system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Can we consider Carl Jung a philosopher, especially on his work on the Archetypes (eg, Imago Dei)? He also critiziced certain pillosophers ideas quite often, such as Nietzsche for example.
gpt
Well people, including Jung himself in a letter to Heinrich Boltze, consider Carl Jung's concepts and contributions to be psychological rather than philosophical. While maybe there's a good question about what any strict difference between those would be and whether Jung's work in psychology relates to philosophy in the broadest sense in any way that overlaps or blurs the distinction at the edges, it's not like Jung was making a particularly philosophical case, or at least recognizably philosophical case, for concepts like archetypes to be *more* than psychological, e.g. transcendental truths or something like that. 

I'd suspect that considering Carl Jung a philosopher would more disadvantage and jeopardize the grounds for the concepts we know him for. Jung considered his analytic psychology to be an empirical science, and I'd expect that he described it as such in order to contrast it with philosophy.