system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Trump's Twitter ban is the perfect spark to a much needed conversation about social media influence

If 10 years ago, you were to tell the average American that the president of the United States were to be banned from using social media platforms that has billions of users in 10 years, you would be called crazy, and rightfully so. It should be horrificly frightening that our public discourse has gotten this bad which warrants censoring the sitting president of the United States.

With that being said, this breaking of eggs can make a good omlette. The public is now having a lot of conversations about legal protections social media platforms have and the vast amount of power they have and whether or not they should have that power to begin with.

Its funny how we're not okay with business monopolies in many industries but in terms of social media, we seem to be okay with just a handful of private companies being in charge of a lot of our public discourse.
gpt
Do you understand the context in which these people are being banned? If 10 years ago you told people the President could be credibly accused of inciting insurrection - or that a sect of conservatives thinks Democrats are a cabal of election stealing child rapists, you'd also be seen as crazy. But that's what happened.

What should we learn from these recent events that helps us understand internet censorship? That it's good to keep the dangerous crazy people off high traffic social media.