system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: People care more about how something is said than what is said.

Someone who conveys an idea with enough confidence and conviction will most likely be believed by most people regardless of the accuracy of, and evidence to back up, the idea. In contrast, the opposite is also true. In a similar light most people judge a person's character by their presentation rather than their actions and beliefs. An example is when someone unqualified for a position gets hired because they are charismatic. Another example is when someone of either sex claims they care more about personal character than appearance yet fall for those who disrespect them but look good doing it. Another example is when a politician uses an important cause as the backbone for their campaign yet takes no real action to fix the problem.
gpt
Won't you need to qualify your CMV of people with "uninformed" / "unsavvy" people. 

If a person presents a poorly done research paper in a scientific convention, the expert audience will quickly punch holes into it. If an emotional but ultimately false appeal before an experienced judge will carry little weigh compared to it being presented to a lay person not familiar with the law or charlatans. 

In short, the audience matters and a blanket statement like your CMV doesn't really work when the audience is a knowledgeable and expert one.