{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.040626659585767395, 'fraction_numerical': 0.028080191184280404, 'mean_word_length': 5.038076152304609, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Phylogeography of msp4 genotypes of Anaplasma marginale in beef cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal.

The msp4 gene of A. marginale is unicodon, stable and mostly homogeneous, being considered as a useful marker for phylogeographic characterization of this bacterium. The objective of this work was to analyze the phylogeography of A. marginale based on the msp4 gene in beef cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal, compared to those found in other regions worldwide. The blood samples investigated were collected from 400 animals (200 cows and 200 calves) reared in five extensive breeding farms in this region. The results indicated that of the evaluated samples, 56.75% (227/400) were positive for A. marginale based on the msp1β gene by quantitatitve PCR (qPCR), while 8.37% (19/227) were positive for the msp4 gene in the conventional PCR. In the Network distance analysis, 14 sequences from the Brazilian Pantanal were grouped into a single group with those from Thailand, India, Spain, Colombia, Parana (Brazil), Mexico, Portugal, Argentina, China, Venezuela, Australia, Italy and Minas Gerais (Brazil). Among 68 sequences from Brazil and the world, 15 genotypes were present while genotype number one (#1) was the most distributed worldwide. Both Splitstree and network analyses showed that the A. marginale msp4 sequences detected in beef cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal showed low polymorphism, with the formation of one genogroup phylogenetically related to those found in ruminants from South and Central America, Europe, and Asia.


Introduction
Anaplasma marginale is an intra-erythrocyte bacterium that infects cattle causing the affected animals to gain little weight, reduced milk production, abortion, incurring in treatment expenses and mortality, being, therefore responsible for great economic losses worldwide . Brazil is considered endemic to A. marginale because the molecular prevalence in domestic ruminants can vary from 7.5% to 100% (SILVA et al., 2016).
Among the main beef producing regions, the municipality of Corumbá in the Brazilian Pantanal region has the second largest cattle population in Brazil, with 1.9 million animals (ALHO, 2005;ABREU et al., 2008). The Pantanal is the largest wetland of the world, occupying areas in Brazil, Paraguay and Bolivia, whose main economic activity is the extensive production of beef cattle (ABREU et al., 2008).
The genetic characterization of A. marginale has been crucial for the development and implementation of epidemiological studies and strategies for controlling bovine anaplasmosis. In this regard, major surface proteins (MSPs) of A. marginale involved in the interaction with vertebrate host cells and vector ticks have been used as genetic markers for characterizing the strains of said agent around the world (PALMER et al., 1999;CABEZAS-CRUZ et al., 2013). Sequences of the msp4 gene, which is responsible for encoding the MSP4 immunogenic protein (MOLAD et al., 2009), showed phylogeographic relationships among the A. marginale isolates from Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and India, suggesting similar evolutionary processes among these isolates (DE LA FUENTE et al., 2004;GEORGE et al., 2017).
Therefore, this work aimed at analyzing the phylogeography of Brazilian A. marginale isolates based on the msp4 gene in order to understand the genetic characteristics of this bacterium population in Brazil compared to other regions of the world.

Animals and study area
We sampled beef cattle (Bos taurus indicus) from five breeding and rearing farms in the Central Region of the Pantanal Sul Matogrossense, in the Nhecolândia Sub-region (Table 1). For this purpose, blood samples were collected from 400 animals (200 cows and 200 calves) for a cross-sectional study approved by the National Council for Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) and by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA, FCAV, UNESP, Protocol No. 12375/15)

Blood sampling
Whole blood samples were collected directly from the caudal vein, stored in EDTA (Ethylenediamine Tetra -Sodium Acetic Acid 300 mmol/L) anticoagulant tubes and used for DNA extraction and subsequent Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).

DNA extraction
The DNA from bovine whole blood samples was extracted following the protocol previously described by Kuramae-Izioka (1997).

Amplification reaction for the mammal-endogenous glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gapdh)
To verify the presence of inhibitors in the DNA samples, a standard PCR assay for the mammal endogenous gapdh gene was performed, following the protocol previously established by Birkenheuer et al. (2003).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for A. marginale (msp1β gene)
The samples positive for A. marginale in the conventional PCR based on the gapdh gene were also submitted to quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) based on the msp1β gene, according to the protocol described by Carelli et al. (2007), with modifications (SOUZA RAMOS et al., 2019).

Conventional PCR (cPCR) for A. marginale based on the msp4 gene
The samples positive for A. marginale in qPCR were submitted to cPCR based on the msp4 gene, using a protocol previously described by De la Fuente et al. (2002). The reaction with a final volume of 25 μL contained 5 μL of genomic DNA, 10X concentrated buffer, 0.75 mM MgCl 2 , 1.25 μM of each primer oligonucleotide the msp45-(5'-GGGAGCTCCTATGAATTACAGAGAATTGTTTAC-3') and

Purification and sequencing of amplified products
The amplified products were purified with Silica Bead DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific  , San Jose, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The sequencing of the purified products was performed using an automated system based on the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method (SANGER et al., 1977). The process was carried out using the ABI PRISM 3700 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystem  , Foster City, CA, USA), in the Technology Department of the College of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences (FCAV/UNESP), Center for Biological Resources and Genomic Biology (CREBIO), using the same oligonucleotides employed in the cPCR assay for detecting A. marginale based on the msp4 gene (1733F and 2957R2) (Integrated DNA Technologies  , Cedar Rapids, USA).

Analysis of the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the A. marginale msp4 gene
Sequencing analysis was performed by the Phred/Phrap/Consed software (EWING & GREEN, 1998), which evaluates the electropherograms generated in the sequencing, observing the quality of the peaks corresponding to each sequenced base and assigning an error probability to each one of the samples. Bases with Phred-quality above 20 were used in the subsequent genotype analyses. The consensus sequences were also generated by Phred/Phrap/Consed. The BLASTn software (ALTSCHUL et al., 1990) was used to compare the identity of the obtained nucleotide sequences with those stored in the international databases (GenBank) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) (BENSON et al., 2002).

Genotype diversity
The alignment of nucleotide sequences of the msp4 gene obtained in the present study was used to calculate the nucleotide diversity (π), polymorphism level (genotype diversity -[DH]), number of genotypes (h) and mean number of nucleotide differences (K) using the DnaSP v5 software (LIBRADO & ROZAS, 2009).

Nucleotide distance analysis
The network distance analysis of the msp4 sequences detected in the present study was conducted together with 54 other sequences from several regions of the world and retrieved from GenBank, using the Splitstree software with the Neighbor-Net and Uncorrected p-distance parameters. The popART software was also used (LEIGH & BRYANT, 2015).

Conventional PCR (cPCR) for mammal-gapdh endogenous gene
All 400 DNA samples extracted from bovine blood were positive for the mammal-endogenous gene (gapdh) in the cPCR, discarding the occurrence of false negative results due to PCR inhibitors. The assay was performed after the spectrophotometric evaluation of the average concentration and absorbance ratios (260/280 and 260/230 nm) of the extracted DNA samples, which assumed values of 25.14 ng/μL, (SD ± 10.14), 1.8 nm (SD ± 0.12), and 1.33 nm (SD ± 0.56), respectively.

Anaplasma marginale genotypes based on the msp4 gene
Among the 14 nucleotide sequences of the msp4 gene obtained in the present study, 1 genotype were identified, with π = 0.00024 ± 0.0020 DH = 0.1429 ± 0.00011029 and K = 0.14286. Among the 68 msp4 gene sequences analyzed (corresponding to those detected in the present study and others retrieved from the GenBank), 15 genotypes were identified, with a polymorphism of DH = 0.6558 ± 0.062 and K = 2.44 (Table 3).

Nucleotide distance analysis and genotype network
The distance analysis using Splitstree software with the "Neighbor-Net" and "Uncorrected p-distance" parameters showed that the 14 msp4 sequences of A. marginale detected in beef cattle in the Brazilian Pantanal were grouped into a single group with those previously detected in Thailand, India, Spain, Colombia, Parana (Brazil), Mexico, Portugal, Argentina, China, Venezuela, Australia, Italy and Minas Gerais (Brazil) (Figure 1). In the Brazilian Pantanal, only one genotype (#1) was found. The analysis of the 68 sequences by the software DnaSP v5 indicated 15 genotypes, being genotype #1 the most distributed, since it has been detected in cattle in 12 countries (Brazil [Pantanal-MS, Minas Gerais and Paraná], Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Argentina, Thailand, China, Portugal, Italy, Spain, Australia and India), followed by genotype #8 detected in 5 countries (Sudan, Japan, South_Africa, Spain, Australia), genotype #5 found in 4 countries (Switzerland, Italy, Turkey and Israel), and genotype #6 found in cattle from 2 countries (USA and Iran). Genotype #1, corresponding to the majority (57.35%; 39/68) of the msp4 sequences detected in cattle in the world and also the only one found in beef cattle in the Brazilian Pantanal, showed to be related to genotypes #3, #4 and #11, respectively, detected in cattle in Mexico, Italy and Mexico. Genotype #1 showed to be distant from genotypes #7 and #10, detected in cattle from the USA and Sudan, respectively (Figure 2).

Discussion
Herein, the qPCR assay based on the msp1β gene was chose for the screening for A. marginale in beef cattle blood samples collected in the Brazilian Pantanal due to its high reprodutibility, specificity and sensitivity (10 1 DNA copies/10 μl of standard DNA and erythrocytes infected with 3 × 10 1 A. marginale / mL) (CARELLI et al., 2007;SOUZA RAMOS et al., 2019). Therefore, the incongruent results found between the qPCR and cPCR assays used in the present study, based on msp1β and msp4 genes, respectively, are mainly due to the highest sensitivity of the former compared to the latter.
The A. marginale msp4 gene has been proposed as a molecular marker for studying the phylogeography of this   LA FUENTE et al., 2001;GEORGE et al., 2017;MOLAD et al., 2009;VIDOTTO et al., 2006). The present study showed that A. marginale msp4 genotypes detected in beef cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal are phylogeographically related to those circulating in countries from South and Central America, Europe, and Asia. De la Fuente et al. (2002, 2004 reported that analyses based on the msp4 gene provide phylogenetic and phylogeographic information and data on the A. marginale samples. Jaimes-Dueñez et al. (2018) analyzed A. marginale samples phylogeographically and detected, in a longitudinal study with dairy cattle, that Colombian isolates were highly correlated with Mexican, Brazilian, Venezuelan, European and Asian isolates, suggesting a high genetic similarity between the strains from Mexico and South American countries. Vidotto et al. (2006) verified a high similarity between A. marginale msp4 sequences detected in dairy cattle in Paraná and those from the USA, Europe, and Asia. Vidotto et al. (2006) reported that the phylogeographic distribution of the A. marginale strains was better demonstrated and more uniform when the msp4 gene was analyzed compared to the msp1α gene. Recently, Souza Ramos et al. (2019) identified 14 A. marginale msp1α strains in the same studied region, with eight never before described in the literature, showing a high genetic diversity of this agent based on a fast-evolving gene.
In this study, the msp4 gene was considered as a stable marker for the phylogenetic characterization of A. marginale samples, corroborating with De la Fuente et al. (2004). The 14 Pantanal msp4 sequences clustered into one genotype (#1), which represented the most frequent genotype detected around the world. In total, 15 A. marginale msp4 genotypes were discriminated in the genotype network, which was performed with sequences detected in the present study together with others retrieved from GenBank and found in other regions of the world. Belkahia et al. (2015) reported that this heterogeneity could be partially explained by the importation of live cattle and/or the spread of infected ticks. Estrada-Peña et al. (2009) andRodríguez-Vivas et al. (2014) suggested that the environmental conditions of each country could modulate the geographical distribution of genotypes, although studies related to the evolutionary history and epidemiological characteristics of these genotypes are still necessary to determine their importance for livestock.
Considering that msp4 is a conservative gene, it would be expected low values of variable sites (VS), diversity of genotypes (DH), nucleotide diversity (π), and mean number of nucleotide difference (K) when a population of A. marginale genotypes would be evaluated in a certain geographic region. Interestingly, when A. marginale genotypes found in different countries were evaluated, higher values of genetic diversity were observed, showing an increase of 17 times in the mean number of nucleotide difference, and 41 times in the nucleotide diversity, with 13 variable sites. This finding might be associated with the different degrees of selection pressure imposed to the pathogen in each locality around the world. Albeit with low number when compared to more evolving genes (such as msp1α), the occurrence of mutational events throughout the evolutive history of A. marginale can be seen in genotype network presented in this manuscript. Future studies aiming at unravelling the "missed genotypes", represented by median-vectors in the genotype network, in Brazil and other parts of the world, are much needed aiming at elucidating the evolutionary history of A. marginale msp4 genotypes.

Conclusion
The A. marginale msp4 sequences detected in beef cattle in the Brazilian Pantanal showed low polymorphism. The only one A. marginale msp4 genotype detected in cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal was phylogeographically related to those found in ruminants from South and Central America, Europe, and Asia. Studies related to the evolutionary history and epidemiological characteristics of these genotypes are still necessary to determine their importance for livestock.