{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023952095808383235, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.610738255033557, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Father loses battle against condom-based sex education.


 The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear a case involving a parent's fight for sexual abstinence at a high school, effectively ending the campaign to place ads in the school's year book and newspaper touting the benefits of sexual abstinence. The plaintiff, [name removed], sued the Town of Lexington, claiming his free-speech and equal protection rights were violated when he could not buy space for ads with the above content. The lower courts found that the banning decisions came from the students, not from any of the school personnel who were the defendants in the case. The court noted that the students' actions were not attributable to the government or the school committee so school officials could not be held liable. The Supreme Court left that ruling undisturbed.
