{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020374898125509373, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012224938875305624, 'mean_word_length': 5.329896907216495, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Outdoor Enthusiasts' Perceptions of Hunting and Animal Welfare

Researchers in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Purdue University conducted an online survey of 872 outdoor enthusiasts from across the United States with regard to their outdoor activities, views on animal welfare, and perceptions of food safety for a variety of domestic and wild animals. Outdoor enthusiasts are individuals who regularly fish, hunt or participate in other outdoor activities such as hiking and/or camping. Of those surveyed, 63 percent regularly fished, 27 percent regularly hunted and 79 percent regularly participated in other outdoor activities. Thirty-eight percent of respondents indicated they had altered their meat consumption in response to food safety concerns, while 32 percent indicated they had done so in response to animal welfare concerns. Most respondents, 93 percent, agreed with hunting to obtain food, and 95 percent agreed with fishing to obtain food. More than half of respondents reported being concerned for the welfare of bison, beef cattle and dairy cattle. Meanwhile, one quarter or more of respondents were unconcerned with the welfare of deer, feral pigs, farmed pigs, chickens, wild turkey and catfish.