system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: The House of Representatives should add an additional seat so the electoral college is a odd number of votes preventing ties.

The system to resolve ties in the US Electoral college is a very terrible and unfair method (if you are unaware, each state gets one vote for president, and each senator votes for vp, so you have 40 million Californians getting one vote for president, and so do the 500,000 people in Wyoming.) Now the electoral college has been debated to death on this sub so I won’t get into it, but considering how hard it would be to change the electoral system, I believe there is some merit to improving individual parts of it. This would include adding a house seat/electoral vote to prevent ties/having no candidate in the majority in the electoral college. Now this is excluding the factor of faithless electors but I believe that is another issue that could be fixed and therefor has a minimal effect on my post.

TLDR; if we’re stuck with the electoral college system, at least for a while, why not fix major issues such as ties? And a fix for ties is adding another house seat so the number of electoral votes is odd and can’t be tied (ignoring faithless electors which can also be eliminated).
\
\
Edit: the main focus of my post is that we should have an additional electoral vote so that assuming no faithless electors (let’s assume there’s been a law preventing it), then there can’t be a tie. Saying it’s unlikely to happen is not changing my view so stop saying it. And also please read the comments before commenting. People keep saying the same alternative solution.
gpt
>if we’re stuck with the electoral college system, at least for a while, why not fix major issues such as ties?

With 540 electors the chance of a tie is low enough not to be one of the main problems with the system.

Why not first fix the "all or nothing" principle and split electors from a state between parties as the proportional votes suggest. That might help the 2 party system problem, and also makes every vote matter, and not only those in swingstates. Under the current system a Californian elector basically means nothing because everyone knows it will be Democrat.

So why fix an issue that happens once in a blue moon when the same effect (votes being more valuable in certain states) is there all the time already?