system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Is Deleuze's metaphysics the metaphysics of modern science?

In the SEP article on Deleuze, they quote him as saying "Bergson says that modern science hasn’t found its metaphysics, the metaphysics it would need. It is this metaphysics that interests me." And that made me wonder if he succeeded. Does Deleuze have a metaphysics for modern science? Would his writing make sense to a person with a more scientific background/mindset? Granted they put in the work to read and understand him.
gpt
It's arguable whether or not Deleuze supplies *the* philosophy for modern science (can there be such a thing?), but he certainly made a good attempt to supply *a* philosophy for it. Deleuze was particularly inspired by complex systems science (through the work of Ilya Prigogine in particular) and was definitely inspired to think in terms of thresholds, populations, gradients, bifurcations, non-linearity and the like, a vocabulary which tracks very closely alot of the broad developments in modern science. 

Manuel DeLanda is probably the philosopher whose best tried to bring Deleuze and modern science together, and his groundbreaking book *Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy* shows just how much both can be - and are - in communication with one another. John Protevi is another scholar who has done alot of work in bringing out the scientific aspects of Deleuze's thinking, particularly his *Life, War, Earth*, which is another fantastic book.