system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Do i have morał obligation to defend my country even if I have no land/property, no family, being unemployed or working minimal wage ?
gpt
I can really only speak for traditions like poststructuralism and critical theory but, in essence, most theorists were, are, and would be skeptical concerning such a moral obligation, especially if the country is a hegemonic power. Instead, the analysis would most likely take place at how a country use particular discourses or means to create narratives such that people develop a sense of nationalism and a desire to 'protect' their country. 

It should be noted that for a country like the US, the vast majority of theoreticians are also skeptical about what such 'protection' looks like. Was the invasion of Vietnam really about protecting the world from the rise of communism or was the invasion of Iraq really about fighting a 'war on terror'? These sorts of questions would, in most cases, undermine moral obligations because inquiry into them reveals a dark history, one that is not consistent with the usual narratives of spreading democracy and freedom. Instead, you might even end up in a position where you feel a moral obligation to act *against* the US, in whatever that capacity might be (ideally through protests and political activism).