{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03245395434103864, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017730801180143793, 'mean_word_length': 5.33611615245009, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an organelle entrusted with lipid synthesis, calcium homeostasis, protein folding, and maturation. Perturbation of ER-associated functions results in an evolutionarily conserved cell stress response, the unfolded protein response (UPR) that is also called ER stress. ER stress is aimed initially at compensating for damage but can eventually trigger cell death if ER stress is excessive or prolonged. Now the ER stress has been associated with numerous diseases. For instance, our recent studies have demonstrated the important role of ER stress in diabetes-induced cardiac cell death. It is known that apoptosis has been considered to play a critical role in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Therefore, this paper will summarize the information from the literature and our own studies to focus on the pathological role of ER stress in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying UPR activation and ER-initiated apoptosis in diabetic cardiomyopathy will provide us with new targets for drug discovery and therapeutic intervention.


Introduction
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a central organelle entrusted with lipid synthesis, calcium homeostasis, protein folding, and maturation [1]. Most secreted and integral membrane proteins of eukaryotic cells are translocated into the lumen of ER. The ER lumen provides a specialized environment for posttranslational modification and folding of secreted, transmembrane, and resident proteins of the various compartments of the endomembrane system [2]. Various factors that interfere with ER function lead to accumulation of unfolded proteins, including oxidative stress, ischemia, disturbance of calcium homeostasis, and overexpression of normal and/or incorrectly folded proteins. This process is called ER stress and further activates the unfolding protein response (UPR). There are two aims of the UPR: the UPR initially tries to restore normal function of the cell by halting protein translation and activating the signaling pathways that lead to increasing the production of molecular chaperones involved in protein folding; if these objectives are not achieved within a certain time lapse or the disruption is prolonged, the UPR tries to turn on apoptotic pathway [3][4][5][6]. Therefore, the UPR can be considered as a safeguard for protein synthesis, posttranslational modifications, folding and secretion, calcium storage and signaling, and lipid biosynthesis [7][8][9][10][11]. Under normal conditions the ER maintains high concentrations of resident calcium-dependent chaperone proteins, such as glucose-regulated protein-78 (GRP78, also known as BiP) and glucose-regulated protein-94 (GRP94) [12], along with a high level of calcium and an oxidized environment. Only properly folded proteins are allowed to reach their final destination, whereas unfolded and misfolded proteins are exported or dislocated from the ER and degraded by cytoplasmic proteasomes. The stresses that can cause the UPR include a variety of conditions such as elevated secretory protein synthesis, overexpression and/or accumulation of mutant proteins, aberrant Ca 2+ regulation, hypoxia, glucose deprivation, altered glycosylation, ischemia, ER calcium depletion, viral infections, shifting of redox status to a more reduced state, exposure to natural and experimental toxins that perturb ER function, and overloading of cholesterol [3,10,[13][14][15][16][17].
In human and animal models of diabetes, a heart musclespecific disease in the absence of other vascular pathology has been described, termed diabetic cardiomyopathy [18,19].

Experimental Diabetes Research
The pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy is a chronic and complex process that is attributed to abnormal cellular metabolism and defects in organelles such as myofibrils, mitochondria, and sarcolemma [20][21][22][23][24]. Probable candidates to explain this heart disease include autonomic abnormalities, metabolic disorders, abnormal enzyme function, and interstitial fibrosis [25][26][27]. For instance, apoptosis, as a regulated, energy-dependent, cell suicide mechanism has also been reported to play a critical role in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy [28][29][30][31].
Recently the involvement of ER stress in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy was also reported [32,33]. However, the mechanisms of diabetic cardiomyopathy are not fully known, and appropriate approaches to minimize these risks are still being explored. This paper focuses on ER stress and its involvement in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy in order to provide certain new insights into understanding of its mechanisms.

Adaptation to ER Stress: Mechanisms to Restore Homeostasis
The ability to adapt to physiological levels of ER stress is important to cells. The initial intent of the UPR is adaptation and restoration of the normal ER function. When unfolded proteins accumulate in the ER, resident chaperones become occupied, releasing transmembrane ER proteins involved in inducing the UPR. These proteins straddle ER membranes, with their N-terminus in the lumen of the ER and their C-terminus in the cytosol, providing a bridge that connects these 2 compartments. The N-termini of these transmembrane ER proteins are usually associated with or bound to intralumenal GRP78 in the absence of ER stress, preventing their aggregation. In some physiological or pathological conditions, the large excess of unfolded proteins in the ER lumen necessitates GRP78 dissociation and launches the UPR. The UPR initially activates intracellular signaling pathways mediated by three ER-resident proteins in mammalian cells: the inositol-requiring kinase-1 (IRE-1) [34,35], the activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), and the protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK) [36,37].

PERK.
The UPR induces an early and transient attenuation of protein biosynthesis which is mediated by PERK, an ER-resident protein whose effector the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α kinase (eIF2α) domain lies on the cytoplasmic side of the ER membrane and whose stress-sensing domain lies on the opposite side of the membrane in the ER lumen [38], as illustrated in Figure 1. The luminal domain of monomeric PERK binds with the ER chaperone GRP78 in an inactive complex under unstressed conditions. However, as client proteins accumulate in the ER lumen, in efforts to assist folding, GRP78 relocates from PERK to misfolded ER proteins. GRP78 relocalization allows PERK to dimerize, which facilitates transautophosphorylation [39,40]. PERK is then activated, and it phosphorylates α-subunit of eIF2α on serine-51. This phosphorylation event decreases cap-or eIF2α-dependent translation, which shuts off global mRNA translation and reduces the protein load on the ER [37,39]. Global translational inhibition acutely reduces the proteinfolding load on the ER and allows the cell to focus resources on resolving the ER stress, thus facilitating survival. However, certain mRNAs encoded by ER stress response (ERSR) genes gains structural features and a selective advantage for translation that allow them to escape PERK-mediated translational inhibition [41]. For example, eIF2α phosphorylation induces expression of GRP78 and ATF4 under stress [42,43]. During the prosurvival phase of ER stress, ATF4 induces numerous genes involved in resolution of the ER stress, such as genes that encode amino acid transporters and ER-resident chaperones [43]. However, after prolonged ER stress, continued ATF4 expression mediates the upregulation of genes that contribute to programmed cell death ( Figure 1).

IRE-1.
Chaperone induction and ER-associated degradation (ERAD), in response to ER stress, are regulated by the IRE-1 pathway. IRE-1 contains both a Ser/Thr kinase domain and an endoribonuclease domain, which thus functions as a kinase and an endoribonuclease. Like PERK, under normal conditions, the luminal domain of IRE-1 monomers associates with GRP78. Also in comparison with PERK, during the prosurvival phase of the ERSR, GRP78 relocates to misfolded proteins, which allows IRE-1 to dimerize, thus facilitating transautophosphorylation [44]. However, in contrast to PERK, transautophosphorylation of IRE-1 activates a novel endoribonuclease activity [45]. In mammalian cells, the substrate for the IRE-1 endoribonuclease is the X-box-binding protein-1 (XBP1) mRNA. After activation, the IRE-1 endoribonuclease splices the XBP1 mRNA with an altered reading frame. This XBP1 splice variant binds to the promoters containing ER stress response elements (ERSEs) [46]. These findings suggest that ER stress, acting through the IRE-1-and XBP1-dependent signaling pathway, upregulates the secretory apparatus in cells. Defective signaling in this pathway would affect professional secretory cells ( Figure 1).

ATF6.
ATF6 is an ER transmembrane protein [47,48]. Two similar transcription factors, ATF6α and ATF6β, exist in mammals. In comparison to PERK and IRE-1, in normal cells, the luminal domain of ATF6 is associated with GRP78 in an inactive form. It should be mentioned that even though ER stress releases GRP78 from ATF6, in contrast to PERK and IRE-1, this is not thought to be attributable to competitive binding of GRP78 to other proteins [49].  proapoptotic phase of ER stress contribute to programmed cell death [59] ( Figure 1).

Apoptosis Induced by ER Stress.
The UPR deals with adverse effects of ER stress in a timely and efficient manner at the early stage and thus enhances cell survival. However, when protein misfolding is persistent or excessive, prolonged ER stress has severe consequences, including apoptosis. When severe and prolonged ER stress extensively impairs the ER functions, apoptosis is necessary not only for removing the cells that threaten the integrity of the organism but also for proper development and differentiation [1]. Although the induction of apoptosis is the least well understood among the responses to ER stress, the apoptotic mechanisms induced by ER stress remain able to be broadly divided into a few categories, as summarized in Figure 2. The first apoptotic pathway involves activation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway. During ER stress, activated IRE-1 recruits tumor necrosis factor receptorassociated factor 2 (TRAF2) and apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK-1) to form IRE-1-TRAF2-ASK1 complex which then lead to activation of JNK and downstream mitochondria/Apaf-1-dependent caspase activation [60,61]. Also, the c-Jun-N-terminal inhibitory kinase (JIK) interacts with activated IRE-1 and promotes phosphorylation and association of TRAF2 with IRE-1 ( Figure 2).
The second apoptotic pathway depends on the activation of ER-localized cysteine protease, caspase-12 in rodents [62]. Several processes have been suggested as contributing factors to caspase-12 activation in ER-stressed cells. m-Calpain, a cysteine protease activated by disturbed calcium homeostasis in ER-stressed cells, may directly cleave and activate caspase-12 [63]. Caspase-7, which is translocated from cytosol to the ER surface in stressed cells, can cleave and activate caspase-12 [64]. ER stress-activated IRE-1 and PERK may lead to clustering caspase-12 at the ER membranes by recruitment of TRAF2 proteins [60]. Upon activation, in rodents but not in humans, caspase-12 translocates from the ER to the cytosol, where it directly cleaves procaspase-9, which, in turn, activates the downstream effector caspase, caspase-3 without the need for mitochondrial amplification [62,65]. Therefore, caspase-12-mediated apoptosis was a specific apoptosis pathway of ER, which is independent on mitochondria or death receptor activation. Caspase-4, one of the closest paralogs of rodent caspase-12, has been suggested to fulfill this role normally ascribed to rodent caspase-12 in the context of ER stress in human [66] (Figure 2). In a recent study, the enhanced expression of the cleaved caspase-12 as an indicator of ER stressassociated apoptosis was also observed in the diabetic heart [32].
The third apoptotic pathway activated by ER stress is mediated by transcriptional activation of CHOP/GADD153, a member of the C/EBP family of b-ZIP transcription factor that potentiates apoptosis, possibly through repressing expression of antiapoptotic Bcl2 and Bcl-X L and induction of ER oxidase 1α which generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) and depletes glutathione (GSH) [67]. While CHOP is barely detected under physiological conditions,  it is strongly induced in response to ER stress [68]. Although both the IRE-1 and ATF6 pathways can upregulate CHOP, the PERK pathway predominates through selective upregulation of translation of ATF4, which subsequently induces transcription of CHOP and other genes involved in amino acid metabolism and transport, and oxidation-reduction reactions [69,70]. The downstream targets of CHOP leading to apoptosis are still unclear ( Figure 2). In addition, prolonged ER stress is associated with release of ER Ca 2+ stores which can perturb mitochondria, triggering oxidative stress. Ca 2+ -induced oxidative stress can induce cell death. Increased cytosol Ca 2+ also activates calpains, a family of Ca 2+ -dependent cysteine proteases which proteolytically cleave caspase-12 (activated), Bcl2, and Bcl-X L (inhibited). Apoptosis is rapidly initiated after ER-Ca 2+ depletion in photodynamic therapy and strictly requires Bax/Bak at the mitochondria [71] (Figure 2).

Requirement of the ER Stress for the Heart.
Several studies have indicated that the ER stress is required for the proper cardiac differentiation and development. It is reported that many genes encoding ER-resident proteins are activated during the early stages of cardiogenesis. For instance, GRP78 can be activated to promote early heart organogenesis through cooperation between the cell typespecific transcription factors and ERSE-binding factors [72]. GRP78 deficiency is lethal at a very early stage of embryogenesis [73]. GRP94 knockout cells fail to develop mesoderm, resulting in a prevention of cardiac development from beginning [74]. Targeted disruption of the XBP1 gene in mice is embryonic lethal because of cardiac development defects [75]. All these studies clearly confirm the requirement of ERSR for the proper cardiac development.
ERSR also involves in the cardiac protection against certain challenges. For instance, GRP78 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide partially abrogated the protective effect of endothelin-1 pretreatment on hypoxic cardiomyocyte injury [76]. Overexpression or pharmacological induction of GRP78 can attenuate cardiomyocyte death induced by proteasome inhibition [77]. Similarly, overexpression of GRP94 also reduces cardiac cell death caused by calcium overload or ischemia [78]. In cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injuries model, ATF6 transgenic hearts exhibited a better recovery of ventricular pressure and lower incidence of cardiac cell death [79]. A recent study showed that induction of autophagy by ER stress before ischemia (similar to ischemic preconditioning) could reduce ischemia/reperfusion-induced lethal injury [80]. Therefore, the ER stress is not only required for the cardiac development, but also provide certain protective mechanisms for the heart against damage caused by various stresses.
Experimental Diabetes Research 5 3.2. The Deleterious Effect of the ER Stress on the Heart. However, ER stress is demonstrated to be pathologically involved in cardiac diseases and damages under numerous conditions, including myocardial infarction, ischemia/reperfusion, and pressure overload. For example, the ERSR is activated in the hearts of transgenic mice that overexpress monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and develop heart failure [81]. They found that the heart failure is mainly due to the activated proapoptotic phase of ERSR that led to massive loss of cardiomyocytes [81]. A further support of a role for ER stress in heart failure is the finding that transgenic overexpression of a mutant KDEL receptor, a retrieval receptor for ER chaperones in the early secretory pathway, induced the ERSR in the hearts, in parallel with a consequence of dilated cardiomyopathy [82].
Hypoxia is an insult that activates cardiac ER stress. During ischemia that could result from the reduced availability of molecular oxygen, significant changes in cardiac energy metabolism happen [83]. Under severe hypoxia, anaerobic metabolism has to occur and results in a massive increase in ROS, leading to cardiac oxidative damage, cell death, and, ultimately, cardiac dysfunction [84]. In addition, reperfusion after ischemia generates increased oxidative stress as the heart converts back to aerobic respiration, thereby generating lethal levels of ROS. Ischemia/reperfusion injury in the heart results in numerous cellular and molecular events that lead to loss of cardiac damage and dysfunction, such as disrupting ER oxidative state or Ca 2+ homeostasis, triggering cellular damage, and eventually causing cardiac apoptotic death [84,85].
Apoptotic cell death as an early cellular event in response to diabetes has been reported to play a critical role in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy [28][29][30]. Because myocytes rarely proliferate in adult cardiac muscles, the loss of cardiomyocytes would eventually lead to compromised cardiac function. Loss of endothelial cells will lead the vascular system to dysfunction and aggravate the ischemia of the heart. Apoptosis of cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells has been observed in the heart of patient with diabetes and in streptozotocin-(STZ-) induced diabetic mice and rats [27,29,86]. Pieces of evidence have demonstrated that apoptosis induced by ER stress was involved in pathogenesis of diabetic and nondiabetic heart failure [87][88][89]. UPR and ER-initiated apoptosis coexist in failing hearts and the CHOP-dependent cell death pathway may be involved in the transition from cardiac hypertrophy to heart failure in mice [90]. Recent studies have also demonstrated the UPR and activation of ER-initiated apoptotic signaling in models of autoimmune cardiomyopathy [91] and alcoholic cardiomyopathy [92]. Overexpression of the ERSR gene product, p53upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA), contributes to ER stress-mediated apoptosis in cultured cardiomyocytes [93] and targeted deletion of PUMA in mouse hearts attenuates cardiomyocyte death during Langendorff ex vivo ischemia/reperfusion [94]. All these studies demonstrated that apoptotic death of cardiac cells plays a critical role of the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy, whether the cardiac cell death at diabetic early stage is mediated by diabetic induction of the ER stress still needs to be further studied.

Contribution of the ER Stress to Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
As early as 1985, whether the ER stress may play an important role in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy has been questioned since in the diabetic hearts the ERs become swollen under ultrastructural examination [95,96], suggesting the disorder of the ER under diabetic condition. In 2007, Li et al. provided the experimental evidence for the involvement of the ER stress in the cardiac apoptosis in a STZ-induced type 1 diabetic rat model [32]. They examined the heart function with echocardiography, morphological changes with hematoxylin-eosin staining, and cardiac cell death with TUNEL staining. Immunohistochemistry, Western blot, and real-time PCR methods were used to examine two ER stress hallmarks, GRP78 and caspase-12. They found that GRP78 and caspase-12 were upregulated at both protein and mRNA levels in the diabetic hearts compared to normal hearts. Since apoptosis plays critical role in diabetic cardiomyopathy [28,30], those results suggested that the ER stress was induced in the diabetic hearts, and the ER stress-associated apoptosis took part in the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy. We have also demonstrated the cardiac up-regulation of several ERSR proteins, including PERK-and ATF6-mediated pathways in diabetic hearts of mice model induced by multiple low doses of STZ (MLD-STZ). However, these ERSR were not observed in the diabetic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of metallothionein (MT) gene (MT-TG) [86]. Since we have demonstrated that diabetes-induced cardiac cell death was prevented by MT at the diabetic early stage, resulting in a significant prevention of cardiac remodeling and dysfunction at the 5 or 6 months, that is, a significant prevention of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Based on that study we further assumed that MT prevented diabetic cardiomyopathy via suppression of diabetic induction of ER stress and associated cell death.
To define the direct protection by MT from ER stressmediated apoptotic cell death, both MT-TG mice and the age-matched wild-type (WT) mice were administrated with chemical ER stress inducer, tunicamycin. We found that cardiac ERSR such as p-eIF2, cleaved ATF6 and GRP78 and cardiac cell death all were significantly upregulated in tunicamycin-treated WT mice, but not in tunicamycintreated MT-TG mice [86]. We have approved that Ang II plays a critical role in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy [97]; therefore, we have explored and demonstrated that the exposure of embryonic rat heart-derived cells (H9c2) to induced a significant ERSR, effect abolished by MT in Ang II-treated MT-TG mice [86]. The direct role of Ang II in the induction of cardiac ERSR was also approved by a recent study that olmesartan treatment downregulated the cardiac expressions of GRP78 and caspase-12, along with oxidative and nitrosative damage [98]. To support this study, Wu et al. reported that valsartan, another selective AT1 receptor antagonist, could relieve the ER stress along with cardiomyocyte apoptosis, 6 Experimental Diabetes Research resulting in a significant prevention of cardiac remodeling [99].
It is well appreciated now that in addition to hyperglycemia and Ang II, diabetic heart experiences many other conditions that can invoke ER stress, such as increased oxidative stress, hypoxia, homocysteine, lipid deposition, and increased synthesis of secretory proteins [100][101][102]. A recent study reported the role of homocystein-(Hcy-) induced ER stress in diabetic cardiomyopathy [103]. Since significant increase in Hcy has been indicated in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy, whether its pathogenic effect on diabetic heart is also related to ER stress has been addressed using a rat model of Hcy. These rats were given overloaded methionine to induce high-plasma Hcy. In the heart of these rats, there were significant increases in GRP78, CHOP, and caspase-12, suggesting the existence of cardiac ER stress induced by Hcy that also plays a critical role in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy [103].

Potential Mechanisms by Which the ER Stress Causes the Development of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
The molecular mechanisms by which hyperglycemia causes cell death are probably related to ROS production. ROS is mainly produced by mitochondria and NADPH oxidase in cardiomyocytes [29,104]. We have used MT transgenic model to indicate the importance of oxidative stress in the induction of ER stress in the diabetic heart. Since MT is a potent, nonspecific antioxidant that can scavenge multiple ROS and/or RNS [104][105][106], we have examined whether diabetes induces cardiac ER stress and, if so, whether MT can prevent diabetic induction of the ER stress, resulting in a prevention of cardiomyopathy as we observed in previous studies [30,107,108]. Therefore we used STZ to induce diabetes in both MT-TG and WT mice. Two weeks, and 2 and 5 months after diabetes onset, cardiac ER stress was detected by expression of ER chaperones, and apoptosis was detected by CHOP, cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-12. Cardiac apoptosis in the WT diabetic mice, but not in MT-TG diabetic mice, was significantly increased 2 weeks after diabetes onset [86].
In parallel with apoptotic effect, significant up-regulation of the ER chaperones, including GRP78, GRP94, cleaved ATF6 and phosphorylated eIF2α, in the hearts of WT, but not MT-TG diabetic mice. Pretreatment with antioxidants completely prevented Ang II-induced ER stress and apoptosis in the cultured cardiac cells. Therefore, our results suggested that ER stress exists in the diabetic heart, which may cause the cardiac cell death. MT prevents both diabetes-induced cardiac ER stress and associated cell death most likely via its antioxidant action, which may be responsible for MT prevention of diabetic cardiomyopathy [86].
In consistence with our finding, recently, Younce et al. [109] also reported that high glucose induces cardiomyocyte death via production of MCP-1 and induction of MCP-1induced protein (MCPIP) that results in ROS production, leading to ER stress to cause autophagy and eventual cell death. Selective inhibition of Rac1 or NADPH oxidase prevents ER stress by blocking ROS production in highglucose-stimulated cardiomyocytes [110].
Diabetes may impair ERSR so that certain functions that can be observed in nondiabetic condition may not be observed in diabetic condition. For instance, under nondiabetic condition, pretreatment with erythropoietin (EPO) can prevent ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiac damage, but the ER stress in diabetic hearts abolished EPO-induced cardiac protection by impairment of phospho-glycogen synthase kinase-3β-(GSK-3β-) mediated suppression of mitochondrial permeability transition [111]. In this study, the authors used type 2 diabetic (OLETF) rats and its control (LETO) to be treated with tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) to induce ER stress. Infarction was induced by 20 min coronary occlusion and 2 h reperfusion. Levels of ER chaperones (GRP78 and GRP94) in the heart and level of non-phoshopho-GSK-3β in the mitochondria were significantly higher in OLETF than in LETO rats. TUDCA normalized levels of GRP78 and GRP94 and mitochondrial GSK-3β in OLETF rats. Administration of EPO induced phosphorylation of Akt and GSK-3β and reduced infarct size in LETO hearts. However, neither phosphorylation of Akt and GSK-3β nor infarct size limitation was induced by EPO in OLETF rats. The threshold for mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening was significantly lower in mitochondria from EPO-treated OLETF rats than in those from EPO-treated LETO rats. Therefore, disruption of protective signals leading to GSK-3β phosphorylation is due to the increased ER stress that inhibited EPO-induced suppression of mPTP opening and cardioprotection in diabetic hearts [111].
There was a recent study that has addressed how glucose induces ER stress in cardiac cells [109]. They found that glucose-induced cardiomyocyte death is mediated via MCP-1 production and MCPIP, which causes sequential events-ROS production, ER stress, autophagy, and cell death [109]. This is an elegant study, in which H9c2 cardiomyoblasts treated with 28 mmol/L glucose were evaluated for MCP-1 production and induction of MCPIP. They disrupted MCP-1 to interact with its receptor, CCR2, and knocked down MCPIP with siRNA to determine if MCP-1 and MCPIP mediate glucose-induced cell death glucose treatment of H9c2 cardiomyoblasts and isolated cardiomyocytes caused MCP-1 production, MCPIP induction, ROS production, ER stress, autophagy, and cell death. Treatment with CCR2 antagonists and knockdown of MCPIP attenuated glucoseinduced ROS production, ER stress, autophagy, and cell death. Inhibition of ROS with antioxidants attenuated ER stress, autophagy, and cell death. Specific inhibitors of ER stress and knockdown of IRE-1 attenuated glucose-induced autophagy and cell death. Inhibitors of autophagy and knockdown of beclin-1 attenuated glucose-induced death. Therefore, they have demonstrated a novel mechanism: hyperglycemia-induced cardiomyocyte ER stress and cell death are mediated via MCP-1 production and induction of a novel zinc-finger protein MCPIP [109].
In summary, various pathogenic factors of diabetes most likely induce ROS that in turns causes the ER stress and associated cell death, as illustrated in Figure 3.  Cardiac cell death will initiate the cardiac inflammation and remodeling and eventually cardiac dysfunction, that is, diabetic cardiomyopathy. The pathogenic factors of diabetes include hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and Ang II and so on ( Figure 3).

Potential Prevention of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy by Inhibition of ER Stress
Since the above studies have strongly demonstrated the critical role of ER stress in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy, ER stress inhibitors would be the new targets for drug discovery and therapeutic intervention in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Chemical or pharmaceutical chaperones, such as 4-phenyl butyric acid (PBA), TUDCA are a group of low-molecular-weight compounds known to stabilize protein conformation to improve ER folding capacity and facilitate the trafficking of mutant proteins. Studies have shown that these chemical ER chaperones can reduce ER stress in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes [112]. TUDCA normalized levels of GRP78 and GRP94 and mitochondrial GSK-3β in the rat model of type 2 diabetes [111]. Inhibition of ER stress with tauroursodeoxycholate (TUDC) and PBA resulted in the attenuation of cardiomyoblast death [109]. Our recent studies have shown cardiac overexpression of MT rescued diabetes-, Ang II-, and even chemical ER stressor-induced cardiac cell death via suppression of cardiac ER stress. MT protection against Ang II-induced ER stress and associated apoptotic effects are mediated by its antioxidant action; this suggests that MT inducers such as zinc may also play the same role as the ER stress direct inhibitors [109,112]. We have treated diabetic mice for the first three months after the establishment of STZ-induced hyperglycemia, resulting in a significant prevention of the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy [113]. Although we did not examine the status of ER stress in the heart for that study, zinc treatment significantly induced cardiac MT expression that might prevent diabetic induction of the ER stress and associated cell death as we observed in other studies [86]. There were also some studies to indirectly inhibit ER stress for the prevention of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Wu et al. have explored the possibility to use valsartan to prevent diabetic ER stress and consequently prevented diabetic cardiomyopathy [99]. They demonstrated that valsartan can ameliorate ER stress-induced cardiac remodeling and myocardial apoptosis in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Similarly, hydrogen sulfide was also explored for the potential to attenuate hyperhomocysteinemia-induced cardiomyocytic ER stress in the rat model [103], with a finding that hydrogen sulfide attenuated cardiomyocyte ER stress in Hcy-induced cardiac injury.
14-3-3 protein was also found to protect against cardiac ER stress and ER stress-initiated apoptosis in experimental diabetes [114]. STZ was used to induce transgenic mice that showed cardiac-specific expression of a dominant negative (DN) 14-3-3eta protein mutant. The expression levels of cardiac GRP78, IRE-1α, and TRAF 2 protein were significantly increased in the diabetic DN 14-3-3eta mice compared with the diabetic wild-type control. Moreover, cardiac apoptosis and the expression of CHOP, caspase-12, and cleaved caspase-12 protein were significantly increased in the diabetic DN 14-3-3eta mice. Therefore, they found that partial depletion of 14-3-3 protein in the diabetic heart exacerbates cardiac ER stress and activates ER stress-induced apoptosis pathways, at least in part, through the regulation of CHOP and caspase-12 via the IRE-1α/TRAF2 pathway. The enhancement of 14-3-3 protein expression can be used as a novel protective therapy against ER stress and ER stressinitiated apoptosis in the diabetic heart [114].
It is reported that low levels of adiponectin, a fatderived hormone, were found to be correlated with coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and insulin resistance. Conversely, high adiponectin levels are predictive of reduced coronary risk in long-term epidemiologic studies. Whether adiponectin has certain cardiac protection and, if so, whether the cardiac protection of adiponectin is related to ER stress have been questioned by Dong and Ren [115]. They have examined the role of adiponectin in cardiac contractile function in the db/db model of diabetic obesity and demonstrated that adiponectin improved cardiomyocyte contractile function in db/db diabetic obese mice, which was not associated with improvement of the ER stress [115]. They demonstrated that cardiomyocytes from db/db mice exhibited greater cross-sectional area, depressed peak shortening, and maximal velocity of shortening/relengthening as well as prolonged duration of relengthening. Consistently, myocytes from db/db mice displayed a reduced electrically stimulated rise in intracellular Ca 2+ and prolonged intracellular Ca 2+ decay. These functional and Ca 2+ changes were abrogated by adiponectin treatment. Levels of the phosphorylated ER 8 Experimental Diabetes Research stress makers PERK (Thr980), IRE-1, and eIF2α were significantly elevated in db/db mice compared with lean controls, but the effect was unaffected by adiponectin. Collectively, they concluded that adiponectin improves cardiomyocyte dysfunction in db/db diabetic obese mice through an ER stress-independent mechanism. However, this study was in contrast to another study that showed that TUDCA normalized levels of GRP78 and GRP94 and mitochondrial GSK-3β in the rat model of type 2 diabetes resulted in significant prevention of diabetic cardiac damage [111]. Therefore more studies with different types of diabetes and different conditions are needed to address whether inhibition of ER stress can prevent diabetic cardiomyopathy in T2D model.
As illustrated in Figure 3, these studies have indicated the potential application of various direct and indirect ER stress inhibitors to prevent diabetic ER stress-mediated cell death, and eventually the development of the cardiac remodeling and dysfunction, as a potential approach applied clinically in the future.

Conclusions
In conclusion, although our understanding of the pathophysiological role of ER stress in diabetic cardiomyopathy has progressed in recent years, many important issues are still unresolved. There are several fundamental questions. One of these important issues is how the cell decides between life and death after the onset of ER stress. Improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying UPR activation and ER-initiated apoptosis in diabetic cardiomyopathy will provide us with new targets for drug discovery and therapeutic intervention.