{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02152414194299011, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0017452006980802793, 'mean_word_length': 6.445887445887446, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An Attachment Perspective on Partner Responses to Genito-pelvic Pain and Their Associations with Relationship and Sexual Outcomes

ABSTRACT Although facilitative and negative partner responses are known to impact couples’ adaptation to provoked vestibulodynia (PVD), a chronic genito-pelvic pain condition, it is still unknown what leads individuals to adopt or perceive such adaptative or detrimental behaviors. Attachment influences sexual and relationship adjustment, emotional reactivity and perceived support in romantic relationships, and as such could be associated with partner responses. This study aimed at examining the mediating role of facilitative and negative partner responses in the associations between attachment and relationship and sexual adjustment in 125 couples coping with PVD. Couples completed self-report questionnaires on attachment, partner responses, sexual satisfaction and distress, and relationship satisfaction. Results indicated that partners’ attachment avoidance was negatively associated with facilitative partner-reported responses, which in turn was associated with partners’ sexual and relationship satisfaction. Attachment anxiety in women and partners was associated with greater women-perceived negative partner responses, which in turn was associated with women’s and partners’ greater sexual distress and lower sexual satisfaction, and women’s lower relationship satisfaction. Partners’ greater attachment anxiety was also associated with greater partner-reported facilitative responses, which was associated with partners’ lower and women’s greater relationship satisfaction. Assessing attachment orientations may help clinicians better understand couples’ dyadic coping.