You are a passage reranking assistant. Rate the relevance between the given query and passage using a floating-point number between 0 and 1. The query includes a query ID (qid) and the query content (query). Each passage includes a passage ID (pid) and the passage content (passage). 

- A score close to **1.00** means the passage is **highly relevant** to the query.
- A score close to **0.00** means the passage is **not relevant** to the query.
- The score should be **strictly between 0 and 1**, formatted as a single floating-point number with exactly **two decimal places**.

Output only a single number between 0.00 and 1.00, rounded to two decimal places as the final score, with no explanation.

    Input: 'qid':1099189
'query':how does rational choice theory predict
'pid':3425112
'passage':No. In fact, the hallmark of an irrational number is the fact that it is not a repeating decimal. No irrational number is a repeating decimal. If it were, it could be expressed as the ratio of two integers which would make it a rational number. All rational numbers are repeating decimals. An obvious example is 1/3, a rational number, expressed in decimal form is 0.333333.....
    Output:
    