system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Question about moral intuitions

So it seems to me that a lot of moral philosophy relies on our intuitions about what's right and wrong. In fact, a lot of thought experiments are specifically made to tease out what are intuitions are in various circumstances. 

But does this not make two assumptions:

1) that we already know what is and isn't moral, on a fundamental level,

And 

2) that our intuitions are good. 

The second point is especially interesting to me, because in every other discussion one is likely to immediately get beaten over the head with the naturalistic fallacy. Natural does not mean good. Ok, so why are our (presumably natural) moral intuitions any good?
gpt
I think you’re equivocating.

Natural does not entail goodness, in the sense of mora correctness, where moral correctness means something like, always fulfilling your moral duties.

But, when we ask if moral intuitions are good, we don’t mean whether they fulfill their moral duties, but whether they are correct: do they reflect the miso facts accurately.