{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0329134498171475, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0337261275904104, 'mean_word_length': 5.345360824742268, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparative Analysis of High-Resolution Soil 
Moisture Simulations from the Soil, Vegetation, and 
Snow (SVS) Land Surface Model Using SAR Imagery 
Over Bare Soil

Soil moisture is a key variable in Earth systems, controlling the exchange of water andenergy between land and atmosphere. Thus, understanding its spatiotemporal distribution andvariability is important. Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) has developed a newland surface parameterization, named the Soil, Vegetation, and Snow (SVS) scheme. The SVS landsurface scheme features sophisticated parameterizations of hydrological processes, including watertransport through the soil. It has been shown to provide more accurate simulations of the temporaland spatial distribution of soil moisture compared to the current operational land surface scheme.Simulation of high resolution soil moisture at the field scale remains a challenge. In this study, wesimulate soil moisture maps at a spatial resolution of 100 m using the SVS land surface scheme overan experimental site located in Manitoba, Canada. Hourly high resolution soil moisture maps wereproduced between May and November 2015. Simulated soil moisture values were compared withestimated soil moisture values using a hybrid retrieval algorithm developed at Agriculture andAgri-Food Canada (AAFC) for soil moisture estimation using RADARSAT-2 Synthetic ApertureRadar (SAR) imagery. Statistical analysis of the results showed an overall promising performanceof the SVS land surface scheme in simulating soil moisture values at high resolution scale.Investigation of the SVS output was conducted both independently of the soil texture, and as afunction of the soil texture. The SVS model tends to perform slightly better over coarser texturedsoils (sandy loam, fine sand) than finer textured soils (clays). Correlation values of the simulatedSVS soil moisture and the retrieved SAR soil moisture lie between 0.753–0.860 over sand and 0.676-0.865 over clay, with goodness of fit values between 0.567–0.739 and 0.457–0.748, respectively. TheRoot Mean Square Difference (RMSD) values range between 0.058–0.062 over sand and 0.055–0.113over clay, with a maximum absolute bias of 0.049 and 0.094 over sand and clay, respectively. Theunbiased RMSD values lie between 0.038–0.057 over sand and 0.039–0.064 over clay. Furthermore,results show an Index of Agreement (IA) between the simulated and the derived soil moisturealways higher than 0.90.