{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019094380796508457, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015275504637206765, 'mean_word_length': 5.280821917808219, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A precise boundary element method for macromolecular transport properties

A very precise boundary element numerical solution of the exact formulation of the hydrodynamic resistance problem with stick boundary conditions is presented. BEST, the Fortran 77 program developed for this purpose, computes the full transport tensors in the center of resistance or the center of diffusion for an arbitrarily shaped rigid body, including rotation‐translation coupling. The input for this program is a triangulation of the solvent‐defined surface of the molecule of interest, given by Connolly's MSROLL or other suitable triangulator. The triangulation is prepared for BEST by COALESCE, a program that allows user control over the quality and number of triangles to describe the surface. High numerical precision is assured by effectively exact integration of the Oseen tensor over triangular surface elements, and by scaling the hydrodynamic computation to the precise surface area of the molecule. Efficiency of computation is achieved by the use of public domain LAPACK routines that call BLAS Level 3 hardware‐optimized subroutines available for most processors. A protein computation can be done in less than 10 min of CPU time in a modern Pentium IV processor. The present work includes a complete analysis of the sources of error in the numerical work and techniques to eliminate these errors. The operation of BEST is illustrated with applications to ellipsoids of revolution, and Lysozyme, a small protein. The typical numerical accuracy achieved is 0.05% compared to analytical theory. The numerical precision for a protein is better than 1%, much better than experimental errors in these quantities, and more than 10 times better than traditional bead‐based methods. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 9: 1191–1205, 2004