system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I believe agnosticism is the most intelligent position to "believe" on the religion/atheism spectrum CMV

My view sits on a foundation of logic like this:

1. Atheism: The way science goes about disproving something is by finding evidence to the contrary. Many religions can be put down through evidence pointing otherwise but some cannot as of yet. Since all religious claims cannot be refuted it's respectful to the scientific method to not completely denounce religions plausibility.

2.Religion: There is no definitive proof of a God or supernatural force acting on the universe anywhere (no, m-theory doesn't count). That being said, faith is what allows people to hold religious beliefs. I think these people aren't being responsible to themselves because faith simply is a delusion.

Those points being stated I think holding a position of admitted ignorance is both respectful to the possibility that faith is necessary in life and the notion that delusions are not a great thing to incorporate all over your life. CMV.
gpt
A very, *very* tiny minority of atheists actually think that god is disprovable. 

Agnosticism is not typically considered as a position on the same axis as athism/theism. In fact, there is no spectrum there, it's a binary choice. A theist is someone who believes in at least one god. If that statement does not apply to you, you are without theism, or an atheist. That's literally what atheist means, the prefix a- means 'without'. 

Gnosticism/agnosticism is a statement about whether or not you believe the existence of god is provable. There are people out there who believe in god, and furthermore believe that his existence can be proven true. They would be gnostic theists. Then there are people who belief in god, but acknowledge that they can not prove this belief, they are agnostic theists. Most atheists are agnostic atheists, who don't believe in god, and who believe that proving his non-existence is impossible.