system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Spelling and grammar errors are unprofessional.

I’ve frequently seen people online with the viewpoint that spelling and grammar errors should just be ignored. They say things like “some people are dyslexic or learning English, so spelling and grammar don’t really matter”. I disagree. If they make it known that they have a disability then accommodations can be made, but if you don’t tell people they aren’t doing anything wrong by holding you to the same standards as everyone else. If you are learning English you can just tell them that, and as you learn you will get better.

For some reason it seems as though less and less people care about spelling and grammar. I’ve found spelling and grammar errors on signs in business. These show just how little the business cares, seeing how they either hired someone who doesn’t know how to spell or didn’t get someone to spell check the sign. 

Spelling and grammar errors on resumes, cover letters, and similar professional papers are just as bad. If you can’t take the time to check through your work or have someone do it for you then I don’t feel bad if you don’t get the job.

I don’t expect everyone’s spelling and grammar to be perfect in non-professional settings (such as on social media), but if you want to be taken seriously then learn proper spelling and grammar. I believe people who say otherwise are just making excuses for people and businesses who don’t even bother trying.

Is there some valid reason I’m missing here?

*Edit: I understand that, especially when typing, a mistake here or there is understandable. I’m mainly talking about things that should have been proofread, such as résumés, signs, and official papers, or things written by hand.
gpt
>For some reason it seems as though less and less people care about spelling and grammar.

It would be grammatically correct to use “fewer” in this sentence instead of “less.”  You use fewer when what you’re referring to is countable, e.g. people.  To relate this back to the discussion, do you think this error makes your argument any less convincing?