system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[Spider-man homecoming] If Stark is pro-registration, why doesn't he have Peter registered?
gpt
Everyone here is missing the point of Stark being "Pro-Registration." He isn't. He really, *really* isn't. He is a massive fan of the idea of oversight over the Avengers, preferably on the scale of what SHIELD used to be or the World Council or the UN still is, but he definitely thinks that the Accords are *not the way to go.*

What they are is the first step there. They aren't the be-all, end-all, they're a step in the path to be discarded the *moment* they're no longer needed. Stark thinks in terms of the future, and plans, not in terms of the here and now. If they ignored UN mandate with the Accords, there'd be no opportunity to sign an edited, looser, *actually effective* version later on. Peter doesn't need to sign because, frankly, he's not relevant to the plan yet. Sure, later on, (when he's no longer a minor) he'll sign an updated version, but why bother when he's not famous, not well known, not under international scrutiny, and not under constant threat of international/inter dimensional threat?

The kid works out of Brooklyn and is basically internationally irrelevant (or so Stark's lawyers would have you believe if ever questioned). The Accords are basically a first draft of a first draft. Combined... Why would he *ever* have the kid sign them?