{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01717791411042945, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00245398773006135, 'mean_word_length': 5.375, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluation of a behavioral audiometry simulator for teaching visual reinforcement audiometry.

Eight audiology students with little or no visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) experience each performed a VRA test on an infant. Four of the students received approximately 5 hours of behavioral audiometry simulator (BAS) training, and 1 week later, after the first VRA test, all eight students tested a second infant. Student performance was rated by three audiologists who were experienced in performing VRA with infants. The performance of the group that received BAS training improved significantly while the performance of the control group did not. Among the students who received BAS training, those who improved the most during stimulated testing also showed the greatest improvement in VRA with real infants.