{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.062266500622665005, 'fraction_numerical': 0.05977584059775841, 'mean_word_length': 3.757396449704142, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Explanation of the Δ5/2-(1930) as a pA bound state

We use the pA interaction in the hidden gauge formalism to dynamically generate N* and Δ* resonances. We show, through a comparison of the results from this analysis and from a quark model study with data, that the Δ 5/2 -(1930), Δ 3/2 -(1940), and Δ 1/2 -(1900) resonances can be assigned to ρΔ bound states. More precisely the Δ 5/2 -(1930) can be interpreted as a ρΔ bound state whereas the Δ 3/2 -(1940) and Δ 1/2 -(1900) may contain an important ρΔ component. This interpretation allows for a solution of a long-standing puzzle concerning the description of these resonances in constituent quark models. In addition we also obtain degenerate J P = 1/2 - , 3/2 - , 5/2 - N* states but their assignment to experimental resonances is more uncertain.