system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Discrimination by a private business is immoral, but should be allowed

I would like to begin by emphasizing that I do think that discrimination in any shape or form is absolutely disgusting and ridiculous. However, I’m a firm believer in personal property rights, and don’t think that the government should have permission to force a private citizen to give anyone else any of his personal property.

All men and women are born with a natural right to their body and labor, as it’s all each individual possesses at birth, and no other person has a right to either of these things (except parents who are still allowed to raise kids and all that jazz). As the person ages and acquires more property outside of the bounds of his or her own body and labor, these same restrictions apply; no one else has a right to their property, which is why theft, vandalism, and other property crimes are wrong. 

Another way of viewing it is in a simpler situation; if I were to own a lemonade stand and did not want to sell lemonade to someone for any reason, I have the complete authority over my own property and should be permitted to do as such. I know there are anti-discrimination laws on the books that make what I just said illegal, but I personally disagree with those laws. The government’s primary function is the protection of property rights, not the legislation of morality at the expense of a violation of property rights. Before anyone says it yes taxation is still okay because it is necessary for the government to carry out its duties, being part of this government is completely voluntary, and the people have a say in how they’re taxed. 

I do recognize the flaws in this argument. I realize that it's all based on the assertion that we all have the right to our own bodies and labor, and that I lack a sound justification for that assertion which is a great handicap for the idea. I would just like to specify once more, even though it already says 'Private' in the title, that only private organizations should be allowed this right, and the government must remain unable to discriminate based on gender, race, sexual orientation, etc.

With all of this said I want it to be perfectly clear that just because I believe that something should be allowed, does not mean that I believe that it is morally permissible. I believe racism, sexism, homophobia, and any other kind of bigotry you can think of, are all absolutely unjustified and morally abhorrent, but the fundamental right to your own property supersedes other people’s perceived right to your property, which does not exist.
gpt
>The government’s primary function is the protection of property rights, not the legislation of morality at the expense of a violation of property rights.

No, it's not. The government's primary function is to create the best society it can, which doesn't always mean enforcing absolute private property rights. Now, enforcing private property rights **is** a major part of the government, but only insofar as they make society better. As you mention in the post, taxation is a shining example of this - taxing people is a gross violation of private property, but a society where the government has no money is far worse than our current one.