text:
Veni, Vedi, Vasectomy?June 5, 2015 at 2:54 pm | Posted in Capitalism, democracy, Human Rights, international relations, Labor, Political Economy, Production, world politics | 1 Comment
Tags: Europe, European Union, Eurozone, France, Germany, Greece
On June 3, when the President of the European Commission (EC), Jean-Claude Juncker conveyed the collective demands of Greece's creditors—the European Central Bank (ECB), the European Commission, and the International Monetary Fund—to the embattled country's Prime Minister, Alexis Tsipras, a member of his governing Syriza party said of the Greek delegation: "They came, they saw, and they had their balls handed to them."
Five months after the anti-austerity party rode to victory in the Greek elections and had renounced efforts by previous Greek governments to impose austerity measures that had led the country's debt grow from 124 per cent of GDP to 180 per cent and its unemployment rate soar to 25 per cent (and youth unemployment to 60 per cent) and its pensioners see their meagre pensions decline even faster, the German Chancellor Angela Merkel invited the IMF's Managing Director Christine Lagarde and the President of the ECB, Mario Draghi to a previously scheduled meeting between herself, Juncker, and the French President Francois Hollande on June 1 to draft a common negotiating position among Greece's creditors. Prime Minister Tsipras was notably not invited.
Papering over their differences, the 5-page demands Juncker delivered to Tsipras made some concessions to Greece—lowering the demand that the primary surplus for 2015 be 1 per cent rather than the 3-4 per cent that had been the earlier demand—but also included "red lines" that the Syriza-led government had vowed never to cross such as generating 2 per cent of the GDP from cutting pensions and raising VAT to a uniform level (except on food, medicines, and hotels), not to reverse the labor market reforms that the 'troika' (the ECB, the EC, and the IMF) had forced down the throats of previous governments, and even to establish an 'independent' tax and customs agency and thereby making its operations beyond the ambit of elected officials.
Yet, far beyond debates on primary surpluses and 'red lines,' the real struggle between Greece and its "European partners" is over politics. The positions are clear. Because of the single currency, an indebted country like Greece cannot devalue its currency and thereby cheapen its exports and with the increase in exports (and tourism) repay its debts. Hence the 'troika' (now renamed 'the institutions') were attempting to impose an 'internal devaluation' on Athens: forcing it to cut minimum wages and increase labor market 'flexibility' (making it easier to hire and fire workers and thereby also curb labor militancy) to force down the prices of Greek products to increase exports, to privatize government assets, improve taxation and efficiency in collecting taxes, and to sharply reduce government expenditures by severely cutting welfare programs and reducing public sector employment and pensions. Syriza and other opponents of the 'austerity' measures have argued that these measures actually impede Greece's ability to repay its loans: if people don't have money due to welfare cuts, job losses, etc., they cannot buy goods and hence more businesses fail. Indeed, Greece's GDP has contracted by over 25 per cent in the five years of troika-mandated austerity and its unemployment remains high while its debt as a ratio of GDP has grown from 124 per cent to 180 per cent.
As Robert Preston, the BBC's economics editor puts it:
But although for the pride of the creditors, the question of whether Greece is obliged to generate a surplus on its budget, excluding interest payments, of a bit more than zero or 3%, feels like a world of difference – it is a rounding error compared with the money Greece owes them, which is equivalent to 180% of Greek GDP.
In the highly unlikely event that Greece could generate a 2% or 3% surplus year-in and year-out without its economy shrinking further (which few economists would anticipate), it would take around half a century for Greek public sector debt to fall to a level regarded as sustainable. gett A half century of austerity? In what modern democracy would that be regarded as a realistic option?
Most egregiously, sharp cuts in expenditure has meant that in some hospitals budgets have fallen by 94 per cent. How can this be sustainable in a continent as rich as Europe?
It is clear that one way or another, as Nils Pratley wrote in the Guardian, there will have to be a debt write-down. What Greece's European "partners" are unwilling to countenance is Syriza's demands to reverse the "austerity" measures because they want to root out any left-wing challenge to the reigning neo-liberal orthodoxy. Once Greece caves in, subjects itself to 'vasectomy' in the words of one of its MPs, then debt-relief could be offered but not before. To offer a write-down of the debt is particularly terrifying to Spain where the governing party has already lost many local elections to a Syriza-like party, Podemos, which now controls the three major cities of Madrid, Barcelona, and Valencia. It is also threatening to other EU economies like Portugal, Ireland, and Italy which have been compelled to implement austerity measures.
Syriza has, however, done its cause no favors despite some eloquent posturing by its Finance Minister, Yanis Varoufakis. It has not demanded a write down of the debt—and we must remember that when the troika made the first loan to Greece in 2010, Germany and France explicitly demanded that the austerity not be extended to the military—and Greece has been the best customer of the German arms industry. How is the cutting of pensions and salaries to workers while maintaining higher than the EU average in military spending morally justifiable?
With Syriza maintaining the charade of negotiating with its European 'partners' over the last months, Greece's position has rapidly deteriorated as frightened depositors have withdrawn their money from the banks and even transferred them outside the country. By the end of April, Greece's bank deposits were at their lowest level since 2004 and by the end of last week deposits were being withdrawn at the daily rate of 1 billion euros.
Interestingly, the Speaker of the Greek Parliament, Zoe Konstantopoulou, has set up a Debt Truth Committee to report to parliament on June 18
is said to be on the point of finding some of Greece's original bailout debt, from either 2010 or 2011, was unlawfully contracted. In addition, Ms Konstantopoulou is armed with a finding from experts that Germany owes Greece €350bn in war reparations – more than the whole of its debt to Europe.
This could open up a host of legal challenges even if Tsipiras was to finally cave into the troika's demands. The question is whether the Left Platform within Syriza is strong enough to prevent a cave in when there is nothing the troika would like than to install a government of national unity with a rump Syriza. That would, temporarily at least till Spain's November election, decapitate the European Left. Will it happen?
In the short run, if no resolution is found, Greece will be unable to make scheduled payments to its creditors and being declared to be in default would make its borrowing costs in private capital markets intolerable; Syriza's reluctance to impose capital controls would lead to the swift collapse of its banking sector unless the government begins to issue a virtual currency against future revenues which could ease the liquify crunch domestically at least. But Greece cannot be thrown out of the EU without its consent as all decisions must be unanimous. Even if Greece were to exit the common currency—Grexit as it has been dubbed—it would call the whole European project into question. It is also unrealistic to expect a country as bankrupt as Greece to police its borders when hordes of refugees from Africa and the Middle East are streaming to Europe—and from Greece, they could move to any country in the Schengen area. Will this be enough for its European 'partners' to blink?
Egypt: Chronicle of a Death ForetoldJuly 31, 2013 at 6:56 pm | Posted in democracy, Human Rights, International Relations, Political Economy, World Politics | 1 Comment
Tags: Brazil, China, democracy, Egypt, Europe, India, Libya, Middle East, South Africa, Tunisia, United States
Heaping irony upon irony, three weeks after protesters cheered the military for ousting Egypt's President Mohamed Morsi, the new strongman, General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi called on the people to take to the streets in a show of support for him to defeat "violence and potential terrorism." And taking the large crowds that gathered in Tahrir Square as a mandate to crush supporters of the democratically elected president, the army launched a massacre of Morsi loyalists at their Cairo sit-in on Saturday 27 June 2013.
Much has been written about President Morsi's overreach for power despite having secured only 51.7% of the vote in a run-off against a factotum of the old regime, Ahmed Shafik, the last prime minister to serve under Hosni Mubarak. But perhaps his biggest failure was not to neutralize the country's coercive apparatus, laughably called its security services.
Though human rights activists had hoped that as Morsi has himself been targeted by the police during his long years in opposition, he would rein in the police, he openly praised the police for its role in the 2011 revolution—a revolution in which uniformed and plain clothes officers had killed over 800 people, just as they killed Morsi's supporters last Saturday. The military has also been unrepentant about its role under the old regime: as late as June 2011, General al-Sisi justified the "virginity tests" the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces inflicted, among other humiliations, on women demonstrators during the Cairo chapter of the Arab Spring.
In yet another irony, the liberals installed in the interim government by the military blamed the massacre on the protesters killing each other! Nor have the liberals protested the interior minister, General Mohamed Ibrahim, a holdover from Morsi's cabinet claiming that the anti-Morsi crowds in Tahrir Square gave him the mandate to resurrect the old regime's hated secret police, the Amn al-Dawla or State Security force that had been disbanded in March 2011. As University of Oklahoma professor Samer S Shehata observes, Egypt's tragedy is that "its politics are dominated by democrats who are not liberals and liberals who are not democrats."
When television cameras beam pictures of massive crowds in Tahrir Square opposing President Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, it is well to remember that in the first round of last year's presidential elections, the candidate who won a plurality of votes in Cairo and in Alexandria, Egypt's second city, was neither Morsi nor his opponent in the run off election, but a secular candidate, Hamdeen Sabahi. Long decades of providing social services to poor neighborhoods in Cairo and other cities, and in the rural areas where most Egyptians live has created a massive constituency of support for the Muslim Brotherhood. No democracy can take root in Egypt by excluding them as the military seeks to do with the connivance of the liberals and the West.
When secular Egyptians—even radicals like Samir Amin—rejoice at the military's ouster of a democratically elected president and plaster the general's photo all across Cairo, they repeat Morsi's fatal mistake of relying on the army and the police rather than on democratic institutions and protocols. By shutting down Islamists' media outlets, reviving the secret police, and conspiring to ban the Muslim Brotherhood entirely, the military is fast overturning the gains of the Arab Spring. No future government is safe from military intervention.
The coup d'etat against Egypt's democratically elected government will have resonances far beyond the country's borders. As the oldest and most influential Islamist movement, the Muslim Brotherhood has affiliates across the Islamic world and while these parties have largely renounced violence, now they could well conclude that violence is the only way to achieve power. After all, previously in 1992, as the Islamists were poised to win an election in Algeria, the army annulled the election. After they are denied office a second time, why should they place their hopes again in the electoral process? An ultraconservative Libyan cleric, Sheikh Mohamed Abu Sibra has already admitted that it has become impossible to persuade militias in Benghazi to lay down their weapons.
The interim government imposed by the military is also not going to be able to solve Egypt's economic problems that also fueled the opposition to the Morsi government. When the tourist industry was in the doldrums and over 40% of the population was living below the poverty level, Morsi ended the food and utility subsidies as demanded by the IMF as the price for a $4.8 billion loan. As prices soared, food became unaffordable and the World Food Program reported that the growth of a third of all children in the country was stunted in 2011. Neither the military nor the interim government it installed is likely to reinstate subsidies and the military which controls 40% of the country's economy will zealously safeguard its privileges. No future government will dare tamper with the military's perks.
With poverty and disenchantment in the streets, and continuing oppression of the Muslim Brotherhood, chances are that Egypt is in for a prolonged bout of conflict unless international forces intervene. By closing the life-giving tunnels to the Palestinians brutally imprisoned in Gaza, the military has played on Israel's security fears and inoculated the coup against pressure from Washington. And the collapse of Egypt's democratic essay has once again prompted the racist trope that Islam is incompatible with democracy. In an op-ed in the New York Times on the day after the coup, David Brooks wrote: "It's not that Egypt doesn't have a recipe for a democratic transition. It seems to lack even the basic mental ingredients."
It is a real pity that the so-called emerging powers—China, India, Brazil, and South Africa don't weigh in on the events in Egypt and leave the West to define an 'international response'! Democracy, after all, is not the exclusive preserve of the West—and the few governments elected by popular vote in Europe and North America before the Second World War were underpinned by colonial or neo-colonial exploitation of the peoples of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. Democracy is no privileged preserve of any peoples–and the peoples of the world ought to pressure governments everywhere to adhere to democratic norms!
Detroitism in Binghamton: A Photo EssayJuly 27, 2013 at 9:56 am | Posted in Capitalism, democracy, Human Rights, Outsourcing, Political Economy, world politics | 2 Comments
Tags: Capitalism, democracy, Human Rights, Manufacturing, United States, Urban, world politics, World-economy
Detroitism has emerged a while ago to encapsulate the emergence of urban ruins in North America and Europe–from Camden NJ to Naples and Bucharest–with the decline of manufacturing and the outsourcing of production to low- and middle-income economies in Asia and Latin America. Populations of these cities have declined sharply–from 1.8 million fifty years ago to 700,000 today in Detroit, shrinking tax revenues and depressing property values leading to a degradation of city services and civic amenities and spiking the crime rate. Abandoned houses are stripped of their valuables–metal and copper are sold to junk merchants to be sent to India and China to be melted down and recycled to fuel these 'emerging economies.'
Smaller towns and cities in the United States have been declining even longer–for more than a century as the mechanization of agriculture and the exhaustion of natural resources set in even before manufacturing began to move to the non-unionized states of the 'Sunbelt' and later to even lower-wage locations overseas. And the emergence of 'big box' retailers like Wal-mart hollowed out their commercial cores as Edward Alden noted.
And so it has been with Binghamton, located at the confluence of the Susquehanna and the Chenango rivers in southern New York State. A small farming community till the Chenango Canal was constructed in the mid-1830s, linking it the the Erie Canal at Utica. In addition, the arrival of the railways in the mid-19th century transformed the area into a minor industrial hub for the production of cigars, and later shoes, and high-tech electronics. Between 1860 and 1880, the population of Binghamton rose from 8,325 to a little over 35,000. Tanneries and shoe factories–most notably the Endicott Johnson shoe factory–made Binghamton and its neighboring Johnson City one of the major shoe manufacturing centers in the United States
By the mid-1950s however, competition from several other locations led to a steep decline of shoe production though its impact was cushioned by the rise of several high-tech firms: IBM which was founded in nearby Endicott, Edwin Link who invented the flight stimulator, Valvoline which was to become Whirlpool Corporation
At the same time, the construction of the interstate highway system, led to a fall in ridership on the trains and the last passenger train rolled off the tracks of the Lackawanna Station in Binghamton in December 1964.
The continuing growth of IBM and other technology companies related to defense and the location of one of the four university centers of the State University of New York system led to further growth over the next two decades.
Yet, the gradual decline of IBM and the closure of the last shoe factory in the 1990s led to a precipitous decline in the fortunes of the city. The arrival of big box retailers like Wal-Mart finally hollowed out the city's commercial core.
The population of Binghamton, which had peaked at 80.674 in 1950 slid to 47, 376 in the census of 2010–less than it was a 100 years ago in 1910.
Imperial Hubris: European Subservience to the United StatesJuly 3, 2013 at 10:53 pm | Posted in Capitalism, democracy, Human Rights, International Relations, Political Economy, World Politics | 1 Comment
Tags: Bolivia, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, United Nations, United States, whistle blower
Rarely in modern history has a statesman's words been so at odds with his actions as those of French President Francois Hollande in dealing with US spying on its allies. When Mr Edward Snowden, the former US National Security Agency (NSA) infrastructure analyst, revealed that the NSA had bugged the European Union's offices and embassies of several EU member states, tapped into communications cables, and bugged the 2009 meeting of the G20 leaders in the UK, the French president thundered that this was "unacceptable behaviour" among friends and allies. Yet, on suspicion that Mr Snowden may have been on board the Bolivian President Evo Morales' plane, Paris took the unprecedented step of refusing the plane permission to fly over its territory on Tuesday.
Actions speak louder than words and while European leaders have feigned outrage about the US eavesdropping on the communications of its citizens and bugging of their embassies, they did not want the man who revealed the extent of US espionage to seek asylum in their countries. If Mr Snowden were on the Bolivian president's plane and if he were to ask for asylum during a refuelling stop, it would have placed the government of a European state in an impossible situation. Since EU-wide laws prohibit the extradition of persons to countries with capital punishment, it would be politically suicidal for any government to deliver him to Washington. Yet, while European leaders were vociferous in denouncing US espionage, none were willing to defy the US on the issue.
Hence, France, Portugal and Spain took the unprecedented step of revoking pre-arranged flight permissions for President Morales' plane—an action in which they were subsequently joined by Italy. When the plane, running low on fuel, finally landed in Vienna's Schwechat airport, President Morales was prevented from leaving for 13 hours while the Austrians satisfied themselves that Mr. Snowden was not on the plane.
Let us be clear: Mr Snowden is not a spy. He did not steal US secrets at the behest of a foreign power. He did not publish the contents of the espionage. He merely revealed its massive reach, and its sheer illegality and violation of human rights on a planetary scale by tracking the communications of citizens the world over. He is a whistleblower. The UN defines a whistleblowers "as individuals releasing confidential or secret information although they are under an official or other obligation to maintain confidentiality of secrecy."
The special UN rapporteur for the freedom of expression in 2004, along with his counterparts in the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the Organization of American states, the Guardian newspaper reports, enjoined all governments to protect whistleblowers from all "legal, administrative or employment-related sanctions if they act in 'good faith'". By revealing the magnitude of US espionage against their citizens and governments, Mr Snowden clearly acted in public interest.
Indeed, before Mr Snowden's revelations, the Director of US National Intelligence, Mr James Clapper had testified to the US Senate Intelligence Committee that in March that the NSA did not collect data indiscriminately on millions of Americans—a testimony he was compelled to retract this week on the scarcely credible ground that he had "simply did not think" of the relevant provision in the Patriot Act that permitted the collection of such data. Likewise, President Barack Obama had claimed several times that the NSA was not eavesdropping on phone calls domestically without warrants—a claim that is proven wrong by Mr Snowden's revelations.
Jean Asselborn, the foreign minister of Luxembourg, observed that "Americans justify everything by terrorism. The EU and its diplomats are not terrorists."
Let us also recall that these very same European governments—especially Spain and Portugal—allowed the use of their "airspace and airports for flights associated with CIA secret detention and extraordinary rendition [torture] operations" as the Open Society's Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detention and Extraordinary Rendition investigation uncovered in a report published earlier this year. An ongoing investigation in France is examining whether the government permitted similar CIA flights. Victims can be carried over their airspace to be tortured but whistleblowers who reveal breaches of their citizens' privacy and of their own sovereignty cannot! And this from member states of the EU that won the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize for the "advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe"!
Speaking out against US actions while surreptitiously aiding Washington is, of course, not a novel practice for its European allies. Ten years ago, the then French president Jacques Chirac loudly proclaimed that an assault against Saddam Hussein's Iraq was unacceptable to Paris but when the US assault started Chirac opened French airspace to US military flights—something he had not done as premier for Reagan's attack on Libya in 1986. Though Germany also opposed the Iraq war, once it had begun, its foreign minister prayed for the 'rapid collapse' of the resistance. Even Russian president Vladimir Putin for a decisive victory for the US 'for economic and political reasons,' just as he offered asylum to Mr Snowden on conditions that he knew would be unacceptable.
The current generation of European leaders have not known a time in their lives when the United States did not dominate their countries—in the economic, political, and perhaps even cultural arenas. For them to symbolically challenge the US is one thing, to challenge it substantively is another thing altogether. Hence, even when their sovereignty was violated with the bugging of their diplomatic missions and EU offices, and when the privacy of their citizens was infringed by the tapping of their phones and digital communications, all they could do was to do all they could to see that Mr Snowden does not seek asylum in their countries even if that meant endangering the lives of President Morales and his entourage. Would they have done that if President Morales was of European descent?
A Fog of Myths About North KoreaApril 29, 2013 at 1:59 pm | Posted in Arms Control, Capitalism, Human Rights, International Relations, Nuclear Non-Proliferation, Political Economy, World Politics | Leave a comment
Tags: China, East Asia, India, interstate system, Israel, Japan, North Korea, Pakistan, South Korea, the Philippines, United Nations, United States, US hegemony, Vietnam
Rarely has the manufacturing of consent in the mainstream media been as thorough as it has been in the case of North Korea. It is the original 'hermit kingdom,' isolated from the outside world by a dynasty of communist dictators–a 'socialism in one family'–and irrational to the extent of threatening Washington with a nuclear Armageddon. This reigning consensus is so widespread that there has been little challenge to it in the major news outlets of the world and yet, a moment's reflection suggests that there are many flaws in this narrative.
In the first instance, in a rare piece of insight into North Korea, a former Western intelligence officer who writes under the pseudonym of James Church has argued that since isolationism is a two-way street, the rest of the world is even more ignorant about North Korea than Pyongyang is about the wider world. After all, North Korean officials can monitor radio and television broadcasts, plug into the Internet, and analyse books and magazines from the outside world. They know what people outside their borders are thinking and doing. But people outside North Korea have little insight into what goes on in the country and are metaphorically reduced to examining the entrails of sacrificial animals to divine Pyongyang's intentions.
Hence, Church writes, "We…have developed a fog of myths about them as a substitute for knowledge. These myths, handed down from administration to administration, are comforting in their long familiar ring, but make it difficult for us to avoid walking in circles. The North Koreans move nimbly through this fog" like small boats deftly weaving in and out between lumbering vessels.
Rather than nuclear weapons, Church argues, North Korea's greatest strength is the capacity to behave badly: by carefully choosing the right time, it knows its actions will force big powers to pay close attention even though they may grind their teeth. What it fears most is being swept aside in big power politics, so by playing its weak hand cleverly, it seeks dialogue with the United States, a process that was derailed when former president George W. Bush labelled it part of an "axis of evil."
Recent concerns about Pyongyang's nuclear program stemmed from an underground nuclear test on February 12, 2013—its third in seven years. In response, the United States and its allies pressed the UN Security Council to add new sanctions on the country: enhanced scrutiny over shipments and air cargo, a ban on the sale of luxury goods, expanded restrictions on a range of institutions and senior officials. China, notably, signed on to these sanctions and did not veto them.
If China is dragging its feet on the issue of North Korea, it is also because Beijing has a stake in the survival of the Kim Jong-eun regime. The collapse of North Korea could bring a stream of refugees to China which already has 2 million ethnic Koreans and threaten the stability of the border region. Moreover, since a unified Korea is likely to be led by Seoul, it raises the possibility of US forces on China's border with Korea. A unified Korea with some 70 million people would also become a formidable economic competitor and transform the dynamics of the regional economy as Timothy Beardson writes in the Financial Times.
When President Barack Obama acknowledges that North Korea does not have a single deployable nuclear warhead, and according to SIPRI, the five permanent members of the Security Council—all declared nuclear powers—had approximately 19,265 as of January 1, 2012, this response to Pyongyang's third nuclear test seems disproportionate. This is all the more so since North Korea has withdrawn from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the other states outside the NPT—India, Israel, and Pakistan—are not treated in the same way as Pyongyang. As Jonathan Steele writes in the Guardian, "If it is offensive for North Korea to talk of launching a nuclear strike against the United States (a threat that is empty because the country has no system to deliver the few nuclear weapons it has), how is it less offensive for the US to warn Iran that it will be bombed if it fails to stop its nuclear research?"
In response, statements in the official newspaper of the ruling Workers' Party of Korea (WPK), Rodong Simun, on March 6, 2013 declared that if the US continues to threaten it with nuclear weapons, Pyongyang now had the ability to turn Seoul and Washington into "a sea of fire." North Korea also repudiated the 1953 Korean War ceasefire and cut the Red Cross hotline though lines between military and aviation authorities across the 38th parallel remain open.
Notably, till the middle of March, its foreign office maintained that it will abandon its nuclear weapons program if the United States removes its nuclear threats and abandons its hostile posture.
In reply, as Peter Hayes and Roger Cavazos of San Francisco's Nautilus Institute note, on March 25 the United States flew B-52 Stratofortress stealth bombers over South Korea in military exercises that stimulated a nuclear attack on North Korea. Not only did these military exercises stir deep memories in North Korea where air raids killed an estimated 20 per cent of the population during the Korean War but the B-52 flights at the same time demonstrated China's inability to affect US mobilization. The United States also bolstered its anti-missile batteries in Alaska and the West Coast.
Should it then surprise us that the North Korean ruling party's Central Committee Plenum meeting set a 'new strategic line' of simultaneously pursuing the path of economic construction and "building nuclear armed forces"? It also announced that it would resume uranium enrichment at the Yongbyon reactor plant that had been moth-balled in October 2007 as a part of the denuclearization process.
Nevertheless, the WPK's Central Committee Plenum ended by also declaring that "As a responsible nuclear weapons state, the DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] will make positive efforts to prevent the nuclear proliferation, ensure peace and security in Asia and the rest of the world and realize the denuclearization of the world."
In a state born of guerrilla struggle, leadership requires as Hayes and Cavazos suggest, endless battles and if Kim's leadership itself is not under threat, he needs to embellish his own credentials. Hence, his belligerence is intended as a professor of Sociology at Seoul National University also suggests, as a manoeuvre to outflank the military while preparing the ground to initiate a more pragmatic economic policy. Thus amid the rattling of nuclear sabres, Kim has appointed as his premier, Pak Pong-ju a pragmatic economist who had been forced out of office in 2007 by the military, reportedly because he followed Chinese suggestions on economic reforms too closely.
North Korea does not have enough resources to build its economy and to maintain the world's third largest conventional armed force. Unlike China when it started its reform process in the late 1970s, Pyongyang does not have a huge reserve labor force in agriculture. Its economy is sustained only by extensive food and oil imports from China. To successfully pursue economic growth, a nuclear deterrent will enable Kim to divert labor from his conventional military and hence the 'new strategic line' announced by the WPK's Central Committee Plenum—to simultaneously work at both economic construction and 'building nuclear armed forces.'
However, by promising not to export nuclear weapons or material, Kim signals that he has no intention of crossing red lines. Indeed, during the recent visit to North Korea by US basketball star Denis Rodman, Kim asked him to tell President Obama to phone him. The American president pointedly refused to accept this invitation in an interview with George Stephanopoulos.
Again, in an unusual move, North Korea's ambassador to the United Kingdom, Hyon Hak-bong addressed the Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist) and asserted that North Korea's only interest was its legitimate self-defence. While North Korean ambassadors have attended meetings of fraternal associations in the past, it has usually been to accept messages of appreciation or praise—not usually to make statements. What better way to signal Pyongyang's intentions to negotiate than for its ambassador to make a statement in a European capital?
All US Secretary of State, John Kerry, would offer in return was an offer to talk if North Korea offered unspecified concessions to show its good faith. Faced with US and South Korean intransigence, North Korea effectively closed the Kaesŏng Indusrial Park—a special industrial region—where 123 South Korean companies had been employing 53,000 North Korean workers and directly paying Pyongyang $90 million in wages every year. Significantly, while this is a serious loss to the Kim regime, it is also a non-military response to what the regime sees as persistent US provocation.
While the military was suspicious of Kaesŏng, viewing it as a Trojan horse, the regime's decision to close it (perhaps temporarily) may indicate that it is trying to show that it is willing to bear a significant cost to send a message that it is serious in its stance.
This should be seen in the light of the fact that the government has turned a blind eye to the growth of a market activities in the country which, Andrei Lankov, a Russian specialist on Korea estimates provides 75 per cent of the income of the people outside the military and the upper echelons of the party. Frequent travel to China and the availability of DVDs about South Korea have opened their eyes to new possibilities offered by consumerism.
This makes it all the more important for the regime to compel its adversaries to change their policies, to secure a peace agreement, to denuclearize the peninsula, and to get reparations from the Japanese who colonized the country from 1895 to 1945. This has been the aim of the regime for 60 years but has assumed a new urgency. A peace treaty is a sign that Pyongyang needs to show that the United States and its friends that grotesquely masquerade as "the international community" accepts it as a legitimate state.
Poverty of Political ImaginationAugust 17, 2012 at 11:48 am | Posted in Capitalism, democracy, Free Trade, International Relations, Labor, Political Economy, Production, World Politics | Leave a comment
Tags: Capitalism, democracy, European Union, financial crisis, Germany, Greece, Political Economy, Spain, United States, world politics
Though it should not have caused any surprise, the news that Eurozone economies had contracted by 0.2 percent in the second quarter of 2012 underscored the deepening economic crisis faced by the 17-state bloc. Though the German economy may have grown by 0.3 percent, France recorded a third straight quarter of no growth, and the Finnish, Italian, Portuguese, and Spanish economies all fell sharply. Greece, of course, suffered the steepest fall: 6.2 percent in the second quarter–and was 18 percent below its GDP level in the April-June quarter of 2008.
There is little doubt that the declines have been aggravated by a failure of political imagination. Confronted by budget deficits brought about by high levels of government borrowing and by the collapses of housing bubbles, the creation of a common currency has meant that indebted Eurozone economies have not been able to resort to a currency devaluation to gain a competitive edge. Consequently, the troika of the European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the International Monetary Fund sought to impose an "internal devaluation" on these economies by forcing budget cuts to lower government deficits and wage cuts.
It follows as the night the day that if budgets and wages are cut, the economy will shrink. Lower government spending due to budget cuts means welfare and pension benefits fall, the cost of health care rises, and educational opportunities vaporize. These impact far more adversely on the elderly and the young. With wage cuts, people have less money to spend and this will depress all sectors of the economy–as sales reduce because of lower spending, companies will slash their work forces leading to greater declines in sales and to further cuts in employment. In the most severely affected of the southern European economies, unemployment rates for the youth are already at 50 percent or more. By May 2012, unemployment in the euro zone had already reached 11.1 percent or 17.5 million people and the International Labor Organization (ILO) estimates that it would rise to almost 22 million in the next four years. And if the euro zone were to break up, the ILO estimates unemployment in the 17-state bloc could reach 17 percent.
The adverse conditions created by the stringent cuts mandated by the troika are aggravated by the greater interest rates imposed on the weaker economies by international financial markets–thus for instance, while Austrian banks and other financial institutions can borrow at 2 percent, Italian banks have to pay 6 percent. As these higher interest costs are passed on by the banks to their borrowers, the cost of doing business in Italy, Spain, Portugal, or Greece increases correspondingly and could even negate the wage cuts imposed by the troika!
The effects of economic contraction will spread to the better performing economies. After all, Germany has been able to have a strong industrial sector because cheaper credit to other eurozone members had allowed them to buy German products while the German small-scale sector–which employs 60 percent of the country's labor force–did not have to worry about currency movements in other European countries or fear that a strong German mark will price them out of the market in other countries.
As Susan Watkins has written, German lessons on debt repayment are especially galling to the Greeks.
Under the Nazi occupation, a hefty monthly payment was extracted from the Greek central bank to cover the Wehrmacht's expenses; in March 1942 an additional forced loan of 476 million Reichsmarks was levied by the Axis powers. Greek partisans put up some of the toughest military resistance to the Nazis in Europe; the damage wreaked by the occupiers' revenge was commensurate. Reprisals were exacted on the civilian population at a rate of fifty Greeks for every German killed. Much of the country's infrastructure was destroyed; forced exports and economic collapse helped bring about one of the worst famines in modern European history.
German occupation (strictly a tripartite occupation since the Italians and the Bulgarians also participated) of Greece also led to hyperinflation–Richard Clogg says it was
five thousand times more severe than the Weimar inflation of the early 1920s. Price levels in January 1946 were more than five trillion times those of May 1941. The exchange rate for the gold sovereign in the autumn of 1944, shortly after the liberation, stood at 170 trillion drachmas.
After the war, the question of German reparations were deferred till German reunification and in the so-called 2+4 (Bonn and Berlin with the US, the USSR, the UK and France) agreement of 1990, Greek claims were excluded. Though several Greek politicians including the current prime minister, Antonis Samaras when he was the foreign affairs minister in 1991, had raised the issue of 476 million marks with the Germans, their demands were summarily dismissed. If this money had, in fact, been paid as the Germans are legally obliged to do, with interest for more than half a century, Greece would no longer be a problem economy.
It is galling too because while ancient historical myths as Greece being the 'birthplace of democracy' are routinely trotted out in discussions of the contemporary situation, recent history that people over 70 remember are carefully hidden from view! Be that as it may.
What is crucial is that the crisis demonstrates that capital and finance markets need to be regulated more stringently. It was irresponsible lending that led to high government deficits in Greece and to the housing bubbles in Spain and Ireland, to the subprime crisis in the US, and to the meltdown of the Icelandic economy to mention just the most obvious cases. Financial markets are continuing to demand punitive rates of interest from the weaker economies. The unchecked power of finance must be corralled–or we will enter another great depression just as the obsession with the gold standard led to the depression as Karl Polanyi showed in his Great Transformation.
What is required is a new political imagination not the shrill advocacy of measures that have already aggravated the situation!
The Greek Challenge: Austerity or NATOMay 9, 2012 at 4:16 pm | Posted in Arms Control, Capitalism, democracy, International Relations, Political Economy, World Politics | 1 Comment
Tags: European Union, Eurozone, France, Greece, Internnational Monetary Fund, NATO
In the Greek elections on Sunday May 6, 2012, the two main parties that had governed the country since the end of the dictatorship–New Democracy and Pasok–and both of which has subscribed to the stringent austerity measures imposed on Athens for a bailout suffered a stunning set-back. Used to dominating the polls, together they received just one-third of the votes. Two-thirds of the Greek electorate voted for parties–including a neo-Nazi party, Golden Dawn–that rejected the austerity measures, though most Greeks still want to remain within the Eurozone. Alexis Tsipras, the leader of the Syriza coalition of green and left parties that placed second in the elections, and was the big winner declared the austerity plan dead. That is certainly what the Greek voters indicated though the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel and the European Commission President, José Manuel Durão Barroso claimed that agreements are binding and cannot be negotiated after every election. By what perverted logic does this hold: last year, when the stringent bailout conditions were imposed on Greece by the 'troika'–the European Union, the European Central Bank, and the International Monetary Fund–the then Greek Prime Minister Giorgios Papandreou wanted to hold a referendum. Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy, forced him to rescind the referendum. The bailout agreement, then, was foisted on the Greek people not only without their consent, but on the explicit condition that their consent not be solicited. No such international agreement can have a shred of legitimacy and the Greeks voted, in their millions, to reject it!
It was, Albert Einstein I think who said that the clearest sign of insanity is to persist in doing something that has failed repeatedly. Clearly, austerity programs have not worked. In Greece, unemployment stands at 21 per cent and the OECD estimates that real wages have fallen by 25 per cent in the last two years.According to the IMF, this will be the fifth straight year of recession for Greece to be followed by a year of stagnation. Even if the Greek government were to implement the austerity measures, the IMF estimates that in 2017, the public debt to GDP ratio would be 137 per cent, higher than at the onset of the current crisis. And thus far, IMF projections have been overly optimistic!
None of this should be surprising! After all if incomes are slashed and taxes raised, people are not going to have the resources to buy as many goods and services as they did earlier. This will lead to a contraction of the market and greater unemployment–which in turn will lead to further contractions in demand and the economy will go into a tailspin. Even Antonis Samaras, leader of the conservative New Democracy party and one who adheres to the austerity pact acknowledges that fully a fourth of all Greek companies have closed their doors since 2009 and a further third of the companies do not pay their workers on time!
What is surprising is that by insisting that Greece implement further austerity measures–and even suspend the rights of collective bargaining–the 'troika' has excluded Greece's military expenditures from the scalpel. As Paul Haydon reported in the Guardian:
In 2006, as the financial crisis was looming, Greece was the third biggest arms importer after China and India. And over the past 10 years its military budget has stood at an average of 4% of GDP, more than £900 per person. If Greece is in need of structural reform, then its oversized military would seem the most logical place to start. In fact, if it had only spent the EU average of 1.7% over the last 20 years, it would have saved a total of 52% of its GDP – meaning instead of being completely bankrupt it would be among the more typical countries struggling with the recession.
In the five years to 2010, Greece was the largest customer for Germany's arms industry. And in 2010, when the first bailout was being negotiated for Greece, Athens spent 7.1 billion euros on arms even as it slashed 1.8 billion in social spending. Daniel Cohn-Bendit, the European member of parliament, even claimed that Papanreou had told him that German and French support for the bailout was specifically linked to continued military spending. In 2010, at 3 percent of its budget on military spending, Athens allocated a higher percentage of its spending to defense than any NATO state other than the United States.
While it is obvious why Germany and France don't want Greece to cut its defense spending, why are Greek politicians not raising this as an issue?
What Difference Will Hollande's Victory in France Make for Europe, for the World?May 6, 2012 at 4:25 pm | Posted in Capitalism, democracy, International Relations, Labor, Political Economy, World Politics | 6 Comments
Tags: European Union, Eurozone, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Spain, World-economy
Francois Hollande has defeated Nicolas Sarkozy to become the first Socialist president of France in 17 years. He campaigned on a platform to renegotiate the austerity package that the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Sarkozy had championed, with the support of the British Prime Minister David Cameron and other 'center-right' politicians in Europe. The victorious Hollande argued that the way out of the fiscal crisis enveloping the Eurozone is to focus on growth rather than to reduce deficits. The austerity packages, by sharply curbing government expenditures not only leads to unemployment but also reduced payments to the elderly, the young, and the unemployed. They can therefore no longer consume at their previous levels leading to further unemployment as businesses curtail production and the economy continues its tailspin–as has already happened in Greece, Portugal, Italy, Spain, and Ireland.
But will Hollande be successful in reviving the Eurozone economies? Will this 'marshmallow' man (so-called because he hates fights) be strong enough to stand up to Merkel? His potential choice as prime minister, Jean-Marc Ayrault. has suggested that rather than reopening the draft fiscal treaty driven by Sarkozy and Merkel., Hollande will seek to incorporate a minor amendment on growth. This would not be surprising as Hollande's previous experience in government was as an aide to the last Socialist president of France, Francous Mitterand, who in his second term initiated a wave of neo-liberal reforms that de-regulated much of the French economy.
Socialist and Labor parties in Europe, as political expressions of trade unions since the late nineteenth-century, have floundered as manufacturing has shifted to lower-waged countries and trade unions have suffered a tremendous erosion of memberships. After Margareth Thatcher defeated the miners strike in 1984, European unions have steadily declined in political and social significance.
What, too, is a 'growth' strategy has never been addressed except to say that it should not be based on austerity measures. As manufacturing is becoming increasingly automated–labor costs amounted to only $7.10 of a total production cost of $178.40 for Apple's iPhone 4–high-paying jobs in industry are simply disappearing. In large, vertically-integrated industrial operations, workers going on strike in a singe shop can disrupt the entire assembly line and hence undermine corporate profits. If workers in a gear-box plant down their tools, the entire auto assembly line will soon grind to a halt. Workers in the service sector–in the fast food industry or tellers in banks–simply do not have this structural power and hence their ability to bargain for better wages are far more limited. And as industrial production relocates overseas, more and more workers enter the service industries.
With lower incomes, their ability to consume is more limited. And this makes it less profitable to produce more goods and so industrial production continues to plummet as capital is increasingly allocated to financial speculation. This has the strange effect that whenever an election is held, the first question asked by the talking heads on TV is what would be the reaction of the markets to the results–because after the de-regulation of capital controls, the flows of capital into and out of a country are crucial to its economy and there is not government mechanism to regulate these flows.
In these conditions, governments are compelled to maintain market-friendly conditions and this is not something Hollande is likely to change. So what does growth-oriented policies mean? This needs to be spelt out beyond saying that it is the opposite of austerity programs, How is the economy going to add well-paying jobs in a situation when manufacturing is being steadily downgraded in the hierarchy of economic activities?
Europe: The Democratic DeficitApril 12, 2012 at 10:45 am | Posted in Capitalism, democracy, Free Trade, Human Rights, International Relations, Political Economy, World Politics | Leave a comment
Tags: 21st Century Capitalism, democracy, Euro, European Union, Eurozone, France, Germany, Greece, Libya, Spain, Syria, United Kingdom, World-economy
"A typical sight during the pre-election protests," in Spain last year Katherine Ainger wrote in the Guardian, "was a respectable middle-aged man with a cigarette in one hand and a marker pen in the other going from municipal bin to municipal bin writing 'Vote here' on the lids." A few months later, at the other end of the Eurozone, in return for loans from the European Union, leaders of all three major political parties in Greece were required to sign pledges not to rescind a savage austerity program cutting more than 3.3 billion euros from the budget, rendering these pledges concrete and irreversible regardless of the outcome of the general election in April 2012. If the 'typical sight' during last year's Spanish elections suggested that all political parties are the same, the demand that the EU wrested from the Greek politicians proved that their general election, announced for May 6, was rendered meaningless as the victors could not implement a new program. Elections become meaningless.
Paradoxically, just as French President Nicholas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David Cameron after a brief hesitation, abandoned their client dictators in North Africa–even violently overthrowing the Gaddafi regime in Libya and chafing at the bit to do the same to the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria–Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel abandoned all pretense of supporting democracy when they forced then Greek Prime Minister Giorgios Papandreou to cancel a referendum he had proposed on the harsh terms imposed by the European Union for a bailout to Athens in November 2011. Threatening to expel Greece from the Eurozone, they effectively forced Papandreou to resign two days later and for him to be replaced by a national unity government headed by a former Vice President of the European Central Bank, Lucas Papademos.
Reporting in the Guardian, Helena Smith wrote:
For a country not only burdened by debt but closer to default than ever before, his appointment at the helm of a transitional government in Athens would be widely welcomed. An avuncular figure, Papademos is well respected in the European Union. In the corridors of power in Paris and Berlin, the capitals that count in deciding Greece's fate, he is seen as a safe pair of hands, more capable than most at navigating the crisis-hit nation away from the shores of economic Armageddon.
Yet, this 'safe pair of hands' was the very one who, as president of the Greek Central Bank cooked the books so that Greece could enter the monetary union–and he was helped in this creative accounting by the European division of the Goldman Sachs—which is to be headed soon by the current president of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi—for a fee of $300 million. Northern European governments only feign ignorance of their Mediterranean neighbors' debts and subsidies, as Wolfgang Streeck notes, because their surveillance agencies could not "have failed to notice how countries like Greece saturated themselves with cheap credit after their accession to the Eurozone." In fact, as government subsidies slowed down in conditions of budget consolidation, it was private flows that made up the difference–and it profited the export industries of the north because of the improved purchasing power among the Mediterranean countries—the prosperity of the north was predicated on the indebtedness of the south! Despite the fact that Eurostat had disclosed in 2004 that billions of euros had been shifted off public records in Greece, Athens continued to enjoy triple-A ratings.
Even the money being borrowed by Greece may have been the money of wealthy Greeks sent abroad as the Greek upper classes were practically tax-exempt as Stathis Kouvelakis has pointed out. When PASOK took office in 1981, it began to institute a social welfare system but did not seek to enlarge the tax base and even the middle class and the moderately wealthy remained exempt. In a sense then it is the untaxed money of richer Greeks, recycled through European banks, that is the source of the Greek debt! Yet, precisely because these funds were recycled through European banks, a Greek default would undermine the whole European financial system.
It is no wonder then that Sarkozy and Merkel refused to countenance a referendum in Greece and not only installed their own man at the helm of the government in Athens but placed officials from the 'troika'–the European Union, the European Central Bank, and the International Monetary Fund–to oversee the operations of the government. Unless the Greek government complied with the stringent terms of the agreement imposed on it, funds in the escrow account will be withheld from Athens: a 32 percent cut in the minimum wage for those under 25, a 22 percent cut for those above 25, a cut in pensions by 25 percent on top of the laying off of some 200,000 workers over the past 12 months.
Given that politicians are hand-in-glove with the banks–from Goldman Sachs helping the Papademos shift billions of euros off the books to the Greek police beat up its Greek citizens to impose order for banks and hedge funds–it is no wonder that citizens are turning their backs on the politicians!
Notes on the Spanish General StrikeMarch 31, 2012 at 2:19 pm | Posted in Capitalism, democracy, Human Rights, International Relations, Labor, Political Economy, Production, World Politics | Leave a comment
Tags: 21st Century Capitalism, anti-systemic movements, European Union, Germany, indignados, new forms of protest, Spain, United Kingdom
To be in Barcelona on Thursday March 29, 2012 was to be a witness to a massive tidal wave of humanity on the streets, stretching beyond the horizon in every direction from Placa Catalunya, the city's symbolic center. This was a response to the general strike called by Spain's two largest trade unions–Union General de Trabajadores (UGT) affiliated to the Socialist Party, and the Comisiones Obreras (CCOO)–in response to the conservative Partido Popular (PP) government's decision to announce the most austere budget since the transition to democracy 37 years ago. As evident on the streets of Barcelona, it was much more than a workers' protest: though some 30 percent of employed workers had said that they would participate in polls before the strike, Spain has a high rate of unemployment–23 percent or double the European rate and almost half the people under 30 are out of work.
The unemployed are the backbone of the indignados ("the outraged") movement that in May last year that with their tents in city centers and their emphasis on transparency, diversity, egalitarianism, and direct democracy, inspired the Occupy movements across the world. The employment situation is only likely to worsen as Mariano Rajoy, the new PP prime minister who took office in December last year, enacted an Emergency decree two months ago that sharply curbed labor rights. Permanent workers in Spain were eligible for 45 days' pay for each year of employment if they were fired; this was substantially reduced to a maximum of 33 days and in Andalucia alone eight times as many workers were let go in the two months after the decree was promulgated than in the corresponding period last year. Companies were also permitted to reduce working hours.
The greater flexibility to hire and fire workers provided by the new labor laws may provide greater incomes in the short run to employers but will further depress prospects of economic growth in Spain. Spanish wages are already the lowest among the EU 15 (members of the European Union on 1 May 2004 before the inclusion of states from the former Eastern Europe) and the new law would further depress wages in the context of the high rates of unemployment and provide for more short-term employment–which will lead to a reduction in effective demand.
Moreover, Spain's economic problems do not stem from high government deficits but from the burst of a property bubble and absurd laws governing liability of borrowers. The Spanish government had run a balanced budget from the time it joined the Euro in 1999 to 2007–that is to say it did not borrow at all during this period unlike many other economies, including Germany, even though interest rates on Eurozone countries fell sharply. However, though Madrid resisted borrowing at lower rates, Spanish citizens could not resist the lure of cheap interest rates and it fueled a housing boom–housing prices rose by 44 percent between 2004 and 2008.
Houses in Spain couldn't be built fast enough. Great swathes of the coast and the countryside became clustered with urbanisations, instant housing estates thrown up to cater to what seemed to be an endless stream of Britons, Germans, and other norther Europeans now able to live the kind of life abroad of which their parents could only have dreamed.
Once the bubble burst with the financial crisis, however, the economy unraveled rapidly–the number of empty and unsold properties in the country is estimated to be between 700,000 and 1,500,000–and some 40 evictions are taking place across the country per day. Employment in construction collapsed and laid-off construction workers account for fully a third of the unemployed. What is more, Spanish law does not allow homeowners to simply hand over the keys and walk away from a property if they can no longer pay the mortgage. They remain liable for the remainder of the mortgage if the sale of the property does not cover the full extent of the mortgage–and they seldom do in a period when property prices have fallen by more than 19 percent. Hence, unlike most other countries, the unemployed in Spain not only lose their houses but remain responsible for part of their mortgages. This has meant that young people who had moved out of their parental home have often had to move back–and even that grandparents have had to use their pensions to help support their children and grandchildren. In turn, the iaiaflautas or retirees and grandparents have mobilized themselves to occupy buses to protest against price hikes, bank lobbies to oppose bailouts, and health departments to turn back cutbacks.
Hence, even if reports say that the general strike led to a fall in electricity consumption by 16.3 percent compared to a fall of 16.9 percent in the general strike of September 2010, it doesn't account for the vast mobilization of the indignados, the unemployed, the students, and the iaiaflautas. What it underlines is that a new politics is emerging, a politics that as Ferran Pedret has put it "is characterized by the absence of leaders, by assemblies as a form of organization, and a diversity and transversality."
it was this that was responsible for the massive turnout–what the strike symbolizes is a new politics, a politics beyond those of political parties because the parties are fully integrated into the system itself that must be changed. So no mere percentages of electricity consumption, businesses that stayed open, or workers participating in the strike can adequately assess its impact.
Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.


text:
With their series wrapped up, the Chicago Blackhawks get to sit at home and watch as the Minnesota Wild and St. Louis Blues battle it out to see which team will be taking on the Hawks in the second round of the Stanley Cup Playoffs.
Either matchup would be a rematch of last postseason for the Hawks, as they dispatched the Blues in six games in the first round and eliminated the Wild in six games in the second round to reach the conference finals for the second consecutive season. Both series were tough for Chicago in different ways, but offensive prowess in the first series and some excellent play by Corey Crawford in the second helped carry them through.
With the Blackhawks' second round opponent still undecided, an obvious question arises: which team should Hawks fans want to see in the second round of the postseason?
While some would argue that the Wild would pose an easier matchup (not to mention the fact that the Blackhawks would have home ice advantage in that series), the reality is that it would be a tough draw for the Hawks. The Wild have played some of their best hockey as the season has worn on, with Devan Dubnyk launching the team from a potential lottery selection into the postseason. He has a well-deserved Vezina Trophy nomination as a result of his play, and the Blackhawks would be hard-pressed going up against such a talented goaltender.
The Blues don't have that level of goaltending in net with Jake Allen and Brian Elliott, but they do have the ability to score at will and a mean streak a mile wide. Having guys like Steve Ott and Ryan Reaves makes life difficult by itself, but then you add in sensational winger Vladimir Tararsenko and gritty forward David Backes, and you can see why the Blues' depth would scare the Blackhawks senseless.
In the end, the Blackhawks have the capability of winning a series against either team thanks to their myriad scoring options and their heaps of playoff experience, but the Wild pose a slightly more favorable matchup. The Blues have the physicality to really throw the Hawks off their game and the speed necessary to put pressure on Chicago's shallow defense. The Wild have those things as well, but their strength is more drawn from their goaltending and their offense than from an overly physical or speedy attack at either end of the ice.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Japan has told the ambassadors of Australia, New Zealand and the Netherlands to take action against anti-whaling group Sea Shepherd, whose harassment cut short its Antarctic hunt this season.
On Friday Japan announced it was bringing home its harpoon ships a month early, citing a need to guarantee the safety of the whalers.
"It is extremely regrettable that the obstructionist activities by Sea Shepherd were not prevented," Japan's foreign minister Seiji Maehara said in remarks directed to the three countries that allow Sea Shepherd to fly their flag or use their ports.
Mr Maehara said the foreign ministry had invited in the three envoys and "conveyed a sense of regret and reiterated a strong request to take effective measures to avoid the recurrence of Sea Shepherd's obstructionist activities".
The US-based environmental group, which has pursued Japan's harpoon ships for months, operates Dutch- and Australian-registered ships and uses ports in anti-whaling nations Australia and New Zealand for its campaigns.
Japan's top government spokesman, chief cabinet secretary Yukio Edano, called the actions by Sea Shepherd "extremely deplorable".
"We can't help but feel outrage because the lives of the crew were endangered," he said.
"We will work out definite measures to ensure we can continue research whaling without giving in to sabotage."
The Department of Foreign Affairs says Australia's Ambassador to Japan has met with the Japanese government.
A spokeswoman says the Federal Government shares Japan's concerns about unlawful behaviour by protesters, but it is not appropriate to comment on details of the meeting.
Earlier, Sea Shepherd founder Paul Watson hailed Japan's decision and pledged to stop any future hunts.
"It's great news. We will, however, stay with the Japanese ships until they return north and make sure they're out of the Southern Ocean whale sanctuary," he said.
"Personally I don't trust them, but I will take their word on this and we will follow them out. We're just not going to leave them until we know for sure they're out of the Southern Ocean."
New levels
Sea Shepherd's boat, the Bob Barker, is currently more than 1,000 kilometres off the South American coast tailing Japanese harpoon ship, the Nisshin Maru.
The environmental group has pushed environmental militancy to new levels in its fight against the whalers.
In recent years its tactics have included moving their ships and inflatable boats between the whaling ships and the whales, as well as throwing stink and paint bombs at their crews.
But captain Alex Cornelissen believes his crew's tactics are now vindicated. He says this season alone, hundreds of whales have been saved.
"We think they've only managed to kill between 30 and 100 whales, so out of a quota of 985, I think we've saved about 90 per cent of the whales or even more and that's pretty good," he said.
Japan introduced so-called scientific whaling to get around an international ban on commercial hunting. It argues it has a right to watch the whales' impact on its fishing industry.
At this stage though it is unclear what will happen next season, but Mr Cornelissen says Sea Shepherd will remain vigilant.
"We do hope the political pressure will also increase and there's also some new International Maritime Organisation regulations that's going to make it harder for the Japanese whaling fleet to come down here next season," he said.
"But should they decide to come down here, we'll be here and likely even stronger than we were this year."
Greenpeace whales campaigner Reece Turner says the Japanese have buckled to international pressure, but he also says changing opinions within Japan have played a role.
"I think there's three factors at play really," he said.
"There's the tactics of the Sea Shepherd organisation in the Southern Ocean, there's a change in the public opinion at home and increasing revelations of corruption, and of course the diplomatic pressure from Australian and New Zealand governments has taken its toll as well."


text:
The Seventeenth Century Image by Claire Thomson: www.catthouse.co.uk
Those who organise the Miller Unfiltered Music/any Miller-sponsored events appear to have a knack for booking great gigs on the same night as other cracking line-ups elsewhere. This has often meant that I've had to leave early to get along to another venue somewhere and it happened yet again tonight. In Oran Mor, FOUND and The Seventeenth Century were supporting Bombay Bicycle Club, whilst over in Stereo, Scott Hutchison was playing a fundraiser for the Japanese earthquake/tsunami. The Peenko and myself left before Bombay Bicycle Club's set, but having had a listen to their music since, I don't think we missed too much.
First up in Oran Mor were The Seventeenth Century. We missed the beginning of their set due to the huge queue outside, finally getting inside just before Banks Of Home begins. The set has an persistently dark tinge, with repetitive melancholic melodies building up layer upon layer underneath soaring harmonised vocals till it all reaches a thunderous cacophony. Their sound is, and I'm sure they'll have heard this before, reminiscent slightly of Gulag Orkestar-era Beirut which is certainly no bad thing. Young Francis, from the debut EP, is superb. The band shift effortlessly from a grandiose combination of legato violin lines, military drumbeats and lush harmonies into near silence, permeated only by Mark Farmer's drawn out vocals and a finger-picked acoustic guitar. The closer, Notes, is similarly stunning, its frantic crescendo rounding the set off perfectly.
FOUND. There's just something amazing about this band. They simply cannot be pigeonholed into any particular genre, appearing to have created a sound entirely of their own. The exceptional Machine Age Dancing, for example, is like The Jesus and Mary Chain and the better moments of The Big Pink crossed with The Dirty Projectors. Yet Blackette sounds a little like The Beatles fathered a child with a Different Class-era Pulp B-side and gifted him a bass fuzz pedal for his birthday. You're No Vincent Gallo is a highlight, with its psychotic garbled guitar riffs and humorously cutting lyrics - the protagonist meets a potential lady-friend who tells him that despite being 'no Vincent Gallo', he'll do. Not that her opinion of him matters however, as it turns out she's 'no Betty Mabry' so it would never work anyway. Their set is a wonderfully weird half hour of mentalness, make sure you see them at some point or at least listen to their debut album, Factorycraft.
We quickly departed Oran Mor before we got trampled by the youngsters barging their way towards the front for Bombay Bicycle Club (jeez, I'm only 21 and I'm calling them 'youngsters'…) and headed over to Stereo for Scott Hutchison. Despite it being a solo gig, he was uncharacteristically sober. The good thing about Hutchison's solo acoustic gigs is the unstuffy, relaxed nature of it all. Where the atmosphere at some acoustic sets may seem stifled and formal due to their intimate nature, Hutchison's sets are relaxed affairs, interspersed with humour and crowd interaction. In fact, it's these humorous interjections which provided the most memorable moments of the evening. For example, during Nothing Like You, Scott breaks off in the middle of the song to explain to us that he has always wanted to 'palm-mute'* the chorus, having not palm-muted since he was 15. He then proceeds to play the song again but this time palm-muting the power chords with one hand and giving the devil horns with the other.
Other highlights included a rare dusting off of Snake**, throughout with Hutchison provides a hilarious line-by-line explanation of the song. Turns out it's not about his penis but rather about a draught excluder which is called 'Snake', which he and 'midnight organ girl' owned before she moved away to New York. A few guests join him onstage at various points, among them his bother Grant and Frightened Rabbit member Gordon Skene, as well as Twilight Sad singer James Graham - who joins in a messy but enjoyable rendition of Hall and Oates' classic Private Eyes. Scott Hutchison is always fantastic, full band or not, and tonight is no different. And, as always, Keep Yourself Warm finishes off the night perfectly. There's really not that much that can beat 300 people singing in unison about getting their hole, right?
* A palm-mute is a guitar technique commonly used in rock/pop-punk music that gives a sort of chugging sound. Although my favourite example of this technique is at the start of Bryan Adams' Summer of 69.
** I'd like to apologise to any Frabbit fans I've annoyed in the past few years by continuously shouting out for Snake at just about every Glasgow/Edinburgh gig they've played. I've heard it now so I can die happy.


text:
How To Write The Perfect Tweet
Twitter has long established itself as the ultimate platform for sharing and exchanging link content. For bloggers and brands, Twitter has surpassed Digg, Stumbleupon, Delicious and Reddit, and is only rivaled by Facebook as the most effective and consistent way to build website traffic through social marketing.
Better still, by building an engaged and relevant community, marketers can continue to reap the benefits of that traffic on a daily basis. Almost by accident, Twitter provided us with a new and improved take on permissive marketing, which has allowed the network to leave other social sharing websites in its dust.
It's not all gravy, though – it's easy to make mistakes that can be very costly indeed, leaving your tweet (and content) all but ignored. Continue making those errors, and Twitter will be about as beneficial to your brand and website as a typo-laden, badly-drawn flyer at your local community centre.
And while it's perfectly acceptable to link to your own content, if you over-sell it, self-promote too much, or adopt the habits of salesmen of old (even slightly), you're very quickly going to be overlooked. Worse, likely it won't be too long before you're labelled as nothing more than a spammer.
Reality check. Only two things really count when striving for the perfect tweet:
- Maximum readability
- Maximum retweetability
Collectively, these are vital. One does not favour the other. For maximum benefit, both of these elements needs to be perfect every single time.
1. Think Like Your Readers
This is a bit of a no-brainer, but it's easily overlooked. For your tweet to be perfect, it needs to appeal most to your readers, to the majority of your network, and not to you.
Unless you're a world-famous celebrity or brand with millions of devoted followers, adopting an attitude of 'they'll know what I mean' or 'everybody likes this!' will almost always backfire.
You have to take the time to craft your tweet accurately and pleasingly, thus ensuring that it will be appeal to the highest number of readers.
2. Use Consistent Excellence To Stand Out From The Crowd
Take a moment to peruse your Twitter feed. Refresh the page. Who stands out? Why?
Through prolonged Twitter use we all become tuned into paying attention to certain things in our timelines, notably the avatars and usernames of our favourite profiles. But a friend or valued associate sharing new content isn't always enough to make us click on that link. We trust their judgement, and we have liked some of the things they've shared in the past, but this hasn't turned us into a robot, automatically clicking on everything they tweet.
Conversely, there are many times when we suddenly notice the tweet of somebody we've only recently started following, or have previously not paid much attention to, because it was excellent. It ticked all of our boxes, and we read the tweet and clicked on that link.
This has an additional benefit in that because the tweet was so good, subconsciously we'll make a little note about the user (particularly their name and avatar) and are more likely to notice them the next time they update. This attention will rise exponentially if their tweets maintain a consistent quality.
Likewise, if the quality of updates dips too sharply or wanders too far off-course, we'll start to pay less attention, and in severe cases this can lead to a total tune-out and unfollowing. Hence, while being occasionally excellent is better than nothing, being consistently excellent is better than everything.
3. Sell The Headline (In A Non-Salesman Way)
People need a really good reason to click on your link. Remember, at any given time (and in almost any Twitter client) the reader is faced with a number of choices to make – there might be as many as a dozen different tweets on their screen, and a lot more if they're using columns or groups.


text:
We want to hear from you!
Village community members: I want to hear from you as we approach January and the start of the 2018 legislative session. Please join Representative Giambatista and I for a community meeting at 6:30pm on Monday, November 27. We will gather at the Essex Community Senior Center (2 Lincoln Street at Five Corners). All are welcome to attend and participate.
We want to hear your feedback about local and state issues. Do you have an item you'd like to see the Governor and legislators address next year? Is there a policy of concern or particular interest? Please join us and let us know what is important to you.
The November 27 meeting will be the tenth community forum we've held since taking office in January. Throughout the year, participating neighbors have shared their stories about accessing health care, education policy, business development and more. We want to hear from you to make sure your voices are represented when we return to Montpelier.
If you can't make the meeting but would like to connect, please feel free to call or email. I can be reached at (802) 373-0599 or email@example.com.
I look forward to seeing you on November 27.
NEWS RELEASE – October 27, 2017
Press Contacts: Tim Lueders-Dumont (802) 828-1451
Treasurer's Office Negotiates 51% Administrative Fee Reduction for Supplemental Retirement Plans
Savings Will Accrue to Plan Participants
MONTPELIER, VT — Vermont State Treasurer Beth Pearce announced today that members of the State (VSERS), Teachers' (VSTRS), and Municipal (VMERS) retirement systems will soon be able to save more money for retirement under an agreement with a new third-party administrator, Prudential Retirement. The Treasurer's Office was able to negotiate a 51% reduction in administrative fees plan participants pay for supplemental retirement, saving members an estimated $3.2 million over 5 years.
"As the fiduciary of retirement plans, we work every day to ensure that plan participants can achieve retirement security," said Treasurer Pearce. "After reviewing multiple proposals, we determined Prudential Retirement would provide excellent value and service to plan participants. Every dollar saved in administering the plans will accrue to the benefit of participating members and to Vermont taxpayers."
The savings and efficiencies achieved in the switch to Prudential builds upon a successful track record of reducing administrative fees paid by plan participants. In February 2016, the per participant fee for the State 457 Deferred Compensation Plan was reduced by 30 percent. Similar fee reductions have been achieved throughout other plans administered by the Treasurer's Office.
Prudential Retirement was selected by the Treasurer's Office after an open RFP was conducted with each of the three retirement systems' Board of Trustees. Prudential Retirement was selected as the third-party administrator for the seven preexisting optional plan offerings available to VSERS, VSTRS, and VMERS members. The VSERS, VSTRS and VMERS defined benefit plans are not impacted by this change and will continue to be administered by the Vermont Retirement Division and overseen by the Retirement Boards.
The scope of service includes administration of:
State 457 Deferred Compensation Plan
State Defined Contribution Plan
Municipal Employees 457 Deferred Compensation Plan
Municipal Defined Contribution Plan
Municipal Retiree Health Savings Plan
Teachers 403(b) Plan
Single Deposit Investment Account Plan
The transition to Prudential will occur in February 2018. Plan participants will benefit from enhanced services and lower fees. Additionally, plan participants will be able to access a number of account management options and improved financial literacy planning tools.
The Treasurer's Office and Prudential Retirement will continue to communicate directly with VSERS, VSTRS and VMERS plan participants as the transition occurs.


text:
1 Thessalonians 5:1 But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you.
1 Thess. 5:2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.
1 Thess. 5:3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.
1 Thessalonians 5:4 But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.
1 Thess. 5:5 Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.
Peace & Safety
Current/Past/End Times/Biblical/'Non'
(1Thess. 5:3 - Peace & Safety)
(1Thess. 5:3 - Peace & Safety)
Post Reply
1 post • Page 1 of 1
Post Reply
1 post • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


text:
Community Enterprises, Inc. - Worcester
65 James Street, Suite 219
Worcester, MA 01603
Worcester, MA 01603
Contact Person: Ken Gagne
Phone: (508) 755-5387 (TTY-enabled)
Fax: (508) 755-5743
Community Enterprises provides job training, employment, case management, education and housing supports for people labeled with disabilities. They have 18 locations in Massachusetts, New York and Connecticut. Their programs include:
- Work Experience for the deaf & hard-of-hearing
- Supported employment for survivors of traumatic brain injury
- ASSET program for those interested in culinary, office work & retail employment
- Help & support for entrepreneurs
- Live-in companions
For a full listing of what they provide: http://www.communityenterprises.com/programs.html#1
For a full listing of their locations & contact information: http://www.communityenterprises.com/locations.htmlWebsite: http://www.communityenterprises.com/ Contact Email: email@example.com
Located in: Adult Education | Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing | Employment | Skill Building | Employment Support


text:
Our current ideal of owning as much "stuff" as we can and of over consumption is being replaced with a new ideal of shared use and ownership. It gives people access to a lifestyle that they otherwise might not be able to afford, and it reduces waste. Imagine owning and sailing your own luxury catamaran for less than 20% of what conventional yacht ownership or bareboat charter would usually cost you! Not only does it save you money but it eliminates the waste of an asset sitting idle for months, collecting dust AND problems.
That is exactly what this program is designed to do! Fractional or Shared Yacht Ownership gives you the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of yacht ownership for a fraction of the cost of conventional ownership or even charter! Shared yacht ownership is exactly what it sounds like—you buy a share or fraction of a yacht. It is not a timeshare where you only purchase the rights of usage for a certain amount of time and end up with nothing when the term expires. With shared ownership you legally own the fraction of the asset and hold the title to the yacht.
It holds the answer to hassle-free and financially smart boat ownership. It's a simple concept— up to five co-owners can enjoy the benefits of owning a yacht while splitting the cost of the vessel and its management. It is the simplest way to realize your sailing dreams sooner than you otherwise could and with the least hassle. You can use the yacht as you like and your preferred holidays are always available for you.
People have been forming partnerships to co-own expensive assets for a long time, but until now they have had to figure out the logistics themselves. The benefits of shared ownership are very appealing, but it's been too cumbersome for most to set up. Finding the right partners, setting up partnerships, and managing the logistics of owning a shared asset can be time consuming and difficult. We have created a program that makes the entire process easier and makes shared ownership available to everyone.
Up to five owners each buys a share in a luxury yacht at a fraction of the cost. Unlike timeshare programs where you do not own the yacht and end up with nothing at the end, this program ensures that you have an equity stake in the yacht and hold title of the vessel. We limit the shares to only five owners per boat or less. That way all owners are guaranteed to get equal time. Because owners of fractional shares involve direct ownership, each user has greater control over how the boat is used and maintained and where it is located.
Duration of the program is 5 years. The boat will be sold at the end of the program. Upon the sale of the asset, the owners recover a percentage of their initial cost and will be proportionally refunded from the net proceeds. The owner is free to sell their ownership interest at any time. Since fractional yachts are well maintained and serviced, the value of each owner's share may not devalue as rapidly as an average yacht's value.
Owners get up to 8 weeks in a four-membership model and 7 weeks in a five-membership model.
The average cost to use the yacht per week (7 weeks per owner) can be as low as $2,500.00. To charter a comparable yacht from a charter company, the cost could be as high as $8,000.00 per week.
Owner use is shared equally between the owners according to the number of members. Owner access is allocated fairly to ensure that all owners can optimize the use of the yacht and that all the owners get quality time on the yacht to meet their needs or desires.
The annual operating costs such as insurance, dockage, annual haul out and scheduled maintenance will be offset or covered by income from chartering the yacht for a maximum of ten weeks per annum. There are no out of pocket costs to the owners for these expenses. With traditional yacht ownership, the owner spends around 10 percent of the total value of the yacht annually but with our model based on five years, one can save up to 90 percent of the cost of traditional yacht ownership. That is a huge advantage for the owners of a fractional yacht.
The latest catamaran models from the worlds top manufacturers like Lagoon, Fountaine Pajot, Nautitech and Bali are available for these programs, fully equipped with air-conditioning, generator, full electronics, dingy, outboard and sun awnings. Boats under consideration at present are Fountaine Pajot Lucia 40, NEW Lagoon 40, Bali 4.0, Dufour 46 (monohull) and Fountaine Pajot Powercat.
The vessel will be professionally managed and maintained by a management company to ensure that you enjoy your use of the boat with minimum hassle – boats are maintained in turn key condition and ready for you to step aboard.
Yacht will be based in a luxury secure marina with live-aboard facilities (pump out, internet, pool, etc.) should the owner wish to spend time on the boat at the dock. Location of the yachts is near the fantastic cruising grounds of Biscayne Bay, Florida Keys, the Bahamas and USVI.
In order to explain how the program works and what the benefits are, we have put an example together using a 40ft catamaran which shows how the financials will work, and what sort of owner use one can expect. Please contact us for more details.
Some of the early fractional yacht business models were guilty of taking advantage of the shareholders, and plenty have failed along the way. They would take a boat with a market price of say $2 million and divide it into 10 shares of $400,000, thereby doubling their investment by selling it for a total of $4 million. The Management / brokerage companies were trying to make a killing on one boat. It did not sit well with many potential buyers. Savvy boat owners might be willing to pay a small premium, but they're not willing to get taken to the cleaners.
Catamaran Guru™'s innovative fractional shared yacht ownership programs provide you with a financially savvy solution to yacht ownership that is ideal for your active lifestyle. You can experience all the benefits of yacht ownership without the hassles of staffing, maintaining, or servicing your yacht.
Contact us for full details today! OR Call: 804.815.5054


text:
Selva Verde Vacation Packages
Selva Verde Lodge, Costa Rica
Let us take care of all the details. Our exclusive packages will let you discover the best of Selva Verde and the Sarapiquí.
Rainforest Essence Honeymoon Package
Surrounded by wildlife, experience the essence of the rainforest at Costa Rica's Selva Verde Rainforest Reserve, your honeymoon paradise.
4 days, 3 nights.
Price for two: $975
Learn more »
Sarapiquí & Tortuguero Package
Enjoy the best of two worlds with our specially priced all-inclusive vacation package. Selva Verde and Pachira Lodge are working together to offer our guests a unique opportunity to explore both Tortuguero and the Sarapiquí with an amazing 5 day, 4 night package.
From $789 per person
Learn more »
Selva Verde & Savegre Package
Explore the lowland rainforest and the high elevation cloud forest with this joint package offering the opportunity to explore two distinct ecosystems. Each located on a river, these two lodges offer accessible forest reserves and abundant wildlife, comfortable lodging, and excellent service.
7 days/6 nights all inclusive.
From $1,365 per person.
Learn more »
Birding Package
We offer day trips as well as multi-night packages featuring the NEW Costa Rica Bird Route sites and local Sarapiquí birding hotspots. Let Selva Verde take care of the details while you focus on the birds!
4 days, 3 nights
From $395 per person.
Learn more »


text:
For those trying to run a dental practice, keeping customers coming back can often be just as difficult as finding them in the first place. Few people actually enjoy going to the dentist, and there are a good number of people who only think about going when they have a specific dental problem they need solved. However, it doesn't need to be this way, and we have a whole selection of promotional products that you can not only use to draw patients into your practice, but keep them coming back as well.
Dentists are in one of the luckiest professions when it comes to promotional items, having one of the clearest themes to work with. Nearly every dentist uses promotional toothbrushes to attract and retain patients, and they are easily one of the most effective dental promotional items it's possible to choose. However, you'll also recognize plenty of other promotional items perfect for dentists among our selection, including promotional dental floss, promotional sugar-free gum, and promotional mouthwash, as well as a variety of tooth-shaped products like promotional tooth-shaped notepads or tooth-shaped puzzle organizers or our cell phone microfiber cleaning cloth, shown below, a great dental practice promotional marketing tool.
Dentists can have a tough time getting and keeping patients, but our promotional products can make it significantly easier. Whether you're looking for a promotional toothbrush, dental floss, or something else entirely, you'll find tons of incredible dental promotional products here at JH Studios.


text:
Price: [price_with_discount]
(as of [price_update_date] – Details)
For maximum efficiency and minimum consumption, use our high-performance propane / isobutane four-season blend. Propane provides higher vapor pressure for better performance in cold weather. Isobutane provides more constant pressure as the fuel level gets low. The 100gram fuel canister will pack inside of any model Personal Cooking System. 230gram and 450gram canisters will pack inside of the Sumo Companion cups and the Sumo systems. Empty fuel cans are recyclable with our CrunchIt Tool. Check local facilities for recycling info.High-performance propane/isobutane four-season blend


text:
Age Concern seek local volunteers to help older people
Age Concern are actively looking for people in Hammersmith and Fulham to join their Befriending Scheme and become companions to older neighbours.
These companions would visit older people who may be alone or housebound and relish a person to talk to or accompany them on a walk or to the shops.
They may also be able to offer practical support with some tasks which are more difficult for older folk.
If you think you could help, call Peter Thellusson at Age Concern on 0207 386 9085.
June 22, 2012


text:
Toner Cartridges For Canon ImageClass Printers
Canon's imageCLASS printers provide superior all-in-one print options. This series brings print, copy, scan, and even fax capabilities to any home or small to medium-size office. The text and photo printing capabilities are superb, though the printer features will vary across the series, depending on which model you own. Some models in this series are capable of wireless printing from your mobile device or from your online storage cloud. Certain models also include added security features that are useful if you need to print confidential information in your office. While performance will also vary across the series, recent models have had print speeds as high as 23 pages per minute (ppm).
The Canon imageCLASS series uses laser printing technology, so you'll need to use toner cartridges in your imageCLASS printer. The specific toner cartridge you use for your printer will depend on what model you own from this series. No matter what type of toner your printer needs, 1ink.com has a budget-friendly option. Our remanufactured Toner Cartridges For Canon printers are designed to match the performance and image quality of original equipment manufacturer (OEM) Canon toner cartridges, but 1ink.com helps you save big by avoiding OEM retail prices. Many of our cartridges for the Canon imageCLASS series are priced at over 70 percent below the OEM price, but they offer comparable degrees of print quality and product performance. We guarantee that our remanufactured replacement toner cartridges are free from any defects and will perform beyond your expectations in your compatible Canon printer model.