system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: A ban on Burqas for the reason of public safety is faulty and a human rights violation.

I personally believe that the view that banning the burqa for the case of public safety is faulty simply because if we look at the latest attacks in Europe, we can find that non of the perpetrators is wearing a burqa. They are dressed like 'normal' European youths (normal here meaning they were no visible religious markers of any kind.) So I believe that to call a ban of burqas or other religious coverings for public safety is a slightly misinformed position. Secondly there is the argument that many women are forced to wear a burqa by their husbands (or other authoritative male actors) and is therefore the subjugation of women. I definitely understand this and I feel for this argument. But what if even only 1 percent of women who wear a burqa do so out of their free will, how is banning them from wearing one not considered a violation of the UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, which states that everyone who wishes should be able to express their religion openly (of course this argument only works if you, like I, interpret that the burqa is no threat to public safety.) I hope to hear from you guys, please make me understand. I wish to understand the other side and am very open for Changing my view if I feel convinced.
gpt
Agree with your position for the most part however the tricky part comes with things like forms of identification. 

So in places like a motor registry (drivers license photos) or a courtroom, or any situation really where legally a persons identity has to be known the burqa then needs to be removed. Hijabs would be fine though. So not a ban all together but a ban in certain places.