text:
Marlins sign undrafted Vanderbilt hero Norwood
PITTSBURGH -- College World Series hero John Norwood may have slipped through the cracks in the First-Year Player Draft in June, but the former Vanderbilt outfielder didn't go unnoticed in the Cape Cod League.
The Marlins heavily scouted Norwood in the wooden-bat summer league, and they presented him with a $275,000 signing bonus.
Norwood now joins Miami's farm system, giving the organization yet another promising talent.
"He went undrafted, which is amazing," president of baseball operations Michael Hill said. "All our guys as part of their summer coverage were up in the Cape, and he just kept it going, kept swinging the bat and hitting with power and playing a good outfield. It's nice to add another piece into the system."
Norwood is another example of the organization's commitment to bolstering its overall farm system.
The Marlins just traded a talented outfield prospect in Jake Marisnick to the Astros. And the club is seeking to improve its position-player depth.
Norwood gained national attention by belting the College World Series-clinching home run for Vanderbilt.
"He's coming from a great school, defending national champions," Hill said. "There's no hiding people in the Cape, especially when you're a college player hitting with wood and you're productive, there's going to be action on you. There was action on him, and we were fortunate he liked our situation and wanted to be a Marlin."


text:
Holds On To Defeat Mississippi 21-16 In 26th Annual Contest
MONTGOMERY, AL – Alabama's All-Stars fought off a furious Mississippi comeback effort in the final quarter to claim a 21-16 victory in the 26th annual Alabama-Mississippi All-Star Foot Game Saturday at Cramton Bowl.
The last Alabama loss came in December of 2007. This was the second year that Cramton Bowl and the Montgomery Lions Club have served as hosts for the game put on by the Alabama High School Athletic Association and its coaches arm, the Alabama High School Athletic Directors & Coaches Association.
With the victory, Alabama now holds a 19-7 edge in the series that dates back to 1988. The first 24 games were played at Ladd-Peebles Stadium in Mobile.
After the teams battled to a scoreless first quarter, Alabama took the lead in the second period when McGill-Toolen place-kicker Thomas Hamlin kicked three field goals to tie the Alabama-Mississippi Game record. His first was a 30-yarder just 53 seconds into the quarter, a 35-yarder with 3:58 left and then a 51-yarder with 1:01 remaining before the intermission. The 51-yard kick was the second longest in Alabama-Mississippi All-Star history.
Mississippi moved the ball well but two turnovers, a fumble inside the Alabama 20 and an interception on the Alabama goal line, thwarted two prime scoring opportunities. Jonathan Cook, a defensive back from Spanish Fort, returned the interception 57 yards before Mississippi quarterback Parker Adamson, the only player in close pursuit, pulled him down at the 43-yard line.
Alabama, head coached by Mountain Brook's Chris Yeager, took command in the third quarter when Cedrix Reed of Foley sped 30 yards for a touchdown at the 8:23 mark while the Alabama defense continued to stymie the Mississippi team coached by Eupora's Junior Graham.
Early in the fourth period Alabama struck again with 10:54 left to build a 21-0 lead when Joshua Walker of Austin ran 9 yards off tackle for another touchdown.
Mississippi quarterback Parker Adamson of Oxford got his team back into the contest two plays later, however, with a 47-yard touchdown pass to Kameron Myers of Charleston to cap a 65-yard scoring drive.
Five minutes later, Kamyron Melton of Dothan intercepted a Mississippi pass at the Alabama 2-yard line. However, the defensive gem was quickly erased when defensive tackle Dylan Bradley of Noxubee County broke through to tackle Walker in the end zone for a safety.
Following the free kick by Alabama just 14 seconds later, Mississippi struck again when Eupora's Derrick Jones caught a 41-yard scoring pass from quarterback Wes Windham of Ocean Springs to cut the lead to 21-16.
The Alabama defense held off the visitors the rest of the game to emerge with its seventh win in eight years and 13th in the last 15 years dating back to 1996.
Jason Smith was named the Alabama MVP. The McGill-Toolen quarterback, who turned wide receiver in this game, snared six receptions for 134 yards to tie the Classic record for yards receiving set by Chalos Boner of Greenwood, MS in 1989. He had two spectacular one-handed catches to keep scoring drives alive.
Mississippi's 6-foot-6, 248-pound defensive end Chris Jones of Houston had eight tackles including a sack and three others for losses to earn MVP honors for his team.
Spain Park's Nick Mullens and Carver-Montgomery's Jeremy Johnson combined to pass for 231 yards. Mullens was 8-of-12 passing for 156 yards and Johnson 4-of-10 for 75. Reed was the game's leading rusher with 57 yards on nine carries and New Hope's Johnathan Ford added 31 on 14 tries. Clark Quisenberry of Enterprise also had two catches for 30 yards and Nate Andrews of Fairhope one for 34.
Northview's Marquez White led the Alabama defense with six tackles. Melton finished with four stops, a fumble recovery and interception.
Leading Mississippi was Adamson, who was 12-of-21 passing for 117 yards. Windham was 5-of-9 for 70. Ashton Shumpert of Itawamba had 12 carries for just 14 yards and JaMarcus Rivies of Petal had an 18-yard gain on his only carry of the day. Myers' five catches for 82 yards and Jones' four for 55 yards led the Mississippi receiver corps
Alabama finished with 15 first downs, 87 yards rushing and 318 total yards. Mississippi had 16 first downs, 49 yards rushing and 192 passing for a 241 total. The deciding factors were the three turnovers by Mississippi and only one by Alabama. Both teams were penalized at a record pace with Mississippi drawing 15 penalities for 115 yards and Alabama 14 for 127 yards.
Series record: Alabama 19 wins; Mississippi 7.
2012: Alabama 21, Mississippi 16
2011: Alabama 31, Mississippi 12
2010: Alabama 24, Mississippi 17 (2 OT)
2009: Alabama 21, Mississippi 13
2008: Alabama 28, Mississippi 3
2007 (December): Mississippi 26, Alabama 7
2007 (June): Alabama 51, Mississippi 14
2006: Alabama 24, Mississippi 3
2005: Mississippi 21, Alabama 18
2004: Alabama 24, Mississippi 22
2003: Alabama 24, Mississippi 16
2002: Alabama 29, Mississippi 17
2001: Alabama 33, Mississippi 14
2000: Alabama 16, Mississippi 9
1999: Alabama 28, Mississippi 24
1998: Mississippi 9, Alabama 0
1997: Alabama 10, Mississippi 6
1996: Alabama 17, Mississippi 14
1995: Mississippi 37, Alabama 9
1994: Mississippi 24, Alabama 10
1993: Mississippi 17, Alabama
1992: Mississippi 17, Alabama 14
1991: Alabama 15, Mississippi 13
1990: Alabama 21, Mississippi 14 (OT)
1989: Alabama 24, Mississippi 21 (4 OT)
1988: Alabama 24, Mississippi 21 (3 OT)

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Makeover Peanut Butter Layer Cake
Our home economists accepted Janice Perdue's challenge to slim down both the cake and frosting for this tried-and-true treat. The Oroville, California baker was delighted with this revamped recipe that serves 113 fewer calories, almost half the cholesterol and 10 less grams of fat.—Taste of Home's Test Kitchen
Total TimePrep: 25 min. Bake: 20 min. + cooling
Makes12 servings
- 1/4 cup butter, softened
- 1 cup sugar
- 1 egg
- 2 egg whites
- 1/2 cup peanut butter chips, melted and cooled
- 1/4 cup unsweetened applesauce
- 1 teaspoon vanilla extract
- 2 cups all-purpose flour
- 1 teaspoon baking soda
- 1/2 teaspoon baking powder
- 1/4 teaspoon salt
- 1-1/2 cups buttermilk
- 1 package (8 ounces) reduced-fat cream cheese
- 1/2 cup peanut butter chips, melted and cooled
- 1 teaspoon vanilla extract
- 1/8 teaspoon salt
- 3 cups confectioners' sugar
- Unsalted peanuts, optional
- Coat two 9-in. round baking pans with cooking spray and line with waxed paper. Coat the paper with cooking spray and dust with flour; set aside. In a large bowl, beat butter and sugar until crumbly. Beat in the egg, egg whites, melted chips, applesauce and vanilla. Combine the flour, baking soda, baking powder and salt; add to peanut butter mixture alternately with buttermilk.
- Pour into prepared pans. Bake at 350° for 20-25 minutes or until a toothpick inserted in the center comes out clean. Cool for 10 minutes before removing from pans to wire racks to cool completely.
- For frosting, in a small bowl, beat cream cheese, melted chips, vanilla and salt until light and fluffy. Beat in confectioners' sugar until smooth. Spread between layers and over top and sides of cake. Garnish with peanuts if desired. Store in the refrigerator.
Nutrition Facts1 piece: 432 calories, 13g fat (7g saturated fat), 43mg cholesterol, 397mg sodium, 72g carbohydrate (51g sugars, 2g fiber), 9g protein.
Recommended Video
Jan 7, 2013
The cake is moist but I wanted more peanut butter taste. I will try adding extra creamy peanut butter next time. The frosting is very good although I did need to add about 2 1/2 tablespoons of milk, it did not stay creamy after adding about 1 1/2 cups of powdered sugar, it became a sticky ball. The cake with the frosting was good.
Jan 15, 2009
for the lady who wanted paula deens receipe


text:
Hey Everyone,
For me this is really a general issue, but lately I struggled very badly with identifying the profession and race I want to play in Guildwars 2. I have tried out several Quizzes in order to evaluate which character might be the right one for me. Unfortunately I haven't really been satisfied with them as they narrowed down results too quickly. So instead I browsed through the GW2 wiki, going through the traits and skills of all professions, just to switch my opinion whenever I went through another professions ability descriptions. They are just all so awesome!
In this guide, I will try to explain a different approach to you, so that you will be able to make decision more easily. This method is applicable to nearly every situation, so it is not limited to economy and gaming. Please note: that all the figures I come up with in this thread are just examples to demonstrate the method I use. They are by no meanings reflecting the state of the game GW2(Guildwars2) nor my personal opinion.
The BCA( Benefit-Cost Analysis)
The BCA is a method that is mostly used in economical context. It supports your decision making with two simple steps. First, it helps you to find out your priority. Secondly it will compare your options according to this priorities. You expected more "Rocket Science"? Sorry to dissappoint you. This is basically precisely the same process our brain goes through a billion times a day. They key point here is focus.
Evalueating your Priorities
So for the first step, think of what are really the most important factors for you. As an example, we will apply this first step, to find out what makes a profession appealing for us. Now, please don't say; "a profession has to be fun!" Eventhough I agree with you that this is a top priority in a RPG, its not bringing us any further. The right Question to ask is "What makes a profession fun?".
Factors could be(In no specific order): Mobility, Damage Potential, Survivability, Number of Abilities, Theme, Supportivity
I will take these as examples. Please note that you can taky any factor that comes to your mind. Maybe it is importent for you how reliant a profession is on pets, or whether it is ranged or meele focused. It realy could be anything you can rate. I reccomend to use between 5 and 10 factors to weight. Less will make single factors too meaningful while more will just wash out the results, giving very low weighting to each and every factor.
To compare the chosen factors, we are going to setup a table. Every factor is compared to every other one. A factor can be either less, equal ore more important than the other one he is compared to. You can either use 0, 1, 2 or -, 0, + to note this down in your table. When you have done that, you can add up the points for each factor and set the weight as percentage. Now you know your priorities.
(Example Priority Evaluation)
Mobility Damage Potential Survivability Number of Abilities Uniqueness Supportivity Total Percentage Mobility 1 0 0 2 2 1 6 16.667 Damage Potential 2 1 2 2 2 2 11 30.556 Survivability 2 0 1 1 1 1 6 16.667 Number of Abilities 0 0 1 1 1 2 5 13.889 Uniqueness 0 0 1 1 1 2 5 13.889 Supportivity 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 8.333
So what does this tell us now? Let us make some assumptions here. I seem to like very offensive characters, with mobility and survivability being equal, but only half as important as damage throughput. I am not so focused on the theme of my class. Even though I might have some preferences, I am okay with both, playing a bulky juggernaut or a fragile mage as long as it provides me with the most damage. I like a broad set of abilities, but a limited set is not a show-stopper. Support hardly is of any importance for me.
Comparing Options
Now we come to the most time consuming part, the actual comparison of options, in our example Professions. We are going to use our 6 chosen factors and their weights, to come up with a ranking for every profession. In order to make this ranking as accurate as possible, we have to base our assumptions on a ton of information. The better the information, the better the ranking. The ideal case was, to have played all the professions in all possible talent builds. But to be honest, if that was the case, you probably wouldn't want to go through this whole exercise. Instead, we will have to base our ranking on YouTube videos, articles on gaming sites, GW2 wiki and if you are lucky, some hours of beta testing. If you really want to make a well-founded decision at the end of this process that makes you happy on the long turn, invest time to do this. If you just want to try this out you can go with your assumptions.
To make this ranking, we need another table, containing our options and the factors on two different dimensions. We will create a ranking for every single factor, multiplying it with the weighting we created in a first step. This will give you a number of points for all the professions, allowing you to identify which wants suits your requirements best.
(Example Profession Comparison)
Elementalist Engineer Guardian Mesmer Necromancer Ranger Thief Warrior Mobility 4*16.667% 2*16.667% 3*16.667% 1*16.667% 5*16.667% 7*16.667% 8*16.667% 6*16.667% Damage Potential 7*30.556% 4*30.556% 1*30.556% 2*30.556% 3*30.556% 5*30.556% 8*30.556% 6*30.556% Survivability 3*16.667% 5*16.667% 6*16.667% 1*16.667% 8*16.667% 2*16.667% 4*16.667% 7*16.667% Number of Abilities 8*13.889% 7*13.889% 6*13.889% 5*13.889% 3*13.889% 2*13.889% 1*13.889% 4*13.889% Uniqueness 5*13.889% 7*13.889% 6*13.889% 8*13.889% 4*13.889% 2*13.889% 3*13.889% 1*13.889% Supportivity 5*8.333% 6*8.333% 7*8.333% 8*8.333% 4*8.333% 3*8.333% 1*8.333% 2*8.333% Total 5.52783 4.83337 4.05558 2.97219 4.38894 3.83338 5.08341 4.86118
This profession comparison leads us to the conclusion that a Elementalist would probably be the best way to go and that I should not start with a Mesmer. What is important to note is, that I didn't just get the Profession with the highest damage ranking . I got the one, which covers my personal priorities overall best. And that my friends, is precisely what puts this method ahead of class quizzes and so forth. It takes your personal interests into consideration.
Please note, this method is not perfect. It has its pros and cons. Also it is not saying you : "Elementalist is the only profession that will bring you fun!" it is meant to show you tendencies, which are more reliant if you go through the whole process as precisely as possible. Be honest with your rating. Even if it means you have to downgrade a profession you otherwise like. If you are absolutely unhappy with the result, you probably have not considered the factors that really matter to you.
Many thanks for reading. I hope this will help you to make decisions in the future. Comments and feedback are much appreciated. I apologise for grammar mistakes and my bad writing. I am still working on it.
Reccomended Factors and Rankings
This section contains factors and rankings that have been propsed by the members of MMO-Champion. I tryed to rank the professions based on information from GW2 wiki and polls in this forum. You may take them and apply your personal factor priority scales to it. I hope it helps you. Many thanks go to all the people who have contributet to this by adding a lot of value to a fruitful discussion.
Mobility: This ranking is determined by the amount of spells that grant a profession stealth, swiftness, evasion or let you teleport, rollback, charge, leap or pull you character to your targets location. Also % movementspeed increases are covered.
Number of Spells: This ranking is determined by the number of spells available to a profession. The information was taken from the GW2 wiki. Chains count as one spell per step. Abilities that grant you access to new spells are counted as one plus the amount of temporarly grantet spells. The Reason for the Ranger being ahead is the amount of spells that come with his pet choice.
Unpopularity: This ranking is determined by your votes, given to a poll that asked for your mains profession choice after the last beta weekend.
Supportivity: This factor is ranked by the number of skills available to a profession that have a positive direct influence to allies aka give a boon to them ore removing negative conditions from them. Traits are not added as too dificult to rate. Please note, that a Ranger is not worse a supporter than a Guardian. He is just more limited in spell choice to fill the role of a supporter.
(Prepared ranked factors that can be used)
Elementalist Engineer Guardian Mesmer Necromancer Ranger Thief Warrior Mobility 5 2.5 1 6 2.5 7 8 4 Number Of Spells 7 6 3 1 2 8 4 5 Unpopularity 2 3 4 8 5 6.5 6.5 1 Supportivity 5 6.5 8 6.5 3 2 1 4
Update Notes:
2012.08.07 13:30 -> Exchanged the factor "Theme" with "Uniqueness" and adapted ranking accordingly
2012.08.08 -> Added a section with reccomended factors that have been ranked propperly, based on data from gw2 wiki or MMOC polls.


text:
Middle Eastern Morning at Al Bawadi Grill in Chicago's South Suburbs
Really, there's nothing wrong with omelets—I'm just not a breakfast girl. That's why, nine times out of 10, I'm the one ordering a burger or BLT first thing. It's not necessarily what I want, per se; it's just more appealing to me than standard morning fare. Unfortunately, my kind of stance can be limiting, especially since I live in the suburbs. Fortunately, I know of Middle Eastern gems that offer the perfect fix.
Check them all out by clicking on the slideshow, or check out each individual dish below.
Al Bawadi Grill
My hands-down favorite for Middle Eastern is Al Bawadi Grill in Bridgeview.
Al Bawadi Grill, 7216 W. 87th St., Bridgeview, IL 60455 (map); 708-599-1999; albawadigrill.com
Al Mawal
Just down the road from Al Bawadi is an unassuming but wholly satisfying alternative: Al Mawal. Whether you carry out or settle into the simple, welcoming dining room, a feast of epic proportions is in store.
Al Mawal, 10718 S. Harlem Ave., Worth, IL 60482 (map); 708-361-5100
While at Al Mawal, wander further down the same strip mall and find Fattoush, its cheery coffeehouse-like confines an inviting place to linger, starting at 7 a.m.
Fattoush,10700 S. Harlem Ave., Worth, IL 60482 (map); 708-671-9999; fattoushchicago.com
All products linked here have been independently selected by our editors. We may earn a commission on purchases, as described in our affiliate policy.


text:
Montessori education information from a Montessori teacher and Mom. Personal art work and journal entries about my life as a busy Mom of three sons ranging in age from 7 years to 21 years. My hope: To create a place where parenting questions can be answered and conversations as well as ideas shared.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Open House for My New School
13 comments:
- nocton4 said...
lovely,all so special, would love to come there x
- August 24, 2010 at 12:08 PM
- Counting Coconuts said...
Beautiful and inspiring! A wonderful place to learn. :)
- August 24, 2010 at 3:49 PM
- XYZZ said...
Looks beautiful! So calm and lovely.
- August 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM
- Unknown said...
I love your set up. The big windows brighten up the classroom too. I like the cozy corner with the IKEA kiddie looking chairs. Is that a reading area or for socializing or...? I'm curious, what do you have on and under the table between the chairs?
- August 24, 2010 at 11:25 PM
- Paul and Ines said...
congratulations on your new school...I , often feel that it's the natural progression for Montessori teachers...either open your own school or teach new teachers...Good luck on your journey!
- August 24, 2010 at 11:31 PM
- Jessie, The Education Of Ours said...
Beautiful! Congrats again!
- August 25, 2010 at 10:54 PM
- Jennifer Williams said...
I love the mix of different chairs and tables.... it's beautiful, very inviting and light, and just so simple and uncluttered!
Well done!
- August 26, 2010 at 4:14 AM
- Lisa said...
It looks lovely! Congratulations! :)
- August 26, 2010 at 9:54 PM
- Sara Ruth said...
What a beautiful and peaceful classroom! It is so sunny and cozy.
- August 27, 2010 at 3:36 PM
- Jennifer Howard said...
Thank you for all the loving and supportive comments!
To answer some questions:
The IKEA looking chairs are actually from a company called Children's Organizers, who by the way were wonderful to work with. In the basket between the chairs is a small etcher sketch, and a lacing card. On the table is a 3 minute egg timer and a set of affirmation cards (I made). The purpose of this corner is not defined...I am interested to see the children in this space and see what they do with it to make it their own. The egg timer is a helpful tool I've found for my four year old to calm down with. It kind of found it's way there one day.
I can't wait to share photo of the children enjoying the space!
With love and in PEACE,
- August 28, 2010 at 7:01 PM
- jojoebi-designs said...
you have been featured on the Montessori Goldmine
love the new classroom!
- September 29, 2010 at 2:31 AM
- Joyful Learner said...
Very peaceful environment. Love the light coming through the windows.
- October 14, 2010 at 8:21 PM
- Alice Law said...
Congratulation, it's beautiful and neat!
- October 22, 2010 at 11:16 AM


text:
Daniel Roberts and Pablo Torre have a fine story in this week's SI (and this month's Fortune—it's a collaboration between the two Time-Life mags) about Leigh Steinberg, the former agent to NFL stars. We learn in the piece that whatever comeback plan he thinks he has, he doesn't really have one. He gets bombarded with emails from high-school swimmers looking for representation and passes them up. He has a Tumblr. He lectures weekly to a class at the UC-Irvine law school while spitting tobacco. And then there was this paragraph, perhaps the saddest thing ever written about a sports agent:
Steinberg occupies a small office with Tom Van Voorst, a fellow recovering alcoholic and lawyer who is also his roommate. The two met at a Sober Living facility in 2010 and now share an apartment in Laguna Niguel. Van Voorst runs errands in Steinberg's maroon Mercury Mountaineer and fields phone calls. "I don't pay him," Steinberg says, "but he gets use of the car, which you'd be totally screwed in Southern California without. And he does the cooking!"
Well, until this paragraph-and-change:
At upscale parties his drink of choice had been Grey Goose; steadily, though, he lowered his vodka standards from Blue Ice to Smirnoff to finally, "when I ran out of money," hefty plastic jugs of Popov.
By the end of 2008, Steinberg and his wife had divorced. He had blacked out, he says, after drinking in front of Steve Young's family on the night the 49ers retired the quarterback's jersey. And he had been arrested for public intoxication after he was found shouting and trying to scale a hill near the Newport Auto Center one night at 7:45 p.m. (He pleaded guilty.) Most troubling to him, Steinberg mangled his relationships with his daughter, Katie, and two sons, Jon and Matt. The sons have retinitis pigmentosa, a rare progressive eye disorder that causes blindness. His kids were often on the receiving end, Steinberg sadly admits, of harsh "drunk-calling and drunk-texting."
He sounds like a super-nice guy. (Even Tom Cruise said Steinberg was deluded, which is an awfully bad sign: "He is not Jerry Maguire ... But he did like to keep going on in that way. It got to the point where it was a little ridiculous.") Can't wait until he's back on top!


text:
Topa-Top Meh-Dai (TopTai,WCMT) from 100% organic cotton Kalimasien and canvas with owls
The Topa Top wrap mei tai baby carriers combines comfort, excellent weight distribution, beauty and stylish design.
The Topa Top wrap mei tai baby carriers are designed by a ClauWe babywearing consultant and made according to baby's physiology and the parent needs.
The Topa Top wrap mei tai baby carriers is hand made from mainly woven wraps or top quality fabric. The structure of this fabric can comfortably hold your baby's back providing support, it also distributes the baby's weight evenly on your shoulders the same as the woven wrap.
- Details
- Instructions
- Wash & Care
BASIC characteristics:
- For babies from 0 month (3,5 kg) till 5 years (18 kg)
- Front, back and hip carries position. also high back position is available.
- Shoulder straps 26-35cm in width and 205cm in length
- Belt of 10cm width and 195cm length ( It is possible to order all models with a condensed belt with the locking buckle)
- Minimal size of the back is 22 in width and 30 in length. Maximum size 44 in width and 42 in length.
- Wide one-layer shoulder straps
- Belt with a fixable paralon input into the center
- Characteristic / figurative back
- Adjustable back in length and in width
- An adjustable ergonomic hood
- It is possible to connect the hood with one hand even when the child is on the back.
- Breast-feeding friendly
- Can be used as a hip seat
- Machine washable
- Handmade from 100% natural materials
Why Topa Top slings?
- Only natural materials are used, cotton, linen, silk, wool and wooden buttons.
- Only tested, high quality fabric are used. We try to carefully cheek the quality of our items and try to do everything we can to provide you a comfortable and convenient product .
- All slings are handmade by moms for moms with love.
- Ergonomic Slings which created with maximum conformance to the child's physiology and the parent's needs.
- Models developed by a ClauWe babywearing consultant.
- All slings allow for babies from 0 month (3,5 kg) till 5 years (18 kg), changing (adjusts) to allow the physiology right position for each age.
- A wide range of models and colors.
- A wide range of appropriate accessories.
- Each baby carrier comes with convenient carrying bag.
- The company with the experience of 4 years in babywearing.
- Machine washable.
- Soft design.
- Allows you to discretely breast-feed.
- Adjusts for parents size 34 to 52.
- All slings allows front, back and hip carries position.
- Made in Israel
Why use wide one-layer shoulder straps and woven wrap or similar fabrics?
- The woven wrap and the similar fabric properly distributes the baby's weight in order to prevent an aching back.
- The structure of this fabric can comfortably hold your baby's back providing support.
- This fabrics are woven aspecially for baby cares and with accordance to top quality standards and Eco tests.
- This fabrics are rather dense and soft, and allow a pleasant feeling for you and your baby.
- Wide one-layer shoulder straps occupying a large area on the body and distribute the baby's weight in the best way as woven wraps do.
- Wide straps do not press and do not bump on yours shoulders.
- Wide straps allow you to best support your baby's back .
- Wide straps hug you and your child.
for combinate carriers with silk, linen or wool/ cashmere
- Washing temperature 30°C/85°F (cold/gentle cycle)
- Never use bleaching agents
- Use mild, preferably liquid detergent
- Use water softener if your water is hard
- Do not tumble dry
- Iron at max 45°C/110°F
for cotton ones
- Washing temperature 40°C/104°F (warm)
- Never use bleaching agents
- Use mild, preferably liquid detergent
- Use water softener if your water is hard
- Dry-spin on gentle cycle only
- Avoid high temperatures, especially in the dryer
- Iron at max 65°C/150°F
People who like this product also like
Storchenwiege Leo Marine
Hoppediz Antigua
Didymos Pfau Rot
Nursing necklace Teething Necklace Forest Lake


text:
Ann Curry | Only One Tool Available
Clip: Season 5 Episode 3 | 1m 35s
Ann Curry is told her grandfather's name, something she never expected to find out.
Aired: 01/22/19Video has closed captioning.
Buy Now:
Problems Playing Video?
Major corporate support for FINDING YOUR ROOTS WITH HENRY LOUIS GATES, JR., Season Six is provided by Ancestry, Johnson & Johnson and AT&T. Major support is also provided by the Ford Foundation, Candace King Weir, the Lloyd Carney Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and PBS.


text:
Gunmaker Remington Plans to File For Bankruptcy
One of the oldest and best known gun-manufacturers in the world is set to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protections according to a release from the company amid declining gun sales.
The financial restructuring plan would allow Remington Outdoor Company to remain in business while reducing its debt load by $700 million. The plan would also contribute $145 million of new capital into its subsidiaries according to the release.
According to the company, normal business operations would not be interfered with by the restructuring plan. "Payments to trade partners, employee wages and other benefits, support for customers, and an ongoing high level of service to consumers will continue without interruption," it said.
Gun sales skyrocketed during the Obama administration because of fears new gun control legislation would be implemented. However, after Trump, a Republican endorsed by the NRA, was elected, sales fell off.
Remington has also had to deal with a series of legal troubles over the last few years. They had to settle a class action lawsuit regarding defective that were sold. The gun company was also named as a defendant in a lawsuit for the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary shooting because the company manufactured the Bushmaster rifle used in the attack.
Remington is headquartered in North Carolina and has been in business for more than 200 years.
Photo: Getty Images


text:
Supastar LT, Dizzy, Primo, Dillan & Eddy Fish - Plottin On A Million [Unsigned Hype]
""Skyways Music Group Presents Plottin On A Million ft. Supastar LT, Dizzy, Primo, Dillan, and Eddy Fish For Booking Email firstname.lastname@example.com"
Please click the "Report" button below if the video on this page is not working properly.
Comments will only be displayed by verified emails. No Spamming or Racism.


text:
An International Conference at the University of Chicago, April 15-16, 2010
The aim of this conference is to expand our understanding of the intersection of German and Jewish culture by emphasizing the extensive cultural production on the German-Jewish and German-Israeli fault lines and putting the dialogue between the two languages and literatures – German and Hebrew – at the center. This is a topic that has evaded scholars of German Jewish and Hebrew Literature in the past because the two fields have largely remained separate. The event is being initiated in reaction to a perceived sea change in both scholarship and culture: an increasing number of bilingual scholars and cultural agents are engaged in the interaction between German and Hebrew and investigating its past. What enables this conversation to thrive at the present moment is one of the central topics to be investigated.
Moving away from the previously dominant concepts of identity, memory and trauma we aim to introduce new concepts such as cultural contact, bilingualism and translation. This is an interdisciplinary project that draws on fields such as Comparative Literature, Translation Studies, Comparative Politics and Anthropology. Germans, Jews and Israelis turn to translation, borrowing, adaptation and exchange between the two languages and literatures for widely different reasons at different times; moreover, none of the different categories – Germans, Jews, Hebrew or German speakers, Israelis – is inherently stable, and they overlap in multiple senses. But a comprehensive mapping of this uneven topography is yet to be undertaken, and there is much to learn from it.
What do Germans and Israelis discover when they travel from one culture to the other? What is the place of Israel in the contemporary German political landscape and cultural imagination? How do Israelis use the German past when they discuss their political present?
Conference Organizer: Na'ama Rokem, Assistant Professor of Modern Hebrew Literature (University of Chicago)


text:
Get Started (model myPOS Smart)
myPOS Package Activation Guide
Quick guide with a step-by-step, easy-to-use instruction to activate your new myPOS device.
Technical Specification & Warranty (model myPOS Smart)
The guide includes key features and benefits, device specification, safety instructions and maintenance, charging.
Quick user guide (model myPOS Smart)
The guide includes main menus and functionalities, how to perform transactions and network connectivity of your new myPOS device.


text:
You are about to enter a website that may contain content of an adult nature.
Hello everyone, this is Indian cam girl HotFoxy here. I'm 30 year old Female speak English in the Indian live sex chat action. Hello ! You dream foxy is here. Hot mature women ready to satisfy all your needs .. and mines too !. Just me .. perfect boobs, perfect legs .. perfect ass and a dirty little smile !!. You`ll see :P is my expertise and also what I will do in Indian live sex private show. I have Black eyes, Medium Black hairs and my measurements are 36-24-36. For Turn ons: I love hot action !. For TurnsOff: I hate beggers, rude people and 1 minute guys. If you prefer kinks, then Shaved, are mine. I'm just hungry for a HARD cock, can't wait to see u in my Indian webcam sex chat room! :)
Show more models
This website contains indian nude cam, desi webcam, online hindi girls webcam and tamil sex cams related sexually explicit content.
You must be at least 18 years of age to enter this website. © Since 2012 myindiansexcams.com Indian Sex Chat Network All Rights Reserved
AllHosts1 - AllHosts2 - AllHosts3 - AllHosts4 - AllHosts5 - AllHosts6 - AllHosts7 - AllHosts8 - AllHosts9 - AllHosts10 - AllHosts11 - AllHosts12


text:
Creation's Critics Countered
|Bert Thompson, Ph.D.
There is clear evidence that these combined efforts are having a serious impact. Consider, for example, the following. In a center-column, front-page article in the June 15, 1979 issue of the Wall Street Journal, there appeared an article by one of the Journal's staff writers commenting on how creationists, when engaging in debates with evolutionists, "tend to win" the debates, and that creationism was "making progress." In 1979, Gallup pollsters conducted a random survey, inquiring about belief in creation versus evolution. The poll had been commissioned by Christianity Today magazine, and was reported in its December 21, 1979 issue. This poll found that 51% of Americans believe in the special creation of a literal Adam and Eve as the starting place of human life. In the March 1980 issue of the American School Board Journal (p. 52), it was reported that 67% of its readers (most of whom were school board members and school administrators) favored the teaching of the scientific evidence for creation in public schools. Glamour magazine conducted a poll of its own and reported the results in its August 1982 issue (p. 28). The magazine found that 74% of its readers favored teaching the scientific evidence for creation in public schools. One of the most authoritative polls was conducted in October 1981 by the Associated Press/NBCNews polling organization. The results were as follows:
|Only evolution should be taught
|Only creation should be taught
|Both creation and evolution should be taught
|Not sure which should be taught
On November 28, 1991 results were released from yet another Gallup poll regarding the biblical account of origins. The results may be summarized as follows. On origins: 47% believed God created man within the last 10,000 years (up 3% from the 1982 poll mentioned above); 40% believed man evolved over millions of years, but that God guided the process; 9% believed man evolved over millions of years without God; 4% were "other/don't know." On the Bible: 32% believed the Bible to be the inspired Word of God, and that it should be taken literally; 49% believed the Bible to be the inspired Word of God, but that it should not always be taken literally; 16% believed the Bible to be entirely the product of men; 3% were "other/don't know" (see Major, 1991, 11:48; John Morris, 1992, p. d). Two years later, a Gallup poll carried out in 1993 produced almost the same results. Of those responding, 47% stated that they believed in a recent creation of man; 11% expressed their belief in a strictly naturalistic form of evolution (see Newport, 1993, p. A-22). Four years after that poll, a 1997 Gallup survey found that 44% of Americans (including 31% who were college graduates) subscribed to a fairly literal reading of the Genesis account of creation, while another 39% (53% of whom were college graduates) believed God played at least some part in creating the Universe. Only 10% (17% college graduates) embraced a purely naturalistic, evolutionary view (see Bishop, 1998, pp. 39-48; Sheler, 1999, pp. 48-49). The results of a Gallup poll released in August 1999 were practically identical: 47% stated that they believed in a recent creation of man; 9% expressed belief in strictly naturalistic evolution (see Moore, 1999).
In its March 11, 2000 issue, the New York Times ran a story titled "Survey Finds Support is Strong for Teaching 2 Origin Theories," which reported on a poll commissioned by the liberal civil rights group, People for the American Way, and conducted by the prestigious polling/public research firm, DYG, of Danbury, Connecticut. According to the report, 79% of the people polled felt that the scientific evidence for creation should be included in the curriculum of public schools (see Glanz, 2000, p. A-1).
The amazing thing about all of this, of course, is that these results are being achieved after more than a century of evolutionary indoctrination. Evolutionists, needless to say, have not been pleased with the obvious failure of their efforts at indoctrinating the American public. As a result, an "anti-creationist hysteria" is in full-swing. Resolutions against creationism are being passed, pro-evolution pamphlets are being distributed, "committees of correspondence" are being formed, debates with creationists are being scorned (so that the creationists no longer can "tend to win" and make evolutionists look bad), and anti-creationist books are issuing from the presses at an unprecedented rate. For example, in 1977 the American Humanist Association fired a major salvo by publishing a Manifesto affirming evolution as "firmly established in the view of the modern scientific community" (see The Humanist, 1977, 37:4-5). Following that, Dorothy Nelkin, a professor of sociology at Cornell University, published the first of what became a series of anti-creationist books when she wrote Science Textbook Controversies and the Politics of Equal Time (1977).
Since then, a lengthy list of such books can be documented. As samples, I might list such volumes as: (1) The Darwinian Revolution by Michael Ruse (1979); (2) Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism by Philip Kitcher (1982); (3) The Monkey Business by Niles Eldredge (1982); (4) Scientists Confront Creationism, edited by Laurie Godfrey (1983); (5) Science on Trial: The Case for Evolution by Douglas J. Futuyma (1983); (6) Science and Creationism, edited by Ashley Montagu (1984); (7) Creation and Evolution: Myth or Reality? by Norman D. Newell (1985) (8) The Blind Watchmaker by Richard Dawkins (1986); (9) Science and Creation by Robert W. Hanson (1986); (10) Cult Archaeology and Creationism by Francis B. Harrold and Raymond A. Eve (1987); (11) Anti-Evolution Bibliography by Tom McIver (1988); (12) Evolution—The Great Debate by Vernon Blackmore and Andrew Page (1989); (13) Evolution and the Myth of Creationism by Tim Berra (1990); (14) The Creationist Movement in Modern America by Raymond A. Eve and Francis B. Harrold (1991); (15) The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism by Ronald L. Numbers (1992); (16) The Myth-Maker's Magic—Behind the Illusion of "Creation Science" by Delos B. McKown; (17) Creationism's Upside-Down Pyramid: How Science Refutes Fundamentalism by Lee Tiffin (1994); (18) Science and Earth History: The Evolution/Creation Controversy by Arthur N. Strahler (1999); and (19) The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism [the sequel to his 1982 volume, The Monkey Business] by Niles Eldredge (2000).
This list could be lengthened considerably, but I think the point is clear. Creation no longer is being taken lightly. A "call to arms" has been made by the evolutionary establishment, and is being answered by many in the evolutionary community. Creationism is enjoying renewed popularity. Were that not the case, evolutionists would not be so busily engaged in meeting what they perceive as a very real threat to the status quo that they have enjoyed for so long.
Argument #1: Creation is not scientific, because creation is not testable, reproducible, or repeatable. Evolution, on the other hand, is scientific, and should be taught in science curricula, while creation should not.
Response: For a theory to qualify as a scientific theory, it must be supported by events, processes, or properties that can be observed, and the theory must be useful in predicting the outcome of future natural phenomena or laboratory experiments. In addition, the theory must be capable of falsification. That is, it must be possible to conceive of some experiment, the failure of which would disprove the theory. It is on the basis of such criteria that most evolutionists insist creation be denied respectability as a potential scientific explanation of origins. Creation has not been witnessed by human observers, it cannot be tested experimentally, and as a theory it is nonfalsifiable. Notice, however, that the General Theory of Evolution (organic evolution) also fails to meet all three of these criteria. No one observed the origin of the Universe or the origin of life. Similarly, no one has observed the conversion of a fish into an amphibian or an ape-like creature into a man. Paul Ehrlich and L.C. Birch, both evolutionists, have stated:
Our theory of evolution has become...one which cannot be refuted by any possible observations. Every conceivable observation can be fitted into it. It is thus "outside empirical science" but not necessarily false. No one can think of ways in which to test it. Ideas, either without basis or based on a few laboratory experiments carried out in extremely simplified systems have attained currency far beyond their validity. They have become part of an evolutionary dogma accepted by most of us as part of our training (1967, 214:349).In a symposium at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia (on the mathematical probabilities of evolution actually having occurred), Murray Eden, in speaking about the falsifiability of evolution, said:
This cannot be done in evolution, taking it in its broad sense, and this is really all I meant when I called it tautologous in the first place. It can, indeed, explain anything. You may be ingenious or not in proposing a mechanism which looks plausible to human beings and mechanisms which are consistent with other mechanisms which you have discovered, but it is still an unfalsifiable theory (1967, p. 71).Neither creation nor evolution is testable, in the sense of being observable experimentally. Both, however, can be stated as scientific models. It is poor science, and even poorer science education, to restrict instruction solely to the evolution model. When evolutionists attempt to depict evolution as the only scientific model, they are no longer speaking in the context of scientific truth. Either they do not know what the data actually reveal, or they are deliberately attempting to deceive. Evolution fails to answer more questions than it purports to answer, and the creation model certainly has as much (and often more) to offer as an alternative model. It is not within the domain of science to prove any concept regarding ultimate origins. The best one can hope for in this area is an adequate model to explain circumstantial evidence at hand. When one observes the undeniable design of every living thing, the complexity of the Universe itself, and the intricate nature of life, the creation model becomes quite attractive. It at least possesses a potential explanation for such attributes. The evolution model does not, but instead asks us to believe that design, inherent complexity, and intricateness are all the result of chance processes operating over eons of time.
Argument #2: Even though it may be true to say that evolution cannot be demonstrated, at least it is based on natural processes, whereas creation is based on supernatural processes. This, in and of itself, proves that creation is intrinsically unscientific.
Response: Actually this argument is intended to be two-fold in its thrust. First, it is intended to convey the idea that since "creation" occurred in the distant past as the result of events not now able to be studied in the laboratory, it is outside the realm of empirical science. Second, it is intended to convey the idea that only those things that are purely naturalistic are of a scientific nature and therefore can be studied scientifically. Let us examine these two concepts.
First, creation and evolution both share one fundamental similarity—the idea that the Universe and life are the products of one or more unique events. Evolutionists speak of such things as the Big Bang and the origin of living from nonliving. Neither of these events, however, is occurring today. In a similar fashion, creationists speak of the Universe and life as the products of divine creative acts, and of a worldwide Flood that helped shape the present Earth. These events also are unique.
Science (in the sense that most people understand the word) normally deals with empirical events and processes—things that can be observed with the five senses. Furthermore, science usually concerns itself with those things that are universal, dependable, timeless, and repeatable. That is to say, a scientist in China can use the same methodology as a scientist in America and obtain the same results today, tomorrow, next year, or at any time in the future.
It should be obvious to all concerned that neither evolution nor creation falls into such a category. Certain of the basic concepts involved (the Big Bang, the creation of man, etc.) cannot be tested using these criteria. Yet there are certain things about both creation and evolution that can be tested. In order to distinguish the things within each model that can be tested from those that cannot, some authors have suggested that science itself be divided into two distinct categories. For example, in their 1984 book, The Mystery of Life's Origin, Charles Thaxton, Walter Bradley, and Roger Olsen recommended separating operation science from origin science. Others (e.g., Geisler and Anderson, 1987) have followed suit.
Operation science deals with regular, recurring events in nature that require natural causes (eclipses, volcanoes, reproduction, etc.), while origin science deals with singularities that may or may not require a natural cause (the Big Bang, creation, etc.). The term "origin science" may be new but, in fact, it works by the time-honored, standard principles of causality and uniformity. The principle of causality says that every material effect must have a prior, necessary, and adequate cause. The principle of uniformity (or analogy) says that similar effects have similar causes. In other words, the kinds of causes that we observe producing effects today can be counted on to have produced similar effects in the past. What we see as an adequate cause in the present, we assume to have been an adequate cause in the past; what we see as an inadequate cause in the present, we assume to have been an inadequate cause in the past.
None of us denies that creation occurred in the distant past as the results of events that now are unable to be studied experimentally in the laboratory. In this sense, creation is no more a "fact" of science than evolution. But the same limitations are inherent in evolutionary scenarios. Anyone familiar with the works of evolutionists like Robert Jastrow and Fred Hoyle is aware of the fact that these scientists, and others, have pointed out that the origin of the Universe, and of life itself, occurred in the distant past under conditions not necessarily experimentally reproducible and therefore not able to be studied in a strictly scientific manner. Paul Ehrlich and L.C. Birch, both evolutionists, also have addressed these issues.
Our theory of evolution has become...one which cannot be refuted by any possible observations. Every conceivable observation can be fitted into it. It is thus "outside empirical science" but not necessarily false. No one can think of ways in which to test it. Ideas, either without basis or based on a few laboratory experiments carried out in extremely simplified systems have attained currency far beyond their validity. They have become part of an evolutionary dogma accepted by most of us as part of our training (1967, 214:349).The origin of the Universe (and evolution, which is linked inextricably to it) is alleged to have begun in the pre-human past under conditions that are not now reproducible. That, it would seem to the unbiased observer, would put both creation and evolution on equal footing. It will not suffice to simply say that "creation is based on supernatural processes in the past" and is therefore not scientific. The "supernatural" beginnings of creation are no less available for scientific examination than are the "unique" (though allegedly "natural") beginnings of evolution.
That would seem, to the unbiased observer, to put creation and evolution on equal footing. Evolutionists likely will disagree, as Trevor Major has observed:
Still, evolutionists may argue that creationists have done themselves no service by making a separate science out of singularities. Defining a nonempirical science is one thing; proposing supernatural causes is quite another. For this reason, they will always view creationism as unscientific. But the idea that history consists of an unbroken stream of natural causes and effects is merely a presumption on their part. Perhaps they fear a new generation of doctoral students invoking God when they cannot explain something in their research projects. Yet this fear is unfounded. As stated earlier, most scientists of the past had no problem with divine intervention. Indeed, one of the driving forces of early Western science was the idea that the Universe, as God's creation, was open to rational investigation. In doing good operation science, these scientists would seek natural causes for regularly occurring events. Many of them recognized, however, that unique events may require a cause beyond nature. Only analogy with the present can determine whether the cause is miraculous or naturalistic (1994, 14:21, emp. in orig.).It is not a justifiable criticism to say simply that "creation" is based on supernatural processes in the distant past" and therefore is not scientific. The "supernatural" beginnings of creation are no less available for scientific examination than are the "unique" (though allegedly natural) beginnings of evolution.
Second, whoever defined science as "naturalism"? The word "science" derives from the Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge." Scientists are supposed to be men and women who are on a lifelong search for truth and knowledge, regardless of where that search may lead. Science is based on an observation of the facts and is directed at finding patterns of order in the observed data." There is nothing about true science that excludes the study of created objects and order!
To assume that knowledge can be acquired solely on the basis of naturalism, and that only those items that might have come about "naturally" may be studied, is to beg the question entirely. It is at least possible that creation could be the true explanation of origins, and thus it is premature and bigoted for certain scientists to exclude it from the domain of science by definition, all the while leaving the theory of evolution within that domain.
Argument #3: Creationists actually are nothing more than pseudo-scientists, and should not be regarded as "real" scientists like evolutionists.
Response: This charge, which is becoming increasingly common, is nothing more than anti-creationist, humanistic propaganda intended as a "scare tactic." However, it is easily refuted. First, many of the great scientists of the past were creationists. Men like Kepler, Boyle, Pascal, Newton, Faraday, Pasteur, Maxwell, Kelvin, and a score of others who founded the various disciplines of science, were creationists, not evolutionists (see Morris, 1982). Second, all real scientists are not necessarily evolutionists. There are thousands of bona fide scientists today who are creationists, not evolutionists. They have graduate degrees from accredited institutions of higher learning, and have records and credentials comparable to those of any other segment of the scientific community. There are creationist Ph.D.s, M.D.s, Sc.D.s, etc. in every branch of the pure and applied sciences—biology, geology, physics, engineering, medicine, and so on.
While it is true that the names of evolutionists such as the late Carl Sagan, Stephen Jay Gould, Robert Jastrow, and many others have become household words, it likewise is true that there are thousands of creation scientists at work in the scientific community today who are equally as good at their jobs as men of somewhat greater public stature. The fact that a man is a creationist, and therefore does not agree with evolution, does not make him by definition a "pseudo-scientist." Evolutionists admittedly are upset by the recent popularity of creation, and thus have resorted to this sort of name-calling in an attempt to undermine the credibility of some creation scientists. But when such men as the late Wernher von Braun, the late A.E. Wilder-Smith, Walter Lammerts, Dean Kenyon, and others like them step forward to espouse creationism, the argument that creation scientists are nothing but "pseudo-scientists" suddenly pales into insignificance, and easily is seen to be devoid of any truth whatsoever.
Argument #4: The creationists' "ulterior motive" is simply to be able to get their own religious views taught in public schools, under the guise of "creation science."
Response: This is yet another of the scare tactics offered by evolutionary humanists, and again, easily is shown to be false. Anyone who has examined books on creation written by creationists for use in public school classrooms quickly will notice the conspicuous absence of any religious overtones. There is no mention of God, there are no quotations from religious literature (including the Bible), and there are no references to religion in general. It is going to be a bit difficult for evolutionists to convince the public that creationists simply want to get "religion into the public schools" when some of the most outspoken critics of religion in the public schools (e.g., religions like secular humanism, etc.) are creationists.
Argument #5: The creationists are unable to support their own case with scientific evidence. All they can do is attack the evolutionist's case with "negative evidence." Why don't creationists have any scientific evidence to support their case?
Response: This argument is parroted carelessly by evolutionists who ought to know better. In multiple debates with evolutionists, creation scientists have affirmed piece after piece of positive evidence for the creation model. Evidences from the various fields of science are piled one on top of the other to make the strongest possible case for creation. In fact, entire books have been written on the subject. Creationists continually point out to evolutionists that the Law of Biogenesis states explicitly that life comes only from life of its kind, and that this law is the cornerstone of all biology. Creationists continually point out that the fossil record is replete with gaps, and is devoid of the transitional forms that evolution must have if it is to preserve its case. Creationists continually point out that there are a multitude of evidences pointing to a young Earth (e.g.: oil well fluid pressures, the helium inventory in the atmosphere, population kinetics, the Earth's rapid magnetic decay, polonium halos in the "oldest" rocks, etc.) that by definition would preclude evolution. Creationists continually point out that genetic mutations reduce viability, rather than changing one species into another. Creationists continually point out that natural selection preserves the status quo and eliminates those organisms that are "changed" from the norm. Creationists continually point out that the laws of thermodynamics clearly indicate that the Universe: (a) could not have created itself; and (b) is running down and becoming less ordered, not building up and becoming more ordered. Creationists continually point out that the Universe is contingent, and that contingent entities ultimately are dependent upon a non-contingent entity—a concept that fits the creation model perfectly, but that is something the evolution model cannot explain.
One by one the arguments of the evolutionist can be, and have been, answered. Name-calling, special-pleading, begging the question, and other such tactics ultimately are inadequate in responding to the scientific evidences presented by creationists. Eventually the subterfuge employed by evolutionists is seen to be both illogical and meritless. The arguments offered by creationists remain unrefuted.
REFERENCESBerra, Tim M. (1990), Evolution and the Myth of Creationism (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
Bishop, George (1998), "The Religious Worldview and American Beliefs about Human Origins," The Public Perspective, pp. 39-48, August/September.
Blackmore, Vernon and Andrews Page (1989), Evolution—The Great Debate (Oxford, England: Lion).
Dawkins, Richard (1986), The Blind Watchmaker (New York: W.W. Norton).
Eden, Murray (1967), in Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution (Philadelphia, PA: Wistar Press).
Ehrlich, Paul and L.C. Birch (1967), "Evolutionary History and Population Biology," Nature, 214:349-352, April 22.
Eldredge, Niles (1982), The Monkey Business (New York: Pocket Books).
Eldredge, Niles (2000), The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism (New York: W.H. Freeman).
Eve, Raymond A. and Francis B. Harrold (1991), The Creationist Movement in Modern America (Boston, MA: G.K. Hall).
Futuyma, Douglas J. (1983), Science on Trial: The Case for Evolution (New York: Pantheon).
Geisler, Norman L. and J. Kerby Anderson (1987), Origin Science (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).
Glanz, James (2000), "Survey Finds Support is Strong for Teaching 2 Origin Theories," The New York Times, p. A-1, March 11.
Godfrey, Laurie R. (1983), Scientists Against Creationism (New York: W.W. Norton).
Hanson, Robert W. (1986), Science and Creation (New York: Macmillan).
Harrold, Francis B. and Raymond A. Eve (1987), Cult Archaeology and Creationism (Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press).
The Humanist (1977), "A Statement Affirming Evolution as a Principle of Science," 37:4-5, January/February.
Kitcher, Philip (1982), Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism (Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press).
Major, Trevor J. (1991), "In the News—National Beliefs Polled," Reason & Revelation, 11:48, December.
Major, Trevor J. (1994), "Is Creation Science?," Reason & Revelation, 14:17-23, March.
McIver, Tom (1988), Anti-Evolution Bibliography (Jefferson, NC: McFarland).
McKown, Delos B. (1993), The Myth-Maker's Magic—Behind the Illusion of "Creation Science" (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus).
Montagu, Ashley (1984), Science and Creationism (New York: Oxford University Press).
Moore, David W. (1999), "Americans Support Teaching Creationism as Well as Evolution in Public Schools," [On-line], URL http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr990830.asp (Princeton, NJ: Gallup News Service).
Morris, Henry M. (1982), Men of Science: Men of God, San Diego, CA: Creation-Life Publishers, San).
Morris, John D. (1992), "Do Americans Believe in Creation?," Acts and Facts, 21[2]:d, February.
Nelkin, Dorothy (1977), Science Textbook Controversies and the Politics of Equal Time (Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press).
Newell, Norman D. (1985), Creation and Evolution: Myth or Reality? (New York: Praeger).
Newport, Frank (1993), "God Created Humankind, Most Believe," Sunday Oklahoman, A-22.
Numbers, Ronald L. (1992), The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).
Ruse, Michael (1979), The Darwinian Revolution (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
San Diego Union (1982), "44% Believe God Created Mankind 10,000 Years Ago," August 30.
Sheler, Jeffery L. (1999), Is the Bible True? (San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins).
Strahler, Arthur N. (1999), Science and Earth History: The Evolution/Creation Controversy (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus), second edition.
Thaxton, Charles B., Walter L. Bradley, and Roger L. Olsen (1984), The Mystery of Life's Origin (New York: Philosophical Library).
Tiffin, Lee (1994), Creationism's Upside-Down Pyramid: How Science Refutes Fundamentalism (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus).
Young, Willard (1985), Fallacies of Creationism (Calgary, Canada: Detselig Enterprises).


text:
SKF @ptitude Decision Support system cuts analysis time by 70%
The problem
The SKF solutionSKF installed the SKF @ptitude Decision Support system on the plant's critical and important equipment, where it could capture predictive maintenance and operator driven reliability data, critical machinery protection system data, process data and oil analysis data. SKF also integrated SKF @ptitude Decision Support with the plant's computerized maintenance management system for simple work order notification creation.
The resultsSKF @ptitude Decision Support helped the company:
- Reduce data analysis time by 70%
- Reduce operating costs while maintaining equipment reliability
- Capture operation and maintenance knowledge, and provide training for new employees


text:
Our Aim
The Pocket Trader is a local, family owned business which aims to provide a free solution for the private advertiser to sell or buy their unwanted goods.
It's FREE
The Pocket Trader relies solely on booklet sales to keep the advertising FREE!
Thank you for supporting your local Pocket Trader for your choice of FREE advertising.


text:
"It [the State] has taken on a vast mass of new duties and responsibilities; it has spread out its powers until they penetrate to every act of the citizen, however secret; it has begun to throw around its operations the high dignity and impeccability of a State religion; its agents become a separate and superior caste, with authority to bind and loose, and their thumbs in every pot. But it still remains, as it was in the beginning, the common enemy of all well-disposed, industrious and decent men." ~ H.L. Mencken
Secession: Are We Free to Go?
"Is all the recent talk of secession mere sour grapes over the election, or perhaps something deeper? Currently there are active petitions in support of secession for all 50 states, with Texas taking the lead in number of signatures. Texas has well over the number of signatures needed to generate a response from the administration, and while I wouldn't hold my breath on Texas actually seceding, I believe these petitions raise a lot of worthwhile questions about the nature of our union."
- Login to post comments
Secession: Are We Free to Go[1]?
As I now understand it...
You, the individual human, are free to withdraw from membership in the STATE OF ______________ (ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, ARIZONA, etc., any time you like, for any reason you choose.
If you choose to remain a member of a we, a collective-individual, (one of the fifty States, for example), you cannot "withdraw from membership" in the larger collective-individual known as the United States, without first, or simultaneously, withdrawing from membership in the collective-individual known as STATE OF ______________, because, (presuming it hasn't seceded), that collective-individual has consented to be a member of the collective-individual known as the United States.
And, remember, if either you, or your State, secedes from membership, you and/or it, must forgo membership benefits/privileges; your "walk must match your talk". The benefits/privileges are the bait in the "monkey trap"[2].
Will you, or your State, be allowed to "freely secede", that is to say without force being used against you, is quite another question, however.
[1] "Secession means the right to stay put, on one's own property, and either to shift alliance to another political entity, or to set up shop as a sovereign on one's own account." ~ Walter Block, Professor of Economics at Loyola University New Orleans and Senior Fellow with the Ludwig von Mises Institute
[2] A cage containing a banana with a hole large enough for a monkey's hand to fit in, but not large enough for a monkey's fist (clutching a banana) to come out. Used to "catch" monkeys that are too greedy to let go of the banana and run away.
Keep in mind that the gangster, Lincoln, was governmentalists through and through: for him there was great benefit in portraying the "anarchist" as a violent, bomb-throwing thug who was willing to do harm to anybody and everybody who disagreed or got in his way. "Anarchism" had to be looked upon as chaos and disorder -- only quelled by a strong hand from authoritarian central government.
Anarchy, on the other hand is....well here: let John Hasnas explain it:
- "...Anarchy refers to a society without a central political authority. But it is also used to refer to disorder or chaos. This constitutes a textbook example of Orwellian newspeak in which assigning the same name to two different concepts effectively narrows the range of thought. For if lack of government is identified with the lack of order, no one will ask whether lack of government actually results in a lack of order. And this uninquisitive mental attitude is absolutely essential to the case for the state.
For if people were ever to seriously question whether government is really productive of order, popular support for government would almost instantly collapse..."
So much for anarchy.
Now as to secession: if a "state" can secede from the District of Collectivism, why can't a "county" secede from a "state" -- or a "city" secede from a "county"???
I am a sovereign state. I'm the richest man in my city. I have very few federal reserve notes or investments designated in said bills of credit, but I have something they don't have and apparently can't achieve: anarchy.
Re: gangster Lincoln
- I was aware of, and agree, with all that you said. Aside from that Abe was right, "...the central idea of secession, is the essence of anarchy."
Re: Anarchy, on the other hand is...
- I agree. Many words have multiple meanings, which is why John Locke suggests in his, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding: (1) never use a word without having a clear idea of what it means; (2) try to recognize the same meaning for words as others do so that we can communicate with a common vocabulary; (3) if there is the slightest chance that the meaning of your words will be unclear, define your terms; and (4) always use words consistently; and why Voltaire [François-Marie Arouet] wrote, in his dissertation entitled, Abuse of Words, "We must here repeat what Locke has so strongly urged — Define your terms."
Re: if a "state" can secede from the District of Collectivism, why can't a "county" secede from a "state" -- or a "city" secede from a "county"???
- And, why can't an "individual" secede, i.e. withdraw from membership in, "all of the above"? The only answer I've ever gotten from anyone amounts to, because their god[1] won't recognize it.
Re: I am a sovereign state.
- No comment.
[1] "…in modern society, with its religious, ethnic, and cultural diversity, it would be much harder for any single group to demand allegiance — except for the state, which remains the one universally accepted god." ~ Roderick T. Long, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill


text:
Black Man Doesn't Hold Guinness Book Of Records Title For Longest Penis: Ladies Meet The 42-Year-Old Who Holds The Record At 13 Inches & A Half [8 Minutes]
Via TLC
Please click the "Report" button below if the video on this page is not working properly.
Comments will only be displayed by verified emails. No Spamming or Racism.


text:
Gastrointestinal Cancers
The world-renowned experts at the OSUCCC – James are transforming the way gastrointestinal cancers are prevented, detected, treated and cured.
Today, cancer is no longer solely defined by location or even by stage. We know there is no routine cancer, and there are no routine gastrointestinal cancers.
Gastrointestinal cancers are complex diseases. Each patient's cancer is different, behaving differently in the bodies they're in and calling for a tailored, individualized treatment plan for each patient.
To deliver the most effective gastrointestinal cancer detection and treatment, our nationally renowned experts identify and understand cancer at the biologic and genetic levels, unlocking the molecular code of a patient's disease and pinpointing what makes each cancer grow — then discovering what stops it.
Our team of gastrointestinal cancer subspecialists spans a broad range of disciplines: from medical, surgical and radiation oncologists to molecular and biological pathologists, genetic scientists and more — all specializing in a particular type of gastrointestinal cancer (and only that gastrointestinal cancer) research, prevention, detection, treatment and cure.
It's that subspecialization and singular focus that enable us to discover, develop and deliver the most targeted therapies for each individual gastrointestinal cancer patient.
And that means our collective expertise leads to improved outcomes, faster responses, fewer side effects and more hope for cancer patients everywhere.


text:
Always open for debate, of course, here's my vote for the 20 coolest female characters in film; here's the Alliance of Women Film Journalists' list of the top 100.
1. Alien, and its later versions, with Sigourney Weaver as Ripley, who got to say some of the best lines ever in her calm, patrician way, even as a clone. "I thought you were dead!", says one. "I get that a lot," she coolly replies. Whether wielding a big-ass flamethrower or her compassion, Ripley remains one of my favorites: the definition of sangfroid amid unimaginable terror, droll in the face of acid-spewing monsters.
2. Doctor Zhivago, 1965, Julie Christie as Lara, a complicated, tough woman who starts out selling her body as a desperate teenager to the creepy Komarovsky and ends up living with her doctor and lover Yuri in the wilds of Varykyno. She's forever the adaptable survivor, cool enough at 17 to stash a pistol in her fur muff and shoot the man who controls her. Heady stuff for the times.
3. Queen Christina, 1933, with Greta Garbo in the lead role. It's not easy being Queen.
4. Terminator, 1984 Linda Hamilton, big guns, serious biceps.
5. An Education, 2009, Carey Mulligan. This fantastic new film about a young British girl — based on a true story — who falls for a handsome older con man is as much about her education as that of her parents, eager to marry her off, out and up.
6. Brick Lane, 2007, Tannishta Chatterjee, from the terrific book by Monica Ali. The choices made by the protagonist defy conventional wisdom about docile, male-ruled South Asian lower-class immigrant women.
7. Water, 2005, Lisa Ray. A film so controversial that filming in India was shut down by protestors and moved to Sri Lanka. Directed by Canadian woman director Deepa Mehta, it's a powerful look at the lives of widowed Indian women. An exquisitely beautiful film with a haunting soundtrack, it's both joyful and despairing about women's lives within the most restrictive constraints.
8. Whale Rider, 2002, Keisha Castle-Hughes. I love this New Zealand film about a feisty 11-year-old Maori girl, Pai, who desperately wants to be accepted into the male-only rituals of her people. She is so touchingly, stubbornly insistent and persuasive. Haunting visuals and a great performance.
9. Erin Brockovich, 2000, Julia Roberts. One of the few films in which she doesn't play a ditz but a tough, funny, compassionate woman, a real-life heroine.
10. Norma Rae, 1979, Sally Field. Who can ever forget her standing on a table in that deafening textile mill, holding up a sign saying "Union"? Based on the real life of union organizer Crystal Lee Sutton.
11. Silkwood, 1983, Meryl Streep. Another profile of a real-life fighter, killed while trying to reveal information about an unsafe nuclear power plant; one of Nora Ephron's earliest screenplays.
12. Notorious, 1946, Ingmar Bergman. Alicia Huberman moves into a mansion and marries a Nazi in Rio while secretly spying on him. The scene where she is rescued does me in.
13. Million Dollar Baby, 2005, Hilary Swank. Not an easy film to watch, and the ending was deeply controversial. I love how this film shows the incredible power a coach can have on a female athlete, for better or worse.
14. Silence of The Lambs, 1990, Jody Foster. Another difficult film to watch. OK, terrifying! Clarice Starling is a compelling character, a young woman in a man's world as a novice FBI agent chasing a serial killer. Her relationship with her boss is as powerfully revealing of her own vulnerabilities.
15. The Piano, 1993, Holly Hunter. A woman married to a brute breaks free in colonial-era New Zealand.
16. Out Of Africa, 1985, Meryl Streep. Writer Isak Dinesen had it all, on paper — a coffee plantation, a farm in the Ngong Hills of Kenya, an aristocratic Danish husband and a dashing British lover. A powerful portrait of love, independence and compromise.
17. Juno, 2007, Ellen Page. Many people found this film nauseatingly anti-abortion. I loved the character of Juno, joking her way through the physical and emotional madness of bearing a baby while still in high school.
18. Rachel Getting Married, 2008, Anne Hathaway. She totally should have won the Oscar for this searing role of Kym, the narcisisstic, needy little sister. It takes guts to play a character so annoying and memorable.
19. Cabaret, 1972, Liza Minelli. "Divinely decadent," darling!" As a lonely American cabaret singer, Sally flashes her dark green fingernails and blusters her way through life and love in pre-war Germany.
20. Charlotte Gray, 2001, Cate Blanchett. No one seems to recall this film, about a British woman who goes behind enemy lines in France to work with the French Resistance and falls in love there. I loved it.
20a. The Reader, 2008, Kate Winslet. Based on a best-selling German novel, she plays a female you can't ever forget, tough and vulnerable and terrifying.
Do strong female characters really scare away movie-goers?
Who are some of your favorite women characters of the cinema?


text:
The Long Island Tween Justin Bieber Riot of '09: Pandemonium, Arrests, Terror-Tweeting
Do you know what a Justin Bieber is? You should: the 15 year-old star was read the riot act as 3,000 fans/parents descended on a Long Island mall, where his appearance had to be canceled. Fights! Chaos! Teenagers! RIOT!
When Dante talks about the Inner Ring of the Seventh Circle of the Inferno, I believe he was referring to something resembling the above photograph. Ughh.
So, yeah: 3,000 people show up to a Long Island mall for a signing this kid's having at an Abercrombie Kids. Madness breaks out, people have to go to the hospital, they've now pressed charges against a senior V.P. at Island-Def Jam for not Tweeting the cancellation of his appearence. Seriously.
Police arrested a senior vice president from Bieber's label, Island Def Jam Records, James A. Roppo, 44, of Hoboken, N.J., saying he hindered their crowd-control efforts by not cooperating. He was in custody Friday night, pending charges that could include criminal nuisance, endangering the welfare of a minor and obstructing government administration, Smith said. "We asked for his help in getting the crowd to go away by sending out a Twitter message," Smith said. "By not cooperating with us we feel he put lives in danger and the public at risk."
I wish cops would arrest me for not Twittering. Fantastic. Who's this kid again? He does this little song and dance:
Somehow, in this story, Usher is the Charlie to his, uh, "angelic teen dreaminess" or whatever, except why are teenage girls always crazy about teenage guys who look like girls? Maybe Zac Efron gets the exception card because he was in that Burr Steers movie with Matthew Perry, but still, like, the Carter Brothers? And they all act kinda hip hop-y [Except, again, for Efron: patterns!]. And early Justin Timberlake? And I mean, let's not even start on Hanson. The middle one? Are you kidding? Can someone please explain these things to me? Also, isn't the whole You + Me thing a bit tired? They should've really consulted MTV's in-house playbook before dropping that one.
Anyway, this kid, this 15 year-old Canadian kid, caused this scene:
Not exactly the reaction I had after the first time I saw the "You Oughta Know" video, but still, understandable on some level, right? WRONG. Because people were hurt. This is where G-12 Protests and Tiger Beat meet in the middle. I'm impressed, but also, kind of disappointed rubber bullets weren't at least threatened. Or even better: that they'd burn this entire Long Island mall's supply of Juicy Couture velour tracksuits. That would've stopped 'em dead in their tracks. Riot cops gotta pull out at least a few decent stops. Next time, call me. I know how to handle these things.
Anyway, a record exec is in jail—yay?—and a star is made, but whatever happened to the days when shit like this was all just A Hard Day's Night? He should learn, even though, apparently, the psychotic teen beasties of Long Island take a little more to be stopped than some clever hiding, in their great tradition of senseless consumer thuggery. Rage on, kids. Rage on.


text:
From Bizarre News:
You don't see these old-fashioned values much any more. There is a big hoopla in Mount Vernon, Ohio about a public school teacher who preached his Christian beliefs despite complaints by other teachers and administrators. Mount Vernon Middle School teacher John Freshwater also taught creationism in his science class and was insubordinate in failing to remove a Bible and other religious materials from his classroom. But it wasn't enough that he tried to burn the fear of God into their little heathen souls, he wanted to burn it into their flesh, too. Freshwater used a science tool known as a high-frequency generator to burn images of a cross on students' arms in December. Freshwater told investigators he simply was trying to demonstrate the device on several students and described the images as an "X," not a cross. But pictures show the images depict a cross. A friend of Freshwater defended him, saying, "With the ex- ception of the cross-burning episode... I believe John Freshwater is teaching the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district."


text:
Heavy Brushed Cotton Cap
Legend Express Heavy Brushed Cotton Cap
Caps can be customised with your logo using embroidery / 3D embroidery. Perfect for events, promotions, or as part of your team uniforms.
Delivery of this style (with embroidery decoration*) available in only 4 weeks (to Brisbane) after we receive sign-off approval of digital photo sample.
*When combining multiple decoration processes, delivery timelines will be extended by 1 week.
Heavy Brushed Cotton Cap
Product Specifications
- Structured
- Sewn eyelets
- Trim design (peak)
Carton Specifications
- Dimensions:38cm w x 36cm h x 53cm l
- Mass:11kg
- Carton Quantity:100


text:
Ah, the 19th century…when mad scientists were really mad, and not only that, they were popular at parties. In 1818, Dr Ure and Professor Jeffray obtained the freshly killed corpse of Matthew Clydesdale, only an hour from the hangman's noose, and proceeded to experiment on it with a battery in the Glasgow University anatomy theater before a crowd of spectators. In my youth, I had to settle for recent roadkill, a 9 volt battery, and a dark basement, all by my lonesome — my jealousy is acute.
Here is a small portion of the account of that day's fun.
The supra-orbital nerve was laid bare in the forehead, as it issues through the supraciliary foramen in the eyebrow: the one conducting rod being applied to it, and the other to the heel, most extraordinary grimaces were exhibited every time that electrical discharges were made, by running the wire in my hand along the edges of the last trough, from the 220th, to the 270th pair of plates: thus fifty shocks, each greater than the preceding one, were given in two seconds. Every muscle in his countenance was simultaneously thrown into fearful action: rage, horror, despair, anguish, and ghastly smile united their hideous expression in the murderer's face; surpassing far the wildest representation of a Fuseli or a Kean. At this period several of the spectators were forced to leave the apartment from terror or sickness, and one gentleman fainted.
The account of galvanic experiments on dead bodies is taken from The Young Man's Book of Amusement, which on the cover promises to teach card tricks and how to make fireworks. You'd think an amusement in which the first step is to obtain a dead body would be listed a little more prominently, but I guess playing with cadavers was just commonplace in the year before Queen Vickie was born.
(Also on FtB)
- Log in to post comments


text:
Tear Drop Shrug Crochet Pattern
An intricate shrug with an almost Southwest-like quality to it.
(11 reviews)
How do you like this product?
Share your thoughts with the Annie's community.
May 23, 2017
I just love the picture of this pattern and am sure it will work up as depicted with the additional instruction I've read in other reviews
January 2, 2017
I loved making this shrug. I made it in a taupe color and added clear sparkly beads to the fringe to give it a more western flair & it came out beautiful!!!
September 5, 2015
I love this pattern and it was easy! This was my first wearable and I love it. I love the Omega Mimosa yarn that's suggested, it hangs beautifully (can't find anything like it where I live so I order it here).
August 3, 2014
Love this pattern! I was leery about trying the pattern after reading the reviews but it was very easy if you follow the directions carefully. I marked the 42 unworked ch 7 loops around the bottom edge so that made it easier for me to keep things straight. The Omega Mimosa yarn was perfect for this pattern & drapes beautifully. The 6 motifs were plenty big for me so I did no adjusting. I'm going to make another one in purple. Thanks!
April 29, 2014
I just loved this. I made it for a friends birthday, and she loved it. I added turquoise stones along the bottom front to give it a southwestern look. The pattern was tricky to follow, but it turned out great. I made 6 motifs, three in back, three in front, and this I would consider a small to med. If I had to make it in large, X-large I would add motifs. Great pattern.


text:
The event you requested is not currently published.
Infections can exacerbate CF symptoms and worsen lung function, so we ask attendees at Foundation-sponsored events to observe the following best practices to reduce the risk of germ transmission:
To further reduce the risk of cross-infection, the Foundation's attendance policy recommends that all people with CF maintain a safe 6-foot distance from each other at all times while attending an outdoor Foundation-sponsored event. All Great Strides walks are non-smoking events.
© 2020 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Legal Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy


text:
David Binder, who has served as chief financial officer at InfoSpace since January 2008, plans to step down from the job in mid-August to take a new position as chief financial officer of Blue Nile. He first joined InfoSpace in 2004, joining the Internet search company from drugstore.com.
"I am thrilled to be joining a team that has great drive and a sense of purpose in building the world's premier diamond and jewelry retailer,"Binder said in a statement. "I believe Blue Nile has unique opportunities to extend its industry leadership position around the world, and I am excited to be a part of the company's future success."
Binder takes over from Vijay Talwar, General Manager of International operations at Blue Nile who had served as interim CFO.
Just last week, Blue Nile announced that Starbucks veteran Chris Bruzzo had joined the company's board.
Shares of Blue Nile are down 23 percent on the year. InfoSpace shares are up 14 percent.
InfoSpace Chief Accounting Officer Eric Emans will serve as interim chief financial officer until a permanent successor is selected, the company said.


text:
We offer our corner lot at Madison & Fourth St. for those with walking issues. Both sides of our lot on the north side of the church building are available on Sundays. Parking is also allowed behind Children's Inc, across from the church: enter from Fourth St. behind the white building. Park on the white building side.
Parking is also available behind Billz Insurance which is acessed from the alley between PNC Bank and P&R Auto Body. Please do not park in the P&R Auto Body Shop Lot.
When you are active in the parish for more than six months, you can park in the enclosed garage in the Gateway Building: enter through the Madison Ave. entrance, north of our church lot,and follow the guard's instructions, which may include providing proof of identity, and the the opening of the car trunk. We cannot offer the PNC Bank lot, or Fifth-third Lot, as they are not under our control.


text:
You are streaming sunny sex video 2016.com from Hardcore sex channel. Free sunny sex video 2016.com sex movie was added 2 years ago together with more porno videos. Find more sunny, sex, video, 2016, com Hardcore porn on our biggest collection of free sex videos. Well organized porno movies are updated daily.
Duration: 13:29
Views: 1383


text:
Join Us
Job Search
Job Creator
call me back
call 24/7 08703 43 00 43
Nurse Jobs
About Us
News & Blog
Online Payslips
Salary Hub
Mayday Healthcare is a nursing agency, and we specialise in recruiting for Allied Health Professionals (AHP) jobs across the UK. We currently have a high demand for Allied Health Professionals (AHP) candidates in Yorkshire.
Working as a Mayday Healthcare agency nurse, you'll have access to benefits including training and CPD courses, free uniform, out-of-hours support and more.
We always have Allied Health Professionals (AHP) jobs available in Yorkshire, so please quick register here if you are interested, and we'll seek a suitable position for you.
High pay rates
Flexible shifts
Online payslips
Open 24/7 365
ID & Timesheets
High shift volume
Referral scheme
Unfortunately we currently have no Allied Health Professionals (AHP) jobs in Yorkshire
View all jobs
Quick Register
Our experienced agency nursing support team
is ready to help find you the best nurse job or the best
shifts at the best locations.
Register now
Refer a Friend
Refer your nursing friends to us and
receive a bonus from Mayday
Refer friend
Nurse Job Creator
Tell us what you are looking for and we will build an agency nurse job package that suits you perfectly.
Create your job
Get in touch
Jump to
Full Application
Gender Pay Report 2018
Gender Pay Report 2017
Legal Disclaimer
Disclaimer and Copyright
Manage My Data
© Mayday Healthcare Ltd 2020
Design and Website by
Follow us on


text:
And he's supposed to be one of the reasonable ones:
Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.) said on Monday evening that he didn't believe highly expensive health care should be provided to uninsured patients with pre-existing conditions…
"While I don't think that someone who is diagnosed with a massive tumor should the next day be able to have millions and millions and millions of dollars of health care provided, I do believe there can be a structure to deal with the issue of pre-existing conditions," Dreier said.
What do you suppose he thinks should happen to this person? Does he think there should be some sort of ….death panel that decides whether he lives or dies? Or should we just assume that anyone with a deadly illness who doesn't have enough insurance to pay for "millions and millions and millions" of dollars of health care should just be euthanized on the spot? Or perhaps they should be made to suffer. After all they failed to get rich enough or lucky enough to have adequate funds to pay for their needs so maybe it would be best to use some of these sickly parasites as cautionary tales.
I think we may actually be coming to the point of debating whether or not to repeal the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act. And it will fail, of course. At first. The country isn't there yet. But it will represent one more step in the disintigration of America's moral fabric (which wasn't that strong to begin with.) Like torture, it's in the political ether now, no longer completely taboo. This is how this sort of thing is mainstreamed.
Oh, and don't expect all the followers of Jesus to come to the rescue. It's true that he would be appalled, but conservative Christians don't seem to care much about what he said anymore. (Not that Dreier is one of them…)


text:
Overall winner: "Team Moab" completed the course in 6:8.45 defending their 2009 title.
Winner of the Women's Category—"Blew by You!" with team members Tamra Lewis, Lori Maughn, Julie Bunker, Jessie Jensen, Shanna Black, and Shannon Bursach.
Also in the Women's Division: "Smokin' Hot Mamas" with Amy Westcott, Laura Butler, Vanessa Young, Tammy Wallace, Sylvia DeMille, and Heidi Doel.
Participating in the Men's Division: Team "Got the Runs" with Matt Briggs, Nick Fox, Rick Clark, Chaz Black, Kirk Hazleton, and Scott Burton.
Local teams in the Mixed Division: "Funner Runners" with Alisa Neilson, Sumer Wilcox, Heather Jensen, Bryan Adams, Layne Barney, and Pete Anderson, "The Replacements" with Trent Schafer, Bert Manheimer, Lindy Frost, Valorie Frost, Cody Randall, and Kalei Fisher, team "Grumpy" with Doug Aiken, Marcie Aiken, Jason Okerlund, Mary Okerlund, Tyler Okerland, and Tara DeSpain, team "Xtreme Trainin" with Jenna LaRose, Randy LaRose, John David Nielson, Shannon Young, Justin Redd, and Koryn Knudson, team "Barely Makin' Hills" with Rachael Hatcher, Summer Wojcik, Andrea Nielson, Josh Nielson, Chad Moses, and David Lyman, and team "Bones Movin' Uphill" with Codi Orr, George Jones, Jay Jones, Arin Shumway, Abigail Hatcher, and Beth Millward.


text:
Click thumbnail to enlarge image
Call us now on 01233 754800
Quoting reference DBCHC-632764754
Click here to view other deals for this vehicle
** Prices are displayed exclusive of VAT
Vehicles standard specification
All offers are subject to change at any time, you must be 18 or over and finance is subject to status, vehicle availability and terms and conditions apply. We can introduce you to a limited number of finance companies, a commission may be received. Failure to maintain payments may result in termination of your agreement and the vehicle being returned, this could affect your credit rating and make it more difficult to obtain credit in the future. All prices correct at time of publication.
All vehicle images and car descriptions on this site are for illustration and reference purposes only and are not necessarily an accurate representation of the vehicle on offer.
VAT at 20% may be payable.
You should try and estimate the distance you will travel as accurately as possible to try and avoid excess mileage charges at the end of your contract.
* All vehicle images and car descriptions on this site are for illustration and reference purposes only and are not necessarily an accurate representation of the vehicle on offer.
E: firstname.lastname@example.com
Horizon Vehicle Leasing Limited
First Floor
Aspect House
Pattenden Lane
Horizon Vehicle Leasing Limited are a credit broker and not a lender, we are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered No : 623486
Registered in England & Wales with company number : 8965212 | Data Protection No : ZA071616 | VAT No : 193011925
Registered Office : Horizon Vehicle Leasing Limited, 200 Eureka Park, Upper Pemberton, Ashford, Kent, TN25 4AZ
Copyright © 2020 Horizon Vehicle Leasing Limited, All rights reserved.


text:
New Fargo Service Center Adds Stretcher Leveling Line
There are 0 comments | Post a comment
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Red Bud Industries, Red Bud, IL, installed a ½-in.-capacity cut-to-length line with a stretcher leveler at the new McNeilus Steel facility in Fargo, ND. The line is the third of its kind acquired by McNeilus—the other two operate at the firm's facility in Dodge Center, MN. Stretcher leveler lines prove ideal for producing flat material that will stay flat, essential for laser-cutting applications.
See also: Red Bud Industries, Inc.
Related Enterprise Zones: Coil Handling


text:
Hands-On Fundraising
Donor communications | Annual Giving | Fundraising Plans
women with stroller passes mural that says The best gift is you
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Name *
Email *
Notify me of new posts by email.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Let's talk about how I can help your organization raise more money.