system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Most philosophers, historically and contemporary, seem to be critical of their (current) society and would prefer a move towards their ideal. Are there any philosophers who strongly advocate the status quo and discourage change?

I hope it's clear what I'm asking. Most philosophers' positions are arguably ideals. And most of those positions don't look exactly like our current way to organize society, our economic models, and what happens in politics.  But are there philosophers, who, for whatever reason, actually defend the status quo and strongly discourage change or progress? 

I'd be happy to hear answers in a wider sense, where the 'status-quo' could mean any nation on the planet (of course somebody who sees Sweden as close-to-ideal, doesn't truly defend "his" status-quo if he lives in the US, but that's fine). But I'm especially curious about philosophers who defend the status-quo of their society. For example, an US-American philosopher, saying that the US-American society+economic model is fine the way it is and discourages any change in either direction.
gpt
Kant, in realizing the potency that Humean skepticism would have on traditional notions of God, the soul, morality, etc. grounded on pure reason, i.e. reason unbounded by sense-experience, sought to re-establish justification for these views on practical reason. 

Kant, though, was also a principal philosopher of the Enlightenment and argued for constitutional republicanism in the waning days of absolute monarchism.