system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I believe Capitalism should be abolished for the interest of humanity. If you have any objections to this, I beg of you to CMV

I do not oppose capitalism because:

-it only favors the rich(too vague)

-poor people should be helped(misleading)

-its better to spread the wealth(strawman)

-because of statism or something(libertarian nonsense)

Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production(whether there is a state or not does not change the marxist critique of private ownership of the means of production, no matter how much markets are skewed by taxation or whatever one might come up with).

Worker owned means of production(/socialism)is advantageous compared to capitalismfor the following reasons:

-all working people have a productive relation to the means of production. All people are actively creating things or providing services, or whatever have you(as opposed to collecting money from workers who work o your property, as in the case of the capitalist).

-as i have said in past comments, when you take an institution whose purpose is to make shoes, it will make shoes, and the quality of its products will not falter, because it exists only to make shoes. But when you give it a profit motive , the purpose becomes to make a profit, shoes being secondary, if relevant at all. Extrapolated, the workers in this institution do not make the shoes for making shoes as a past time, or passion, but for profit too.

-markets are not efficient as a selfmanaged economy where people directly vote for the things they deem they need. "Voting with dollars" is not nearly the same: voting with dollars will make eight unoccupied house for every homeless person, and lump a strong portion of our food in the garbage whilst a vast majority of the population do not eat correctly as it is.

-in a socialist economy, workers actively collaborate with eachother to better the productio process to their liking, instead of having an owner do it for them, making workers invested in their work.

Obviously there are many more reasons, but go ahead and change my view for me.
gpt
>the purpose becomes to make a profit, shoes being secondary

why do you assume that quality falls when profits are involved.  There's two ways to increase profits: cut costs and increase revenue.  You seem to be forgetting that second part.  Give me any category or market and I'll give you a company that prides itself on quality products and people pay them more because of it.