{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0036363636363636364, 'mean_word_length': 5.8875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Toward a Uniform Nursing Terminology: Mapping ICNP and the Omaha System

CONCLUSIONS At least 12 standardized terminologies represent the domain of nursing knowledge; each having unique, implicit ontologies that describe nursing diagnoses, interventions, and /or outcomes. The need for interoperability across systems supports the development of a uniform blended ontology, based on common semantic interpretation. To attain the goals of data reuse and interoperability, the ontologies that underlie these terminologies must be explicated and mapped.