system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Parents who choose not to vaccinate their children should be treated the same as sex offenders, in that they should be barred from public areas containing at-risk members of the population, and required to obtain written consent of those who live in an area before being allowed to move in.

The issue is that herd immunity is an incredibly fragile thing, as California is finding out with Whooping Cough and Measles outbreaks. Recall, also, that for legitimate medical reasons there is a certain portion of the population that cannot be vaccinated and depend on the herd to be, in effect, the "buffer" between them and the plagues of ages past. Further, vaccinations are not permanent, and many people do not get their boosters on time; we are one idiot parent in the wrong place at the right time away from having a full-blown Rotavirus or Meningicoccal epidemic on our hands.
No. Vaccines should not be voluntary. And those who choose not to vaccinate ought to be barred from public areas, such as schools and playgrounds. At minimum, a choice to not vaccinate your children should be treated like sex offenders: you and your family should be mandated to stay 300 yds away from areas containing at-risk members of the population at all times, and the parent should be required to obtain written consent from all residents of a neighborhood before being allowed to purchase a home in one.
gpt
This needs a little clarification here. You say: "*No. Vaccines should not be voluntary*", and then in the next sentence you say:"*And those who choose not to vaccinate*".

Are you proposing involuntary vaccinations? And if so, how exactly would people still be able to "choose not to vaccinate"?