{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010183299389002037, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.56, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On the Use of Empirical Studies to Compare Failure Analysis Techniques

In our effort to develop and compare failure analysis techniques, we have developed a framework to facilitate certain repetitive tasks that might be encountered by researchers performing investigations and experiments in this area. We first introduce the framework architecture and its major functionalities. Then, we implement two failure analysis techniques within the framework to demonstrate how it can be utilized.