{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.035597952536063286, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011982317356910192, 'mean_word_length': 5.26603498542274, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 1, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 2, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Lung protective mechanical ventilation strategies in cardiothoracic critical care: a retrospective study

A body of evidence supports the use of low tidal volumes in ventilated patients without lung pathology to slow progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to ventilator associated lung injury. We undertook a retrospective chart review and tested the hypothesis that tidal volume is a predictor of mortality in cardiothoracic (medical and surgical) critical care patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Independent predictors of mortality in our study included: type of surgery, albumin, H+, bilirubin, and fluid balance. In particular, it is important to note that cardiac, thoracic, and transplant surgical patients were associated with lower mortality. However, our study did not sample equally from The Berlin Definition of ARDS severity categories (mild, moderate, and severe hypoxemia). Although our study was not adequately powered to detect a difference in mortality between these groups, it will inform the development of a large prospective cohort study exploring the role of low tidal volume ventilation in cardiothoracic critically ill patients.


Introduction
Positive pressure mechanical ventilation (MV) can lead to ventilator associated lung injury (VALI) due to cyclic alveolar atelectasis and strain. Risk factors for VALI in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) include high tidal volume (V t >6 mL/kg predicted body weight [PBW]), acidemia, blood product transfusion, and restrictive lung disease. 1 A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of low tidal volume ventilation in patients with mild ARDS (the term acute lung injury has been replaced with mild ARDS: 26.6 kPa < partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO 2 )/fraction of inspired oxygen (F i O 2 ) ≤40 kPa), [2][3][4] carried out by the ARDS Network, demonstrated an 8.8% absolute reduction in short term mortality. [3][4][5] There is a body of evidence supporting the use of low tidal volume (V t 6-8 mL/kg PBW) in slowing progression to ARDS in patients with normal lungs. 4 Gajic  The use of lung damaging ventilation strategies (large V t s and high plateau pressures) in patients who develop subclinical lung injury during surgery, which involves large pulmonary resection or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), can contribute to ARDS in noninjured lungs. 6,7 Based on the current evidence and understanding of MV and ARDS, it would seem reasonable to use lung protective ventilation (V t 6-8 mL/kg PBW, low plateau pressures and positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]) in all patients, whether they are at risk of ARDS or not. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] However, use of least damaging ventilation settings is not always feasible. Patients with airway obstruction (chronic obstructive airway disease, asthma) who may have increased intrinsic PEEP or patients with interstitial lung disease who have restrictive lung disease and poor lung compliance may require higher plateau pressures to ensure adequate gas exchange.
Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are particularly sensitive to lung damage due to prolonged MV, multiple comorbidities, and pro-inflammatory cofactors such as CPB, transfusions, and ischemia/reperfusion. 8,9 Aims and objectives The aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that tidal volume is a predictor of mortality in the cohort of cardiothoracic critically ill patients.
Additional aims of this project were 1) to identify the commonly used ventilatory modes and parameters in our cardiothoracic ICU (postoperative and nonsurgical patients), 2) to identify whether certain components of lung protective ventilation care bundles are followed by our institution's cardiac intensivists at the onset of MV, 3) to help develop a ventilatory guideline within our cardiac ICU and cardiac recovery unit and integrate a ventilator bundle in checklist format in our electronic clinical information system, and 4) to organize teaching sessions on lung protective strategies for all ICU medical, nursing, and allied health professionals.

Methodology
We performed a retrospective database analysis of patients >18 years admitted to tertiary center high volume cardiothoracic ICU between 01/01/2015 and 15/08/2015 requiring MV for ≥48 hours (n=189).
Exclusions were made for: • Patients who did not require invasive MV.
• Patients who required strict PaCO 2 control (eg, in post cardiac arrest syndrome goal directed ventilatory strategy).
• Patients for whom ICU electronic daily charts are unavailable.
Predictor variables in the first 24 hours extracted from clinical information system included sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at the onset of MV, ventilator mode, V t , respiratory rate, PEEP, FiO 2, pH, PaO 2 , arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ), peak airway pressure, compliance, PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, albumin, bilirubin, fluid balance, [H + ], and types of surgery (cardiac/thoracic, transplant, and nonsurgical). Outcome variables included ICU and 90-day mortality.
This project has been reviewed and approved by the Research and Development Unit of Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust -it has no material ethical issues. The Research and Development Unit on behalf of Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust has reviewed this project and did not require written informed consent be obtained from the participants, as this was a retrospective study and service evaluation, and all data was anonymous.

Results
Overall, 129 patients were identified according to the inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine percent were female and 71% were male. Sixty-four percent were admitted to ICU following cardiac/thoracic or transplant surgery, 25% for nonsurgical reasons (cardiothoracic medical pathologies) and 11% were patients who were readmitted in the postoperative period. Of all patients, 7% were admitted following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, 9% following valve replacement/ repair, 16% following combined valve and other procedure, 14% following heart and/or lung transplant, and 0.8% following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. All patients included in the study were mechanically ventilated on Siemens Servo-I ventilators. Summary statistics for initial choice of ventilator mode are demonstrated in Table 1

417
Ventilating the cardiothoracic critically ill surgery, admission type, V t , FiO 2 , PaO 2 , PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, PaCO 2 , albumin, platelet count, H + , total bilirubin, and fluid balance. When controlling for covariates, V t and other ventilator variables did not independently predict mortality in our model, despite best evidence suggesting that they should (Tables 2-4).

Discussion
When controlling for covariates, V t and other ventilator variables did not independently predict mortality in our model, despite best evidence suggesting that they should.
Independent predictors of mortality in our study included: type of surgery, albumin, H + , bilirubin, and fluid balance. In particular, it is important to note that cardiac, thoracic, and transplant surgical patients were associated with lower mortality. This could reflect the expertise of our institution as a cardiothoracic center in ensuring the best outcomes for these patients. The Berlin Definition of ARDS severity 10 categorizes patients on their degree of hypoxemia (mild, moderate, and severe based on PaO 2 :FiO 2 ratio) which should predict mortality. However as demonstrated in Table 3, we did not sample equally from each of these groups. As a result, our study was not adequately powered to detect a difference in mortality between these groups and therefore our results are not definitive. Further study of this sample would add the required power or use subgroup analyses to determine all factors contributing to death.

Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Publish your work in this journal
Submit your manuscript here: https://www.dovepress.com/international-journal-of-general-medicine-journal The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed open-access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors.