{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020590868397493287, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0026857654431512983, 'mean_word_length': 5.076086956521739, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A note on the challenge of feature selection for image understanding

It is well known that using the correct features for pattern recognition is far more important than using a sophisticated classifier. A high order classifier, given inadequate features, will produce poor results. Low-level formed are combined to form mid-level features, which have much more discriminating power. Yet, the challenge of feature selection is often neglected in the literature. The literature often assumes that given N low-level features there are 2N-1 ways to use them, which significantly understates the challenge of finding the best features to use and the best ways to combine them. Basic low-level features (input measurements) must be combined in groups to construct features that are relevant for object recognition [1], yet the computational complexity of grouping measurements for input to a pattern recognition system makes the task very difficult. This paper discusses a method for quantifying the total number of ways to group a given number of low-level features for better understanding the feature selection problem.