{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03655352480417755, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005221932114882507, 'mean_word_length': 5.235772357723577, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Postscript: Should the Court Rely On Postcensal Estimates for Redistricting?

The recent court decision in the Los Angeles redistricting case (Garza J~ v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors) concludes that (a) apportionment exclusively on the basis of total population is permissible, even if this results in substantial change to the value of a vote cast by a citizen in one or another district; (b) estimates of a district’s &dquo;eligible voter population&dquo; (in Judge Kenyon’s words) can be based on extrapolations of the composition of that district’s registered voters; and (c) postcensal projections of population size can be used to form election districts. The first two premises are debatable. On the last point, the 1990 Census (released after the