system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Does living on the faster moving equator cause differences in longevity from living at the poles?

I appreciate that the earth takes a day to rotate at the equator, and a day to rotate at the poles. Therefore, because the circumference of the equator is bigger, it is moving faster.

Ignoring environmental factors, if we had two lifeforms or devices with a guaranteed identical lifetime, how would having one at a pole and one on the equator cause a difference in duration of life?

Go physics go!

Thanks.

EDIT: Great responses, thanks, and I'm glad I've generated a little discussion. I'd weigh in but I have just enough science in me to understand but not express!
gpt
If the diameter of earth is 12,742 km, then everyday, a person on the equator moves 12,742 km x pi more than someone on the pole. This equals v = 463.3 m/s. According to the time dilation formula, t = t_0 / sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2). Thus, you're increased time would be around 1.19 x 10^-10 %. Or, if you lived 100 years, you would see an increased lifespan of just under 4 milliseconds.