{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03006614552014432, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017438364401683705, 'mean_word_length': 4.757785467128028, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Prospective validation of a non-invasive method to estimate myocardial work in aortic stenosis


 
 
 Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): ANR - Maestro project
 
 
 
 Stratification of aortic stenosis patients remains challenging and robust indices are required. Myocardial work assessment is a new afterload independent alternative to evaluate left ventricular function. Although, this method was developed in patients with normal aortic valve. We previously developed an integrated cardiovascular system simulated by a computational model to estimate non-invasively myocardial work in aortic stenosis patients* (figure 1A). In the present study, we tested our model in a prospective population of AS patients.
 
 
 
 9 patients with severe AS (aortic valve area < 1cm2) were included. A complete trans-thoracic echocardiography with a non-invasive blood pressure by brachial artery cuff were realized immediately before a left heart catheterization to have an invasive left ventricular pressure. Myocardial work is then calculated with non-invasive and invasive LV pressure combined to LV strain curves. For constructive and wasted work, root mean squared between invasive and estimated measures were respectively r2 = 0.92 and r2 = 0.94 (figure 1B)
 
 
 
 The proposed model is efficient to estimate non-invasively myocardial work indices in AS-patients. These afterload independent indices could permit in future to better stratify this population. 
 *Owashi KP, Hubert A and al. Model-based estimation of left ventricular pressure and myocardial work in aortic stenosis. PlosOne 2020. Mar 3;15(3):e0229609
 Abstract Figure 1
