{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031223628691983123, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004219409282700422, 'mean_word_length': 5.410810810810811, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluation of the use of the luciferase-reporter-gene system for gene-regulation studies involving cyclic AMP-elevating agents.

The effects of cyclic AMP (cAMP)-elevating agents on the activity of cis-acting gene promoter sequences are frequently studied using the luciferase-reporter-gene system. The aim of the present study was to assess whether cAMP-elevating agents induce any changes in the level of luciferase activity independently of a transcriptional activation of promoter elements. Chloramphenicol acteyltransferase (CAT) and luciferase reporter genes under the control of the same promoter elements were transiently expressed in primary cultures of human vascular smooth-muscle cells. Transfected cells were treated with a cell-permeable and non-hydrolysable cAMP analogue, 2'-O-monobutyryl-8-bromo cAMP, or with the cAMP-elevating agents forskolin and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1). Forskolin and PGE1 induced a significant increase in the level of luciferase activity, but had no effect on CAT activity. Conclusions based solely on the use of the luciferase-reporter-gene system in studies involving promoter activation by cAMP-elevating agents could therefore be misleading.