system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Reading Marx and Hegel has turned me off of Analytic Philosophy. What's the best defense of the worth of that tradition?

A little about me, for context: I've always been broadly interested in philosophy, but only when I started reading Marx and Hegel did it totally transform my thinking.

With the exception of  Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems (which I think count as Analytic, and were also transformative for me), it seems like all the interesting philosophical questions are out of reach of the analytic method. Consider Marx's take on utilitarianism:

>The apparent absurdity of merging all the manifold relationships of people in the one relation of usefulness, this apparently metaphysical abstraction arises from the fact that in modern bourgeois society all relations are subordinate in practice to the one abstract monetary commercial relation.

I mean, I consider this critique to be quite scathing, once fully unpacked. It's not even, strictly speaking, just philosophical - it merges philosophy, history, psychology, etc. And the analytic method, it seems, doesn't even have a way to respond!

In spite of this, I obviously don't want to be dismissive of philosophy, and I want to be fair and open. Therefore I ask for readings that will (hopefully) restore my respect for the analytic style.

Thank all of you beautiful people!

&#x200B;

EDIT: it seems I really don't know what analytic philosophy is so the post is moot. Thanks for responses.
gpt
That utilitarianism doesn’t adequately acknowledge the separateness of persons is actually a central criticism within analytic philosophy.

Anyways, is the problem that you don’t think there are any interesting ideas in analytic philosophy, or that you happen not to like the writing style typical of analytic philosophy?