{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01794453507340946, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011419249592169658, 'mean_word_length': 5.463157894736842, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Agreements under the Brussels I Regulation: Reconsidering the Principle of Party Autonomy

The role of jurisdiction agreements within the scope of the European Community Regulation 44/2001,2 also known as the Brussels I Regulation ('the Regulation') is discussed. The only way to solve enforcement problems is when the jurisdiction rules of the Regulation should be amended to reverse the obligation to suspend proceedings in cases where there is a court designated by an exclusive jurisdiction clause, granting to that court the exclusive right to determine the clause's validity.