system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Charity in its truest form does not bare your name.

I feel that if you are helping anyone out with 100% sincerity, it will not matter to you if people know that you are behind the charity, no matter how big or small the contribution.  I see large charities bearing the name of the person behind it followed by words such as "foundation" and I often see people on social media looking for a pat on the back for something good they've done.  This is still giving but the giver is still looking for something in return.  

For instance, we have the Oprah Winfrey Foundation and the Trump Foundation, then we have Mathew McConaughey's charity 'Just Keep Livin" and Morgan Freeman's 'Rock River Foundation'.  Until I looked it up, I had no idea about the people behind the last two... and maybe they prefer it that way. 

The stories in the news of anonymous givers have always intrigued me and make me have hope for mankind... like the recent one about the man at Walmart who paid off everyone's layaway items.  This man insisted on remaining anonymous.  He gave for the pure sake of giving.
gpt
If you are a person who is already famous (such as Oprah Winfrey, Bill Clinton, or Bill and Melinda Gates) then having your name on a charitable foundation can help it seem more legitimate, which increases donations and make the charity more effective.