system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Designer babies aren't inherently unethical

That is, if they were designed to get rid of diseases, deficiencies and disabilities along with the technology being universally available for use.

I don't understand what other issue there might be with them if no one is getting an unfair advantage. If these two conditions are met, no one is giving deliberate advantages to the baby and the wealthy wouldn't be the only ones getting healthy, inherited disease free babies.

I don't understand where the issue is with a future with no disabilities or genetic diseases.
gpt
To start with, they are not inherently unethical. The idea could be used to do a lot of good. But that's going to have to come with limits. 

The supposition that they would be equally available is simply wrong, however, and will be forever. There will be those that can afford to have their cake and eat it on the genetic level, and those who can afford to have a baby. Even a universal healthcare system is not going to mess around doing some of the things that designer babies may actually be able to be in future.

If genetics could be manipulated so that they were smarter and stronger and maybe even bigger than the rest of us, then you would be creating a master race of rich people's babies.

Also, as pointed out, we're not completely sure what we're doing. It's possible that in eliminating some diseases, we might also produce a vulnerability to other diseases. In a few human beings, that's going to be a bummer for them, but it will sort itself out. If it's everyone, then everyone could die. 

I think it was said that the Spanish gave the native Americans such deadly diseases that between them arriving, and the British setting up their colonies in the US, 90% of the population had died. Imagine trying to produce some kind of society with 10% of the people. 

Also, we find the gay gene. What do we do? Gay people aren't inherently suffering from their sexuality. But if we knew that we could set them up to be "normal", what then?
 
I think there are lots of qualities in people that we would try to edit out, and actually, it may not benefit us. Some of the world's smartest people are autistic. But for the vast majority of people, autism is considered a hideous mental issue, and would be edited out on birth.