{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024200913242009132, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014611872146118721, 'mean_word_length': 5.295977011494253, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Nonrandom distribution of interspersed repeat elements in the BCR and ABL1 genes and its relation to breakpoint cluster regions

The Philadelphia translocation, t(9;22)(q34;q11), is the microscopically visible product of recombination between two genes, ABL1 on chromosome 9 and BCR on chromosome 22, and gives rise to a functional hybrid BCR‐ABL1 gene with demonstrated leukemogenic properties. Breakpoints in BCR occur mostly within one of two regions: a 5 kb major breakpoint cluster region (M‐Bcr) and a larger 35 kb minor breakpoint cluster region (m‐Bcr) towards the 3′ end of the first BCR intron. By contrast, breakpoints in ABL1 are reported to occur more widely across a >200 kb region which spans the large first and second introns. The mechanisms that determine preferential breakage sites in BCR, and which cause recombination between BCR and ABL1, are presently unknown. In some cases, Alu repeats have been identified at or near sequenced breakpoint sites in both genes, providing indications, albeit controversial, that they may be relevant. For the present study, we carried out a detailed analysis of genomic BCR and ABL1 sequences to identify, classify, and locate interspersed repeat sequences and to relate their distribution to precisely mapped BCR‐ABL1 recombination sites. Our findings confirm that Alu are the most abundant class of repeat in both genes, but that they occupy fewer sites than previously estimated and that they are distributed nonrandomly. r‐Scan statistics were applied to provide a measure of repeat distribution and to evaluate extremes in repeat spacing. A significant lack of Alu elements was observed across the major and minor breakpoint cluster regions of BCR and across a 25‐kb region showing a high frequency of breakage in ABL1. These findings counter the suggestion that occurrence of Alu at BCR‐ABL1 recombination sites is likely by chance because of the high density of Alu in these two genes. Instead, as yet unidentified DNA conformation or nucleotide characteristics peculiar to the preferentially recombining regions, including those Alu elements present within them, more likely influence their fragility. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.