{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0253592561284869, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016060862214708368, 'mean_word_length': 5.5054945054945055, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using crude S. haematobium soluble egg antigen with a radioimmunoassay using purified S. mansoni egg antigen for the serodiagnosis of schistosomiasis haematobium.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using crude Schistosoma haematobium soluble egg antigen (ShSEA) was compared with a radioimmunoassay (RIA) employing purified heterologous species S. mansoni egg antigen (MSA1) for the serodiagnosis of schistosomiasis haematobium in a group of 45 Nigerian school children living in an area endemic for S. haematobium. Both assay systems appeared applicable. The ELISA proved to be more sensitive detecting 100% of the 27 parasitologically positive individuals while the RIA defined 89% of this group. Neither test had false-positive results for the 10 non-endemic area parasitologically negative controls, although the ELISA demonstrated that 56% of the 18 endemic area parasitologically negative controls had anti-ShSEA antibodies. The RIA indicated that 44% of this group had anti-MSA1 antibodies. These latter findings were interpreted as related to the hyperendemicity of schistosomiasis haematobium for the study area.