It has to be a better technology, more durable. Right? Lessen, like, ability to, like to copy it, more censorship, like, more resistant to. What am I trying to say? To, like printing forfeit. Yeah, exactly. All of these things, right? And so that. But anyway, he was doing that in the context of when I asked the question of when did freedom of speech come about? And he was like, oh, we've always. We've had it. David Graber talks about this. We've had it in small tribes. So it's not like it's this new concept that we just sort of discovered and propagated in the 16 hundreds and onward in the age of enlightenment, it actually existed. And, like, it exists at my dinner table. Do you know, like, with my family, I just like, hey, be open. Like, let's talk about things. Let's not. How was your day? How was your day? Right? And then it exists at the tribe level. The challenge with all of these things is how do you scale it? And the first amendment in the constitution was one answer to how you scale it. Well, if everyone agrees to this document, this piece of paper, this code called the constitution, and then we set up a rule of law to enforce it with the balance of power across three branches of government. Right. Then maybe we have a shot at scaling out this concept that we had at the tribe level of freedom of speech. And if we do that, there's lots of benefits. People are more literate. We can make wiser decisions as a society. We can have truth propagate and do science, be more innovative, outcompete other societies. And that is a good thing. That's kind of how it was born. It's all about, I guess, scaling something. That's what we're trying to do with money, right? It's not enough to have a money that works with a small tribe. You have to kind of, like, scale out to create social coordination. Anyway, freedom of speech is a social technology in the same way that money is a social technology and the art is making it scalable.