{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031395348837209305, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013953488372093023, 'mean_word_length': 4.519230769230769, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Passive in Danish , English , and German Stefan Müller and Bjarne Ørsnes Deutsche Grammatik

In the following subsections we examine various properties of passives in which Danish, English, and German differ. We look at the morphological passive in Danish in Section 1.1, compare the personal and impersonal pas-sives in the three languages in Section 1.2, examine the possibility to promote the objects in passives of ditransi-tive constructions in Section 1.3. 1.1 Morphological and Analytic Forms Danish has two basic variants of passives. The first one is an analytic form with an auxiliary blive and a participle (1b) and the second one is a morphological passive that is formed by adding an-s suffix to a finite verb (1c,d). (1c) shows an example of passive applying to the present tense form of a verb and (1d) shows one applying to the past tense form.