system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
I think personal material heritage is evil for society, CMV

If we want a perfect society where if I work hard I will get where I want, why material (usually money) heritage is not evil, killing the meritocracy system? Rich people will finance and give so much more opportunities (education, experiences, contacts, influence) to many generations of their offspring, how young people can compete equally so their merit will decide who deserves what and gives the best individuals of a society the top positions!?. Only moral heritage should be valid.
gpt
You don't seem to take into account that parents and grandparents often work their asses off, and thus help to better society, because they want to allow their descendants to have a better life. Thus, by outlawing personal material heritage, you may actually harm the prosperity of the entire population.