system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Answers to the omnipotence paradox

What are some good arguments refuting the omnipotence paradox? 

EDIT: The paradox suggests a problem on the divine attribute of omnipotence. Can god create a task even he can't perform? The most famous example is the stone paradox. What if god created a stone so heavy that even he can't lift?
gpt
You either understand "omnipotence" to just being able to do everything that's logically possible, or you say God can do things that are logically impossible. You will very rarely find someone who will entertain that God can do the logically impossible, and typically that will involve just us being wrong about what really is impossible in the first place (e.g. Descartes).

>>I answer that, All confess that God is omnipotent; but it seems difficult to explain in what His omnipotence precisely consists: for there may be doubt as to the precise meaning of the word 'all' when we say that God can do all things. If, however, we consider the matter aright, since power is said in reference to possible things, this phrase, "God can do all things," is rightly understood to mean that God can do all things that are possible; and for this reason He is said to be omnipotent. (Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, I:25:3)

For your specific example, a stone that God couldn't lift wouldn't be logically possible, because God could lift any stone. Now if God can do logically impossible things, He could create a stone He could not lift, but then He would also have no problem lifting that stone too, since being logically contradictory is no barrier.