{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.045133991537376586, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014104372355430184, 'mean_word_length': 5.509174311926605, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 6, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Infant and Preschool Well‐Child Care: Master's‐ and Nonmaster's‐Prepared Pediatric Nurse Practitioners

The nursing and medical literature reveals considerable debate over whether graduate or continuing education is the appropriate level for nurse practitioner preparation. These arguments have been rhetorical since the research literature lacks data on the scope of practice of master's- and nonmaster's-prepared nurse practitioners. The purpose of this study was to examine possible differences between the two types of practitioners in one area—well-child care provided by pediatric nurse practitioners (PNPs). A total of 236 master's- and non-master's-prepared PNPs completed a background questionnaire and checklists of nursing activities involving infant and preschool well-child care. Analysis of study results showed that master's PNPs performed more activities involving (1) assessment of physical and cognitive development of infants (p <.003); (2) assessment of personality and socialization of preschool children (p <.05); and (3) counseling and guidance involving the physical and cognitive development of infants (p <.01). Master's PNPs also appeared to benefit more from their years in practice both in terms of the number of assessment activities (p < .04) and management activities (p <.06) they performed. Finally, master's PNPs engaged in more leadership activities than nonmaster's PNPs (p <.005).