{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018306636155606407, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.645161290322581, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Section: Essays and Review: Neuroscience in the Courtroom

The book is difficult to read, which is a disadvantage exacerbated by the small size of its type. Another criticism of this book is difficulty learning about its author: Most readers of a book like this like to know more about the writer. Unfortunately, because of very limited biographical information about the author in the book itself, the reader must of necessity conduct an Internet search of Dr. Utall. Only then can one discovery that Dr. Utall is a Professor Emeritus in Psychology from Arizona State Universty and a Professor Emeritus of Engineering at the University of Michigan. These are impressive credentials, but the reader still does not know where Dr. Utall attended school or what other background he can rightfully claim. It is never good for a book to create such obstacles for the reader.