{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025555555555555557, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.390070921985815, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Mind Over Matter? I: Philosophical Aspects of the Mind–Brain Problem

Objective: To conceptualize the essence of the mind–body or mind–brain problem as one of metaphysics rather than science, and to propose a formulation of the problem in the context of current scientific knowledge and its limitations. Method and results: The background and conceptual parameters of the mind–body problem are delineated, and the limitations of brain research in formulating a solution identified. The problem is reformulated and stated in terms of two propositions. These constitute a ‘double aspect theory’. Conclusions: The problem appears to arise as a consequence of the conceptual limitations of the human mind, and hence remains essentially a metaphysical one. A ‘double aspect theory’ recognizes the essential unity of mind and brain, while remaining consistent with the dualism inherent in human experience.