system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: There is nothing wrong with using the word "normal" when describing those who for within societal averages as long as it's not used to judge those outside those parameters

Here's a couple of examples of what I'm taking about. I have a friend who is genderfluid and they posted in their Facebook the other day a post explaining the term cis as in cisgender. The post ended with "sorry not sorry cisgendered people you can't call yourself normal".

I watched a video on YouTube made by a high functioning autistic girl who spoke of those without autism as neurotypical and criticized the use of the world normal to refer to those without autism. 

The dictionary definition of normal is "conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected."  Considering that we determine what is usual or expected based on what we experience the majority of the time it is not wrong to call cisgendered or non autistic people normal as the majority of people are. The only time I see this as wrong as if people use normal to equate with goodness.  In other words, if people say that because trans aren't normal they're wrong or bad. But I think that regardless of using the word normal or cisgendered those that would marginalize others would do so regardless of the term. 

Am I wrong, is normal intrinsically a bad term for people to use?
gpt
> The dictionary definition of normal is "conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected." Considering that we determine what is usual or expected based on what we experience the majority of the time 

That's already a crude and self-serving simplification of the dictionary definition. Police officers are about as common as transgender people, but you wouldn't go around calling them abnormal. You wouldn't start a story with "Three guys walked into a bad, one of them was a police officer, the other two were normal...". 

That's because police even if officers might be a minority, but their existence is part of our norms, they conform to our society's standards.

Which is a key part of the definition. Conforming to a standard isn't just about mathematical majority, it is inherently tied to moral statments on what our standards of expected behavior and identity are.  

Eyeglass wearers are normal, drug addicts are not. Jewish people are normal, school shooters are not. Opera fans are normal, Snuff film fans are not. 

This isn't just some obscure example of the word being used in a mean way, it is inherently tied to it's definiton. Things are called abnormal, when they deviate from our expectations of how our world *ought to* look like.