system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: There is no system of government that is impervious to corruption and abuse of power

If you’re in a monarchy, dictatorship, or other system that entrusts most or all decisions to one person, you rely on that person’s morality and leadership ability to keep your human rights safe.  If the king is a good dude, this works, but if not you have an all powerful asshole at the helm.

The converse then is democratic forms of government.  Things might be better because you can vote an asshole out, but mob rule leads to things like the legislation of fear and possibly systemic exploitation of minorities (the southern us states pre civil war is an example).

Now regardless of what ethnic, economic, religious, or other principles a nation is founded on, its government is either elected or permanent.  It might be possible to clean things up and move closer to an open, uncorrupted system, but my conjecture is that no system can or should be expected to be the perfect one.
gpt
You could have a system of government that operated entirely by chance, based on the roll of a pair of dice by a randomly-selected robot. The twelve choices that the dice select from would be selected based on a randomly-selected child (under the age of 12) throwing a dart repeatedly at a board with thousands of policy options pinned to it. The options would be written in a language the child can't read.

So, this would make policy selection pretty impervious to corruption. But it's plainly batshit.