system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: The new wave of Progressive Politics is deeply rooted in an archaic christian-like mentality that the world is made up of the "sinners" who need to repent and the "righteous" who are without sin, and that is toxic.

Note: this post isn't a criticism of BLM, or LGBT rights, or any of those incredibly worthy causes. It is not a criticism of the cause but a criticism of a specific sub-section of activism surrounding it.

The vocabulary I have seen used in the recent political turmoil has me concerned, because it echoes of religious notions. The world is "sinful" (world ie the "system" in "systemic racism") and anyone participating in it is either a "sinner" or someone "righteous" oppressed by the "sinful world":

\- There's the "sinners". They are "sinners" due to their inherent privilege they are born with, which means they can't help but be racist/sexist/capitalist/etc. They grow up in a sinful world which turns them into sinners. And therefore, they need to acknowledge their sinful ways, publicly, openly, and repent in the aim of doing better. Just like in Christianity, a sinner who sees the light and confesses their sins can be forgiven. One who doesn't, and refuses to apologize for their sins, cannot be saved.

\- If you die without repenting for your "sins", you die a "sinner". And if so, then that is all you will ever be: it doesn't matter what else you did in your life, a sinner's a sinner. Just like in Christianity, no matter what other actions you have committed in your life, no matter the good or bad. It doesn't matter, because you were a "sinner".

\- And finally there's the righteous. Those who are without those sins. Because they were not born with certain types of privilege, they are not tainted by the "sin" of having privilege.

This worldview is toxic for the same reasons why the Christian concept of sin is toxic. It turns the complexity of human experience into a binary, and it makes people ashamed of just being human and participating in a society that has its flaws (like every society).
gpt
It sounds to me like the only (weak) point of analogy, that in both cases, the problem is omnipresent.

Yeah, in Christian theology, every person is born with sin.

And according to anti-capitalism, the entire world runs on a capitalist economy that exploits the working class.

The big difference is that in the former, the solution is explicitly personal, (faith in the saviour Jesus Christ), and the latter is **explicitly intended to be** a description of global sociatetal systems, not of individual morality.

If we are comparing apples to apples, then progressives are much LESS focused on individual virtue, than conservatives are.

When you look at a problem like racial inequality, the conservative position begins and ends with "Well, maybe black people should do less crime, clean up their act, raise their kids, etc." It's all about how the individual blacks should all start to act virtously one by one, act very righteous. 

The progressive position that if you subjugate a group for centuries, then their ongoing inequality will be baked into every levelof how they are raised, policed, employed, housed, etc., it permeates all of society and that is what you have to undo.

Which one of these sounds more inspired by Christian dogma?

You are basically criticizing progressives, for language that was designed to counter the individualistic, virtue based morality of *actual Christian* conservatives, just because the way they talk about all-encompassing problems, vaguely sounds at a glance like Original Sin.