{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025954198473282442, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0071246819338422395, 'mean_word_length': 4.903903903903904, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of volatile organic chemicals on surface-enhanced Raman scattering of 4-aminobenzenethiol on Ag: comparison with the potential dependence.

4-Aminobenzenethiol (4-ABT) is an unusual molecule in the sense that several distinct peaks whose counterparts are rarely found in the normal Raman spectrum are observed in its surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectra. Their origin has been argued over recently as due to either a metal-to-adsorbate charge transfer or the formation of a photoreaction product such as dimercaptoazobenzene (DMAB). In an electrochemical SERS measurement, the intensities of the new peaks depended strongly not only on the excitation wavelength but also on the electrode potential. Interestingly, we observed a similar spectral variation even under ambient conditions by exposure of 4-ABT on Ag to volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) such as acetone and ammonia. Since acetone and ammonia barely react directly with 4-ABT, the effect of VOCs must be indirect, presumably associated with the movement of electrons between VOCs and the Ag substrate causing either an increase or a decrease in the surface potential of Ag. Based on the potential-dependent SERS data, the effect of acetone therefore appeared to correspond to an application of +0.15 V to the Ag substrate vs. a saturated Ag/AgCl electrode, while the effect of ammonia corresponded to the application of -0.45 V to Ag. We admit that much the same VOC effect could be observable if a photoproduct was formed immediately upon irradiation and the product was also subjected to a chemical enhancement mechanism. The Gaussian response of the peak intensities of the b(2)-type bands to applied potential, as well as to VOCs, dictated that the new peaks appearing in the SERS of 4-ABT have nothing to do with any electrochemical reaction. In addition, a separate preliminary work suggested that the b(2)-type bands are not at least due to a photoreaction product such as DMAB.