system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Can human enslavement of animals and plants be justified without justifying AI enslavement of humans?

If you were to explain to someone why it is acceptable to force animals to do labor for humans what would your reason be? That you know better for them? That you are more intelligent than them? That you evolved from them so therefore you are better and they deserve to be opressed? It is hard to think of a reason that a species more intelligent and evolved than us would not use as justification to oppress, eat, medical test etc on humans.
gpt
Sure. It's easy enough.

Humans are autonomous agents and this is sufficient for having full rights. (Most) non-human animals are not autonomous so they fail to meet *a* sufficient condition for full rights (some might meet enough other conditions to have rights or there might be other sufficient conditions, but that's not at issue). Humans would still be autonomous and thus still have full rights if strong AI existed (it would be irrelevant). So, it would be wrong to enslave humans, and it might not be wrong to enslave certain non-human animals. 

AI or no AI is completely irrelevant to the rights issue.