{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029891304347826088, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004528985507246377, 'mean_word_length': 5.038251366120218, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Respecting Difference: A Moral Commitment with Universalist Implications

As calls for respect to difference represent a central objective of contemporary political movements, the essay examines how philosophy might contribute to elaborating a well-argued foundation for these demands. 
Part 1: On persons and individuals takes issue with the view that blames the contractual foundation of the constitutional state as well as Kant’s moral universalism for being “forgetful of context”.  
Part 2: The obligation to cultivate “a broad-minded way of thinking”explains the relevance of Kant’s reflections on the “sensus communis”.
Part 3: The ethical community discusses the thesis that it is only within the framework of a particular community that individuals are capable of developing their unique identity (Taylor, MacIntyre).     
Part 4: Within the framework of the constitutional state contends that by prioritizing “the just” over “the good” the modern state is capable of curbing social asymmetries. 
Part 5: Anticipating a global public discourse focuses on Kant’s conception of the “public”.    
 