{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027261462205700124, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004956629491945477, 'mean_word_length': 4.572413793103448, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
To Attain the Text. But Which Text?

Raymond Bellour’s 1975 essay ‘The Unattainable Text’ has, in recent years,
 enjoyed new life as a founding text of the loose, global movement devoted
 to the making and theorizing of audiovisual essays. Where the film-text
 was once unattainable to scholars and artists, now we can get our hands
 on it thanks to the various technological waves that were once only a
 distant dream. However, there are challenges in Bellour’s text that are
 conveniently overlooked in its optimistic interpretation; in particular,
 the multiple meanings attached to the word text itself. Attaining this
 ‘text’ is not a straightforward procedure of downloading and re-editing
 digital files. What more is at stake that we need to make explicit today
 in discussing the audiovisual essay?