system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I think it is hypocritical to take advantage of technological advances made possible by science but then dismiss science when it does not support your religious beliefs. CMV

People who say that they "don't believe" in the science behind evolution or climate change, to me, imply that they don't trust the scientific process.  But they *do* seem to have enough "faith" to trust that airplanes will fly, cars will drive, that they won't necessarily die on the operating table...and all of these things have come about based on the scientific process, the *same* method some people invalidate.  

I don't understand this contradiction.  Is there a fundamental misunderstanding about how science works on the part of deniars? I'm not a scientist but I have a basic understanding of the scientific method and how peer reviews help establish the authenticity of scientific research.  Or perhaps I don't? Am I'm missing something? Can you help me understand this?
gpt
Science is not one monolithic idea. People can accept some scientific thoughts will simultaneously remaining cynical of others. For example, a creationist may accept the laws of aerodynamics and motion, which is why they don't mind flying, but may not believe in radiocarbon dating.