{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0142602495543672, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.314606741573034, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A case study looking at appropriate catheterization.

The use of indwelling urinary catheters in older adults is not without its consequences. Catheters used appropriately are cost effective and very useful in clinical practice. However, what happens when catheters are used as a means of aiding the nurse rather than the patient? What sort of problems can practitioners inadvertently create? In this case study Mrs Seymour is tracked through the process of admission for osteoporosis. The relative advantages and disadvantages of catheterization are discussed.