{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013916500994035786, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.904109589041096, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Efficiency comparison of signature monitoring schemes for FSMs

This paper addresses the detection of permanent and transient faults in complex VLSI circuits, with a particular focus on faults leading to sequencing errors. Several Finite State Machine implementations using signature monitoring for control-flow checking are compared in terms of error detection latency, theoretical error coverage, experimental error coverage and area overheads. Advantages and drawbacks of each approach are presented.