{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04659628685839097, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011649071714597743, 'mean_word_length': 5.450704225352113, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Kinetics and mechanism of the benzenethiolysis of O-ethylS-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) and O-ethyl S-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) dithiocarbonates and O-methyl O-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) thiocarbonate.

Reactions of O-ethyl 2,4-dinitrophenyl dithiocarbonate (EDNPDTC), O-ethyl 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl dithiocarbonate (ETNPDTC), and O-methyl O-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) thiocarbonate (MDNPTOC) with a series of benzenethiolate anions in aqueous solution, at 25.0 degrees C and an ionic strength of 0.2 M (KCl), are subjected to a kinetic investigation. Under excess benzenethiolate, these reactions obey pseudo-first-order kinetics and are first order in benzenethiolate. Nonetheless, similar reactant concentrations were used in the reactions of 4-nitrobenzenethiolate anion with the ethyl trinitrophenyl ester (ETNPDTC), which showed overall second-order kinetics. The nucleophilic rate constants (k(N)) are pH independent, except those for the reactions of ETNPDTC with the X-benzenethiolates with X = H, 4-Cl, and 3-Cl, which increase as pH decreases. The Brønsted-type plots (log k(N) vs pK(a) of benzenethiols) are linear with slopes beta = 0.66 for the reactions of both ethyl dinitrophenyl ester (EDNPDTC) and ethyl trinitrophenyl ester (ETNPDTC) and beta = 0.58 for those of the thiocarbonate ester (MDNPTOC). For the benzenethiolysis of MDNPTOC and EDNPDTC, no breaks were found in the Brønsted-type plots at pK(a) 4.1 and 3.4, respectively, consistent with concerted mechanisms. Benzenethiolysis of the ethyl trinitrophenyl ester (ETNPDTC) should also be concerted in view of the even more unstable tetrahedral "intermediate" that would have been formed had this reaction been stepwise. ETNPDTC is more reactive toward benzenethiolate anions than EDNPDTC due to the better leaving group involved in the former substrate. The k(N) values found for the reactions of EDNPDTC with benzenethiolates are larger than those obtained for the concerted reactions of the same substrate with isobasic phenoxide anions. This is explained by Pearson's "hard and soft acids and bases" principle. The concerted mechanism for the benzenethiolysis of MDNPTOC, in contrast to the stepwise mechanism found for the phenolysis of this substrate, is attributed to the greater kinetic instability of the hypothetical tetrahedral "intermediate" formed in the former reaction, due to the greater nucleofugality of ArS(-) compared with an isobasic ArO(-). Benzenethiolates are more reactive toward MDNPTOC and EDNPDTC than the corresponding carbonate and thiolcarbonate, respectively. This is also in accordance with the HSAB principle, since benzenthiolates are relatively soft bases that prefer to bind to a relatively soft thiocarbonyl center rather than a relatively hard carbonyl center.