system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Steve Rodger’s side in MCU Civil War is completely illogical.

So in the MCU adaptation of the comic book civil war, the avengers split down the middle.  Half of them sign the Sokovia Accords and half of them don’t.

I would side with Steve, but the thing is; Tony doesn’t actually agree with the accords, and has no intention of actually obeying them.  

Tony pretty much says that the only reason he wants to cooperate with the United Nations is to keep the Avengers from becoming fugitives.  Tony disobeys the accords multiple times within days of signing them and doesn’t listen to the UN at all. 

The avengers are in the business of saving people, and how many people do you think Steve saves when he goes on the run.  Steve having to avoid being captured on sight by almost every major government surely is more of a hindrance then having to dodge the UN every once and a while.

Edit:  I would like to rephrase the title “Steve Rodger’s side in MCU Civil War is completely illogical” to “Steve Rodger’s is clearly in the wrong in MCU Civil War”.

Edit2:  I see now how Steve was acting in character by not signing the accords, but I still think that the CHARACTER of Steve Rodgers was clearly in the wrong for making the decisions he made.
gpt
>I would side with Steve, but the thing is; Tony doesn’t actually agree with the accords, and has no intention of actually obeying them.

**If Steve's side was completely illogical, you wouldn't side with him in any capacity, not just because of Tony's actions not being consistent.** Tony doesn't always trust himself. His character arc is heavily affected by his own previous choices and behavior (Iron Man 1) as well as his own mental struggles (Iron Man 3). Steve, on the other hand, has always been sure of himself and his own morals/values. 

If you're arguing that Steve should have just pretended to go along with things and then backed out later, that would go against his character. Steve isn't one to back away from a promise. It also would look incredibly bad for the Avengers to be caught lying about following the accords. **Steve's position was centered on the fact that the Avengers needed to be as trustworthy and dependable in all aspects; he believed that it would be better to be at odds with the government than to compromise his morality and duty by only pretending to go along with the UN's decisions.** 

Obviously the Avengers fighting looks bad, but you can't blame that entirely on Steve. It may not have been the most practical, the most efficient, or even the wisest choice, but Steve's side is centered on the need for the Avengers to keep their integrity. You may not believe it was the best choice, but it's far from illogical.