{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016080402010050253, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003015075376884422, 'mean_word_length': 5.30379746835443, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Decompression after gastric surgery. Gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube.

The efficacy and associated morbidity and mortality of gastrostomy (G) versus nasogastric (NG) tube decompression after gastric surgery were analyzed in a review of 100 patients. Age, sex, and risk factors were homogeneously distributed between the two groups, while perforated ulcers and emergency operations were more common in the G group. A gastrostomy did not completely eliminate the need for NG tube decompression in the G group. Postoperative morbidity was similar in the two groups, with the exception of an increased incidence of atelectasis in the elective NG group and increased mortality in the emergency G group. There was also a significant increase in length and cost of hospitalization in the emergency G group compared with emergency NG patients. Gastrostomy does not appear to offer any significant advantage over nasogastric decompression after gastric surgery and should be limited to special cases.