{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03406340940419666, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01920661663348139, 'mean_word_length': 4.805797616930464, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 9, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 1, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Skin-resident CD4+ T cells protect against Leishmania major by recruiting and activating inflammatory monocytes

Tissue-resident memory T cells are required for establishing protective immunity against a variety of different pathogens, although the mechanisms mediating protection by CD4+ resident memory T cells are still being defined. In this study we addressed this issue with a population of protective skin-resident, IFNγ-producing CD4+ memory T cells generated following Leishmania major infection. We previously found that resident memory T cells recruit circulating effector T cells to enhance immunity. Here we show that resident memory CD4+ T cells mediate the delayed-hypersensitivity response observed in immune mice and provide protection without circulating T cells. This protection occurs rapidly after challenge, and requires the recruitment and activation of inflammatory monocytes, which limit parasites by production of both reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide. Overall, these data highlight a novel role for tissue-resident memory cells in recruiting and activating inflammatory monocytes, and underscore the central role that skin-resident T cells play in immunity to cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Introduction Tissue-resident memory T cells (T RM ) are critical mediators of immunity against a number of different infections in a variety of different tissues [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Because they are typically located at barrier surfaces and therefore occupy the initial sites of infection, T RM cells are poised to provide rapid protection. CD8 + T RM cells are the best defined tissue-resident T cells, and mediate protection through direct cytotoxicity [12][13][14], production of cytokines [1,15], maturation of local innate cells [6], triggering of tissue-wide antiviral signaling [16], and/or the recruitment of additional lymphocytes to the site of infection [15]. CD4 + T RM cells remain relatively uncharacterized, although they have been described in the lung, vaginal mucosa, and skin [3][4][5]17]. We recently demonstrated that skin-resident CD4 + T cells play a critical role in immunity to cutaneous leishmaniasis [18], however the various mechanisms by which CD4 + T RM cells mediate protection in the skin remain illdefined.
Human cutaneous leishmaniasis encompasses a spectrum of diseases caused by the intracellular protozoan parasites. Murine models that mimic aspects of the human disease have proven invaluable for understanding the mechanisms mediating susceptibility and resistance [19]. For example, similar to some forms of human cutaneous leishmaniasis, C57BL/6 mice infected with Leishmania major develop lesions that heal over several weeks, and once resolved the mice exhibit immunity to reinfection [19]. Studies in this model have shown that in a primary leishmania infection, innate cells including neutrophils, monocytes, and dendritic cells are rapidly recruited to the site of challenge [20][21][22][23]. These cells have the potential to restrict parasite infection [21,[24][25][26], but they can also be co-opted by the parasites to evade immune detection or suppress the immune response [20,27,28]. Conversely, in a secondary infection, the recruitment of pre-existing circulating effector CD4 + Th1 cells leads to the rapid control of the parasites [29,30], and CD4 + T RM cells contribute by promoting the recruitment of these effector T cells to the site of infection [18]. However, given their location at the site of a challenge infection and their rapid production of IFNγ, it might be expected that CD4 + T RM cells may also provide some level of rapid protection that is independent of additional T cell recruitment from the blood.
Here we show that CD4 + T RM cells mediate control of the parasite burden within the first three days of infection, which correlates with a strong delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response, the hallmark of immunity in murine and human leishmaniasis. While IFNγ produced by T RM cells might be expected to activate resident macrophages in the skin and limit the parasite burden, surprisingly we found that protection by CD4 + T RM cells required the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes that subsequently controlled the parasites by the induction of both reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Importantly, we found that T RM cells provided protection independently of circulating CD4 + T cells, emphasizing the importance of generating T RM cells for optimal immunity to leishmaniasis.

L. major immune mice are protected within 72 hours of challenge in a CD4 + T RM cell dependent manner
In experimental models of cutaneous leishmaniasis, protection to a challenge infection is often assessed after several weeks, when a large difference in parasite number is evident between naive and immune mice. This approach also allows for the assessment of protection mediated not only by circulating effector T cells, but also by central memory T cells that are delayed in their protective response [30]. However, the identification of T RM cells and their occupation of the skin led us to hypothesize that they might contribute to immune protection very early after challenge. To test this, we challenged naive and leishmania-immune mice in the ear with L. major, and assessed the immune response during the first 72 hrs of infection. For these studies, immune mice were infected with L. major in the contralateral ear at least 12 weeks earlier, and had resolved their primary lesion.
One of the hallmarks of immunity to leishmaniasis is the presence of a DTH response, and a positive reaction indicates that an individual has generated a type 1 immune response. As expected, immune mice developed a DTH response, represented by an increase in ear swelling within 24-72 hrs after challenge, while naive mice did not ( Fig 1A). In order to evaluate whether the presence of this DTH reaction was associated with control of the challenge inoculum, we assessed the parasite burden by performing three different assays: limiting dilution, qPCR for parasite ribosomal RNA, and analysis of the frequency of cells infected with dsRed expressing parasites by flow cytometry. We found that the number of parasites was consistently decreased 2-4 fold in immune mice at 72 hrs, as measured by limiting dilution and qPCR (Fig 1B and 1C), and that the frequency of infected cells was significantly decreased by flow cytometry (Fig 1D). These results demonstrate that as early as 72 hrs after challenge, mice that have resolved a previous L. major infection can mount an immune response that is effective at controlling the parasites.
To determine if the DTH in leishmaniasis was dependent on either CD4 + or CD8 + T cells, we individually depleted each subset in immune mice before challenge with L. major, and then monitored the DTH response and parasite burden over 72 hrs (Fig 1E). αCD4 treatment, which depletes both circulating and tissue-resident CD4 + cells in our hands (S1 Fig), completely ablated the DTH response (Fig 1F), while effective CD8 depletion (S1 Fig) did not, suggesting that CD4 + cells are the critical drivers of this early inflammation. Importantly, CD4 + cells, but not CD8 + T cells, were also required for the decrease in parasites at 72 hrs ( Fig 1G).
We next wanted to test if T RM cells were mediating the early control of the parasites. To do so, we grafted naive and immune skin side-by-side onto the flanks of naive recipient mice, challenged each graft, and measured the parasite burden three days later ( Fig 1H). As the graft recipients contain only naïve T cells, this approach enabled us to specifically assess the protection mediated by T RM cells, which we have previously shown to remain in the grafted tissue [18]. In all cases, the immune grafts had significantly fewer parasites than their naive counterparts at 72 hrs ( Fig 1I). Taken together, these results indicate that CD4 + T RM cells mediate parasite protection in immune skin at 72 hrs in a process that is independent of circulating CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.

Rapid protection in immune mice is associated with recruitment of inflammatory monocytes
To gain further insight into how this rapid protection is mediated, we analyzed the cells recruited to the skin of naive and immune mice 72 hrs after challenge. We compared the numbers of CD90.2 + T cells, Ly6G + neutrophils, Ly6C + inflammatory monocytes, MerTK + CD64 + macrophages, and CD11c + MHCII + dendritic cells in naive and immune skin 72 hrs after infection (Fig 2A). As expected, we observed increased T cell recruitment to immune skin consistent with previous results [18,29]. However, a majority of the recruited cells were myeloid lineage cells, specifically inflammatory monocytes (Fig 2B and 2C). We analyzed the activation status of these monocytes and found that they expressed high levels of MHCII, ROS, and iNOS. Further, both MHCII and iNOS expression were significantly increased in the monocytes recruited to immune skin compared with those recruited to naive skin ( Fig 2D). Finally, using fluorescent parasites, we found that greater than 70% of the infected cells in the skin of immune mice were inflammatory monocytes ( Fig 2E). Notably, these infected cells contained fewer parasites per cell when compared with monocytes in naive skin, as demonstrated by the lower MFI of dsRed (Fig 2F and 2G), and when counted in cytospins ( Fig 2H). These data show that monocytes are highly recruited to immune skin where they are more . Representative data shown are from one experiment representative of eight (n = 3-4 mice per group). E) Naive, immune, and immune mice depleted of CD4 + or CD8 + T cells were challenged intradermally in the ear with 2x10 6 dsRed L. major. F) DTH response was monitored over the course of 3 days. G) Parasite burden was determined at 72 hrs. Data shown are from one experiment representative of two (n = 3 mice per group). H) Naive and immune flank skin were grafted side-byside onto naive recipients, then each graft was challenged intradermally with 2x10 6 dsRed L. major. I) Parasite burden was determined at 72 hrs. Data shown are from one experiment representative of four (n = 5 mice per group). P < 0.05 = *; P < 0.01 = **; P < 0.001 = ***. likely to be infected than other cell types, have a more activated phenotype, and contain fewer parasites per infected cell. These results suggest that inflammatory monocytes recruited by T RM cells might be better able to kill parasites, and therefore we next investigated whether they were required for parasite control and if so how they mediated protection.

Early protection is dependent on inflammatory monocytes
To assess the role of inflammatory monocytes in the early protection of immune mice, we used a pair of depleting antibodies that target either Ly6G + and Ly6C + cells (and thus deplete both neutrophils and monocytes) or Ly6G + cells alone (and thus deplete only neutrophils) ( Fig  3A, S2 Fig). Depletion of neutrophils alone had no effect on the DTH response in immune Early protection is dependent on inflammatory monocytes. A) Naive, immune, and immune mice depleted with αGR1 clone RB6-8C5 (neutrophils and monocytes) or 1A8 (neutrophils only) were challenged intradermally in the ear with 2x10 6 dsRed L. major. B) DTH response was monitored over the course of 3 days. C) Parasite burden at 72 hrs was determined by limiting dilution. Data shown are from one experiment representative of two (n = 3 mice per group). D) Naive and immune flank skin were grafted side-by-side onto WT or CCR2 -/naive recipients, then each graft was challenged intradermally with 2x10 6 dsRed L. major. E, F) Parasite burden was determined in each graft by limiting dilution (E), and the number of activated Ly6C + MHCII + monocytes was determined at 72 hrs (F). Data shown are combined from two experiments (n = 9-10 mice per group). G) Naïve and immune flank skin were grafted side-by-side onto RAG -/recipients. Half the mice were treated with 500μg αGR1 clone RB6-8C5 one day prior to challenge, then each graft was challenged with 2x10 6 dsRed L. major. H) Parasite burden was determined in each graft by limiting dilution at 72 hrs. I) The number of Ly6C + MHCII + cells in each graft was quantified. Data shown is combined from two experiments (n = 4 mice per group). J) Naive and immune flank skin were grafted side-by-side onto WT, PHOX -/-, or iNOS -/naive recipients, then each graft was challenged with 2x10 6 dsRed L. major. K) Parasite burden was determined in each graft by limiting dilution at 72 hrs. Data shown are from one experiment representative of two (n = 5 mice per group). P < 0.05 = *; P < 0.01 = **; P < 0.001 = ***.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006349.g003 mice, but depletion of both neutrophils and monocytes dramatically reduced the early inflammatory response (Fig 3B). Importantly, the protection observed in immune mice was also completely ablated by the depletion of monocytes and neutrophils, while depleting neutrophils alone did not have a significant effect (Fig 3C). Because activated CD4 + cells can also express Ly6C, we confirmed that RB6-8C5 treatment did not reduce the frequency of Ly6C + CD4 + T cells in the spleen or ear after challenge ( To specifically address whether inflammatory monocyte recruitment is critical to early protection against L. major, we assessed the response to challenge in CCR2 -/mice, which contain monocytes that lack the ability to respond to CCL2 and CCL7 chemokine signaling and therefore cannot be efficiently recruited to sites of inflammation [31,32]. To do so, we grafted naive and immune skin from WT mice onto the flanks of naive WT or CCR2 -/recipients, challenged with L. major, and measured the parasite burden 72 hrs later ( Fig 3D). As previously observed, immune skin had significantly fewer parasites compared to naive skin in WT recipient mice (Fig 3E). In contrast, the reduction of parasites in immune skin was lost in CCR2 -/recipient mice (Fig 3E), and correlated with a loss of activated monocytes in the skin ( Fig 3F). Together, these results demonstrate that it is recruited CCR2 + monocytes, rather than resident myeloid cells, that are required for protection.
To further confirm that inflammatory monocytes were necessary for early protection, and that this protection could be conferred in the absence of circulating T cells, we grafted WT naïve and immune skin onto the flanks of RAG -/recipient mice that lack T and B lymphocytes. Additionally, we treated some of the mice with αGR1 clone RB6-8C5 to deplete inflammatory monocytes and neutrophils as described above. We challenged each graft with L. major and measured the parasite burden 72 hrs later ( Fig 3G). As expected, immune grafts on RAG -/mice contained significantly fewer parasites, demonstrating that the protection observed at 72 hrs was independent of circulating lymphocytes (Fig 3H). Protection in immune skin was lost in mice treated with RB6-8C5 ( Fig 3H). When we quantified the number of Ly6C + MHCII + cells in each graft, we found a strong correlation with the level of protection (Fig 3I). Taken together, these data further implicate inflammatory monocytes as the critical cell type required for early protection.
To gain further insight into the mechanism by which the inflammatory monocytes might control the parasites, we performed skin graft experiments in which we grafted naive and immune skin onto the flank of 1) WT naive mice, 2) Phox -/mice in which monocytes lack the ability to produce ROS, or 3) iNOS -/mice that have deficient NO production (Fig 3J). Grafts were then challenged with L. major, and the parasite burden measured at 72 hrs. We found that the protection associated with immune skin was lost in both the Phox -/and iNOS -/mice (Fig 3K), suggesting that both ROS and NO from inflammatory monocytes are required for this early protection.

Early protection is not enhanced by circulating memory T cells
Although T RM cell-mediated recruitment of inflammatory monocytes was sufficient to reduce the parasite burden at 72 hrs, we predicted that the presence of circulating leishmania-specific T cells might further enhance immunity, as they are also recruited early after challenge [18,29]. To examine the contribution of circulating T cells, we pretreated immune mice with either FTY-720, which prevents egress of T cells from tissues, or αCXCR3, which we previously demonstrated blocks the ability of T RM cells to recruit effector T cells from circulation [18] (Fig 4A).
Despite the expected decrease in the number T cells recruited to the challenge site (S6 Fig), neither treatment affected the DTH response (Fig 4B), the decrease in parasite burden (Fig 4C), or the recruitment of monocytes (Fig 4D). Unexpectedly, this result demonstrates that DTH and early parasite control are not enhanced by T cells from circulation, and implies that CD4 + T RM cells are solely responsible for mediating these responses.
To test if circulating T cells would provide protection in the absence of T RM cells, we utilized a parabiotic model in which the circulations of naive and immune mice were surgically joined, allowing circulating T cells to equilibrate between the two animals, while T RM cells remained exclusively in the immune partner ( Fig 4E, S7 Fig). Each parabiont was then challenged with L. major in the ear, and DTH and parasite number were measured 72 hrs later. As expected, immune parabionts had the same DTH response, monocyte recruitment, and parasite numbers as control immune mice (Fig 4F-4H). In contrast, naive parabionts, despite having a full complement of circulating memory T cells, did not exhibit a DTH response, had defective monocyte recruitment, and lost the early protection observed in immune mice ( Fig  4F-4H). These results show that circulating leishmania-specific T cells by themselves are unable to provide any protection at this early time point, further demonstrating that T RM cells are the critical subset for this rapid protection.

Circulating memory T cells are not required to control low dose L. major infection
In contrast to the parasite control observed at 72 hrs in immune mice, we previously found that when protection was assessed two weeks after challenge with 2 x 10 6 parasites, optimal parasite control depended upon both CD4 + T RM cells and circulating effector T cells [18]. These results, in combination with our current findings, suggest that while T RM cells may initially reduce the parasite number, the long-term consequences are limited in the absence of additional circulating T cells. However, since parasite dose can significantly influence what is required for protection, and the number of infective parasites transmitted by the sand fly is thought to be much lower than 2 x 10 6 parasites [33], we next tested whether T RM cells might provide protection greater than 72 hrs after challenge if fewer parasites were present in the challenge inoculum.
First, we challenged naive and immune mice with 10 3 parasites in the ear, measured the DTH, and assessed the composition of cells recruited to the challenge site at 72 hrs. Similar to our results with high dose challenge, immune mice had an increased DTH response (Fig 5A), there was a large population of inflammatory monocytes infiltrating the lesions (Fig 5B), and the monocytes had a more activated phenotype (Fig 5C), though the magnitude of the overall response was lower.
To test if T RM cells could provide protection more than 72 hrs after challenge without circulating T cells, we challenged intact naive mice, immune mice, naive grafts, and immune grafts with 10 3 L. major, and measured parasite burdens 4 weeks later ( Fig 5D). As expected, intact immune mice were better protected than naive mice against low dose L. major challenge ( Fig  5E). However, immune skin grafts also showed significantly better protection than their naive counterparts, despite the absence of circulating leishmania-specific effector T cells (Fig 5E). These results demonstrate that T RM cells do not require previously activated circulating T cells to provide protection as long as 4 weeks after low dose challenge. However, naive leishmaniaspecific T cells would be expanded during the 4 weeks of infection, and could contribute to the protection we measured. Therefore, to test if T RM cells could provide protection without any circulating lymphocytes, we grafted naive and immune skin onto WT and RAG -/recipient mice, challenged with 10 3 parasites, and measured the parasite burden 4 weeks later (Fig 5D). Surprisingly, we found that the immune grafts showed significantly better control of the . D) Naive and immune flank skin were grafted side-by-side onto naive WT or RAG -/mice, then each graft was challenged with 10 3 dsRed L. major. E) Parasite burden at 4 weeks was compared between intact naive and immune mice as well as naive and immune grafts on WT recipients. Data shown are from one experiment representative of two (n = 5 or 9 mice per group). F) Parasite burden at 4 weeks was compared between naive and immune grafts on WT or RAG -/recipients. Data shown are combined from two experiments (n = 5 mice per group). P < 0.05 = *; P < 0.01 = **; P < 0.001 = ***. parasites in both WT and RAG -/mice (Fig 5F). While circulating effector T cells may have potential to contribute to long-term immunity, these results indicate that T RM cells and innate cells alone are sufficient to provide a significant level of protection.

Discussion
We recently reported that T RM cells provide optimal immunity against L. major infection by recruiting circulating leishmania-specific effector T cells to the site of infection [18]. We now identify an additional, novel function for leishmania-specific T RM cells: to rapidly recruit and activate inflammatory monocytes at the site of infection, resulting in a significant reduction in the initial parasite burden. Further, we show that when the challenge inoculum is at a physiologically relevant dose, CD4 + T RM and inflammatory monocytes exhibit significant control of the parasites, even when circulating leishmania-specific effector T cells are not present. Together, these results demonstrate that in addition to facilitating the recruitment of circulating effector T cells, CD4 + T RM cells play a primary role in controlling parasites immediately after challenge, which not only indicates the importance of generating CD4 + T RM cells in a vaccine, but also expands our understanding of the functions of CD4 + T RM cells.
Our experiments have identified CD4 + T RM cells as the critical cell subset required for both the DTH response and the immediate control of leishmania infection. The response is antigen specific as it is not induced by PBS injection, and is likely initiated via local antigen presentation [34]. The identification of T RM cells as required for DTH responses was unexpected, since the prevailing view was that circulating effector T cells mediated DTH. However, our results are similar to those that have been described in studies of contact-hypersensitivity, where T RM cells mediated the inflammatory response independent of circulating T cells [35]. Since DTH responses can be elicited at sites distal to the initial site of infection, these results confirm that CD4 + T RM are distributed and can function throughout the skin. Thus, our results extend those of others which have focused on the functions of CD4 + T RM cells at the site of infection [3,17]. Surprisingly, neither CD8 + T cells nor circulating effector T cells are required for the DTH response and the early control of the parasites, implicating CD4 + T RM as the mediators of the initial inflammatory responses.
We found that inflammatory monocytes are rapidly recruited to the lesion site by T RM cells, and are responsible for the observed protection. Inflammatory monocytes are important mediators of protection against many viral [36,37] bacterial [38][39][40], fungal [41,42], and parasitic infections [24,43,44], and thus this mechanism of protection has the potential to influence a number of different immune responses. Inflammatory monocytes are known to be activated by memory T cells [45], and restrict leishmania infection in certain contexts [21,24,44], but their role in secondary leishmania infection and interaction with T RM cells has not previously been appreciated. On the other hand, neutrophils did not appear to be required for early protection or the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes. This is in contrast to a primary infection where neutrophils may contribute to the recruitment of dendritic cells [46]. This difference is most likely due to the presence of T RM cells, which are sufficient to mediate phagocyte recruitment in secondary challenge. Indeed, CCL2 and CCL7 transcripts are both increased 12 hrs after challenge in immune mice [18], and CCR2 signaling is required for the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes and subsequent protection.
ROS and NO from myeloid lineage cells have both been shown to have roles in controlling leishmania infections, though results vary based on the site of infection, the species of parasite involved, and whether the studies are done in mice or humans [21,[47][48][49][50][51]. Nonetheless, it is clear in our model that both ROS and NO are required for full protection early after challenge of immune mice, and neither is sufficient alone. Thus, while most studies in mice have emphasized the central role of NO, it has become clear that ROS can contribute to protection not only in humans but also in the mouse. For example, following L. major infection Phox -/mice can develop chronic lesions long after presumed cure [47]. Understanding why ROS is required under certain conditions for control of leishmanial infections in mice is still not well understood, although we would speculate that at the early time point the levels of NO induced may be insufficient for parasite control, and ROS are required to boost the killing by the inflammatory monocytes.
Currently there is no human vaccine for leishmaniasis, which has been partially attributed to the inability to maintain sufficient circulating effector T cells following immunization [52][53][54]. Thus, it is the presence of low numbers of parasites in immune mice that are believed to maintain maximal levels of responsive effector cells [29,30,52,54]. However, our studies indicate that T RM cells can mediate protection alone, suggesting that these T cells should be targeted for a vaccine. Importantly, we found that they can survive in the absence of persistent parasites [18], similar to central memory T cells [30], and thus if generated in a vaccine may be maintained long-term. Thus, defining the requirements for the generation and maintenance of T RM cells, as well as developing vaccination strategies that induce T RM , are the next important steps in developing a vaccine for leishmaniasis.
As our understanding of tissue resident T cells grows, more functions have been attributed to T RM cells. CD8 + T RM can be directly cytotoxic [12,13], and IFNγ from T RM cells has been shown to drive recruitment of circulating T cells [15,18]. Transcriptional analyses have identified a core set of changes induced by T RM activation that induce a tissue state of pathogen alert, capable of protecting against viral challenge non-specifically, [6,16]. However, this is the first demonstration to our knowledge of T RM cells orchestrating the innate response and classic DTH responses by recruiting inflammatory monocytes to the site of infection. This protective mechanism has the potential to be relevant for a number of different intracellular infections, as DTH responses are the hallmark of immunity against many infections and inflammatory monocytes are potent killers of many pathogens [55]. Although circulating effector T cells are undoubtedly beneficial, in certain contexts the rapid response provided by a combination of CD4 + T RM cells and inflammatory monocytes that lessen the initial pathogen burden may be critical in limiting the magnitude of the disease.

Skin preparation
For ear preparation, dorsal and ventral layers of the ear were separated and incubated in RPMI (Gibco) with 250 μg/mL Liberase TL (Roche) for 90 minutes at 37˚C in 5% CO 2 . Skin was then dissociated using a 40 μm cell strainer (BD Pharmingen) and resuspended in complete RPMI media (cRPMI) containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 55 μM 2-Mercaptoethanol. For flank skin preparation, a section of skin was harvested from the flank following hair removal with an electric trimmer equipped with a two-hole precision blade (Wahl). Skin sections were then minced with a sterile scalpel blade into~2mm sections, and incubated in RPMI containing 1 mg each of type III and type IV collagenase (Worthington) for 120 minutes with vortexing every 30 minutes. The resulting solution was passed through a 40 μm cell strainer and resuspended in cRPMI. Bone marrow derived dendritic cells for restimulations were generated by culturing C57BL/6 bone marrow in GM-CSF supplemented cRPMI for 7-11 days. BMDCs were then harvested and infected 5-8 hours with stationary phase L. major at a ratio of 10:1 in the presence of 1 μg/ml CpG and LPS. Infected BMDCs were incubated at a ratio of 1:5 with 10 6 skin cells in 24 well plates for 12-16 hours. Cells were incubated for the last 4 hours with 5 μg/ml BFA (eBioscience), stained for IFNγ, and analyzed by flow cytometry.

Parasite quantification
Parasite burden from ear and flank skin was calculated by serial 2-fold dilution in 96-well plates of CSM and incubated at 26˚C. The number of viable parasites was calculated from the highest dilution at which parasites were observed 7 days into culture. For qPCR, single cell suspensions from infected tissue were diluted in RLT lysis buffer, then RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen). RNA was converted to cDNA using the High Capacity RNA to cDNA kit (Applied Biosciences), then the Power SYBR green PCR mater mix (Applied Biosciences) was used to quantify parasite ribosomal ssRNA on the ViiA7 qPCR machine (Applied Biosciences) with primers F: 5'-TACTGGGGCGTCAGAG-3' and R: 5'-GGGTGTCATCGTT TGC-3'. Cytospins were prepared at 1000 RPM (Shandon Cytospin3) and imaged by light microscopy at 40X magnification (Nikon E600).

Skin grafts
Skin grafts were performed as previously described [18]. Briefly, donor skin was prepared under sterile conditions from naive and immune mouse flank skin by shaving, depilating, cleaning with chlorhexidine (Vetoquinol), then excising the skin using sterile 8mm biopsy punches (Miltex). Grafts were placed onto a fresh graft bed prepared by excising skin using a 6mm biopsy punch. All mice were anesthetized, received analgesics, and were monitored postoperatively as previously described. In challenge experiments, graft skin was injected intradermally with 2 x 10 6 metacyclic L. major 14-20 days after grafting.

Parabiosis
Congenically disparate (CD45.1 + naive and CD45.2 + immune) mice were cohoused 2 weeks prior to surgery. After induction of anesthesia with isoflorane, each received 0.1mg/kg buprenorphine subcutaneously as preemptive analgesia. The surgical site was shaved and aseptically prepared with chlorhexidine scrub. A longitudinal skin incision was made on the mirroring side in each mouse starting at 0.5 cm above the elbow and ending 0.5 cm below the knee joint. The left elbow and knee of one animal were attached to the right elbow and knee of the other with a 3-0 ethilon suture (Ethicon) around each joint beneath the skin in a manner loose enough to not disrupt circulation to the distal limb. The dorsal and ventral skin edges created by the flank incision from one mouse were sutured to the respective skin edges of the second mouse using a continuous absorbable 5-0 vicryl suture patter (Ethicon). Suture glue (Abbott laboratories) was used to approximate skin edges. 0.5 ml of 0.9% NaCl was administered subcutaneously to each mouse to prevent dehydration in the immediate post-operative recovery period, and mice were monitored twice daily for the first 48 hrs post-operatively, then observed daily for signs of surgical site complications, pain, or discomfort. In challenge experiments, ears were infected intradermally with 2 x 10 6 metacyclic L. major 14-20 days after surgery.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the Student's t-test (paired or unpaired where applicable), ANOVA, or 2-way ANOVA in Prism software (GraphPad).