system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[Asimov] How do you get AI to follow the 3 Laws of Robotics?

It's a flawed system.

I am basing this on the idea that humans are just meat robots and that our own "Laws of Robotics" are programmed into us as a product of the evolution of social behaviour. Empathy and cooperation provide an evolutionary advantage for our species and as such, we follow them. (Although we regularly break them... if we feel the situation warrants it)

More over, we don't know how we're programmed because evolution programmed us over millions of years. If we create Robots, we are going to know how they are programmed. Even if we were to hardcode the laws of robotics into a robot's hardware, it makes it much easier to tinker with the system if you know how the system works.

At the very least, one has to have a law that one is not allowed to change the laws. I suspect that's not sufficient.
gpt
The comparison to humanity simply doesn't work. Empathy and cooperation aren't laws, they aren't overriding things coded into us, they're simply one part of our psyches, a single tool. With machines, we're building their psyches from the ground up. 

Of course, the idea that the three laws are insufficient is kind of the entire point of much of Asimov's work. We can compel machines to follow certain principles absolutely, but the real world is too complicated for three simple principles to create a viable ethical framework. When his stories take place when robots are just starting to become common, those stories are often specifically about how a computer's logic fucks up when trying to apply the principles to the real world. When he tells stories further and further into the future, the ethical programming of his robots gets more and more complex behind the scenes to account for edge cases and contradictions, though it stays based on the three laws, broadly.