text: TCR_Public/150910.mbx T R O U B L E D C O M P A N Y R E P O R T E R Thursday, September 10, 2015, Vol. 19, No. 253 HeadlinesALL WAYS ACCESSIBLE: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured CreditorsALLANA BARONI: OneWest Summary Judgment Bid to ProceedAMERICAN STANDARD ENERGY: Hires Loeb & Loeb as CounselATP OIL: Pension Fund's Securities Class Suit DismissedBLUE SUN ST. JOE: Hires Gallagher & Kennedy as Bankruptcy CounselBLUE SUN ST. JOE: Hires Lentz Clark as Local Bankruptcy CounselBLUE SUN ST. JOE: Hires MCA as Financial AdvisorsCAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Fined $9.5MM Over Money-Laundering ControlsCANDAX ENERGY: Geofinance Extends Waiver Thru Sept. 14CORINTHIAN COLLEGES: Panel Taps Willkie Farr as Insurance CounselCOYNE INT'L: Asset Sale to Save Jobs; To Close NY PlantsCROWN CASTLE: Moody's Assigns Ba3 Rating on Sr. Unsec. Debt ShelfCT TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Retains 'B' CCR After ECS AcquisitionCURTIS JAMES JACKSON: 50 Cent Reveals New House in AfricaDCP MIDSTREAM: Moody's Affirms Ba2 CFR & Changes Outlook to StableDEWEY & LEBOEUF: Lawyer Says Suit vs. Ex-Chairman "Fantasy Fraud"DUNE ENERGY: Cash Collateral Use Extended Until Sept. 18DYCOM INDUSTRIES: Moody's Rates New $400MM Unsecured Notes Ba3DYCOM INDUSTRIES: S&P Assigns 'BB-' Rating on $400MM Unsec. NotesE*TRADE FINANCIAL: Moody's Puts Ba2 Rating on Review for UpgradeENCLAVE AT BOYNTON: Case Summary & Largest Unsecured CreditorsENERGY FUTURE: U.S. Trustee Attacks Plan Over Fee PaymentsHAGGEN HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured CreditorsHAGGEN HOLDINGS: Files for Chapter 11 Amid Albertson's LawsuitHAGGEN HOLDINGS: UFCW Comments on Chapter 11 Bankruptcy FilingHYPNOTIC TAXI: Cases Jointly Administered for Procedural PurposesHYPNOTIC TAXI: Needs To Borrow $350K in Subordinated DIP LoanINNOVATION VENTURES: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR, Outlook StableINTERNATIONAL BRIDGE: Wants Plan Filing Period Extended to Dec. 3LADDER CAPITAL: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Issuer Default RatingLEHMAN BROTHERS: Trustee Begins Third Payout to Brokerage CreditorsLUCA INTERNATIONAL: Hires Hoover Slovacek as AttorneysMAGNETATION LLC: Court Approves Trenti Law as Minnesota CounselMAGNETATION LLC: Court Okays Bingham Greenebaum as Indiana CounselMEDIA GENERAL: S&P Puts 'BB-' Corp. Credit Rating on Watch NegativeMF GLOBAL: November 20 PwC Settlement Fairness Hearing SetNIGHTTIME OF PALM BAY: Case Summary & 3 Top Unsecured CreditorsNNN MET: Asks Court to Set Oct. 30 as General Claims Bar DateNNN MET: Cases Joint Administered for Procedural Purposes OnlyOAKFABCO INC: Hires Reed Smith as Bankruptcy CounselOAKFABCO INC: Taps Logan & Company as Claims and Noticing AgentOAKFABCO INC: U.S. Trustee Forms 4-Member Asbestos Claimants' PanelONDOVA LIMITED: 5th Cir. Affirms Dismissal of Petfinders' AppealONDOVA LIMITED: 5th Cir. Dismisses Schepps' Appeal as MootORIGINAL ACADEMY: Case Summary & 2 Largest Unsecured CreditorsPARKVIEW ADVENTIST: Asks Court to Reconsider Cash Collateral OrderPETERSBURG REGENCY: Hires Sokol Behot as CounselQUIKSILVER INC: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured CreditorsQUIKSILVER INC: Files Pre-Arranged Ch.11 with Support from OaktreeQUIKSILVER INC: Postpones Filing of Q3 Financial Report with SECQUIKSILVER INC: Seeks Approval of $175-Mil. DIP FinancingQUIKSILVER INC: To Conduct Store Closings with Hilco/Gordon JVSANTA FE GOLD: Amends List of 20 Largest Unsecured CreditorsSANTA FE GOLD: Can Employ ALCS as Claims & Noticing AgentSECOND SOUTHERN BAPTIST: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case SummarySIGNAL INT'L: Committee Seeks to Hire Pachulski Stang as CounselSIGNAL INT'L: Committee to Hire GlassRatner as Fin'l AdvisorsSIGNAL INT'L: Files Amended Schedule E-2STEVEN PALLADINO: New England Colleges Team Up vs. Tuition SuitsTARGA RESOURCES: S&P Affirms 'BB+' CCR & Revises Outlook to Neg.TEMPUR SEALY: S&P Affirms 'BB-' CCR & Revises Outlook to PositiveTMT GROUP: Bid to Convert Bankruptcies to Chapter 7 DeniedTRANS COASTAL: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Creditor's CommitteeWASHINGTON HEIGHTS: Has Authority to Use Cash Until Sept.30WETDOG LLC: Belle Resources Claim Entitled to Postpetition InterestZUCKER GOLDBERG: Genova Burns to Serve as Labor Law CounselZUCKER GOLDBERG: Taps Getzler Henrich as Financial Advisors[*] QS Energy to Take Advantage of Spike in US Bankruptcy Filings[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings *********ALL WAYS ACCESSIBLE: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors--------------------------------------------------------------Debtor: All Ways Accessible Rehab, LLC d/b/a Mobility Specialists 610 Magnolia Avenue Auburndale, FL 33823 Case No.: 15-09169 Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 8, 2015Court: United States Bankruptcy Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa)Debtor's Counsel: Pierce J Guard, Jr., Esq. THE GUARD LAW GROUP, PLLC 2511 Orleans Avenue Lakeland, FL 33803 Tel: 863-619-7331 Fax: 863-619-7992 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Assets: $500,000 to $1 millionEstimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 millionThe petition was signed by William Vanderpool, managing member.A list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is availablefor free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb15-09169.pdfALLANA BARONI: OneWest Summary Judgment Bid to Proceed------------------------------------------------------Judge Martin R. Barash of the United States Bankruptcy Court forthe Central District of California, San Fernando Valley Division,denied Allana Baroni's motion to strike the summary judgment motionby OneWest Bank, F.S.B., on the latter's counterclaim.OWB filed a proof of claim for more than $1,800,000, asserting asecured claim against the Baroni and certain real estate in whichshe holds interest. Baroni disputed the claim, arguing that OWBdoes not own, and otherwise is not entitled, to enforce thepromissory note and deed of trust on which the claim is premised.On November 15, 2013, Baroni initiated a post-confirmationadversary proceeding against OWB, alleging six claims for reliefwhich all contended, in one way another that OWB is not the holderof the note and security agreement or not otherwise entitled toenforce and collect the secured debt created under thoseinstruments.On January 17, 2014, OWB filed a counterclaim seeking a declaratoryjudgment that OWB may enforce the note and security agreement andthat OWB holds an allowed secured claim under the Bankruptcy Codebased on those instruments.On October 1, 2014, OWB filed its Motion for Summary Judgment or,in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication with Respect to AdversaryComplaint. The bankruptcy court granted the relief requested,providing that OWB is entitled to enforce the note and deed oftrust, and that OWB is entitled to judgment as a matter of law onall claims in Baroni's complaint.As to the counterclaim, Judge Barash was persuaded that there isgood cause to permit consideration of OWB's summary judgment motionon the merits of its counterclaim, and to alter the AmendedScheduling Order of the case to permit that motion to proceed. While Judge Barash reserved final judgment on the motion forsummary judgment on the counterclaim until that motion is fullybriefed and argued, he found no reason why the court's judgment onthe complaint does not also resolve the material issues of factrelevant to the counterclaim.The adversary proceeding is ALLANA BARONI, Plaintiff, v. ONEWESTBANK, FSB, Defendant. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Counterclaimant, v. ALLANABARONI, Counterdefendant, ADV. PROC. NO. 1:13-AP-01249-MB (Bankr.C.D. Cal.).The bankruptcy case is In re: ALLANA BARONI, Chapter 11,Reorganized Debtor, CASE NO. 1:12-BK-10986-MB (Bankr. C.D. Cal.).A full-text copy of Judge Barash's August 14, 2015 memorandum ofdecision is available at http://is.gd/xkyfwMfrom Leagle.com. AMERICAN STANDARD ENERGY: Hires Loeb & Loeb as Counsel------------------------------------------------------American Standard Energy, Corp. and American Standard Energy Corp.seek authorization from the Hon. Ronald B. King of the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas to employ Loeb &Loeb LLP as counsel, nunc pro tunc to the Aug. 3, 2015 petitiondate.The Debtors require Loeb & Loeb to: (a) advise the Debtors with respect to their powers and duties as debtors in possession in the continued management and operation of businesses and properties; (b) advise and consult on the conduct of these chapter 11 cases, including all of the legal and administrative requirements of operating in Chapter 11; (c) attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of creditors and other parties in interest; (d) take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the Debtors' estates, including prosecuting actions on the Debtors' behalf, defending any action commenced against the Debtors and representing the Debtors in negotiations concerning litigation in which either of the Debtors is involved, including objections to claims filed against the Debtors' estates; (e) prepare pleadings in connection with these Chapter 11 cases, including motions, applications, answers, orders, reports and other papers necessary or otherwise beneficial to the administration of the Debtors' estates; (f) advise the Debtors in connection with any potential sale of assets or investment by a third party; (g) appear before the Court and any appellate courts to represent the interests of the Debtors' estates; (h) advise the Debtors regarding tax matters; (i) take any necessary action on behalf of the Debtors to negotiate, prepare and obtain approval of a disclosure statement and confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan and all documents related thereto; and (j) perform all other necessary legal services for the Debtors in connection with the prosecution and administration of these chapter 11 cases, including (i) analyzing each Debtor's leases and contracts and the assumption and assignment or rejection thereof; (ii) analyzing the validity of liens against the Debtors; and (iii) advising the Debtors on corporate and litigation matters.Loeb & Loeb will be paid at these hourly rates: Bernard J. Given $725 William M. Hawkins $725 Bethany Simmons $490 Partners $675-$725 Associates $490-$665 Paralegals $250-$405Loeb & Loeb will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocketexpenses incurred.Bernard R. Given II, partner of Loeb & Loeb, assured the Court thatthe firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined inSection 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent anyinterest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.Loeb & Loeb can be reached at: Bernard R. Given, II, Esq. LOEB & LOEB LLP 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel: (310) 282-2000 Fax: (310) 282-2200 E-mail: email@example.com Standard Energy, Corp. and American Standard Energy Corp.filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case Nos.15-70104 and 15-70105) on Aug. 3, 2015. Steven Person signed thepetition as president. The Debtors disclosed total assets of atleast $40 million and total debts of $53 million as of July 31,2015. Loeb & Loeb LLP serves as the Debtors' counsel. The casesare assigned to Judge Ronald B. King.ATP OIL: Pension Fund's Securities Class Suit Dismissed-------------------------------------------------------Judge Sarah S. Vance of the United States District Court for theEastern District of Louisiana granted dismissed the second amendedcomplaint filed by Firefighters Pension & Relief Fund of the Cityof New Orleans, et al., against ATP Oil and Gas Corporation seniorexecutives and members of the board of directors.On May 24, 2013, a securities class action was brought on behalf ofall persons who acquired ATP 11.875% Senior Second Lien ExchangeNotes traceable to an allegedly false and misleading Form S-4registration statement and prospectus issued in connection withATP's December 16, 2010 exchange offer. Firefighters sued ATP'ssenior executives and board of directors, alleging violations ofSections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1922. The defendantsfiled a motion to dismiss Firefighters' Second Amended Complaintfor failure to state a claim.Judge Vance found that Firefighters has failed to plead actualknowledge as required by the Private Securities Litigation ReformAct. The judge stated that the plaintiff has failed to pleadsufficient facts to give rise to an inference that defendantspossessed actual knowledge that the projection of a substantialincrease in production was false or misleading at the time it wasmade.Further, Judge Vance found that ATP's projection of a substantialincrease in productions was accompanied by "substantivecompany-specific warnings" and therefore falls within thesafe-harbor provision of the PSLRA for forward-looking statementsand defendants cannot be held liable under Section 11.The case is FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RELIEF FUND OF THE CITY OF NEWORLEANS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others SimilarlySituated v. T. PAUL BULMAHN, ET AL., Section: R., CIVIL ACTION NO.13-3935, NO. C/W 13-6083., 13-6084, 13-6233 (E.D. La.).A full-text copy of Judge Vance's August 14, 2015 order isavailable at http://is.gd/6JSHeufrom Leagle.com. Firefighters Pension & Relief Fund of the City of New Orleans isrepresented by: Andrew Allen Lemmon, Esq. Irma L. Netting, Esq. LEMMON LAW FIRM 650 Poydras Street, Suite 2335 New Orleans, LA 70130 Tel: (504) 581-5644 Fax: (504) 581-2156 Email: email@example.com -- and -- Donald A Broggi, Esq. Joseph P. Guglielmo, Esq. SCOTT & SCOTT LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Ave. 40th Floor New York, NY 10174-4099 Tel: (212) 223-6444 Fax: (212) 223-6334 Email: email@example.com email@example.com Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund is represented by: Louis Leo Robein, III, Esq. ROBEIN, URANN, SPENCER, PICARD & CANGEMI, APLC 2540 Severn Avenue, Suite 400 Metairie, LA 70002 Tel: (504) 885-9994 -- and -- Christopher D Stewart, Esq. Cody R LeJeune, Esq. Danielle S Myers, Esq. Robert R. Henssler, Jr., Esq. ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: (619) 231-1058 Fax: (619) 231-7423 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com email@example.com M Neiman and David Callaham are represented by: William B. Federman, Esq. FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 10205 North Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Tel: (405) 235-1560 Fax: (405) 239-2112 Email: email@example.com -- and -- Stephen H. Kupperman, Esq. BARRASSO, USDIN, KUPPERMAN, FREEMAN & SARVER, LLC 909 Poydras Street 24th Floor New Orleans, LA 70112 Email: email@example.com Brian Stackhouse is represented by: Sammy Ford, IV, Esq. ABRAHAM WATKINS NICHOLS SORRELS AGOSTO & FRIEND 800 Commerce Street Houston, TX 77002 Tel: (713) 222-7211 Fax: (713) 225-0827Thomas J Mansfield, Albert L Reese, Jr., and Keith R Godwin arerepresented by: Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. GAINEY & MCKENNA 440 Park Avenue South, 5th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 983-1300 Fax: (212) 983-0383 Email: email@example.com T Paul Bulmahn is represented by: Roy Clifton Cheatwood, Esq. Matthew A. Woolf, Esq. BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ 201 St. Charles Avenue Suite 3600 New Orleans, LA 70170 Tel: (504) 566-5200 Fax: (504) 636-4000 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com -- and -- Hamilton P Lindley, Esq. DEAN & LYONS, LLP 325 North Saint Paul Street Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 Tel: (214) 736-7861 Fax: (214) 965-8505 -- and -- James P. Sullivan, Esq. Michael J. Biles, Esq. Paul R. Bessette, Esq. Royale Price, Esq. Tyler W Highful, Esq. Yusuf Bajwa, Esq. KING & SPALDING, LLP 401 Congress Avenue Suite 3200 Austin, TX 78701 Tel: (512) 457-2000 Email: email@example.com email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com email@example.com Chris A Brisack, Arthur H. Dilly, Gerard J. Swonke, Brent M.Longnecker, Walter Wendlandt, Burt A. Adams, George R. Edwards, andRobert J. Karow are represented by: Omer Frederick Kuebel, III, Esq. Corby Davin Boldissar, Esq. Monique M. Lafontaine, Esq. LOCKE LORD LLP 601 Poydras Street Suite 2660 New Orleans, LA 70130 Tel: (504) 558-5100 Fax: (504) 558-5200 Email: email@example.com email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com -- and -- Alicia Fazzano Castro, Esq. Brent Benoit, Esq. Philip Guy Eisenberg, Esq. LOCKE LORD LLP 2800 JPMorgan Chase Tower 600 Travis Houston, TX 77002 Tel: (713) 226-1200 Fax: (713) 223-3717 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. is represented by: John William Hite, III, Esq. Erika Lynn Mullenbach, Esq. Glen Mercer, Esq. Peyton C. Lambert, Esq. SALLEY, HITE, MERCER & RESOR LLC 365 Canal Street One Canal Place, Suite 1710 New Orleans, LA 70130 Tel: (504) 566-8800 Fax: (504) 566-8828 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com email@example.com email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com T Paul Bulmahn, Leland E Tate, Albert L Reese, Jr., George RMorris, and Keith R Godwin are represented by: Paul R. Bessette, Esq. James P. Sullivan, Esq. KING & SPALDING, LLP 401 Congress Avenue Suite 3200 Austin, TX 78701 Tel: (512) 457-2000 Email: email@example.com email@example.com -- and -- Matthew A. Woolf, Esq. Roy Clifton Cheatwood, Esq. BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ 201 St. Charles Avenue Suite 3600 New Orleans, LA 70170 Tel: (504) 566-5200 Fax: (504) 636-4000 Email: email@example.com email@example.com Advisors, Inc. is represented by: Eric J. O'Bell, Esq. GAUTHIER, HOUGHTALING & WILLIAMS 3500 N. Hullen Street Metairie, LA 70002 Tel: (504) 456-8600Summit Capital Management LLC, is represented by: Lewis Stephen Kahn, Esq. Melinda A. Nicholson, Esq. KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC 206 Covington Street Madisonville, LA 70447 Tel: (504) 455-1400 Fax: (504) 455-1498Moshe Issac Foundation is represented by: James H. Gibson, Esq. ALLEN & GOOCH 2000 Kaliste Saloom Rd Suite 400 Lafayette, LA 70508 Tel: (337) 291-1000 Fax: (337) 291-1200 -- and -- Shashi H Patel, Esq. Jeffrey W. Chambers, Esq. WARE JACKSON LEE & CHAMBERS, LLP America Tower, 39th Floor 2929 Allen Parkway Houston, TX 77019 Tel: (713) 659-6400 Fax: (713) 659-6262 -- and -- Joshua W. Ruthizer, Esq. Lester L. Levy, Esq. Patricia I Avery, Esq. WOLF POPPER, LLP 845 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Tel: (212) 759-4600 Fax: (212) 486-2093 Email: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com email@example.com -- and -- Stephen H. Kupperman, Esq. BARRASSO, USDIN, KUPPERMAN, FREEMAN & SARVER, LLC 909 Poydras Street 24th Floor New Orleans, LA 70112 Email: email@example.com Zohar Asher and Jack D Hart are represented by: Ronald Dean Gresham, Esq. PAYNEMITCHELL LAW GROUPWilliam Kruse is represented by: Ronald Dean Gresham, Esq. PAYNEMITCHELL LAW GROUP 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd Suite 1400 Dallas, TX 75219 Tel: (214)252-1888 Email: email@example.com -- and -- Stephen H. Kupperman, Esq. BARRASSO, USDIN, KUPPERMAN, FREEMAN & SARVER, LLC 909 Poydras Street 24th Floor New Orleans, LA 70112 Email: email@example.com -- and -- William B. Federman, Esq. FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 10205 North Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Tel: (405) 235-1560 Fax: (405) 239-2112 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com About ATP OilHouston, Texas-based ATP Oil & Gas Corporation is an internationaloffshore oil and gas development and production company focused inthe Gulf of Mexico, Mediterranean Sea and North Sea.ATP Oil & Gas filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. CaseNo. 12-36187) on Aug. 17, 2012. Attorneys at Mayer Brown LLP,serve as bankruptcy counsel. Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., isthe conflicts counsel. Motley Rice LLC and Fayard & Honeycutt, APCserve as special counsel. Opportune LLP is the financial advisorand Jefferies & Company is the investment banker.Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the claims and notice agent.ATP disclosed assets of $3.6 billion and $3.5 billion ofliabilities as of March 31, 2012. Debt includes $365 million on afirst-lien loan where Credit Suisse AG serves as agent. There is$1.5 billion on second-lien notes with Bank of New York MellonTrustCo. as agent. ATP's other debt includes $35 million on convertiblenotes and $23.4 million owing to third parties for their shares ofproduction revenue. Trade suppliers have claims for $147 million,ATP said in a court filing.An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed inthe case. Evan R. Fleck, Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy,in New York, represents the Creditors Committee as counsel.A seven-member panel of equity security holders has also beenappointed in the case. Kyung S. Lee, Esq., and Charles M. Rubio,Esq. of Diamond McCarthy LLP, in Houston, Texas, serve as counselto the Equity Committee.BLUE SUN ST. JOE: Hires Gallagher & Kennedy as Bankruptcy Counsel-----------------------------------------------------------------Blue Sun St. Joe Refining, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seekauthorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the WesternDistrict of Missouri to employ Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. as generalbankruptcy and restructuring counsel, nunc pro tunc to the July 31,2015 petition date.The Debtors require Gallagher & Kennedy to: (a) provide legal advice with respect to the Blue Sun Debtors' powers and duties as debtors-in-possession in the continued operation of their businesses and management of property; (b) prepare all necessary applications, motions, answers, orders, reports and other legal papers on behalf of the Blue Sun Debtors; (c) appear in Court and protect the interests of the Blue Sun Debtors before the Court; (d) assist the Blue Sun Debtors with the collection and disposition of assets, by sale or otherwise; (e) assist the Blue Sun Debtors with ongoing corporate and regulatory legal needs; (f) represent the Blue Sun Debtors in any future collection or other litigation commenced by and/or against Debtors; (g) assist the Blue Sun Debtors in preparing and confirming a Chapter 11 plan; and (h) represent the Blue Sun Debtors in connection with all aspects of their bankruptcy case and perform all legal services which may be necessary and proper in these proceedings. This Application is supported by the Rule 2014 Declaration of John R. Clemency.Gallagher & Kennedy will be paid at these hourly rates: John R. Clemency $595 Todd A. Burgess $545 Lindsi M. Weber $395 Keri K. Adickes $260 Shareholders $375-$625 Associates $325-$385 Paralegals $240-$260Gallagher & Kennedy will also be reimbursed for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred.In April 2015, the Blue Sun Debtors provided Gallagher & Kennedywith a $10,000 retainer. Through July 27, 2015, Gallagher & Kennedywas paid fees and costs totaling $2,870 for work done in April –June, 2015 leaving a retainer balance of $7,130.On July 30, 2015, G&K received an additional retainer of $150,000in anticipation of the chapter 11 filings, increasing the totalprepetition retainer to $157,130. Immediately prior to the filing,Gallagher & Kennedy applied the retainer to pay its July 2015 fees,incurred in preparing the cases for filing, in the total amount of$115,312.90, leaving Gallagher & Kennedy with a retainer balance of$41,817 (the "G&K Retainer") as of the Petition Date.John R. Clemency, partner of Gallagher & Kennedy, assured the Courtthat the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined inSection 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent anyinterest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.Gallagher & Kennedy can be reached at: John R. Clemency, Esq. GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A. 2575 East Camelback Road Phoenix, AZ 85016-9225 Tel: (602) 530-8000 Fax: (602) 530-8500 E-mail: email@example.com About Blue Sun St. JoeBlue Sun St. Joe Refining, LLC, and its three affiliates soughtprotection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on July 31, 2015(Bankr. W.D. Mo., Case No. 15-42231). The case is assigned toJudge Arthur B. Federman.The Debtors have engaged as bankruptcy counsel Jeffrey A. Deines,Esq., at Lentz Clark Deines PA, in Overland Park, Kansas; and ToddA. Burgess, Esq., John R. Clemency, Esq., and Lindsi M. Weber,Esq., at Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., in Phoenix, Arizona. MCAFinancial Group, Ltd. serves as their financial advisors.BLUE SUN ST. JOE: Hires Lentz Clark as Local Bankruptcy Counsel---------------------------------------------------------------Blue Sun St. Joe Refining, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seekauthorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the WesternDistrict of Missouri to employ Lentz Clark Deines PA as localbankruptcy counsel, nunc pro tunc to the July 31, 2015 petitiondate.The Blue Sun Debtors wish to employ Lentz Clark as local bankruptcycounsel and special conflicts counsel in certain cases, to assistGallagher & Kennedy, as lead bankruptcy counsel, and the Blue SunDebtors, as necessary and appropriate.Lentz Clark will be paid at these hourly rates: Jeffrey A. Deines $375 Shane J. McCall $245 Shareholders $375-$390 Associates $245 Paralegals $90Lentz Clark will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocketexpenses incurred.Prior to the commencement of the Related Cases, the Blue SunDebtors provided Lentz Clark with an advance fee retainer in theamount of $15,000, $7,978 of which was applied by Lentz Clarkprepetition in payment of services rendered in relation to thepreparation of the Related Cases, including filing fees. Thebalance of $7,022 is being held in trust by LCD to be appliedtoward the payment of LCD's compensation and expenses awarded inthe Related CasesJeffrey Deines, partner of Lentz Clark, assured the Court that thefirm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interestadverse to the Debtors and their estates.Lentz Clark can be reached at: Jeffrey A. Deines, Esq. LENTZ CLARK DEINES, PA 9260 Glenwood Overland Park, KS 66212 Tel: (913) 648-0600 Fax: (913) 648-0664 E-mail: email@example.com About Blue Sun St. JoeBlue Sun St. Joe Refining, LLC, and its three affiliates soughtprotection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on July 31, 2015(Bankr. W.D. Mo., Case No. 15-42231). The case is assigned toJudge Arthur B. Federman.The Debtors have engaged as bankruptcy counsel Jeffrey A. Deines,Esq., at Lentz Clark Deines PA, in Overland Park, Kansas; and ToddA. Burgess, Esq., John R. Clemency, Esq., and Lindsi M. Weber,Esq., at Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., in Phoenix, Arizona. MCAFinancial Group, Ltd. serves as their financial advisors.BLUE SUN ST. JOE: Hires MCA as Financial Advisors-------------------------------------------------Blue Sun St. Joe Refining, LLC and its debtor-affiliates seekauthorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the WesternDistrict of Missouri to employ MCA Financial Group, Ltd. asfinancial advisor, nunc pro tunc to the July 31, 2015 petitiondate.The Debtors require MCA Financial to: (a) assist with the preparation of an interim cash needs analysis and 13-week cash flow; (b) develop budgets and forecasts to determine financing needs during the case and post-petition; (c) advise on business reorganization matters including operations, financial and strategic; (d) assist with the preparation and the filing of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy including the preparation of the Statements and Schedules, Statement of Financial Affairs, and creditor matrix among other items; (e) provide bankruptcy financial advisory services, including expert witness reports and testimony related to interest rates, plan feasibility and valuation, as necessary; and (f) assist the Blue Sun Debtors with other matters related the cases, as requested, necessary, and appropriate.MCA Financial will be paid at these hourly rates: Morris C. Aaron, Senior Managing Director $425 Karrilyn Thomas, Managing Director $350 Michael Zaft, Director $295 Senior Managing Directors $425 Managing Directors $350 Directors $295 Administrative and research personnel $95The Debtors have agreed that MCA Financial will be compensated atthe rate of $50 per hour for all non-billable out of town traveltime.MCA Financial will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocketexpenses incurred.The Debtors have provided MCA Financial with an advance feeretainer in the amount of $34,624.71Morris C. Aaron, senior managing director of MCA Financial, assuredthe Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term isdefined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does notrepresent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.MCA Financial can be reached at: Morris C. Aaron MCA FINANCIAL GROUP, LTD. 4909 N 44th St Phoenix, AZ 85018-2708 Tel: (602) 710-2500 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com About Blue Sun St. JoeBlue Sun St. Joe Refining, LLC, and its three affiliates soughtprotection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on July 31, 2015(Bankr. W.D. Mo., Case No. 15-42231). The case is assigned toJudge Arthur B. Federman.The Debtors have engaged as bankruptcy counsel Jeffrey A. Deines,Esq., at Lentz Clark Deines PA, in Overland Park, Kansas; and ToddA. Burgess, Esq., John R. Clemency, Esq., and Lindsi M. Weber,Esq., at Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., in Phoenix, Arizona. MCAFinancial Group, Ltd. serves as their financial advisors.CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Fined $9.5MM Over Money-Laundering Controls------------------------------------------------------------------Kate O'Keefe, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported thatU.S. and Nevada regulators have fined Caesars Entertainment Corp.'sbankrupt unit a total of $9.5 million for deficientanti-money-laundering controls at its Caesars Palace VIP rooms,which cater mainly to Chinese high-rollers.According to the report, Caesars agreed to pay an $8 million civilpenalty to federal regulators after admitting that it had openlyallowed wealthy patrons to gamble anonymously in private rooms atits flagship casino in Las Vegas, the U.S. government said in awritten statement on Sept. 8. The casino company also admitted ithad failed to properly monitor transactions at internationalmarketing offices in Hong Kong and elsewhere that recruited theplayers, the Journal said, citing the settlement with the U.S.Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN. About Caesars EntertainmentCaesars Entertainment Corp., formerly Harrah's Entertainment Inc.,is one of the world's largest casino companies. Caesars casinoresorts operate under the Caesars, Bally's, Flamingo, GrandCasinos, Hilton and Paris brand names. The Company has itscorporate headquarters in Las Vegas. Harrah's announced itsre-branding to Caesar's in mid-November 2010.In January 2015, Caesars Entertainment and subsidiary CaesarsEntertainment Operating Company, Inc., announced that holders ofmore than 60% of claims in respect of CEOC's 11.25% senior securednotes due 2017, CEOC's 8.5% senior secured notes due 2020 andCEOC's 9% senior secured notes due 2020 have signed the Amendedand Restated Restructuring Support and Forbearance Agreement,dated as of Dec. 31, 2014, among Caesars Entertainment, CEOC andthe Consenting Creditors. As a result, The RSA became effectivepursuant to its terms as of Jan. 9, 2015.Appaloosa Investment Limited, et al., owed $41 million on accountof 10% second lien notes in the company, filed an involuntaryChapter 11 bankruptcy petition against CEOC (Bankr. D. Del. CaseNo. 15-10047) on Jan. 12, 2015. The bondholders are representedby Robert S. Brady, Esq., at Young, Conaway, Stargatt & TaylorLLP.CEOC and 172 other affiliates -- operators of 38 gaming and resortproperties in 14 U.S. states and 5 countries -- filed Chapter 11bankruptcy petitions (Bank. N.D. Ill. Lead Case No. 15-01145) onJan. 15, 2015. CEOC disclosed total assets of $12.3 billion andtotal debt of $19.8 billion as of Sept. 30, 2014.Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross entered a ruling that thebankruptcy proceedings will proceed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Courtfor the Northern District of Illinois.Kirkland & Ellis serves as the Debtors' counsel. AlixPartners isthe Debtors' restructuring advisors. Prime Clerk LLC acts as theDebtors' notice and claims agent. Judge Benjamin Goldgar presidesover the cases.The U.S. Trustee has appointed seven noteholders to serve in theOfficial Committee of Second Priority Noteholders and nine membersto serve in the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee.The U.S. Trustee appointed Richard S. Davis as Chapter 11examiner. * * *The Troubled Company Reporter, on April 27, 2015, reported thatFitch Ratings has affirmed and withdrawn the Issuer DefaultRatings (IDR) and issue ratings of Caesars Entertainment OperatingCompany (CEOC). These actions follow CEOC's Chapter 11 filing onJan. 15, 2015. Accordingly, Fitch will no longer provide ratingsor analytical coverage for CEOC.In addition, Fitch has affirmed the IDR and issue rating ofChester Downs and Marina LLC (Chester Downs) and the ratings havebeen simultaneously withdrawn for business reasons.CANDAX ENERGY: Geofinance Extends Waiver Thru Sept. 14------------------------------------------------------Candax Energy Inc., a company with mature oil & gas fielddevelopments in Tunisia, on Sept. 9 disclosed that it has obtainedfrom Geofinance NV, major debtholder and shareholder of theCompany, a further extension of 6 days on the waiver with respectto terms of the facility agreement entered into by the parties.The extension will extend the waiver until September 14, 2015. Asa result, Geofinance NV has agreed not to seek any remedy under thefacility agreement in respect of the $3.5 million unpaid amountuntil September 14, 2015, except in case of specific circumstances. A copy of the amendment and waiver letter will be filed publiclyby the Company and available on SEDAR.The Company is in advanced discussions regarding financialalternatives and needs more time to continue these discussions. About CandaxCandax is an international energy company with offices in Torontoand Tunis. The Candax group is engaged in exploration and theproduction of oil and gas in Tunisia and holds a royalty interestin an exploration permit in Madagascar.CORINTHIAN COLLEGES: Panel Taps Willkie Farr as Insurance Counsel-----------------------------------------------------------------The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the Chapter 11cases of Corinthian Colleges, Inc., et al., asks the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for permission toretain Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP as its special insurancecounsel for the limited purposes nunc pro tunc to Aug. 10, 2015,Wilkie Farr will, among other things: a. assist the Creditors' Committee's lead counsel in preservingclaims against the Debtors' insurance coverage provided under theD&O Policies; b. advise the Creditors' Committee on the consequences withrespect to the D&O Policies of any pending actions against theDebtors or any current or former director, officer or otherinsiders of the Debtors; and c. review and analyze the impact of any Plan provisions withrespect to the D&O Policies, as may be requested in connection withconfirmation of the Plan.The firm's Marc Abrams tells the Court that Willkie Farr will billat its standard hourly rates: Partners and Of Counsel $900 - $1,275 Special Counsel $890 Associates $305 - $875 Paraprofessionals $135 - $340 Willkie Farr attorneys with primary responsibility for the matterare: Mr. Abrams (Partner -- Business $1,275 Reorganization & Restructuring) Jeffrey B. Clancy (Associate -- $875 Corporate & Financial Services) Christopher S. Koenig (Associate -- $565 Business Reorganization & Restructuring)Mr. Clancy is a senior corporate associate at Willkie Farr withsignificant knowledge and experience with D&O and other insuranceproducts and is expected to be the principal timekeeper on thematter. Other Willkie Fan attorneys or paraprofessionals will fromtime to time provide legal services.In connection with its representation of the Committee, WillkieFarr will cap its total fees and expenses for the engagement at$75,000.To the best of the Committee's knowledge, Willkie Farr is a"disinterested person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14)of the Bankruptcy Code.The firm provided a response to the request for additionalinformation set for in the Appendix B Guidelines:Question: Did you agree to any variations from, or alternatives to,your standard or customary billing arrangements for thisengagement?Response: No variations were agreed to from Willkie Fares standardor customary billing arrangements.Question: Do any of the professionals included in this engagementvary their rate based on the geographic location of the bankruptcycase?Response: No.Question: If you represented the client in the 12 monthsprepetition, disclose your billing rates and material financialterms for the prepetition engagement, including any adjustmentsduring the 12 months prepetition. If your billing rates andmaterial financial terms have changed postpetition, explain thedifference and the reasons for the difference.Response: Willkie Farr did not represent the Creditors' Committeeprepetition.Question: Has your client approved your prospective budget andstaffing plan and, if so, for what budget period?Response: The Creditors' Committee has approved a budget of $75,000for Willkie Fan's retention in this matter. Given Willkie Farr'slimited retention to advise on certain insurance matters and the$75,000 budget cap, Willkie Farr and the Creditors' Committee havenot prepared a formal budget and staffing plan. About Corinthian CollegesCorinthian Colleges, Inc., Pegasus Education, Inc., and 23affiliated entities filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D.Del. Lead Case No. 15-10952) on May 4, 2015, to complete an orderlywind down of its operations. The cases are jointly administeredCase No. 15-10952.Judge Kevin J. Carey presides over the case. Richards, Layton &Finger, P.A., represents the Debtors in their restructuringefforts; FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as restructuring advisors;and Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy serves as claims and noticingagent.Corinthian Colleges, Inc., disclosed $721,596,789 in assets and$2,929,448,278 in liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed five creditors to serve onthe official committee of unsecured creditors.COYNE INT'L: Asset Sale to Save Jobs; To Close NY Plants--------------------------------------------------------Chelsea Diana at Albany Business Review reports that the sale ofCoyne International Enterprises Corp.'s assets will save majorityof jobs in the Company.As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 9, 2015, theCompany said that it remains on track to complete three plannedsales of its operating units: New Bedford, Massachusetts, whichwill be sold to Clean Uniforms and More!; Richmond, Virginia andGreenville, South Carolina, which will be sold to PrudentialOverall Supply; and the remaining plants and service centers --Bristol, Tennessee, Buffalo, New York, Cleveland, Ohio, London,Kentucky, Syracuse, New York, and York, Pennsylvania -- which willbe acquired by Coyne's existing senior management team. The Company said in a notice filed with the New York StateDepartment of Labor this month that due to possible sale offacility, it was closing plants in Onondaga, Tioga, Albany, andErie and letting go of a total of 150 workers on Oct. 31, 2015,which is also the closing date of the plants. These locations arealso affected: Barton, Guilderland, and Buffalo.Mark Samson, the Company's CEO, said in a statement, "The WARN Actfilings were a formality because there will be a change of controlin Coyne's business entities. There are buyers lined up for all ofCoyne's facilities. There are two locations that could be impactedby possible layoffs -- New Bedford, Massachusetts, and Greenville,South Carolina. Under the existing deal, approximately 525 jobswill be preserved out of approximately 620 positions." About Coyne International Coyne International Enterprises Corp. filed a Chapter 11bankruptcy petition (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-31160) on July 31,2015. The petition was signed by Mark Samson as CEO. The Debtorestimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities ofat least $50 million.Herrick Feinstein LLP serves as the Debtor's general counsel. Phillips Lytle LLP acts as the Debtor's local bankruptcy counsel.Cohnreznick LLP is the Debtor's financial advisor. SSG CapitalAdvisors LLC is the Debtor's investment banker. Rust Omni servesthe Debtor as claims and administrative agent. Raab, Sturm &Ganchrow, LLP acts as labor counsel to the Debtor. HarbridgeConsulting Group, LLC serves as the Debtor's pension consultant.Beveridge & Diamond PC is the Debtor's environmental counsel.GZA Geoenvironmental, Inc., represents the Debtor as environmentalconsultant.CROWN CASTLE: Moody's Assigns Ba3 Rating on Sr. Unsec. Debt Shelf-----------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service rated Crown Castle International Corp'ssenior unsecured debt shelf at (P)Ba3 and subordinate debt shelf at(P)B1. The rating outlook is stable.These ratings were assigned with a stable outlook:Crown Castle International Corp.: -- Senior unsecured debt shelf: (P)Ba3 -- Subordinate debt shelf: (P)B1RATINGS RATIONALECrown Castle's Ba1 corporate family rating reflects the REIT'sposition as the leading independent provider of shared wirelessinfrastructure in the U.S., geographic diversification within thedomestic market, and ample liquidity. CCI's high visibility intofuture earnings due to long-term leases with annual escalations,high credit quality tenants, and the ability to generatesignificant free cash flow also support the rating. Moody'sbelieves that wireless infrastructure industry fundamentals andgrowth trends --both in towers and small cells -- remain favorableover the next several years owing to continued strong demand forwireless and data services, the acceleration in mobile traffic andcontinued build out of carriers' wireless networks. These creditstrengths are offset by the REIT's high share of secured debt inits capital structure and significant tenant concentration.Importantly, structural subordination and material subsidiarieswith secured debt in CCI's capital structure are key creditchallenges that constrain the REIT's ratings. Crown Castle'sratings are also tempered by its exposure to technology networkshifts or major technological transformation and untestedalternative use for its properties should such dramatic changesoccur -- risks that are not typically associated with traditionalcommercial REITs.The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Crown Castlewill continue to pursue a disciplined financial policy and makeprogress simplifying its capital structure over time, but that itcould take some time before the REIT is able to adequately addressits restrictive capital structure. It also incorporates Moody'sexpectation of continued EBITDA and cash flow expansion that willallow the REIT to maintain, if not improve, its credit profile andleverage metrics.In order to strengthen its credit profile sufficiently to warrantan upgrade to investment grade, Crown Castle will need to align itscapital structure with its strong fundamentals by simplifying itscapital structure, resolving structural subordination issues andreducing its reliance on secured debt funding. An upgrade toinvestment grade would also require Crown Castle to sustain strongcredit metrics, including net debt/EBITDA below 6x (calculatedincluding Moody's operating lease adjustment) and effectiveleverage (debt plus preferred over gross assets) closer to 60%.Conversely, if operating performance deteriorated or if the REITchose to pursue an aggressive financial policy (including largedebt-funded acquisitions or shareholder-friendly return policy)such that net debt/EBITDA is sustained above 7x or effectiveleverage (defined as debt plus preferred over gross assets)sustained in the high 70% range, a downgrade could occur.Moody's last rating action with respect to Crown Castle was onAugust 14, 2015, when the rating agency upgraded the corporatefamily rating of Crown Castle International Corp. to Ba1 from Ba2as well as upgraded all other existing ratings of Crown Castle andits subsidiaries with a stable outlook.The principal methodology used in this rating was Global RatingMethodology for REITs and Other Commercial Property Firms publishedin July 2010.Crown Castle [NYSE: CCI] is real estate investment trust based inHouston, Texas which owns, operates and leases towers and otherinfrastructure for wireless communications. Crown Castle'sportfolio includes approximately 40,000 towers and 15,000 smallcell nodes supported by approximately 16,000 miles of fiber.CT TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Retains 'B' CCR After ECS Acquisition----------------------------------------------------------Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said that its 'B' corporatecredit rating on Alpharetta, Ga.-based release-of-information (ROI)provider CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings Inc. (doing businessas HealthPort) is unchanged, following the company's announcementthat it will issue a $117 million add-on to its first-lien termloan to fund the acquisition of Enterprise Consulting SolutionsInc. (ECS), a provider of outsourced record retrieval services forU.S. commercial health plans. The outlook is stable. At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B' issue-level rating on thecompany's $596 million first-lien term loan due 2021 ($594 millionoutstanding) and $35 million revolving credit facility due 2019.The '3' recovery rating is unchanged and reflects S&P's expectationfor meaningful recovery (50% to 70%, lower half of the range) inthe event of payment default. The ratings reflect Standard & Poor's adjusted leverage in the high6x area as of June 30, 2015, pro forma for the proposed transaction(which includes maximum earnout payments as debt and excludesmanagement's adjustments for unrealized cost savings) and thecompany's niche focus on the highly fragmented ROI market, whichhas regulated pricing. ECS will enhance HealthPort's position inthe adjacent outsourced record retrieval market, adding newtechnology capabilities and opportunities to expand the ECScustomer base, although ECS has significant customerconcentration.S&P expects leverage to fall to the low 6x area by the end of 2015and the low to mid-5x area in 2016 in the absence of additionalacquisitions, mainly on cost reductions at IOD Inc. (acquired inJuly 2015) and the payment of earnouts. Leverage could fall fasterif the company acquires smaller businesses funded from cash flow asit has in the past, but leverage could exceed S&P's expected levelsif HealthPort pursues larger, debt-financed acquisitions. S&Pcould lower the rating if the company sustains leverage above 7xdue to acquisitions, lower EBITDA resulting from changing healthcare market dynamics that disrupt the ROI market, or adverseregulatory action; S&P could also lower the rating if suchconditions result in tight covenant cushion restricting access tothe revolving credit facility, such that S&P comes to viewliquidity as less than adequate.RECOVERY ANALYSISKey analytical factors -- S&P's simulated default scenario assumes a default occurring in 2018 due to reduced reliance on outsourced ROI services, lower regulated pricing, or breach of security protocols that leads to customer loss and potential liabilities. -- S&P has valued the company as a going concern due to its leading position in its market segment and some proprietary technology. S&P applied a 5.5x EBITDA multiple, which is consistent with that of other health care information technology companies that we rate, to an assumed emergence EBITDA of $64 million, and derived a gross recovery value of $352 million.Simulated default and valuation assumptions: -- Default year: 2018 -- EBITDA at emergence: $64 million -- EBITDA multiple: 5.5xSimplified waterfall: -- Net enterprise value (after 3% administrative expenses): $341 million -- Valuation split (obligors/non-obligors): 100%/0% -- Priority claims: $1 million -- Collateral value available to secured creditors: $341 million -- Secured first-lien debt: $627 million -- Recovery expectations: 50% to 70% (lower half of the range)All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.Collateral value equals asset pledge from obligors after priorityclaims plus equity pledge from non-obligors after non-obligordebt.RATINGS LISTRatings UnchangedCT Technologies Intermediate Holdings Inc. Corporate credit rating B/Stable/--Ratings Affirmed; Recovery Ratings UnchangedCT Technologies Intermediate Holdings Inc. $596 mil 1st lien term ln due 2021 B Recovery rating 3L $35 mil revolv cred fac due 2019 B Recovery rating 3LCURTIS JAMES JACKSON: 50 Cent Reveals New House in Africa---------------------------------------------------------WMUR 9 abc reports that Curtis James Jackson, III, has shown offthrough a video posted on Instagram his new and unfinished house inAfrica."My crib is almost finished in AFRICA. I'm gonna have the craziestHouse warming party ever," WMUR quoted Mr. Jackson as saying.According to the report, Mr. Jackson did not reveal in hisInstagram post any more details about the house or the exactlocation of the property.Curtis James Jackson, III, aka 50 Cent, filed for Chapter 11bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 15-21233) on July13, 2015.DCP MIDSTREAM: Moody's Affirms Ba2 CFR & Changes Outlook to Stable------------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service affirmed DCP Midstream, LLC's Ba2corporate family rating, Ba2-PD probability of default rating(PDR), Ba2 senior unsecured notes rating and B1 junior subordinatebond rating. Moody's affirmed DCP's speculative grade liquidityrating of SGL-3. The rating outlook was changed to stable fromnegative.Moody's also affirmed DCP Midstream Operating, LP's (DPM) Ba1 CFR,Ba1-PD PDR, and Ba1 senior unsecured notes rating. Moody's loweredDPM's speculative grade liquidity rating to SGL-3 from SGL-2. DPM'srating outlook was changed to stable from negative."The change in outlook to stable at DCP reflects the injection of$1.5 billion of cash and the contribution of one-third ownership oftwo pipelines that should generate about $100 million of annualizedEBITDA, by Phillips 66 (A3 stable) and Spectra Energy(Baa2negative), respectively. The cash injection and additionalfee-based cash flow will reduce leverage at DCP to a levelconsistent with the Ba2 rating." said Terry Marshall, Moody'sSenior Vice President. "The change in outlook to stable at DPMreflects its relatively stable cash flow even in the current priceenvironment, and the stable outlook of its general partner, DCP,with whom it is closely linked through assets, capex, contracts andownership."Ratings Lowered:Issuer: DCP Midstream Operating LP Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Lowered to SGL-3 from SGL-2Outlook Actions:Issuer: DCP Midstream Operating LP Outlook, Changed To Stable From NegativeIssuer: DCP Midstream, LLC Outlook, Changed To Stable From NegativeAffirmations:Issuer: DCP Midstream Operating LP Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba1-PD Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba1 BACKED Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture (Local Currency), Affirmed Ba1 (LGD4)Issuer: DCP Midstream, LLC Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba2-PD Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-3 Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba2 Junior Subordinated Regular Bond/Debenture (Local Currency), Affirmed B1 (LGD6) Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture (Local Currency), Affirmed Ba2 (LGD4)RATINGS RATIONALEDCP's Ba2 CFR considers its' very high leverage (consolidated debtto EBITDA declining to about 6x in 2016 from 9X currently,including Moody's adjustments), significant exposure to natural gasliquids (NGL) and natural gas pricing with only about 35% of itsstand-alone revenues protected by fee-based contracts in 2015 andabout 50% in 2016, the structural subordination of distributionsfrom DPM to debt of that entity, partially mitigated by anindication of the two owners that they will not take distributionsfrom DCP through 2017 in the current low pricing environment. Therating is supported by DCP's large and diverse, directly held assetbase in the natural gas and NGL midstream space, as well as itsownership and control of DPM (0.3%% GP, 22% LP, and IDRs of DPM'spublic MLP parent, DCP Midstream Partners, LP) and its midstreamasset base, which provides DCP with about 40% of DPM'sdistributable cash flow, which in turn represents about 20% ofDCP's consolidated EBITDA. DCP takes considerable commodity pricerisk on both its directly generated cash flow and that of DPM forwhich it is a contract counterparty on a portion of DPM's fee-basedcontracts. Both companies are subject to volumetric risk, which ismitigated by their significant presence in the most active USresource plays.DPM's Ba1 CFR is driven by reasonable leverage (4X currently), sizeand scale in the US gathering and processing sector, good cash flowstability, although that will decline as hedges roll off, offset byDPM's interconnectedness with DCP (ownership, assets, capex anddropdowns). Cash flow stability benefits from a combination offee-based and hedged revenues that total about 95% of anticipated2015 margins and 85% of 2016 margins. A portion of DPM's fee-basedcontracts are with DCP, which is lower-rated than DPM.DCP's speculative grade liquidity rating of SGL-3 indicatesadequate liquidity. Moody's anticipates cash consumption of about$450 million from June 30, 2015 to Sept. 30, 2016, including a $200million debt maturity in October 2015. This consumption can befunded under DCP's $1.8 billion revolving credit facility thatmatures in March 2017, which will be fully available pro-forma forthe $1.5 billion cash injection from Phillips 66. The revolver issecured by 100% of the equity interests in DPM held by DCP. Proforma for $1.5 billion of debt reduction from the cash injection,DCP will be in compliance with its two financial covenants atDecember 31, 2015: secured debt to EBITDA under 3.25x and totaldebt to EBITDA under 5x, although with limited cushion under thetotal debt to EBITDA covenant. As is the norm, the bank covenantcalculations include the addition of projected EBITDA for partiallycompleted projects. DCP has alternate liquidity in the form ofpotential asset sales, joint ventures and DPM limited partner unitsales and its fixed assets are not pledged to the banks.DPM's speculative grade liquidity rating of SGL-3 indicatesadequate liquidity. At June 30, 2015 it had $1.15 billionavailable under its $1.25 billion revolving credit facility thatmatures in May 2019. Typical of most MLPs, all free cash flowafter maintenance capital is distributed to LP unit holders and theGP, leaving the long-term funding of growth capital expendituresreliant on the revolver as well as debt and equity capital marketsThe availability under the revolver is sufficient to fund ourexpectation of cash consumption of about $800 million from June 30,2015, to Sept. 30, 2016, including a $250 million debt maturity inOct. 2015. The revolver has a leverage covenant of a maximum 5xdebt/EBITDA, which at June 30, 2015 was 3.1x (debt/EBITDA isadjusted for partial year EBITDA for capital projects andacquisitions). Moody's expects DPM to be in compliance with itsfinancial covenant through 2016. DPM has alternate liquidity inthe form of potential asset sales and joint ventures.DCP's Ba2 CFR could be downgraded if debt to EBITDA appearsunlikely to decline to around 6x in 2016. DCP's rating could alsobe downgraded in the event of a downgrade in DPM's rating. Anupgrade to Ba1 would be dependent on leverage below 5x and having60 -- 70% of revenues covered by third-party fee-based contractsand hedges. An upgrade would also likely be dependent on anupgrade in DPM's rating.DPM's Ba1 CFR could be downgraded if leverage appears likely torise above 5x in 2016 and it does not have at least 50% of itsrevenues covered by third-party fee-based contracts and hedges.DPM's rating may also be downgraded if the rating of DCP isdowngraded. An upgrade would be dependent on debt to EBITDAapproaching 4x and in excess of 70% of revenues covered bythird-party fee-based contracts and hedges. An upgrade would alsolikely be dependent on an upgrade in DCP's rating.DCP Midstream Partners, LP and DCP Midstream Operating, LP areaffiliated midstream gathering and processing companiesheadquartered in Denver, Colorado. DCP Midstream, LLC is a jointventure between Phillips 66 and Spectra Energy.The principal methodology used in these ratings was GlobalMidstream Energy published in December 2010.DEWEY & LEBOEUF: Lawyer Says Suit vs. Ex-Chairman "Fantasy Fraud"-----------------------------------------------------------------Matthew Goldstein, writing for The New York Times' DealBook,reported that the lawyer for Steven H. Davis, former chairman ofDewey & LeBoeuf, told a state jury that the criminal case againsthis client was a "fantasy fraud" brought by prosecutors inManhattan with "fanciful theories" about the spring 2012 collapseof the once-prominent law firm.According to the report, Elkan Abramowitz, in a closing statementof more than three hours on Sept. 8, told a jury in New York StateSupreme Court in Manhattan that prosecutors had failed to prove Mr.Davis was aware of any wrongdoing that might have occurred in thefirm's finance department to make the law firm's revenue appearbetter than it was to lenders and creditors.He said even the prosecution's star witness, Frank Canellas, thelaw firm's former finance director, testified that he never toldMr. Davis about any improper accounting adjustments being used bythe finance department, the report related. About Dewey & LeBoeufDewey & LeBoeuf LLP sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.Case No. 12-12321) to complete the wind-down of its operations.The firm had struggled with high debt and partner defections.Dewey disclosed debt of $245 million and assets of $193 million inits chapter 11 filing late evening on May 29, 2012.Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP operated as a prestigious, New York City-based, law firm that traced its roots to the 2007 merger of DeweyBallantine LLP -- originally founded in 1909 as Root, Clark & Bird-- and LeBoeuf, Lamb, Green & MacCrae LLP -- originally founded in1929. In recent years, more than 1,400 lawyers worked at the firmin numerous domestic and foreign offices.At its peak, Dewey employed about 2,000 people with 1,300 lawyersin 25 offices across the globe. When it filed for bankruptcy,only 150 employees were left to complete the wind-down of thebusiness.Dewey's offices in Hong Kong and Beijing are being wound down.The partners of the separate partnership in England are in processof winding down the business in London and Paris, andadministration proceedings in England were commenced May 28. Alllawyers in the Madrid and Brussels offices have departed. Nearlyall of the lawyers and staff of the Frankfurt office havedeparted, and the remaining personnel are preparing for theclosure. The firm's office in Sao Paulo, Brazil, is beingprepared for closure and the liquidation of the firm's localaffiliate. The partners of the firm in the Johannesburg office,South Africa, are planning to wind down the practice.The firm's ownership interest in its practice in Warsaw, Poland,was sold to the firm of Greenberg Traurig PA on May 11 for$6 million. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. took $2 million ofthe proceeds as part of a settlement.Judge Martin Glenn oversees the case. Albert Togut, Esq., atTogut, Segal & Segal LLP, represents the Debtor. Epiq BankruptcySolutions LLC serves as claims and notice agent. The petition wassigned by Jonathan A. Mitchell, chief restructuring officer.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Revolver Agent on behalf of thelenders under the Revolver Agreement, hired Kramer Levin Naftalis& Frankel LLP. JPMorgan, as Collateral Agent for the RevolverLenders and the Noteholders, hired FTI Consulting and GulfAtlantic Capital, as financial advisors. The Noteholders hiredBingham McCutchen LLP as counsel.The U.S. Trustee formed two committees -- one to representunsecured creditors and the second to represent former Deweypartners. The creditors committee hired Brown Rudnick LLP led byEdward S. Weisfelner, Esq., as counsel. The Former Partners hiredTracy L. Klestadt, Esq., and Sean C. Southard, Esq., at Klestadt &Winters, LLP, as counsel.FTI Consulting, Inc. was appointed secured lender trustee for theSecured Lender Trust. Alan Jacobs of AMJ Advisors LLC, was namedDewey's liquidation trustee. Scott E. Ratner, Esq., Frank A.Oswald, Esq., David A. Paul, Esq., Steven S. Flores, Esq., atTogut, Segal & Segal LLP, serve as counsel to the LiquidationTrustee.Dewey's liquidating Chapter 11 plan was approved by the bankruptcycourt in February 2013 and implemented in March. The plan createda trust to collect and distribute remaining assets. The firmestimated that midpoint recoveries for secured and unsecuredcreditors under the plan would be 58.4 percent and 9.1 percent,respectively.DUNE ENERGY: Cash Collateral Use Extended Until Sept. 18--------------------------------------------------------Judge H. Christopher Mott of the United States Bankruptcy Court forWestern District of Texas, Austin Division, signed off astipulation giving Dune Energy, Inc., et al., further authority touse cash collateral until September 18, 2015, and/or the effectivedate of a plan of liquidation.Pursuant to the Consent Order, the termination date with respect tothe DIP Facility has occurred, all Commitments are terminated as ofJuly 24, 2015, and the Debtors are authorized to pay theOutstanding DIP Obligations in full in accordance with the terms ofthe Final DIP Order and the DIP Loan Documents. The First LienAgent and First Lien Lenders have consented to the Debtors'continued use of Cash Collateral in accordance with thesupplemental budget. The Post-Closing Budget will constitute theDIP Budget, for purposes of the Final DIP Order and the ConsentOrder, for the period from and after July 24, 2015, through theTermination Date under the Final DIP Order, and the Debtors willnot be entitled to use Cash Collateral except in accordance withthe terms of the Post-Closing Budget.The amount of $1,155,000 will be disbursed from the Sale Proceedsfor use in accordance with the Post-Closing Budget. All money paidto the First Lien Lenders (or their attorneys and agents) under thePost-Closing Budget is deemed a payment of adequate protection andreduces the principal balance of the loan obligations unless theFirst Lien Lenders first file notice with the Court that they claimto be over-secured, in which case any party may dispute theallocation. The First Lien Agent and First Lien Lenders haveconsented to the Debtors' continued use of the Unused BudgetedAmount in accordance with the DIP Budget and theDebtors are authorized to use the Unused Budgeted Amount inaccordance with the DIP Budget. Absent access to Cash Collateral, the Debtors will be forced toterminate their remaining employees, shut down any remainingoperations, and immediately convert their cases to chapter 7. Useof Cash Collateral in accordance with the Post-Closing Budget willafford the Debtors an opportunity to pursue confirmation of achapter 11 plan that will facilitate an orderly liquidation of theDebtors' estates for the benefit of their creditors.The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed a response tothe Debtors' emergency motion to approve the stipulated consentorder, complaining that the DIP Loan is being paid by the order sothe budget is a cash collateral budget. As an under-securedcreditor, the First Lien Lenders should not be paid legal fees, theCommittee asserted. They are, probably, entitled to adequateprotection of their First Lien, the Committee said.The Committee further complained that the allocation of the budgetfor the Committee's professional fees and expenses ($9,000 perweek/$75,000) is too low. The Committee told the Court that it wasnot consulted on the negotiations on the appropriate budget of theCommittee professional fees. The Committee asserted that it has amajor statutory role in the plan process and is required to act forthe benefit of the unsecured creditors, the major constituencyaffected by the plan. The Committee said it has not been providedthe liquidating trust agreement and is excluded from substantiallyall negotiations. The Court should require the Debtors to providethe materials in contemplation of the plan to the Committee whencirculated to the First Lien Lenders to avoid future issues likethe one requiring the present motion, the Committee argued.Dune Energy, Inc., et al. are represented by: Charles A. Beckham, Jr., Esq. Kenric D. Kattner, Esq. Kourtney Lyda, Esq. Kelli Stephenson, Esq. HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2100 Houston, TX 77010 Tel: (713) 547-2000 Fax: (713) 547-2600 Email: email@example.com email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com of Montreal is represented by: Charles S. Kelley, Esq. MAYER BROWN LLP 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 3400 Houston, TX 77002-2730 Tel: (713) 238-3000 Fax: (713) 238-4625 Email: email@example.com -- and -- Sean T. Scott, Esq. MAYER BROWN LLP 71 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 Tel: (312) 782-0600 Fax: (312) 701-7711 Email: email@example.com Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by: Hugh M. Ray, III, Esq. MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 600 Travis, Suite 7000 Houston, TX 77002 Tel: (713) 485-7300 Fax: (713) 485-7344 Email: email@example.com About Dune EnergyDune Energy, Inc. (OTCMKTS: DUNR) is an independent energy companybased in Houston, Texas. Since May 2004, the Company has beenengaged in the exploration, development, acquisition andexploitation of natural gas and crude oil properties, withinterests along the Louisiana/Texas Gulf Coast. The Company'sproperties cover over 90,000 gross acres across 27 producing oiland natural gas fields.Affiliates Dune Energy, Inc. (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 15-10336),Dune Operating Company (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 15-10337), andDune Properties, Inc. (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 15-10338) filedseparate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions on March 8, 2015. Thepetitions were signed by James A. Watt, president and chiefexecutive officer.Judge Christopher H. Mott presides over the case. Charles A.Beckham, Jr., Esq., Kourtney P. Lyda, Esq., and Kelli M.Stephenson, Esq., at Haynes And Boone, LLP, serve as the Debtors'bankruptcy counsel. Deloitte Transactions And Business AnalyticsLLP is the Debtors' restructuring advisors. Parkman Whaling LLC isthe Debtors' sale professionals.The Debtors listed $229 million in total assets and $144 million intotal debts as of Sept. 30, 2014. In their schedules, DuneEnergyInc., et al., disclosed $263,337,172 in assets and$107,981,306 in liabilities.The U.S. trustee overseeing the Chapter 11 case of Dune Energyappointed three creditors to serve on the official committee ofunsecured creditors. The Committee is represented by Hugh M. Ray,Esq., at McKool Smith, P.C.DYCOM INDUSTRIES: Moody's Rates New $400MM Unsecured Notes Ba3--------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba3 rating to DycomIndustries, Inc.'s proposed $400 million convertible unsecurednotes due 2021. Concurrently, Dycom's Ba2 Corporate Family Rating,Ba2-PD Probability of Default Rating and Ba3 rating on its existingsenior subordinated notes were affirmed. The company's SpeculativeGrade Liquidity Rating ("SGL") was lowered to SGL-2 from SGL-1. The existing subordinated notes are expected to repaid upontransaction close and subsequently withdrawn. The ratings outlookis stable.The proceeds of the proposed convertible senior unsecured notes areexpected to primarily be used to redeem the company's $278 millionsenior subordinated notes due 2021. Remaining proceeds will beused to pay the existing subordinated notes make whole premium,accrued interest and other transaction-related expenses.The transaction increases leverage by almost half a turn to 2.7times (including Moody's standard adjustments), positioning thecompany's leverage toward the high end for its rating. The ratingsare based on the expectation that the company will be prudent inusing debt to finance share repurchase activity and acquisitions.The ratings also weigh the company's recent strong earningsperformance, healthy backlog and contribution from recentacquisitions. Although total funded debt would increase by morethan $100 million as a result of the proposed transaction, thetransaction is expected to lower cash interest expense by over $15million annually by paying off the existing higher coupon 7.125%existing subordinated notes.Dycom's SGL rating was lowered to SGL-2 from SGL-1 largely due tothe expectation that the company will continue to partially userevolver borrowings to finance future share repurchases andacquisitions, as well as reduced headroom under the company'sleverage covenant under its existing credit facility due to higherdebt levels as a result of the proposed transaction.Dycom Industries, Inc.This rating was assigned:Dycom Industries, Inc. $400 million convertible unsecured notes due 2021, at Ba3 (LGD-5)These ratings were affirmed:Dycom Industries, Inc. Corporate Family Rating, at Ba2 Probability of Default Rating, at Ba2-PDDycom Investments, Inc. $278 million senior subordinates notes due 2021, at Ba3 (LGD-5)This rating was lowered:Dycom Industries, Inc. Speculative Grade Liquidity rating, to SGL-2 from SGL-1Dycom Industries, Inc. and Dycom Investments, Inc. Outlook, StableRATINGS RATIONALEDycom's Ba2 CFR considers the risks of operating in a highlycyclical industry with sizable re-investment requirements balancedagainst partially debt-funded share buybacks and acquisitions. Theratings also consider Dycom's high customer concentration with itstop 5 customers comprising roughly 60% of revenue. The demand forgreater bandwidth and the deployment of fiber to enable videoofferings and increase the speed at which data is transmitted overnetworks has resulted in healthy demand reflected in the company'stwelve month backlog that stood at $1.6 billion as of the company'sfiscal year-ended July 25, 2015.Pro forma for the proposed refinancing transaction, debt/EBITDA forthe fiscal year ended July 25, 2015 is 2.7 times (on a Moody'sadjusted basis), increasing to 2.9 times if the initial purchasersof the notes exercise their option to purchase additional noteswithin 30 days after initial issuance of the notes. Theseestimates of pro forma leverage do not include the EBITDAcontribution from recent acquisitions. The ratings incorporate thecompany's track record of well-balanced financial policy decisionswith share repurchase activity typically increasing during periodsof stronger earnings performance with more financial conservativepolicies instituted when earnings moderate.The SGL-2 rating reflects a good liquidity profile supported by theexpectation of continued positive free cash flow generation andmeaningful availability under the company's revolving creditfacility. In addition, the company's liquidity profile benefitsfrom alternate sources of liquidity through unpledged assets.Dycom's proposed convertible notes are rated Ba3, one notch belowits Ba2 CFR, reflecting structural and effective subordination tothe company's existing revolver and term loan. The proposed notesare unsecured and not guaranteed by operating subsidiaries.The stable outlook is based on the expectation that the companywill maintain well-balanced financial policies with debt/EBITDAbelow 3.0 times while maintaining a good liquidity profile.Additional debt-financed acquisitions, excessive share repurchases,a decline in earnings and/or loss of a key customer could haveadverse rating implications. An expectation that debt/EBITDAlevels would exceed and be sustained above 3.0x and/orEBITA/interest would approach 2.0x could also result in adowngrade.A ratings increase is considered unlikely at this time givenelevated debt levels, the highly cyclical nature of the end-marketsthe company operates in and Dycom's share repurchase/acquisitionstrategy. Positive rating momentum would likely be driven by anexpectation of strong, sustained revenue growth as well as theachievement and maintenance of debt/EBITDA below 1.5x andEBITA/interest coverage of 4.0x.The principal methodology used in these ratings was ConstructionIndustry published in November 2014.Dycom Industries, Inc., located in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, isa leading provider of specialty contracting services in NorthAmerica. Dycom provides engineering, construction and maintenanceservices that assist telecommunication and cable televisionproviders expand and monitor their network infrastructure in a costeffective manner. The company also provides underground locatingservices for telephone, cable, power, gas, water, and sewerutilities. Dycom generated revenues approximating $2.0 billion forfiscal year ended July 25, 2015.DYCOM INDUSTRIES: S&P Assigns 'BB-' Rating on $400MM Unsec. Notes-----------------------------------------------------------------Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'BB-' issue-leveland '5' recovery ratings to Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.-based DycomIndustries Inc.'s (Dycom) proposed $400 million senior unsecuredconvertible notes due 2021. The '5' recovery rating indicatesS&P's expectation of a modest (10%-30%; higher end of the range)recovery in the event of a default. S&P's corporate credit ratingon Dycom remains 'BB' with a stable outlook.Dycom plans to use proceeds from the notes issuance to repay its$277.5 million 7.125% senior subordinated notes due 2021,repurchase common stock, and pay the cost of convertible note hedgetransactions. S&P's corporate credit rating on Dycom reflects S&P's view that thecompany will continue to compete in large, highly fragmented, andcyclical end-markets with long-term capital investmentrequirements. It also reflects S&P's expectation that thecompany's debt leverage will remain below 3x with a funds fromoperations (FFO)-to-debt ratio approaching 30%.RECOVERY ANALYSISKey analytical factors: -- Given Dycom's position as a specialty engineering and construction contractor competing in the cyclical telecommunications end-market, S&P's distressed scenario envisions a period of significant delays and outright cancelations of cable- and telecom-related capital spending programs and Dycom's key customers reduce their capital expenditure budgets in line with the broader industry. -- S&P's analysis further assumes that: the revolver is 85% drawn at default; the margin on the revolver and term loan increases by 125 basis points (bps), reflecting higher borrowing costs from credit deterioration simulated in S&P's scenario; EBITDA declines by approximately 57% from fiscal- 2015 levels at default; and EBITDA at emergence is estimated at $115 million. S&P has valued the company on a going- concern basis using a 5x multiple of its projected emergence EBITDA.Simulated default assumptions: -- Simulated year of default: 2020 -- EBITDA at emergence: $115 million -- EBITDA multiple: 5xSimplified waterfall: -- Net enterprise value (after 5% admin. costs): $546 million -- Senior secured claims: $456 million -- Total value available to subordinated debt: $90 million -- Senior subordinated claims: $405 million -- Recovery expectations: 10%-30% (higher end of the range)Note: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.RATINGS LISTDycom Industries Inc. Corporate Credit Rating BB/Stable/--Issue-Level Ratings AssignedDycom Industries Inc. Senior Unsecured $400 mil. convertible notes due 2021 BB- Recovery Rating 5HE*TRADE FINANCIAL: Moody's Puts Ba2 Rating on Review for Upgrade----------------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service has placed the ratings of E*TRADEFinancial Corporation (E*TRADE) (Ba2 senior unsecured) and thelong-term ratings of E*TRADE Bank (Baa2 deposits) on review forupgrade, and affirmed E*TRADE Bank's Prime-2 short-term depositrating. The rating actions follow E*TRADE's announcement that itwill terminate the entirety of its $4.4 billion of legacy wholesalefunding obligations by Sept. 30.Moody's has taken these rating actions:E*TRADE Financial Corporation Issuer rating, Ba2 on review for upgrade Senior unsecured rating, Ba2 on review for upgrade Senior unsecured shelf rating, (P)Ba2 on review for upgrade Subordinated shelf rating, (P)Ba3 on review for upgrade Preferred shelf rating, (P)B1 on review for upgrade Preferred shelf noncumulative rating, (P)B2 on review for UpgradeE*TRADE Bank Long-term bank deposit rating, Baa2 on review for upgrade Short-term bank deposit rating, Prime-2 affirmed Long-term issuer rating, Ba2 on review for upgrade Baseline credit assessment, ba1 on review for upgrade Adjusted baseline credit assessment, ba1 on review for upgrade Long-term counterparty risk assessment, Baa3(cr) on review for upgrade Short-term counterparty risk assessment, P-3(cr) on review for upgradeRATINGS RATIONALEMoody's said E*TRADE Bank's exit from expensive repurchaseagreements (repos) and Federal Home Loan Bank advances, and itsplans to replace these funding sources via the on-boarding oflow-cost deposits over the next several quarters, willsignificantly reduce its annual operating interest expense byroughly $150 million. This will improve E*TRADE Bank's futureprofitability and will benefit E*TRADE's debt service capacity. The transactions will improve E*TRADE Bank's funding profile byremoving reliance on short-term repo funding, said Moody's, sincethe ongoing availability of repo funding can be susceptible todownturns in demand and liquidity in the wholesale borrowingmarket.E*TRADE expects to report a pre-tax charge of approximately $410million in the current quarter in connection with terminating thedebt, the vast majority of which is non-cash. Moody's said this isa prudent use of E*TRADE's regulatory capital, given thelonger-term benefits of its actions, and continues a trend ofcredit positive developments at the company. Moody's added thatthese positive developments have resulted in many of E*TRADE'sfinancial credit metrics improving significantly.However, Moody's said it will also review a number of E*TRADE'scredit challenges, and the rating agency said these considerationsare key to its assessment of E*TRADE's overall credit strength.Moody's said these credit challenges include: how E*TRADE'sresponse to strategic challenges might affect its credit strength;how E*TRADE might respond to shareholder pressure to introducesignificant shareholder distributions and to grow and broaden itsfranchise into areas of increased risk; how E*TRADE Bank's size,loan portfolio risk and securities investment profile are likely tochange; and the degree of risk that may still exist from themagnitude of change that has taken place at E*TRADE.Moody's said its consideration of E*TRADE's positive developmentsand credit challenges could result in an upgrade of E*TRADE'ssenior unsecured and issuer ratings of up to two notches intoinvestment grade status.The principal methodology used in these ratings was GlobalSecurities Industry Methodology published in May 2013.ENCLAVE AT BOYNTON: Case Summary & Largest Unsecured Creditors--------------------------------------------------------------Debtor affiliates filing separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions: Debtor Case No. ------ -------- Enclave at Boynton Waters Properties, LLC 15-26141 6849 Cobia Circle Boynton Beach, FL 33437 Lake Placid Waterfront Properties, LLC 15-26143 Hillsboro Mile Properties, LLC 15-26148 Estates of Boynton Waters Properties, LLC 15-26152 Enclave at Hillsboro, LLC 15-26155 Remi Hillsboro, LLC 15-26156 Antipodean Properties, LLC 15-26162 Kerekes Land Trust Properties, LLC 15-26165Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 8, 2015Court: United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)Judge: Hon. Erik P. KimballDebtors' Counsel: Bradley S Shraiberg, Esq. SHRAIBERG, FERRARA, & LANDAU P.A. 2385 NW Executive Center Dr. #300 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Tel: (561) 443-0801 Fax: (561) 998-0047 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Total Total Assets Liabilities ---------- -----------Enclave at Boynton Waters Properties $5.5MM $39.24MMAntipodean Properties $2MM $39.06MMKerekes Land Trust Properties $7MM $39.20MMThe petitions were signed by John B. Kennelly, manager.A. List of Enclave at Boynton Waters' 19 Largest UnsecuredCreditors: Entity Nature of Claim Claim Amount ------ --------------- ------------13th Floor Investments, LLC Lawsuit $829,309c/o Etan Mark, Esq.Berger Singerman, LLP1450 Brickell Ave, Ste 1900Miami, FL 33131Andrew M. Schwartz, P.A. Attorneys Fees $16,740Aquageniz Maintenance $300Atlantic Caribbean Mapping, Inc. Boundary $1,850 SurveyAuto Owner's Insurance Insurance $433CBIZ MHM, LLC Accounting $1,350 ServicesFlorida Department of Revenue UnknownFlorida Power & Light Electricity $27,037Internal Revenue Service UnknownInternal Revenue Service UnknownOffice of Attorney General UnknownState of FloridaPalm Beach County Tax Collector Tax $38,419SEC Headquarters UnknownSecurities and Exchange Commission UnknownSpecialized Industries, Inc. Maintenance $124,000The Ardent Companies UnknownUnited States Attorney UnknownGeneral's OfficeUS Attorney Southern UnknownDistrict of FloridaWGI Engineering and Surveying Preparation of $2,900 Pre-Application Preparation of Traffic StmtB. List of Antipodean Properties' 15 Largest Unsecured Creditors: Entity Nature of Claim Claim Amount ------ --------------- ------------13th Floor Investments, LLC Lawsuit $829,309c/o Etan Mark, Esq.Berger Singerman, LLP1450 Brickell Ave, Ste 1900Miami, FL 33131Auto Owner's Insurance Insurance $433Broward County Tax Collector Tax $13,624Broward County Tax Collector Tax $10,331Florida Department of Revenue UnknownInternal Revenue Service UnknownInternal Revenue Service UnknownOffice of Attorney General UnknownState of FloridaSEC Headquarters UnknownSecurities and Exchange Commission UnknownSpecialized Industries, Inc. Maintenance $2,500Specialized Industries, Inc. Maintenance $2,500The Ardent Companies UnknownUnited States Attorney UnknownGeneral's OfficeUS Attorney Southern UnknownDistrict of FloridaC. List of Kerekes Land Trust Properties' 19 Largest UnsecuredCreditors: Entity Nature of Claim Claim Amount ------ --------------- ------------13th Floor Investments, LLC Lawsuit $829,309c/o Etan Mark, Esq.Berger Singerman, LLP1450 Brickell Ave, Ste 1900Miami, FL 33131Auto Owner's Insurance Insurance $433Florida Department of Revenue UnknownGentile Glas Holloway O'Mahoney $1,003Internal Revenue Service UnknownInternal Revenue Service UnknownOffice of Attorney General UnknownState of FloridaPalm Beach County Finance $285DepartmentPalm Beach County Tax Collector Tax $63,786 Palm Beach County Tax Collector Tax $26,424Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. $3,818SEC Headquarters UnknownSecurities and Exchange Commission UnknownSpecialized Industries, Inc. Maintenance $79,800The Ardent Companies UnknownThe Martin Architectural Group $600United States Attorney UnknownGeneral's OfficeUS Attorney Southern UnknownDistrict of FloridaWGI Engineering and Surveying Utilities $89ENERGY FUTURE: U.S. Trustee Attacks Plan Over Fee Payments----------------------------------------------------------Tom Hals, writing for Reuters, reported that the U.S. government'sbankruptcy watchdog blasted an agreement aimed at bringing EnergyFuture Holdings out of Chapter 11 because it requires Texas'sbiggest power company to pay millions of dollars in fees tolawyers.According to the report, Energy Future Holdings struck a "plansupport agreement" in August that binds key parties to worktogether to end the contentious bankruptcy, which began in April2014. The support agreement is aimed to preventing pitched legalbattles if the current bankruptcy exit proposal, based on the saleof the Oncor power distribution business, fails, the reportrelated. However, the plan support agreement also requires EnergyFuture's creditors "to vote in favor of a plan that provides formillions of dollars (and possibly billions)" for 45 professionalsworking for undisclosed parties, the report further related, citingthe U.S. Trustee. About Energy FutureEnergy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is aprivately held diversified energy holding company with a portfolioof competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas. Oncor,an 80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the largestregulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas.The Company delivers electricity to roughly three million deliverypoints in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created inOctober 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas powercompany TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies KohlbergKravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliatedcompanies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some keyfinancial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating whilereducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.Sontchi (CSS). The Debtors are seeking to have their casesjointly administered for procedural purposes.As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion inbook value and liabilities of $49.7 billion. The Debtors have $42billion of funded indebtedness.EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and itsrestructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lienlenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented byPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor,and Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuringagreement are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP,as legal advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor. The EFH equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement arerepresented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor. EpiqSystems is the claims agent.Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee forthe second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, isrepresentedby Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has been appointed inthe case. The Committee represents the interests of the unsecuredcreditors of ONLY of Energy Future Competitive Holdings CompanyLLC; EFCH's direct subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric HoldingsCompany LLC; and EFH Corporate Services Company, and of no otherdebtors. The Committee has selected Morrison & Foerster LLP andPolsinelli PC for representation in this high-profile energyrestructuring. The lawyers working on the case are James M. Peck,Esq., Brett H. Miller, Esq., and Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., atMorrison & Foerster LLP; and Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Justin K.Edelson, Esq., Shanti M. Katona, Esq., and Edward Fox, Esq., atPolsinelli PC.HAGGEN HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors--------------------------------------------------------------Debtor affiliates filing separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions: Debtor Case No. ------ -------- Haggen Holdings, LLC 15-11874 2211 Rimland Drive Bellingham, WA 98266 Haggen Operations Holdings, LLC 15-11875 Haggen Opco South, LLC 15-11876 Haggen Opco North, LLC 15-11877 Haggen Acquisition, LLC 15-11878 Haggen, Inc. 15-11879Type of Business: Operates food and pharmacy storesChapter 11 Petition Date: September 8, 2015Court: United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware (Delaware)Debtors' Matthew G. Garofalo, Esq. General Elizabeth Taveras, Esq.Bankruptcy STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLPCounsel: 180 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038-1982 Tel: (212) 506-5400 Fax: (212) 806-6006 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com email@example.com' Matthew Barry Lunn, Esq.Local Robert F. Poppiti, Jr., Esq. Counsel: Ashley E. Jacobs, Esq. Ian J. Bambrick, Esq. YOUNG, CONAWAY, STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP 1000 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19809 Tel: 302-571-6600 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com email@example.com' ALVAREZ & MARSAL NORTH AMERICA, LLCFinancialAdvisor:Debtors' KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS LLCNotice, Claims,Solicitationand BallotingAgent:Estimated Assets: $50 million to $100 millionEstimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 millionThe petitions were signed by Blake Barnett, chief financialofficer.Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors: Entity Nature of Claim Claim Amount ------ --------------- ------------Unified Grocers-Corporate Trade Payable $14,873,7465200 Sheila St.Commerce, CA 90040Tel: 323-264-5200Fax: 323-262-1950Topco Associates Inc. Trade Payable $5,724,438150 Northwest Point BlvdElk Grove Village, IL 60007Tel: 847-676-3030Fax: 847-676-4949Merlone Geier Contract $5,666,768425 California St. LiabilityTenth FloorSan Francisco, CA 94104Tel: 415-693-9000Fax: 415-693-0480Dale C. Henley Deferred $4,894,437 CompensationCharlies Produce Inc. Trade Payable $3,477,5364103 2nd Ave S.Seattle, WA 98134Tel: 206-625-1412Fax: 206-442-9023Moneygram Trade Payable $2,509,1452828 North Harwood St.15th FloorDallas, TX 75201Tel: 214-9999-7552Fax: 214-9999-7670Pepsi-Cola Trade Payable $1,710,473700 Anderson Hill RoadPurchase, NY 10577Tel: 914-253-2000Fax: 914-253-2070Coca Cola Trade Payable $1,625,8391 Coca Cola PlazaAtlanta, GA 30313-2499Tel: 404-676-2121Fax: 404-676-6792DPI Specialty Foods Trade Payable $1,409,110601 Rockfeller AveOntario, CA 91761Tel: 909-975-1019Fax: 909-975-7238Fintech Trade Payable $1,180,6733109 W. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.Blvd. Suite 200Tampa, FL 33607Tel: 800-572-0854Fax: 813-289-5599Supervalu Inc. Trade Payable $1,010,90911840 Valley View RoadEden Prairie, MN 55344Tel: 952-828-4000Fax: 952-828-8998Steve Julius Construction Inc. Trade Payable $984,918230 Calle PintorescoSan Clemente, CA 92673Tel: 949-369-7820Fax: 949-369-7821MGP X Properties LLC Trade Payable $919,812c/o Merlone GeierAttn: Lease Admin.425 California StreetEleventh FloorSan Francisco, CA 94104Frito Lay Incorporated Trade Payable $785,158 75 Remittance Dr Ste 1844Chicago, IL 60675-1844Tel: 972-334-7000Fax: 972-334-2019Starbucks Corporation Trade Payable $722,6492401 Utah Ave SSeattle, WA 38134-1436Tel: 206-597-1575Fax: 206-447-3432Design Fabrications Trade Payable $717,9101100 Mandoline AveMadison Heights, MI 48071Tel: 248-597-0988Fax: 248-597-0989Woodman Construction Inc. Trade Payable $710,22310910 117th Place NE Bldg 6Kirkland, WA 98033Tel: 425-454-3621Fax: 425-454-6918Santa Monica Seafood Trade Payable $687,837 18531 Broadwick StreetRancho Dominguez, CA 90220Tel: 310-886-7900Fax: 310-886-3333TNG GP. Trade Payable $665,3583995 70th Ave E Ste BFife, WA 98424-3616Tel: 253-952-7150Fax: 253-952-7151Bunzl Seattle Trade Payable $649,2344501 West Valley Hwy E Ste ASumner, WA 98390Tel: 253-321-3300Fax: 253-321-3302Palisades MediaGroup Trade Payable $555,6101620 26th St. Suite 200 SSanta Monica, CA 90404Tel: 310-564-5400Fax: 310-453-8370Bon Suisse Trade Payable $503,62311860 Community Road Suite 100Poway, CA 92064-8887Tel: 858-391-9222Fax: 858-391-9299Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Family Bakeries Trade Payable $493,983PO Box 742654Los Angeles, CA 90074-2654Tel: 503-232-2191Fax: 503-731-5680Mondelez Global LLC Trade Payable $472,318100 Deforest AveEast Hanover, NJ 07936Tel: 855-535-5648Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Western Builders Inc. Trade Payable $468,6902862 Executive PLEscondido, CA 92029-1524Tel: 760-796-6346Fax: 760-796-6360Bimbo Bakeries USA Trade Payable $453,711255 Business Center DriveHorsham, PA 19044Tel: 800-984-0989Fax: 610-320-9286Mission Foods Trade Payable $429,9111159 Cottonwood Lane, Suite 200Irving, TX 75038Tel: 972-232-5000Fax: 972-232-5167Ocean Beauty Seafoods LLC Trade Payable $416,0221100 West Ewing StreetSeattle, WA 98119Tel: 206-285-6800Fax: 206-285-9190Email: email@example.com Distributing Co. Trade Payable $414,00713017 La Dana CourtSanta Fe Springs, ID 90670Tel: 503-289-9600Fax: 503-240-8389Email: firstname.lastname@example.com's LLC and Litigation UndeterminedAlbertson's Holdings LLCHAGGEN HOLDINGS: Files for Chapter 11 Amid Albertson's Lawsuit--------------------------------------------------------------Haggen Holdings and five of its affiliates sought Chapter 11protection in Delaware on Sept. 8, 2015, with the intention ofreorganizing, or selling as a going concern, their stores for thebenefit of their creditors. The Debtors listed Unified Grocers as its largest unsecuredcreditor holding a claim of $14.8 million. Albertson's LLC is alsolisted to have an undetermined amount of litigation claim.Headquartered in Bellingham, Washington, Haggen was founded in 1933as a single grocery store. From 1933 to 2014, Haggen grew into a30 store family-run grocery chain, with stores located in thenorthwestern United States. From 2011 to 2014, Haggen reduced itsstore base to 18, including a stand-alone pharmacy location. Haggen rapidly expanded in 2014 and 2015, and, as of the PetitionDate, Haggen owned and operated 164 stores through three operatingcompanies: Haggen, Inc., Haggen Opco North, LLC and Haggen OpcoSouth, LLC.Haggen has recently filed a lawsuit against Albertson's LLC inDelaware federal court in connection with the actions Albertson'stook that ultimately led to Haggen's failure in its efforts tooperate Haggen stores in the Albertson's locations.In December 2014, Haggen executed an asset purchase agreement withAlbertson's after the Federal Trade Commission ordered Albertson'sto sell 146 of its locations in Washington, Oregon, California,Arizona, and Nevada. The Albertson's Locations were thentransitioned to Haggen in a staggered schedule from Feb. 14, 2015,to June 23, 2015.During the transition process, the Haggen team faced the task ofclosing the Albertson's Locations and rebranding them as Haggenstores, essentially opening a brand new chain of 146 grocery storesin just over 120 days, while limiting each store closure to only1–2 days.Blake Barnett, chief financial officer of Haggen Holdings, says ina declaration filed with the Court that Albertson's engaged innumerous breaches of the APA that made the transitioning andrebranding unsuccessful, leading to major drop-offs in customerlevels at the new stores. This, according to Mr. Barnett, led to asevere liquidity crisis for the Debtors.Following the acquisition of the Albertson's Locations, theDebtors' liquidity dropped precipitously. During the period fromJune 19, 2015, until the Petition Date, the Debtors' availabilityunder their prepetition credit facility dropped from $35,988,128 to$2,334,274. In the weeks leading up to the Petition Date, theDebtors' operations continued to generate increasingly negativecashflow. As a result of, among other things, these liquidityissues, Haggen determined to close several of its recently acquiredstores. In particular, Haggen entered into an agreement with HilcoMerchant Resources, LLC in late August 2015 to conductgoing-out-of-business sales for 27 of its stores.Additionally, Haggen has engaged Sagent Advisors to market for salesome of the Haggen North and Haggen South locations and to exploremarket interest in various store locations. As a result of theseefforts, a number of third parties have expressed interest inacquiring a number of the Haggen North and Haggen South locations.Concurrently with the filing of the petitions, the Debtors areseeking: -- joint administration of their cases; -- to continue using their cash management systems; -- to pay certain prepetition employee compensation; and -- to obtain post-petition financing and utilize cash collateral.A full-text copy of the declaration filed together with thepetitions is available for free at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/15_HAGGEN_Declaration.pdf About HaggenHaggen Holdings, LLC, and its affiliates filed Chapter 11bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del., Case Nos. 15-11874 to15-11879) on Sept. 8, 2015. The petitions were signed by BlakeBarnett as chief financial officer.Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, is serving as the Debtors'local counsel. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP serves as theDebtors' general counsel. Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC,acts as the Debtors' financial advisor. Kurtzman CarsonConsultants LLC serve as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.The Debtors have estimated assets of $50 million to $100 millionand estimated liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.HAGGEN HOLDINGS: UFCW Comments on Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing--------------------------------------------------------------The United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) International Union,the largest private sector union in the nation, released thefollowing statement on Sept. 9 regarding Haggen's Chapter 11bankruptcy filing."For years, hard-working men and women in grocery stores atHaggen's have shown their commitment to their job, theirco-workers, the community, and this union family."As difficult as this bankruptcy process is, our message to Haggenis simple -- we expect Haggen to do what is right by theirhard-working employees and their families. Haggen's must neverforget that these incredible men and women who do the work are theheart and soul of their stores."They are not numbers, but real people whose work and dedicationshould be honored. Looking ahead, our union family will doeverything in our power to protect the livelihoods of every memberwho is and has been dedicated to meeting the needs of everyHaggen's customer."Headquartered in Bellingham, Washington, Haggen, Inc. --http://www.haggen.com-- operates nearly 20 combination supermarkets throughout Washington and Oregon. Most upscale HaggenFood & Pharmacy stores feature specialty departments, while the TOPFood & Drug outlets emphasize savings; however, both may offer suchamenities as Starbucks coffee shops, Blockbuster video outlets, orchild-care centers. Founded in 1933 in Bellingham, Washington,Haggen has grown to be one of the nation's 75th largest grocerychains. In 2011 private equity firm Comvest acquired a majoritystake in the chain.HYPNOTIC TAXI: Cases Jointly Administered for Procedural Purposes-----------------------------------------------------------------The Hon. Carla E. Craig of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for theEastern District of New York directed the joint administration ofthe Chapter 11 cases of Hypnotic Taxi LLC, and its debtoraffiliates under Lead Case No. 15-43300, for procedural purposesonly.Hypnotic Taxi LLC and 21 of its affiliates filed Chapter 11bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 15-43300) onJuly 22, 2015. The petition was signed by Evgeny Freidman as soleand managing member.Klestadt Winters Jureller Southard & Stevens LLP serves as theDebtors' counsel. Judge Carla E. Craig presides over the case.The Debtors each own either two or three medallions issued by theNew York City Taxi and Limousine Commission that permit taxiservices to be performed by the Debtors.Hypnotic Taxi LLC disclosed total assets of $1,941,314 and totalliabilities of $2,825,401 as of the Petition Date.The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed three creditors to serve onthe official committee of unsecured creditors.HYPNOTIC TAXI: Needs To Borrow $350K in Subordinated DIP Loan-------------------------------------------------------------Hypnotic Taxi LLC, et al., seek authority from the United StatesBankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to obtainsubordinated postpetition financing in the aggregate principalamount of up to $350,000 from Philadelphia Taxi Management LLC.The Debtors explain that the $350,000 capital is needed to fund thecosts of their restructuring efforts, including professional fees,compensation to the Chief Restructuring Officer, United StatesTrustee fees, and other normal costs and expenses.The lender, an affiliate of the Debtors with common ownership, iswilling to provide the unsecured postpetition financing to theDebtors, interest free and without fees, and subordinated to eachand every other creditor of the Debtors. The Lender will makerevolving loans to the Debtors in the aggregate principal amountnot to exceed $350,000, with each revolving loan evidence by apromissory note issued by the Debtors and payable to the Lender. The Revolving Loans will be and are subordinated to the AllowedClaims of any and all other creditors or parties in interestasserting Claims against the Debtors and may not be repaid unlessand until all the other Allowed Claims have been fully paid andsatisfied.The Debtors are represented by: Fred Stevens, Esq. Sean C. Southard, Esq. Maeghan J. McLoughlin, Esq. KLESTADT WINTERS JURELLER SOUTHARD & STEVENS, LLP 570 Seventh Ave., 17th Floor New York, New York 10018 Tel: (212) 972-3000 Fax: (212) 972-2245 Email: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com About Hypnotic TaxiHypnotic Taxi LLC and 21 of its affiliates filed Chapter 11bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 15-43300) onJuly 22, 2015. The petition was signed by Evgeny Freidman as soleand managing member.Klestadt Winters Jureller Southard & Stevens LLP serves as theDebtors' counsel. Judge Carla E. Craig presides over the case.The Debtors each own either two or three medallions issued by theNew York City Taxi and Limousine Commission that permit taxiservices to be performed by the Debtors.INNOVATION VENTURES: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR, Outlook Stable-----------------------------------------------------------Moody's Investors Service affirmed the Corporate Family Rating ofInnovation Ventures', but changed the outlook to stable fromnegative. Moody's also affirmed the company's B3 senior securedrating and SGL-2 speculative grade liquidity rating. The outlookrevision to stable reflects Moody's view that revenues havestabilized and will remain around current levels over theforeseeable future.These ratings were affirmed: -- Corporate Family Rating at B3 -- Probability of Default rating at B3-PD -- Senior secured notes due August 2019 at B3 (LGD 4) -- Speculative grade liquidity rating at SGL-2The outlook on all ratings is stable.RATINGS RATIONALEInnovation's B3 Corporate Family Rating reflects its reliance onessentially one product in a niche category, making it susceptibleto changes in consumer preference and tastes. The rating alsoreflects weak corporate governance and a history of large payoutsto its owners. These significant negative characteristics arepartially mitigated by very high profit margins and good cash flow,driven in part by the company's dominant U.S. market position inthe niche energy shot category. Moody's expects the company togenerate ample cash flow over the next 12 to 18 months anddistribute most of this cash to its owners.The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the companywill maintain very high product concentration, and an aggressivefinancial policy in the years ahead.The rating could be downgraded if there is a sustained decline insales or operating profit, leverage increases, liquidity weakens,or Moody's becomes concerned that the company will have difficultyrefinancing its debt as maturity approaches.Innovation's rating could be upgraded if it increases its productdiversity, adopts a more conservative financial policy, andsustains debt to EBITDA below 2 times.The principal methodology used in these ratings was the Global SoftBeverage Industry published in May 2013.Headquartered in Farmington Hills, MI, Innovation Ventures, LLCmanufactures liquid energy shots under the 5-hour ENERGY® brand.This product is sold in 1.93 ounce bottles and is designed toprovide a feeling of alertness for hours. It licenses theintellectual property related to 5-hour ENERGY including theformula and trademarks from International IP Holdings, LLC, anentity under common control with Innovation. Innovation is 80%directly or indirectly owned by CEO Manoj Bhargava. Net sales forthe twelve months ending June 30, 2015, approximated $500 million.INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE: Wants Plan Filing Period Extended to Dec. 3-----------------------------------------------------------------International Bridge Corporation asks the United States BankruptcyCourt for District of Kansas to extend its exclusive period to fileits disclosure statement and plan of reorganization until December3, 2015, and its exclusive period to solicit acceptance of its planto February 3, 2016.Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor was involved in a UnitedStates Department of Navy Contract Disputes Act AdministrativeProceeding, Contract Number N62742-08-C-1301 FY08 MCON P-502,stemming from disputes regarding work performed on the Kilo WharfExtension for the Department of the Navy at the Commander NavalRegional Marianas, Main Base, Guam. The Navy AdministrativeProceeding is being litigated under the Federal Claims Act, and adecision is central to the instant bankruptcy case. However, adecision will not be made in time for Debtor to file its Chapter 11bankruptcy Plan.International Bridge Corporation is represented by: Wesley F. Smith, Esq. STEVENS & BRAND, LLP 900 Massachusetts, Suite 500 P.O. Box 189 Lawrence, KS 66044 Tel: (785) 843-0811 Fax: (785) 843-0341 Email: email@example.com About Int'l Bridge Corp.International Bridge Corporation, a contractor for governmentprojects in the South Pacific and Guam, sought Chapter 11protection (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 15-20951) in Kansas City on May7, 2015. Robert Toelkes, the sole shareholder and manager, signedthe petition. The Debtor disclosed total assets of $17.4 millionand total debts of $27.4 million.The case is assigned to Judge Robert D. Berger. The Debtor tappedStevens & Brand, LLP, as its counsel. Foulston Siefkin, LLP,serves as the Debtor's special litigation counsel. Robert G. Nath,PLLC, represents the Debtor as special tax counsel.LADDER CAPITAL: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Issuer Default Rating--------------------------------------------------------Fitch Ratings has affirmed the long-term Issuer Default Ratings(IDRs) and senior unsecured note ratings of Ladder Capital FinanceHoldings LLLP and Ladder Capital Finance Corporation at 'BB'. TheRating Outlook is Stable. KEY RATING DRIVERS The affirmations incorporate Ladder's growing commercial realestate (CRE) investment platform that enables flexibility to investacross products, a conservative underwriting culture, and access tomultiple sources of capital. Ladder varies its leverage dependingon the risk profiles of and allocation levels to the various CREasset classes in which it invests. As a result of an increasedallocation to 'AAA' and other investment grade rated CMBSsecurities over the last two years, the overall corporate debt toequity ratio increased to 2.7x as of June 30, 2015, at the higherend of the company's articulated target of 2.0x-3.0x and up fromthe 1.5x-2.0x range from 2011-2013. Ladder's credit strengths include growing core earnings throughperiods of market volatility, recently reduced reliance on gain onsale income -- though this has yet to be sustained over an extendedperiod -- and adequate liquidity. Rating constraints include thecompany's less diversified business model focused on the commercialreal estate sector, high proportion of secured funding, weakunencumbered asset coverage of unsecured debt following the August2014 bond offering, reduced capital retention stemming from theparent Ladder Capital Corp's (LADR) REIT tax election effectiveJan. 1, 2015, the absence of a track record as a standalone entitythrough a full credit cycle and key man risk.Symbiotic Business LinesFitch has a favorable view of Ladder's track record of originatingconduit and balance sheet mortgage loans, purchasing investmentgrade CMBS, U.S. Agency and other securities, and acquiring netlease and other equity real estate as market conditions warrant.Net lease equity real estate and highly rated securities balanceLadder's gain on sale for conduit loans and higher risk balancesheet loans given that they are on properties undergoingtransition. The balance sheet continues to grow, with total assetsincreasing to $5.7 billion as of June 30, 2015 from $3.4 billion asof Dec. 31, 2013. As noted in Fitch's commentary 'Commercial mREITs Eye Growth asBanks Keep CRE in Check,' dated July 6, 2015, commercial mortgageREITs (mREITs) like LADR are becoming more prominent in thecommercial real estate lending market. There is a possibility thatcommercial mREITs will fill a void left by large U.S. banks, whichhave pulled back from the more volatile segments of CRE lending,such as construction, acquisition and land development whilegrowing overall CRE lending volumes post-crisis. Ladder hassignificant floating-rate loan holdings (60% of total loans as ofJune 30, 2015), including higher risk CRE loans on transitionalproperties, thereby potentially benefitting from a rising interestrate environment.Conservative Underwriting Culture Ladder was founded during the financial crisis in October 2008 andhas operated during multiple periods of market volatility withoutincurring credit losses since inception. Ladder's averageloan-to-value is lower and debt service coverage and debt yieldlevels are higher than commercial real estate finance peers,including other commercial mREITs, banks, and other real estateinvestment and asset management firms, a credit positive. Ladder'saverage loan balance was $19 million as of June 30, 2015, limitingindividual loss exposures, and the weighted average loan-to-valueon balance sheet first mortgage loans was approximately 64% as ofJune 30, 2015, down from approximately 70% year-over-year. Access to Multiple Sources of Capital; FHLB Remains a Low-CostAlternativeLadder remains reliant on wholesale funding sources, although thereis growing diversity amongst Ladder's sources of capital. As ofJune 30, 2015, the company had five repurchase facilities, twosecured credit facilities and a corporate credit facility fromnumerous lending institutions, mortgage loan borrowings, borrowingsfrom the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), and access to unsecurednotes and public equity. In June 2015, Ladder's captive insurer subsidiary, Tuebor CaptiveInsurance Company LLC (Tuebor), increased its FHLB advance limit tothe lesser of $2.9 billion, 40% of Ladder's total assets or 150% ofLadder's total equity ($325 million increase). This came almost ayear after the FHLBs' regulator, the Federal Housing FinanceAgency, proposed rules to revise the requirements for financialinstitutions to apply for and retain membership in one of the 12FHLBs. Among the proposed rules was that existing captive insurerswould sunset over five years. Ladder has continued to takeadvantage of the low-cost funding afforded to FHLB borrowers.Interest rates on Tuebor's FHLB borrowings ranged from 0.25% to2.74% as of June 30, 2015, which is among the lowest borrowingrates for any of Ladder's borrowings. Therefore, Fitch expectsLadder to continue accessing this capital source when financingcertain first mortgage loans, mezzanine loans and investment gradeCRE securities. Fitch believes that Ladder's potential loss of access to FHLBfunding would be manageable, considering Ladder finances highquality conduit loans and CMBS securities with the FHLB. Theseinvestments can be replaced with other sources of funding includingterm debt and repurchase facilities. However, this shift in fundingwould increase Ladder's cost of borrowing impacting itsprofitability metrics, and if replaced with shorter-term repurchasefacilities, further reduce Ladder's liquidity profile and financialflexibility. Fitch will monitor the regulatory developments andcontinues to view access to more unsecured and longer-term fundingsources positively. Increase in LeverageLadder levers its assets based on their liquidity and volatilitycharacteristics, with highly rated securities levered the highest,followed by net lease and other real estate equity, conduit loans,and balance sheet loans. The company matches its assets andliabilities well from a funding duration standpoint. Low leveragehas been a key credit strength for Ladder but increased to 2.7x asof June 30, 2015, at the upper end of the company's articulatedtarget of 2.0x-3.0x, from 1.9x as of Dec. 31, 2014 and 1.4x as ofDec. 31, 2013. Should the company fully utilize its recentlyauthorized up to $50 million share repurchase program, leveragewould increase slightly to 2.8x, which would still be appropriatefor the 'BB' rating.Growing Core Earnings and Lower Reliance on Gain-on-Sale IncomeCore earnings totalled $100.1 million during the first half of2015, down year-over-year due in part to adjustments related to thetiming of the recognition of hedge results and the realization ofgains/losses related to the sale of hedged assets. The overallearnings trajectory has remained strong at $219.3 million in 2014,up from $200.3 million in 2013 and $177.5 million in 2012. Thiscomes despite several periods of volatility in the commercial realestate debt markets during the past several years. Core earnings toaverage equity was 13.3% in 1H2015, down slightly from 16.3% in2014 and 17.5% in 2013; the decline was partially driven by areduction in loan sale proceeds, including securitization profits.Notably, the quality of Ladder's earnings has improved from acredit standpoint as gain on sale income (loan sales and gain onsecurities), net of hedges related to securitized loans,represented 30.9% of net revenues in 1H2015, down from 51.0% in2014 and 53.3% in 2013. Greater revenue diversity with reducedreliance on gain on sale income over a longer term period would beviewed favorably by Fitch.Predominantly Secured BorrowerLadder's secured debt represented 83.2% of total debt and 59.5% oftotal assets as of June 30, 2015, which limits financialflexibility. In addition, unencumbered asset coverage of unsecurednotes has weakened over the past year due to the company's August2014 bond offering. Unencumbered assets and unrestricted cashtotaled $835.2 million as of June 30, 2015, which covered unsecureddebt by 1.2x. This ratio is down from 2.2x as of June 30, 2014. Nevertheless, Ladder's liquidity position remains adequate withsources (unrestricted cash, projected retained cash flows fromoperating activities) covering uses (debt maturities assuming a 90%refinance rate on secured debt, operating lease expense, securitiescommitments remaining to be funded and unfunded commitments onmortgage loan receivables) by 1.0x through Dec. 31, 2016. As ofJune 30, 2015, Ladder had $957.6 million of excess committedcapacity under its committed secured repurchase funding facilitiesand other repurchase facilities, $38 million under its securedcredit agreement, and $507.8 million of undrawn committed termfinancing from FHLB, for a combined $1.5 billion available to fundfuture growth in its business. Key Man RiskKey man risk is not unusual for mortgage REITs or similar financecompanies. In Fitch's view, key man risk continues to reside withthe Chief Executive Officer of Ladder. However, the company has adeep bench, and the six executive officers of the company average26 years of commercial real estate finance experience. In August2015, Ladder's Chief Investment Officer resigned to assume theChief Executive Officer role at a competing commercial real estateinvestment platform. Fitch views Ladder as having sufficientremaining management depth to absorb this departure. As of June 30, 2015, Ladder's management team and directors heldinterests in the company comprising 12.3% of the company's totalequity, aligning interests of management and shareholders. REIT Tax Election Credit Neutral; Higher Dividend Payout RatioLADR's REIT tax election effective Jan. 1, 2015 had no impact onLadder's 'BB' long-term IDR or Stable Outlook. This was because ofLadder's intention to maintain a consistent operating strategy andpay a portion of the dividend in common stock rather than anall-cash dividend, which offset the limited capital retentionflexibility that comes with REIT election. The REIT conversionnegatively impacts Ladder's ability to retain capital for growthand/or opportunistic activity, driven primarily by the requirementthat REITs distribute at least 90% of taxable income toshareholders. As a result of the REIT tax election, Ladder is expected to retainapproximately 45% of its core earnings going forward, compared toapproximately 60% prior to the REIT conversion. All else beingequal, the REIT conversion increased after-tax core earningsbecause of a lower effective tax rate as a REIT, but this wassomewhat offset by an increase in the company's cash dividend to$1.10 per share from $0 per share previously.RATING SENSITIVITIESIDRS AND SENIOR DEBTThe Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that the companywill continue to prudently grow its business, maintain conservativeunderwriting standards, and continue to moderate reliance on gainon sale income. This is offset by Ladder's increase in leverage andgrowing access to FHLB financing, which is economical butnevertheless constrains further growth in the unencumbered pool andthe ratio of unencumbered asset coverage of unsecured debt.The following factors may have a positive impact on Ladder'sratings and/or Outlook: -- Greater revenue diversity with a sustained reduction inreliance on gain on sale income; -- Sustained profitability and asset quality performance throughmultiple market environments, while maintaining conservativeleverage at the lower end of the 2.0x-3.0x target and strongliquidity levels; -- Increased economic access to long-term unsecured debt funding.The following factors may have a negative impact on Ladder'sratings and/or Outlook: -- Regulatory risks that immediately impede access to FHLBborrowings without an offsetting increase in long-term economicsources of funding; -- Material increase in exposure to more aggressively underwrittenbalance sheet loans or real estate equity investments withoutadequate reserves and commensurate decrease in leverage; -- An increase in leverage beyond the company's articulatedtarget; -- Sustained reduction in liquidity levels and/or unencumberedassets relative to outstanding unsecured debt; -- Sustained operating losses or material weakening of assetquality.Fitch has affirmed the following ratings of Ladder Capital FinanceHoldings LLLP and Ladder Capital Finance Corporation: -- IDRs at 'BB'; -- Senior unsecured notes at 'BB'.The Rating Outlook is Stable. LEHMAN BROTHERS: Trustee Begins Third Payout to Brokerage Creditors-------------------------------------------------------------------James W. Giddens, Trustee for the liquidation of Lehman BrothersInc. under the Securities Investor Protection Act and chair of theHughes Hubbard & Reed LLP Corporate Reorganization and BankruptcyGroup, initiated the third interim distribution to unsecuredgeneral creditors with allowed claims on Sept. 9 by wiring andsending checks totaling $1.75 billion to claimants. Distributionsfrom the LBI estate will now total $114 billion, the largestdistributions across the worldwide Lehman insolvency proceedings. "The third multi-billion dollar distribution to general creditorsis underway as winding down the estate moves ahead," Mr. Giddenssaid. "We will continue to resolve remaining claims to maximizepotential future distributions and successfully conclude thelargest broker-dealer liquidation in history."In August 2015, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Trustee's motionfor a third interim distribution with an allocation of $1.9billion. More than 90 percent of the allocated funds for the thirdinterim distribution are being distributed this week, anddistributions will continue as necessary tax forms are received. The cumulative payout on allowed claims of unsecured generalcreditors now totals 35 percent.The Trustee has distributed approximately $7.65 billion to LBI'screditors since July 2014. Customers have received more than $106billion, fully satisfying the 111,000 customer claims. Secured,priority, and administrative creditors have also received 100percent distributions. The Trustee is represented by Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP.Joseph Checkler, writing for Dow Jones' Daily Bankruptcy Review,reported that the payments, approved by Lehman's bankruptcy judgein July, will bring a recovery of about 35 cents on the dollar. Combined with distributions made to customers, the total amountrecovered in the brokerage's liquidation will be around $114billion, the report noted. About Lehman BrothersLehman Brothers Holdings Inc. was the fourth largest investmentbank in the United States. For more than 150 years, LehmanBrothers has been a leader in the global financial markets byserving the financial needs of corporations, governmental units,institutional clients and individuals worldwide.Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Sept. 15, 2008(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 08-13555). Lehman's bankruptcy petitiondisclosed US$639 billion in assets and US$613 billion in debts,effectively making the firm's bankruptcy filing the largest inU.S. history. Several other affiliates followed thereafter.Affiliates Merit LLC, LB Somerset LLC and LB Preferred SomersetLLC sought for bankruptcy protection in December 2009.The Debtors' bankruptcy cases are handled by Judge James M. Peck. Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Richard P. Krasnow, Esq., Lori R. Fife,Esq., Shai Y. Waisman, Esq., and Jacqueline Marcus, Esq., at Weil,Gotshal & Manges, LLP, in New York, represent Lehman. EpiqBankruptcy Solutions serves as claims and noticing agent.Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan Fleck, Esq., and Dennis O'Donnell,Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, in New York, serveas counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital, Inc., is the Committee'sinvestment banker.On Sept. 19, 2008, the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch of the U.S.District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered anorder commencing liquidation of Lehman Brothers, Inc., pursuant tothe provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act (Case No.08-CIV-8119 (GEL)). James W. Giddens has been appointed astrustee for the SIPA liquidation of the business of LBI.The Bankruptcy Court approved Barclays Bank Plc's purchase ofLehman Brothers' North American investment banking and capitalmarkets operations and supporting infrastructure for US$1.75billion. Nomura Holdings Inc., the largest brokerage house inJapan, purchased LBHI's operations in Europe for US$2 plus theretention of most of employees. Nomura also bought Lehman'soperations in the Asia Pacific for US$225 million.Lehman emerged from bankruptcy protection on March 6, 2012, morethan three years after it filed the largest bankruptcy in U.S.history. The Chapter 11 plan for the Lehman companies other thanthe broker was confirmed in December 2011.As of Oct. 2, 2014, Lehman's total distributions to unsecuredcreditors have amounted to $92.0 billion. As of Sept. 30, 2014,the brokerage trustee has substantially completed customer claims distributions, distributing more than $106 billion to 111,000customers.LUCA INTERNATIONAL: Hires Hoover Slovacek as Attorneys------------------------------------------------------Luca International Group LLC and its debtor-affiliates seekauthorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the SouthernDistrict of Texas to employ Edward L. Rothberg and Hoover SlovacekLLP as attorneys, effective as of the Aug. 6, 2015 petition date.The Debtors require Hoover Slovacek to: (a) assist, advise and represent the Debtors relative to the administration of these Chapter 11 cases; (b) assist, advise and represent the Debtors in analyzing the Debtors' assets and liabilities, investigating the extent and validity of liens and participating in and reviewing any proposed asset sales or dispositions; (c) attend meetings and negotiate with the representatives of the secured creditors; (d) assist the Debtors in the preparation, analysis and negotiation of any plan of reorganization and disclosure statement accompanying any plan of reorganization; (e) take all necessary action to protect and preserve the interests of the Debtors; (f) appear, as appropriate, before this Court, the Appellate Courts, and other Courts in which matters may be heard and to protect the interests of Debtors before said Courts and the United States Trustee; and (g) perform all other necessary legal services in these cases.Hoover Slovacek will be paid at these hourly rates: Edward L. Rothberg $425 Annie Catmull $335 Melissa Haselden $310 Deirdre C. Brown $300 T. Josh Judd $285 Brendetta A. Scott $250 Legal Assistants/Paralegals $110-$150Hoover Slovacek will also be reimbursed for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred.Hoover Slovacek was paid $20,000 for pre-petition bankruptcyrepresentation and counsel. Prior to the filing, Hoover Slovacekreceived filing fees of $20,604.00 to be paid on behalf of theDebtors.Edward L. Rothberg, partner of Hoover Slovacek, assured the Courtthat the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined inSection 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent anyinterest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.Hoover Slovacek can be reached at: Edward L. Rothberg, Esq. HOOVER SLOVACEK LLP 5051 Westheimer Suite 1200 Houston, TX 77056 Tel: (713) 977-8686 Fax: (713) 977-5395 E-mail: email@example.com About Luca InternationalLuca International Group LLC and Luca Operation, LLC, and theiraffiliates are engaged in the exploration and production of naturalgas, petroleum and related hydrocarbons. The primary assets arelocated in Iberville and Ascension Parishes in Louisiana. Theseassets include 3 operating oil and gas wells -- Belle Grove 1,Dugas & Leblanc 1 and Jumonville 2. In addition, the assetsinclude a water disposal well, Acosta 1, and a shut-in-oil and gaswell, Jumonville 1. The Luca entities also own oil and gas leasesin Texas and working interests in various locations. The Lucaentities are owned by Bingqing Yang.Luca International Group and 11 related entities sought Chapter 11protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 15-34221) in Houston,Texas, on Aug. 6, 2015. The cases are assigned to Judge David R.Jones.The Debtors tapped Hoover Slovacek, LLP, as counsel, and BMC Group,Inc., as claims agent.Luca International estimated $50 million to $100 million in assetsand debt.The petitions were signed by Loretta R. Cross, the CRO.MAGNETATION LLC: Court Approves Trenti Law as Minnesota Counsel---------------------------------------------------------------Magnetation LLC and its debtor-affiliates sought and obtainedpermission from the Hon. Gregory F. Kishel of the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Minnesota to employ Trenti Law Firm asMinnesota local real estate counsel, nunc pro tunc to July 13,2015.The Debtors anticipate that Trenti Law will render certain legalservices during these chapter 11 cases in connection with realestate research, negotiations and document preparation, as well asother matters that may involve Minnesota real estate law asrequested by the Debtors.Trenti Law will be paid at these hourly rates: Attorney $240 Legal Assistant $120Trenti Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocketexpenses incurred.Scott C. Neff, attorney at Trenti Law, assured the Court that thefirm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interestadverse to the Debtors and their estates.Trenti Law can be reached at: Scott C. Neff, Esq. TRENTI LAW FIRM 225 First Street North, Suite 1000 P.O. Box 958 Virginia, MN 55792 Tel: (218) 749-1962 Fax: (218) 749-4308 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com About Magnetation LLCMagnetation LLC -- http://www.magnetation.com/-- is a joint venture between Magnetation, Inc. (50.1% owner) and AK IronResources, LLC, an affiliate of AK Steel Corporation (49.9%owner).Magnetation LLC recovers high-quality iron ore concentrate frompreviously abandoned iron ore waste stockpiles and tailingsbasins. Magnetation LLC owns iron ore concentrate plants located in Keewatin, MN, Bovey, MN and Grand Rapids, MN, and an iron orepellet plant in Reynolds, IN. Magnetation LLC and four subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 bankruptcyprotection (Bankr. D. Minn. Lead Case No. 15-50307) in Duluth,Minnesota, on May 5, 2015, after reaching a deal with securednoteholders on a balance sheet restructuring. The cases areassigned to Chief Judge Gregory F Kishel.The Debtors have tapped Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Lapp, Libra,Thomson, Stoebner & Pusch, Chtd., as attorneys; BlackstoneAdvisory Partners LP as financial advisor; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as the claims agent.The Debtor disclosed $239,210,542 in assets and $575,938,301 inliabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.The U.S. Trustee for Region 12 appointed three creditors ofMagnetation LLC to serve on an official committee of unsecuredcreditors. The Committee tapped Cooley, LLP as its lead counsel,Foley & Mansfield PLLP as its local counsel, and Province Inc., asits financial advisor.MAGNETATION LLC: Court Okays Bingham Greenebaum as Indiana Counsel------------------------------------------------------------------Magnetation LLC and its debtor-affiliates sought and obtainedpermission from the Hon. Gregory F. Kishel of the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Minnesota to employ Bingham GreenebaumDoll LLP as Indiana local counsel, nunc pro tunc to June 10, 2015.The Debtors anticipate that Bingham Greenebaum will render certainlegal services during these chapter 11 cases in connection with thedefense of an annexation proceeding, a personal injury claim underIndiana law, as well as other matters that may involve Indiana law,as requested by the Debtors.Bingham Greenebaum will be paid at these hourly rates: Partner $450 Associate Attorney $275Bingham Greenebaum will also be reimbursed for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred.Matthew M. Price, partner of Bingham Greenebaum, assured the Courtthat the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined inSection 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent anyinterest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.Bingham Greenebaum can be reached at: Matthew M. Price, Esq. BINGHAM GREENEBAUM DOLL LLP 2700 Market Tower 10 West Market Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 Tel: (317) 635-8900 About Magnetation LLCMagnetation LLC -- http://www.magnetation.com/-- is a joint venture between Magnetation, Inc. (50.1% owner) and AK IronResources, LLC, an affiliate of AK Steel Corporation (49.9%owner).Magnetation LLC recovers high-quality iron ore concentrate frompreviously abandoned iron ore waste stockpiles and tailingsbasins. Magnetation LLC owns iron ore concentrate plants located in Keewatin, MN, Bovey, MN and Grand Rapids, MN, and an iron ore pellet plant in Reynolds, IN. Magnetation LLC and four subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 bankruptcyprotection (Bankr. D. Minn. Lead Case No. 15-50307) in Duluth,Minnesota, on May 5, 2015, after reaching a deal with securednoteholders on a balance sheet restructuring. The cases areassigned to Chief Judge Gregory F Kishel.The Debtors have tapped Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Lapp, Libra,Thomson, Stoebner & Pusch, Chtd., as attorneys; BlackstoneAdvisory Partners LP as financial advisor; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as the claims agent.The Debtor disclosed $239,210,542 in assets and $575,938,301 inliabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.The U.S. Trustee for Region 12 appointed three creditors ofMagnetation LLC to serve on an official committee of unsecuredcreditors. The Committee tapped Cooley, LLP as its lead counsel,Foley & Mansfield PLLP as its local counsel, and Province Inc., asits financial advisor.MEDIA GENERAL: S&P Puts 'BB-' Corp. Credit Rating on Watch Negative-------------------------------------------------------------------Standard & Poor's Ratings Services placed its ratings, includingthe 'BB-' corporate credit rating, on Richmond, Va.-basedtelevision broadcaster Media General Inc. on CreditWatch withnegative implications. The CreditWatch placement follows the company's announcement thatit has entered into a definitive agreement to merge with DesMoines, Iowa-based Meredith Corp. (not rated) in a transactionvalued at $2.4 billion. The combined company will own and operate or service 88 stations in54 television markets, reaching approximately 30% of U.S.households. It will also have several leading women-focusedmagazine and digital brands. S&P views Media General's business risk profile as "satisfactory"and believe the transaction will not affect that assessment, thoughthe acquisition will increase the size and scale of the company'sTV broadcasting assets. This should provide some benefit in MediaGeneral's retransmission consent negotiations with cable,satellite, and telecom video service providers, as well as for itsprogramming purchases and station management efficiency.The transaction will be financed with a combination of MediaGeneral stock and approximately $1.5 billion in cash. S&P expectsthe company to fund the cash component with cash on the balancesheet and the issuance of incremental debt. As a result, S&Pexpects the combined company's adjusted leverage to be above its 5xleverage threshold for an "aggressive" financial risk profileassessment when the transaction closes.In resolving S&P's CreditWatch placement, it will fully evaluateMedia General's ability to integrate all of its acquired stationsfrom the LIN Media LLC and Meredith Corp. acquisitions. Inaddition, S&P will assess the combined company's financial riskprofile and evaluate its financial policy and ability to reducedebt to average trailing-eight-quarter EBITDA below 5x on asustained basis within one year of the transaction closing.MF GLOBAL: November 20 PwC Settlement Fairness Hearing Set----------------------------------------------------------UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIN RE MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION,Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-07866-VMTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:All Securities Actions, (DeAngelis v. Corzine), ECF CASESUMMARY NOTICE OF (I) CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASSES; (II)PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS WITH PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AND THEINDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS; (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS'FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES; AND (IV) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESSHEARINGTO: All persons and entities who or which, during the periodbeginning on May 20, 2010 through and including November 21, 2011,purchased or otherwise acquired any MF Global Securities(1) andwere damaged thereby (the PwC and the Individual DefendantSettlement Classes).PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BYA CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT.YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rulesof Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Courtfor the Southern District of New York, that the above-captionedlitigation (the "Action") has been certified as a class action forthe purposes of settlement only on behalf of the PwC SettlementClass and the Individual Defendant Settlement Class, except forcertain persons and entities who are excluded from those SettlementClasses by definition as set forth in the full printed Notice of(I) Certification of Settlement Classes; (II) Proposed Settlementswith PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the Individual Defendants;(III)Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement ofExpenses; and (IV) Settlement Fairness Hearing (the "Notice").YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that Lead Plaintiffs in the Action havereached proposed partial settlements of the Action (i) withdefendant PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC" for $65,000,000 in cash(the "PwC Settlement") and (ii) Jon S. Corzine, J. Randy MacDonald,and Henri J. Steenkamp (collectively, the "Officer Defendants"),David P. Bolger, Eileen S. Fusco, David Gelber, Martin J.G. Glynn,Edward L. Goldberg, David I. Schamis, and Robert S. Sloan(collectively, the "Director Defendants," togetherwith the Officer Defendants, the Individual Defendants") for$64,500,000 in cash, that, if approved, will resolve all claimsasserted in the Action against PwC, MFG Global's outside auditor,and against the Individual Defendants, respectively. Theseproposed Settlements will be considered independently by the Courtand they do not resolve any claims against the other Defendants inthe Action.A hearing will be held on November 20, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., beforethe Honorable Victor Marrero at the United States District Courtfor the Southern District of New York, Courtroom 11B of the UnitedStates Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 todetermine: (i) whether the proposed PwC Settlement should be approved asfair, reasonable, and adequate; (ii) whether the proposed Individual Defendant Settlementshould be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (iii) whether the Action should be dismissed with prejudice asagainst PwC and the Releases specified and described in theStipulation and Agreement of Settlement with PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP dated April 3, 2015 should be granted; (iv) whether the Action should be dismissed with prejudice asagainst the Individual Defendants and the Releases specified anddescribed in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with theIndividual Defendants and the Releases specified and described inthe Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with the IndividualDefendants dated July 2, 2015 should be granted; (v) whether the proposed Plan of Allocation for the proceedsof the settlements achieved in the Action is fair reasonable andshould be approved; and (vi) whether the Co-Lead Counsel's application for an award ofattorney's fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses should beapproved.If you are a member of the PwC or the Individual DefendantSettlement Class, your rights will be affected by the proposedsettlements and any orders or judgments related to thosesettlements, and you may be entitled to share in the PwC and/orIndividual Defendant Settlement Funds. If you have not yetreceived the Notice, the proposed Plan of Allocation and the Proofof Claim Form (the "Notice Packet") you may obtain copies of thosedocuments by contacting the Claims Administrator at In re MF GlobalHoldings Limited Securities Litigation, c/o Garden City Group, LLC,P.O. Box 10164, Dublin, OH 43017-3164, or calling toll-free1-877-940-5045. Copies of those documents can also be downloadedfrom the website maintained by the Claims Administrator,www.MFGlobalSecuritiesClassAction.comPlease note, if you are a member of the PwC or the IndividualDefendant Settlement Class, you may also be a member of the classescertified in connection with the settlement with certainUnderwriter Defendants (the "Underwriter Settlement") and thesettlement with defendant Commerz Markets LLC ("the CommerzSettlement"). In order to be eligible to receive a payment fromthose settlements, which were approved by the Court on June 26,2015, or from the proposed PwC and Individual DefendantSettlements, if they are approved, you must submit a Proof of ClaimForm postmarked no later than December 3, 2015(2). If you are amember of one or more of these settlement classes and do not submita proper Proof of Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share inthe distribution of net proceeds of the settlement(s) obtained onbehalf of those class(es) in which you are a member but you willnevertheless be bound by any judgments or orders entered by theCourt related to the applicable settlement(s).If you are a member of the PwC or the Individual DefendantSettlement Class and wish to exclude yourself from the class, youmust submit a written request for exclusion such that it isreceived no later than October 23, 2015, in accordance with theinstructions set forth in the Notice. (The deadline for requestingexclusion from the Underwriter and Commerz Settlement classes haspassed, as set forth in the notices of those settlements which werepreviously disseminated and which can be viewed on the websitenoted above.) If you properly exclude yourself from the PwC or theIndividual Defendant Settlement Class, you will be excluded fromboth of those classes and you will also be excluded from any otherclasses that may be certified in the Action in which you wouldotherwise be a member, you will not be bound by any judgments ororders entered by the Court in the Action with respect to the PwCor Individual Defendant Settlements or any classes yet tocertified, and you will not be eligible to share in the proceeds ofthe PwC or the Individual Defendant Settlements or any otherrecoveries that may subsequently be obtained in the Action.Any objections to the proposed PwC Settlement, the proposedIndividual Defendant Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation,or Co-Lead Counsel's motion for attorneys' fees and reimbursementof litigation expenses must be filed with the Court and deliveredto Co-Lead Counsel, and if the objection to the PwC Settlementand/or Individual Defendant Settlement, to designated counsel forthose Defendants such that they are received no later than October23, 2015, in accordance with the instructions set forth in theNotice.Please do not contact the Court, the Clerk's office, Defendants ortheir counsel regarding this notice. All questions about thisnotice or the proposed PwC and Individual Defendant Settlements,the Plan of Allocation or the fee/expense application should bedirected to Co-Lead Counsel or the Claims Administrator.Inquiries, other than requests for the Underwriter Notice, shouldbe made to Co-Lead Counsel:BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLPSalvatore J. Graziano, Esq.1285 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019(800) firstname.lastname@example.com FONTI TOUNTAS & AULD LLPJavier Bleichmar, Esq.7 Times Square, 27th FloorNew York, NY 10036(212) firstname.lastname@example.com for the Underwriter Notice or to be added to the mailinglist for future notices in the Action should be made to:In re MF Global Holdings Limited Securities Litigationc/o Garden City Group, LLCP.O. Box 10164Dublin, OH 43017-3164(877) 940-5045www.MFGlobalSecuritiesClassAction.comBy Order of the Court1 The MF Global Securities are: the common stock of MF GlobalHoldings Limited ("MF Global") (including shares acquired throughthe MF Global Ltd. Amended and Restated 2007 Long Term IncentivePlan or the MF Global Ltd. Stock Purchase Plan) (CUSIP 55277J108);MF Global's 9% Convertible Senior Notes due June 20, 2038 issued onor about June 25, 2008 (CUSIP 55276YAB2); MF Global's 1.875%Convertible Senior Notes due February 1, 2016 issued on or aboutFebruary 7, 2011 (CUSIP 55277JAA6); MF Global's 3.375% ConvertibleSenior Notes due August 1, 2018 issued on or about July 28, 2011(CUSIP 55277JAB4); and MF Global's 6.25% Senior Notes due August 8,2016 issued on or about August 1, 2011 (CUSIP 55277JAC2).2 If you ask to be excluded from the PwC and the IndividualDefendant Settlement Classes, but you are a member of theUnderwriter and/or Commerz Settlement Class(es) you will still beeligible to participate in the recoveries obtained in connectionwith those settlements, but you will not be eligible toparticipate in the recoveries obtained from PwC and the IndividualDefendants if those settlements are approved or any subsequentrecoveries achieved. About MF GlobalNew York-based MF Global -- http://www.mfglobal.com/-- was one of the world's leading brokers of commodities and listed derivatives. MF Global provides access to more than 70 exchanges around theworld. The firm also was one of 22 primary dealers authorized totrade U.S. government securities with the Federal Reserve Bank ofNew York. MF Global's roots go back nearly 230 years to a sugarbrokerage on the banks of the Thames River in London. On Oct. 31, 2011, MF Global Holdings Ltd. and MF Global Finance USAInc. filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. CaseNos. 11-15059 and 11-5058), after a planned sale to InteractiveBrokers Group collapsed. As of Sept. 30, 2011, MF Global had$41,046,594,000 in total assets and $39,683,915,000 in totalliabilities. On Nov. 7, 2011, the United States Trustee appointed the statutorycreditors' committee in the Debtors' cases. At the behest of theStatutory Creditor's Committee, the Court directed the U.S. Trusteeto appoint a chapter 11 trustee. On Nov. 28, 2011, the BankruptcyCourt entered an order approving the appointment of Louis J. Freeh,Esq., of Freeh Group International Solutions, LLC, as Chapter 11trustee. On Dec. 19, 2011, MF Global Capital LLC, MF Global Market ServicesLLC and MF Global FX Clear LLC filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 11-15808, 11-15809 and 11-15810). OnDec. 27, the Court entered an order installing Mr. Freeh as Chapter11 Trustee of the New Debtors. On March 2, 2012, MF Global Holdings USA Inc. filed a voluntaryChapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 12-10863), and Mr.Freeh also was installed as its Chapter 11 Trustee. Judge Honorable Martin Glenn presides over the Chapter 11 case. J.Gregory Milmoe, Esq., Kenneth S. Ziman, Esq., and J. Eric Ivester,Esq., at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, serve asbankruptcy counsel. The Garden City Group, Inc., serves as claimsand noticing agent. The petition was signed by Bradley I. Abelow,Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of MF GlobalFinance USA Inc. The Chapter 11 Trustee has tapped (i) Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan LLP,as investigative counsel; (ii) FTI Consulting Inc., asrestructuring advisors; (iii) Morrison & Foerster LLP, asbankruptcy counsel; and (iv) Pepper Hamilton as special counsel. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has retained CapstoneAdvisory Group LLC as financial advisor, while lawyers at ProskauerRose LLP serve as counsel. The Securities Investor Protection Corporation commencedliquidation proceedings against MF Global Inc. to protectcustomers. James W. Giddens was appointed as trustee pursuant tothe Securities Investor Protection Act. He is a partner at HughesHubbard & Reed LLP in New York. Jon Corzine, the former New Jersey governor and co-CEO of GoldmanSachs Group Inc., stepped down as chairman and chief executiveofficer of MF Global just days after the bankruptcy filing. In April 2013, the Bankruptcy Court approved MF Global Holdings'plan to liquidate its assets. Bloomberg News reported that thecourt-approved disclosure statement initially told creditors with$1.134 billion in unsecured claims against the parent holdingcompany why they could expect a recovery of 13.4% to 39.1% from theplan. As a consequence of a settlement with JPMorgan, supplementalmaterials informed unsecured creditors their recovery was reducedto the range of 11.4% to 34.4%. Bank lenders will have the samerecovery on their $1.174 billion claim against the holding company. As a consequence of the settlement, the predicted recovery became18% to 41.5% for holders of $1.19 billion in unsecured claimsagainst the finance subsidiary, one of the companies under theumbrella of the holding company trustee. Previously, the predictedrecovery was 14.7% to 34% on bank lenders' claims against thefinance subsidiary.NIGHTTIME OF PALM BAY: Case Summary & 3 Top Unsecured Creditors---------------------------------------------------------------Debtor: Nighttime of Palm Bay, Inc. dba Crossroads Sports Bar 5070 Minton Road Palm Bay, FL 32907Case No.: 15-07698Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 8, 2015Court: United States Bankruptcy Court Middle District of Florida (Orlando)Debtor's Counsel: Kenneth D Herron, Jr., Esq. WOLFF, HILL, MCFARLIN & HERRON, P. A. 1851 West Colonial Drive Orlando, FL 32804 Tel: 407-648-0058 Fax: 407-648-0681 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Assets: $100,000 to $500,000Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 millionThe petition was signed by George McCall, president.A list of the Debtor's three largest unsecured creditors isavailable for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb15-07698.pdfNNN MET: Asks Court to Set Oct. 30 as General Claims Bar Date-------------------------------------------------------------NNN Met Center 15 39, LLC, et al., ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Courtfor the Northern District of California to establish Oct. 30, 2015,as the deadline for any individual or entity to file proofs ofclaim against the Debtor. The Debtor also ask that the Court setthe bar date for governmental units as 180 days after the date ofthe order for relief in the case. About NNN MetNNN Met Center 15 39 and 32 of its affiliates filed Chapter 11bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Lead Case No. 15-42359)on July 31, 2015. Alan Sparks signed the petitions as manager andresponsible individual. NNN Met Center 15 39, LLC, disclosed total assets of $32,003,866 and total liabilities of $28,143,523 as of the Petition Date. Judge William J. Lafferty presides over the cases. The Law Officesof Darvy Mack Cohan represents the Debtors as counsel. ElkingtonShepherd LLP serves as their local counsel.On Aug. 12, 2015, the Court, in its amended order approved thejoint administration of the cases.Creditors have until Oct. 30, 2015, to file proofs of claim againstthe Debtors.NNN MET: Cases Joint Administered for Procedural Purposes Only--------------------------------------------------------------The Hon. William J. Lafferty, III, of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court forthe Northern District of California signed an amended orderdirecting the joint administration of the Chapter 11 cases of NNNMet Center 15 39, LLC, and its debtor affiliates, under Lead CaseNo. 15-42359. Judge Lafferty makes clear that the jointadministration is for procedural purposes only. About NNN MetNNN Met Center 15 39 and 32 of its affiliates filed Chapter 11bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Lead Case No. 15-42359)on July 31, 2015. Alan Sparks signed the petitions as manager andresponsible individual. NNN Met Center 15 39, LLC, disclosed total assets of $32,003,866 and total liabilities of $28,143,523 as of the Petition Date. Judge William J. Lafferty presides over the cases. The Law Officesof Darvy Mack Cohan represents the Debtors as counsel. ElkingtonShepherd LLP serves as their local counsel.Creditors have until Oct. 30, 2015, to file proofs of claim againstthe Debtors.OAKFABCO INC: Hires Reed Smith as Bankruptcy Counsel----------------------------------------------------Oakfabco, Inc. seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Courtfor the Northern District of Illinois to employ Reed Smith LLP ascounsel, nunc pro tunc to the Aug. 7, 2015 petition date.The Debtor anticipates that Reed Smith will perform, among others,the following legal services: (a) representation of the Debtor, as debtor-in-possession, to prepare all necessary motions, applications, answers, orders, reports, and other papers in connection with the administration of the Debtor's estate; (b) advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties as debtor and debtor-in-possession in the continued management and operation of its business and assets; (c) attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of creditors and other parties in interest and advise and consult on the conduct of the chapter 11 case, including all of the legal and administrative requirements of operating in chapter 11; (d) representation of the Debtor in connection with matters involving its insurance coverage for asbestos claims; (e) representation of the Debtor in actions to protect and preserve the Debtor's estate, including the prosecution of actions on its behalf, the defense of any actions commenced against the estate, negotiations concerning all litigation in which the Debtor may be involved and objections to claims filed against the estate; (f) representation of the Debtor in connection with the negotiation and preparation on behalf of the Debtor of a liquidating plan of reorganization and all related documents; (g) appear before this Court, any appellate courts, and the U.S. Trustee, and protect the interests of the Debtor's estate before such courts and the U.S. Trustee; (h) perform all other necessary legal services and provide all other necessary legal advice to the Debtor in connection with the chapter 11 case; and (i) additional matters that may be assigned to it from time to time.Reed Smith will be paid at these hourly rates: Paul M. Singer, Partner $750 Steven T. Bobo, Partner $685 Luke A. Sizemore, Associate $470 Joseph D. Filloy, Associate $470 Partners $530-$910 Counsel $440-$915 Associates $210-$725 Legal Assistants, Paralegals and Support Staff $110-$385Reed Smith will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocketexpenses incurred.Reed Smith set off its unbilled time and expenses against the fundsheld in its client trust account the day prior to the filing of theDebtor's Chapter 11 petition. The set off was in the amount of$243,352.56 ($241,114.50 for fees and $2,238.06 for expenses),leaving a balance in the trust account of $1,031,647.44.Paul M. Singer, partner of Reed Smith, assured the Court that thefirm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interestadverse to the Debtors and their estates.Reed Smith can be reached at: Stephen T. Bobo, Esq. REED SMITH LLP 10 S. Wacker Drive Suite 4000 Chicago, IL 60606 Tel: (312) 207-1000 FaX: (312) 207-6400 About Oakfabco, Inc.Oakfabco, Inc, formerly known as Kewanee Boiler Corporation, hasnot manufactured boilers since 1988 when it sold its Kewanee boilerbusiness in an 11 U.S.C. Section 363 sale to Coppus EngineeringCorporation. In early 2009, it sold all of its remaining assets.The Debtor has no employees, and, Frederick W. Stein is theDebtor's sole officer and director. The Debtor's sole remainingasset is its insurance, and it has no known liabilities other thanasbestos claims.In January 1970, Kewanee Boiler Corp, then a newly-formed IllinoisCorporation, acquired the assets and debt of American Standard,Inc.'s commercial boiler manufacturing division known as "KewaneeBoiler." The boilers manufactured and sold by Kewanee Boiler wereinsulated with asbestos.Oakfabco sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.16-27062) on Aug. 7, 2015, to resolve its remaining asbestosclaims. Reed Smith LLP serves as counsel to the Debtor.The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and debt.OAKFABCO INC: Taps Logan & Company as Claims and Noticing Agent---------------------------------------------------------------Oakfabco, Inc. seeks authorization from the Hon. Jack B.Schmetterer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern Districtof Illinois to employ Logan & Company, Inc. as claims and noticingagent, nunc pro tunc to the Aug. 7, 2015 petition date.The Debtor requires Logan & Company to: (a) prepare and serve required notices and documents in this Chapter 11 Case in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules in the form and manner directed by the Debtor and/or the Court, including (i) notice of the commencement of this Chapter 11 Case and the initial meeting of creditors under section 341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, (ii) notices of objections to claims and objections to transfers of claims, (iii) notices of hearings on motions filed by the Office of the United States Trustee for the Northern District of Illinois, (iv) notices of transfers of claims, (v) notices of any hearings on a disclosure statement and confirmation of the Debtor's plan of reorganization, (vi) notice of the effective date of any plan, and (vii) all other notices, orders, pleadings, publications, or other documents as the Debtor or Court may deem necessary or appropriate for an orderly administration of this Chapter 11 Case; (b) maintain an official copy of the Debtor's schedules of assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs (collectively, the "Schedules"), listing the Debtor's known creditors and amounts owed thereto; (c) maintain the Master Service List (as the term is defined in the Debtor's Motion for Entry of an Order Establishing Certain Case Management Procedures); (d) maintain a post office box or address for the purpose of receiving claims and returned mail and processing all mail received; (e) for all notices, motions, orders, or other pleadings or documents served, prepare and file or causing to be filed with the Clerk an affidavit or certificate of service within 7 business days of service which includes (i) either a copy of the notice served or the docket number(s) and title(s) of the pleading(s) served, (ii) a list of persons to whom it was mailed (in alphabetical order) with their addresses, (iii) the manner of service, and (iv) the date served; (f) process all proofs of claim received, including those received by the Clerk, checking said processing for accuracy, and maintaining the original proofs of claim in a secure area; (g) maintain the official claims register (the "Claims Register") for the Debtor on behalf of the Clerk; upon the Clerk's request, providing the Clerk with certified, duplicate, unofficial Claims Register; and specifying in the Claims Register the following information for each claim docketed: (i) the claim number assigned, (ii) the date received, (iii) the name and address of the claimant and agent, if applicable, who filed the claim, (iv) the amount asserted, (v) the asserted classification(s) of the claim (e.g., secured, unsecured, priority, etc.), and (vi) any disposition of the claim. (h) record all transfers of claims and providing any notices of such transfers as required by to Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e); (i) upon completion of the docketing process for all claims received to date for each case, turning over to the Clerk copies of the Claims Register for the Clerk's review (upon the Clerk's request); (j) monitor the Court's docket for all notices of appearance, address changes, and claims-related pleadings and orders filed and making necessary notations on and changes to the claims register and any service or mailing lists, including to identify and eliminate duplicative names and addresses from such lists; (k) identify and correct any incomplete or incorrect addresses in any mailing or service lists; (l) assist in the dissemination of information to the public and responding to requests for the administrative information regarding this Chapter 11 Case as directed by the Debtor or the Court, including through the use of a case website and/or call center; (m) 30 days prior to the close of this Chapter 11 Case, to the extent practicable, requesting that the Debtor submit to the Court a proposed order dismissing Logan as Claims and Noticing Agent and terminating its services in such capacity upon completion of its duties and responsibilities and upon the closing of this Chapter 11 Case; (n) within 7 days of notice to Logan of entry of an order closing this Chapter 11 Case, providing to the Court the final version of the Claims Register as of the date immediately before the close of this Chapter 11 Case; and (o) provide such other claims processing, noticing, and related administrative services as may be requested from time to time by the Debtor.Under the Services Agreement, Logan will invoice the Debtor monthlyfor services rendered to the Debtor during the preceding month,except that the Debtor will pay Logan by wire transmission of fundsfor all (a) legal publications costs; and (b) postage for anymailing to at least 500 creditors, before such publication ormailing, as the case may be.As set forth in the Services Agreement, the Debtor has paid, orwill pay, Logan a retainer of $3,000.Kathleen Logan, president of Logan & Company, assured the Courtthat the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined inSection 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent anyinterest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.Logan & Company can be reached at: Kathleen Logan LOGAN & COMPANY, INC. 546 Valley Road Upper Montclair, NJ 07043 Tel: (973) 509-3190 Fax: (973) 509-3191 About Oakfabco, Inc.Oakfabco, Inc, formerly known as Kewanee Boiler Corporation, hasnot manufactured boilers since 1988 when it sold its Kewanee boilerbusiness in an 11 U.S.C. Section 363 sale to Coppus EngineeringCorporation. In early 2009, it sold all of its remaining assets.The Debtor has no employees, and, Frederick W. Stein is theDebtor's sole officer and director. The Debtor's sole remainingasset is its insurance, and it has no known liabilities other thanasbestos claims.In January 1970, Kewanee Boiler Corp, then a newly-formed IllinoisCorporation, acquired the assets and debt of American Standard,Inc.'s commercial boiler manufacturing division known as "KewaneeBoiler." The boilers manufactured and sold by Kewanee Boiler wereinsulated with asbestos.Oakfabco sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.16-27062) on Aug. 7, 2015, to resolve its remaining asbestosclaims. Reed Smith LLP serves as counsel to the Debtor.The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and debt.OAKFABCO INC: U.S. Trustee Forms 4-Member Asbestos Claimants' Panel-------------------------------------------------------------------Patrick S. Laying, the U.S. Trustee for Region 11, appointed fourmembers to the Asbestos Claimants' Committee in the Chapter 11bankruptcy case of Oakfabco Inc.The members of the Asbestos Committee are:Vince Holajn (Interim Chairman)406 Sierra PlaceGurnee, IL 60031William E. Gallet6216 WoodwardAmarillo, TX 79106Kristin Leigh Hart4685 Frank Gay RoadMarcellus, NY 13108Michael Batchelor1206 NortonAlton, IL, 62002 About Oakfabco, Inc.Oakfabco, Inc, formerly known as Kewanee Boiler Corporation, hasnot manufactured boilers since 1988 when it sold its Kewanee boilerbusiness in an 11 U.S.C. Section 363 sale to Coppus EngineeringCorporation. In early 2009, it sold all of its remaining assets. The Debtor has no employees, and, Frederick W. Stein is theDebtor's sole officer and director. The Debtor's sole remainingasset is its insurance, and it has no known liabilities other thanasbestos claims.In January 1970, Kewanee Boiler Corp, then a newly-formed IllinoisCorporation, acquired the assets and debt of American Standard,Inc.'s commercial boiler manufacturing division known as "KewaneeBoiler." The boilers manufactured and sold by Kewanee Boiler wereinsulated with asbestos.Oakfabco sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.16-27062) on Aug. 7, 2015, to resolve its remaining asbestosclaims. Reed Smith LLP serves as counsel to the Debtor.The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and debt.ONDOVA LIMITED: 5th Cir. Affirms Dismissal of Petfinders' Appeal----------------------------------------------------------------The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmedthe district court's order dismissing as moot the appeal filed byPetfinders, LLC, from a bankruptcy order authorizing the OndovaLimited Company trustee to sell the company's domain name.On October 7, 2011, the Trustee requested authority to sell thedomain name. Petfinders filed an objection challenging theproposed sale price and alleged that was not the property of theestate but was instead owned by another entity, Novo Point, LLC,which had assigned its rights and interests in to Petfinders. Thebankruptcy court granted the Trustee's motion and authorized thesale of the domain name to Discovery Communications, LLC for$25,000.Petfinders and Novo Point appealed the sale order to the districtcourt and argued, for the first time, that the evidence did notsupport the bankruptcy court's conclusion that Discovery was a"good faith purchaser" under Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code. The district court dismissed the appeal as moot, concluding thatappellants had waived any challenge to Discovery's good-faithstatus by failing to raise such challenge before the bankruptcycourt. Petfinder appealed.The Fifth Circuit held that the district court correctly concludedthat Petfinder's appeal is moot under section 363(m). Theappellate indicated that a challenge to the purchaser's good-faithstatus may not be raised for the first time on appeal to thedistrict court.The appeals case is PETFINDERS, L.L.C., Appellant, v. CHAPTER 11TRUSTEE DANIEL J. SHERMAN, Appellee, NO. 13-10120 (5th Cir.),relating to In the Matter of: ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY, Debtor.A full-text copy of the 5th Circuit's August 14, 2015 opinion isavailable at http://is.gd/q3C6ySfrom Leagle.com. About Ondova Limited CompanyCarrollton, Texas-based Ondova Limited Company, a former Internetdomain name registrar, filed a voluntarily Chapter 11 bankruptcycase (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 09-34784) on July 27, 2009, at atime when Ondova was still controlled by Ondova's former presidentand sole equity owner, Jeffrey Baron. Ondova Limited Company, dbaCompana, LLC, and dba budgetnames.com, performed a "middle man"registration activity pursuant to a license it had from theInternet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers -- which is,essentially, a creature of the United States Department of Commerce-- and also pursuant to an agreement with Verisign, Inc., which isa private corporation that essentially acts as the operator of thehuge ".com" and ".net" registries. Verisign is not in any wayrelated to Ondova.Edwin Paul Keiffer, Esq., at Wright Ginsberg Brusilow, PC, servesas Ondova's bankruptcy counsel. In its petition, Ondova estimated$1 million to $10 million in both assets and debts. The petitionwas signed by Mr. Baron.A Plan of Liquidation was confirmed in the Chapter 11 case. TheJoint Plan contemplated approval and implementation of (a) aso-called "Plan Settlement" between the Ondova bankruptcy estateand the Receivership Entities; (b) a sale of significant assetscontributed to the Joint Plan by the Receivership; (c) the creationof a Liquidating Trust to accept substantially all the assets andliabilities of both the Ondova bankruptcy estate and theReceivership, which Liquidating Trust would resolve and pay allremaining claims of and against the Receivership and the Debtor,with a return of residual funds or assets to Mr. Baron after thesatisfaction of all claims; and (d) certain releases of parties andprofessionals.ONDOVA LIMITED: 5th Cir. Dismisses Schepps' Appeal as Moot----------------------------------------------------------The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissedas moot the appeal filed by Attorney Gary Schepps from a bankruptcyorder barring him from appearing or participating further in theOndova Limited bankruptcy case.The bankruptcy court issued the Bar Order against Schepps toprohibit the latter from taking further action on behalf ofentities subject to receivership in violation of the receivershiporder entered by the district court in the case Netsphere, Inc. v.Baron. Schepps had made several filings in the bankruptcy court onbehalf of Novo Point, LLC, an entity expressly subject to thereceivership, thus violating the said order.On appeal to the district court, the said court reasoned that theunderlying purpose of the Bar order would not be further served byits enforcement at that time since the receivership was in theprocess of winding down. On June 18, 2012, the district courtentered an "Order on Appeal" that effectively reversed the BarOrder. In response to the Order on Appeal, the bankruptcy courtdischarged its show-cause matters against Schepps.The Fifth Circuit concluded that the Bar Order against Schepps waseffectively vacated by the subsequent orders of the district courtand bankruptcy court. Emphasizing that it has been so vacated andthat Schepps remains an officer of the court in good stead, theFifth Circuit thus dismissed Schepps' appeal as moot.The appeals case is GARY N. SCHEPPS, Appellant, v. DANIEL J.SHERMAN, Chapter 11 Trustee, Appellee, NO. 13-10122 (5th Cir.),relating to In the Matter of: ONDOVA LIMITED COMPANY, Debtor.A full-text copy of the Fifth Circuit's August 14, 2015 opinion isavailable at http://is.gd/2fsLPkfrom Leagle.com. About Ondova Limited CompanyCarrollton, Texas-based Ondova Limited Company, a former Internetdomain name registrar, filed a voluntarily Chapter 11 bankruptcycase (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 09-34784) on July 27, 2009, at atime when Ondova was still controlled by Ondova's former presidentand sole equity owner, Jeffrey Baron. Ondova Limited Company, dbaCompana, LLC, and dba budgetnames.com, performed a "middle man"registration activity pursuant to a license it had from theInternet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers -- which is,essentially, a creature of the United States Department of Commerce-- and also pursuant to an agreement with Verisign, Inc., which isa private corporation that essentially acts as the operator of thehuge ".com" and ".net" registries. Verisign is not in any wayrelated to Ondova.Edwin Paul Keiffer, Esq., at Wright Ginsberg Brusilow, PC, servesas Ondova's bankruptcy counsel. In its petition, Ondova estimated$1 million to $10 million in both assets and debts. The petitionwas signed by Mr. Baron.A Plan of Liquidation was confirmed in the Chapter 11 case. TheJoint Plan contemplated approval and implementation of (a) aso-called "Plan Settlement" between the Ondova bankruptcy estateand the Receivership Entities; (b) a sale of significant assetscontributed to the Joint Plan by the Receivership; (c) the creationof a Liquidating Trust to accept substantially all the assets andliabilities of both the Ondova bankruptcy estate and theReceivership, which Liquidating Trust would resolve and pay allremaining claims of and against the Receivership and the Debtor,with a return of residual funds or assets to Mr. Baron after thesatisfaction of all claims; and (d) certain releases of parties andprofessionals.ORIGINAL ACADEMY: Case Summary & 2 Largest Unsecured Creditors--------------------------------------------------------------Debtor: The Original Academy of Learning, Inc. 445 S Orange Blvd Sanford, FL 32771Case No.: 15-07693Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 8, 2015Court: United States Bankruptcy Court Middle District of Florida (Orlando)Debtor's Counsel: Roman V Hammes, Esq. ROMAN V. HAMMES, P.L. 250 East Colonial Drive, Suite 305 Orlando, FL 32801 Tel: (407) 650-0003 Email: email@example.com Assets: $1 million to $10 millionEstimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 millionThe petition was signed by Lynn A Mosca, director.A list of the Debtor's two largest unsecured creditors is availablefor free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb15-07693.pdfPARKVIEW ADVENTIST: Asks Court to Reconsider Cash Collateral Order------------------------------------------------------------------Parkview Adventist Medical Center appeals to the United StatesDistrict for the District of Maine from the Bankruptcy Court'sorder denying authority to use cash collateral.The following issues will be presented in its appeal of theBankruptcy Court's Order: (1) Did the Bankruptcy Court err in denying the Debtor's requestto use cash collateral as set forth in the Cash Collateral Motionand subsequent pleadings and briefing? (2) Among other things, did the Bankruptcy Court err in theOpinion in finding that the failure of the members of Parkview tovote to authorize the execution of the mortgages and securityinterests purportedly granted to Central Maine HealthcareCorporation, as required by 13-B M.R.S.A Section 1001, did not voidthose mortgages and security interests? (3) Among other things, did the Bankruptcy Court err in theOpinion in finding that CMHC's security interests could attach tothe Debtor's accounts notwithstanding the anti-assignmentprovisions of, inter alia, 42 U.S.C. sections 1395g(c) and1396a(a)(32)? (4) Among other things, did the Bankruptcy Court err in theOpinion in finding that the fact that CMHC did not have a controlagreement as to the Debtor's accounts "does not vitiate thevalidity of CMHC's security interests in [the Debtor's] accounts"? (5) Among other things, did the Bankruptcy Court err in theOpinion in finding that CMHC's security interests in Medicare andMedicaid receivables did not become unperfected by operation of 11M.R.S.A. Section 9-1315(4)? (6) Among other things, did the Bankruptcy Court err in theOpinion in finding that the Debtor failed to meet its burden ofshowing that CMHC was adequately protected for cash collateralpurposes?Parkview Adventist Medical Center is represented by: George J. Marcus, Esq. Jennie L. Clegg, Esq. David C. Johnson, Esq. Andrew C. Helman, Esq. MARCUS, CLEGG & MISTRETTA, P.A. One Canal Plaza, Suite 600 Portland, ME 04101 Tel: (207)828-8000 E-mail: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com email@example.com email@example.com About Parkview Adventist Medical CenterParkview Adventist Medical Center, a Maine non-profit corporation,operates the Parkview Hospital, a faith-based acute care communityhospital located in Brunswick, Maine, affiliated with the SeventhDay Adventist Church. Its mission is to provide servicessupporting the physical, emotional and spiritual wellness of itspatients.Parkview sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Maine Case No.15-20442) in Portland, Maine, on June 16, 2015. The case isassigned to Judge Peter G Cary.The Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets anddebt.The deadline for filing claims is Oct. 7, 2015. The Debtor's planand disclosure statement are due Oct. 14, 2015.The Debtor is represented by George J. Marcus, Esq., at Marcus,Clegg & Mistretta, PA, in Portland, Maine. PETERSBURG REGENCY: Hires Sokol Behot as Counsel------------------------------------------------Petersburg Regency, LLC seeks authorization from the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to employ SokolBehot, LLP as counsel, nunc pro tunc to July 27, 2015.The Debtor seeks to employ Sokol Behot, LLP as successor counsel toNowell Amoroso Klein Bierman.The professional services that Sokol Behot will render to theDebtor will consist of all issues relating to the administration ofthe Debtor's chapter 11 case, including challenging liens andclaims, and seeking a fair and equitable distribution of theInsurance Proceeds.Sokol Behot received $15,000.00 from Angelo DiGiovanni in August2015.Sokol Behot will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocketexpenses incurred.Sokol Behot can be reached at: David Edelberg, Esq. SOKOL BEHOT, LLP 433 Hackensack Avenue Hackensack, NJ 07601 Tel: (201) 488-1300 Fax: (201) 488-6541 About Petersburg RegencyPetersburg Regency, LLC, commenced a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 15-17169) in Newark, New Jersey, on April20, 2015. The case is assigned to Judge Vincent F. Papalia.An involuntary bankruptcy case was previously filed against thecompany (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-30526) but the case wasdismissed by consent order in March 2015.QUIKSILVER INC: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors-------------------------------------------------------------Debtor affiliates filing separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions: Debtor Case No. ------ -------- Quiksilver, Inc. 15-11880 5600 Argosy Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 QS Wholesale, Inc. 15-11881 DC Direct, Inc. 15-11882 DC Shoes, Inc. 15-11883 Fidra, Inc. 15-11884 Hawk Designs, Inc. 15-11885 Mt. Waimea, Inc. 15-11886 QS Optics, Inc. 15-11887 QS Retail, Inc. 15-11888 Quiksilver Entertainment, Inc. 15-11889 Quiksilver Wetsuits, Inc. 15-11890Type of Business: Outdoor sports lifestyle companyChapter 11 Petition Date: September 9, 2015Court: United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware (Delaware)Debtors' Counsel: Van C. Durrer, II, Esq. SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 300 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3144 Tel: 213-687-5000 Fax: 213-687-5600 Email: email@example.com - and - John K. Lyons, Esq. SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 155 North Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 Tel: 312-407-0700 Fax: 312-407-0411 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com' PETER J. SOLOMON COMPANYInvestmentBanker:Debtors' FTI CONSULTING, INC.FinancialAdvisor:Debtors' KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS LLCClaims andNoticingAgent:Total Assets: $337 millionTotal Debts: $826 millionThe petition was signed by Andrew Bruenjes, assistant secretary.Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors: Entity Nature of Claim Claim Amount ------ --------------- ------------U.S. Bank National Association Unsecured Notes $225,483,750as Indenture Trustee60 Livingston Ave.,St. Paul, MN 55107Fax: 651-466-5400Email: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.com & K Trading Co., Ltd. Merchandise $7,262,832867 Woo 1-Dong Haeundae-Gu, Busan13 612-822 South KoreaTel: 82-51-747-2425Fax: 82-51-747-2425Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Tong Sang Co. Merchandise $5,550,60818-130 Gangdong-DongBusan, 13 618-800 South KoreaTel: 82-51-972-0031Fax: 82-51-979-1729Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Sourcing Group HK Ltd Merchandise $4,506,997Room 602, 6/F, OrientalCentre, Kowloon, KLN 999077Hong KongTel: 4257093005Fax: 86-769-8503-2121Coins International Co., Ltd. Merchandise $3,886,1167F-1 No. 89 BO Guan RoadTaichung, TWN 404 TaiwanTel: 886 4 2328677Fax: 886-4-23298638Dragon Crowd Garment Inc. Merchandise $3,241,369FL/5 Bldg A, C&E CentreNingbo, 130 315040 ChinaTel: 0086-574-877004Fax: 0086-574-87703108Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Xinxiesheng Merchandise $2,976,756Footwear Co., LtLiuxian, Laidian TownXianyou, Putian, 150 351251ChinaTel: 0594 8673899Fax: 0594 8673799World Marketing, Inc. Litigation $2,542,252306 38th Street, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10018Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Corporation Merchandise $2,004,832Che-1L Bldg Rm 1501, 256-13Seoul, 13 121-758 South KoreaTel: 82 70 7508 9461Fax: 82 2 719 70253 Times Square Associates LLC Real $1,922,462JP Morgan Chase Bank, GPO PropertyP.O. Box 27488, New York, NY 10087Fax: 212-270-1648Sumec Textile and Light Industry Co. Merchandise $1,651,93213F, 198 Changjiang RoadNanjing, 100 210018 ChinaTel: 852-23446040Fax: 852-23290040 86-025-89695000Email: firstname.lastname@example.com West LLC Real $1,529,596c/o Winter Management Corp. Property730 Fifth Ave., New York, NY 10019Fax: 212-616-8985Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Apparels JSC Merchandise $1,447,768No. 18 Lot 8, Long BienResettlme, HA NOI, 10000VietnamTel: 84 4 363 69090Fax: 84 4 363 69091Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Kong Hesheng Int'l Merchandise $1,345,323RM 1102, Wofoo CommercialBuilding, Kowloon, KLN999077 Hong KongTel: 86 594 7668888Fax: 86-594-762817 CPG Partners LP Real $1,322,139P.O. Box 827727, Philadelphia PropertyPA 19182Tel: 973033169Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Exports Global Clothing Merchandise $1,306,94010, 12 Kumaranagar (South),Tirupur, 641603 IndiaFax: 91-421-4301205Email: firstname.lastname@example.com C&D Light Industry Co., Ltd. Merchandise $1,273,01415th Floor Seaside Bldg.,Xiamen, 150 361000 ChinaTel: 86 592 2337246Fax: 86-592-2100118 86-592-2987067Email: email@example.com, Andrew P. Severance $1,252,400PO Box 69447, WestHollywood, CA 90069Fax: 480-596-1384Full Creative Co., Ltd. Merchandise $1,204,081No. 4 Jin-Ying 2nd St.Dongguan, 190 523942 ChinaTel: 86 769 8998199Fax: 86 769 89981002Merry Link Development Merchandise $1,196,040(Macao Commercial Offshore)Limited, AlamedaDr Caros D'Assumcap No 336Macau, MO 999078 MacauTel: 853-2878 3742Fax: 853-2878-3744NewTimes Far East Merchandise $1,113,653Unit D, 7th Floor, Phase 5Kowloon, KLN 999077 Hong KongTel: 85221977349Fax: 886-2-2716-228452 852-2454 3111 212 997 7283Original JY&T Ltd. Merchandise $1,110,853Sanchong Dist. New TaipeiCity, TPE 241 TaiwanTel: 886 2 2999 1933Fax: 886-2-2999-1960Weihai Textile IMP and Expo Co Merchandise $1,097,795No. 16 Shichang Da Road,Weihai, 120 264200 ChinaTel: 0086 631 569256Fax: 0086-631-5692171 86 63 1522 0773Ningbo Isun Fashion Co. Ltd. Merchandise $1,014,787East Fenghua Industrial, Ningbo, 130 315500 ChinaTel: 86-574-88950166Fax: 86-574-88950166 86-574-88950000Email: firstname.lastname@example.com, Robert Severance $1,000,000167 Emerald Bay, LagunaBeach, CA 92651Fax: 714-889-3700Carmichael International Service Freight $992,340 P.O. Box 51025, Los AngelesCA 90051Fax: 213-250-0710Email: email@example.com Fashions Pvt Ltd. Merchandise $988,463Plot No. AP4, 5th Avenue, 2ndCross, Chengalpat, 22 603002IndiaTel: 91-44-4746 830Fax: 91-44-45560304Deltina Trading Pty Ltd. Merchandise $963,448Unit 2, 32 Bell StreetTroquay, VIC 3228 AustraliaTel: 61-3-52614555Fax: 61-3-52614555 03 5261 4470 Zhejiang Xishi Merchandise $945,776Jiafang Textile Co LPaitou Village Paitou Town,Zhuji, 130 311825 ChinaTel: 0575 87512872Fax: 0575-87512877O'Melveny & Myers LLP Legal $931,041P.O. Box 894436Los Angeles, CA 90189-4436Tel: 213-430-6000Fax: 213-430-6407QUIKSILVER INC: Files Pre-Arranged Ch.11 with Support from Oaktree------------------------------------------------------------------Quiksilver, Inc. and its U.S. affiliates sought Chapter 11bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-11880) inWilmington, Delaware bankruptcy court, to execute a pre-arrangedrestructuring transaction with Oaktree Capital Management, a holderof 73% of the Company's U.S. Secured Notes. The Company's Europeanand Asia-Pacific businesses and operations are not part of thefiling. The Company said the bankruptcy filing will facilitate itsfinancial and operational restructuring, and restore the Company tolong-term financial health.The Company said holders of the Company's Eurobonds sufficient towaive any technical default arising from the filling have agreed toallow the Company to reorganize its U.S. operations in Chapter 11.The Company has been in the midst of an operational turnaroundsince 2013. "The Company's weakened performance during the turnaround periodcaused further contraction of trade liquidity, and the Company wasrequired to hasten its efforts. The Company explored a range ofalternatives to loosen liquidity in order to allow the operationalturnaround initiatives to take hold, but those efforts did notresult in an actionable transaction," says Andrew Bruenjes, chieffinancial officer of the Americas Division of Quiksilver.Prior to the Petition Date, the Company engaged with Oaktreeregarding the possibility of executing the refinancing andrestructuring transaction in the context of a chapter 11 case. Those negotiations culminated in a debtor-in-possession financingand plan sponsor agreement.The Company has entered into a Plan Sponsor Agreement with Oaktree,which provides a comprehensive blueprint for the Company'semergence from chapter 11 as a going concern pursuant to a plan ofreorganization, under which Oaktree has agreed to provide allnecessary funding for the chapter 11 process and will convert itssubstantial debt holdings into a majority of the stock in thereorganized Company on exit. More specifically, the PSAcontemplates that Oaktree and Bank of America, N.A. will providethe Debtors with up to $175 million in post-petition financing. The PSA contains certain conditions, including confirmation of aplan of reorganization by the Bankruptcy Court."After careful consideration, we have taken this difficult butnecessary step to secure a bright future for Quiksilver," saidPierre Agnes, chief executive officer of Quiksilver. "With theprotections afforded by the Bankruptcy Code and the financingprovided by Oaktree, we will not only be able to satisfy ourongoing obligations to customers, vendors and employees, but wewill also have the flexibility needed to complete the turnaround ofour U.S. operations and re-establish Quiksilver as the leader inthe action sports industry. Our fresh capital structure, with avery low level of debt for our industry, will enable us to investin and reinvigorate our brands and products. We are confident wewill emerge a stronger business, better positioned to grow andprosper into the future."Following the filing, the Company will continue to operate in theordinary course of business as a "debtor-in-possession" under thejurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. The Company anticipates that the financing from the affiliates ofOaktree and from Bank of America, in conjunction with otherexisting sources of liquidity, will be more than sufficient to fundits ongoing operations in the U.S. and abroad. The Company alsorequested various forms of "first day" relief from the BankruptcyCourt to ease the U.S. subsidiaries' transition into Chapter 11 andprotect its stakeholders and customers.Mr. Agnes continued: "Oaktree's financial strength and expertise,deep experience working with companies in situations similar toours, and successful history operating in our industry make them anexceptional partner for us going forward. We value our wholesalecustomers as well as our vendors and suppliers and appreciate theirsupport through this process. In addition, we thank our passionateand dedicated employees and athletes who remain our greatestassets. Quiksilver is, and as a result of this process willcontinue to be, an iconic leader in the action sports market."In connection with the filing, the Company intends to continue itsexisting store closing program to rationalize its store base in theAmericas. As is customary, it is anticipated that the BankruptcyCourt will consider the Company's request for "first day" reliefpromptly. The requested relief includes requests for the authorityto make wage and salary payments, continue various benefits foremployees, and honor certain customer programs, like gift cards andreturns on merchandise purchased prior to the bankruptcy filing.Citing people familiar with the matter, Hannah Madans at the OrangeCounty Register reports that the Company had already startedtalking with potential bidders before filing for bankruptcy, andthat the goal was a management-led buyout in which the Companywould retain its stores. The report says that the Company cut 80jobs.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as theCompany's legal advisor, FTI Consulting, Inc., as its restructuringadvisor, and Peter J. Solomon Company as its investment banker.A copy of the declaration filed together with the petition isavailable at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/20_QUIKSILVER_Declaration.pdf About QuiksilverQuiksilver, Inc. -- http://www.quiksilver.com,http://www.roxy.comand http://www.dcshoes.com-- is an outdoor sports lifestyle companies, that designs, produces and distributes branded apparel,footwear and accessories. The Company's apparel and footwearbrands, inspired by a passion for outdoor action sports, representa casual lifestyle for young-minded people who connect with itsboardriding culture and heritage. The Company's Quiksilver, Roxy,and DC brands have authentic roots and heritage in surf, snow andskate. The Company's products are sold in more than 100 countriesin a wide range of distribution, including surf shops, skate shops,snow shops, its proprietary Boardriders shops and otherCompany-owned retail stores, other specialty stores, selectdepartment stores and through various e-commerce channels.QUIKSILVER INC: Postpones Filing of Q3 Financial Report with SEC----------------------------------------------------------------Quiksilver, Inc. on Sept. 9 disclosed it has filed a Notificationof Late Filing on Form 12b-25 with the Securities and ExchangeCommission that the financial statements to be included in theCompany's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2015 could notbe completed within the required deadline. The Company expects tofile such 10-Q no later than September 14, 2015. The Company alsoannounced that it cancelled its previously scheduled conferencecall to discuss third quarter financial results.Quiksilver and each of its wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries, filedvoluntary proceedings in the United States Bankruptcy Court for theDistrict of Delaware seeking relief under chapter 11 of the UnitedStates Bankruptcy Code on September 9, 2015. The Companyconcurrently announced that in connection with such chapter 11filing, it also entered into a Plan Sponsor Agreement with respectto the terms of a proposed plan of reorganization with certainfunds affiliated with Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. where theCompany's existing debt will be reduced by over $500 million,including the extinguishment of all of the Company's 2018 Notes and10.000% Senior Notes due 2020. Given the significance of suchchapter 11 filings, proposed restructuring and the othertransactions to be addressed, the Company was unable to meet thefiling deadline. About QuiksilverQuiksilver, Inc. -- http://www.quiksilver.com-- is one of the world's leading outdoor sports lifestyle companies. The Companydesigns, produces and distributes branded apparel, footwear andaccessories. The Company's apparel and footwear brands, inspiredby a passion for outdoor action sports, represent a casuallifestyle for young-minded people who connect with its boardridingculture and heritage. The Company's Quiksilver, Roxy, and DCbrands have authentic roots and heritage in surf, snow and skate. The Company's products are sold in more than 100 countries in awide range of distribution, including surf shops, skate shops, snowshops, its proprietary Boardriders shops and other Company-ownedretail stores, other specialty stores, select department stores andthrough various e-commerce channels. QUIKSILVER INC: Seeks Approval of $175-Mil. DIP Financing---------------------------------------------------------Quiksilver, Inc., et al., seek authority from the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Delaware to obtain secured postpetitionsuperpriority financing and use cash collateral on an interim andfinal basis. The Debtors seek approval of: (a) a debtor-in-possession term loan credit agreement, pursuant to which the DIP term loan lenders are providing a debtor- in-possession term loan credit facility of up to $115,000,000, subject to a $70,000,000 borrowing limit on an interim basis pending entry of a final order; and (b) a debtor-in-possession asset-based credit agreement, pursuant to which the DIP ABL lender is providing a debtor- in-possession asset-based revolving loan credit facility in an aggregate maximum principal amount of up to the lesser of $60,000,000 or the Borrowing Base.The Debtors tell the Court they have an urgent need to obtainpostpetition financing as they do not have sufficient funds on handor generated from their business to fund operations. "Without the postpetition financing and the use of cash collateralthat will be provided under the DIP Credit Agreements and theproposed DIP Orders, the Debtors would not be able to maintainoperations pending confirmation of a plan of reorganization thatwill maximize value for all constituents," according to Van C.Durrer, II, Esq., at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,counsel to the Debtors.Absent adequate funding, Mr. Durrer notes, the Debtors may berequired to close their stores prematurely, lose valuable wholesaleaccounts, otherwise cease operations, and liquidate on a piecemealbasis, causing irreparable harm to the Debtors and their estates.The DIP Term Loan Credit Agreement was entered by and among QSWholesale, Inc., as borrower, Quiksilver, Inc., as parent, theDebtors, as guarantors, Oaktree FIE, LLC, as administrative agent,and the lenders from time to time party thereto.The DIP ABL Credit Agreement was entered by and among QS Wholesale,Inc., DC Shoes, Inc., Hawk Designs, Inc., QS Retail, Inc. "DIP ABLDomestic Borrowers,", Quiksilver Canada Corp., Ug Manufacturing Co.Pty Ltd, and Quiksilver Japan Co., Ltd. "DIP ABL ForeignBorrowers", Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent,collateral agent and L/C Issuer and as lender.The DIP Term Loan Facility has an interest rate of 12% per annum.The interest rates per annum applicable to the loans under the DIPABL Credit Facility will be (i) (a) LIBOR plus (b) 3.50% or, at theoption of the Borrower, or (ii) (a) the Base Rate (to be defined asthe highest of (x) the Bank of America's prime rate, (y) theFederal Funds rate plus 0.50%, or (z) LIBOR for an interest periodof one month plus 1.00%) plus (b) 2.50%. The Debtors may selectinterest periods of only one month for LIBOR loans. Interest onLIBOR loans will be payable at the end of the selected interestperiod. Interest on Base Rate loans will be payable on the firstday of each calendar month.The Debtors propose to grant to the DIP Term Loan Agent valid,automatically perfected, and enforceable priming liens uponsubstantially all of their assets to secure the obligations owingunder the DIP Term Loan Credit Agreement. The Debtors also proposeto grant the DIP ABL Agent valid, automatically perfected, andenforceable priming liens upon substantially all of their assets tosecure the obligations of the DIP ABL Obligors owing under the DIPABL Credit Agreement. Prepetition Secured IndebtednessAs of the Petition Date, the Debtors had secured indebtednesspursuant to the Prepetition ABL Facility and the U.S. SecuredNotes.On May 24, 2013, QS Wholesale entered into a secured $230 millionasset-based revolving credit facility, pursuant to that certainAmended and Restated Credit Agreement among, inter alia, QSWholesale, DC Shoes, QS Retail, and Hawk Designs, Inc., asborrowers, Quiksilver Canada Corp., Ug Manufacturing Co. Pty Ltd,and Quiksilver Japan Co., Ltd. and other borrowers from time totime party thereto, as borrowers; several banks and other financialinstitutions or entities from time to time party thereto aslenders; guarantors from time to time party thereto as guarantors;and BofA and General Electric Capital Corporation, as co-collateralagent.As of the Petition Date, Quiksilver had approximately $92 millionoutstanding under the Prepetition ABL Facility comprised of $68million on account of Prepetition Domestic ABL Borrowers andGuarantors and $24 million on account of Prepetition Foreign ABLBorrowers and Guarantors.The Prepetition Secured Notes. Pursuant to an Indenture dated July16, 2013, among, inter alia, U.S. Bank, N.A., as trustee andcollateral agent, and the Prepetition Secured Notes Obligors,Quiksilver, Inc. and QS Wholesale issued $280 million aggregateprincipal amount of 7.875% senior secured notes with a maturitydate of Aug. 1, 2018. The Prepetition Secured Notes are guaranteedby DC Shoes, Hawk Designs, and QS Retail, the Prepetition SecuredNotes Obligors. As of the Petition Date, the Prepetition SecuredNotes had an outstanding principal balance of approximately $279million.Full-text copies of the DIP Agreements are available for free at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/17_QUIKSILVER_Financing.pdf About QuiksilverQuiksilver, Inc., designs, produces and distributes brandedapparel, footwear and accessories. The Company's apparel andfootwear brands, inspired by a passion for outdoor action sports,represent a casual lifestyle for young-minded people who connectwith its boardriding culture and heritage. The Company'sQuiksilver, Roxy, and DC brands have authentic roots and heritagein surf, snow and skate. The Company's products are sold in morethan 100 countries in a wide range of distribution, including surfshops, skate shops, snow shops, its proprietary Boardriders shopsand other Company-owned retail stores, other specialty stores,select department stores and through various e-commerce channels.For additional information, please visit the Company's brand Websites at www.quiksilver.com, www.roxy.com and www.dcshoes.com. Quiksilver, Inc., and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 bankruptcypetitions (Bankr. D. Del., Case Nos. 15-11880 to 15-11890) on Sept.9, 2015. Andrew Bruenjes signed the petition as chief financialofficer. The Debtors disclosed total assets of $337 million andtotal debts of $826 million.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as the Debtors'legal advisor; FTI Consulting, Inc., as their restructuringadvisor; and Peter J. Solomon Company as their investment banker. Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC acts as the Debtors' claims andnoticing agent.QUIKSILVER INC: To Conduct Store Closings with Hilco/Gordon JV--------------------------------------------------------------Quiksilver, Inc., et al., seek authority from the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Delaware to assume an agreement for HilcoMerchant Resources, LLC, and Gordon Brothers Retail Partners, LLC,to conduct store closings. The Debtors also seek authority toassume a "pop up store" agreement with the Agent.Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors undertook efforts to cutcosts, streamline operations, and increase profitability. Inparticular, as part of the Company's multi-year turnaround planthat was first launched in 2013, management spent considerable timeon a plan to rationalize the Company's retail store base,particularly in the United States. The Debtors' management, withthe assistance of their advisors, performed a comprehensive reviewof the performance of each store and the market in which theDebtors operate.As a culmination of those efforts, the Company developed a storeclosing plan, which it continued to refine from time to time. Inparticular, during the prepetition period, the Company started toclose stores consistent with the Store Closing Plan as and whenunderperforming store leases came up for renewal or otherwise whenthere was an opportunity to exit a lease early, such as due to alandlord request. In addition, like many retail businesses, theDebtors determined that it was necessary to sell certainmerchandise and excess, clearance, obsolete, or distressedinventory as well as certain associated furniture, fixtures, andequipment.After the Company determined that it was necessary to sell certainexcess inventory, it began soliciting offers from potentialliquidation firms to conduct sales of excess inventory through a"pop up" store program. The Company evaluated bids fromliquidation firms. In June 2015, QS Retail entered into the Pop UpStore Agreement with the Agent. Pursuant to the Pop Up StoreAgreement, the Pop Up Sales are conducted at Pop Up Stores. QSRetail has entered into several short-term license agreements thatallow for the limited right to use a space to sell merchandise fora limited period. The Agent began those sales in July of 2015. Asof the Petition Date, the Debtors have opened 24 Pop Up Stores,with 23 stores still in operation. The Debtors have entered intosix additional short-term license agreements for which Pop UpStores have not opened.In connection with the Company's contingency planning efforts,management worked with FTI to accelerate and potentially expand theStore Closing Plan in the context of a chapter 11 filing. InAugust 2015, the Company, in consultation with its advisors,concluded that it was necessary to close certain underperforming orunprofitable retail stores and began soliciting offers frompotential liquidation firms to conduct store closing sales andliquidate the Store Closure Assets associated with those stores.To that end, the Company obtained five bids from nationalliquidation firms: Gordon Brothers Retail Partners, LLC and HilcoMerchant Resources, LLC; Great American Group, LLC; Tiger CapitalGroup, LLC; SB Capital Group, LLC; and Yellen Partners, LLC. TheCompany then evaluated the bids and determined that proceeding withthe Store Closing Sales according to the terms of the Store ClosingAgreement was in its best interest and the best interests of itsstakeholders. The Agent's bid was the highest or otherwise bestbid, and given its involvement with the Pop Up Stores, the Agentwas already familiar with the Debtors' business. Accordingly, onSept. 4, 2015, the Agent and the Company executed the Store ClosingAgreement, and the Agent subsequentlybegan preparing for the Store Closing Sales. On Sept. 6, 2015, theAgent officially began the Store Closing Sales at the Store ClosingLocations.Pursuant to the terms of the Pop Up Store Agreement, the Agent hasbeen acting as the exclusive, independent agent of the Debtors toconduct the currently ongoing Pop Up Sales at the Pop Up Stores.As the Sales are completed, the Debtors will reject their leasesand short-term license agreements.A list of the Pop Up Stores that are currently open are asfollows: Shopping Center Address -------------- ----------------------- Westgate Center 1600 Saratoga Ave San Jose, CA Crow Canyon Commons 3191M Crow Canyon Place San Ramon, CA Ellisburg S/C 1598 Kings Highway Cherry Hill, NJ Crossroads S/C 223 Skokie Valley Road Highland Park, IL Finley Square S/C 1524 Butterfield Road Downers Grove, IL Lawrence Park S/C 1991 Sproul Road Bromall, PA Andorra S/C 8500 Henry Ave Philadelphia, PA Bristol Plaza 622 Farmington Ave. Bristol, CT Pike 7 Plaza 8397 Leesburg Pike Vienna, VA Graham Park Plaza 7285 Arlington Blvd. Falls Church, VA Eastgate 1800 East Franklin Street Chapel Hill, NC 29th Place 100 Shoppers World Court Charlottesville, VA NewPark Mall 2086 Newpark Mall Newark, CA Mt. Shasta Mall 900 Dana Dr Redding, CA West Valley Mall 3200 N Naglee Rd Tracy, CA Spring Hill Mall 1072 Spring Hill Mall West Dundee, IL Lakeland Square 3800 US Hwy 98 N Lakeland, FL Chesterfield Towne Center 1500 Midlothian Turnpike Chesterfield, VA Clayton Valley Shopping 5434 Ygnacio Valley Road Center Concord, CA East Washington Place 401 Kenilworth Drive Petaluma, CA Bayhill Shopping Center 851 Cherry Ave. San Bruno, CA El Cerrito Plaza 3010 El Cerrito Plaza El Cerrito, CA Regency Square 2526 W Brandon Blvd. Brandon, FLIn addition, pursuant to the terms of the Store Closing Agreement,the Agent has been acting as the exclusive, independent agent ofthe Debtors, conducting the Store Closing Sales at Store ClosingLocations, pursuant to the Sale Guidelines. A list of the 27 StoreClosing Locations are as follows: Store Name City/State ---------- ---------- Quiksilver - Universal CityWalk Universal City, CA Quiksilver - South Coast Plaza Costa Mesa, CA Quiksilver - Times Square New York, NY Quiksilver-Hollywood, FL Hollywood, FL DC - Irvine Spectrum Irvine, CA Quiksilver - Seattle Seattle, WA Roxy - Fashion Island Newport Beach, CA Quiksilver - Del Amo Torrance, CA Waterman - Waikiki Beach Walk Honolulu, HI Quiksilver Glendale Glendale, CA Boardriders Meatpacking New York, NY Boardriders Pasadena Pasadena, CA Quiksilver Outlet - Lakewood Lakewood, CO DC Outlet - Pismo Pismo Beach, CA DC Outlet - El Paso Canutillo, TX DC Outlet - Gilroy Gilroy, CA DC Outlet - Lauglin Laughlin, NV DC Outlet - Dophin Mall Miami, FL DC Outlet - Katy Mills Katy, TX Quiksilver Outlet - Miromar Estero, FL Quiksilver Outlet - Chicago Rosemont, IL Quiksilver Outlet - Silver Sands Destin, FL Quiksilver Outlet - Great Lakes Auburn Hills, MI Quiksilver Outlet - Annapolis Annapolis, MD Quiksilver Outlet - Charlotte Charlotte, NC Quiksilver Outlet - Woodbury Central Valley, NY Commons Quiksilver Outlet - North Dawsonville, GA Georgia Premium Outlets"In order for the Debtors to conclude the Sales as quickly andefficiently as possible, and thereby minimize any unnecessaryadministrative expenses, including rent and related costs, it isessential that the Debtors be permitted to continue performingpursuant to the Agreements and Sale Guidelines," says Van C.Durrer, II, Esq., counsel to the Debtors."Failure by the Debtors to continue performing pursuant to theAgreements at this point would in all likelihood lead only tounnecessary delay and expense that would in turn disrupt theDebtors' restructuring efforts and cause significant harm to allstakeholders," he adds. About QuiksilverQuiksilver, Inc., designs, produces and distributes brandedapparel, footwear and accessories. The Company's apparel andfootwear brands, inspired by a passion for outdoor action sports,represent a casual lifestyle for young-minded people who connectwith its boardriding culture and heritage. The Company'sQuiksilver, Roxy, and DC brands have authentic roots and heritagein surf, snow and skate. The Company's products are sold in morethan 100 countries in a wide range of distribution, including surfshops, skate shops, snow shops, its proprietary Boardriders shopsand other Company-owned retail stores, other specialty stores,select department stores and through various e-commerce channels.For additional information, please visit the Company's brand Websites at www.quiksilver.com, www.roxy.com and www.dcshoes.com. Quiksilver, Inc., and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 bankruptcypetitions (Bankr. D. Del., Case Nos. 15-11880 to 15-11890) on Sept.9, 2015. Andrew Bruenjes signed the petition as chief financialofficer. The Debtors disclosed total assets of $337 million andtotal debts of $826 million.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as the Debtors'legal advisor, FTI Consulting, Inc. as their restructuring advisor,and Peter J. Solomon Company as their investment banker. KurtzmanCarson Consultants LLC acts as the Debtors' claims and noticingagent.SANTA FE GOLD: Amends List of 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors------------------------------------------------------------Santa Fe Gold Corporation, et al., filed with the U.S. BankruptcyCourt for the District of Delaware an amended list of creditorsholding 20 largest unsecured claims, a copy of which is availableat http://bankrupt.com/misc/SFGCcredlist0826.pdf About Santa Fe GoldSanta Fe Gold Corporation and three affiliated entities, a group ofmining and mineral exploration companies headquartered inLordsburg, New Mexico, filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-11761) on Aug. 26, 2015, to pursuean expedited sale of their assets in order to maximize value forall stakeholders.The case is pending before the Honorable Mary F. Walrath. Thecases are being jointly administered for procedural purposes. TheDebtor continues to operate its business and manage its propertiesas a debtor-in-possession.The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, ascounsel; Canaccord Genuity Group Inc., as financial advisor; andAmerican Legal Claim Services, LLC, as notice, claims, andsolicitation agent.Santa Fe Gold disclosed $19.1 million in assets and $29.9 millionin debt as of March 31, 2015.SANTA FE GOLD: Can Employ ALCS as Claims & Noticing Agent---------------------------------------------------------Judge Mary F. Walrath of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Districtof Delaware authorized Santa Fe Gold Corporation, et al., to employAmerican Legal Claim Services, LLC, as claims and noticing agent.Once the Debtors' debtor-in-possession funding is approved, theDebtors intend to provide ALCS a retainer in the amount of $10,000. ALCS seeks to hold the retainer under the Engagement Agreementduring the Chapter 11 Cases as security for the payment of fees andexpenses incurred under the Engagement Agreement. About Santa Fe GoldSanta Fe Gold Corporation and three affiliated entities, a group ofmining and mineral exploration companies headquartered inLordsburg, New Mexico, filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 15-11761) on Aug. 26, 2015, to pursuean expedited sale of their assets in order to maximize value forall stakeholders.The case is pending before the Honorable Mary F. Walrath. Thecases are being jointly administered for procedural purposes. TheDebtor continues to operate its business and manage its propertiesas a debtor-in-possession.The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, ascounsel; Canaccord Genuity Group Inc., as financial advisor; andAmerican Legal Claim Services, LLC, as notice, claims, andsolicitation agent.Santa Fe Gold disclosed $19.1 million in assets and $29.9 millionin debt as of March 31, 2015.SECOND SOUTHERN BAPTIST: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary----------------------------------------------------------Debtor: Second Southern Baptist Church of New York c/o Mario Delbrun 587 Riverside Drive, Apt. 3D New York, NY 10031 Case No.: 15-12509Chapter 11 Petition Date: September 9, 2015Court: United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York (Manhattan)Judge: Hon. Sean H. LaneDebtor's Counsel: Lawrence R. Reich, Esq. REICH REICH & REICH, P.C. 235 Main Street, Suite 450 White Plains, NY 10601 Tel: (914) 949-2126 Fax: (914) 949-1604 Email: email@example.com Assets: $1.2 millionTotal Liabilities: $389,384The petition was signed by Mary Willis, vice president.The Debtor did not include a list of its largest unsecuredcreditors when it filed the petition.SIGNAL INT'L: Committee Seeks to Hire Pachulski Stang as Counsel----------------------------------------------------------------The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for SignalInternational Inc. and its debtor-affiliates asks the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for authority toretain Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as its counsel.a) assist, advise, and represent the Committee in its consultationswith the Debtors regarding the administration of these cases;b) assist, advise, and represent the Committee with respect to theDebtors' retention of professionals and advisors with respect tothe Debtors' business and these cases;c) assist, advise, and represent the Committee in analyzing theDebtors' assets and liabilities, investigating the extent andvalidity of liens and participating in and reviewing the proposedasset sales, any asset dispositions, financing arrangements, andcash collateral stipulations or proceedings;d) assist, advise, and represent the Committee in any mannerrelevant to reviewing and determining the Debtors' rights andobligations under leases and other executory contracts;e) assist, advise, and represent the Committee in investigating theacts, conduct, assets, liabilities and financial condition of theDebtors, the Debtors' operations, and the desirability of thecontinuance of any portion of those operations, and any othermatters relevant to the cases or to the formulation of a plan;f) assist, advise and represent the Committee in connection withthe proposed sale of the Debtors' assets;g) assist, advise, and represent the Committee in its participationin the negotiation, formulation, or objection to any plan ofliquidation or reorganization;h) assist, advise, and represent the Committee in understanding itspowers and its duties under the Bankruptcy Code and the BankruptcyRules and in performing other services as are in the interests ofthose represented by the Committee;i) assist, advise, and represent the Committee in the evaluation ofclaims avoidance actions; andj) provide other services to the Committee as may be necessary inthese cases.The firm's professionals and the hourly rates: Professionals Hourly Rates ------------- ------------ Robert J. Feinstein, Esq. $995 Bradford J. Sandler, Esq. $825 Shirley S. Cho, Esq. $750 Jason Rosell, Esq. $525 Peter J. Keane, Esq. $525 Margaret L. McGee, Esq. $305Bradford J. Sandler, Esq., partner at the firm, assures the Courtthe firm does not hold any interest adverse to the Debtors andtheir estate, and is a "disinterested person" within the meaning ofSection 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code. Robert J. Feinstein, Esq. Bradford J. Sandler, Esq. Shirley S. Cho, Esq. Jason Rosell, Esq. Peter J. Keane, Esq. Margaret L. McGee, Esq. 780 Third Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10017-2024 Tel: 212.561.7700 Fax: 212.561.7777 Email: email@example.com email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com About Signal InternationalSignal International Inc. -- http://www.signalint.com/-- primarily engages in the business of offshore drilling rig overhaul, repair,upgrade, and conversion, as well as new shipbuilding construction. Additionally, Signal provides services to the general marine andheavy fabrication markets for barges, power plants, and modularconstruction. Signal International, LLC ("SI LLC"), was organized on Dec. 6,2002, as a limited liability company after acquiring the assets ofthe Offshore Division of Friede Goldman Halter from bankruptcy. SIInc. was incorporated on Oct. 12, 2007, and began operations withoffshore fabrication and repair in Mississippi. Today, Signal'scorporate headquarters are in Mobile, Alabama, with operations inAlabama and Mississippi, and a sales office in Texas.On Oct. 3, 2014, Signal International Texas, L.P., soldsubstantially all of its assets to Westport Orange Shipyard, LLC,in a partially seller-financed transaction for a total purchaseprice of $35,900,000. As part of the transaction, Westportprovided a down payment of $7,000,000 and delivered a promissorynote in the principal amount of $28,900,000 to SI Texas due on orbefore Oct. 3, 2019 (the "Texas Note").On July 12, 2015, SI Inc. and its direct and indirect wholly ownedsubsidiaries, including SI LLC, commenced cases under chapter 11 oftitle 11 of the United States Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.15-11498).The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP asbankruptcy counsel, Hogan Lovells US LLP as general corporatecounsel, GGG Partners, LLC, as financial and restructuringadvisors, and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims andnoticing agent.Signal International Inc. estimated $10 million to $50 million inassets and $50 million to $100 million in debt.The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed seven creditors to serve onthe official committee of unsecured creditors.SIGNAL INT'L: Committee to Hire GlassRatner as Fin'l Advisors-------------------------------------------------------------The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for SignalInternational Inc. and its debtor-affiliates asks the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for authority toretain G1assRatner Advisory & Capital Group LLC as its financialadvisors.A hearing is set for Oct. 14, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., to consider theCommittee's request. Objections, if any, are due Sept. 11, 2015 at4:00 p.m.The Committee needs the firm to: a) analyze the Debtors' liquidation/waterfall analysis, aswell as the Debtors' underlying financial projections; b) as necessary, develop a revised liquidation/waterfallanalysis and valuation based on GR's evaluation of the underlyingfacts and circumstances; c) monitor the Debtors' sale process, including periodicupdates as to the status of specific buyers; d) analyze the Debtors' operations prior to and after thePetition Date, as the Committee deems necessary;e) Analyze the Debtors' financial information prior to and afterthe Petition Date, as the Committee deems necessary;f) Review the prospects and opportunities for the Debtors as anongoing business operation;g) Review the financial aspects of any disclosure statement andplan of reorganization or liquidation;h) Negotiate with the Debtors' financial advisor in the bestfinancial and business interests of the unsecured creditors;i) Advise the Committee and its counsel on various financial andbusiness matters associated with the Debtors;j) Address any related financial and business issues, as requestedby the Committee and its counsel;k) Attend meetings of creditors and confer with representatives ofthe Committee, the Debtors and their counsel; and1) Report to the Committee and its counsel on a regular basis.The firm's professionals and the hourly rates: Professionals Hourly Rates ------------- ------------ Evan Blum $550 James Fox $550 Wojciech Hajduczyk $400 Marshall Glade $350 Marc Levee $325 Ryan Silverman $225Mr. Blum, principal at the firm, assures the Court the firm doesnot hold any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estate, andis a "disinterested person" within the meaning of Section 101(14)of the Bankruptcy Code.The firm can can be reached at: Evan Blum James Fox Wojciech Hajduczyk Marshall Glade Marc Levee Ryan Silverman One Grand Central Place 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1062 New York, NY 10165 Email: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com email@example.com About Signal InternationalSignal International Inc. -- http://www.signalint.com/-- primarily engages in the business of offshore drilling rig overhaul, repair,upgrade, and conversion, as well as new shipbuilding construction. Additionally, Signal provides services to the general marine andheavy fabrication markets for barges, power plants, and modularconstruction. Signal International, LLC ("SI LLC"), was organized on Dec. 6,2002, as a limited liability company after acquiring the assets ofthe Offshore Division of Friede Goldman Halter from bankruptcy. SIInc. was incorporated on Oct. 12, 2007, and began operations withoffshore fabrication and repair in Mississippi. Today, Signal'scorporate headquarters are in Mobile, Alabama, with operations inAlabama and Mississippi, and a sales office in Texas.On Oct. 3, 2014, Signal International Texas, L.P., soldsubstantially all of its assets to Westport Orange Shipyard, LLC,in a partially seller-financed transaction for a total purchaseprice of $35,900,000. As part of the transaction, Westportprovided a down payment of $7,000,000 and delivered a promissorynote in the principal amount of $28,900,000 to SI Texas due on orbefore Oct. 3, 2019 (the "Texas Note").On July 12, 2015, SI Inc. and its direct and indirect wholly ownedsubsidiaries, including SI LLC, commenced cases under chapter 11 oftitle 11 of the United States Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.15-11498).The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP asbankruptcy counsel, Hogan Lovells US LLP as general corporatecounsel, GGG Partners, LLC, as financial and restructuringadvisors, and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims andnoticing agent.Signal International Inc. estimated $10 million to $50 million inassets and $50 million to $100 million in debt.The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed seven creditors to serve onthe official committee of unsecured creditors.SIGNAL INT'L: Files Amended Schedule E-2----------------------------------------Signal International Inc. and its debtor-affiliates filed with theU.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware an amendedschedule E-2. A full-text copy of the schedule is available forfree at http://is.gd/yobOkd About Signal InternationalSignal International Inc. -- http://www.signalint.com/-- primarily engages in the business of offshore drilling rig overhaul, repair,upgrade, and conversion, as well as new shipbuilding construction.Additionally, Signal provides services to the general marine andheavy fabrication markets for barges, power plants, and modularconstruction. Signal International, LLC ("SI LLC"), was organized on Dec. 6,2002, as a limited liability company after acquiring the assets ofthe Offshore Division of Friede Goldman Halter from bankruptcy. SIInc. was incorporated on Oct. 12, 2007, and began operations withoffshore fabrication and repair in Mississippi. Today, Signal'scorporate headquarters are in Mobile, Alabama, with operations inAlabama and Mississippi, and a sales office in Texas.On Oct. 3, 2014, Signal International Texas, L.P., soldsubstantially all of its assets to Westport Orange Shipyard, LLC,in a partially seller-financed transaction for a total purchaseprice of $35,900,000. As part of the transaction, Westportprovided a down payment of $7,000,000 and delivered a promissorynote in the principal amount of $28,900,000 to SI Texas due on orbefore Oct. 3, 2019 (the "Texas Note").On July 12, 2015, SI Inc. and its direct and indirect wholly ownedsubsidiaries, including SI LLC, commenced cases under chapter 11 oftitle 11 of the United States Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.15-11498).The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP asbankruptcy counsel, Hogan Lovells US LLP as general corporatecounsel, GGG Partners, LLC, as financial and restructuringadvisors, and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims andnoticing agent.Signal International Inc. estimated $10 million to $50 million inassets and $50 million to $100 million in debt.The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed seven creditors to serve onthe official committee of unsecured creditors.STEVEN PALLADINO: New England Colleges Team Up vs. Tuition Suits----------------------------------------------------------------Katy Stech, writing for The Wall Street Journal, reported thatYale, Brown and several other New England universities are urging abankruptcy judge to protect colleges that are sued to returntuition paid by a student's bankrupt parent, arguing that thesetypes of lawsuits go against "societal and congressionalexpectations."According to the report, lawyers for two trade groups representinguniversities in Connecticut and Rhode Island are throwing theirsupport behind Sacred Heart University, a private Catholic schoolin Fairfield, Conn., that has been sued for the return $66,275. The lawsuit came from a bankruptcy trustee trying to collect moneyto pay off the debt of Steven and Lori Palladino, a Connecticutcouple who filed for bankruptcy last year after paying for theirdaughter, Nicole, to start studying at the school fall 2012, thereport related.The couple's bankruptcy trustee, however, said that the tuitionmoney should be redirected to victims of a multimillion dollarPonzi scheme that Steven Palladino orchestrated through aMassachusetts-based firm called Viking Financial Group, the reportfurther related.TARGA RESOURCES: S&P Affirms 'BB+' CCR & Revises Outlook to Neg.----------------------------------------------------------------Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said it affirmed its 'BB+'corporate credit rating on Targa and revised the outlook tonegative from stable. S&P also affirmed its 'B+' corporate creditrating on general partnership TRC and revised the outlook tonegative."The negative rating outlook on Targa reflects our view that thepartnership will have financial leverage in the 5.0x to 5.5x rangeand a weak distribution coverage ratio below 1x through 2016," saidStandard & Poor's credit analyst Nora Pickens.S&P could lower the rating if industry fundamentals weaken further,leading to financial leverage above 5x and distribution coveragebelow 1x for an extended period of time. This could occur ifadditional pressure on commodity prices weakens Targa's margins andleads to lower volumes across its operating platform. S&P couldalso consider lowering the ratings if the partnership has costoverruns or material delays on large capital projects.S&P could revise the outlook to stable if it expects Targa willmaintain financial leverage below 5.0x and distribution coveragecomfortably above 1.0x given the inherent risks to thepartnership's cash flow. The negative rating outlook on TRC reflects S&P's maintaining athree-notch rating separation between TRC and Targa. S&P could lower the rating on TRC if S&P lowers the rating on Targaor if it expects that TRC's stand-alone debt to EBITDA to be above4.0x in the long term due to distributions growing at a lower rateor due to further debt issuances.S&P could revise the outlook to stable if it revises the outlook onTarga to stable and stand-alone debt to EBITDA remains below 4.0x.TEMPUR SEALY: S&P Affirms 'BB-' CCR & Revises Outlook to Positive-----------------------------------------------------------------Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'BB-' corporatecredit rating on Lexington, Ky.–based Tempur Sealy InternationalInc. S&P revised its outlook to positive from stable."We also affirmed our 'BB+' issue-level ratings on the company'ssenior secured credit facilities, including its $350 millionrevolver due 2018, $550 million term loan A due 2018, and $870 termloan B due 2020. The recovery ratings remain '1', indicating ourexpectations for very high (90% to 100%) recovery in the event of apayment default. We raised our senior unsecured debt issue-levelratings on the company's $375 million notes due 2020 to 'BB-' from'B+' and revising our recovery ratings to '3', indicating ourexpectations for meaningful (50% to 70%) recovery in the event of apayment default at the higher end of the range, from '5'. Theraised ratings reflect the company's overall debt reduction, andour reassessment of the company's enterprise value," S&P said."The outlook revision to positive from stable reflects TempurSealy's deleveraging since its acquisition of Sealy in 2013 and ourexpectation that credit protection measures will continue toimprove," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Bea Chiem.S&P estimates the company's adjusted debt was approximately $1.7billion as of June 30, 2015.TMT GROUP: Bid to Convert Bankruptcies to Chapter 7 Denied----------------------------------------------------------Judge Marvin Isgur of the United States Bankruptcy Court for theSouthern District of Texas, Houston Division, denied Hsin-Chi Su'smotion to convert the Chapter 11 cases of TMT Group, TMT USAShipmanagement LLC and its affiliates, to cases under Chapter 7 ofthe Bankruptcy Code, and held that the appointment of an examineris in the best interests of the estates and their creditors.The motion was filed by Su on May 1, 2015, alleging that"substantial or continuing loss to or diminution of the estate andthe absence of a reasonable likelihood of rehabilitation"constitutes cause to convert. Su also expressed concern that thedebtors were not properly pursuing avoidance actions before thelimitations period was set to expire on June 20, 2015.The Debtors, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, MRMBSII LLC, Macquarie Bank, Bank Sinopac, and Wilmington Trust allobjected to the motion to convert.During the hearing on the motion on June 12, 2015, the court made apreliminary ruling that required the United States Trustee toselect an examiner whose role was limited to determining whetherestate causes of action had been preserved for timely prosecutionand whether the professional fees charged to the estate werereasonable.Judge Isgur concluded that Su has established a substantial loss tothe estate and that there is no reasonable likelihood ofrehabilitation in accordance with Section 1112(b)(4)(A), and thushas made a prima facie case of cause to convert the debtors' casesto Chapter 7. However, the judge found that Su has failed to showhow either the estate or its creditors will benefit fromconversion.Judge Isgur determined that, considering that the debtors haveterminated operations, the appointment of an examiner under Section1112(b)(1) is in the best interests of the estates and theircreditors. The examiner provides the estate an independent sourceto verify the reasonableness of administrative expenses and theexaminer's fees will be limited compared to the alternative of acostly chapter 7 trustee.Since the preliminary relief has already been granted in the formof an examiner, Judge Isgur held that further relief is notappropriate.The bankruptcy cases are IN RE: TMT PROCUREMENT CORPORATION, et al,C WHALE CORPORATION, D WHALE CORPORATION, E WHALE CORPORATION, GWHALE CORPORATION, H WHALE CORPORATION, A DUCKLING CORPORATION, FELEPHANT INC., A LADYBUG CORPORATION, C LADYBUG CORPORATION, DLADYBUG CORPORATION, A HANDY CORPORATION, B HANDY CORPORATION, CHANDY CORPORATION, B MAX CORPORATION, NEW FLAGSHIP INVESTMENT COLTD, RORO LINE CORPORATION, UGLY DUCKLING HOLDING CORPORATION,GREAT ELEPHANT CORPORATION, CASE NOS. 13-33763, 13-33743, 13-33744,13-33745, 13-33746, 13-33747, 13-33748, 13-33750, 13-33751,13-33752, 13-33754, 13-33755, 13-33756, 13-33757, 13-33758,13-33759, 13-33760, 13-33761, 13-33762 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.).A full-text copy of Judge Isgur's August 14, 2015 memorandumopinion is available at http://is.gd/4ldG20from Leagle.com. About TMT GroupKnown in the industry as TMT Group, TMT USA Shipmanagement LLC andits affiliates own 17 vessels. Vessels range in size from 27,000dead weight tons (dwt) to 320,000 dwt.TMT USA and 22 affiliates, including C. Ladybug Corporation, soughtChapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 13-33740) inHouston, Texas, on June 20, 2013 after lenders seized sevenvessels.TMT filed a lawsuit in U.S. bankruptcy court aimed at forcingcreditors to release the vessels so they can return to generatingincome.TMT has tapped attorneys from Bracewell & Giuliani LLP asbankruptcy counsel and AlixPartners as financial advisors.On a consolidated basis, the Debtors have $1.52 billion in assetsand $1.46 billion in liabilities.TRANS COASTAL: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Creditor's Committee---------------------------------------------------------------Nancy J. Gargula, U.S. Trustee for Region 10, appointed fivemembers to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in theChapter 11 bankruptcy case of Trans Coastal Supply Company Inc.The members of the Committee are:1) CHS, Inc. Attn: Jim Johnson 5500 Cenex Drive MS625 Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 Phone: (651) 355-6376 Email: email@example.com) Gavilon Ingredients, LLC Attn: Bill Vernon 1331 Capital Avenue Omaha, NE 68102 Phone: (402) 889-4698 Email: email@example.com) J.D. Heiskill Holdings dba J.D. Heiskill & Co. Attn: Michael Isham 20010 Manderson Street, Suite A Elkhorn, NE 68022 Phone: (402) 289-5700 Fax: (402) 289-6748 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com) Green Plains, Inc. Attn: Ken Kozlik 450 Regency Parkway, #400 Omaha, NE 68114 Phone: (402) 315-1620 Fax: (402) 884-8776 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com) China Shipping (North America) Agency Co., Inc. Attn: Nancy Zhang 11 Phillips Parkway PO Box 420 Montvale, NJ 07645-0420 Phone: (201) 505-6900 Fax: (201) 505-9810 Email: email@example.com in Decatur, Illinois, Trans Coastal Supply CompanyInc ships grain and other agricultural products like the ethanolbyproduct distillers dried grains (DDGS) in containers to overseasbuyers.Trans Coastal Supply Company Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcyprotection (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Case No. 15-71147) on July 23, 2015. Judge Mary P. Gorman presides over the Debtor's case. Jeffrey DRichardson, Esq., at Richardson & Erickson, represents the Debtor.The Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities between $10million and $50 million.WASHINGTON HEIGHTS: Has Authority to Use Cash Until Sept.30-----------------------------------------------------------Judge Martin Glenn of the United States Bankruptcy Court forSouthern District of New York signed of an interim orderauthorizing Washington Heights Parking, LLC, to use cash collateralfrom the Petition Date until September 30, 2015.All rents from the Debtor's property, including any funds collectedor received by the Debtor, will be deposited into the LockboxAccount, and the Debtor will direct all tenants to pay rentsdirectly to the Lockbox Account. The Debtor may use the CashCollateral to pay the actual, ordinary, necessary and reasonableProperty operating expenses in the amounts necessary or appropriatefor the ordinary operation of the Property. To the extent thosefunds are available, the Trust will release funds to the Debtor orthe Debtor's representative or designee in an amounts equal to thebudgeted amount of the Property operating expenses, except that,the Trust may retain and escrow funds sufficient to pay taxes andinsurance and may pay those taxes and insurance. The Trust mayset-off (a) the accumulated prepetition net cash flow from theProperty, which, as of the Petition Date totaled $100,775 againstprepetition interest and default interest owed to the Trust; and(b) accumulated postpetition net cash flow against the postpetitioninterest and default interest owed to the Trust.The authority for the Debtor to use cash collateral follows anagreement between the Debtor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trusteefor the Registered Holders of COMM 2005 LP5, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, on the use of cash collateral on aninterim basis as express in their Stipulated Interim Order AllowingUse of Cash Collateral. The Debtor asked authority to use rents topay expenses during cash collateral period and the Trust has agreedto allow the Debtor to use rents in accordance with the terms andcondition in the their Stipulated Interim Order Allowing Use ofCash Collateral.Washington Heights Parking, LLC, is represented by: Gary Sachs, Esq. SACHS & ASSOCIATES 20 Crescent Drive Albertson, NY 11507 Tel: (516) 396-0129 Fax: (516) 277-1857 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com Asset Management LLC, solely in its capacity as SpecialServicer for the Trust, is represented by: Gregory A. Cross, Esq. Catherine Guastello Allen, Esq. VENABLE LLP 750 East Pratt St., Suite 900 Baltimore, MD 21202 Tel: (410) 244-7400 Fax: (410) 244-7742 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com -- and -- Edward A. Smith VENABLE LLP Rockefeller Center 1270 Avenue of the Americas Twenty-Fourth Floor New York, NY 10020 Tel: (212) 307-5500 Fax: (212) 307-5598 Email: firstname.lastname@example.com About Washington HeightsWashington Heights Parking, LLC, one of 20 companies owned by realestate developer Jose Espinal, sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-11687) in Manhattan on June 26, 2015.Washington Heights Parking, a real estate business, owns a buildingat 4320 Broadway, New York. It leases the premises to threetenants who pay annualized rents of approximately $1.4 million.WETDOG LLC: Belle Resources Claim Entitled to Postpetition Interest-------------------------------------------------------------------Judge Edward J. Coleman, III, of the United States Bankruptcy Courtfor the Southern District of Georgia, Savannah Division, concludedthat Belle Resources, Ltd., is entitled to interest under Section506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code on its secured claim during the17-month period between the Petition Date and the order confirmingWetdog, LLC's plan, accruing at the contractual non-default rate ofLIBOR plus 4.25%, except that no interest accrued for the firstfour months of that period. After confirmation of Wetdog's plan, Belle, an oversecuredcreditor, sent a spreadsheet to Wetdog showing the amount itclaimed it was still owed after giving Wetdog credit for paymentsmade during the bankruptcy case. Belle charged the default rate of18% interest during the Pendency Period and added certain fees tothe amount owing for work performed by lead counsel and localcounsel on its behalf.Wetdog objected, contending that Belle is barred from now assertingits entitlement to interest at the note's default rate during thePendency Period and is instead limited to the floating contractinterest rate of LIBOR plus 4.25%. Wetdog also asserted that Belleis barred from claiming the "reasonable fees, costs, or chargesprovided for under the agreement" under Section 506(b) and that themajority of the fees were unreasonable in any event.Judge Coleman held that the res judicata effect of planconfirmation bars Belle from establishing its entitlement tointerest at the default rate during the Pendency Period. Accordingly, the judge ruled that Belle is entitled to PendencyPeriod interest at the non-default contract rate of the 90-dayLIBOR rate plus 4.25% with the exception that the first four monthswhen Comerica Bank held the Wetdog note, no interest accrued.Judge Coleman also rejected Belle's argument that there is nodeadline under Section 506(b). The judge ruled that the resjudicata effect of plan confirmation also bar Belle from seekingthe allowance of "reasonable fees, costs, and charges."The case is In the matter of: WETDOG, LLC, Chapter 11, Debtor, NO.13-40601-EJC (S.D. Ga.).A full-text copy of the August 14, 2015 opinion is available athttp://is.gd/4bRltWfrom Leagle.com. About Wetdog, LLCWetdog, LLC, dba Foley House Inn, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy(Bankr. S.D. Ga. Case No. 13-40601) on April 5, 2013. C. JamesMcCallar, Jr., Esq., at McCallar Law Firm, serves as the Debtor'scounsel. It scheduled assets of $3,053,445 and liabilities of$3,389,681. A list of the three largest unsecured creditors isavailable for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/gasb13-40601.pdfThe petition was signed by Grant Rogers, managing member.ZUCKER GOLDBERG: Genova Burns to Serve as Labor Law Counsel-----------------------------------------------------------Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman, LLC seeks authorization from the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to employ GenovaBurns, LLC to represent it on matters relating to labor issues.Genova Burns will be paid at these hourly rates: Angelo J. Genova $850 Partners $450-$600 Counsel $350-$550 Of Counsel $500-$550 Associates $225-$325 Paralegal $175Genova Burns will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocketexpenses incurred.Genova Burns required a $5,000 retainer from the Debtor.Patrick W. McGovern, partner of Genova Burns, assured the Courtthat the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined inSection 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent anyinterest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.Genova Burns can be reached at: Patrick W. McGovern, Esq. GENOVA BURNS LLC 494 Broad Street Newark, NJ 07102 Tel: (973) 533-0777 Fax: (973) 533-1112 About Zucker GoldbergFormed in 1923 as Zucker & Goldberg, law firm Zucker, Goldberg &Ackerman, LLC, is primarily engaged in the representation oflenders and secured parties in foreclosure matters, insolvencyproceedings and related matters. The sole members of ZGA areMichael S. Ackerman, Esq. and Joel Ackerman, Esq. Michael S.Ackerman is the managing member of the firm. ZGA's primary offices are in Mountainside, New Jersey.Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 15-24585) in Newark, New Jersey, on Aug. 3, 2015, to complete the orderly liquidation of the business.The case is assigned to Judge Christine M. Gravelle.The Debtor disclosed total assets of $11.5 million and totalliabilities of $53.3 million as of June 30, 2015.ZGA tapped Wasserman, Jurista & Stolz, P.C. as bankruptcy counsel;Brown, Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C., as special litigation counsel;Genova Burns as labor counsel; and BMC Group, Inc., as noticing andballoting agent.ZUCKER GOLDBERG: Taps Getzler Henrich as Financial Advisors-----------------------------------------------------------Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman, LLC seeks authorization from the U.S.Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to employ GetzlerHenrich & Associates, LLC as financial advisors.The Debtor requires Getzler Henrich to: (a) assist with the preparation of Court motions as requested by counsel; (b) assist with compliance with the reporting requirements of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules and local rules, including but not limited to monthly operating reports, Schedules of Assets and Liabilities, and Statements of Financial Affairs; (c) participate in Court hearings and, if necessary, provide, expert testimony in connection with any hearings before the Court; (d) consult with all other retained parties, and other parties- in-interest, as necessary; (e) assist with the analysis and reconciliation of claims against the Debtors and other bankruptcy avoidance actions; (f) assist with trade creditor negotiations, if appropriate or required; (g) assist with the analysis and reconciliation of claims against the Debtors and other bankruptcy avoidance actions; (h) assist the Debtor with the bankruptcy process to minimize costs associated with that process; and (i) perform such other tasks as appropriate as may reasonably be requested by management or counsel.Getzler Henrich will be paid at these hourly rates: Bill Henrich $535 Mark Podgainy $460 Principal/Managing Director $495-$595 Director/Specialists $385-$550 Associate Professionals $160-$385Getzler Henrich will also be reimbursed for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred.William Henrich, co-chairman of Getzler Henrich, assured the Courtthat the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined inSection 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent anyinterest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.Getzler Henrich can be reached at: William Henrich GETZLER HENRICH & ASSOCIATES, LLC 295 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10017 Tel: (212) 697-2400 Fax: (212) 697-4812 About Zucker GoldbergFormed in 1923 as Zucker & Goldberg, law firm Zucker, Goldberg &Ackerman, LLC, is primarily engaged in the representation oflenders and secured parties in foreclosure matters, insolvencyproceedings and related matters. The sole members of ZGA areMichael S. Ackerman, Esq. and Joel Ackerman, Esq. Michael S.Ackerman is the managing member of the firm. ZGA's primary officesare in Mountainside, New Jersey.Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 15-24585) in Newark, New Jersey, on Aug. 3,2015, to complete the orderly liquidation of the business.The case is assigned to Judge Christine M. Gravelle.The Debtor disclosed total assets of $11.5 million and totalliabilities of $53.3 million as of June 30, 2015.ZGA tapped Wasserman, Jurista & Stolz, P.C. as bankruptcy counsel;Brown, Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C., as special litigation counsel;Genova Burns as labor counsel; and BMC Group, Inc., as noticing andballoting agent.[*] QS Energy to Take Advantage of Spike in US Bankruptcy Filings-----------------------------------------------------------------QS Energy, Inc., a developer of integrated technology solutions forthe energy industry, on Sept. 8 disclosed that it has engaged aU.S.-based boutique investment bank to pursue financing in supportof the Company's parallel growth strategies. These dual strategiesare consistent of 1) commercialization and deployment of QSEnergy's technology offerings; and 2) the acquisition ofsynergistic and accretive entities or product lines through itswholly-owned subsidiary, QS Energy Pool.Greggory Bigger, QS Energy Chief Executive Officer and Chairman,commented, "We are excited to partner with an organization that isfully committed to the realization of our parallel growthstrategies. This oil & gas focused firm will assist QS Energy'scapital raising initiatives to fund ongoing operations, andseparately for potential acquisitions on a case-by-case basisthrough QS Energy Pool. As I have stated over the last few months,the current energy market environment provides QS Energy with aunique opportunity, one which we are poised to take advantage ofthrough our product portfolio and via our M&A strategy. The recentdownturn and volatility in the US equities markets has onlyincreased opportunities for us on both fronts, and now more thanever, opportunities are opening up for QSEP. Our banking partnerunderstands the potential for immediate revenue generation stemmingfrom these opportunities, and with their capital raising support wehope to aggressively pursue new proposals for our technology aswell as accretive acquisitions, thereby leading to immediate valuecreation for our shareholders."QS Energy recently initiated its mergers & acquisitions planthrough its special purpose vehicle, QS Energy Pool, in an effortto acquire companies or assets that will have a substantial,positive impact on the Company's operations and balance sheet. Thedrastic decrease in global oil prices has put tremendous pressureon many small to mid-sized companies across all segments of theenergy industry. In concert with the commodity price crash is thecurrent downturn in US Equity markets, which is being pushed partlyas a result of the crash, but also by factors such as China'seconomy, a potential US interest rate hike, poor jobs reports,among many others. The current instability of the US economy isputting an even tighter stranglehold on small to mid-sized energycompanies, which is resulting in US bankruptcy filings at analarming rate. QS Energy Pool will take advantage of these uniqueconditions through the identification and acquisition ofundervalued entities, assets and technologies that have filed forChapter 11, and that can be leveraged for the deployment andenhancement of its AOT and Joule Heat technology offerings.Mr. Bigger continued, "We are looking at what is almost a perfectstorm of events for QS Energy, and our duel strategies for growth.Our Company is making inroads with additional operators who are inneed of improved operational efficiencies provided by our viscosityreduction systems, and in fact, we currently have a number ofpotential acquisition deals on the table for QS Energy Pool. Ouradvisors to the acquisition strategy, Scott and Bill, have beennothing short of stellar, as their knowledge of the industry andkey relationships have put us into position to strike on a numberof potential acquisitions. Our investment banking partner willpursue financing for those acquisition opportunities that are bothaccretive to, and synergistic with QS Energy's current operationson a case-by-case basis. I expect us to be very busy, workingtogether on this front."QS Energy continues to make progress as it moves from R&D to fullcommercialization of its Applied Oil Technology(TM) (AOT(TM)) andJoule Heat(TM) Solutions. AOT is a patent-protected hardwaresystem designed to reduce the viscosity of crude oil transportedvia pipeline, and developed in partnership with Temple University. AOT harnesses the principles of electrorheology to reduceviscosity, thereby lowering operational costs and improvingefficiencies when transporting feedstock. QS Energy has partneredwith various third-party testing organizations, as well as bothupstream and midstream operators, to prove the financial benefitsof AOT as a result of reduced viscosity. The Company's Joule Heattechnology offering is a solution for the challenges oftransporting heavy, waxy feedstock, as well as transportingpetroleum products through cold weather environments. Preliminarytesting suggests that Joule Heat will operate at significantlybetter efficiency rates than existing trace heating technologies.AOT and Joule Heat are both in active beta deployments with majorNorth American operators.Mr. Bigger stated, "We are making great strides towards the fullcommercialization of our viscosity reduction technologies, and weare ramping up testing, research & development, and production forboth AOT and Joule Heat. Our newly-engaged investment bankingpartner will assist the Company with any necessary capital raisingin support of our technology operations. It is critical that wemaintain steady forward progress as the benefits of our hardwaresystems are further proven up, so that we are ready to deploy withoperators around the globe at any time. Our banking firmunderstands the financial benefits that these deployments willbring to QS Energy and our shareholders, and we are highlyconfident in their abilities to raise capital for ongoingoperations in support of these goals."Mr. Bigger concluded, "Our banking partner is invested in, andcommitted to the success of our parallel growth strategies, andtogether we hope to reach the next level of value creation for ourloyal shareholder base. The firm will lend its considerableresources to financing initiatives for QS Energy in support ofongoing operations, technology deployments, and acquisitions thatwill bolster our product portfolio and bottom-line revenues. We areproud to partner with their team as QS Energy moves into anexciting new era." About QS Energy, Inc.QS Energy, Inc. (OTCQX: QSEP) -- http://www.QSEnergy.com-- provides the global energy industry with patent-protectedindustrial equipment designed to deliver measurable performanceimprovements to crude oil pipelines. Developed in partnership withleading crude oil production and transportation entities, QSEnergy's high-value solutions address the enormous capacityinadequacies of domestic and overseas pipeline infrastructures thatwere designed and constructed prior to the current worldwide surgein oil production. In support of our clients' commitment to theresponsible sourcing of energy and environmental stewardship, QSEnergy combines scientific research with inventive problem solvingto provide energy efficiency 'clean tech' solutions to bring newefficiencies and lower operational costs to the upstream, midstreamand gathering sectors.[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings-------------------------------------------------------In re Calvin L. Raup and Angela J. Raup Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 15-10994 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015In re Mega, Inc. Bankr.S.D. Fla. Case No. 15-25559 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb15-25559.pdf represented by: Brett A. Elam, Esq. FARBER + ELAM, LLC E-mail: email@example.com re Walter Henry Schwab Jr. Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 15-66300 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015In re Camera Mart, Inc. Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 15-52693 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb15-52693.pdf represented by: Ernest Hassan, Esq. STEVENSON & BULLOCK, PLC E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re Kathleen Sellars Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-43948 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015In re Anthony T Fowora Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-73680 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015In re Stephen E. Kezmarsky, III and Nancy L. Kezmarsky Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 15-23073 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015In re Richvin, Inc. Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 15-23802 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb15-23082.pdf represented by: Robert O. Lampl, Esq. E-mail: email@example.com re Joaquin De Puigdorfila Esteve and Teresita M Iturregui Munoz Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 15-06577 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015In re Patricia Fuller Lowe Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 15-06017 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 27, 2015In re Caroline Leslie Collin Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 15-23543 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015In re William Merlo Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 15-25639 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015In re Bobby F. Price, Jr. Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 15-71003 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015In re Prico Enterprises, Inc. Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 15-71004 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/gamb15-71004.pdf represented by: Wesley J. Boyer, Esq. KATZ, FLATAU, POPSON AND BOYER, LLP E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re Praise Christian Center Church Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 15-66355 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015 represented by: Melvin L. Dansby, Esq.In re Marc John Randazza Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 15-14956 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015In re Marinus J. Van Peenen Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 15-26283 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015In re Darlina C. Crowder Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 15-41542 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015In re Alton Earl Donalson, Sr Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 15-34525 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015In re Hugh Edmond Long Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 15-52079 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 28, 2015In re Sanchez Auto Body, Inc. Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 15-31270 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 30, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb15-31270.pdf represented by: Amado Leija, Esq. THE LAW OFFICE OF AMADO LEIJA E-mail: email@example.com re Crofchick, Inc. Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 15-03723 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 30, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb15-03723.pdf represented by: Tullio DeLuca, Esq. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re Crofchick Realty, LLC Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 15-03724 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 30, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb15-03724.pdf represented by: Tullio DeLuca, Esq. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re Sandra L Turner Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 15-06099 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 30, 2015In re John Jefferson Vitalich Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 15-52814 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re Sonja Vaughan Bell and Johnathan Shariff Bell Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 15-21541 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re BCGC Unit 1 Inc.d/b/a BIG CITY GRILL Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 15-08883 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb15-08883.pdf represented by: Samantha L Dammer, Esq. TAMPA LAW ADVOCATES,P.A. E-mail: email@example.com re Harvey B. Bee and Veronica G. Bee Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 15-52017 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re Michael Joseph Hamby and Kendal Elizabeth Horton Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 15-22145 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re Judith Ann Young-Doss Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 15-52939 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re Spa San Marco, Inc. Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 15-26383 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb15-26383.pdf represented by: Jeffrey B. Saper, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY B. SAPER, PC E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re Angel David Fuster, II Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-44018 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re William J. Gerbe, Jr. Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-44035 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re Paula Malliarakis Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-44058 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re William A. Baker Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-11799 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re Pretty Girl of Jerome Corp. Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-12453 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb15-12453.pdf represented by: Nancy Lynne Kourland, Esq. ROSEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re Braddell-Davey Corporation Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-11834 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb15-11834.pdf represented by: Arthur G. Baumeister, Jr., Esq. AMIGONE, SANCHEZ & MATTREY LLP Email: email@example.com re Douglas William Lee Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 15-04689 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re Le Thi Nguyen Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 15-43500 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re Eric N Lingenfelter Bankr. W.D. Va. Case No. 15-61673 Chapter 11 Petition filed August 31, 2015In re Edmundo Tijerina, Jr. Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 15-34647 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015In re Timothy R Wright Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 15-11190 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015In re Leo R Sandoval Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 15-11767 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015In re Holmes & Sons Trucking, Inc. Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 15-52840 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb15-52840.pdf represented by: Jason Vogelpohl, Esq. CENTRAL COAST BANKRUPTCY E-mail: email@example.com re Juan Carlos Casas Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 15-52841 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015In re H. Edward Sherman APLC Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 15-12244 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 Filed Pro SeIn re H. Edward Sherman Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 15-12246 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015In re Jeffrey R Gutzwiller Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 15-26602 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015In re Chun Ya Cheung and Min Qin Zheng Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 15-13397 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015In re Empresas Figueroa Goytia Assoc Inc Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 15-06756 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb15-06756.pdf represented by: Wanda I. Luna Martinez, Esq. LUNA LAW OFFICES E-mail: email@example.com re Jose G. Maldonado Malave and Zulma I. Recio Lopez Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 15-06762 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015In re Andy Valiente Caballero Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 15-06765 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015In re Glenn, Glenn & Dave, LLC Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 15-04639 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/scb15-04639.pdf represented by: Robert H. Cooper, Esq. THE COOPER LAW FIRM E-mail:firstname.lastname@example.com re Carolina Procurement Institute, Inc Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 15-04646 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/scb15-04646.pdf filed Pro SeIn re YOGA4YUGP, LLC Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 15-41606 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb15-41606.pdf represented by: Kevin S. Wiley, Jr., Esq. LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN S. WILEY JR E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re Divine Solutions and Development/D Mitchell Properties Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 15-34675 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb15-34675.pdf Filed Pro SeIn re A.N.J. Enterprises, Inc. Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 15-52157 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb15-52157.pdf represented by: David T. Cain, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF DAVID T. CAIN E-mail: email@example.com re Mollett Welding and Mine Service, Inc. Bankr. S.D.W. Va. Case No. 15-20456 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvsb15-20456.pdf represented by: Mitchell Lee Klein, Esq. KLEIN, SHERIDAN & GLAZER, LC E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re St. Johns Professional Center, LLC Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 15-03949 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 1, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb15-03949.pdf filed Pro SeIn re Maria Motherbaugh Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 15-12926 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015In re Los Angeles Federal Armored Services, Inc. Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 15-23810 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb15-23810.pdf represented by: Kahlil J. McAlpin, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF KAHLIL J. MCALPIN E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re Paul H. Leek Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 15-21570 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015In re Randy Kevin Metcalf and Regina Michele Metcalf Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 15-30915 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015In re Discepolo LLP Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 15-22242 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb15-22242.pdf represented by: George N. Doumas, Esq. DISCEPOLO LLP E-mail: email@example.com re Red Oaks Mill Carpet Corp. Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-36638 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb15-36638.pdf represented by: H. Bruce Bronson, Jr., Esq. BRONSON LAW OFFICES, P.C. E-mail: email@example.com re Leonel Diaz Hernandez and Rosemarie Espinal Castillo Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 15-06796 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015In re 12 Degree Entertainment, LLC Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 15-06194 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnmb15-06194.pdf represented by: Steven L. Lefkovitz, Esq. LAW OFFICES LEFKOVITZ & LEFKOVITZ E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com re Tanglewood Medical Center, Inc. Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 15-06198 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnmb15-06198.pdf represented by: Steven L. Lefkovitz, Esq. LAW OFFICES LEFKOVITZ & LEFKOVITZ E-mail: email@example.com re Continental Exploration, LLC Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 15-41607 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb15-41607.pdf represented by: Eric A. Liepins, Esq. ERIC A. LIEPINS P.C. E-mail: email@example.com re Henry S. Fitzgerald Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-13064 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015In re MLRG, Inc. Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-13069 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb15-13069.pdf filed Pro SeIn re Nathan Construction, Inc. Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 15-15325 Chapter 11 Petition filed September 2, 2015 See http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb15-15325.pdf represented by: Larry B. Feinstein, Esq. VORTMAN & FEINSTEIN E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.com *********Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative pricesfor bond issues that reportedly trade well below par. Prices areobtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources duringthe prior week we think are reliable. Those sources may not,however, be complete or accurate. The Monday Bond Pricing tableis compiled on the Friday prior to publication. Prices reportedare not intended to reflect actual trades. Prices for actualtrades are probably different. Our objective is to shareinformation, not make markets in publicly traded securities.Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy orsell any security of any kind. It is likely that some entityaffiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuerspublic debt and equity securities about which we report.Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies withinsolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 pershare in public markets. At first glance, this list may look likethe definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.Don't be fooled. Assets, for example, reported at historical costnet of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm'sassets. A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet forliabilities that may never materialize. The prices at whichequity securities trade in public market are determined by morethan a balance sheet solvency test.On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filedChapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets andliabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts. The listincludes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollarpetitions in Acrobat PDF format.Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book ofinterest to troubled company professionals. All titles areavailable at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com. Go tohttp://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today. Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday editionof the TCR.The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the weekthen-ending. *********S U B S C R I P T I O N I N F O R M A T I O NTroubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-publishedby Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA. Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel ElaineTumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, CarloFernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,Editors.Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. ISSN: 1520-9474.This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale orpublication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronicre-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without priorwritten permission of the publishers. Information containedherein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but isnot guaranteed.The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered viae-mail. Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the samefirm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereofare $25 each. For subscription information, contact Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552. *** End of Transmission ***