system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Is it inconsistent to be intolerant of intolerance or to judge people for being judgemental?

The title. “Inconsistent” is my attempt at phrasing “not ok” in a useful way. If you have better phrasing, please substitute that instead.
gpt
One view of this question, advanced by Karl Popper, is that unlimited tolerance can only result in the collapse of all tolerance. That is, when intolerant voices abandon rational argument in favor of violence, those who value tolerance should *not* tolerate them any further. This is not endorsing the suppression of intolerant voices which still engage in rational argument and respect the rule of law but, rather, that the tolerant must, at some point, be prepared to defend its own institution of liberty. He writes about this in *The Open Society and Its Enemies*. John Rawls also writes on this in *A Theory of Justice*. Both are great reads with regard to modern social liberalism.