system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: It's perfectly fine if I like and consume lab-grown human meat

Biologist Richard Dawkins recently tweeted "What if human meat is grown? Could we overcome our taboo against cannibalism? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus “yuck reaction” absolutism." And people were up in arms, calling him Satanist and such.
  
However I fail to understand why is synthetic cannibalism unethical. The only potential problem may be a few deranged individuals who procure human meat from the natural source i.e. by killing another human being or from dead bodies. But this scenario where a person can't afford human meat and thus due to  *addiction* has to resort to get the meat from natural sources would be quite rare and these people should be declared clinically insane anyways. Another solution might be restricting human meat to labs till it becomes viable for every economic class to purchase it.

Apart from the above mentioned problem, I find it completely right and normal to eat lab-grown human meat or be curious about its taste and texture. So please try and change my view.
gpt
One potential issue: If lab grown human meat were to become popular and create a demand, it is possible that would enable a black market in real human flesh. Not because it would be cheaper, but because almost anything people consume, some part of the population tends to fetishise more rare or "authentic" versions of it, even to the extent of breaking the law. See the popularity of Cuban cigars, the trade in poached protected animals and the insane amount of money people pay for "premium" versions of things. Kobe beef, rare scotch, etc. 

Researchers have found that legalizing prostitution for instance, does NOT decrease human trafficking. It actually provides a smokescreen making it harder to detect. The same could be said for a widespread trade in human meat.