{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01628052598622417, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002504696305572949, 'mean_word_length': 5.686192468619247, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Guidance, Navigation, and Control Technology System Trades for Mars Pinpoint Landing

Landing site selection is a compromise between safety concerns associated with the site’s terrain and scientific interest. Therefore, technologies enabling pinpoint landing (sub-100 m accuracies) on the surface of Mars are of interest to increase the number of accessible sites for in-situ research as well as allow placement of vehicles nearby prepositioned assets. A survey of various guidance, navigation, and control technologies that could allow pinpoint landing to occur at Mars has shown that negligible propellant mass fraction benefits are seen for reducing the three-sigma position dispersion at parachute deployment below approximately 3 km. Four different propulsive terminal descent guidance algorithms were analyzed with varying applicability to flight. Of these four, a near propellant optimal, analytic guidance law showed promise for the conceptual design of pinpoint landing vehicles. The existence of a propellant optimum with regards to the initiation time of the propulsive terminal descent was shown to exist for various flight conditions. In addition, subsonic guided parachutes are shown to provide marginal performance benefits due to the timeline associated with Martian entries, and a low computational-cost, yet near fuel optimal propulsive terminal descent algorithm is identified. This investigation also demonstrates that navigation is a limiting technology for Mars pinpoint landing, with overall landed performance being largely driven by navigation sensor and map tie accuracy.