{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01946787800129786, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003244646333549643, 'mean_word_length': 4.908045977011494, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clock Paradox and the Absolute Reference Frame

In this paper it is shown that the well-publicized claim about the Special Relativity Theory, which states that it is not possible, using only arguments contained within the theory, to detect an absolute motion. This is one of the fundamental conclusions of the theory and it is usually considered in connection with the so called Clock Paradox or the Twins’ Paradox. There have been many papers published on this topic with the various proposed resolutions, however, the controversy related to these paradoxes continues to this day. This paper will clearly show that the resolution of the Clock Paradox is related to the clock synchronization procedure and that by introducing an absolute reference frame the paradox can be simply resolved. In addition it will be shown that it is possible to detect the absolute motion of particular reference frames relative to this absolute reference frame. Introduction To avoid possible misunderstandings and to refresh the definitions of the terms that will be used throughout this paper this section will start with the definition of the well-known Lorentz coordinate transformation [1] . This transformation relates the spatial and temporal coordinates between the laboratory coordinate system, which is considered not moving, and the moving coordinate system. The moving coordinate system variables will be designated for a moment as the primed variables. It is therefore well-known that the following relations hold: 2 2 / 1 ' c v vt x x    , (1)