{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019138755980861243, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.477876106194691, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Laboratory constraints on feeding behaviours in polymorphic bluegill sunfish (
 Lepomis macrochirus
 )

Evaluating fish feeding behaviours is imperative to understanding prey resource use in the field. Previous work on fish feeding has taken place almost exclusively in a laboratory setting, which may impose artificial restrictions. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the constraints the captive setting places on fish feeding behaviours. We recorded polymorphic (littoral and pelagic) bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) feeding in the laboratory and the field using a high‐speed camera and underwater cameras. Following successful strikes video events, were digitised using ImageJ (laboratory) and Argus (field). Gape velocity, ram velocity, and body deceleration were higher in the field than in captive fish. Significantly greater gape velocity in field fish suggests that these fish feed with greater suction pressure than captive fish. Prey effects were detected, as brine shrimp feeding events were characterised by slower gape and ram velocities and a smaller gape. Feeding events on brine shrimp in the field were similar to feeding events on worms in the laboratory suggesting an artefact of training. These results indicate that feeding behaviours measured in the laboratory may not be representative of feeding behaviours in the wild. Further consideration of organismal performance and laboratory constraints should be taken in future functional studies.