system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: The entire Clinton/Corporate wing of the Democratic Party needs to be eliminated for the party to survive.

If a friend of yours was dumped 40 years ago and spent the entire intervening time killing and robbing their friends in order to impress the person who dumped them you'd call them creepy as heck and stop hanging out with them.  This is what's happening to the Democratic party, especially post Democratic Leadership Conference of 1985.

40 years ago white racists, xenophobes, and rich people with fascist sympathies completed their vacating of the DNC that they had been working on since FDR was elected to vote for Ronald Reagan.  Ever since then major Democrats have structured all their policies to get that ex to come home.  These policies are why every year the Democratic Party is having to distance itself from itself and the Sanders/AOC wing of the party is constantly gaining popularity.

Let's run through all their major policy accomplishments since the 1980s and test the idea: 1, Three strikes laws; 2, Omnibus Counter Terrorism Act; 3, The ACA, a plan straight from the conservative think-tank The Heritage Foundation;  4, Deregulation of Wall Street in the Commodities Futures Modernization Act; 5, Deregulation of air and radio leading to the rise of right wing radio in The Telecommunications Act of 1996; 6, Making student loans non-dispersable via bankruptcy; 7, Gutting welfare; 8, Internationally promoting fracking under Obama; 9, Selling artic drilling rights to Shell under Obama; 10, 5 wars under Obama; 11, most deportations of any president in history under Obama; 12, most arrests of Journalists under the espionage act of any president in history under Obama; 13, NAFTA; I could keep going but this is getting boring.

Between the 30s and 80s, prior to this profound policy shift, the Democrats held the Presidency an overwhelming percentage of the time , same with the House and Senate. Since then they've been running fairly even to losing on elections across the board and they've gotten the tar beaten out of them on federal Judiciary appointments.  

In summary, can you convince me that being impostor Republicans has helped the party in any way?

P.S, this is not change my opinion to vote for Trump, I would never do that.  There are forced hysterectomies of a population being held in concentration camps on the basis of race.  Anyone with pro-Trump sympathies at this point would have ratted out Anne Frank and worn Hugo Boss with the rest of the goose steppers.

Edit: Easiest way I think to change my opinion is to show long term demography projections and current data showing that Republican leaning swing voters are a larger voting bloc than the people alienated by current policies.

Edit 2:  Current democratic strategy is contingent on winning old white people, those demographics are both disappearing for different reasons.  Can you prove that the rate of replacement for voters with those preferences is sufficiently high to offset losses in the long term?
gpt
Do you have an actual reason why you believe the Democratic party would do better by abandoning the "Clinton/corporate wing," or is this just a rant? You give the barest mention to two people: an Independent senator who couldn't even win over the Democratic electorate, and a Progressive representative whose strategy is to run against Democratic incumbents, neither of which have proven to expand the party's power. Beyond that, nothing.

Democratic Presidents might dominate the period of 1930-1980, but don't forget the absolutely devastating loss to the Reagan Republicans which ended that period, or the fact this occurred six years after Richard Nixon left office in disgrace. The Democratic party didn't regain the office until Clinton.