{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018754186202277295, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.610619469026549, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Can Shared Coal Industry Knowledge be Adapted to Improve Risk Management Outcomes in Other High-Risk Domains?

Abstract Every high-risk industry manages a workforce that operates in hazardous high-risk environments. The risks inherent to coal mining are recognised globally and coal production operates under high levels of regulatory and public scrutiny. The coal-chain is associated with other high-risk industries including power generation and transmission, construction, railways and road transportation, ports and marine shipping. Other energy sectors such as oil and gas have similar dynamics around the management of a workforce in a complex high-risk environment. Despite the discipline required working within hazardous and high-risk industries, incidents continue to be repeated and lessons learned in one industry should be applicable across other similar industries. This paper uses the RISKGATE framework to classify incident/accident data from three other high-risk industries, oil and gas, construction and road transportation. It will clearly identify opportunities where RISKGATE knowledge may offer utility beyond the coal sector. These three industries, as well as related activities such as power generation, railways, ports and marine shipping, are encouraged to engage with both the RISKGATE knowledge bank and the action research workshop process to maximise information sharing about risk management practice across national and international supply and energy chains.