system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Trump shouldn't have been banned from social media

 I disagree with Trump on almost every single issue.

I do think he was responsible for the capitol riot and for that he should be held accountable by the congress.

However, social media platforms should not have banned him. No one company should have the power to censor prominent political views no matter how wrong they might be.

Even though these companies are private, they shouldn't be allowed to censor opinions or fact check things. If a company decides that they want to start doing this, then they should be held accountable for everything that's published on that platform.

For example, ISIS has been actively publishing things on twitter and the management has done almost nothing to stop them in the name of free speach. I can't comprehend how that's acceptable yet they feel like they have to ban Trump.
gpt
>I do think he was responsible for the capitol riot and for that he should be held accountable by the congress.

Well, the companies have a explicit "no inciting violence" policy. Sure, there are many smaller accounts, even from ISIS as you cited, that have not been banned. Two wrongs don't make a right, however. They should be banned too, rather than unbanning Trump.

If you believe he was indeed responsible for the riot, then you *must* admit that he used their platforms to incite violence and thus **unambiguously** broke their rules, even causing deaths. Companies have a right to, within reason, choose the rules they want their users to abide to. Trump broke these rules and so they were justified in banning him.