system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
ELI5: How is media allowed to extensively cover the details of a crime investigation if it essentially makes it impossible to form an unbiased jury later for the trial?

Yes, I've been binge watching "Making a Murderer." Is it simply a right provided in the first amendment which allows reporters to cover anything they can about the investigation as it progresses? At least in today's modern society, it seems to me that by not restricting access to the details of a crime investigation to reporters, it is inevitable for at least some of the jurors to be previously exposed to the information through media (and therefore form their own biases) prior to the trial. Wouldn't it be more consistent with the right to a fair and unbiased jury to conceal the details of the investigation until the actual trial is underway, and then allow reporters to cover the trial in real time?
gpt
In the USA, freedom of the media is an extremely strongly protected right -- *especially* coverage of things the government is doing.

They can always find a  jury, since (1) not everyone follows the news and (2) if necessary they can relocate the case.