text:
- Font:
- +
- -
Guests: Mark Halperin, Michael Steele, Milissa Rehberger, Daniel Yergin, Eugene Robinson, Susan Milligan, Walter Shapiro, Chrystia Freeland, Douglas Brinkley
CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: The age of Santorum.
Let`s play HARDBALL.
Good evening. I`m Chris Matthews in Washington. Leading off tonight:
Escape from Santorum. Who gave Rick Santorum a weekend pass for the 21st
century? Did you hear this guy? He doesn`t like public schools, and the
alternative is he doesn`t like prenatal care. He thinks environmentalism
is a false theology. And what, Dr. Santorum, is intelligent design? He
thinks President Obama is this guy over in Europe in the 1930s.
In one weekend spree, this front-running Republican candidate for
president in 2012 was out there blasting it all -- schools, science, caring
for the environment, doing that bad old number of comparing his opponent to
Adolf Hitler. How many wild things can you say before people think you`re
the wild thing, or suddenly think tame old Mitt Romney might not be so bad?
Plus, shouts and whispers. Republicans are beginning to say out loud
what was once unthinkable, that Mitt Romney might lose Michigan and leave
Santorum as the likely nominee. The whispers of drafting another candidate
are the Tampa convention are getting louder.
Also, the good news for President Obama, his poll numbers are rising.
The bad news, so are gas prices. Could this be the issue Republicans are
looking for?
And art imitates art. How about the first family as characters in the
old "Cosby Show." If you missed it -- well, there it is! If you missed it
on "Saturday Night Live" this weekend, we`ve got it in the "Sideshow."
Finally, "Let Me Finish" with a real pick-me-up, what happened 50
years ago today that got us headed to the moon.
We begin with Rick Santorum. "Time" magazine`s Mark Halperin is
MSNBC`s senior political analyst. And we`ve got Susan Milligan here with
me. She writes for "U.S. News & World Report."
Let`s take a look at this. Here`s Rick Santorum speaking at the
Christian Alliance luncheon in Ohio on Saturday. Certainly, he knew his
audience there. He criticized prenatal testing and the public education
system of this country. Let`s listen.
RICK SANTORUM (R-PA), FMR. SEN., PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: They require
free prenatal testing in every insurance policy in America. Why? Because
it saves money. Why? Because free prenatal testing ends up in more
abortions and therefore less care that has to be done because we cull the
ranks of the disabled in our society.
Where did they come up with public education and big education
bureaucracies was the rule in America?
But the idea that the federal government should be running schools,
frankly, much less that the state government should be running schools, is
MATTHEWS: You know, Mark Halperin, people say the media keeps
shifting attention away from the economy to these crazy cultural questions
that we thought were all long ago put to bed. There he is, Rick Santorum,
you could argue is the front-runner in the country right now for the
nomination of the Republican Party, pushing these issues sharp as nails.
He wants a fight.
MARK HALPERIN, "TIME," MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Chris, when he does
that, he -- the media thinks three things about him. They think he`s
unelectable in a general election. They think he`s extreme and out of
touch. And they think he`s incompetent. And those things are going to
hurt him with the national media narrative.
But at the same time, he`s talking about issues that makes it
impossible for Mitt Romney to attack hi. and emphasizes the passion he has
on the issues he cares about.
I talked to a senior aide to him today who said they`re not backing
off any of it. He means it all. This is what he`s about. The press is
the only one who cares. They may be right, they may be wrong, but this is
Rick Santorum. This is not some fabrication.
MATTHEWS: So Susan, this is an odd argument. Not that he believes
this stuff. We know he believes it. But his fact that he home schools his
kids -- fair enough. He doesn`t think public schools are any damn good,
OK? That`s an incredible statement. Public schools as an institution he
thinks are wrong.
Prenatal testing, admitted, it`s a controversial question. Obviously,
there are people who choose abortions after the prenatal testing. But to
bring up issues like this in a presidential campaign he knows are red hot,
he`s appealing to the right.
SUSAN MILLIGAN, "U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT": He is. I mean, I think
he knows that the one way to beat Mitt Romney is to kind of whip up that
part of the party that has ever been satisfied with Romney as a social
conservative. And he`s not saying anything more out there than he ever
said when he was...
MATTHEWS: You covered him...
MILLIGAN: ... a United States senator.
MATTHEWS: ... on the Hill.
MILLIGAN: Yes. I remember when he said that the Catholic church sex
abuse scandal was a result of the liberalism in Massachusetts and the
environment that it created. And he said it, and then we went back at it
again, and he didn`t back off from that, either. I mean, he`s -- this is
who he is. So he`s not moving to the right. He is this way.
MATTHEWS: Do you buy the fact that he`s doing this deliberately, that
he knows -- he`s saying what he believes. He knows it`s tricky business.
But he`s going, as Mark says, where Mitt Romney can`t follow him?
MILLIGAN: I think that`s absolutely true because he`s not trying to
win the approval of the national media, or even right now, the independents
in this country. He`s trying to get the nomination. And he knows that
Romney has, you know, kind of shaky credibility with social conservatives
to begin with. And when he goes this far to the right on it and so
passionate about it, too...
MATTHEWS: OK, let`s -- I think people watching right now are
progressives and independents and some moderate Republicans watching now,
and even some conservatives who are watching, ought to pay attention to the
fact that this is not "gotcha" journalism.
MILLIGAN: Right.
MATTHEWS: We`re trying to track what a guy is saying because he
really believes it. And according to Mark and Susan, he knows he`s being
listened to by the people he wants to win over in this primary in Michigan.
Here he is at a Tea Party rally on Saturday. Romney (sic) criticized
President Obama`s energy policy here for what he says, putting concerns
about the planet above the comfort of people. Let`s watch this
philosophical argument he`s making.
SANTORUM: This is what the president`s agenda -- it`s not about you!
It`s not about you! It`s not about your quality of life. It`s not about
your jobs. It`s about some phony ideal, some phony theology, oh, not a
theology based on the Bible, a different theology, but no less a theology!
MATTHEWS: Well, I couldn`t disagree with him more on this stuff.
Anyway -- well, most of this stuff. Here`s today Santorum trying to
explain his use of that word "theology," blasting President Obama for
having this "phony" -- what he calls "phony theology." Let`s listen.
SANTORUM: I referred to it the other day, and I got criticized by
some of our -- well, less than erudite members of the national press corps
who have a difficulty understanding when you refer to someone`s ideology.
MATTHEWS: Mark, this -- the question -- well, he just changed the
word right there from "ideology" to "theology." (sic) Obviously,
"theology" is a wild word. But basically, his argument is to say that if
you care about this planet, if you`re concerned about scientific theories
right now about global warming, if you worry about getting rid of -- of
just using up our resources on this planet, wearing out the planet, you are
not being a Christian. That`s what he`s saying.
I would think that caring about the planet that God created would be a
Christian or a Judeo-Christian belief -- part of our system of belief.
Your thoughts? What`s he saying here?
HALPERIN: Well, I`m not here to advocate for Rick Santorum, but I
think the way you characterize it probably goes a notch or two further
MATTHEWS: Well, go for it. You do it your way.
HALPERIN: ... than at least he intends. Look, we`ve said for months
that part of the what the Republican nomination fight is about is who can
be the most anti-Obama, who can have the most energy, who can impugn his
legitimacy and his hold on the office most emotionally and passionately.
And that`s what Rick Santorum`s doing.
As Susan said, if you`d been with him last year, the year before, the
year before that, this the way he would have talked. It`s getting a lot
more attention now.
He is undisciplined as a candidate. He`s got a lot of skills and a
lot of strengths as a candidate, but he says stuff he shouldn`t say.
As I said before, his advisers don`t think this falls into that
category, but I don`t think if he wants to be president of the United
States this is a sustainable line...
MATTHEWS: OK, so you...
HALPERIN: ... including on the environment.
MATTHEWS: ... think he`s crossed the line. You think he`s crossed
the line on the environment, where he`s questioning...
MATTHEWS: ... Teddy Roosevelt Republicans, if there are any,
certainly, conservation is a 20th century concept bought by both political
parties, we got to preserve this planet, like the Grand Canyon. I mean,
there are a lot of people that walk into the Grand Canyon and say, OK, man
can have a trail here or there, but let`s not screw this thing up. He says
that`s a false theology, to worship beautiful things, like even Niagara
Falls and things that are all part of our wonder on this continent, he
thinks we should put them below us in some food chain kind of idea.
MILLIGAN: Well, that`s -- first of all, remember that he -- that his
party on the Hill, when they took control of the House of Representatives
in 1995, changed the name of the Energy and Environment Committee to Energy
and Natural Resources to send a signal that this isn`t something for us to
MATTHEWS: It`s to use.
MILLIGAN: ... but to use. And there is -- I had heard that religious
argument that, you know, we`re all here on this earth for however long God
wants us here, and we`re here to use the earth. I don`t hear that from a
lot of people, but...
MATTHEWS: But you know -- you know, if he`s saying that -- let me
give a little -- a little sermonette here. You say I`m overstating this,
Mark. Maybe I am. But look, how long would there be a Central Park in New
York if you opened it to development? There wouldn`t be a central park.
Trump and everybody`d be in there competing. Everybody we know would be
competing to build -- Zuckerman, every real estate developer in New York
would be developing that area. There wouldn`t be a tree left, OK? Maybe a
couple trees outside your window for effect.
If you opened up most of this country to development -- the reason we
protected our environment is a way to keep it away from capitalists. Is he
saying capitalism should trump natural beauty, the environment, our
national forests, our national, actually, monuments to God`s creation, if
you will? Mark, how far do you see him going?
HALPERIN: I think he was more making a statement about the
president`s view of the environment and the place it should play in our
Look, Chris, we don`t disagree about this. If you`re David Axelrod,
you`re sitting in Chicago saying, Would I rather run against the guy from
Bain Capital with -- with investments in the Cayman Islands and
Switzerland, or the guy who`s now leaving a longer and longer paper trail
of -- and videotape of statements about birth control, the environment...
MATTHEWS: Yes.
HALPERIN: I mean, both of these guys are flawed candidates. And
Santorum is maybe helping himself with parts of the party...
HALPERIN: ... but he`s killing himself with the press and fat cat
donors and the sharpies in Washington who want somebody who`s electable in
a general election.
MATTHEWS: OK, I would say Teddy Roosevelt is so far to this guy`s
left, it`s unbelievable.
MILLIGAN: Absolutely.
MATTHEWS: Anyway, let`s take a look at -- here`s -- here`s what he
said speaking at a Georgia church last night. Here`s Santorum comparing
the late entry of the United States into the fight against Nazi Germany
back in `41 to what`s at stake in this election. Here he describes why the
United States was late to engage. Let`s listen.
SANTORUM: We`re a hopeful people. We think, Well, you know, it`ll
get better. Yes, he`s not -- I mean, he`s a nice guy. I mean, it won`t be
near as bad as what we think. I mean, you know, this`ll be OK. I mean,
oh, yes, I mean, maybe he`s not the best guy. After a while, you found out
some things about this guy over in Europe and he`s not so good of a guy
after all. Sometimes, it`s not OK.
MATTHEWS: I don`t know who said he was a nice guy.
MATTHEWS: We`re talking about Hitler here! Anyway, today Santorum
explained his comments, saying, "It`s a World War II metaphor. It`s one
I`ve used 100 times." When asked whether he meant to compare the president
to Hitler, he said, "No, of course not." But what was he doing?
MILLIGAN: I think he was putting this election in apocalyptic...
MATTHEWS: But he was saying if we don`t stop this president from
being what he considers a socialist...
MILLIGAN: Yes.
MATTHEWS: ... he`ll -- we think he`s a nice guy socialist, he`ll end
up being a dictator socialist.
MILLIGAN: Yes. He`s trying to put this election in apocalyptic terms
and almost religious apocalyptic terms. But I think also what we`re seeing
here is that while Romney is this incredibly scripted candidate and that`s
not working for him, Santorum is incredibly unscripted.
MATTHEWS: Yes. So we`re choosing here, if you`re a Republican voting
on -- coming up on the 28th, which is now about eight days from now --
Mark, it looks to me like this is really tightening up in Michigan to
practically even right now. Is there any way -- I think Romney could
easily win this based on his trends in some of these -- the PPP poll, if
you believe it.
But is this really a bout between a guy who can`t talk and a guy who
talks too much?
HALPERIN: Well, that`s one way to frame it, but it`s also a guy who
at this point is spending a lot more money on negative ads, as he has in
the past. So Romney has some advantages here.
But look, the metaphor he used -- we all agree, Nazi metaphors just
shouldn`t be part of politics.
MATTHEWS: Sure.
HALPERIN: But at the same time, there are tens of millions of people
in this country who think the president`s illegitimate and he`s destroying
America. And that`s who`s voting, to a large extent, in these contests.
I don`t -- I don`t think Santorum should use language like that, but I
think he`s -- in this case, he is trying to tap into something, which is
the urgency that a lot of people have on the side -- on the Republican and
conservative side to get rid of the president.
Romney doesn`t tap into that as well. And that -- if he does lose
Michigan, some of these other states, I think that`ll be the reason as much
as anything else.
MATTHEWS: So it`s not gotcha journalism, it`s just God-fearing,
right-wing politics.
MILLIGAN: You got to give him points for being who he is.
MATTHEWS: Yes. Well said. I think we`ve learned something here
tonight. Don`t think Rick Santorum`s an idiot. Just consider him a right-
wing ideologue who`s willing to say what he is, and that`s what we`re not
used to anymore. Politicians who say what they`re -- even when they`re so
far right, it scares the bejesus out of a lot of people in the middle.
Anyway, thank you, Mark Halperin, for a very analytical look at this.
Susan, same deal.
Coming up: If Mitt Romney loses Michigan -- and this is -- I still
think he`s got the favorite opportunity out there -- will we get a brokered
convention and someone else. There is a chance we go to Florida and we got
a draft down there for Jeb Bush or somebody. If this thing keeps going
crazy like this, the voters of the Republican Party may just say, This is
chaos. The grown-ups have got to take over. Well, that`s ahead, the
You`re watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.
MATTHEWS: One week after the Michigan and Arizona primaries which are
coming up next Tuesday, nine states vote on super-Tuesday. That`s March
6th. We`ve got some new numbers, new poll numbers from super-Tuesday in
the HARDBALL "Scoreboard."
In Oklahoma, it`s Rick Santorum with a 16-point lead over Mitt Romney
in a new Sooner poll, 39-23. Newt Gingrich is a close third at 18. And in
Massachusetts, where Mitt Romney was governor, of course, Romney has a 48-
point lead over Santorum -- 48 points -- in a new Suffolk poll.
Massachusetts, by the way, is one home state Romney shouldn`t have a
problem winning in the primary. But the home state love doesn`t extend to
November. President Obama has a big lead over Mitt Romney in a general
election match-up -- catch this, 53-39 -- 53-39. And that could help
Elizabeth Warren, the presumed Democratic nominee in that hot Senate race
with Scott Brown.
We`ll be right back.
MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL. The fear amongst Republicans
that Mitt Romney`s campaign might self-destruct is growing as he trails
Rick Santorum in every Michigan poll right now. Politico reports today
there is even talk in Republican circles now of a brokered or a contested
convention come Tampa time down in August.
Anyway, quote, "Most party veterans still believe Romney will muscle
his way to the nomination. But even among his own donors, it`s not
difficult to find concern about both his general election prospects and
anxiety about the potentially chronic nature of the rest of the primary --
the chaotic nature of the rest of the primary and the Tampa convention
Michael Steele is the former chair of the RNC and an MSNBC political
analyst and Walter Shapiro covers politics for "The New Republic" and Yahoo
Walter, your column grabbed me today, my friend, and this whole idea
that you talk it up like -- to Mitt Romney, who we all know is a bit
structured in his manner and rather unspontaneous, you (INAUDIBLE) said it
was like a business school case study at Harvard B school. Tell me about
that, the way he`s looking at this campaign.
WALTER SHAPIRO, "THE NEW REPUBLIC": Well, the whole thing about Mitt
Romney is he`s doing everything technically right. And the problem is, he
is still losing to a ragtag opposition. No one took Rick Santorum
seriously as a first-tier presidential candidate. And Newt Gingrich, who
beat him in South Carolina handily, was like the Harold Stassen of 2012.
MATTHEWS: Right.
SHAPIRO: And yet Mitt can`t put them away. Imagine if he was up
against a real opponent.
MATTHEWS: Well, let me go over to Michael Steele about that. This
whole question -- maybe, maybe -- do you hear it among your colleagues,
your erstwhile colleagues, perhaps, of the talk of some kind of -- you
know, I was thinking back in history 50 years ago. Was it -- 60 years ago,
`52. The last time a convention really picked somebody who hadn`t ran was
Adlai Stevenson.
MICHAEL STEELE, FMR. RNC CHAIR, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Right.
MATTHEWS: He was the host governor, and he had refused to run. All
the party people had said, You got to run, you got to run. And Truman had
said, Run, run, run. He wouldn`t run.
But when it came time for the convention in Chicago, just like this
convention coming up in Tampa, he gave a barn-burner of a host speech, like
the guy (ph) (INAUDIBLE) host speech is boring. He gave this great speech
and he got the nomination.
Is that still possible in your party, that a guy or woman could go up
and give a speech welcoming the convention so well they nominate her --
STEELE: No. No, it can`t.
MATTHEWS: No?
STEELE: And in fact, you know, I was the first -- one of the first
out there to raise about a 50-50 proposition of a brokered convention.
And my point was not so much about the convention being brokered where some
third party is going to come in and be the knight on white shining horse
coming in the door at the end...
MATTHEWS: Sure.
STEELE: ... but more about a contested convention.
You could have a scenario where at least three of the four of these
individuals walk into that convention, 400 or 500 votes short or 300 votes
shy of what they need for the nomination. And then the contest begins
negotiating with one or the other to get the votes you need from the
delegates so that you can pull out the nomination.
That`s very likely, particularly if you see in Michigan Romney losing
Michigan, it sends a very strong signal out there about not just
eligibility, but about credibility. And I think Newt asked the right
question. How does Mitt go to his donors the next morning and say, I`m
your guy, give me more money?
Everything becomes different, it`s game changer should that happen.
MATTHEWS: So it`s Michigan next week.
STEELE: Absolutely. Absolutely. And I think what happens in that
situation is you`re looking at then jockeying for the position, the
strongest position to make the best argument to get the most delegates once
you get to Tampa.
MATTHEWS: Let`s take a look at some of those new numbers that are
coming in, in states and primaries eight days from today.
In Michigan, the PPP robo-poll has Romney gaining from last week`s
poll, which was probably an outlier, you could say. Now they have Santorum
still on top 37 percent to Romney`s 33 percent, a four-point spread there.
In Arizona, in what was thought of as a Romney stronghold because of the
large Mormon population down there, Romney has just a three-point lead over
Rick Santorum, 36 percent to 33 percent.
Let me go to Walter on this.
The idea that Santorum could be doing so well, it reminds me of
Buchanan in the old says running where you can run well in one state and
all of a sudden be running well way across the country. This is a
nationalized political environment we`re in right now. Everybody who is
voting in these primaries, guys, is watching shows like this and on FOX
because the politically interested people are the ones making these
decisions, not the regular public.
Walter, do you see anything that gets in the way now of Romney being
the nominee? Because every time I sit down, they say it will end up being
Romney. It may be dirty, it may be jagged, he will end up being the
nominee in the worst, bloody way, but he will be the nominee.
Is that still inevitable?
SHAPIRO: No, I don`t think it`s inevitable at all. Because there are
some things called voters.
And the nationalization is not new. Gary Hart went from nowhere to
leading many national polls after he won the New Hampshire primary in 1984.
Of course, we long for an open convention because if it gets to the
convention there are no brokers left. And I would love to see a second
ballot. But as you point out in your book, in 1956, Kefauver won the vice
presidential nomination over Kennedy because Sam Rayburn, the convention
chairman, decided to recognize Oklahoma, instead of Illinois.
I`m not sure that lack of democracy would play very well for a
political party on national television, when we`re totally unused to the
deal making at a national convention.
MATTHEWS: Let me go back to the former chairman.
Is there a chance that because of Romney`s poor performance if it
continues that you will have something like a democratic process in Tampa,
where people will actually come and actually get released by the second
ballot and actually make a decision about who the nominee should be in that
STEELE: Yes. Yes. That I think is again very, very likely if coming
out of next week and Super Tuesday, the combination of those two, you don`t
have someone with -- showing the wind in their sails, pushing towards that
magic number of 1,100 votes. Yes, I think you could have a situation.
MATTHEWS: OK. What`s more likely, Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Ron
Paul all ganging up on Romney or Romney buying one of the three guys off
with a vice presidency or something...
STEELE: I don`t see any of those three getting bought off at this
The problem -- and this goes back to the 2008 campaign. The Romney
operation has a way of poisoning the well vis-a-vis the other candidates so
badly that they don`t want to work with him, that they don`t want to
cooperate with them.
MATTHEWS: Oh, well, you`re telling me something here.
STEELE: And so that there`s always this, you know, thing that sticks
in their craw about him. I don`t see them sort of jumping up and down
saying, OK, I want to be on Mitt`s team after battle, particularly someone
like Newt. I don`t see that happening.
MATTHEWS: Same question to you. Do you see a more likely scenario
where they all gang up and agree on one of the three being the nominee
rather than giving to Mitt because he`s got the money at the convention to
buy them off?
SHAPIRO: Well, let me try another scenario which I think is more
If Mitt can`t put away Santorum or Gingrich makes a great jack-in-the-
box comeback, and this year anything is possible, and they look like
political disasters in November, will there be pressure by the Republican
establishment for Romney to get out of the race and release his delegates
to a Jeb Bush, a Mitch Daniels, a Chris Christie, and resolve this thing in
May and June with a replacement establishment candidate for Romney?
That`s a small chance, but I think it`s possible.
MATTHEWS: Fall on his sword for the party?
MATTHEWS: Michael is laughing at the thought of such generosity.
MATTHEWS: No generosity like that, Michael, right?
STEELE: No.
STEELE: Walter, I loved your piece today, man, but that scenario is
not happening.
MATTHEWS: These guys who come in first like to stay in first.
Anyway, thank you, Michael Steele.
STEELE: All right, guys.
MATTHEWS: It`s been a good segment.
MATTHEWS: Thank you, Walter. It`s great to see your piece today.
MATTHEWS: Up next: Mitt Romney infamously strapped his dog to the
roof of the car for a family vacation. He had it in a dog house up there,
by the way. He wasn`t just flying loose up there. But now Rick Santorum
has a dog story of his own. That`s ahead in the "Sideshow."
You`re watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.
MATTHEWS: Back to HARDBALL. And now for the "Sideshow."
First up, step away from the sandwich. The first family went Cosby
this weekend on "SNL," with each member of the family slipping into their
alter egos for "The Cosby Show." Even Vice President Joe Biden was
represented. The president found himself in the doghouse after fashioning
a sandwich that didn`t quite pass muster with Mrs. Obama. Let`s watch.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: I hereby approve this hoagie for eating.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: But, first, some amendments. We`re going to add
a little salami to the hoagie.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: I also hereby veto the rice cakes that Michelle
said were healthier than the hoagie. Here we go.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTRESS: Hi, Barack. My meeting was canceled. And...
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: She`s home. My beautiful wife is home.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTRESS: Barack Obama, is that a hoagie? Foods like
that lead to obesity. And you know you are to never, never, never, never,
never, never, never eat them.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: I know. I just found it here.
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: I think one of the children must have made it.
MATTHEWS: That`s a great version of Phylicia Rashad.
Ever since, by the way, the Let`s Move initiative hit the ground
running, some people have come to see the first lady as some kind of junk
food cop.
Next up, grin and bear it? Reliving embarrassing campaign moments
isn`t the most popular strategy for a presidential candidate, but Rick
Santorum gave it a go this past weekend with a specific tale involving,
what else, a dog. Here`s when a woman invited him in for a water break
while he did some door-to-door campaigning back in the `90s.
RICK SANTORUM (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: She hands me the glass of
water. And the dog jumps up and hops in my lap. And the next thing I
know, there`s a warm sensation on my lap.
SANTORUM: I jump up and on my tan pants is a huge wet spot where you
don`t want a huge wet spot.
SANTORUM: Undeterred, I soldiered on.
Anybody remember the closer for the 1979 World Champion Pittsburgh
Pirates? Kent Tekulve, correct. That`s Kent Tekulve`s house next door.
And I said: "Hi, Mr. Tekulve. I`m Rick Santorum. I`m running for
And he does this.
I say to him, "Mr. Tekulve, I`m so excited to meet you."
MATTHEWS: Pretty good. Santorum said he told the story to show the
audience that he`s -- quote -- "walked the path that you have walked."
Would that be a different path than the one Romney took when he
infamously strapped his dog in the kennel on the roof of his car for a
family road trip up to Montreal? I doubt it.
Finally, excitement is ramping up as baseball season approaches. But
the Washington Nationals team got things under way with another crucial
part of their team spirit this past weekend, the mascots. If you haven`t
seen them before, the figureheads for the Nationals are, fittingly, the
four presidents featured up on Mount Rushmore, George Washington, Abraham
Lincoln, Tom Jefferson, and Teddy Roosevelt.
And Saturday brought the last round of tryouts for mascot wannabes.
The requirements -- look at these guys -- handling that 45-pound costume,
not to mention clocking a 40-second run from center field to home plate and
even freestyle dancing. And it`s now a tradition, by the way, for the
mascots to race against each other at the fourth-inning mark. Look at it.
That`s a job, and not an easy feat.
Up next: Gasoline prices are up. We all know that. Way up. We all
know that. And Republicans think they have got an issue to use against
President Obama -- $75 to fill my car the other day.
You`re watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.
MILISSA REHBERGER, MSNBC Correspondent: I`m Milissa Rehberger.
Here`s what`s happening.
Three skiers were killed on Sunday after being caught in an avalanche
near a ski resort in Washington State. They had been skiing in an out-of-
bounds area. Authorities say there were minor only injuries after a small
plane and a helicopter flipped each other last night over Northern
California. Aviation officials are investigating that.
And U.N. nuclear inspectors are in Iran for a two-day visit. Last
week, Iran declared major progress in its nuclear program -- now back to
MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.
President Obama might be thankful for the lowered unemployment rate,
of course, and the rising stock market, of course. The Dow has been way
up. But there`s one troubling number that still faces America. It`s the
rising cost of gasoline at the pump.
Today, the AAA national average has it at $3.57 for regular. And
that`s up 18 cents from just last month, up 40 cents from a year ago. And,
by the way, it`s higher in different places, like here in Washington area.
It was a fortune for me the other day. And in L.A., apparently out in
California, it`s a fortune.
Republicans see this as a winning issue for the November elections,
obviously. But is this something that you can really argue about as an
Obama failure in terms? Is it his fault?
Daniel Yergin is a great expert on energy. He`s author of The Quest,"
big book, "Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World." He`s
also a CNBC energy analyst. Chrystia Freeland is editor at large for
Thomson Reuters.
We have two great people on. Unfortunately, this show deals with the
bottom line of politics. So let`s just talk about the bottom line here.
Daniel, it`s great to have you on.
Why are gas prices going so high now? I said I paid 75 cents (sic) to
fill up my car with super the other day. Why so up so fast?
DANIEL YERGIN, CNBC ENERGY ANALYST: The basic reason is what has
happened on the front page. It`s about what Iran, the fear of a disruption
of supplies, what Iran is threatening, to close off the supply of oil.
And both -- the U.S. is putting sanctions on the Iranian Central Bank.
The Europeans are putting an embargo on, so there`s a sense that all of
this is intensifying. And that means there may be problems in the supply
of oil.
MATTHEWS: Why does a fear of a shortage of oil down the road drive
prices up now?
YERGIN: Well, it`s because -- it`s because people are in the market
now getting ready, preparing themselves. No one wants to be caught short
of oil.
MATTHEWS: No, big oil companies are buying as much oil futures as
they can in case this happens?.
YERGIN: Well, not necessarily just the big oil. Kind of everybody.
Airlines are doing it, everybody else.
MATTHEWS: I got you. So they are buying it now because they don`t
want to be cut short?
YERGIN: Right.
MATTHEWS: So, Chrystia, your sense of this thing and whether it`s
going to keep going up. I know I`m just a pedestrian political guy here,
but I want to know one thing. Where`s the price of gasoline going to be
during this summer when people travel? I hear it always goes up in the
summer because of the demand of vacationers, of families getting on the
CHRYSTIA FREELAND, GLOBAL EDITOR AT LARGE, REUTERS: That tends to
happen, although with the brilliant Dan Yergin, I`m not going to forecast
the price of oil.
What I will say is that I think that this is tactically a smart issue
for the Republicans to be focusing on, because as you pointed out earlier
in the show, Chris, the culture wars have gone so far to the right in the
Republican Party that in the general election, I think that kind of a focus
could really kill them.
And they will have to try to find a way to return to the economic
debate. But with economic numbers looking a little bit better, it`s hard
to find something to peg that on. So the oil price really could be the
issue. I think that if they are smart, they will raise the Keystone
MATTHEWS: Well, as Don Rumsfeld, the late, I`m not going to say
great, secretary of defense, said, you fight the war with the army you
have. And their army is gas prices.
Look at this. Here`s yesterday on FOX News. Newt Gingrich, who
always knows how to exploit an issue, pledged to drive down gas prices
under his informed leadership. Let`s listen to him.
NEWT GINGRICH (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: So, what I can guarantee
you is the Obama program has higher prices, more dependency on the Middle
East, more vulnerability to Saudi Arabia and Iraq and Iran -- exactly the
wrong direction.
Now, can we get to $2.50? Can we get to $2? It was $1.13 when I was
speaker. It was $1.89 when Obama was sworn in. I mean, $2.50 is not some
inconceivable number, except in the Washington establishment, which always
explains to you why whatever you want to do that`s good for the American
people can`t be done.
MATTHEWS: OK. His boogeyman is us, in Washington, the establishment,
because he`s getting his keister (ph) handed to him.
Is there anything he said that`s true?
YERGIN: I think it`s mainly -- it`s -- if he can change the outcome
in the Middle East, if he can solve -- anybody can solve the Iranian
imbroglio, short of the kind of tension that`s around it now, then we`d see
prices lower. We actually -- on top of what`s happened with Iran, the
world oil market is kind of tight in terms of other supplies.
So, if you just talk about an embargo of Iranian supplies and making
it hard for them to sell it, you have to figure out where --
MATTHEWS: But these same characters that they`re saying, let me go
to Chrystia into this, I`ll be back to you, Daniel. Chrystia, the same
characters like Newt Gingrich, they are saying he`s going to solve the
whole thing overnight are also saying let`s bomb Iran tomorrow morning.
The minute you bomb Iran, whether it`s good policy or not, you have to
calculate a lot of factors. But one of those factors is Iran will have a
reaction. That reaction is not going to be cheaper gas for the West.
FREELAND: Absolutely. I totally agree with Dan that the main thing
driving the price of oil right now is uncertainty around Iran.
MATTHEWS: Right.
FREELAND: If that war, you know, if that conflict gets hotter, then
the oil price will go up very significantly. I wonder to what extent that
is figuring into the White House calculations on that issue.
MATTHEWS: You mean if we bomb or encourage Israelis to bomb, not
that they need a lot of it, they have a reaction, just cut off the Straits
of Hormuz, the gulf becomes a log jam. Then what happens?
YERGIN: Right. And in fact, the Iranians are very shrewd. They
know that if they threaten to cut off -- close the strait or have the large
these military maneuvers, the price of oil goes up because people get
MATTHEWS: So, what would we do? If you were the president of the
United States, Dan Yergin, what would you do to keep prices through the
election? Total political Machiavellian, what would you do?
YERGIN: I think the options are quite limited in what you can do. I
mean, you can jaw a bone. You can tell people don`t gouge. You can go --
MATTHEWS: I`m going to the Saudis and say, open the pumps.
YERGIN: The Saudis have said that. The Saudis have said it in a
kind of this -- they`ll say we will meet the needs of our customers. And
the Saudis have just about enough oil -- extra oil supply to put in the
market that can replace Iranian oil.
So, Saudi Arabia is the main place to go for other oil. Saudi Arabia
is also in the Persian Gulf, however.
MATTHEWS: Yes, so it`s very hard to deal with it, to get the oil out
even if they want to.
YERGIN: But the Saudis --
MATTHEWS: But right now, could we go to the Saudis and say, prince,
whether your highness, or whatever, can you reduce the price of gas so I
can get reelected?
YERGIN: Well, I think it would be put that way. You could say, can
you put more oil into the market to help reduce the price. And I wouldn`t
be surprised if those conversations are already going on.
MATTHEWS: OK, you`ve told us something. Thank you, Daniel, the
brilliant author "The Quest." If you want to understand this issue, read
that book in yellow.
Thank you, Chrystia Freeland. I notice how differential you are to
somebody that happens to be a particular expert on this issue.
FREELAND: I love Dan.
YERGIN: It`s mutual.
MATTHEWS: You care about your emotions. I`m just kidding.
Thank you, Chrystia. Please come back.
Up next, what will Bill Clinton do to help President Obama win
reelection? We want to talk about the Clinton factor. It`s huge. I know
it is somehow. He`s going to bring in the vote this president needs.
This is HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.
MATTHEWS: That final county in Maine finally held its caucus this
weekend. Despite a big turnout for Ron Paul, it doesn`t seem to be enough
to overtake Mitt Romney up there. The results from Washington County gave
Ron Paul 163 votes, Romney, 80, Santorum got 57 and Gingrich won four. So,
that leaves Romney with the overall lead in the state over Paul of 156
votes, that`s all he won by.
We`ll be right back. Total votes.
MATTHEWS: We`re back.
Well, it`s been over 10 years since Bill Clinton left the White
House, but he remains one of the most fascinating political figures in the
world. We talked -- I had in the documentary on that recently.
Over the next two nights, PBS will air a four-hour American
experience doc examining the former president`s life from his humble
beginnings in Hope, Arkansas, to his time in the presidency. Here`s the
trailer for "Clinton."
NARRATOR: In his teen years, lots of people were saying they
expected Bill Clinton to be president some day. They hated his guts and
they would go to the end of the earth to e destroy him.
What a squandering of talent possibility.
BILL CLINTON, FORMER U.S. PRESIDENT: Tonight has made Bill Clinton
the comeback kid.
NARRATOR: A definitive look at the man and the president, "Clinton".
MATTHEWS: Actually, that comeback was before the problem.
By the way, joining me right now to talk whether the former President
Bill Clinton, about him, are former or actually current historian Doug
Brinkley, and "Washington Post`s" Eugene Robinson, who`s also an MSNBC
political analyst.
I want to start with Gene on this.
Covering politics today and you look ahead to this spring and summer,
as the Democrats come alive in their campaign and when Obama really hits --
starts hitting on all of the pins, all the pistons start pumping, what role
does Bill Clinton play in that?
EUGENE ROBINSON, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, Bill Clinton can be
an adversary to Democrats in places like Pennsylvania and Ohio and places
that the president really wants to win that maybe he`s a little soft among
traditional Democrats.
MATTHEWS: Older, whiter?
ROBINSON: Older, whiter, more blue collar, more -- you know, Clinton
has that sensibility. Obama doesn`t. Obama didn`t do that badly among
those voters last time.
MATTHEWS: But those who cling to their guns and religion, as Obama
said, in felicitous, out in San Francisco, they like Bill Clinton better.
ROBINSON: Right. Bill Clinton, he has the -- he has that touch.
MATTHEWS: I agree with that. I don`t know how you improve on that,
Doug. He has that touch they are looking for in the presidency right now.
DOUGLAS BRINKLEY, PRESIDENTIAL HISTORIAN: He`s going to be, you
know, the super envoy. He`s going to be an incredible job. Bill Clinton
has really become a folk figure in America. He`s more like Babe Ruth or
Buffalo Bill than a politician. And just going as Eugene said, college
campuses imagine in Pennsylvania and Ohio, or even at the convention just
standing there with Barack Obama, he has a very high public approval
rating, Bill Clinton. And post-presidency, he`s been quite remarkable, and
he still has this wife Hillary Clinton as secretary of state.
So, the Clintons are very important. They remind people of what a
good economy was when the Democrats had eight years.
MATTHEWS: So well said. So well said.
So we`re talking about the past, the present and the future. The
past looks damn good right now. We had great unemployment numbers. We had
a growth. We had the eyeball.
Everything was high time. Everything was great, right? In fact,
when the Republicans say restoration, they really mean go back to this guy,
not W. Nobody wants to go back to W.
ROBINSON: Exactly.
MATTHEWS: So, let`s talk about the president. Of course, my son
worked with him in the global initiative, fantastic work around the world.
Let`s talk about the future. Insipient, when you look at Bill
Clinton and you look at Secretary Clinton, you don`t just see the past.
You see the future.
What role does the potential of Hillary Clinton as secretary of state
to retire for a year two and then head for the presidency, play in the
ROBINSON: Well, I think she still has the opportunity, if she wants.
And I, frankly, I think that`s an if. Some people don`t think that`s an
if. Some think it`s a when.
I think if she wants, she still is such a prominent Democrat, such a
well-known figure. She`s done a good job as secretary of state. She is
Hillary Clinton.
And so, in four years, she has the potential there for --
MATTHEWS: Who would -- I mean, let`s go to Doug and let`s do some
prospecting here. If she decides to go out there and take a year, oh, I
thought she`d probably want to take a year after this excruciating
worldwide job she`s had. Take a break. Don`t get committed to anything
that would tie her down and begin to run, say, a year or two before the
presidential election.
Who would be her opponent? Who would try to challenge her for the
nomination? Actually, Andrew Cuomo, I guess. But who would have a chance
to beat her given how much she`s established politically and
BRINKLEY: You could have somebody like Evan Bayh trying to come in
playing the Midwest, particularly if the Democrats lose in the Midwest in
But she -- when she leaves if she leaves in, I`d say, probably March
of 2013, if Obama got re-elected, she`d write a memoir, become a number one
book. She got a great deal of money, probably rest up. She needs a rest.
I think she`s done a lot of world travel.
She`s going to be on everybody`s top of the list for running in 2016.
She`s been an extraordinarily effective secretary of state.
MATTHEWS: Yes, I think so.
Let me ask you about the politics my favorite question. Let`s tie it
all together.
What does Bill Clinton want from Barack Obama to go out and campaign
his heart out for this re-election so that Hillary Clinton -- how does that
connect to his wife becoming president some day? Is there an interlock
here we should be looking for?
ROBINSON: Well, what I think he wants is props first of all. I
mean, this is Bill Clinton who Barack Obama --
MATTHEWS: Let me the latest lingo.
ROBINSON: Barack Obama, remember when he was running, he kind of
wanted to go beyond Bill Clinton. He wanted to be --
MATTHEWS: No more referring to Bill as the --
ROBINSON: Like Ronald Reagan. He didn`t say like Bill Clinton.
OBAMA: He wants a little more respect.
ROBINSON: Exactly. He wants a little more respect and, look, he`s
going to get it from Barack Obama. He`s going to get it.
MATTHEWS: He`s got to get it.
Do you think there`s any deal there? We don`t know when the
president decided to name Hillary Clinton, Senator Clinton at the time,
Secretary Clinton. We don`t know how that will work out. It just worked
Doug, do we know historically how that worked and what may be part of
a future transition politically here?
BRINKLEY: Well, I was just going to add, I think, remember, the
mistake that Barack Obama could play if he tries to distance himself from
Bill Clinton because, you know, Al Gore did that in 2000 and it wasn`t a
smart idea.
MATTHEWS: Sure.
BRINKLEY: The rap against Obama this summer is going to be he`s a
Jimmy Carter 1980 president -- double-digit inflation, long gasoline lines
and a problem in Iran. And instead, when you have Clinton there, it`s that
constant jobs, jobs, jobs reminder. The economy was better under the
Democrats and it does put some of the blame on W.
MATTHEWS: Doug, you`re great. Doug Brinkley, great American
historian. Thank you, sir, for being on, anytime and get on. We
appreciate you.
And Gene, of course, the same exact truth, from a Pulitzer prize-
winning great guy. Thank you so much.
We all agree, Hillary Clinton may well run for president. We don`t
know the slightest whether she will or not. It`s up to her, obviously.
It`s an amazing decision because she could easily win this thing.
Thank you.
We`re going to finish with a milestone tonight what all Americans
could savor. What a time we`re united behind.
Think about John Glenn. Think about how popular he was. Fifty years
ago today, he went around the world three times.
You`re watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.
MATTHEWS: "Let Me Finish" tonight with this:
When I was growing up, we got a lot of our science from television.
There was Mr. Wizard who taught us chemistry; and Wernher von Braun, with a
little help from Walt Disney, who taught us physics.
The main lesson was that we Americans were first in everything, that
we were going to be the country to conquer space. We were going to start
the conquest by putting little things called satellites into orbit around
the earth. Yes, that was how it was going to be.
And then came that terrible day in 1957 when we awoke -- we awoke,
Americans, to find the Soviets had done it. That there was indeed a
satellite, a really big one winging its way around our world. But it had
been launched out there into space by the communists, the people we had
been taught by Wernher von Braun and Walt Disney were hardly in the game.
Well, it made us sad. It made me sad because it undermined us. It
made me us think that the communists were doing something we were trying do
but couldn`t. It had to do with booster rockets, with something called
thrust. Their rockets were bigger, stronger, therefore, better than ours.
Well, for five years, it went on like this. They would send a man
into space, Yuri Gagarin. They would send a man into orbit, (INAUDIBLE).
And we could send one vanguard rocket up after another, only to watch it
topple right there in front of us, barely off the launching pad.
Well, then came the first American successes into space followed by
this wondrous day 50 years ago today. On February 20th, 1962, John Glenn
became the first American to orbit the earth, circling the globe three
times in Friendship 7. Glenn met with President Kennedy at the White House
both before and after that mission. Even space, especially space, isn`t
free of politics.
And John Glenn well understood that. He recalled that Kennedy knew,
quote, "We were actually superior to the Soviets and that`s what we were
there out to prove."
Well, Glenn`s triumphant space flight proved the boost NASA needed
and he knew it. Quote, "I think one reason my flight got so much attention
was because we sort of turned the corner in public opinion at that point."
Well, in fact, conquering space offered us an unprecedented thrill
for the American people. Suddenly, it seemed as if extraordinary things
were truly possible. And, yes, there was a time in the lives of so many of
us watching right now that one of the extraordinary things today was quite
ordinary, that we Americans could all root for one thing together. It was
us against the Soviets for leadership in space. Leadership we knew in
science, engineering and in all possibilities.
And one of the great things about the early 1960s, besides the thin
ties and the 50-mile hikes was the sense we Americans could do the things
we set out to do and could do them together. As the voice of mission
control said back then, "Godspeed, John Glenn."
That`s HARDBALL for now. Thanks for being with us.
"POLITICS NATION" with Al Sharpton starts right now.
United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written
permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark,
copyright or other notice from copies of the content.>


text:
Hadrians Wall Accommodation at Holmhead
Holmhead offers accommodation on Hadrians Wall in a beautifully quiet location in a sheltered valley
next to the Tipalt Burn and beneath the ruins of Thirlwall Castle. Built in 1800 with Wall stone, the house is bordered by open fields and has stunning views south towards the North Pennines, whilst to the north lies the Northumberland National Park and Thirlwall Castle. Holmhead is built over the foundations of Hadrians Wall.
A great location for exploring Hadrians Wall
Our location, directly on The Hadrians Wall Path and Pennine way make us an ideal stop-off for walkers, and were only 250m off the Hadrians Wall Cycle Trail. For evening meals, there's a local pub which is a pleasant half-mile stroll away and serves great food and real ales.
For those staying for longer breaks, we're ideally situated for exploring all the Hadrians Wall sites and museums, the North Pennines, Lake District, Tyne, Wear and Tees Dales, The Northumberland National Park and the stunning coastlines. We?re only about an hour's drive from Newcastle and about half an hour from Carlisle.
There are a number of local walks, either along the national trail or local circular walks through some of the most spectacular (and peaceful) scenery in the country. We're always happy to help with advice or map loans wherever possible. At Holmhead, we can also offer self-catering accommodation in our two-bedroom cottage or, for backpackers and cyclists on a budget, we offer bunk barn facilities.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Dominick Amprey
Suitland High Class of 2009
Personal Info
- Name:
- Dominick Amprey
- Graduation Year:
- 2009
Memories of Dominick Amprey
Are you Dominick Amprey?
This page means someone is someone is looking for you. Register for free to let other alumni contact you and more:
- Let others find you
- Contact old friends
- Share photos and memories with other registered alumni
Looking for Dominick Amprey?
This is a placeholder page for Dominick Amprey, which means this person is not currently on this site. We do suggest using the tools below to find Dominick Amprey.
About placeholder profiles
You are visiting the placeholder page for Dominick Amprey. This page is here because someone used our placeholder utility to look for Dominick Amprey. We created this page automatically in hopes Dominick Amprey would find it. If you are not Dominick Amprey, but are an alumni of Suitland High School, register on this site for free now.


text:
For thousands of years, the Ohlone Indians lived in what is now known as the San Francisco Bay area. Spanish missionaries arrived in the late 1700's. Milpitas is Spanish for "little cornfields." Like many small California towns, Milpitas began as a waypost, an in between where farmers raised corn, strawberries, prunes, beets, peas and potatoes.
Jose Maria Alviso adobe
The City formed in 1954, the same year Ford opened a manufacturing plant. With their eyes on the prize, nearby San Jose tried to annex Milpitas. The "Milpitas Minutemen" were quickly organized and residents voted overwhelmingly to keep Milpitas independent. To make sure no one ever forgot, the City inserted an image of a revolutionary war statute in its logo.
Over time, Milpitas neighborhoods, schools, and shopping areas grew and became popular with local companies as a business friendly community ideally located within the southern portion of the bay area.
In 1984, the closed Ford plant was converted into the largest indoor mall in the Unites States- The Great Mall of the Bay Area.
Now home to corporate headquarters of San Disk, Cisco Systems, Flextronics, and other high-tech companies Milpitas boasts outstanding schools, popular parks and thoroughfares, and local shops all while maintaining the small town feel and fighting spirit of its forefathers. Milpitas celebrated its 50th birthday on January 26, 2004.


text:
Majestic Men's Replica Chicago Cubs Anthony Rizzo #44 Cool Base Home White Jersey
Available to ship.
Standard Ground Service Available
Gear up like the pros when you wear the Majestic® Chicago Cubs Anthony Rizzo #44 Cool Base® Jersey.
On-Field Design
Button front with authentic decoration and trim
Stretch mesh gussets under arms for enhanced range of motion
Team Details
Official team colors and logos
Full player name and number on back in Heat Seal Twill
Official MLB® logo on back
Protective, Moisture-Managing Technology
Cool Base™ performance technology provides extra comfort
On-Field technology worn by players
Additional Details
Officially licensed by the MLB®
Fabric: 100% moisture-wicking polyester
- Brand : Majestic
- Country of Origin : United States of America or Imported
- Style : 7700CUBHEJ7R44
- Fabric : 100% moisture-wicking polyester
- Web ID: 16MAJMMLBCBSRZZ44APTX


text:
Baltimore Maryland Moving Made Easy as A to Z!
Voted "Best of Baltimore Movers"
By Baltimore Magazine
Licensed :: Insured :: Bonded
Whether you require assistance with a local move or are planning a long distance move in Maryland or beyond, our 19 years of moving experience and dedication to impeccable service will make your next move...a Breeze.
A to Z Movers is a family owned and operated moving services company with experienced, professional Baltimore movers. With over 17 years of experience we can help ease your worries and reduce your stress whether you're moving local in Baltimore City, Baltimore County or relocating across Maryland.
Voted the "Best of Baltimore Movers" and known as one of the best moving companies in Maryland, much of our business comes from satisfied repeat customers and personal referrals. Our expert Baltimore movers will move your furniture, appliances, complete household or office with care anywhere across the great state of Maryland and beyond.
Sit back worry free, while A to Z Movers experienced professionals make your next Maryland move the smoothest yet. We are specialists in providing local and long distance moving services for residents and businesses in and around Baltimore City, the Metro area, surrounding counties and all of Maryland.
A to Z's Baltimore Movers can assist you with your upcoming move.
You can pick and choose from a variety of Maryland moving services provided by A to Z movers. From packing and unpacking services, crating, loading & unloading, expert piano moving to boxes & moving supplies, A to Z's Baltimore movers can take care of all your moving needs! We offer discount moving for previous customers, military personnel, seniors & referrals. Contact A to Z Movers to ask any question to satisfy your curiosity or use our FREE Quote form to request an estimate so that you can begin planning your next home or office move TODAY!
Trusting your valuable belongings to amateurs can make for regrettable experiences, let our experienced professional movers provide you with our affordable, high quality services. We are one of the most highly committed moving companies in Maryland, known for our commitment to quality customer service and satisfaction. No job is too big or too small, we are expert piano movers too. We make Moving as Easy as A to Z!


text:
Pryer Technology Group Creates Distribution Network for Hydroforming Presses
There are 0 comments | Post a comment
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
A team of nearly 20 machine-tool distributors and dealers, covering all 50 states and parts of Mexico and Canada, has been created to represent Pryer Technology Group and its Triform sheet-hydroforming presses. The presses, popular among fabricators serving the aerospace industry, also find application in the lighting and medical-device industries, among others.
See also: Beckwood & Triform Press
Related Enterprise Zones: Presses


text:
Next Episode of Mission: Impossible (1966) is
not planed. TV Show was canceled.
Mission: Impossible ran from 1966 to 1973. The show was about a team of secret agents called the Impossible Mission Force, or the IMF, who go on covert missions to fight and defeat Syndicate crime lords and evil dictators. Each week the Team Leader would get his assignment from a tape recording left at an isolated location. He would then assemble his team of specialists from a photo dossier, cut ahead to one final briefing, then move out into the field. The IMF team typically was composed of The Master of Disguise, the Femme Fatale, the Technical Genius, and The Strongman. However, they would bring in additional specialists as necessary, anyone from a safe cracker to a contortionist to a memory expert.
The team would used advanced technological gadgets, disguises, drugs, psychological manipulation, and a series of elaborate ruses to break into impenetrable safes, despose dictators, set two bad guys against each other, etc. If they couldn't get the villain punished for a crime he committed, they'd frame him for something he hadn't done or trick him into shooting another bad guy. Each week at the end the team would quietly slip away in a vehicle, their mission completed.
Although the formula varied only slightly from time to time, and very little was ever revealed about the team members' background, the show proved popular enough to run seven years and outlast the other spy shows of the era.
Opening Theme
Looks like something went completely wrong!
But don't worry - it can happen to the best of us,
- and it just happened to you.
Please try again later or contact us.


text:
September, of course, is when baseball approaches my favorite part of the season — the end. I have no genuine qualms with the game or its fans; in fact, I can think of few more enjoyable ways to spend a sunny weekend afternoon than taking in a Greenville Drive game and enjoying moderately-overpriced refreshment between innings. But in September, baseball almost seems to get bored with itself. Most of the playoff spots have already been established, rosters have expanded. The season becomes stale. The hopes of fans have already withered.
Football, on the other hand, is the shiny new toy that we find under the tree that we can't wait to open and cherish. A game featuring our teams becomes an event, a celebration. Quite literally, it becomes a holiday. And while the congregated may not share a bloodline or a penchant for explosive devices as the case remains for other items on the calendar, these games do, in their own way, bring us together.
Sincerely, I am really looking forward to catching some playoff baseball, as I find those games as exciting as any played throughout the year, in any sport. But until October gets here, every one of my spare thoughts will be centered around the feasability of the end-around, the logic of the draw on 3rd and long, and devising new ways to make Peyton Manning look like an asshole.


text:
Glasgow-based Shitdisco was formed in early 2004 by Joel Stone (bass), Joe Reeves (guitar and vocals), Jan Lee (keyboard), and Darren Cullen (drums and cutlery). Very much informed by modern-day dance-punk sounds as well as the post-punk sounds of their forefathers, the group quietly gained a loyal following and their sporadic gigs earned them a reputation for a live show not to be missed. Their debut recording, Disco Blood, was released on Fierce Panda in 2005. Their follow-up single, "Reactor Party," was released in October 2006. ~ Rob Theakston
Re-Mixer, Studio Personnel
Author, Interprète Vocal


text:
It's great Wise! I've sent it to my family and friends. Maybe the effect of womens sexuality is a littl lacking though.
"Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow"
~ Anon
It's great Wise! I've sent it to my family and friends. Maybe the effect of womens sexuality is a littl lacking though.
"Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow"
~ Anon
dr young will dr haung treat me with fetal oeg cells,chondroitinase,rolipram,cylic adenosine,monophosphate,an dhea. i'm a t-11 burst fracture with asending escema to my t-5 complet injurd june 24 2000 . thank you dan sheean
Emi, Sorry, I was in a bit of hurry when I wrote the blurb this morning and I had an early meeting that I had to attend. I will try to amplify a little on women's sexuality.
dan#3, I am not sure that it is a good idea to try the "everything but kitchen sink" approach to a cure. Cure, like everything else in our body, requires a careful balance. It is not a good idea to blast them with everything. Like too much water or fertilizer will wilt a plant, too much will stop growth. I am hoping to gather some of the resources for combination therapies so that Dr. Huang and other doctors can start testing them in a rational way.
gettinup, yes, pink bubbles.
Rollin' Rick, I love it when people are ambitious. If our government will invest a billion per year, I think that kind of rate of progress that you are talking about can be achieved.
Isildur, its good news.
Dr. Young...thanks for the post. Much like Emi, I have sent this out to all of my family and friends. Please keep up the good work.
"Another day that I can't find my head...My feet don't look like they're my own...I'll try and find the floor below to stand...I hope I reach it once again" ~Norah Jones
Dr Young, thank you very much for the summary. Can't tell you how much my family and I appreciate this site and the knowledge that you give us.
A question on osteoporosis. I have not had a bone density test done, should I? I was walking with a walker 5 weeks after my operation. Do people who walk reverse the osteoporosis or is it a problem for all people with SCI?
Thanks again. Mike
T12 Incomplete - Walking with Walker, Oct 2003
Dr. Young thanks for all the information. I have a question regarding the tendon tranfer. Is it an irreversible procedure. My fiance is a c6-c7 quad. I truly believe there will be something to help her in the next few years or I make myself believe this. I would like her to wait to see what kind of therapies will be around in the five year range. She is one year post, accident was on 7/12/03. She is 26, I think she is still young enough to benifit that far out. Once again thank you for all your effort.
Wise, great post. In your timeline for a "cure" procedure, is that in the U.S.? Or will it be sooner in other countries?
MikeC, I suspect that you don't have much osteoporosis if you have been walking. In general, I think that most people with spinal cord injury should check their bone density at a year after injury. It is not low, there is probably no point in checking again until there is reason to suspect that bone density is low. However, if it is low and you are receiving treatment for the osteoporosis (e.g. bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone), it probably should be checked annually. My philosophy is that one should not check unless there is intention to treat or to change treatment. Wise.
350zc5c7, tendon transfers are not usually done with the intent of reversal. I suppose that it is theoretically possible to reverse a tendon transfer after the "cure" but that situation has not yet occurred and I don't know of anybody who has tried. A tendon transfer does not compromise too much function and it probably is not worthwhile to do a reversal procedure.
For those who are worried that their age or the length of time after injury may disqualify them from the cure, I want to offer some reassurances. In my opinion, age or time after injury is not necessarily an obstacle to treatments to restore function. It is possible that regeneration may take longer in an older person and reversal of muscle/bone atrophy may be harder to achieve in people with long-term injury. But, I think the therapies should still work.
I still remembers some pictures that Richard Bunge of Miami Project showed me about 8 or 9 years ago, of axon terminal endings in a spinal cord of somebody who had died more than 20 years after injury. At that time, we thought that such terminal bulbs were axons that had stopped growing but Jerry Silver has argued that these are just frustrated growth cones. Neurons are the longest lived cells in the body and I think that they continue to try to regenerate for as long as they are alive.
JoJo, when I wrote the above, I was thinking about the United States and I was referring when I think treatments will have been shown to be effective rather than when they will be going into clinical trial. It will be only after the treatments have been shown to be effective that they will be adopted and practiced by doctors, and covered by insurance. However, I want to say that my guess is just as good or bad as anybody's. I don't have a crystal ball to predict funding or politics.
I have a few questions regarding your FAQ
When you say something will be available in 8 years do you mean available to the public or available for clinincal trials on humans?
Is it true that the success rate of a treatment or surgery that can restore function or improve quality of life is inversely porportional to the patient's post-injury time? 1 year is better than 10 years?
If that's the case, one would have to decide between waiting for a safer and better procedure in the future or taking advantage of the window of opportunity now, right?
FES does not seem to work below injury (T-8 to t-10 lesion & 2 years post). When I use FES I don't see my muscles move. Does that mean it's not working? Why is that?
Is 1 hour a day on the standing frame enought to prevent Osteoporosis?


text:
I have acquired an old photo album containing many pictures from the late 1800s. I'm going through the album to catalog the photos with as much information as can be gleaned from them. My hope is to return the album and photos to the descendants of those pictured. Read about the first photos in the album here. **Click on the images below for larger versions**
Whoa, baby! Here's Photo No. 13:
No photographer's imprint to help us assign a location to this photo. There is an inscription on the back:
The handwriting here is different than the notes left on other photos.
Here is Photo No. 14:
Yay! We have an imprint. We're back in Yonkers, N.Y. Here is the reverse side of the photo:
I found photographer Charles H. Frazier in local directories in the following years:
1886-87 16 N. Bway; h 60 N. Bway
1888-9 h 51 N. Broadway
1892 16 N. Bway; h 149 N. Bway
Interestingly, the only census in which I think I've found him is in the 1900 U.S. Census living in Morristown, New Jersey, which is about an hour away from Yonkers in today's driving time. Hmmm…
Back to the photo itself. I thought it was cute that this baby seemed to be pointing to something off-camera. Upon closer inspection, I noticed that she (I'm assuming) is wearing a ring on her ring finger of her left hand!:
On another note, I'm wondering if these two babies may be siblings. They look an awful lot alike to me…
1900 U.S. Census, Morris County, New Jersey, population schedule, Morristown Ward, page 12, dwelling 213, family 245, Charles H. Frazier; FamilySearch (www.familysearch.org : accessed 13 March 2011).
Boyd's Yonkers City Directory, 1888-89, p 162, Charles H. Frazier; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011).
Thompson and Fowler's Second Annual Directory of The City of Yonkers, For The Year 1886-87, p 106, Charles Frazier; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011).
Yonkers City Directory, 1892, p 133, C. H. Frazier; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011).


text:
The way I do my genealogical research has certainly evolved from the days of microfilm and photocopies. But it is a fact of life that the current technological changes will dramatically affect the way I do my research and record my findings in the near future.
I guess we all come to the point of wondering if we will live long enough to see the technology we see coming in the future. One thing we do know, if we look around things will have changed since yesterday. I started to think about some of the technology that is just now becoming available and how it will likely affect me and the genealogical community.
Digitized books and records
I think this must be the number one trend in genealogy that will have the largest effect on me and my work and I assume everyone else is feeling the importance of this change also. Despite the seemingly significant problems that need to be resolved before online materials are universally available, the quantity of useful material going online every day is almost overwhelming. At one time in the recent past, new online collections of records were noteworthy, today, millions of new records go online almost unnoticed. New records online are no longer news, they are every day occurrences. But the impact on my research is significant. I certainly acknowledge that there is still a long way to go before many of the valuable local and hard-to-find records are digitized, but the impact of the vast online collections cannot be overstated.
The expansion of libraries into the service of providing digitized content
Having huge digitized collections of books and records is meaningless unless those records are easily available. The expansion of the public and private library distribution networks to include more and more valuable resources enables those who cannot afford to travel or pay the expense of purchasing digitized media, the opportunity to check those items out of a library for use, just as has been the case with physical book collections for many, many years. As the online collections grow and start to include more reference and lower circulation items, we will all be using our computers and tablets to "go to the library" in the not-too-distant future.
The availability of online educational classes
In just the last year in the genealogical community, we have seen a proliferation of online classes, webinars, webcasts and YouTube videos dealing with all sorts of both general and technical subjects. I cannot predict the impact of the availability of online instruction but I do see it changing the way conferences and seminars are held. I do not think there is a substitute for in-person teaching, but that sort of instruction may become rare or more centralized. RootsTech 2014, if it is broadcast to over 600 locations world-wide, may be the turning point for this type of conference. There are social and networking reasons for attending conferences in person, but the need to go to a conference to obtain high-quality training is evaporating through technological advances.
The impact of online training will ultimately obviate the need for some types of schools and training facilities. Right now, there are free classes online that will give you a complete grade school and high school education and even a college degree. What used to be called distance learning or correspondence school, has been changed by the technology into a reasonable substitute for classroom attendance. In genealogy, there is a flood of classes and learning opportunities online.
Portable Internet devices
The availability of a way to connect to the Internet virtually anywhere at anytime is having a huge impact on me and I am sure on the rest of the world also, genealogically and otherwise. It is more than convenient to be able to carry my entire genealogy file, including documentation and sources, around in my pocket. In addition, I can access the entire Internet in an instant from anyplace I happen to be. EBook readers are revolutionizing the printed book industry. It is only a matter of time before genealogy materials are likewise available in digital format.
The ability to move large files, including graphics and texts almost instantly
Genealogy usually deals in large numbers of documents and images. The ability to share and send large files from one place to another almost instantly is changing the way I view my data files. I can easily share hundreds of images online with my family in a matter of minutes using a program such as Dropbox. This type of program will continue to evolve with even more features in the near future.
High quality digitizing equipment
The availability of high quality digitizing equipment is spurring the vast increase in online images.
All of these and others will continue impact us for the foreseeable future.


text:
Anything Else?[edit source]
Is there anything else we can find out about this... the picture doesn't seem normal for Nintendo. can we finc any thing to prove that its official?
I don't mean to be rude but what's the point of even maintaining the Pokemon Wiki when there's Bulbapedia? You people should actually be playing Pokemon instead of writing up stuff already on other sites. No one I know even goes on Pokemon Wiki. No offence ppl Runescaperx 03:48, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
I think Reshiram is awesome. there I said it. Winxfan1 18:01, February 10, 2011 (UTC)Winxfan1
I don't quite understand why Reshiram is supposed to represent yang. Isn't yin white and yang black? Or is it the other way around?
Yin = dark, negative, female, cold, low
Yang = light, positive, male, hot, high Orban Sirgen 17:21, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
In the gallery, the picture of Reshiram under N's control, it actually looks like a scene from when Reshiram emerges from the light stone in Black version. Because I remember playing White version and in there, when Reshiram appeared under N's command, the scene showed it at a different angle than it was in Black version. Are you sure that picture is from White version? 22.214.171.124 18:16, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
I have recently checked videos of the cutscenes in both black and white version, and I can say without question that the picture that is shown for "Reshiram under N's Command" is actually a picture from black version. I think either the picture should be changed, or it should be renamed as "Reshiram appears before the player", or something. Of course, if it doesn't matter thats....okay.220.127.116.11 16:20, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
I just changed it. Thats okay, right?JTrainer 16:30, May 30, 2011 (UTC)


text:
OrthodoxWiki talk:Community Portal
I took off the 'To Do' list because so much of it was done - that's great! I just sent out an email to the OCA Clergy list soliciting contributions. More solicitations to come. FrJohn
Does anyone know how to add bookstores to the book list that comes up when you click on an ISBN number? It seems a little sparse right now. It would be great to add Orthodox sellers like light-n-life.com, svspress.com, eightdaybooks.com, and so on. FrJohn
Just as a general note: if you can't think of what to work on, a good place to start is Special:Wantedpages. There's still a lot of basic stuff needing coverage there. --Rdr. Andrew
- I was just going to do that, and I cannot determine where articles on priest, deacon, bishop, hieromonk, etc. should go. I was thinking an "Orders" subcat in "Ecclesiology". --Basil 20:05, 24 Jan 2005 (CST)
- There's Category:Clergy already, which could certainly include all these articles and even those for the minor clergy. --Rdr. Andrew 20:39, 26 Jan 2005 (CST)
Just created OrthodoxWiki:Meta Reflections for discussions about the kind of endeavor we're engaged in here. FrJohn
Divide, divide
Methinks we ought to apportion this page into several discussion sub-pages, e.g., OrthodoxWiki:Meta Reflections, OrthodoxWiki:Suggestions (to be a renaming of Suggestions for future development), OrthodoxWiki:Administration, OrthodoxWiki:Help wanted, OrthodoxWiki:Categories, OrthodoxWiki:Free-for-all, etc. Comments? --Rdr. Andrew 09:10, 25 Jan 2005 (CST)
- Sounds good -- then this page will be a portal to the whole realm of OWiki community discussion, yah? Also, let's add something like OrthodoxWiki:Chatter, i.e. reverse links and "what they are saying" :-). FrJohn 14:59, 25 Jan 2005 (CST)
Hey, doesn't Wikipedia have a newsfeed? We've got to figure out how to do that too. That's something for the admin to do list... FrJohn 15:41, 25 Jan 2005 (CST)
- Never mind -- I found it. See Special:Newpages.
Skins and FAQs
I notice some skins (well, at least CologneBlue) prominently feature an OrthodoxWiki:FAQ page. Maybe we should think about this at some point in the future, or even just slip in a redirect to something appropriate. Fr. John
IRC Channel?
Was wondering if you would be intereseted in creating an IRC channel for the wiki. I am an avid WordPress user and have found their #wordpress IRC channel a very helpful addendum to their wiki Codex manual.
The channel could be used for sysops and users to basically do group chat and might help communication.
I know of several others that are using the IRC channel that Kevin Basil created called #orthodoxy, but it is registered with lplug.org. I personally think that freenode gets a lot more coverage. Anyways, let me know what you think.
You can find out more about freenode at their site. This wiki would classify as Web Media, as it is an online community reference site.
A primary group called #orthodox-wiki or #orthodoxwiki could be created. Online registration seems fairly easy. I could facilitate if you would like.
--Joe Rodgers 00:17, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
Vandal rename
Why exactly is it that on this wiki, indefnitely blocked "vandal-only" accounts get renamed? I have never come across it on any other wiki. Jow (Community Portal)
- Hey JOW - this is our own business. Feel free to email me privately if you want to talk seriously about what your beef is - otherwise, you're still banned from the wiki for the previous abuse. — FrJohn (talk)
Lost link
Hello, in the section "How to contribute", said "We also recommend the Wikipedia Extension for Mozilla Firefox". The link to "Wikipedia Extension" doesn't work now and I have no idea what was meant. Is it same Wikipedia search toolbar found at mozdev.org? --Cat68 22:55, February 16, 2007 (PST)
Double redirects, FYI
28 of them currently: Special:DoubleRedirects. --JohnK 22:13, July 27, 2007 (PDT)
Hi, I think adding 'clean up' tags to just about EVERY article I create is getting beyond ridiculous ... I cant believe that everything I contribute is considered by Martha as rubbish and requiring clean up ... I think Administrators need to moderate how much 'policing' they exhibit on this site as it can appear to be personal and out of control some times ... I challenge anyone to compare the Jacob disambiguation page to the Mary disambiguation page and explain to me why the Jacob page requires a clean up and the mary page DOES NOT? If anything the format is the same, the etymology is there, all saints with that name have been listed, put into chronological list AND linked to availale OW pages ...do u know how much work went into doing that? It was hours ...and its disappointing to have a 'clean up' tag just added with no IDEA what it is I need to clean up! Vasiliki 06:47, April 10, 2008 (UTC)
- It is true that the tag is often included in an article without an explanation—it would help if we were all a little more fastidious in that regard. In any event, it's never meant personally. It's just a mark noting that work needs to be done on the article to bring it up to OrthodoxWiki standards. It may appear that your articles have been tagged often, but let's face it: you've also added a rather massive number of new articles in a short time. It stands to reason that many tags may be included.
- I think the reason why many of your articles are tagged is that it's clear that academic English is not your primary means of communication, in addition to various non-standard bits of formatting and so forth. I can see a lot of things that need to be fixed in both the Jacob (disambiguation) and Mary articles (and most of the other disambig articles you've done), especially in their introductory paragraphs. They don't read as sentences, for instance—more like erratically parsed dictionary entries. The language notes need to be put inside parentheses, and there's a broken link in the Jacob article. If you want to see a well-done disambiguation page, check out Symeon (disambiguation) or Synaxis.
- Remember—it's not personal. A general rule, though, is that if you feel emotionally agitated by something on the wiki, it's probably best to take a wiki-break and then come back to the work later. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 19:22, April 10, 2008 (UTC)
- Thank You for making the time to have this discussion. Vasiliki 01:51, April 11, 2008 (UTC)
New Webpage
I dont know where this can fit in ... so if anyone has any ideas: http://meetorthodox.com/ -IXthis


text:
Sufferers of Type-I diabetes will appreciate this concept insulin-delivering watch from Germany. Piezoelectricity generated by the wearer's movements drive the insulin-delivering pumps in the watch body, which contains enough of the drug for two to three weeks. The idea is to make life a little more normal for diabetics rather than have them wrestle with syringes each day. Jump for more info.A student at Braunschweig University of Art called Nicole Schmeidel came up with the idea after watching a film of an 8-year old kid using a clunky insulin pump. Her device, named COR, combines a better delivery system with wrist-watch styling that she hopes will improve the quality of life of diabetics. Multiple piezo-electric transducers, originally designed for European satellites, turn the movements of the wearer into electrical current, which is then stored and used to drive pumps that deliver insulin intravenously.
Nicole intends it to look "like a watch and not a medical device", so its display switches to watch mode when the pump is not operating. The design won an award at the recent Design Technology Student Awards at the Materialica trade fair in Munich, so she is hoping to get COR into production and onto the wrists of diabetes sufferers as soon as possible. ESA via Eureka][


text:
Zobrist is the Rays MVZ (Most Valuable Zorilla)
Before the 2008 season, Benjamin Thomas Zobrist was considered a possible "Super Utility" player for the Tampa Bay Rays future. He was one of the players the team acquired back in July 2006 when the Rays sent disgruntled rightfielder Aubrey Huff to the Houston Astros near the MLB Trade Deadline. When the Rays made that deal, Zobrist was being sought after as a back-up and not a starter, even though he had the talent to start in the Major Leagues.
And even if the Rays did throw that "utility" moniker on Zobrist when he arrived, at that point the Rays had not given him a fair amount of time to shine at the Major League level until the end of 2008. But then again, Zobrist has always seemed to be in that different group of player who's game beats to a different drummer, but is in unison with the team's goals and aspirations.
But Zobrist has always been strong silent type who used his glove and bat to do his talking. And even then he still got pigeon-holed into a small finite group in the MLB. Zobrist is only the ninth player in MLB history to ever appear in the regular game at the shortstop position, joining Rays Senior Advisor Don Zimmer in that exclusive club.
Zobrist is only the second Rays player to have a "Z" at the beginning of his name, joining Victor Zambrano in that club. And only Tiger's pitcher Joel Zumaya is lower in the alphabetical listing in the MLB entire active roster than Zobrist. So as you can see, Zobrist has always seemed to be at the back of the class by alphabet, but on the field, well that is a different story.
But how valuable is a guy who in 2008 played 6 different positions for your squad? During the Rays 2008 season he jumped back and forth from the minors to the major leagues four times before finally sticking with the Rays on August 5,2008 and played every field position but pitcher, catcher and first base during the season. And this season, he added first base to his playing resume' when he started playing the position after a late season injury to All-Star first baseman Carlos Pena.
And who knows, after the Rays let go of Joe Dillon, maybe Zobrist was the Rays designated "third catcher" option in case of a unfortunate injury to Dioner Navarro and Gregg Zaun during a contest. But that is the reason Rays Manager Joe Maddon think so highly of his fielding handyman who brings four different types of fielding gloves into the dugout during Rays games. I can still remember a game during the 2009 season where he started the game in rightfield, moved to second base in the middle innings of the contest, then finished out the game at third base subbing for Evan Longoria.
I know there are only a handful of players on any roster in the Major Leagues who can hop, skip and jump from position to position like Zobrist. And that is one of the reasons I keep looking at players like Mark DeRosa and new White Sox journeyman Mark Teahen and can ultimately see Zobrist developing into that same mold of player who will do whatever the team needs to win every game.
So am I upset that Zobrist did not end up in the top 5 in the MVP voting? I am a little surprised, but I also know that it sometimes take more than a splash on the scene to convince the tunnel visioned BBWAA guys in the press box who never played the game that you are a special breed. And that is honest truth to why I feel he did not post any higher vote totals in the American League MVP race because the BBWAA voters are more geared towards their own teams player selections and other regional and divisional guys they see all the time.
But I can understand some of the BBWAA voters for not getting so excited about Zobrist this season. But if he still puts up the same numbers in 2010, and even posts higher numbers, will they still see him as a reliable utility player or as a full-time field player?
And the fact the Zobrist began this statistic campaign actually during the last 4 games of the 2008 season when he hit four home runs and won co-AL Player of the Week honors after the Rays season ending series in Detroit. Sure in 2008 he might have only appeared in 62 games ( 49 starts), but people forget Zobrist might have actually made the Rays 2008 Opening Day roster if he had not gone down with a left thumb break. So you have to wonder, if Zobrist had gotten more playing time in 2008, would this season's MVP total have been different.
And of course, this has to be speculation, but sure, his number would have been dramatically different, and considering he lead all Major League middle infielders with a 16.5 At Bat per Home Run ratio finishing ahead of players like Marlin Dan Uggla (16.6), Hanley Ramirez (17.9) and Phillie infielder Chase Utley (18.4). Considering each of these players is an All Star caliber player, doesn't that make you think the potential might have always been bubbling under the surface in Zobrist.
And also in 2008, he hit is second Gram Slam of his career during a September 13th game against the New York Yankees and was the last visiting player to hit a Grand Slam in the old Yankee Stadium off starter Sidney Ponson in the nightcap of a doubleheader. So as you can see, his 2008 numbers gave Rays fans something to look forward to in 2009.
And if you have even looked towards the outfield grass beyond first base before a Rays game, Zobrist is always out there stretching with the starters even if he is not in the lineup. That is part of his game day prep, and one of the reason I truly feel he is a player to watch over the next few seasons.
And considering he is not even arbitration eligible yet, Zobrist becomes a huge double-edged value to the Rays both in payroll and in his playing ability. Zobrist's projected 2010 salary might only be around $450,000 before he hits arbitration for the first time after the 2010 season. And how valuable is that right now with the Rays looking to stabilize their payroll and find needed money for possible Bullpen help. Zobrist is not only helping the Rays on the field already, he is heaping them in their fiscal bottom line too.
So even if Zobrist did not get an additional votes in the MVP race to post his name up there with the American League heavyweights, his day might still come in the future. People always love to root for the underdog, and you know Zobrist definitely fits the bill for that title, even in 2010. And you can be sure that in 2010 there will be more than a few Fantasy Baseball team owners who will take Zobrist onto their rosters. I have to admit, I took him in the 10th round last year because I have seen his potential over the last two years and have always liked what he brings to the game both on and off the field.
So Benjamin Zobrist, we are proud of what you have done in 2009. And we salute you and hope and pray that the off season keeps you safe and ready for Spring Training in 2010
. Starting this spring, when your name appears in the lineup people will begin to check your stats and watch your development to see if you are a flash-in-the-pan or the real deal. We already know the answer here in Tampa Bay. We already know you are our MVP.
So what if the American League's other BBWAA voters do not give you the respect yet, or even the courtesy of a 10th place vote on every ballot. You can be our little secret for another year. You can be the guy that opposing fans look at each other and wonder who you are after you launch one into the stands. Sure we might hide you around the outfield and infield again, but getting you on the field is the main thing, because a lineup with Zobrist in it is a ticking time bomb ready to launch an offensive explosion.
So as we begin to go towards the bulk of the off season, it is okay if the rest of the countries media want to forget about Zobrist. It is fine if they do not want to honor a year to remember from a guy who stepped up and accepted the challenge and propelled his team. We know your value and we know your potential. Tick,tock…..tick, tock. Spend the off season resting, relaxing and playing with your son Zion. For in the Spring of 2010, you can again get your determination and intensity scale set to "10", because some people forgot who you were. They forgot you were "Zorilla", but that is fine. Even Godzilla had more than one film, and he did pretty well for himself.
10 Comments
The BWAA is full of idiots who vote for their favorite players and gush about them endlessly. If Zobrist had won, they would have gushed nauseatingly about him…or maybe that's just the NL guys? No, they did deliberate to the point of sickness with Mauer.
If that writer in Seattle could cast a first-place vote for Miguel Cabrera, I guess the association isn't exactly perfect in terms of their picks!
Zobrist is a real gamer, and he certainly is on my radar screen. Whenever we Red Sox played you and we faced Zobrist, I always would think "Don't underestimate this guy, he's good." I like his willingness to play anywhere and do anything asked of him, and he never seems to get a big head for himself. He would deserve any accolade they can give him. Take care.
Zobrist was a REAL bright spot this year for the Rays. Kudos to all those learned gents who picked him up off waivers in my fantasy leagues (it's okay, I got Coghlan and Garret Jones AND Andrew McCutcheon)… I just hope he continues this level of play. If he does, the future is bright in Tampa.
I would have found it more interesting, and total blog fodder if Albert Pujols had not gotten every first place vote today.
Mauer deserved the same level of respect and total first place votes as Pujols, but someone in the NY market voted for Miguel Caberra.
Rays Renegade
I agree with you there.
Why in god's name does a Seattle P I reporter even get the idea to vote for someone in the AL Cantral.
Well, he probably did it the same way Florida QB Tim Tebow did not get every vote in the All-SEC pre-season poll.
Someone always has to pee in the punchbowl( watch the movie " Hollywood Knights").
Rays Renegade
The thing that has impressed me about Zobrist the last two seasons is he did not take the news of Jason Bartlett coming like he was losing his job, he fought harder and worked more to be a complete player from both sides of the plate.
That is the kind of guy you find a spot for on your roster and on the field in the top nine.
I think he might have a down 2010 since pitching kind of caught up to him in the second half of the season, but he will adjust and convert his game a notch higher.
Rays Renegade
The real value to him is that he comes with a nice price tag for at least the next two seasons.
After that he might just price himself out of the Tampa Bay market.
But knowing the Rays, they might see to tying him up for three years or so and make him a vital part of the team as the next generation start to hit the Major League level.
Rays Renegade
Have a good Thanksgiving and holiday season, Cliff. Rock out some Daughtry with the Zorilla! ;) Take care.
Thank you for that.
It is going to be very uneventful for me this holiday.
But, I do have the new Daughtry album in the DVD player on the computer, and just might play a few trakcs while I write today.
Hope you and yours have a glorious Thanks giving, and that every stomach is full, but not upset after the feasting is over.
I am thinking of making myself a turkey panini with a cranberry relish and melted aged swiss right now (9:02 am).
Rays Renegade


text:
Carson City Sheriff's Log: Man arrested on suspicion of felony battery
Carson City
The following people were booked into the Carson City Jail. All suspects are innocent until proved guilty in court:
• 3:53 a.m.: A 19-year-old Carson City man was arrested in the 4700 block of South Carson Street on suspicion of minor consuming alcohol and violation of bail conditions. According to his arrest report, he was on alternative sentencing with a clause that he couldn't drink alcohol or use drugs. He had a blood-alcohol level of .024 when checked by a deputy who was responding to a noise complaint. Bail was set at $3,150.
• 7:27 p.m.: A 35-year-old Carson City man was arrested in the 1900 block of Hamilton Avenue on suspicion of domestic battery. Bail was set at $3,000.
• 6:38 p.m.: A 33-year-old Carson City man was arrested in the 2000 block of Menlo Drive on suspicion of felony domestic battery with strangulation. Bail was set at $15,000.
The Nevada Appeal only names people arrested on suspicion of felonies, violent crimes and DUIs. Carson City Secret Witness will pay up to $2,500 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of people committing crimes. Anyone with information is asked to call 775-322-4900. The School Secret Witness number is 775-283-1799. Callers remain anonymous.