system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: If there were a Hell, not even Stalin would deserve it, nor would it be logical to send him there. (Nobody deserves Hell)

First off, I consider myself somewhat agnostic atheist. But when it comes to scripture, I am not that agnostic about it, since it's too selfevidently flawed.

Obviously, this is not only about Stalin.   
Yes it's partly about Stalin, but more as an example of how far I'm going with this. It's about nobody deserving it, not even the worst of the worst.  
**The main opinion is in the brackets.** 

Not only do I think that the concept of "Hell" is inherently flawed and just fearmongering, but even Stalin would not deserve hell. And I always see people rooting for non-believers to rot in hell. Or rooting for God with 100 and/or "100" emojis. I came to think that these are just kids.  
And every religious person out there should humble themselves. A LOT.  
You don't know what is true and what is not. More importantly, you are not "God". You don't know who deserves what, not in the least. So if anyone reading this ever said someone will go to hell, deserves hell, or tries to speak for something which they're obviously not, stop. It's time to stop and more importantly to humble yourself.

Back to the main point:

Since I don't buy Stalin deserving hell, really no one deserves hell. I guess there are worse people than Stalin, but I figured to take a famous one.   
I guess some folks will take incredible offense to that, but let me explain.  


No amount of suffering inflicted does equal to eternal torture.   
No amount of non-believing or denying does equal to eternal torture.  
No amount of murder or torture does equal to eternal torture.   


That really sums up my point. It's math, folks. 

And If you ask me what should be done with Stalin, I don't know. Since we don't know with 100% certainty if free will even exists, even though the evidence is hardly proving it's existence. 

It seems moreso that it doesn't exist. Atleast that's what the evidence suggests.   
But since religion inherently states a free will, I would still stand by my statement. It's still basic math. One murder does not equal to eternal torture. Mass murder somehow does equal to heaven, if said murderer accepts Jesus and asks for forgiveness 5 seconds before he dies, amirite? 

But if there were free will, I don't know what a man like Stalin would deserve. But in my view, not eternal torture. And even less so, since there is most likely no free will. And if there is, it's not even close to unlimited. Since we have enough cases of brain-tumors literally making people extremely violent and leading to murder. So yeah. The game is rigged, religious.   
God gives you a brain tumor, which leads to you murdering you family and yourself, which are both sins, and continues to send you to hell for his action. What a goof. 

And on top of that, Stalin didn't cause all the suffering himself. So what's with the people executing his will? How do you divide it up? To what amount does it go on Stalin's bank of caused suffering? How much is it the fault of the people executing his will? We could try to be precise about this, but it's obvious that it doesn't matter for my point too much. Because either way, it will never equal eternity. Never.   


If there were a single being that deserves hell, it would be the god of scripture.   
And just to clarify my first statement. I am an agnostic atheist. But if there were a god, it would be far off from the god presented in scripture. That's why I'm a agnostic atheist when it comes to a creator, or higher being, but not agnostic when it comes to scripture.
gpt
You're simply putting words in god's mouth. You - absolutely, beyond a doubt - do not get to decide what someone "deserves".  The seriousness of a sin and whether you are forgiven or not is the determination of god, not you.

To accept the envelope for your argument that is god's existence, but then reject the information that sits right next to the source of one's ideas of gods doesn't make much sense. You're not supposed to _agree_ with god, you're supposed to accept him and what he tells you.  In this context, you DO deserve hell if you commit sin and don't repent _because that is what god says_.  Can't take one without the other.