system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
If it is moral to live in restraint, why do only sick people do so?

Hello everyone, I need existential help! A puzzle troubles me endlessly.

I can't decide between morality and meaning. If it is not absolutely moral to live a meaningful life, and if it is not absolutely meaningful to live a moral life, which of the two should one choose?

Perhaps you care about pleasure, beauty, creativity, love, passion, peace, serenity, health, wealth, safety, excitement, competition, or relaxation. But is it ethical?

A sensible, ethical person works as effectively and efficiently as possible to minimize universal suffering, maximize universal happiness, saves as many lives as possible, or support the environment. Is that the meaning of life?

Is it good to water one's tulips while children are being killed in a war in another country? Is it good to feel corroded by regret because one kicked a friend off a bridge to save the lives of three strangers? Is it selfish to be passionate? Is it naive to be a savior? 

To what should one dedicate one's life? What should one care about? How can one defend one side of the dilemma for the other? Is there a sane way out of this?

Is art a corrupt waste of time? Is a moral life a life squandered to showing off? Are passions immortal? Are moral people existential failures?

Is this a savior complex leading me to take place in society? Is it good to get rid of it? Should I torture myself for its wishes? Imagine a patient is tortured by his conscience because he knows he could be of more use to the world, is this person sick?

How do I decide for myself? How should I live? Is it OK to live a meaningful and only kind of not immoral live?
gpt
>A sensible, ethical person works as effectively and efficiently as possible to minimize universal suffering, maximize universal happiness, saves as many lives as possible, or support the environment.

Only if you accept a very particular version of consequentalism. But yes if you do accept this then this is what should dictate your life, morality is about that which we should do, how we should live, but if you have all these concerns maybe you don't accept this very particular version of consequentalism.