system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[Star Wars] How is the Jedi's use of clones as soldiers morally justifiable?

How can the Jedi make any claim to moral superiority when they use clones in warfare? 

Not only are they clones, but they have been tampered with in order to render them more complacent and obedient and to ensure that they happily march into the Separatist meat grinder. 

Furthermore, the clones clearly demonstrate individuality, personality, and independent motives and desires. Yoda even went so far as to clearly state that clones each have a distinct presence in the Force, thereby proving from a Jedi's perspective that the clones are more than flesh-and-blood robots; they are individual beings.

Frankly, the use of clones, as well as the forced conscription and indoctrination of child soldiers for their cause, leaves the Jedi with very little moral legitimacy. The use of clones in warfare clearly demonstrates that the Jedi and the Republic as a whole are perfectly content to create a second-tier citizenry that exist only to fight and die without choice so that the galactic status quo can be upheld. 

I think it's time for a change.

(Working my way through the Clone Wars series on Netflix. Deep into Season 2 right now -- what a fantastic series!)
gpt
The Republic is under attack by a secessionist government whose leader is a known rogue Force-user. The Separatists also have an expendable army that outnumbers the few standing forces the Republic has on hand and the entire Jedi Order. Desperate times call for desperate measures. The clone army discovered on Kamino is a boon to the Republican cause. It may not be morally justifiable, but allowing a known dark-side force user to take over the Republic is even worse.