{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01744186046511628, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.7444444444444445, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Submitted to Physical Review C in reply to a Comment by M.K.Orlowski on the paper

This reply claims to show that the mathematical difficulty noted by Orlowski was already met in the original paper by invoking the physical restrictions arising from relativistic kinematics and an ordered limit based on them. In contrast we claim that Orlowski's procedure is unmotivated physically, ad hoc from a mathematical point of view, and, even if adopted, too flexible to be of much use in most problems of physical interest.