{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02696272799365583, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.607329842931938, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Comparative Analysis of the Ensemble Models for Detecting GPS Spoofing attacks on UAVs

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles have been widely used in military and civilian areas. The positioning and return-to-home tasks of UAVs deliberately depend on Global Positioning Systems (GPS). However, the civilian GPS signals are not encrypted, which can motivate numerous cyber-attacks on UAVs, including Global Positioning System spoofing attacks. In these spoofing attacks, a malicious user transmits counterfeit GPS signals. Numerous studies have proposed techniques to detect these attacks. However, these techniques have some limitations, including low probability of detection, high probability of misdetection, and high probability of false alarm. In this paper, we investigate and compare the performances of three ensemble-based machine learning techniques, namely bagging, stacking, and boosting, in detecting GPS attacks. The evaluation metrics are the accuracy, probability of detection, probability of misdetection, probability of false alarm, memory size, processing time, and prediction time per sample. The results show that the stacking model has the best performance compared to the two other ensemble models in terms of all the considered evaluation metrics.