system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Are the steps one can take to get good at continental philosophy different than those one would take to get better at analytic philosophy?

If one wanted to "get good" at, or "improve" at philosophy (I put those words in scare quotes b/c im not entirely sure what it means to be "good" at philosophy, generally), would doing so look different if one wanted to become better at, say, continental philosophy, in particular? 

What might one do to become better at continental philosophy?
gpt
Well, they're different in the sense that to get good at continental philosophy you should study continental philosophy and to get good at analytic philosophy you should study analytic philosophy. General competence at philosophy, in terms of understanding its problems, having strong reading and note-taking skills, having a competence in critical thinking, etc., would be helpful foundations in both cases.

So this is like "Are the steps one would take to get good at Aristotle different from the steps one would take to get good at Kant?" Well, to get good at Aristotle you should study Aristotle, while to get good at Kant you should study Kant, but general competence in philosophy... etc.