{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030864197530864196, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.443708609271523, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Structure of LEAD in the Secondary Panel

This chapter provides readers with an applied example of the L.E.A.D. Program for Teacher Candidates within the secondary panel. This intrinsic case study explores a compensatory school's student success solution through an increase of Student Success Literate (SSL) Student Teachers. Their presence and conscious efforts contribute to the overall implementation of the school's student success strategies, adapted from Adlai Stevenson High School's intervention model. The five main themes that emerged were: i) the collective is a benefit; ii) visibility and accountability; iii) shift in teaching approaches; iv) increased individual support; and, v) holistic education. Research findings indicate how the L.E.A.D. program shapes teachers into mindful educators equipped with foundational knowledge that bolsters student success and provides an accurate depiction of the working structure of the program in the secondary panel.