system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Greenpeace is a threat to public health, humanitarian efforts, and scientific reasoning.

Greenpeace has caused quite a stir since its formation, from the opposition to nuclear testing and protesting for the preservation of Orca Whales. Those were very good causes, I have no doubt. But recently Greenpeace has been targeting other issues, such as the ban of certain chemicals. One of the most outrageous things that I've heard them say is that they want Chlorine banned. What folly! Chlorine is an indispensable chemical used in water treatment. Ever since its use, life expectancy has risen 50% in the US. Although Chlorine has many ways it can be misused, it has saved more lives than it has taken away. It is morally inexcuseable that anyone try to ban such a life-saving chemical.

Another thing is Greenpeace's opposition to Genetically Modified Organisms. That was the straw that broke the camel's back. There are so many different ways that GMOs are used, including the fortification of foods. The main food I think Greenpeace opposes is Golden Rice, which contains extra β-carotene (a precursor chemical that safely converts into Vitamin A in human bodies) that helps malnourished children, as vitamin deficiencies can be fatal. 

In a time where GMOs are thoroughly tested for potential hazards with decades of studies done under qualified institutions and researchers, there is simply no reason for the opposition of GMOs. It's unreasonable, and such stupidity is tantamount to the opposition of vaccines.

Whatever the reason, Greenpeace has taken a destructive turn from its noble origins. As such, I think that we need to disempower Greenpeace in order that we preserve basic public health and not be distracted from our efforts of battling hunger and malnutrition in impoverished areas.
gpt
PETA has some very damaging views regarding pets and working animals.   


Susan G. Komen for the Cure is essentially nothing more than a marketing ploy at this point.   


Autism Speaks uses people with autism to make money.   


I could go down the list of big time charities and non-profit organizations that are, at best, nothing but a cash grab for their leadership. Some are worse than that.   


However, these big time organizations do create one thing that is a good thing, and that is awareness. PETA is freaking crazy sometimes, but their efforts have made the treatment of animals a major issue. Same could be said about lots of those organizations.   


Greenpeace is probably not a great organization, but their work in building awareness about the state of our environment can't be understated, and that is a good thing.