{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026173285198555957, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01895306859205776, 'mean_word_length': 5.410404624277457, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparing Physicians' Responses to the First and Second Mailings of a Questionnaire

Surveys are an important data collection method in evaluation research. Low response rates often occur, with follow-ups used to increase responses. However, surveys of homogeneous groups, such as physicians, about topics of concern to them may not require high response rates. We examined physician responses to a first and second mailing of a family practice questionnaire sent to a national sample of 308 recent residency graduates, 383 residency directors, and 319 residents. Among graduates, the first mailing produced a 63% response and the second another 17%; among directors, thefirstproduced 79% and the second another 10%; and among residents, the first gave 55% and the second another 21%. No differences between the two mailings existed by demographic variables, substantive questions ornonresponse to questions, with two exceptions. The absence of differences in physicians who responded to the follow-up questionnaire suggests that remailings to obtain higher response rates may be unnecessary in some surveys.