system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Feminism and Mens Rights Activist are equally discriminatory and should be grouped as "Human Rights Activists" CMV

I think Mens Rights Activists and Women's Rights Activists/Feminists suffer from "Grass is always greener syndrome." Both sexes have different problems and different privileges and neither one really see what they have. Women do have a higher chance of getting sexually harassed, but men's problems are never taken as seriously as a woman's. As far as privileges go, there might not be a lot of women as engineers, math, etc. But there aren't a lot of men in social work and teaching jobs.  

Feminists focuses too much on Women's problems, and Men's rights focuses too much on men's problems. We should get together and make sure everyone is getting equal treatment and not be selfish and focus on our own problems. CMV.
gpt
Resolving issues is much more efficient if the group is focused on them. By your logic, everyone has issues (a true point.) But why stop a group focused on gender issues? Why shouldn't the group also focus on racial issues? Economic issues? And so forth. 

The most effective groups for social change are those that tend to have a razor-sharp focus on one issue (see the impact of MADD). The bigger groups get, the more they tend to degenerate into in-fighting, power struggles, identity issues, and the less they actually get done.

A more reasonable argument might be for feminists and MRAs to spend less time fighting each other and more time working towards common interests (such as dismantling gendered social institutions that hurt both men and women).