system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Voluntary euthanasia and mandatory reversible contraception would improve the wellbeing of the populace

I think that my view comes from the belief i hold that whether my own life is worth living is based upon my own subjective assessment of whether the good in my life outweighs the bad. Ill advocate for each of the above seperatley. 

First voluntary euthanasia would allow those who suffer with chronic incurable pain to end their suffering prematurley when it outweighs the good in their life. It would allow those with diminished quality of life due to chronic disease to end their life in dignity. It would allow those with a diagnosis of dementia to prevent the suffering they experience as their brain slowly dies. I think alot of the concerns about euthanasia such as that people would be coerced into it, or that they would make these decisions at times when their capacity would be impaired could be mitigated by having requirements with seperate specialists with a yearly interval before their desire to die is respected as an unchangable fact. You could even rule out mental health problems as a permissible condition for the request. Also the other main argument against euthanasia is that a cure could become available... However looking at the drugs industry i think that things take too long and any possible cures on the horizon could be provided as hope in consultations in order to allow informed decision making. In addition to the advantages for the individual, by allowing people to die when they do not want to live anymore this would reduce the economic burden society is increasingly needing to bear to care for many people who cannot care for themselves. The social care crisis in the deficency of care available for the elderly in western countries is worsening and worsening. 

In terms of mandatory reversible contraception, i feel that reproduction is a lifechanging decision that can be made before someone fully understands the consequences of their actions and can have extremley negative consequences for both them and the new person they create. Having children when you cant care for them, when you cant afford to care for them will ruin their life forever. Having a child can be the difference between a stable life and economic ruin. It boggles my mind when i see people have children when they have no money when they hope that society will care for them (when that could all change after any election) and when they have a relationship with theur partner with frequent domestic violence. So.... If we were to prevent reproduction at a young age (with the option for the individual to request for reversal at any time without question) all of those ruined lives could be prevented. We give vaccines to prevent disease and chronic suffering so why not this? I must admit i am not fully happy about the state interfering with reproduction myself so i dont hold this view as strongly as the above.
gpt
What reversible contraception? Vasectomies aren’t guaranteed reversible. Birth control for women has major nasty side effects, etc. 


Also, even abusers want kids, they’ll be able to easily convince their abused spouse to have kids.