system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Is it morally wrong to own smartphones given the questionable(to say the least) treatment of their workers in every part of manufacturing.
gpt
Calculating utility has always been difficult, and it doesn't seem any easier to take a consequentialist approach to this either. Overall, industrialization (which every developed and developing country has to go through at some point) has benefited the human population, allowing for the mass production of goods and exponential growth in technological advancements. In countries like the US, you struggle more with overconsumption than you do  scarcity.

Global life expectancy and nutrition have improved with noticeable declines in poverty. But pointing out these facts are not to say that industrialization doesn't come with its own ills. We also experience pollution on a mass scale (much of which we export to countries like China), and we see an increase in obesity in affluent countries. Whether or not industrialization has done more good than harm is really a matter of perspectives, many arguing that--in spite of the working conditions--foreign labor has overall seen improvements in living standards because of industrialization and global trade.

Some, specifically socialists, would argue that an economic system that permits such exploitation and inequality is unethical in and of itself, which to them overshadows the fruits of industrialization and capitalism and warrants a revolution.