system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Why do some Nationalized airlines do outstanding (Emirates) While others offer a subpar experience to private and bleed money (Air India)? And other confusions regarding airlines.

I read Air India used to be pretty good before it was nationalized and started needing massive subsidies to get by. Nowadays it is one of the worst airlines. This gave me the impression that privatized airlines would do much better than Nationalized ones, yet Emirates is massively profitable and an incredible experience and is actually Nationalized. Adding to my confusion, Etihad is a nationalized airline which was also a luxurious experience, yet they financially do terrible! Plus, there are plenty of private airlines that also offer mediocre experiences and are sometimes unprofitable. So what gives? Could someone explain what is going on, and if privatization is better for airlines, or nationalization?
gpt
Believe it or not, whether or not a company is private is not the only factor which determines how well it is run :p

I would guess (having done no research) that they are run vastly differently at every level of management. 

 Your question is logically equivalent to: "why is the North Korean military so different than the American military when they are both owned by the government?"