{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.041031652989449004, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015240328253223915, 'mean_word_length': 4.972027972027972, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Blake v. Cromek: A Contemporary Ruling

"One of the best-known quarrels in literature," as G. E. Bentley, Jr., describes it, involved the engraver-turned-publisher Robert Hartley Cromek and William Blake, and it was centered on two of Cromek's ventures: his illustrated edition of Robert Blair's The Grave (1808) and the print after Thomas Stothard's Procession of Chaucer's Pilgrims to Canterbury (1817).1 About September 1805, Cromek promised Blake the commission to engrave his own designs for The Grave but later withdrew the offer and employed Luigi Schiavonetti as engraver of Blake's designs. Not long after receiving Cromek's commission, Blake had produced a rough white-line etching of "Death's Door" as a specimen of the style of engraving, but it appears to have caused Cromek some uneasiness because he considered it too crude to attract new