system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Natural Rights do not exist.

I believe natural rights, i.e. *"...those not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable..."* do not exist.

I believe all rights given to any human are social constructs, produced by society from moral structures determined by a multitude of factors. However, all of these rights can be removed in some way, and are not somehow intrinsically given to a human at birth.

To clarify, I am defining a "right" as a guarantee of access to a commodity or state of being, without necessarily referring to a legal structure.

Please, CMV!
gpt
It's true. All rights are social constructs. That doesn't mean they don't exist. 

Language is a human construct, but it still is "real" per se. 

In the same way, rights are still here. "Natural rights", as they were coined by John Locke, are inalienable rights that people, and society requires to function in a civil manner. These are rights that we morally cannot deprive people of. Being a social construct doesn't make it any less essential, or real.