system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Lawful Evil is better than Chaotic Good for the average person

Lawful Evil is better than Chaotic Good. Lawful Evil will stay in it's own lane, for more or less, and has clearly defined objectives and goals. Agreements, compromises, and working solutions are all acceptable and minimize the total damage and disruption. Chaotic Good on the other hand oftentimes rushes into situations thinking of their own misapplied, self-righteous principles and ignores the actual material reality of the situation. Chaotic Good more often than not just results in, leaving a broken mess behind them while celebrating that they freed the city (just ignore the burnt granaries that mean thousands more are gonna die of famine). Lawfulness means that people have dependability and can be assured some standard of survival. Chaotic Good oftentimes takes short-sighted steps and hopes that something later on will be better. More often than not, Chaotic Good actions simply lead to worse results in the long run.
gpt
Lawful Evil is bad for innovation. It's a recipe for stagnation. If you want LE, then it's a roadmap for social regression back to "might makes right." It's the simplest form of what we now know as conservatism: backward-looking, unchanging, unadaptable, and fearful. 

CG are the gamblers, and when they hit, they hit *big.* More often than not, CG stumbles or fails, but given enough success, it becomes what LE aspires to but cannot achieve on its own: prosperity, safety, novelty, competition, and resilience.