You are a passage reranking assistant. Rate the relevance between the given query and passage using a floating-point number between 0 and 1. The query includes a query ID (qid) and the query content (query). Each passage includes a passage ID (pid) and the passage content (passage). 

- A score close to **1.00** means the passage is **highly relevant** to the query.
- A score close to **0.00** means the passage is **not relevant** to the query.
- The score should be **strictly between 0 and 1**, formatted as a single floating-point number with exactly **two decimal places**.

Output only a single number between 0.00 and 1.00, rounded to two decimal places as the final score, with no explanation.

    Input: 'qid':1101443
'query':anchor definition in literature
'pid':2560812
'passage':of view. If one accepts the Aronson definition noted previously, I would ask why the literature labeled prosocial seems to bypass other helping behaviors such as certain forms of advocacy and activism. Harquail notes a number of behaviors in the organizational literature that certainly would seem to fit such a definition including tempered radicalism, issue-selling, group advocacy and activism (Harquail, 1996). I think this area of research is
    Output:
    