{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013023255813953489, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005581395348837209, 'mean_word_length': 4.977777777777778, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Is it Practical for Defence to Reduce its Carbon Emissions Without Affecting its Effectiveness?

The two quotes above set out the scientific and political context for the approach that the United Kingdom is taking in developing its policies towards the current demands of climate change. In the contemporary arena, climate change is set to define the path that humanity takes in its approach to life in the 21st century. It promises to be the defining change that we will have to embark upon in order to preserve the future of life on this planet. Notwithstanding the over exploitation and unsustainable nature of man’s approach to earth’s resources, many believe that the choices facing mankind are indeed stark. Indeed, the recent award of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize jointly to the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the renowned climate change lobbyist and US politician Al Gore is further recognition by the international community of the valuable work that is being done in raising awareness of climate change and its potential impacts.