{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018125, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00375, 'mean_word_length': 5.429718875502008, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Time-space at the airport: New directions in aeromobilities research: Saolo Cwerner, Sven Kesselring and John Urry (eds), Aeromobilities

emerged. Hoy’s decision to make temporality and phenomenology a frame perhaps limits his ability to take analysis further, where it might outsize the phenomenological tradition and link up with contemporary social scientific, and dominant Continental philosophical models. In this regard, phenomenologically-inflected models of temporality arguably require extension or risk becoming outmoded, for the social scientific arena at least – indicating the extent to which the social sciences are now beginning to advance our understanding of a topic which, for 20th-century scholars at least, was largely the provenance of philosophers and physicists. But such debates and queries can only be advanced by detailed engagement with the issues which Hoy’s very welcome and illuminating book addresses. Hoy astutely reviews and synthesizes the most productive philosophical debates on time of relevance to the study of human experience, and in the process renders some of the thorniest intellectual debates of the 19th and 20th centuries with consummate clarity. Social scientists seeking to acquaint themselves with this complex literature can turn to no better secondary source, which should be required reading for any scholar engaged in time studies. The work of assimilating this body of thought, and developing an effective and integrated model of the temporal is ongoing, and The Time of Our Lives can nourish and inform this project in a highly effective manner.