system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: A woman looking for a sugar daddy is a prostitute.

For some reason it's not only acceptable but pervasive for women to state the main thing they are looking for in a relationship as being, "Someone who can take care of them". It's normal for a woman to break up with a man who can't keep a job, even when she never worked a day in her life, and society as a whole will support and justify her actions. 

Its my view that in the current year there's no expectation that a female should be financially incentivized in a relationship outside of sex work. Women work and carry their own and men do women's work around the house. The idea that a women whos only prospect at social mobility is spreading her legs can possibly be called anything other than a hooker is just entirely beyond me.
gpt
No. Same field, but slightly different job.

Prostitution is short term reward for short term gain.
Sugar daddy is long term service for long term gain.

It's like the difference between a nanny and a babysitter. 

One actually requires you to "play the part" for life. This is work, no matter how fraudulent the relationship is.

A prostitute just has to "act the part" for an hour or so.