{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022457067371202115, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.162601626016261, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Theatre and Globalization: Irish Drama in the Celtic Tiger Era (review)

In the third chapter, Baron and Carnicke employ a taxonomy created by Stephen Heath that delineates how audiences perceive the presence of characters, actors, star images, and other elements of the cinema industry. Heath’s taxonomy is applied to scenes from four films to show how cinematic elements and an actor’s expressive gestures in tandem affect audience reception. Concomitant to this analysis, the authors seek to refute the idea that acting occurs only in live performance. Arguing that the difference between acting and not-acting depends on the degree of representation in the performance, they conclude that acting and not-acting occur in both stage and film performances.