system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[House] Morally speaking who's the most good character?

House is out for obvious reasons. 

Wilson is a genuinely great guy with a few flaws.

Same goes for Cuddy (although she's arguably got more issues than Wilson).

Foreman's a sob.

Chase is just neutral; leaning good. Give him major props for killing that dictator. Sic semper and all that.

Cameron is good with a flawed reliance on emotion that means she often does bad in the name of good.

Taub isn't evil but he is a weasel.

Kutner is as nice as you can be and still interact with House.

Thirteen is a hedonist (but for understandable reasons) and other wise seems like a decent person.

CB; yeah she's a dick.

I'm saying Kutner; what do you guys think?
gpt
via the **Theory of Moral Value (Moral objectivism)** and the **Rational-Egoist Theory of Morality**, House is the most moral person, since he has the most objective value as a doctor, and recognises that value in himself, acting accordingly.  


via the **Pragmatic Moral Theory** (Moral Pragmatism/Consequentialism/Utilitarianism) House is also most likely the most moral person, since consequences of his actions saved the most lives (though it would take a difficult calculation to be certain of that).  


via **Deontological Theory of Morality** (Rules Based Morality) and **Social Contract Morality**, Wilson is the most moral one, since he is least likely to break social, legal and corporate rules he agreed to uphold.  


Via **Divine Command Theory of Morality** all of them are sinners one way or another, and none of them is good enough to qualify as a moral person.  


Via **Ethics of Care Theory of Morality,** again, probably Wilson, though after so many seasons, it is hard to say.  


  
In other words, if we were to divide the whole problem into two problems: **Moral Actions vs Moral Stance**, then House performs the most moral actions while Wilson has the best Moral Stance. Or to put it another way: House is a bad person who does good deeds for bad reasons, and these good deeds have good consequences. Wilson is a good person who does (usually ) good deeds that sometimes have bad consequences.  
The difference comes from the fact that House, regardless of his morality, is a much better doctor and a brilliant man, and thus can see the consequences of his actions several steps ahead, so even when he acts immorally (from Rules Based perspective) it is for the greater good in the end. Wilson is not so brilliant, so he acts morally NOW, on the problem at hand, even if it has bad consequences down the road.