{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020429009193054137, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008171603677221655, 'mean_word_length': 5.049382716049383, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The discovery of the child as an object 'sui generis' of cure and research by Melanie Klein as reflected in the notes of her first child analyses in Berlin, 1921-1926.

In the early days of psychoanalysis the child served mainly as an object to demonstrate the correctness of findings inferred from adults' analyses. The author demonstrates that one of the hindrances to the development of child analysis was the negative transference. Based on the author's studies of Klein's handwritten notes of her first child analyses in Berlin, she outlines some factors which contributed to Klein also treating the child as an object sui generis of psychoanalytic cure and research: she proceeded methodologically, she accepted enactment as communication, and she learnt from her experiences. Klein's development in meeting the challenge of the negative transference is a fundamental part in this process, as is shown with reference to the analyses of three children: Grete, Rita and Erna.