system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Diversity efforts are discriminatory in nature, therefore unconstitutional, and not the best course of action.

All current diversity efforts that I have seen are extremely discriminatory in nature. The quotas (a certain percentage of employees have to be of a minority or female) are the most obvious since they potentially require you to bypass better employees based on race to meet a quota. 

I am sure there are diversity efforts that make more sense that don't discriminate but I am not finding any.  

I do believe diversity of BACKGROUND matters for company success, having a wider world view can help you reach more. Again, I don't know how you can implement this without discrimination. One way I can see handling this if a team is large enough and background really would make a difference is having background specific positions. Say it's an advertisement team; hire a rural, urban, male. female and so on for team members.
gpt
Depends on the constitution. Section 15 of the Candian Charter of Human Rights has an exception clause  build in:


>*15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.*

>*(2) Section (1) __does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups__ including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.*