system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Organ donation should be mandatory when you die

There is absolutely no reason not to be an organ donor. The only thing that will change from your decision to donate or not to donate is that if you don't donate someone might suffer and die because of your superstition / selfishness.

A person does not have the right to decide whether to donate their organs. Just because you used to control those organs and that meat sack when you were alive does not mean you should have the rights to it.

I equate your organs after you die to your excrement. If we could build a machine that takes in the populations feces and urine and turns it into a life-saving antibiotic / energy source / something else useful to society, you do not have the right to opt-out of that system. Why should you? There is nothing to be gained from letting your excrement go to waste, so, why should we let you stop it going to something useful?
gpt
> There is absolutely no reason not to be an organ donor. The only thing that will change from your decision to donate or not to donate is that if you don't donate someone might suffer and die because of your superstition / selfishness.

> A person does not have the right to decide whether to donate their organs. Just because you used to control those organs and that meat sack when you were alive does not mean you should have the rights to it.

While you could force people to donate, this will make people distrustful and unsupportive of their government. A much better approach would be an opt-out system: individuals can still choose not to donate, but you also still have access to all the organs you need since very few people actually do. Win-win!

For example, Austria has an opt-out system, yet a consent rate of 99.98%. If you were to opt out there, you wouldn't be doing any harm, all else being equal.