{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024096385542168676, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0024096385542168677, 'mean_word_length': 5.021739130434782, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Created Receptivity and the Philosophy of the Concrete

G RIEL MARCEL gave his phenomenological enquiries the name "Philosophy of the Concrete," 1 and he made no bones about the distance between his philosophy and that of Thomism.2 Between these philosophies there can be no question of an approchement of tone, nor even of manner, but at most a convergence of truths shared differently. Moreover, there can be no doubt that the two philosophies differ in their relation to experience. Within the broad sense of "Christian experience," Thomas drew upon experientia ( empiria) in the narrower sense in order to derive by way of conceptual abstraction the principles of his philosophy, including those of act and potency. Marcel's relation to experience was more immediate, more deliberate, and more explicit. Yet his philosophy has