{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025048169556840076, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0038535645472061657, 'mean_word_length': 5.341463414634147, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Corridor for Land‐Locked States

The disadvantages of such countries are immediately discernible – lack of access to the sea for fisheries and sea-borne trade, to name a few. It is in fact this position of being geographically compromised that witnessed the forging of interests during negotiations under UNCLOS, of a coalition of sorts now well recognised under international law as Land-Locked and Geographically Disadvantaged States (LLGDS). UNCLOS, in Art 70, defines geographically disadvantaged States as being: