system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: The politically correct understanding of the differences in human genetics might be in our best interest socially, but isn't necessarily the truth.
gpt
1. There is no such thing as a "superior" gene or trait because it all depends on what the environment is. It's like saying that the ace of spades is the best card. It is in some card games, but it's the worst card in others.

2. Even genes that seem really horrible often have some really good qualities too. For example, the gene that causes sickle cell anemia is the same one that protects carriers from malaria. On the flip side, some supposedly good genes have bad qualities too. The gene that causes strong testosterone output in men also causes baldness.

2. Genes aren't everything. The environment that a person grows up in plays an equal or larger role in how a person turns out. A person might have a gene that predisposes them to heart disease, but with proper exercise and nutrition, they might never know.

4. With technology, genes matter a whole lot less. Say a person is genetically disposed to be thin, which is bad for cold winters because they can't retain as much heat. Now they can just put on a jacket or live in a heated home. On the flip side, a pale-skinned person is much more likely to get skin cancer in sunny environments. Now they can just put on sunscreen or a hat.

Genes are much more complicated than you'd expect. It is really hard to pinpoint down what genes are good or bad. Plus, by the time we finally do learn how they work, it's likely that we will have developed gene therapy that will allow us to tweak our genes as necessary to best match our environment.