system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: The vegans are (mostly) right (especially about pork)

If you believe causing pain and sufering is wrong, obviously causing pain and suffering is wrong, especially to animals that have a deeper capacity to feel.

People have gut intuitions towards consumption of dogs because we understand them as sentient beings that can feel and think and pigs are even smarter.  Vegans are disproportionately hated because people are uncomfortable with the idea that their traditions or practices are immoral. In your economic situation you might not be able to afford veganism, but to say that it's not more moral to avoid consumption of meat is wrong if you believe causing pain and suffering is wrong. To say that it's incorrect to judge people's beliefs is just wrong because no one accepts everyone's beliefs. Like maybe if you accept beliefs like the consumption of unwilling human meat or believe that animals have no inherent moral value and permit things like torturing animals for pleasure as moral.   


The vast majority of moral philosophers, even meat-eating ones, will agree that consumption of mammal meat is immoral. Most arguments against veganism are inconsistent at best.
gpt
> People have gut intuitions towards consumption of dogs because we understand them as sentient beings that can feel and think and pigs are even smarter.

I think that's actually more of a historical development. Dogs and cats lived together with humans for a long time, because they were useful for humans to keep them around (guard dogs, shepherd dogs, cats to kill mice and rats, etc.).