{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030861354214647627, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01427913403961308, 'mean_word_length': 5.0, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Abstract WP370: Inpatient Outcomes and Resource Utilization Among Patients With Large Hemispheric Infarction Who Developed Cerebral Edema: An Analysis of U.S. Real-World Data


 Introduction:
 Patients with large hemispheric infarction (LHI) may suffer from life-threatening complications, including cerebral edema. Published data among these patients in real-world settings are limited. This study describes inpatient outcomes and resource utilization associated with cerebral edema among hospitalized patients with LHI.
 
 
 Methods:
 A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the MarketScan Hospital Drug Database (2015Q3-2017Q4). As infarct volume is not captured in the data, patients were included based on diagnosis codes for infarction of the middle cerebral artery or carotid artery, which are most closely associated with LHI. Within this group, cerebral edema was determined based on a diagnosis code of cerebral edema (ICD-10-CM G93.6) or herniation (G93.5), or a craniectomy procedure. Logistic regressions, comparing patients with edema vs. those without edema, were used to estimate the odds ratio of death, ICU admission, and tracheostomy/intubation during the hospital stay. Linear regression models were used to estimate the mean difference in length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and hospital charges. All models controlled for age, sex, and admission type.
 
 
 Results:
 A total of 11,772 patients were designated as likely LHI cases; 869 (7%) were identified with cerebral edema.
 Table 1
 compares inpatient outcomes and resource utilization in patients with vs. without cerebral edema. Patients with cerebral edema had significantly higher odds of death, ICU admission and tracheostomy/intubation. They also had longer hospital stays, longer stays in the ICU, and higher hospital charges.
 
 
 Conclusion:
 This study provides evidence in a real-world setting, highlighting the substantial clinical and economic burden associated with cerebral edema among patients hospitalized with LHI. Given the unmet needs, management strategies and interventions focusing on reducing cerebral edema among patients with LHI are warranted.
 
 
 
