{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027892561983471075, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005681818181818182, 'mean_word_length': 5.521885521885522, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Computer education. Don't forget the older GPs.

OBJECTIVE
To implement and evaluate a computer education and support program for GPs.


METHODS
A 'hands-on' curriculum, based on small group learning in a clinical computing laboratory and supported via the Internet, was developed and implemented. Evaluation was threefold: observations during lessons; interviews; and participants completing a questionnaire before and six months after the course. A randomly selected group of GPs from the same region completed a modified version of the 'before' questionnaire at the same time as participating GPs were completing their six month questionnaire. Participants included 128 GPs in a computer education program in Victoria (Australia) plus 127 'control' GPs. Outcome measures were self reported computing skill, attitudes to and actual use of clinical applications.


RESULTS
Six months after training, there was a significant increase in self reported computer skill (p < 0.01). Multivariate regression found that, after controlling for gender, practice characteristics, and previous training, the older (> 55 years) GPs reported greater change in their skills than their younger colleagues. The increased skill happened regardless of which or how many modules were completed, and included use of email, the Internet, computers for research and electronic prescribing. Awareness of relevant computer applications, confidence with computers and intention to use applications also increased. Participants found the dedicated clinical computing laboratory useful; however, there are significant issues with maintenance and keeping systems up-to-date.


CONCLUSIONS
The computer education and support program was relevant to GP needs, deliverable and effective in improving skills and utilisation. Divisions and other GP organisations should be assisted to establish similar education and support programs and, perhaps, target older doctors.