{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03432282003710575, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0037105751391465678, 'mean_word_length': 4.832432432432433, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Hearing instruments for the elderly hearing impaired. A comparison of in-the-canal and behind-the-ear hearing instruments in first-time users.

The purpose of this investigation was to compare negative and positive experiences between two matched groups of elderly first-time users of hearing instruments (HI). One group had been supplied with behind-the-ear hearing instruments (BTE), the other with in-the-canal hearing instruments (ITC). There were 20 persons in each group. All were visited in their homes. Those who needed extra help were offered follow-up at the Hearing Centre. ITC were found to be superior to BTE as regards time-of-use, operational difficulties and undesirable sound experiences. ITC were also used in more difficult listening situations. Successful instruction and follow-up was more easily achieved with ITC users than with BTE users. ITC are recommended as the preferred instrument for elderly first-time HI users, at least for hearing losses not exceeding 60 dB PTA, provided the subject's dexterity and anatomical conditions permit fitting of ITC.