system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: An actor's personal life does not change how I watch their movies.

Let's use the Amber Heard v Johnny Depp case going on as an example;

I could care less about what either of them have done in their personal lives. Whether they are perpetrators in domestic abuse/violence, whether they do drugs, have humiliated themselves in public, or in a worst case scenario, even killed someone.

This applies to any actor, no matter what has happened in their personal lives that society looks down upon, I'm not watching a movie to care so much about the actor as much as I am watching a movie for the sake of the movie.

Also for the record, I don't think Amber Heard should have been removed from Aquaman 2.
gpt
So you are just arguing wherever you should be able to remove the artist from the art. 

Which its a valid points for both sides.

The other side to yours is that you should acknowledge you may be contributing to their fame and money - a life considerably better than most peoples. And they might use that fame and money to continue doing bad things. It doesn’t matter to them wherever you are seperating them or not, money comes unmarked in that sense and some does the power. 

Take Weinstein, he was only able to commit bad acts because of his power and money and for lots of people not caring because of that power and money.

Or James Franco, he was able to commit his sexual misconduct because if his influence. In part from money and in part from fame. 

You stopping watching and giving money is only a small unnoticable effect, but the point is when people suggest to stop they suggest a full boycott which would have an efect.