{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02912621359223301, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021359223300970873, 'mean_word_length': 5.0, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Correction to "Exploiting Epistemic Uncertainty of Anatomy Segmentation for Anomaly Detection in Retinal OCT"

The authors of "Exploiting Epistemic Uncertainty of Anatomy Segmentation for Anomaly Detection in Retinal OCT" which appeared in the January 2020 issue of this journal [1] would like to provide an updated Fig. 3 because there was an error in the published version. The output of the last convolutional layers says "2" in the number of channels but it should be "11" (10 retinal layer and the background).