system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
What can be known with little or no evidence?

Some things, like math or "I think therefore I am", can be known a priori. Is there anything else? Is reasoning futile without good information. Why or why not?
gpt
Tautologies, e.g. "All bachelors are unmarried".


One need not consult experience to determine whether all bachelors are unmarried. Now of course -as one may object-  experience is required to understand the concepts "bachelor," "unmarried and so forth. However, the a priori/a posteriori distinction as employed by Kant refers not to the origins of the concepts but to the justification of the propositions. Once we have the concepts, experience is no longer necessary.