system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I am an antinatalist. (i.e. I believe that having children is unethical.) CMV

**Please read the entirety of my post before commenting. Thank you.**

I'm here today on CMV because I hold a belief that is not only so uncommon to the point of being practically unheard of, but is borderline taboo. I feel as if my belief is based on well founded ideas of ethics, and follows objective reasoning, and therefore, is correct. And yet, here I stand against a world of academics and thinkers, most of which do not adopt antinatalist viewpoints. I'm not here to understand why they think it - biology, sociology, and religion all give compelling answers as to *why* they think it. Why *I* think it, (as in, how I came across it and haven't recoiled in horror,) is also off topic. I'm just here today to discuss the topic of antinatalism, and that's all.

Okay, here is my logic. If you find a problem with any step or missing information, please point it out so that we can get on with this debate as quickly and efficiently as possible. 

~~1. Moral actions are actions that, regardless of physical consequences to one's self, are things that ought to be done.
2. Immoral actions are actions that, regardless of physical consequences to one's self, are things that ought not to be done.
3. Doing harm to someone else, and having them acknowledge/react to the harm, is always immoral.
4. Incurring pleasure to someone else, and having them acknowledge/react to the pleasure, is always moral. 
5. Doing harm to and incurring pleasure upon someone else is only moral if the net outcome in the recipient's mind is positive. Otherwise, it is immoral.
6. Acting on consent voids the morality of an action, *if and only if the person giving consent is capable of rational decisions, and is 100% certain of the outcomes.* (Under this rule, a person giving consent would never regret doing so. Otherwise, he or she was not entirely informed of the consequences.)
7. When you bring together a sperm and egg to create a new human, (i.e. Have a child,) you are bringing both harm and pleasure to the new human, as he or she would not have experienced either otherwise.
8. An unborn child is unable to give consent to his or her creation.
9. You can never know how the life of a child will turn out.
10. A risk taken for someone else (without consent) that could incur harm or pleasure is immoral. 
11. Because of (8), (9), and (10), creating a life is immoral.
12. Because of (11) and (2), having children ought not to be done. I am perfectly fine with societal consequences of this, and feel as if our inevitable demise is better if voluntary and under our control, as opposed to violent and horrid as it probably will be.~~

**The premises were flawed, but also unnecessary, okay? Just read the paragraph below.**

And now for the sloppy version:

Having a child incurs pain and pleasure to an otherwise non-feeling, non-existent person. By doing so, you are taking a risk as to whether or not they will experience more pleasure or more pain, and whether or not they will wish to undo their life. Undoing their life, (or ruing their creation,) indicates that they have been harmed, and as a result, the action was immoral. You may argue that only a small percent of people actually feel harmed by their existence. Other antinatalists step in here and try and prove that we ALL suffer enough to OBJECTIVELY prove that our lives were not worth being created. I take a different approach - I say that you are taking a greater-than-negligible risk for someone else. The only saving grace could be consent, but as that is impossible to obtain, childbirth is immoral.

Alright, I hope I explained myself well enough. Please don't comment along the lines of "why don't you kill yourself then?". Yes, I've received this type of reply before.

Thoughts?

EDIT: Okay, my axioms are a bit flawed, but a few of them are also a bit unnecessary. Just pay attention to my paragraph at the end, then. I think my logic is solid there.

EDIT 2: Thanks for all your replies - I'm having much fun replying to them. However, I need to get to bed - I'll be back tomorrow!

EDIT 3: I'm sorry everyone, but it's becoming daunting and quite time consuming to keep up with the replies. I feel I've responded to the lot of incoming comments anyway. I'll check back later. 

EDIT 4: Okay everyone, thanks for your replies. I changed my view away from the risk argument, and back towards something more like the asymmetry argument. I'll still be checking my mail box for new replies, but chances are I won't be replying to all of them unless something particularly strikes me. Have a great day all you breeders!
gpt
You really think that your moral view is sensible if it causes the absolute eradication of the human race.

Also, have you heard of implied consent. It makes a lot more since than 3. 

As far as 6 goes, is anyone ever 100% sure of the consequences?