{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021436227224008574, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.626506024096385, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Analysis of near-field light intensity

In this paper a numerical simulation is used to calculate near-field intensity by `split light beam.' The calculation proves to be valid as we apply it to the plane wave. In the case of one dimension structure such as a compact disk sample, the near-field intensity profiles show a rather complicated structure. In many cases the near-field intensity does not represent the actual surface profile. The near-field intensity is strongly modulated by the surface structure. When the distance between the sample and the probe becomes larger, some subtle perturbation is added to the intensity profile, and a shift between the surface and the intensity profile became more clear. The shift may cause some problems when we use the optical probe as a multi- function probe to do some lithograph work or to position. In this paper, a comparison between the calculation and experiment results was made.