system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Bodily autonomy and drinking while pregnant

Does the bodily autonomy of a pregnant mother grant them then right to drink while pregnant (where this will harm the foetus)?

If not then the foetus seems to have a right to not be harmed by the mother’s conduct, limiting the mother’s bodily autonomy in the case of harm to the foetus.

Would this limit (in the case of causing harm) not imply a similar limit in the case of abortion, where termination would constitute an even greater harm to the foetus?
gpt
>If not then the foetus seems to have a right to not be harmed by the mother’s conduct

Is that the only possible reason we can think of why it may not be permissible? Like first you could just add the proviso of 'fetus you plan to bring to term', which cuts out the comparison to abortion, or you could just avoid talking about the fetus at all, and speak about taking about avoiding actions which would harm a person who is going to come into existence (around birth or whenever you feel like is the cut off) and have no concern with the fetus at all in of itself.