{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030791788856304986, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008797653958944282, 'mean_word_length': 5.153153153153153, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
3 cases of contact dermatitis from alkylammonium amidobenzoate (Osmaron B®)

To our knowledge, there are no previous reports of Type I allergies to polychloroprene gloves. The contact urticaria syndrome stage-4 (8) in our patient provoked by donning a particular brand of polychloroprene gloves was attributable to small amounts of latex in the glove's inside coating. Since an immediate-type allergy to latex may rarely cause life-threatening anaphylactic reactions in sensitized persons (9--11), as in our patient, there is an absolute necessity for the declaration of latex, for example on glove packages. Future quality norms for protective gloves should take this into account.