system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
cmv: Pro-life is a violation of human rights and the decision by courts/government on the baby's life is a overstepping of authority unless the baby can be considered as public property.

Hello, I know this post is going to be bombarded with religious people but the decision of abortion/ no Abortion solely lies with the mother as she is the one carrying it and is in her natural right to the decision regarding her baby. This can be compared to as the right to oxygen, food and water as these are the natural needs of a human being.
Secondly, the government/courts must have the authority over the baby to make any decision regarding it but since the baby acts as a private property, technically the government/courts cannot interfere in the matters related to private property as that would be a violation of their jurisdiction.
gpt
Humans cannot be owned as property by anyone, including their mothers...in the US there’s ample precedence for that. That being said, there’s also precedence for a government body stripping parental rights in instances where say, a parent is abusive. There are plenty of good pro-choice arguments out there, but the “mom has full domain over the child” is just simply not one of them.