system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: I believe determinism should be the dominant philosophy and objections to such are simply due to lack of human understanding even with mounting evidence.

This has been posted before and is a fairly common topic. People typically make objections such as quantum mechanics. Now quantum mechanics simply bring up that we can't predict the location and momentum of a particle. But scientists such as Einstein object with that we are simply ignorant of hidden variables. It i only fairly recent in history that we could use physics to predict anything at all. We just started understanding genetics recently and it is hard to imagine the brain isn't the next frontier. I'm not even sure I'll object to the idea that we can't predict everything. But I do feel confident in saying that every year we are understanding the universe more and creeping toward determinism and away from the concept of randomness and free will. In a poor mathematical analogy: the limit is approaching complete determinism, while it may never reach it. 

Simply put: Every year we are moving further away from true randomness and free will. Why not believe the trend will continue indefinitely?
gpt
If hidden variable theory has no more predictive power than nondeterminism, on what basis do you suggest that we are moving away from nondeterminism? What is this mounting evidence that suggests hidden variables exist or that nondeterminism is false?