{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03974358974358974, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01987179487179487, 'mean_word_length': 5.757575757575758, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinical significance of hyperglycaemia in acute coronary syndrome patients

Background: The clinical significance of moment measurements (admission and fasting glycaemia), persistent (hyperglycaemic index, HGI; time average glucose, TAG; mean glucose; maximum glucose) or chronic hyperglycaemia (HbA1c, estimated average glucose, eAG) is still elusive in clinical practice. Aim: To identify the clinical significance of hyperglycaemia in ACS. Methods: The study included 226 consecutive patients with ACS. Indicators for hyperglycaemia were defined, calculated and a correlation analysis with standard parameters—EF, maximum CPK, maximum CPK-MB and troponin was performed. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Results: Indicators for persistent and chronic hyperglycaemia correlated neither to ejection fraction, nor to the enzymes for myocardial necrosis (P > 0.05). In contrast, acute hyperglycaemia correlated negatively with ventricular systolic dysfunction (P = 0.001/0.007) and positively with maximum CPK, MB and troponin (P = 0.0001/0.008). TAG was an independent predictor for 6-month re-hospitalization (P = 0.027) because of cardiac complications. Conclusion: Glycaemia at admission and fasting glucose could be used as metabolic surrogate markers for ventricular systolic dysfunction and TAG as an independent surrogate marker for six-month re-hospitalization. None of the indicators for hyperglycaemia could be used as independent prognostic factors for survival. Hyperglycaemia rather reflects an underlying impairment in glucose metabolism.