{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0350140056022409, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0056022408963585435, 'mean_word_length': 7.313953488372093, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Magnetic resonance elastography plus Fibrosis‐4 versus FibroScan–aspartate aminotransferase in detection of candidates for pharmacological treatment of NASH‐related fibrosis

Patients with NAFLD with significant hepatic fibrosis (Stage ≥ 2) are at increased risk of liver‐related morbidity and are candidates for pharmacologic therapies. In this study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of MEFIB (the combination of magnetic resonance elastography [MRE] and Fibrosis‐4 [FIB‐4]) and FAST (FibroScan–aspartate aminotransferase; combined liver stiffness measurement by vibration‐controlled transient elastography, controlled attenuation parameter, and aspartate aminotransferase) for detecting significant fibrosis.