system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
There is a real fear that AI will become too advanced for humans to control and we will be "enslaved" to the AI. So, is it our obligation to train AI to govern us the way a king would train his son to rule?
gpt
There might be a real fear but it's an open question whether that fear is justified. The current popular conversations are fostered by people who don't actually seem to be experts on AI (Sam Harris, Elon Musk, etc.) and those who are experts usually dismiss the current conversation as overly enthusiastic and closer to science fiction than reality. 

I think rather than jumping ahead and thinking about some robot apocalypse future we ought to be asking questions like: what constitutes intelligence, what does 'far more intelligent than humans' mean (we know what 'twice as much water as this cup holds' or 'processing videos three times faster' means in the relevant contexts). Does 'twice as intelligent' or 'many times more intelligent than humans' have any sort of sense? What would it mean for intelligence to emerge from a neural net? Does intelligent behaviour require pain and pleasure, avoidance and some form of success (i.e., a creature that has no goals, or at a more basic level if there is nothing that constitutes success or failure for it, how can we measure its intelligence?).