{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.06097560975609756, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011178861788617886, 'mean_word_length': 5.15625, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 1, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Interpreting the World: Kant's Philosophy of History and Politics . By William James Booth (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1986. xix, 189 p. $27.50).

In the celebrated and beautiful close of the Critique of Practical Reason, later abbreviated on his own tombstone ("the starry heavens above me, the moral law within me") Kant had stressed the gulf that divides nature and persons, the chasm that separates causality and moral self-determination; but in the Critique of Judgment he had striven to bridge that gulf through a "teleological substrate": persons freely pursue both "relative" ends given by "pathology" and reason-ordained "objective ends" (e.g., respect for persons as ends-inthemselves), while nature is interpreted through ends (purposes, functions) that mechanical causality cannot explain. He went on (in the "aesthetic" half of the Judgment) to propose two ways of "reading" the world: the "beautiful" (orderly purpose) and the "sublime" (awe-inspiring chaos).