Need Help Understanding Fine-Tuning Techniques for My Thesis
Hi everyone,I’m currently working on my master’s thesis in engineering, focusing on AI and generative models. I have a specific question about fine-tuning techniques that I’m hoping an expert can help me with.My question is: Do different fine-tuning techniques require datasets with different characteristics (e.g., size, diversity, specificity)?For example, how do the dataset requirements differ between methods like LoRA, adapter-based fine-tuning, or traditional fine-tuning? Are there specific qualities that make a dataset better suited for one method over another?I’d really appreciate insights, explanations, or even references to relevant papers or articles. This would help me structure my thesis more effectively and deepen my understanding of these methods.Thanks in advance for your help!
2025-01-05T23:43:04Z
Hi there!This is a great question, and it’s exciting to hear about your thesis focus. Different fine-tuning techniques do indeed have varying requirements and benefits, often influenced by the nature of the dataset. Here’s a breakdown to help clarify:1.Traditional Fine-TuningDataset Requirements: Large, high-quality datasets with significant diversity are often needed. This method updates all model parameters, so it works best when you have enough data to prevent overfitting and ensure meaningful learning.Ideal Use Case: When you have domain-specific datasets large enough to fully leverage the model’s capacity, such as fine-tuning a language model for medical text analysis.2.LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)Dataset Requirements: Smaller datasets with specific characteristics can suffice because only a subset of parameters (low-rank matrices) is updated. Diversity is still important, but size constraints are less critical.Ideal Use Case: When computational resources are limited or the dataset size doesn’t justify full fine-tuning. It’s also great for preserving the base model’s generalization capabilities while focusing on a specific task.3.Adapter-Based Fine-TuningDataset Requirements: Moderately sized datasets work well. The dataset should align with the specific task, but full diversity isn’t as critical because adapters focus on adding task-specific modules while leaving the base model unchanged.Ideal Use Case: When working on multiple tasks with shared underlying data, or in a multi-domain scenario where you want modular adaptability.And finally I will give you some urls for helping your understanding.RecommendationsIf your dataset is small and specific: Consider LoRA or adapters. They reduce the risk of overfitting and require fewer computational resources.If you have access to a large, diverse dataset: Traditional fine-tuning may yield the best results but is resource-intensive.Papers & ReferencesLoRA: Hu, Edward J., et al. “LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models.” (2021)arXiv link.Adapters: Houlsby, Neil, et al. “Parameter-efficient transfer learning for NLP.” (2019)arXiv link.Traditional Fine-Tuning: Howard, Jeremy, and Sebastian Ruder. “Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification.” (2018)arXiv link.Best of luck with your thesis! Feel free to ask if you have further questions.
2025-01-06T07:18:39Z
Traditional fine-tuningworks best when you have alarge, diverse datasetand need to adapt the model significantly to a new task or domain. It’s often computationally expensive but offers full flexibility.LoRAandadapter-based fine-tuningaremore efficientfor smaller datasets. They introduce minimal changes to the model, which means they require less data to prevent overfitting and can still achieve strong performance in specific domains.Adapter-based fine-tuningis particularly useful for cases where you want toadd modular task-specific expertisewithout modifying the entire model. It’s a good choice when you have a lot of different tasks and want to avoid retraining the entire model each time.
2025-01-06T14:46:37Z
Thank you so much to everyone who took the time to respond! Your insights have been incredibly helpful and have given me a much clearer understanding of the role datasets play in different fine-tuning techniques. I truly appreciate the detailed explanations and examples shared.If I may ask a follow-up question: based on your experience, which fine-tuning techniques are the most commonly used in practice today? Are there specific methods that are gaining popularity or are particularly impactful in real-world applications? I’d love to know which techniques I should focus on for my thesis to ensure it’s both relevant and aligned with current trends.Thanks again for all your help!