system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
ELI5:Why do so many great MMA fighters have multiple losses on their record compared to boxers?

It seems to me that the truly great MMA fighters tend to have multiple/more losses on their records when compared to boxers, where the truly great ones tend to have none or one or two defeats only.
gpt
A couple of reasons:

1) MMA is more physically tolling on the body. Even in training, you get hit, get slammed and get submissions put on you. More parts of the body are involved so there are more places to get injured. You are pretty much safe below the belt in boxing and don't have to worry about falling unless you get knocked out. You have to worry about both of these things in MMA.

2) It depends on who you consider "a great" and when you consider them one. Anderson Silva didn't lose between 2007-2012. Fedor didn't truly lose from 2000-2009. GSP only lost twice from 2002-2013. Fedor's now lost multiple times, but it doesn't make his original run any less.

3) With UFC being the only real show in town right now and MMA matchups being booked by a company, and not individual promoters, it's hard to duck and dodge the best competition like boxers do. Boxers don't really have to face anyone they don't want as it's more on individual drawing power, while UFC is a full company. UFC will be around if say Rhonda Rousey leaves. Random boxing promoter may not be if his man leaves.

4) UFC and MMA have a lot less weight classes than boxing. There are 17 boxing weight classes right now. UFC has 8. That means the better talent is less spread out and you have a lesser chance of getting by on favorable matchups than skill.