{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0367816091954023, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011494252873563218, 'mean_word_length': 4.45, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
GDM: more diabetes, more good or more harm?

In this issue of BJOG, Shah and Sharif report an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in women meeting IADPSG, but not "2-step" criteria for GDM (Shah B, et al. BJOG 2019). These women were not considered to have GDM and were not treated for the condition. The authors used a clever study design leveraging population-based data and their findings are consistent with other studies.