{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032388663967611336, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005398110661268556, 'mean_word_length': 6.203883495145631, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Psychiatry and the scientific fallacy

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is now a science. So is psychiatry: DSM-III emphasized diagnostic reliability as the condition for scientific psychiatry; randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses are the gold standard to measure therapeutic effects; psychopathology evolved into a complex statistical discipline; psychiatric disorders are investigated by neuroscientists; and, since the 1990s, psychiatrists use newgeneration antidepressants and antipsychotics. A scientific nosology, complex tools, rigorous statistics and modern, sophisticated, receptor-specific drugs – this is the current Zeitgeist: psychiatry is finally leaving the Freudian wars of the past and joining up with science.