system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Ending friendships or relationships over politics is healthy

I hear a common refrain that it is inherently bad to live in an "echo chamber" and that we should therefore befriend people from multiple political points of view. I disagree. When I think of friendships and relationships, I'm looking for a respite where I get to hang out with people who make me happy and whose company I enjoy. If I want to debate politics, I'll join a debate club (or look at this subreddit), but I do not expect, nor want, this quality in friends. Ending relationships over politics does not automatically mean one is in an echo chamber or that one is unopen to listening to other perspectives. It simply means you are curating your social circle and maximizing the quality of your friendships and relationships, so that your social circle is more compatible and less combative.

 It should be considered a healthy practice that we nurture the relationships and friendships that give us comfort and joy, and let go of the ones that cause friction and hostility. I am not saying this is the solution for every person, but rather it should be seen as a generally good thing if people do decide to end relationships over contentious issues, such as politics.
gpt
There might be a difference between what is “healthy” and what is “euphoric” (makes you happy).

Some healthy things are a bit bitter or painful.

For hypothetical example, if your community of friends is all incels (or some other “bad” demographic of people), you might not want to leave your friend circle. Your friend circle is safe and makes you feel happy/good about yourself.

However, if you were like 16 years old or generally a young kid/teen (or anyone with prospects for a better future), maybe it would be healthy to broaden your horizons a bit more and to leave your comfort zone.