{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.035305343511450385, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011450381679389313, 'mean_word_length': 5.319277108433735, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Density functional analysis of the magnetic structure of Li3RuO4: importance of the Ru-O···O-Ru spin-exchange interactions and substitutional Ru defects at the Li sites.

We evaluated the spin-exchange interactions of Li(3)RuO(4) by performing energy-mapping analysis based on density functional calculations and examined the nature of its magnetic transition at T(1) = 66 K and the divergence of the field-cooled and zero-field-cooled susceptibilities below T(2) = 32 K. Our study shows that T(1) is associated with a three-dimensional antiferromagnetic ordering, in which the two-dimensional antiferromagnetic lattices parallel to the ab plane are antiferromagnetically coupled along the c direction. We examined how the substitutional defects, Ru atoms residing in the Li sites, affect the antiferromagnetic coupling along the c direction to explain why the expected c-axis doubling is not detected from powder neutron diffraction measurements. The susceptibility divergence below T(2) is attributed to a slight spin canting out of the ab plane.