system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Conservatives are hypocritical for espousing and coveting wealth creation, yet willing ignore those views when passing family wealth down to their children through inheritance

Isn't it a bit much to get all up on your high horse about all the jobs you've created, all the value you've brought to the economy, all how you deserve everything you've worked so hard for, but then turn around and say your kids deserve it all, yes ALL OF IT, despite them having done nothing for anyone else and simply just being born into the family?

You can look at families like the Buffet/Gates and see how they have taught their children responsibility in finances, and limited their access to the families wealth, but I am of the opinion that of the great family wealths, these are the minority and ultimately we shouldn't rely on the ultra-rich to be so altruistic. 

Please help me understand the other side of the argument. 

EDIT: Thanks guys for helping my understand the flaw in my argument.
gpt
It isn't hypocritical at all.  When people defend wealth creation, they are not only defending the creation of the wealth in the first place, but the ability of the creator to determine what is done with that wealth.  That is why they tend to oppose excessive taxation - they feel that they earned the money, so the government has no right to order how that money must be spent.

Their stance on inheritance is perfectly in line with that - they feel that it is their money so they should get to decide where it goes after they die.  If they want to leave it to charity, their children or just light it on fire in the backyard, that is their prerogative because it is their money.

Now, you can _disagree_ with that stance, but it is internally consistent.