system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[Jurassic Park] Is there any interest in cloning prehistoric mammals in this world? What about Neanderthals and Australopithecus?

Like the Wooly Mammoth, the Smilodon, the Andrewsarchus, the Paraceratherium, the Embolotherium, the Hyaenodon, etc.

What about Neanderthals and Australopithecus?
gpt
It's considered to have low scientific value.  The changes are significant enough to create problems, IE the staff of the Jurrasic World park understood that the reconstructed clones varied greatly in appearance from the originals, and even if they patched those up they'd lack the original symbiotic bacteria, the learned behaviors that some real dinosaurs picked up from parents, and the ability to compare behavior in captivity from behavior in the wild, which is sometimes wildly different. Even the very large ranges that were eventually built are small enough to cause island effects, which would distort both behavior and biology.

Economically it's a very expensive undertaking with a necessarily expensive ticket price (no matter how cheap you set the ticket price, you gotta build it on a remote island to limit invasive species events, which means customers have to pay somebody else a bunch of money for a plane ticket), so unless demand is very very high the numbers don't work out. Dinosaurs are much sexier than mammoths etc, though you could maybe talk the existing park into opening a mammalian megafauna wing if it actually reopens.

As far as other species of human go that opens up a massive ethical clusterfuck, while cloned mostly-dinosaurs isn't really any dicier than zoos in general (hell its better really, you don't have to take any out of the wild to begin with).