{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03355704697986577, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003355704697986577, 'mean_word_length': 6.280487804878049, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Accuracy of early‐phase versus dual‐phase single‐photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in the localization of Parathyroid disease

Preoperative localization for parathyroid disease has improved in recent years with the advent of dual‐phase 99mTc‐sestamibi single‐photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging. However, dual‐phase imaging is associated with increased cost, time, and radiation dose. The aim of this study was to investigate the need for late‐phase imaging when using SPECT/CT for the preoperative localization of parathyroid disease.