{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019534184823441023, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019534184823441023, 'mean_word_length': 5.138248847926267, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Eeficiency of conventional technique and surgical operating microscope in crown lengthening: An original research

Background: The success of any  periodontal therapy always depends on better visual access and, magnification is an important component which provides good hand eye coordination with a better treatment outcome. The aim of our study is to assess the effectiveness of magnification over conventional method while performing surgical crown lengthening and to evaluate the patient comfort level and pain perception over a period of 3 months. Methods -The study was conducted amongst 20 patients, 10 in each group requiring crown lengthening for restorative purpose and was evaluated ever a period of 3 months. Results - During 3months follow up, significant differences were found between the groups for probing depth with mean difference of 1.22±0.6, position of gingival margin as with mean  2.7±1.15 and biologic width with mean difference 2.8±0.42.Regarding patient comfort and patients pain perception it was found low for microscope group with mean difference of 2±0.67 Conclusion – A good visual access is a primary requisite behind the success of any periodontal therapy and it was concluded from our study that there was significant reduction in probing depth and improvement in biologic width, gingival margin.