{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019120458891013385, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0076481835564053535, 'mean_word_length': 4.822222222222222, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Undue Influence: When and How it Matters to Banks and Solicitors

In 1994, the House of Lords laid down an important principle in Barclays Bank plc v O'Brien in relation to the enforcement of sureties or charges provided by the debtors' spouses. This principle allows a spouse who provided surety for the debts of her partner, as the result of the latter's undue influence or misrepresentation, to set it aside as against a creditorbank, provided the bank had constructive notice of the presence of these vitiating factors.