{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02631578947368421, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012145748987854251, 'mean_word_length': 4.5543071161048685, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Die Punch Fragment: Analysis of Fragment Geometry and Need for Fixation.

Introduction  Die punch (DP) fragments are among the most common fracture fragments to lose reduction after volar locked plating of articular distal radius fractures (DRFs). We aimed to report the number of patients in our institution who had a computed tomography (CT)-confirmed DP fragment and who had open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) through a dorsal approach; to report the length of the radioulnar portion of the DP fragment relative to the total distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) length; and to identify if an association exists between this length and the choice for a volar versus a dorsal operative approach to the DP fragment. Materials and Methods  We performed measurements on the preoperative CT scans of 94 skeletally mature patients with a DP fragment. We also collected data related to their demographics, injury, and treatment. Of the 94 patients in this study, 84 (89%) had AO type C fractures. Results  Thirteen out of 94 patients (14%) who had ORIF of their DRF with a DP fragment had a separate dorsal incision. The mean proportion of the DP fragment length relative to the total DRUJ length was 0.51 ± 0.19. There was no association between the length of the DP fragment and volar versus dorsal approach. Conclusion  DP fragment size is not an indicator of the need for or use of a dorsal approach in DRF fixation. Level of Evidence  This is a Level IV,-retrospective study.