system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: A millionaire is less likely than a billionaire to suck a dick for $1 trillion

This is based on a debate between my gf and myself. 

We were discussing how many people would refuse to suck a dick for any amount of money whatsoever, and both agreed that the percentage is probably pretty low, probably single digits. I know we both would for the right price, and we both would encourage the other to do so for the right price as well, and we're reasonably well-off. The disagreement comes from the fact that I believe that a billionaire is more likely to suck a dick for a trillion dollars than a millionaire is, and she disagrees. I might do a poor job of representing her arguments, but the crux of it is that Jeff Bezos, for instance, has way more 'fuck you money', and therefore has less need to suck a dick for a trillion dollars compared to somebody who 'only' has $5 million in the bank.

This does make some objective sense from a purely mathematical standpoint, but my counterpoint was that a millionaire is rich and has more than enough, but a billionaire is rich, has more than enough, and also quite possibly fundamentally doesn't understand the concept of 'enough', making them more likely to suck a dick for a huge increase in their wealth. Many millionaires probably fall under this definition too and would suck the dick without hesitation, but the fact is that many upper middle class people who planned well for retirement and are currently in their 70s, living off their retirement savings, while technically millionaires, aren't necessarily cut from the same cloth as billionaire types. Someone with $5 million in the bank has enough, and is possibly even aware of the fact that they have enough, although possibly not. Once someone has hit the point of being worth $1 billion though, they almost by definition either don't understand the concept of 'having enough' or quite simply find the idea to be irrelevant. Anyone with over a billion dollars is already at the point where a 50% or even 90% decrease in their net worth would make zero impact on their day to day quality of life. 

To Bezos, every billion after the first doesn't provide any sort of benefit besides status. He has the most billions, and having the most is the only value that they provide to him directly at this point. So if Bezos, worth a bit over $100 billion, was given the chance to increase his net worth by a factor of ten simply by sucking one dick, I don't think he'd hesitate to do it. Assuming that no one else was given the same offer, it would practically ensure that he remains the richest man in the world for the remainder of his life, which is unlikely otherwise.

My argument is that there would be more internal debate among the 1% than among the 0.0001% when it comes to sucking the dick. I think millionaires would probably 50-50 suck the dick for a trillion dollars, whereas poor people, middle-class people, and billionaires would almost universally suck the trillion dollar dick. I realize this is somewhat of a silly question, but quarantine has fucked with our brains to the point where it feels very serious, and I'm hoping for some good discussion on this issue to help with some of the stir craziness. Looking forward to reading input and throwing out deltas.

EDIT:
Some posters have reasonably asked for some clarification about the source of the trillion dollars, so I guess for the purpose of this conversation it could be helpful to specify that the offerer of the trillion dollars is a genie who can magically create it, and will do so only after getting a blowie from the recipient. Nobody else would get the offer if it's refused; everything would simply stay the same if the genie's dick remains unsucked.

EDIT 2:
For some more clarification, I'll consider a comment delta-worthy if it presents a moderately convincing argument, based on sociology or psychology or some other hard or soft science, that a billionaire would not be significantly *more* likely than a millionaire to partake. It's obviously an absurd hypothetical, so I'm not expecting hard sources and formal logic, just something moderately convincing enough to the point where I at least become a bit uncertain in my view, even if it isn't fully changed.
gpt
A million dollars isn't 'more than enough'. It's a middle class retirement fund.

I think the top handful of billionaires are more likely than other billionaires.  Just because they don't want someone else to get it.

The rest of the billionaires really do have enough.