system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV:Using crazy parts of the Bible as an argument as to why it bad is a bad argument

_____
Note: I'm not Christian

A lot of times people point out very crazy things that the Bible says as to why the bible is bad. However a lot of people fail to point out that  the  bible is very old and has been translated a million times. Ever translated something a million times using Google Translate. It come out something different. The general idea is right but part are way off. Same with the bible. The general idea is right but some part are off. Is there something off to this logic or is there something i'm missing about the bible? 

EDIT: And now my internet is going crazy.
gpt
Then all you're doing is cherry picking "Well that crazy thing they said was bad translation, but all the good stuff was translated correctly" . So either what's in the bible is true or it's all false. So if you argue against the crazy stuff saying "This book is no good for these reasons (from the book)" they have to either defend that crazy or deny the legitimacy of the whole document, lose-lose.