{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.034271099744245526, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02404092071611253, 'mean_word_length': 4.769911504424779, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Application Value of 3D Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements with Sensing Technology for Diagnosis and Staging of Endometrial Cancer (Preprint)


 BACKGROUND
 Background: In recent years, the morbidity of EC has increased significantly. Early diagnosis and reasonable treatment of EC patients have improved the survival rate of patients.
 
 
 OBJECTIVE
 Objective: The value of 3D ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging based on sensor technology on the diagnosis and staging of endometrial cancer is explored. 
 
 
 METHODS
 Methods: The paper selected 31 patients with endometrial cancer who were admitted to our hospital from February 2016 to February 2018 and who were diagnosed as endometrial cancer. All patients underwent 3D ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for measurement evaluation. The results of the joint examination were compared with the final pathological diagnosis analysis, and the pathological diagnosis was used as the gold standard, and the detection rate and the coincidence rate of each examination result were calculated.
 
 
 RESULTS
 Results: The detection rates of 3D-TVUS, MRI and 3D-TVUS*MRI were 65% (20/31), 71% (22/31) and 97% (30/31), respectively. 3D-TVUS was statistically significant compared with 3D-TVUS*MRI results. MRI and the 3D-TVUS*MRI results were statistically significant. The difference between the three methods was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The coincidence rate of 3D-TVUS*MRI was higher than that of 3D-TVUS or MRI single examination. For Ia and Ib, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), and in stage Ia. The staging results of MRI were compared with the staging results of 3D-TVUS*MRI, and the difference was statistically significant.
 
 
 CONCLUSIONS
 Conclusions: The diagnosis and staging of 3D-TVUS*MRI for EC is significantly better than 3D-TVUS or MRI single examination, which could better guide clinical treatment.
 
 
 CLINICALTRIAL
 
