{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010752688172043012, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0039100684261974585, 'mean_word_length': 5.64935064935065, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Breves Comentários Acerca das Novas Leis de Arbitragem Comercial Internacional de Argentina e Uruguai

Argentina and Uruguay promulgated, in 2018, new international commercial arbitration statutes following the UNCITRAL Model Law. Such countries evolved from a monist system, which made no difference in what regards the law applicable to domestic and international arbitration, to a dualist system providing a specific legal framework for international arbitrations. The article analyses the arbitration background in the two countries and examines the text of the new laws in comparison with the UNCITRAL Model Law and with the Brazilian Arbitration Act. The article also investigates the effects of international treaties on the legal regime applicable to arbitration in such countries, especially from the viewpoint of Brazil. In conclusion, the analysis indicates that Argentina and Uruguay both adopted a modern legal framework amenable to promote the development of arbitration between business actors in the region.