{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020005635390250773, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0011270780501549732, 'mean_word_length': 5.537753222836096, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Medicines from New Biotechnologies

Furthermore, political aspects ofculture-in-relationto-psychiatry are of particular importance at the present time. It appears that there must be an anthropology ofpsychiatry as well as a sociology of it, and a sociology of anthropology. In addition, it appears important to give medical students a cultural perspective on disease and healing, for people's beliefs about their diseases and their outcomes contribute to these outcomes and require anthropological insights for their understanding. For instance, rituals are important for people everywhere in relation to birth, death, and the transitions which occur as a person passes from one to the other, and doctors need to understand this, with the necessary anthropological concepts. Certainly to equate anthropology with 'ethnic minorities and how to cope with them' is a serious mistake. Anthropology is a serious discipline, studies of groups of different racial origin in relation to each other being only one of its fields. Psychology is now vast in scope and pre-eminent among the behavioural and social sciences in its relevance forpsychiatry. Perhaps 'potential relevance' would be nearer the mark, for it seems that few psychiatrists at present seriously attempt to apply the findings of the various branches of psychology to psychiatric subject matter. For instance, occupational, cognitive, developmental, physiological, and social psychology are all largely ignored in current Britishpsychiatric texts and in the regulations for Membership of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Explorations yet to be made could illumine much current psychiatric practice. In social psychology, for instance, emotion has received renewed attention in recent years. Vocal aspects of emotion can now be reliably measured and shown to indicate different emotional states, shedding modern light on the classic James-Lange theory of emotion and also clarifying Schacter's 1960s' idea that it was the cognitive 'addition' to physiological arousal which gave one emotion rather than another. Nonverbal aspects of emotional behaviour are also now susceptible to measurement; these include facial expression, gesture, and aspects of interaction. The increased sophistication, availability, and ease of use of video and computer technologies have facilitated these advances. Improved methods of studying interaction, giving moment-by-moment data about communication and information-sharing processes, for example, are particularly promising for psychiatry, where interpersonal relationships (not the same as interaction but obviously related to it) are vitally important throughout the field and hitherto have often been assessed without direct observation of interaction between the people concerned. Many other examples could be given of ways in which modern psychology could usefully be applied to psychiatry. An important reason for the relative lack of contact between these subjects in Britain concerns their usually being administered in different parts of universities. Easier intercollegiate arrangements would greatly ease this problem. Another difficulty is of course the relatively 'Cinderella' status of both psychology within science and psychiatry within medicine. The levels of resource available for these subjects from public funds in Britain are now so low that it is a tribute to the workers concerned that any research is done at all. Without sustained additional support, the advances waiting to be made will be made other than in the United Kingdom.