{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028037383177570093, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02102803738317757, 'mean_word_length': 4.493589743589744, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Editing the Historia Apollonii Regis Tyri

in Tacitus was mysterious; silence also or misunderstanding on per limitem uiae at 3.25.1 and on the whole relationship of the Cremonese grid of 43 B.C. with the course of the Via; hence the failure to explain fully the force of the comparative dexteriora of 27.2 or to allude to Baatz on 29.2. Again, at 3.9.1 and 14.1 there is total confusion about the rivers Tartaro and Po. The one solitary map (at least three are necessary) is a portent. While generous with the unnecessary, it omits the Regio Transpadana and the Viae Flaminia and Aemilia, represents the Postumia by a brief tramline running dead straight from Bedriacum to Verona, confounds Urvinum Mataurense and Urvinum Hortense, and renders placenames sometimes in French and sometimes in Latin, and indeed twice in an unknown tongue: Nicosa and Genna.