text:
Game over: Whites 2, blacks 0 in Democrats' firehouse primary
By Rob Schilling
A 32-year reign of engineered, single-seat black representation on Charlottesville's City Council crashed to a screeching halt on Sunday, August 21 with the early morning release of results in Charlottesville's Democratic Firehouse Primary. In their wake, racial turmoil and long overdue electoral reform increasingly are likely.
Colette Blount, assumed successor to the "black crown" on Charlottesville's all Democrat and historically white City Council, has lost her electoral bid, reportedly finishing fifth in a field of seven candidates. Only the top three vote-getters can appear on the November general election ballot where the finalized Democrat slate is predestined for victory.
Blount's defeat puts Charlottesville's primarily white Democrat committee and the city's black community at odds, threatening an uneasy alliance that has existed between the two entities since the early 1980s.
Charles Barbour was Charlottesville's first black City Councilor. Elected in 1970, he served two terms. In 1978, black Democrat, James Hicks, was defeated in his attempt to follow Barbour leaving a two-year period of no black representation on Charlottesville's City Council. Although Hicks would have been victorious running solely in either of the city's two black precincts, Firehouse (Tonsler) and Lane (Carver), Charlottesville's at-large voting scheme effectively nullified Hicks's precinct victories when votes from white areas of the city were tallied.
During the ensuing years, seeking a fairer environment within which to compete, the Charlottesville NAACP called for ward-based elections to replace the city's racially exclusive at-large system. Led by the late Virginia Carrington, the NAACP relentlessly petitioned then mayor Frank Buck to move the city from at-large elections (which had been dismantled by the United States Department of Justice in many other Southern cities during the 1960s and 1970s) to ward-based elections.
Buck and his predominantly white Democrat council cohorts reluctantly agreed to place the issue of moving toward ward-based elections on the November 1981 ballot as an advisory referendum. The measure passed in 6 of the city's 8 precincts, with overwhelming support in the city's two historically black precincts, Firehouse and Rose Hill (Carver). But there was a significant under-vote on the measure, as the Charlottesville Democratic Committee did not place the referendum on their sample ballot—knowing well that omission would yield greatly diminished voter participation. When Carrington and the NAACP pressed Mayor Buck to act on the referendum's results, he rejected the obvious call for change, disingenuously claiming that the vote was "not decisive enough."
Six months later, in May 1982, Buck put the same advisory referendum back onto the ballot—this time, a ballot on which Buck himself was a candidate for reelection to the City Council. He and other establishment Democrats actively campaigned against the referendum. Concurrently, Charlottesville's white Democrats also colluded to divide the NAACP's support for wards by offering perks to strategically-recruited members of the city's black community in what later was termed a "system of patronage." Under this proposal the Charlottesville Democrats guaranteed in perpetuity one black seat on the five-member council in exchange for voting cooperation from the elected black Democrat in issues of importance to (white) Party leadership.
Following Buck's backroom deal, the second ballot referendum was defeated in six of the city's eight precincts: a mirror opposite of the previous ballot result. The NAACP membership split over the outcome, and the organization was substantially weakened. Buck, meanwhile, was victorious in maintaining lock-fisted, white control of the Charlottesville Democratic Committee.
From the deal's inception through today, there has been an uninterrupted succession of one, and only one sitting black Democrat at a time on Charlottesville's City Council:
Engineered succession of black Charlottesville City Councilors
E.G. Hall 1980-1988 (two terms) Alvin Edwards 1988-1996 (two terms) Maurice Cox 1996-2004 (two terms) Kendra Hamilton 2004-2008 (one term) Holly Edwards 2008-2012 (one term)
Fearing that a powerful black voting bloc would emerge to challenge the white Democrat establishment, the Charlottesville Democratic Committee has never run a second black candidate while one was serving.
As the burden of assenting to demands of the Party became unbearable for solicited black men, fewer and fewer appeared interested in carrying the mantle as Charlottesville's token black councilor. With a dearth of available men, the city's Democrat machine then began recruiting women for the black seat. Unlike their male predecessors, both Kendra Hamilton and Holly Edwards each served only a single term, adding complexity to Democrats' recruitment efforts for their ongoing racial manipulation scheme. Today, finding any black candidate willing to capitulate to the city's Democrat Party bosses has become a near impossibility. In the absence of a willing mark, Party leaders appear intentionally to have let the bargain lapse.
When Colette Blount emerged as the only black Democrat candidate in the 2011 election cycle, nerves began to jitter. The establishment wing of the party– headed by Jim Nix and Tom Vandever– worried that Blount would be independent of Party dictates since she had aligned herself with Mayor Dave Norris's interests and did not seek counsel and blessing from the elders. Of particular concern was Blount's pro-Norris-plan position on the community water supply, which was diametrically opposed to that of Nix and Vandever, et al.
Blount's candidacy received its death-blow when establishment Democrats, Kay Slaughter (former Mayor) and Kristen Szakos (current councilor) endorsed only two candidates, Kathy Galvin and Satyendra Huja, for the three open seats council seats, thus backstabbing their reputedly ideologically aligned co-candidate, Paul Beyer. Establishment Democrats needed to secure only two seats to maintain their control of council (Huja and Galvin along with incumbent Szakos will form a majority bloc). Thus Beyer was rendered superfluous.
While these racially motivated non-endorsements were the unofficial abrogation of Beyer's campaign, they represented the eradication of Blount's. Although refusing to directly challenge the black candidate's legitimacy, through calculated omission, Szakos and Slaughter secretly signaled the acceptability of establishment Democrats' deprecation of Collette Blount in their ballot rankings.
The Democrats' implementation of an Instant Runoff Voting (IRV)– allowing every voter to vote for every candidate through a ranking system– was another culprit in Blount's electoral demise. In previous primary elections, most Democrats knew that it was in the Party's best interest for the chosen black candidate to be the top vote getter, and sure enough, the designee typically received the most votes. IRV changed the voting dynamic drastically. As every voter now voted for every candidate through a ranked ballot, the black candidate was now one-of-many votes on every ballot instead of one-of-a-select-few votes on (nearly) every ballot. Since casting a vote for Blount inherently was a function of every ballot, there was no overriding imperative to rank her highly. In fact, many Democrats, angry with Norris and his slate, ranked Blount in the bottom half of their ballots, ultimately placing her fifth in a field of seven candidates.
White Charlottesville Democrats received the Slaughter/Szakos directive loud and clear– as demonstrated by their voting patterns– and resultingly, both Blount and Beyer were sacrificed at the altar of Democrat machine politics.
But the racial hangover from the Democratic Firehouse Primary does not end with Colette Blount's repudiation. An intra-party challenge from Llezelle Dugger and Pam Melampy for Paul Garrett's long held Clerk of Court seat saw Garrett, who is black, ejected from the position he's occupied since his initial appointment to the post over 30-years ago– a date not coincidental to the inception of the Charlottesville Democrats' 32-year-old compromise with the city's black community. Garrett's ouster will heap gasoline onto an already raging fire of racial discontent within Charlottesville's Democrat Party.
Major electoral changes are possible and necessary in the aftermath of the disastrous firehouse primary. Non-partisan elections, implementation of ward or district-based elections, and a move toward a directly-elected mayor are getting discussed by Democrats who most recently had not considered such remedies necessary or even palatable.
In a city long dominated by white Democrats who have refused to equitably share the power of governance, their corrupt patronage "solution" to Charlottesville's black "problem" eventually had to fall under its own encumbrance. And now it has. Sadly, it took 32 years; but finally, and thankfully, Charlottesville's racially engineered political chickens have come home to roost.
Rob Schilling, who left office in 2006, was the last Republican to serve on City Council. Today a radio talk-show host, he initially put this essay on his blog, schillingshow.com.Read more on: colette blountdemocratic machinepaul beyer
62 comments
Rob Schilling is now a Hook contributor? Maybe the world really did end when the earthquake struck.
And yet you didn't dispute a single word of his editorial. The truth shall set us free.
Fascinating essay Mr. Schilling. I also found the interview yesterday with Bob Fenwick and your discussion with Mr. White about this issue very informative.
seriously people! who effing cares what color their skin is! The only thing I care about is only one out of the three who got elected isn't corrupt and in the pockets of the developers and contractors! Jeez cville these people are just as bad a national politicians. Greeeeeeeeeeeeed
This history of the Machivellian "white Democrat" in Charlottesville is without a doubt the most informative "essay" I have ever read in the Hook. I am sure that former mayor Maurice Cox, an internationally know urban planner and faculty member at UVA's School of Architecutre who has also served as Director of Design at the National Endowment of the Arts, would be interested to know that the was only elected to to council because of a scheme of "white Democrat" patronage. I myself was thankful to Mr. Schilling to be dispossed of my illusions. After having read in dozens of publication over the last ten years that Charlottesville was one of the best places, if not The Best, to live in the United States, I was unaware that I was actually knee-deep in a cesspit of injustice where much of the population has been disenfranchised by corrupt political maneuvering. Since such disenfranchisement is a clear violation of the Civil Rights Act, I am sure Mr. Schilling is somberly working with the Department of Justice to alleviate the oppression he see everywhere around him.
In all seriousness, is the new editorial policy of your magazine is to feature "essays" that conclude with mocking references to Reverend Jeremiah Wright's chickens come home to roost diatribe? Would an essay that truly illuminated party politics in Charlottesville over a period of 30+ years really end with such a sophomoric and intellectually lazy jibe--the closest cudgel it seems whenever a conservative want to educate the populace on race issues these days? Does this piece, as written, reflect positively on your editorial standards?
Mr. Schilling is a well-known local retailer of conservative propaganda. As such, he echos an international right-wing media empire which has helped to enact policies that have brought on, and worsened, the greatest economic crisis since the 1930s. As such, he represents a prospective available from any of a million sources. In fact, conservative name-calling so fully saturates our radios, newspapers, magazines, online information sources, and televisions, that one can hardly avoid it without the wherewithal to purchase a private island distant from civilization. If your paper wants to share these sorts of mocking and ubiquitous perspectives, then I will add your publication to my list of untrustworthy news sources and avoid it at all cost.
What an insult to the African Americans who previously sat on the Council, and especially Maurice Cox, a former Mayor who oversaw the City during the time Charlottesville first starting receiving so much national recognition as a fabulous place to live. While I don't agree with 'engineering' an African American seat on Council, the way this has been reported exclusively by white journalists shows an underlying issue that should have purged from our collective thinking a long time ago.
@ Jeff: You thought this rag was trustworthy before this essay? Been reading it much over the years?
So now, not only are over half the Democrats that voted in the primary corrupt, but they are also racist?
The pro-dredgers are now in OJ Simpson defense team territory. It can't be that reasonable adults came to a decision about the water supply and want to move forward, it must all be a massive water-stealing, racist conspiracy!!!
The Hook, Mr Schilling, Dave Norris and anyone that parrots this nonsense really ought to be ashamed of themselves. They also ought to grow up.
As downtown brown notes, it is only white "journalists" and politicians spouting this garbage. The head of the NAACP had a markedly different theory as to why Collette Blount lost.
Interesting that the Hook does not show the NAACP the same respect as it does Rob Schilling. I wonder if racism has anything to do with that?
As someone who voted for two of the three winning candidates, I can assure you that my vote had nothing to do with the Democratic machine or the ethnicity or racial profile of any candidate. I simply voted for the candidates whose positions were most in tune with mine. Nothing more, nothing less. If there had been three black candidates running who promoted positions I support, I'd have voted for all of them. Why must the losing side impugn the motives of their opponents? About Mayor Norris, I thought his endorsement was not well advised and I did not understand his failure to endorse Mr. Huja who by all accounts seems to have been a dedicated and effective public servant over an extended period. The endorsement did help me zero in on the candidates whose positions were contrary to mine, however.
As long as we continue to compare black to white in any event the racist still win.
re:'In a city long dominated by white Democrats who have refused to equitably share the power of governance, their corrupt patronage "solution" to Charlottesville's black "problem" eventually had to fall under its own encumbrance.'
Putting the words "solution" and "problem" in quotes implies that Mr. Schilling is quoting someone in the pages of The Hook. Would be nice to know who, exactly. Who, other that Mr. Schilling, says that Charlottesville has a black "problem"? Where, other than the pages of The Hook, can you read or hear that Charlottesville needs a "solution" to a black "problem"?
It is Mr. Schilling and The Hook that are being the white racists here and no one else. Shame on them.
This is a page out of the Dede Smith Scottie Griffin playbook. Push your agenda and use the race card to do it while fanning the flames of racial discord.
I hope Dr. Turner weighs in on this ploy of the mostly white dredgers to use the race card to achieve their agenda.
Wow Schilling ruling in a puppet regime with Smith and Norris as the puppets. It is crazy town.
A lot of sound and fury that will signify nothing...unless they go to the justice department, file a suit and get a ward system.
Nah, that will NEVER happen!
Gee. I wonder if Schilling brings any agenda to this discussion.
I guess next Hawes will be offering George Huguely a guest spot to opine about the horrors of domestic violence
You just compared Schilling to a murderer..really that'd pretty horrible. I don't care for Rob rants all that much but come on, that's just spiteful and mean. The real Joe Friday (badge # 714) of the LA police force would never stoop so low.
Rob shouldn't be expected to know the history of the Democratic Party's nominating procedures, and he doesn't. The instant runoff system is an effort to accommodate two perhaps competing interests -- to make voting easy and relatively painless for voters, and to nominate only candidates with some degree of support from the entire Party (as opposed to the situation in the Senate 22nd District this week, where the Republicans nominated in a primary a candidate -- Tommy Garrett -- with just under 26% of the vote).
Until we went to the instant runoff system in 2009, we would have nominating conventions like in 2002, when Blake Caravati and Alexandra Searls were nominated after about 5 hours, and when more than 100 voters left before the fourth and final round of voting. Nobody thought that was good, and we have been looking for ways ever since to make it easier for people to participate. The progress on that front is undeniable; in 2002, we had about 500 people participate, while in 2011, over 2,600 people participated.
Is Instant Runoff Voting racist? Various civil rights leaders and organizations don't think so. Most easily found on line, look at the website for fairvote.org. This is an organization that supports various reforms to the electoral process, including instant runoff voting. Instant runoff voting, by the way, has been used and continues to be used in such racist places as San Francisco, Minneapolis, and Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Actually, there is one sense in which the instant runoff system may have led to Colette Blount's defeat. One of the virtues of the old, time-consuming nominating process was that each voter could stop and take stock of the situation after each ballot, and perhaps to readjust his or her preference based on the results of the first round. It is possible that if everyone had been gathered in the same place at the same time, and if they realized that Kathy Galvin and Satyendra Huja had been nominated, perhaps the supporters of the Meadowcreek Parkway and the dam might have said, "OK -- we've got a majority for moving forward; we can now nominate Colette and be sure that she won't become the third and dispositive vote to change course."
But ultimately, Instant Runoff Voting is not responsible for Colette Blount's defeat. My sense of the electorate is that there were two cross-currents at work here. First, in every election in a place the size of Charlottesville, voters are more likely to vote for candidates whom they know. People know Satyendra Huja, Kathy Galvin and Dede Smith from their years of community involvement. Second, there was the substantive question -- most folks don't know or care about the details of dredging vs. a new dam, but they do want government to get on with the business of government and to stop bickering about decisions already made. Colette would probably have been better advised to have NOT clearly identified herself with the "let's change course" view that is something of a minority position in Charlottesville, and in the Democratic Party.
Colette didn't lose because she is black, she lost because she tied her campaign to a position that was not favored by a majority of the voters, and she didn't have Dede Smith's long history of community involvement to compensate.
Umm...Paul Garrett lost because he is terrible at his job, race has absolutely nothing to do with it. Ask anyone who has ever had to do business in the Circuit Court.
First of all, I'm a Democrat who has been, at least peripherally, involved with city politics. Not once have I ever worried about a "black voting block" killing the "white establishment." Nor has anybody else I've come in contact with in the twenty five years since moving to town. I'm, frankly, embarrassed that anyone who lives elsewhere might read this opinion-piece and take it as fact---which it most certainly is not. Racist people, both white and black, can simply never grasp that it might not be the only issue in play.
I'm disgusted by The Hook. This is exactly the baloney one would expect from the writer. When the president talks about the economy collapsing because of needless partisan sniping over non-issues, he might as well hang a picture of Rob on the podium. If I ever see Rob Schilling's byline again, I can absolutely promise that for me at least, this paper will go the same way of WINA after they gave this clown a prime time slot---something I used to enjoy but now stay away from.
The percentage of black population is less than 20% . This article just makes the case of the necessity of having sitting members on council assesed based on their skin colour . At 20% of the population that requirement would equate to one black member . That quota has been achieved over the past number of years . The last one had two black skinned members exceeding Skinnings quota idea by 100% . Thankfully Williams has not screwed up his chances as did Blount with her poor policies , poor campaigning ,and poor strategy . This election can easily repeat the two black skinned members by electing Hugi and Williams giving the council 40% black skinned members out of a population of less than 20% .Williams is young smart ,agressive ,speaks well and is pumped for victory .
Edit Schilling ....
"Game over: Whites 2, blacks 0 in Democrats' firehouse primary" ???
I say Hook 1 Responsible Journalism 0.
Without even needing to look at the text in the article, this title, which ostensible summarizes the essence of the article, is just incendiary and anti-communitarian.
As ontheroad33 noted above, any rhetoric that overtly or indirectly states that black and white interests are in opposition and/or that only members of a race can and do look out for their own racial interests is an inherently racist act in itself.
Shame on you.
Maybe it is time we eliminated the electoral process and have the Council "persons" appointed...perhaps by the Governor or maybe even by the President. The criteria would be...religion, gender, race, age, employed/unemployed, disability, height, weight, eye color, length of hair, etc, etc. That way each and every person could be fairly represented!!!
Qualifications be damned...
It is not customary of The Hook to have periodic, say weekly or even monthly political guest columns, even under the guise of calling them "Essays." The appearance of this piece with no byline or warning that it is "editorial" or "opinion" is notable and does not reflect the usual high journalistic calibre of this paper. One can only guess this appears because Hawes is frustrated that his piece on the Nature Conservancy failed to sway the City primary results away from the dredging constituency the way he would have wanted. And solicits an inflammatory voice like Schililngs to impeach the results of the election? Come on, Hawes. The Hook is better than Rob Schilling's blog.
The sentence I like states that Szakos and Slaughter's endorsements of Huja and Galvin are "racially-motivated non-endorsements." How many false assumptions and jumps of fact can you make in one paragraph, Rob? Much less, one "essay."
The line I like Blount lost not be
Sorry for the straggler last line. By my bad proofreading, one can tell I'm not a journalist.
Rob S. is many sandwiches short of a picnic.
How did Szakos and Slaughter "backstab" Beyer by not endorsing him? That sounds like a mean thing to do. Had they made a prior promise to him that they would all stick together? Were they all really good friends? All of this conspiratorial intrigue! Someone should write a play about it.
But seriously, just because you lump candidates based on dredging/damming doesn't mean everyone else believes these categories morally demand loyalty automatically. There are other issues, you know, and I assume Szakos and Slaughter considered many factors when making their endorsements.
I like Beyer, by the way, and I hope he runs again in the future.
Should anybody of any color be an "assumed successor?" How many more "engineered representation" seats are there? 2008 Presidential election should have shown that with an intriguing message, anything is possible.
Seriously, this article is painfully moronic. Mr. Schilling (on the radio and in print) is a race-baitor with a nonsensical rightwing-nuttery agenda. Sustainability is evil, the socialist are coming for our children, the Muslims are stealing our way of life, bike-paths are for communists, global warming is a liberal conspiracy to keep corporations down, and more soda for kids will defeat the nanny-state. Mr. Schilling talking-points at times my fox news seem like NPR and he appears to live in a fantasy world.
the more I think about this article, the more angry it makes me at The Hook. This is maybe the most overt piece of racism (in a "legitimate" media outlet) that I've seen in print in Charlottesville, ever, and one of the worst I've seen anywhere. And the fact that the dozens of racial digs are used to jab a political party (basically, "I'm not the racist---but look at the Democrats! THEY hate black people") is so far beyond disgusting. The Hook needs to be above this.
This editorial has to be removed from the website. It has no place in the Hook. I've bought advertising in the Hook more than a dozen times, and read it every week. But if this stays on the website and/or shows up in next week's paper, I'm done. I want nothing to do with this racist paper that associates itself with this moron.
This piece has been on Schilling's blog space for quite a while now-not news until the Yellow Journalist Hawes Spencer decided to take another bite at the dredging apple. Only before. Schilling's spin was shame on the democrats for picking one African-American for Council. Now that it serves his (and Norris' and the dredgers') interests, when there is no African-American candidate, it is somehow the Democratic Party being racist. Come on, you can's have it both ways.
We all know what Schilling's agenda is: Cause dissension in the Democratic Party, promote a ward system and non-partisan elections so more Republicans get on Council and support dredging. If you buy into his arguments, might as well go get a Republican card.
What is shameful is the use of the race card to get dredging accomplished. A small group of elite whites speaking for African Americans in an attempt to use them for narrow interest gains. I feel confident that Dr. Turner and the African-American Community can speak for themselves and that they see the ploy here. Talk about gutter politics, we have reached a new high in lows.
I would pay special attention to the relationship among Schiiling, Smith and the Dredgers, Norris and the anti-dammers, the Hook and perhaps Fenwick. It seems in my opinion they will do ANYTHING to over turn the earthen dam decision, including try to use allegations of racism to their own benefit. I believe the voters saw through the last attempt by Norris to form a ticket-bloc and the democrats in town and they will see this for what it is and that will be it for Mayor Norris and the dredgers.
What we really need to know and what the responsible journalists in this town should be asking is:
1) Will Dede Smith, elected in the Democratic Primary in which she signed a pledge to support only Democrats in the up comng election, come out PUBLICLY and state she supports Huja and Galvin and not support Fenwick or any other pro-dredging Independent. Remember, according to Tom Vandever,and as reported in a previous Hook article, she violated the Dem. pledge in the last election and supported Fenwick. Will she do it again?
2) Will Dave Norris do the same? He voted and signed the pledge last Saturday. Will he PUBLICLY support Huja and Galvin in the General election and state publicly that voters should not vote for non-democratic candidates? His recent statements in the DP indicate that he is encouraging people to not vote fro democratic candidates because the party and recent elected candidates of the Party are supposedly racially insensitive. He has been playing the race card in my opinion to encourage democrats and independents and perhaps even Republicans to vote for the independents because they all are against the Earthen dam.
@Lloyd Snook, Mr Norris seems to respect and respond to you. Please have a talk with him about what he is doing with the race card. He has now expended all political capital and I am doubtful if he runs again, he would be successful. This is shameful what he is doing.It is a disgrace to the democratic party. Perhaps you and the other democratic states people in town can explain to him that is it not worth creating racial conflict to accomplish his objective of getting the dam stopped. There are other ways of addressing the issue of race and politics in this town. He's acting like a teenager run amuck. He should retract his statements in the DP about how the newly elected candidates will take a top-down approach to public housing, and statements about his the Democratic Party engaged in racist behavior. His candidate lost because of her stance on the issues and as Dr. Turner has said because she didn't do her due diligence in the community. Not because of her race.
Most importantly does Norris intend PUBLICLY to stand by the pledge he made in the Primary (if he voted in it) and support Galvin, Huja, and Smith and eschew support for any independent candidate? Or will he violate the pledge, support independents over democrats and thereby assure he will not have a future on Charottesville democratic politics? I had lost confidence in him on the Anti-dam-ticket shenangigans, now with the racism nonsense, I wouldn't vote for him again and would actively campaign against him, unless he learns and changes course now.
What Schiiling, the Hook, and the dredgers have done is disgustingly transparent. No issue, certainly not dredging, is worth what they are doing to the discourse and culture of our community.
Those of you throwing around the charge of racism need to look up it's definition. To argue that someone should be elected to public office because of their race is racist, just as it would be to say that someone shouldn't be elected to public office because of their race. If you wish to dispute the points made in this essay, try making them without the gratuitous personal attacks on the writer. Is Charlottesville incapable of a courteous debate?
re:"To argue that someone should be elected to public office because of their race is racist"
That certainly appears to be exactly what Mr. Schilling is implying, that Collette Blount's race is the paramount attribute when considering her fitness for office.
It is Mr. Schilling that focused like a laser beam on the color of Ms. Blount's skin. All the outrage is simply a response to his blatant racism.
Schilling claims to be in Virginia as a refugee from LA and the thin veneer of civilization on AA's as displayed by their actions during the R.King riots . As a refugee in C'Ville he now tries to make a buck pretending to be their friend ' spewing out racist clap trap .
I did not realize The Hook was in the business of publishing manifestos.
Rob Schilling is a media whore who will say or write anything that keeps his whining juvenile voice on the airwaves. Like any petulant child who screams when he doesn't get his way, the best course is to ignore him and sooner or later he'll realize that no one cares about his bitterness or his paranoia and he'll learn to keep it to himself.
Women 3, Men 2 - I guess nobody sees the interesting news in this pre election result - we would have a majority female council, possibly for the first time? - Szakos, Smith, and Galvin. Is race more important than sex, or should both be ignored in favor of ACTUAL ISSUES?!
I think understanding our different communities is important. In this case, the black community is important. Also, the lack of having black winners is worth a look. Certainly, their community should be expected to turn out good leaders and also we don't want to marginalize ethnic differences by overlooking black community aspects that the white community might not notice.
That being said, it's fine to vote for your best candidate regardless of color especially not using color as a ranking mechanism. Also, I disagree with blaming the voting system. I think ranked voting is a great idea and I think voters get it.
The take home action item I see is that our all white council needs to continue to pay attention to non-white community issues. The article is a little unnecessarily alarmist.
Actually I made a similiar comment on the gender make up couple of days ago noting the trend was female and no white males. Didn't realise this would be the first majority female council but good show . That puts the idea of supporting Williams forward to achieve the customary 40% black voting bloc in question though .What a delimma ! With only five members suitable candidates need to have many characteristics going for them . Someone who was a disabled,bisexual,female,of colour would make an awesome candidate .
Look closely at the connections: Schilling/Hook/Smith-Dredgers/Norriis(anti-Edam)= Agenda and tactics to influence the General Elections.
And once again from Wikipedia: Yellow Journalism/Hook (Spencer) Journalism
"Yellow journalism or the yellow press is a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate well-researched news and instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more newspapers.[1] Techniques may include exaggerations of news events, scandal-mongering, or sensationalism.[1] By extension "Yellow Journalism" is used today as a pejorative to decry any journalism that treats news in an unprofessional or unethical fashion.
Campbell (2001) defines Yellow Press newspapers as having daily multi-column front-page headlines covering a variety of topics, such as sports and scandal, using bold layouts (with large illustrations and perhaps color), heavy reliance on unnamed sources, and unabashed self-promotion. The term was extensively used to describe certain major New York City newspapers about 1900 as they battled for circulation.
Frank Luther Mott (1941) defines yellow journalism in terms of five characteristics:[2]
scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news
lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings
use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudo-science, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts
emphasis on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips (which is now normal in the U.S.)
dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system.
Once gain, Spencer uses the paper to try to influence an election. Failed the first time and will again. Piss poor. Advertisers I will purposefully shun your products if I see them in the Hook. Advertisers should be pulling out more and more and who knows maybe the Hook will have done itself in with all the nonsense. Courtney, Dave, Lisa jump ship go work for the Cville Weekly and maintain high journalist standards your boss is unwilling to uphold. Or stage a Coup.
Citizen Party - i am beyond anti-schilling, he is like a spoiled child living in the make-believe of overindulgent parents, but I am also pro-dredging and anti-dam. As a result, please be careful lumping anti-dam democrats with intellectual fly-weight.
It's hard to imagine any African Americans work at The Hook, for then Hawes Spencer would have to actually look them in the eye every day after publishing this racist diatribe.
No one that actually cared about civil rights would publish such a piece. Shame on Hawes Spencer and the entire staff of The Hook.
"Schilling claims to be in Virginia as a refugee from LA and the thin veneer of civilization on AA's as displayed by their actions during the R.King riots"
Well Frank, at the very least Schilling actually lives here unlike you, who as a Canadian have nothing to do with any of the political issues being discussed here.
It is my belief that if we could put a lie detector on every single voter and ask them if they would choose a less qualifed candidate because of skin color how would they vote we would find that at least 90% don't care at all and the 10% that say it matters don't care enough to make it to the polls.
Slavery ended 146 years ago. Jim Crow ended 40 years ago.
The racism that exists is more prevelant in the wal mart parking lot then in politics or government. Baltimore Dc Atlanta, Detroit and LA have all had black mayors.
get over it. The liberals on the council will certainly represent every faction out there except white conservatives and we can take care of ourselves.
@NTK: thanks, good to know there are some reasonable pro-dredging folks out there. I think reasonable people can disagree on that issue. Don't like nasty tactics though and this is not passing the smell test. I know Schilling is pro-dredging and there seems like a strange convergence of folks who seem like odd bedfellows. I know there are probably some folks who support the smaller dam or dredging that are not a part of the schilling cabal, but there are some who would do anything to over turn the dam decision including sidle up to Schillings nonsense and sign up on to his agenda. How can we tell these two groups apart? I have just found it odd that Norris is using the race card and now Schilling is and they seem to have some things in common, oddly enough. I hope more pro dredgers like you come forward and denounce Schilling's tactics. As a democrat will you support Galvin, Huja, and Smith in the general election?
Frank thanks for taking an interest in Cville. its a free county and the bloggosphere is open to all t discuss ideas.
Mr. Snook you wrote : "Most folks don't know or care about the details of dredging vs. a new dam, but they do want government to get on with the business of government and to stop bickering about decisions already made. "
I doubt if most people want government to spend tens of millions of dollars needlessly that they will be asked to pay for.
You may not care what this dam/pipeline plan costs, but my guess is you are not in the majority. Last I heard we are in tough economic times and many are experiencing job loss or loss or income due to cut backs in consumer spending.
You may be disengaged from major issues facing the city, but luckily others who care about cost and what it will do to their water rates, plus the loss of city's assets and resources, are not. Your attitude of- I don't care, just move on, when the cost to city residents is still unknown is disappointing for a man of your intelligence and professed compassion for those less well off than yourself.
@Citizen Party (Carl): I don't know a single pro-dredger who doesn't think that Rob Schilling is a toxic idiot, and this article a piece of s**t. I'm appalled that the Hook would publish this creepy essay made up of innuendo and faulty reasoning.
What's just as appalling, though, are posters like you and your cohort Truthtopower who have been continually lumping the pro-dredgers in with people like Schilling. Now you've insinuated above that Dave Norris is in cahoots with Schilling! Are you insane?
From the beginning of this dirty campaign, you and your candidate have been repeatedly stating that people with differing views are easily duped, members of a troika or cabal, or shouldn't be allowed to discuss certain issues. In particular, your slurs against Ms Blount's intelligence have shown you to be a small man with small ideas. Shame on you for your bullying throughout this campaign. You and Schilling are far more alike than you'll ever realize.
The ward system will be a big issue in the election this November.
All the Independents at this event favor it and they are not all Shilling anythings, just intelligent, independent thinkers that understand the grip certain individuals, Lloyd Snook being one of them, have on who gets elected. To their credit the democratic executive committee, and their friends, have used these friendships and Obama e-mail lists to line up voters who have the Lloyd Snook, I don't care- just move on attitude toward local government ( as long as their people are in control ) and constitute " the government"
OOOOOSH- those "of color" do. Hey, I'm white, or "flesh" or whatever.....- so I care
@More Reality,
I think you have gone off the deep end. From my perspective the dirt in the campaign has come from people castigating all folks who support the Earthen Dam. The dredgers started the negative politics after they lost the RWSA, City Council votes, that's when it just got ugly. Supporters of the dam have been called by dredgers such things as "liars," corrupt, in the pocket of special interests. Just look at the Hook water article-just down right scandal mongering and character assassination. The slurs against Szakos and Huja (Napolean was a Smith supporter) have been atrocious. So shame on you and all those dredgers who are making innuendos about other public servants. And the nasty things said about Galvin, Huja, and Szakos, you didn't think those would go unanswered did you, so save the the holier than thou crap. Its politic sand you and your side played them too.
I have never said anything about Ms. Blount's intelligence or character and I resent your baseless accusation. I am sorry she lost and would have much rather seen her elected than Smith, even though I disagreed on the water and MCP issue. She has been a great school board member. Nor has there been any bullying going on (other than by the dredger lobby)-nice try though. Discuss all the ideas you want but don't expect people to believe your assertions about dredging or the dam, its costs, and supply realities just because you scream them loudly and don't expect no push-back when the dredgers engage in such nasty tactics. The less nasty but still distasteful tactics in my opinion included a sitting mayor endorsing candidates, the ticket crap, the softball questions of the troika.
Now that you have exorcised your desire to personalize this and accuse individual posters(a la dredger style) let's get back to the issues. You have to admit that it may be more than an odd coincidence that Norris who is against the Earthen Dam, ran three candidates to over turn the dam decision who ran as a ticket and threw softball questions to each other, when he lost that one in the primary election, began to raise the race card in the DP. It just looks like he's mad because he lost the primary and was looking for ways to bash the democratic party and question the support of Huja and Galvin. I find Mayor Norris' comments about race within the context of the primary and general election to be disingenuous. Then the same week, Schilling gets on the race issue in the Hook. Now one could speculate that since they are both against the Earthen dam that its an attempt to sway voters away from democratic candidates in the primary and toward independent candidates who are all against the dam. My question, is: do they have the same objective in the general election?
Are there independents who don't support Schiiling's perspectives? Sure. Are there pro-dredgers who don't support Schilling's perspective? Sure. I just hope people look closely at the agenda of various groups in this upcoming general election and tease out the motives.
What would put an end to that possibility is if Norris and Smith would come out publicly and support the democratic ticket over the independents. I am glad to hear that there are dredgers out there who understand that Schilling's motive in using the race issues is to undermine the democratic party, get ward elections and nonpartisan elections to assure more republicans spots on Council. Since he is pro-dredging, one could be influenced to vote for the independents for his reasons and then as a trojan horse you get something else.
I am glad there are independents running but they all want to revisit the water supply and the Parkway (I think) and I, like a lot of other citizens in town are plain tired of it and want to move forward so I won't be voting for them. So I don't see diversity in the Independent pool. Also I decided to vote in the primary and signed that pledge and feel morally obligated to live up to my word. In the past I have been a vocal critic of the Democratic party, but on this issue I think it was the pro-dredging faction and their elected officials qua supporters and their candidates who are off base, mostly in tactics. I try not to discriminate in my critique.
BTW I will probably vote for Blount in the School Board election.
"This editorial has to be removed from the website."
Oh great... now we hear a call for censorship.
"The racism that exists is more prevelant in the wal mart parking lot then in politics or government."
.... we're not elitist either are we?
"Those of you throwing around the charge of racism need to look up it's definition. "
While you're at it .. .look up cognitive dissonance
cognitive dissonance ---can't you heat the sour grapes " I didn't really want to be the mayor any longer anyway if the people don't like my my great trioka " -----------------" I didn't really want to be on council now i know the people more"
It would be interesting to know if there are any black contributors to the comments above. Largely it appears to be a bunch of white guys commenting on race and gender.
What ever happened to the normal electoral issues of taxes, budgets, ranking of needs all traditional fodder for a campaign?
Can Charlottesville just move ahead without racial politics? Can the city Dems stop using race to maintain their control?
One spot of hope emerged from the Random Row Citizens Debate. The inclusion of the Independent candidates changed the balance of power. No longer could the Dems demand that Dems were protected. Topics like DECEPTIONS emerged. And it could not be controlled. Unlike City Council, FREE SPEECH could not be suppressed by Szakos labeling it as Lying and Xenophobic or by labeling people disagreeable and unwelcomed to speak.
Schilling's essay is his Free Speech. He informs and offers a perspective which is different from the Dems; it challenges them. I hope the NAACP, and women's groups also offer their perspectives.
But most of all, I hope everybody would concentrate their efforts on what would be good for The People of Charlottesville and leave the race/gender politics of the past, in the past.
How can the legal assets which were paid for and are owned by the City be protected and not forfeited? How can the money paid by City residents to purchase Buck Mountain land be recovered?
How can the lease (which requires the reservoirs be maintained) of the three reservoirs be enforced? How can the irreplaceable city parks be protected from use a low cost real estate for buildings and roadways?
How can the employable people of Charlottesville be employed?
How can the elderly, sick and disabled people of Charlottesville be better supported?
There are big challenges in front of us and honest discussion is needed. It is a time to bring forward new ideas, and open Free speech. It is a time to give up on dysfunctional single party rule and work for all the people in a truly DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC!
Schilling is constantly boasting about how influential he is and how he gets underneath the opposition's skin. As someone who has frequently challenged him on his blog and via email, I can say that he usually dodges or ignores hard questions.
Today on the show he naturally took pride in all the abuse he's supposedly getting for this editorial, and he claimed that his critics haven't refuted him. I think he's made a strong case that the Democrats made a cynical deal decades ago, but he has presented zero evidence that white Democrats today make any attempt to limit the number of African-Americans on the city council, and he has refused to present what he thinks is evidence, even when asked directly why he attributes Blounts failure to secure more endorsements to race and not substantive issues. Schilling has effectively called slaughter and Szakos racists, and refused to provide evidence for that extremely ugly charge.
Schilling is not just a cynic, he's a coward. Having given him a platform for slander, the Hook ought to call him to account.
Can Norris and Schilling (White guys) stop using race to forward their non-poverty, non-race agenda to stop the dam? The only African American have seen without a dog in the fight has been Dr. Turner of the NAACP who gave his perspective on Blount's loss and It didn't seem overly focused on dem. party racism. and:
"What ever happened to the normal electoral issues of taxes, budgets, ranking of needs all traditional fodder for a campaign?" Simple, the dredgers tried to move everything else but the water supply off the agenda for discussion.
Don't think I heard Szakos accuse "lying"? But Napolean's comments was disagreeable and I wouldn't welcome that kind of politically motivated garbage speak back myself.
@ Lloyd: I am confused in one breath you say: "Can Charlottesville just move ahead without racial politics? Can the city Dems stop using race to maintain their control?"
Then you say:
"But most of all, I hope everybody would concentrate their efforts on what would be good for The People of Charlottesville and leave the race/gender politics of the past, in the past."
I am confused. The Dems didn't bring it up. The first mention of this was Norris' comments in the DP after the Primary, and now Schilling in the Hook.
"But most of all, I hope everybody would concentrate their efforts on what would be good for The People of Charlottesville and leave the race/gender politics of the past, in the past." But Norris did this in the DP articles after the Primary and Now Schilling is doing it.
And... "How can the legal assets which were paid for and are owned by the City be protected and not forfeited? How can the money paid by City residents to purchase Buck Mountain land be recovered?
How can the lease (which requires the reservoirs be maintained) of the three reservoirs be enforced? "
Now are you not back to all the anti-dam stuff and not focused on the other things you mentioned which were really good suggestions I thought. The water supply thing will be done and over very soon, and your suggestions:
"How can the employable people of Charlottesville be employed?
How can the elderly, sick and disabled people of Charlottesville be better supported?
There are big challenges in front of us and honest discussion is needed."
are great ways to move on to other important issues. Let's move on.
@Ken - You are too modest. You don't "frequent" Rob's blog. You've been parked there so long that you can claim squatters rights. Your fixation with Rob is not that of a lone wolf in the wilderness so much as it is a disturbing fixation. Schilling is largely criticizing the SYSTEM which he has strongly documented to be rigged. No one on this blog has yet to refute his documentation of history or the soundness of his argument -- only to pull the overused liberal hole card of a faulty racism charge out and stamp their feet. Everyone seems to love one party rule so long as it's their party in power. Change is coming.
I do dispute his choice of hairdo, though.
Feet to the Fire, you'll notice that I credit Rob for his history, but that he is the one charging racism is a factor today. But where has he actually "documented" the motives of today's white Democrats? Since you defend him, how do you know racism was responsible for Blount's defeat, and how do you know today's white Democrats conspire to only let one African-American at a time on the city council? You have "documented" nothing.
The corruption charge is cheap and predictable. Liberals habitually ascribe the worst motives to conservatives and vice-versa. We need leaders with enough character to break that pattern, to refuse to presume the worst about their ideological opponents just because they are their ideological opponents.
Politicians are like diapers, the have to be changed regularly and usually for the same reason
Ken- the last thing that anyone can call Schilling is a coward. He has in the past and is more than willing to meet anyone, anywhere and at anytime to discuss and debate his long standing views.
You up to it- Ken?
Harry, you're right, coward is too strong a word because Rob does invite people of differing views on his shows. He deserves credit for that. But for whatever reasons they very rarely challenge him, or at least they don't in the few hours a week I hear, and when he's challenged to defend his claims online, he won't answer. Feet to the Fire seems to have fallen silent after being challenged in a rebuttal as well. Now why would that be? I don't respect that behavior and I think Rob's charges are reprehensible.
As for me, I've had discussions and debates with all kinds of people online for years. I find it fun and I'm always up for it.
I don't need to point out what is so pathetic about this piece. But I am surprised the hook editors would print such shit writing.


text:
One of the 'Boys': Mystery deepens on the Corner
The Slate Hill Boys
at Jaberwoke
July 9
The Slate Hill Boys, mysterious beyond all other Charlottesville groups I've heard, were a chance discovery as I walked down the Corner Friday night. In search of music to soothe the savage Hook Prowl beast, a free show, at a pretty empty establishment, was enough to get me through the doors and ordering from the bar (yeah, I'm easy).
As I sat at one of the many vacant tables, the Jaberwoke's principal layout fault became blatantly apparent– the high sides of booths to the left of the stage mean you have to strain to see the band. If the club would simply turn the booths, suddenly the seating options for patrons of the arts would increase immensely (four booths or so).
Tuning up (behind the wooden side panel), were two Slate Hill Boys, although "Boys," had led me to expect at least three of them. Soon enough, after the customary "Dueling Banjos" Deliverance theme, the two went into their first number, an instrumental "old time country blues song" whose name I didn't catch.
To the left of the singer was an acoustic guitarist, playing what might be described as "rhythm bluegrass guitar. Though picking was featured prominently in his playing, the flashier performance was consistently given by the gentleman to his right. Sporting a beat-up cap, and consistently talking and singing in a deep Southern accent, the group's singer/guitarist played his instrument with skill and ease.
"Black Cat Blues" was next, a song the singer attributed to John Jackson. Based on a standard blues progression, the song, with its "I've got one black cat hanging around my door. If that black cat don't leave here, don't want it hanging around no more" lyrics sung by the still-hatted Southern gentleman, was technically impressive, and even more impressive emotionally. After a number of slower blues numbers, including one called "Key of the Highway," a stand-up bass player appeared on stage, leading the capped one to proclaim, "Now we have a bass player we should all stand up," though he himself remained sitting (for apparently technical reasons).
"For years and years I rambled, I drank my wine and gambled," began the singer, in a story song about one man's struggles with his rowdy past. The song went something like this "I was rowdy" / "I met a girl" / "I cannot change my rowdy ways" / "I met an old friend"/ "Yodalayhehoo!"
The Slate Hill Boys played good, rough and tumble country-folk, but the show was, as previously mentioned, very mysterious. The accent– affected or real? Who exactly is in the band? I believe the bass player was, as far as could be determined, just a walk-on for the evening.
In some dilapidated shack deep down South, are there more members waiting for their chance to become one of the "Boys"?
The Slate Hill Boys

subset: commoncrawl


text: Both cars are indisputably awesome. Hell, both are in our Fantasy Garage. One has a BMW V12 that in standard tune is good for 627 hp, with other more bat guano iterations easily hitting 680 hp and 244 mph. Of course the other has an 8.0-liter VW mill with 16 cylinders and 4 turbochargers and I-can't-count-that-high many intercoolers and radiators. Seriously dude, the hand brake has a cooler. Bottom line: more than 1,000 hp. Each vehicle represents one man's vision of the very best car in the world. In the case of McLaren, that man happens to be Formula 1 maestro Gordon Murray. With the Veyron, that man is Ferdinand Piech, a gonzo engineer whose Porsche 917 was so dominating that it killed Cam-Am. You might make the argument that the Bugatti is too heavy, but even Murray himself was surprised and impressed by how well the Veyron handled. The only legitimate argument we'll leave you with one way or the other is that in bone stock form, the Veyron is way faster than the heavily modified, record setting F1. Of course, who cares?


text:
Connecticut Garden Journal
Connecticut Garden Journal is a weekly program hosted by horticulturalist Charlie Nardozzi. Each week, Charlie focuses on a topic relevant to both new and experienced gardeners, including pruning lilac bushes, growing blight-free tomatoes, groundcovers, sunflowers, bulbs, pests, and more. Learn more about Charlie at gardeningwithcharlie.com, or reach him at email@example.com.
Hear Connecticut Garden Journal on Thursday afternoons on Connecticut Public Radio at 3:04 pm.
- « first
- ‹ previous
- …
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8


text:
Dean Kamen is an inventor, an entrepreneur, and a tireless advocate for science and technology. His roles as inventor and advocate are intertwined—his own passion for technology and its practical uses has driven his personal determination to spread the word about technology's virtues and by so doing to change the culture of the United States. His vast knowledge of the physical sciences, combined with his ability to integrate the fundamental laws of physics with the most modern technologies, has led to the development of breakthrough processes and products.
As an inventor, he holds more than 440 U.S. and foreign patents, many of them for innovative medical devices that have expanded the frontiers of health care worldwide. While still a college undergraduate, he invented the first wearable infusion pump, which rapidly gained acceptance from such diverse medical specialties as chemotherapy, neonatology, and endocrinology. In 1976, he founded his first medical device company, AutoSyringe, Inc., to manufacture and market the pumps. At age 30, he sold that company to Baxter International Corporation. By then, he had added a number of other infusion devices, including the first wearable insulin pump for diabetics.
Following the sale of AutoSyringe, Inc., he founded DEKA Research & Development Corporation to develop internally generated inventions as well as to provide research and development for major corporate clients. Kamen led DEKA's development of the HomeChoiceTM peritoneal dialysis system for Baxter International, Inc. The HomeChoiceTM system allows patients to be dialyzed in the privacy and comfort of their home and quickly became the worldwide market leader. Kamen also led the development of technology to improve slide preparation for the CYTYC (now Hologic Inc.) ThinPrep® Pap Test. Kamen-led DEKA teams have also developed critical components of the UVARTM XTSTM System, an extracorporeal photophereisis device marketed by Therakos, a unit of Johnson & Johnson, for treatment of T-Cell lymphoma. An advanced prosthetic arm in development for DARPA should advance the quality of life for returning injured soldiers. Other notable developments include the HydroflexTM surgical irrigation pump for C.R. Bard, the CrownTM stent, an improvement to the original Palmaz-Schatz stent, for Johnson & Johnson, the iBOTTM mobility device, and the Segway® Human Transporter.
Kamen has received many awards for his efforts. Notably, Kamen was awarded the National Medal of Technology in 2000. Presented by President Clinton, this award was in recognition for inventions that have advanced medical care worldwide, and for innovative and imaginative leadership in awakening America to the excitement of science and technology. Kamen was also awarded the Lemelson-MIT Prize in 2002, and was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame in May 2005.
In addition to DEKA, one of Kamen's proudest accomplishments is founding FIRST® (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology), an organization dedicated to motivating the next generation to understand, use, and enjoy science and technology.
Watch Dean Kamen on YouTube!


text:
Decals stickers description:
This iron-on T-shirt heat transfers feature full color logos. Iron on transfers are made of top quality heat transfer paper that will not crack or peel. All iron on heat transfer products arrive on a carrier for easy one-step applies. The image is cut to the outside dimension of the logo and fine detail is screened within the transfers.
Iron on transfers sizes available:
12", 10", 8", 6", 4", 2"
The size is the vertical or horizonal dimension (height or width which is larger) of logo
A high quality image on the iron on T-Shirt heat transfers. This is the easiest way to custom your own t-shirt, uniform, tank top, pillowcase, baby bibs and more.
The iron on transfers adheres to the garment permanently with a hot iron or heat press machine and can be washed up to 100 times without color fading and cracking.
Temperature of iron: 330F / 165C (Set iron to "cotton" or "linen")
Iron Time: 65~180 seconds (depends on transfers size)
For step-by-step instructions, please visit instructions for heat transfer paper
Thank you for shopping at www.diytransfers.com, you may also like other items in store: Heat transfer paper, Heat transfer vinyl, iron on patches, letters numbers, decals stickers and other iron on transfers
This product was added to our catalog on Friday 22 January, 2016.
We Also Suggest
More..New Products For February


text:
In my Revolution Investing class that I used to teach at Seton Hall and in my Revolution Investing newsletter, published by Marketwatch, I talk about why I rarely, if ever, invest in non-U.S. securities, even if they have a great platform.
Put simply, I know how hard it is to stay on top of and believe in the numbers that U.S.-based companies publish. To think that I could successfully do so in most any foreign-based company is rather insane. On the other hand, when I see someone like Muddy Waters's Carson Block target a company like NQ Mobile out of China , it piques my interest, because I do think there's money to be made finding companies who are pushing the envelope overseas.
Block, as Marketwatch explains in today's Muddy Waters: Stay out of China stocks, is the founder of Muddy Waters Research and the man who became famous in the investing world two-plus years ago when a research report he wrote help set in motion the collapse of Sino-Forest Corp., a Toronto-listed firm that managed forest land in China. In my book/game, Stock Market Events That Mattered, we use Muddy Waters attack on Sino-Forest as a lesson. It didn't end pretty for those who ignored Muddy Waters' warnings that time.
I don't necessarily like the idea of shorting a Chinese tech stock without having a long-pairing for it. And in this case, I think an $NQ short paired up with a Baidu long might be a good mid-term to long-term way to play China tech. Baidu's been a long position of mine in the past because it's building platforms for the Chinese consumer.
Three years ago, when Baidu (and Yahoo!) were a small fraction of today's prices, I wrote an article called, "Investment themes and stock ideas from new trends on the Internet and explained that, "There are now 1.7 billion people who use the Internet on planet Earth. That's up an impressive 18% over 2008. The order of the user base in hundreds of millions: Asia at 738, Europe at 418, North America at 250, Latin America at 179, and Africa, Middle East and Australia at 67, 57, and 21 respectively. Baidu and Yahoo! are two plays on this Asian/Global Internet user growth trend."
More to the point, NQ Mobile's not ever going to become a de facto standard platform, like Baidu has and which is key to Revolution Investing. I've been highlighting my own Scutify platform in part because it fits in so perfectly with the Revolution Investing platform approach I've written about so many times, including highlighting Baidu's own platforms in a Revolution Investing newsletter literally called, "Build your portfolio up on these platforms."
I was immediately drawn to the Scutify platform and the Scutify Android app, and I soon became addicted to its ease-of-use and the way I could follow news, tweets and "Scuttles" about each stock in my portfolio all on one site and on one app. You can literally "Follow" a stock like $NQ or $AAPL instead of just following a user on Scutify. It's a perfect all-in-one turnkey solution for most traders and investors.
I also think that Baidu's established itself as the "Google of China" as I have called it for years and I'm not nearly as leery about believing that company's financials as I am, say, NQ Mobile.
In general, I totally agree with Block in that most investors should totally stay away from not just China stocks, but most any non-U.S. stock. If you want to short $NQ, I suggest pairing it with a $BIDU long.
Finally, on a personal note -- please don't go posting it all over the Internet, but my wife is 39 weeks pregnant and we're about to welcome Ms. Lyncoln Lee Willard to this world! I get why people call a new baby a miracle. We are truly blessed and wildly excited about having our first child.
I'll probably be a little bit light on the writing after the baby is born in the next week or so. I'll be spending as much time as my wife will allow me holding that baby. $NQ
And in the meantime, be sure to come check out the best site and app for investors and traders, Scutify.com. Scutify is basically an expanded stock-market-centric twitter (here's the Scutify $TWTR feed for example). It's the best stock market app out there. Click here to download the Scutify Android app or click here for the Scutify iPhone app.
Cody Willard writes Revolution Investing for MarketWatch, posts the trades from his personal account at TradingWithCody.com, which is not affiliated with MarketWatch and is the largest shareholder in Scutify's parent company, Wall Street All-Stars. At time of publication, Cody was net long Google and Apple. Follow Cody on Twitter attwitter.com/codywillard.


text:
Zuo Furniture brings in a perfect mixture of the top three priorities in their line - style, substance, and value. Featuring a classy line of furniture collection, Zuo Furniture strongly puts its focus on the modern and contemporary designs which then blends with the current trend of fashion and of course, culture. Zuo Furniture is no ordinary furniture brand, offering pleasant designs that can run across the liking of all ages in the industry today. While covering a whole collection and variety of furniture sets, your home's gorgeous and stunning aesthetic value is sure to fire up every quality that you have always needed.:
The dates below represent the closing schedules for the next several weeks.
|Friday, March 6, 2020
|5:50:00 pm EDT
|Saturday, March 7, 2020
|7:10:00 pm EDT
|Friday, March 13, 2020
|7:00:00 pm EDT
|Saturday, March 14, 2020
|8:15:00 pm EDT
|Friday, March 20, 2020
|7:05:00 pm EDT
|Saturday, March 21, 2020
|8:25:00 pm EDT
|Friday, March 27, 2020
|7:15:00 pm EDT
|Saturday, March 28, 2020
|8:30:00 pm EDT
You have successfully Added item to your wishlist.VIEW WISHLIST


text:
The Circle of Moms site will be discontinued on March 1st, 2020. Head to POPSUGAR Family's Facebook page for more community discussions.
Let's Go >>
Let's Go >>
About Erin and Sarah & her Blog
Erin and Sarah is a winner of Top 25 Product Review Moms - 2012
What's your favorite resource for discovering new products?
Whats the best parenting product you've ever reviewed?
Erin and Sarah's Answers
What is the best product you've reviewed that you think every mom should own? (please include a link to the review)
Sarah and ErinThe Beaba Baby Cook for creating your own fresh baby food.
How do you make shopping for your family's clothes affordable?
Sarah and ErinFor basics, I head to low cost stores like H&M and GAP. Spend your money on classic key pieces like great jeans, coat/blazer, and a few work and cocktail dresses. In an attempt to only purchase high-quality, durable, and stylish clothing for exceptional prices, I use a lot of private shopping sites. For my daughter, I use sites like Zulily and The Mini Social. For the rest of my family, I use Hautelook, Rue La La, Gilt, Ideeli and more. This keeps my general clothing cost down. When purchasing a new seasonal wardrobe, go for a specific color scheme. This creates mix-n-match pieces, which expands your possible looks without buying excessively. Also look for bold accessories to further expand (think scarves, chunky necklaces, belts, etc). When in doubt, check out great mom blogs for coupon codes and giveaways!!
What's your favorite song for kids that moms can download?
Sarah and ErinAnything from Muppets: The Green Album! Play during the day and be prepared to dance and laugh. Download from iTunes or Amazon - http://www.amazon.com/Muppets-Green-Album-Various-Artists/dp/B002YICN7O/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1325923738&sr=8-1
Under what circumstances, if any, is spanking acceptable to you?
Sarah and ErinViolence in any form is not allowed in my house and I consider spanking a for sure form of violence. It creates a pattern of abuse as you will often hear parents say, "well I was spanked" as an excuse. Even if I was okay with the act, I do not think it is an efficient parenting skill. Punishing your child in such a way only makes them stop having bad behavior to not be hit. It does not teach them why they should behave and continue to be a good person (even when no one is around to see). So my answer is "never".
Erin and Sarah's Blogger SoundOff Posts
A New App by Ragu!
A Long Day Of Childhood {App}
This app is for all of you who love the A Long Day of Childhood campaign… More
Hub Network's Halloween Bash
Halloween Mason Jar Light {DIY}
For all my crafty readers out there, get your costume designs started!… More


text:
Slant Six Studios
Galactic Reign hits Windows Phone, PC
Resident Evil: Operation Racoon City developer Slant Six has released a new game – a science fiction strategy effort called Galactic Reign. The Windows 8, RT and Windows Phone app has players colonising planets, designing ships, building fleets and battling in space in both single-player and head-to-head modes. Combat is turn-based and plays out in […]
Slant Six Studios headlines
Resident Evil: Operation Racoon City beta due early 2012
A beta for multiplayer squad-shooter Resident Evil: Operation Racoon City is expected "early next year", according to producer Mike Jones. Joystiq reports the beta was outed at Capcom's Gamers Day 2011 last week. Operation Raccoon City is expected on PC, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 in the first half of 2012. See the latest trailer […]
Rumour - Star Wars: Battlefront Online canceled
Remember Star Wars: Battlefront Online? The multiplayer-only title apparently in development at SOCOM: Confrontation devs Slant Six? It's no more, apparently.
Uncharted and SOCOM: Confrontation added to PS3 Greatest Hits
SCEA's confirmed that Uncharted: Drake's Fortune and SOCOM: US Navy Seals Confrontation has been added to the PS3's Greatest Hits collection in the US. They're both on sale for $29.99. Uncharted has been in the European Platinum collection for a good year or so now, you should go pick it up for about £15. From […]


text:
It was after midnight on a cold November night. Chris and Debra Hall were driving home to El Cajon, California, on Baja's coastal toll road, as they had done a hundred times. Every year for the last 25 they'd gone to Mexico so Chris could pursue his passion for off-road racing. Baja had the best competitions, and he worked the pit crews for all of its big races.
On this evening, in 2007, they were returning from the Baja 1000, in Cabo San Lucas, pulling a racing buddy's 30-foot Weekend Warrior trailer. As their 16-year-old son Tyler and 21-year-old daughter Divinia dozed in the backseat of Chris's new Ford truck, the couple heard an upsetting story on the radio: Two armed gunmen in Ensenada, Mexico, wearing masks and dark clothes, had forced a surfer from San Diego out of his RV, robbed and beaten him, then raped his girlfriend. How awful, the Halls thought. That wasn't the Baja they knew and loved.
They were five miles from the U.S. border, just outside Tijuana, when a black car with flashing red and blue lights and a blaring siren pulled up behind them. "Were you speeding?" Debra asked her husband, who shook his head no. "Are you sure?" she said.
"I absolutely was not speeding," Chris said as he pulled to the side of the highway, convinced this must be another police shakedown. No big deal, he thought. Payoffs and petty thefts were part of the Mexico experience; over the years they'd had to hand over race helmets, an ice chest, and the occasional watch and wallet, but never had they feared for their safety. This was laid-back TJ, after all, not bullet-scarred, kidnap-crazy Colombia. The Halls figured $40 would satisfy the cops – it always had in the past – and in an hour they'd be home.
Seconds later another car pulled in front of them and backed onto their bumper. Nine men, all wearing black paramilitary uniforms, high black leather boots, and knit face masks surrounded the truck, rifles drawn. "Shut up or we'll shoot you!" said the group's leader, a 30-something Mexican. He put a gun to Tyler's head while another man pulled Chris from the truck and a third pressed a gun to Debra's ribs as he ripped out the truck's radio and navigation system.
The attackers moved with speed and precision, as if they'd been trained for this kind of operation. Over and over they screamed, "Where's the money?" "What do you do for a living?" "Where's the race car?" and the chilling, "Who do we call?" Chris knew this last question meant they'd been kidnapped for a ransom. He tried to stay calm as he explained that they were an ordinary family of modest means – he was a truck driver; Debra, an account manager at a health insurance company. They had no race car.
"Let our kids go," Debra pleaded.
"Shut up, lady, or I'll kill you!" one of the gunmen yelled in English, as he shoved Chris into the backseat with the kids, then jumped behind the wheel. The car in front led them off the main highway onto an unmarked dirt road, then lumbered up a steep hill. Then they stopped. As three gunmen stayed in the truck guarding the Halls, the others ransacked the trailer, then the truck, picking both clean: wallets, cell phones, credit cards, keys to both vehicles, all their cash – about $1,100 – and even Debra's gold loop earrings. One man put his hand around Divinia's neck as another felt down her legs to see if she had anything of value in the pockets of her cargo pants.
Again, the angry questions: "Where is the rest of your money?" "Where is the race car?" And again Chris told them, "We don't have a race car or any more money."
Agitated and impatient, the gunmen huddled to discuss their next move, since it was clear that the Halls were worth nothing to them. Moments later the gang's leader signaled for everybody to get back in the vehicles, and the caravan started up again, driving farther into the isolated, pitch-black hills. When they stopped, two men yanked Tyler out of the truck and pushed him down on his knees in a ditch. He started to cry, terrified. Next, the men forced Debra facedown on the ground, then Chris and Divinia – all of them with guns pointed at their heads. "Please don't hurt my babies," Debra pleaded.
"Shut the fuck up about your babies!" shouted the leader. Wearing only shorts, T-shirts, and flip-flops, the Halls trembled in the frigid night air. Chris draped his body over his daughter to protect her as one of the gunmen threw a sleeping bag over Debra and her son. She figured this was to muffle the sound of bullets and keep blood from splattering onto the uniforms of their killers. "I'm so sorry," Debra said to Tyler, stroking his head and crying. Over and over the Halls said to each other, "I love you." Then they lowered their heads and prepared to die.It's a mess down there," a former DEA agent told me as I prepared to cross the U.S. border into Tijuana. When he realized that I was going despite his warning, he said, "Try not to look like an American."
The huge, garishly colored WELCOME TO TIJUANA billboard near downtown is faded from years in the searing sun, and its message – to report any crimes to the Baja state police – is now a poignant reminder of the good old days, when car thieves and traffic cops seeking petty bribes were the biggest problems norteamericanos encountered in TJ.
This January marked the fourth year of a brutal, bloody war that seems to have no end in sight. Mexico's big drug cartels have been fighting for control of the border, killing policemen, army troops, and one another and losing profits in the process. Dwindling drug sales stemming from the Mexican government's crackdown, tighter post-9/11 border security, and the economy's perpetual downturn have led to a rise in alternate means of support for the criminally minded – kidnapping and extortion, crimes with little risk but big rewards. The violence is escalating and has now spread to America, where a string of kidnappings has singled out Mexicans with valid U.S. visas who have children or spouses living in the States.
As the Mexican government's war against drug trafficking and corruption rages on, the violence that first spread north from the little-visited mountain state of Sonora has now turned Tijuana and Rosarito, the most popular tourist towns in Baja, into the war's dangerous front lines. Paul Magallanes, a former FBI agent and the founder of MAI, a security firm based just north of Los Angeles that works regularly on kidnapping and ransom cases in Mexico, says abductions are so common, some Americans are being snatched not only a few miles south of the border like the Halls, but also in San Diego border towns or when they cross into Tijuana. "We're seeing all kinds of victims, with or without ties to the drug cartels, even innocent women and children," says Magallanes. "It's open season on just about anyone."
Until 2007, when tourist traffic all but died, TJ drew thousands of U.S. visitors every weekend, many of them college kids and young recruits from San Diego's military bases drawn to the raunchy nightclubs and bars that trafficked in underage drinking, gambling, whoring, and brawling. The rules of El Norte didn't apply here; a pitcher of beer cost 70 cents (and tasted like piss), weed was plentiful (and inevitably mixed with dirt), and the women in the bars – well, you hadn't had the complete TJ experience until you came home with an STD. You might have spent a night in the drunk tank or woken up with a black eye, but rarely did anyone worry about being shot or kidnapped.
Those days are gone. Tijuana marked its bloodiest year in 2008, with 843 people killed, more than twice the total in 2007. Many of the dead were local drug dealers and low-ranking gang members killed by rivals or by the government. At least 450 police officers and soldiers have also been murdered, as have innocent bystanders – among them children, spouses, and co-workers who got caught in the crossfire.
No one knows for sure how many kidnappings went down last year – most victims are afraid to go to the police because they can't be sure the cops aren't working for the ones doing the abducting – but everyone agrees that the number is alarming. One security agent in Mexico says only Baghdad has more kidnappings than Tijuana.
Mexican soldiers now patrol the streets in Humvees, automatic rifles at their sides. Others pace in front of Hospital General de Tijuana, guarding locked gates so drug traffickers can't storm in to rescue one of their own or finish off a wounded rival. Cops stand nervously on corners, scanning streets for bad guys. The bad guys are out too. Black Escalades and jacked-up Hondas slither through the streets and alleys of downtown Tijuana.
Outside police headquarters a group of officers, sweaty from the blazing heat and swatting away flies, are standing watch for any suspicious activity. "You know the saying, 'The well is dry'?" a disgruntled policeman told me, smiling ruefully. "Well, TJ is dry. It used to be nice here. I'd come downtown with my wife to have a beer, and I couldn't walk down the street because it was so crowded. Now, look. Tourists don't want to come anymore. If I could, I'd hightail it out of here myself."
Anyone in a cash business or with a tie to law enforcement is a potential target – at least 20 police chiefs and commanders have been gunned down, although it's impossible to tell which of them were the good guys and which ones were wearing a badge but moonlighting for drug lords as bagmen, bodyguards, drivers, interrogators, and executioners. However, there is no confusion when it comes to the common methods of killing and torture: beheadings, victims submerged in vats of acid, tongues cut out, heads covered with duct tape to cause suffocation.
All these killings are meant to intimidate, to send a message, none more direct than the one delivered by the 12 bodies found near an elementary school on the morning of September 29. At the scene, police found a plastic bag holding seven severed tongues and a note scribbled on cardboard that promised the same fate for anyone associated with the Arellano Félix cartel, which once ruled the U.S.–Mexico border.
Mexico's president Felipe Calderón has called out the army to fight this crippling, systemic crime and corruption. Since 2006 he has sent 50,000 troops into the worst hot spots. The drug cartels responded by killing more than 300 police officials and some 30 federal agents.
In late October, Calderón sent additional troops to patrol Tijuana's streets. Ten days later three more people were killed in retaliation. "You never saw this degree of violence when the Arellano Félix family was strong and intact," says David Shirk, director of the Trans-Border Institute at the University of San Diego. The ruthless organization run by seven Arellano Félix brothers and two sisters was one of Mexico's most powerful crime groups and controlled Tijuana's drug trade – smuggling tons of cocaine into the U.S. – from 1982 to 2003.
The arrest that same month of Eduardo Arellano Félix was a drug agent's dream come true. All of the active Arellano Félix brothers, and many of their lieutenants, were now either dead or in custody. But the cartel's weakening led to an unforeseen consequence as new players moved in. The Sinaloa and Gulf cartels moved to fill the power vacuum, facing off against organized crime cells led by a nephew of the brothers in a battle for control of the lucrative drug transit routes into the U.S. "Now it's a real war between the cartels," says Shirk. "A war with very high stakes." Eighty percent of all the cocaine, marijuana, meth, and heroin consumed in the U.S. – a $13.8 billion business – comes across the 2,100-mile border with Mexico annually. As do an estimated 2,000 guns, smuggled each day from the U.S. into Mexico.
Violence against American citizens is clearly on the rise as well. Since summer 2007 at least six robberies targeting U.S. surfers along the 780-mile Baja peninsula were reported on Baja sports websites. Mexican authorities dispute this but concede that tourists may not be stopping to report the incidents as they flee back to the U.S. "The bad guys are obviously getting more aggressive," said one Baja surfer. "It's like the frickin' Wild West down there."
No one knew that better than Felix Batista, a kidnapping and ransom expert in Miami, and his comments to me last December, a few days before his own abduction, now seem particularly poignant. (Read about Batista's kidnapping here.) "Kidnapping has become Mexico's biggest cottage industry, and now every lowlife is getting in on the game," he said. In 2008 drug gangs and their surrogates in the U.S. with green cards and passports abducted or killed people in San Diego, Phoenix, Dallas, and Atlanta. Recently, Las Vegas was added to the travelogue of horrors. In October three Hispanic men wearing police uniforms kidnapped six-year-old Cole Puffinburger at gunpoint in his home. Police believe Mexican drug dealers took the boy as revenge after being ripped off for millions of dollars by the child's grandfather, 51-year-old Clemens Tinnemeyer.
"It's one thing to drive across the border into San Diego," Batista told me last December, "but driving all the way to Vegas to take a little boy? Now that's brazen."
Instead of waiting for the ransom call, Las Vegas police blanketed TV, radio, and print with information about the abduction. It worked. Four days after the kidnapping, at around 10:30 at night, a bus driver spotted Cole walking on a deserted sidewalk near downtown Vegas, bewildered but unharmed. The boy's grandfather and one Hispanic "person of interest" are in custody, awaiting trial, as the investigation shifts from a kidnapping to a drug rip-off.
Most of the American kidnapping victims – 27 in 2007 and 26 in 2008 – were abducted in broad daylight after crossing the border (usually to work or visit family). They were held in dark, filthy safe houses while desperate relatives negotiated for their release. Victims have been beaten, raped, tortured – and killed. After ransom drops, some have been returned, unharmed or with serious wounds – their fingers or toes cut off – while still others have never been seen again, presumed murdered, their bodies dumped on roadsides, at the city dump, or in shallow graves scattered across the Sonoran Desert.
That's probably what happened last year to a medical doctor (whose name the FBI is withholding) who lived in San Diego but worked in Tijuana. Sometime in early 2008, the FBI says, a van full of young Mexican men began following him as he crossed the border at San Ysidro. He was the perfect target: He and his wife had moved to the U.S. for a better quality of life 10 years earlier but still had close ties – relatives and a medical practice – in Tijuana, and the doctor frequently crossed the border.
The kidnappers followed the doctor for a few days to nail down his routine. One evening in March the men, heavily armed and wearing police uniforms, grabbed him off a street near downtown Tijuana as he left his office. They pushed him into their van, drove to a nearby safe house, and used his cell phone to call his wife in California. "Give us two million dollars or we're going to kill your husband," the kidnapper said haltingly, as if reading from a script. "And if you go to the cops or tell anyone, we'll cut off his fingers and ears, then kill him." Negotiations dragged on for three weeks before the kidnappers agreed to a lesser ransom. The doctor's wife then drove into Tijuana, followed the kidnappers' purposely convoluted directions, and left the cash in a duffel bag in her car and walked away, with the doors unlocked and the keys on the driver's seat. Moments later two men in their 30s, dressed in jeans and T-shirts, came out of the bushes. One grabbed the bag as the other threw her car keys under a nearby parked car.
They were part of what the FBI believes are at least a dozen well-financed crime groups working in Tijuana, organized like terrorist cells, with clear-cut divisions of labor. The guys waiting in the bushes were the bagmen, while their cohorts handled other tasks: surveillance, abduction, guarding the victim in safe houses, ransom negotiations; if necessary, there are others who cut off fingers and ears or kill a victim when relatives can't pay enough – or pay fast enough. "This is not about getting revenge on some drug rival or government soldier," says Alex Horan, who directs the FBI's violent crime unit in San Diego. "This is a business, and it's all about the money. They know who they're after, and they do this all year long."
After the woman dropped off the ransom, the kidnappers refused to release her husband, demanding more money. Again she begged friends and family for help, and again she drove across the border and dropped the money off, in a bag, as directed.
A year later she still hasn't heard from her husband. "I knew the first time I dropped off the money that they had probably killed him," she says, tearing up, "because they wouldn't let me talk to him. But I kept hoping he was still alive and would come back to us. That's what these kidnappers count on – our love and hope."
Plomo o plata. Lead or silver. Honest cops in Tijuana face this choice every day. "Even if you're righteous and don't want to cooperate with the mob, you don't have a choice," says my chatty cop. "If you don't cooperate, they'll kill you." That's what happened to a district commander, his wife, and their 11-year-old daughter. They were gunned down in January of last year, and the message was clear: No one is safe from us. Cooperate or die. Plomo o plata.
In January 2007 the Mexican army confiscated the guns of every TJ police officer to determine if they had been used in any unsolved murders. Ten days later the guns were returned, but by then more than half the force had quit. The results of the forensics tests were never released, but 500 cops were fired.
Not surprisingly, police commander is not exactly an easy position to fill. Days before Alberto Capella was to start as the new public safety director last year, a dozen heavily armed gunmen dressed entirely in black surrounded his home early one morning and opened fire with automatic weapons. He survived the attack. But now he's gone, fired last December when 37 people were killed over a weekend.Police are now carefully vetted with polygraphs, psych evaluations, drug tests, and thorough financial checks. "But it's not enough," a top federal official working on the drug wars says candidly. "Mexico's problems will only begin to change when the entire legal and law enforcement system is cleaned of corruption, which is not an easy thing to do." This official is one of just 17 exhaustively vetted agents chosen by President Calderón to fan out across the country and oversee all city and state police.
The Halls were sprawled facedown in that ditch for five minutes before they noticed how quiet it had become. Chris no longer heard the rough idle of his truck, so he cautiously lifted his head and looked around. Their attackers had fled with his truck and trailer.
In the dark and dense fog, it took the Halls two hours to find their way back to civilization, walking and stumbling on brambles and rocks, blood covering their feet and legs. Finally, in the distance, they saw a light and heard dogs barking. They called out, pleading for help. Instead, someone fired two shots at them.
The Halls trudged on and came upon a row of houses near the coastal highway; they knocked on a dozen doors before a woman let them in. She offered to call the police, but Chris yelled, "No, don't call the police!" Chris, Debra, Divinia, and Tyler cleaned themselves up as best they could, and made it to the border, where they borrowed a quarter from a stranger at a McDonald's and called a cousin collect in San Diego, who drove down to pick them up.
More than a year after the incident, the Halls still have nightmares and tear up when they talk about it, even in the safety of their home, in which they recently installed an elaborate security system. They no longer believe that their abductors will be captured or that the Baja state police ever really looked for them.
They are still afraid the gunmen will slip across the border and kill them – they have the Halls' home address from the driver's licenses they stole. In October, Arizona sheriff deputies found Chris's truck in the desert outside Yuma, filthy and full of dents and scratches, its windows painted black. It had been used to smuggle illegals into the U.S. Someone is still making charges on the stolen credit cards the Halls cancelled the minute they got back; most businesses in Mexico use the old paper-slide charge machines, so there's no instant check by phone or computer. The Halls' Citibank, Amex, and Home Depot cards were recently used in Tijuana to buy clothes and shoes, a night at Ensenada's Hotel Coral and Marina, and a $2,200 meal.
In all, with the stolen cash, jewelry, and the truck and trailer, the Halls have lost $120,000. "But they robbed us of something more precious than physical stuff," says Debra. "They took Mexico from us. We loved Mexico, and now we'll never go back."
For access to exclusive gear videos, celebrity interviews, and more, subscribe on YouTube!


text:
Botanical name: Crataegus spp.
About: For protection of the heart. For those situations one finds disorienting, uncomfortable or when one needs to deal with those of opposing mind, thought or action.
*All Flower Essence's are 1/2 ounce stock bottles.*
*This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
"Offering hope in a bottle with our
Herbal Extracts, Flower Essences & Body Care
products since 1995."
Love and Blessings from the Forest,
Kate & Don
The window of time for gathering Scots Pine Pollen is a brief week in Spring when our Woodland Essence team cheerfully picks the pollen-filled strobiles one at a time!
Echinacea purpurea is a native plant that grows in high grass prairie and open wooded areas as far east as New York and Pennsylvania. Echinacea angustifolia is a native of the western sandy prairie.
The plant Jewelweed can be crushed and applied to skin that has been in touch with poison ivy to either prevent or treat a poison-ivy rash.
Reishi mushrooms are one of the oldest medicinal mushrooms, referred to as "the mushroom of immortality" for the health benefits it bestows.


text:
Log In
Register A New Profile
Link Exchange
Image Resize
Terms of service
Buy / Sale / Trade
> Topic
Whites Goldmaster GM-3
Even though My Treasure Spot is a nice friendly forum, please be careful when buying and selling items. Make sure that both parties fully understand the terms of the transaction. If possible, confirm the seller's physical address and phone number before sending any payment. Ask for references on a buyer or seller from other members of the forums.
As a service to your fellow buyers and sellers, please take the time to post a reply to the original post pertaining to the transaction. In this reply, please give a short description of your satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the transaction including the seller or buyer's name. This will allow users to search for feedback for future transactions.
Under no circumstances will the website owners, hosts, advertisers, administrator and/or moderators be liable for any loss of revenue or anticipated profits, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, or any indirect, consequential, special or exemplary damages arising from the use of this site regardless of the form of action.
This forum is for My Treasure Spot members to sell items that are for their personal use and for Sponsors to promote their business endeavors. If you are not a Sponsor and would like to use My Treasure Spot to sell items related to a business endeavor, contact me at firstname.lastname@example.com for info on becoming a sponsor.
Forum List
Message List
New Topic
Print View
Whites Goldmaster GM-3
September 20, 2013 10:24AM
Registered: 11 years ago
Posts: 11
Nice clean GM-3 for sale. $350
This is the same family as the current GMT with the following differences.
Square box which can be removed for hip or chest mount
Manual two-stage GB
Analog meter
This is the most sought-after of the Goldmaster series and these are not for sale often - the owners keep them. Ideal for detecting gold down to fly speck size. Also a very popular machine for meteorite detection
SOLD - Whites Goldmaster GM-3
September 21, 2013 05:58PM
Registered: 11 years ago
Posts: 11
Newer Topic
Older Topic
Print View
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Click here to login
Online Users
Guests: 119
Record Number of Guests: 2955 on October 07, 2019
Questions or issues can be sent to
Copyright 2016. Usage of this website constitutes acceptance of the TERMS OF SERVICE that are presented on the registration page, FAQ forum and on the pages throughout the website. Images and/or other content from this site may not be used for other purposes without the expressed consent of My Treasure Spot. Under no circumstances will the website owners, hosts, advertisers, administrator and/or moderators be liable for any loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profits, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, or any indirect, consequential, special or exemplary damages arising from the use of this site regardless of the form of action. MY TREASURE SPOT shall not be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or exemplary damages, including but not limited to, damages for loss of profits, goodwill, use, data or other intangible losses (whether or not MY TREASURE SPOT has been notified of the possibility of such damages). MY TREASURE SPOT forums are a public service. MY TREASURE SPOT assumes no responsibility for any postings and/or their content. MY TREASURE SPOT reserves the right to remove any post at any time.
Powered by


text:
Mr. Speaker, this year, King George Public Community School is celebrating its 100th anniversary. The staff and students, together with the community, are kicking off their celebrations with an event at the school this Friday.
King George School was started in 1911 due to a demand for schools for children of new immigrants coming to Canada. Throughout its history, King George School has educated several notable individuals, including Gordie Howe and Art Jones.
An integral part of the school's vision has been to build strong and lasting relationships and is the foundation of its legacy and resilience over time.
Mr. Speaker, I invite you, together with all of my colleagues, to join me in congratulating King George Public Community School on its 100th anniversary.


text:
Aldi is warning its customers about a 'fraudulent' voucher that is being circulated online.
The supermarket chain issued a statement on its Facebook page saying that the offer of an £85 voucher is a 'hoax' and is 'being fully investigated'.
Aldi's warning, which was posted at around 3pm:
ALERT: We have been notified that there is a hoax £85 Aldi voucher being circulated online. Please be aware that this voucher is fraudulent and cannot be redeemed in our stores. Aldi UK will never ask you to share your personal details via a website to redeem a genuine voucher offer. This hoax is currently being fully investigated. Thank you, Aldi UK.