system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Asexuals are definitely a part of the LGBT community.

I am not asexual myself (bi, technically, but i hate labels) but i have friends who are. Being asexual is a non traditional sexuality and/or identity, so why would it not be part of LGBT? 

Sure, they don’t face a lot of discrimination for who they are, but why would that have to do with anything? discrimination shouldn’t be the defining term of LGBT+ — i get that it’s important and still happens a lot, but society is slowly moving on from focusing on  discrimination anyways.

Most people don’t agree with me and I feel like an SJW for thinking this way, thats why i want my views changed.

EDIT: Honestly i now agree that the point of the LGBT+ community DOES in fact have to do with the discrimination they face. After all, what else would make them different than everyone else? We’re all humans :)
gpt
>Sure, they don’t face a lot of discrimination for who they are, but why would that have to do with anything? 

LGBT is a political coalition. Each letter of LGBT represents a distinct group, but these groups have faced similar historical discrimination and therefore band together in union to achieve political (and social) goals. Being a lesbian is still grounds for employment dismissal in a majority of US states. There's no national protection against housing discrimination for a gay couple in the US. Addressing these and other issues--like same-sex marriage and the many legal situations that entails--required a political coalition, and that union is what we today know as LGBT. Asexuals do not face these challenges so it's inappropriate to group them together with LGBT.