system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: If the police displace you from your home in the process of doing their job, the government should pay for any and all accommodations, food etc. Until the police resolve their conduct.

Recently, there has been a standoff down the street from me. An adult who lives with his parents had a warrant put out for his arrest on the basis of sexual assault. He took his parents hostage in the attic with a handgun.

I know one of the neighbors to this standoff, and they were not allowed to enter or leave their home until its resolution. The standoff began at 4PM and did not conclude until 10PM the following day. While displaced from their home, they were on the hook for room and board and food despite the fact that they had both readily available to them but were not allowed to utilize it under threat of force/arrest.

I am all for being safe, but even more than that I value bodily autonomy. If someone wants to take the risk and barricade up for the night in the comfort of their home they should be allowed to do so. However, IF the precedent for keeping people (I.E. The Police)  safe outweighs that, then it should be the government that pays for the upheaval to people's lives when an arm of the government acts as such.
gpt
Do you think that the government's role in this circumstance differs substantially from an evacuation order due to a natural disaster such as a wildfire or hurricane? 

The government did not cause the hostage situation. They're not responsible for damages caused by it. Their job is to limit the damage and loss of life caused by it. That's what there's doing in your scenario.

Secondarily, having people around can make it more difficult to do their job. Similar to how a building fire is much easier to manage if there's no one inside.