{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01773049645390071, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004964539007092199, 'mean_word_length': 4.953586497890296, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Particle size of bone graft and method of impaction affect initial stability of cemented cupsHuman cadaveric and synthetic pelvic specimen studies

We determined the effect of bone graft particle size and impaction technique on the initial stability of cemented acetabular cups. First, acetabular reconstructions were performed in human cadaveric pelvic bones in which type 2 AAOS cavitary defects were created. Reconstructions were made with small bone grafts (average 2 mm) produced by a bone mill or large bone grafts (average 9 mm) produced by hand with a rongeur. All chips were made from freshly-frozen femoral heads. Impaction was done using acetabular impactors and a hammer. We did a loading experiment with a gradually increasing dynamic load up to 3000 N. We used radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to determine cup stability. The cups were more stable when large bone grafts were used. Because of limitations of the cadaver model, we developed a synthetic acetabular model. For validation of this model, we repeated the experiments using small and large bone grafts. The results with both models were similar. In the synthetic model, we compared impaction with hammer and impactors with the reversed reaming technique using manual compression on the reamer. The latter method resulted in more migration. We recommend firm impaction with a hammer of large bone grafts for optimal stability of the cup.