, Antebi's article is worth a read.» Read More
Mike Adams on Johns Hopkins
December 7, 2006
Mike Adams has addressed the suspension of Johns Hopkins University junior Justin Park in an article on Townhall.com. Driving home the excessiveness of Park's punishment—which includes a one-year suspension and 300 hours of community service, among other things—Adams commented, "Fortunately, the committee stopped just short of making Park sit in the back of the bus when he relies on public transportation." Precisely FIRE's point. Not only was Park punished for protected expression (in and of itself a violation of his rights as a Hopkins student), but the penalty the university imposed on Park was extremely severe. As Chris noted recently […]» Read More
FIRE on FOX News
December 4, 2006
Fox News reports on FIRE's case at Johns Hopkins where a student was punished for posting invitations to a fraternity party on Facebook that some students found offensive. Scroll down to "Conduct Unbecoming."» Read More
Hopkins Ignores Due Process
December 1, 2006
FIRE's mission statement makes clear that we work to "defend and sustain individual rights"—but what exactly are those individual rights? A few leap to mind readily: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, freedom of conscience. Those are easy; First Amendment rights are the all-stars of constitutional law. But while the First Amendment "freedoms" get all the attention, the right to due process is too often overlooked. That's a shame—because in many respects, the right to due process is the guarantor of all other constitutional rights. Due process rights find their textual origin in the Fifth Amendment, which […]» Read More
Expression, Not Harassment, at Hopkins
December 1, 2006
Inside Higher Ed features an article today about Justin Park's suspension at Johns Hopkins University. The article concludes with a statement by Hopkins Executive Director of Communications and Public Affairs Dennis O'Shea, who told IHE, "There is a difference between expression of opinion and harassment." There is no doubt a distinction between the two—I just don't think that Hopkins knows what that distinction is. The entirety of Park's crime has been to create two Facebook.com invitations to a Halloween party. Justin filled the first invitation with language suiting the party's theme, "Halloween in the Hood." After he was told to […]» Read More
Public Pressure on Hopkins Continues
December 1, 2006
The press coverage of Justin Park and Johns Hopkins continues. United Press International, the Baltimore Examiner, and Inside Higher Ed all ran accounts of the story. In an editorial published in the Baltimore Sun, Gregory Kane, a black writing professor at JHU, writes: I've said it a couple dozen times before. Others have said it. We'll just keep saying it until the idea sinks in: There is no right, constitutional or otherwise, to not be offended. The News-Letter, JHU's weekly student newspaper, ran two articles about the case. Both document the extent of student unrest with the fairness of the […]» Read More
Speech Code of the Month: Johns Hopkins University
December 1, 2006
FIRE announces its Speech Code of the Month for December 2006: Johns Hopkins University. Hopkins' brand new Principles for Ensuring Equity, Civility and Respect for All prohibit "rude, disrespectful behavior" at the university. This policy virtually necessitates abuse, since it is so broad that it could never be enforced across the board, instead leaving students at the whim of the administration. No university could possibly have the resources to prosecute every instance of rudeness that takes place anywhere on its campus. This policy also stifles free expression on campus, since much legitimate speech is both rude and disrespectful. Michael Moore, […]» Read More
FIRE in 'The Baltimore Sun' on Censorship at Johns Hopkins University
November 30, 2006
FIRE's criticism of Johns Hopkins University for its blatant disregard for free speech has gained the attention of the Baltimore media. The Baltimore Sun reported today on Hopkins' one-year suspension of student Justin Park, and on the letter that FIRE sent the university to protest the severe, life-altering sanctions imposed upon Park simply for engaging in free speech. Park is the social chair of Hopkins' Sigma Chi fraternity, which was sanctioned for hosting a "Halloween in the Hood" party that offended some students at Hopkins. Park posted an invitation to the party on Facebook.com, and after students complained that they […]» Read More
JHU Statement on "Halloween in the Hood" Party
November 6, 2006
In response to an "offensive" Halloween party, John Hopkins University President William R. Brody recently released a statement denouncing the party and outlining several diversity initiatives that will take place as a result. Perhaps the most troubling part of this plan is the emphasis on Principles for Ensuring Equity, Civility and Respect for All which mandates that "[r]ude, disrespectful behavior is unwelcome and will not be tolerated." This new speech code runs completely counter to a very core concept of a university—the marketplace of ideas. It is impossible to present a wide array of ideas without, at one point in […]» Read More
Hopkins Busts 'Halloween in the Hood'
October 31, 2006
As the Baltimore Sun reports today, on Saturday night the Sigma Chi fraternity at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) threw a "Halloween in the Hood" party. The party was shut down because the invitation the frat circulated "invoked racial stereotyping" and because "[a] decoration outside the party site was a plastic skeleton dressed in pirate garb hanging from a rope noose," according to a statement issued yesterday by JHU. The statement explained, The university is now conducting a full investigation into this matter. Based on the information received thus far, the university has suspended all activities of the Sigma Chi fraternity, […]» Read More
Offensive Halloween Costumes and Censorship
October 31, 2006
Halloween is upon us and college students all across the country will be celebrating this day by dressing up in a wide array of costumes. While some students will probably stick to classic costumes such as ghosts and vampires, some others may be thinking about slipping into scarier, more politically incorrect costumes this Halloween. For instance, in 2005, at the University of Chicago a group of students found themselves in trouble for holding a "Straight Thuggin' Party" where students listened to rap music and dressed in hip-hop attire. Should students be afraid of disciplinary action for wearing potentially offensive Halloween costumes? […]» Read More
Partial Victory at Johns Hopkins
September 21, 2006
As today's press release shows, Johns Hopkins University (JHU) told FIRE in a letter that it has dropped the harassment investigation against members of The Carrollton Record (TCR). However, the victory is bittersweet since JHU remains unrepentant about its discriminatory behavior toward TCR, has instituted tighter restrictions on distribution for every paper on campus, and has refused to condemn the theft of the paper. TCR first came to FIRE when it got in trouble for printing an article about a campus event featuring Chi Chi LaRue, a pornographic film director, sponsored by the Diverse Sexuality and Gender Alliance (DSAGA). The […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins Drops Harassment Investigation of Student Journalists
September 21, 2006
BALTIMORE, September 21, 2006—The Johns Hopkins University (JHU) has finally dropped its investigation of a harassment complaint filed against staff members of a conservative student newspaper, The Carrollton Record (TCR). After several months of correspondence with JHU administrators, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) has gained assurance that JHU is no longer pursuing the investigation, but FIRE's other concerns—about JHU's viewpoint discrimination, indifference towards newspaper theft, and limitations on distribution rights—remain. "We are pleased that JHU has ceased its investigation into TCR staffers," stated FIRE President Greg Lukianoff, "although JHU should have never investigated this complaint at all. […]» Read More
What 9/11 Taught Us About Academia
September 11, 2006
Today, FIRE joins the rest of the nation in remembering the tragic events of September 11, 2001. Five years ago, the events of 9/11 highlighted—in a very ugly way—just how out of touch many universities are with the American public. In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, when much of America was still in mourning, a number of very prominent universities moved swiftly to suppress displays of public sympathy and patriotism by students and faculty. Here are some examples of university actions in September and October 2001: At Central Michigan University, an administrator told several students to remove various patriotic posters […]» Read More
'Know Before You Go'
September 7, 2006
With students heading back to school, the busy season for FIRE has started once again. This year, FIRE has more resources than ever before to help students and professors combat censorship and oppression on college campuses. From an expanded Spotlight, to the Guides to Student Rights on Campus, to our individual rights defense work, FIRE is here to ensure that liberty on campus is protected. One of the challenging things about dealing with college students is that every few years or so you get an entirely new cohort of students who might not be familiar with their rights or […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins University Tries to Ignore FIRE's Objections to the State of Press Freedom on Campus
August 23, 2006
On August 9, FIRE wrote to the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Board of Trustees to once again express concern about the state of liberty on campus. FIRE had already written a letter in May to JHU President William Brody regarding violation of freedom of the press for The Carrollton Record (TCR). JHU counsel Frederick Savage responded to FIRE's first letter by saying that 600 missing copies of TCR did not constitute theft, that TCR was prohibited from distributing in dorms by a "longstanding" (i.e., unwritten) policy, and that JHU would go forth with investigating the harassment complaints against TCR staffers. […]» Read More
Journalism Association Condemns Press Freedom Violations
August 16, 2006
Yesterday, the Student Press Law Center (SPLC) reported the August 4 decision by the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC) to censure a community college in New Jersey for violating freedom of the press. Ocean Community College (OCC) has already been censured by the College Media Advisers, Inc. (CMA), a national organization that advocates for best practices among college media outlets. According to the SPLC, the AEJMC passed the resolution of censure following the OCC Board of Trustees' December decision not to renew student newspaper advisor Karen Bosley's contract. Bosley's "offense" was allowing the newspaper to print […]» Read More
FIRE Continues to Fight for Press Freedom at Johns Hopkins University
August 15, 2006
In June, FIRE reported that Johns Hopkins University had ignored the theft of The Carrollton Record (TCR), banned the distribution of the conservative paper in campus dormitories, and entertained the possibility of investigating "harassment" complaints against the paper's editors. All of this came after the paper ran a story about a campus visit by a pornographic film director, complete with a front page picture of the speaker with members of the sponsoring student group, the Diverse Sexuality and Gender Alliance (DSAGA). JHU officials told TCR that the disappearance of their newspaper did not actually constitute theft, and then used a […]» Read More
'What Difference Can My Measly $18 Million Make?'
June 30, 2006
Two days ago, David French had a great post over at National Review's Phi Beta Cons about Larry Ellison's decision to rescind his $115 million gift to Harvard University following the Larry Summers fiasco. I have consistently been amazed at how wealthy alums give to their alma maters uncritically and almost as if they had no choice in the matter. The most extreme version of this that I have been exposed to was at a speech in New York City, when an audience member stood up and said (this is far from an exact quote, but it gets the point […]» Read More
Hopkins Responds
June 15, 2006
Upon reading FIRE's press release on Johns Hopkins University's shameful viewpoint discrimination against The Carrollton Record (TCR), a conservative student newspaper, Annie Turner of Maryland e-mailed JHU President William Brody asking him to reverse the college's decision. She received the following response from JHU spokesman Dennis O'Shea, here analyzed for your reading pleasure. Dear Ms. Turner, Thanks for your message below to President Brody. We appreciate your thoughts and I am pleased to respond on his behalf. Please be assured that Johns Hopkins University fully supports free speech on campus, including the expression of viewpoints, popular or otherwise, […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins: Harassment Investigation of Students for Newspaper Must Be Dismissed
June 14, 2006
Since we issued our press release yesterday about the shameful viewpoint discrimination at Johns Hopkins University (JHU), we have received many e-mails from angry citizens and Johns Hopkins alumni about what can be done. Yes, JHU should openly condemn the theft of The Carrollton Record (TCR) and should end its illiberal and selectively enforced distribution policies, but the single most important step JHU must take is to dismiss the harassment investigation against the newspaper. On May 18, TCR editor Jered Ede was called into JHU's Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Programs and informed that a harassment complaint […]» Read More
Johns Hopkins University Denies Students Freedom of the Press
June 13, 2006
As today's press release describes, freedom of the press is in serious jeopardy at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Last month, The Carrollton Record (TCR) published an issue that criticized a recent campus appearance by pornographic film producer Chi Chi LaRue. TCR's cover page pictured LaRue surrounded by members of the Diverse Sexuality and Gender Alliance (DSAGA), which sponsored the event. This cover photo apparently angered some students, and a harassment complaint against TCR staffers has been filed with JHU's Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Programs. Within 24 hours of distribution, the 600 copies of the paper that had […]» Read More
Student Newspaper Suffers Viewpoint Discrimination at Johns Hopkins University
June 13, 2006
BALTIMORE, June 13, 2006—Johns Hopkins University (JHU) ended this school year by engaging in shameful viewpoint discrimination and denying its students freedom of the press. First, JHU turned a blind eye to the theft of a conservative student newspaper, The Carrollton Record (TCR), then stifled its right to distribute in dorms while allowing other papers to continue distributing there. TCR staff members contacted the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) soon after these administrative abuses began. "Freedom of the press and the freedom to distribute literature are vital liberties that should not be denied to JHU students," said FIRE […]» Read More
Silence Speaks Volumes at NYU
May 24, 2006
New York University prides itself on being a "private university in the public service," but talk is cheap—that is, when it isn't silenced altogether. Despite the lofty aspirations of the school's motto, in late March NYU decided that certain types of speech on campus just aren't entitled to the core First Amendment protections relied upon by every American with something to say. On March 30, a panel discussion entitled "Free Speech and the Danish Cartoons," hosted by NYU's Objectivist Club, was censored by NYU officials, who refused to allow the event to proceed as planned (and be open to the […]» Read More
Policies are rated on their inclusion of 10 due process safeguards. Each policy may receive 2 points for fully including that safeguard, 1 point for partial inclusion, and 0 points for no meaningful inclusion. Most, but not all, institutions have separate policies for sexual misconduct and all other misconduct. See FIRE's Spotlight on Due Process report for more information.