{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02810810810810811, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009189189189189189, 'mean_word_length': 5.029315960912052, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.

BACKGROUND
Current interest in the assessment of probing attachment level measurements has been stimulated by recent introduction of novel periodontal probes as well as by the reclassification of periodontal diseases. Clinical attachment level (CAL) is currently the "gold standard" for diagnosing and monitoring periodontal diseases.


AIM
To evaluate the performance of the newly introduced cementoenamel junction (CEJ) Probe in detecting CAL using the CEJ as a fixed reference point, and to compare the CEJ Probe with the Florida Disk Probe and a standard Manual Probe (North Carolina Probe).


MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three examiners probed 12 periodontal patients to determine intra- and inter-consistency of both the probes and the examiners, over a 4-week time interval. Subjects ranged in age from 22 to 74 years. The experimental design was structured to balance the intra- and inter-examiner consistency at the same site during the two visits.


RESULTS
Using the PROC MIXED of SAS, a strong interaction (p<0.001) between the examiner and probes was found. The consistency of probing (repeatability of measurements) depended upon the type of periodontal probe used as well as the skill (experience) of the examiner. Overall, the CEJ Probe displayed a more consistent performance. The CEJ Probe demonstrated greater intra-examiner consistency than the Disk Probe for two examiners (p<0.01). The CEJ Probe also showed increased inter-examiner consistency (p<0.01).


CONCLUSIONS
The CEJ Probe has the potential to offer the dental team an efficient, accurate mechanism to chart and monitor attachment level measurements over time. Additional studies, using large numbers of examiners, are needed to assess more clearly the performance of each individual probe.