I understand that that's not what the defendants want in this case, but I don't think it's called for. And, as a matter of fact, I think if I did that and I ordered that and if -- I assume that the reporters would not testify and I would predict, if it went to the Third Circuit on that basis, I would be reversed. I don't think that that's a fair area of inquiry to get into.
the reporters would be happy to help
it says the reporters would not testify but it never said they would not be happy to help and therefore it is neither correct or incorrect
( z1 happy :ARG0 ( z2 help :ARG0 ( z3 person :ARG0-of ( z4 report ) ) ) :ARG1 z3 )