system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
If men are obligated to recognize any children they have, should't they have a say in abortion?

So this question popped up in a debate I had with a friend of mine about feminism. He was arguing for the rights of men and he asked me if forced fatherhood is fair when a man impregnates a woman and she decides to keep the child but he doesn't want it considering that he doesn't have a say over abortion.  

&#x200B;

I have never thought this question before, but it seemed fair to me that if you must bear the consequences of supporting a child, you must have as much control as possible to its birth, the same control as the woman who bears it, while at the same time respecting the bodily autonomy of women. 

&#x200B;

It seems like an ethically delicate subject that is complicated. 

&#x200B;

What are some philosophical thoughts about this?
gpt
With the way this is framed this isn't an abortion issue, but rather a child support issue. If the man does not want the child and the consequences of supporting it, then it is possible for the child to be born while still not forcing him to have to support it. The issue isn't so much, "should men have a say in abortion if they don't want the child but have to support it", the issue is more "should people have to support a child that they do not want?"