system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I believe the Supreme Court Justices decide cases based on how they feel then use the Constitution to justify it, versus trying to determine what the Constitution says about an issue. CMV

The judicial restraint practiced by people like Oliver Wendell Holmes is not being practiced by the current SCOTUS. Although Chief Justice John Roberts said the following, SCOTUS is not living by it:
“Members of this Court are vested with the authority to interpret the law; we possess neither the expertise nor the prerogative to make policy judgments. Those decisions are entrusted to our Nation’s elected leaders, who can be thrown out of office if the people disagree with them. It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.”
gpt
How could you possibly know this? Unless you could enter the minds of the justices themselves, or they write in their opinions something to the effect, then what leads you to believe they just picked "what they felt was right" rather than what they believed was within their judicial purview to decide or what best squared with their interpretation of the Constitution?