system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: News Sites Should Be Banned From Using Clickbait Headlines

Very simply, it's annoying reading a headline that overstates or clickbait's its reader into reading an honestly boring or mundane story. In a perfect world, a news headline would work like a name for a thesis paper; a rough amalgamation of all the important details. If you're writing a paper about some new climate change research, have the research company in the name, and a summarization of their findings. For example: Climate-Initiative has recorded a new world-record temp. of 140 Degrees in Death Valley. Boom. If you want to know more about how they recorded the temperature or death valley's history with high temps, you read the article.   


The only issue I see with this is that, at least in the U.S., due to the first amendment, you would have to be very tricky in how you handle it.
gpt
>you would have to be very tricky in how you handle it.

This is the main issue. How do you differentiate between "clickbait" and not clickbait? You'd need some sort of mechanism for deciding this which would inevitably be abused. Alternatively, you could use our current legal system, but that would take a lot of time and energy to manage.