{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03941908713692946, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004149377593360996, 'mean_word_length': 5.348684210526316, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Early Gravestone Art in Georgia and South Carolina by Diana Williams Combs (review)

Whitman's essay ''A Backward Glance O'erTravel'd Roads'' is once cited as ''A Backward Glance.'') Although Weisbuch enters into debate with many previous scholars, there are some bibliographic omissions from his book, most notably Peach's study itself. This particular omission undercuts Weisbuch's claim "to inaugurate a new field, or subfield, of literary study" (xx) and prevents a profitable comparison of divergent approaches to the same topic. The failure to respond to previous scholarship bedevil_s study in this field. Peach, for instance, writes on the Carlyle-Emerson relationship without acknowledging Kenneth Marc Harris's 1978 book on that subject. Of course, it is easy to become sanctimonious about bibliographic lapses; still, we need to become better readers of our colleagues' work if we are to attain a clearer synthesis in the field of AngloAmerican studies.