text:
- March 1, 2016
Have you ever had surgery of any kind? Whether inpatient or outpatient there's usually a sedation factor: it makes the procedure easier on everyone! Many of the patients we see at our Ortonville dentist office seem to believe that dental sedation doesn't follow the same rules – most believe it's only for patients who are scared of dental care.
While the nervous patient can benefit greatly from dental sedation they aren't the only one. There are several kinds of patients who will find sedation to be a great option for them – you might even be one!
Who Can Benefit From Dental Sedation?
Everyone has different needs, constraints, and desires when it comes to dental care. Almost all of those people could benefit from sedation at some point in their lives, which is why we're glad to offer three different levels to all our patients!
- Nitrous Oxide is ideal for short appointments: it isn't too strong and wears off quickly after your appointment. You'll feel calm and at ease while under the effects of nitrous, which is commonly called "laughing gas."
- Oral Sedation is a pill prescribed to you prior to your procedure. You'll take it before you come in, and by the time you sit down in our dental chair you'll already be feeling really relaxed. It lasts longer, is stronger, and also has an amnesic quality so you won't remember the procedure at all.
So, which of these sedation options has the greatest effect? It all depends on who you are and what you need!
Busy People: We're Here For You!
Not every dental procedure can be resolved in one quick visit, and the reason for that isn't because the work is too complicated. We like to break up procedures because they're difficult for patients, and sitting through a full deep cleaning or a multiple implant procedure can be really taxing.
If you're a busy person who can't take multiple trips away from work, children, or other obligations then sedation is a great idea for you. With sedation you can have more complex work done in a single sitting, allowing you to get on with your life with less interruptions!
It can be hard to find babysitters multiple times, take multiple vacation days, or leave a project sitting all on account of your teeth, and now you don't have to!
The Nervous Patient: We Can't Forget You!
We would be remiss if we didn't mention nervous patients when talking about sedation: they're a big reason we offer it as a service! A lot of people simply can't handle dental care, and we understand why: it can be intimidating, stressful, and uncomfortable.
Nervous patients can benefit a lot from even the lowest levels of sedation. Nitrous oxide can be enough to take the edge off of dental care, leaving you relaxed and at peace with the care you're going to receive.
We're always glad to offer sedation to anyone who needs it. We only ask that you come to Brandon Family Dental with an open mind toward your dental care: we're not here to hurt you – we want to keep your smile healthy for years to come!
Special Needs Patients
If you're responsible for someone else's care you know how stressful medical visits of any kind can be. Sometimes people simply don't understand what kind of care they need, and dentistry is one of the most in-your-face types of medicine out there.
For patients who might not understand or who could react poorly to even the simplest dental procedures we recommend sedation. It can make care a lot easier to provide and receive, especially for patients who might become a danger to themselves during treatment.
We're happy to discuss any special considerations a patient may need ahead of their appointment. We want to make dental care great for every single person we see!
Sedation: It Can Help!
These three types of people are hardly the only ones who can benefit from sedation – you might be able to think of other kinds of people right off the top of your head. Some of them could even be you, so don't exclude your needs from this list either!
If you want to find peace with your dental care then call our Ortonville office right away at 248-469-0218 or request an appointment by filling out our online form. We look forward to seeing you soon!


text:
Overtakes. Score: 10. I'm all for quality overtakes over quantity overtakes, and Jacques Villeneuve is a great example. Those single-seaters really show who's talented and who's not. Who has the guts and who hasn't. Who knows how to be bold and overtake and who doesn't. If only they got rid of the horrible circuits (the worst Tilkedromes) and started to add more gravel escape routes…
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Ferrari SF70H. Score: 10. The little one, Gina, is growing well. It is astonishing to see Maranello's men bringing some innovations to the second Grand Prix… and they work! Good job! Who knows how it would have been a dry Grand Prix…
Team Ferrari. Score: 8. The strategy they tried on Vettel was a well-calculated hazard, in those circumstances it was quite predictable that an S-Car would have shown up. The problem was the passage in the pit lane (it was unpredictable) and Raikkonen that blocked the way. If this happened in any other part of the circuit, they wouldn't have passed in the pit lane, and Vettel would almost certainly have snatched victory (or, at least, we would have seen a close duel with Hamilton). But I understand Ferrari's team, if they had given instructions from the team they would have been criticized, however, they didn't give it, and they have been criticized anyway. It's easy to judge while we watch the Grand Prix sitting comfortably in our homes.
Hamilton. Score: 9. Lonely race for him. As soon as Vettel marks a fast lap, he does the same. One all, it's a draw with the Ferrari's man. I feel like it's more his victory rather than Mercedes' victory.
Hamilton vs Rosberg. Score: 2. Just stop this! Hamilton keeps teasing his nerdy former teammate. I can understand that he's bothered because he doesn't have a payback on the race track. Everybody should know how to be a gracious loser (and appreciate and make someone appreciate your victories). Hamilton makes a bad impression, rather than Rosberg (who on social networks is acting as if nothing happened). Maybe the Valkyrie that escorts him to every interview in a diligent and motherly way should explain it to him.
Hamilton in love with Vettel. Score: 2. This new budding romance, with sweet and passionate declarations, doesn't convince me at all. I believe that Hamilton whispers love words just to keep diminishing Rosberg (see above). If Vettel starts to rise in the ranking, I bet they will start to fall apart… or maybe I'm just cynical and I know nothing about heart's reasons
Vettel. Score: 10. I give him a point more compared to Hamilton because he did a masterpiece overtaking Ricciardo. This performance kind of reminds me of Villeneuve vs Arnaux (Dijon) and Mansell vs Senna (Spain). Awesome.
Mad Max. Score: 8. As I said before: I notice that he's matured. He's always really fast and tough, but he doesn't go over the limit. He embarrasses his teammate with a great overtake, tries to catch Hamilton, and he fails under Vettel's pressure (he's human after all). If he keeps going like that I'll have to remove the nickname "mad". It wouldn't be pleasant (just joking).
Ricciardo. Score: 6. His intention was to give tit for tat to his teammate, during the last laps, but he didn't make it. Overall he looks like a sort of slow cab driver.
Bottas. Score: 5. He qualifies pretty well (and he must be under a lot of pressure to confront himself with a legend like Hamilton). The S-Car's mistake was a newbie mistake. But it is not an isolated case and it is not the most famous. I can recall Imola's Grand Prix, in 1991, when Prost started to "surf" during the reconnaissance lap, before the race. He was driving a Ferrari.
Raikkonen. Score: 5. Is Iceman becoming a shrinking violet? Second race without praise or blame. During the race he pointed out some issues with power gaps and according to Antonini (in live coverage) it was fixed via software. To me he's ready to retire, and I'm very sorry to say that. He acted like he was an exquisite Moet & Chandon cork and he made his teammate lose precious seconds.
Giovinazzi. Score: postponed. He's an unquestionable talent. But in two days he did two almost identical crashes (and he was the only one to do that), it reminded me of Massa during his last year in Ferrari (in Montecarlo, I believe). Sauber's team, which is currently in troubled waters, doesn't even know anymore how to put together the pieces to create a good single-seater to bring to the next GP. And, crashing on the main straight, he indirectly damaged Ferrari's aggressive strategy with Vettel. Let's hope the young Italian pilot does better in the next Grand Prix.
Race direction. Score: 7. The turnaround that started with this championship keeps going on. The race marshals are featureless (and it should be like that, except for extreme cases) and the pilots aren't blocked by ridiculous rules.
Pirelli tires. Score: 8. In the Grand Prix the tires are great. That's a pity. Last year I got used to criticize them! I'm joking, of course.
Marchionne. Score: Bad luck. He was in the box shortly before the Grand Prix and he said that a mistake is ok. You know the rest of the story. Mr. president, a free advice: watch the Grand Prix at home!
P.S.: Let's draw a veil over the former record pair McLaren-Honda… but you know, subject to certain exceptions, getting back together is the same soup, just reheated…
Mariano Froldi
Translated by Isabella Lai

subset: commoncrawl


text:
UniRex Shorties
UniRex Shorties
Product Description
I'm sorry...but is there really anything better than a Unicorn and a T-Rex combined!?! NO obviously ;)
- Super soft and luxurious fabric
- Not see through even though its white
- Moisture wicking
- 2.5" inseam
- 87% polyester 13% spandex
- Square gusset ensures no camel toe!
Coming Soon!
Please allow 3-5 days for your domestic order to arrive. We try to ship within one day out of our Verona, Wisconsin warehouse. Yay! The midwest...so convenient.
Returns and Exchanges are easy, simply make request for a return or exchange online, receive your return label, and send your item to our returns center for fast processing. We'll get you a replacement or refund in a snap!
PRE-ORDERThis item is a pre-order item and will ship on or around May 10th. As a small business with big dreams, pre-orders let us release new shorties more often, which in turn, let us grow! We know in a world of instant gratification, waiting for your purchase is a pain. We also know once you have it in hand, you will love it so much and totally love your participation in helping a passionate group of people design beautiful and punny shorts.
OUR PROMISEThere is nothing more important to us than our customers being happy with their purchase.
Our happiness promise means if you've got issues, we are going to solve them. If after you get your goodies and you aren't completely happy, just send us an email at email@example.com or head over to our Exchange and Return Portal to swap sizes, items, etc.
Customer Reviews
Love this tee💕💕
These have the absolute best fit! They stay where they are supposed to be and stay out of where they're not supposed to be.
These shorties have an awesome cool design. They fit great and stay put when doing squats. Luv luv WobBottom💜💗💜💗


text:
About the Author
View more articles by Dagyum Ji
Dagyum Ji
Dagyum Ji is a senior NK News correspondent based in Seoul. She previously worked for Reuters TV.
Reunions of families in the North and South separated by the Korean War – as well as further humanitarian cooperation – will not take place until the South returns 13 "abducted" defectors to the North, state-run outlet DPRK Today reported on Monday.
State media said that the 12 female workers involved in a mass-defection to South Korea in April last year and Kim Ryon Hui – who wishes to return to her homeland after mistakenly going to South Korea in 2011 – should be returned to the North.
"Until this problem is solved, any humanitarian cooperation projects, including family reunions… can never be realized," the article says.
"If the South Korean government is sincerely interested in the issue of 'human rights', 'humanitarianism' and 'separated families,' … the issue of repatriating our women should be resolved as soon as possible."
The article echoes claims made by a senior North Korean official last week in an interview with AFP, in which Kim Yong Chol of the DPRK's Committee for the Peaceful Unification of Korea said that Pyongyang will not permit reunions for families separated by the Korean War until the women are returned to the North.
"They should be returned immediately," Kim said.
In response to the interview, South Korea's Ministry of Unification (MOU) told local media outlets last week that the issues of separated families and defectors were unrelated.
"It's not logical to connect the two issues," an unnamed official at MOU told local media last week.
The restaurant workers, consisting of 12 female employees and one male manager, arrived in Seoul on April 7 last year via Malaysia and Thailand, having allegedly fled a North Korean government-run restaurant in the Chinese city of Ningbo.
Pyongyang has repeatedly insisted that the group was "abducted" and that their male manager colluded with South Korea in the plot. Most recently, the state-run Uriminzokkiri reported that the father of Ri Ji Ye, one of the defectors, had passed away, saying that his health problems had been "exacerbated" by his daughter's case.
Kim Ryon Hui claims she "accidentally" defected to the South in 2011 and that she wants to return to her family.
The MOU last week reiterated that the restaurant defectors decided to stay in the South "of their own free will," and that Kim came to Seoul "by herself and acquired Korean nationality but changed her mind afterward."
The latest reunion of the divided families was held in October 2015.
The DPRK Today article implored the Moon Jae-in government to not pursue confrontational policies and "the kidnapping and forced detention of the DPRK citizens which the Park Geun-hye group left as its 'legacy.'"
The North said that it is "illogical" that Seoul is seeking an improvement in inter-Korean relations without acknowledging the "crime of the allurement and abduction."
While the inauguration in May of the left-leaning Moon Jae-in as South Korea's President brought expectations of a "Sunshine 2.0" policy from Seoul, inter-Korean relations have remained tense.
North Korea last week refused to allow the malaria-prevention NGO the Korean Sharing Movement (KSM) to visit the DPRK, and on Friday the June 15 Committee NGO said it would no longer seek to hold an event in Pyongyang this week.
Pyongyang has also continued to conduct provocative missile tests, with last Thursday's being the fourth since Moon took office and the 10th this year.
Seoul has maintained throughout the tests that it is open to the resumption of inter-Korean exchanges, while condemning the tests and reaffirming its commitment to the alliance with the U.S. and the deployment of the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile defense system.
Rodong Sinmun, an organ of North Korea's ruling party, on Monday criticized the Moon administration's dual-track approach to the North.
"The South Korean authorities – which are fearful of the U.S. tyranny – are actively taking part in the anti-DPRK sanction racket as clamoring about the contradiction which seeks sanctions and dialogue at the same time," the Rodong Sinmun said.
The newspaper also criticized a planned summit between the U.S. and the South in late June as "another brainwashing process."
"The behavior of the South Korean government – which feels like a reed in front of the wind – is beyond deplorable."
North Korean state media said last week that Seoul should withdraw all "confrontational" measures against the DPRK, arguing that humanitarian assistance and civilian exchanges would not be enough to improve inter-Korean relations.
Edited by Oliver Hotham
Featured Image: anokarina's Flickr
Reunions of families in the North and South separated by the Korean War - as well as further humanitarian cooperation - will not take place until the South returns 13 "abducted" defectors to the North, state-run outlet DPRK Today reported on Monday.
State media said that the 12 female workers involved in a mass-defection to South Korea in April last year and Kim Ryon Hui – who wishes to return to her homeland after mistakenly going to South Korea in 2011 – should be returned to the North.


text:
Maybe you responded to expensive TV insurance advertising only to find out, surprise, that what they offer is expensive. You then might have found it tempting to just ride on your bike and go any place you want to without establishing the motorcycle insurance that you desperately need. You will find comprehensive and affordable motorcycle insurance with an independent insurance agent. You may consider yourself among the pool of best riders but even your expertise could not guarantee your safety as there are more unfortunate events that could happen on the road other than accidents.
There are still a lot of risks on the road the can be much costly on your end if you do not have the right liability insurance policy in place. The motorcycle insurance policies that we write throughout VA, MD, DC provide a comprehensive coverage for all motorcycles, big bikes, scooters, snowmobiles, ATVs, and even golf carts so you can drive one of them with more peace of mind.
Studies show that motorcycle riders are adventurous and are likely the types of people who enjoy boating. It would also be wise to consult an independent insurance agent when planning to purchase a policy in order to get more than the typical coverage. Getting a custom boat insurance policy from TriState means having some specialized coverages that you may not be familiar with, but are indeed what you need during emergency situations. These include but are not limited to accessory coverage, roadside assistance, and total loss replacement. You can have these specialized coverages in addition to protection against collision, vandalism, and theft all at a competitive rate with the help of a certified insurance professional.
If you have not recently reviewed your policy with an independent insurance agent or have none at all, contact TriState Business Insurance.


text:
As our applications become more complex and the number of systems we manage grows, it's only natural to worry that the risks to our environments are also increasing. This worry is profoundly felt in industries that must adhere to regulatory compliance standards.
Regulatory frameworks like PCI, HIPAA, FedRAMP, and the forthcoming GDPR mandate rigid security requirements for computing environments, but they introduce a new concern: that they will slow the pace of development for organizations that aren't equipped to rapidly and effectively validate the compliance of their environments. Even in organizations that don't need to adhere to any specific regulatory standard, the ability to reliably validate security is no less important, as frequent headlines about vulnerabilities and security breaches are keen to remind us.
To evaluate our readiness to adapt to these challenges, there are a few questions we must ask. Can we accurately determine which servers, in a fleet of thousands, are in need of software patching? Can we validate that the new feature developed adheres to our organization's security requirements? Can we ensure our environments comply with regulatory standards, even when not actively under audit?
InSpec is an open source testing framework that can help you answer "yes" to all of those questions by providing an easy to understand, yet deeply customizable, framework to define expectations for the systems managed and detect deviations from those expectations wherever they arise.
InSpec provides a great amount of flexibility in how to go about that detection process. For ad hoc point-in-time scans, the InSpec command line utility allows users to evaluate any system reachable over SSH or WinRM. For testing infrastructure changes in development, InSpec can be used natively in Test Kitchen to validate that Chef Cookbooks behave as expected and that the resulting system remains compliant with existing policies. Finally, for continuous compliance evaluation, InSpec can be invoked as part of a Chef Client run via the audit cookbook, which can be configured to send data to a Chef Automate server, providing an aggregated, searchable, and filterable view into the health of the environment.
Below we will walk through a step-by-step guide to using InSpec to define and enforce security standards.
InSpec controls
InSpec code is made up of "controls" that define a single expectation, or group of expectations, for your systems. Here is a simple example:
control 'sample-1.0' do
impact 1.0
title 'Hello, World'
desc 'You have to start somewhere'
describe command('echo "Hello, World"') do
its('exit_status') { should eq 0 }
its('stdout') { should cmp /Hello, World/ }
Let's take a look at the "sample-1.0" control and see what makes it tick.
impact 1.0
Every control is rated on its
impact, a weighted value from 0 to 1 describing its criticality. Most InSpec profiles will consist of many controls, which allow users to categorize results as minor (0.0 - 0.3), major (0.4 - 0.6), or critical (0.7 - 1.0).
title 'Hello, World'
desc 'You have to start somewhere'
title and
desc parameters allow users to define a human-readable title and description for a control. When using the Chef Automate UI, these will be the first elements to show up when selecting a control, with a click-through to the source code in full. This provides an excellent way for different teams to get the context they need about systems, whether they need only high-level information about controls or to dig into the methodologies to craft a remediation.
describe command('echo "Hello, World"') do
its('exit_status') { should eq 0 }
its('stdout') { should cmp /Hello, World/ }
Now we get to the meat of the control. The InSpec DSL is made up of "resources" that provide a variety of built-in validations for common infrastructure components. Above you see the "command" resource, which tells InSpec to run the command specified—in this case "echo 'Hello, World'"—and evaluate what it returns.
Each resource contains one or more "matchers," the definition of an expected result when evaluating the resource. In this case, two expectations are set:
- The command's exit status should be 0
- The command's stdout should contain "Hello, World"
The InSpec executable
Now that we've covered the makeup of InSpec controls, how can we start using them? The Chef development kit includes the InSpec command line utility, which will allow us to evaluate our example control. If we take the full text of the control in the previous section and save it to a file called sample_control.rb, we can run it on our local machine with this command:
inspec exec sample_control.rb
Our output should look something like this:
Profile: tests from sample_control.rb
Version: (not specified)
Target: local://
✔ sample-1.0: Hello, World
✔ Command echo "Hello, World" exit_status should eq 0
✔ Command echo "Hello, World" stdout should eq "Hello, World\n"
Profile Summary: 1 successful, 0 failures, 0 skipped
Test Summary: 2 successful, 0 failures, 0 skipped
The InSpec executable can also scan remote systems, provided they're available via SSH or WinRM. The syntax for doing so with the above example would look like so:
inspec exec sample_control.rb -t ssh://USER@HOSTNAME -i /path/to/identityfile
inspec exec sample_control.rb -t winrm://USER@HOSTNAME -p 'PASSWORD'
It is worth noting that this example should work on most servers, regardless of operating system. InSpec's execution doesn't change from platform to platform. As long as the OS is supported, if the system being scanned behaves as described in the control, the tests will pass and the system will "echo" the expected output, regardless of whether that system is Linux, Windows, MacOS, etc.
In circumstances where differences between servers would necessitate different testing, the InSpec DSL allows users to define conditional execution for controls or resources. To illustrate this, we created a new file, called user_test.rb, containing the following code:
control 'Test Windows Super User' do
impact 0.5
title 'Superuser Test'
desc 'Make sure the Administrator user exists.'
only_if do
describe user('Administrator') do
it { should exist }
control 'Test *nix Super User' do
impact 0.5
title 'Superuser Test'
desc 'Make sure the root user exists.'
only_if do
os.redhat? || os.debian? || os.linux? || os.darwin? || os.bsd?
describe user('root') do
it { should exist }
Here, two controls are defined and in each we see a block like this:
only_if do
We're specifying that this particular control should only be run if the system being evaluated is running Windows. To illustrate, let's try it out first locally on a Windows server, then remotely on a Linux counterpart. Note that the test for the Linux superuser is skipped on the Windows machine, and vice versa:
InSpec profiles
Thus a single file can be used to run controls. However, before committing that file to version control, or uploading it to a Chef Automate server, we'll need to add it to an InSpec profile. InSpec profiles allow users to organize controls to support versioning and dependency management. To demonstrate, we'll create an InSpec profile using the same CLI as before:
inspec init profile example_profile
This should return output similar to:
Create new profile at /Users/myuser/example_profile
* Create directory controls
* Create file controls/example.rb
* Create file inspec.yml
* Create directory libraries
* Create file README.md
* Create file libraries/.gitkeep
Creating a profile creates a number of files and directories, but for now, turn your attention to the controls directory.
The example.rb file that our command created provides a few more syntax examples for using InSpec controls, with some helpful comments. However, since we have controls of our own to implement, we can delete example.rb and move our sample_control.rb and user_test.rb files into the controls directory instead:
$ rm example_profile/controls/example.rb
$ mv sample_control.rb example_profile/controls/
$ mv user_test.rb example_profile/controls/
$ ls example_profile/controls/
sample_control.rb user_test.rb
Now that our controls are in place, we can run InSpec exec again, this time pointed at the path to the profile we created, and it will execute all of the contained profiles:
$ inspec exec example_profile
Profile: InSpec Profile (example_profile)
Version: 0.1.0
Target: local://
✔ sample-1.0: Hello, World
✔ Command echo "Hello, World" exit_status should eq 0
✔ Command echo "Hello, World" stdout should cmp == /Hello, World/
↺ Test Windows Super User: Superuser Test
↺ Skipped control due to only_if condition.
✔ Test *nix Super User: Superuser Test
✔ User root should exist
Profile Summary: 2 successful, 0 failures, 1 skipped
Test Summary: 3 successful, 0 failures, 1 skipped
If we're making use of a Chef Automate server, we can also run the
inspec archive command to compress the profile into a tarball that can be uploaded to our server:
$ inspec archive example_profile
I, [2017-08-29T20:28:44.999748 #81989] INFO—: Checking profile in example_profile
I, [2017-08-29T20:28:45.000973 #81989] INFO—: Metadata OK.
I, [2017-08-29T20:28:45.006901 #81989] INFO—: Found 3 controls.
I, [2017-08-29T20:28:45.007360 #81989] INFO—: Control definitions OK.
I, [2017-08-29T20:28:45.007868 #81989] INFO—: Generate archive
I, [2017-08-29T20:28:45.019701 #81989] INFO—: Finished archive generation.
Note that when we run
inspec archive, InSpec will first check that the metadata and controls in the profile are syntactically valid, then generate a tarball that can be invoked directly with InSpec exec, as above, or uploaded to a Chef Automate server. In either case, InSpec runs controls from all contained files, so we're seeing both of our tests from the previous section run together in all of these examples.


text:
Judge Quickly (But Temporarily) Blocks New CA Law That Takes Away Anonymous Speech Rights
from the quick-response deptSo, we had just written about the unfortunate (if expected) news that voters in California had overwhelmingly passed a ballot measure which (among other things) would take away anonymous speech rights from anyone on the state's sex offender list (which could include things like people arrested for urinating in public, or consensual sexual activity between teenagers). That seemed both extreme and unconstitutional. We noted that we expected the law to be challenged, though I had assumed it might wait until the law was used. Instead, the EFF and ACLU immediately teamed up to challenge the law, arguing that it was unconstitutional:
"Requiring people to give up their right to speak freely and anonymously about civic matters is unconstitutional, and restrictions like this damage robust discussion and debate on important and controversial topics," said EFF Staff Attorney Hanni Fakhoury. "When the government starts gathering online profiles for one class of people, we all need to worry about the precedent it sets."And... before I could even finish writing about the challenge, the judge issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the implementation of the law.
In this case, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have raised serious questions about whether the challenged sections of the CASE Act violate their First Amendment right to free speech and other constitutional rights. In addition, the balance of hardships tips sharply in favor of issuing a TRO. Defendant Harris's counsel represented to the Court that the State would be in no position to enforce the law until March 20, 2013. The harm to Defendants of a TRO therefore appears to be minimal. Plaintiffs, by contrast, would suffer the potential loss of their "ability to speak anonymously on the Internet," which is protected by the First Amendment... Such "loss of First Amendment freedoms . . . unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury." .... Additionally, the Ninth Circuit has "consistently recognized the 'significant public interest' in upholding free speech principles," ..., and that "it is always in the public interest to prevent the violation of a party's constitutional rights," ..... The Court therefore finds that Plaintiffs have satisfied the standard for a TRO.Of course, now the state will need to waste taxpayer money defending this awful part of the law. It would have been nicer if it had never been on the ballot in the first place.
Filed Under: california, free speech, sex offenders, temporary restraining order