{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014936519790888723, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0022404779686333084, 'mean_word_length': 4.702127659574468, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparisons between wild populations and bred perennial ryegrasses for root growth and root/shoot partitioning

Abstract Root and shoot dry weights (DW), and root DW depth distribution were determ ined for wild type perennial ryegrass, breeding lines and cultivars. The plants were grown in 1 m deep tubes of sand culture in a glasshouse experiment. There were significant differences in shoot DW among accessions in the wild types but not within the bred material, and the wild types had more accessions with low shoot DW. Root DW varied significantly among accessions in both the bred material and the wild types. There were significant differences in root/shoot DW ratios among accessions, and between pools in the breeding lines, but no differences within the wild types. Root/ shoot ratios in the wild types had a much narrower and generally higher range of values than those in the bred lines. The percentage of root DW in the top 10 cm of sand did not vary significantly in the bred lines but it did in the wild types. Variation was recorded in root DW depth distribution at both the accession and genotype levels. We concluded that selection for merit based on shoot performance does not necessarily result in large root systems, and better plant performance might result from an increase in root system size in perennial ryegrass.