{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02304147465437788, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.297101449275362, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Science and religion: friends or foes?

There is a widespread assumption that science and religion are incompatible with each other; it may be acceptable for a scientist to practise religion, but--it is believed--this should be seen as despite, not because of his or her scientific profession and knowledge. Such an assumption is wrong. Examination of conflicts between science and religion (such as those about evolution) show that they always arise through misinterpretation or tenacious presuppositions. Unfortunately protagonists (both anti-religion and anti-science) receive more publicity than conciliators. This paper reviews some of the background and development of arguments over creation and evolution and shows that there is no need to choose between a rigorous scientific approach and an avowedly religious acknowledgement of God as creator and sustainer.