{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.041817243159525036, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021166752710376872, 'mean_word_length': 5.0, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of orally active prostacyclin analogue on survival in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension without major vessel obstruction.

OBJECTIVES
This study investigated whether treatment with beraprost sodium (BPS), an orally active prostacyclin analog, improves hemodynamics and survival in patients with peripheral-vessel chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), for which there is no surgical option.


BACKGROUND
Oral administration of BPS has been shown to improve the hemodynamics and prognosis in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension; however, whether BPS has beneficial effects in CTEPH remains unknown.


METHODS
Forty-three patients with peripheral-vessel CTEPH were classified into two groups: patients treated with BPS (BPS group, n = 20) and those without BPS (conventional group, n = 23). Baseline demographic and hemodynamic data did not significantly differ between the two groups.


RESULTS
BPS therapy improved New York Heart Association functional class in 10 patients (50%) and significantly decreased total pulmonary resistance from 18 +/- 6 to 15 +/- 8 Wood units (p < 0.05) [mean +/- SD]. Sixteen patients died of cardiopulmonary causes in the conventional group during a mean follow-up period of 58 +/- 45 months. In contrast, only three patients died of cardiopulmonary causes in the BPS group during a mean follow-up period of 44 +/- 30 months. The absence of BPS therapy, elevated total pulmonary resistance, heart rate, and age were independently related to the mortality by Cox proportional hazard analysis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates for the BPS group were 100%, 85%, and 76%, respectively, compared to 87%, 60%, and 46% in the conventional group.


CONCLUSIONS
This preliminary study suggests that oral administration of BPS may improve hemodynamics and survival in patients with peripheral-vessel CTEPH, for which there is no surgical option.