{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03745108999441028, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024035774175517048, 'mean_word_length': 5.2369337979094075, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pyogenic liver abscesses: a comparison of older and younger patients.

BACKGROUND
Pyogenic liver abscess is a life-threatening disease. Few studies have specifically explored the way in which the clinical features and management of elderly patients with pyogenic liver abscess differ from those of younger individuals.


METHODS
A retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate whether older patients with pyogenic liver abscess have distinctive presenting features or whether their management and outcome differ from that of younger patients. A total of 133 patients with liver abscess treated in five hospitals during 13 years comprised two groups: 78 patients aged 60 years or above (older group) and 55 patients below age 60 years (younger group). Clinical features, laboratory data, imaging and microbiological findings, management and outcome were determined in each group.


RESULTS
The older group contained more patients with associated diseases (p=0.03), nausea and vomiting at presentation (p=0.02), higher APACHE II (Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II scale) score (p<0.001) and blood urea nitrogen (p<0.001) and serum creatinine levels (p=0.002). Multiple abscess (p=0.05) and bilobar (p=0.03) abscess were also commoner in this group. By contrast, in the younger group men predominated (p=0.01), and there was a higher overall complication rate (p=0.05).Time to diagnosis, hospital mortality rate and other variables analysed were similar in both groups.


DISCUSSION
Elderly patients with pyogenic liver abscess have some subtle differences in clinical and laboratory presentation, but these do not appear to delay diagnosis. Active management is tolerated well, with a lower morbidity rate than in younger patients and no difference in the mortality rate.