{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015086206896551725, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01221264367816092, 'mean_word_length': 4.9025423728813555, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Epidemiologic study of persons having group 2 insurance in Denmark. 2. Utilization of the health services among persons insured in groups 1 and 2].

Persons insured in Group 2 constitute only approximately 4% of the total number of persons insured. In contrast to the approximately 96% of the population insured in Group 1, persons insured in Group 2 are ensured free choice of general practitioner and practising specialists from time to time on payment of partial payment of the doctor's bill. Group 2 insured persons make less use of assistance from the general practitioner than persons in Group 1. On the other hand, persons in Group 2 make much more use of assistance from practising specialists. Persons in Group 2 thus substitute specialist help for help from the general practitioner. This holds particularly true for the specialties gynaecology and medicine. An age-subdivided analysis of the differences between the utilization of hospital services by the two insurance groups shows that persons insured in Group 2 have lower rates of hospitalization and briefer periods of hospitalization than persons insured in Group 1. A review of the utilization of health services by the two health insurance groups supports the theory that persons in insurance Group 2 are, on the whole, relatively healthy persons with a relatively high demand for the level of service of health treatment.