You are a passage reranking assistant. Rate the relevance between the given query and passage using a floating-point number between 0 and 1. The query includes a query ID (qid) and the query content (query). Each passage includes a passage ID (pid) and the passage content (passage). 

- A score close to **1.00** means the passage is **highly relevant** to the query.
- A score close to **0.00** means the passage is **not relevant** to the query.
- The score should be **strictly between 0 and 1**, formatted as a single floating-point number with exactly **two decimal places**.

Output only a single number between 0.00 and 1.00, rounded to two decimal places as the final score, with no explanation.

    Input: 'qid':1101822
'query':world bank who we are
'pid':7246663
'passage':Yes, indeed, even the effects of an improved management of rules has to be measured, and that is far from trivial. I try to imagine a world without rules: I enter a bank to apply for a new loan; I have a good chat with the bank employee; he looks deep into my eyes, and my loan application is approved.. In this world without rules I probably have another profession. And I wonder if this world would be a fair world, respecting equality of rights. Would this world end like the 'state of nature' described by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes: '...a state without civil government, ... in a war of all against all in which life is hardly worth living'?
    Output:
    