system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Ignorance masqueraded as intelligence is best exemplified by those who falsely equate Communism with Nazism presenting them as flip sides of totalitarianism.

Nazism whose central doctrine is the primacy of one group over another. Communism in its Marxist–Leninist persuasion seek to resolve class conflicts through a violent revolution against the Capitalist ruling class and dissolve class conflict through the equal distribution of resources by a dictatorship of the proletariat. 

First off, let me acknowledge both as terrible ideas. But they are fundamentally different. Nazism is by nature exclusive, if you are not born to a certain race and do not possess certain qualities that comes with birth, you are automatically placed on the antagonistic position. Communism as an end state seeks to embrace everyone, its group are structured by economic classification, stripping away that, it is an intellectual position that you can choose or choose not be a part of. 

There are other type of Communism, libertarian communism, anarcho communism possess none of the genetics of totalitarianism. Yet all forms of Nazism promote a combative and antagonistic politics where a Group member is to serve the Group by destroying or subjugating those who are not a part of the Group

One seeks to make exclusion a norm, the other seeks to make inclusion as a norm. The difference is fundamental, any attempt at equating the two doctrine is simply absurd.
gpt
The problem with your argument is every communist state that has ever actually existed in the world has been totalitarian. Marx may have written about a certain playbook for a communist state but it has never been used and we have only received communist dictators. Additionally, saying “that’s not true communism” is not an argument because that is all we got. If you want to say Marxism and Fascism are different fine but communism and fascism are the same in practice.