{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026234567901234566, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.9, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
If the robot is there, why not use it? Why we should use the robot for laparoscopic nephrectomy

To summarise, with this example we would like to encourage clinical researchers to distinguish between the risk calculated using conventional survival and competing-risk methods. In many study scenarios these two will result in similar findings, but in studies of populations with high mortality (e.g. elderly) or when the main exposure of interest is associated with a competing event (e.g. smoking or obesity and risk of death), the risk calculated from competing-risk analysis is required to provide a full understanding of the association studied.