system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I don't believe taking a human life is inherently wrong. CMV

I bring this up because I recently got into a debate with someone on reddit about the moral justifications of taking a human life. He argued that killing another human is never morally justifiable, no matter the reason. However, I lost interest when he started talking about killing being ok if robots do it. I believe that killing another person is completely justifiable and "right" if killing that person saves other innocent people. If a man is holding a detonator rigged to blow up a building with 1000 people in it, and the only way to stop him is to kill him, I see nothing wrong about taking his life. If a man is about to take one innocent human life and I could stop him by killing him, I see nothing wrong with that. So please, show me the other side and CMV.
gpt
I think your problem stems from the fact that you justify murder by preventing another murder or murders. Both are wrong, but one seems to be outweighed by saving another life. Therefore, a more morally coherent approach would be that killing, while always evil, is sometimes necessary or preferable. 

A necessary evil, however, is evil nonetheless.