system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Citing evidence that I found in a review article - should I cite the review as well?

I'm confused if it's bad form to not include a review article as a citation when referencing studies identified by the review article. On one hand, the review article is less relevant to the reader - who only needs to see that I support my argument with direct evidence. On the other hand, I wouldn't have found this evidence without the review article.

What's the etiquette here?
gpt
I would not assume that the author(s) of a review paper are accurately representing all of the studies they cite. It is always wise to read the source that is referenced, and cite that original paper, not the review.