{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03415659485023647, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012611665790856543, 'mean_word_length': 5.56551724137931, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinical significance of health status assessment measures in head and neck cancer: what do quality-of-life scores mean?

OBJECTIVES
To determine the magnitude of clinically significant differences in domain scores for a quality-of-life questionnaire specific to head and neck cancer; and to demonstrate a clinically relevant method of presenting head and neck cancer-specific quality-of-life data using cutoff scores and clinical anchors.


DESIGN
Anchor-based and distribution-based techniques for determining clinically significant differences in health-related quality-of-life scores were used.


SETTING
University-based tertiary care hospital.


PATIENTS
A total of 421 patients with head and neck cancer enrolled in a longitudinal outcomes project.


MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The Head and Neck Cancer Inventory; clinical anchor health status in the domains of speech, eating, and social disruption; and distribution-based clinically significant score differences.


RESULTS
Clinical anchor health states representing incremental levels of dysfunction were significantly correlated with domain scores for eating, speech, and social disruption. The anchor-based clinically important difference magnitudes were consistent with the values obtained using distribution-based techniques. For mean domain scores (minimum, 0; maximum, 100), differences of approximately 4, 10, and 14 or greater represented small, intermediate, and large clinically significant differences, respectively. Stratifying mean domain scores into low (0-30), intermediate (31-69), and high (70-100) categories allowed presentation of the health-related quality-of-life data in a clinically relevant format.


CONCLUSIONS
This study provides benchmarks for small, intermediate, and large clinically significant changes in scores and demonstrates the presentation of health-related quality-of-life data in a clinically useful format.