{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03859964093357271, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02064631956912029, 'mean_word_length': 4.930851063829787, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Association between ocular dominance and refractive asymmetry.

PURPOSE
To investigate the association between ocular dominance (sighting dominance) and refractive asymmetry in phakic patients.


METHODS
This retrospective study included 3,012 patients with a mean age of 29.0 ± 5.3 years (range: 20 to 39 years). Refractive error was determined with cycloplegic refraction and axial length was determined with IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Ocular dominance was assessed using the hole-in-the-card test.


RESULTS
The right and left eyes were dominant in 77.7% and 22.3% of the patients, respectively. In the high anisometropia group (⩾ 2.0 diopters), the non-dominant eyes had significantly higher myopic spherical equivalents and longer axial lengths than the dominant eyes (P < .05). However, there were no significant differences in these parameters in the low anisometropia group.


CONCLUSION
The current study revealed that non-dominant eyes had a greater myopic refractive error and longer axial length than the dominant eyes, especially in the patients who had high amounts of anisometropia.