{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014516129032258065, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.856353591160221, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The foot-and-mouth disease RNA virus as a model in experimental phylogenetics.

Phylogenetic reconstruction methods are subject to two types of limitations: our knowledge about the true history of organisms and the gross simplification implied in the numerical simulation models of the relationships between them. In such a situation, experimental phylogenetics provides a way to assess the accuracy of the phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Nonetheless, this capacity is only feasible for organisms in which replication and mutation rates are high enough to provide valuable data. On the other hand, experimental phylogenetics also provides insights on the main evolutionary processes acting on viral variability under different population dynamics. Our study with the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) strongly suggests that the phylogenetic reconstruction methods can infer erroneous phylogenies due to nucleotide convergences between isolates belonging to different experimental lineages. We also point out that the diverse evolutionary mechanisms acting in different experimental dynamics generate alterations and change the frequencies of genetic variants, which can lead to the misinterpretation of the real evolutionary history.