{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03898305084745763, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00847457627118644, 'mean_word_length': 4.343891402714932, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: Code of the Suburb: Inside the World of Young Middle–Class Drug Dealers

I am a double agent, an interloper, an infiltrator, between and within the Chicago School of Robert Park and the Atlanta School of W.E.B. Du Bois. What do I mean? In The Scholar Denied, Aldon Morris argues clearly and persuasively that “Du Bois’s sociology of race was developed two decades before that of [Robert] Park and the Chicago School” (p. 129) . . . “[yet] Park and the Chicago School locked Du Bois out of the intellectual fraternity of sociology by systematically ignoring his scholarship” (p. 141). This is the major intervention of The Scholar Denied: to prove beyond dispute that Du Bois’s Atlanta School was where sociology began, not Robert Park’s Chicago School. Yet I must expose myself as a child of that imposturous Chicago School. I did my PhD at the University of Chicago and worked in the research areas that Robert Park was famous for. And I drank the Kool-Aid. In the Methods section of my first book, Black Picket Fences (2013), I gave nearly full homage to Park and the Chicago School for the methods and content of everything ever written about black folks. I wrote: