{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018076178179470628, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005164622336991607, 'mean_word_length': 5.739130434782608, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pleasure, womanhood and the desire for reconstructive surgery after female genital cutting in Belgium

Abstract Growing numbers of women are showing interest in clitoral reconstructive surgery after ‘Female Genital Mutilation’. The safety and success of reconstructive surgery, however, has not clearly been established and due to lack of evidence the World Health Organization does not recommend it. Based on anthropological research among patients who requested surgery at the Brussels specialist clinic between 2017 and 2020, this paper looks at two cases of women who actually enjoy sex and experience pleasure but request the procedure to become ‘whole again’ after stigmatising experiences with health-care professionals, sexual partners or gossip among African migrant communities. An ethnographic approach was used including indepth interviews and participant observation during reception appointments, gynecological consultations, sexology and psychotherapy sessions. Despite limited evidence on the safety of the surgical intervention, surgery is often perceived as the ultimate remedy for the ‘missing’ clitoris. Such beliefs are nourished by predominant discourses of cut women as ‘sexually mutilated’. Following Butler, this article elicits how discursive practices on the physiological sex of a woman can shape her gender identity as a complete or incomplete person. We also examine what it was that changed the patients’ mind about the surgery in the process of re-building their confidence through sexology therapy and psychotherapy.