system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Voicing your virtuous opinion through social media is nothing but narcissism.

I don't really use social media often, especially not to post anything. I am usually "tagged" or "checked-in" to places. I do scroll through on an evening, but really that is just to see funny videos or see an interesting story.

What really annoys me the most, is that people will latch on to ANY trending news story to voice their virtuous OPINION on the subject matter. This is surely only an attempt to gain validation from strangers online, and only serves to improve or cement your opinion of yourself, or to think that you, solely, have the almighty world view and you should repeat this rhetoric for all to hear.

Either way, clearly every person on this planet wants the world to become a utopia, the elysium, so why do you feel the need to voice that you also have this opinion?

The bit that further adds insult to injury, is that they will never voice opinions of matter from the around the world that have not been given social attention. People won't be talking about war torn countries, famine, slavery in other countries, because frankly they don't care. They only want to talk about their first world, privileged problems because they think it gives them something to further raise the pedestal they perch themselves so high upon.
gpt
>The bit that further adds insult to injury, is that they will never voice opinions of matter from the around the world that have not been given social attention. People won't be talking about war torn countries, famine, slavery in other countries, because frankly they don't care.

Ignoring the fact that people talk about goings-on in other countries all the time, you're saying you'd be okay with people posting their virtuous opinions on social media but only if it were about these issues?

If so, what makes you the arbiter about what it and what isn't worth talking about?