{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017421602787456445, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.388888888888889, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A case study comparing static analysis tools for evaluating SwiftUI projects

Declarative programming languages such as SwiftUI have gained increasing relevance for user interface implementation in mobile applications. A tool for evaluating and improving the quality of such projects is static analysis (SA). This study compares the usefulness of two of the most popular SA tools (SonarQube and Codacy) for evaluating real-world SwiftUI projects. Moreover, it recommends setup and adjustments to promote SA tools for SwiftUI projects that can be extended to other languages.