system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Why is skepticism seen as unintuitive?

To me, at least, skepticism seems almost obvious. I am quite new to philosophy and am just learning about the concept, and it seems like philosophers will completely overcomplicate this topic in order to avoid skepticism at all costs, when I dont see how it can be disproven at all. It is surely impossible to know anything, with 100% certainty. 

I am really struggling to get through the views of contemporary philosophers who go on about other worlds and different contexts. Maybe I just  dont understand them, but its so hard to follow when I just dont have the intuition that something is wrong with skepticism. 

If anyone could pursuade me otherwise or explain that I am misunderstanding something, then I would be grateful.
gpt
Philosophers who reject skepticism typically reject the stringent standards which skeptics hold. In short, they don’t claim to have 100% certainty, but instead allow knowledge claims without 100% certainty.

Here’s one way to think about it. Suppose you accept skepticism. Okay, now what? There’s nowhere to go. But, if we’re willing to accept a little uncertainty, we can develop ideas, raise arguments, respond to objections — basically skepticism is a dead end.