system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: A dictator with extreme power within a very narrow range would actually solve certain problems better than the government.

This is a theory that came into my mind when I talking to my wife about two problems that are prevalent in Vancouver, BC. Homeless camps/drug abuse in the downtown east side and spreading, and the out of control cost of housing. 

The solutions to these problems are usually not really explored fully because they aren’t popular within certain areas of the public. With drug abuse, a proportion of the population hates the idea of decriminalizing drugs and even giving away drugs for free to help taper people off. They also hate the idea of free subsidized housing. On the other side, people hate the idea that charter rights kind of have to be broken for the obviously mentally ill people on the street and they need to be mandated treatment. Almost no one likes the amount of money that would cost. 

With housing, there are zoning laws that municipalities hate changing because nimbys want to keep their area single family detached housing even though they are literally a block from the sky train. 

In these situations, it would be beneficial for the govt to have maybe one opportunity a term to appoint a panel of experts to a problem and they have free reign for 4 years.
gpt
The problem with the benign dictator is that there is no stopping that dictator from scrapping those rules to keep him in check. 

Going back to the example you state, that group probably wouldn't have full dictatorial control since they would have to report to someone and they would have finite resources. Also other groups would have the right to resist if that commission  tried to violate rights without due process. 

For instance they couldn't steal homes away from people and use those homes toi house people without giving compensation.