{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018548827059465357, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002727768685215494, 'mean_word_length': 5.597122302158273, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Unveiling the Interplay Between Global Link Arrangements and Network Management Algorithms on Dragonfly Networks

Network messaging delay historically constitutes a large portion of the wall-clock time for High Performance Computing (HPC) applications, as these applications run on many nodes and involve intensive communication among their tasks. Dragonfly network topology has emerged as a promising solution for building exascale HPC systems owing to its low network diameter and large bisection bandwidth. Dragonfly includes local links that form groups and global links that connect these groups via high bandwidth optical links. Many aspects of the dragonfly network design are yet to be explored, such as the performance impact of the connectivity of the global links, i.e., global link arrangements, the bandwidth of the local and global links, or the job allocation algorithm. This paper first introduces a packet-level simulation framework to model the performance of HPC applications in detail. The proposed framework is able to simulate known MPI (message passing interface) routines as well as applications with custom-defined communication patterns for a given job placement algorithm and network topology. Using this simulation framework, we investigate the coupling between global link bandwidth and arrangements, communication pattern and intensity, job allocation and task mapping algorithms, and routing mechanisms in dragonfly topologies. We demonstrate that by choosing the right combination of system settings and workload allocation algorithms, communication overhead can be decreased by up to 44%. We also show that circulant arrangement provides up to 15% higher bisection bandwidth compared to the other arrangements, but for realistic workloads, the performance impact of link arrangements is less than 3%.