system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Anti-trans bathroom rhetoric is either political theatre or outright insane.

Regardless of whether you think trans people should use a bathroom conforming to their gender identity, the enforcement of any kind of bathroom laws in this matter would be a complete catastrophe. 

Let’s say you have a law that states people should only use the bathroom corresponding to their biological sex. Who’s going to check a bathroom goer’s birth sex and how are they going to do it? 

Let’s say this law envisions a “bathroom custodian” who’s going to guess what biological sex someone belongs to and assign them a bathroom accordingly. 

Well, cis women can have varying degrees of masculine physical characteristics and look more masculine than trans women, so almost certainly a lot of cis women will be turned away from female bathrooms.

Now, let’s say, to better equip the bathroom custodian to perform their duty, such a law lets them ask to physically examine a potential bathroom go-er to clarify whatever doubts they have about their birth sex. This would be the very picture of disaster. A lot of them will 100% use this as a tool to commit sexual assault against someone who desperately needs to use the bathroom, definitely not the intended consequence of a law trying to reduce sexual assault in bathrooms. Even if used “properly”, this would generally be extremely intrusive for practically everyone, since they’ll have to live with the perpetual risk of being asked to present their genitalia if they want to use a public toilet. Also, if such a law envisages penalties for violators, trans people who attempt to use the toilet conforming to their birth sex in accordance with the law will almost always be physically examined since they’ll be presenting as the gender other than the one whose toilet they’re trying to use. 

Any enforcement of this kind of a rule would be extremely inconvenient for literally everyone involved, which leads me to believe that most of the moral panic behind this issue is just political posturing, and those people who aren’t politically posturing and genuinely support this are advocating for a solution a thousand times more problematic than what they’re trying to solve.
gpt
Would "intentionally terroristic"  fall outside of your definition?

The point of bathroom bills is to inspire popular revulsion at gender nonconforming people (not only trans people), create the narrative that they are sexual predators, disrupt their daily lives, and rile up unfounded fears in the general public that favor a particular political ideology but which, if they were real (and they are not) would be completely unsolvable as you have pointed out.

Some of the first breaking news stories years back when bathroom bills first got fashionable was of a masculine lesbian (cis) woman getting detained and carded for using the womens bathroom.  The people responsible for these bills wholly intend for this kind of harassment to happen.

Furthermore, compliance with the law would make trans people, especially trans men who have completed their initial transitional hormone therapy, drastically more visible and disruptive in public.

The point is to create a legal environment where it is not possible for trans or other gender nonconforming people to live their lives in peace - to raise stigmas against them and by extension expose them to more policing (resulting in more personal danger) and more public conflict (resulting in more personal danger).