{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02297872340425532, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.391304347826087, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Settlement, Refuges, and Adult Body Form in Colonial Marine Invertebrates: A Field Experiment.

We examine the relationship between adult body form (sheet vs. arborescent) and larval settlement in colonial animals. Because thin sheet forms are more susceptible to overgrowth than arborescent forms, we predict that larvae of sheet forms should preferentially settle in refuges from competitors. On both natural and artificial substrata, the larvae of the sheet form (Membranipora membranacea) settled more often on high spots, which could serve as refuges from competition. The arborescent forms (Bugula neritina and Distaplia occidentalis) settled around the bases of bumps more frequently than would be expected by chance. For many arborescent forms, their most vulnerable periods are the days immediately following settlement, when individuals can be consumed easily by predators or dislodged by physical disturbances. Settlement in a crevice (base of a bump) would provide protection from the bulky mouthparts of predators. Moreover, dislodgment would be less likely than if settlement had occurred on flat locations, such as the tops of bumps or the areas between bumps.