{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021455223880597014, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.386904761904762, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Shaping the Immigration Debate: Contending Civil Societies on the US-Mexico Border by Cari Lee Skogberg Eastman (review)

Shaping the Immigration Debate centers on three case studies of activist organizations that engage in direct action on the issue of unauthorized immigration at the U.S.Mexico border, in particular the Arizona border. The Minuteman Civil Defense Corps drew attention to unauthorized immigration and advocated strengthened border enforcement. Members considered themselves to be “helping” the U.S. Border Patrol by conducting reconnaissance near the border, spotting people, and contacting that agency. The organizations Humane Borders and No More Deaths both advocate for a reformed border enforcement and immigration policy that reflects a universal human right of mobility and reduces risk of harm and death in migration. Humane Borders stocks water supply locations in the desert where migrants cross, at risk of death from hyperthermia. No More Deaths operates assistance encampments in the desert that provide water, food, shelter, and first aid.