system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: all nuclear weapons and bioweapons should be destroyed or permanently disabled

We as a human society with intelligence have been around for a very long time. In the last 70 years we have managed to use nuclear fission to create something terrible. And we have created enough of those things to completely wipe out the entire human race and possibly all life on earth.  What are the advantages of this other that to show we could fuck up an entire country if we wanted?  Shouldn’t we be working towards a peaceful utopia like society?  We’ve already seen how destructive and deadly these weapons can be through historical events.  And I get that war will still continue on without them.. but to what point should we have and still be producing more of these weapons that bring tragedy, death, and disease?
gpt
Here is your fundamental problems.

First, the technology has been invented. People know how to make them. Even if you got rid of all of them today, all it takes is one state to decide to make them again and they would be an instant superpower status nation. That is the intense incentive to create new ones once all of the existing ones are gone.

Second, international relations is simply slightly ordered anarchy. The most powerful dictate the rules for everyone and then the most powerful don't even have to follow their own rules. There is no check on this. He with the biggest stick wins. As such, there is no possible way to 'destroy' or 'disable' weapons on the worldwide scale.