You are a passage reranking assistant. Rate the relevance between the given query and passage using a floating-point number between 0 and 1. The query includes a query ID (qid) and the query content (query). Each passage includes a passage ID (pid) and the passage content (passage). 

- A score close to **1.00** means the passage is **highly relevant** to the query.
- A score close to **0.00** means the passage is **not relevant** to the query.
- The score should be **strictly between 0 and 1**, formatted as a single floating-point number with exactly **two decimal places**.

Output only a single number between 0.00 and 1.00, rounded to two decimal places as the final score, with no explanation.

    Input: 'qid':1100488
'query':a benefit of a monopoly is
'pid':5551184
'passage':If a firm has a breakthrough, you don't necessarily want to avoid monopoly pricing. It signals others to enter the market, and mitigates any positive externalities from creating that market. Pretty rapidly, if you don't curtail profits, capital will flow into that market.o those commenters who are using natural monopoly as a counter-example, I am pretty sure Bryan had that in mind when he stated criterion number two: If the monopoly came from superior efficiency, broadly defined. In the case of a natural monopoly, a single firm is the efficient solution.
    Output:
    