{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011656952539550375, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.532608695652174, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluation of peer review of infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in four acute care trusts in the East of England.

In order to constructively use Department of Health surveillance data to address the issue of healthcare-associated infection, a peer review process investigating infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in acute care trusts was initiated in the East of England. This study set out to evaluate that process and determine if it should be rolled out regionwide. A questionnaire survey of infection control doctors at trusts visited was conducted by telephone. Respondents commented that the peer review process raised the profile of infection control and healthcare-associated infection in participating trusts, and that a review of routine surveillance data was a useful way to initiate discussion about and focus attention on hospital infection control. Respondents felt the forum for discussion of infection control was most beneficial. A peer review process utilising routine surveillance data is of value in addressing issues related to infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in acute care trusts.