system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Most political podcasts are heavily biased and no more reliable than any other form of media

Many people on all sides of the political spectrum are realizing that the mainstream media is not a reliable news source. However, I see people following various podcasts instead (TYT, youtube podcasters, candace owens etc).

These podcasts are just as biased (if not more) than any other form of media, encourage tribal group think, and are toxic by nature. They tend to offer very little diversity of opinion and have a clear agenda behind them.

For these reasons, I believe that people are better off choosing not to subscribe to political podcasts. To me, it seems like the equivalent of refusing to read a newspaper and instead asking your next door neighbor for the news.
gpt
The fact that the media are biased means you should consume more, not less. Yes, most political podcasts have a viewpoint; it's hard to imagine one that didn't. People who inform themselves enough to run a podcast must be highly motivated, and it's hard to be motivated about politics if you don't care about politics. 

What's more, most are pretty open about their stance. 

So the way to get a balanced picture is not to unsubscribe from all of them, it's to subscribe to several. Pick a diverse range of opinions, including some you disagree with. You need to hear what other people think, in order to pick your own stance on the issues.