system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: NASA and the government should not be able to put factories or large building's on the Moon ever.

NASA recently revealed that in the next couple years they will have people on the Moon. With the end of space travel to the Moon I believe this is a great and needed mission for seeing how the human race does with new planets in the future. When people get there I'm sure they will have some little houses and building for gardens but I do not believe they should be allowed to build and large building's there at all. I say this with the sense of national parks their beauty is preserved and no profitable company or industries are allowed to build there. I believe this is what has to be done to the Moon when I look up at the moon through a telescope I should see only craters and other natural occurring landmarks not a building or store. I believe we have to preserve the natural beauty of the Moon for future generations. However I understand that this may have to be done and am willing to change my perspective on this. I will be happy to hear any and all opinions on this matter.
gpt
What is the purpose of preserving a national park, a coral reef, or a rainforest? I'd say it's at least partially because there are living things that live there such as plants and animals. Those environments are their homes.

On the other hand, the moon is a lifeless rock. No living thing exists there. It's completely empty. We could detonate 1000 nuclear bombs there and not even a fly would be hurt.

You could say that the moon is a special lifeless rock and should be preserved the way it is. But there are trillions upon trillions of moons outside of the Earth's atmosphere. There are 193 other moons in our solar system alone. The only distinctive thing about the moon is that it's the one that happens to be closest to us.

Overall the Earth's moon is not special and there are no living things there. That makes it the perfect place to put factories and large buildings. Those factories and buildings might hurt people, plants, animals, and other organisms on Earth, but they wouldn't disrupt anyone on the Moon. We could test Chernobyl style nuclear power plants, and even if they exploded, no one would get hurt. We could leave radioactive material on the surface of the moon, and it would be nothing compared to the almost infinite amount of radioactive material spread out throughout the universe. We can use the moon for a ton of things without any consequences or harm done to any living thing. Perhaps we'd lose the natural beauty of the Moon, but we'd trade it for unlimited usable energy, which means that global warming would be fixed.

Ultimately, your argument is like saying that no one should go play outside after the first snow. Sure the snow looks beautiful and untouched by human hands. But letting kids run around, go sledding, throw snowballs, make snowmen, etc. is it's own kind of beauty. And  it's great to let kids have fun on one acre of land, especially if we have thousands of acres of untouched virgin snow as well.