{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03802281368821293, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019011406844106463, 'mean_word_length': 5.273809523809524, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Explaining and Improving Educational Administration

Administration was up and running in the USA and Canada, it sponsored an array of activities on values and philosophy (se~,’ e.g. Ohm and Monahan, 1965). During that time, I presented what I described as a ’general philosophical position concerning educational administration’ (1964, p. 96) and have continued to write on the topic. However, it was not until the subjectivist and neo-Marxist critiques that marked the social sciences reached educational administration that