system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
Are Hegelian metaphysical basis subjected to Hegelian metaphysical basis?

Alright, I hope I explain myself because I am not very Hegel-read (we all know why), and perhaps my "problem" was addressed by him, for I think it is a reasonable objection (reasonable as in "most people would have thought of it"). 

If everything, parts and whole Being, follows a "moving" dialectical logic, where things change and evolve through the "dialect" of the different logics. 

Now, if this thesis is part of the Being, as everything is, why couldn't we expect it to change at some point? Why dialectics would not be applied to dialectics themselves, changing the system into, let us say, a logic which is "traditional" and static.
gpt
I think you've just misunderstood what Hegel is saying. You seem to be taking him to be some kind of skeptic or relativist, and you're doing the usual thing people do with skeptics or relativists by applying the skeptical or relativist claim to their own skepticism or relativism. But Hegel isn't a skeptic or relativist in any relevant sense.