system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Twilight didn't deserve all the hate it got

Twilight: the series with the sparkling vampires that everyone loathed. Well, over the July long weekend, I finally read through the books, and I've got to say, they aren't that bad. In fact, I think the internet's hatred of them is completely undeserved. 

I'm going to break down the main arguments against them I've seen and explain why they're bogus: 

* **Twilight portrays an abusive relationship**. Not really. Twilight portrays reasonable consequences flowing from a human loving a vampire. If an undead monster is into you, chances are that monster's going to be scary, socially weird, stronger than you, and scared of hurting you. Once Bella becomes a vampire, the power imbalance is fixed and never mentioned again.  

* **Girls are going to go out and look for a boyfriend like Edward. Even if he isn't abusive, that's still a bad idea**. Sure. And kids who read *Lord of the Rings* might think butchering orcs is cool and, in the absence of orcs, start killing their classmates. Either we acknowledge that teenagers can tell fiction and reality apart, or we ban all literature.   

* **Bella gave up her humanity for a man.** If anything, Bella wants to be a vampire more than she wants Edward. She often alienates/annoys him by requesting immortality. These books are power fantasies about giving up your humanity and becoming sexy + strong, more than romantic fantasies.   

* **Sparkly vampires are cringey.** All YA is cringey. Katniss being the coolest archer in all the districts is ridiculous. Harry Potter having amazing eyes that everyone recognizes is exhausting. Heck, jumping on over to adult high fantasy, 50&#37; of the epithets from *A Song of Ice and Fire* are absurd. ("Mother of Dragons"? "Hand of the King?") Either you like the tropes/"twists" of the genre or you don't; they don't make any given book bad on their own.   

* **The writing is bad.** The writing is middling. It's not going to win any awards, but it's serviceable. 

In short, I firmly believe that Twilight is a perfectly fine series for teenagers which got a lot of undeserved hate. Change my view by convincing me that there's something uniquely bad about it, making the pushback warranted.
gpt
No, Twilight didn't deserve all the hate it got.

But it definitely deserved most of it.

1) The problem isn't that Edward is scary, socially weird, etc. It's that Edward is all of these things and the narrative tells us all that he's the perfect boyfriend throughout all of it. Bella is head over heels in love with him, ignores the assorted objections from her dad and others, and in the end, turns out to be right. 

2) You really don't see the difference between romance and murder? The entire point of the series is to make Bella and Edward's romance as tantalizing as possible. Meyer is trying to make the audience attracted to Edward, in a way that Tolkein isn't trying to get the audiance interested in murder.

5) No, it's bad. It constantly repeats the same descriptions and overuses other words (see: chagrin). Meyer is not a good writer.