text:
Workshop Location: Carman Room 118, Lehman College
See also 2010 Workshop on Cellular Signalling Pathways
The Lehman College Workshops on Computational Modeling of Complex Systems are held each January. They are part of an NSF-funded Expedition in Computing, called Computational Modeling of Complex Systems, involving researchers from CMU, NYU, Cornell, University of Pittsburgh, University of Maryland, Stony Brook University, and JPL. The primary goals of the workshop are to motivate students to consider fields in science, especially scientific research, and to train the students to use the methods developed in the program's research activities. The Expedition's research addresses four important societal problems: pancreatic cancer, atrial fibrillation, automotive safety, and aerospace safety.
Students from all CUNY colleges are invited to apply. They are admitted on the basis of grades and recommendations. The workshop staff includes researchers engaged in the ground-breaking research being done on the project. Also, each year, we invite distinguished visitors from various institutions to provide additional insights into the research problems. This year, special visitors included James Glimm from Stony Brook and Robert Gilmour from Cornell.
The theme of the 2011 CMACS Workshop on Atrial Fibrillation was understanding emergent behaviors of cardiac cells in order to improve understanding of both normal and abnormal cardiac rhythms. Better understanding of emergent behaviors in cardiac tissue will support better health care for victims of heart disease, in particular atrial fibrillation, which affects about one in five people who reach the age of 80.
Student Presentations of the data they collected for spiral wave tip trajectories where given on the final day of the workshop. You can see them here
Participants learned important electrophysiological dynamics of cardiac cells that have been discovered experimentally; how these characteristics are modeled; some mathematical techniques for analyzing models, and limitations of the techniques; and how to build and use simulations based on such models to discover and understand emergent properties of cardiac cells. An emergent behavior of particular interest is the development of spiral waves as a precursor to atrial fibrillation.
The approach taken in the workshop was participatory, inquiry-based, and team-oriented, culminating in a project in which participants used simulations to discover and test emergent behaviors in cardiac tissue. The first week of the workshop was based on lecture and guided exercises, the second week developed skill with mathematical and simulation tools, and the final week focused on team-oriented student projects. Participants were provided with scaffolding (based on existing code) for their simulations.
Distinguished visitor Flavio Fenton of Cornell presented the basics of cardiac cell function, as understood from experiment, and discussed how experiments are constructed. He introduced two historically important models, the Hodgkin-Huxley and Fitzhugh-Nagumo models of action potentials in cells. These models describe the behavior of action potentials in individual cells. Action potentials are important to the understanding of both cardiac cells and neurons, because they cause neurons to fire and drive the contractions of cardiac cells. Dr. Fenton also discussed how action potentials propagate in tissue to form waves and how disruptions to propagation can produce spiral waves, which are precursors to atrial fibrillation, as well as introduce mathematical and simulation techniques for studying cardiac behavior.
Participants learned and applied standard mathematical techniques for analyzing models such as Hodgkin-Huxley and Fitzhugh-Nagumo. Since these models and other important models of cardiac cells are based on partial differential equations, techniques for mathematical and numerical analysis of pde's were discussed along with their limitations.
There are many more models of cardiac behavior, some developed to simplify analysis and others to model specific aspects of behavior in more detail. Participants in this workshop worked with "minimal" three- and four-variable models of cardiac cells developed by Flavio Fenton and Elizabeth Cherry, which were designed to combine accuracy of the model with simulation speed.
This work was supported by the NSF under grant number 0926200.
Nancy Griffeth


text:
This software allows you to create and send up to 12 messages across a network to be stored in projectors that support this feature. When used with Projector Management software V7.11 you can send to multiple projectors at the same time.
System Requirements
The following are the minimum system requirements of hardware and software to use the Projector Image Tool.
Operating System
Windows 2000 Professional
Windows XP Home Edition
Windows XP Professional
Windows Vista Home Basic (32-bit)
Windows Vista Home Premium (32-bit)
Windows Vista Business (32-bit)
Windows Vista Ultimate (32-bit)
Windows 7 Starter (32-bit)
Windows 7 Home Basic (32-bit)
Windows 7 Home Premium (32-bit)
Windows 7 Professional (32-bit)
Windows 7 Ultimate (32-bit)
CPU: Pentium3 500MHz or higher
Memory: 128MB or higher
Hard Disc: Minimum 20MB free space for installation.
Local Area Network port (RJ-45)
Compatible with the following models:
ED-AW100N, CP-DW10N, CP-X2510EN, CP-X3010EN, ED-X45N, ED-D10N, ED-D11N, ED-AW110N, CP-X2511N, CP-X3011N, CP-WX3011N, CP-X4011N, CP-AW100N, CP-X4021N, CP-WX4021N, CP-X5021N, ED-A220N, CP-AW250N, CP-A300N, iPJ-AW250N, CP-X2514WN, CP-X3014WN, CP-WX3014WN, CP-X4014WN

subset: commoncrawl


text:
ActionFest to Give Inaugural Chick Norris Award to Gina Carano
You may not know much about ActionFest, but that's okay because we're going to help change that. Later today we'll be launching a countdown to ActionFest column, which is exactly what it sounds like. So what is ActionFest? Well, it's also exactly what it sounds like: a film festival dedicated to the globe's finest action films, both new and old. The fest was co-founded by Aaron Norris (Chuck Norris' brother) and is programmed by none other than Colin Geddes, who genre fans will know as the man behind the Toronto International Film Festival's Midnight Madness program.
Held April 12-15 in Asheville, North Carolina, this year marks the third iteration of ActionFest, and today the team behind it announced the creation of a new part of the festivities, an award honoring the Best Female Action Star of the Year, dubbed the Chick Norris Award. And the first recipient of this coveted certification of one's cinematic badassery will be none other than Haywire star Gina Carano.
Check out the full press release below, and check back her later tonight for our first ever ActionFest Countdown. Trust us, if you like movies that involve more punching than talking, you're going to want to keep your eye on ActionFest.
Asheville, NC – February 8, 2012 – ActionFest returns to Asheville on April 12-15, to once again showcase the most exciting action films from around the globe and feature mind-blowing live stunt performances by the best in the business. The festival will also continue to pay tribute to Hollywood's stunt men and women, fight choreographers, and 2nd unit directors, whose fearlessness makes action films thrilling for audiences worldwide.
ActionFest is pleased to announce that Haywire star Gina Carano will be the recipient of the inaugural Chick Norris Award at the 2012 festival. The Chick Norris Award honors the Best Female Action Star of the year, in a play off the attitude, spirit, athleticism and grit of Hollywood legend Chuck Norris, who was awarded ActionFest's inaugural Lifetime Achievement Award in 2010 (this year that honor goes to the legendary stuntman Mickey Gilbert, as previously announced).
Carano's decisive prowess in the MMA world has won her the support of fans worldwide and recognition as a pioneer in women's MMA. She first appeared on TV on the legendary American Gladiators show as "Crush," and debuted in film alongside Michael Jai White in Blood and Bone. Recently, she made a splash as the lead in Steven Soderbergh's Haywire alongside Ewan McGregor, Michael Douglas, and Michael Fassbender.
Said Carano: "It is an incredible honor to be included in this event. Chuck Norris has always been someone I respect and look up to. Being able to represent martial arts as a woman has been a blessing in my life and I am so intensely grateful to the people who have supported and shared this passion with me."
Said ActionFest co-founder Aaron Norris: "An award to honor the work of women in action films is long overdue, and we're honored to present the first Chick Norris Award to the astonishing Gina Carano, who I am a huge fan of. She has exploded on the movie scene with the magnificent Haywire. We know from very bruised and reliable sources that she's as tough as they come—making her the perfect honoree for ActionFest."
Chuck Norris also commented: "I am honored to have Gina Carano receive this award. My entire career has been blessed because martial arts allowed me to do what I love– make Action Movies. I cannot think of a better person than Gina for this honor, and I am proud that she is the first to receive this award. I highly respect her martial arts ability and she deserves all her accolades for Haywire. Watch out world, a star is born. A proven fighter and very tough action star is here to stay."
The 2012 film line up, information about celebrity attendees, and badge sales are upcoming at www.actionfest.com.
Movies.com, the ultimate source for everything movies, is your destination for new movie trailers, reviews, photos, times, tickets + more! Stay in the know with the latest movie news and cast interviews at Movies.com.
Copyright © 2018 FANDANGO MOVIES.


text:
Yu-gi-oh! Dueling AndroDisc - AR app for Android, that allows you to see 3D monsters models on the top of your cards when you look on yor Android-device screen. App's is'nt ready yet, and I guess that it will never have all cards support. App is COMPLEATLE free, and it will stay like this forever. I'm not going to realease any paid version.
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Youtube removed the Yu-Gi-Oh! Dueling Androdisc video for violation of YouTube's policy.
30 comments:
I dont have expirience with 3D modeling and that stuff but i played Yu-gi-oh Duelists of the roses on ps2. it has cards with 3D models above them. can you use some of them it has many cards.ReplyDelete
Can you fix the problem with Slifer the Sky Dragon.ReplyDelete
No one of my girl workReplyDelete
Please can you do just Amazon Archer 3d model
You should make more 3d popups like:evigishki tetrogre,steelswarm longhorn,and evil hero dark gaiaReplyDelete
sorry fella those guys are ass holes first level i mean hacking i now that problemsReplyDelete
If u need send me an email i can put a team together of programmers and 3d modelers maybe a voice activated system can b used for attacking and the activation of spell and trap cards. Hope to hear from you email@example.com
Support you!ReplyDelete
You have made a great work!:)
Is it possible to make an app for ios/ iphone?ReplyDelete
Can you imagine this with Google Glass? It would be almost like the new Zexal series lol. Great work so far, keep it up.ReplyDeleteReplies
Exactly! Ohh technology :')Delete
I love the app but slifer has a problem and could u add more of the cards fusions like dark palidin or dragon master knight which come from dark magician+buster blader and black luster solider+blue eyes ultimate or iyst more gen 1cards in generalReplyDelete
Hi i am from Brazil. Do you have other contact, like Facebook or twitter??? I want to explain about one project like your app, but using a physic table.ReplyDelete
hey I have an idea that you if your application is used in augmented reality glasses, please i want help in creating this system, I'm from EcuadorReplyDelete
Hello, sir.....im trying to find the pictures on my phone and i have not been able to....ReplyDelete
can anyone give me a step by step instructions on how to get to the screenshots?
i would really appreciate it :)Replies
They might show up in your downloads :) That's where it was for me!Delete
Did you make all these models?ReplyDelete
this app is fucking awesome plz keep working on itReplyDelete
I just downloaded the app and it's awesome! I would love to help further it's progressReplyDelete
Please consider these :)ReplyDelete
Feral Imp
Gogiga Gagagigo
Giant Soldier of Stone
Luster Dragon
Battle Ox
Gemini Elf
Dark Blade
Kaiser Sea Horse
Insect Knight
Gazelle the King of Mythical Beasts
Mystic Horseman
Axe Raider
Koumori Dragon
Bacon Saver
Inari Fire
Thanks :) Love the app!
I am using this App, it was wonderful and it inspired me that's why I want to learn how to program it, please teach me how to create a program with augmented reality. I'm a student and I proposed an augmented reality project using Android.ReplyDelete
Please Help Me.
I love this app. Its great. I wish there were more updates for it though. Seeing those models brings my childhood dreams come true. With this app, we Duelists are a few steps away from fully functional duel disks. Keep up the excellent work. I look forward to more updates and more cards being added.ReplyDelete
Update pleaseReplyDelete
just do what you supposed to be doing many people support you ^^ReplyDelete
software free download for pc full version 2013ReplyDelete
thanks for giving good information of Youtube removed the Yu-Gi-Oh.ReplyDelete
backup software for windows free download
this is a great article.thanks for giving very useful information.ReplyDelete
latest new download free
thanks for giving very useful information, it's very great article.ReplyDelete
Crack Download Software
Are you doing all models? If it is too much, I completely can't find on the Internet, if you agree,I want add more modles in you app and I can use you model in app,I think you should be take you email address,because more people want to ask you,Maybe I write not clear,I am sorry .It Translated by softwareReplyDelete
Everyone please comment or ask questions either atReplyDelete
we don't check this often


text:
Slow Cooked Chicken and Rice Soup
1/2 cup chopped celery
1 pound boneless chicken breast halves, cooked and diced
3 (14.5 ounce) cans chicken broth
1/2 cup water
2 cups frozen mixed vegetables
3/4 cup converted long-grain white rice
1 tablespoon dried parsley
2 teaspoons lemon and herb seasoning
Combine celery, chicken pieces, chicken broth, water, mixed vegetables, rice,
parsley, and herb seasoning into a slow cooker
Cover, and cook on low 6 to 8 hours. If soup is too thick, add more water to
dilute and allow 15 minutes of additional cooking time.
6 servings
Back to Soup Crock
Pot Recipes
Everyday Cooking Home
Razzle Dazzle Recipes
Copyright ©2002 - 2012
That's My Home


text:
COSTA MESA — Local nonprofit Serving People In Need will celebrate 21 years of serving Orange County's homeless families and working poor this weekend.
Since the inception of SPIN, 74,000 families and individuals have received a second chance at self-sufficiency and financial independence through the organization's programs for home placement, substance abuse and free meals.
"It's not just the homeless, but also what we're calling the newly homeless that we're seeing," Executive Director Jean Wegener said about a recession-fueled influx of struggling Orange County residents who come into SPIN offices on a daily basis. "It's someone who has worked his entire life and not the person you'd expect to see homeless."


text:
Whether the economy is in a boom or a bust, the so-called "sin stocks" are supposed to be business as usual either way.
In reality though, many of the stocks trading in the gambling, drinking, and adult entertainment sectors have proven to be extremely volatile of late.
After scanning through many of the major companies operating mainly in either gambling, drinking, adult services, or smoking, several names broke through with major 1-month price swings to take note of.
Million Dollar Saloon
1-Month Change: Down 40%
Million Dollar Saloon owns and operate an adult cabaret which offers restaurant and first-class bar service conducive to attracting businessmen and out-of-town convention clientele in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. The company hit a 52-week high of 0.15 per share back in March, but has since shed more than half of its value.
Lodgenet Interactive
1-Month Change: Down 38%
The company primarily provides interactive television systems (including adult movies) to hotels, resorts and casinos throughout United States, Canada, and Mexico. Lodgenet spent parts of 2007 trading in the 30's, fell all the way to under a $1 per share last December, jumped back up again to trade around 8, and has since fallen down around the $5 level.
MGM Mirage
1-Month Change: Down 29%
MGM Mirage, a major player in the hotel-casinos and resorts industry went from bottoming out at $1.81 per share in March, to bringing in astounding returns for bottom fishers, up nearly 400% since. The shares have taken a sizable dip in the last month for this highly volatile stock.
Wynn Resorts
1-Month Change: Down 26%
Wynn, the owner of destination casino resorts such as Wynn Las Vegas and Wynn Macau is another gambling stock that has come back strongly from its March lows. Wynn last closed over $70 per share back in September, and has since fallen under the $60 level.
Las Vegas Sands
1-Month Change: Down 24%
The Sands, owner and operator of the Venetian Casino Resort is another of the volatile gambling stocks. It ran almost as high as $140 per share back in 2007, was crushed down 99% by March of 2009, and has since those lows surged up to trade in the teens.
Private Media Group
1-Month Change: Up 21%
A provider of adult media content, Private Media has been on a slow decline since the spring of 2006. Once trading around $5 per share, the company has spent several months trading as a penny stock.
Rick's Cabaret
1-Month Change: Down 18%
The company owns and operates several major metropolitan adult nightclubs. Rick's traded for nearly $30 per share back in 2007, saw its shares plunge to under $3 in March 2009, and has more than doubled since reaching that low.
Note: The 1-month price changes were calculated from the close of September 29, 2009 to the close of October 28, 2009
Send comments to email@example.com


text:
In July, a California jury convicted four leaders of a white supremacist prison gang of murder, conspiracy and racketeering.
Barry "The Baron" Mills, Tyler "The Hulk" Bingham, Edgar "The Snail" Hevle and Christopher Overton Gibson had denied all the allegations against them.
The federal authorities claimed they helped turn the Aryan Brotherhood (AB) into one of the most violent and insidious gangs ever to operate inside US prisons.
In many US prisons the population is divided along racial lines. Inmates often join gangs such as the AB out of a desire for self-preservation.
Motivated by power
The AB was formed in the late 1960s partly in response to the formation of gangs like the DC Blacks and the Black Gangster Family.
It espoused white supremacy but many gang experts believe it was simply a flag of convenience for the AB, whose real motivation was power and wealth.
In recent years Mills, 58, and Bingham, 59, were two of the most important leaders of the AB. The third, "Big Al" Benton, became a prosecution witness and was given only a nine-year sentence for the murder of an inmate, Abdul Salaam.
Mills, Bingham and Hevle were convicted of the murder of Arva Lee Ray, an inmate at Lompoc penitentiary in California in 1989. But Mills and Bingham were acquitted of the 1993 murder, also in Lompoc, of William McKinney, an inmate who dared to leave the AB.
The trial was one of several which stemmed from an operation launched in October 2002 with a series of raids on inmates and their alleged accomplices in jails all over the United States.
Code system
The indictment named 40 people, including a prison guard, and accused them of involvement in murders - both inside and outside jails - extortion, robbery, and drug trafficking.
It was the largest federal capital case ever to come to court, with at least a dozen people facing the death penalty.
He said the FBI had exaggerated their influence and told the BBC News website: "The AB was like a flashy, violent streak across the prison sky between about 1981 and 1989. They were responsible for a number of spectacular murders but the most recent murder on the indictment was 10 years ago."
It emerged during the trial that AB members, many of whom were locked up in so-called supermax high security prisons, communicated using invisible ink made of urine.
It was also claimed they employed a 400-year-old binary code system devised by Sir Francis Bacon, with notes being smuggled out by guards, hidden in mop handles or under rocks in recreation yards.
This week the trial reached the death penalty phase - a jury will now have to decide whether Mills and Bingham deserve to be executed.
Assistant US Attorney Joey Blanch told jurors: "Mills is a six-time, multi-murderer and if he'd had his way he would have been responsible for 12 murders. Prison sentences did nothing to deter him from his criminal behaviour.
"Every time these men made a choice, people died. At some point, somebody has to stand up and say 'That's enough'."
More trials
Opponents of the death penalty do not accept the prosecution's argument.
Zachary Katznelson, senior counsel with the London-based pressure group, Reprieve, told the BBC News website: "It is wrong and uncivilised for the state to take a life.
"Practical reasons also argue against the death penalty for these men. As death is the ultimate punishment, it comes with built-in appeals to make sure the rules are followed.
"Even if these men were sentenced to death, 10 or 20 years would pass before they were executed."
Even if they are spared the death penalty, Mills and Bingham face spending the rest of their lives in the ADX supermax jail in Florence, Colorado, alongside former AB leader Tommy Silverstein - who has been in solitary confinement for 23 years.
"The ADX is not a nice place. It's stuck out in the desert of southern Colorado, it's like something out of science fiction. Nobody knows you're there. You could be in a cell next to your best friend for 20 years and you wouldn't know he was there," said Mr Rearick.
There are several more trials still to come, with one scheduled for 2008, and it seems the Brotherhood is finished as a major power.
Most Popular Now | 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now.";


text:
- State of the Art Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing 3:30 – 4:30 pm
- Preparing for an FDA Facility Audit 5:30 – 7:00 pm
- Just added: Dr. Raymond Brullo "Preparing for an FDA Inspection: A Compliance Officer's Perspective."
Thursday, May 26, 2016
Brouwerij West
Brouwerij West
A Newly Opened Brewery in
San Pedro
110 E. 22nd St. Warehouse No. 9 San Pedro, Ca 90731
Plenty of Free Parking
Brouerji West's new San Pedro space is amazing – L.A. Weekly review
Experience bioprocessing in action and join us at Brouerji West, a new brewery in San Pedro, Belgian-inspired ales made in a 72-year-old wooden warehouse in the port of Los Angeles. Technical sessions take place in the area next to exhibits, please keep the noise levels down during the sessions.
Please download our free ISPE Los Angeles Chapter App: you will find powerpoints from the presentatations here in the Speakers section
It is thanks to the generous sponsorship of our exhibitors that we are able to offer such a high-quality program at such a value, please visit their links in the exhibitor tab.
Questions? email firstname.lastname@example.com
- 12:30 – 2:30 pm
Exhibitor Set Up
- 2:30 – 3:30 pm Event Begins
Attendee registration and networking in Exhibit Area – come see what's new for your cGMP-compliant facility
- 3:30 – 4:30 pm
State of the Art Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing in the Developing World
- Speaker: John M. Hyde, Chairman and Founder, Hyde Engineering + Consulting, Inc.
- Program Manager: Chris Wilkinson, Regional Manager, Southern California, Hyde Engineering + Consulting, Inc.
- Synopsis:
- This Session will Feature Case Studies: New, compliant facilities that minimize capital and operating costs while maximizing manufacturing efficiency Biopharmaceutical products offer uniquely effective treatments for serious disease conditions. For economic reasons, these drug products have typically only been available to patients in developed countries, but demand is growing in developing countries as their economies expand at relatively rapid rates. This growing demand is being addressed by in-country manufacture of biopharmaceutical products at costs that make treatments accessible to the growing middle classes in the developing world. Biopharmaceutical manufacturing facility case studies will be presented, highlighting strategies and methodologies for minimizing capital cost and construction timelines and maximizing operational efficiency. Cost saving and efficiency maximizing techniques, including the utilization of single-use components, modular construction, islands of automation, flexible and efficient process system configuration, will be discussed. The session will specifically address: • Design bases for new biopharma manufacturing facilities in the developing world • Strategies and methodologies for minimizing capital cost and construction timelines • Maximization of operational efficiencies for minimization of cost of goods • Role of single use components and modular construction • Automation strategies that maximize operational flexibility while minimizing complexity and costs
- About the Speaker:
- John Hyde founded Hyde Engineering + Consulting in 1993 to serve the Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical community. Prior to the formation of Hyde Engineering + Consulting, John was a Senior Project Engineer with a biopharmaceutical research and manufacturing company located in Boulder, CO. His work included design, start-up and validation of key process systems and the overall responsibility for the cleaning validation programs for the firm's large scale and clinical manufacturing facilities. From 1982-1993, John was Manager, Process Systems Design with an engineering firm specializing in the design and start-up of pharmaceutical, dairy and food process systems and the application of CIP technology. John has published and presented papers at numerous engineering conferences and short courses on topics including biopharmaceutical process systems design, cleaning and cleaning validation principles and practices, FDA compliance strategies, and control systems design for manufacturing processes. John served as a member of the PDA Subcommittee for Biopharmaceutical Cleaning validation and in this capacity he contributed two chapters to "Cleaning and Cleaning Validation, Volume 3". John serves on the board of the Society of Bioprocess Professionals (SBP) and is a regular speaker at conferences sponsored by SBP, ISPE, PharmaConference, IVT, Microrite and other professional societies. He holds bachelor's degrees in Food Science and Business Administration and a master's degree in Food Engineering from Ohio State University.
- 4:30 – 5:30 pm
Break in Exhibit Area
- 5:30 – 7:00 pm
Preparing for an FDA Facility Audit
- Speaker: Vincent J. Cebular, Principal and Senior Vice President of Compliance, Integrated Project Services (IPS)
- Speaker: Raymond W. Brullo, DPM, Compliance Officer, Office of Regulatory Affairs, FDA Los Angeles District
- Program Manager: Margaret Stava, cGMP Laboratory/Facilities Equipment Specialist, Laboratory Equipment Company
- Synopsis:
- The presentation will begin with a presentation by Dr. Raymond Brullo "Preparing for an FDA Inspection: A Compliance Officer's Perspective.
- Following will be Vincent Nebular who will focus on how to prepare for a successful PAI (Pre-Approval Inspection) for newly constructed and/or renovated facilities. The approach will follow the FDA' Six-System Inspection Model with an emphasis on the engineering aspects of Facilities and Equipment Systems and Production Systems. The session will highlight the cGMP requirements throughout a project lifecycle leading up to and supporting a facility inspection. It will include recommendations for interacting with the FDA and planning/ conducting Pre-operational Reviews of Manufacturing Facilities (FMD-135). Following a successful plan review, the presentation will progress throughout the project and culminate with the facility inspection / PAI.
- About the Speakers:
- Dr. Raymond W. Brullo, D.P.M. is a Compliance Officer for the FDA/Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA) in the Los Angeles District Office. Ray has a B.S. degree in Biology from Loyola University of Chicago. He is a D.P.M., Doctor of Podiatric Medicine from Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science. Ray was previously a Biologics, Bioresearch Monitoring and Medical Device Investigator.
- Mr. Cebular is a principal and the Sr. VP of Compliance at Integrated Project Services (IPS). IPS is an industry leader in providing full-service engineering, integrated EPCMV, construction management, project controls, commissioning, validation, and regulatory consulting services to the pharmaceutical, biotech, health care, and specialty manufacturing industries. Vince has over twenty five years of experience in cGMP consulting, engineering, commissioning, and validation of capital projects within the pharmaceutical, biotech, medical gas, and medical device industries. He has a broad range of experience in the areas of bulk drug manufacturing, aseptic processing, solid dosage manufacturing and packaging, vivariums and R&D laboratories. At IPS, Mr. Cebular's primary responsibilities include leading the day-to-day compliance operations, performing facility audits and design reviews, working with department leaders to promote efficiency and quality work practices, and conducting internal and external training on technology advancement and innovative methodologies.
- 7:00 – 8:00 pm
Reception with appetizers, student poster contest


text: Okay i've spent the last 30 minutes trying to make a very simple custom bitly url and i can't do it to save my ass. Maybe i've been up too long and my brain is officially fried. But could someone please, in the name of all that's good and holy tell me how the hell to make a custom bitly url. And yes i have googled it lmao. Truly a sad day that i actually have to post how to make a url.


text:
Played 10961 times
Beach game information:
It's so fun to go to the beach in the summertime! Help her have fun in the sun; pick out her beach clothes. bulb should have the number of connections displayed on it without any wires being crossed. Click Ready to check your configuration. You have 3 tries and a limited amount of time.
How to play:
Use mouse to interact.
Add this game to your website or blog!
Popular Tags
Latest Games
- Knf Santa Claus Christmas Gift Escape
- Help The Santa
- Santa Double Adventure
- Liberation Of Santa
- Recover The Gift
- Memory Loss Santa
- Xmas Pass Over
- Perfect Winter Trendy
- Santa Arctic Adventure
- Knf Winter Wooden House Escape
- Santa Way 3
- Bart Shootout
- The Hulk Differences
- Princess doll house 2
- American Trucks Memory
- Sailor Ship Escape
- Defend Kindom Wars
- Deadpool Jigsaw
- Offroad Race Truck
- House Cleaning
- Kings Castle 20
- BMW F32 Jigsaw
- Art Gallery Escape
- Fairy Beauty Salon
- Daredevil Jigsaw
- Semi Truck Jigsaw
- Lexus RS 350 Jigsaw
- Land of the Monsoon
- Kings Castle 19
- Italy Palazzo Escape


text:
You know to be fair last year was a bad year for Republicans nationally and who knows hopefully 2008 will be much kinder to them. We'll see though but what might 2008 be for Cook County Republicans?
On this that figures in Stewart's column from last month was the squabbling between County Republican chair Liz Gorman and her fellow commissioner/Republican Tony Peraica. Remember earlier back in March I posted about some squabbling between the intended 42nd Ward Republican committeewoman Eloise Gerson and Gorman. Well that figures here too.
Now to the column, in 2008 this is what could possibly happen...
Cook County State's Attorney (2008): Cook County Commissioner Tony Peraica got 547,225 votes (46 percent of the total) in his 2006 race for Cook County Board president in 2006, losing to Democrat Todd Stroger. He carried 12 Chicago wards and 23 suburban townships, and he got 31.5 percent of the city vote and 59.6 percent of the suburban vote.Now there is a little more about the situation in the 42nd ward. I want to explore that, but I'll let you read up about what this column says about 2010...
Since November Peraica has been Stroger's most vociferous critic, voting against his budget and claiming that "one family" -- meaning the Daleys -- "run the entire operation" in the city and the county. "I am a majority of one, and I will continue to fight for the taxpayers," Peraica said.
To maintain his visibility and to give himself a platform to continue to criticize county government, Peraica is going to run for state's attorney in 2008, challenging incumbent Democrat Dick Devine. "There is corruption throughout county government, but there is no prosecution," said Peraica, who will rip Devine as oblivious to the corruption. Peraica doesn't expect to win, but he'll keep his name before the public.
After her election as chairman, Gorman quickly ousted two Chicago ward committeemen appointed by Skoien: Eloise Gerson in the Gold Coast 42nd Ward and Kent Griffiths in the Wicker Park/Bucktown 32nd Ward. Both backed Swiss, and both are Peraica allies. Under party by-laws, an appointed committeeman can be removed at any time by the chairman.
A graphic example of Republican idiocy is the 42nd Ward. Gerson replaced Rich Gordon, who resigned. Gordon ran for 42nd Ward alderman in 2003 and got 44 percent of the vote. The 42nd Ward delivered 11,696 votes to George Bush in 2004, his second-best ward in the city, and it produced 10,972 votes for Bush in 2000, again his second-best. According to Gerson, Gorman asked her for her vote for chairman but she demurred, saying that she was committed to Swiss.
Gerson said that her "unappointment" was punishment for opposing Gorman. "She told me that the numbers in the ward have declined," Gerson said. "That's absurd. They've improved." According to a Gorman spokesman, Gerson was ousted because the ward's "vote count was down and there were no precinct captains, no events and no organization meetings." Responded Gerson: "That's an absolute lie. She spoke at our meetings. She knows we have a viable organization."
Gerson's replacement is Susan Simmons, the wife of Craig Simmons, a disgruntled Gordon supporter who was defeated by Gordon for committeeman in 2004 by 1,124-754. "She (Gorman) said that she wanted party unity (for the February election)," Gerson said. "She is fomenting party disunity. She is trying to destroy our organization."
Gerson had a recent open house at her headquarters, is president of the 42nd Ward Republican Organization, and will run for committeeman in 2008 against Simmons. Gorman has done what 42nd Ward Democrats have been unable to do: permanently divide the ward's Republicans. Instead of battling Democrats, they battle each other.
This squabbling is all about 2010. Gorman wants to build a base to defeat Peraica in a Republican primary for county board president. Republicans can ill afford, among themselves, to divide and conquer. There's not much to divide. Understandably, Democrats sneer at the Republicans' stupidity.


text:
Give us a call to get our secret deals 1-800-293-2602
The Barceló Sants**** hotel offers magnificent rooms with views over the city ofBarcelona. Accommodation in the avant-garde design which recreates a feel of space and time, transporting you from your room into another world. The recently refurbished Barceló Sants**** hotel has opened its doors to a more modern, avant-garde image. A space station that offers all the necessary services to enjoy on an imaginary trip into outer space, set in tranquil and comfortable surroundings, permitting you to enjoy this travel experience in the completely renovated . The rooms feature large windows with spectacular city views and 2 "hatchways" that convert them into original rooms with a galactical air. Located in Sants Railway Station, it offers direct access to the AVE and Barcelona metro and train stations, making it the best connected hotel in the city.
It is located just 500 m from the Barcelona Congress Palace and Trade Fair Centre and Montjuïc, 15 minutes by train from El Prat International Airport and 4 minutes by train from Plaza Catalunya. 200 parking spaces right in front of the hotel. The 3,000 m2 of space distributed over 14 function rooms make this hotel the ideal venue for organising events and conferences. With natural light, capacity for up to 1,500 people, a showroom for exhibiting vehicles and large format products as well as a revolutionary cuisine based on the Brain food concept, or special gastronomic menus for work sessions prepared using healthy and fresh food to stimulate and provide the brain with energy. Success guaranteed! And after the working day, the hotel offers a gym for restoring mind and body, free Wi-Fi, a cyber corner, the Orbital Bar and an excellent choice of gastronomy to enjoy in the restaurants.
Breakfast from September 2015 : 20 €


text:
Lancashire Constabulary are sending best wishes for a happy New Year to all residents.
New Year's Eve is by far the busiest night of the year for the police and we have extra staff on duty tonight both in our Contact Management Department answering our emergency and non-emergency telephone lines and out on the streets attending all manner of incidents.
As an example in a normal 24-hour period we receive around 500 emergency telephone calls but on New Year's Eve last year in the 7-hours after midnight we received 1700 emergency calls, a substantial increase in demand.
You can help us to ensure that everyone in Lancashire has a safe New Year's Eve by only ringing 999 when there is a genuine emergency; unlike the person who rang us last year on 999 asking for a lift home from the pub, the person who rang us on 999 to wish us a Happy New Year or the person who rang us on 999 about fireworks going off at midnight.
If you need to contact the police tonight and it is not an emergency you can speak to us using the 101 non-emergency telephone service and you can now contact us online to report non-emergency incidents or crimes, lost and found property, to contact an officer already dealing with your case, to complain about your service and to say thank you to our staff at https://doitonline.lancashire.police.uk/ .
Enjoy your evening, wherever you may be spending it, and we hope that you have a happy and prosperous 2015.


text:
Monitoring Jerusalem starts the year 2012 denouncing the continuous and systematic human rights violations in occupied East Jerusalem, in the form of house demolitions, home evictions, discrimination policies and violence against Palestinian population with a special focus on children.January issue includes an internal report by the EU focusing on Israeli efforts to undermine peace solutions of the conflict, stating that the Palestinian presence in the occupied West Bank – has been "continuously undermined" by Israel in ways that are "closing the window" on a two-state solution. In this month's feature story, Khulud Alnatshe explains how her participation in JCW's legal clinics and psycho-social support trainings has made her a different woman who knows her rights and is not afraid to demand them loudly.
Click for pdf report


text:
The impact of real exchange rate fluctations on employment and wages in eighteen different manufacturing industries in the United States: An error correction model approach analysis
Mo, Wan-Shin (Cindy)
MetadataAfficher la notice complète
This dissertation discusses the effects of exchange rate volatility on wages and employment in 18 different U.S. manufacturing industries with an error correction model approach. Innovative from prior research, this research project is more industry-specific. The implication of exchange rate fluctuations for the labor market is indeterminate. On one hand, domestic currency depreciation facilitates a firm's exports and thus increases its wages and employment; on the other hand, currency depreciation increases a firm's cost of production and generates loss of its profitability. Thus, a firm will experience an expansion or a contraction due to the currency depreciation. Previous studies have investigated the effect of exchange rate volatility on industry wages and employment by using the aggregate trade-weighted real exchange rate indexes— i.e., the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System's broad real exchange rates and the real effective exchange rates. Because the real exchange rate indexes consider the entire U.S. trade shares, they are not specific enough to study this effect on each different industry. In order to remedy this weakness, this dissertation instead uses the trade-weighted industry-specific real exchange rate index to study this issue. This type of real exchange rate takes each trade partner of the United States in a specific sector into account; thus this study has a more precise analysis and more robust results than previous studies. In addition, this dissertation is the first study to construct the trade-weighted industry-specific real interest rate differentials and confirm the mean-reverting property of the differentials. This finding suggests that trade weights in each sector affect a firm's profit in holding a currency. Further, this dissertation computes a new type of real exchange rate based on the trade-weighted industry-specific real interest differentials and explains how an industry's wages and employment are affected by exchange rate movements when using this new type of exchange rate. Empirical results of this dissertation show that movements of the two types of tradeweighted industry-specific real exchange rates have a significant effect on employment and real wages, and the response differs quantitatively and qualitatively across industries. In particular, this effect is found in some of the lower markup and higher markup industries, which indicates that an industry's pricing power in the market appears to weakly affect its growth rates of employment and wages when facing an exchange rate shock. Moreover, some of these industries generate positive responses on wages when experiencing unforeseen real dollar depreciation, which reflects the fact that wage growth has been closely related to exchange rate movements since the 1980s.


text:
STATE LAWMAKERS properly are moving to make it easier for people to "take the law into their own hands" in a legal way to amend the Florida Constitution through the citizen initiative procedure.
A House judiciary subcommittee has approved a bill to set up a pre-screening process. This would let the wording of proposed amendments be reviewed before petitioners have to collect all 343,000 voter signatures needed to put an amendment on the ballot.
The amended bill would allow the attorney general and Florida Supreme Court to review a proposed amendment for constitutional wording, if at least 10 percent of the required signatures were collected.
Another bill would establish a two-tier system of reviews: If 1 percent of the necessary petitions were collected, amendment backers could obtain an unofficial ruling from the attorney general. Once the 10 percent mark is reached, they could go directly to the Supreme Court.
As the Legislature tries to pick the best features of several initiative reform measures, it must vow not to repeat its performance last year when a House-passed bill stalled in the Senate.
Some pre-screening procedure is essential to restore people's confidence in their ability to accomplish governmental change through initiative. That confidence was shaken in 1984 when the Florida Supreme Court removed two proposed amendments from the ballot, after the successful completion of multi- million-dollar drives in which 900,000 voter signatures were collected. Amendment One was a government revenue limitation measure, and Amendment Nine was a doctor-sponsored measure called "Reason '84," designed to limit awards in medical malpractice lawsuits.
The court rightly ruled that both amendments violated the single-subject rule in the Constitution and that the Amendment Nine ballot summary was misleadingly worded.
By requiring a token number of signatures, Florida can protect itself against frivolous amendments that have little public support. By allowing a court review of amendment wording at an early stage of the petition process, Florida can prevent a repeat of the 1984 incidents of last-minute court rejection of defectively worded amendments.


text:
Complete a seperate registration form for each player. Registration fee is only $65.00.
Due to league deadlines for team roster submissions we cannot make exceptions to our deadline.
Players must be 4 years or older as of July 31st 2018.
For the Fall 2018 season the player age on Dec 31st 2018 will determine their eligible team age group. Following national US Soccer mandated re-alignment we are using birth year (no longer July 31st age) to determine age groups.
Any player eligible and wishing to play up a level must make a note in the special requests line and will be evaluated to confirm their ability is appropriate for their play-up request.
Contact us with questions at: firstname.lastname@example.com or phone (231) 769-2331
Tue Dec 11 4:02:44 EST 2018


text:
Section 16: Publication of application
Sections (16.01 - 16.37) Last updated: December 2016.
Section 16(1)
|Subject to section 22 below and to any prescribed restrictions, where an application has a date of filing, then, as soon as possible after the end of the prescribed period, the comptroller shall, unless the application is withdrawn or refused before preparations for its publication have been completed by the Patent Office, publish it as filed (including not only the original claims but also any amendments of those claims and new claims subsisting immediately before the completion of those preparations) and he may, if so requested by the applicant, publish it as aforesaid during that period, and in either event shall advertise the fact and date of its publication in the journal.
s.130(5) is also relevant
r.26(1) and r.26(2) is also relevant
References in the Act to publication of an application are to publication under s.16, the publication consisting of the application as filed including the original claims and also any amendments of those claims and any new claims subsisting immediately before the completion of preparations for publication (see 16.02). The application is published as soon as possible after the expiry of the period of eighteen months from the declared priority date or, where there is none, the filing date. On the publication date an "A document" is made available consisting, as far as possible, of (a) the specification as published; (b) a front page bearing certain bibliographic data, classification information, a list of the documents cited in the search report under s.17, the abstract and any drawing selected to accompany the abstract; and (c) a copy of the external search report(s). The bibliographic data will not contain an inventor's name if the comptroller has accepted an application from the inventor to waive his right to be mentioned (see 13.03). See 89A.14-89A14.2 regarding PCT applications entering the national phase under section 89.
s.118(2) is also relevant
The determination as to when preparations for publication have been completed is made on a case by case basis. The hearing officer in Peabody International's Application [1986] RPC 521 applied the guidance given by the Court of Appeal in Intera Corporation's Application [1986] RPC 459 that preparations have been completed when the print-out of the application data and the specification have been allocated to one of the printing contractors and are ready to be sent to or collected by him from Publishing Section. Following subsequent computerisation, the nearest equivalent point in the procedure is now selected. Unless accelerated publication is requested (see 16.04), a letter issued with the search report gives an estimated date soon after which the preparations for publication of the application will be completed. This letter mentions that the applicant will receive a further letter at this time giving the date of publication, publication number and exact date when the preparations for publication will be completed (the PPC date). The letter with the search report also advises the applicant that any amended or new claims for inclusion with the published application or any request to withdraw the application so as to prevent publication must be filed before the PPC date since it is not possible to withdraw an application from publication on or after this date. This letter should not be relied upon as a reminder if the applicant wishes to withdraw the application before publication. If accelerated publication has been requested, it is unlikely that there will be sufficient time after issue of the search report to file amended or new claims for inclusion with the published application or to request withdrawal before publication because the preparations for publication will be completed very soon after issue of the report. Unless accelerated publication is requested, completion will be at least sixteen months and three weeks after the declared priority date or the filing date and at least four weeks after the date of issue of the search report. The fact of publication is advertised in that issue of the Patents Journal which is published on the same date as the application, since information about the application may not be disclosed before the date of publication (except for the bibliographic information which may be published earlier under s.118(3)(b), see 118.18.
s. 8; r.51 is also relevant
On the date of publication the file on the application becomes open to public inspection, as does the relevant entry in the Register. In particular, any amendments to the claims which were filed too late to be included in the published application and any amendments to the description or drawings, are published on that date by being open to public inspection, as is any matter omitted (other than under s.16(2) - see 16.34-16.37 from the A document, for example, in the circumstances referred to in 16.27. In addition, certain documents are available free of charge on the Office website through Ipsum, the Office's online patent information and document inspection service.
S.16(1) permits the publication of an application before the expiry of the period prescribed by r.26(1) at the request of the applicant. When such a request is made, an application should be sent for publication as soon as the necessary formal requirements have been complied with and a report under s.17(5) has been issued. The application is thus accelerated in that it is placed at the head of the queue waiting to pass through the publication cycle. It is not necessary to give a reason for wanting accelerated publication.
[ A case on which accelerated publication has been requested should have the appropriate label applied to the cover of the dossier by the Formalities Examiner. Formalities should check the action log and minute sheet on PDAX for an indication that the application has been diarised to return to the examiner after publication. If such a diary entry is present formalities should update it so that the case returns at the appropriate time after accelerated publication. ]
[ There are no established Office procedures for providing "instant" publication of an application, or for shortening the 5-week A-publication cycle. To make the most of the 5-week cycle, Formalities need to generate "Ready for A Publication" by the end of Wednesday. DIS PRO should be checked by the examiner on the following day to make sure that the case has been picked. If "Ready for A picklist" is still displayed, contact PD/A3 immediately. ]
s.22(3)(a) is also relevant
An application on which, for security reasons, directions prohibiting publication have been imposed will not be published until such directions have been revoked.
r.8 is also relevant
Where there is a declared priority date the claim to priority is relinquished if the file number of the priority application and priority document is not filed within sixteen months (extendible in accordance with r.108(2) or (3), see 123.34-41), unless this requirement does not apply (see 5.08 to 5.10). If this occurs the applicant should be so informed and the declaration on Form 1 amended and OPTICS updated. If the priority date so lost is the earliest or only date declared then the time when publication becomes due will be correspondingly later (see 16.01). An application should not be sent for publication until either the priority document has been filed or the priority date has been lost. Thus the filing of a priority document towards the end of the prescribed period will cause an application to be sent late for publication (see 16.31) and will thus delay publication under s.16 until after the end of the normal eighteen month period. Publication should not however be delayed solely because a translation (when needed) of a priority document has not been filed.
s.118(3)(b) is also relevant
r.55 is also relevant
If an application has been withdrawn or treated as withdrawn or has been refused (either under s.15A(7) or, after a hearing following a preliminary objection (see 17.96.2), under s.18(3)) before the completion of preparations for publication, it will not be published, nor, subject to the exceptions provided for in s.118, will any of the documents become open to public inspection. However, the termination will be advertised in the Journal.
Content of the published application and 'A' document
The application as filed
s.130(4) is also relevant
The application must be published as filed, that is, in the state in which it was on the filing date. Therefore if any of the documents originally filed is subsequently replaced by another, for example because the original did not comply with formal requirements, the new document must conform essentially with the original. (See 14.30) for private applicant cases and 15A.22) for the situation where there is a discrepancy between formal and informal drawings). The A document will carry a notice (see 16.29) that replacement documents or drawings or formulae, as the case may be, were filed later than the filing date. (If the examiner has reframed the abstract (see 14.170-191) then the A document includes the abstract in its amended form instead of as originally filed.) A divisional application which as filed discloses additional matter may under s.76.(1) proceed following exclusion of the additional matter (see 76.02). However it should be published under s.16(1) as filed, that is including the additional matter (see also 15.35 and 15.39) .
If the formalities examiner is unable to establish that the text of a replacement page is identical with that originally filed he should refer the matter to the search examiner. If the search examiner confirms that the original text is literally illegible (as distinct from merely difficult to read) then square brackets should be placed around the text replacing the illegible matter in the copy of the document to be published, and the front page should carry a notice, in addition to the notice referred to in 16.08, to the effect that matter so shown was submitted after the filing date to replace defective text. If no legible replacement for illegible matter is filed, arrangements should be made to omit it from the A document and to insert on the front page a notice that this has been done. In view of the serious consequences for the applicant which may follow an allegation that the application as filed contained illegible matter, the procedure referred to in this paragraph should be followed only when the examiner is satisfied that the original matter cannot be deciphered.
[ When the search examiner wishes illegible matter which has not been replaced by legible matter to be omitted from the A document, he should send the case to the appropriate formalities group for retyping and/or blanking out as appropriate. ]
In deciding the "as filed" state of an application, account should be taken of any documents relating to the application which were present in the Office at the close of business on the date of filing (or in the case of a divisional application, on the date of lodging of that application). Any such document or set of documents tending to complete an otherwise deficient application should be incorporated into the application, as should any alterations to the specification, whether in the form of replacement pages or proposed in a letter. If the resulting specification does not comply adequately with formal requirements (see 15A.05) objection should be raised under s.15A(3) making it clear what form of the application is being objected to.
Where two versions of a document were present on the filing date and the only difference is that one is formal and the other informal, then the formal version should be regarded as the effective one; the informal copy should be marked "surplus". Where there is a difference in substance between two versions of the same document, then, if the applicant has given explicit instructions, or if it is implicit or obvious which version is intended to be definitive, the application should be reconstituted accordingly.
[ If the formalities examiner is in doubt how to proceed he should consult the Formalities Manager and, if necessary, the divisional Head of Administration or relevant Deputy Director. If he is unsure the case should be referred to the Divisional Director. If he considers that the applicant's intention is in doubt he should select which appears to him to be the most appropriate version and proceed as in 16.12. ]
If the applicant's intention regarding amendments or different versions of the same document is in doubt he should be informed which version appears to the Office to be most appropriate and that, unless he indicates clearly his intentions within a specified short period (generally one month), that version will be treated as definitive. When the application is subsequently reconstituted (whether after a reply or not), the applicant should be informed in writing of the course taken.
[ Letter SL11 should be used in the first instance, and SL12 to inform the applicant of the action eventually taken. ]
[ Deleted ]
Where the description as filed is in a foreign language and is not accompanied by a translation, see 15.06.1-2. If a translation is filed, the A document will carry a notice (see 16.29) that the specification was originally filed in a foreign language.
Later-filed claims
The published application includes not only the specification in the state in which it was on the date of filing but also original claims filed later than the filing date within the period prescribed by r.19(1) and (3). The front page of the A document should carry a notice (see 16.29) that the claims were filed later than the filing date of the application, but the actual date on which the claims were filed will not be referred to in the published application.
Amended or new claims
Amendments to original claims, or new claims, are also included in the published application, provided they are filed before preparations for publication have been completed. (The actual date on which they were filed is not material and is not mentioned in the A document). Since the publication is required to include, in addition to original claims, only those amended or new claims which subsist immediately before completion of preparations for publication, any amended or new claims which have been in the meantime further amended or cancelled are not included. The amended or new claims are included in the A document if they are available in a suitable form for direct reproduction with the original description and claims. For this purpose, it is necessary for all the changes to appear on fresh pages which are self-explanatory and do not rely on instructions in a covering letter. The first such page should preferably be suitably headed, eg "Amendments to the claims". If suitable pages are not received by the time preparations for publication are completed the amended or new claims are omitted from the A document but published by inclusion in the file laid open to public inspection: a notice on the front page of the A document indicates that amended or new claims unsuitable for reproduction have been filed.
[ To obtain the footnote re omitted amendments to the claims, an appropriate free text entry should be entered on OPTICS. ]
As a consequence of the wording of s.16(1), if a prohibition order under s.22 is revoked but the application is published under s.16 only after substantive examination the published application will include both the claims in their original form and (if they have been amended) the claims of the application as in order for grant.
When amendments to the claims, or new claims, are filed they should be checked and collated for inclusion in the A document by the formalities examiner. Amended or new claims are to be published with the original claims only if the changes to the claims are filed as fresh pages meeting the requirements of r.14 and Schedule 2. The applicant or agent should be informed of any deficiency but publication should not be delayed to await any response. The formalities examiner should consult or refer the application to the search examiner for advice when necessary.
[No attempt should be made to edit new sets of claims to avoid unnecessary repetition of the wording of the original claims nor add explanatory text. Furthermore, unless new claims are received before the search (see 17.35), they should not be considered for any lack of clarity as to the precise effect of the changes on the existing claims until substantive examination. Applicants and agents are now encouraged to provide a heading identifying the fresh pages as relating to changes to the claims.
When new or amended claims are filed the formalities examiner should check that they meet the requirements of r.14 and Schedule 2 and annotate them with "Incorporate after A Pub" in the TOC on the dossier. If the new or amended claims are not a complete set, the document assembler should be used to create a full set, the pages of new or amended claims and external search report being renumbered as appropriate. After publication, the amended claims should be annotated "Working Copy" in the TOC by the formalities examiner.
If on receipt of new or amended claims
(a) the search report has not yet issued
(b) a report, such as letters SL2 or SL2PA, that no search is possible has already issued
(c) new or amended claims have already been filed
(d) there is a gap in the numbering of the new or amended claims, or
(e) there is reason to doubt that what has been filed are new or amended claims, the application should be referred to the heading or search examiner. ]
Unless amended or new claims are filed under r.31(5)(a) before search, no attempt should be made to establish whether they introduce new subject-matter. Amended or new claims allowed under r.31(5)(a) or filed at the applicant's own volition under r.31(4) are published as filed, subject to the omission of matter under s.16(2).
Other amendments, corrections or alterations
s.118 is also relevant
Any amendments to the specification other than the claims are not included in the A document, although they do become open to public inspection on the publication date.
r.31(5)(b)and r.49 is also relevant
Any amendment to the Request for Grant (Form 1) is however included, provided that a written notification or Patents Form 20 (required for a correction of a name), as appropriate, setting out the proposed amendment has been filed before preparations for publication have been completed (see 19.05-19.12 and 32.06); the front page of the A document will bear an appropriate notice (see 16.29) eg that such amendment has been made under r.31(5) or under r.49(1). (If the amendment concerns the declaration of priority the date on which the application is due to be sent for publication may need to be revised - see 16.01.
[ Where a footnote regarding amendments made under r.49(1) is required, an appropriate free text entry should be entered on OPTICS. ]
If it is requested that the application proceed in the name of a person other than the or an original applicant, for example because the application has been assigned under s.30, or because the original applicant has died and the application is to proceed in the name of the deceased's personal representative, then, provided the change has been effected before preparations for publication have been completed, the A document will reflect the change and will carry an appropriate footnote (see 16.29). (See also 19.09).
r.105(1) and r.49(1) is also relevant
If correction of a clerical error (see s.117) is sought and allowed before completion of preparations for publication, the application will be published as corrected and the A document will bear a notice (see 16.29) that a correction has been made. Except in the case of a name (where correction must be requested on Form 20), an error may be rectified merely by written notification (see 117.03); if no form has been received in the case of a request for correction of a name, the examiner should ask by telephone that it be filed. Reasonable time should be allowed for this, although a case should not be retained on this account for long after it is due to be sent for publication. If no Form (or suitable evidence) is forthcoming the application should proceed to publication uncorrected, and the matter may be dealt with afterwards.
If an application contains an applicant's or agent's identifying reference to another application filed on the same day or earlier under the 1977 Act, the search examiner should supplement it by the application number, even if it is necessary to telephone the applicant or agent to ascertain the number. All other references are published as filed.
s.19(2) is also relevant
The comptroller may, of his own volition, amend the specification contained in an application in order to acknowledge a registered trade mark (see 19.23- 19.26).
Since the Office is under a statutory obligation to publish an application in the conditions in which it was filed, subject only to the derogation of s.16(2), if an application contains matter accompanied by wording suggesting that the copyright is owned by a person other than the applicant, then it must still be published as filed.
Computer programs, biological sequence listings and other bulky ancillary material
Computer programs, and nucleic acid or protein sequences listings, ancillary to the main text and extending over many pages are unduly burdensome to include in the published specification. This is also the case with other extensive material clearly ancillary to the main text. Therefore if an application contains such a program, sequence listing or material, it is normally omitted from the A document at the discretion of the examiner, although of course it remains part of the published application and becomes open to public inspection on the publication date (see also 24.04). A notice referring to the omission should be included on the front page (see 16.29). If however the search examiner considers that the program or other material would facilitate a ready understanding of the invention it may be included in the A document.
[ If the program or other ancillary material is to be omitted from the A document the examiner should minute the file to instruct Formalities which pages of the application are not to be included. The minute should also instruct Formalities that the appropriate common standard text (see 16.29) relating to computer programs et al is to be included on the front page of the A document. If other material is to be omitted, the minute should include details of an appropriate non- standard text. ]
If the pages of a computer program, sequence listing or other ancillary material do not comply with r.14 and Schedule 2 the formalities examiner should report accordingly, but no objection should be raised unless the pages are to be included in the A document or are unsuitable for reproduction in response to requests on Form 23 after publication. (If the applicant retains the pages in the specification, objection should be made during substantive examination).
Final procedure
When one or more notices is to be included on the front page of the A document, the formalities examiner and/or the search examiner should give appropriate instructions.
[ Where appropriate, the search examiner should add a minute to the dossier instructing Formalities which of the standard texts (see the "Notices for front page of 'A' document" form in annex 8A of the formalities manual) are to be included on the front page of the A document. When necessary, a minute should also be added to the dossier outlining the exact wording of any non-standard texts to be inserted. A PSM message should then be sent to the appropriate Formalities Group/Examiner. This data will subsequently be inputted to OPTICS for preparation of front page data. Note that, the text of pre-printed notices should not be altered in any way, save the non-standard text relating to drawings omitted under s.15(5) or (6) which requires completion. ]
[As part of the pre-A publication checks, formalities examiners should check all documents and consider if personal or sensitive information contained therein should be redacted for Ipsum. After publication, formalities examiners should check all incoming documents as they are received and redact as necessary.]
[The Enhance feature on PDAX may be used to redact any personal information, either at the head or foot of the correspondence or in the body of the text. Once this has been done, "set handle" is applied to the redacted version and the redacted document is annotated as "OLFI" to enable post–publication display of the letter on Ipsum.]
When the search examiner sends the application for issue of the search report and of any documents cited thereon (see 17.104, 17.104.1) or of a report that a search would serve no useful purpose he should normally authorise publication of the application, regardless of whether this is yet due, whether or not there are any outstanding formal objections and whether formal or formula drawings are awaited. He should not however authorise publication if the abstract is awaited.
[The search examiner should record the appropriate OPTICS processing status in PROSE. Processing status 5 "May be s.16 published" will apply to the majority of completed searches and CS&Es (including divisionals). It applies when the application will be in order for A-publication with respect to the examiner's requirements once the search report is ready to be issued. It also applies to PCT national phase applications which have been classified and are ready for republication. This status should also be used when an application is in order for publication having previously had a status recorded as processing status 2 (see 18.47) or 3. Processing status 3 "Searched – Do not s.16 publish yet" should be used when a formal search or CS&E has been carried out but for some reason the examiner needs to see the dossier again before it is sent for publication. This is most often used when no abstract has yet been filed.]
If formalities have been complied with and unless accelerated publication is requested (see 16.04), the application should be sent for publication 16 months and 3 weeks after the earliest declared priority date or, where there is none, the filing date, provided that 4 weeks have elapsed since issue of the search report. When accelerated publication is wanted the application should be sent for publication immediately because the normal 4 week wait after issue of the search report is taken to be waived.
[ On receipt of the application the formalities examiner will use OPTICS to check the date of intended publication. The formalities examiner will either accept this date or overtype with "today's date" for accelerated publication. Once this OPTICS action has been completed the application enters the "A-publication" queue. At the start of the publication cycle the appropriate applications are picked and transferred to Publishing Section. ]
If formalities have not been complied with or if the 16 months and 3 weeks has not yet passed (provided accelerated publication is not requested) publication should be deferred, the application being sent for publication at the appropriate time and after any objections have been met without, in general, being referred to the examiner. Applications should however be referred to the search examiner if necessary upon the filing of amendments or formal drawings or formula drawings (see 15A.22 16.09 and 16.18), or if a letter needing the examiner's attention or a request for further search is received. In such circumstances, the documents selected for publication may need amending before publication.
[Once all the formalities are complied with, the application should be transferred to Publishing Section or enter the A-publication queue, or the application should be referred to the search examiner, whichever is appropriate.
[ When the search examiner has dealt with any such matters referred to him after issue of the search report (see the second sentence of 16.32), then he should refer the application to the appropriate formalities group, after setting the appropriate OPTICS status if he has not already done so (see list in 18.47). The formalities group will resume responsibility for forwarding the application to Publishing Section at the appropriate time.]
Correction of printer's errors
If the A document contains a printer's error, whether in the specification, the bibliographic or classification data or in a footnote (see 16.29) or in the search report, it may be corrected by the issue of an erratum. In this context, "printer's error" is interpreted broadly to embrace any error originating within the Office or during the publication process. However, it does not extend to errors made elsewhere, such as by the applicant. (See also 14.191).
[ An erratum should not be issued to correct an error in the specification which is detected by the search/substantive examiner unless the error is significant, in the sense that it misleads or introduces doubt. An erratum should be issued for an error in the specification which is notified by the applicant or by a member of the public or for any error in the bibliographic or classification data or the footnotes or for an omitted footnote. An erratum should also be issued whenever an error is found in an external search report or when an additional citation is found before A-publication (see also 17.105), but where in each case it is too late for the amended or corrected external search report form to be incorporated in the A document. No erratum is necessary in respect of citations found after A-publication.
[ As soon as a search/substantive examiner appreciates that the classification assigned to an A document is erroneous and/or does not reflect fully the disclosure of an inventive concept or other significant disclosure, the OPTICS record should be amended to indicate the classification that the document should have carried at the date of A publication.
[ When the search/substantive examiner detects a significant error in the specification or any other error requiring correction, the relevant formalities group should be instructed to arrange for the production and issue of an erratum. Where the correction relates to classification or field of search bibliographic data, is in the text of the specification or abstract, or is complex, the search/substantive examiner should give precise instructions concerning the content and location of each deletion and insertion before referring the case to the formalities group. When errors are brought to the attention of a formalities group other than by search or substantive examiners, the formalities group will not normally consult the relevant examiner except in respect of technical matters. See also paragraph 5.12.1 of the OPTICS Manual re correction of OPTICS front page data. ]
|Section 16(2)
|The comptroller may omit from the specification of a published application for a patent any matter -
(a) which in his opinion disparages any person in a way likely to damage him, or
(b) the publication or exploitation of which would in his opinion be generally expected to encourage offensive, immoral or anti-social behaviour
While the search examiner should not specially look for material of the kind referred to in s.16(2), where he becomes aware of such matter which is in his opinion both evident and blatant he should take steps to see that it is withheld from publication. The published specification will contain a statement at the place(s) concerned that "certain matter has here been suppressed from publication under Section 16(2)". If a specification is either completely offensive or is so riddled with offending matter that publication of any text would appear ridiculous, the whole of the specification may be suppressed. Care should be taken that any matter which it is considered should be omitted under s.16(2) is not only absent from the A document but also will not become open to public inspection after the publication date. Rule 51(2)(d) provides the same power in respect of documents other than the published application (see 118.07).
[ If formalities notice matter which may require omission under s.16(2) the document code should be changed to CONFIDENTIAL and the document annotated as "Not Open to Public Inspection". A minute should be added to the dossier clearly and unequivocally identifying the matter to be suppressed and the reasons for it being withheld from publication. A PDAX message should then be sent to the examiner.
[ If the examiner becomes aware of matter which may require omission under s.16(2) he should immediately ask formalities to change the document code and annotate accordingly.
[ The Deputy Director should be consulted and the examiner should use the "Enhance" function on PDAX to blank-out the matter concerned. Once this has been done the redacted version should be annotated appropriately and given the appropriate document code (e.g. DESC). The original version should retain the document code CONFIDENTIAL and should not be made public following publication.]
[ If the highlighted material is not considered offensive or libellous, and may therefore be open to public inspection, the examiner should write a minute to formalities asking them to reinstate the original document code, remove any annotation and set public following publication.]
Statements which are critical of prior inventions (whether identified, eg by reference to specific patents, or not) should be regarded as falling within the scope of s.16(2)(a) only if they are explicitly disparaging of a person (natural or corporate) or if by very clear implication they reflect adversely on the character or competence of any person. Mere statements that prior inventions are in some way unsatisfactory cannot be omitted under s.16(2)(a).
The question as to what would be considered to encourage offensive, immoral or anti-social behaviour is discussed in paragraphs 1.41-1.45.
s.97(1)(b) is also relevant
Although there is no appeal from a decision of the comptroller under s.16(2), the applicant should be informed that matter is to be omitted under this subsection from his application as published. The substantive examiner may be required to consider whether the matter may be restored before grant.


text:
Happy Hour 3 -7 Daily
S.I.N. All the Damn Time!
Bring us your food or OLCC card
and get happy hour prices on drinks and drafts
Any Day, Any Time.
Open 7 days a week
3pm - 2am
435 N Killingsworth St, Portland, OR 97217
(503) 287-5658
S.I.N. all the damn time
3pm - 2am
Copyright 2013. The Florida Room. All rights reserved.


text:
Terms and Conditions
The Company is
Easyfit Window Warehouse Ltd. and any of its subsidiaries, agents or
The customer is any
person, company, firm, proprietor, subsidiary, agent or employee, who
places an order with the Company.
Orders are only
accepted on the Company?s Terms and Conditions. Any order accepted for
manufacture will be deemed to be on the Company's Terms & Conditions
even though the customer has not read or understood them.
The Company will
not carry out surveys. It is the customer?s responsibility to provide
accurate dimensions and instructions for manufacture.
Once an order has
been accepted, customers can not cancel their order.
All windows, doors
and conservatories are manufactured to the purchaser's specific
requirements and are not stock items.
The Company will be
under no liability whatsoever in respect of any advice given or views
expressed whether or not such advice is given or views expressed at the
customer?s request. Any advice made by the Company for the installation
of the goods is made in good faith and the Company shall accept no
responsibility for any such advice. It is the customer?s responsibility
to ensure that the goods supplied are suitable for the purpose for which
they will be used.
The Company will
not accept responsibility for any errors, misinterpretation or omissions
on orders accepted for manufacture, excepting if the order has not been
produced to the customers written instructions or dimensions. Dimensions
input by the customer will be deemed to have been checked for accuracy
by the customer and the Company will not accept responsibility for
errors or omissions.
The Company will
not accept responsibility for losses or consequential damages due to
wrongful, short or non-delivery of goods ordered or supplied. The
Company will supply only the goods specified on the order. It is the
customer?s responsibility to check all goods supplied for completeness
and correctness in dimensions and design, before installing products
supplied by the Company.
The Company will be under no
liability whatsoever in respect of any cost related to products being
replaced under our guarantee. Replaced products will be delivered to the
original site address and defective products may be required to be
returned for inspection. The Company will accept no responsibility
whatsoever in respect of any cost related to fitting any products being
replaced under our guarantee and The Company will also not carry out any
replacement fitting.
Lead-time for the
manufacture of Window and Door orders is 7-10 working days from receipt
of your order with all details confirmed. If items require confirmation,
the lead-time starts from the time customers have confirmed all details
required. The Company will not process any order that has incomplete
information. For Conservatories, Patio Doors, Bi-Folding Doors and
Decorative glass 14 working days is required from the time of order
confirmation. Delivery will only be scheduled once manufacture is
completed. Any time or date specified by the Company for delivery or
supply of goods is given in good faith and is given and intended as an
estimate only and the Company will not be responsible for any loss,
damage or expense, however arising, from delay in delivery. The
Company will give no guarantee of delivery time or date.
N.B. The lead-time
does not start from the time you request a quotation. Please do not ask
for your order to be squeezed in as this only causes other customers?
orders to be delayed and causes problems for our production schedules.
Samples of our
products are readily available at our works. These samples show a
typical window and its construction. Ironmongery and fittings shown on
brochures are for illustration purposes only and may vary from those
supplied. The Company reserves the right to change specifications and or
fixtures and fittings of all products supplied or used to fulfil any
order, without giving prior notice of such changes to the customer.
The Company shall
not be liable for any shortages, loss or damage to goods supplied,
unless notified immediately upon delivery. The customer shall take all
responsibility for checking off all items delivered and once signed for
the goods will be deemed to be complete and undamaged. Later claims will
not be entertained.
Unless you state
otherwise, the Company?s standard dimensions will be used for transom
drops, mullion widths and mid-rail heights all of which are measured
from outer frame to centre line of transom, mullion or mid-rail.
Measurements of
goods supplied are nominal in accordance with normal trade usage and the
Company shall not be liable for minor variations resulting from
manufacturing processes or from cutting of goods to size.
Delivery will
normally be in our own vehicles using a one man delivery service and we
will only deliver to ground floor locations.
The nature of the
goods are not normally carried by transport contractors and couriers,
they do not like carrying glass or large items like Patio or French
We deliver to the
nearest point to the vehicle and do not carry the goods to your ultimate
storage area.
We are only able to
deliver to addresses within the United Kingdom and it might not be
possible for us to deliver to some locations.
We will deliver the
goods to the address you specify for delivery in your order. It is
important that this address is accurate. Any changes to your delivery
address after your order has been processed for despatch may result in
additional administrative charges. We will not accept our driver being
directed to another delivery address under any circumstances.
When a delivery
date has been arranged please ensure that an able bodied and fit person
is available at your address to accept the delivery, some of our goods
can be very heavy. Should our delivery driver arrive and there is no one
available to accept delivery, unfortunately you will incur a second
delivery charge. Please ensure that someone is available to accept the
N.B. For offshore and overseas deliveries, we charge for
delivery to the U.K. based Shipping Company, you pay the shipper for his
delivery charges to you.
Until payment for
the invoiced goods has been made, the Company shall remain owner of the
goods and the customer shall hold the goods as agent on behalf of the
Company until the customer has paid the Company the invoice price in
full. Any goods held in storage that have not been paid for must be
insured at all times and the customer shall indemnify the Company for
the value of such goods. At all times the customer shall store such
unpaid goods separately and shall separately identify them. The Company
may at all times seek the return of such goods until the invoice price
is paid in full. The customer hereby grants the Company a right of entry
onto the land and premises of the customer for the recovery of such
goods. The Company shall be entitled to use all reasonable means to
affect recovery. The customer is not permitted to sell the goods or
install them in the customers own property or any property not belonging
to the customer until the invoice price has been paid in full. Nothing
in these Terms & Conditions shall give the customer any right to sell
goods for which the invoice price has not been paid in full.
It is standard
industry practice to indicate the arrowhead as the hinge side, to draw
all windows as viewed from outside and to provide internal frame width
dimensions for all bays, bow windows, porches and conservatories. All
dimensions should be in Metric. The Company will not accept
responsibility for errors converting Imperial to Metric dimensions or if
the standard industry practice is not complied with.
The standard
dimensions are: -
Transom drop
Mullion width
Door mid-rail
height 850mm
All frames are
reinforced to the following standard EasyFit Window Warehouse Ltd.
Specification. i.e.
Window outer
frames, transoms and mullions in excess of 2000mm. Window sash in excess
of 1150mm. All Doorframe and Door sash vertical members.
All bay poles and
corner posts are fully reinforced. Wood grain and wood grain on white
products are fully reinforced. Fully reinforced white frames are
available on request.
Reinforcement is
with galvanised steel in frames and aluminium in bay posts. (This may
vary dependant on supplies).
Reinforcement in frames does not imply that they are suitable for load
bearing and should never be used as such. Separate support should be
provided to carry any brickwork or other imposed loads.
The Companies
liability will not exceed the value of the defective goods. The Company
will, at its option, replace or repair any goods, which are, or become
defective by reason of faulty material or workmanship on the following
extrusion, which are or become defective within 10 years of delivery by
the Company to the customer.
Fittings and ironmongery, which are or become defective within 1 year of
delivery by the Company to the customer.
Double-glazed sealed units, which are or become defective within 10
years of delivery by the Company to the customer and glazed into uPVC
frames but does not cover runs, cracks, shells or scratches unless
notified of such defects immediately upon delivery. (This does not apply
to polycarbonate roof sheets.) Glazing installation must be carried out
in accordance with the glazing instructions displayed on the
failure to glaze in accordance with the instructions may void your
This guarantee is
not transferable and is null and void if all payments due to the Company
are not made in full at the agreed time.
Legal notice
Upon visiting our website you are required to accept these terms and
conditions in return for receiving information about our company,
services and any other business information supplied.
Conditions of use
uPVC Windows
Tilt and Turn
Secondary Glazing
Cottage Windows (Georgian windows)
Sliding Sash Windows
Caravan Windows
Economy Shed & Garage Windows
French Windows
Roof Lights
BiFold Doors
Composite Doors
French Doors
Residential uPVC Doors
Sliding Patio Doors
uPVC Doors
Double Glazed Units
Triple Glazed Units
Security Units
Acoustic Units
Reinforcement for uPVC Windows and Doors
How to control condensation
on house Windows
How to get value for your money
FAQ - uPVC Windows, uPVC
and composite doors
Save money by diy windows and doors
How to Measure for your uPVC windows
How to fit uPVC and Composite Doors and uPVC windows
How to fit uPVC Conservatories
How to fit double and triple glazed units
Liniar Window
Installation Manual
BiFold doors installation Manual
About Us
Contact Us
UNIT E5, Countess Avenue,
Stanley Green Trading Estate, Handforth, Cheshire, SK8 6QS
0161 486 6049 Fax 0161 486 0912


text:
Pricing will vary depending on size, quantity, and construction. When you contact us for your custom art proof, our Sales Team will create your custom price quote. Whether straight from our catalog or a completely original design, our Sales Team can assist you in coming up with a unique, one-of-a-kind look that reflects your group's style.
Applique Parade Banners can be made in any size and with your school logo, mascot, and name! With the applique process your details are sewn directly on to your banner, layering thread and nylon to create a handcrafted look. You will receive a professional art proof of your design before your banner goes into production. Because of the handcrafted nature of these banners, allow 6 to 8 weeks for delivery from receipt of completed order and signed approval form.
Click here to learn more about Digital and Applique Parade Banners and which option is right for your group.
Contact us at
1.800.457.3501, email email@example.com, or use our online sketch request form to place your custom uniform order.


text:
New Yoga Series in two locations…
Get your yoga on! Start the new year off right by making your body, mind and spirit connection through your yoga practice. We will start a Monday night yoga practice on January 6th at the Fraser Activity Center. Classes are from 6:30 – 7:30 p.m.
Register for this 10-week series at their website or in person. Walk-in's are welcome at $11 per session.
We also have a new Wednesday night series starting on January 8th from 7-8:00 p.m. This series is held at the Center for the Healing Arts in Sterling Heights. The cost is $90.00 for the 10-week series. If you can't commit, feel free to walk-in for $11 per session. Register for this series on our events page with Visa or Mastercard.
All these classes are suitable for any level of yoga, sp grab your yoga mat and come check the classes out.


text:
Discussion in 'Politics' started by KMAN, Jul 18, 2008.
Any suggestions?
1. Make Illegal Spotting a national past time and put KOA campgrounds all along the southern border.
2. Take 100 miles of Mexico's land south of the Rio Grand and create the 51st state comprised of caught illegals.
3. End Nafta and all trade bennys until Mexico learns how to wipe it's own ass.
Remind me again how it is ok for Arabs to kill Jews though? And that Arabs should be allowed to destroy Israel. How it is not ok for Israel to control the West Bank and Gaza and put Arabs there.
Finish the real wall, then do the "electronic wall" with Jstars, Predator and other UAV support and Ground Surveillance Radar.
Give the "weapons free" order for border guards when armed encroachers are spotted. (Not all illegal border-crossers are huddled masses yearning to be free).
Increase the number of border patrol agents to the size adequate to get the job done. Implement a heavy weapons section of the border patrol to take on drug runners.
Institute seismic sensors along the border to detect tunneling activity.
Mexicans have never been AMERICANS.
Say, I noticed that you ran like a little bitch when I challenged you to whow me that big bad GREAT AMERICAN LATINO PURGE you seem to think happend, dude. GOSH, what happend with that?
I would never suggest that LEGAL LATINOS are "destroying" AMERICA, dude. I love how you expose your hatred each time you insist that illegal mexicans validate palestinian refugees.
mormons. typical.
Really??? Seems to me their homeland once covered a big chunk of the good old U S of A.
Move it North a couple hundred miles.
That'll give us a few years before we have to move it further North.
Except Southwest US used to be Mexico, there for all that land should be free for Mexican's to live on with no interference from us. And if you honestly never got taught about the land grab, murder and mayhem conducted by Americans against Mexicans in the Conquered territories we stole from them you need to get a new history teacher.
Even today some people are fighting to gt back land stolen in the 1800's after we conducted that illegal war of aggression against a peace loving Mexico that was just defending its stolen territory of Texas.
And your right Mexicans are not Arabs, they join gangs and can be criminals but I don't read about suicide attacks on Busses full of women and children or suicide attacks on Pizza Parlors or schools. Can't we all just get along?
We stole their land EXACTLY like Israel stole Arab land. You are ok with our theft but not Israels, why?
Hey, im not interested in kicking you in your brain today. If you have evidence of a GREAT LATINO PURGE by America that even remotely reflects whats been done to palis then post your evidence. Manifest destiny and the western expansion happened BEFORE CALIFORNIA AND THE SOUTHWEST WERE STATES. WE are not responsible for Texas ceding from Mexico either. But hey, believe what you want. It's cute when you fail so miserably with flimsy excuses for your blank check, mormon. America has the land, but we sure the fuck don't insist that latinos in general get the fuck out. ONLY illegal aliens. WE HAVE A SINGLE STATE SOLUTION TO AMERICA's CULTURAL PLURALITY. As ive said numerous times, WE allow LATINOS to participate equally. You can't say the same for israel and you sure as fuck won't validate an arab PM of Israel.
Feel free to wallow in your ignorance as you fuck off.
hmmmm, let's see...because he's not only anti-semitic but he's also full of hatred for Mexicans.
Separate names with a comma.


text:
Does anyone know if Jockamo's on Sand Lake in Orlando has closed? I tried to call today and their phone seems to be out of order. Also, their website is gone.
This was one of our favorite places and it would be a shame if it was gone. Is there any other place in Orlando that serves New Orleans style food?


text:
The promotional code:
has been applied.
☎ Order by phone on 0844 326 2200
⌚ 24 hours a day 7 days a week
FREE Weekly Email Offers
Refine by
intentionally left blank
…a prolific crop of tasty, glossy, dark green fruits.Pepper F1 Redskin (Sweet) - A dwarf pepper producing good yields of medium-sized exceptionally sweet-flavoured red fruits.Pepper F1 Apache (Chilli) - Neat…
SuttonsOrder Online or call 0844 326 2200 - 24hrs a day, 7 days a week Product or other query Email Customer Services Customer Services call 0333 043 0700 - 8:30am -5pm, Mon-Fri Charges to 0844 numbers cost 5p per minute plus your telephone company's access chargeCharges to 03 numbers are the same as standard UK landline numbers starting in 01 or 02 and mobile providers may vary
Suttons, Woodview Road, Paignton, Devon TQ4 7NG. Registered in England and Wales No. 284448. VAT No 158 9318 27.


text:
Grand Canal Show
Hangzhou Grand Canal Square
Camile supports 1080p and 720p recording.
Fitted with a 140° wide-angled lens
and EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization),
it deals easily with all cycling environments,
meaning you won't lose a single moment.
Using the GPS with a 6 Axis motion sensor and altimeter,
as well as advanced fusion algorithms,
Camile can give you quick and accurate 3D positioning.
Ride without wait.
Camile includes a rechargeable 1350mAh battery,
which provides continuous shooting for 3 hours
or independent operation of the GPS for 16 hours on a single charge.
Paired with the huge 32GB internal memory
Camile supports 8 hours of continuous shooting,
So you can capture a ride without worry.
With the Camile App you can set time and distance goals
for a customized cycling plan, custom alerts will let you know when you've reached your goal.
The special Long Distance Trip function can record each and every journey,
using Smart Edit to put them together, and ready to share at any time.
Supports WiFi connectivity with phones,
providing simulated cycling data.
Smart Edit filters and editing functions,
help create brilliant videos in seconds.
This is just the beginning.
Follow us to discover what else Camile has planned.
Hangzhou Grand Canal Square