{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01813236627379873, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.202247191011236, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns.

Altering our angle of vision changes what we see. Many who grapple with the problems of fetal rights and abortion do so either from the vantage point of feminist theory or from within the framework of constitutional law. My work provides different sightlines-those generated by a specialization in law and medicine. Consequently, the issues I assess, and the questions I find myself asking about abortion and fetal rights diverge from those that typically command center stage among feminists specializing in gender discrimination. Nonetheless, I speak from within the feminist tradition, building upon its rich insights and vital truths, seeking to refine its perspective. I offer these thoughts not with the conviction that they are more fundamental or more comprehensive than others on the conversational table, but with the aspiration that they might add to the discussions that proceed among women in hallways, classrooms, and restaurants, in political and legal strategy sessions, as well as in formal briefs and law review articles.