{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017085427135678392, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.64, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Punctuated-Tuckman: Towards a New Group Development Model

As organizations attempt to achieve higher levels of performance, organizational leaders have begun focusing on creating high functioning groups. Well organized groups can potentially accomplish more than individuals. The problem that arises is how do effective groups form? Group development is a topic that has long been studied, but has few definite answers. In educational settings, group development tends to focus primarily on Tuckman’s model of group development. While Tuckman’s theory has many benefits, ignoring or under utilizing other group development theories does a disservice to those responsible for learning how to create dynamic and high performing groups. With the various theories available, educators of group development theory need to explore alternate avenues instead of relying solely on Tuckman’s model of group development, thus this paper presents a case for integrating three group development theories