system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Ronda Rousey should not be compared to Mike Tyson, a “prime Roy Jones Jr.” or even male MMA fighters.

While Ronda has been destroying every opponent insane enough to stand in front of her (11-0 MMA, 5-0 UFC), and is an incredible athlete, she hasn’t fought even close to the calibre of athlete that Mike Tyson, Roy Jones or many male MMA fighters face. The talent pools are simply deeper and more developed in men’s combat athletics than in women’s.

Men’s MMA has enjoyed a larger platform, with further global reach than women’s MMA and combat sport in general, aside from perhaps judo and kickboxing. The money, marketing and talent search has consistently been wider and farther-looking.

Furthermore, and perhaps ironically, because of this “smaller-pond” scenario, no one has tested Ronda in a manner that can be compared to some of the wars the other side has been through. We can’t truly assess her “grit”.
gpt
Myke tyson was great because as a heavyweight, he beat up any other heavyweight by a wide margin. Dominated his competition.

Ronda Rousey has fought her strongest peers and opponents and stands out.

who would she need to fight for you to feel we have a fair comparison?

you cant blame her there is no competition, but shes fought anyone at the top of her sport no?