{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031332304059576786, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03373898828444283, 'mean_word_length': 4.979636166168884, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
3q26 Amplification Is an Effective Negative Triage Test for LSIL: A Historical Prospective Study

Background Women with low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) at cervical cancer screening are currently referred for further diagnostic work up despite 80% having no precancerous lesion. The primary purpose of this study is to measure the test characteristics of 3q26 chromosome gain (3q26 gain) as a host marker of carcinogenesis in women with LSIL. A negative triage test may allow these women to be followed by cytology alone without immediate referral to colposcopy. Methods and Findings A historical prospective study was designed to measure 3q26 gain from the archived liquid cytology specimens diagnosed as LSIL among women attending colposcopy between 2007 and 2009. 3q26 gain was assessed on the index liquid sample; and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were measured at immediate triage and at 6–16 months after colposcopic biopsy. The sensitivity of 3q26 gain measured at immediate triage from automated and manually reviewed tests in 65 non-pregnant unique women was 70% (95% CI: 35, 93) with a NPV of 89% (95% CI: 78, 96). The sensitivity and NPV increased to 80% (95% CI: 28, 99) and 98% (95% CI: 87, 100), respectively, when only the automated method of detecting 3q26 gain was used. Conclusions 3q26 gain demonstrates high sensitivity and NPV as a negative triage test for women with LSIL, allowing possible guideline changes to routine surveillance instead of immediate colposcopy. Prospective studies are ongoing to establish the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 3q26 gain for LSIL over time.


Introduction
Human papillomavirus (HPV) and telomerase overexpression have been recognized as independent carcinogenic factors for which the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded in 2008 and 2009, respectively. Harald zur Hausen defined the link between human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer; and Elizabeth Blackburn, Carol Greider and Jack Szostak detailed the function of telomeres and the enzyme telomerase. Cells that are becoming cancerous or are cancerous express telomerase over-abundantly, allowing gains in the chromosomes' telomere length. Testing for gains in human chromosome length of HPV infected cells may identify a potential biomarker for cervical cancer screening.
The primary screening method for cervical cancer has been the morphologic characteristics of HPV infection in the epithelial cells of the uterine cervix. The Bethesda System, (TBS-2001) [1,2] has replaced the original Papanicolaou classification system for cervical cytologic reporting in many parts of the world. The cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1, 2 and 3 nomenclature is reserved for histologic classification of morphologic evidence of HPV associated changes and, in general, corresponds to the cytologic diagnoses: low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) to CIN 1; and, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) to CIN grades 2 and 3 [3]. The cytologic screening diagnosis of LSIL makes up 24-31% of all abnormal cytology reports [4,5]. While LSIL is the most concordant diagnosis among cytopathologists [1], nearly 35% of all LSIL diagnoses are both over-and under-called with respect to inter-observer agreement [6]. In addition, nearly 20% of the LSIL cytology represents cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN 2/3) disease at colposcopy [7][8][9][10][11], not the histologic CIN 1 usually associated with LSIL. Inversely, among all women with biopsy proven CIN 2/3, 20% were referred due to a LSIL screen.
Cocktail high risk (HR) HPV testing, such as Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) is positive in 76-80% of LSIL cytology samples [10,12,13], too high to be a meaningful positive triage test to efficiently detect precancerous lesions without a high false positive rate. Even as testing has become more refined to identifying specific oncogenic HPV genotypes as an improved positive triage test in cervical cancer screening programs [13,14], these tests cannot reduce the colposcopic referral rate for those whose HPV infections are highly unlikely to progress to invasive cervical cancer. The addition of a host marker, such as host telomere length, offers the potential to reassure women that they have a very low risk of developing CIN 2/3 prior to their next routine cytologic screen despite a LSIL cytology report. This negative triage test focuses the biomarker on the host rather than the established viral infection.
The purpose of this research is to establish the test characteristics of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the gain of the chromosome 3q26 region (3q26 gain) for predicting which women with LSIL cytology do not have CIN 2/3 at colposcopy.

Patient Selection
We designed a historical prospective study of women who had presented to the colposcopy clinics at Truman Medical Center, the teaching hospitals of the University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City Missouri, USA. To be eligible for inclusion, we reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for those women whose index liquid cytology LSIL sample had been archived, who had a colposcopically directed biopsy and who was not pregnant at the time of cytology or biopsy sampling. We were granted ethics approval, and consent waiver, from both the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (#09-70X) and the Truman Medical Centers' Privacy Board to use the de-identified data.

Liquid Cytology Specimens
Clinicians collected the index samples in the SurePath TM system (Tripath, BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) as part of routine cervical surveillance. The specimens were pelleted and resuspended for cytology processing for immediate clinical diagnosis. No other sampling was done on the specimen. The remainder of the resuspended sample was refrigerated at 2-4uC until it was used for 3q26 gain testing. The Bethesda System was used to report the cytology diagnoses (e.g. negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), LSIL, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)). CIN nomenclature was used to report the histologic diagnosis from the biopsy specimen (e.g. CIN grade 1, 2 or 3).

3q26 Gain Fluorescence In-situ Hybridization (FISH) Testing
The cytology specimens were mailed at ambient temperature to the Ikonisys laboratory where each was transferred to a 15 mL tube and centrifuged for 6 minutes at 1200 RPM. The supernatant was decanted and the pellets resuspended in 5 mL of KCl for 15 minutes at 37uC. Two milliliters Carnoy's Fixative was added and the samples centrifuged for 6 minutes at 1200 RPM. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet resuspended in 10 mL of Carnoy's fixative and incubated overnight. Samples were centrifuged for 6 minutes at 1200 RPM, the supernatant discarded and the pellet resuspended in an appropriate volume of Carnoy's Fixative. Slides were prepared manually and incubated at 55uC for 10 minutes. Prior to hybridization, slides were immersed in 2X SSC for 2 minutes at 73uC and treated with 1% pepsin for 10-15 minutes at 37uC. Slides were then incubated in 1X PBS for 2 minutes and fixed in 2% formalin for 5 minutes, at room temperature. Slides were washed in 2X SSC for 2 minutes at room temperature and dehydrated in an ethanol series (70%, 85%, 100%).

Hybridization
The slides were hybridized using the oncoFISH cervical probe kit (Ikonisys, Inc. New Haven, CT). Briefly, 1 mL of 3q26 probe, 1 mL of CEP 7 probe, 1 mL distilled water and 7 mL of hybridization buffer were mixed and applied to the slide. A 22 mm round glass cover slip was placed over the probe and air bubbles were removed. Slides were transferred to a ThermoBrite (Abbot Molecular, Des Plaines, IL), denatured at 76uC for 5 minutes and hybridized overnight at 37uC. Following hybridization, slides were washed in 2X SSC, 0.3% NP-40 at 73uC for 2 minutes then in 2X SSC, 0.1% NP-40 at room temperature for an additional 2 minutes. Slides were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 3-4 minutes at room temperature and dehydrated in an ethanol series. Ten microliters of antifade and a 22650 mm cover slip were applied and slides were placed at 220uC for at least 15 minutes prior to analysis.

Slide Scanning
We analyzed 65 slides using an automated system developed specifically for rare-cell detection and analysis (Ikonisys, Inc., New Haven, CT). The entire sample was scanned using a 206objective and both the total number of nuclei and number of nuclei with .2 signals for 3q26 were determined. The nuclei were ordered based on the number of 3q26 FISH signals, and up to 800 nuclei with the highest number of 3q26 FISH signals were imaged using a 406 objective. Nuclei were enumerated for both 3q26 and control centromeric 7 FISH probe signals to determine 3q26 gain. The test was positive if two or more cells with more than four 3q26 FISH signals were detected ( Figure 1).
Fourteen cytology samples were unable to be read by automated scanning for the 3q26 gain signal. These slides had less than 50 nuclei imaged at high magnification (406), and they had an increase in background autofluorescence that could confound the signal to noise ratio. Therefore, following scanning, these fourteen slides were reviewed for 3q26 gain manually, while maintaining blinding to the subjects' clinical information.
Statistics. The power analysis was calculated with Statistica software [15] using a chi square test for one proportion defining significance to include a two-tailed alpha level of 0.05. In order to achieve power of 80% while observing a negative predictive value of at least 85% while assuming a null negative predictive value of 70% we needed a sample of at least 60 subjects. We estimated proportions of sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values with binomial exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Population characteristics of those women whose results were obtained via automation vs. manual review were compared with chi-square testing using a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 as the threshold of significance [15]. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine variable correlations. The results are reported according to the STARD initiative for diagnostic accuracy [16].
Results 81 LSIL cervical specimens from unique non-pregnant women were collected between May 2007 and January 2009 and stored at 2-4uC. Of these 81, 73 women had colposcopically directed biopsies on average 36 days from their index cytology (standard deviation (SD): 18). Of these 73 specimens, 65 provided sufficient archived material to run the 3q26 gain test resulting in 65 women with complete index cytology, colposcopically directed biopsy and index 3q26 gain status ( Figure 2). Of these 65 women, 16 whose colposcopically directed biopsy was reported as CIN 1 had a repeat cytology sample 6-16 months after biopsy; and four of the 10 women with CIN 2/3 had cytology follow up 6-8 months after their loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). The 3q26 gain test was performed on average 616 days after collection (SD 157).
The average age of the study population was 32 years (SD 9.6 yrs) ranging from 17-59 years. Most of the women in the study were African-American (51%) or Caucasian (40%). The women had a mean gravidity and parity of 2.6 (SD 1.9) and 2.0 (SD 1.6), respectively, and 40% of the women had had a prior abnormal Pap. Ten of the 65 women (15%) had CIN 2/3 at colposcopy with the remaining having CIN 1 or normal tissue (Table 1).
Recalculation of the 3q26 gain test characteristics after exclusion of the manually reviewed slides does not substantially change the four test characteristics of 3q26 gain (Table 3). There was no difference between those slides scanned by automation and those reviewed manually for 3q26 gain in terms of the subjects' age, gravidity, parity and past history of a prior abnormal Pap test; the age of the cytology specimen prior to processing; or the number of days from cytology sampling to colposcopic biopsy. Similarly there was no correlation between the age of the sample and the 3q26 gain status (r2 = 0.0002, p = 0.92). Compared to the automated scanning, though, the slides manually reviewed occurred less often in Caucasian subjects (14.3% vs. 47.1%, p = .03) and were less likely to be associated with a CIN 1 biopsy (42.9% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.04).
Of secondary interest, sixteen women whose colposcopically directed biopsy was CIN 1 returned for repeat cytology 6-16 months (mean 302, SD 96) from their index cytology. None of the women had progressed to HSIL in that time frame for a non-evaluable sensitivity and a 0% positive predictive value. Twelve of the women regressed to normal cytology, one of whom had had a gain in the 3q26 chromosome on her index cytology, representing a false positive 3q26 gain test. None of the four women whose LSIL persisted had a 3q26 gain on her index cytology, making the specificity of the 3q26 gain test for regression or persistence at a 10 month average follow up 94% (95% CI: 70, 100) and the negative predictive value 100% (95% CI: 78, 100).
In addition, four of the women with biopsy confirmed CIN 2/3 had follow up cytology 6 months (mean 203 SD 16) after their LEEP. All LEEP specimens had negative resection margins. All 6 month follow up cytologies were reported as NILM. Two of the women who showed a 3q26 gain at index cytology showed no 3q26 gain at the post-LEEP follow up cytology. Discussion HPV infections create the morphologic effects seen to codify a LSIL entity. Cells must exhibit nuclear enlargement as well as a defined, perinuclear clear area demarcated by a dense cytoplas-mic ring (koilocytes); there may be nuclear smudging and binucleation. The nuclear contour of a LSIL cell may be smudged or granular or slightly irregular with hyperchromasia but the chromatin is evenly distributed. The nuclear enlargement seen in LSIL is at least three times that of the normal intermediate cell  along with an increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio. These changes are most often seen in the superficial and intermediate cells, in sheets or individually [17]. These morphologic changes are irrespective of the oncogenic potential of the HPV infection and do not signify malignant potential by themselves. While only 2.5% of all women screened for cervical cancer will have LSIL cytology, these women constitute nearly 50% of all the referrals to colposcopy [4,18,19]. This high referral rate results from the current management guidelines which acknowledge the inaccuracies of a LSIL cytologic diagnosis and recommend all women be referred to colposcopy because of the fear of missing underlying CIN 2/3 disease [20,21]. While these conservative guidelines attempt to expedite any precancerous detection, they are costly and may cause psychosocial harm to the majority of women whose LSIL will not indicate a CIN 2/3 lesion before the next screening interval [22,23].
The natural history of LSIL cytology supports an observational management guideline if the sensitivity and negative predictive value of a triage test is high enough to provide reassurance that the LSIL lesion will not progress to CIN 2/3 before the next screening interval. LSIL lesions caused by oncogenic HPV types regress, on average, in 14 months, ranging from 9-19 months, while those caused by low risk, benign, types regress, on average, in half that time [24]. Progression rates into HSIL from LSIL caused by oncogenic HPV types occur in 12% of women over 18 months, giving a mean time to progression of about six years [24]. For women with HPV 16 associated CIN 1, which constitutes about a quarter of all CIN 1 [25], less than 20% progress to small CIN 3 lesions within 2 years [26] and about 1% progress to less than two quadrants of CIN 3 within 3 years [27].
Positive triage tests to improve the diagnostic accuracy of cytology have included testing for oncogenic HPV types, quantitating viral load, measuring integration and quantifying markers of cell cycle aberration, such as p16ink4a. These triage tests need high specificity and positive predictive value for identifying women whose abnormal cytology hides a true cancer precursor, balanced with an acceptable rate of false positive tests. The results of these positive triage tests would change clinical management from passive surveillance to requiring further diagnostic work up such as referral to colposcopy. Randomized controlled trials show high risk HPV testing, as a triage test after LSIL, to have specificities less than 50% for predicting those women with CIN 2+ disease where CIN 2+ is defined as CIN 2 or 3 or cervical cancer [28]. The specificity of the test decreases as the method of HPV testing changes from HC2 to PCR methods and the endpoint changes from CIN 2+ to CIN 3+ [29]. Viral load performs marginally better with a specificity of 65% for predicting CIN 2+ in women with viral loads $100 pg/ml regardless of the initial cytology [30]. The specificity of integration status, depends on the size of the deleted HPV genome fragment for predicting precancerous disease progression; integration status has not been well-operationalized for clinical utility [31]. The specificity of p16 testing in screened women with normal or mild dyskaryosis predicting CIN 2+ disease has been shown to be similar to viral load testing at 68%; while the specificity of HPV 16, 18, 31, 33 and 45 mRNA testing for E6/E7 protein expression was the highest at 75% [32].
A negative triage test would be one whose negative/normal results would modify current aggressive clinical guidelines to allow observation without clinical intervention until the next screening interval without missing a significant portion of diseased women. A negative triage test is one with a high sensitivity for cancer and cancer precursors in addition to a negative predictive value exceeding 97% [33,34]. For those countries whose clinical guidelines already refer all women with LSIL to colposcopy, a negative triage test could change clinical guidelines to continued passive routine screening surveillance.
A promising new negative triage test for women with LSIL cytology has been the gain of chromosome length of 3q26. Prior studies report greater than 80% sensitivity for the detection of CIN 2/3 from a LSIL population [35]. Chromosome arm 3q contains the human telomerase RNA gene on chromosome band 3q26. Chromosomal telomeres shorten by dropping terminal DNA sequence repeats as the cell repeatedly divides, leading to chromosomal instability. Telomerase is the enzyme that maintains chromosomal length and stability. Overexpression of telomerase, specifically the catalytic subunit of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), is one of the crucial steps for malignant transformation and cellular immortalization. Gains in chromosome 3q26 commonly represent chromosomal instability in squamous cell cancers and adenocarcinomas, independent of specific TERT overexpression, and are found in a high proportion of head and neck [36], lung [37], esophageal [38], colon [39], pancreatic [40], breast [41], cervix [42] and vulvar cancers [43]. It should be noted that the 3q26 region contains a plethora of loci, including PIK3CA which might also cause cell cycle dysregulation [44].  Prior studies using gains in 3q26 amplification showed increasing proportions of 3q26 gain among women with increasingly more severe cervical cytology and histology fulfilling the biological plausibility and temporal association characteristics needed for this triage test to be clinically relevant in cervical cancer screening [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Recent advances in liquid cytology preparations have facilitated 3q26 gain determination from cytology specimens [62] increasing the likelihood of using this biomarker of genetic instability for negative triage screening. Automation of 3q26 gain evaluation could allow large volume triage of LSIL cytologies [63].
Our results show a sensitivity of 80% and a NPV of 98% for automated scanning for 3q26 gain among women with LSIL cytology at immediate colposcopy; and 100% NPV at the 6-16 month follow up visit after CIN1 biopsy. These excellent negative triage test properties are balanced by reassurance of not missing diseased women as seen from the high specificity of 90% and the PPV of 44%, nearly three times the prevalence rate of CIN 2/3 disease in our study population. These test characteristics are sufficiently high to warrant further prospective investigation of this test as a negative triage tool to change clinical guidelines to conservatively follow LSIL women negative for 3q26 gain instead of the current guidelines of immediate referral to colposcopy.
Other clinical states that may benefit from a host-based negative triage test, such as 3q26 gain, include those women with atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGC) [64], women with vulvar disease [65] and those women with abnormal cytology who also have HIV, organ transplants and other immunosuppressed states [66,67] who currently are advised to undergo frequent diagnostic work ups.
The limitations of our study include the historical prospective trial design which relies on the integrity of archived liquid cytology material for 3q26 gain testing; and an unknown disease state in women whose LSIL smears were censored from analysis due to incomplete records of a colposcopic endpoint or interval surveillance screens.
A prospective trial in larger numbers of women with LSIL from the general population of wide age ranges is ongoing. This study may determine a more robust characterization of the 3q26 gain test for reassuring women and physicians of the lack of need for immediate colposcopy after a LSIL Pap test.