system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I recently learned that Panpsychism is seeing a renaissance of sorts among some philosophers. What makes this view attractive?

It's really interesting and fun to think about, but it also seems a little strange at the same time. It makes sense that individual minds could exist due to 'mind' being a fundamental property of the universe, but at the same time, most of existence (a star, chair, a tree, a cup of coffee) doesn't seem to have any properties we would associate with 'mind'.

I'm probably completely misinterpreting this, of course.
gpt
> What makes this view attractive?

First, a situation where physicalism had become popular. Then, the spreading opinion that the traditional ways of reconciling what we want to say about mental states to physicalism are untenable.