{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05947136563876652, 'fraction_numerical': 0.048458149779735685, 'mean_word_length': 3.7824561403508774, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Contact Nd:YAG laser and CO2 laser for cylindrical excision of the cervix. A comparative study.

An excess of blood loss and persistence of intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization occur with some frequency. Contact Nd:YAG laser conical excision of the uterine cervix is a new technique designed to remedy those problems. In this study, 36 women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were treated with cylindrical excision of the uterine cervix with a contact Nd:YAG laser. The results were compared with those in 30 women who had similar lesions and were treated with the CO2 laser. Use of the Nd:YAG laser resulted in less intraoperative blood loss (mean +/- SD, 3.12 +/- 0.28 vs. 30.3 +/- 2.12 mL for the CO2 laser, P less than .01) and less postoperative blood loss. The volume of early bleeding was 6.23 +/- 1.21 vs. 20.13 +/- 2.24 mL for the CO2 laser (P less than .01), and that of late bleeding was 5.22 +/- 2.21 vs. 31.24 +/- 0.05 mL for the CO2 laser (P less than .01). The operative time was similarly less for the contact Nd:YAG laser (6.2 +/- 2.2 vs. 20.2 +/- 1.2 minutes for the CO2 laser, P less than .01). The dimensions of the excised specimens were similar. These findings suggest that the contact Nd:YAG laser offers distinct advantages over the CO2 laser in performing cylindrical excision of the cervix.