{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029259896729776247, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0051635111876075735, 'mean_word_length': 5.767441860465116, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Professional Standards Review Organizations. A critique.

Certain weaknesses in the evaluation methods utilized by the authors of "Professional Standards Review Organizations" undermine the validity of the program effectiveness results cited by them to the extent that program success has not been demonstrated. These weaknesses are grouped into three categories: (1) failure to account for causal factors other than the Hospital Admission and Surveillance Program (HASP), (2) weaknesses in the HASP evaluation time period selection, and (3) weaknesses in the measurement criteria.