system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Does "peak science" exist?

.
gpt
I feel like this hypothesis is limited by working within a strictly capitalist framework. Ultimately, if we can envisage a world where no science can withstand a cost/benefit analysis, it would be equally possible to see a world where money isn't the limiting factor.

tl;dr: Money ain't real, science is. If money stops permitting science, money is more likely to be the obsolete factor!

(Sorry this is so woolly, it's hard not to be on this topic.)