{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.045091779728651235, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025139664804469275, 'mean_word_length': 4.969047619047619, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Morbidity of Open Transthoracic Approach for Anterior Scoliosis Correction

Study Design. Retrospective study. Objective. To analyze the patient satisfaction and the patients' perceived approach-related morbidity (ArM) after open thoracotomy (OTC) for instrumented anterior scoliosis surgery. Summary of Background Data. There is no mid- to long-term data on the patients' perceived ArM concerning chest wall dissection for open anterior scoliosis correction. Methods. A specific questionnaire was used to retrospectively evaluate mid- to long-term follow-up data concerning ArM after OTC of patients younger than 30 years (range, 11–28 years) who underwent anterior open transthoracic scoliosis surgery. The questionnaire was comprised of detailed scar-related questions. Applying strict inclusion criteria, we could analyze outcomes in terms of percentage morbidity (morbidity [%]) of 40 patients who underwent OTC for instrumented scoliosis correction. Results. Mean age of the patients was 16 ± 3.8 years, follow-up was 61.5 ± 72.6 months on average, and mean incision length was 25.7 ± 3.1 cm. Mean number of levels fused was 5.9 ± 1.5. Single thoracotomy was performed in 25 patients and a thoracoabdominal approach in 15 patients. Mean morbidity (0%, not delineating no ArM; 100%, delineating highest ArM) was 5.4% ± 11.3%; 47.5% of patients had no morbidity; 12.5% had morbidity >10% (mean: 28.5%). Signs of intercostal neuralgia (ICN) were present in 10%. Patients judged their clinical outcome as “good” in 20% and “excellent” in 80%. Statistical analysis did not reveal differences in outcomes and percentage morbidity concerning age of patients, extent of approach (thoracotomy vs. thoracoabdominal approach) and incision length, gender, or follow-up length. However, the presence of ICN had a significant effect on the outcome, showing high correlation with increased morbidity (P < 0.0001). In the clinical judgment of outcomes, the severity of the ArM after OTC was mild, except for 2 patients who had moderate approach and scar-related morbidity. Conclusion. ArM after open thoracic spinal surgery or thoracoscopic procedures can be assessed using the questionnaire. The current study showed that ArM in young patients who underwent OTC for anterior instrumented scoliosis correction was low. Patients with increased signs of ICN did worse in terms of the questionnaire survey. The study showed that neither cosmesis nor scar-related problems were a concern for patients undergoing OTC.