{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02400408580183861, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007150153217568948, 'mean_word_length': 5.551839464882943, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Temporal cues for consonant recognition: training, talker generalization, and use in evaluation of cochlear implants.

Limited consonant phonemic information can be conveyed by the temporal characteristics of speech. In the two experiments reported here, the effects of practice and of multiple talkers on identification of temporal consonant information were evaluated. Naturally produced /aCa/disyllables were used to create "temporal-only" stimuli having instantaneous amplitudes identical to the natural speech stimuli, but flat spectra. Practice improved normal-hearing subjects' identification of temporal-only stimuli from a single talker over that reported earlier for a different group of unpracticed subjects [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 1152-1161 (1987)]. When the number of talkers was increased to six, however, performance was poorer than that observed for one talker, demonstrating that subjects had been able to learn the individual stimulus items derived from the speech of the single talker. Even after practice, subjects varied greatly in their abilities to extract temporal information related to consonant voicing and manner. Identification of consonant place was uniformly poor in the multiple-talker situation, indicating that for these stimuli consonant place is cued via spectral information. Comparison of consonant identification by users of multi-channel cochlear implants showed that the implant users' identification of temporal consonant information was largely within the range predicted from the normal data. In the instances where the implant users were performing especially well, they were identifying consonant place information at levels well beyond those predicted by the normal-subject data. Comparison of implant-user performance with the temporal-only data reported here can help determine whether the speech information available to the implant user consists of entirely temporal cues, or is augmented by spectral cues.