{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02304964539007092, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0017730496453900709, 'mean_word_length': 5.141304347826087, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Our experience with cochlear implants: have we erred in our expectations?

Many clinicians feel that single-channel cochlear implants are limited in the information they can provide. This has led to some common misconceptions regarding single-channel and multichannel systems. At the House Ear Institute, a growing number of children with the 3M/House single-channel implant are demonstrating open-set understanding of speech on measures designed to test such abilities in children. As a result, we have revised our thinking regarding the potential of this device.