{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011278195488721804, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005012531328320802, 'mean_word_length': 5.495934959349594, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Importance of Anamnesis in the Evaluation of Infertile Patients

A study was done to determine the importance of case history or anamnesis alone in the diagnosis of sub- or infertility of male patients. 1187 case histories were used in the study. Anamnestic categories were tabulated. Results of the study indicate that a meticulous compilation of etiological factors is important in fertility diagnosis. Congenital defects of the urogenital area constitute suspicion of fertility disorder. Occupational or iatrogenic injuries infectious diseases accidents and urogenital infections lead to suspicion regarding fertility disorder. An inconspicuous anamnesis indicates normal fertility. The value of the case history was found to depend on the thoroughness and conscientiousness of the investigator.