{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031506849315068496, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.166666666666667, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Runoff: The Case for Retention

The first approach—social conservatism triumphant—attempts to build a majority coalition by adding socially conservative groups, including religious (largely Protestant) fundamentalists and traditionalistic (largely Catholic) urbanites, to the normal Republican vote. As a result, it requires emphasizing culture and laying off economics, since conservative economic doctrine runs counter to the economic interests of these lower-middleand working-class individuals. Yet this approach simultaneously drives away the socially liberal members of the upper-middle class, who comprise the largest share of those self-styled "independents" who, in turn, bulk increasingly large in American politics.