{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019933554817275746, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0016611295681063123, 'mean_word_length': 6.094117647058823, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reducing microleakage with the glass-ionomer/resin sandwich technique.

The effect on microleakage of two glass-ionomer/resin "sandwich" restorations and an incrementally placed microfilled resin restoration was tested in class 5 preparations extending apical to the cementoenamel junction. There was significantly less leakage detected in the sandwich restorations with microfilled resin placed in one or two increments. These results indicate that a glass-ionomer/microfilled resin sandwich restoration may significantly reduce microleakage in restorations extending below the cementoenamel junction.