{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02092675635276532, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.613636363636363, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of outcomes of single‐incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis requiring percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage

Single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has been accepted as a less invasive alternative to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). However, the feasibility and safety of SILC for acute cholecystitis, especially in cases with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), are still limited because of the technical difficulty of SILC. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and feasibility of SILC compared to CLC for cholecystitis requiring PTGBD.