system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I have a bit of a sticky question: Does a pedophile who has not touched a child deserve sympathy?
gpt
I believe it would be immoral to not offer sympathy. First of all, pedophiles are still human beings and deserve to be treated as such. Secondly, admonishing or condemning them is likely to promote their actions. Consider that making someone believe they are a monster can turn them into that monster. Third, this question implies that if a pedophile doesn't deserve sympathy that by extension pedophiles don't deserve help. Not getting someone help to change their desires is also immoral. Not to mention that if they aren't helped they're more likely to act.

Basically we ought to treat everyone fairly and humanely because we're all human beings. Being unsympathetic would be immoral because it is unfair.