system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I'm a staunch pacifist. CMV

I believe that killing is wrong in any situation and that there is no difference between murdering and killing. This stems from my belief that we as people cannot possibly judge these acts accurately, only some sort of God figure could. Because we cannot judge who should and should not be put to death, it is morally better to die than to kill, if forced into that choice. The reason we cannot judge acts of killing is that we cannot fathom the true meaning of dying, since none of us has experienced it before (hopefully!). All we do know about dying is that there is no coming back and so for any of us to condemn another person to this fate is never justifiable by human means alone. I'll just head off one potential counter argument right now and say that, yes, even in the case of Hitler, it is wrong to kill for the reason I outlined above: we don't know whether he truly deserves death (even though we are pretty strongly convinced). I think that killing another person is overstepping human bounds and acting as a God-like judge. Change my view.
gpt
If killing is worse than dying, then surely by letting someone kill you rather than killing them, you're actually being selfish and putting the burden of doing the worse thing on the shoulders of someone else.