{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025595119687023406, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018632716663351236, 'mean_word_length': 4.7258921791951405, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Comparative Study of Force Measurements in Solution Using Micron and Nano Size Probe

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a device that is used for not only high-resolution imaging but also used for measuring forces. It is possible to quantify the surface density change for both colloid and nano probe as well as silica surface. By changing the quantity of ions within a potassium chloride solution, it then becomes possible to evaluate the quantity of ions that attach themselves to AFM colloid probe, nano probe and silica samples. In this study, the force was measured between AFM probes and silica surface in different ionic concentrations. Two different types of AFM probe were used: a colloid probe with a radius of 500 nano-meters and a nano probe with a radius of 10 nano-meters. This study is focused on measuring how the force magnitude, especially electrical double layer force, varied between the two types of probes by changing ionic concentrations. For all test trials, the results agreed with the electrical double layer theory. Although the micron probe was almost an exact match for all ranges, the nano probe was closest within its short-range forces. This is attributed to the formula use when analyzing the electrical double layer force. Because the formula was originally calculated for the micron probe, the shape and size of the nano probe created too many va-riables for an exact match. Along with quantifying the forces, this experiment allowed for an observation of Van der Waals force making it possible to calculate the Hamaker constant. Conclusively, all results show that the obtained surface charge density increases as the ionic concentration increases. In addition, through the comparison of the results obtained from the nano-sized probe and the micron-sized probe, it was concluded that nano size probe mapped higher surface charge density above the silica surface than the mi-cron-sized probe under the same conditions.


Introduction
In 1861 Thomas Graham first used the word "colloid" as a synonym to Adhesive [1]. Colloid systems have been used since the start of human civilizations [2].
One of the earliest examples is the colloidal pigment that was used for painting during the Stone Age. More modern examples include daily necessities like soap and cosmetics. One element of manipulating colloidal systems uses Interfacial forces, which are forces experienced between two bodies. To measure these forces, an instrument called the Surface Force Apparatus (SFA) has been used [3] [4] [5] [6] Using an SFA that had a 1-micron resolution, and a force sensitivity of 10-8 N Tabor et al. [3] conducted Van der Waals force measurements between two surfaces. Researchers have worked extensively to measure the surface forces between two microscopic samples by SFA before the invention of Atomic Force Microscopy [7]- [12]. With the advancement of cutting edge technology within the AFM, researchers are better able to measure Pico-Newton level forces [13]. AFM and SFA work similarly with the main difference being that the AFM measures force between the small probe and surface while SFA measures force between two macroscopic bodies. In addition to the development of the experimental techniques for measuring the interfacial forces, in 1941 Derjaguin-Landau and Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) developed a theory for attractive Van der Waals forces and electrostatic forces between two samples [14]- [24].
Four basic interaction forces exist and they can be divided into two categories these categories are the short and long-range forces. Strong and weak forces act over short ranges, while electromagnetic and gravitational forces act over long ranges. The interfacial forces include the Van der Waals, electrostatic, hydration and steric forces. These forces are again divided into short-range and long-range forces. These forces are dominated when an AFM probe and a sample separation distance is about a nanometer. Inter-facial forces between the AFM probe and surface depend on the Hamaker constant, surface charge, and surface potential of materials. Electrostatic long-range forces were measured at different ionic concentrations. Short range Van der Waals forces were measured in DI water.
Many researchers have used the unique AFM tool for interfacing force measurements between two surfaces. Larson et al. [11] measured interfacial force between titanium dioxide colloid and single crystal in an ionic solution. They measured interaction forces by changing pH values and ionic concentrations.
Their experimental results show good agreement with theoretical Debye length.
Olga et al. [25] measured forces between pairs of polystyrene particles in the electrolyte solution. They observed long range repulsive forces below 0.01 M KCl concentration. Their 0.001 M KCl concentration results show a good fit with the DLVO theory. Fielden et al. [26] measured interaction force between air bubbles and silica particles in an electrolyte. They observed repulsive forces at long ranges and attractive forces when bubbles and AFM tip distance decreases.
Meagher et al. [26] investigated hydrophobic interaction forces between a modified AFM tip and a polypropylene surface within a NaCl solution. They measured the attractive interaction force when the separation distances were about 30 nm. Christenson et al. [27] measured attractive hydrophobic force between two mica surfaces in divalent solutions. In their experiments they used magnesium sulfate at different ionic concentrations and they also showed interaction magnitude decreased with increasing ionic concentration. Parker et al., [28] investigated force measurements between AFM tips and functionalize glass surface in a NaCl solution. They showed the magnitude of the force reduced with increasing salt concentration, but the attractive force magnitude increased.
Kokkoli et al. [29] found that the strength of attractive force decreased when ethanol was added to water. They also showed a hydrophobic attractive force magnitude close to the Van der Waals force when the ethanol mole fraction increased about 75%. Subir et al. [13] performed force measurements investigation between an AFM tip and a gold surface. Both surfaces are functionalized with bacteria. Their results showed agreement with extended DLVO theory.
Colloidal science, biomolecular transport, and drug delivery mostly used silica particles [28] [30]- [37]. One of the objectives of this study is to get a fundamental understanding of nano particles in a salt concentration at a very small scale.
In this study, we quantify the force magnitude between micro and nano size probes against smooth flat surfaces under varying quantities of a salt solution.
We also figured out the force trend in varying salt concentrations. In this study, we investigated how ions change in solutions with increasing salt concentrations.
Our study shows that charge density increased with an increase of ionic concentrations.

Method and Materials
The sample surfaces were taken from a big silica wafer (Montco Silicon Technologies, San Jose, CA, USA) that was cut into 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm squares. These silica surfaces were sonicated with a 1 M KOH (Acros Organics, New Jersey, USA) solution for about 15 minutes. Then these samples were rinsed with DI water for about 4 to 5 minutes. The sample surfaces were sonicated with acetone for about 15 minutes. After this step the samples were rinsed with acetone (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) followed by DI water about 2 to 3 minutes. These sample surfaces were then sonicated with isopropanol (Fisher Science Education, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) for another 15 minutes; after this process, they were rinsed with isopropanol and DI water for 2 to 3 minutes. Finally, sample surfaces were sonicated in DI water following a 15-minute rinse with acetone, ethanol and DI water. These samples were dried by air gun and then put them above a hot plate at 120 degrees Celsius for 5 minutes. These sample surfaces were kept in clean boxes so that dust could not deposit above the sample surfaces.

Van der Waals Force
Van der Waals forces are the total of interaction forces between atoms and molecular dipoles of different particles [38]. An electromagnetic field is created when two particles approached each other less than 10 nm apart and electrons moved between particles while Van der Waals force is experienced. Van der Waals forces consist of three different kinds of forces such as Keesom force, Debey force and Dispersion force [39]. Dipole-dipole interactions between atoms or molecules are also known as Keesom forces. Another name for the Dispersion force is the London force. Dispersion forces are non-additive and bring atoms or molecules closer as well as align them. Dispersion force interacted between instantaneous dipole-induced dipole the most simplified approximation of the Van der Waals force between a sphere and a flat surface is [ In the above, R is the radius of the sphere, A is the Hamaker constant, and h is the separation distance.

Electrostatic Force
Due to the ionization or dissociation process, solid surfaces become charged in aqueous solutions [40].

Results
All AFM experiments were carried out by commercially available nanonics Multiview-4000 multi-probe AFM. For AFM image calibration, I have done standard silicon grid imaging. The AFM scanning images were taken in air at room temperature. The scanning speed was 30 micron per second. We had to wait for 30 minutes to stabilize the system. Before imaging the sample surface, I checked resonance frequency and quality factors of the AFM tip. The resonance frequency was 31,580 Hz and quality factor was 1058. And these values were matched with the manufacture's value. The AFM nano tip radius of curvature was 10 nm. Before doing interfacial force measurements, we examined silica surfaces roughness. The AFM scanning area is 10 × 10 µm −2 . The scanning speed was 20 microns per second. Figure 1 shows silica surface AFM topography image. The resolution of the AFM image is very high and its vertical resolution is less than 1 nm.

Force Measurements by Colloid Probe
Between     Figure 4 is of the silica surface charge density versus a differential ionic concentration curve. The lower ionic concentration predicted a lower amount of charge density. In the 0.005 M KCL solution charge density is −0.00218 C/m 2 . The charge density increased with increasing ionic concentration. At higher ionic concentrations, it exhibits a higher density whereas in the 0.1 M KCL concentration it shows that the silica surface density was −0.01287 C/m 2 .

Force Measurements Using Nano Probe
Measured between the AFM's nano tip and silica surface in 0.0005 M KCL solution were interfacial forces. Figure 5 shows experimental results along with theory fitted curves. The solid red line represents the theoretical results, and the    Figure 5 shows repulsive forces due to the similarly charged surfaces and also osmotic pressure of the counter ions. In 0.0005 M KCL solution, force curve exponentially decreased with the distance of about 15 -20 nm. The experimental curve was fitted with theoretical results using Matlab programming. The AFM tip and silica surface densities as a result of the curve fit are given in Table 2. The maximum tip surface charge density was −0.017313576 C/m 2 and the minimum was −0.01575993 C/m 2 . The maximum silica surface charge density was −0.003525419 C/m 2 and the minimum value was −0.001587851 C/m 2 . The average and SD curve fit results in tip and silica surface charge densities of −0.01672 (±0.00084) C/m 2 and −0.00263 (±0.00098) C/m 2 , respectively. Figure 6 shows force versus separation distance curves fitted with theory in different KCL concentrations using nano-probe as opposed to a colloidal probe. Experimental curves were fitted with electrical double layer theory. All of the experimental curves have good agreement with theory. At 0.01 M KCL solution, the double layer thickness is about 3.06 nm and the electrical double layer forces are experienced when the AFM tip and the substrate are 6 nm apart.
The experimental curve shows a maximum force is about 0.12 nN, when the probe reaches to the sample surface. At the lowest ionic concentration, the maximum force magnitude is about 4.5 nN. Figure 7 shows silica surface charge density versus different ionic concentration curve. In the 0.0005 M KCL solution charge density is −0.00263 C/m 2 . The     Figure 8 shows charge density measurements in different ionic concentration using different size of AFM probe. It also shows how charge density varies within ionic concentrations. Both the micron and nano-sized probe charge density increased with increasing of ionic concentrations. The qualitative increased of charge density with higher ionic concentrations agree with theoretical results got by Atalay et al. [40].

Van der Waals Forces in DI Water
AFM experiments were carried out in DI water by using the nano-sized AFM probe which radius of curvature is about 10 nm to measure the Van der Waals force. Figure 9 shows the force versus the separation distance in DI water, and attractive Van der Waals force is observed when the separation distance between the tip and the flat silica surface is very close. The measured force is fitted by the Van der Waals theory (symbols in Figure 9) to estimate the Hamaker constant. Based on the fit of the last part of the force curves, the estimated Hamaker constant is A = 1.99 × 10 −19 J. Hu et al. [42] investigated Van der Waals force measurements between silica and gold surface in DI water, and their Hamaker constant is A = 1.6 × 10 −19 J, which is close to our result.

Conclusion
It is feasible to map the surface charge density of silica surface and AFM collide probes as well as nano probe in KCl solution. To predict how the quantity of ions would affect the acquired force and the surface change density, electrostatic Figure 8. Comparison between the nano probe and micron probe surface charge density mapping above the silicon wafer in different ionic concentrations. World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering theory was used. This theory was tested with both a micro and nano colloid probe. All the testing trials matched the theory, though the micro probe's results coincided more with the predicted results for all ranges of force, while the nano probe's test results were good match during the short-ranged forces. This difference in accuracy can be attributed to the formula used for the test theory. In the original model, all calculations were based upon the shape and size of the micro-size probe. Along with measuring surface charge density, this experiment focused on Van der Waals force providing enough information to calculate the Hamaker constant. In an overall conclusion, data analysis from this experiment shows that the obtained surface charge density increases with the ionic concentration. In addition, the nano probes predict higher surface charge density above the silica surface in KCl solution than the micro-size probe.