{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0293141592920354, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016592920353982302, 'mean_word_length': 5.650735294117647, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Critical incident monitoring in a teaching hospital--the third report 2003-2008.

UNLABELLED
Several factors have been incriminated in the etiologies of critical incidents: shortages in organizing rules, anesthesia technique, patient environment, human factor, team work and communication. This is the third follow up report describing our performance during the last five years (2003-2008). The possible incriminating causes were identified with the objective of avoiding such eventualities and consequently providing a better patient outcome.


PATIENTS & METHODS
The computerized database and the medical records of critical incidents reports in our Department during the period of 2003-2008 were reviewed on case-by-case basis. Seventy reported incidents were discussed in the Department's Morbidity & Mortality Meetings (MMM). Incidents were classified as per possible incriminating causes: pulmonary, cardiovascular, central nervous system, metabolic, inadvertent drug injection, communicating failure, equipment failure and miscellaneous causes.


RESULTS
Most of the critical incidents reports occurred during maintenance of anesthesia, followed next by during induction and next by same operative day later in the ward. The majority of cases were respiratory events (29 cases), followed by communication failure (12 cases), failure of equipment (9 cases) and inadvertent drug injection (4 cases).


CONCLUSIONS
Respiratory events, human errors, team communication and equipment failures, continue to be the leading causes of critical incidents. Critical incidents are apt to occur so long as the human factor is involved. Vigilance in operational efficiency and the scrutiny in drug administration, supervision and training should be closely monitored in order to minimize critical incident reports.