{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.008674101610904586, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.30859375, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Features of Reaction in a Conflict Situation Among Students-Defectologists with Different Levels of Reflexivity

The article presents an analysis of the problem of the peculiarities of reaction in a conflict situation among students of defectology with different levels of reflexivity. It is noted that in the mechanisms of response in a conflict situation, a significant place is occupied by personal factors that determine the predisposition of the subject to the choice of a behavior strategy. Various typologies of conflicts are presented, which are developed on the basis of different approaches to understanding this social phenomenon. A number of definitions of behavior strategies in a conflict situation are given based on the analysis of foreign and domestic works. The concept of reflexivity in relation to various psychological characteristics is defined. The results of an empirical study of the peculiarities of reaction in a conflict situation among students of defectology with different levels of reflexivity are presented, according to which students of defectology with a low level of reflexivity tend to defend their own interests without taking into account the interests of the opponent, students of defectology with a low level of reflexivity are characterized by the lack of a tendency to find solutions to the problem and defend their own interests, which manifests itself in ignoring the conflict situation., students of defectology with an average level of reflexivity tend to search for solutions to the problem taking into account their own interests and the interests of the opponent.