system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[1984 book] If Eurasia and Eastasia do exist, what differences might their approach to totalitarianism exhibit?

(Topic of discussion permitted under Rule 7: "Discussions relating to the political systems of fictional worlds that resemble real-world political systems may be allowed provided they are strictly within the context of that setting and its characters.")

An example of how Neo-Bolshevism and Obliteration of the Self might differ; in Stalinist Russia, secret police and Party members were trained individuals, and much of the country's industry was operated by slave labour in the gulags; however, in Mao Zedong's China, citizens were encouraged to report friends and relatives to the Party through public "Denunciation Boxes", and industrial projects were chiefly undertaken through the use of mass mobilisation.
gpt
Our allies, the Eastasians, descend from a genius political philosophy called Marxist-Leninism, and are built around a core vanguard party seizing total control of society, and utilizing the resources of the state for the good of the proletariat.  An inner party of upper level decision makers plan out what resources will be needed in what areas, and send instructions via the outer party to produce and distribute those resources, creating a perfect society much like the one we live in.

In contrast, the doubleplusungood Eurasians have a political system that descends from a primitive and despicable political philosophy called Marxist-Leninism, where a group of self-interested oligarchs forming something called a Vanguard party have seized control of society's resources, and abuse the people for their own enrichment.  It is for the purpose of freeing the proles from their eternal toil that we war against the Eurasians, and will one day liberate them from the hellscape they find themselves forced to live in.