{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032564450474898234, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.3076923076923075, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Philosophy Scare: The Politics of Reason in the Early Cold War

First, this text offers useful critical terminology or conceptual frames for analysis (e.g., imitatio, rhetorical scenes, both/neither, feeling rhetorical critic, phronetic orientation, co-presence, audiencing critic, holographic rhetoric). In addition, the essays, taken individually and as a whole, provide clear and compelling arguments for how different field methods enrich the possible conclusions that a critic might offer. Finally, the essays connect to recent conversations about the move to the field – reading them offers a way to bring oneself up to speed on current scholarship and how one might enter into the conversation in their own research endeavors.