{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025274725274725275, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01098901098901099, 'mean_word_length': 4.802547770700637, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
British opiate users: II. Differences between those given an opiate script and those not given one.

The interview data from some of the people approaching London drug clinics during the 1-year period beginning mid-November 1970 were used to compare two groups of subjects: those who were given a regular opiate script (113 people) and those who were not (61 people who, for the most part, did not produce an opiate-positive urine at the time). People who were given such a script were likely to have been using more illicit heroin or methadone (than were people not given an opiate script), and the script given was usually a small quantity of methadone. Significantly higher rates of unemployment, illegal activities, and physical complications were demonstrated in the group who were not given a regular opiate script; further differences between the Script Group and the No-Script Group are also described.