system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
If we can't get an ought from an is, how else do we get an ought?

For example, if an anti-realist says morals come from our emotions and empathy, and that we ought to follow these emotions and empathy, then isn't this also falling into the is-ought gap?
gpt
The is-ought gap describes the logical problem of not being able to justify a particular conclusion based on given premises.

So one way to approach this question would be to consider the possibility that at least some 'oughts' are basic or implicit rather than being conclusions that are produced _a posteriori_ after a due consideration of facts.

For example, you couldn't have articulated this question without already having implicitly accepted that you ought to drink and eat in order to survive. But this isn't the sort of ought that you arrived at as a logical conclusion; it's an ought that we can recognize as being implicit in your behavior and in your ongoing survival.