system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
In a democracy all parties should have the same funds and prefab, standardized election campaigns, CMV

It seems to me that already big parties have an unfair advantage in that their financial means enable them to produce election campagns of much higher quality and quantity compared to smaller parties. Therefore, I believe there should be templates for election posters, election video ads and websites for the approved parties in which they can fill-in their statements and views. Also the count of screenings of the ads and reproduction of the posters should be the same for each party.

Basically, the election compaigns should all look the same (except, of course, for the party emblem): no colors, no illustrations, a uniform fontface, uniform photos of the candidates and only grey or black text in standardized sizes.
gpt
Would you also ban PACs (political action corporations) from existing?  Because PACs form a lot of political ads.  PACs cannot be in any way connected to the candidates themselves, so the candidates have no control over them.  Would you ban PACs?  Or would you ban them from creating ads?  Under your system, Candidate A can't make an attack ad about Candidate B, and vice versa.  But what's to stop a PAC named something like "American Americans for America's American Americanness" from making an attack ad saying that Candidate A eats babies?  Can "Making A Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow" say that Candidate B slept with prostitutes?  Until you force all bodies capable of making campaign ads to adhere to your standards, campaigns will remain pretty much the same.