{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03942505133470226, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03737166324435318, 'mean_word_length': 5.167088607594937, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Advanced Diffusion-Weighted Abdominal Imaging

Introduction Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen increasingly incorporates diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Whereas DWI can substantially aid in detecting and characterizing suspicious findings, it remains unclear to what extent the use of ultra-high b-value DWI might further be of aid for the radiologist especially when using DWI sequences with advanced processing. The target of this study was therefore to compare high and ultra-high b-value DWI in abdominal MRI examinations. Methods This institutional review board–approved, prospective study included abdominal MRI examinations of 70 oncologic patients (mean age, 58 years; range, 21-90 years) examined with a clinical 1.5 T MRI scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with an advanced echo planar DWI sequence (b = 0, 50, 900, and 1500 s/mm2) after ex vivo phantom and in vivo volunteer investigations. High b900 and ultra-high b1500 DWIs were compared by a qualitative reading for image quality and lesion conspicuity using a 5-point Likert scale with 2 radiologists as readers. The ratios of apparent signal intensities of suspicious lesions/normal tissue of the same organ (LNTRs) were calculated. Appropriate methods were used for statistical analysis, including Wilcoxon signed-rank test and κ statistic for interreader agreement analysis (P < 0.05/0.0125/0.005 after Bonferroni correction). Results Image quality was significantly increased with b900 as compared with b1500 DWI (P < 0.001) despite using an advanced DWI sequence. A total of 153 suspicious lesions were analyzed. Overall reader confidence for characterization/detection of malignant lesions and, correspondingly, the LNTR (mean, 2.7 ± 1.8 vs 2.4 ± 1.6) were significantly higher with b900 than with b1500 DWI (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). The increased confidence of lesion recognition and LNTR in the b900 DWI remained significant qualitatively in lymphatic and hepatic lesions and quantitatively in lymphatic, pulmonal, and osseous lesions. Conclusions Using high b-value DWI (900 s/mm2) provided an improved image quality and also lesion conspicuity as compared with ultra-high b-value DWI (1500 s/mm2) in oncologic abdominal examinations despite using advanced processing. Consequently, the value for additional ultra-high b-value DWI in oncologic examinations should be critically evaluated in future studies.