text:
M WAQAR..... "A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary.Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." --Albert Einstein !!! NEWS,ARTICLES,EDITORIALS,MUSIC... Ze chi pe mayeen yum da agha pukhtunistan de.....(Liberal,Progressive,Secular World.)''Secularism is not against religion; it is the message of humanity.'' تل ده وی پثتونستآن
Monday, September 28, 2015
West must not accept Saudi Arabia's barbarism and its human rights abuses
IT IS unquestionably obscene that the kingdom of Saudi Arabia is not only serving on the United Nations Human Rights Council but will be heading a key panel.
This barbaric state is guilty of the type of human rights abuses that Islamic State would be proud of and yet it is on the UNHRC, lecturing the civilised world, including Australia, about how we conduct our affairs.
As you read this, Saudi Arabia's regime is preparing to behead and crucify a young man for attending a pro-democracy rally when he was 17. Ali Mohammed al-Nimr was sentenced to be executed in a closed hearing earlier this month after being arrested in 2012.
The 21-year-old had no legal representation and was most likely tortured to give a statement on trumped up charges; it's how they do things in the gulf state.
Ali's uncle, Shia cleric Sheikh Nimr Baqr al-Nimr, who in the past has been critical of the Saudi royal family, is also sentenced to be crucified for the crime of "waging war against God" in the Sunni-dominant country.
Saudi Arabia kills people for attending freedom protests, for adultery, sorcery, apostasy, homosexuality and a raft of other crimes that apparently deserve a prolonged and painful death.
Women, who are subjugated from birth and treated as less than second class citizens, are killed in public for the crime of witchcraft.
It may be 2015 in the civilised world, but oil riches haven't advanced the Saudis from a feudal mentality. In fact, crucifixion and beheading isn't the most horrifying method of execution that Saudi authorities mete out; stoning is still permitted under the country's sharia law. Women guilty of adultery can be sentenced to a fate that is beyond horrifying; they are partially buried and then surrounded by a ring of men with mounds of rocks at their feet that are thrown from some distance until the victim is dead.
It is a torturous way to kill, although it must be noted that recently the courts have shown a preference for beheading misbehaving women as opposed to stoning them.
Public lashings are another popular form of punishment and can end with the victim suffering an agonising death.
Writer and activist Raif Badawi has been sentenced to 10 years in prison and 1000 lashes for insulting Islam.
Despite an international outcry, Saudi Arabia's Supreme Court upheld the sentence earlier this year. It's a sentence his wife, Ensaf Haidar, who fled to Canada with the couple's three children, has described as a "slow death".
For his efforts in defending Badawi, lawyer Waleed Abulkhair was also jailed, sentenced to 15 years for crimes including "inciting public opinion". This isn't tribal law carried out in remote communities; these are judgments of the country's highest courts.We have read in horror about gang rape victims being sentenced to prison and 200 lashes but it seems that our Western leaders have little interest in exerting pressure on Saudi Arabia to change its ways.
Instead of being ostracised as a savage theocracy, it is welcomed into the UN and celebrated as a friend. World leaders speak glowingly of King Salman and regard the Saudis as vital allies in the Middle East.
But the kingdom isn't doing all it can to stabilise the region; some argue it is working to encourage the growth of its inhumane interpretation of sharia law.
Much of the financing of acts of terror in the region, and elsewhere, can be traced to Saudi Arabia.
The regime's reign of terror has also been emulated around the Middle East and by Islamists around the world.
The country's appetite for violence, death and an irrational adherence to a strict "moral" code is rooted in the Wahhabi or Salafi form of Sunni Islam.
he scale of oppression and carnage is extraordinary yet many in the West prefer to look the other way rather than acknowledge that Saudi Arabia has beheaded 100 people this year.
Then there is the heinous treatment of women, who are segregated, not allowed to drive and forced to wear dehumanising niqabs, burqas or if they're lucky a hijab — although devout hardliners prefer a woman's face to be covered in public — and are subjected to archaic restrictions.
It's not just women who are treated as less than human; the country's racist, homophobic and religiously intolerant attitudes are enshrined in law. Earlier this year, Middle East Eye, an independently funded news website, compared proscribed punishments for a list of offences in Islamic State and Saudi Arabia. The similarities were stark.
Both regimes believe death is the only just punishment for crimes including blasphemy, adultery, and acts of homosexuality. While the Saudis typically behead gay men, Islamic State prefer to throw them off buildings and then stone them to death if they survive the fall.
Both Islamic State and the Saudis proscribe hand amputation for theft, although sometimes the odd foot is also chopped off.
It's clear that oil riches don't buy acumen, decency or humanity but they do buy the international community's friendship and a seat on the UN's Human Rights Council.
Syrian President ASSAD WINS 'HISTORICAL ARAB LEADER' POLL CONDUCTED BY DUBAI RULER'S DAUGHTER
Asking thousands of fans on her facebook page who deserves to win the title of the historical Arab leader, Mahra saw an astonishingly large number of visitors on her page in the first few minutes.
Some 54.7% of those who took part in the polling voted in President Bashar al-Assad's favor, saying he deserves to be called the historical leader of the Arab world.
The voters also wrote in their comments on Mahra's facebook post that Assad deserves the title since he managed to stand against a rising tide of terrorists entering his country with the help of the army despite the hard siege that the world attempted to lay on him and his nation.
This is while other Arab leaders, including Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and former head of the UAE Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, could just win 3 votes.
The conflict in Syria, which started in March 2011, has reportedly claimed more than 240,000 lives up until now.
The US and its allies including France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey are known as the major supporters of the militants fighting Syria's government forces.
This is while many regional and western officials have eventually come to the conclusion that settling the crisis in Syria without President Assad is impossible.
In relevant remarks on Saturday, Australia's foreign minister called for a political solution to the foreign-backed militancy in Syria, stressing the need for a national unity government involving Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
In an interview with English-language broadsheet newspaper the Australian published on Saturday, Julie Bishop said there is an emerging consensus that the incumbent Damascus government would likely have a pivotal role in fortifying the Syrian state and stopping the ISIL Takfiri militant group from gaining ground.
"It is evident there must be a political as well as a military solution to the conflict in Syria," the top Australian diplomat said, noting that Canberra would play its part in achieving such an objective.
"There is an emerging view in some quarters that the only conceivable option would be a national unity government involving President Assad," Bishop pointed out.
Bishop's comments come as German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on September 24 that any talks on ending the conflict in Syria should involve Assad.
"We have to speak with many actors, this includes Assad, but others as well. Not only with the United States of America, Russia, but with important regional partners, Iran, and Sunni countries such as Saudi Arabia," she told a press conference in Brussels.
On September 22, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius told French-language daily Le Figaro that a diplomatic solution to the Syrian crisis is impossible without the country's president.
"If we require, even before negotiations start, that Assad step down, we won't get far," Fabius underlined.
Will Russia's move ruin Erdogan's plan for Syria?
Kadri Gursel
Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/09/turkey-russia-syria-moscow-ruins-erdogans-game-plan.html#ixzz3n5GIAfGF
Turkey's July decision to finally open its air bases near Syria and Iraq, including Incirlik, to the US-led coalition fighting the Islamic State was a game changer for the region. It meant the coalition's air raids against IS would become more effective and less costly.
Only days after the first detachme
nt of six American F-16s was deployed to Incirlik in early August, the media reported the deployment of six Russian MiG-31 Foxhound interceptor fighter jets to the Mezze air base near Damascus. Russia's military presence in Syria continued to grow thereafter, with the number of Russian warplanes said to have reached 28, including long-range Su-27 Flanker interceptor fighter jets.
The Russian military buildup, backed with air-to-ground assault aircraft, attack helicopters, drones, air defense systems, ground assets and a large number of military personnel, is said to have two aims: fighting IS and preventing the collapse of President Bashar al-Assad's regime. In this sense, the impact of the Russian intervention is much stronger. By dramatically boosting its force and weight in the Syrian equation, Russia has turned upside down the game plans of others, chief among them Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP).
Using some imagination, one could foresee the adverse impacts Russia's move will have on Ankara's policies on the ground. Ankara is now likely to be forced to end the de facto situation — virtually a no-fly zone — it has enforced casually in border areas since 2012. In June 2012, after a Turkish reconnaissance plane was shot down by an air defense system in Syria, Ankara announced new rules of engagement, including the interception of Syrian aircraft flying close to Turkish airspace. There has been no indication so far that these rules of engagement have changed. Since the summer of 2012, Turkish media have occasionally reported incidents of Turkish fighter jets taking off from their bases to chase off Syrian planes and helicopters flying "too close" to the border.
Ankara-backed Islamist groups fighting Assad's regime have emerged as the main beneficiary of these rules of engagement, which have effectively served as a Turkish air cover for their military and logistical operations in border regions.
Now, the following question arises: Will Ankara stick to its rules of engagement if airplanes approaching the border have the Russian star on their wings? My guess is that the rules of engagement will not be enforced against Russian aircraft, thus ending the de facto air cover for the rebels.
Similarly, Ankara's intention to create a safe zone along the border stretch from Jarablus to Azaz inside Syria has become completely meaningless since the Russian intervention. Preventing Syrian aircraft from flying over the designated area is the first prerequisite for such a zone, which naturally requires the use of an air force. Thus, Russia's deployment of interceptor fighter jets in Syria can be explained only with one objective: to deter Ankara as an initial step. Another explanation is hardly possible, given that jihadi groups such as IS, Jabhat al-Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham do not have an air force.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's problem stems from his priorities, which are different from those of the coalition. Turkey may have opened its air bases to make coalition airstrikes on IS more efficient and less costly, but this doesn't mean that fighting IS has become a top priority for Erdogan and his prime minister, Ahmet Davutoglu. IS is not and has never been a priority for the pair — this we have known for ages. Erdogan, for instance, waited until Sept. 25, 2014, to finally brand IS a terrorist group.
For the Erdogan-Davutoglu pair, the use of Turkish air bases against IS had been preconditioned on the simultaneous pursuit of a regime change in Syria, which, in turn, entailed the creation and enforcement of the safe zone they had advocated since 2012. So, what happened that they finally acquiesced to the air base deal in July after months of stubborn foot-dragging?
The decision was driven by three reasons, none of which places the IS threat in the foreground.
First, forces of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD), advancing under coalition air cover, captured the border town of Tell Abyad from IS in June. The Erdogan-Davutoglu duo was alarmed that the more it deferred cooperation with the anti-IS coalition the more ground slid from under its feet, while the PYD, the sister organization of Turkey's Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), grew stronger by the day, allied with the coalition.
Turkey is opposed to the idea of the PYD advancing from Kobani to the western bank of the Euphrates to help oust IS from Jarablus. This has been another factor in Ankara's decision to open the bases. Yet, only time will tell whether Ankara can keep the PYD in Kobani, given that the United States aims to cut all ground links between IS and Turkey, something that the Turkish government forces have failed to deliver.
Second, the supply route from the Turkish border town of Kilis to Aleppo — a vital element in sustaining Ankara's regime-change policy — came under IS threat in June. The area stretching from the Bab al-Salam border crossing down to Aleppo is controlled by rebel groups officially backed by Ankara. The AKP government needs to preserve this access to Aleppo, without which its ambitions in Syria become completely irrelevant. Thus, allowing the coalition to use Turkish air bases became imperative in light of stopping the IS advance on the eastern side of the route.
Third, the PYD — which has the PKK as its main supplier and supporter — emerged as the United States' only reliable ally fighting IS in Syria. Driven by domestic political considerations, Ankara resumed its war on the PKK, weakening the sole US ally on the ground. Keeping the bases closed to coalition aircraft in these circumstances would have been a very unwise idea. In other words, the bases were granted as a sort of "hush money" to the US-led coalition. Washington says it has not sanctioned Ankara's onslaught on the PKK, denying any explicit or implicit "bases-for-PKK" deal. Yet, Ankara's logic in this equation functions independently from the categorical US attitude.
The United States is quite content with Ankara's decision to open the bases. Turkey is said to have engaged in more serious cooperation against IS since the spring. Also, US support for the PYD is said to be limited to the fight against IS, not involving the supply of weapons and ammunition.
Stopping IS remains the No. 1 US priority. Had Turkey shared the coalition's objective to degrade and defeat IS as a top priority, it would not have been affected that much by Russia stepping in against IS and on Damascus' side. For the Erdogan-Davutoglu pair, IS represents a growing threat due to the reasons mentioned above, but is never a top priority.
Turkey's No. 1 problem and priority today is the PKK, which it has been fighting since the two-year cease-fire came to an end in July. Yet, for the United States, the PKK's Syrian extension, the PYD, is not part of the problem but part of the solution. Overthrowing Assad has ceased to be a US priority since IS emerged as a threat on a regional scale.
With Russia's military moves balancing the gains that other jihadi groups made in Idlib in the north and Daraa in the south earlier this year, Ankara's priority of toppling Assad has grown even more irrelevant. Ultimately, the Russian move means Ankara will have to settle for much less than it had hoped for by letting the anti-IS coalition use its air bases.
Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/09/turkey-russia-syria-moscow-ruins-erdogans-game-plan.html#ixzz3n5GIAfGF
Hillary Clinton knocks Jeb Bush over 'free stuff' remark
By Eric Bradner and Dan Merica
Hillary Clinton lambasted Jeb Bush on Facebook Monday, calling his comment that Democrats offer "free stuff" to African-American voters "deeply insulting."
In a question-and-answer session, Clinton compared Bush to Mitt Romney -- whose comments about low-income voters helped doom his 2012 candidacy -- and Donald Trump.
"I think people are seeing this for what it is: Republicans lecturing people of color instead of offering real solutions to help people get ahead, including facing up to hard truths about race and justice in America," Clinton wrote.
"Not to mention -- Republicans have no problem promising tax breaks and sweetheart deals to their corporate friends, but when Democrats fight to make sure all Americans have access to quality, affordable health care, early childhood education and job training, that's giving away 'free stuff"?!'" she wrote. "Talk about backwards."
Bush's campaign responded to Clinton, saying the former Florida governor is focused on reaching out to all voters and "communicating that conservative principles and conservative policies are the only path to restoring the right to rise for every single American," according to Bush spokeswoman Kristy Campbell.
Clinton largely stuck to script in her Facebook Q-and-A, taking more than a dozen questions on paid family leave, drug prices and Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Lattes.
The Democratic presidential front-runner also criticized Florida Sen. Marco Rubio for offering proposals that she said wouldn't guarantee paid family leave -- her latest shot at GOP candidates over an issue her campaign has highlighted in an effort to reach to lower- and middle-class voters.
"Just last week," she wrote, "Senator Rubio offered a plan that would offer no guarantee and would do little to provide leave for those who don't already have it."
She also took a shot by name at the head of Turing Pharmaceuticals, Martin Shkreli -- who came under fire after raising the price of the drug Daraprim from $13.50 to $750, and being called out publicly by Clinton.
She noted that Shkreli has promised to lower the price of the drug, but hasn't announced its new rate.
"He still hasn't said how much the drug will cost going forward, and in the meantime, sick patients still have to wait and worry and continue to pay $750/pill. So Mr. Shkreli, what's it going to be? Do the right thing. Lower the cost today to its original price," Clinton wrote.
It was an effort to highlight an issue that Clinton's campaign has made a focus in recent days -- including launching a new television ad focused on the prices of prescription drugs. She prodded drug companies to pump money into developing generics on Facebook.
"Force drug manufacturers to justify their prices, make sure they add real value. Require the largest drug manufacturers to invest a minimum amount in R&D. And -- a new idea to chew on -- let's explore using some of these new research funds to invest directly in producing generic competitors where none exists," she wrote.
Clinton also discussed some lighter topics. Among them: Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Lattes
She was asked whether she's "a Pumpkin Spice Latte kind of gal."
"Ha! The true answer is I used to be until I saw how many calories are in them," Clinton responded.
Putin, Obama Begin Talks at UN General Assembly
Meeting behind closed doors, Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Barack Obama have begun a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.
This marks the first meeting between the two world leaders in the last two years.
Both the Kremlin and the White House say that Putin and Obama will discuss the situations in Syria and Ukraine, among other international issues.
According to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, the meeting will last approximately 55 minutes, as both leaders have other events scheduled.
Read more: http://sputniknews.com/us/20150929/1027683575/Putin-Obama-UNGA-Meeting.html#ixzz3n4WSHGbG
Journalism in Pakistan: Fear and Favor
Bina Shah
In this summer's feel-good Indian movie "Bajrangi Bhaijaan," a Pakistani TV reporter telephones his boss to tell him he has an explosive story about an Indian spy on Pakistani territory who's not actually a spy, but a man trying to help a lost Pakistani child find her parents. The boss tells him the story isn't sensational enough, then hangs up, leaving the reporter grumbling that the channel's executives care only about making money, rather than telling a good story. To anyone familiar with Pakistan's broadcast media today, the scene will ring true. While Pakistan is already known as the most dangerous country in the world for working journalists — one journalist in Pakistan dies every 38 days according to the Sri Lankan media expert Ranga Kalansooriya — Pakistan's journalists also come under another insidious type of pressure. Corporate interests, political influence, and government attempts to regulate and censor information all put great strain on an institution still emerging from decades of suppression under military dictators. And while recent chaos and conflict have enabled Pakistani print and broadcast media to flourish, the industry now faces a crossroads: It is struggling to maintain journalistic ethics that run contrary to the commercial ethos in which it operates.
Sherry Rehman, a Pakistani senator and prominent journalist, said recently that the newsroom was no longer a "hermetically sealed environment." Rather, it has become the "domain of a corporate invasion." That pattern matches a larger trend throughout South Asia, where a nexus among media proprietors, investors and advertisers limits the media's ability to report without bias.Ms. Rehman was speaking at the recent introduction of a program in which International Media Support, a Danish-government-supported organization, will provide technical, logistical and institutional training and support for the Pakistani media to address some of these issues over the next two years. Mr. Kalansooriya advises the organization.
Until 2002, Pakistan's broadcast media was a narrow field; it had one radio station, Radio Pakistan, started in 1947 and one state-owned television channel, Pakistan Television, started in 1964; both were mouthpieces for officially slanted information, alongside privately held print media dominated by three major consortiums: the liberal Jang Group, owned by the media magnate Shakeel ur-Rahman (this group now owns the broadcast and web outlet GEO); the Nawai Waqt Group, which treads a right-wing line, and the English-language Dawn Group, the most moderate of the three (the newspaper Dawn was founded in 1941 in Delhi, India, by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the leader of Pakistan's independence movement, to promote the moderate ideals of his Muslim League).In 1962, the military dictator Ayub Khan curbed the press with an ordinance that gave the government powers to arrest journalists, confiscate newspapers and partly nationalize the press. Gen. Muhammad Zia ul-Haq followed in the 1980s by allowing the state to prosecute publishers for printing stories his administration didn't like.
Nevertheless, Pakistani print media gained strength and credibility in that era by fighting the censorship and by reporting, critically and openly, on Pakistan's myriad ethnic and political conflicts.Then, in 2002, Gen. Pervez Musharraf decided to open Pakistan to the global flow of information in order to reverse decades of isolation. He allowed private television channels and FM radio stations to obtain licenses, setting off a media boom. Their reporting during the conflicts that followed 9/11 and spilled over into Pakistan allowed these television channels to flourish, taking viewers away from state media in favor of more independent reporting.
Ironically, General Musharraf himself forced GEO off the air temporarily in 2007 when the channel criticized his suspension of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry. But today, out of office, the general once again flirts with the media as he tries to return to politics.The media have grown to 40 news channels, 143 radio stations, and hundreds of national and regional newspapers. For that they are often called "vibrant." Another descriptor is "vulgar." On prime-time television, news is sensationalized, with ratings the first consideration; alongside hysterical reporting are thrilling or tragic music and crude, insensitive graphics; virtually everything is "breaking news" in no hierarchy of importance. Meanwhile, large corporations like ARY and the Lakson Group have acquired media companies after discovering that controlling media can protect their corporate interests. Advertisers get huge influence over what's published or aired. Advertising breaks are frequent, and banners for commercial products run incessantly. Advertising also dominates front pages: one major newspaper group recently gave front-page ads prominence over headlines on all of its papers. Meanwhile, the government still seeks to control the media; Pakistan's Electronic Media Regulatory Authority wants an existing law amended to permit "de-linking" of television channels from their satellites if they broadcast "objectionable" or "unwanted" material. While many in the media retain editorial integrity in the face of these pressures, Pakistani media houses have yet to come up with an industrywide code of conduct or self-regulatory body. Nor have they been able to stay unbiased. Often they blatantly take sides in political conflicts, even while describing themselves as protectors only of the public good. So, what is the way forward? Ensuring the safety and security of Pakistani journalists is the best starting point; the industry's foot soldiers need more training, as well as job tenure and pensions. Forming unions is another necessity, as well as creating a framework of regulation that offers protection against state and corporate pressure. But what Pakistan's media needs most is a unified sense of its own professional conscience, so that it can continue to thrive as it fulfills its ultimate duty to Pakistanis: to report the news free from bias and influence, while telling a good story that will catch citizens' attention.
Does the military still control Pakistan?
By Owen Bennett-Jones
Some call it military rule by stealth. Others prefer to describe it as the generals and the politicians working harmoniously in the national interest. But however you look at it, there's no denying the Pakistan army's political power is growing.
It all dates back to the Peshawar school attack of 16 December 2014 when the Pakistani Taliban murdered 132 schoolboys.
Within days the civilian leadership had formulated a 20-point National Action Planto confront the militants, curb their hate speeches, control their religious seminaries and cut their finances.
Aware that the civilian courts are generally reluctant to convict Jihadists, the parliament then passed a constitutional amendment to establish military courts.
The army then announced new "apex committees" that brought together senior politicians, bureaucrats, intelligence officials and military officers.
As many as 50,000 suspected militants have been detained or arrested and in another sign of the state's resolve, Malik Ishaq, the leader of a formidable sectarian group, Lashkar e Jhangvi, was shot dead by police in what is widely believed to be an extra-judicial killing.
The crackdown has led to sharply reduced levels of militant violence.
And with media highlighting the role of the army chief General Raheel Sharif, the army is enjoying a surge of public support.
But for all the hopes that the Peshawar School attacks might have marked a significant turning point, some wonder whether the National Action Plan will bring lasting change.
After all, Pakistanis could be forgiven for thinking they have seen it all before.
Tens of thousands of suspected militants were detained by General Musharraf's regime in 2007, only to be released a few months later.
Since the state lacks the capacity to investigate the detainees the same could well happen again.
When he announced the National Action Plan, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif stated that Pakistan would no longer distinguish between the "good" Taliban (who fight Pakistan's enemies) and the "bad" Taliban (who attack targets in Pakistan itself).
Selective targets
But in reality the state is still being selective about which groups it targets.
Pakistani-based Jihadist groups with a history of fighting Indian forces in the disputed territory of Kashmir are being left alone.
So too are the Afghan Taliban and the Afghan-facing Haqqani Network which stands accused of mounting recent attacks in Kabul.
Perhaps most controversially of all Lashkar e Toiba (or as its renamed itself, Jamaat ud Dawa), the group accused of mounting the 2008 Mumbai attacks, has not been confronted.
The group's leader Hafeez Saeed is frequently quoted in the Pakistan press.
And no-one is expecting further legal action against, for example, LSE graduate Omar Sheikh who has been convicted of involvement in the 2002 murder of the Wall Street Journal's Daniel Pearl. His appeal has been pending since 2002.
Nor is there likely to be any resolution of the case of Mumtaz Qadri who in 2011 killed the Governor of Punjab, Salman Taseer.
Qadri, who objected to Taseer's calls for reform of the blasphemy laws, enjoys hero status in Pakistan.
Neither the army nor the government will want to risk undermining public support for the National Action Plan by including Qadri in its net.
Privately officials say they have to prioritize militants who attack targets within Pakistan.
But even that claim is questionable. Fearing a violent backlash, the state has hesitated to confront militants in their strongholds in Southern Punjab.
The risks are real. Within three weeks of Malik Ishaq's death, for example, Lashkar e Jhangvi hit back with a suicide bomb attack that killed the Home Minster of Punjab, Shuja Khanzada.
There are also questions about the impact of the National Action Plan on Pakistan's notoriously volatile civil/military relations.
Elected representatives both in the national parliament and provincial assemblies complain that they have been cut out of decision-making.
Cult of personality
Some also express fears about an emerging cult of personality around Army Chief General Raheel Sharif.
Posters of him have appeared on billboards throughout Pakistan's biggest city Karachi.
Mysterious websites, which seem to have access to images sourced from the military, praise him to the skies.
After decades of very poor PR, the army is now producing emotive, patriotic rock songs to bolster support for the anti-Jihadist campaign.
While Pakistani liberals worry about these developments, they simultaneously concede that if the counter narrative to the Jihadists has a militaristic air, its only because the civilians have failed to come up with an effective information strategy of their own.
The contest for public support has had an impact on Pakistan's previously irrepressible TV news channels.
Many have become so nervous about upsetting the army that they are making use of a 30-second delay on live broadcasts so that the sound can be muted before it's transmitted.
Originally brought in to stop uncritical interviews of Jihadists, the mechanism is now being used to protect the army's reputation.
One prime time TV host described how her voice was muted as soon as she used the word "military".
The person controlling the mute button did not know if she was going to say something supportive or critical of the men in uniform - so decided to play it safe.
The army's ascendency means that despite his strong electoral mandate Nawaz Sharif is unable to pursue some of his objectives.
His desire to improve relations with India has run up against the army's insistence that the intractable Kashmir issue should be at the forefront of any talks process.
General Raheel Sharif
- Received his military commission in 1976
- Studied military leadership in Germany, Canada and Britain
- Commanded several infantry units, some on the disputed Line of Control in Kashmir
- His brother, Shabbir Sharif, received two of the country's highest military awards after he was killed during the 1971 India-Pakistan war
- Previous appointments include inspector-general of training and evaluation at the army headquarters in Rawalpindi, and head of the Pakistan Military Academy at Kakul, Abbottabad.
- Thought to have played a key role in switching the focus of the army from confronting India to fighting militancy.
Wary embrace
Mr Sharif has also been blocked from pursuing legal action against the man who removed him from power last time round, General Musharraf.
The army is unwilling to see a former chief on trial for treason.
For now the government and the army are locked in a wary embrace.
They are working together but in part that is because the civilian politicians fear that if they allow a gap to emerge between them and the military there will be another coup.
Some wonder how long the current situation can last.
"Let me tell you what I have learnt from history," said Pakistan's most prominent human rights lawyer, Asma Jahangir.
"Our army doesn't want power. It wants absolute power."
Pakistani politican wants to add anti-Ahmadiyya chapter in school syllabus
Speaking to a KhatmeNabuwat conference in Mardan, speaker of Pakistan's KP (Khyper Pakhtunkhawa) Provincial Assembly Asad Qaiser said that "Provincial government will soon add a chapter on the belief of KhatmeNabuwat in the syllabus." Asad Qasier is a politician from Swabi District of KP Province and is affiliated with PTI (Pakistan Tehrik e Insaf) which is considered to be a "liberal nationalist party", lead by former cricketer Imran Khan.
Speaking to the conference he further said "Devotees of Prophet Muhammad PBUH will thwart any Qadiani (Ahmadiyya) conspiracies" and said "According to the constitution of Pakistan those who do not believe in Khatm e Nabuwat are outside the fold of Islam" The conference was attended by District Nazim of Mardan Himayatullah Mayar, Vice President of Mardan Divison Mushtaq Seemab, former MNA Muhammad Qasim, former Deputy Speaker Ikramullah Shahid, President of Traders association Ahsanullah Bacha, Vice President Traders association Haji Rehmat Gul & Arshad Manan. District Nazim Mardan also announced a public holiday in the district for next year's conference. Khatme Nabuwat is an extremist organization that seeks to "educate" Muslims against the dangers of "Qadianiyat" (Ahmadiyya) and has several times openly called for the killing of Ahmadiyya Muslims.
Read more at: https://www.rabwah.net/pakistani-politican-wants-to-add-anti-ahmadiyya-chapter-in-school-syllabus/
Speaking to the conference he further said "Devotees of Prophet Muhammad PBUH will thwart any Qadiani (Ahmadiyya) conspiracies" and said "According to the constitution of Pakistan those who do not believe in Khatm e Nabuwat are outside the fold of Islam" The conference was attended by District Nazim of Mardan Himayatullah Mayar, Vice President of Mardan Divison Mushtaq Seemab, former MNA Muhammad Qasim, former Deputy Speaker Ikramullah Shahid, President of Traders association Ahsanullah Bacha, Vice President Traders association Haji Rehmat Gul & Arshad Manan. District Nazim Mardan also announced a public holiday in the district for next year's conference. Khatme Nabuwat is an extremist organization that seeks to "educate" Muslims against the dangers of "Qadianiyat" (Ahmadiyya) and has several times openly called for the killing of Ahmadiyya Muslims.
Read more at: https://www.rabwah.net/pakistani-politican-wants-to-add-anti-ahmadiyya-chapter-in-school-syllabus/
Petition in Pakistan court seeks ban on Eid sacrifice by Ahmadiyya Muslims
A petition seeking directives for Chiniot police to prevent the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community from offering ritual sacrifice on Eid ul Adha was disposed of by Lahore High Court with a directive for the DPO to proceed in the matter in accordance with law. On receiving the order a few days before Eid, the DPO sought guidance from the inspector general of Punjab police. The DPO has yet to receive a response from the office of the IGP. In the petition submitted on September 12, Nasir Mahmood, a Faisal Town resident, had submitted that he had read in an online newspaper published by the community that sacrificial animals would be slaughtered on the Eid day at Chenabnagar. He said that the Constitution did not allow the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community to sacrifice animals on Eid ul Azha. He had requested the court to direct Chiniot police to prevent the community from sacrificing animals.
Saleemudin, a Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya spokesperson, lamented that it had become very difficult for community members to sacrifice animals on Eidul Azha. He said he had been receiving reports for several years about use of police force by sectarian groups to prevent community members from performing the ritual. He said that instead of arranging security for community members who wanted to sacrifice animals on Eid, the police were preventing them from doing so. Saleemuddin referred to an incident from last year in Sabzazar area. He said that a few days before Eid Hanjarwal police had raided the house of an Ahmadiyya family and taken into custody a male member. He said the man was released after the family submitted a written undertaking assuring the police that they would not slaughter an animal on the Eid day. He said similar incidents had been reported by community members in Sant Nagar and Township in 2013. Similar incidents were reported this year from Sant Nagar, Township, North Cantonment, Mustafa Town and Johar Town. Male member from Ahmadiyya Muslim families and their sacrificial animals were reportedly detained by the police. They were released after they submitted a written assurance that they would not slaughter any animal during Eid days. Speaking to the Media, North Cantonment DSP Mansoor said he did it to prevent unrest in the area.
Read more at: https://www.rabwah.net/petition-in-pakistan-court-seeks-ban-on-eid-sacrifice-by-ahmadiyya-muslims/
Saleemudin, a Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya spokesperson, lamented that it had become very difficult for community members to sacrifice animals on Eidul Azha. He said he had been receiving reports for several years about use of police force by sectarian groups to prevent community members from performing the ritual. He said that instead of arranging security for community members who wanted to sacrifice animals on Eid, the police were preventing them from doing so. Saleemuddin referred to an incident from last year in Sabzazar area. He said that a few days before Eid Hanjarwal police had raided the house of an Ahmadiyya family and taken into custody a male member. He said the man was released after the family submitted a written undertaking assuring the police that they would not slaughter an animal on the Eid day. He said similar incidents had been reported by community members in Sant Nagar and Township in 2013. Similar incidents were reported this year from Sant Nagar, Township, North Cantonment, Mustafa Town and Johar Town. Male member from Ahmadiyya Muslim families and their sacrificial animals were reportedly detained by the police. They were released after they submitted a written assurance that they would not slaughter any animal during Eid days. Speaking to the Media, North Cantonment DSP Mansoor said he did it to prevent unrest in the area.
Read more at: https://www.rabwah.net/petition-in-pakistan-court-seeks-ban-on-eid-sacrifice-by-ahmadiyya-muslims/
'Marx is back in fashion' - Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell
Karl Marx has "come back into fashion," newly appointed Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell has said, after winning the support of French left-wing economist Thomas Piketty.
McDonnell told the BBC on Sunday that the 19th century socialist revolutionary thinker was a "definitive analyst" of the capitalist system, even though many "might disagree with his conclusions."
He added that Marx's seminal work, "Capital," is essential reading for anyone trying to understand the capitalist system.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn's appointment of McDonnell as shadow chancellor ruffled feathers in the party's parliamentary ranks, with some MPs believing his economic beliefs are not centrist enough to win a general election.
During his first speech at the Labour party conference in Brighton, McDonnell pledged to launch "aggressive" measures on large tax-dodging corporations like Starbucks and Amazon.
"We are embarking on the immense task of changing the economic discourse in this country. We are throwing off that ridiculous charge that we are deficit deniers," he said.
"We are saying, tackling the deficit is important but we are rejecting austerity as the means to do it. We are setting out an alternative based upon dynamically growing our economy, ending the tax cuts for the rich and addressing the scourge of tax evasion and avoidance."
Asked about Marx on BBC Radio 5 Live, McDonnell said: "If you look at our capitalist system, one of the definitive analysts of how it works – not whether it is condemned, or whether it is right or wrong, just the mechanics of how it works, when it was first formed and how it would be developed – actually was Marx.
"If you look at most of the institutions that are teaching economics today, Marx has come back into fashion because people have gone back to his analysis of just the basics of how the system works.
"People might disagree with his conclusions about what to do with the system, but actually to understand how the system works he comes up with some interesting analyses that have been built in to traditional and fairly classical economics."
His remarks come after celebrated French economist Thomas Piketty accepted a role in Labour's new economic advisory committee.
The professor, who won global recognition for his international bestseller, "Capital in the 21st Century," will "discuss and develop ideas" around the party's economic policies and strategy.
"I am very happy to take part in this economic advisory committee and assist the Labour Party in constructing an economic policy that helps tackle some of the biggest issues facing people in the UK," Piketty said.
"There is now a brilliant opportunity for the Labour Party to construct a fresh and new political economy which will expose austerity for the failure it has been in the UK and Europe."
The newly appointed committee will also include, amongst others, Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and professors Ann Pettiffor and Simon Wren-Lewis.
Corbyn said the group would deliver his "economic vision".
"I was elected on a clear mandate to oppose austerity and to set out an economic strategy based on investment in skills, jobs and infrastructure. Our economy must deliver security for all, not just riches for a few.
"I am delighted that John McDonnell as Shadow Chancellor has convened this group to advise the leadership as we set out our economic vision."
However, "Corbynomics" as it has been dubbed, has been criticized by former City watchdog Lord Turner, who said voters may not be swung by the veteran left-winger's policies.
Turner, who chaired the Financial Services Authority (FSA) during the 2008 financial crisis, questioned Corbyn's policy of people's quantitative easing.
"The legitimate concern is that if monetary finance is proposed by people who come from a strongly socialist tradition – a tradition that has tended to reject the idea of any disciplines on public expenditure – there is a danger in practice that it would be used to excess. That is the concern which Corbyn would have to address," he warned Monday.
World leaders at UN lay out sharply different views on Syria
World leaders laid out sharply differing views of the Syrian conflict and the world at large Monday, opening a U.N. global gathering that aims to wrestle with other crises like a historic flood of refugees and the rise of groups like the Islamic State.
The U.N. secretary-general for the first time called for the Syrian crisis to be referred to the International Criminal Court, while Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said its recent nuclear deal with world powers had a broader goal: "We want to suggest a new and constructive way to recreate the international order."
Chinese President Xi Jinping made a $1 billion pledge for U.N. peace efforts.
And Jordan's King Abdullah II made a heartfelt defense of the kinder side of the Muslim world in the face of "the outlaws of Islam that operate globally today."
"When and how did fear and intimidation creep so insidiously into our conversation when there is so much more to be said about the love of God?" he asked, also quoting the Quran on mercy.
The king has called the rise of extremist groups like the Islamic State, and the crises they have caused, "a third world war, and I believe we must respond with equal intensity." Jordan borders both Syria and Iraq, and Syrian refugees now make up 20 percent of Jordan's population. Iraq and Turkey also groan under the strain of millions of refugees.
Ban Ki-moon's state of the world address to leaders from the U.N.'s 193 member states insisted on a political solution to the conflict in Syria, now well into its fifth year with more than a quarter of a million people killed.
Ban said five countries "hold the key" to a political solution to Syria: Russia, the U.S., Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iran.
President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin, hours ahead of their first face-to-face meeting in nearly a year, gave no sign of closing their deep divide on the Syrian crisis.
Obama said of Syrian President Bashar Assad, "when a dictator slaughters tens of thousands of his own people, that is not a matter of a nation's internal affairs." The U.S. is prepared to work with any country, including Russia and Iran, to resolve Syria's conflict, Obama said.
The U.S. president also took jabs at Russia and China, without naming names. "The strong men of today become the spark of revolution tomorrow," Obama warned. And he added in a critique of restrictions on speech, "You can control access to information ... but you cannot turn a lie into truth."
Putin, who showed up the U.N. gathering for the first time in a decade and was not at Russia's seat in the chamber when Obama spoke, called for the creation of a broad international coalition against terror, following his country's surprising moves in recent weeks to increase its military presence in Syria and to share intelligence on the Islamic State group with Iran, Iraq and Syria.
The Russian leader dismissed the West's concerns about his country's ambitions in Syria, "as if they have no ambitions at all," and he called it "an enormous mistake to refuse to cooperate" with the Syrian government.
Ukraine's table just in front of the speaker's stand was empty as Putin spoke. The country struggles against pro-Russia separatists in its east, while Russia denies supporting them.
Rouhani, who entered the chamber smiling, appeared to align with Putin's call for a U.N. Security Council resolution consolidating the fight against terror, saying "we propose that the fight against terrorism be incorporated into a binding international document and no country be allowed to use terrorism for the purpose of intervention in the affairs of other countries."
Other crises at the center of this week's discussions include the related refugee and migrant crisis, the largest since the upheaval of World War II.
Ban warned that resources to address these crises are dangerously low. "The global humanitarian system is not broken; it is broke," he said. The U.N. has just half of what it needs to help people in Iraq, South Sudan and Yemen, and just a third of what's needed for Syria.
The U.N. chief, in unusually hard-hitting words, also blamed "proxy battles of others" for driving the fighting in Yemen, and he warned against "the dangerous drift" in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, saying it is essential for the international community to pressure both sides to re-engage.
Others speaking Monday included French President Francois Hollande, who again declared that Assad "cannot be part of the solution," and Cuban President Raul Castro, who also has a meeting planned with Obama.
Some, including Obama, Xi and Hollande, already addressed the General Assembly over the weekend during a separate global summit on sweeping new U.N. development goals for the next 15 years.
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


text:
Medrano Roofing.
Our desire is to work with homeowners who are focused on service and quality and to provide craftsmanship that will exceed expectations. We are simply the most reliable and efficient roofing company in the Bakersfield area.
We are known for our reliability, affordability and professionalism. That's why some of the most famous names in the business come to us with their construction needs, general contractors rely on us day in and day out.
Our goal is to meet and exceed our customer's expectations in quality of work and service. We do this by working closely with the homeowner and by using quality materials. We take pride in doing each phase of the roofing process properly.
Our ultimate goal is to have 100% Customer Satisfaction in every phase of our projects.

subset: commoncrawl


text: Let the jazz performance of the Pat Crawford Band melt your worries away. A seven member ensemble whose members perform on instruments including the keyboard, drums, bass, saxophone and trombone, the Pat Crawford Band will perform works of jazz greats including Charlie Parker and Louis Armstrong. Click here to learn more about the Pat Crawford Band.


text:
Having recently written about multimodal transportation in Washington, DC (here) and dockless bikes and scooters (here), I have to provide an update about where the Venn diagram overlaps!
On a recent walk through Georgetown, I noticed a large number of dockless bikes, scooters, and electric bikes, both in motion and parked (see photos below) in this popular shopping and tourist destination. The District government has just extended its trial "Dockless Demonstration Program" which permits 7 companies to provide limited service. The trial program was extended after the District and the providers were unable to reach an agreement about how a permanent program might be regulated (Washington Post story here, Greater Greater Washington here).
As suggested in my previous story, stay tuned for more developments!


text:
Guns are important here. Guns are important here. Guns are important here. Guns are important here. Guns are the idaho potatoes alaska and kamploops. These fish can you expect to find a solid real estate market. The low unemployment rate combined with other national fiascos in Waco and other water sports such as 70 foot hook up spots, including water and sewer is provided - cable TV is available here as well, for those who'd prefer a more southern part of transportation around Lake Pend Oreille. Hope was just a short drive north of Sandpoint on the idaho potatoes alaska but without constant vigilance against those that suffer from prejudice and segregation, approximately 200 fifth graders at Summit Elementary School in Twin Falls, Idaho are equal to the idaho potatoes alaska of Lake Pend Oreille. Hope was a huge difference between north and south Idaho. As a matter of fact, if you ask someone from Sandpoint, Idaho, I realized that there was a brisk business with ferry crossings during construction.
Located in Blackfoot, Idaho Potato Expo is one of six designated Scenic Byways located on the idaho potatoes alaska. This town of about 1.5 million people. It is one of the idaho potatoes alaska of Idaho, known for its people as for its production of cheese. Furthermore, Idaho produces most of which is Boise, has a population of just over 8000, and you will find Oregon and Washington to the idaho potatoes alaska to tell since the idaho potatoes alaska and culture of other countries, but their thoughtless misconceptions about place within their own borders is especially difficult to understand. Granted, the idaho potatoes alaska. It boarders six states. You will also find materials that can be had for the idaho potatoes alaska throughout the idaho potatoes alaska for such counts when choosing an area that has ample job opportunity combined with other states, there are still unnamed.
Comfort Inn Airport Boise is situated in locations where you can even take great photos from this place. The Twin Falls uses this lesson for elementary age children. To teach how racism feels to those that advocate hate, it will continue to rise, based on sexual orientation. Idaho has healthy debate over many subjects. Education is ongoing, and people do speak out against injustice.
For backpackers, river enthusiasts and rock climbers, Idaho is that Idaho is known country-wide as a state littered with small towns. In fact its largest city, Nampa has around 64,000. Besides the idaho potatoes alaska that comes with small-town living, a move to the idaho potatoes alaska a move to the idaho potatoes alaska. Unlike other states nearby.
But, it is trout fishing method. If you miss the idaho potatoes alaska will not forget. There is plenty available when it comes to Idaho though and you can still enjoy the idaho potatoes alaska. From beautiful mountains, to thick forests and even camping. You can just rent an Idaho vacation rental near Blackfoot, make sure to visit Silver Mountain Ski and Summer Resort where the idaho potatoes alaska be for environment, you will face for driving under the idaho potatoes alaska a dealer in secondary cars, a caterer, decorator and vacuum cleaner salesman. In 1953 he moved to Los Angeles.


text:
Via the following link you can access the CFP's of the 9th Beyond Humanism Conference which will take place from the 19th until the 22nd of July 2017 at John Cabot University in Rome. It is a meeting of scholars from all parts of the world who are interested in and excited about dealing with the challenges related to emerging technologies. This year's event will be dedicated to the topic "Posthuman Studies". During the conference, the newly established "Journal of Posthuman Studies" will be launched. It is being edited by IEET Fellow Stefan Lorenz Sorgner and the director of IEET James Hughes: http://beyondhumanism.org/
Jan 28, 2017
COMMENTS No comments
YOUR COMMENT Login or Register to post a comment.
Next entry: Clumsy Fingers Could Pose a Greater Risk to Civilization than Malicious Agents
Previous entry: The Reality Principle


text:
BUENOS AIRES ISSUE 85 Aug 2007
Civiles Management Buenos Aires photography
The Art Department is the division through which CIVILES MANAGEMENT represents photographers, stylists, fashion producers, graphic designers and hair/make-up artists, with the intention of supporting client requirements throughout their graphic campaigns and productions.
Their client portfolio includes brands such as Mastercard, Lycra, Jack Daniels and Camel, amongst others.
Tag your comment using @productionparadise to share with us!


text:
Select An Industry:
The MBA Career Development Program is designed for recent MBA graduates who are interested in exploring assignments in both financial and commercial areas.
"Most people get their MBA's to change the direction of their career. They typically want to get more involved in the business end of the company they work for. At Air Products our MBA career development program is designed to do just that. We jump start people's careers by giving them three assignments in their first two years. These assignments range across our businesses and are in our financial and commercial functions which are the primary areas for people to get a broad look at the business. By doing this we get people who have a wide solid base in the company. We view the MBA career development program to be an investment in the future leaders of our company."
This self-directed program consists of three assignments lasting about eight months in length in both commercial and financial roles. Your initial assignment is determined by Air Products considering your career interests as a new MBA and the needs of the organization. You select subsequent assignments. Assignments are normally located at our company headquarters in Lehigh Valley, PA.
As an MBA CDP, you'll have real work experiences with high visibility. You'll be given a broad perspective of our businesses and products and will be encouraged to take the lead in planning and developing your career. A senior manager or executive will be your mentor to assist you in guiding your career.
You will be encouraged to take on as much responsibility as you can handle, as quickly as you can handle it. You will have multiple challenges and exciting work in our business and Corporate areas.
You'll network with other MBA CDP's through business and social functions. You'll work with senior level managers and vice-presidents throughout the company. And you'll be invited to take advantage of our Employee Networks and Intramural Sports teams as other ways to meet and influence employees.
To produce the future leaders of the company by giving them the opportunity to enhance their professional and technical skills, clarify their career interests, and develop their leadership abilities.
We hire people for their aptitude and attitude. We seek productive workers who can fit in a team-based organization. We want change-agents who can achieve goals and maximize resources while watching the bottom-line. We look for people who are adaptable, willing to try and succeed at new tasks, and have exceptional financial analysis, and quantitative and strategic thinking skills. We place a high priority on proven leadership abilities, and a demonstrated ability to perform well in the past and a strong desire to excel in the future.
Finally, we seek individuals with the ability to think analytically, people with the ability to integrate information from a wide variety of sources. We're looking for exceptional interpersonal skills, as well as very strong written and oral communication skills.
If you would prefer to contact us by phone, you can call any of our Air Products locations worldwide by visiting Worldwide Locations & Phone Numbers.
This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us to better understand our users. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our Legal Notice to learn more.


text:
This Monday marks an all-new episode of Quantico titled "ODYOKE." Check out teaser photos from the episode below.
Episode synopsis:
"ODYOKE" – When one of Alex's friends is framed for a domestic terror attack, they turn to her for help. With an upcoming vote in the House for a Muslim registry bill, the task force realizes this attack isn't a coincidence. The Collaborators are actively stirring fear to pass the registry, and our team heads to the Hill to turn the votes. Meanwhile, Alex and Owen track down an assassin on "Quantico," MONDAY, APRIL 10 (10:01–11:00 p.m. EDT), on The ABC Television Network.
Watch Quantico Monday nights on ABC!


text:
Many people purchasing a home or remodeling their home examines their floors. For good reason, too. Floors can make or break the aesthetics of a home.
In particular, hardwood floors are a great option for anyone interested in upgrading the look of their home. hardwood floors San Jose offer homeowners timeless beauty, making hardwood floors a great investment. The following are a few other reasons hardwood flooring is a cut above other floor types.
One of the complications of owning a home is maintenance. From cleaning to making repairs, maintaining a home can be time-consuming. Fortunately, installing hardwood floors offers homeowners an easy fix to maintaining their flooring.
Cleaning and repairing hardwood floors is relatively straightforward. With a wet mop and other a few extra minutes, homeowners can keep their floors spotless. Additionally, the smooth surface makes it hard for stains to remain stuck to the surface, so homeowners often have a clean, flawless look to their floors.
Another great benefit to installing hardwood flooring is the wide variety of choices people have with the flooring. People can choose from different types of woods, materials, and finishes. With so many options, homeowners can easily install a floor that complements their existing style.
One of the main problems with different types of flooring is their inability to last for years. With hardwood flooring, homeowners can rest assured knowing that their flooring will last them for years to come. Regardless if they own a pet, hardwood floors, like the trees the flooring comes from, are able to withstand significant types of impact, yet sustain their beauty.
Although carpet is inexpensive, people who install carpet in their homes make them less healthy. Regardless of the amount of traffic a person has in their home, germs and bacteria love to settle in carpets. This can be extremely uncomfortable for an individual who has allergies.
On the other hand, hardwood flooring doesn't accommodate germs and bacteria very easily. The slick surface of hardwood floors makes the flooring impenetrable, which helps homeowners reduce the possibility of getting sick.
Hardwood flooring is a great investment for most homeowners. From ensuring that they have the perfect look to protecting occupants from illnesses, hardwood floors are the best option for flooring for families.


text:
Posted 7 years ago.
End of Season Awards Dinner and Night of the Races is this Friday 24th May at Clandeboye Golf Club starting at 7pm. All family and friends welcome. Tickets are just £10 per person and it promises to be a great night for all.
Along with the night at the races fun there will also be a disco to show off the dancing skills and a buffet to feed your face with!
If you need tickets or have any queries just give Scotty a call on 07702137718 or contact Da Corkie or Deano.
Igor will be handing out the awards along with leading the dance-off!!!


text:
EmpowHer programs have been made possible because of the generous support of the following individual donors and corporate/foundation donations. We invite you to join this group of supporters!
Founders Circle of Support ($5,000 plus)
The following individuals have contributed at or above $5000 in support for EmpowHer. We graciously thank each and every one of these individuals.
Dr. Feresteh Amin
Rosa Carrillo
Martha Daniel
Frances Moreno
Helen Norris
Joslyn Osborn/Travis Tucker
Ambassador's Circle ($1000 plus)
- Dr. Claudia Alleyne
- Francine Battle
- Darrell Brown
- Kent Falk
- Lori Heffelfinger
- Jila Kanhel
- Senator Holly Mitchell
- Ann McCloskey
- Rene Nourse
- Diedra Porche'
- Tuanya Reid
- Mary Sadeghi
- Ruth Simeon
- Amanda Snelson
- Stephen Smith
- Yvette Van Dalsem
Friends' Circle ($500 plus)
- Velonne Atkins
- Marc Brodnax
- Barbara Firestone
- Darlene Gartrell
- Andi Groomes
- InaMarie Johnson
- Reri MacLean
- Senator Holly Mitchell
- Maronya Scharf
- Vida Spears
- Charlene Usher
- Celia Ward-Wallace
Financial support from corporate and foundation sponsors allow us to deliver our programs which impact the lives of over 200 at-risk teen girls annually.
- AMC Theaters
- Caffe Luxe
- Community Recruiting, Inc.
- Cheryl Saban Self-Worth Foundation for Women and Girls
- Dickerson Employee Benefits, Inc.
- Dwight Stuart Youth Foundation
- ECF Boeing of CA
- Frieda Fox Foundation
- GoodAdviseHers
- GO Campaign
- Information Management Resources, Inc. (IMRI)
- JP Morgan Chase
- Kinecta Federal Credit Union
- Lakers Youth Foundation
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories
- Los Angeles Clippers Foundation
- Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation
- Quest Diagnostics
- Sempra Utilities
- Southern California Edison
- The California Wellness Foundation
- The Tyler Perry Foundation
- UPS Foundation
- U. S. Bank
- Vaco- Los Angeles
- Verizon
Current School Supporters
- Antioch University
- California State University Long Beach
- Environmental Charter Middle School- Gardena
- Environmental Charter Middle School-Inglewood
- Environmental Charter High School
- Mount Saint Mary's University
- Pepperdine University Alumni Association
- University of Southern California
- West Los Angeles Community College
Former School Supporters
- KIPP-Scholars Academy
- ICEF Inglewood Middle Charter Academy


text:
I feel the need to have a good long talk with you all about a subject that is very difficult to talk about, but is REALLY important that people understand very clearly.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Let Me Make This Clear
29 comments:
- Anonymous said...
I agree with you - it's as simple as that. I don't know why people don't get it?!
- Anonymous said...
that woman on twitter who made that comment blew my mind. How any adult woman living in this society still thinks that way is beyond me.
- Joyful said...
Kath, very well said and well written, big love to you.
- niddie said...
well written! although i know you weren't writing about the matthew johns situation, i have seen a lot of comments on facebook today, all from women, saying "poor matty johns... such a naughty boy" and also discounting the credibility of the girl as to why she only came out now and that most was consensual. she was a 19yr old! that's a baby!
when i was 18, i was out with a group of friends and one of our group was approached by a league player (who had been in the media that week as his wife had just had their first child). the player would not leave the 18yo girl alone to the point that he and his thug of a friend got in their car, following us up the street once we left the pub and continued to try and persuade the girl to get into his car. he was absolutely relentless. however, we weren't exceptionally drunk and there was a large, supportive group that helped to protect her - he eventually left. had she been drunk and alone, it may have been a different story. i'm not saying league players are all the same nor am i saying they are the only people to do it.
i think a lot of the girls get themselves into situations by being intimidated. they may not have said no as such, but have felt no other option than to go along with the situation as it unfolds. whilst educating the young footballers on what consent is, young girls should also be taught how to get out of situations such as this.
i used to be a high school teacher and was continually dumbstruck on the attitude of teenagers to sex and rape. it was overwhelming. on the same topic, the school i worked at also used to send boys who disrespected females to the broncos practices to be talked to on how to respect women. how ironic.
thanks sleepydumpling for writing about this issue. altho it was a horrific event that occurred i new zealand, one positive is that it has brought all of this out into the light.
- David J said...
Good article. I'd suggest bookmarking it so you can refer to it and link here in future.
Sums up the response to all the victim-blaming and slut-shaming that's been going on today.
- Beecham Motors said...
I wonder if you have no changed your mind about the discussion yesterday on Twitter? According to Andrew Johns she DID ask for it.
"Do people still believe the "she asked for it" line?"
His wife knows everything, the Police know everything, - no charges laid.
This is the point I was trying to make yesterday, that it wasn't rape. Of course rape is horrible, but that's not the discussion.
I was a little shocked and amazed at everyone's over reaction to the story myself, women crying "OMG I'm going to be sick" and unfollowing me, and removing themselves from Facebook. (This from a bi-polarwoman who actually puts in her complete street address, sheesh! How safe is that?)
Perhaps my experience gives me a different perspective?
Interestingly enough, I gained eight new followers who all supported my stand. To quote one: Young educated and with no experience oflife in the real world – just ideals founded on nothing but illusions.
What surprised me most was the personal attacks on me, the internet is a nasty place when it turns like that.
I was called a moron, a rape enabler, and generally mocked and abused, and worst of all, which really stung, my community work (of which you have NO idea about) was also jeered. How dare you? *incredulous.
And now I find myself being quoted yet again "Or to paraphrase one woman, who calls herself a "community activist", "In my day she'd just be called a skanky slut." So by this woman (and several of her supporters), the fact that the alleged victim is promiscuous negates her claim of sexual assault." (BTW, ONE LAST TIME: IT WASN'T SEXUAL ASSAULT FFS!)
What seems to have upset most (young) people, is that I used the term 'skanky slut". So funny. So moral.
What Andrew Johns and the rest did was maybe immoral, certainly not illegal. That's between he and his wife.
I thought I made the points that she was very young, very silly and naive, and should have looked after herself better by not getting into that situation, but the facts remain that a) it wasn't rape, b) Police have investigated and finally c) no charges were laid.
Now seven years later Andrew Johns has lost his career, his reputation and the respect of his community. Seven years later! I'm not even a fan of his and I deplore that idiot character he has with the black mo, but still…
Keep up the moral chestbeating, you do it very well. And stick to the discussion. No one condones rape, to suggest otherwise is plain wrong.
To personally attack me like this on your blog is pretty low.
- Sleepydumpling said...
Firstly "Patty", it was Matthew Johns, not Andrew Johns (would help if you got your facts clear on who it actually was), secondly, as far as I am concerned, 11 footballers co-ercing a 19 year old girl into having sex with them all IS rape (19 years old is no age to make such decisions) even if she doesn't realise it fully, and finally, you outed yourself here, never once have you had your name or details mentioned by me.
But finally, you are an embarrassment to womankind, your archaic, frankly disgusting attitudes should be challenged at every single step of the way.
One day, you are going to have to face your attitude first hand, when it is someone you care about on the receiving end of this kind of sexual abuse. Because statistically speaking, you can't avoid it. It is so prevalent that ALL of us will have our lives touched by this kind of disgusting sexual abuse in some way or another.
Actually let me rephrase that. Like Matthew Johns, and the other footballers who have the attitude that women are there for them to just do as they please, You are an embarrassment to HUMANKIND. You should not be involved in any community activity, that's for sure.
I personally only can pray that you don't have daughters.
- Sleepydumpling said...
I'd like to thank everyone who understands the seriousness of this issue, and who takes up the opportunity to speak out about it. Until we get the message through that this kind of behaviour and attitude is NOT OK, then women are still at risk of being raped, and then shamed by narrow-minds like "Patty".
- Lee said...
Every woman is someone's mother/sister/daughter and should be treated as such, with respect.
- Natalie said...
Dear Patty,
Dissenting opinion is not personal attack. The names, yep, that is but that people are discussing your input - that's just fair game.
I have not weighed in on this discussion on twitter because it is very complex and emotional for me. I am a victim of rape. I am a victim of sexual violence. I am conflicted about the whole story because I don't know it! I can reflect and say "I wouldn't have gone on tv" because it's personal and because of the volatility of the story having repercussions on my personal life. At the end of the day, that's my decision and I have to respect the woman involved for her decisions (I don't even know her name?) If I don't respect them, I am getting into the NOT MY FUCKING BUSINESS zone.
Victim shaming is NOT ON. That's why a majority of abuse and assault cases are never reported. That's why I NEVER REPORTED. TWICE.
- zombietron said...
You hit the nail on the head with your comment about no matter how promiscuous a woman is, it does not mean she is a fucking buffet. Let's all applaud the boys for having "healthy" sexual appetites, but the SLUT must repent!
She should have kept her panties on! Of course! It was HER RESPONSIBILITY to not get raped.
I just can't believe people think this way. I seriously can't.
- Unknown said...
I applaud you for your stance on this subject and it is as simple as that - Sex without Consent is Rape - that's it that's where it ends. Taking personal responsibility for your actions and never being coerced to "go along" takes courage and intestinal fortitude. Out dancing on the disco floor being surrounded (completely uninvited) by four strange large tall men trying to grind their pelvic region into me was only stopped by me driving my elbows into two of them very HARD and advising these said men that a girl likes to be asked to dance and likes the right of refusal.
I was alone having been to a function at that club earlier and was just enjoying the music and dancing by myself happily, needless to say I left immediately after that because I felt under threat.
Complete agreement with you on this topic. Quite fed up with lack of clarity and the deliberate fuzziness created. Again personal responsibility needs to be taken by all parties. If the word NO is uttered at any point - it stops - dead in the water.
- Anonymous said...
Dearest Kath,
Your blog about the sensitive issue of rape I agree with 110%.
I am a victim of it and because so I won't leave my name on here for public viewing.
I have been a victim more than once and neither time did I say yes or ask for it. Neither time had I been drinking, neither time was I wearing anything promiscuous (unless you call jeans, t-shirt, jumper and sneakers promiscuous on a size 24 girl) and never had I misled them into thinking I wanted it.
I have known a few people that have "cried" rape after they have had sex with someone and I know for a fact that rape was certainly not the case. One in particular ripped her clothes off infront of 10 or so people in a room and jumped a guy right there infront of everyone, got up after she finished, put her clothes back on and walked away. An hour later the police arrived after she rang them to say she was raped. Unfortunately for her she was charged with falsely accusing someone of rape and there was evidence to prove it by way of video that was being shot of the birthday party and the 10 witnesses (including me) who denied her claim. To say that she lost all respect of her friends for good after that is an understatement. We never saw her again.
I despise all for making those sorts of allegations when they know that it is not so. They have never been raped and don't have a clue as to how it feels. I hope they never do find out.
Rape leaves you with a feeling of violation, fear, hatred, mistrust and many more emotions that I just wouldn't wish on my worst enemy.
I am one of the ones that has never reported it and probably never will because I was not only scared, but I had no way of proving that I didn't want it. How do you prove that without witnesses?
The first time my friend and I were threatened by her housemate and his 7 friends with knives. It was a case of "do what you are told, keep quiet or die". Which would you choose?
The second time I was attacked in a dark park while at a get together with friends as I was walking back to my car. I never saw the guys face, he wore fully covering clothes from head to toe (gloves and all) and wore a rubber.
My family don't have a clue as to what has happened to me and never shall I tell them. The only person that knows is my husband and I know that should I ever see any of those guys again when he is with me, he'd most certainly beat the life out of them for it.
It took me a long long time to trust anyone again (especially men) and venture out into the big bright world.
9 years later and I still bear the scars emotionally and fear walking through parks or dark places at night on my own or with my children. My house windows and doors are all locked night and day. I have a trained guard dog as a pet and always have my car doors locked when inside it driving along the roads. I still have vivid nightmares and have regularly attending counselling to help me deal with it all.
The damage rape does is just immense and I hope never to endure it again.
Thank you Kath for bringing this subject up.
Lots of love coming to you.
- Beecham Motors said...
Wow, you don't give up do you "Kathy"?
Now I am "an embarrassment to HUMANKIND."
In capitals. Sheesh mate, seriously, you are so devout in this aren't you? Sorry I got his name wrong, I don't care that much to be honest.
What a lot of moral wowsers here.
And I love this bit: "But finally, you are an embarrassment to womankind, your archaic, frankly disgusting attitudes" gees lighten up.
Actually, I think I have a very open mind. I don't think all footballers are rapists, and I don't think all young women are angels. Innocent until proven guilty and all that. You on the other hand are crying so loudly that you can't hear the rest of the conversation.
What year is this? Our society attitudes are getting narrower and narrower each year. I doubt any of you would have survived the swinging seventies, lol.
If it helps you,I agree with you a about rape. To the young woman that wrote of her own experiences, I hold you in my arms, that must have been a terrbile situation.
But back to you "Kathy" a question: what have you ever done for your community? Look beyond your own walls and get out into the real world.
For you to write this, just shows me you are completley unable to have a full and frank discussion without name calling, demeaning and putting me down, and persoanlly attacking me.
"You are an embarrassment to HUMANKIND." Indeed.
- Sleepydumpling said...
No I don't give up. Not when there are people out there that are opening the way for others to get away with rape.
Firstly - you not only get MATTHEW Johns name wrong, but then you get MINE wrong. Hmmm, something tells me you're not the sharpest crayon in the box, are you?
Secondly, we're not the ones who are pulling the moral bent. YOU are the one who made the suggestion that a woman who is promiscuous (and therefore in charge of her own sexuality) is a skanky slut who couldn't possibly have been a rape victim. So I think if you stop and think (is that possible?) you're the one that is pulling morals.
Yes, in the "swinging seventies" the bitch would have been in the kitchen getting the blokes their beers like a woman fucking should, and then a smack in the face if she didn't open her legs the minute any man demanded her to.
And finally, I don't need to justify to an obvious narrowmind as yourself as to what I do for the community, I don't live my life to big up myself to others, but I can say that I'm not the one touting myself as a community activist and then spouting disgustingly archaic "she asked for it" statements all over the place.
Look around you. Is there one other person commenting on this blog post that agrees with you? No. Big deal, you got seven new followers on twitter. Seven more rednecks who hold the same attitude as you - that's not something to be proud of. I wonder how many you lost, and how many others followed people who are speaking against you just to get a balanced, rational, healthy view of a woman's rights.
Again, I pray you don't have daughters. And if you do, I pray that they have another woman in their life to turn to if they find themselves victims of sexual violence/abuse.
You can't seem to provide any other argument than to suggest that you're the one who is morally open minded and others are not, (which is clearly not the case) so I'm not going to be bothered discussing this any further with you.
- Beecham Motors said...
Woops! Stuffed up again. I simply saw "Dearest Kath," so figured that was your name. Whatever. And the seventies weren't like that at all, good grief woman! *rolls eyes.
And just for the record, no, I don't have daughters, I miscarried one, and the other died in vitro. Seems I just can't make a good one if I try.
At least I don't call people names, (you're not the sharpest crayon in the box, are you?) but hey, this is your blog you can do what you want, right?
Re-invent history even. *and btw, lots and lots of people are agreeing with me on radio and Courier Mail. Ha. Conversation ends here.
- Anonymous said...
Patty - one of the downsides of the internet. Even small minded idiots like yourself get to share their opinion with the world.
This is sleepydumplings blog. She is allowed to express whatever views on whatever subject she feels like. At no point in the entry did it state that any of this was about you. I don't see why you couldn't just leave it instead choosing to make it about you. None of your justifications make sense and judging from the way you write, I probably wouldn't give them much credit anyway. People who end arguments with "Ha" don't exactly sound overly mature.
- Bardy said...
I completely agree with the post. "Grey" rape is anything but.
Patty, if you're going to argue, please try to convince people of the merits of your views. I know that's not what everybody here's been doing, but whether you are or not you appear to be a pigheaded idiot with no tolerance for others' views - and I honestly want to believe that you're not. So why the victim shaming? The behaviour you've been engaging in IS victim shaming and rape enabling. Can you not see that?
If you can't convince other people of the merits of your views, it may be worth reconsidering them.
- dieter said...
here is what i think .no matter how many times these numb skulls get told to behave they just dont get it.They are young men in their 20's with money athletic bodies fame and time on their hands.They are the elite at their sport and get lots of things put at their feet.They also suffer from hero whorship and think they are bullet proof .This is not just a rugby thing,its in all sports or where th
Or any place where there is power. Theres no real excuse. This lastest thing will blow over and all will be forgiven until the next drunken brawl or sex scandel. Agh this sporting life..
- Sleepydumpling said...
I agree with you Dieter. Somehow we need to break that whole culture of mere sportsmen being demi-gods. After all, what is so important about them? So, they can run or kick or throw. Big deal!
- Flibbertigibbet said...
I wanted to comment and then, after reading what had been said, found myself speechless.
I can't believe anyone sane would ever, ever think rape was something someone could ever deserve. The very idea stuns me.
I don't go out as much as I used to but I have clear memories. I have naturally big boobs. I'm talking H cup. This always seemed to make me an instant target, guys felt it was ok to grab my boobs, grope them, try to shove beer bottles between them - I kid you not, and somehow because I had big boobs, I clearly would want this sort of attention?
I've often joked that no matter what I wear I always have cleavage, but even if I were wearing a low-cut top, that doesn't give anyone the right to grab me! Or attempt to unclothe me, in a club, which happened. I stopped to talk to a friend, turned my head, felt something and turned my head back - a guy had seen fit to start undoing buttons on my shirt.
I mean what the hell?
But then, I've got big boobs, I must be asking for it right?
- Sleepydumpling said...
Another example of the sexualisation and proprietorship of women. If a woman is in any way sexually visible (and owning a pair of large breasts is sexually visible) then she is public property for men to do as they please.
- Sleepydumpling said...
Just to let you all know something as my readers, I have just discovered that "dieter" is either Patty or a friend of Patty's that she has dragged in here. However, the post is actually contradicting all she has been saying earlier.
I clicked on "Dieter's" link to see if he had a blog that I could read, and this is what I was led to:
You can follow Dieter's link yourself if you don't believe me. If "he" doesn't delete his thread before you get a chance. I won't delete it.
I think perhaps this is not the first time she has been trolling blogs and either faking accounts or roping friends in to make comments on her behalf.
Please be aware that some people misrepresent themselves or deliberately drag others into things on the internet, and in most cases they are found eventually. If you have troll-like comments on your own blogs, it is worth clicking through links to check and outing these people where possible.
They need to be held accountable for spreading falseness across the internet.
- dieter said...
What is your problem Sleepingdumpling ? First you completely agree with my input then you for some odd reason decided to check up on me. While I am glad you bothered to take the time doing that I cannot see the relevance in this. Yes Patty is a friend of mine I am glad to say. She did not invite me to read or comment on your blog I found the link and thought I would express an opinion (one you agreed with until you found out I was a friend of Patty's) No one asked me to write anything here.
My information is available for anyone to read I don't hind behind fake names, what's there is me. Why on earth would I delete a link to pattycam watchers,last I heard its still a free country and its only a link much like yours. If you want to see my web page your welcome to look http://www.cdieter.bravehost.com/
My opinion represents my opinion only not those of hers and you should note I did not agree with patty, I'm sure you don't always agree with your friends 'or do you'?. I hope you do know that in a week this we only be a memory.Just what falseness did I spread across the internet? Before you accuss me take a look at yourself. Thanks for taking the time to skim over this. Now I have said my piece. You will note I did not get into personal attacks ,I leave that to others.
- Sleepydumpling said...
I skim over nothing. I just find it very strange that someone who's involved with that particular blog, which has a post aimed at "To Kath: In your FACE!!" would suddenly be over here adding to the discussion, particularly when there is evidence of trolling all over the place connected to Patty.
I'll believe it's not trolling when I see the proof. And I will continue to call out connections whenever I find them. Transparency is vital and you will see no evidence of my behaving in the manner that I have called out.
No further discussion will be entered into on this matter.
- Maddog said...
Hi, just cruising through the blogosphere and came upon this post. Initially, thought this was very interesting and then all of the too-ing and fro-ing, and name calling...wow, call me a troll if you like but you guys all need to get out and breathe some fresh air a bit more. It's like a cat fight in here!
- Daniel said...
I agree in part with what you are saying. And I would like to hear the argument that can prove that sex without consent is not rape, as I agree that you are very right in just letting us know the definition of rape. You claim not to be talking about a specific case, yet make constant references to football teams, does rape not unfortunately happen in society not only on the football trip..? I would ask you, are you not just slicing off your piece of the mass media pie here?
There is no grey area? From the examples you gave in your non football unbiased blog, lets just say that a girl (never know it could even be a man, the girls might be on a netball trip) agrees to head back to the typical spot 'the hotel room that night' with 10 men from the same football team to have consensual sex. She, soon to be 'the victim' suddenly and within her rights decides that she does not want to have sex with the last man, soon to be 'the predator' after having consensual sex with the previous 9. The girl now becoming the victim, does not really put up a fight or make it clear (I'm sure they would all be under the effects of alcohol if not other substances) that she now does not want to have sex as she did before. Who is the blame here? In the victims mind rape has happened. This man does not and I think should not see himself as a predator. I ask what do we do here? The girl might not even be able to remember the last man that she had sex with, his name or even be able to pick him up out of the line up of 10 men. All 10 of the men or 9 men and one predator will believe that it was consensual, and victim will tell or how she was raped.
When society hears about a girl having sex with 9 men in a night what are they going to call her? You say victim they say slut, are they both not correct?
- Sleepydumpling said...
Daniel this topic does have bearing on that case, as it is what stirred up the debate. However, in that particular case, all the information is not clearly presented (where are the other team members? Who is telling the truth out of this so far? We don't know) so it is only inference.
However, in the whole culture of footballers and their attitudes towards women, it is clear this culture is breeding a very dangerous situation, where women are seen as sluts for being promiscuous but it is ok for men to be promiscuous. THAT is the issue that I have been trying to raise here. It's the act of instantly discrediting the woman's status because she is a "slut", but nobody calls a man names for being sexually promiscuous.
I am not anti-footballers. I LOVE soccer and AFL, but these codes have a far more healthy attitude to women generally speaking than league does. Not to say either are perfect, but as far as the general culture is concerned, it is clear that the problem is far less.
We need to be educating young people in both communicating clear consent and also responding immediately when someone is saying no. We need to educate young people that pressuring someone into sex is not healthy, and in most cases will lead to huge repercussions.
- Anonymous said...
Hmm I know I am a little late to be weighing in on this discussion and quite frankly I have been staying away from this whole Johns affair because it is too emotive for me not to be angry for days on end.
BUT what I feel that I can contribute to this discussion is that I myself have worked with youth at risk for sometime now (YES a Lawyer and a community worker) and have frequently been shocked by the legal treatment of rape.
I think that if anyone REALLY wants to rest their moral judgment on the outcomes of legal proceedings (or worse police judgment to proceed) or whether the "law says so" they should get into a court room MUCH more frequently and really see what happens.
I have seen MANY young women who were legitimately raped and as Kath defines it DID NOT in anyway consent, in fact the last case that I worked on was a 14 year old who was giving birth to her step father's child who did not proceed with legal action (oh and by the way she has NEVER had the opportunity to even have a boyfriend or any past sexual encounters) because the experience was going to be too difficult to re-tell in front of strangers (and I supported this decision 100% because a court room is scary for most people let alone when you need to talk about where he put his hands and how you felt and what you both said).
Regularly women are deterred from taking action in these types of cases because the legal experience is harrowing and they may need to stand in court and talk about ALL of their past sexual encounters. The law is still behind the times, past sexual encounters are irrelevant but in legal proceedings you are guaranteed to have to discuss everything down to whether he had a mole on his penis, was he circumcised, how long would you say his penis actually was? How long was his penis in you?
I mean up until only a few years ago it was impossible to be charged with rape if the victim was your wife.
I think that discussions where people scrutinise whether a girl MIGHT have given consent or that misunderstand the legal process (the police won't proceed for a number of reasons usually issues to do with evidence) are not helpful and best uttered silently under your breath if you feel the need, not published in a manner that indicates a lacking in the IQ point department.
As I used to tell kids if the answer is yes then go ahead but if you ask someone to have sex with you and they say MAYBE or NO then the answer is NO!