{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016713091922005572, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0006190034045187249, 'mean_word_length': 4.660245183887916, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Five tips on getting research published.

The easiest way to get your research published is to conduct significant research in a rigorous fashion. However, once you have completed your study and ensured that it is significant and rigorous, there are five tips I can share with you to improve the likelihood that your work will get published in a timely fashion.Tip I: Start with a readable title. Shorter is usually better. One common mistake that writers make is to include statistical or methodologie techniques in the title. For example, if your study found that extended hospital visiting hours were correlated with decreased requests for patient pain medications, you may be tempted to give your article a title such as, "The Relationship Between Visiting Hours and Pain Management: A Regression Approach." But a better title, such as "Visiting Hours and Patient Pain Relief" would provide the take home practice message. The studies I always choose to read first as an editor have simple titles and promise to be about an important clinical topic.Tip 2: Use the style of the journal. Different disciplines and different journals have different writing practices. Read other articles published in the journal and the author guidelines closely. Then follow those guidelines while writing and revising. If all articles in a particular journal start with a two-paragraph introduction your manuscript will seem aberrant if it begins with a review of literature. Moreover, ignoring the instructions in the author guidelines can cost you additional time in review. I can't tell you the number of authors I have to ask to revise and resubmit a manuscript because they haven't included a statement of clinical relevance or a list of clinical resources. Both of these components of a manuscript are requirements for JNS. So do yourself a favor and cut your time in review by submitting a complete manuscript with your first submission in order to avoid unnecessary resubmissions.Tip 3: Check the logic flow of your manusaipt. Often I read manuscripts that explain why research needs to be done on an important nursing problem, such as pain management in hospitals. I am excited to see that someone is studying this problem, but when I read the manuscript I find that the author really hasn't conducted a study about pain management but rather has studied relaxation techniques and anxiety. Anxiety is not pain, although they may be related. If you start off by explaining the need to study pain it is important that you use tools that measure pain! One of the best ways to avoid this problem is having someone who is unfamiliar with your work read a manuscript for logic. My children, friends, and neighbors have all served as readers for me and have all been very helpful in letting me know if I am staying on track. If I find myself without one of these helpful people readily available to read for me, I have found that just writing out the first sentence of every paragraph is another excellent way to make sure that the structure of my manuscript is logical. If I saw that all my first paragraphs began with sentences about pain, but later paragraphs started with sentences on anxiety I would realize that I had a logic problem. …