system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Anarchism is a system that cannot work.

I understand that anarchism/anarchy is not necessarily ending in a ruleless wasteland but anarchists have told me they wanted to get rid of money in general (which I think is a perfect means of facilitating exchange) and draw no boundaries anywhere (which I believe won't last very long unless you manipulate people) and that, in an anarchist worldwide direct democracy, the people's interest might be very badly represented.  (Such that a law lots of Americans, Indians and Chinese people find great but Europeans might not), I also think a state is needed to facilitate things such as healthcare, infrastructure, regulations and whatnot. (Sorry for unprofessional wording)

______
gpt
I'd like to point out that political anarchism is a really broad subject with many different facets but the one underlying theme is that no political entity has any legitimate authority.

This does not mean that no political entities can exist, or that they're necessarily bad, just that they lack they don't have a monopoly on legitimate violence.

So you can be a political anarchist and still want to have public infrastructure and safety nets, you just have to make it all voluntary.