{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027184466019417475, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006796116504854369, 'mean_word_length': 4.994186046511628, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
After the Nation: Postnational Satire in the Works of Carlos Fuentes and Thomas Pynchon by Pedro García-Caro (review)

(100), wherein boundaries blur. If we are to read the novel as an allegory of the Peruvian nation, then Arguedas seems to argue that the end-point of cholification is a state of confused sovereignty and authority. In the brief final chapter, Feldman shifts her analysis to Socialist discourse in El sexto (1961) and El zorro de arriba y el zorro de abajo. This seems a book-length project all its own, and might have been more productively approached in conversation with Todas las sangres. Feldman’s approach to examining Arguedas’s “hidden” novel is a welcome shift from the Subaltern Studies-inflected approach that criticism of the writer’s other works has commonly followed. Rethinking Community from Peru is ambitious in its treatment of Todas las sangres—its ample readings of previous unstudied moments in the text are themselves cause for celebration—and should anchor a revival in Arguedian criticism.