system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Is Absurdism an end point in philosophy?

I've done tons of personal research/reading and introspection, and after a lot of thinking I can't seem to see another philosophical path so to speak coming out of absurdism. There only seems to be ways to deal with the idea of the Absurd and figuring out ways to endure. The same seems to be with existentialism and nihilism. They explain the nature of existence and how to deal with that reality, and as far as I can tell absurdism is the most accurate depiction of existence. However, where do you go from there? Is there anywhere *to* go? Is the end point really that one must "rebel" or take some "leap of faith"? Are there any philosophies that stem out of absurdism (or a similar philosophy)? This has been bugging me for a long time, and I appreciate any insight.
gpt
> Is the end point really that one must "rebel" or take some "leap of faith"?

No -- or at least not necessarily, and this is not a point of general consensus. Oodles of philosophers are not absurdists; your thought that absurdism is where philosophy ends up is an idiosyncrasy of your views rather than a recognized result of philosophy.

NB: the absurdist thoroughly denies that a leap of faith is a philosophically acceptable response.