system
Given the following post, respond as if you're commenting on Reddit:
human
How do we differentiate artistic philosophy from scientific philosophy?

The book "Thus spoke Zarathustra" by Nietzsche and the movie "Begotten" are philosophical works. "Critique of Pure Reason" and "A Treatise of Human Nature" are also philosophical works. While the second group is scientific and rather concrete, the first group of works is more open to various interpetations. If two people (in this case, my friend and I) start talking about philosophy, one could talk about their experiences and self-reflection after a book, while the other one could start talking about the objective scientific philosophical nature of a book.
My friend makes a case that philosophical pieces are open to interpretation, which is not always the case, obviously. Let's call it artistic philosophy. It helps you reflect upon yourself, and find out more about yourself based on how you reacted to the contents of the work. The other type of philosophy, the way I see it, is "objective science" philosophy. You can't interpret it your own way, it is concrete and set in stone, and thw author is clear about what they are conveying. See, I'm not interested in "artistic philosophy" and self-analysis, for me it is a strict science. For my friend - on the contrary, philosophy is a way to figure out his own life and reflect. So when we both say philosophy - we clearly mean different things. How are these two types of philosophy differentiated within the community?
gpt
I don't think this sort of distinction would generally be accepted. The idea that people everyone agrees on what Hume and Kant has written in those works isn't at all true! People vastly disagree about what Kane and Hume should be understood to be getting across. Nor would it generally be accepted that Thus Spake Zarathustra is a work which is best taken as something as which will best help you 'talk about their experiences and [engage in] self-reflection' as oppose to a work like Nietzsche's others work, i.e. that are trying to argue for a certain view of things on various matters, just in this case the text happens to be a narrative.