{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04373610081541883, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021497405485544848, 'mean_word_length': 4.74468085106383, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of score-line on internal and external load in soccer small-sided games

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of the score-line on the internal and external load in soccer small-sided games (SSGs). Thirty male semi-professional soccer players participated in an acute crossover design study. Players performed 4 series of 4 vs 4 with a game duration of 4 min. The data corresponding to players’ external load were collected using a portable Global Positioning System device and players’ internal load using rating of perceived exertion. The results showed that players covered significantly higher total distance (effect size [ES]: 0.63–55), medium-intensity distance (ES: 0.81–82), and high-intensity running distance (ES: 0.86–0.53) when the final result of SSGs was a draw in comparison when losing or winning. Players’ power score was significantly higher when the final result of SSGs was a draw compared to when was a loss (ES: 0.77). On the contrary, players covered significantly shorter walking distance when drawing compared to losing (ES: 0.55) and winning (ES: 0.63). Present results indicate players’ external load during SSGs is related to the final score-line. In order to maximise players’ external load during SSGs, teams should be as balance as possible to increase the probability of a draw score-line.