{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025933609958506226, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012448132780082987, 'mean_word_length': 5.03125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Shortcut to Rejection: How Not to Write the Results Section of a Paper

This article discusses common errors in writing up the results of papers. It covers the following: 1) giving details about irrelevant topics, such as what program was used to enter the data, while ignoring important ones (for example, which options were chosen for various statistical tests); 2) reporting P levels of 0.0000 and negative values for t tests; 3) giving the P levels but not the actual values of the statistical tests; 4) not including confidence intervals and measures of the magnitude of an effect; 5) testing irrelevant hypotheses, such as whether reliability or validity coefficients are significantly different from zero; 6) attributing reliability and validity to tests rather than to the circumstances under which they are given; and 7) reporting levels of accuracy that cannot be supported by the data. Suggestions are made regarding the proper way to report findings.