system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
[Marvel/DC] How would people's feelings about heroes and vigilantism break down along party lines?

Recognising that the actual politics of the DC and Marvel comics universes are pretty well hidden from partisan identification, supposing Spiderman were real and were a controversial figure in the media, or supposing Batman existed in the same universe. Would it be the Republicans or the Democrats who are on the supportive side of the controversy?

Do the republicans appreciate heroes who represent hard work and personal responsibility thanks to individual liberty and minimal government involvement, against the Democrats who want to see power checked? Or is it the Democrats who are more willing to accept a new way of fighting crime while the Republicans favor good old fashioned police and military involvement?

What would Donald Trump say?

Thunderbolt Ross and J. Jonah Jameson both seem conservative to me, but so does James Gordon and Daredevil's supportive priest. Are there any apparent liberals who take sides on these issues? Any relevant cameo appearances by real-world politicians?
gpt
Well, in the context of the Marvel universe anti-superhuman activists like J. Jonah Jameson, Thunderbolt Ross, and William Stryker are almost always conservatives. Within the context of political policy, the Republican Party seems to push more for government regulation over superhumans, but many of these regulatory efforts are likely bipartisan. Ronald Reagan created the Commission of Superhuman Activities deal with superhuman issues and The Superhuman Registration Act was passed under George W. Bush's tenure. In contrast, Barack Obama gave Norman Osborn, and later Captain America, near autonomy in running their versions of the Avengers and repealed the Superhuman Registration Act, (though this was done in order to get Captain America to run the Avengers.)