{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03189792663476874, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001594896331738437, 'mean_word_length': 4.9245283018867925, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Not there yet: A gerontologist's lament

Not only did it highlight the importance of ‘a good match between service demand and supply across the care sectors to ensure that people receive the right type of care for their needs’ [1]; at a broader level than aged care, it offered a long-term strategic framework, intended ‘to be used as a blueprint’ for the government’s ‘actions and decisions with respect to population ageing’. It is sober reading because the informed, coordinated blueprint it set out remains highly relevant, while action towards achieving it in any comprehensive way has faltered, almost grinding to a halt.