{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018581081081081082, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.588888888888889, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
LSID versus HTTP URI: Two approaches and e-infrastructures for managing information about taxon names

The amount of biological information has increased during the last decades. The information is hidden in museum specimens, data bases of observations, and in literature. Integrating data from scattered sources is hard because different vocabularies are used. The biggest barrier for data integration is the changing nature of scientific names, which hinders the interoperability of information systems. A solution is to use machine-processable identifiers for identifying biological names.