{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030815109343936383, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.758389261744966, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Analyzing national e-Government interoperability frameworks: A case of Thailand

Many countries have actively engaged in the development of interoperability for electronic data and transaction exchange among government agencies to provide better joint-up public services to their citizens. National-level policy frameworks, often called Electronic Government Interoperability Frameworks (e-GIF), were established in many of those countries. However, most of these e-GIF frameworks haven't adopted the holistic concept of Enterprise Architectures (EA), except for example, Thailand, U.S.A. and Canada. This paper proposes a comparative analysis methodology with an aim to propose further improvement for the EA-based interoperability frameworks to better drive the effective development of smart and connected e-government services. In this paper, Thailand e-Government Interoperability Framework is methodically compared and analyzed with the U.S. Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework as a case study.