system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Is philosophy tube's explanation of the differences between analytic and continental philosophy accurate?

Going to be an undergrad soon and majoring in philosophy (and therefore don't know anything about anything). While I will be investing in learning both sides I would like to think long term and try to understand the differences now so I can make the best decisions when enrolling and signing up for classes. Thanks.
gpt
Not really: the two distinctions they suggests are "logical" versus "wooly" and "mostly done in the UK" versus "mostly done in continental Europe", neither of which is particularly helpful or accurate. And they suggest that Kant is the beginning of continental philosophy, which is crazysauce on pancakes.