{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002, 'mean_word_length': 5.341772151898734, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
DOMESTIC RESPONSES TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTABILITY

I. THE MACROECONOMICS OF BOOM-BUST CYCLES The association between capital flows –and, more particularly, the net resource transfer— and economic activity has been a strong feature of Latin America over the past decade (and, for that matter, the past quarter century), as Figure 1 indicates. This fact highlights the central role played by the mechanisms by which externally-generated boom-bust cycles are transmitted in the developing world.