system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: If there is a God, then he is definitely evil.

My 3yo daughter was diagnosed with dysmoid fibromatosis. Today I was in the children's oncological clinic and saw that there were a lot of children. When I left the clinic, the man on the street asked me to donate money for the church and said that he would pray for me. And then I thought that if there is a God, then he is definitely evil. How could he allow this to happen for innocent children? And now it seems to me that we need to live reckoning with the fact that this world was created for suffering. And it seems to me that good is what opposes the evil intentions of God. Please change my view, because I really need it.
gpt
Statistically speaking, that's somewhat unlikely. Much more likely options include but are not limited to the following:

First, based on the Christian understanding of God as "Omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent", the fact that Earth has excessive suffering shows that this claim is incorrect. God cannot be all three of these things, but this doesn't determine which one, two or three of them in particular is not correct. If God is Omniscient and Omnibenevolent, then he must be aware of suffering and must want to fix it, but because it still happens, he therefore lacks the power to fix it, and he is not omnipotent. If God is Omnipotent and Omnibenevolent, then he has the power to fix suffering and the hypothetical desire to do so, but because it still happens, he therefore doesn't know it's happening and is not omniscient. And of course, if God is Omnipotent and Omniscient, then he knows suffering occurs and he has the power to fix it, but because it still happens, he therefore must not *want* to fix it and is not omnibenevolent. God could also lack multiple of these facets, such as being omnipotent but neither knowing nor caring about suffering, being all-knowing but neither having the power nor desire to fix suffering, or being omnibenevolent but lacking both the knowledge of suffering and the power to fix it. 

Alternatively, there may be a pantheon of multiple deities who each express different wills, knowledges and/or powers. This would be somewhat akin to Zoroastrianism, the religion that inspired Abrahamic beliefs, in which there are two gods, one who represents good and one who represents evil. The evil god is responsible for suffering, and while the good god will eventually do something about it and slay the evil god, that good god cannot do so right now and is still basically building up power like a really slow charging death star. Other pantheistic religions also tend to contain themes of good vs evil, essentially making evil gods responsible for bad things and good gods not powerful enough to overcome them at least until some undetermined point in the future. 

Another possibility, and probably the more likely one, is that god is neither good nor evil, but simply some kind of observer or warden, tasked to maintain the universe but not interfere in what happens inside it. Thus, suffering occurs because it is a part of life, but happiness also occurs because it is also a part of life. A good god wouldn't allow suffering to happen, but an evil god wouldn't allow happiness to happen, so given both happen it's probably more likely that if a god exists, it just doesn't really give a shit either way, or it has bigger fish to fry. 

So given all the numerous possibilities, and I've only listed a small handful here, statistically speaking it's much more likely that god *isn't* evil than *is*, but is instead either neutral or lacking in power.