{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02207727044656297, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.495114006514658, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Low Resistivity Reservoir Pay Evaluation, New Opportunity for Further Development, Case Study On Gumai Formation Of B Field, Jambi Sub Basin, South Sumatera Basin

The understanding of low resistivity reservoir zone is one of the most challenging cases for further development in order to optimize the remaining oil and gas field productions. In the Intra-Gumai Formation “B” Field where marine clastic reservoirs are deposited, a low resistivity reservoir is being developed as a new perforation and workover target. This study discusses how to identify the cause of low resistivity case and evaluate the proper petrophysical parameters to unlock the potential reservoir pay zones. The data set consists of petrographic, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), routine core, Drill Stem Test ((DST) and wireline logs data. Petrographic, XRD, CEC and routine analysis were performed to recognize the low resistivity causes characterized by the presence of framework grain (quartz, K-feldspar and glaucony, calcite and kaolinite) observed in intergranular pore and also quartz overgrowth developed prior to kaolinite precipitation. Petrophysical analysis defines the reservoir property parameters by comparing some equations also validated with routine core and DST result. Based on the quantitative analysis carried out, namely the evaluation of the distribution of shale volume, calculation of porosity, and determination of water saturation, it is recommended to use the Stieber method for the distribution of shale volume in the reservoir and its properties, the neutron density porosity method to calculate porosity model, and the Waxman Smits method to determine the final fluid saturation model. Finally, by using the hydrocarbon saturation results in the current study, this interval was improved as pay zone. This method will be applied to other wells and other structures that have a similar depositional environment to increase hydrocarbon reserves in the same field.