system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: The Hammer and Sickle should be considered just as offensive as the Swastika

Both of these symbols have lately become more prominent in popular culture. While the swastika rightfully elicits a bad reaction, the hammer and sickle does not. 

Both of these symbols represent failed countries from the 20th century that had commented horrible atrocities to achieve their goals. Both nations were extremely authoritarian, and extremely repressive to their citizens. The leadership of both counties was responsible for countless deaths, with the holocaust for Nazi Germany, and the purges and holodomor for the Soviet Union. 

I believe that the only reason that the Hammer and Sickle does not illicit such a reaction is because the ideas that it represents have become more fashionable lately. If it was far right ideas that were gaining prominence, the current situation with these symbols would be reversed.

Edit: Aight I’m done with this post. I feel like I’ve said everything I can say, and if you have any more questions you can look through other replies and see similar questions to yours.
gpt
You just said it yourself, it's the idea that the symbol illicits, the hammer and sickle is synonymous with communism, which as an ideology isn't bad, though it can be argued that it's unachievable, so that's an obvious reason for why the hammer and sickle should not be at the same level of disgust as a swastika, the swastika represents fascism and that ideology is inherently flawed because it doesn't uphold equality like and ideology like communism or socialism.