text:
It's the second stabbing attempt on Swedish police within hours. The perpetrator is a Morroccan youth. The same is happening in London. Two stabbing attempts on police within two days.
Welcome to Islam. The only way to end this is not to "deport terrorists" and allow them to train thousands of more terrorists elsewhere. First shoot these people rather than arrest them. The way to end it is to ban Islam, ban all further migration of muslim background and start deportations. Mosques need to close down and muslims and Islam need to change definition from 'religion' to 'fascist ideology'. Once they change the definition for Islam everything else can change; laws can change, greater restrictions can be applied. stricter laws, etc.
BREAKING NEWS: Swedish police officer stabbed in the neck in a busy square in Stockholm
- Officials have said it was an unprovoked attack at Medborgarplatsen Square
- The knifeman has been arrested in Stockholm, Sweden, for attempted murder
- Understood he crept up behind the policeman and stabbed him in the neck
- Witnesses described seeing a man in his 30s being dragged away by police
A Swedish police officer has been stabbed in the neck in a busy square in Stockholm.
Officials have said it was an unprovoked attack at Medborgarplatsen Square and that the knifeman has been arrested for attempted murder.
The attacker is said to have crept up behind the police officer before delivering a blow to the neck at around 10.30am this morning.
Police immediately locked down the area and witnesses described a man aged around 30 being dragged away.
A witness told Aftonbladet: 'I got up from the subway when the police dragged a man, he appeared to be at the age of 30.'
The injured policeman was rushed to Karolinska Hospital but the extent of his injuries are unknown at the moment.


text:
Tottenham Hotspur midfielder Christian Eriksen has detailed the events surrounding his trials with Premier League champions Chelsea and how he failed to impress Barcelona as a youngster. Eriksen underwent a series of trials across Europe but eventually joined Ajax in 2008.
As a youngster at Odense in his native Denmark, Eriksen was highly regarding across Europe and his ability saw him attract interest from a host of big-name clubs. Aged 14 he began to have trials with major clubs on the continent, and would end up moving to the Netherlands where he would be part-educated by Dennis Bergkamp.
Eriksen went for trials at both Chelsea and Barcelona, with varying levels of success. In England, he twice went to play for the west London outfit before deciding against a move, while at Barca he was unable to impress academy coaches.
"Me and Rasmus Falk, my team-mate from kids football and also Odense, went to Chelsea on trial," Eriksen explained to The Daily Mail. "I also went back the next year and had to think what I wanted. I played three games at Under 18s — versus Millwall, West Ham and some other team. We ate together with first-team players and you see Jose Mourinho and Didier Drogba walking around.
"But the whole thing was really different to Denmark, where everyone goes in and everyone goes out, no problem. Relaxed. Chelsea, boom, the door closes behind you and stays closed. It would be too big a step for me as a person back then."
"At Barca, we played a match against the Catalonia national team when I was there," he added. "I touched the ball three times in 90 minutes. Literally. I was running around, all quiet, saying, 'Here, play to me', but no. Then to the other side, 'Here, play me'. No? OK, to the other side, 'Here, play me'. No. I did that for 90 minutes.
"I don't know what happened. Training was good, but in this game I was thinking, 'I am not going to get the ball at all'. Maybe it's because all the guys were speaking Spanish. I learnt to be more aggressive in getting possession."

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Mark is a newbie to the world of Miss T. as of December, but he certainly fits right in. He's the real silent type accomplishing most of his communication through a series of head shakes, nods, and shrugs. Investigating into what took place during his weekend can be quite the chore, but has turned into a bit of a game for all of us.
Teacher: "Did you see any movies?"
Mark: Head shake
Teacher: "Did you play video games?"
Mark: Head shake
Teacher: "Watch TV?"
Head shake
"Go out to eat?"
Head shake
"Play with Legos?"
Head shake
"Read a book?"
Head shake
"Build a 747?"
Lip twitch.
"Eat a starfish?"
Bigger lip twitch.
"Save a beached whale?"
Split-second, legitimate, but quickly muffled smile. Followed by a head shake.
If I couldn't even evoke a conversation about the free moments reserved for fun in his life, I didn't hold out much hope for forming some New Years goals with him today. Surprisingly, the boy jotted down some realistic aims for the rest of the school year, namely completing homework assignments each night. I was impressed. he's silent, but self-aware.
Now came the time to determine an incentive for reaching his goal. In theory, this would be the easiest part of the task. But, Mark doesn't do easy. It seemed there was no pleasing him.
Teacher: "Would you like to work toward something from the prize box?"
Mark: Head shake
Teacher: "How about free time in class?"
Mark: Head shake
Teacher: "Lunch with a friend?"
Head shake
"A handshake?"
Head shake
"A pat on the back?"
Head shake
"Thumbs up?"
Head shake
"Round of applause?"
Head shake
It was about this time that Leon stepped in with a suggestion from far left field.
"Hey, what about if he makes his goal, he gets to wear the mustache glasses for the period?"
Just as I went to thank (but no thanks) Leon for his proposal and continue brainstorming rewards, I caught Mark out of the corner of my eye. Wonder of all wonders, he was nodding.


text:
The stoves for outdoor cooking enable those who enjoy the wonderful outdoors, to prepare delightful dishes, when they are away from their homes. The term "stove" refers to an appliance employed for cooking purposes or for heat generation. A camper or a backpacker requires an outdoor stove for cooking. Quite a few of the outdoor camping expeditions can continue for a number of days and call for cooking expertise to handle a lot of meals. These outdoor stoves are well accepted since the heat can be regulated as compared with open fires. The cooking stoves for outdoor use take much less time to cook food than charcoal grills. Every time you set fire to the charcoal, you are heavily dependent on the outside weather conditions. Many a times, when your survey team members and you return to the campsite, you are far too tired and famished to contend with making repeated attempts to light the charcoal.
In spite of the arguments regarding cooking stoves, F.W. Linqvist is acknowledged as the person who registered a patent, way back in 1880, for a burner that ran on kerosene. In the Roman era, stoves were made using earthenware, clay, and tile. The discovery of some attractively tinted glazed tile cooking stoves, dating back to the 16th – 17th century, suggest the effect of Moorish influence.
With technological advancement and the extensive use of electricity, coal fueled or wood burning cooking ranges have turned obsolete. These days the Pressurized burner cooking stoves are commonly used, since its potential to set ablaze any type of extremely inflammable liquid such as diesel, alcohol, or other type of motor fuels makes it very handy. Although, these stoves are far more complicated to manage, and more cumbersome to use than other stoves, they can certainly warm and cook the food far more quickly.
The stoves for outdoor cooking are available in a wide array of designs and styles. Some have replenishable gas-bottle stoves and gas-cartridge stoves. This makes it very easy to transport the stove, since the liquid can be carried in a separate container. You can always think about taking it with you on your camping trips, since it is convenient to cook on as well as to carry.
Stoves for outdoor cooking come in various sizes. Backpacking stoves can be the apt choice when traveling over long distances. The stove includes a burner, which enable the camper to prepare one dish at a time. Further outdoor stoves for cooking are larger, and can be transported by canoe, car, or horseback. They can store more fuel and can facilitate the preparation of more than a single main dish at a time. Usually, they are available with two or more burners.
Stoves for outdoor cooking are an excellent selection for outdoor camping, catering or social gatherings and in addition, they make your fishing and hunting expeditions more enjoyable. The outdoor stoves are sound and strong and are made to endure the severe climatic conditions. They are reasonably priced and can be made use of on the route or in your own backyard!
Find More Camping Cook Stoves Articles


text:
Mont Ste Odile (France)
October 16-19th 2019
For any contact with the organization of the Congress in 2019
only use the following email address:
Cette adresse e-mail est protégée contre les robots spammeurs. Vous devez activer le JavaScript pour la visualiser.
The Mont Sainte-Odile, an old abbey founded
more than 13 centuries ago in Alsace, France
ESE offers Meeting Grants worth up to € 450 each for ESE members as a contribution towards the total cost of attending ESE events and meetings.
Please note that a limited number of ESE Meeting Grants are available and they will be provided on a first-come first-served basis.
Where? The Mont Sainte-Odile (30 km from Strasbourg), an old abbey founded more than 13 centuries ago in Alsace, France
Program ? Programme
When ? Wednesday OCTOBER 16th to Saturday OCTOBER 19th 2019
Registration ? Coming soon
Grants ? Coming soon
Contact ? Cette adresse e-mail est protégée contre les robots spammeurs. Vous devez activer le JavaScript pour la visualiser.
The symposium starts on Wednesday 16 October at 4 pm The monastery of Mont Sainte Odile is located in Ottrott
(Alsace, France), 4,5 km from Obernai and 30 km from Strasbourg Airport ( see here)
There is a bus coming to Strasbourg main station on Wednesday, 16 October picking up passengers at 1:00 PM, then going to the airport picking up passengers at 1:45 PM.A snack will be served at Mont Ste Odile at 3:00 pm before the beginning of the conferences.Departure is scheduled on Saturday 19 October .
One bus will leave Mont Ste Odile at 1:30 PM after lunch for the airport, and a second bus will leave at the same time for Strasbourg main station.
If you cannot make the bus, a taxi from Strasbourg costs around 90 euros.
Alternatively, there are trains from Strasbourg to Obernai
(TER line Strasbourg-Molsheim-Obernai-Barr-Sélestat) every 30 min starting at 15h40.
Not all trains stop at the airport, but you can manage to go to Molsheim andboard the next train to Obernai.
A list of taxis in Obernai is here
An award of 250£ for the best poster will be provided by the Biochemical Journal.
Uploading abstracts:
Abstracts can be uploaded using the template available during the online registration process.
You will also be able to upload your abstract following your registration by logging back in using the username and password which you will have received on registration
The abstract template will be available for you to download.
The panel size for posters is 2m high and 80 cm wide.
Banner and Poster :
Nunez a major contributor to our knowledge of the thyroid gland and the role of thyroid hormone on brain development and one of the founding members of the European Thyroid Association and of the Hormones
and Cell Regulation Symposium, died in Washington in February 2018. French, he was born in Tunis (Tunisia) in 1927 in a Jewish family of Italian origin. He began his career as a fundamental organic chemist at the Pasteur Institute,
then ,as biochemist, at the College of France, Inserm and finally at the NIH.The first part of his career was devoted to the biosynthesis of thyroid hormone and the control of thyroid cell metabolism. In particular he discovered
reverse T3, characterized the enzymatic systems (thyroperoxidase ,H2O2 generating system etc.,) involved in the synthesis of thyroid hormones. He also developed the field of the biochemical actions of thyroid hormones. He
then began a major research activity on the role of microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins on brain development and on their regulation by thyroid hormones. He described the changes in activity and composition of the
microtubule-associated proteins tau and MAP2 during brain development.
During his stay in Bruxelles in 1982-1984, working with J.P. Brion, they discovered that tau proteins were the molecular component of neurofibrillary tangles, a key brain lesion in Alzheimer's disease. This major discovery led him later to further findings in brain development and in Alzheimer's disease.A major, authoritative figure in thyroid and in neurosciences, a forceful debater and organiser.
Nunez will be much regretted.
J E DUMONT , J P BRION Francon J, Fellous A, Lennon AM, Nunez J: Is thyroxine a regulatory signal for neurotubule assembly during brain development? Nature 1977, 266:188-90. PMID 859595 Mareck A, Fellous A, Francon J, Nunez J: Changes in composition and activity of microtubule-associated proteins during brain development. Nature 1980, 284:353-5. PMID 7360270 Brion JP, Passareiro H, Nunez J, Flament-Durand J: Mise en évidence immunologique de la protéine tau au niveau des lésions de dégénérescence neurofibrillaire de la maladie d'Alzheimer. ArchBiol(Brux) 1985, 95:229-35.
with the support of ... Avec le soutien de ...


text:
BlackBytes Components
Wednesday 23rd May, 2007 at 9:26 am Leave a comment
Anybody know the fate of BlackBytes? They have some great .NET components on their site but don't appear to be operating anymore – I've sent a number of emails and tried to contact them on their forums but they appear to have becomes ghostware.
One of the problems with automated systems – as can be found when you download and request trial keys – is that the system responds – giving the appearence of activity…
It'll be a shame if they have folded – their DNS API is the only one available.
Entry filed under: .NET, Development, Visual Studio.
Leave a Reply
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


text:
Every summer in the first week of August the Verden International Dressage and Jumping Festival is held. Crowds poor into stadiums and tents to watch fantastic performances by horse and rider combinations. From young horses to Grand Prix the international show is a summer must-see.
When wanting to take a break from spectating one can get lost in a maze of european equestrian riding vendors and brands. From custom boots and saddles to saddle pads and blankets available in any color under the sun… the experience is simply a equestrians dream.
Rain or shine competitors put in top efforts leaving onlookers in awe. From young PSG competitors skipping through torrential rain during their flying change routines to top jumpers gripping into soaked grass …. the event carried on.
On behalf on EQL.CO we would like to congratulate all competitions on a top weekend and sponsors for yet another wonderful summer event!


text:
Advanced Software Engineer - Platform / Linux Kernel - Low Level
Applied: No
|Date Posted:
|Wednesday, December 12th, 2018
|Job Location:
|San Jose, CA
|Pay Rate:
|Employment Type:
|Job Duration:
|Required Skills:
|Platform - OS Team, Kernel, internals, Linux operating system, low level, device drivers
Job Description:
Advanced Software Engineer - Platform / Linux Kernel - Low Level
Nimble Storage is the fastest-growing storage array start-up in history. We are currently looking for a Software Engineer to join our growing Platform-OS team and take a lead role in the development of our Linux-based Kernel.
Investigate, design, and develop enhancements for our Linux-based kernel, Nimble Operating System (OS) .
Design and development of software, typically as libraries, that interfaces Nimble's data path with the kernel and with hardware devices for reliable I/O of data to/from the network, NVRAM, and storage devices
Help to develop an effective Nimble OS packaging scheme.
Drive and deliver requirements for our Release Engineering team, in building the package, distro and USB image.
Design and develop thorough and effective unit and fault injection testing cases for Nimble OS.
Experience with Operating System development and debugging, preferably with Linux/Unix operating systems.
Experience with firmware (BIOS, BMC, Expander FW, NVRAM, HBA) is highly desired.
Hands-on experience on RPM packaging is highly desired.
Working knowledge of distro and 3rd party code management.
Experience with Operating System upgrade design, development, and testing.
Familiarity with multi-threaded and distributed software and with network protocols
Excellent communication skills, as well as strong analytical and diagnostic skills
Proficiency and significant experience in C/C++ and shell scripting
Strong knowledge of data structures and algorithms.
Ability to work with minimal direction in an open & fast-pace environment and take on a variety of roles as needed.
7+ years of relevant work experience including some lead technical roles.
Bachelor, MS, or PhD. in Computer Science or closely related field.
Who We Are:
Nimble has developed breakthrough architecture that combines flash memory with high-capacity disk to converge storage, backup, and disaster recovery for the first time. Nimble Storage solutions are built on the idea that enterprises should not have to compromise between performance, capacity, ease of management, and price.
Nimble's patented Cache Accelerated Sequential Layout architecture, designed from the ground up to effectively combine flash with high-capacity drives, makes high performance affordable, simplifies and enhances disaster recovery and backup, and delivers pain-free operations. Nimble Storage platforms support the performance needs of the most demanding primary applications while at the same time reduce backup windows / restore times from hours to seconds—all for at least 60 percent lower cost than existing solutions. Nimble Storage solutions are available through a global network of world-class channel partners.
Using its unique CASL architecture, Nimble Storage platforms support the performance needs of the most demanding primary applications while at the same time reduce backup windows / restore times from hours to seconds—all for at least 60 percent lower cost than existing solutions. Nimble Storage sells its appliances worldwide through a network of resellers and channel partners. More information about the company can be found at www.nimblestorage.com
Since its launch in July 2010, Nimble has garnered an impressive list of awards, including:
• CRN Storage Product of the Year
• CRN Test Labs "Highly Recommended" rating, calling Nimble "the Holy Grail of high- performance storage"
• Wall Street Journal "Next Big Thing" award
• Storage Newsletter #1 Most Promising Startup
• InfoWorld / Network World "25 New IT Companies to Watch"
• InfoWorld / Network World "25 Hot Products"
EEO Employer: Race, Religion, Color, Sex, Disability, National Origin, Age, Genetic Information, Protected Veteran Status, or any other legally protected group status.
* Qualified applicants in San Francisco with criminal histories will be considered for employment in accordance with the San Francisco Fair Chance Ordinance.
For more than 25 years, Randstad Technologies has been connecting companies around the world to customized technology solutions that meet and surpass objectives. We combine our deep industry expertise with our broad range of full-service capabilities – recruitment, consulting, projects, outsourcing – to deliver the right fit to our clients and candidates. From recruitment to technology solutions aimed at protecting and maximizing the value of technology investments, we power our clients' success – and drive our candidates' growth.


text:
Yesterday, I received my blog candy that I won from Jen who created this adorable stamp and sentiment. This is just part of her new released Wild Flower Kids, Ghoul Friends set that Stamp Happens carries exclusively.
The day this set was released I immediately fell in LOVE to say the least. Violet is just soooo cute and so much fun to color! Jen did an amazing job with all the details as you can see. I mean c'mon look at those cute leg warmers and the striped leotards. CUTE CUTE!
There are more stamps to this set that are just as adorable and full of detail, which by the way I cannot wait to tackle like the "Frankenstein" image (again)! Actually I did color the Frankenstein image last night, but decided it would be best not to post him, because, well he kinda looks like the Incredible Hulk! (Sorry Jen) From his neck down he looks great, but his poor little face looks "hulkish".
I can hardly wait to see what Jen comes up with next!
Well off I go to play with this incredible stamp set! Hope everyone is having a great weekend with family and/or friends.


text:
But don't try to touch me, don't try to touch me. 'Cos that will never happen again.
Past, Present, Future
John.Steven. It is now one hundred years since the log jam of accumulated productive forces reached critical mass and lurched into war. And after the war, in preparation for the next cycle, but to prevent a recurrence of the same blocking, productive forces were plumbed into a continent-wide plan of irrigation. From the Atlantic to the Baltic, a vast technocratic project of reconstructing the European economies was commenced. By implication, it is one hundred years since the moment when the revolution that should have happened within this clotting event, didn't. And so, from the occurrence of one event, and the non-occurrence of another, we might, as communists, reasonably conclude that effectively everything finished for human society at that juncture - one hundred years later, we are still stranded in some self-eternalising netherworld.
Joseph. In Radetzky March, Roth draws just such a line through the world as an aid for his 'before and after' comparison. And as you suggest, the line intersects history at 1914...
Back then, before the Great War [...], it was not yet a matter of indifference whether a person lived or died. If a life was snuffed out from the host of the living, another life did not instantly replace it and make people forget the deceased. Instead, a gap remained where he had been, and both the near and distant witnesses of his demise fell silent whenever they saw this gap. If a fire devoured a house in a row of houses in a street, the charred site remained empty for a long time. For the bricklayers worked slowly and leisurely, and when the closest neighbours as well as casual passers-by looked at the empty lot, they remembered the shape and the walls of the vanished house. That was now things were back then. Anything that grew took its time growing, and anything that perished took a long time to be forgotten. But everything that had once existed left its traces, and people lived on memories just as they now live on the ability to forget quickly and emphatically.
John.Steven. I understand from this, that the institutionalised forgetting of the dead, and a concomitant shift in emphasis to moving on, announces the passage of social reproduction into a new phase. From that moment, the earlier, haphazard, patchwork pattern of accumulation is supplanted by a strategic programming of relations as a means to stabilise and secure the accumulation of forces.
Joseph. All social power, until 1914, had been orchestrated around great squanderings of life – that brute which could afford, and survive, the greatest quantity of death was, by the principle of last man standing, the greatest power. With the commencement of war in 1914, and with a final tragic irony, this grandest of squanderings marked the expulsion of the ancien regime's last residues - it took a war of attrition to undo the institutions of life as attrition. The archaic global cult of death was then superseded by a systematic interference in the processes of life to the end of conserving forces. From that moment, the state began to realise its true function as strategiser of the security of social relations (i.e. it began to seek out certainty in the long term reproduction of labour power from which it could secure longer and longer lines of credit). Thus, the great advance within capitalist relations is located in its momentous reorientation towards life. Ideologically, after 1918, this is presented in the widely repreated slogan, Never Again. In order to permanently by-pass cyclical spirals into irrational capital destruction and the resultant resetting of social relations to the status quo ante, the state found its true purpose in redirecting social institutions towards securing the value of life as an exploitable, quantifiable and inexhaustible resource. By this means, it successfully navigated the Northwest Passage to biopower.
Jack. Obviously, the nostalgia in Roth is ironic, particularly in relation to the myth at the centre of The Radetzky March, but even so, he locates a genuine faultline in the Real.
Joseph. Yes, the description of an emergent logistics by which the dead are mechanically replaced by the living, as if it were a matter of replenishing supermarket shelves, creates a powerful impression of the progress in the assumption of interchangeability amongst living beings, and the level of violent abstraction in society that would be necessary to achieve this. This motif of infinite substitution reappears throughout social existence from 'mega-farms' to 'unlimited lives' in video-games.
Jack. The transformation of social process also changed the mechanism of change itself.
Joseph. The ground on which the 'revolutionaries', those emigrants of time, stood in 1914 broke off from the world and floated away, whilst they continued to rage at the receding coastline of the old world, to which they would never return. The revolt against death, that is against the power of causing death, ideologically represented by 'tyranny', lost its focus. Capitalism was not simply killing people but orchestrating material scarcity in relation to the surplus population it had generated.
John.Steven. This is well worn now, but if we rehearse it briefly: an imagined overthrow of repression (or tyranny) has always been the standard mythos of revolution, but from 1914, the mythos itself no longer connected with the production of actual relations. From that juncture, apparatuses directed towards exploitation of life were supplanting repressive institutions and the ongoing revolt against repression only served to 'autonomously' enable this process.
Joseph. In the previous century, the revolutionaries, like alchemists before them, had created their own field. They were the most keenly understanding of social process being themselves an expression of change. Suddenly the ground shifted and they became mere practitioners of an obsolete symbolic system which was consequently incorporated as a lost art within social reproduction - meanwhile, social scientists expropriated society as an object of knowledge and manipulation.
John.Steven. Revolutionaries became uncomprehending of actual social forces.
Joseph. They preferred to replay the narrative which set themselves against the oppressive archetypes of the old world which continued to emerge from their unconscious. They carried on attacking that which 'capitalism' was already destroying.
Jack. We have heard from you about nihilist communism, imaginary communism, impossible communists, anti-political communists, cosmic communism, whimsical tragical communism... who are you now?
Joseph. Today, we have our last communists' hat on. By this I mean, we are the last communists, and so are you. The difference between us is that we have tried to include this as a factor in our reflections but you have not - on the other hand, this difference is not so very significant.
John.Steven. So, we are all last communists. I can guess at what you mean: maybe, that we have reached the final permutation in the performance of ultraleftism's theoretical contortions - and now we must disappear in a puff of smoke. Your spiritual forebear, uncle PKD wrote, 'The universe has a habit of deleting anachronisms.'
Joseph. Cue my mirthless laughter. Valis certainly seems to anticipate our every argument - it is a black mirror of discomfortment which anticipates and thus diminishes the entire repertoire of the escape artist. But still, we press on. We explore the dead ends, and include the new confirmations of our old dreads. We produce a record.
Jack. Like the alchemists.
John.Steven. Precisely. Don't you think you fall into the fallacy of end days thinking? You are merely the present representative of successive generations which have assumed historic process must conclude with them.
Jack. Agreed, the real problem has been their failure to recognise their place as a moment in the continuum. We can easily imagine how capitalism, as you characterise it, could pass once again from a system of exploitation to repression.
John.Steven. In fact, this is happening now. It is being driven by an increasing global population, of which an increasing proportion is redundant and unemployed. The correlation between this population and capital's ongoing problem of realising surplus value (in circumstances driven by the inexorable increase in proportion of constant capital within the productive process) could easily indicate an already established spiral of breakdown and regression back through the phases of domestication, real domination and then to something like formal domination, i.e. a direct class struggle between two expropriating classes.
Jack. And where this occurs might not an 'outside' re-establish itself within the surplus communities. I mean a clear 'relation' between the proletarianised class of humanity and capital... and might not communism reappear within those communities as an expression of this relation?
Joseph. Simply, in terms of human suffering, capital destruction or the collapse of systems of dependence is nothing to be hoped for... the return of repression would indicate an end for capitalism but not necessarily a liberation from the autonomising environment of exploitation. The production of surplus population is not a true return to an earlier moment but merely the cyclical reversion to a particularly wintry configuration of a highly advanced form of domination. Already, we see how wealth and power may be directly extracted from 'being' rather than from 'activity' - it is true that this process could not be characterised as real 'capitalism', but on the other hand it would probably not create an opening for communist consciousness (i.e. the freedom to sell or withhold labour has become irrelevant in circumstances of an unemployed 'outside' - and this removes the opportunity for commencing the upward spiral of a self-valorising world-producing identity).
John.Steven. I suppose the content of the last communists' reflections concerns the historical probability of an objective historical communist event.
Joseph. Of course. We conclude that this has become progressively less probable over the last hundred years. Specifically, the defeat of the workers' movement in 1914 (which it registered practically as the failure to realise its programme from 1917-1920) indicates the precise moment where communism became historically untenable.
Jack. Why?
Joseph. In practical terms, the working class ceased to adequately antagonise capital's domination within the social relation. At that point, capital passed into a stage of real domination where it progressively incorporated the workerist values of the Republic of labour in the form of the Community of Capital. Yet another threshold was passed in 1945 when 'real domination' accelerated into what we might call 'real exploitation' or domestication. By this term we refer to an environmental imperative that we are still adapting to, but which is akin to the seeming paradox of free range factory farming.
Jack. But why does that make communism impracticable?
Joseph. The runaway of capital, i.e. the unbalanced series of progressive adaptations within human society that were set in motion since 1914, has caused the historical disappearance of a viable revolutionary subject from the world. In short, the ongoing modifications of society have first inhibited, then banished, and finally engineered away the capacity of human beings to take conscious control of the relational systems which produce them - this unfortunate turn of events implies that any revolt against some or other tyrant only serves to remove the barriers which had previously held back the flooding of society by global capital.
Jack. So the Arab Spring indicates the passage from manifest repression to a subliminal exploitative process.
Joseph. The given forms of revolt now facilitate rather than restrict the decisive mode of power - under current conditions, the only object of revolt is to remove little dictators, it gains no purchase on global social process. We can understand this process, which we call domestication, as a circuit of mutually conditioning components - at the lowest level, the life-concerns of life-forms are channelled into the apparatus of domination. People now desire, rather than refuse, their own integration.
John.Steven. 'Why do men fight for their servitude as stubbornly as though it were their salvation?'
Joseph. It is only in their revolt that people formulate the desire for their own repression because it is only in repressive relations that permission plays a significant role. Hypersensitive responses to exploitative algorithms (these cannot be called productive 'relations') tend to take a repressive ideological pathway because the processes which trigger intolerances operate beneath the threshold of permissions - they function immanently, immersively and create a disturbing sense of de-realisation and alienation. Thus, the desire for self-repression is an attempt to flood that foreboding before an amorphous and unopposable processive vapour (e.g. cloud computing) with tangible relations... within which the self-repressed figure at least appears to itself as significant, human, and thus retains some sense of power, i.e. the power located within the downtrodden. Self-repression is minimally preferable to that sense of self-dispersal which is the consequence of submergence within networks of subliminal exploitation. In a situation where the self cannot even register that which feeds upon it, it finds itself incapable of formulating arguments against, for example, 'social media' (that liberating acid of totalisation which has dissolved the mechanics of human repression.)
John.Steven. Why can't we communise domesticating technology and expropriate it for our own ends?
Joseph. Automation is realised as the compression of command chains in technological process. The advent of 'scientific management' integrated the multiples of discreet command chains into a complex 'food net' which further removed productive relations into the abstract. The emergence of a sentient food net only served to augment barriers against communist possibility by removing the productive process as a physical site for conscious intervention. We find that we cannot take control of certain processes for communism when those processes by their very architecture are programmed to realise the prevention of communism. As human beings of the present moment we are manufactured to be incompatible with obsolescent social forms like communism. On broader terms, automation materialises both the removal and inhibition of conscious interference - but communism is nothing but conscious interference in process.
Jack. The other version is that automation liberates us from what is tedious and backbreaking.
Joseph. No doubt. That which is automated is removed from conscious vigilance. However, on a large scale this removal also indicates the problem of bringing consciousness back...
Jack. Because, I assume, consciousness appears only where there is disruption to process, and as consciousness costs energy, our preference is to not think directly into the world but allow machines to take the strain.
Joseph. A return to consciousness from immanent repose supposes a willed struggle through states of drugged inertia, avoidance rituals, and hostile resistance. It is painful to bring consciousness into the world and change direction - it is always preferable to allow things to take their course.
John.Steven. But to return to the earlier question. Why last communists and not nihilist communists?
Joseph. I think the object is different. Ha ha, the word is not the thing. There is no 'nihilist communism', it is a term for two incompatibilities linked together. On the one side there is individuated 'nihilism', this may only find resolution, on other terms than its own, i.e. by social forces appearing as 'communism'. On the other side, socialised 'communism' stumbles before the problem of a non-abstract equality between different individuals. Nihilist communism supposes two trajectories that indicate a lived contradiction between social imperative and lived existence, and which, we have found, finally, cannot be overcome.
John.Steven. So you mean there are no real 'last communists', it is just a label for a point you want to make?
Joseph. Ha ha. Um, well, all communists are last communists.
Jack. Explain.
Joseph. Nihilist communism contained a fundamental inconsistency in its theory which nobody much engaged with because they were too busy with that title.
Jack. Which was?
Joseph. The term 'pro-revolutionary'. It signified both those who were simply 'in favour' of revolution and those who could no longer seriously identify themselves as the subjective agents of revolution (for the latter, the prefix pro indicated a relinquishment of an otherwise assumed relation with a particular term). The theory became complicated due to lack of clarity in who was being referred to, i.e. those who identified themselves as revolutionaries, or those who identified themselves as occupying a specific space for being not-revolutionaries.
Jack. And the designation 'last communist' clarifies this how?
Joseph. It does not clarify that problem at all. My point is that the term is directed at another problem. I mean, the problem of nihilist communism is the definition of who is and who is not a revolutionary - i.e. no agency is adequate to the role of revolutionising social relations. The problem for the last communists is the processive dematerialisation of communism from history despite the vigilant attention to detail of the communists.
John.Steven. Okay. Then why 'last' exactly?
Joseph. It is a matter of recording as simply as possible a relation to an object that is no longer present, and which applies appropriately for all those existing objectively in relation to that object.
John.Steven. The object being 'communism'?
Joseph. We should say, historical communism.
John.Steven. And the relation specifically is defined by the disappearance of communism from history?
Joseph. I would say, set in motion, rather than defined. Just as the object of Christianity has receded into the distant past as a result of a parallax-type movement within historical social relations, and which has caused all those who maintain the Christian life-world to appear in the actual world as last Christians, so the realisable object of communism has leaked out of its theoretical framing, even though the frame itself has, to some extent, survived. We should note here before getting too far into this, that 'last' does not suppose an imminent demise... a last relation to an object may survive for millennia.
Jack. How does this relate to Marx's famous comment on the real power of Apollo in Greek life?
Joseph. I think that is somewhat of a distraction, or at least we could get bogged down in it. But the issue could be framed along the lines of: what does it mean for those who fall into existence within an apollonian life-world to continue to live there after the advent of their disbelief in Apollo (i.e. after they accept Apollo is not there)?
Jack. And, what is the significance of that question?
Joseph. For example, it is well known that the rationale of science first utilised already established theological procedures rather than the supposed 'scientific method' – the findings of science appeared as irreducible anomalies within the dominant life-world, even within the life-world of the scientists themselves. Thus, the form of scientific practice for hundreds of years was essentially theological, specifically neo-platonist, but proceeded with a god-shaped hole at its centre. The vaunted scientific method was incorporated into the neo-platonist frame as a retroactive demonstrative device, whilst actual discoveries continued to be produced within the scientific domain theologically.
Jack. Then the communist 'life-world' operates with a communism shaped hole in it.
Joseph. Communism has become objectively impossible - as communists, we are living with the acceptance of the non-existence of Apollo. And yet we carry on. The life-world survives. The moment for communism's appearance is now nearly a hundred years past - for many years an afterimage of its possibility survived (until 1945), and was maintained subjectively. But that too has now faded and an absence is fully established at the centre of communist consciousness - the struggle of the 'ultraleft' has been to incorporate the impossibility of communism into its project.
Jack. A rather difficult undertaking given the emphasis on 'praxis'.
Joseph. All permutations have now been explored, and the ultraleft cannot honestly not orient itself towards the absence of Apollo. There is compulsion, a pressure from the external world, for a re-calibration of the communist life-world and for the removal of the category of 'realisation'.
Jack. Then why not simply abandon the ultraleft 'life-world' of theory and casting the net for a revolutionary subject?
Joseph. Well yes, why not? And yet we do not abandon it. The object of Christianity has been literally absent from the centre of its conceptual frame for two thousand years, and it has been historically absent for several hundred. However, the frame itself, the life-world, even taking into consideration the tacit acceptance that Christ will never rise again, has survived. There has been a convoluted passage into gall-like domains, outgrowths, of ethics, metaphor, ontology, politics, narrative and science.
Jack. But to what purpose, self-deception, mystification? Christian ethics is bad ethics, Christian metaphor, ontology, politics science is merely bad metaphor, ontology, politics, science.
Joseph. Mystification is a major factor, of course it is. But it is not the main factor. The frame continues to produce materials of experience in the world that are considered worthwhile; these materials sustain the given life form. In particular, the Christian life-world processes the stuff of loss, grief, meaning, relations and so on. As to your other point, we might also observe that communist politics, ethics, metaphor, science are all 'bad'. In practice, it turns out that even pure science, objective ethics, the most conscious and transparent politics, also turn out to be 'bad', if by this we mean that all praxis is splattered with the gore of unintended consequence.
John.Steven. But communism cannot be simply relegated to an ersatz Christianity, a means for framing humanity's 'issues'. The real problematic of communism has always been its realisation.
Joseph. Well, we cannot know which demon might advance towards us because of the conceptual constraints of our undertaking, as is illustrated in MRR James' The Mezzotint. The point is that Christianity pushed science and atheism out from the constraints of its own life-world, and into the objective world - these exaptations took shape as a form of knowledge in relation to those earlier constraints but really only actualised under later, and altered, conditions.
Jack. Perhaps all that has proved a distraction too far. The term 'last communists' is not clear, and was lost early in the rather verbose account of the pro-revolutionary ambiguity.
Joseph. The lost communists are those who, knowingly or unknowingly, appear in the last possible relation to the final phase of their object, which is its absence or removal from their immediate intimacy with it.
Jack. They are last because there can be no other relation to their object?
Joseph. They are in the process of introjecting the irreducibility of a communism-shaped hole into the conditions of their practice... conditions which otherwise absolutely assumed the possibility of communism. In a similar way, Christians no longer believe in a literal Bible, a literal Resurrection, a literal Day of Judgement - the last relation is a lost relation, or a cutting loose from that which initially set the body in motion.
Jack. You should get out more. I think literalist fundamentalism is not as rare as you might think.
Joseph. That is second order literalism, which appears post-refutation, it is reaction. The perverse fanaticism of revivalists proves them to be the true unbelievers, they revel satanically in their error. Their arguments are based in a refusal of that which they secretly know to be true, they draw their energy from an external force and it appears as denunciation, anathema, fatwa. Their's is a sick flourishing at the end, a last flaring up. They know their doctrine to be disconnected from the world and yet are also allowed by the world to advance their arguments from strategically irrelevant caves, because no living force in the world can be bothered to contradict them. This fate is also enjoyed by the communists.
Jack. You should get out more. I think literalist fundamentalism is not as rare as you might think.
Joseph. That is second order literalism, which appears post-refutation, it is reaction. The perverse fanaticism of revivalists proves them to be the true unbelievers, they revel satanically in their error. Their arguments are based in a refusal of that which they secretly know to be true, they draw their energy from an external force and it appears as denunciation, anathema, fatwa. Their's is a sick flourishing at the end, a last flaring up. They know their doctrine to be disconnected from the world and yet are also allowed by the world to advance their arguments from strategically irrelevant caves, because no living force in the world can be bothered to contradict them. This fate is also enjoyed by the communists.
John.Steven. We are the last communists because the last few strands of our attachment are to be severed, but from the other end.
Jack. We are also the lost communists because the last few strands of attachment must be severed from our end.
Joseph. Passage into the last phase depends entirely upon a severance event. The manner in which the umbilicus is cut is decisive for what must happen next. It is a matter of relinquishment, of letting go but also of being cut adrift, marooned.
Jack. What is the gain for those communists who continue as if they are persuaded that communism is a real movement? What is the reason for them not to suspend their performance?
Stephen. They know, we all know, communism is not possible and yet they cannot reconcile this with their practice.
Joseph. The problematic is similar to that in method acting - how real do you have to get to really get real? As dear Larry once observed vis-à-vis 'the method': Acting is illusion, as much illusion as magic is — and not so much a matter of being real.
John.Steven. And yet communists are caught between 'pretending' (i.e. going through the motions of what Blanchot calls insufficiency at the heart of the elective community) and taking their project for real. Can one, as if by sleight of hand, deceive others with the image of 'another world is possible' and also believe in that to which the trick alludes?
John.Steven. And yet communists are caught between 'pretending' (i.e. going through the motions of what Blanchot calls insufficiency at the heart of the elective community) and taking their project for real. Can one, as if by sleight of hand, deceive others with the image of 'another world is possible' and also believe in that to which the trick alludes?
Jack. Put another way, what is in it for the communists who really believe? What is the reward that might be extracted for carrying on as if the communism-shaped hole were not there?
Joseph. It is the reward extracted by all congregations where two or three are gathered together in the transcendent term's name. Just as 'faith communities' cannot relinquish the reality of God, so communists find it difficult in relation to their ultimate goal. The role of the transcendent term, which is fervently asserted as not only a real term but as realising of all other terms, is to mediate the actual social relations which are undertaken within its domain. Of course, these assertions of possibility are made by individuals who, like Peter before the cockerel crows, and in divergent contexts, wholly accept them to be fraudulent. This is precisely the behavioural circuit which underlies 'fetishism'. In short, faith communities derive compensation from the espirit de corps which is generated by their direct internal relations (and the relation of these relations to the external world) which they then misattribute to the agency of the transcendent term.
John.Steven. Why can't they sever their relation to the transcendent and simply extract the same compensations from the immanent social intercourse of the congregation? What would be the cost of abandoning their willed delusion?
Joseph. That is the great mystery. When relations are rationalised to the status of nothing but direct relations (where all terms are rationally present to the participants), they lose their compulsive lustre. The disillusioned community drifts apart. Something similar is encountered in the problematic of transference where simple knowledge of the operative mechanism within an inappropriate relation is insufficient to relieve its compulsive allure.
John.Steven. In other words, a transcendent term always takes on a threefold form: it is necessary, it is an illusion, but it is also unhealthy.
Joseph. Compulsion, or a 'traumatic kernel', is intrinsic to all relations. This component cannot be undone but may, perhaps, only be dispersed into other and further mediating regimes.
John.Steven. Then it is a matter of deciding upon the character of engagement, in particular between knowing pretence and the method, locating a register somewhere between Olivier and Artaud.
Joseph. Knowing pretence is preferable, but a pinch of both madness and method is necessary - after all theatre is real.
Jack. Are you advocating that communists should put away childish things, adopt a pragmatic approach, and adapt to the world as it is. Doesn't 'last communist' suggest 'post-communist.'
Joseph. Absolutely not. We are for le communisme pour le communisme my dear fellows and nothing less.
John.Steven. It comes down to antirealism: nothing is possible, nothing is realisable from within the 'communist life-world' but, by some twisted path, this turns out to be precisely the true end of social existence.
John.Steven. It comes down to antirealism: nothing is possible, nothing is realisable from within the 'communist life-world' but, by some twisted path, this turns out to be precisely the true end of social existence.
Joseph. I do not know if a prize of truth can be claimed. However, communists, or indeed anarchists, are compelled to maintain their life-world, come what may and in terms of universality.
John.Steven. Where you are acknowledged at all, I suppose the term 'beautiful soul' has been applied to you. Do you think it is appropriate that your argument concerning the severance of communist conscious from world process is dismissed as 'purism' - and indicative of a reluctance to get your hands dirty? With reference to this the following paragraph must have been quoted more than once at you:
It lives in dread of staining the radiance of its inner being by action and existence. And to preserve the purity of its heart, it flees from contact with actuality, and steadfastly perseveres in a state of self-willed impotence to renounce a self which is pared away to the last point of abstraction, and to give itself substantial existence, or, in other words, to transform its thought into being, and commit itself to absolute distinction [that between thought and being]. The hollow object, which it produces, now fills it, therefore, with the feeling of emptiness. Its activity consists in yearning, which merely loses itself in becoming an unsubstantial shadowy object, and, rising above this loss and falling back on itself, finds itself merely as lost. In this transparent purity of its moments it becomes a sorrow-laden "beautiful soul" , as it is called; its light dims and dies within it, and it vanishes as a shapeless vapour dissolving into thin air.
Joseph. The powerful ambivalence in Hegel's sketch (what is this passage exactly: a warning? A repudiation?), which draws from the relinquishment of his earlier embrace of the beautiful soul, if considered with its place in romantic consciousness, together with its anticipation of later forms of decadence, takes on a magical resonance. It is enchanting, captivating. It is a siren's song.
John.Steven. I agree. Maybe it is so powerful because the figure denounced is inseparable from the denunciation.
Joseph. The intimacy between Hegel's mood of conceptualisation and his personified concept causes the latter to appear, in the case of the beautiful soul, fatally draped in a guise of that which must not be countenanced even though its allure cannot be denied.
John.Steven. I don't know. I am also unable to read that text, part paen, part eulogy, part renunciation, part castigation and not become entranced by it.
Joseph. After all, the soul, whose beauty exemplifies the counter-term to Hegel's instrumentalising ideal, is both properly named and yet if it had not been negatively presented, would not have sung so affectingly: the beautiful soul is a warning that is also the trap. So much of the Impermissible Ideal is channelled into Hegel's description that the figure is altered by the pressure into a sort of outcast, a character from Büchner or Hoffman.
John.Steven. I swoon. I wear a frilled blouse open to the navel. I cannot help but desire it to be who I am.
Joseph. Is not the beautiful soul conflictedly beautiful, in truth a locus of contradiction (a beauty that appears only by denunciation), and therefore, archetypically sublime?
Jack. And I was thinking it was a convenient pressure valve in Hegel's argumentation to prevent idealist runaway. But what does it mean to identify with the beautiful soul in full knowledge that it may only appear as that which must be discounted in advance?
Joseph. The beautiful soul is a divine but fallen soul, which must be saved if it is to save... empathy with the beautiful soul, the work of saving the saver is the task of the ugly soul. He who knowingly takes up the mask of the beautiful soul is presented with a quite different problematic of redemption than he who stands accused of being the beautiful soul.
John.Steven. The beautiful soul refuses the historical task of participation in history, it casts about for an essence outside of process.
Joseph. The beautiful soul stands back from the full realisation of the bourgeois forces articulated by the Enlightenment - for whatever reason (probably sentimentality or narcissism), it baulks at process, it is the very thought of the diverticulum. Even so, the trauma at the heart of the beautiful soul, which causes it to hold back and refuse movement, still places it in advance of Marxism. However, by contrast, the ugly soul recognises that inaction is imposed from the outside. Or, more accurately, the ugly soul is aware how its potential for 'action' remains but also recognises that all the acts open to it only further contribute to the circumstances which it refuses - it is caught in zugzwang.
Jack. But people still try to improve their situation and resist the further encroachments of exploitative processes into their lives.
Joseph. I would never argue against the proletariat's defence of its own interest. But we are talking here about communists, a non-economic formation, and the problematic of the salvator salvandus - he who must be saved in order to perform his saving purpose.
Jack. Is there is no path from the flexing of economic self-interest to communist consciousness?
Joseph. In practice, communists have attempted to lay such paths by participating in reformist campaigns. Unfortunately, the worth of their efforts is established for others by the intensity of their commitment - they're the guys who are prepared to clean the toilets of the struggle. But their contribution is never registered at the level of their theoretical input, i.e. within the category where their difference makes a difference.
Jack. They are communists in motive but are constrained by circumstance to behave as reformists.
John.Steven. Communists do not bring the quality of communism to the struggle but only the quantity of their energy.
Joseph. Revolutionary reformism, or Marxism, can be understood precisely in terms of energy conversion where a precious quality of consciousness is transformed into a willingness to undertake unrewarding and eventually futile tasks in the cause of 'realisation.'
John.Steven. Militants are only ever present because of an ulterior motive... they're the nutters, they're the fanatics, the loonies, the fringe. They perform a role but not that which they have set themselves.
Jack. I do accept that that has often proved to be the case - but if they were not in place, then they would not be in position to introduce the transcendent term if opportunity should present itself.
Joseph. But even then, the problem does not lie within the struggle to formulate an authentic and effective movement of consciousness into the world, which might broadly be termed 'communisation'. The real problem is located in the paradox of self-abolition - which in its essence is also the paradox of the redeemed redeemer.
Jack. You mean, we cannot assert ourselves and also disappear.
John.Steven. He means that if communism is the key that will release the world from its prison, then someone or something must first unlock the cell which constrains communism.
Joseph. We are capitalised beings, we embody abstract domination in our social relations. We might intellectually grasp the necessity of our disappearance from the world as domesticated creatures but we are also driven by a lust for life. And it is at the level of our life-signs, our appetites, that we are tracked, modified, directed and exploited in the life-world. Our opposition to dependancy, being dependent in itself, only colonises opposition with the opposed logic.
John.Steven. That argument is evidence to support the allegation of your 'literary turn'. Why should communists hold onto the communist life-world if it is unrealisable?
Joseph. It is a question of subjective maturation in relation to the realisability of the ideal object. That a set of principles may not be realised in the world is not necessarily a sufficient blow against maintaining those principles - the real issue is whether they work; whether they are theoretically compelling; whether they produce findings that are worthy of further investigation - whether they draw attention, attract energy, razzle-dazzle 'em.
John.Steven. But don't these activities lose all relevance if the ultimate goal becomes utopian?
Joseph. On the contrary, the refusal of that convenient instrumentalisation into 'ends and means' causes the means to become intrinsically prizeworthy, and re-presents the end as a glittering ideal.
John.Steven. As in Wilde's map that must include Utopia?
Joseph. Nobody ever thought Formulary for a New Urbanism was a realisable blueprint. It indicated a different orientation between i. presence in this world, ii. the impossible and iii. the transcendent term.
John.Steven. There is a strand of Kleinianism running through that argument.
Joseph. I agree. It is a matter of relinquishing the part-object of communism, which turns out only to have been a subjective representation, and not communism itself. We must learn our most difficult lesson: Communism is not what is represented by communists.
Jack. Just as there will be no believers in heaven, there can be no communists in communism?
Joseph. They are like clumsy lovers, they crush the object of their adoration.
Jack. Communists destroy communism.
Joseph. Historically, communists have suppressed communism so as to save it.
John.Steven. But still, you seem to be suggesting a love by other means. Is there a backdoor to communism which by-passes the impotent representations of the communists?
Joseph. That is not my concern. I am interested in preventing communists controlling the representation of their object. It is necessary for communism to become a free floating and invisible planet. The object may only become truly autonomous when it has become truly unrealisable, when it has become archaic, in possession of the other, entirely alien. Communists must come to terms with the termination of their desire by the dematerialisation of its object.
Jack. Are you suggesting that if they maintain their life-world as communists, then something else will appear within it, some other and unexpected object for which they alone are prepared?
Joseph. Not at all. I have given the wrong impression. No. If anything other than communism appears within the communist life-world, the communists themselves will not recognise it except as an incompatible presence, all teeth and claws, that is 'burrowing his way slowly and stealthily straight toward me.'
Jack. Then, I still fail to see why they should 'maintain the life-world' - particularly if this routine of maintenance produces false representations.
Joseph. As they pass into the phase of the last relation, their discipline consists entirely of tending to their arguments and incorporating the knowledge that the object of those arguments is no longer accessible to them.
Jack. Again and again, I keep coming back to the question, why not give up if there is no hope of success?
Joseph. Hope was never the decisive element. It is not because someone has hoped that their goal becomes attainable. To include the code for relinquishing hope within the programme changes nothing objectively that was not already there, but it does clarify things programmatically.
Jack. You mean, by removing insupportable components, the machine runs more efficiently?
Joseph. The nonsense of realisation, of communisation, of praxis, of radical subjectivity, of joining theory with practice - all of that may now be set to one side if it was ever thought that it truly contributed anything. The burden of realisation is lifted.
Jack. But that was all there was to communism, the point is to change the world.
Joseph. Not at all. Anyway, communists cannot give up by act of will, they may only be defeated, crushed, abolished - the life-world breached. Before that eventuality, their purpose is to defensively modify the communist burrow so that they can no longer be caught out by external attacks and internal failures. Even as the life-world shrinks, the core must still be defended... i.e. the conditions of the life-world's own (and not communism's) autonomous possibility. Practically, the life-world must maintain its programme but at the same time engage the world without self-delusion.
Jack. You seem to be talking about the last monks not the last communists.
Joseph. Perhaps - but we are not referring to a voluntary undertaking. This is a historical matter of what is left to us. The problem we have all been wrestling is that we cannot overcome by our own efforts that which has been placed in our way. For decades now, the ultraleft has engaged the problematic of communism without movement, of revolution without subject. There is no evidence whatsoever that it has got anywhere at all. On the contrary, the holding out for 'Bolshevism without a party' has only caused it to wither more rapidly.
Jack. But still, you give no indication of what it is that the last communists are for. What do they do?
Joseph. They are scattered like island croutons of attachment disorder; an archipelago of deep fried processeive bread cubes, oscillating between rapt attention and low intensity detachment. They are caught in the surface of a cooling soup system which cycles endlessly through its sub-programmes of minimal preference. Will that do?
Jack. Try again.
Joseph. I clear my throat:
For when the traveller returns from the mountain-slopes into the valley,
he brings, not a handful of earth, unsayable to others, but instead
some word he has gained, some pure word, the yellow and blue
gentian. Perhaps we are here in order to say: house,
bridge, fountain, gate, pitcher, fruit-tree, window–
at most: column, tower. . . . But to say them, you must understand,
oh to say them more intensely than the Things themselves
ever dreamed of existing.
Jack. I don't know if that really describes what it is you are referring to, or whether it is a case of misdirection by association. However, on a different tack, what is it that differentiates your approach to that of communisation?
Joseph. The 'communising' current has sought to rationalise the dual separation of historic communist consciousness from its natural carrier (i.e. the proletariat) and from the site where this separation must be overcome, but instead has been reinforced and institutionalised (as social reproduction).
John.Steven. By 1920, neither the proletariat nor the industrial terrain, in which it was located, survived?
Joseph. The communisation current argues that communism until 1920 could only ever take the form of a 'republic of labour' in which all life was reduced to the question of production. Further to this, it is supposed, within this current, that the critique of workerism and of work only became feasible during the later decades of the Twentieth Century - as a result of proletarian struggles against the procedural form imposed on those struggles.
John.Steven. Is that not at least plausible?
Joseph. Well, in contradistinction to the analysis, communism as the object of struggle against capitalism has bled out of the world. Before you can evaluate its claims you really have to keep in mind what communisation theory is addressing.
Jack. OK, I suppose you are going to say a lack, as that is the stuff of all theory.
Joseph. Communisation theory has had to compensate for the disappearance of a discernible communist movement and yet at the same time maintain its historicist framing of the developments in the relations of production. In short, there is no adequate, self-describing communist agency in the world, so communisation theory seeks to supplant the role of this agency by identifying a pattern of conflict at the level of social production, which otherwise would go unrecorded. The argument is that developments in social relations are driven by the proletariat's struggles against those constraints that once contained it. The runaway in disciplinary infrastructure indicates the increasing problems of containment of populations within the social relation.
John.Steven. You evidently don't agree, if you did, we would not be having this discussion.
Joseph. Well, the claims of communisation theory are untestable. We find ourselves, at one level, trapped into observing 'he would say that wouldn't he?' At another level, we can see that it is compelled to operate to preserve itself and its organs on its own terms. It elaborates a self-containing life-world and seeks to defend the integrity of its labyrinthine burrow which sustains, conditions and constrains its presence in the external world.
Jack. We will talk about life-world later, but what are the actual arguments against communisation theory's historicist analysis?
Joseph. We have covered this ground before and now we are free of it, we no longer have to repair the walls of our burrow against it. Communisation theory enjoyed the short season of its blooming like a rare desert plant - in a sense it has been too successful. It has since lost impetus as a plausible theory, and now awaits the invading creature which has tunnelled down into its tunnels.
Jack. No, but what are the arguments.
Joseph. In measurable reality, (i.e. by the rate of appearance of communist arguments in the world) the territory and practice of communism, its material relevance in society, has continued to shrink since the death of workerism even as communist ideas strain towards theoretical perfection - i.e. the decline of workerism has not facilitated the possibility of a more fully elaborated for-itself communism. On the contrary, that trace which survives of communism, its utopian essence, has become irrevocably separated from, and irrelevant to, world process - the purity of theoretical communism now demonstrates its unrealisability.
Jack. Respond to the claims concerning the proletariat.
Joseph. The passing of the repressive phase of workerism is not the indicator of a 'critique' but of a collapse. For decades now workers have taken the injunction 'its up to you not to heed the call up' to heart, and yet this has resulted only in a diminishment in the capacity of autonomous self-discipline.
Jack. You think repressive structuring is necessary for communist consciousness?
Joseph. I cannot answer that, but the subversion of repressive mechanisms by capital has not facilitated the appearance of 'uncontrollables', only those who are disciplined remotely, and beneath the threshold of their awareness: salt, sugar, fat.
Jack. What has the end of repression 'facilitated.'
Joseph. We can measure the terms of the external world against the terms of our life-world. We find that the absence of communism from the world is everywhere demonstrable. We also find that the presence of communism in the world is nowhere demonstrable. Therefore, to insist on communism's continued relevance requires the mechanism of self-deception common to all irrational belief systems - i.e. that disappearance indicates emergence, that no evidence is highest evidence etc. For this reason, it is necessary to turn communisation theory on its head, in order to come to terms with the disappearance of communism from the world.
Jack. What does that mean, turn on its head?
Joseph. The idea that the social relation is increasingly unstable. That this instability has engendered and is exacerbated by a progressively uncontrollable proletariat. That this uncontrollability in itself is an embodied argument against the social category of proletariat. That it is but one step from the critique of proletariat to that of the act of expropriation. That expropriation, i.e. theft, indicates an initial movement towards communising consciousness. That this move will only accelerate as it is realised autonomously at numerous flashpoints. That communisation will begin within this process. All this must be turned upside down and reconsidered through the hypothesis of domestication.
John.Steven. You think it is a mistake for the theory of communist revolution to take a convoluted turn?
Joseph. Certainly. Communisation theory flagrantly violates the rule of Occam's razor. It takes a very complicated and counterintuitive route to end up at its desired destination - communisation theory finds what it wanted to find. We must suppose that the reason for the particular framing of its analysis is to reproduce itself unchanged. It calls upon the theme of historical movement purely as a means for establishing external verification. In this case, as in so many others, correlation does not imply causation.
Jack. Just now, you said communisation theory was too successful. I understand what you mean, or at least I think I do. The communising current theorisies formal breaks between periods of class conflict, this contrasts within syndicalist arguments for continuity. For the syndicalists, social change is always a matter of exacerbation: increasing demands, involving more people, expanding the organisation, spreading the core ideas and practical forms, and ratchetting up class polarisation. However, the recent Grangemouth dispute indicates how a militant workforce and its basic syndicalist tactic of solidarity can now be outmanoeuvred by militant capitalism. It seems that communisation theory does anticipate the defeat of the Grangemouth militants on the grounds that their militancy is in itself obsolete.
Joseph. I think that is a good example... and communisation theory demonstrates itself to be too successful because really, there is no viable alternative at the level of agency. There is no communising capacity amongst human beings embedded at the heart of industry. They require the throwing of the switch which will release them from their fascination. Something, an event, must first cause gravity to shut down before they will move away from their set patterns.
Jack. We will run from the eruption only when we see the lava coming down the slope towards us... otherwise, we are easily habituated to the rumblings and the smoke.
John.Steven. To return to finding patterns that we are conditioned to find. What is your intuition about elaboration in theory.
Joseph. Evidently, it occurs where theory encounters obstacles. In practical terms, we cannot allow ourselves to become vulnerable in those places where communism has sought to 'analyse' the working class but has succeeded only in projecting its own desires onto objective transformations in the productive relation.
John.Steven. What does maintaining the life-world involve?
Joseph. Orwell's refrain on dignity is one component - the continence of the life-world is vital to its continued function. But the concept of life-world is derived from Jakob von Uexküll's theory of umwelt by which he theorised a specific environmental space of relations, resources, signs, behaviours which surround the individuals of every species - every form of being inhabits its own particular sphere (remember Borges contemplation on the hell of Pascal which has its centre everywhere and its circumference nowehere). We are already familiar with the terms 'discursive domain' and dispositif. However, life-world seems more appropriate to our purpose because it refers to the autonomous activity of the life form at the centre of its own self-producing mechanism. This activity is directed towards maintaining, not itself exactly, but the specific context in which it appears.
John.Steven. If the alienating mechanism of social production summarised in the concept of dispositif could be expressed by Sound and Vision then wouldn't umwelt find its best exposition in In my room?
Joseph. From my notebook, I see that the life-world is a protective shield and a stage for performance. It is a plane of existence inserted into reality. It is a necessary defence mechanism (reizschutz) that functions to conserve vital processes. Obviously, defences sometimes turn against and trap that which is defended, as in The Burrow. And Freud describes the constraints of perception and its conservational function, as if it were a life-world by which he means both a protective shield and a filtering mechanism: For the living organism protection against stimuli is almost a more important task than reception of stimuli; the protective barrier is equipped with its own store of energy and must above all endeavour to protect the special forms of energy-transformations going on within itself from the equalising and therefore destructive influence of the enormous energies at work in the outer world.
John.Steven. What about the people who have chosen to quit the milieu?
Joseph. They did not leave. There is no choice in the matter. They were simultaneously abolished and expelled by the life-world.
John.Steven. But then, what about those who might enter the umwelt and seek to make themselves at home. Do you hope to achieve, to reach out?
Joseph. These nibbling creatures, who Kafka dismisses as 'small fry', and who we take also to be the terrifying creatures outside the burrow, are all wholly unsuspecting... they are not motivated by the enticements of our world but fall in accidentally, or are simply drawn into the labyrinth for some other reason - following a length of thread. Nobody is ever persuaded to become a communist.
Jack. Are you coming to the end of the project you have set yourself for describing the communist life-world?
Joseph. I don't know. There is a loss of energy. There are fewer and fewer readers and even less who are willing to negotiate with us. We are passing into a state of unrecognisability. Nobody talks to us now. Nobody even bothers to denounce us. For reason of our isolation we have less and less to say. We have wandered far out, onto the thin ice. Even now, we are drifting, or so it seems, so many, so many, light years from home.
John.Steven. Your discourse elicits no response from the expected source.
All. It receives no answer at all.
John.Steven. And consciousness is a wound to the world from which life energy flows.
All It may be cleaned and tended but does heal.
John.Steven. What follows the last?
All. At the end is released pure content. Which is unknown.
John.Steven. From which there follows elaboration. Which is unknowing.
All. But not for us as we are fixed in final relation.
John.Steven. As the last in relation to the last.
Joseph. If the last adventure was revolution, then we are presented with non-adventure as the true last relation to the world.
Jack. That is not very appealing.
Joseph. We are not in advertising. Communism is a mode of organisation which requires no permissions, nor agreements to operate as a transcendent term, but on the contrary, conditions what is to be permitted as social intercourse.
Jack. There is always a return to your fascination with constraint.
Joseph. It is constraints and not 'possibilities' that are decisive... this is not about persuading or selling - we are not looking to manipulate the 'affect switch' in human beings. Anyone who agrees with communism can later disagree with it... that is a very flimsy sort of relation to life-world. It is not possible to 'choose' a life-world but only maintain it, like a creature in a burrow.
Jack. But human beings must produce the conditions of communism?
Joseph. Communism is not made 'possible' through the actions of human beings but it is a frame for constraining human actions.
John.Steven. Which is why you reference the image of the 'saved saviour', i.e. salvation must have occurred before there can be salvation.
Joseph. The fallen term is to be raised up by unknown means before it becomes autonomously viable. The saviour who appears prematurely, within the created world, and thus not upon the plane of salvation, undertakes what is merely a 'reform' function. Under such conditions he saves souls 'for' the world as it is. There are acts of salvation all the time but they feed into the fallen world of creation. Similarly, le communisme pour le communisme cannot be 'achieved' by conscious effort, and nor can it 'achieve' itself by objective movement. The mystery lies in the thought of the relation of communism sheered away from the process of communism. Mystifyingly, we await an event of the uncaused caused.


text:
Celebrate the triumph, tragedy and history of Argentine football with the best writers around as These Football Times make their first foray into the world of print. More of a book than a magazine – something you'll keep on your coffee table or tucked away safely in your favourite drawer – this magazine won't grow old with time. Made from the very best print materials, carefully put together by a team of experts, this is These Football Times quality to keep with you forever.
Córdoba: forever in the shadow of Buenos Aires
River Plate's Los Cuatro Fantásticos
Javier Zanetti: Il Capitano
Why don't Argentina produce world-class goalkeepers?
Diego Maradona: the Boca years
Italy's successful use of Oriundi players
Aimar and Saviola: the greats that never were
Juan Sebastián Verón: slicker than your average flop
The on-field menace of Diego Simeone
Argentina 1978 and the discord of a nation
Entente Discordial: how Brits shaped Argentine football
Perennial loser or indefatigable underdog? The Héctor Cúper paradox
El Catalán: understanding Lionel Messi's troubled career for Argentina
River Plate: from relegation to champions of South America in four years
Note: this magazine is only available as a digital copy now. All printed editions are sold out.
[button url="http://thesefootballtimes.bigcartel.com/product/these-football-times-magazine-issue-1-digital" style="tksc-btn-info" size="tksc-btn-small" type="round" target="_blank"] Order [/button]


text:
World news story
British High Commission in the Eastern Caribbean on Social Media
Follow the news and activities of the British High Commission in Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean.
As social media continues to evolve into one of the most important ways to communicate online, we are developing a strong presence across a range of channels, making us more accessible, more open and more transparent in the way we communicate.
You can follow us on:
Facebook: www.facebook.com/UKinBarbados - Follow our events, news and activities from the FCO and our partners
Twitter: www.twitter.com/UKinCaribbean - Information for British Nationals in Barbados and the Caribbean, UKTI events and news. Also follow activities from the FCO and British High Commission in Barbados and British consulates around the Caribbean.
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/UKinBarbados - Our events, our Ambassador's visits in pictures, Ministerial visits.
Youtube: www.youtube.com/user/ukforeignoffice - Watch our videos with UK Ministers, policy experts, case studies, and much more.
Last updated 13 May 2013 + show all updates
- changed the title to show eastern caribbean
- First published.


text:
This page uses content from Wikipedia and is licensed under CC BY-SA.
|Daniel R. L. Brown, Matt Campagna, Rene Struik
|First published
|Derived from
|Digest sizes
|224, 256, 384 or 512
|Best public cryptanalysis
|Second Pre-Image
The elliptic curve only hash (ECOH) algorithm was submitted as a candidate for SHA-3 in the NIST hash function competition. However, it was rejected in the beginning of the competition since a second pre-image attack was found.
The ECOH is based on the MuHASH hash algorithm, that has not yet been successfully attacked. However, MuHASH is too inefficient for practical use and changes had to be made. The main difference is that where MuHASH applies a random oracle[clarification needed], ECOH applies a padding function. Assuming random oracles, finding a collision in MuHASH implies solving the discrete logarithm problem. MuHASH is thus a provably secure hash, i.e. we know that finding a collision is at least as hard as some hard known mathematical problem.
ECOH does not use random oracles and its security is not strictly directly related to the discrete logarithm problem, yet it is still based on mathematical functions. ECOH is related to the Semaev's problem of finding low degree solutions to the summation polynomial equations over binary field, called the Summation Polynomial Problem. An efficient algorithm to solve this problem has not been given so far. Although the problem was not proven to be NP-hard, it is assumed that such an algorithm does not exist. Under certain assumptions, finding a collision in ECOH may be also viewed as an instance of the subset sum problem. Besides solving the Summation Polynomial Problem, there exists another way how to find second pre-images and thus collisions, Wagner's generalized birthday attack.
ECOH is a good example of hash function that is based on mathematical functions (with the provable security approach) rather than on classical ad hoc mixing of bits to obtain the hash.
Given , ECOH divides the message into blocks . If the last block is incomplete, it is padded with single 1 and then appropriate number of 0. Let furthermore be a function that maps a message block and an integer to an elliptic curve point. Then using the mapping , each block is transformed to an elliptic curve point , and these points are added together with two more points. One additional point contains the padding and depends only on the message length. The second additional point depends on the message length and the XOR of all message blocks. The result is truncated to get the hash .
The two extra points are computed by and . adds all the elliptic curve points and the two extra points together. Finally, the result is passed through an output transformation function f to get the hash result . To read more about this algorithm, see "ECOH: the Elliptic Curve Only Hash".
Four ECOH algorithms were proposed, ECOH-224, ECOH-256, ECOH-384 and ECOH-512. The number represents the size of the message digest. They differ in the length of parameters, block size and in the used elliptic curve. The first two uses the elliptic curve B-283: , with parameters (128, 64, 64). ECOH-384 uses the curve B-409: , with parameters (192, 64, 64). ECOH-512 uses the curve B-571: , with parameters (256, 128, 128). It can hash messages of bit length up to .
The ECOH hash functions are based on concrete mathematical functions. They were designed such that the problem of finding collisions should be reducible to a known and hard mathematical problem (the subset sum problem). It means that if one could find collisions, one would be able to solve the underlying mathematical problem which is assumed to be hard and unsolvable in polynomial time. Functions with these properties are known provably secure and are quite unique among the rest of hash functions. Nevertheless, second pre-image (and thus a collision) was later found because the assumptions given in the proof were too strong.
One way of finding collisions or second pre-images is solving Semaev Summation Polynomials. For a given elliptic curve E, there exists polynomials that are symmetric in variables and that vanish exactly when evaluated at abscissae of points whose sum is 0 in . So far, an efficient algorithm to solve this problem does not exist and it is assumed to be hard (but not proven to be NP-hard).
More formally: Let be a finite field, be an elliptic curve with Weierstrass equation having coefficients in and be the point of infinity. It is known that there exists a multivariable polynomial if and only if there exist < such that . This polynomial has degree in each variable. The problem is to find this polynomial.
The problem of finding collisions in ECOH is similar to the subset sum problem. Solving a subset sum problem is almost as hard as the discrete logarithm problem. It is generally assumed that this is not doable in polynomial time. However a significantly loose heuristic must be assumed, more specifically, one of the involved parameters in the computation is not necessarily random but has a particular structure. If one adopts this loose heuristic, then finding an internal ECOH collision may be viewed as an instance of the subset sum problem.
A second pre-image attack exists in the form of generalized birthday attack.
Description of the attack: This is a Wagner's Generalized Birthday Attack. It requires 2143 time for ECOH-224 and ECOH-256, 2206 time for ECOH-384, and 2287 time for ECOH-512. The attack sets the checksum block to a fixed value and uses a collision search on the elliptic curve points. For this attack we have a message M and try to find a M' that hashes to the same message. We first split the message length into six blocks. So . Let K be a natural number. We choose K different numbers for and define by . We compute the K corresponding elliptic curve points and store them in a list. We then choose K different random values for , define , we compute , and store them in a second list. Note that the target Q is known. only depends on the length of the message which we have fixed. depends on the length and the XOR of all message blocks, but we choose the message blocks such that this is always zero. Thus, is fixed for all our tries.
If K is larger than the square root of the number of points on the elliptic curve then we expect one collision between the two lists. This gives us a message with: This means that this message leads to the target value Q and thus to a second preimage, which was the question. The workload we have to do here is two times K partial hash computations. For more info, see "A Second Pre-image Attack Against Elliptic Curve Only Hash (ECOH)".
Actual parameters:
The official comments on ECOH included a proposal called ECOH2 that doubles the elliptic curve size in an effort to stop the Halcrow-Ferguson second preimage attack with a prediction of improved or similar performance.


text:
Wish meJust quickly on my way out the door...
I have used some of my spare time thus far into my summer vacation to create a WISH LIST. If you really want to shower me with gifts and give me that brief sensation of happiness and 'world-rightness' that material possessions sometimes bring, buy me something!
Some of the music in the list I've owned before and had stolen, some of the movies were part of my collection that were unfortunately left behind in the US.
Merrrrrrrrry Christmas! To me.
the earley edition - Posted by Dave @ 12/09/2004 12:41:00 pm || ||


text: Phil Raynsford Cwmbran, Torfaen Hello. I'm a Master Trainer in both WorldHost Principles of Customer Service and Group Training Techniques. I'm an accomplished trainer, presenter and public speaker with have over 20 years' experience of consultancy, market research, marketing, project management and policy development in the skills arena. Above all I have a real passion for helping people reach their potential. Thanks for taking an interest in me and my profile. If I can be of any help to you or your organisation please don't hesitate to get in touch. Get in touch email@example.com


text:
Funny Status Message #181652
X says -inventing vodka- who's thirsty for yeast infected potato juice?
Save as Image
- Related Status Messages:
- # 112885 If we start calling it 'potato juice', Vodka becomes a health drink. RIGHT??
- # 182033 Vodka is practically a health drink. That is if you call it potato juice.
- # 154937 It's amazing how the lowly potato gives us potato chips, french fries, and vodka. Get it together, every other vegetable
←Rate | 11-15-2017 13:49 by Kisstopher707
Comments (0)
Comments with offensive language will be automatically deleted within 24 hours. By Commenting, you agree to these terms.
Funny Facebook Statuses


text:
Are the Cavaliers now the best team in the East?
Gregory Eng
On Sunday, the Boston Celtics had their Paul Pierce jersey retirement ceremony when they faced off against the Cleveland Cavaliers. While Boston was excited for another legend to get his jersey in the rafters, LeBron James and the new looking Cavaliers were looking to win. This was the first game for the players they got at the trade deadline and they flourished. Cleveland blew out the Celtics in the TD Garden and established that they are still the team to beat in the Eastern Conference.
While the game was just a small sample size, Cleveland played phenomenal and showed what kind of team it can potentially be. They have more athleticism, speed, and most importantly energy. Each of the new players are playing on a bigger stage an being able to showcase their skills. They showed that when they play on a bigger stage, with better teammates and a star like LeBron James, they can be incredible.
After this big win, the Cavaliers proved once again that nobody in the East can beat it in a series of seven. The Celtics are talented and play great defense, but they lack the offensive firepower and depth to match the Cavaliers. Think about if Kyrie Irving is having an off night, who can carry the scoring load? The Cavaliers have shown they have plenty of options to go to if somebody is off one night.
Lastly, the Cavaliers are finally back to the style of play that they've been most successful in. They have their leader in LeBron James and everybody else plays off him. Players like Rodney Hood, Jordan Clarkson, Kyle Korver, and George Hill all play better off a star player which makes this a perfect match. Every player has a role and each player plays that role well while their star LeBron James leads the way to victory. If somebody in the East wants to face the Warriors in the finals, they have to go through the Cavaliers first.


text:
Camp fYrefly Calgary is located outside of Cochrane, Alberta on Treaty 7 Territory. We are grateful to host our camp on the land which includes the traditional territories of the Siksika, the Piikani, the Kainai, the Tsuu T'ina and the Stoney Nakoda First Nations as well as the Metis Nation of Alberta, Region III.
In partnership with the Calgary Sexual Health Centre, Camp fYrefly held its inaugural camp in the summer of 2013. In 2018, we will be hosting our Camp from June 30th to July 3rd this year.
There are many ways that you can become involved with Calgary Camp fYrefly as a volunteer, donor, or community supporter – if you are interested in more information about the Calgary Camp, please contact the coordinator at email@example.com.
Camp fYrefly-Calgary is greatly appreciative of the amazing support we have received from the Calgary community, including financial support from many individuals and organizations such as ATB Financial, TELUS, The Calgary Foundation, YYC Cycle, Dawg Tired, Hillhurst United Church, and Deer Park United Church.
All funds donated to Camp fYrefly-Calgary stay in Calgary and are used to support the local camp. All donations are eligible for a charitable donation receipt.
Have a listen to this great song written at Calgary's Camp Fyrefly by LGBT Youth at Rae Spoon's Group Songwriting Workshop.


text:
Back to School: Preparing for College isn't Just About the Dorm FurnitureSubmitted by Flourish Wealth Management on July 25th, 2018
By: Kathy Longo, CFP®, CAP®, CDFA
I was a wreck when my daughter Maddy went off to college three years ago. I had so many emotions about my oldest child, my first baby, leaving home and venturing out on her own. On the other hand, Maddy was so excited--without an apprehensive bone in her body. She was ready to start her college experience and for that I was grateful. But I had my concerns about her safety, her well-being, her ability to create her own structure with all that freedom, and all the other concerns that come with being the parent of a young adult.
Although Maddy was focused on how she was going to furnish her dorm room and what her roommate was going to be like, she was also looking forward to the adventures and challenges of college. The furthest thing from her mind was worst case scenarios and creating a plan for the what-ifs of adulthood. While the curtains and the rug and the mini fridge all have their place in planning for college life, so too does preparing documents that will protect you as a parent and them as an adult in the event of an emergency.


text:
The PencentralRead all about Song Writers, Script Writers, Novelists, Ebook Creators and more...
Thursday, 17 January 2019
Contact Us
Health Counsultant @ Dealpharmarx.comView My Page
Hello I`m Jasmine Langer from New York, check out new updated stylish version of Buy Sarees Online http://www.dessiattire.com/ for reasonable price these are first copy of all top brands.View My Page
aura M. LaVoie is a professional writer living in the mountains of North Carolina in a 120 Square Foot house with her partner and their hairless cat, Piglet. Laura graduated from Western Michigan University with a degree in Anthropology. She has been published in magazines and anthologies on the subjects of mythology and culture. She spent nearly 15 years in the temporary staffing industry before deciding to become a full time writer. Laura is a co-founder of Tiny House NC, an organization dedicated to showcasing tiny house builders, dwellers, and dreamers in the state of North Carolina as well as be a vital resource to them in their path to a tiny life. Laura has worked with the Zulu Orphan Alliance volunteering her time to build a shelter for orphans and other vulnerable children living near Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Laura also enjoys simple living, brewing and drinking craft beer, and popular culture.View My Page
Amy Lawson has kept a journal since she was old enough to hold a pencil. Presently, she writes about whatever strikes her fancy including being a divorced mom of two boys and her irrational dislike of Gwyneth Paltrow, with an occasional foray into more serious topics.
She is an avid reader and an okay sewer.View My Page
Marie Landry has always been a daydreamer. She has created imaginary worlds for as long as she can remember, so it only seemed natural that she would become a writer. With a passion for words that started in early childhood, Marie has written a varied range of works, and has been freelance writing since 2009. Her 2012 debut novel, Blue Sky Days, is a contemporary coming-of-age tale about love, life, and friendship. She resides in Ontario, Canada, and most days you can find her writing, reading, blogging about writing and reading, listening to U2, or having grand adventures with her two precious nephews.View My Page
To receive the free updates and the Latest News, JOIN our Mailing List Today
© 2013 The PenCentral. All Rights Reserved
FAQ | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions


text:
Shannon Sharpe
Shannon Sharpe roots began in Glennville, Georgia where early poverty increased his desire to better himself and find away out. Sharpe played his collegiate ball at Savannah State College, where he graduated with a degree in criminal justice. Sharpe was drafted in the 7th round of the 1990 NFL Draft by the Denver Broncos, 192nd overall. It didn't take long for the Broncos braintrust to realize that Sharpe's ability could cash the check his mouth just wrote. Sharpe was elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame, and inducted on August 6, 2011. Sharpe played 12 seasons for the Broncos (1990–99, 2002–03) and two years with the Ravens (2000–01), winning three Super Bowls and finishing his career as the NFL's all-time leader with 815 receptions, and over 10,060 receiving yards. Sharpe has the distinction of being the first tight end ever to record 10,000 receiving yards. Shannon was also named a member of the NFL's first team All-Decade team of the 1990s.