{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.008816120906801008, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0012594458438287153, 'mean_word_length': 5.162790697674419, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Using Patient Data to Rank Records of Literature Retrieval

Introduction. Several studies have assessed the needs of clinicians for access to information pertinent to clinical practice. 2 Increasing importance is being given to the use of the best current evidence in clinical practice and health services. Special attention has also been given to the assessment of medical errors and other adverse events in health care. Studying the incidence of medical errors and other adverse events, researchers have shown that most of the failures can be related to impaired access to information. Our goal is to improve the way retrieved medical literature is presented by identifying critical information in the individual medical record that is useful for determining the relevance of literature data.