system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
What did Camus mean by "there are truths, but no truth"?

I'm reading through The Myth of Sisyphus, and in it Camus says, 

>Of whom and of what indeed can I say: “I know that!” This heart within me I can feel, and I judge that it exists. This world I can touch, and I likewise judge that it exists. There ends all my knowledge, and the rest is construction. For if I try to seize this self of which I feel sure, if I try to define and to summarize it, it is nothing but water slipping through my fingers. I can sketch one by one all the aspects it is able to assume, all those likewise that have been attributed to it, this upbringing, this origin, this ardor or these silences, this nobility or this vileness. But aspects cannot be added up. This very heart which is mine will forever remain indefinable to me. Between the certainty I have of my existence and the content I try to give to that assurance, the gap will never be filled. Forever I shall be a stranger to myself. In psychology as in logic, there are truths but no truth. 

What does he mean by the last phrase?
gpt
There are groups of properties or aspects which are truths, however we cannot sum them up to form a truth.  There will for Camus always be parts of the equation which we cannot know, which are as well to numerous, such that we can only construct a partial equation.  X+Y+?+?=?