{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03715670436187399, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.560975609756097, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Spatial representations from language and visual perception

Spatial representations contain parameters for locating objects in space (e.g., egocentric bearing, distance). These spatial parameters have attributes such as bias (systematic error in value), strength (accessibility to memory retrieval and computation processes), and precision (stability over time and over observations). Spatial representations are functionally equivalent, if they have equivalent parameters with equal attribute values. • What is “functional equivalence”? Are representations from language and visual perception functionally equivalent?