{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021203830369357045, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005471956224350205, 'mean_word_length': 5.388646288209607, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Simulation of diagnostic ultrasound image pulse sequences in cavitation bioeffects research.

Research on cavitational bioeffects of diagnostic ultrasound (DUS) typically involves a diagnostic scanner as the exposure source. However, this can limit the ranges of exposure parameters for experimentation. Anesthetized hairless rats were mounted in a water bath and their right kidneys were exposed to ultrasound. Amplitude modulation with Gaussian envelopes simulated the image pulse sequences (IPSs) produced by diagnostic scanning. A 10 mulkgmin IV dose of Definity((R)) contrast agent was given during 1-5 min exposures. Glomerular capillary hemorrhage was assessed by histology. A stationary exposure approximated the bioeffects induced by DUS within the beam area. However, the use of five closely spaced exposures more faithfully reproduced the total effect produced within a DUS scan plane. Single pulses delivered at 1 s intervals induced the same effect as the simulated DUS. Use of 100 ms triangle-wave modulations for ramp-up or ramp-down of the IPS gave no effect or a large effect, respectively. Finally, an air-backed transducer simulating DUS without contrast agent showed a zero effect even operating at twice the present DUS guideline upper limit. Relatively simple single-element laboratory exposure systems can simulate diagnostic ultrasound exposure and allow exploration of parameter ranges beyond those available on present clinical systems.