{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017123287671232876, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00228310502283105, 'mean_word_length': 6.016, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cholangiocarcinoma - Part 2, Tumoral and Nontumoral Mimics and Imaging Features Helpful in Differentiation.

Each of the 3 morphological subtypes of cholangiocarcinoma has a different set of imaging differentials. Emulators of mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma include other primary and secondary hepatic malignancies, benign tumors and tumor-like mimics such as abscess, hemangioma and confluent hepatic fibrosis. Benign inflammatory biliary strictures constitute the major differential of periductal-infiltrative type and intraductal calculi are the main consideration for intraductal-growth type. CT and MRI are the standard imaging tools for characterization of cholangiocarcinoma and differentiating it from close mimics. Here we will describe the various tumoral and non-tumoral mimics of cholangiocarcinoma and discuss specific imaging features useful in differentiation.