{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016025641025641024, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0016025641025641025, 'mean_word_length': 5.067961165048544, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ethics of care in technology design

The recently published article by Broadbent et al. [1] significantly advances our understanding of the efficacy of robots in residential care environments. It clearly demonstrates that current robotic assistance is neither more nor less helpful than other interventions. That is important because on the one hand, it means that the hype frequently associated with the introduction of new technologies is not a true reflection of the benefits. But on the other hand, it shows that current technology is at least as effective as similar conventional means, making it a suitable substitute.