{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015706806282722512, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.7518796992481205, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Medical audit in general practice

THE topic of audit has become one of the main growth areas in the medical literature over the last decade. There are now thousands of articles in the world's medical journals either describing audits, arguing for or against them, discussing ways and means of carrying them out, and even defining and debating the meaning of the word itself. There is now a danger that the number of articles on audit will smother any worthwhile ideas which are struggling to reach the light. Many articles on audit have confused the 'average general practitioner driving his Mini-Metro down Clapham High Street,' and the main aim of this paper is to illuminate the important issues raised by the introduction of medical audit to general practice.