{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016105417276720352, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.162162162162162, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Kinetic Occlusion by Apparent Movement

A small square and a large triangle below it were presented in the first frame. These were switched off and replaced by a triangle alone in the second frame, shifted horizontally and upwards. The triangle appeared to move obliquely, as expected, but most observers also saw the square moving horizontally and hiding behind the triangle, although there was no stimulus corresponding to it in the second frame. The visual system invokes the occlusion ‘hypothesis’ in order to explain the otherwise mysterious disappearance of the square. The experiment suggests that apparently intelligent solutions can be rapidly computed by the visual system.