{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02586206896551724, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004310344827586207, 'mean_word_length': 5.114035087719298, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Sociological and Institutional Background of Perroux's Economic Domination Theory

Deploring the neglect of sociology in economics, H. Albert holds that marginalism and equilibrium thinking have little to do with an explanation of social market phenomena, with the sociology of market events. As market relationships are just one special kind of human interactions, economic science, he continues, "ought to be interpreted as a part of sociology, as the sociology of market relations or of market behavior" [1, p. 23]. His statement is an illustration of the plea made by some scholars for the unification of the social science disciplines, and the removal of the boundary lines between them.