system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: There is no winning for the poor in capitalism

With the people on top of a capitalist ladder trying to remain on top, there will be little possibility for those that are not as educated financially to succeed in capitalistic game. Mainly because those that are poor will have to worry about surviving in their local environments, scrummaging for resources to be able to avoid being robbed while trying to supply food for their children. In that pursuit for the right to live, a capitalist, at the very least one that is focused lessed on surviving and more on changing the world, would continue to gain more resources to do what he/she cares to do on a moment's whim.

There is also the aspect that the poor do not control their wages and have a cap on how much they can sell any products for, due to the supply/demand of their environment. Though the internet has made it easier to expand markets, the internet is also a place for capitalists to continue to siphon more money faster than the lesser financially educated, still leaving those who grew up poor - specifically from lineages who did not survive well in the capitalistic society - unable to make enough to survive (stretching here).

Change my mind please.
======

Edit: it looks like my view is unchangeable here because winning to me is “not needing to play the game anymore”. It looks like an economic system isn’t about moving “out” of a system, but having an equal opportunity within it. Thank you all for your comments. Moving on to a new topic.
gpt
The evidence is pretty overwhelming that the standard of living for the poorest in the US has significantly improved in the last 30-40 years. Much of that improvement built on top of a largely capitalistic economy. 

Isn’t this more than enough evidence that there are some benefits of capitalism to those on the bottom of the income ladder?