{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02118003025718608, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01059001512859304, 'mean_word_length': 5.635451505016722, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pregnancy Does Not Increase Susceptibility to Bupivacaine in Spinal Root Axons

Background The underlying mechanism of enhanced antinociceptive effects and increased susceptibility to local anesthetics during pregnancy is not known. Mechanical, hormonal, biochemical, and neural changes have been suggested. The authors measured the susceptibility of individual spinal root axons to bupivacaine during late pregnancy in rats and compared them with similar measurements in nonpregnant rats. Methods Lumbar dorsal and ventral roots were excised from anesthetized pregnant and nonpregnant rats. Single-fiber dissection and recording techniques were used to isolate activity in individual axons. Supramaximal constant voltage stimuli were delivered to the distal end of the root. During in vitro perfusion, each root was exposed to increasing concentrations of bupivacaine, and the minimum blocking concentration (Cm) and the concentration that increased conduction latency by 50% (EC50) were measured. Results Myelinated and unmyelinated dorsal and ventral root axons of pregnant rats appeared to be less sensitive to steady-state conduction block and to the latency-increasing effects of bupivacaine than were equivalent axons from nonpregnant rats. Although when comparing specific axon types, only the difference in C-fibers was significant (Cm = 29.8 micro Meter for pregnant and Cm = 22.1 micro Meter for nonpregnant rats, P < 0.05; EC50 = 19.9 micro Meter and 13.6 micro Meter, respectively). Conclusions In contrast to clinical expectations, the susceptibility to bupivacaine conduction block in individual dorsal and ventral root axons during late pregnancy in rats was not greater in pregnant animals. Pregnancy-related changes in diffusion barriers and activation of endogenous analgesic systems without changes in the electrophysiologic properties of spinal root axons are suggested as possible explanations for the discrepancy between clinical and experimental observations.