{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033707865168539325, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008239700374531835, 'mean_word_length': 5.88659793814433, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On the methodology of Engineering Geodesy

Textbooks on geodetic surveying usually describe a very small number of principles which should provide the foundation of geodetic surveying. Here, the author argues that an applied field, such as engineering geodesy, has a methodology as foundation rather than a few principles. Ten methodological elements (ME) are identified: (1) Point discretisation of natural surfaces and objects, (2) distinction between coordinate and observation domain, (3) definition of reference systems, (4) specification of unknown parameters and desired precisions, (5) geodetic network and observation design, (6) quality control of equipment, (7) quality control of measurements, (8) establishment of measurement models, (9) establishment of parameter estimation models, (10) quality control of results. Each ME consists of a suite of theoretical developments, geodetic techniques and calculation procedures, which will be discussed. This paper is to be considered a first attempt at identifying the specific elements of the methodology of engineering geodesy. A better understanding of this methodology could lead to an increased objectivity, to a transformation of subjective practical experiences into objective working methods, and consequently to a new structure for teaching this rather diverse subject.