system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Is Sagan Wrong?

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." 

I recently read that this is flawed, but I'm not sure how. I'm thinking that the main issue here is that "Sagan's Razor" is only semantically true, but not necessarily logically. It seems contextual. Feedback?
gpt
It is not clear what Sagan means by extraordinary . He is probably critisizing  unscientific explanations to understand how things work . But it can be risky to dismiss some claims just because it doesn't fit current paradigmas .