{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.055444221776887105, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04074816299265197, 'mean_word_length': 5.215767634854772, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Value of Left Internal Mammary Artery Velocity in Predicting the Prognosis of Patients After CABG


 Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore the value of the LIMAV measured by ultrasound before CABG in predicting the prognosis of patients after LIMA bypass grafting. Methods: 104 patients who underwent CABG with LIMA as the bridge vessel in the cardiovascular surgery department of our hospital between May 2018 and June 2019 were selected. All patients underwent transthoracic Doppler ultrasonography to measure LIMAV preoperatively. Intraoperatively, MGF and PI of the LIMA bridge were measured using TTFM. The primary endpoint event in this study was cardiac death within 18 months after surgery. Results: The Cox survival analysis showed that the MGF , the LIMAV and LVEF were risk factors for death after CABG . The cut-offs of MGF ,LIMAV and LVEF for the prediction of death after CABG were ≤14 ml/min [AUC: 0.830; Sensitivity:100%; Specificity: 65.6%], ≤60cm/s (AUC: 0.759; Sensitivity:65.5%; Specificity:85.3%) and ≤44%（AUC:0.724; Sensitivity:50%; Specificity: 88.5% ）respectively. Compared with the use of MGF, MGF+LIMAV, combination of the MGF+LIMAV+LVEF （AUC:0.929; Sensitivity:100%; Specificity: 81.1%）resulted in a stronger predictive value（MGF vs MGF+LIMAV+LVEF: p=0.02）. Conclusion: LIMAV measured by transthoracic ultrasound pre-operation combined with intraoperative MGF and LVEF may have a greater value in predicting patients' risk of cardiac death after CABG.