{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0281086231538828, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03287279656979514, 'mean_word_length': 4.511811023622047, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Four hundred meters walking test in the evaluation of heart failure patients.

UNLABELLED
The best evaluation of the severity and prognosis of heart failure patients is obtained by the maximal exercise stress testing, but for the very large number of HF patients and for evaluation of their daily effort capacity submaximal stress testing, mainly 6 minutes walking test are used. The limit of 6mWT is that during it the patients are not motivated to walk and also, the periphery, so important for heart failure patients, is not equally involved.


OBJECTIVE
To compare a new fixed walking test-400m walking test with 6MWT and maximal exercise testing.


METHODS
There were investigated 20 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The patients were included in the study after the relief of the congestive syndrome. Each patient was submitted in three consecutive days to a maximal symptom-limited exercise stress test on cycloergometer, a six minutes walking test, a 400 meters walking test. The last one consisted of walking on a corridor 40 meters long, at a speed chosen by the patient himself. The results were expressed in seconds representing the necessary time to cover the established 400 meters of distance.


RESULTS
During cycloergometer exercise stress test the calculated mean peak VO2 was 15.2 +/- 1.4 mlO2/kg/min (4.32 METs). The mean distance walked during 6MWT was 350 +/- 34m and the mean time needed to walk 400m (400mWT) was 300 +/- 27 seconds. The correlation between peak VO2 and distance walked during 6MWT was -0.40, a similar but negative value (r = -0.42) being registered between peak VO2 and time registered during 400mWT. Only weak correlation was registered between LVEF and all the three tests. In turn the correlation between distance registered during 6MWT and time registered during 400mWT was excellent: r = -0.60.


CONCLUSION
400mWT is a useful tool for the evaluation of submaximal effort capacity of CHF patients. Its value to evaluate exercise capacity is similar with that of the 6 MWT, but 400mWT can assure a better evaluation of peripheral involvement.