{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023096663815226688, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009409751924721984, 'mean_word_length': 5.428571428571429, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: classification and management].

The goal of bone reconstruction in revision total knee arthroplasty is to provide a stable support for the implant and to re-establish the correct joint line. Therefore, a useful, therapy-based classification of the defects is necessary. According to Stockley et al. (1992), the defects are classified into contained and uncontained defects. Uncontained defects can be reconstructed using structural allografts or metal wedges. In contained defects, cancellous allograft can be used. For aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty, the defect classification according to Engh and Parks (1994) can be helpful because of its recommendations for reconstruction. In case of the more common first or second graded defects, reconstruction is performed using modular revision components or allografts. For the rare third graded defects, bulk allografts or modular tumour endoprostheses are recommended. On the basis of more than 150 revision total knee arthroplasties performed in our hospital the classification of bone defects and their clinical consequences are presented in this review.