text:
Why restaurant owners hate Yelp
Patrick Maguire gets fed up with Yelp after reading somebody gave the Lincoln Tavern in South Boston just one star, not because of the food, but because they gave her a pizza to go in a generic box:
Maybe it's a ruse, or maybe Nikki is just looking for a little attention, but restaurant workers have a right to be frustrated and angry when anonymous dimwits fuck with their livelihood. It's not funny.
Do you like how UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Lots of reasons to get fed up with Yelp
This is not one of them.
Yelp is notorious for extorting businesses who get negative reviews to try and push those off their summaries so that only more positive reviews show up first.
However, for Yelp to be accurate, even the morons who give 1-star reviews for stupid reasons need to be allowed to be included. If that review is so powerful and simultaneously inaccurate, then it's only because there aren't enough reviews from the 4- and 5-star customers to vastly outweigh it. There is always noise like Ms. Pizza Box in your sampling data. You're dealing with literally everyone who has ever eaten at that restaurant and all of their proclivities, hang-ups, and druthers. You're not going to please every single person who ever eats at your restaurant and those people's opinions matter too. However, what you're hoping is that you please far more people than go away dissatisfied. And when it comes to something like Yelp, you also have to hope that the ones you pleased are more willing to share their opinions too.
When it comes down to it, that's all that matters and has ever mattered, even before Yelp existed. The people you entertained and who enjoyed your meals need to go and tell others and convince them to give you a chance. One 1-star review about pizza boxes isn't going to change that.
This is all absolutely true.
This is all absolutely true. Lincoln Tavern has 161 reviews and a four-star rating overall. One moronic review from a shithead isn't messing with anyone's livelihood. Sounds like Patrick Maguire needs a hanky to cry into, and the Lincoln Tavern should be more concerned about the 1-star review that mentions the bouncer's anti-gay attitude.
This sort of thing is what Maguire's blog is all about
Server Not Servant advocates for service industry workers against the abuses of idiotic, uncivil, jerkwad customers with an inflated sense of entitlement. This kind of Yelp review is red meat for that blog. It's one example of millions as to why you have to be selective about whose advice you listen to online. Do you ask strangers on the street where you should eat? Choose a North End restaurant because it has a line out front? How do you know that five-star rave isn't from some putz who thinks The Cheesecake Factory is the most awesomest place evar? Caveat emptor. It's just that some idiots are so egregious, they're worth pointing and laughing at.
Local versus Visitor
Do you ask strangers on the street where you should eat?
Well, when I'm not in Boston, or other cities that I know well, what are my options?
Yelp can be very useful for tourists - particularly those with minimal time and an entourage. They do give you the opportunity to drill down on their data and see the distribution of reviews,etc. Most business travelers are savvy enough to junk those one-star reviews like this one, some are not and that can affect the bottom line of a small place that wants to vend ambiance to tourists who are willing to go off the beaten path.
Yes, but there's no substitute for homework
I travel a lot for business, so I cultivate a network of trusted locals who can give me far better dining-out advice than the typical lowest common denominator that Yelp, Zagat and their ilk yield. Rely on Yelp, and you won't even be able to dodge tourist traps, which are essentially defined by their location in areas with high tourist traffic and can survive despite mediocrity because they don't have to worry about repeat business. Yelp has nearly 1000 reviews apiece of the Sewage Crab and the Union Oyster House, and both still rate a solid three stars I don't think either remotely deserves. You are welcome to the so-called wisdom of crowds; I don't have much use for it.
Three Stars on Yelp = not good
Anyone using Yelp who thinks that a three star rated restaurant is anything above average doesn't understand Yelp.
Really? You figured out 3 out of 5 stars is average?
Congratulations. Was that all by yourself, or did you have help?
My point is that awful tourist traps like my examples often deserve barely a star, but the kind of crowds that queue up for hour-plus waits at The Cheesecake Factory usually rate them higher. Star ratings on amateur review sites roll up a lot of advice from people whose opinion I don't value.
I never said "3 out of 5 stars is average." I guess you might need some help figuring things out.
I said that three stars = not good, right there in the subject line. I'm sorry that you missed it.
I also insinuated that anyone who reads into a three star restaurant that it is anything above average doesn't understand the rating system. That also doesn't mean that 3/5 is average.
However, you seem to be bent out of shape because two restaurants you don't like have three star ratings. Anyone who understands the Yelp rating system knows that means they aren't very good. Maybe you should just get over it.
You say "Star ratings on amateur review sites roll up a lot of advice from people whose opinion I don't value."
Wow! Did you figure that out all by yourself? Should I sarcastically congratulate you?
My point was that people on Yelp, in aggregate, overrate establishments. I don't think we disagree about that, but you felt the need to be an ass about it.
Guess I missed something there
"My point was that people on Yelp, in aggregate, overrate establishments." That was my point, too. Even utter crapholes get three stars on Yelp. My examples are simply two that came to the top of my mind; there are countless others among Boston's tourist traps.
Incidentally, Yelp describes a 3-star rating to mean "A-OK": good, not great.
You just don't get it.
It's only an "utter craphole" in your own mind. Hundreds of people trump the opinion of a few. That's democracy at work.
If you don't trust the collective opinion of the unwashed masses, then don't use Yelp. Read the local food critic's reviews if you want the "expert" opinion. However, most people (by definition) have tastes that are closer to the "common man" so Yelp is useful to them.
Hundreds of people are indeed greater in number than one person
But let's not make the mistake that because something is popular, it's going to be awesome. Following mass taste leads you to the Olive Garden, Justin Bieber, and The Bachelorette. (And the Sewage Crab.) Yelp is no different from any random collection of citizens: its typical reviewer is someone with unknown, probably dubious taste and limited experience of the dining world. Trusting the average person for dining recommendations is no way to ferret out the extraordinary.
Figure out who's got great taste and follow their advice, great taste meaning different things to different people -- it's not so much about who's a so-called expert, but who has sensibilities, likes and dislikes, that closely match yours. (But note that some people do indeed have expertise that you don't and may find useful, like the gal who grew up eating her Taiwan-native mom's cooking.) Going to strangers about whose taste, intelligence and experience you know nothing and asking them for restaurant advice is a terrible strategy. Rolling up the opinions of thousands of random strangers only gets you to the great mean of popular taste. If you trust mass taste to guide your aesthetic experiences in life, then you deserve to go wherever Yelp star ratings send you.
I always check Chowhound
No ratings, just opinionated comments and possibly rebuttals by people who pay attention to what they eat. ;~}
Point and laugh, fine, but
Point and laugh, fine, but don't get all huffy and pretend that someone's "livelihood" is threatened because of one moronic Yelp review.
Anonymous "Scratchie"
Hold the hanky, and the douchebag comment.
"One moronic review from a shithead isn't messing with anyone's livelihood."
If several 1-star, moronic reviews are allowed, eventually a restaurant's rating will go down. I've spoken with several people (tourists and locals using Yelp) who confirmed that on the fly they'll scan restaurants by neighborhood, use the star system, choose the type of food they're looking for, then read a handful of the most recent reviews. Some people set standards, "Nothing less than 4+ stars." They don't always have time to do their research on the reviewers or their credibility. There's often a significant delay between when an obvious idiot posts and when Yelp removes their review, if they remove it at all. Anonymous morons with no credibility are fucking with the livelihoods of a lot of hard-working people, and I believe we should continue to call them out.
And there will be people who
And there will be people who set standards like "no red signs" or "no generic pizza boxes". Whining about Yelp isn't going to change anything since it's a long-established website that many people rely on (rightly or wrongly). If someone really sets a standard like "Nothing less than 4+ stars", then I don't know where they're going to eat, since I don't think I've ever seen a restaurant on Yelp that has never gotten a three-star review (or below). Most people with two brain cells to rub together can judge a review on its own merits -- just like they do on Amazon and dozens of other social-media websites -- without doing "research" into the credibility of that particular reviewer, and anyone who's used Yelp more than once knows to take any of the reviews with a grain of salt.
If you actually think that any "good" restaurant is never going to get any bad reviews on yelp, then you're living in a dreamland. Restaurants that provide good food and good service will prosper, Yelp notwithstanding, even if a few clueless tourists happen to give them a pass.
PS: Thanks for deleting my comment on your whiny blog, too. If you can't take a little bit of criticism, you've got no business being on the internet at all!
Anonymous "Scratchie"
My post isn't "whining" about Yelp, it's calling out an anonymous idiot Yelper, and I will continue to do so. I'll also continue to moderate and filter anonymous comments from my blog when people make douchebag throwaway comments like you've made. They don't add any value to the conversation.
I disagree that Yelp isn't going to change. Lawsuits, public sentiment, and media exposure of late, are heading in the direction of more accountability and transparency.
From Anonymous "Scratchie": "If you actually think that any "good" restaurant is never going to get any bad reviews on yelp, then you're living in a dreamland."
I don't recall anyone here implying that. Savvy restaurateurs know that they're not going to please everyone, and that they shouldn't try. That doesn't mean that we can't expose the anonymous morons for them.
Yeah, well, good luck with
Yeah, well, good luck with all of that. Nice to hear you have a hobby.
Like a Child on the Playground
Stay tuned for my blog post titled, "The Parting Shot" about customers who have to get the last word in when they don't what they want. Something tells me it will resonate deeply with you. Go ahead...
Ignore single high and low ratings
Probably the stupidest I've ever seen was the turd that downrated Bloc 11 because there were death camps that had a Bloc 11 (the name came from the property parcel designation on the City of Somerville land maps).
I shit you not.
Also ignore: any review that says "I got food poisoning" that isn't backed up with a health department investigation (Clover). Those are typically hit jobs or hapless fools who happened to dine there when they were coming down with Norovirus.
Lauditory reviews without any details? Shitcan them, too.
Yelp does give you the ability to see the distribution of reviews, and also the date. I use that to get an idea of how many spurious reviews there are.
yeah, no
Prettty sure I can tell the difference between food poisoning (which ends pretty fast) and norovirus (which is like being a double-ended firehose, for far longer.)
Tons of people get sick from food in the US - far more than in any other world, just about.
Too bad the WHO and the CDC don't seem to agree with you.
Then again, what do they know.
Most foodborne illness isn't isolated to a single person and place. Period. You are also wrong about the time course of both diseases. If only one isolated person "got food poisoning", chances are very very good that they did NOT have food poisoning, but a typical communicable pathogen. That's because a bad bunch of food or a bad restaurant practices are not limited to a single dish served to a single patron.
" FoodNet reports on the changes in the number of people in the United States sickened with foodborne infections that have been confirmed by laboratory tests. "
Because whenever people get a bout of diarrhea, or even if they get fire-hose-like sick, they rush to their doctor and the doctor orders a workup of lab tests, and then ships the sample off to WHO. People think "I have the flu" or "I caught a virus" and they don't bother even calling their doctor, especially when said doctor won't be able to fit them in for a week.
Special world you live in.
Please explain
People think "I have the flu" or "I caught a virus" and they don't bother even calling their doctor, especially when said doctor won't be able to fit them in for a week.
So you are saying that, despite survellance data much to the contrary, that you believe that food poisoning is somehow DIFFERENTIALLY under reported? In other words, people who do go to their doctors are more likely to NOT have food poisoning than people who don't go to their doctors? Somehow?
Because that is what would have to happen for your lay person assertions (amok actual surveillance data) to make any sense at all.
BTW, you still haven't provided any support whatsoever for your initial assertion that food poisoning is rampant in the US, or that it is more prevalent than in other countries.
Until then, your "just so" stories about your "gut feelings" about these things are truly irrelevant arguments against the actual data, and do not support your attempts to claim that I live in some "special world" of some sort where CDC data are wrong and you are right.
Relief for Business Owners from Yelp
There is finally Search Engine relief for the small business owner. One of the biggest problems with Yelp is that because of its size and volume it outranks all original websites on Google. For example, it you put Johnny's Pizza into a web search, JP's site doesn't show up, Yelp's does. This is known as scraping. When you use someone else's content to rank above the original site, it is against Google's rules. This week Google has implemented reporting procedures. If you are successful, the Yelp page with your listing will come up below your page in searches in the future. So go to Google, put in your company name and if any pages come up about your company (yelp or otherwise) above your website that you did not authorize, report them. Here is the official Google report url: http://t.co/WohXQmI45X
here is the solution
Remove any posting made by an account with 0 friends and only 1 review after a specified amount of time. Most of the time you see a review from an account with no picture, no friends, and only that one review it is either an account made by an employee/owner trying to elevate the ratings, or made by someone with a petty grudge against the place. So after 60 days, if that account has no new activity, no friends, no pictures, then remove the account and it will eliminate the harm done by these accounts.
How do we remove the account!
How do we remove the account!?!? YELP is infuriating. No phone number. No human to speak with. A convenient "no reply" email address. How do fight this cowardly online monstrosity?
Oh no! A "monstrosity"! Clear
Oh no! A "monstrosity"! Clear the fainting couch! I do believe I need to clutch my pearls now.
"Why" is more impotant
Like any other rating service, I always look at *why* someone didn't like something rather than just the raw rating.
For example, TripAdvisor may have a bad rating for a B&B, but if someone didn't like it because they weren't waited on like at the Four Seasons, I ignore the rating. There's lots of stuff like this. So, if someone doesn't like their generic pizza box, ignore it and look at the other comments.
Yelp is inaccurate by design
Yelp is inaccurate by design and purpose. More people are more likely to post a yelp review for a poor experience than a positive. I highly doubt most people going out with friends and having an enjoyable and satisfying time is going to have the mindset to post a glowing review.
I do
No I do, I'm very active on Yelp and write a ton of reviews. (so active, sometimes regional admins often message me to say 'keep up the good work'). I've written several glowing reviews for places that didn't have a yelp presence or what was there were not very good review (but I knew otherwise). I do it because I know people DO look at yelp so if I can write a nice review for a place I do like and throw some business their way, then that's great. I've supported a small business..
Same here
In fact, I'm more likely to review places I like that don't have many reviews or have inane ones like the one here. I don't generally write a bad review unless it's repeated service and/or quality issues. I always figure a place can have a bad night and if it's promising enough I'll try again.
One of my favorite spots in the North End had very few entries and was being dragged down by three reviews from people who came in with no reservation on a Friday night and then had to wait for seating. I just. . .really? You're in a major tourist area during a weekend rush time and you expect to waltz in and sit right down? Where are these people from?
There's also no way
To point out that a review is "unhelpful"...or "idiotic" or "are you f'ing kidding me? What kind if status obsessed moron gives a [email protected]& about a pizza box?" I'm not a restaurant owner but I can hardly stand to go on Yelp. Two thirds of the posts seem to be written by entitled, 22-year-old whiners who write things like "well we stopped by at midnight but it was closed. Didn't seem to have many gluten-free vegan options tho so I am giving it two stars."
You have "helpful" and "funny" buttons under a review, but never an "unhelpful" button. That is badly needed.
And Yelp has known this for
And Yelp has known this for years.
I rate those "funny"
Because I think it's funny that someone got worked up enough about a pizza box or whatever to take the time to log into a site and write a review.
Sites like Yelp and Tripadvisor reviews are helpful, but the key is to focus on what is written, not the stars. Someone doesn't like the pizza box? Well, I guess that's helpful to others who rate pizza on the type of box it comes in. But since I don't care about that, I just ignore those reviews. Same with Tripadvisor. Someone once gave a one-star review to a hotel I was considering because the colors of the comforter didn't match the rest of the room. Since I don't care about hotel room color coordination, I ignored it.
The forums can be pretty helpful too, sometimes more than the reviews.
No, that's completely wrong.
No, that's completely wrong. Most people tend to overinflate their ratings on Yelp. If you look at the average Yelp rating sitewide, it stands around 4 stars. And we know that should not be.
Can we just take a moment and
Can we just take a moment and think about the review in question. Really?
Apropos of nothing else, no
Apropos of nothing else, no one will choose to forgo this establishment because of an absurd review like that.
Apparently, their livelihood
Apparently, their livelihood is now very much in question, at least according to Mr. Maguire. I guess they take Yelp reviews pretty seriously in Southie.
You're missing the point.
Yes--there are some people who drill down and read the reviews but yes--two or three morons who give a place one star because of some idiotic reason do drag down the ratings. I'd be willing to bet that most people just scan the stars and don't do in-depth analysis of the ratings. We once stayed at a terrific B & B in Maine--it had been recommended by friends but I checked the Trip Advisor reviews before we went and was surprised to see them ranked much lower than the other local b & b's? The reason? One disgruntled reviewer who took offense at the enthusiastic political signage on display (let's just say that it was 2008 and this traveler was a fan of neither hope nor change).
Let's think about this
If a restaurant that would normally be a 4 star restaurant has 160 reviews, but three of them are 1 stars while the rest average to 4 stars, then the restaurant would have a ~3.94 star Yelp rating.
So, two or three bad ratings don't really matter much in the end, as far as the overall star rating goes.
Wow, someone who can do math!
Wow, someone who can do math! Unlike certain posters here.
Can't blame them
For what you pay for a pizza there, they should deliver it to you.
So, what's the best value for pizza in Southie?
Serious question. I've been working my way through them -- Southie has like three dozen pizza places in three square miles, especially if you include the bakeries and cafes that also carry pizza. I think Cafe Porto Bello might be my favorite so far.
Depends What You Want
If you like a decent New York crisp crust, nothing fancy, a good slice can be had at either Liberty Bell, at C and Broadway, or at The Village, corner of L and 3rd. Liberty Bell offers a good roast beef, too; one of the best in the city, in my humble estimation. The Village also serves pretty good subs. Neither is a fancy joint, by any means, but both serve a good standard pie.
I'm a fan of Liberty Bell
Reviewed it for the Phoenix a few years back: http://thephoenix.com/Boston/Food/80969-LIBERTY-BELL/
Had a slice at Village the other day: frickin' uuuuge! And decent. A pal swears by Pat's Trattoria. I wish Mirasola kept later hours. L Street Diner is alright in my book, too. Need to try the non-pizzeria pies, like Sidewalk and Joseph's.
Spot On
Well-written review, and spot on. The first paragraph, about the appearance of the place... Where I said, above, "Neither is a fancy joint", I considered saying, "The Liberty Bell looks like a dump from the outside", but I didn't want to turn you off of it immediately.
Are you doing reviews for anyone else now? I'd like to follow your stuff.
Thanks, Suldog!
I'm reviewing for The Improper every other issue. On Twitter at @mcslimjb. Links to my reviews, etc. can be found here: http://mcslimjb.blogspot.com/
Shilling for MC Slim JB
Check out his really interesting essay on amateur restaurant reviewing: http://mcslimjb.blogspot.com/2013/04/11-reasons-your-yelp-reviews-suck-a... .
Hands down. I also like Pizza Pie-er but that is a thing altogether different from pizza. The new Pizzeria 260 was also good (not great), but more of your standard greek/italian hybrid that you seem to get around here, with an olive oil crust that still has some crunch to it, iirc. And then there's Olympia if you really need greek pizza. That one day a year or something.
a) Principal guys at yelp headquarters?... and b) Boston region?
a) Who are the principal guys at the yelp headquarters?...
b) Who are the regional yelp people for each of the yelp regions ?...
c) Who are the regional yelp people for Boston?
Change yelp deficiencies!...
If you take Yelp "star" ratings at face value
You're doing it wrong. It's really not that hard to read comments, look at dates they were posted and find trends that might raise some flags or make a place more enticing. I get the frustration, but the rant only looks at one side. I've used Yelp quite a bit while traveling and found some great places I may have otherwise overlooked. And businesses have the ability to publicly respond to reviews at any time.
Not just a Yelp problem
Even though Yelp is one of the worst sources of reviews, it's far from the only one. People take to review sites and review irrelevant factors constantly. Ordered something from an online store and UPS screwed up your shipment? Leave a bad review on the product!
The other day, there was an influx of 1-star reviews on an iPhone app in Apple's App Store because it was given out free as part of an Apple 12 days of christmas kind of promotion, and people didn't like that it was the free app and they would have rather been given something they liked better for free.
Messing with Livlihood
No matter what any of us think this is true. Could you imagine if you were reviewed by people for your performance? Even if you work in an office, picture someone posting a review about you. Maybe you suck at your job. I know when I was 17 I wasn't all that great.
I am not a server but I worked at a restaurant and some wait staff were truly great but a customer who doesn't know them, catches them on a bad night, can give a heinous review. I'm sure all of us have had bad days but nobody is reviewing us. You can just sit at your desk doing nothing and nobody would know. I know lots of people who pretend they are working which basically is a job in itself and exhausting if you ask me.
My cousins boyfriend, no matter how good a server was, always has something negative to say. Always. He yells at them etc. It's embarrassing. If he got on Yelp no restaurant would get a good review, anywhere. (ps this comment box is awful)


text:
Forum addressed economic development in the county
Olivia�s at Frenchman�s Creek was the site on Tuesday for Lenoir County residents with early morning interests about local government.
Dozens of people came out to the Wake Up Lenoir breakfast, where they had the opportunity to hear and discuss recent updates about public projects, community goals and budgets in a friendly setting.
Kinston City Councilman Bobby Merritt hosted the event, with Kinston City Manager Tony Sears, Lenoir County Manager Mike Jarman and Economic Development Director Mark Pope speaking. Those in attendance were treated to vital information, fellowship and refreshments.
�I just like hearing what goes on out here and being updated,� Pink Hill Mayor Carol Sykes said. �I want to be updated on how things affect the county government because it trickles down to the towns. I�m not campaigning, but I�ll give support to the people here. To me, this is just one big family.�
Sears was the first speaker, talking about the Unified Development Ordinance, needed demolition in the area and how the city planned on getting people inside and outside the area to spend money.
�The city of Kinston is in a good place,� Sears said as he addressed the crowd. �We�re not in the best place, but we�re making changes and laying foundations as we move forward.�
Jarman discussed the Lenoir County budget and reinforced how it was constructed. He explained why the property tax rose from 80 cents per $100 value to 83.5 cents in the 2013-14 fiscal year.
�It was basically letting the people know that the need for the increase was because of the debt service on the school bonds,� Jarman said. �We tried to inform them on the budget, updated them on actions with the general assembly and also the Jones and Lenoir county communication department merger.�
Pope talked about industries such as Sanderson Farms, West Pharmaceutical, Smithfield, Electrolux, Lenox China, Spirit AeroSystems and DuPont bringing jobs and revenue to the city.
Later Tuesday, Gov. Pat McCrory announced in a press release food packaging company Pactiv would expand manufacturing facilities in Lenoir County, bringing another 26 jobs to the community.
�This is a great event to be around,� Pope said. �The industries we have are so important to us and we have to get the word out and support by buying local products.�
One of the businesses Pope pointed out was the Woodmen Community Center, which has flourished in large part due to its water park.
�Woodmen has helped the community immensely and is very instrumental to showing people out of town they can have a good time in Lenoir County,� Pope said. �It helps in my department to show other businesses the quality we have here in the area.�
Kinston City Councilman Sammy Aiken enjoyed the good atmosphere and people who want to see the area flourish.
�This is a very positive event,� Aiken said. �The people here want Kinston to be much better and progressive and they�re a treasure of the community. They volunteer time and effort to make the city better and it�s appreciated.�
The next Wake Up Lenoir breakfast is on Sept. 5 and will deal with the Health Care Reform. The place will be announced at a later date.
Junious Smith III can be reached at 252-559-1077 and email@example.com. Follow him on Twitter at @JuniousSmithIII.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
How To Locate The Buyers Of Your Damaged Cars For Disposal
Cars once damaged or old enough are always fit for disposal and one may wonder where they can find the best deals for such assets. But all thanks to the presence of the online car dealers who will easily take away this stress out of your life for they will come and offer you very nice quotes for the disposal of your junk machines. This notwithstanding, you will still need to put in a little more effort to ensure that you are dealing with the right company and getting the best offers.
First and foremost, check to see if the buyer is legally in business. It is a common trend with a majority of the buyers to post their legality on the web pages on which they are found. As such it becomes very prudent to avoid selling your junk vans to those dealers without a clarification of their position with the law on their websites.
The other factor you will consider helpful as you look for those professional buyers for your old car is the speed with which they respond to your call for a quote. A good junk car dealer should not waste your time and money calling on them for the price they are willing to settle on for the asset to dispose to them. The worthy dealers will have stated on their websites the estimates they give for the various cars and categories of old cars for you to know before you call on them. Simply spare some time worth the deal to compare the variety of offers for your asset for it is worth it.
Lessons Learned About Sales
Did you know that the buyer is to bear the cost of removing the junk motor from your yard? However since some people neglect to let this responsibility lie on them, it will be well to confirm this detail with the dealer of your choice before you hit the road for the business. Enjoy the seamless service of the professional junk car buyers who will do the moving of the damaged or old car off the garage lot without the danger of running into spoils your lawns and yard items.
The 10 Best Resources For Automobiles
Trust your friends and associates to be another good source of recommendation to you who wishes to deal with a professional junk car dealer. But we must note that these so got recommendations from friends will and should not be your overall point for deciding to deal with these companies. You must do your own research for the circumstances for sale will always vary from one person to another.


text:
Michu is out of the spotlight and underperforming, at least in comparison to what he did over the last two seasons. Maybe it's second-season syndrome; maybe he was never that good in the first place. No. It is a natural dip in form and productivity that could work in other teams' favour.
The Spanish forward was on the list of targets for Arsene Wenger during the summer. Swansea wouldn't sell, understandably, with their valuation being in the region of £25 million. They know he's not worth that on the market, so that price tag more or less acts as a not-for-sale sign. But what about now?
Michu has expressed his desire to play for a club competing in the Champions League, with Arsenal being one of the teams linked with the Spaniard.
Is he good enough for Arsenal, is the important question. The fact that he's received a call up to the Spanish national team and looks more or less settled in English football is a good indicator. What can he bring to Wenger's team? His size means he'd be able to offer a similar presence in the attack as currently provided by Olivier Giroud, and he's arguably a better finisher. Not only that, Michu is a player who drives forward and can carry the ball too.
Arsene Wenger may feel that the team and overall the club are in need of a boost. It's been a trying week for Arsenal, losing in Napoli, yet going through to the next round of the Champions League, and having their title credentials seriously questioned after the loss at Manchester City. The team need a boost, the fans want assurances, perhaps rightly so after the failure to properly address the striker department in the summer.
Nicklas Bendtner is the butt of all jokes. What people fail to see, however, is his talent as a footballer, instead focusing on his shortcomings and missteps away from the pitch. Nevertheless, he is still Denmark's leading marksman, a forward who scored twice against Italy when the two sides met in October. He's not the answer for Arsenal long term, but he's an option for now.
The problem is it won't do for some. Bendtner's reputation away from the pitch precedes his ability on it. Look at his contribution against Manchester City. Giroud missed a handful of fantastic opportunities to add to Arsenal's tally. Bendtner came on and put his first real chance away, only to be wrongly adjudged offside.
If Arsenal are to enter the market in January, they could do worse than Michu – though of course they could do much better, but only in the summer. The Swansea striker's stock is down, he's not catching the attention or imagination in the way he used to, and there could be a feeling at Swansea that now might be the right time to move him on and reinvest.
The fact that he was on Arsenal's radar in the summer is a good sign, but he doesn't fit the bill as the long-term addition the club need. The last thing Wenger needs to do is sign a player for the purpose of appeasing others. If a January signing is to take place, it needs to be with purpose and with long-term thinking in mind. Does Michu fit the bill?
The summer will more than likely see Arsenal spend again, adding to an already good squad. Due to the club's financial capabilities and those available during the summer, Michu is more than likely to be an afterthought. He's good, but will he lead a team to the league title? It's unlikely.
The Spaniard may be looking to his own future as further up the Premier League ladder. For Arsenal, though, a partnership makes little sense beyond this season, despite Michu's obvious qualities.


text:
White male pansies.
According to the gamesters, your response should be:
damn, i'm torn. do i want a thriving society or easier access to sex? yeeeeah… i'll take the latter and leave the self-sacrifice required of the former for the anti-poolside chumps
According to real men, the proper response is: SMASH THE SYSTEM.
Baby steps first: democratic multiculturalism. First, weaken and undermine the system, be the termites eating away at the foundation, be the moles burrowing deep inside, be the biting pests always tormenting and then flying away.
Once suitably weakened, all the rotten edifice needs is a strong enough push, and it all comes crumbling down.


text:
Guest Review: Oswald On Boss
Helen Oswald reviews
by Todd Boss
Todd Boss comes from Midwestern farming stock; he plants his words carefully, judiciously spaced, with no wastage, like precious seed, and his lines grow up lean and tall through the centre of the page. The first two sections of the debut collection Yellowrocket, deal with the poet's early years. The title poem tells the story of a family engaged in a bleakly biblical struggle with stubborn soil, trying to make the best of bad land but not without some Job-like grumbling:
The work was clay
deep, the debt was
north slope steep…
We were the unsung
angels of our portion
of the plat. And for
all that, on Sundays
the Lord gave us halos
of hat hair and gnats…
Boss's talent for internal rhyme gives his often very short lines a pleasing musicality and the literal poverty of the setting is wittily contradicted by lyrical riches: "Had holes been coins,/ our gloves and boots/ would've jangled."
Many of the lines display the tough wisdom and bone dry humour of those who have fought against the odds for survival. Wit is often a consolation, but the poems are also characterised by a melancholy beauty that comes in flashes, like lightning. In 'In the Morning We Found', the narrator's parents are described walking through the wreckage of the aftermath of a violent storm:
My parents walked,
alone and paired,
through the weird
carnage, mourning
–downed trees still
green and breathing
as soon they would
no more–fallen
as in a war.
The difficulty of connection between those who live closely-bound lives – so simply expressed in "alone and paired" – pervades the collection and suffuses it with sadness. Love, like the rest of life, is not easy here, where marriage can easily become 'a bicker'. The heart of the book examines the cut-and-thrust of an embattled relationship and the cruel intensity that can accompany intimacy:
"You asked me how," she said.
I said,
"How what?" and reached to shut
the tap, but she stopped me, her nails
in my veins.
The love poems take us into the painful heart of a crisis of failed communication and separation. 'Six Nights in a Hotel' evokes the cold chill of this state: it starts simply with "My wife and I/ a mile apart" and, through the dispiriting details of the "crusty screws" and "crack of tile", finally arrives at the unflinching confessional stanza:
My pride
is a fire
retardant blanket
It covers but it
does not warm.
Here again is the precise imagery and distilled style that Boss employs with such ease and effectiveness. Mostly his touch is assured, almost magical at times, but occasionally he approaches a little too close to the prosaic, as in the poem 'Don't Come Home':
Don't Come Home
ranks first among
the worst things
someone you love
can say. Not even
the common I
hate you does
the damage Don't
come home will
Here, the short lines and carefully chosen line breaks cannot do quite enough to elevate the poem, despite some bird imagery that arrives too late and feels somewhat forced, as if the poet perhaps sensed the weakness. This 'talky' tendency occurs again later in 'She Rings Me Up', where the frisson created by a misunderstanding between the narrator and a check-out girl does not carry enough narrative interest or poetic charge to earn the poem's five pages. The title of this poem (like nearly two-thirds of those in the book) doubles as the first line – "She Rings Me Up/ four frozen dinners/ and a pint of politically/ correct ice cream" – and this may encourage the temptation to run away with a somewhat loose narrative. A well-chosen title provides the reader (and writer) pause for thought at the start of a poem and again at the end where, reconsidered, it can lend another layer of meaning. It is a shame that a poet such as Boss, who considers his every word so carefully, so often misses this opportunity.
After the emotional storm at the centre of the book, the last two sections breath more easily and begin to restore the possibility of the "melancholy joy" that is the natural territory of this voice: "Everything's a mess/ and genius all at once…" in 'The Day is Gray and the Lake'; and in the tender love poem 'To a Wild Rose' the poet asserts, "There is a way/ in this world for beauty,/ for good." The possibility of redemption underpins this collection, connected to a religious sensibility worn lightly and often with a sense of irony. Although seldom overt, it is there right from the start in the language's biblical undertones; in the struggles with the enormous forces of nature; in the capitalised features of human failure ("Pride, Ruin's bride-to-be"); in God's dealing of 'Another Hand', and at the "brick altar" of 'Wood Burning'.
The difficulty of negotiating a relationship with God is examined most openly in 'Worst Work' where, even if some of the language is distinctly modern, the metaphysical conceit and syntactic struggle with "the great provocateur" are reminiscent of John Donne's heart/head tug-of-love with his Creator. Here, the narrator places himself in the humorously awkward position of having to give God feedback on a bad poem written about the poet himself – both poem and poet being his "worst work". But, despite the cheeky tone, love is never in doubt:
I owe it to my faith to give the old fart
the benefit of doubt.
It's hard to write a poem
about someone you love,
for one thing. And for another,
it's hard to take a lesson from
your own worst work.
Some of the later poems that explore life's more temporal epiphanies also demonstrate Boss's talent for sharp observation through a whimsical lens and bring to mind the serious play of his fellow American poet, Billy Collins. In 'Things, Like Dogs' a laptop is capable of climbing onto a table and eggs of cracking themselves into a skillet in a bizarre but benign act of welcome; and, in 'A Man Stares into the Same Painting Day after Day', a brief moment where a small domestic detail is noticed afresh, is transformative:
And then one day something appears
in a window that wasn't there before.
A curled cat or an ornate crack or a
stack of folded linens, it's hard to tell.
And a window is opened in him, and
and he is placed upon his understanding's
gritty granite sill. His life has a fresh
smell. It tingles.
smell. It tingles.
This, of course, is also the effect of good poetry: Boss's first collection most definitely has the power to generate that tingle. Its poems vibrate with a sharp and sensitive awareness of the pains and ecstasies that every life must bear.
Helen Oswald's Learning Gravity, from Tall-lighthouse, was nominated for the Forward Prize for Best First Collection 2010. She works as a writer and editor from her home in Brighton.