{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028037383177570093, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004672897196261682, 'mean_word_length': 4.713333333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Strange but rational

balance, I would argue that it is probably better to have a book on this important topic in print imperfect though it may seem to be than no book at all. Sadly, however (since its subject matter is highly topical), I would see this book as having a potentially limited readership. It is not well-suited to an undergraduate readership or, at least, to a readership looking for clarification and certainty. However, even at a postgraduate level (where engagement with uncertainty is a must), it is not one that I would automatically recommend to students looking to broaden their critical awareness of CBT. To my mind, House and Loewenthal’s earlier (2008) edited collection would suit this purpose better. However, it has a potential readership beyond CBT alone, and could still be a useful addition to a university or college library.