{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030283505154639175, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007731958762886598, 'mean_word_length': 4.927480916030534, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Age and composition of the Rebang Co and Julu ophiolites, central Tibet: implications for the evolution of the Bangong Meso-Tethys

Subduction of the Bangong Meso-Tethys and collision between the Lhasa and Qiangtang blocks were important for the growth of Tibetan crust, as well as the development of super-large porphyry copper deposits in central Tibet. However, the initiation and closure timing, and nature and structure of the Bangong Meso-Tethys are still poorly constrained. Petrology, geochronology, and geochemistry of the Rebang Co and Julu ophiolites in the western part of the suture zone are used to constrain the tectonic history and structure of the Bangong Meso-Tethys. These two suites consist of ultramafic rocks, gabbro and diabase dikes, pillow basalts, and radiolarian cherts. Zircon U–Pb dating of zircon grains of gabbros yields well-defined weighted mean ages of 161.5 ± 1.5 Ma and 103.8 ± 3.9 Ma for the Rebang Co and Julu suites, respectively. Both of ophiolitic suites have mid-oceanic ridge basalt and island-arc tholeiite affinities, similar to back-arc basin crust. We suggest these suites formed above an intra-oceanic subduction zone at least during Middle Jurassic through mid-Cretaceous times. Along with coeval subduction beneath the southern Qiangtang margin, as well as fore-arc basin development, the Bangong Meso-Tethys has a complicated structure and history. Clearly, subduction in the Bangong Meso-Tethys was still active during mid-Cretaceous time and the Meso-Tethys did not close until Late Cretaceous time.