system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I heard an MIT professor say that it's actually quite difficult to argue against the theory that we are living in a simulation. Why is that? What is the brief version of each sides main points?

Edit: Thanks y'all.
gpt
It's not empirically falsifiable, and if you take it as a serious scientific hypothesis, there is no plausible way to argue against it; similar to the way there is no plausible scientific way to argue against "there is an elephant in the room but it can't be detected by empirical means."