{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0140485312899106, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.475206611570248, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Differential effects of static and dynamic inputs on neuronal excitability.

The intrinsic excitability of neurons is known to be dynamically regulated by activity-dependent plasticity and homeostatic mechanisms. Such processes are commonly analyzed in the context of input-output functions that describe how neurons fire in response to constant levels of current. However, it is not well understood how changes of excitability as observed under static inputs translate to the function of the same neurons in their natural synaptic environment. Here we performed a computational study and hybrid experiments on rat bed nucleus of stria terminalis neurons to compare the two scenarios. The inward rectifying Kir current (IKir) and the hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) were found to be considerably more effective in regulating the firing under synaptic inputs than under static stimuli. This prediction was experimentally confirmed by dynamic-clamp insertion of a synthetic inwardly rectifying Kir current into the biological neurons. At the same time, ionic currents that activate with depolarization were more effective regulating the firing under static inputs. When two intrinsic currents are concurrently altered such as those under homeostatic regulation, the effects in firing responses under static vs. dynamic inputs can be even more contrasting. Our results show that plastic or homeostatic changes of intrinsic membrane currents can shape the current step responses of neurons and their firing under synaptic inputs in a differential manner.