{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03385049365303244, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.590551181102362, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The State of the Language

Haskell would reply. He is not interested in conventional short fiction with characterization and a narrative arc; he is even uninterested in dialogue. What remains admirable about Haskell's prose throughout is its lack of self-congratulation: it never wails, "I am different, look at me," and it does not set for itself the pedantic task of teaching us anything. But, in the end, Haskell's words don't have what it takes to create fiction. Writing about Hawthorne, Borges says: "An author may suffer from absurd prejudices but it will be impossible for his work to be absurd if it is genuine, if it responds to a genuine vision." That is a vision achievable only through character.