{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030263157894736843, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015789473684210527, 'mean_word_length': 4.9921259842519685, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Data-Rate Performance and Coverage of the Sub-Band Vectoring for VDSL 35b Profile

ABSTRACT Vectoring, used in VDSL2 to counteract FEXT, becomes less effective, or even ineffective, when users belong to different vectoring groups. This situation is common when the Regulator imposes sub-loop unbundling and users of uncoordinated service providers cause alien-FEXT. The sub-band vectoring (SBV) technique introduced here, avoids this situation and retains the vectoring benefits. We show SBV allows achieving up to 150 Mbit/s per user in downstream at 200 m from cabinet for VDSL2 profile-35b, with two concurrent service providers. We also introduce the concept of data-rate coverage representing the users’ percentage served at a given data-rate in the area.