system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Given three buttons, which one will Immanuel Kant press?

So, Immanuel Kant needs to press one and only one button (that's the premise), which one do you think he will press?

* Button 1: The person who Immanuel Kant loves the most in the world will die.
* Button 2: 5% of the world's population will die. However, all of those people are people who IK doesn't know anything about and whose deaths are guarantee not to affect his life in any way (i.e. those people's deaths wouldn't cause world famine, war, economic collapse, etc).
* Button 3: Pressing this button has a 75% chance of killing 95% of the world population; but, there is a 25% chance that nothing will happen.
gpt
Kant doesn’t say much about the ethics of risk. In fact, even his account of beneficence (in the Groundwork) is curiously limited and contingent. 

Rather than saying you must help others because they matter, he argues that there would be a contradiction in your will if you refused to help since, Kant assumes, you would want them to help YOU if you were in their shoes. This is really more like a duty of reciprocal aid than straight up beneficence. (Of course, he does also have the formula of humanity, which might be of some help.)

There’s a reason why Kantians are so cagey when you ask them these questions.