system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: There needs to be more transparency regarding the use of artificial intelligence in court sentences

There is little to no regulation to how artificial intelligence can be used in determining sentences for criminals in the US. Currently, some judges have been using algorithms created by 3rd party companies that show criminals “risk level” of committing future crimes to help determine the proper sentence. However, there is little transparency about how these algorithms are made and their potential bias against certain groups. No one gets the see the full algorithm except the company who created it, not even the judge. While I’m not accusing any company of being intentionally biased, these algorithms have the power to exaggerate the current racial bias in the court system. If the full algorithm can be reviewed and be proven not to be unbiased, it would be a lot fairer compared to now, where the lack of transparency is potentially biased against minorities.
gpt
>Currently, some judges have been using algorithms created by 3rd party companies that show criminals “risk level” of committing future crimes to help determine the proper sentence.

That's remarkable. Could you link to some sources explaining what these algorithms are and how they're used?