system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: it is not possible to have an entirely "non-offensive" existence.

You can please some of the people all of the time. 
You can please all of the people some of the time. 
You cannot please all of the people all of the time.

Offense is sometimes given/intended, and sometimes taken/unintended.

It's possible to go through life and deliberately choose to not engage with things you know will give/have intentional offense to an individual or group.

It's not possible to make every possible consideration in every possible way in order that nothing you ever do or say or be can ever be unintentionally offensive, or that someone can take offense from it where no intention is there.

If you change your behaviour to match one groups expectations you may be causing offense to another, and vice versa. There is always someone who can find issue with something.

The only option is to be your own compass, make your own decisions, and accept that some people may not like that. It doesn't mean to change for them but accept that there is no pure choice that leads to entirely accepted results.
gpt
Isn't this just a subset of the paradox of tolerance?

The very act of being non offensive is offensive to some, see just admitting the existence of LGBT. And that's ok.

Who is seriously proposing an existence where you offend literally noone?