system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Libertarianism is a flawed ideology because it oversimplifies the nature of human social interactions.
gpt
You are coming to this conclusion based on the bizarre rantings of a small subset of libertarians that are popular on the internet. 

There are several flaws with your reasoning. 

There is no "grand unified theory" of libertarian thought. A *lot* of discussion goes on about what does or doesn't constitute "aggression". A lot of discussion goes on about what is or is not a necessary component of government. 

But your view that libertarianism ignores the messy "patchwork of evolutionary hacks, emergent properties, and game theoretical quirks" that makes up human social life is perhaps the *most* bizarre. 

Libertarians completely understand and accept this idea. Indeed, it is statists that seem to want to reduce all human social life to a grand unified theory, because government is exactly that grand unified theory. One monopoly on force that provides one answer to the messy world of human interactions. 

Libertarians want to *let* people get on with their messy "patchwork of evolutionary hacks, emergent properties, and game theoretical quirks" without any more interference from government than is absolutely necessary to minimize the aggression inherent in that messy patchwork. 

No one can figure that out well enough to "control it" without massively infringing on the rights of individuals in order to promote the collective idea of what is proper behavior. Any time they try, it turns into a disaster.