system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Libertarianism is institutionalized narcissism. CMV.

Libertarianism says it is unjust to tax the rich in order to provide health care for the uninsured poor. I disagree.

The place where libertarianism goes from being practical to absurdly dreamy, is when it goes from the principle of self-possession to concluding that self possession means one should not pay taxes or have any kind of responsibility to their fellow citizens. It takes on the countenance of the naïve idealist in its persistence in seeing participation in society as an individual matter. A libertarian would have it such that a wealthy person could become wealthy through the benefits of society, and then continue to reap the benefits of society, while acting as if they are functioning in a vacuum, where they created everything all by themselves and therefore have no responsibilities to the society. The essence of the libertarian philosophy is delusion, for one has to benefit from something while at the same time pretending that they are not benefiting from that thing. It is narcissism at its most cognitively dissonant.

So, is it just to tax the rich in order to provide health care for the uninsured poor? Yes! The taxation of the wealthy as a form of redistribution of wealth is moral. What’s even more important than redistribution of wealth however, are stop-gap measures to mitigate the progress of unequal distribution of wealth to begin with. Once a society is at a point where it must redistribute its wealth, it has already failed, because it has already become a rigged system where the privileged can (and they always do when they can) exploit the less privileged.
gpt
> The place where libertarianism goes from being practical to absurdly dreamy, is when it goes from the principle of self-possession to concluding that self possession means one should not pay taxes or have any kind of responsibility to their fellow citizens.

In theory, libertarianism *increases* the responsibility of citizens to help each other.  The premise is NOT "every man for himself, got mine, fuck you."  The premise is that government power and force inevitably lead to corruption and we all need to step up to the plate to cooperate with each other in a voluntary manner.

> A libertarian would have it such that a wealthy person could become wealthy through the benefits of society, and then continue to reap the benefits of society, while acting as if they are functioning in a vacuum, where they created everything all by themselves and therefore have no responsibilities to the society.

No.  A libertarian society draw most of its "benefits of society" from cooperation of the citizenry versus government imposition.  Only the most radical libertarians would pretend to be an island independent from his or her community, and personal responsibility is a cornerstone of libertarian thought.  Moreover, most libertarians still support smaller government at a local level and only the most radical libertarians would have a problem with, for example, paying taxes for traffic lights.

Also, to take your view literally-- narcissism can hardly be institutionalized via libertarianism because libertarianism is hardly an institution but a philosophy.