{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01509433962264151, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025660377358490565, 'mean_word_length': 4.815789473684211, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Double Eagle and Rising Sun: The Russians and Japanese at Portsmouth in 1905

1986, but too much water has gone under the bridge for it to be able thoroughly to supplement the earlier chapters. Furthermore, there are several instances in the chapters where events or trends are described as recent or contemporary, when it is clear that they occurred in the late 1970s or very early 1980s. Similarly, there are estimates for the future that refer to 1983-86, with awkward results. Both problems could have been eliminated by careful editing. Despite these flaws, the book should be of interest to specialists in Northeast Asian affairs or international relations because of the high quality of the analyses. They help put Japan's emergence in the 1970s and early 1980s into important international and domestic contexts that have persisted regardless of other changes. But for Asian studies or international relations generalists, who also need to become familiar with Japan's changing role in world affairs, this volume is a bit too dated to give a thorough sense of what is causing the changes they read about in the daily press. Perhaps the best way for educators to treat this volume is as sound background reading that should be shored up with timely articles explaining the significance of what has happened since 1983.