The measurement is not: Are we safer? The measurement is: Are we as safe as we ought to be? And there are a host of options that this president had available to him, like making sure that at all our ports in America containers are inspected. Only 95 percent of them -- 95 percent come in today uninspected. That's not good enough.
The speaker is complaining that the president has not personally inspected all of the containers coming into America, even though that's an option available to him.
The speaker obviously does not think that the president should be personally inspecting the containers coming into American ports, and it is clearly not possible, and thus not an available option. This original statement was not particularly coherent, so I'm not surprised the system had trouble parsing it.
( z1 complain :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 speak ) ) :ARG1 ( z4 inspect :polarity - :ARG0 ( z5 person :ARG0-of ( z6 have-org-role :ARG2 ( z7 president ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z8 container :ARG1-of ( z9 come :ARG4 ( z10 country :name ( z11 name :op "America" ) ) ) :mod ( z12 all ) ) :ARG1-of ( z13 personal ) :concession ( z14 option :ARG2-of ( z15 available :ARG1 z5 ) :domain z4 ) ) )