system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[D&D] If I had a Lawful Good, Neutral Good and Chaotic Good trio of royal siblings, who would be the best Ruler? How would they differ?

I am an old king and I am going to die soon. I have three granddaughters who all stand to inherit the throne. My choice will decide who will be Queen after I go.

Arabella is the oldest, and she is Lawful Good.

Elisamarie is the middle, and she is Neutral Good.

Noelle is the youngest, and she is Chaotic Good.

You, my loyal Royal Adviser, are an expert on these mystical "Alignment Systems". Tell me, which one would make the best Queen? How would their manners of ruling be different?
gpt
I think the answer to this question hinges on the challenges that they will face.

If your kingdom will need an unflinching crusader, then Arabella is the right choice.  She would be a bulwark against the enemies of your land and a stable, reliable hand at the wheel for your people.  However, her steadfastness could become a problem if your kingdom ends up needing a more flexible leader who can shake things up.

If you kingdom will need a reformer, Elisamarie would be a good choice.  She has the right mindset to appreciate the good things that your kingdom already has but also to see room for improvement.  She would not feel beholden to the status quo and would make the changes that do the most good.  However, her desire to please and help everyone might stymie forward progress and could even be a problem in times when quick decisions are required.

If your kingdom will need a fresh start, Noelle is the daughter to choose.  She would ignore law, religion, and custom in order to do what is right.  She would likely be unpopular with the nobles and the clergy, but perhaps some upheaval of the status quo is what your country needs.  However, if your land is fine as is then maybe one of your more orderly daughters would be a better choice.