{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011119936457505957, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.428571428571429, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Public/Private Negotiation and Strategic Co-evolution in a Biocluster

Clusters are characterized by partnership practices that lead to a high competitiveness. However some of them encounter coordination difficulties due to conflicts for the appropriation of collective gains. It is more particularly the case of bioclusters because of their sectorial particularities and because of the different public policies improved. Stemming from an analysis of conflicts at stake in a biocluster, this article aims at bringing to light how firms and institutions strategies emerge and co-evolve as their actions are characterized by divergent interests. According to an evolutionary perspective, we propose an exploratory simulation leading to an analysis of the mutual adaptation dynamics developed by the agents involved. The results show on one hand that firms adjust their bargaining strategies according to uncertainty and to their perception of the gains which might be generated at the collective level. On the other hand, the model shows that local authorities can play a regulatory part in the game. This exploratory research contributes to the comprehension of the management public modalities so as to generate cooperation and innovation within bioclusters.