{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05045871559633028, 'fraction_numerical': 0.05504587155963303, 'mean_word_length': 5.993589743589744, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Toward a Discursive Approach to Intra-organizational Ethicality: an Instiutional Theory Perspective

From its conceptual beginnings in Weber’s (1947) transposition of bureaucracy into the metaphoric “iron cage,” institutional theory has evolved into amongst the most influential theoretical paradigms invoked in organizational analyses in the last three decades. Its illustrious rise and subsequent entrenchment into management scholarship has transcended traditionally-defined disciplinary boundaries of fields such as organizational behavior (Greenwood and Sudabby, 2006; Staw and Epstein, 2000; Zilber, 2002), strategy (Dacin et al., 2007; Lounsbury and Glynn, 2001; Oliver, 1997), accounting (Carpenter and Dirsmith, 1993; Dirsmith et al., 1997; Fogarty and Rogers, 2005), information systems (Chiasson and Davidson, 2005; Orlikowski and Barley, 2001; Teo et al., 2003), and operations management (Ketokivi and Schroeder, 2004; Shane and Foo, 1999). As such, the available literature on institutional theory is vast, highly nuanced, and has been applied to a myriad of diverse contexts.