system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Bernie Sanders would make a bad president, despite the fact that I agree with him often

Although I agree with many of his political stances, and hist critiques of the current system, I'm not entirely sure that he'd make a good president.  The way I see it, the job of the president of the United States is to represent the populous of the United States, and many of his more extreme views might appeal widely to a crowd on reddit, but are hardly representative of the entire political sphere of USA.   Even if he were to somehow win a majority vote, he would be as unpopular in the south as Lincoln was.

Furthermore, in order to get anything accomplished as a president, he needs to work fairly closely with Congress, and his current stance of "attack anyone who receives donations from rich people" would prevent him from being able to play nicely.   Finally, I think that as a president, his laser focus on the social problems of America would prevent him from focusing on the other issues that the president must contend with.  The way he presents himself currently, it seems as though he sees it as his mission to attack the current system, which is not the position that the president should occupy.    

Finally, as a 74 year old man, who will be 75 at the time of the election, I think the same critiques that applied to John McCain also apply to him - there's a fairly good chance that if he were elected, he would die, or become quite ill while still in office.  For these reasons, I think he'd be better situated trying to solve these social/political problems in a different capacity.

**Edit**:  I've seen a lot of the same points being brought up over and over again trying to refute my points, rather than offering evidence as to why he'd make a good president.   So I think I'll clarify:   I think that a good president is someone that unifies the nation, not someone that divides it, or enforces his will upon it.
gpt
>in order to get anything accomplished you must work with congress.  

while that is true to a point, by that logic you should only elect those who could work with them and then how how could anything change?   Possibly electing a very popular antiestablishment President can inspire changing up congress.  

Also with the arguments with age.  John McCain is now still very active when he could have been in a second term.