{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026730637422892393, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025359835503769704, 'mean_word_length': 5.32034632034632, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Prevalence of a training module for difficult airway management: a comparison between Japan and the United Kingdom

Summary To examine the education of trainees with regard to difficult airway management, we sent a questionnaire to all 89 Japanese University Departments of Anaesthesia (to be answered by a person who was responsible for teaching trainees) and all 280 Royal College of Anaesthetists' Tutors in the UK. The presence or absence of a formal training module for difficult airway management, timing and methods of training, types of airway devices that should be taught, and tutors' expertise with various techniques and devices were surveyed. Sixty‐seven of the 89 Japanese tutors (75%) and 167 of 280 UK tutors (60%) replied to the questionnaire. Only 19 of 67 (28%) Japanese anaesthetists and 33 of 167 (20%) UK anaesthetists who replied, indicated that they had a difficult airway training module. In six Japanese departments (9%) and 115 (69%) UK departments, equipment for percutaneous transtracheal ventilation was readily available. Airway devices and techniques that tutors considered necessary to be mastered in the first 2 years of training, differed considerably between Japan and the UK, with notable differences in the use of gum elastic bougies and awake intubation. A training module for difficult airway management is often not provided and equipment for emergency transtracheal ventilation is often unavailable in both countries.