text:
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Friday night starts the basketball season with a chili supper and a orange/black game that consists of all the basketball teams coming together to play against each other...Varsity, JV, and Freshmen. Next week starts her first JV tournament. Her first Freshmen game is Dec 1st.
And sooooo it starts. (MOM TAXI) Good thing Tucker likes basketball. I will have to get him a special outfit for the games.....something really embarrassing for Hunter. (hee hee)
1 comment:
- Zachery&Allie*Mommy said...
Tell her great job..Sorry I haven't talked to you things have been a roller coaster around here nothing new!!! I'm going to have to make a special trip to mercy in our rush out the door on discharge day apparently they had her blanket in the closet and we left it BUT good news they called and they put it up for they said it will be there for as long as it take for us to get back and get it.I was so mad at myself she loves that blanket, she snuggles it like crazy! So i see you have some snow..u can keep it:) I can't believe looking at pictures of tucker wow he is growing he is such a cutie, well I'll quit babbelin and will talk to you soon, let me know if your coming to Chula anytime soon maybe we can meet up with you, or you could even come to our house


text:
I held Ax, AKT9xx, AKQx, x
Partner Txxxx, Q, xx, AKxxx
The bidding was 2c - 2d (shows Ace/King, I forgot and thought it was temporizing)
2h - 3c (Miss alerted by opener, saying it was double negative. Our card is mark 2H is double negative.)
4h by me
Regardless if you agree with the bidding, Under which rules can he continue to bid his hand? He passed so there was no problem but he thought
since I said it was a double negative, he could not bid on, afterwards we changed our mind? Thanks for any comments
How does this violate our Community Guidelines?
Benefits include:
Plus... it's free!

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Monday, July 3, 2017
My Heart Belongs on Mackinac Maude's Mooring by Carrie Fancett Pagels
The beautiful cover is an instant draw and most appropriate for the wonderful historical novel. The book is written in a wonderful setting and definitely makes me want to go there on a trip! I love the mystery that develops throughout the book. It has a great plot!
I received a copy of this e-book from Net Galley for my honest review. All thoughts are my own.
Posted by Sonja at 7:45 PM
Labels: Carrie Fancett Pagels
1 comment:
Thanks so much, Sonja, for the lovely review. Actually, this is a standalone novel and not part of a series but I do have a novella that precedes this novel (Maggie Award finalist -- "The Substitute Bride" which has a couple of characters from the novella and there are some Christy Lumber Camp series characters with a cameo role in the novel too.) The sequel, "His Anchor", with Sadie Duvall is due out in early 2018 and I'm writing it now! Blessings!ReplyDelete
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)


text:
Do you prefer a bath or shower?
In our current house we have both, but the shower causes leakage.
So since a year we are forced to use the bath.
Something I can live with 😉
Do you prefer a bath or shower?
In our current house we have both, but the shower causes leakage.
So since a year we are forced to use the bath.
Something I can live with 😉
Both! 😬
Baths are a treat for me – I have one every Sunday, with a hair mask and face mask. It's my bit of me time and I love it 😊
Aww wonderful!
Then tonight is your night! 😌
Shower is more efficient, I agree!
It is indeed lovely ☺ xx
Depending on time… they both have perks and both do the job! 😁😉
Shower! Unfortunatly I never have time for a bath (but I would love eheh) 🙂
🙂 In my case, I prefer the shower.
I'm a shower person! I have to take recovery baths after running and I hate them!
I love a bath but only before bed. I need a shower to wake me up a bit lol.
I like both, but baths are less convenient so more of a once-in-a-while kind of thing. Plus after the bath, I still need to shower anyway.
I like both but you need one of those baths that you can really lay back in and enjoy the warmth of the water
I prefer a long, relaxing bath, but rarely have time for that, so showers it is.
Both- i just took a bath:) but showers when i am in a rush!
Shower in the summer and bath in the winter – simple as that :O) Unfortunately I don't have a bath in my current apartment and winter is coming……..damn! xx
That makes sense! I must say I do enjoy a very cold bath in the summer as well!
Does it even get cold in the south of France?! 😉
I agree. I find taking a shower in bathtub uncomfortable!
Time always seems to be issues, for me too 😦
Agreed! It's super relaxing!
yeah, you can't really wash your hair in a bathtub.
But I shouldn't do that as often as I do now anyhow!! I wash it every day. I don't even know why haha
Oh I never looked it that way, but it does make sense!
That is interesting! You'd rarely see people who don't like a bath!
Because of time and efficiency? Or do you just like a shower better?
Ugh yes! Times is always an issue!
🙂 It is a case of liking a shower better.
And, thank you for asking.
Cold bath!!!??? Oh no, I'm not that brave, however hot it is.
It did get down to 5 degrees last year and it snowed for one day (chaos as it hadn't happened for 15 years) but, because it's hot for much of the time you do feel cold when the temperature dips below about 18 degrees. When I lived in England that would be shorts and t-shirt weather, here it's jeans and a jacket ;O) xx
I think it is for most of us. Most of us lead very busy lives.
I'll sit in an actual hot tub, but not a bathtub. It might be because I have a 90s one where the water just barely covers my thighs
I shower more often than I take a bath. Every once in a while a soak is needed to destress.
Save water, shower!
I would not live somewhere without a bathtub, as I prefer long, hot baths.
I am the same! But unfortunately for the next apartment I think there won't be a bath 😦
Can't disagree 😉
Bath for relaxation. Shower for practical and quick cleansing…
They both have their 'perks'.. 🙂
Didn't expect anything other from you.
You seem to be the practical and efficient type 😉
I love bath time just wish I had the time to do it all the time x x x
Haha when it's hot it's hard not to but I did hear it's bad to do so everyday so now that the season is cooler I'll probably try to alternate too… Iono… my hair gets so greasy though
That made me laugh so hard.
So predictable, huh?
But also spot on assessment.
I love baths but I never seem to find the time to enjoy them more. Shower are great especially when I get to use my lavender shower steamers from bath and body works. It makes the shower more relaxing.
I love Baths but also showers in summer are great
We have an entire Pinterest board with the very question ….tub for Sure!
I have to say my bath is my place of solace to unwind for the day. Love the darker months because can put candles on, music on and pretend for a small amount of time the chaos with the kids isn't happening on the other end of the door 🙂 🙂


text:
You can type a short message that your driver will see when he or she accepts your journey. After entering your pickup address, tap "Prebook / Options", then tap "Booking Options".
From here, you can use the "Message to driver" field at the beginning of the page to enter any relevant information. This message is sent to the driver with your order. You can call your driver before he/she arrives if there is something important you need to communicate to him or her.
To call the driver, simply tap on the telephone symbol.


text:
As the population ages, baby boomers are preparing to make one of the largest transfers of wealth in history. For many families, the underpinning to the transfer of wealth from one generation to the next is the preservation of that wealth notwithstanding the recipient's marriage. Often times, parents or grandparents will want to ensure that if the recipient's marriage comes to an end, the wealth will remain in the family and, more precisely, not be shared by the recipient's spouse.
Ontario's Family Law Act makes clear that an individual's property acquired by gift or inheritance from someone other than the recipient's spouse during the marriage will not be shared between married spouses. Simply put, it is excluded from the recipient spouse's net worth that would otherwise be shared by the spouses. Taking it one step further, the Family Law Act goes on to provide that property into which the gift or inheritance can be traced will similarly not be shared. Similar rules exist in provinces across Canada.
To ensure the recipient's spouse does not receive one half of the gift or inheritance in the context of divorce, the transfer of wealth must be exercised with caution, paying particular attention to the structure of the gift or inheritance. Even more caution must be exercised by the recipient in using the inherited or gifted funds once they are received. That is particularly the case when the inheritance or gift is invested in a matrimonial home or a joint bank account.
According to the Family Law Act, if a gift or inheritance is invested in a matrimonial home (which is a home in which the spouses ordinarily reside at the time of their separation), it will lose its excluded character. In other words, the spouses will share the gift or inheritance if and when they separate. The Ontario courts have applied a strict interpretation of this provision.
In the 2012 case of Ward v. Ward, the wife received a gift from her father of $200,000 during the marriage. Of those funds, $180,000 were invested in the matrimonial home. The husband ended the marriage two months later. While the wife expected the husband to repay those funds to her if they separated, the husband denied any such expectation or agreement existed. The Court of Appeal for Ontario confirmed the loss of the exclusion. However, as a result of the windfall to the husband arising from the substantial gift from her father, the wife successfully claimed the parties' assets should be unequally divided between them. While, in Ward, the sharing of the gift or inheritance was avoided to some extent through the court's intervention, such a remedy is discretionary in nature and cannot be relied upon in structuring one's affairs and preserving the exclusion of a gift or inheritance.
In order to protect the inheritance or gift with any degree of certainty when the funds are to be invested in a matrimonial home, the recipient spouse ought to consider either a marriage contract (into which the parties can enter during their marriage) or a mortgage registered on title to the matrimonial home in the recipient spouse's favour. Until such time as either is concluded, the recipient spouse ought to preserve the funds in a segregated bank account in his or her sole name. Doing so will ensure the exclusion if the spouses are unable to agree upon the terms of the marriage contract or mortgage.
While the Family Law Act does not expressly address the strength of the exclusion in the event the funds are deposited to a joint bank account, the case law has squarely addressed the issue. In Townshend v. Townshend, also in 2012, the husband received a $25,000 gift from his mother during the parties' marriage. The husband deposited those funds into a joint mutual fund account he held with his wife. The wife sought to share in those funds while the husband resisted that claim on the basis of the funds being excluded. The trial court found that the entirety of the gifted funds were to be shared by the married couple. On appeal, however, the excluded nature of the funds was restored. Writing for the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Justice Simmons stated the following:
"Given that the legislature made clear its intention that gifts used to purchase a matrimonial home lose their excluded character, but did not do the same in relation to monies deposited into a joint account, I discern no legislative intent that the entire amount of the gift should lose its excluded character when deposited into a joint bank account."
The cost of obtaining this decision from the court likely eclipsed the value of the exclusion itself. With that in mind, beneficiaries of an inter-generational transfer of wealth should take notice of the need to properly plan if the intent is to ensure the funds are not shared in the unfortunate event of a divorce.
Adam N. Black is a partner in the family law group at Torkin Manes LLP in Toronto.


text:
We are proud to be a woman-owned business since 2013. Our management planner and project designer has over 30 years of experience in the field.
Sensitive Environmental builds positive relationships with clients by providing professional, timely and quality-oriented solutions for complex asbestos, lead, and mold removal projects. We strive to increase quality, knowledge and efficiency while consistently exceeding our client's expectations.
Our environmental management experience includes a wide range of projects, involving residential properties, commercial buildings, and industrial facilities.


text:
Beyond analysis and meaning of dreams with a cockroach, this insect is an evil symbol in many cultures. Cockroaches usually linked to dirt, pests, and diseases. However, cockroaches are insects related to longevity and survival. Who tends to have a cockroach dream? Dreams about cockroaches are very common in men and women of all ages.
What does it mean to dream about cockroaches?
This vision is a great dream. Dreaming about many cockroaches usually comes from people with insect phobia. Cockroach dream often comes from people who need to rejuvenate and cleanse their emotional state. It can also come from people who face problems. It depends on how we act in dreams can have many interpretations.
We have taken an attitude with initiative and decisive. We fight our problem. Despite our distress, we take the necessary steps to end the very worrying obstacles we face. It is also indicative of the certainty that something bad will happen.
1. When you saw a cockroach in a dream, it means there is a disappointment in you that you are now living, causing your depression. If the cockroach you saw in a dream was enormous, it means a big disappointment.
2. When you saw a cockroach on the food you ate, it means that you will be sick.
3. When you stepped on a cockroach, but it didn't die, it means that the challenge you are facing right now will make it difficult for you to meet it. If the cockroach died, then you will successfully face the challenge.
4. When you dreamed of eating a cockroach, it symbolizes that you are a very careless and comfortable with others using you.
5. If you saw cockroach in your body, it shows that there are people who do not like you.
6. When cockroaches chased you in a dream, it symbolizes that you will get into trouble.
7. When you dreamed of seeing the cockroach upside down, it symbolizes that you are beating a group of people who are trying to knock you down.
8. When you saw many cockroaches, this dream shows that there are many demands on you.
9. When cockroaches out of your body, this dream signifies that you have to rid yourself of envy.
10. When you saw cockroaches under the table, this dream …


text:
Missy Seaman has worked alongside Brian for 14 years. After graduating from the University of North Carolina at Wilmington she began her career at Sageworks. Since Sageworks was still a start-up, she worked across many departments as the company grew, including accounting, marketing, human resources, product development, recruiting, and account management.
During her time at Sageworks, Missy's involvement in the non-profit sector relocated her to Toronto, Canada where she helped start a non-profit which is in the process of birthing another non-profit. The first is Trinity Life Church that she and her husband founded which works with the city to seek reconciliation. The second is The New Common which focuses on asset-based community development by empowering people and organizations in one of the poorest neighborhoods in Toronto.
Missy now enjoys working with the Brian Hamilton Foundation as General Manager to help ensure efficiency across the organization.


text:
Property Management Wavell Heights (4012)
Pure Rentals Property Management Wavell Heights is a specialist in property management and is looking for more Investment Properties in Wavell Heights and surrounding suburbs.
Looking for a specialist property manager in Wavell Heights? Call us today for a friendly chat on 0406 743 965.
If you have an investment property in Wavell Heights or surrounding suburbs you should take advantage of our new Investor sign up package.
The package includes:
- Guaranteed higher returns
- Experienced property managers
- Regular inspections with photos
- Professional online marketing – photography & scripts
Contact us now for further information on how to become a satisfied Pure Rentals investor and experience the difference that so many Wavell Heights owners are talking about.
Wavell Heights – Suburb Profile
Wavell Heights, a residential suburb, is 10 km north of central Brisbane. Originally known as West Nundah, Wavell Heights is west of Sandgate Road and extends southwards from Downfall Creek to Kedron Brook.
Part of Wavell Heights adjoining Sandgate Road is less than one kilometre from the Nundah railway station. It was subdivided for housing in the mid-1920s and by the outbreak of the World War II was nearly completely built up. In 1992 a housing character study showed that less than 10% of the residences had fallen to multiple dwelling development. Known as West Nundah, letter deliveries apparently became confused, and in 1941 the local progress association agitated for a new name. The choices offered were Inala and Wavell Heights, the latter succeeding in the wartime environment, honouring Field Marshall Lord Wavell, leader of the Allied Forces.
The rest of West Nundah was farming, mostly pineapple growing and dairying. Shops were opened along Rode Road and a Neighbourhood Society was formed in 1948. It concentrated on a site donated by the Council at the corner of Edinburgh Castle Road and Fourteenth Avenue, installing an ex-army hut for a local hall. Ultimately a memorial hall, kindergarten, bowling greens and Scout and Guide facilities were built there. War Service and Housing Commission homes were built, along with private sector estates.
Wavell Heights is serviced by the Wavell Heights Neighbourhood Society Inc. which manages the Murray Duus park on Edinburgh Castle Road, Wavell Heights, including the subleasing of areas to a kindergarten, Karate club, girl guides, scouts and a lapitary club. The Society also manages a public tennis court and a community centre, consisting of a hall with two floors, stages and kitchen facilities.
The Wavell Heights Neighbourhood Society Inc. is unique in that it is the only organisation within Brisbane to manage a park precinct on behalf of the Brisbane City Council.
Recreation areas were laid out on the Kedron Brook swamp lands, but similar proposals along Downfall Creek did not eventuate; there is a linear park at the back of more recent housing estates near the creek. Residents have neighbourhood shops, and regional shopping is at Chermside and Toombul, each equidistant from Wavell Heights.
Read more Sourced from Queensland Places


text:
Welcome to EXCELLENCE LIMOUSINES
EXCELLENCE LIMOUSINES offers a luxury car rental service with driver, available 7/7, 24h/24.
With its fleet of prestige vehicles and professional drivers, travel safe on the roads of the French Riviera, in France and abroad.
We offer different services to a selective clientele demanding quality service : transfer to any destination, disposal with private chauffeur. We also organize weddings, baptisms, birthdays, excursions and any other private or professional event.
Our multilingual drivers will satisfy you in all circumstances. They are eager to use their expertise and experience to ensure a five stars service. Listening to you, they will answer all your expectations, whether spontaneous or planned in advance.
To book a car, you also can send us an email and we would be happy to answer;
you will receive a booking confirmation by email with a link for secured payment.
The Quality Label VTC-GR "FF-EVTC" is reserved for virtuous VTC companies, providing high quality services.
IPEM – International Private Equity Market
23-25 January 2019 – Cannes
MIPIM – The world's leading property market
12-15 March 2019 – Cannes
Festival de Cannes
14-25 May 2019 – Cannes
Private Transfer Nice Airport – Cannes & At disposal service
Professional discount, special Congress


text:
Is it agreed?
House of Commons Hansard #41 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was jobs.
House of Commons Hansard #41 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was jobs.
Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings
4 p.m.
The Deputy Speaker Conservative Bruce Stanton
Is it agreed?
Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings
4 p.m.
Some hon. members
The House resumed consideration of the motion that Bill C-10, An Act to amend the Air Canada Public Participation Act and to provide for certain other measures, be read the second time and referred to a committee, and of the amendment.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4 p.m.
Alexandre Boulerice NDP Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC
Mr. Speaker, first, I would like to mention that I will share my time with my hon. colleague from Elmwood—Transcona. He will have an opportunity to speak to this very important bill, which will have a real impact on people's lives.
Most days, I am pleased to rise in the House and participate in debates with my parliamentary colleagues. Today is a bit different. Today, I feel bitter and disappointed about a major decision made by the Liberal government that is the culmination of betrayal, deceit, and a lack of trust. This Liberal government is letting down 2,600 families across Canada, including 1,700 in the Montreal area. These families are being completely rejected by this Liberal government and Bill C-10. They are being left high and dry.
I will try to give a little bit of background. The Air Canada Public Participation Act took effect in 1988 and set out the conditions for the privatization of Air Canada, which took place the following year in 1989. Section 6 of the act specifically states that maintenance on Air Canada aircraft must be carried out in three specific cities in Canada: Winnipeg, Mississauga, and Montreal. That worked for years. Air Canada complied with the act, awarding a contract to a subcontractor in the Montreal region named Aveos, which went bankrupt in 2012. That is where things start to get complicated. Aveos went bankrupt and disappeared, but Air Canada did not find a replacement. On the contrary, Air Canada took advantage of the situation and relocated those jobs to various countries around the world, such as the United States and countries in Europe and Asia. These 2,600 workers lost their jobs, even though they were guaranteed by a federal law duly passed by the House of Commons and applied for years.
The Conservative government of the day stood by and did nothing to enforce the law, but the Liberals wanted to demonstrate their support for the workers as well as their camaraderie and solidarity. We even saw the current Prime Minister, the member for Papineau, demonstrate with unionized workers on Parliament Hill chanting "So-so-so-solidarity" and demanding that the Conservative government of the day enforce the law. His argument, a good one, was that the least a law-and-order government could do was enforce the law, particularly when doing so would save good, well-paid jobs in a high-tech sector.
As soon as the Liberals took over, they changed their tune. So long "So-so-so-solidarity", hello "Relocate; forget about our good jobs; who cares about the aerospace sector?" The government is basically telling these people that their jobs are gone for good.
When they came to power, the Liberals realized they did not have to enforce the law because they could just change it. That makes things much easier, for sure. There is no need to enforce the law when it can be changed so that Air Canada is no longer required to carry out aircraft maintenance in Canada.
We have to wonder whether that is the Liberal plan for job creation, namely eliminating the good jobs we have here in Quebec, in Mississauga, and in Winnipeg and shipping them off to the United States and Europe, because that is what will happen under Bill C-10. This bill means abandoning the workers represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, supported by the FTQ. They took their case to the Quebec Superior Court, which ruled in their favour in 2013. Air Canada appealed that decision, and the case went to the Quebec Court of Appeal. In 2015 the Quebec Court of Appeal also ruled in favour of the workers.
I would like to quote Justice Marie-France Bich, of the Quebec Court of Appeal:
From the moment that Air Canada decided to close this centre [the Aveos centre in Montreal] or reduce its activities in such a way that they were no longer at the same level as they had been in 1988, it broke the law.
This could not be any clearer. Bill C-10 threatens to pull the rug out from under the workers by making it that much harder to take this kind of legal action. When they are arguing their case before the Supreme Court, if section 6 of the act is amended, there will be a whole new legal framework. The changes to the Air Canada Public Participation Act set out in Bill C-10 are extremely weak, or virtually non-existent, in terms of Air Canada's obligations.
There is no longer any requirement to keep jobs in this country, let alone a minimum of jobs, a certain volume of work, or a percentage of tasks that must be carried out in Canada.
In short, they are giving Air Canada a blank cheque. The government wants to provide flexibility, but before long Air Canada will be doing contortions to outsource the good jobs that we have in Canada. I am saddened to know that our government is not giving a second thought to the lives of 2,600 families and is prepared to cynically abandon them after publicly supporting them. That is sad.
I am rising in the House of Commons today with a sad story of employees at Air Canada who lost their jobs in 2012. We are talking about 2,600 families around the country. Air Canada had the legal obligation to do the maintenance of its planes in Canada, especially in Winnipeg, Mississauga, and Montreal. Now it can do whatever it wants.
When the Liberals were in the opposition, they stood outside this building with the workers, with the union, singing "solidarity, brothers and sisters", saying that they would support the union's jobs because they were good jobs. They were asking the Conservative government to apply the 1988 law about Air Canada.
When they gained power, it was like some magic appeared, and the Liberals changed their mind completely. Now they are singing another song. It is no longer "solidarity forever", but "job creation for United States, Europe, or Asia." With Bill C-10, there would be no more legal obligation for Air Canada to keep those good jobs in Canada. Air Canada would have a blank cheque; it could do whatever it wants.
It is sad because the workers and their union, the machinists and in Quebec the QFL, went to court and won twice. They won in the Superior Court and in the Court of Appeal of Quebec. The decision of the judges was crystal clear that Air Canada was not respecting its legal obligation about the maintenance of its planes. Now the Liberals want to change the law and that might have a profound and brutal impact on the legal pursuits in the Supreme Court of Canada of those hundreds of workers.
Now the Liberals are saying they do not want to help them anymore, that Air Canada can do whatever it wants, and workers can find another job. However, aerospace is a very important sector in our economy, especially in the Montreal area.
We do not agree with the Minister of Transport's argument that Air Canada will create jobs by buying Bombardier's C Series aircraft. That is comparing apples and oranges. If Air Canada buys the C Series, it will be because it is a good aircraft and they need it.
We refuse to pit the aircraft manufacturing sector against the aircraft maintenance sector. We can and should support both. The Liberals should understand this. They should be ashamed that they are giving up hundreds of good jobs and sending them abroad. We are asking them to finally listen to reason and to withdraw Bill C-10.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:10 p.m.
London West Ontario
Kate Young LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport
Mr. Speaker, I think the hon. member and I can agree that our aerospace industry is very important, but he has forgotten some of the key points to the changes to this act and what this would do.
Quebec has estimated that the creation of the centre of excellence in Montreal alone could produce 1,000 jobs over 15 years, while the manufacturing of Air Canada's C Series aircraft could create an additional 300 jobs.
Air Canada also intends to support the creation of 150 jobs in Manitoba with the possibility of expanding beyond that.
It is obvious the opposition is not understanding the positive impact that the changes to the act would have.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:10 p.m.
Alexandre Boulerice NDP Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC
Mr. Speaker, my colleague does not have the facts right. First, the centre of excellence is not in Montreal. It is supposed to be in Trois-Rivières. She needs to have the right city first.
By the way, Bill C-10 has nothing to do with the fact that Air Canada will buy Bombardier's C Series, and that is a good thing They are good jets. However, we are talking about legislation that will change the law about the maintenance of airplanes. They are two different things. We should not compare bananas with oranges, or apples or whatever fruit.
Regarding the excellency centre in Trois-Rivières, it maybe will do the maintenance for the C Series in 15 or 20 years, but we have absolutely no guarantee about job creation there.
We are talking about real families and real jobs that the Liberals are abandoning right now, and that is bad.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:10 p.m.
Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB
Mr. Speaker, I am a bit incredulous about the arguments the government is making, especially as it respects the C Series. Many of the speeches and comments made by the government allude to those jobs associated with the C Series, but Bombardier is a separate company.
The government will not be clear about the connection between the Air Canada Public Participation Act and the investments being made by Bombardier. It is curious that the government seems to draw this connection, but will not answer a direct question about whether the introduction of this act was dependent on the purchase of the C Series by Air Canada. It it curious that it will not identify the connection.
Could the hon. member perhaps speculate on what the connection between these two things is and why the government continues to refer to Bombardier in the context of this debate when the Air Canada Public Participation Act does not directly mention Bombardier in any way?
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:15 p.m.
Alexandre Boulerice NDP Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC
Mr. Speaker, my colleague is absolutely right. I will probably not say that for many issues, but on this one he is on target.
I think the Liberals are trying to put forward some job creation fabrication about the C Series to make people forget they are abandoning 2,600 families and not respecting a promise they made and repeated to those workers and those families.
The Liberals should reconsider Bill C-10. Air Canada should continue to keep those good jobs in Canada. It is good for our regions, our cities, and our economy. That would be a good job creation plan from the Liberals. It is really sad they are doing otherwise.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:15 p.m.
Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague from Quebec.
I imagine there are two versions of the Liberal Party now. One is the election version of the Liberal Party. There are also two versions of the hon. member for Papineau, who is also the new Prime Minister. He made some bold statements when he was standing before the workers and their families. He said he would comply with the law.
The other version of the Liberal Party is the governing version. During the election campaign, the Liberals said the same thing to the workers that we are saying today. I am sorry, but the Liberal government is going to change the law and jeopardize the jobs of 2,600 people and their families.
I imagine there is a quid pro quo: Air Canada wants something, so it asks the government to change the law and the existing bill in exchange for buying a few planes. It is settled then. The hon. member for Papineau, the new Prime Minister, says yes, no problem. That is good for the bosses, but not so good for the workers.
Which version of the Liberal Party and the hon. member for Papineau are we dealing with now?
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:15 p.m.
Alexandre Boulerice NDP Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his excellent question.
This is classic behaviour. When the Liberals are in opposition, they are friends with workers, associations, groups, and unions. When they are in power, they suddenly become the best friends of Bay Street and CEOs.
My colleague is right. If they had been honest during the election campaign and told people they were going to change the Air Canada legislation and legalize these job losses, they would not have gotten the number of votes they did in many ridings, because people would have known the truth.
Today, those workers feel betrayed and misled. They are disappointed and angry with this Liberal government. We will keep fighting for these people and their jobs.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:15 p.m.
Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB
Mr. Speaker, I will start by saying how disappointed I am at having to rise to speak to this bill. This is not the kind of bill that I expected to have to deal with. If I had been told a year ago that the Liberals would be in government and then base a projection about this kind of bill on what they were saying at the time, I never would have thought that I would be speaking to such a bill.
In the last Parliament the now Prime Minister was standing on picket lines with Air Canada workers, shouting about solidarity, and probably taking a few selfies, too. That was great, because he was out shopping for votes. Many workers who felt that the Prime Minister was serious in his expression of solidarity may well have gone out and voted for the Liberals because they never would have suspected a Liberal government to bring forward a bill like this.
Some of the prime minister's members, some of whom have returned, like the member for Winnipeg North, were saying, "The law is clear. The corporation is to maintain operational and overhaul centres in the city of Winnipeg, the Montreal urban community, and the city of Mississauga. That is the law. The Conservative government says it is tough on crime. It is time to get tough on Air Canada". Those are the kinds of remarks we were hearing at the time from Liberal MPs like the member for Winnipeg North.
Fast forward to today. As I mentioned in debate on a motion earlier, we are six months into the new government. Most of the legislation that has been brought forward is either routine business with respect to the finances of government, bills responding to Supreme Court decisions, usually with a court-imposed timeline, or they are straight up and down repeal of certain measures brought in by the previous Conservative government that were explicit election commitments by the Liberals.
If we want to look for a bill that does not involve any of that, that goes beyond those things, then really the only indication of what the government is going to be like for the next four years on issues that were not foreseen in the election is this bill. I have to say that this bill is a complete betrayal of the workers that the Liberals pretended to be the champions of when they stood beside them on the picket line. It is absolutely shameful. It is a sign of the kind of cynicism and condescension the Prime Minister must feel toward Canadian workers. How could he stand on a picket line with them and say that he is going to protect their jobs, to shame the government of the day for not enforcing an act that in the end it was his intention to change when he came into government? That is a rhetorical sleight of hand the likes of which even the previous government was not capable of doing. During the campaign the Liberals were righteous in saying "Oh, the government should enforce the act. We will enforce the act." Yes, they will, right after they change it to get rid of the very provisions that would protect the jobs and the very reason for which the workers would like to see it enforced.
I am appalled, frankly, but maybe having spent as much time around politics as I have I should not be surprised, particularly not by Liberals. We are six months in and they have already managed to teach me a new depth of cynicism when it comes to politics.
If it is a contest of narratives as politics so often is, the Liberals would have us believe there is a happy coincidence of factors, that it just so happened that without any prodding or conversation between the government and Air Canada, Air Canada decided to buy some Bombardier C Series jets, and it just so happened to be at a time when Bombardier was in trouble. Some other hon. members have done a good job of poking and prodding at this issue to get the government to affirm that there is a connection between those things, but if we listen to the government members' answers, they say, "No, no, no. There is no connection. It is just a happy coincidence. Bombardier was in trouble and Air Canada came forward." It just so happened that when Air Canada came forward and there were some rumblings about the federal government selling out Canadian workers that the provinces just happily decided to drop their lawsuits.
As a result of all of these things magically coming together by some unseen force, the government feels this is a great time to change the act because we need to be fair to Air Canada, the very same Air Canada that the Liberals not that long ago when they were in opposition thought it was time to get tough on.
That is the story.
The Liberals have said that a whole bunch of benefits are going to accrue from this bill. It just so happens that none of them are in the bill. The centres of excellence are not in the bill.
There are no legal guarantees for those jobs. There are for the ones that are getting gutted. However, for the new jobs that we are supposed to get in this great trade, there are no legal protections for those jobs and there is no guarantee that Air Canada would not turn around, walk away, and put those jobs somewhere else.
Under the terms of this bill, by far the most contentious clause is not the clause that says instead of having the jobs in Winnipeg, Mississauga, and Montreal we would have them in Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. It is the one right under it that says Air Canada would define for itself the type of work that would be done and the type of work that would satisfy the requirements of the act. It is the clause that says it would determine the volume of work and the level of employment. Air Canada could rent a closet in Winnipeg, put some engine parts in it, and pay a guy to come around once a year to check up on them, make sure they are still there, maybe dust them, and that would be sufficient to meet the requirements of the bill.
The Liberals cannot tell me that we are supposed to be happy with that situation and accept a bunch of jobs that have no guarantees at all, particularly with the language of the company, and the government, incidentally. Next time there is a spot for a Liberal speaker on this bill, I wonder if they should not just invite the Air Canada corporate executives in and hear from them directly and cut out the middle man. They are expensive middle men for Air Canada in this debate. We do not need them.
We have heard these kinds of arguments before when we have heard about flexibility and the need to compete. I am sensitive to some of that, but one wonders, there is a tension here. That is, are we saying that we have come to the point where we cannot do maintenance on planes in Canada and have a competitive company? Is that what we are prepared to say? Is the Liberal government encouraging Canadians to believe that the global economy has come to a point that we cannot do maintenance on planes in Canada, that they have to be shipped somewhere else in order for companies to be competitive?
One wonders why one should be so concerned about the viability of a company once it does not mean any direct employment in Canada anymore. We are giving up guarantees for these jobs because we need to be flexible and competitive. That language means moving the jobs out of Canada. The government cannot have its cake and eat it to. It cannot say this is all about creating jobs when all of the jobs it is talking about, frankly, are completely consistent with the act as it is. There is zero reason in order to establish those centres of excellence to change the act. If this is not about exporting jobs, if this is not about sending jobs to Mexico or elsewhere, then why the changes to the act? It does not make sense.
On the face of it, this is about taking good-paying Canadian jobs and moving them out of Canada. The rest of it, the window dressing, none of which is in the act, and none of which is legally enforceable, is all about giving a fig leaf to cover the government in this, and it needs a big one because there is a lot that is ugly to cover.
There is nothing to say that a month later Air Canada would not take those jobs away. I am not saying it will. Maybe it will be three, four, or five years, but there is nothing to prevent those jobs from being taken away. The Liberals knew that well when they were opposition. That is why the Liberals said that the Conservative government should enforce the act. The Liberals must realize that now there will not even be an act to enforce, not in any meaningful sense, because under the bill Air Canada will be given every right to define the scope of this work right out of Canada.
The Liberal narrative on this is so contorted it is just shocking. I hope Canadians will listen to this debate. They do not have to listen to a lot of it to understand what is really going on. I hope they are paying attention, because what is going on here is completely unacceptable.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:25 p.m.
Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB
Mr. Speaker, I congratulate my colleague on his speech. I worry that I am agreeing with New Democrats a little too much today. He is absolutely right to highlight the strangeness of the government's arguments. We have these repeated kind of wink-wink, nudge-nudge references to Bombardier, yet there is no reference to Bombardier in the legislation.
Even so, even if there is some kind of quid pro quo going on here, it is rather poorly set up, because after this legislation passes, there is of course no guarantee that the purchase of the C Series will go forward. These are not guaranteed jobs at all. The government really is giving up something for nothing at this stage.
I wonder if the member has thoughts on why, at this stage, the government is giving up these Canadian jobs and getting absolutely nothing in return for workers or taxpayers.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:25 p.m.
Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB
Mr. Speaker, that is the question that the government has yet to answer. What is here, really? As he says, we have some nods and we have some winks. This may help out Bombardier, and that would be nice because that seems like a big issue; and it is. It is important to continue to have work at Bombardier.
The proper response by the government would have been to say it needs a strategy for the aerospace industry; that is what it needs to do. I do not know if it was panic or inexperience, or just what it was, but it said, "Here is a one-off deal. We can give something to Air Canada and make Air Canada executives happy. We can create some jobs at Bombardier. Oh yes, western Canada; where is that again?"
We need a national strategy so that we are not doing the same old thing of pitting region against region, but making sure that each region gets its due. There are serious challenges in the aerospace industry today. The way to do it is to come up with a strategy instead of cutting a bunch of one-off deals and finding out later it was the wrong play.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:30 p.m.
Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC
Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for his speech.
I want to read the member something that a Liberal member said in the transport committee in 2012 when this issue was before it. He can try to guess who said this at the time. The member stated:
What interests me...is it's important for us to note that there must have been some form of a fairly strong relationship between Aveos and Air Canada. I talked with numerous employees of Air Canada, who were ultimately shifted over to Aveos. I can recall very clearly that many of the employees who made that shift indicated they were concerned that this was just a shell game Air Canada was playing, and Aveos was just executing what Air Canada wanted: to be able to ultimately facilitate the demise of those very important jobs.
Who said that? It was the member for Winnipeg North, who stood in this place and presented petition after petition. In committee, the member, in the excerpt I just read, was fighting for a motion to get Aveos in front of the committee to stand up for workers, workers who I assume live in his riding—my colleague will be able to tell us that—workers he has now betrayed.
I would like my colleague to elaborate on that.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:30 p.m.
Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB
Mr. Speaker, I am thankful for the opportunity to note that the reversal of the position by the member for Winnipeg North on this is totally appalling. Many times in the last Parliament, 15 or 20 times, he presented petitions, saying that this was terrible, that we needed to get tough on Air Canada, and that we needed to enforce the act.
As a politician, first at the provincial level and then at the federal level, he spent more than 20 years in opposition. He finally got a chance to do something for those workers whom he stood beside all that time, and he dropped the ball. Not only did he drop the ball, but he has since stood in the House and talked about how we need to be fair to Air Canada and recognize its difficult position. If the very same things had come out of the mouth of a Conservative cabinet minister no more than 12 months ago, he would have been all over the Conservatives in the House.
It is shameful and a testament to the fact that, if the member for Winnipeg North belongs anywhere in the House, it is in opposition.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:30 p.m.
Jim Eglinski Conservative Yellowhead, AB
Mr. Speaker, I agree wholeheartedly with the hon. member.
I was flying from Edmonton to Ottawa last weekend, and I remember looking at an Air Canada brochure that talked about carbon pricing, a carbon tax, and using light food containers. I wonder what the member thinks about flying across the United States to Mexico and how much fuel would be used versus putting light food containers in Air Canada's aircraft to save on carbon taxes.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:30 p.m.
Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB
Mr. Speaker, I am really heartened to hear a concern from a Conservative member about the carbon footprint of Air Canada's operations. I would agree that when it comes to this, given where the jobs are most likely to go, as with a number of issues when it comes to global trade, assessing the carbon footprint of goods and not simply the cost charged to consumers at the counter is very important, indeed.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:30 p.m.
The Deputy Speaker Conservative Bruce Stanton
It is my duty pursuant to Standing Order 38 to inform the House that the questions to be raised tonight at the time of adjournment are as follows: the hon. member for Beloeil—Chambly, Rail Transportation; and the hon. member for Courtenay—Alberni, Telecommunications.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:30 p.m.
Erin O'Toole Conservative Durham, ON
Mr. Speaker, it is my privilege to rise to speak to Bill C-10 and to join in the debate today. This is one of those unique circumstances where the opposition, in many ways, is united in part and is in some ways speaking with a unified voice, but for different reasons, perhaps. In many ways, this debate is an interesting one for me, given my background in the Air Force and my background as a lawyer. In my early days, articling as a first-year lawyer, I was involved in the CCAA restructuring of Air Canada. That was a time when Canadians worried about losing our flagship carrier. The company successfully restructured under CCAA, which protected a lot of jobs, a lot of commercial relationships across the country, and the airline.
We all remember years when there were many more serving the country, companies like Canadian and Wardair. It shows how globally competitive this industry is.
I was very proud, as a young lawyer, to be involved with the firm that represented Air Canada in that restructuring many years ago.
Its heritage as a former crown corporation is really why we are here with Bill C-10, an act to amend the Air Canada Public Participation Act, which was a creature of the privatization. Most of the comments from my NDP friends along the way relate to the commitments made back in 1987 and 1988 when this crown corporation was privatized.
I do not think even my Liberal friends would suggest that the industry is the same today as it was in 1988. To suggest even the members of the unions they are talking about are performing the same tasks on the same type of aircraft would be false, because certainly the industry has changed in terms of technology, in terms of the needs of the workforce, and in terms of the globalization of the supply chain. Therefore, we have to have these debates in the House of Commons.
Where I am united with my NDP friends in my concern is really how this debate is coming to the floor. In many ways, the new Liberal government is showing that the old ways—and in fact the ways a lot of Canadians disliked about the Liberal governments in the past—appear to be back, when deals are made to benefit special interests or certain groups and the public policy ramifications of an issue are not actually spoken about.
I am going to raise a few of these points, in relation to the debate of Bill C-10 because I think they are important.
In many ways, the Liberals prove that old adage: why take one position on an issue when one can take two positions on an issue politically and advance both?
Here is one. Most of the Liberal Party at the time, in the 1980s, opposed privatization of Air Canada at the time when the Mulroney government proceeded with that privatization. Yet, here it is sneaking in an amendment to the participation aspects and sort of the job guarantees provided in the 1980s, with limited discussion and no real mention in its election document, which it holds sacrosanct in all other aspects of what it is doing in its early days, and we are here as a result of it.
It is also the result of its bad policy decision with respect to the Toronto island airport and the fact that a private sector operator was looking at buying a Bombardier aircraft at a time that Bombardier was seeking government assistance. However, because of a small lobby group in downtown Toronto, very influential within its caucus, it circumvented the regulatory process looking at the expansion of a regional airport.
That is not just a decision made in isolation, because our transportation networks are integrated. What happens about Billy Bishop airport will impact Hamilton, the airport in Kitchener-Waterloo, Pearson airport, and the Pickering airport and what size that takes in the future.
These decisions cannot be taken in isolation, but they stopped expansion applications and review for the Toronto Island, thereby eliminating a private sector sale for Bombardier at a time when it is teetering. Yet, behind Bill C-10, is really a deal, I believe, that was crafted by the federal government in relation to another purchaser acquiring said aircraft and coming to the rescue, so to speak. I would like the minister to bring to the House whether Bill C-10 was discussed as an element of the private sector sale to Bombardier that we see Air Canada announcing? The announcement came mere days after that company met with the minister, so what someone needs to do is connect the dots on all this and see what led up to Bill C-10. The reason it was not in the Liberals' election platform was that it has come about as a result of the challenges Bombardier is facing. That is my concern.
We need to have a full debate, with discussion of the impact of Bombardier's financial difficulties alongside sales of aircraft and alongside litigation that several other provinces were party to, in relation to the Air Canada Public Participation Act.
Bill C-10 is a small bill in terms of the number of words, but when the onion is peeled on the issues underlying this, as all members of the opposition have been doing today, we see there is a lot more to the bill than the couple of pages that it appears to represent, and the government has not been transparent on that at all. For a government whose hallmark is transparency and sunny ways, we have seen that jettisoned on most issues within weeks.
In my remarks I am going to explore why I think these underlying public policy decisions relate to what is before us in Bill C-10, and that is why I have serious concerns with the bill. The government has not been transparent on the road that has us here considering this amendment to a longstanding act and a longstanding practice.
I am also very proud, as a former officer of the RCAF, of our aerospace industry, very proud of Bombardier, proud of Air Canada, our carriers, and proud of the suppliers, which are world-class. That is why, when the government made a quick move to scuttle the expansion of the Toronto island airport without proper consultation, that impacts our industry, which is world-class. Many Canadians do not realize that Canada was the third nation in space, with Alouette I. Canada basically trained most of the pilots in the free world that won World War II with the British Commonwealth air training plan.
On the weekend, I played the Hon. George Hees, John Diefenbaker's transport minister, at a dinner that re-created the Avro Arrow dream. We celebrated aerospace and our achievements. Diefenbaker himself was not celebrated at this dinner, because he did cancel the Arrow, but we have a tremendous heritage, and the opportunities in this industry are really not well known by Canadians. We remain the number one producer, from an R and D and a production standpoint, of flight simulators around the world.
When I was in Seoul as the parliamentary secretary for international trade in the previous government, I toured CAE's simulator just outside Seoul, which provides flight training and aircrew training for Asian airlines. We were there as part of the South Korea trade agreement. That is a company with a global reputation as the best in the business, and we should celebrate that.
Canada remains the number three producer in terms of aircraft production, small and medium-size aircraft with a new larger one on the horizon from Bombardier, which will again be best in class. We are third in engine production for civil air purposes. These are incredible numbers. They are all well-paying, all highly skilled and high trade jobs, and they are all trade focused.
At a time when our dollar is lower and we have the ability to trade very competitively, we should be taking advantage of leveraging this industry, not secret deals that hold it back. There are $28 billion in revenue across the companies within this sector, both in the supply chain and in production and manufacturing; and 76,000 jobs across the country, in all provinces, with particularly well-regarded and highly concentrated industries in the Montreal area, Winnipeg, Toronto, and also in Mainland B.C. We should foster these jobs and work with them.
Our previous government did in terms of reforming research and development. In fact, the previous government outlined the Red Wilson report to ensure we constantly looked at our competitiveness. Red Wilson had been a corporate leader at CAE.
It is worth noting some of these companies, and I have a particular passion for them, not just because I am ex-air force, but because I am ex-minister of veterans affairs. A lot of these companies are veteran employers. In some cases, their senior leadership are veterans. They include MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates, the famed Canadarm, probably our biggest iconic R and D development; Viking Air, which has recreated some of the old classic de Havilland aircraft that have been flying for generations; Cascade; Avcorp; Bombardier; CAE; and COM DEV. We also have global companies producing in Canada, including Boeing, General Dynamics, and Lockheed Martin, through our industrial regional benefits programs that provide supply sector jobs as a result of our defence purchases, which at times the government seemed somewhat uncertain. However, if something is acquired, there is money put in to research and development into jobs on the ground here.
That supply chain is critical and is why our industry has to modernize. We need to have a debate on the ground about public participation and about the industry so our manufacturers, including some of the businesses I named, do not take advantage of servicing for Air Canada, or WestJet or Porter. They really need to be involved in the global supply chain for both maintenance and production.
What are we here for on Bill C-10? We have heard a lot of passion on the side of members of the New Democratic Party, but it boils down to three subtle changes to the act, which came in as a result of the privatization of Air Canada in 1988.
The bill would amend section 6(1)(d) of that act, changing the maintain operations and overhaul description of securing jobs as they stood in the 1980s into "...carry out or cause to be carried out...", which recognizes that a lot of specialized manufacturers, whether landing gear or components, can provide that specialized life cycle maintenance that is important in the airline industry, and that specialization can happen through the carrying out. That makes sense in this environment, but we have not heard that because of the secret deals that have brought us to Bill C-10.
The operation and overhaul would be expanded to show that it would include any type of work related to airframes, engines, and components mainly because we have some expertise on a sub-component basis in Canada in terms of some of the leading producers.
The geographic areas protected back in 1988 with the privatization at that time were described as the city of Winnipeg, the city of Mississauga and the Montreal urban area, because I think they needed to describe that in a wider sense. The new amendments proposed in Bill C-10 will refine that to the provinces, as opposed to those cities proper.
The substance of Bill C-10 in some ways recognizes the fact that the industry is not the same industry it was in 1988. I can certainly understand why Air Canada probably wants to be unshackled from the requirements put on it in 1988 to ensure that the privatization was not too disruptive.
If we look at the airline as it stands today, it is strong and a global leader in many ways, but it is also subject to global competition. It has to be able to take advantage of the same expertise and opportunity. Therefore, if we are carry out, or cause to be carried out in a certain part of Canada, as long as we are getting that best-in-class ability to maintain and modernize fleets, then that is what we want to see.
The other thing I said at the outset, which has us here in this debate today and that the government has not been transparent on, is the fact that Bill C-10 is really the result of litigation in relation to adherence to this act. As I said, Air Canada probably, understandably, feels unfairly shackled by something that was done, not just by the last government or the previous government, but three governments ago, in the 1980s at a time when privatizations were a little newer. However, I think today most Canadians would certainly not expect the federal government to operate its airline in a competitive environment where there is a lot of choice.
Quebec and Manitoba joined the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers in litigation related to business changes in those jurisdictions. Certainly, with that union involved, it is why my friends in the NDP are as passionate, and I respect their standing up for workers and items they believe. However, I would suggest that their workers would tell them that this is not the same industry that it was in 1988.
What we saw was the government of Quebec drop its participation in this litigation as a result of an Air Canada decision to purchase aircraft. Obviously, there was some political horse-trading that went on, and the Quebec government removed itself from the litigation in return for Air Canada supporting the industry through the acquisition of Bombardier aircraft.
Manitoba also removed itself from this litigation by carving out a deal whereby Air Canada supported three world-class aerospace services suppliers in Manitoba and leased one of the Air Canada maintenance hangars to an operator in Manitoba on favourable terms. In that case, there was another provincial government coming up with a deal it thought was sound enough to remove itself from a civil action in relation to an act from 1980s.
As I said at the outset of my remarks, I would have much preferred it if the Minister of Transport had come to the House and told us that Bill C-10 was the result of yet another pragmatic deal that was made. However, to do that, he would have had to outline all aspects of that deal, what exactly happened, and if the government approached a private sector player to help it with respect to requests from Bombardier for assistance.
This is where we get into some difficult territory. Should the government be convening these meetings behind closed doors to cobble out a position, particularly when the minister was getting heat for ending the exploration of the expansion of the Toronto Island Billy Bishop Airport, and cancelled that with a tweak after demands from people within his caucus and within a group in Toronto advocated against an expansion? What that cancellation led to was a private sector company that was planning an acquisition of Bombardier aircraft could no longer proceed. All of these events gather, and that is the run-up to why we have Bill C-10.
We can actually have a rational discussion on whether it would be helpful to unshackle a company from requirements that limit its competitiveness from 1988 legislation. We can have that discussion, and I would like to, because the minister and the Liberal government have not come to the House in an open and transparent way, much like the parliamentary budget officer said they approached their recent budget, the least transparent in over 15 years.
I would like the government to outline all aspects that went into Bill C-10: the related litigation, the pressures in relation to the financial stability of Bombardier, and Air Canada's need to be competitive in a global age. I think we could have a proper debate if that was before the House. I am disappointed the information is not here for this debate.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:55 p.m.
London West Ontario
Kate Young LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport
Mr. Speaker, I would like to underscore a couple of points for clarity.
The government wants Air Canada, which is a private company, to have the flexibility it needs to manage its business operations in 2016. We understand that since 1989, the air transportation sector has evolved and will continue to evolve. Air Canada needs the tools and regulatory supports to keep pace. However, this must be done within a framework that maintains adequate safeguards for Canadian workers and suppliers. That is why we propose to ensure the act continues to require that Air Canada carry out aircraft maintenance in certain Canadian regions. Therefore, we want this bill to proceed to the committee stage so we can hear from stakeholders and have more debate at the committee level.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:55 p.m.
Erin O'Toole Conservative Durham, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think the parliamentary secretary could detect from most of my remarks that it is not the actual policy within Bill C-10 that I take issue with, but it is the road getting to Bill C-10 that causes me some difficulty.
As I said at the beginning of my speech, having worked on the restructuring of Air Canada and seeing its growth and success in recent years under the strong leadership of Calin Rovinescu and the team, there is a good debate to be had on whether it should be shackled exactly to the purposes of the 1988 act.
Therefore, I would ask her this. Was she part of the meetings on February 15 that the minister had with that company? Did the minister facilitate this deal, much like the Quebec government facilitated a settlement of litigation, much like the Manitoba government facilitated a deal? It is the facilitation that is an important part of Bill C-10, and that has not been explained to the House.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:55 p.m.
Matthew Dubé NDP Beloeil—Chambly, QC
Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for his speech.
The two opposition parties are both opposed to the bill, but not for exactly the same reasons. I would like my colleague to talk briefly about the Liberals' about-face on this file.
I had an opportunity to read a quote before. I would like to read another one. Let us keep going and digging through the archives of the transport committee.
One member stated:
I do believe in the rule of law. I do believe that whether an individual or a corporation breaks the law, there should be some justice that comes out of it....The workers of Aveos, who were formerly Air Canada employees, feel that there has not been any justice, that their government has let them down.
He then reads the law as it currently exists, before Bill C-10 of course.
He then goes on to accuse Air Canada of wanting to privatize. He states:
...as someone who is concerned about the worker, we read that and interpret it as meaning that Air Canada is obligated to maintain those overhaul centres. Then Air Canada kind of privatizes and pushes that responsibility over to Aveos. A court then makes a decision that because Aveos is now there, Air Canada is indirectly keeping those jobs.
Who said that? Once again, the member for Winnipeg North, who is showing us how the Liberal government opposes one way and governs another.
I would like to hear my colleague's comments on that.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
4:55 p.m.
Erin O'Toole Conservative Durham, ON
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his passion on this issue. We have heard some of his colleagues express the same concerns. Where we do differ is that the Progressive Conservative government of Prime Minister Mulroney privatized Air Canada. At the time, the public policy decisions were reflected in the Public Participation Act. I would think it would be fair to say, and I think my friend would agree, that the centres for excellence in the aerospace industry are still quite strong, and I have mentioned our strengths in that industry in Montreal, in Winnipeg in particular, and in Toronto. What has changed is the nature of the global supply chain. These are the debates we should be having in this Commons, not in a court of law, which is the route some of the unions have taken.
To hold the industry to a frozen moment in time in 1988 would not be prudent. However, what we have not had here is the full discussion that has taken place in Quebec or in Winnipeg with respect to how those governments took pragmatic public policy decisions to then remove themselves from litigation related to this act. The same thing has happened here. I have outlined in my speech where I think it has happened. However, I would prefer that the minister would get up and say that in the House.
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
5 p.m.
Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB
Mr. Speaker, I want to note that there are many other things the government could be doing that would improve the competitiveness of Air Canada that do not negatively impact workers. For instance, they could raise the foreign ownership threshold. They could work to streamline processes in terms of customs. They could work to realign regulations. Air Canada has mentioned a variety of things as contributing to and helping its competitiveness, and this is not one of them.
Could the member speculate on why the government is moving in this direction, and maybe identify, as I have, alternative ways that we could help to increase Air Canada's competitiveness?
Air Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
5 p.m.
Erin O'Toole Conservative Durham, ON
Mr. Speaker, there are a variety of public policy options available to the government.
In the previous government, the capital cost allowance acceleration and a variety of other R and D credits and reforms were ways we were trying to help a range of manufacturing industries across the country, and particularly in my province of Ontario. I met regularly with the Aerospace Industries Association in Canada on ways that we could help them.
What we see here, as I said earlier in my speech and in previous answers to questions, is something that is the result of litigation, which is the result of the financial instability of one of those aircraft assemblers. What we have not had is a proper talk on that industry.
Having lived and served in the air force in Winnipeg, I know the excellent track record and global reputation of that industry. How can we best facilitate the success of that industry? Some of the policies of the previous government are the answer, as well as letting the regulatory process for airports like the Toronto island airport run its course. Then the private sector will actually help before the government has to come in with a bailout.


text:
And by the way, while thinking about profanity, I realized the various ways it can be described. Let's see: there's the aforementioned cursing and having a foul mouth; then there's swearing, cussing, obscene language, indecent language, bad language, having a dirty mouth, having a potty mouth, vulgar language, French (as in, "Excuse my French") and so on.
This decision hasn't been a big deal; after all, it's my home and everyone who visits, knows to curb his or her language when my children are around. Actually, most of our visitors don't even "slip up," even when the kids aren't around. The public arena is a different story.
When traveling, we've been known to frequent the chain restaurants, along with other vacationers and the locals. On a memorable family outing, the people in the adjacent booth were a little colorful. After dropping the f-bomb two or three times, DH couldn't stand it any longer. First he told the waiter to say something to them, and he did – timidly - so it continued; as if they just couldn't control themselves. Sooo… DH got up and went to their table to tell them that his wife and children were behind them at the next table, and for them to "watch their mouths," as Darling Wife (me) prayed that he didn't get punched.
Civilized human beings they were – they halted the bad language and quieted down.
(To my nosey kids who are reading this post: "It's a joke, girls!" An intended contradiction.)
All was good, until a Mommy, Daddy, and Toddlers came and sat two feet away from us. Darling Cousin had gotten deep into the family gossip, when "sh*t" comes out of her mouth. I glanced over to the sweet family to see if there was a reaction.
None that I noticed.
DC dropped another goody. I cringed. Then I uttered that cliché phrase, "Watch your mouth. There are children at the next table."
My lovable cousin was confused for a second, and then issued a heartfelt apology to me. It was a revelation to her, a woman who does not have kids, that her language might be offensive.
Swearing, cursing, cussing - whatever you call it…
What do you think?
Image found here.


text:
The World Health Organization (WHO) reported in 2015 that there are 1.89 billion people worldwide with vision afflicted by refractive errors such as myopia (nearsightedness) and hyperopia … [Read more...]
Archives for February 2019
Eyeglasses: A Short History
Eyeglasses were one of the earliest solutions for correcting common vision problems such as myopia and hyperopia, and they remain a popular option to this day. In today's post, Vienna Eyecare Center … [Read more...]
Low Vision: An Overview
The term "low vision" applies to the types of visual impairment that can't be corrected with prescription eyeglasses, contact lenses or eye surgery. Eye care specialist Vienna Eyecare Center provides … [Read more...]


text: Katy had a very rare talent that of good original design and the skill of a couture fashion house. She communicates well and is committed to her bride providing unique gowns to a clients particular requirements. Her styling is awesome based on elegance, balance and a magic of grace. As an individual she has a real eye for detail, and a skill rarely seen in bespoke fashion which is hand made dresses of beauty. A great personality she managed life with a real can do attitude. I'd recommend Katy.


text:
The Clubhouse
Summer Day Camp
|Entering 1st Grade - 5th Grade
+ options for younger kids
|Any consistent 10 hours per day between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday-Friday
|$240 / Week
( Includes a field trip, all lunches, and snacks )
|* CDA, YMCA, YMCA Stage 1 Accepted
About Clubhouse Summer Day Camps
The Clubhouse summer day camps provide kids outrageous fun and excitement in addition to keeping them sharp with learning activities all summer long. We pride ourselves on offering action packed days through water play, cool crafts, cooperative games, science experiments, yummy cooking classes, spectacular sports and incredible friendships. Daily activities also include reading, fun math projects, thinking games and small group times where your child will have the ability to engage in mind challenges and educational opportunities.
Camp "Kiddo" & Kindergarten Readiness
We also offer summer camps for younger children too! Children up to 4 years old can enjoy camp and continue to learn and grow with fun themed activities similar to our school age camp. Children are cared for in our preschool setting and grouped age appropriately by our preschool staff. They'll have the opportunity to play outdoors, interact with other children and engage in plenty of hands on adventure.
- Low teacher to child ratios
- Healthy meals included
- Fun, Healthy and active experiences
- Weekly field trips
- Flexible full-day
The Clubhouse Day Camper
- Makes lots of friends
- Experiences San Diego Sites
- Loves a Big Challenge
- Feels Safe and Healthy
- Is Imprinted with Enduring Memories
- Sleeps Like a Bear
10 Reasons to join us!
- FUN Experiences
- Professionally Trained Staff Licensed by Community Care Licensing
- Low teacher to child ratios
- SAFE and happy!
- Affordable
- Weekly FIELD TRIPS
- HEALTHY & Active
- Flexible FULL DAY
- Highly Regarded
- Healthy Meals Included
LEADERSHIP launch
Leadership week kicks off the summer with getting to know others and discovering the unique leadership qualities in each individual camper. Collaborative work sessions and team building activities will build confidence, resilience and responsibility, empathy and the value of diversity to empower and inspire leaders. By the end of the week campers will know what it takes to make a great leader and how to empower and inspire others.
DATE: June 10-14
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals
UNDER THE sea
Explore the wonder and fascination of the deep sea in this underwater adventure camp. Ocean voyagers will experience the thrill of scientific ocean discovery during a trip to Birch Aquarium and field exploration at a local beach. Dockside activities include ocean related arts and crafts, games and even a few "fish stories." We are closed July 4th.
DATE: July 1-5
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals
ARTFUL antics
Come and create with different artistic mediums including photography, acrylic paints, clay and oil pastels. We may even create a script for a summertime story and make a movie. The artistic exploration continues with a dance contest, talent show and a trip to the Museum of Making Music.
DATE: July 22-26
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals
MAD science
Turn up your curiosity and team up with fellow "scientists and inventors," participating in interactive experiments, involving anything from rocks and minerals to electronic circuits and chemicals. We'll do some investigative reporting, get a little messy and explore the science behind your favorite sport or hobby.
DATE: June 17-21
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals
ALL BALL week
This week campers definitely have a BALL exploring all things involving a ball (ball shaped/ball related). Campers will be able to play traditional ball sports such as basketball, volleyball and soccer but with exciting twist. After sporting around the ball campers will even make and eat ball-shaped foods!
DATE: July 8-12
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals
TROPICAL paradise
Relax on a different tropical island everyday! Join us as we explore the various island environments while noshing on juicy pineapple and sipping fresh fruit smoothies. Handmade leis, grass skirts, a hula or stimulated surf lesson and a fun-filled luau round out this trip to paradise!
DATE: July 29 – August 2
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals
NICKELODEON days
Explore the wacky and fun world of Nickelodeon through themed activities that relate to popular shows on Nickelodeon. Campers will compete in game shows, preform science experiments seen on TV, take on the role of a favorite character, and learn from the positive life lessons Nickelodeon shows portray. This is one week campers will not want to miss!
DATE: June 24-28
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals
GET YOUR game on
Here is an awesome chance to challenge your skills at different board, card, arcade, and sports games such as Family Feud, Minute to Win It and Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader? This camp has something for everyone who likes to play games including team tournaments, old-school card games and a trip to Boomers! We'll also play some soccer and gaga ball!
DATE: July 15-19
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals
GIVING BACK attack
Develop a sense of community, gain personal self-confidence and an inherit sense of caring while giving back to our community. We'll strive to build a place where everyone is equal and included, supported and cared for, connected and challenged. Campers will prepare food for the needy, make recycled art and clean up our local environment.
DATE: August 5-9
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals
UNDER THE paradise BIG TOP
Clubhouse Campers are in charge this week! They'll help create different carnival games and activities, and get prizes and treats galore! Anticipation is at an all-time high leading up to this end-of-summer celebration. You will not want to miss this amazing summer bash!!!
DATE: August 12-16
LOCATIONS: All Preschools
INCLUDES: Field Trip & Meals


text:
Mitchell, originally from Long Island, NY, moved to Charlotte in 2004. His passion is to help people. Beginning in food services and later in customer service, he began to realize his goal was to work in real estate. After passing his real estate exams in both North Carolina and South Carolina he found a home at Ivester Jackson Distinctive Properties. Mitchell enjoys assisting buyers and sellers with the process and helping people achieve all their real estate needs.
When he is not at work, he enjoys following the New York Giants and New York Yankees, traveling, networking, and spending time with his family and friends.


text:
Services (in order of what we're good at/type of preferred business):
Strategy Development, Branding, Integrated Marketing, Experiential Marketing,
Consumer Insight Research, Social Media
Alchemy at AMS joined forces with Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) just as it was launching one of the most significant service expansions in its history to create an integrated campaign to build awareness and ridership for the much-anticipated opening of its Orange Line to DFW International Airport.
Beginning with strategic planning and creative ideation, we crafted an approach around the idea that DART connects you to the world. The fully integrated campaign included traffic and cinema spots, radio spots, digital outdoor, transit and print advertising, consumer sweepstakes, as well as PR and experiential pop-up events. Fueling a huge amount of wanderlust, the "DART to DFW" campaign amassed more than 25 million media impressions and increased ridership to the DFW Airport beyond expectations during the launch.
Then the transit experts wanted to tackle an even loftier objective: Change overall consumer perceptions of DART by getting current riders to use DART for new occasions and non-riders to think of DART differently and consider taking it for new occasions. Our team created a marketing plan that integrated the entire consumer experience through paid, owned and earned media utilizing video marketing, print and digital ads, out-of-home and transits ads, and social media.
To position DART as the trusted guide that empowers discovery, the "DARTable Gems" campaign highlighted 50 unique "gems" (locations of the unusual/interesting variety) that were "DARTable" (within a short walk of a DART station or stop). And the results were outstanding—more than half of respondents who saw the ads said they were willing to explore a DARTable Gem using DART, and travel for leisure ridership increased from 68% to 74% with an even bigger increase among existing riders—from 70% to 83%.


text:
Content:84% Polyester /16%Spandex
Width: 58"
Description: A premium fabric. Designer deadstock fabric. A matte cool stretchy fabric ideal for athletic wear, leotards, and dance, and swim! Excellent quality. 50% 4 way stretch. medium weight. This bohemian beautiful print is a one sided border print with border about 21" long. Scroll pictures to see details.
End of Bolt price of $15.00 for 2 yard cut.


text:
By Julie Tomascik
Safety is a priority on Texas farms and ranches, and additional emphasis is being placed on farm safety this week through the Agricultural Safety Awareness Program.
As part of the program, March 3-9 has been designated as Agricultural Safety Awareness Week.
U.S. Agricultural Safety and Health Centers is joining efforts with the American Farm Bureau Federation and state Farm Bureaus to promote the week. This year, the theme is "Safety: Know Your Limits."
The program aims to keep those in agriculture safe and healthy by helping them recognize common dangers to physical and mental health.
A different safety focus will be highlighted each day of the week, including:
Monday, March 4 – Emergency Preparedness
Tuesday, March 5 – Livestock
Wednesday, March 6 – Heat Stress and Hydration
Thursday, March 7 – Roadway Safety
Friday, March 8 – Hearing Safety
Throughout the week and the year, Farm Bureau encourages farmers and ranchers to make safety a priority on the farm.
Join the conversation this week on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram with #ASAP19 and #KeepFarmsSafe.
For more information and resources, visit the ASAP Facebook page.
The 11 U.S. Agricultural Safety and Health Centers are funded by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
For content and ideas about how to stay safe while working in agriculture, forestry and fishing, visit the U.S. Agricultural Safety and Health Centers' YouTube channel.
The Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers' Compensation Workplace Safety also offers tips for farm tractor road safety.


text:
Subscribe to our newsletter to get 10% off... / Recevez une remise de -10% en vous inscrivant à la newsletter
Handmade ceramic serving dish 34cm - order for January delivery
Wheel thrown ceramic serving dish with white glaze and subtle patterns.
34cm diam.
Food safe. Dishwasher and oven-proof.
Note : order now for January delivery


text:
Introduction: Creative Ways to Exstinguish a Fire
Here are several ways to extinguish a fire:
*Baking Soda
*Smothering it
*Crushing It
Teacher Notes
Teachers! Did you use this instructable in your classroom?
Add a Teacher Note to share how you incorporated it into your lesson.
Step 1: Small Fire
If its a small fire and if you have a big enough jar just cover the whole flame. The jar should be covering the candle/small fire. The jar should cut off the oxygen one of the essential to fire.
Step 2: Dirt
This si the way to put a fire out with dirt. Bigger fires=more shovlesful of dirt. When putting out a fire with dirt make sure u cover everything the good part about using dirt si that that part of the fire cant relight. Cover all the fire this will suffacate the fire.
Step 3: Water
If theres a fire this is the first thing that comes to mind is WATER!!! Well the larger the fire the more water youll need so the size ranges. Water puts out fire but can be evaporated and reelight if the fire is hot enough. Just pour the water on the fire. Aim at the embers that were the fire is.
Step 4: Baking Soda
This is the semi creative one. It was well known that baking soda puts a fire out but the info has dispeared through the ages. Just four the powder on the fire and wham it out.
Step 5: Sorry
Sorry I couldn't show picks of dead body or pee on a fire, but I thought that was a little inappropriate. But i did show you many ways to put a fire out and told you some other ways.
Be the First to Share
6 Discussions
if you lick your finger and then clamp down on a candle will it hurt?
no thats one of my favorite things to do with fire. just do it quickly
my brother dose that every time he puts out a candle
yeah, after i asked that question i lit a match and did it, its pretty fun and doesnt hurt unless you leave ur fingers on it.
Heck, you don't even need to lick you fingers first, thats the way I do it (I am not responsible if you try it that way and burn yourself). Just be careful.
I've been camping and had one of the other guys get up in the middle of the night and pee on our fire. We were all very mad at that guy when we woke up cold and discovered that the fire had "gone out." It works, though!


text:
Our team is passionate about our clothing line and what it can do for you and your busy schedule. As a community of professionals, we must have clothing that lends itself to our productive lifestyle.
As a nurse and busy mother of two daughters, I realized my scrubs were not functionally designed for the professionals that wear them from the AM and sometimes into the PM of our days. In a society that does not slow down, I knew I had to design clothing that would keep up with my on-the-go lifestyle.
That is where AM PM Medical Apparel came in.
My vision was to design scrub apparel that could get me comfortably through the AM of my work day and seamlessly carry me into any PM activities that always hold me captive as I am a busy mom, wife, friend, daughter, sister, and neighbor that does not easily say "No" when something is needed of me.
- Patented Two-Way Capri Design w/Reflective Lining Option
- 4 Way Stretch Fabric In a Variety of Colors
- Zip-Out Jacket w/5 Pockets For Your Every Day Carry
- Antimicrobial Protection
- Wrinkle Resistant
- Moisture Wicking
- Flattering | Fit Yoga Waistband


text:
Respite from the unsightly cheap sexy lingerie enemy might embrace terms of support, time for any bubble shower or a pink increased. Many of the publications even have on the web websites the area you would probably get some style advice and other information — one other place value looking at. Sadly, the vogue globe is about small girls, yet issues are gradually changing. Phyllis continues to be to be considerably in demand like a fashion makeup artist and has just recently worked with Pharrell Williams and Kylie Minogue. You can assure product security by choosing from qualified suppliers, along with 150 with ISO9001, 149 with Other, and 117 with BSCI qualification. A: Completely different products offers totally different worth, although the same product designed to use completely different fabric and craftsmanship could possess totally different cost, as suppliers, we promiss to supply among the best pre-sales and after-sales support for the shoppers! Sexy underwear products are most well-known in Traditional western Europe, The united states, and Jap Europe. The wide range of clothing products shows a variety of closet necessities every part otherwise.
Truly, fits are comfy as well as simple plus size bodystocking to wear and straightforward to consider care not to mention reasonably priced to any or all vary of ladies. Once they do correctly, take actually little improvement as a positive sign and reveal your infant just how comfortable if you're of them. However, staircase displays a two-storey video display playing video footage of all the items from displays to behind-the-scenes on advertisements. I've in no way heard of the product before! The majority of have signals displaying costs as much as 30, 000 yen. You additionally gave the impression to become chronically exhausted within the afternoon, no matter how much sleep you purchased the night period earlier than. Usually do not misunderstand us_we like somewhat pink like a lot because the following man (or gal), nevertheless we forecast that obtaining there is a big a part of the fun! In the event that you've in no way tried this fun way of bringing enjoyment to your favourite set of sneakers, don't fear — we've managed to get easy and simple for you!
Deliver sexy returning dhajy1jtdof to the bedroom when you set our unique sexy in addition measurement underwear together with your preferred strappy mycket bra or simply absolutely nothing in any respect. Reconsider to the occasions once you two had been getting to know one another better, and recall the problems he/she pointed out about what they will like/love. It's not a big-deal in your fifty percent – once again, think of the income one can generate. Nevertheless, it's extremely simple to discover who's. Your associate who had been as soon as seeking you to become in her arms regularly, has immediately started staying away from being romantic with both you and is getting annoyed manner a lot, with no obvious cause! Complete your intimate put on assortment having a silk trip bag to provide your intimates travel accommodations worthy of their particular beauty. Olivia Okay Communion dresses — Olivia Okay Communionwear provides a incredible assortment of communion dresses to fit every taste. Whether you select correct this moment's maxi dresses or continue with a knee-length sundress, you will look stylish. You'll look and feel wonderful about this seductive fine mesh one-piece high lower underwear bodysuit with thick connectors and a deep neckline. The limited version dress is a chiffon piece with elegant side slits, sleeves and deep bust opening.
About 50 six% plus size bodystocking of these are laundry baggage & baskets, 1% are totes, and 1% are purchasing bags. Each one of the older children have their personal bag dangling on their own connect in the laundry space. Kurt Cobain is sure to achieve success, notably around the off probability that you have to start a date that might go because Courtney Like. A CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT can effortlessly pull the best 12 months earnings and utilize the service from it if anticipated. You may extend your dollars for individuals who learn how to buy clothes that are flexible, which you'll inter-change with one another. This really is essential since not exclusively do each goes along numerous alternative different items, also, they are safe for nearly each event and extremely simple to take care of. If you find yourself at the beach or pool, merchant your sunscreen in a awesome place. You need to have the ability to easily select one thing which usually is ideal within your fiance. Most of the women want comfy and sexy underwear to put on. e to put on.


text:
In this episode of Spilling Tea w/ Samantha & Dr. B, we talk about a great many things … like sex dreams, Tom Hiddelston's penis, and my washing machine. What do they all have in common? You'll have to watch to find out!
Have you ever had a sex dream about a celebrity? Tells us below!
You can find Dr. B and I all over the internet, so come have fun with us!
Dr. B ~~ http://www.chrisbelous.com
Insta: http://www.instagram.com/chrisbelous
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/chrisbelous
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/realdrb
Samantha ~~ http://www.samanthaheuwagen.com
Insta: http://www.instagram.com/samantha_heu…
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/sheuwagen
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/609493369396318/


text:
Becoming Us is Serene Hackel's debut novel. It is drawn from the true stories her mother told Serene about the experiences of her grandparents, her mother and her siblings; grounded in established historical fact.
At age eighteen, orphan Minnie Margolis was sent from her native Poland to Vienna, Austria, a city where she had no connections. After literally bumping into the man who would one day become her husband, Minnie's Search for roots drew her to the United States as a shy immigrant who sought to embrace American values, politics, and freedom.
Told in Minnie's voice as well as that of her husband and oldest daughter, this compelling story follows one family as they move from the old world to the new, experiencing all the cultural forces that swept them along in this whirlwind of change.
GPL: F Hackel


text:
I had a serious work accident in January 2012 which resulted in a serious fracture of both leg bones in my left leg and severe muscle damage. I was bedridden for almost 9 months and unable to work. Ben and staff immediately came to bat for me and quickly had my income protection activated, Ben even negotiated with my insurer for a better rate than I was normally entitled to. Through all stages of my recovery I had constant updates and contact from Ben who helped resolve any financial stresses on myself and my family, I was able to focus on my healing and recovery while my finances were looked after by their helpful team. They were there for me when I really needed support and were incredibly easy to deal with.
Aubin Grove WA


text: Advertisement Advertisement Community Blogs The race is on with Russell Crowe and Elizabeth Banks! Mar 08, 2011 | 12:00 AM Next Gallery PHOTOS Rebelution Brings the Love to Our Virginia Beach Amphitheater PHOTOS Photoblogging Beloff | Lantern Asia Makes Norfolk Even More Beautiful Advertisement Community Blogs Community Blogs Yanni Enchants His Audience At Our Sandler Center For The Performing Arts More family time, learning new skills, "puppy breaks" among 2018 resolutions for animal care officials Faith and reality go head-to-head in "All Saints" Gru's family grows in "Despicable Me 3" The price of obsession revealed in "Letter from an Unknown Woman" History and fiction merge in "Victoria & Abdul" Dylan O'Brien and Michael Keaton headline "American Assassin" "Operation Petticoat" sails in with extras galore! Advertisement Latest Photos USNS Comfort arrives in New York Preaching from the rooftop Matt Kucharski & Sean Brickell USNS Comfort departs for New York to help fight coronavirus pandemic Portsmouth students can't come to school, so teachers come to them — safely


text:
Aquafresh RO Customer Care The Nilgiris - Aquafresh RO Customer Care The Nilgiris is available 24x7. If you have any kind of query related to Aquafresh RO in The Nilgiris, you can simply call Aquafresh customer care phone number. Aquafresh customer care The Nilgiris team is always ready to resolve your queries.
Aquafresh RO Toll Free Number The Nilgiris - You can register your Aquafresh RO related queries by using Aquafresh RO tollfree number The Nilgiris. Being one of the top companies in India, Aquafresh RO customer care toll free team provides a 360-degree solution.
Aquafresh RO Helpline The Nilgiris - To find out a solution of Aquafresh RO problems or know about Aquafresh RO latest products in The Nilgiris, you can now call on Aquafresh RO Helpline number.
Customer Care Type
Contact Number
Aquafresh Customer Care Number The Nilgiris
Aquafresh Complaint The Nilgiris
Aquafresh Toll Free Number The Nilgiris
Aquafresh Helpline in The Nilgiris
Aquafresh Customer Service The Nilgiris