system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: A woodchuck cannot chuck any amount of wood, and to focus on the hypothetical amount possible is a waste of effort.

As conventional wisdom would tell you, "a woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if his dentures were any good," but I fail to see where it is relevant. It puts into question the ability of the woodchuck to chuck wood, which we have established from the question that it simply cannot. To turn around and claim that, "Well it could chuck everything it wanted to if it had better teeth," puts it into the person's mind that the woodchuck could chuck wood and is willing to do so we're it not at a biological and economic disadvantage as to not have proper dentures. Furthermore, this line of thought implies that it is a worthy effort to outfit woodchucks with the ability to chuck wood for the hypothetical benefit of chucked wood, regardless of the aptitude of the individual woodchucks at chucking wood and cost effectiveness of training and denture production. In my opinion, it would be far more effective to invest in an industrial based solution, which would more likely be more efficient and lucrative than woodchucks who formerly could not chuck wood. CMV?
gpt
You hold no truck with the woodchuck's chuck, but the question's not plumb luck.  By pluck and luck your mouth must muck with squirrely words awhirl.  What's learned is earned by churning muscles turned.