Who could claim, without raising an eyebrow, that this system is truly equitable, transparent and accessible, a system that allows corporations, which do not have the right to vote, to meddle in the electoral process by making contributions far beyond the capability of the ordinary voter, and thus unduly influencing the political policy of the parties and the candidates seeking votes?
the candidates seeking votes dont want any pets
It is not something to discern, whether they want pets or not
( z1 want :polarity - :ARG0 ( z2 candidate :ARG0-of ( z3 seek :ARG1 ( z4 vote ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z5 pet :mod ( z6 any ) ) )