{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.006493506493506494, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0021645021645021645, 'mean_word_length': 4.935897435897436, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A THEORY OF EARMARKING

local special purpose districts such as school or drainage districts are considered to be earmarked. But although there is a near universal condemnation of the practice by experts in government budgeting and fiscal theory,2 there does not appear to exist an analytical model of earmarking consistent with the broader theory of state and local expenditure and capable of being used for empirical tests of its effects in any very exact way.