system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV:Abandoning euphemisms (like pro-life and pro-choice) would make our discourse far more honest, open and ultimately more productive.

It seems the most contemptible and pathetic aspect of our discourse is our reliance on euphemism. It is hard not to sneer at the duplicity and cringing cowardice inherent in the self-bestowed titles of various political movements, like the "pro-lifers" or "pro-choicers". 

Say what you mean- respectively, you're against abortion and women's ability to abort. Conversely, the latter are for the availability of abortion.

When you resort to calling yourself a "pro lifer", for example, you by implication endorse beliefs within the remit of being "pro-life" which you don't necessarily support. Pro-lifers tend not to care how many brown children are bisected by apache fire in the middle east, nor do they tend to oppose the death penalty.

But the "pro-choicers" don't get off either, because their chosen name implies all sorts of positions related to bodily autonomy that choicers do not necessarily endorse, like the right to use any sort of drug, the right to terminate the biological functioning of one's own body (suicide) etc. etc. We perhaps ought to be softer on this side of the debate, as these are positions that choicers are more inclined than others to support.

Nevertheless, there is something about the euphemistic titling of social movements centred on a single issue that retards our discourse and devalues the concepts they appropriate to their purpose, adopting whatever term they like when it becomes politically expedient and dropping it whenever it ceases to be so.

TL;DR Call yourself exactly what you are, do not mince your words, be honest with yourself and others. If you can't manage this, you pollute our collective discourse with your cowardice and spineless politicking.
gpt
This is simply not possible. Language is inherently loaded. As soon as you find a neutral word for something someone else will start to associate both negative and positive connotations thereby infecting the word with bias and double meaning. To expect us to "not mince words" is to pretend that language is perfect and that there are words that better reflect the truth than others. Language is an abstract way of communicating and it heavily relies on our perception of both the words used and the meaning intended.