{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012195121951219513, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0040650406504065045, 'mean_word_length': 5.847222222222222, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Identification of prostate cancer risk categories according to surgical margins status, pathological stage and Gleason score

One‐third of patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy develop recurrent disease. The distinction between pT2 with positive margins and pT3a can be difficult. Aim of the present study was to assess the impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy, adjusted for pathological stage and Gleason score.