system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I don't think that employers should be forced to accommodate religious attire, even in cases where they don't negatively affect job performance. CMV

So I was watching some clips from that show "What would you do" on Youtube the other night. Normally, I like the scenarios that the show creates but one of the clips rubbed me the wrong way. A man (Sikh I think) was wearing a turban to a job interview and the boss said that he had to lose the turban if he wanted to get hired. The guy made a big stink about religious discrimination and honestly, it kind of pissed me off. 

I don't think there's anything wrong with what the boss did, especially since I live in a country that considers itself secular. Religion is a choice, and so is wearing that religious attire. Nobody would care if I didn't hire somebody because they had a pink mohawk, were covered in tattoos, or had ear ear gauges, even though the particular subculture that they belong to may be just as important as a religion is to somebody else. Why should employers be forced into accepting religious attire if it doesn't meet company dress policy? 

I mean, I have nothing against employers who *do* accommodate that kind of thing, in fact, I encourage it. But I think it's wrong for employers to be shoehorned into accepting attire from something that is ultimately, a choice.
gpt
Clarifying question:  People choose to get married and have kids as well.  Are you arguing that employers should be allowed to discriminate against people who are married, or people who have children?

Should employers be allowed to discriminate on anything that is a choice, or should some choices be protected, while others shouldn't?