system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: A person's opinions should ALWAYS matter more than their demographics (i.e. their race, age, sexual orientation, gender, and religious identification)

You could say that a person's religious identification constitutes his/her opinions, but that isn't always the case.  A person could be BORN into a religion before he can generate opinions on his own.  Therefore, practicing a certain religion could be all that he knows and part of his identity.  Therefore, in some cases, a person's religious identification is something he/she can't always control!

However, that does not change the fact that a person's opinions\-\-something he/she HAS GOT control over\-\-should always matter more than his/her demographics\-\-something he/she cannot control.  Martin Luther King kind of alluded to this when he made his "Dream Speech", saying that the content of a person's character should mean more than the color of his/her skin!
gpt
The two are somewhat inseparable. 

Your demographics almost inherently inform your opinion don't they? Your demographics have a role in your lived experiences and it's through those lived experiences you generate your opinions.

This is a big issue with perspective. Some people's demographics allow them a different perspective. So why then shouldn't their demographics be considered as a caveat to their opinion?