{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012132822477650063, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001277139208173691, 'mean_word_length': 5.395918367346939, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Qualitative Assessment of Machine Learning Support for Detecting Data Completeness and Accuracy Issues to Improve Data Analytics in Big Data for the Healthcare Industry

Tackling Data Quality issues as part of Big Data can be challenging. For data cleansing activities, manual methods are not efficient due to the potentially very large amount of data.. This paper aims to qualitatively assess the possibilities for using machine learning in the process of detecting data incompleteness and inaccuracy, since these two data quality dimensions were found to be the most significant by a previous research study conducted by the authors. A review of existing literature concludes that there is no unique machine learning algorithm most suitable to deal with both incompleteness and inaccuracy of data. Various algorithms are selected from existing studies and applied against a representative big (healthcare) dataset. Following experiments, it was also discovered that the implementation of machine learning algorithms in this context encounters several challenges for Big Data quality activities. These challenges are related to the amount of data particualar machine learning algorithms can scale to and also to certain data type restrictions imposed by some machine learning algorithms. The study concludes that 1) data imputation works better with linear regression models, 2) clustering models are more efficient to detect outliers but fully automated systems may not be realistic in this context. Therefore, a certain level of human judgement is still needed.