{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021708352996696555, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004247286455875413, 'mean_word_length': 5.604361370716511, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
OP101 Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment At UW Medicine

Introduction: New medical technologies are an important part of delivering innovative healthcare, however, expanding use of medical technology is a major contributor to rising costs. The increase in medical spending is related to new technologies being rapidly developed, marketed and adopted; and often being incorporated into health systems with little evidence. They also come with higher prices when compared to existing technologies. Methods: We describe how University of Washington (UW) Medicine has designed, and developed a new hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) program, Smart Innovation. Smart Innovation will replace a fragmented and complex set of purchasing and coverage-decision processes. The program will streamline the decision-making process for new medical technologies and balance quick turnaround with rigorous evidence standards. The program is also being developed in collaboration with UW Medicine's Value Analysis team, an evidence-based purchasing team and MedApproved, a new centralized software program for medical purchasing at UW Medicine. Results: Smart Innovation has been reviewing technologies during its first year and has received encouraging results. For example, by adopting a new liver ablation technology, UW Medicine has estimated improved patient outcomes by reducing the number of procedures and adverse events; as well as saving approximately USD 8,000 per patient. Additionally, The Smart Innovation program has achieved projected cost avoidance from deciding not to adopt uncertain or investigational technologies. For example, by not adopting a new bladder cancer screen, our models indicate UW Medicine will avoid spending USD 1.5 million per year. Conclusions: Smart Innovation is proving to be an effective program for reviewing and making critical healthcare policy decisions that is showing significant fiscal and patient improvements for UW Medicine. As the program continues to grow and become embedded into UW Medicine, its impacts will become even more valuable and system-wide.