{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031007751937984496, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006029285099052541, 'mean_word_length': 5.564971751412429, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Economy As Journalism: About The Heritage Of Alexander Tatarkin

In this paper, one of the later articles by Alexander Tatarkin ("Behavioral readiness of the Russian Federation for neo-industrialism," published in 2015) is analyzed. Three layouts of the text are described through the lens of Critical Discourse Analysis: (1) economic research discourse as a part of scientific communication; (2) emotional discourse that represents the socially-oriented position of Tatarkin; (3) Tatarkin’s ethical position, expressed as a message to the Russian government. These three levels (the Aristotelian triad “logos – pathos – ethos”) intersect and combine into the journalist-like discourse. It is shown here that the boundaries between scientific communication and journalism considered as a significant element of democratic development are blurred; the analyzed text overcomes the narrowness of the research segment, which is related to the development of economic systems, and becomes a journalistic message, addressed to a broad audience. Research responsibility is considered a trend in the history of science in general and in the history of economic thought.