{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02976190476190476, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02040816326530612, 'mean_word_length': 5.342318059299191, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Practitioner and digitally delivered interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in people not seeking alcohol treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AIM
to compare the effectiveness of practitioner versus digitally delivered interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption.


DESIGN
Systematic review and network meta-analysis comprising comprehensive search for randomised controlled trials, robust screening and selection methods, and appraisal with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Network meta-analyses were conducted in Stata using random effects, frequentist models. The Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool was used to assess confidence in effect sizes.


SETTING
online or community or health settings where the intervention was immediately accessible without referral.


PARTICIPANTS
non treatment-seeking hazardous or harmful drinkers.


MEASUREMENTS
primary outcome was mean difference in alcohol consumption (grams/week); secondary outcome was number of single high intensity drinking episodes. Baseline consumption was analysed as a covariate.


FINDINGS
Of 201 included trials (94,753 participants), 152 reported a consumption outcome that could be converted to grams/week; 104 reported number of single high intensity drinking episodes. At 1 and 6 months, practitioner delivered interventions reduced consumption more than digitally delivered interventions (1 month: -23 grams/week [95% confidence interval [CI] -43 to -2]; 6 months: -14 grams/week [95% CI -25 to -3]). At 12 months there was no evidence of difference between practitioner and digitally delivered interventions (-6 grams/week [95% CI -24 to 12]). There was no evidence of a difference in single high intensity drinking episodes between practitioner and digitally delivered interventions at any time point. Effect sizes were small but could impact across a population with relatively high prevalence of hazardous and harmful drinking. Heterogeneity was a concern. Some inconsistency was indicated at 1 and 6 months, but little evidence was apparent at 12 months.


CONCLUSION
Practitioner delivered interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption are more effective than digitally delivered interventions up to 6 months; at 12 months there is no evidence of a difference.