{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030456852791878174, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024655547498187092, 'mean_word_length': 6.076923076923077, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of Acediasulfone in Mixture with Cinchocaine

Abstract Derivative spectrophotometry techniques (ratio‐spectra first derivative and zero‐crossing first derivative) were described for simultaneous determination of acediasulfone and cinchocaine. Acediasulfone was also determined via the formation of a colored product as a result of its reaction with p‐dimethylaminobenzaldehyde. In the ratio‐spectra first derivative method, the measurements were taken at 310 and 233.9 nm for acediasulfone and cinchocaine, respectively. By the zero‐crossing first derivative method, lines of regression were taken at 318 and 233 nm for acediasulfone and cinchocaine, respectively. In the colorimetric method, absorbance measurements were obtained at 452 nm. Acediasulfone showed linearity over concentration ranges 2–14 µg/ml, 2–16 µg/ml, and 12–60 µg/ml for ratio‐spectra first derivative, zero‐crossing first derivative, and colorimetric methods, whereas cinchocaine showed linearity over concentration ranges 1–10 µg/ml and 2.28–16 µg/ml for ratio‐spectra first derivative and zero‐crossing first derivative techniques. The proposed methods proved to be specific and accurate for the analysis of the cited drugs in laboratory‐prepared mixtures and dosage form. The obtained results agree statistically with those obtained by reference methods.