system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Panpsychism

There was a question here soon closed off "isn’t it obvious that consciousness is ubiquitous?" and it turned out that there is a name for this idea: panpsychism. I would like to be assured that panpsychism is not a respectable theory in philosophy as being completely against common sense. For instance, something that has no intelligence, like a rock, cannot possibly have consciousness (?)
gpt
You won't be assured of that as panpsychism is a working theory in the philosophy of mind currently (albeit an unpopular one). The most plausible version of the view at the moment is called panprotopsychism, and is the view that, while things like electrons or rocks aren't themselves conscious, they might in some way be "made up of" some very small pieces of "consciousness," which, when arranged into brain-like ways, become properly conscious.

Philosophy is a field where the justification "it's just common sense" doesn't really fly. Philosophers like to give reasons and arguments for their beliefs, and challenging our previously held beliefs is one of the main things that philosophers have to do to do their job well. While you're right that it's very obvious that something like a rock is unlikely to be conscious, you should probably assume that the clever people working in this field had already thought of that before putting the theory out there.