{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04670912951167728, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014861995753715499, 'mean_word_length': 4.297752808988764, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Rhythms in Politics and Economics. Edited by Johnson Paul M. and Thompson William R.. (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1985. Pp. xviii + 342. $38.95.)

He does not say why these tyrants are not modem, stating only that "acknowledging all this, one may nevertheless believe that without the modern spirit a much poorer future, indeed, one may say a much worse fate, awaits humanity" (p. 322). Why? Certainly no one expects the world to go back to the village as a way of life, but one cannot glibly dismiss the contradictions of being modern, either. The problem with the ideal type of the modern person portrayed here is that he (one wonders how the modern woman would differ) is so shallow and Pollyannish. In the entire book, there is not one bad trait ascribed to the modern man. Open, interested, respectful, accepting, adjusted—these are the adjectives Inkeles uses over and over again. No human, even in the abstract, can be that perfect.