{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02588686481303931, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012464046021093002, 'mean_word_length': 5.382262996941896, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Exploration and Discussion on the Clinical Therapeutic Effects of the Application of Cross-Injury Vertebral Fixation and Via-Injury Vertebrae Fixation in the Treatment of Bone Tumor with Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture

Objective: To explore and discuss the clinical therapeutic effects of the application of cross-injury vertebral fixation and via-injury vertebrae fixation in the treatment of bone tumor with thoracolumbar spine fracture. Methods: A total of 58 patients with bone tumors and thoracolumbar spine fractures admitted to our hospital from February to February 2019 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 29 cases in each group. The patients in the control group received cross-injury vertebral fixation treatment, while the patients in the observation group were treated with via-injury vertebral fixation. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The operation time and hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group (P<0.05), and the postoperative drainage volume of the intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain and spinal JOA scores between the two groups (P>0.05); there was no significant difference in the compression ratio of the injured vertebrae and the kyphosis Cobb angle between the two groups (P>0.05), after the operation, the two groups of patients were significantly reduced, and the compression ratio of the injured vertebrae and kyphosis Cobb angle of the observation group were more obvious (P<0.05); the vertebral height loss and Cobb angle loss in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of bone tumor with thoracolumbar spine fracture, compared with cross-injury vertebral fixation, via-injury vertebral fixation has a more significant clinical effect and is more suitable for clinical application and promotion.