{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025547445255474453, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008211678832116789, 'mean_word_length': 5.341040462427745, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
How does the Spatial Scale Mismatch Between in Situ and Smos Soil Moisture Evolve Through Timescales?

The SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) mission, together with other passive microwave based missions (AMSR, SMAP), provides soil moisture estimates at resolutions ranging from 30 to 55 km. These estimates are validated by direct comparison to in situ measurements that typically measure over an area of a few centimeters. There exist a spatial scale mismatch between the satellite (large support) and the in situ measurements (point support), which contributes to the differences observed. Their magnitude depends on the spatial representativeness of the in situ measurements, which varies in time and with the selected location. This communication will show how the spatial scale mismatch evolves through timescales. It is characterized by using modeled, in situ and satellite soil moisture time series. Timescales, from 0.5 to 128 days, are obtained using wavelet transforms and the spatial representativeness is assessed with a new approach that uses wavelet-based correlations (WCor).