system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
What are arguments against the school of Relativism?

Do no objective truths exist at all? Or are some objective and some are relative? Relativism seems like the most likely school of thought that most people go with but what are arguments against Relativism?
gpt
American Pragmatism offers a theory called Objective Relativism, which kinda splits the difference between strict Objective Truth and pants-on-head Relativism.  Objective Relativism is the theory that truths are objectively true relative to specific contexts.

For example, baking directions.

The question "What is the objectively true temperature at which to bake a cake?" is not answerable.  This because baking is subject to considerations of altitudes.  The *same cake* must be baked at different temperatures, depending on the altitude.

* At sea level, bake a cake at 350.

* At altitudes over 3,000 feet, bake a cake at 375.

For your purposes, this can be an argument against both Relativism and Objective Truth theories.  This is not Relativism, since there are definite answers.  And also this is not Objective Truth, because the answers depend on context.

There is a correct temperature at which to bake your cake.  But the correct temperature depends on a few factors.