system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV. Agnosticism is the most logical view to hold while atheism and theism are both equally absurd beliefs.

Many atheists claim that because there is so much evil in the world and God allows it then clearly God does not exist.  


If humans were to live for another millions of years and then perish, it would still only be a blink of an eye when compared to the lifespan of the Earth. The Earth is far less than the size of an atom when compared to the size of the entire universe. 



Both theists and atheists alike place too much emphasis on the importance of human life that they feel God (or lack thereof) should care about us. When in reality we're really no more important than a pebble on the ground. 



Also people who've experienced DMT will have noticed, what the feeble human mind perceives is only a thin slice of reality.




 To claim to definitively know whether or not God exists just seems so mind bogglingly absurd.
gpt
... this view doesn't actually make logical sense. 

You can be an agnostic atheist, and you can be an agnostic theist.  Both of these positions are defensible. 

To be truly "agnostic" is a disingenuous position.  All people when pushed can be pushed beyond agnosticism. 

To be agnostic, is to comment on the actual evidence at hand, and make a claim of inconclusiveness. 

To be a theist/atheist is to subscribe to the *belief* that a God(s) exist, or don't exist.  *beliefs* need not be moderated by conclusive factual evidence. 

>To claim to definitively know whether or not God exists just seems so mind bogglingly absurd.

Neither theists nor atheists need to claim knowledge. 

Your view is wrong because you don't understand the terms involved properly.  This one is objective.