system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Veganism is morally correct compared to meat eating.

I am not a vegan or vegetarian myself. That said I probably should be. 

The moral case for veganism is pretty simple and ironclad:

1) Producing meat and animal products causes thinking feeling animals to suffer.

2) We can feed ourselves perfectly well without animal products.

3) Therefore we should not eat animal products as it causes less suffering.

I don't really have a counterargument to this that isn't ultimately just "but they're tasty". Most of the counterarguments I've seen don't even try to make the case that meat is morally correct, just that it's *less* morally wrong.

Is there any case to be made for the morality of eating meat?
gpt
Why is it morally correct to limit animal suffering? Animal's being eaten by other animals is about as natural as it gets. Is a Lion immoral for eating a Zebra?  


Would it be moral to kill a lion then if it saves countless zebras? Under the idea that we should minimize animal suffering, you can argue we should actually kill a ton of animals that are predators.