system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: Indiana's "religious freedom" bill isn't as bad as people are making it out to be.
gpt
Just to set aside the "Religious Freedom" part of it for now, your main argument is that a business owner should be allowed to refuse service to a customer based on moral reasons, but doesn't that allow for discrimination based on race? If you replaced "gay" with "black" or "same sex marriage" with "interracial marriage" in your argument, would you still argue that it's not as bad as people say? Perhaps in this particular instance it may not have as much impact as people are saying, but it sets a terrible precedent for what excuses discrimination and for that reason it is just as bad as everyone says.