{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.041672816728167285, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02912669126691267, 'mean_word_length': 4.850892343120322, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 17, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
11S Glycinin Up-Regulated NLRP-3-Induced Pyroptosis by Triggering Reactive Oxygen Species in Porcine Intestinal Epithelial Cells

11S glycinin is a major soybean antigenic protein, which induces human and animal allergies. It has been reported to induce intestinal porcine epithelial (IPEC-J2) cell apoptosis, but the role of pyroptosis in 11S glycinin allergies remains unknown. In this study, IPEC-J2 cells were used as an in vitro physiological model to explore the mechanism of 11S glycinin-induced pyroptosis. The cells were incubated with 0, 1, 5, and 10 mg·ml−1 11S glycinin for 24 h. Our results revealed that 11S glycinin significantly inhibited cell proliferation, induced DNA damage, generated active oxygen, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, and increased the NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP-3) expression of IPEC-J2 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Further, IPEC-J2 cells were transfected with designed sh-NLRP-3 lentivirus to silence NLRP-3. The results showed that 11S glycinin up-regulated the silenced NLRP-3 gene and increased the expression levels of apoptosis-related spot-like protein (ASC), caspase-1, the cleaved gasdermin D, and interleukin-1β. The IPEC-J2 cells showed pyrolysis morphology. Moreover, we revealed that N-acetyl-L-cysteine can significantly inhibit the production of reactive oxygen species and reduce the expression levels of NLRP-3 and the cleaved gasdermin D. Taken together, 11S glycinin up-regulated NLRP-3-induced pyroptosis by triggering reactive oxygen species in IPEC-J2 cells.


INTRODUCTION
Soybean is an important economic crop and is the main source of plant protein in food, feed, and other industries (1). Soybean is one of the eight allergic foods that can affect the respiratory system (2), digestive system (3,4), and seriously affect animal growth and health (5). 11S glycinin is the main antigenic component of soybean protein. It is a hexamer protein consisting of different subunits, each of which consists of an acidic peptide chain and a basic peptide chain. The structure is very stable and is not easily damaged in its natural state. After eating 11S soybean protein, an intestinal immune response is triggered in young animals, damaging the intestinal mucosal barrier, resulting in growth retardation, dyspepsia, and allergic diarrhea (6,7).
The intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) layer is exposed to the intestinal lumen contents, participates in the selective absorption of nutrients, and acts as a barrier to the passive paracellular permeability of the intestinal lumen contents through the expression of a tight-junction between adjacent IECs. Soybean allergy usually induces intestinal inflammatory diseases, characterized by the atrophy and proliferation of crypt villi, which accelerate the apoptosis and migration of intestinal cells (8,9). Our previous studies have determined that 11S glycinin decreases intestinal porcine epithelial (IPEC-J2) cell membrane potential (10), damages the cell cytoskeleton and cell tight junctions, and induces IPEC-J2 cell apoptosis via the p38/JNK/NF-κB signaling pathway (11). Abnormal activation of the MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways promotes an inflammatory response, leading to inflammatory damage of the small intestine tissue of piglets (12). However, the inflammatory response is a complex process and is the result of the interaction and mutual regulation of multiple pathways. In the recent years, a large number of studies have revealed that epithelial pyroptosis plays a key role in allergic diseases (13,14). Pyroptosis is a pro-inflammatory form of programmed cell death (PCD), which is characterized by the continuous expansion of cells until the rupture of the cell membrane, resulting in the release of cellular contents and then activating a strong inflammatory response (15,16). NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP-3) is a protein complex in cells. Its main function is to activate caspase-1, activated caspase-1 cleaves gasdermin D (GSDMD), induces pyroptosis and promotes the secretion of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), causing an inflammatory response (17,18).
In our previous studies, it was often found that some IPEC-J2 cells were swollen, the cell membrane was ruptured, there were holes in the cell membrane, the cytoplasm flowed out, and the cell morphology was highly redolent of pyrolysis. However, whether cell pyroptosis exists in 11S glycinin-induced IPEC-J2 cell injury and the molecular mechanism thereof, has not been reported. Therefore, in this study, we aim to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms of 11S glycinin in inducing IPEC-J2 cells pyroptosis.

Cell Culture
The IPEC-J2 cell lines were purchased from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (Wuhan, China) and cultured with RPMI 1,640 containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin, and 1% streptomycin at 37 • C with 5% CO 2 in a humidified atmosphere.

Cell Viability Assay
IPEC-J2 cells were seeded into sterile 96-well plates at a density of 5×10 3 cells per well. After a 24 h stabilization period, the cells were treated with different concentrations (0, 1, 5, and 10 mg·ml −1 ) of 11S glycinin for 24 h. After stimulation, CCK-8 regent was added followed by incubation at 37 • C in a 5% CO 2 humidified atmosphere for 1 h. The absorbance was determined at 450 nm using a Multiskan MS plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The ratio of viability of control cells was taken as 100%.

Visual Fluorescence Effect of Live and Dead Cells
IPEC-J2 cells were seeded into sterile-glass-bottomed dishes at a density of 1.6 × 10 4 cells/dish and cultured for 24 h. The cells were treated with different concentrations (0, 1, 5, and 10 mg·ml −1 ) of 11S glycinin. After 24 h stimulation, the cells were stained by the LIVE/DEAD Cell Imaging Kit, as per the manufacturer's instructions. The living and dead cells were observed and photographed using a JEM-1230 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan).

Cellular ROS Detection
IPEC-J2 cells were seeded into sterile-6-well-culture plates at a density of 1.2 × 10 5 cells/hole and cultured for 24 h. The cells were treated with different concentrations (0, 1, 5, and 10 mg·ml −1 ) of 11S glycinin. After 24 h stimulation, all the cells were treated with 10 µM of DCFH-DA (Elabscience Biotechnology, Wuhan, China) for 30 min, and the cells were observed and photographed using a fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Japan). The signal of cellular ROS was evaluated by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and the data were statistically analyzed by FlowJo software (Ashland, OR, USA).

Flow Cytometric Analysis of JC-1 Staining
IPEC-J2 cells were seeded into sterile-6-well-culture plates at a density of 1.

Immunofluorescence Assay
The IPEC-J2 cells were seeded at a density of 8 × 10 4 cells per well into sterile 24-well plates covered with 14 mm cell slides and incubated with 1, 5, and 10 mg·ml −1 11S glycinin for 24 h. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 5 min/time). Polyoxymethylene (4%) was used to fix cells for 30 min and PBS was used to wash cells (3 times, 5 min/time). Triton X-100 (0.5%) was used to permeate the cell membrane for 15 min. The reaction was blocked with BCA (0.5%, 1 h). The IPEC-J2 cells were cultured overnight at 4 • C with primary antibodies NLRP-3, after washing three times with PBS for 5 min each time. The FITC-bound secondary antibody (dilution of 1:100, E-AB-1016) was added and the cells were incubated for 1 h, and then washed with PBS (3 times, 5 min/time). After 10 min of nuclei staining with DAPI, cells were washed three times for 5 min each time with PBS. The sections were sealed with anhydrous glycerol and imaged under a confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Western Blotting
IPEC-J2 cells in logarithmic growth phase were seeded in sterile 6-well plates at a density of 1.6 × 10 5 cells/ml for 24 h, and then treated with 0, 1, 5, and 10 mg·ml −1 11S for 24 h, respectively. Samples were collected and IPEC-J2 cells were lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA), lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China), centrifuged (12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 • C), and the supernatant was collected. The Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was used to determine the protein concentration. The protein content of samples was adjusted to 40 µg and then diluted with 5 × loading buffer. The protein of samples was separated by 5% stacking gel and 10-15% separating gel and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were blocked with bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 4 h, washed 4 times with TBST, and then incubated with the indicated primary antibodies overnight at 4 • C. After washing with TBST, they were incubated with goat antirabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) secondary antibody (1:5,000, Zen Bioscience, Chengdu, China) at room temperature for 1 h. After washing with TBST again, the pictures were collected by gel imager. The gray value of protein bands was analyzed using the ImageJ software.

qRT-PCR Assay
The mRNA expressions were detected using the qRT-PCR assay. Briefly, after IPEC-J2 cells were transfected by LV and incubated with 11S, samples were collected. Total RNA of samples were isolated and reverse transcribed into cDNA. The primer sequences used in qRT-PCR were shown in Table 1. The qRT-PCR detection method steps were performed as described previously (10).

Transmission Electron Microscopy
After the samples were transfected and treated according to the method in Lentiviral transfection of IPEC-J2 cells, the supernatant was discarded after centrifugation at 1,000 rpm for 5 min. Then, 1 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde was added to each tube and fixed at 4 • C for 12 h. The PBS was washed three times (4 • C, 5,000 × g, 15 min) and then fixed with 2% osmotic acid for 4 h. After rinsing with PBS, gradient dehydration with 30-100% alcohol, osmotic embedding, cutting, and staining of ultrathin sections were carried out. Photographs were clicked with a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1230, JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan).

Data Analysis and Processing
The experimental data are expressed as mean ± SD. ANOVA of SPSS 17.0 software was used for variance analysis, and the LSD method was used for significant comparison, with P < 0.05 indicating significant difference and P < 0.01 indicating extremely significant difference. Graph Pad Prism 7.0 software was used to draw the histogram.

11S Glycinin Suppressed IPEC-J2 Cells
We evaluated the effect of 11S glycinin on the viability of IPEC-J2 cells using the CCK8 assay. 11S glycinin exhibited a strong inhibitory effect on the proliferation of IPEC-J2 cells in a dosedependent manner (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01, Figure 1A). To further detect the inhibition of 11S glycinin on the proliferation of IPEC-J2 cells, LIVE/DEAD TM staining was used. The quantity of dead cells increased with the raise of 11S glycine concentration, which was consistent with the results of CCK8 analysis ( Figure 1B).
All of the aforementioned results demonstrated that 11S glycine could suppress IPEC-J2 cells.

11S Glycinin Induced ROS Generation and Decreased MMP in IPEC-J2 Cells
As shown in Figures 2A,B, ROS generation was significantly increased after 11S glycinin treatment (P < 0.01). As shown in Figure 2C, the mitochondrial membrane potential of IPEC-J2 cells which was treated with 11S glycinin was significantly reduced, compared with the control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01 or P < 0.001).

11S Glycinin Induced DNA Damage and Increased the NLRP-3 Expression in IPEC-J2 Cells
We evaluated whether 11S glycinin induced DNA damage in IPEC-J2 cells by TUNEL staining. As presented in Figure 3A, after treating the cells with 11S glycinin, the immunofluorescence intensity significantly increased, indicating that the number of positive cells increased significantly. According to the principle of TUNEL assay, the increase of positive cells evidenced that their DNA was fragmented. As revealed in Figure 3B, the morphology of IPEC-J2 cells in the low concentration (1 mg·ml −1 ) group was slightly damaged. In the middle concentration (5 mg·ml −1 ) group, the morphology of IPEC-J2 cells had reduced. While in the high concentration (10 mg·ml −1 ) group, we observed significant morphological changes, including cell swelling and the generation of large bubbles, which was highly redolent of pyrolysis. The NLRP-3 protein was assessed by the western blotting and immunofluorescence. As shown in Figures 3C,D, after 11S glycinin stimulation, the NLRP-3 protein expression (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) and immunofluorescence signal were increased significantly.
As Figure 4C shows, transfection of the designed sh-NLRP-3 lentivirus did not affect the cell activity of IPEC-J2,but the cell activity of IPEC-J2 transfected with the designed sh-NLRP-3 lentivirus decreased significantly after stimulation with 10 mg·ml −1 11S glycinin (P<0.01). As Figure 4D shows, we observed the typical pyroptosis morphology in sh-NLRP-3+11S group, including cell membrane rupture, cell swelling, and mitochondrial degeneration. The green fluorescent significant enhancement in sh-NLRP-3+11S group cells suggests that mitochondrial membrane potential was decreased ( Figure 4E). As shown in Figures 4C,G, the cells of sh-NLRP-3+11S group showed a significant increase in protein level and mRNA expression of NLRP-3, apoptosis-related spot-like protein (ASC), cysteine-containing aspartate-specific proteases-1 (caspase-1), c-GSDMD, and IL-1β (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The contents of proinflammatory factor caspase-1 and IL-1β were assessed by ELISA. As shown in Figure 4F, the contents of caspase-1 and IL-1β in sh-NLRP-3+11S group were significantly increased than control group and NC group (P < 0.01).

11S Glycinin Up-Regulated NLRP-3 by Triggering ROS in IPEC-J2 Cells
As shown in Figure 5A, the ROS immunofluorescence signal of IPEC-J2 cells in 11S glycinin treatment group was significantly enhanced. Figure 5B showed a significant increase in the protein expression of NLRP-3 and GSDMD after incubation with 10 mg·ml −1 11S glycinin at 24 h (P < 0.01). Treatment with the inhibitor (NAC) significantly weakened the ROS immunofluorescence signal, inhibited the up-regulated expression of NLRP-3 and GSDMD (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01).

DISCUSSION
Previous studies demonstrated that soybean antigen protein allergic can induce IPEC-J2 cell apoptosis (11), and can lead to inflammatory injury of the piglet small intestine (12). However, in the pathogenesis of acute and chronic enteritis, cell death has many forms, including apoptosis, cell scorching, iron death, necrosis, and autophagy. Although a recent study reported that common allergens can cause pyroptosis and lead to allergic diseases (19), the role of pyroptosis in allergy with 11S glycinin remains to be understood. Pyroptosis was a kind of death that was characterized by cell membrane rupture, which shares certain features with apoptosis, such as a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential and DNA fragmentation (20). Our results demonstrated that 11S glycinin induced mitochondrial membrane potential decrease. We also demonstrated that 11S glycinin induced DNA damage in IPEC-J2 cells using the TUNEL assay; this contributes to pyrolysis. With the increase in the concentration of 11S glycinin, we observed distinct changes in morphology, including cellular swelling and the production of bubbles on IPEC-J2 cell membrane, which resemble the pyroptosis induced by the gasdermin D (GSDMD) (17,21). Recently, it has been shown that NLRP-3 was an inflammatory compound widely existing in epithelial cells and played an important role in the occurrence and development of allergic diseases (22). We found that the expressions of NLRP-3, caspase-1, and IL-1β were significantly elevated in IPEC-J2 cells with increasing concentrations of 11S glycinin. The accumulation of NLRP3 inflammasome is considered to be an important activator of pyroptosis. Mature NLRP3 induces adapter ASC polymerization and ASC spot assembly (23,24). ASC spots recruit and activate caspase-1, which then triggers the cleavage of GSDMD family proteins and promotes the release of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), as well as pyroptosis (25,26). Therefore, we speculated that 11S glycinin may induce pyroptosis of IPEC-J2 cells by activating NLRP-3.
Few studies have shown the role of pyroptosis in 11S glycinin allergy. In order to fully prove our conjecture, we used the designed sh-NLRP-3 lentivirus to transfect IPEC-J2 cells and successfully silenced the target gene, NLRP-3. The NLRP-3 gene silenced IPEC-J2 cells that were incubated with 11S glycinin for 24 h. Our results demonstrated that 11S glycinin significantly up-regulated mRNA and protein levels in IPEC-J2 cells of the NLRP-3 and other signaling molecules downstream, such as ASC, caspase-1, and IL-1β. More importantly, the mRNA of GSDMD and the protein levels of c-GSDMD were significantly increased as well. The secretion of IL-1β increased, which is common in pyroptosis. A recent study showed that GSDMD was an executor of pyroptosis and was required for the secretion of IL-1β (27). Furthermore, 11S could reduce the mitochondrial membrane potential in IPEC-J2 cells when the NLPR-3 gene was silenced. Under the transmission electron microscope, the IPEC-J2 mitochondria were degenerated, the mitochondrial cristae disappeared, and the cell membrane was damaged, which were the main morphological features of pyroptosis. Our results suggested that 11S glycinin up-regulated NLRP-3 expression, activated caspase-1, cleaved GSDMD, induced pyroptosis, and released inflammatory factors, which may be responsible for amplifying the inflammatory response. These results have not been reported earlier.
It is widely accepted that inflammation and oxidative stress usually occur simultaneously. ROS is an important cellular signal product responsible for oxidative stress (28), and is related to intestinal tissue injury and intestinal cell death (29,30). ROS could promote the cleavage of GSDMD by activating NLRP-3, thereby inducing inflammatory processes (31). In this study, we verified that ROS production increased in a dose-dependent manner after 11S soybean globulin treated IPEC-J2 cells. The addition of NAC, a specific inhibitor of ROS, significantly weakened the fluorescence expression of ROS. More importantly, we also found that NAC significantly reduced the expression of NLRP-3 and c-GSDMD. Therefore, we believed that 11S glycinin induced IPEC-J2 cell pyroptosis, which was related to ROS and NLRP-3 in IPEC-J2 cells.

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, our results demonstrated that 11S glycinin induced cell membrane rupture, DNA damage, mitochondrial membrane potential decrease, and ROS generation in IPEC-J2 cells. Furthermore, 11S glycinin up-regulated the expression of NLRP-3, activated caspase-1, cleaved GSDMD, and promoted the secretion of inflammatory cytokine IL-1β. Reducing ROS production could inhibit the expression of NLRP-3 and cleaved GSDMD. Taken together, our findings demonstrated that 11S glycinin up-regulated NLRP-3-mediated pyroptosis by triggering ROS in IPEC-J2 cells. This study provided new ideas for the prevention and treatment of the allergic diseases, which was induced by 11S glycinin. Allergic reaction in the organism is a very complex process involving multiple molecular pathways. However, our results were based on in vitro experiments, only revealing one of the possible mechanisms. Therefore, in the subsequent studies, weaned piglets will be used to construct animal models, and many prospective clinical trials will be conducted to reveal the mechanism of soybean antigenic proteininduced allergy.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
JW and CP conceived and designed this experiment. JW coordinated financial and technical support. LW and ZS performed experiments and wrote the manuscript. WX and HD collect the experimental samples. JW, YL, SF, XW, and CZ reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.