{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021035598705501618, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.7967032967032965, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Addressing Hiccups in Conversations with Recommender Systems

Conversational Agents (CAs) employing voice as their main interaction mode produce natural language utterances with the aim of mimicking human conversations. To unveil hiccups in conversations with recommender systems, we observed users interacting with CAs. Our findings suggest that those occur as users struggle to start the session, as CAs do not appear exploratory, and as CAs remained silent after offering recommendation(s) or after reporting errors. Users enacted mental models derived from years of experience with Graphical User Interfaces, but also expected human-like characteristics such as explanations and proactivity. Anchoring on these, we designed a dialogue model for a multimodal Conversational Recommender System (CRS) mimicking humans and GUIs. We probed the state of hiccups further with a Wizard-of-Oz prototype implementing this dialogue model. Our findings suggest that participants rapidly adopted GUI mimicries, cooperated for error resolution, appreciated explainable recommendations, and provided insights to improve persisting hiccups in proactivity and navigation. Based on these, we provide implications for design to address hiccups in CRS.