{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021216407355021217, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005657708628005658, 'mean_word_length': 5.315476190476191, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of aging on work hardening behaviour of cold rolled Nimonic C-263 alloy

Abstract Experimental true stress–true strain data of Nimonic C-263 alloy in solution treated as well as aged condition have been analysed using different flow relationships. Ludwigson relationship provides the best fit of the data for all the conditions investigated. The transition in macroscopic flow behaviour of the alloy with plastic strain, in solution treated condition, can be correlated with the transition in deformation mode from low strain regime to high strain regime. Although aging does not appear to alter the macroscopic flow behaviour, it causes a considerable change in flow parameters of the Ludwigson relationship and substructural evolution. On the other hand, the effect of sheet thickness is marginal. The flow data of the aged alloys fitted according to Ludwigson model not only yield a unique set of flow parameters for each aging condition but also exhibit a systematic trend with aging time. The transition in macroscopic flow behaviour of the alloy with strain, in aged conditions, can be correlated with a change in dislocation mechanism from dislocation–precipitate interaction at lower strains to dislocation–dislocation interaction at higher strains leading to formation of a dense dislocation tangled networks in the matrix regions surrounding the precipitates. The alloy in both solution treated and aged conditions exhibits three fairly distinct stages of strain hardening. The strain hardening rate decreases in regime I, remains constant in regime II and begins to fall again in regime III. Furthermore, it is observed that the alloy specimen with longitudinal orientation (L, i.e. parallel to rolling direction), exhibits marginally highest strain hardening rates, while specimens with long transverse orientation exhibit lowest strain hardening rates both in solution treated and aged conditions. However, for all other in-plane orientations (i.e. L+30°, L+45° and L+60°), the strain hardening rate data are fairly very close and lie in between those of longitudinal and long transverse orientations.