{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03863557257222416, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010790114862513052, 'mean_word_length': 5.762352941176471, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Postmodern American Literature and Its Other (review)

In Postmodern American Literature and Its Other, Hogue argues the insuffi ciency in the theory and practice of postmodernism in American literature. Hogue locates the insuffi ciency in postmodernism’s inability to successfully overthrow the prevailing version of modernism that is Eurocentric, patriarchal, capitalist, instrumentalist, and imperialist. This failure is most visible in postmodern fi ction’s failure to meet the following challenge: “does postmodern American fi ction augur a different culture/social reality? A new/ different way of constructing the world beyond/different from modernity?” (x). The answer, Hogue offers, depends entirely on the writer’s ability to fully embrace the decentralizing potential of postmodernism, a “planetary postmodernism” that not only decentralizes the hierarchies of race, class, gender in Western history and culture, but also disrupts the politics of subject formation that necessitates the making of “the other.” Hogue builds his theory of planetary postmodernism on Enrique Dussel’s distinction between a Eurocentric modernism and a planetary modernism. The prevailing understanding of modernity, Dussel argues, is a deeply Eurocentric one, in which the subject of modernity is unfailingly Western, male, and a champion of “Reason, progress, hierarchy, monism, sameness, and center” (1). Conversely, this Eurocentric modernism elides all that lies outside its purview—the non-Western, the female, the poor, all of which constitute the global periphery—that is not only elided, but objectifi ed, as the necessary condition of making the Western male the subject of history and social reality. From the failings of Eurocentric modernism, Hogue draws the two kernel questions of his analysis: how thoroughly and consistently does the novel 1) overthrow the Eurocentric, patriarchal modernist worldview, and 2) challenge the objectifi cation of the global periphery? The analysis operates by pairing novelists by race and gender; it begins with Thomas Pynchon’s V. (1963) and Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy (1985, 1986), moves to Rikki Ducornet’s The Jade Cabinet (1993) and Kathy Acker’s Pussy, King of the Pirates (1996), and ends with Ishmael Reed’s Mumbo Jumbo (1972) and Gerald Vizenor’s The Heirs of Columbus (1998). This ordering of paired novelists represents the spectrum of postmodernisms, from postmodernism-as-neomodernism to planetary postmodernism-as-anti-modernism. Pynchon and Auster exemplify canonical postmodern literature’s failure to supersede the objectifi cation of the global periphery. However insistently these novelists deconstruct Enlightenment reason, teleology, and history by propelling mystery, indeterminacy, and multiplicity, they never escape the modernist quest for Origin, order, and Truth. Furthermore, the very means of their