{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.036968576709796676, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009242144177449169, 'mean_word_length': 5.3023255813953485, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Alteplase in Acute Lacunar Ischemic Stroke

In the article “Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Alteplase in Acute Lacunar Ischemic Stroke: The ENCHANTED Trial” by Zhou et al.,1 the first sentence under Methods in the Abstract should read “In a cohort of 3,297 ENCHANTED participants, we identified those with lacunar or non-lacunar AIS with different levels of confidence (definite/probable/possible) according to prespecified definitions based on clinical and adjudicated imaging findings.” The publisher regrets the error.