{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018518518518518517, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0008230452674897119, 'mean_word_length': 5.448275862068965, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparison of the cavitation potential of prosthetic heart valves based on valve closing dynamics.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY
This study compares the cavitation potential of prosthetic heart valves based on valve closing dynamics.


METHODS
A laser sweeping technique measured valve closing dynamics (average closing velocity and deceleration) immediately before valve closure. A high-fidelity, piezoelectric pressure transducer was mounted proximal to the mitral valve and measured the high-frequency pressure fluctuations caused by cavitation bubble formation and collapse after valve closure. The band-pass filtered root mean squared (RMS) value of the mitral pressure signal was used as a measure of cavitation intensity. The combination of these two techniques allowed the direct correlation of valve dynamics and cavitation intensity for each valve closure. The effects of three parameters on prosthetic heart valve dynamics and cavitation were examined: valve geometry (Medtronic Hall and Björk-Shiley Monostrut), occluder material (pyrolytic carbon and Delrin), and gap width between the occluder and housing. A dimensional analysis was also performed to investigate the general form of the relationship between valve dynamics and cavitation intensity.


RESULTS
For all of the valves investigated in this study, the RMS pressure increased (signifying an increase in cavitation) as the average closing velocity and deceleration increased. In order to compare the cavitation potential of the valves, the RMS pressure was estimated at specific closing velocities using the linear regression of RMS pressure versus average closing velocity for each valve. The effects of valve geometry, occluder material and gap width were then examined at high valve loading conditions (closing velocity of 4.0 m/s). For both pyrolytic carbon and Delrin, the Medtronic Hall valves had significantly higher RMS pressures than did the Björk-Shiley Monostrut valves. For a given valve geometry, the pyrolytic carbon occluder had a significantly higher RMS pressure than the Delrin occluder. The valve gap width did not have a significant effect on RMS pressure. The dimensional analysis revealed the general relationship among average closing velocity, occluder material properties and cavitation intensity.


CONCLUSIONS
The results presented here contribute to our fundamental understanding of cavitation on mechanical heart valves.