system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I believe that some redistribution of wealth is a necessary component of a healthy, reasonable society. CMV

I don't believe that spontaneous voluntary charity sufficiently provides the sufficient resources or proper allocation of those resources to aid those in need in a way that we as a society feel would be appropriate. I believe that some portion of the tax collected by any major government should go to ensuring the basic human wellness and dignity (clothing, food, education) of those who would not experience it otherwise due to economic circumstances.

I concede that this is not always a perfect arrangement for the health of the economy, but that it is better to reduce suffering at a reasonable cost to economic growth (within the bounds of diminishing returns and necessary growth) than to routinely place net economic prosperity above human dignity.

At risk of sounding stereotypically left-wing, I've only heard one side of this argument presented reasonably and convincingly.
gpt
A much more compelling solution to me would be to figure out why we have growing inequality between the rich and poor in the first place, and address the root cause. Government Robin Hood-ery is just an inefficient bandage put on in lieu of curing the disease.