system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
There is no such a thing as race within the species of Homo sapiens. CMV

Before I start I just want to say, I'll respond to everyone's comment, if your comments lacks logic or you're merely repeating what you've just said without taking in consideration what I just addressed, I will stop the conversation with you. I used to think CMV was a good place to have debates, but internet conversations quickly degenerate into shit. If needed, I will skype with any of you in order to 1 to 1 resolve any debate.

1. Anthropologists figured this one out a couple decades ago.

2. Yes that's right, we've been having conflicts over thousands of years for nothing.

3. I dont mean there are no physical/biological variation over our species, I mean the non-scholar traditional classification of race doesnt make sense, the scholarly classification is good for research, and they've found that the differences are not as huge as regular people think.

4. Indeed there are populations that share features and characteristics, but that's not anywhere close to what the traditional classification mean anyways.

5. Intelligence = no meaningful difference across any type of classification.

6. what everyone focus on is really primary outward traits (mainly skin color) and culture. Which first primary outward traits do not tell you anything meaningful really about the person, just as I can't tell anything meaningful about a tall person, just that person is tall, I cant tell if he or she has a higher chance of getting certain diseases, I cant tell if he or she has a higher life expectancy than the average of population, I cant tell anything, I certainly can't tell anything about behavior...

7. which gets me into this point, a huge portion of behavior is determined by culture and environment, which may have historical correlations, but never causation. Like traditionally, purple people are poor in the last 100 years, so when I see a poor purple person, he or she is a poor person. (Wow this is so meaningful I think I'm gonna go publish a paper on this.) This does not remotely mean purple people are in general poor, or lazy or whatever. (if you can link being poor to being lazy) At the very best you may be able to link being lazy with being poor, but I doubt you can link being lazy to being purple.

8. Most physical/biological anthropologists agree that race doesnt exist, and a huge portion of the ones that disagree are disagreeing on definition differences.

9. Just be completely clear tho, you take two "white" people, their differences features and physical characteristics are not less than if you were to compare those 2 "white" people to a "black person.

10. Fact is Homo sapient hasnt been in existence long enough, and the forces of evolution (drift, flow, mutation and selection) are greatly minimized due to the fact populations are not in isolation for huge chunks of time, that we fuck everyone, that there's no huge extinction event or something that would fuck up the math, etc.
gpt
Stop asking anthropologists about race, and start asking biologists. Your assertion that there are no differences between the races is, quite simply, flat out false. There are countless examples of different populations possessing different phenotypes. 

1.) A standard example taught in many intro classes is that of heterozygotes for sickle cell anemia having malarial resistances. Areas of the world (namely, parts of Africa) with heavy malaria infestations have higher rates of sickle cell alleles because being a heterozygote confers a selective advantage.

2.) Lactose intolerance has huge variances among populations, ranging from 5% in Northern Europeans to 90% in some Asian populations. Guess where more dairy is eaten? That's not a coincidence.

3.) Mitochondria from populations in northern latitudes are often less efficient than from populations in equatorial latitudes. Why? Because inefficiency leads to greater heat generation, which is important in the north. This has large implications in studying free radical biology and its relationship with the modern diet and lifestyle.

There are plenty more examples. To sum up, while we might like to talk about cultures being homogenous at the end of the day, when you look at populations on a genetic level, there are very definite differences. Two average "white" people will certainly be more similar than two average "black" people.