{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0290437890974084, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00938337801608579, 'mean_word_length': 6.1079365079365076, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Iron Complexes for Cyclic Carbonate and Polycarbonate Formation: Selectivity Control from Ligand Design and Metal-Center Geometry.

A family of 17 iron(III) aminobis(phenolate) complexes possessing different phenolate substituents, coordination geometries, and donor arrangements were used as catalysts for the reaction of carbon dioxide (CO2) with epoxides. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of the iron complexes with a bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium chloride cocatalyst in negative mode revealed the formation of six-coordinate iron "ate" species. Under low catalyst loadings (0.025 mol % Fe and 0.1 mol % chloride cocatalyst), all complexes showed good-to-excellent activity for converting propylene oxide to propylene carbonate under 20 bar of CO2. The most active complex possessed electron-withdrawing dichlorophenolate groups and for a 2 h reaction time gave a turnover frequency of 1240 h-1. Epichlorohydrin, styrene oxide, phenyl glycidyl ether, and allyl glycidyl ether could also be transformed to their respective cyclic carbonates with good-to-excellent conversions. Selectivity for polycarbonate formation was observed using cyclohexene oxide, where the best activity was displayed by trigonal-bipyramidal iron(III) complexes having electron-rich phenolate groups and sterically unencumbering tertiary amino donors. Those containing bulky tertiary amino ligands or those with square-pyramidal geometries around iron showed no activity for polycarbonate formation. While the overall conversions declined with decreasing CO2 pressure, CO2 incorporation remained high, giving a completely alternating copolymer. The difference in the optimum catalyst reactivity for cyclic carbonate versus polycarbonate formation is particularly noteworthy; that is, electron-withdrawing-group-containing phenolates give the most active catalysts for propylene carbonate formation, whereas catalysts with electron-donating-group-containing phenolates are the most active for polycyclohexene carbonate formation. This study demonstrates that the highly modifiable aminophenolate ligands can be tailored to yield iron complexes for both CO2/epoxide coupling and ring-opening copolymerization activity.