{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01847826086956522, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002173913043478261, 'mean_word_length': 5.181208053691275, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Music Theory Curriculum for the 99%

Due to the lack of diversity as represented by the repertoire typically studied in the undergraduate music theory core, a number of scholars have called for an "integrated" or stylistically neutral theory curriculum, in which more pedagogical attention is devoted to jazz, world, and popular music. I contend that this approach is fundamentally insufficient and inadequate to genuinely address the diversity problems facing the field. Instead, I propose for all music students that the entire first year of theory coursework be devoted exclusively to popular music, with the study of other styles reserved for upper-division courses according to academic interests or tracks. In this essay, I present some of the motivating factors behind my recommendation, provide a brief sketch of what such a curriculum would look like, and discuss some of the challenges in its implementation.