system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: In 100 years, the current Republican Party will be shown to have been on the wrong side of history with nearly all their main stances and platforms.

Mostly social issues (against universal healthcare, using religion to bring the weak and dumb to repeatedly vote against their own self interest, implicit/explicit racism and against social justice), but also economic (supply side economics, policies that benefit the top 1%, obsession with everything privatized and profiteering to the detriment of society, etc.) Also anti-science beliefs, especially climate change, rah rah beliefs about bringing back dead industries (coal, pie in the sky beliefs about bringing back 20th century pre-automation manufacturing) I can go on and on. I don't care for the Democratic party as a whole but being anti-progress, anti-science, and catering to people's mythologies and opinions like they can compete with facts really turns me off about the American right.
gpt
The fact that every single one of your descriptions of the republican platform is an inaccurate caricature shows that you really don’t understand the other sides’ arguments.  

I suggest that for a productive conversation, you adopt a strategy of steel manning your opponent’s arguments, which is the opposite of strawmanning.  Try to come up with a version of your opponent’s position that they would say is a fair and accurate summary of their position.  Otherwise, you’re not arguing against a real opponent, you’re arguing with yourself, which guarantees that you win every time.