{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019758507135016465, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0043907793633369925, 'mean_word_length': 5.3776223776223775, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Managerial Risk-Taking Incentives and Firm Risk in the Post-Regulatory Era

We provide evidence that there has been a fundamental change in the relationship between managerial risk taking incentives and firm risk after 2002, a period characterized by significant regulatory changes concerning executive compensation practices in public corporations. A consequence of the regulatory changes is a drop in CEO stock option grants, translated into significantly lower risk-taking incentives. We show that firms with different risk profiles have responded to regulatory changes differently. Riskier firms decreased the stock option grants, thus risk-taking incentives to their CEOs the most. Yet, the changes in risk-taking incentives have not been accompanied by changes in firm risk. As a result, the relationship between managerial risk-taking incentives and firm risk becomes negative in the post-regulatory era.