{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0208, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0016, 'mean_word_length': 6.358823529411764, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Intervention in Aortofemoral Revascularization

Minimally invasive surgical procedures have become popular recently because they offer several advantages over conventional operative techniques. A person undergoing a minimally invasive procedure usually experiences less pain, is discharged earlier from hospital, returns to work sooner and has a less obtrusive postoperative scar. Excluding highly technical techniques (e.g. laparoscopic surgery), operations performed using mini-laparotomy are usually more cost-effective than conventional procedures, largely because they are less expensive to perform. Our paper investigates cost-effectiveness and other parameters relating to minimally invasive aortofemoral revascularization procedures performed at our clinic. We compared 20 similar cases, half where revascularization was undertaken using mini-laparotomy and half where conventional laparotomy was selected. From our findings we conclude that mini-laparotomy is safe and reliable for aortobifemoral bypass procedures and has several advantages over traditional techniques; namely, shorter operating time, earlier resumption of intestinal function, shorter duration of in-patient stay and reduced costs.