{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017964071856287425, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00249500998003992, 'mean_word_length': 5.552287581699346, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Signaling through surface IgM in tolerance-susceptible immature murine B lymphocytes. Developmentally regulated differences in transmembrane signaling in splenic B cells from adult and neonatal mice.

During the course of B lymphocyte development, newly emerging surface Ig+ B cells pass through a stage when Ag-Ag receptor interactions lead not to immune responsiveness but to a state of functional tolerance. We have explored the molecular basis of antigenic nonresponsiveness and tolerance susceptibility using tolerance-susceptible surface Ig+ splenic B lymphocytes from neonatal mice and anti-mu chain antibodies as a polyclonal ligand. In this population of cells, surface IgM is uncoupled from the inositol phospholipid (PI)-hydrolysis pathway at a point proximal to the receptor; anti-mu antibodies did not stimulate inositol phosphate generation despite the fact that PI-hydrolysis was observed after treatment with A1F4, implicating the existence of a functional G protein and phospholipase C. Further evidence for a difference early in the signal transduction pathway stems from the finding that anti-mu stimulation does not induce the expression of two immediate/early PKC-linked genes egr-1 and c-fos. This appears to be the primary signaling difference between the mature and immature B cells from the neonatal mouse splenic population, as these cells undergo a G0-G1 cell cycle phase transition when surface IgM is bypassed using phorbol diester and calcium ionophore. Interestingly, despite undetectable levels of PI-hydrolysis, we observed equivalent receptor-mediated changes in intracellular calcium when comparing the immature and mature populations. These results indicate incomplete coupling of surface IgM to the signal transduction machinery operative in mature, immunocompetent B cells and suggests a molecular mechanism accounting for the differential processing of surface IgM signals into activation vs tolerogenic responses observed in these two stages of B cell development.