system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV:There is no valid reason other than defending Trump for the current Republican attack on the FBI.

There are a number of attacks on the credibility of the FBI from Republican politicians. These attacks have come in a number of forms, the most recent being the Nunes memo which apparently alleges that there was misconduct in the FBI relating to how FISA warrants were obtained, and allegations of a "secret society" within the FBI that has been conspiring against Trump. 

These attacks dangerously undermine the credibility of the FBI, and do a disservice to it's officers. Additionally, *even if true* the manner of the attacks through innuendo and allegations rather than through hard data is irresponsible. Also, *even if true*, there is no reason to believe that Mueller investigation would be able to falsify evidence. At worst the investigation would dig into areas that are not directly related to the Russian interference like money laundering.  

The only valid reason for the attacks is a preemptive defense if charges are levied against Trump or his senior staff. To be convinced otherwise I would need to be convinced there is a good reason undermine the authority of the FBI with rumor and innuendo, or that the investigation can be conclusively determined to be so corrupt that it needs to be ended before it has completed. 



_____
gpt
NOT a Trumpette but

The FBI has a long history as political hacks,though mostly in support of GOP hate of minorities,gays etc [ie the "other"]. While it would be out of character to bite the hands that fed them it is not out of character for them to stick their fingers into politics.


I think it would be more accurate to say that attacks on the FBI's credibility are coming from  the Tea Party wing of the GOP [and/or those fearful of a Tea Party challenger in their district]. This is a direct challenge to the never-Trumps and progressives and yes,is likely a form of preemptive defense.