{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020618556701030927, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004581901489117984, 'mean_word_length': 6.163934426229508, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Further revision of the caddisfly family Uenoidae (Trichoptera): evidence for inclusion of Neophylacinae and Thremmatidae

Abstract. A survey of characters within the Limnephilidae was made to test the cladistic hypothesis underlying traditional classification placing Neophylacinae as a subfamily of the Limnephilidae. Characters emerged which support an alternative hypothesis of phylogeny and classification, linking the Neophylacinae with the Thremmatidae and with the Uenoidae. The Uenoidae as defined here contain two monophyletic groups: subfamily Uenoinae containing the four genera Uenoa, Sericostriata, Neothremma and Farula previously constituting Uenoidae (sensu Wiggins et al., 1985), and subfamily Thremmatinae consisting of Thremma, Neophylax and Oligophlebodes. The new classification is shown to have predictive value for behaviour and ecology of the taxa.