{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019696347968814115, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004513746409519901, 'mean_word_length': 5.518716577540107, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
PP138 Italian Medicines Agency Registries Distribution By Managed Entry Agreements And By Anatomical Therapeutic Area

INTRODUCTION: In a budget constrained environment characterized by an increasing number of high-cost medicines, manufacturers need to demonstrate that their drugs can provide value-for-money. In this complex environment Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) have been developed with the aim of sharing the risk between the National Health Service (NHS) and manufacturers (1). The objective of this analysis was to identify a correlation between Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification (ATC) and different type of agreements assigned taking into consideration the distribution of Italian Medicines Agency registries by ATC and by kind of agreement negotiated (financial or performance based) (2). METHODS: This analysis takes into account all drugs under monitoring AIFA registries in place in Italy from 2006. For each registry included in the analysis it was collected the status of the registry (active, closed or incoming), the disease area that the registry covers and the monitored drugs with or without an associated Managed Entry Agreements. Considering the high weight of oncology drugs, a sub-analysis was done to investigate registries distribution for each specific form of cancer. RESULTS: The majority of drugs monitored are under a registry with no associated risk sharing agreement according to AIFA (60 percent). For what concerned monitored drugs with an associated agreement, performance-based agreement is the most diffused type of MEA. In terms of therapeutic area involved in the monitoring registries activity, oncology was the most common area. Financial based agreements characterize principally medicines used for Leukemia and Hepatitis C, whereas drugs administrated for Melanoma, Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Ophthalmology diseases follow performance based agreements. CONCLUSIONS: MEAs represent a way to guarantee a sustainable access for innovative medicines. It is proven that oncology products are most likely to have a MEA since they represent some of the most expensive drugs launched in recent years. From this study appear a correlation between the therapeutic disease area of the monitored drugs and MEA assigned by AIFA which is influenced also by other factors like budget impact, risk-benefit ratio and the presence of appropriate endpoints to evaluate the treatment response.