{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02005730659025788, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0014326647564469914, 'mean_word_length': 5.131578947368421, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Defending the Significance of Human Dignity

Chapter 5 identified the main dimensions of human dignity and some important roles of it in human rights discourse. This chapter addresses the most important charges levelled against the deployment of the idea of human dignity in human rights discourse. They say that the idea is empty, indeterminate, incoherent, politically pernicious, exclusionary, sterile, or redundant. The chapter argues that each of these charges fails. As a result, we can resist the disabling skepticism associated with them. We can learn from these objections to improve our views of human dignity, but we can remain confident about its significance in human rights discourse.