system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: I think Tim Cook and Apple are being super hypocritical by "boycotting" Indiana while having stores and profiting in countries like Saudi Arabia where they imprison and kill homosexuals.

To me like I stated in the title that I have a hard time understanding how a Company like Apple or Wal-mart that has came out publicly against the Indiana "Freedom of Religion law" when they conduct major operations in countries that imprison or kill homosexuals.  To me it comes off like like making the all mighty buck is more important to them than their ideological beliefs. I think that it shows a level of exploitation of human beings for the sole reason of profit, while fueling a media lynch mob against small businesses like Memories Pizza in Indiana like them preferring to not catering a homosexual wedding squares to the stoning to death of homosexuals in the Middle East.  So I guess in the end if Tim Cook feels that strong enough about the issue of gay rights maybe he should hold some solidarity of the very real life and  death struggle of fellow homosexuals in not only in but on a very large scale inbtje Islamic world. Because if social justice is what we are looking to accomplish then maybe we should start as human beings place our morals and beliefs in basic human rights with those that are very much suffering instead of picking on a pizza parlor in tje middle of the Midwest.
gpt
Apple isn't boycotting Indiana because they refuse to do business in Indiana, they're boycotting because they're hoping to actually change the law through applying political pressure.  That's the thing about absolute monarchies, political pressure doesn't work nearly as well as it does in democracies.  A boycott of Saudi Arabia wouldn't accomplish anything, a boycott of Indiana might.