system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Eileen Gu is a competitive sports traitor in terms of nationalism.

Important edit up front:

There seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about the point I am making. To make thise completely simple.

Within a "nationalistic perspective and framework", if she is competing for China to benefit China and "grow the sport there" while growing up in, training, and planning to live in the USA then she is betraying the USA to benefit China.

 As opposed to someone who moves to another country to benefit themselves but tries to grow the sport in their own country by sponsoring athletes there or doing training seminars etc.

Imagine a reverse scenario that could be possible.

A Chinese table tennis player grows up in China, trains in China and plans to live in China...but competes for the USA...and tries to grow the sport in the USA as opposed to in China


Edit: After reading a comment that says that she was sponsored financially by Chinese backing since she was 9 years old. Then depending on how much the backing she got was intended for Chinese national interests, and how much of her knowledge and training came from America then Eileen Gu is essentially a mole within a "nationalistic framework" of thought.
gpt
In order to be a "traitor," you have to assume she owes some measure of loyalty to the US. In particular, she needs to have some special duty to "grow the sport" in the US that she is breaching by doing it in China instead.

Can you explain what that duty is and where it comes from?