system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Why do the majority of philosophers not accept solipsism?
gpt
Because there's literally no reason to whatsoever. The point of solipsism isn't that you're supposed to use it as a conclusion. Its that you're supposed to note that its technically all you can prove in an absolute sense. Not all that exists. But why would everything that exists correspond to everything you can prove absolutely? The mistake certain people make is to assume that you shouldn't think anything until its absolutely proven. But that's an incorrect way to approach proof. There's no privileged reason to be skeptical even of things you have good reasons to think, just because you're only 99.9% certain. And there's no reason to be in favor of it either. It doesn't get points for phrasing itself as a negative.