system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: The Prequels are good

I will surface my post by explaining that as a whole I have no nostalgic biased influencing my enjoyment of the Prequels. I first watched the trilogy a few years back in 2016 and as one who's not the sentimental type have not formed a nostalgic bias. The Prequels in my OPINION are good movies that contain overall good story lines, (be it with a few plotholes much like the OT)  good acting, (done in a specific style) good action scenes, and suprisingly depth characters like Anakin Skywalker. (I'll explain why in the comments) They have a few course spots like a some clunky lines once in a while. However I believe this is over played and highly up to what you like in a script. To finish my explanation off I'll warn you that I strongly dislike the Plinkett reviews. To me they boil down to nothing but a strawman, nitpicking, ramblings of a bias critic. Much of his supposed "killer points" like the character personalies of characters in I or the politics of Episode III are simply wrong. (I'll explain more in the comments)  and anything having to do with a camera angle really doesn't affect the quality for me at all. 

Now I'll tell you why I want a good opposing argument. It's not that I want my view changed it's that I want a logical opposition to my opinion. Without further Ado fire away...
gpt
What movies would you consider "bad" and why?  (A complete list isn't necessary but a few examples would be useful)

Because if we don't know what you would consider a "bad" movie  it is hard to make a proper argument that the prequels might fall into that particular category....