system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: The U.S. should not provide financial aid to countries which criminalize homosexuality

Most of us would agree that the treatment of gay people in too much of the world, with punishments including life imprisonment and death, are reprehensible. Many of these countries rely on the U.S. and other more liberal, western nations for millions of dollars of aid a year. I say we cut them off. I don't like my tax dollars going to such a tyrannical government, and maybe losing all or most of their aid might incentivize some countries to change their laws. 

I realize that many of these countries are extremely poor, and this may screw over many of their citizens who are already living in abject poverty, however couldn't we instead give the money to charities that help these citizens, rather than just give the money to an evil government?
gpt
If you cut them off, they'll seek aid from China or Russia, who won't care if they criminalize homosexuality.

You'll also perpetuate hostility to liberalism in that country. You can't strongarm a society into accepting gay people, they'll just decide they would rather not have the money if it comes with a mandate to change the culture. The idea of being forced to change the country because of the demands of foreigners is going to lead people to embrace nationalist movements, because why wouldn't they be angry about that?

What you will inevitably be left with is a country with no reason to care what the US thinks, outright hostile to the US, abd funded by adversaries. In other words, you're going to start having more states in the model of Iran pop up.