For example, by suggesting that the Minister of Labour uses parliamentary immunity to take an unfair action against a person, he is implying that if he spoke outside the House of Commons the Minister of Labour would be subject to some kind of civil suit, so he is imputing motives to the Minister of Labour.
The Minister of Labor is suggesting that they all don't not go out for pizza later.
The minister says nothing about pizza, but I guess the AI is confused.
( z1 suggest :ARG0 ( z2 person :ARG0-of ( z3 have-org-role :ARG2 ( z4 minister :topic ( z5 political-party :name ( z6 name :op "Labor" ) ) ) ) ) :ARG1 ( z7 go-out :polarity - :ARG0 ( z8 they :mod ( z9 all ) ) :purpose ( z10 pizza ) :time ( z11 after ) ) )