system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: when someone sues the government, the case should not go to a public/government court because that's a conflict of interest

P1. A third party who works for the same organization as the defendant should not be considered unbiased (if you sue Coca Cola, you wouldn't want someone who works for Coca Cola to decide the case)

P2. Public/government court judges work for the government and arbitrate disputes between people suing the government and the government. 

C1. Public/government court judges should not arbitrate disputes between people and the government because there is good reason to believe that they will not be unbiased

Note: this also applies to suing the police and other government employees for something they did as part of their job.
gpt
The government isn't one cohesive body. It's specifically structured to separate power and interest among a lot of different semi-autonomous groups to prevent the type of problem you hope to. Of course, it isn't always infallible (congress deciding their own salaries and whatnot) but the judiciary is typically the most disconnected from everything else, and therefore the most impartial. Judges typically have no problem ruling against the government. They do it happily quite frequently, including and especially in the Supreme Court.

Moreover, who would you suggest replace the Judiciary in these cases? A private corporation that decides the outcome of these cases? That sounds like it would create far more problems than it would ever solve.