{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015116279069767442, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023255813953488372, 'mean_word_length': 4.937931034482759, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
APPROBATORY GLOSS TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF 1 DECEMBER 2017. SYGN. ACT II GSK 282/16

The subject of the gloss on the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 1 December 2017, ref. no. II GSK 282/16 is the issue of enacting local laws on sports scholarships established and financed by a local government unit. The Supreme Administrative Court stated in the judgment under review that it is inadmissible for the municipal council to adopt a resolution which provides for subjective restrictions on access to sports scholarships in terms of age and membership of a player’s club. The modifications introduced in the scope of the subjective criterion resulted in exceeding statutory authorization, which must be strictly interpreted. Therefore, the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court should be evaluated positively

