{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03177907299472662, 'fraction_numerical': 0.028517901748542882, 'mean_word_length': 5.225917926565875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Trends in surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze recent demographic and medical billing trends in treatment of femoral neck fracture of American elderly patients. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was analyzed from 2006 to 2015, for patients aged 65 years and older, using the Current Procedural Terminology codes 27130, 27125, 27235, and 27236. Patient demographics, postoperative complications, and frequency of codes were compared and analyzed over time. Our sample had 17,122 elderly patients, in that, 70% were female, mean age of 80.1 years (standard deviation±6.6 years). Results The number of cases increased, but age, gender, body mass index, rates of diabetes and smoking did not change over time. Open reduction internal fixation was the most commonly billed code, with 9,169 patients (53.6%), followed by hemiarthroplasty with 5,861 (34.2%) patients. Combined estimated probability of morbidity was 9.8% (standard deviation±5.2%), and did not change significantly over time. Postoperative complication rates were similar between treatments. Conclusion Demographics and morbidity rates in femoral neck fractures of elderly patients did not change significantly from 2006 to 2015. Open reduction internal fixation was the most common treatment followed by hemiarthroplasty.


❚ INTRODUCTION
Hip fractures are among the most common injuries seen by orthopedic surgeons and are especially prevalent in the geriatric population. In 2014, there were over 320,000 hip fractures that presented to the emergency department in the United States with the majority occurring in women age 65 or older. (1) This number has increased compared to the previous 5 years. Over one-third of adults age 65 or older suffer a fall each year. (2) Increased numbers of falls in combination with increased susceptibility for fracture from age-associated decreases in bone mineral density, as well as the presence of other co-existing comorbidities makes the geriatric population particularly susceptible to fracture. Hip fractures decrease patient independence, mobility, and have been associated with increased risk of mortality. (3) As the population continues to age the absolute number of falls, and subsequently the number of fractures, are set to increase.
There are a number of treatment options for fractures of the femoral neck. Typically, these fractures are classified as either non-displaced or displaced. Nondisplaced fractures can be treated with internal screw fixation, although several studies have demonstrated internal fixation as a less optimal treatment, particularly in the elderly population. (4,5) In very elderly or chronically ill patients, surgeons tend to proceed with a hemiarthroplasty (HA). Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has historically been preserved for younger, active patients that have a history of hip osteoarthritis. There have been many studies, however, that have shown function after THA to be superior to HA. (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) In 2008, Jain et al. reviewed inpatient data from 1990 to 2001 and found that overall, regardless of age, there was a decrease in the use of THA for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. (15) In contrast, Miller et al. looked specifically at the Medicare population from 1991 to 2008 and found that the percentage of hip fractures treated nonoperatively, with internal fixation, HA, or THA remained fairly constant over time. (16) These studies utilized ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding, however, medical billers, resident case logs, and certain databases, like the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP ® ) database rely on Current Procedural Codes (CPT) instead.

❚ OBJECTIVE
To analyze recent demographic and surgical coding trends in the management of femoral neck fractures for patients aged 65 or older using the Current Procedural Codes system.

❚ METHODS Data source
We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data using the ACS NSQIP ® database. NSQIP ® is a surgical outcomes database that maintains preoperative through 30-day postoperative data on randomly assigned patients from more than 400 academic and private community hospitals. NSQIP ® contains deidentified patient information, and no characteristics allowing for personal identification of patients are included in the data set. Therefore, this study was exempt from review by the Institutional Review Board.
Our study cohort included all patients aged 65 years old and over, who underwent surgical repair of femoral neck fracture from 2006 to 2015. The patients queried in our study were identified by CPT 27130, 27125, 27235, and 27236. These codes correspond to total hip replacement, partial hip replacement, placement of cannulated screws for femoral neck fracture, and open treatment of femoral fracture with either internal fixation or prosthetic placement, respectively. Patients with operative times less than 25 minutes or greater than 300 minutes were excluded, to avoid outlying data.
A total of 17,122 geriatric patients were included in our sample. Overall, our sample was 70% female with an average age at surgery of 80.1 years (standard deviation -SD, 6.6 years).
The primary outcomes of interest were the trends in: type of procedure performed between 2006 to 2015; pre-existing comorbidities (e.g. diabetes, smoking status, chronic steroid use) across the four CPT codes; and post-operative complications including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), surgical site infections, and pneumonias.

Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC). Trends in the demographic variables and frequency of THA, HA, and cannulated screw fixation, and were analyzed and plotted using a stacked column graph.

❚ RESULTS
Patient demographics were similar between surgical techniques despite differing group sizes. Combined estimated probability of morbidity of all patients was 9.8% (SD 5.2%).
Summary statistics of surgical demographics by procedure and trends in demographics over time are provided in table 1 and figure 1, respectively.

Surgical trends
Open reduction internal fixation/prosthetic placement (CPT 27236) was the most commonly performed procedure, with 9,169 patients (53.6%) from 2006 to 2015. Hemiarthroplasty (CPT 27125) was the second most common method of fixation, with 5,861 (34.2%) patients. Only 397 (2.3%) patients underwent internal fixation with cannulated screws, and there were no records of this procedure after 2011. Trends in procedure frequency over time are portrayed in figure 2.    Additionally, we found some differences among the surgical techniques as to the probability of developing postoperative pneumonia, requiring postoperative blood transfusion and reoperation. The lowest probability was observed in patients treated with cannulated screw fixation. We believe that this finding is largely attributed to the fact that many surgeons rely on this form of fixation for healthier patients, who present with less complicated fractures.

Postoperative complications
Several studies have looked at the trends in type of surgery performed for fixation of femoral neck fractures. Miller et al. studied the Medicare database from 1991 to 2008, and found that HA was the most common treatment modality for femoral neck fractures, with 63.9% of patients treated from 2006 to 2008. (16) Similarly, studies of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, from 1990 to 2010, reported that HA was the most common surgical technique across all age groups, accounting for 62.3 to 75.3% of femoral neck fracture surgeries. (15,17) Our study also found that HA was more common than THA or internal fixation, but only 34.2% of our patients underwent HA. Instead, open reduction internal fixation/prosthetic placement was the most common procedure type among our patients. Miller et al., reported a steady decline in overall procedure volume from 1996 to 2008, but no change in the percentage of fractures treated with each treatment modality over time. (16) In contrast, our study showed a steady overall increase in the number  the rates of THA and HA, and decrease in internal fixation cases, from 1998 to 2010. (17) Bishop et al. also reported that THA utilization increased in patients aged 60 to 79 years, and decreased in patients aged 80 years and over. In terms of HA utilization, Bishop et al. found that this technique decreased in patients aged 60 to 69 years and increased in patients aged 80 years and up. (17) Similar to Bishop et al., (17) we also found that THA and HA utilization increased, while cannulated screw fixation decreased. To our knowledge, the finding that the percent of cases using open reduction internal fixation/prosthetic placement procedures increased has not been reported in prior studies. Open reduction internal fixation/prosthetic placement was the most commonly used and fastest growing procedure code from 2006 to 2015, and accounted for over half of all cases in 2015 (2,494 out of 4,170 cases). Since this code is non-specific for surgical technique and probably involves all procedure types, this trend suggests that American surgeons prefer to use simpler coding, which does not require specifying the surgical technique.
On the other hand, we consider that the work relative value units (RVU) are partially responsible for the trends of medical coding utilization. Open reduction internal fixation/prosthetic placement (CPT 27236) has a work RVU of 17.61, with a relative frequency of 53.6%, while HA (CPT 27125) with a work RVU of 16.64 had a frequency of 34.2%, from 2006 to 2015. As we can notice, there is a coding redundancy and, according to that, a HA can be coded with either codes. As open reduction internal fixation/prosthetic placement code has higher reimbursement, it may be leading to the observed relative frequency.
Alternatively, this trend may be a result of inadequate understanding of medical billing. Several studies have proposed the need to implement or improve formal education in billing and coding during orthopedic surgery residency training. (18)(19)(20) Regardless of the cause, continuing trends toward simplified coding could be detrimental to the database research community, since a single code cannot be analyzed to compare outcomes between techniques. Thus, the ease and time efficiency of simplified coding needs to be balanced by the need for useful coding data for future research purposes, and increased efforts to train physicians in coding should be implemented.
Many studies have assessed complication rates in elderly patients treated for femoral neck fractures. Overall, thirty-day complication rates between 13.9% and 36.4%, (21)(22)(23)(24) and reoperation rates between 3.6% and 16% (22,24,25) have been reported in recent literature, which are similar to the rates in our study. While previous studies have reported internal fixation as a less optimal treatment, (4,5,25) patients in our study treated with cannulated screw fixation had the lowest complication rates, including reoperations. However, this may be in part accounted for by missing data and the fact that long-term outcomes are not considered in the ACS NSQIP ® database.
This study had some limitations. First, we recognize the limitations associated with all database studies. This study, which utilizes the NSQIP ® database, is additionally limited in that it only considers 30-day outcomes. Next, it seems likely that missing data limited this study's ability to adequately assess some variables between groups, especially in respect to cannulated screw fixation operations. Another major limitation involves the CPT coding involved in this study. First, we recognize that the open reduction internal fixation/prosthetic placement group likely contains patients treated with all three surgical techniques. We also speculate that the code for cannulated screw fixation was discontinued in favor of the open reduction internal fixation/prosthetic placement code after 2011, which would account for the fact that the number of patients dropped abruptly to zero in a single year. It is unclear how much this transition may have affected our results. We were also limited by known and unknown baseline differences between groups. For example, the average body mass index of patients treated with THA was overweight, whereas all other groups had average body mass index within more normal weight limits. Additionally, there may be numerous other confounding demographic variables that were not adequately assessed in our study. Surgeons may have chosen healthier, less complicated patients for cannulated screw fixation, which would explain the lower incidence of certain complications among these patients.
Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable insight into recent surgical trends in the management of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Hospitals, doctors, researchers, medical billers, and patients can utilize data from this study to compare practice standards, both domestically and internationally. In addition, we hope this study will lead to improvements in medical coding and billing in the future, specifically through improved communication between hospital administrators and surgical trainees. Future endeavors to more optimally align the demands of hospital billing and evidence-based research may be an avenue to improve both patient and physician satisfaction.
This study provides valuable insight, for hospitals, physicians, researchers, medical billers and patients, into recent surgical trends in the management of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. ❚ AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTION Each individual author contributed individually and significantly to the development of this work. EJIL wrote and reviewed the article; RDS contributed to the acquisition of data; WS wrote and reviewed the article; BW contributed to the interpretation of data; MCP wrote and reviewed the article: GM obtained the data and performed statistical analysis; AS contributed to the interpretation of data and critical revision; ALGS study conception/design and critical revision; SN reviewed the article, performed statistical analysis and contributed to the intellectual concept of the study and the entire research project.