system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
If we consider a painless murder bad due to the denial of future good, then can the same be said of abortion?

If a person could be killed in an entirely painless manner, and let’s say they have no one to care about them, then why is this wrong? I imagine that the answer is that we would deprive them of any future good, and in that sense we do them a harm, but if that is the case, then couldn’t someone make the same argument against abortion? What would be the difference?

Edit: I should have specified, I mean from a utilitarian point of view.
gpt
From this logic couldn’t you also say that it is immoral for a mother to not get pregnant because she is denying a potential baby of life?

In the scheme of things, what is the difference between a woman having no baby, and a woman getting pregnant and having an early abortion?