{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016913319238900635, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011416490486257928, 'mean_word_length': 5.20997375328084, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
N400 in schizophrenia patients

Purpose of review The purpose of this article is to review major findings in event related potential (ERP) research in schizophrenia patients, specifically focusing on the N400 component. Recent findings Patients with chronic schizophrenia have difficulty using ‘context’ (understanding the meaning of the word relative to the sentence) in sentence processing studies and often show differences from control populations in language experiments using word priming. Both of these observations are associated with an abnormal N400 ERP component when compared with nonpsychotic individuals. Many studies of language function rely on priming paradigms that use pairs of words such that the first word in a pair is a ‘prime’ and a second word in a pair is a ‘target’, separated from the prime by a period of time known as the Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA). If the SOA is short (i.e., below 400 ms) then it is believed that a priming study examines primarily processes of initial activation within semantic networks; if it is long (i.e., more than 400 ms) then it is believed that a priming study examines primarily processes of context use, generating predictions and matching these predictions against upcoming semantic information. Priming paradigms that use long SOAs are consistently associated with a more negative N400 (hence lack of priming) in schizophrenia, whereas priming paradigms using a short SOA produce either a normal N400 priming response or hyperpriming as shown by a reduced N400 and related to a hypothesized too rapid automatic spread of activation within the semantic memory pathway. Apparent differences among reported study results are likely due to paradigm differences that tap into different aspects of language processing. Although the presence of both hyperactivation within semantic networks and difficulties with the use of context is well known in schizophrenia, it is unclear whether these abnormalities are also present prior to illness onset in people who are at risk for development of schizophrenia or even present at the onset of illness. Summary In order to clarify the findings reviewed here, future studies will be needed that focus on examining the N400 response in young people at high risk for developing the illness using multiple paradigms that probe different aspects of language function.