{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020618556701030927, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.665236051502146, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Sole hospital commitment to health promotion and disease prevention (HPDP) services: does ownership matter?

Hospitals have been increasingly involved in health promotion and disease prevention (HPDP) in the last two decades. Concurrent with this trend, environmental changes and market pressures have resulted in more hospital consolidations and conversions from not-for-profit (NFP) to for-profit (FP) organizations. The emergence of a large number of sole community hospitals has attracted the attention of policy-makers and community stakeholders because sole community hospitals have more power in the local market and may discontinue unprofitable services to pursue profit maximization. This may be especially true when the sole hospital is a FP organization. On the other hand, sole community hospitals are confronted with a variety of expectations to offer community-oriented services that promote community population health, regardless of ownership. There is relatively little literature that has attempted to examine the behavior of sole community hospitals. This study depicts the profile of sole hospitals' involvement in HPDP services and estimates the possible influence of community constituencies on hospitals with respect to their providing community-oriented services. The results indicate that typically, when there is only one hospital in the community, hospital ownership has no significant influence on hospital HPDP services than their NPD counterparts. Implications for policy-makers and health care leaders are also discussed.