{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030744336569579287, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.457831325301205, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Kryptonite of Evidence-Based I–O Psychology

discipline?’’ Evidence-based practice is well established in other fields, particularly in medicine. Medicine has long investigated how publication bias influences systematic reviews and limits evidence-based practice. We believe that Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), scientists, and practitioners, through collaboration, hold the key to overcoming publication bias. The following commentary concisely explains recommendations for preventing and evaluating publication bias to promote improved systematic reviews and evidence-based practice.