system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Does a hunter forfeit the right to life while hunting?

I've had an argument about the statement "when a hunter is hunting their forfeit their right to life".           
I've based my position on the principle that:                
>"every animal has the right to not be infringed upon realized by the moral right to fight back against oppression and moral obligation to not willingly infringe on others" the violation of this principle on another animal gives them the right to defend it at the cost of yours.               

I can't get a straight argument why this is wrong but it seems both intuitive and bad to accept it.
gpt
If an animal attacked and killed a hunter we might think it was unfortunate (I’m sure some people wouldn’t, but that’s not the point), but we wouldn’t think the hunter’s rights had been violated. Only if the Hunter is attacked by another person is there a possible infringement of the hunter’s rights.