{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013077593722755012, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.713450292397661, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Toward a Cognitive Process Model of Ethnic/Racial Biases in Clinical Judgment

The purpose of the present article is to discuss approaches to the development of cognitive process models of misdiagnosis of African Americans, with particular emphasis on structured clinical interviews. Two basic approaches to cognitive process models are discussed. The first is cognitive bias based on prototype models of information processing. The second approach involves using the structured clinical interview to see how and when the decision-making process may be flawed, or where cognitive shifts are made in considering one diagnosis over another. Although routine training in structured clinical interviews may nullify cognitive biases associated with clinician judgment, it does not address cultural biases in the diagnostic system. It is concluded that a comprehensive approach to training in clinical decision making for mental health professionals is needed which include courses in the administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, sociocultural case formulation, and cross-cultural sensitivity in making psychodiagnostic judgments.