system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[The Shawshank Redemption] Is it possible that Andy was actually guilty?

Some of the evidence against him is pretty iron clad. He buys a gun the exact caliber that the murder was committed with. 

He sleeps through eight fuckin' shots while "sleeping it off" right in the driveway of his house. Those murders seem pretty personal. What's it to Elmo Blatch to reload and fire two more shots right into their heads? Seems like a crime of meditated and furious rage.

He buys dishtowels for no reason while in a drunken stupor. What is he using those dishtowels for? You can muffle a gunshot with dishtowels. 

He has the motivation, he has the opportunity, and he was there. 

If Andy didn't do it, why is it called the Shawshank *Redemption*? To me, it's Andy growing past his callous and sociopathic nature. 

So, is it possible that Andy was lying about being innocent, just like everyone else at the prison?
gpt
Because we know that Elmo Blatch was the one that did it. He served as a busboy at the country club of the guy Andy's wife was sleeping with to collect information on wealthy guests. He would then later burgle said people's houses. If he were bluffing he wouldn't be so clear about the details of the case.