{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.056612981942410934, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04050756466569058, 'mean_word_length': 5.083086053412463, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Insulin resistance does not impair response of chronic hepatitis C virus to direct-acting antivirals, and improves with the treatment

Background Insulin resistance (IR) is a common complication in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. The impact of IR on outcome of therapy with direct antivirals has not been studied. Aim The aim was to assess the impact of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy on IR status in chronic HCV patients. Patients and methods A total of 511 patients [mean age: 50.7±10.4 years, 29.7% pegylated interferon and ribavirin (RBV) experienced] were enrolled. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, decompensated liver disease, or previous nonresponse to DAAs were excluded. Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) was calculated before and 12 weeks after treatment, and IR was defined as HOMA greater than 1.9. Patients were treated according to the treating physician’s choice, and received 12 weeks of either ombitasvir/ritonavir/paritaprevir/RBV (n=28); sofosbuvir (SOF)/simeprevir (n=36); SOF/ravidasvir (n=101); SOF/pegylated interferon/RBV (n=192); or 24 weeks of SOF/RBV (n=154). Results Most patients received IR pretreatment (80.6%); 51.3% had fibrosis stage F4 and 24.7% had diabetes. A sustained virological response (SVR) at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) was achieved in 465 (91%) patients. SVR12 was achieved in 90.5% of patients with IR and in 92.9% of patients without IR (P=0.560), and pretreatment HOMA was not different in responders and nonresponders (P=0.098). The number of patients with IR decreased significantly in patients who achieved an SVR much more than in nonresponders (P<0.0001) and HOMA improved significantly more in patients with SVR than in nonresponders (P=0.001). All treatment protocols were associated with a comparable improvement in HOMA (P=0.101). Predictors of SVR12 included age, platelets, and liver stiffness, but not pretreatment IR. Conclusion IR does not impair the response of patients with HCV treated with DAAs, and improves significantly in patients who achieve an SVR.