system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[General Superheroes] We love to rag on superheroes who misapply their talents towards vigilantism when they could do so much more good in other fields. What about the opposite? What superheroes really are optimized to do good via the traditional superhero routine?

Tony Stark arguably (Arguably!) shouldn't ever personally be in the field, for example. Luke Cage, however,  found a pretty excellent niche as a street-level vigilante- he's tough enough to pose a real problem to organized crime just by existing, but he was never going to leverage his powers to cure cancer or end world hunger.

Thoughts?
gpt
There was a comic about Superman not existing leading to a much more strained relationship between regular people and metahumans.

So despite the fact he's astoundingly powerful and is capable of all sort of world-changing actions, Superman being the face of superheroes and normalizing metahumans for the population is probably the best thing he can do. Martian Manhunter and a few others are just as strong as him but how many them could do the cheesy boy scout act with as much sincerity as Superman does?