system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Ghosts are more likely to not exist than vice versa

I’ve never believed in ghosts, at least since I can remember. Yet, it seems like every other person I meet in life believes in ghosts. I’ve never seen a single thing that convinced me that they are real. Every piece of evidence seems goofy or fake. Why isn’t there any solid, irrefutable evidence of ghosts existing if they’re so clearly real? A lot of people compare this to believing in god. But a lot of religious people just have faith that their religion is true, and they recognize there debate is philosophical more than anything. What I am posing is that the belief in ghosts is visible, and in some cases tangible. What piece of damning evidence am I missing? There has to be something I haven’t heard that makes other people so sure that they are real, because I’ve seen nothing that has me even a little bit convinced.
gpt
Suppose somebody actually did see a ghost, and the ghost made themselves plainly evident to that person. What reason would have to expect that if this incident occurred, it would give *us* any tangible evidence for ghosts?

After all, there are people in this world who have observed things that other people have not. The fact that some people, like you, haven't observed ghosts is no reason to think other people haven't.

So the fact that you've never seen a ghost is flimsy evidence that ghosts don't exist. Surely there are lots of things that exist that nobody has ever seen. This is evident in the fact that we keep discovering them.