{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016736401673640166, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0041841004184100415, 'mean_word_length': 5.746478873239437, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reply to Dunkel and Weber: Probability distributions and shortfall risk measures in conservation portfolio analysis

We welcome the interest Dunkel and Weber (1) show in our work (2). We intended this paper to stimulate other researchers to think about scientific issues in using tools from portfolio theory to help decision makers choose conservation investment portfolios across space that efficiently reduce climate change-related uncertainty in future conservation outcomes.