system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[Incredibles] Why aren't heroes covered by Good Samaritan laws?

After Mr. Incredible saves the jumper and a train, he is sued by both the jumper and the passengers. Wouldn't this principle make him immune to legal action?
gpt
Typically good samaritan laws assume that the individual was acting for the well-being of another and had sufficient training or skills to do good. Someone who has never done surgery is more likely going to do harm if they try to help someone in the street in urgent medical need (say they were shot in a vital organ and the bullet needed to be removed), but a trained Dr could do it. 

This comes down to recognition and registration. Supers are not recognised by the law, they are not trained, they do not get tested or audited, they are a vigilante. So good samaritan laws will not cover them. 

It wouldn't be long anyway before some criminals took advantage of this cover. Creating a fixed brawl downtown near a bank and conveniently smashing open the vault before the "criminal" escapes with the cash while the "hero" claims immunity as they were trying to do good. These loopholes have to be covered otherwise we need to define what a hero is.