system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Tweets denouncing Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner for winning the Bravest Person award only serve to show why she won it

Okay, so my main basis of thinking here is that s/he won the award,  for "coming out" as a transgender person, then underwent the surgery to complete this transformation. The reason this is significance is because there is a lot of transphobia in today's culture, and to announce something like this from a person of his/her societal stature took a lot of courage. The fact that people are mad that she won this award only contribute to the proof of prevalent transphobia. 

This is my view, and my twitter feed seems split between she deserved/did not deserve the award. So far I'm on the side of her deserving it, open to anything that can change my mind tho.
Edit: The award is called the  Arthur Ashe Courage Award, but everybody else I've seen refers to it as the "bravery award" and so that's what I went with.
gpt
If people criticizing her victory only further reinforce her worthiness in your view, and presumably her supporters don't *harm* her perceived worthiness, is there any conceivable argument or set of facts which could convince you that she is not worthy?

I ask because claiming to hold a proposition to be unfalsifiable (which you appear to be tending towards, whether you are aware of it or not) is not an encouraging sign for your epistemological health.