system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: there is nothing wrong with viewing someone as a sex object

Basically as it says in the title. When I say sex object, I mean to say that, subjectively, to you, this person represents nothing more than a potential opportunity (or desirable fantasy if you’ll never meet them) of getting your end away. 

This is on a case by case basis and if you extend this view to an entire gender, as a whole, well that’s just sexism. But in the same way that you may have zero interest in another person and that’s fine, it’s also fine if your only interest in them is sexual in nature, so long as any and all interactions with them are consensual. 

CMV

Edit: I’ve been reading your replies, I don’t have time to reply to all right now, but I will later and there will be deltas incoming. Just to clarify though on the point of objectification- it seems I may have been misusing the term or softening the definition, which seems to be that when you do it you effectively no longer see the person as being human any more, they have no agency or rights as such. My usage of the term was more that you view them as a human being and you extend to them the basic empathy you should extend to all humans regardless of how well you know them, but you’re not interested in any other “higher” aspects of their personality or life beyond their sexuality. 

As such you would still be able to communicate about their sexual desires and be able to meet them.
gpt
Viewing someone as just sexual is fine but just a sex object is a little questionable to me. Sex should involve two people coming together and communication. Treating someone as a sex object to me implies using them just for sexual pleasure with no regard for them. If you want that buy a sex toy.