{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01556420233463035, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0023346303501945525, 'mean_word_length': 6.564705882352941, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Inspection for micrometastasis is essential for predicting the prognosis of serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma: Case report and literature review

Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma is the precursor of invasive uterine serous carcinoma. Here, we present two cases of serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma with omental micrometastasis and discuss their clinical significance. Two menopausal patients with abnormal endometrial biopsy findings underwent hysterectomy and comprehensive surgical staging (bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy, omentectomy, and pelvic and para‐aortic lymphadenectomy). Although gross examination failed to detect tumors, the pathological diagnosis was serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma. Both patients had omental micrometastasis; they were diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVB disease and received postoperative chemotherapy. One patient died of the carcinoma 9 months after the hysterectomy, and the other had a recurrence of carcinoma 17 months after the end of the initial therapy. The present cases and literature review highlight the importance of meticulous inspection for micrometastasis in the abdominal cavity, including the omentum and peritoneum, for predicting prognosis.