system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Contraception such as a drug eluting implant should be mandatory until say.. 21 and there is no cases where teenage pregnancy is a good thing

I cannot see any cases where teenage pregnancy is a good situation or certainly where it wouldn't be better for the parent to be a few years older.
In terms of lost opportunity for social, educational and professional development having a child when very young, is never the best situation.

Surely having better established parents would reduce poverty, welfare reliance and the likelihood of  single paternity?
Therefore the logical step of mandatory contraception sounds like the best option.
Let's say a drug eluting implant for both boys and girls. And for the sake of clean argument let's say the medicine is 100% safe and effective.
gpt
In a perfect world where some hypothetical unisex implantable non-hormonal side-effect-free reversible no-cost contraceptive device exists, maybe, but I'd argue that you can't force an adult to undergo medical care when they are mentally competent. How do you propose we rewrite the laws on consent for medical procedures for adults without setting a precedent that opens the door for serious ethical violations of an adult's bodily autonomy?