system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Incels are just as shallow as everyone else

Let me start this post by saying that this is not an incel hate thread. I actually sympathise with their emotional struggles and believe in mental health for all. In particular, ridiculing incels has always felt to me like kicking people when they’re down, and in my opinion, makes the problem worse by entrenching patterns of self-hatred and hatred for wider society.

However, it occurs to me that there is a great hypocrisy at the heart of incel culture, namely that incels are just as shallow, if not *moreso*, than the average person. For a group that constantly criticises societal notions of desirability, they seem quite comfortable celebrating their own biases. For example, I have noticed that they, as a community, regard overweight women with disgust, and zealously value female virginity. I’ve seen incels go as far as to profess racial preferences on the basis of perceived differences in personality. Meanwhile, never have I heard them call for a greater diversity of body types and personality types in media, which would certainly be an important step towards gaining acceptance in society. Perhaps I am making a mistake to compare them to a traditional advocacy group, but if anything, they tend to resist movements for diversity.

None of this behaviour is consistent with the way they wish to be treated by others. One would think that they would be more conscious of this contradiction, as addressing it would give them greater legitimacy and maybe even bring about positive social change for future generations. If incels are any less shallow than the average person, it’s not because of some moral enlightenment, but rather an amoral recognition that beggars can’t be choosers. CMV.
gpt
Here is the thing:  They have a goal.  They ultimately want happiness.  They are a group of males who have come to the conclusion that a female partner is all they need to be happy.  That female is not a person, that female is a means to being happy, she is an object, not a person.  She is what the hero gets at the end of the story as a reward for saving the day.

Since no women are lining up to make them happy they get angry at anyone who could fill that need but doesn't.  Where are all the rewards they were promised?  Someone is not giving them their due!  Then it starts to feed into it's self and warp.  Now women are the enemy.  The most desired ones are the most evil.  Their claims that all woman are shallow is just ammunition in the war against women- proof of evil.

What they find is that they get a little relief from their sadness when they group and demonize women.  They are less lonely with kindred spirits.  They do not dare go outside the group-think or they will lose that social network that they now rely on.  That social network reinforces the idea that women are objects, evil and some sort of robot who runs on the tears of men.   Women give out happiness when you put in a quarter- but not them.  Never them.  

It's more along a lines of a coke machine that will dispense a coke to anyone but you, so you kick the coke machine.

I don't believe it's shallow to want happiness.  If they thought women were actually people with feelings and needs, yes.  They would be shallow.  Since women are not human (in their eyes), they are not shallow.  

Picture yourself in the grocery store buying limes.  You usually go for the limes that are the greenest.   Are you shallow for only buying those limes?  No.  You want the best for your money.  

This is the mind of the incel.  He is mad because all the best limes are out of reach and the basket nearest to him has a few scattered rotten ones.   Since these are automated limes, and the limes on top do not jump down to him, it's their fault he's not happy and all limes are evil.

&#x200B;

TLDR;Incles are not shallow, they have a damaged world view and do not view women as human, but objects to be used towards the goal of happiness.  If they DID view women as human they would be shallow, but as women are only objects, they only hold the commerical value as any other object would.  If someone is not shallow for picking a pretty product over an ugly product, they too are not shallow.

&#x200B;

So now you know what is worse then being shallow in reguards to another person:  Not being human so that the ability for someone to feel shallow towards you is not applicable.