system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
How Nietzsche reconcile his denial of Free Will with the Overman?

Nietzsche reject the concept of Free Will completely.But how can all people create new values transvaluing all existing ones if there is no Free Will.I think that the result of those 2 beliefs is Nietzsche's affinity for hierarchy.Some possess a strong will to power capable for the project of Overman some are not(the slave mentality).
gpt
Nietzsche's statements about the will are not all compatible with each other as he explored different views at different times. In *The Gay Science,* Nietzsche is more open to a kind of free will in which people can shape their own character and choose how they respond to the themselves and the world even though they are limited in certain ways by who they are. A theme in *The Gay Science* is that individuals can and should re-evaluate values. Nietzsche wrote *Zarathustra* directly after *The Gay Science* (in fact, the last passage of *The Gay Science* was the first passage of *Zarathustra* until book V was added to *The Gay Science* a few years later). The concept of the Overman is not featured in Nietzsche's writing after *Zarathustra*, so the timing of when Nietzsche wrote *Zarathustra* is part of the answer.  Another often overlooked detail is that Nietzsche's concept of the Overman seems to be presented as an ideal in the way that other unreal characters like Achilles and Athena are ideals for how to live and what to value.  This first mention of overmen is in *The Gay Science #143.* In that passage, Nietzsche includes the idea of overmen among gods, heroes, and other *unreal characters* mankind has created as a way to explore and advocate for different ways of being: how to live, what to value, and so forth. This indicates that Nietzsche's own concept of The Overman is a way to explore and advocate for an alternative way of being while not suggesting that such a figure is actually possible. In *Zarathustra*, Nietzsche appropriates the quasi-historical figure of Zarathustra, who he considers the original preacher of good and evil, to now be a prophet for his Overman. So, it seems Nietzsche was writing a fantastical story that appropriates earlier stories to provide a new example of an ideal figure, just as the Greeks put forward the figures of Achilles, Athena, Aphrodite and others, and the Jews put forward Abraham, Moses, Jesus and others.