{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021456804065499716, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01355166572557877, 'mean_word_length': 5.110344827586207, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of the number and the position of transfixation pins in acrylic connecting bars.

Acrylic columns are commonly used in external skeletal fixators, especially for fracture management or trans-articular fixations. To the authors' knowledge, there are no studies demonstrating if the number or position of the transfixation pins influence the ultimate strength and stiffness of the acrylic column. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the number and position of transfixation pins (concentric versus eccentric) on the strength and stiffness of acrylic columns placed in axial compression. We hypothesized that strength and stiffness of acrylic columns under axial compression would not be affected by the number or position of the transfixation pins through the column. Three different groups of 12 acrylic columns were constructed with 4, 6, and 8 pins. In each group, 6 columns were constructed with the pins placed concentrically and the remaining 6 columns with the pins placed eccentrically. Each column was then placed under axial compression using a biomechanical testing machine. No significant differences were observed in ultimate strength regarding the number or position of transfixation pins (P = 0.83 and P = 0.27, respectively). However, stiffness was significantly decreased for columns with 4 eccentric pins compared with columns with 6 and 8 eccentric pins (P < 0.01) and with columns with 4 concentric pins (P < 0.001). Although the effects of transfixation pins on the rigidity of acrylic columns do not appear to be clinically significant, these tests were performed only in compression and results might differ if complete external fixator systems are used with different models of testing. Future studies are recommended.