system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
CMV: If pro-life views are ever to become law in the future, it must be done by covering the costs of birth and contraceptives first.

I am pro life obviously.  I offer a critique on the "angle" of the traditional pro-life lobby.

* I believe the goal of centrist\populist pro-lifers, so EXCLUDING the extreme\radical holders, is to minimize abortions, not maximize children.
* And thus contraception poses no ethical qualms with the above viewpoint.
* Abortion is often a more financially advantageous position compared to putting a child up for adoption.
* To nip in the bud a follow up to the above statement, I realize making it financially ADVANTAGEOUS (though way of say a credit for children born) would create a "cobra market."

I also believe forcing women who have been raped or are in risky pregnancies to complete their births is wrong.

So I believe for someone who is seriously pro-life, it should be seen as a step in the right direction to obtain that goal, by eliminating reasons why a person would or should choose to end a pregnancy.
gpt
> contraception poses no ethical qualms

What are you including in contraception?  Depending upon one's viewpoint, there are a lot of birth control methods that some people consider contraception while others consider it abortion.