{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033962264150943396, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.247058823529412, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Chatter: Language and History in Kierkegaard (review)

sometimes make his interpretation resemble a "system" of the very sort his reading warns against. At the same time, though, he can be persuasively astute when tracing the parodie presence of opponent texts in Voltaire's: Fontenelle, Pascal, Rousseau, and (in several of the late contes) various books of the Bible. Above all, Pearson succeeds in showing that these fictions are at once better as contes and more genuinely philosophiques than critical commonplace has allowed.