{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031746031746031744, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002506265664160401, 'mean_word_length': 5.0201005025125625, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Aliens Among Us: Fascism and Narrativity

The putative "death of history" does not mean the death of historical narrative; rather, it indicates a proliferation of competing stories, "the fragmentation of grand narratives into little narratives" (Currie 107). A sort of pseudo-Darwinian evolution occurs among these "little narratives," each attempting to capture the vacant throne of the master narrative. This evolution is a political process, taking place in the arena of power, and each "little narrative" is an ideology-in-the-making. Fredric Jameson's concept of the "ideology of the form" assumes a genre is a repository of a Weltanschauung that accrues to narrative structures through the process of ideological "sedimentation." But his theory implies that the reverse is also true: ideology possesses a narrative dimension. Each would-be master narrative is a story, offering a paradigm of meaning and coherence in a complex social reality. The appeal of an ideology must be understood in terms not only of concatenations of social and economic factors but also in terms of specific narrative pleasures. Thus, it is possible to speak of the aesthetics of an ideology and even of its genre.