system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: You should be able bring criminal/civil suits against anti-vaxxers if they cause harm to you or a loved one

Currently there is very little personal cost to become an anti-vaxxer. Most family member's of anti-vaxxers will not be immunosuppressed, have immunosuppressive cancer, or have AIDS. All young infants cannot get the MMR vaccine early because their immune systems are not ready for the live vaccine- complications are very serious and include death. If their children (vectors for disease) come into contact with someone who is unable to get vaccinated (for the above reasons), they will seriously harm or kill them.

In addition to the extreme cases of harm, giving someone the flu can cause serious financial damages. Time off of work for some can cost them thousands of dollars and/or impact the livelihood of their family.

Being able to sue for damages from either lost wages or bodily harm would be a way to have the cost of anti-vaxxers reflected directly back to them- they have been shielded from the costs of their decisions far too long.

In addition, civil cases should be easier to bring forth because they require a lower burden of proof.
gpt
Since you are restricting this to vaccines it is clearly about punishment not really about convering damages, nor a responsibly of the sick not to infect others. Otherwise you would have to extend this to all illness and even people who cannot get vaccinated but still infect people. 

Becides for every sick person there is a giant number of people who infected them, can you really single one kid out and be like your parents owe me $100000 because you happen to be sick and rich. While the people who inflected your kid go free because they don't have money or because we do not know who they are?