{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031082360366046072, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02003786683496371, 'mean_word_length': 4.867016352977476, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Botulinum toxin injections for Japanese patients with urinary incontinence caused by neurogenic detrusor overactivity: Clinical evaluation of onabotulinumtoxinA in a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial with an open‐label extension

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin treatment (onabotulinumtoxinA 200 units) for Japanese patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity caused by spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. Methods Patients with urinary incontinence refractory to pharmacological treatment were enrolled and randomized in a phase III trial. A single dose of onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 11) or placebo (n = 10) was given in the double‐blind phase, and repeat injections of onabotulinumtoxinA were given in the subsequent open‐label phase. Outcomes included urinary incontinence episodes, urodynamics, patient‐reported outcomes and adverse events. Results The onabotulinumtoxinA group showed a numerically greater reduction in the number of urinary incontinence episodes per day than the placebo group, with the difference between the groups at week 6 of −3.02 (95% confidence interval −5.85 to −0.19). The onabotulinumtoxinA group also showed greater improvements in urodynamic assessments. Adverse events related to onabotulinumtoxinA injections were hematuria, urinary retention, urinary bladder hemorrhage, autonomic dysreflexia and epididymitis. Most events were deemed mild or moderate. Conclusions Intradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA are efficacious and tolerable for Japanese patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity‐related symptoms that are difficult to manage with anticholinergics and/or β3‐adrenergic receptor agonists.

Abbreviations & Acronyms AE = adverse event BoNTA = onabotulinumtoxinA CI = confidence interval CIC = clean intermittent catheterization FAS = full analysis set IDC = involuntary detrusor contraction MCC = maximum cystometric capacity MS = multiple sclerosis NDO = neurogenic detrusor overactivity P maxIDC = maximum detrusor pressure during the first involuntary detrusor contraction PVR = post-void residual QOL = quality of life SCI = spinal cord injury SD = standard deviation SE = standard error TBS = treatment benefit scale TC = treatment cycle UI = urinary incontinence Introduction NDO is a urodynamic observation characterized by IDC during the filling phase, and its primary cause is neurological conditions, such as SCI and MS. NDO frequently induces UI, which can negatively impact QOL, and high intravesical pressure, which can damage the upper urinary tract. [1][2][3] Pharmacological treatments including anticholinergics are generally used for NDO to decrease intravesical pressure and improve continence. However, their use is often limited by insufficient efficacy and/or intolerable side-effects, such as constipation and dry mouth. 4,5 Botulinum toxin type A is a neuromuscular blocker that inhibits the presynaptic release of acetylcholine at the parasympathetic nerve terminal, and causes the detrusor muscle to relax. 6 At present, BoNTA is the only botulinum toxin formulation that has been approved worldwide for the treatment of NDO. It has been shown to improve NDO in several randomized trials carried out mainly in Europe and North America. [7][8][9] Its use is recommended worldwide as a treatment option for NDO patients who cannot have satisfactory results with prior therapies (e.g. anticholinergics). 10,11 In Japan, before carrying out the present trial, BoNTA was assessed only in an open-label study with a relatively small number of NDO patients and its use had not been approved for NDO. 12 Thus, the present trial was carried out to evaluate its efficacy and safety in Japanese NDO patients who had UI refractory to other drugs in support of registration in Japan.

Participants
Patients aged 20 years or older with NDO secondary to SCI (with neurological injury level at C5 or below) or MS were enrolled. They had to have six or more episodes of UI recorded in a 3-day diary, with no more than one UI-free day. The patients were all refractory to anticholinergics and/ or b 3 -adrenergic receptor agonists, experiencing ineffectiveness or intolerability. These NDO medications were maintained on the same treatment regimen, if necessary, throughout the double-blind phase (TC 1), but could be reduced or discontinued in the open-label phase (TCs 2 and 3). Patients could join regardless of CIC use; however, they had to provide consent to use CIC when the investigator deemed it necessary. The exclusion criteria included any diseases, functional abnormalities or bladder surgery that might have affected bladder functions; previous treatment of any urological condition with botulinum toxin; and a PVR urine volume of >200 mL in patients with spontaneous voiding. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (at a ratio of 1:1) to BoNTA 200 U or placebo, while being stratified according to NDO etiology (SCI with neurological injury level at C5 to C8, T1 or below, or MS).

Design
This phase III trial included a randomized, placebocontrolled, double-blind phase followed by an open-label retreatment phase (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02849418). The study was carried out in Japan from October 2016 to December 2018, with approval from the institutional review board obtained for all 12 study sites and in accordance with Good Clinical Practice regulations. The trial comprised a screening period (up to 4 weeks before the first dose) and a treatment period (48 weeks) consisting of two phases: (i) a comparison was made between single injections of BoNTA 200 U and placebo in the double-blind phase; and (ii) repeat injections of BoNTA 200 U were given in the subsequent open-label phase (Fig. 1). BoNTA TC 1 (n = 21; red cells in Fig. 2) was defined as the first TC with BoNTA, including patients who were treated with BoNTA in the double-blind phase, as well as patients who were treated with placebo in the doubleblind phase and then received BoNTA in the subsequent cycle. Similarly, BoNTA TC 2 (n = 11; green cells in Fig. 2) and BoNTA TC 3 (n = 3; blue cell in Fig. 2) were defined as the second and third TCs with BoNTA, respectively.

Treatment
Patients were given prophylactic antibiotics before and after treatment, and on the day of treatment. Local anesthesia could be intravesically instilled (with or without sedation) at the discretion of the investigator. General anesthesia was used for SCI patients with neurological injury levels of C5 to C8, according to local site practice due to the potential for developing autonomic dysreflexia from the injection procedure. A rigid or flexible cystoscope with a 22-G needle attached (BoNee; Coloplast, Humlebaek, Denmark) was used to inject 200 U of BoNTA (BOTOX; Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) and placebo, both reconstituted with 30 mL of saline. Each dose was equally divided into 30 sites in the detrusor muscle, sparing the dome and trigone. Patients could request retreatment of BoNTA 200 U at 12 weeks or later, up to 36 weeks after the first treatment, and then they entered the open-label phase, if qualified, to receive retreatment of BoNTA 200 U, as shown in Figure 1. To be qualified for retreatment, patients had to have experienced at least four episodes of UI, with no more than one urinary incontinencefree day, recorded in the bladder diary during the three consecutive days of the week before the qualification for retreatment visit.

Evaluations of efficacy and safety
A 3-day diary was utilized to gather data during the screening period and in the week before each post-treatment visit. The primary end-point was the change from baseline in the number of daily UI episodes at week 6 after a single dose. Secondary end-points included the changes from baseline in MCC and P maxIDC after a single dose, the change from baseline in the number of daily UI episodes after repeated doses at week 6 for each total number of BoNTA treatment and time to patient request for retreatment. Patient-reported outcome after a single dose and in the BoNTA TCs 2 and 3 was assessed using TBS. 13 The patients with a response of "greatly improved" or "improved" among response options (greatly improved, improved, not changed or worsened) were considered to have a positive response on the TBS. With respect to safety, AEs were collected, PVR urine volume was measured and CIC use for urinary retention or elevated PVR was recorded. Clinical laboratory tests (i.e. chemistry, hematology and urinalysis including urine culture) were carried out, as well as monitoring of vital signs, ultrasonographic observation of the bladder and kidney and 12lead electrocardiogram recording. Blood samples were collected to assess immunogenicity at screening and at the end of the study.

Statistical analysis
The primary analyses were carried out for the FAS (all randomized patients with one or more post-baseline assessments of efficacy). Safety analyses were carried out for the safety population (patients who had received at least one dose of any study drug). A sample size was determined as 30 patients based on enrollment feasibility. The study provided a 26% power to detect treatment differences for the change from baseline in the mean number of daily UI episodes at a significance level of 5%, with the assumption that the mean difference would be À1.5 episodes per day, and its SD would be 3.0 episodes per day. For the analysis of the primary endpoint, a mixed model for repeated measures was used with treatment, visit, baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction and baseline value-by-visit interaction as fixed effects. The present study was not designed to evaluate formal statistical hypotheses. Therefore, the multiplicity was not adjusted for any end-points, and sensitivity/supportive analyses were not planned. Considering the small target number of patients, no subgroup analyses were planned.

Results
Although 30 patients were to be randomized according to the initial plan, recruitment was closed when 21 patients (11 patients in the BoNTA group, 10 patients in the placebo group) were randomized into the study and received study treatment in TC 1 because of difficulty in enrollment of patients. All 21 patients had SCI; one patient with MS was screened, but did not fulfill the eligibility criteria.
The 10 patients in the placebo group all entered the open-label phase and received retreatment with BoNTA 200 U; in contrast, approximately half the patients (5/11) in the BoNTA group completed the 48-week study period without receiving retreatment of BoNTA 200 U. In total, BoNTA 200 U was given more than once to 11 patients, three of whom received it three times (Fig. 2). No patients discontinued the study.
The baseline demographics and disease characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1. A lack of efficacy was the primary reason for being inadequately managed with prior NDO medications in all patients.

Efficacy of single-dose treatment (TC 1: double-blind phase)
The change from baseline in the mean number of daily UI episodes at week 6 was À3.20 in the BoNTA group and À0.18 in the placebo group (Fig. 3, Table 2). The difference between the treatment groups was À3.02 (95% CI À5.85 to À0. 19), with a numerically greater reduction noted in the BoNTA group (Table 2).
Compared with the placebo group, patients in the BoNTA group had an increase in MCC and a decrease in P maxIDC at week 6 ( Table 2). The proportion of patients without any IDC at week 6 was higher in the BoNTA group (45%) as compared with the placebo group (20%; Table 2).
In addition, the proportion of patients attaining 100% reduction in daily UI episodes from baseline (i.e. "dry") at week 6 was higher in the BoNTA group (36%) as compared with the placebo group (0%; Fig. 4). The BoNTA group also included a higher proportion of patients with a positive response on the TBS at week 6 ( Table 3).

Efficacy of repeated-dose treatment
The change from baseline in the mean number of daily UI episodes at week 6 for each total number of BoNTA treatment is shown in Figure 5. The mean number of daily UI episodes at week 6 was reduced from the study baseline for most patients receiving repeated doses. In the majority of patients, the changes from the study baseline in the mean number of daily UI episodes at week 6 were similar among the BoNTA TCs. The proportions of patients attaining 100% reduction from baseline in daily UI episodes ("dry") at week 6 of BoNTA TCs 2 and 3 were 36% (4/11) and 33% (1/3), respectively. The proportions of patients with a positive response on the TBS at week 6 of BoNTA TCs 2 and 3 were 82% (9/11) and 67% (2/3), respectively.

Duration of efficacy
In the BoNTA group, 54.5% (6/11) requested retreatment with BoNTA within 36 weeks after the first treatment and 45.5% (5/11) did not request retreatment (Fig. 6). The median time to patient request for retreatment was 246.0 days in the BoNTA group and 84.5 days in the placebo group.
The median time to qualification for retreatment was 246.0 days in the BoNTA group and 85.0 days in the placebo group.

Safety
The incidence of AEs during the first 12 weeks of TC 1 was 73% (8/11) in the BoNTA group and 50% (5/10) in the placebo group (Table 4). Treatment-related AEs in the BoNTA group were hematuria, urinary retention and autonomic dysreflexia (9% [1/11] each), which were localized to the urinary tract except for autonomic dysreflexia. All AEs reported in the BoNTA group were deemed mild or moderate. Adverse events reported for two or more patients in BoNTA TCs 1--3 are shown in Table 5. Urinary tract infection was the most common AE, and its incidence in BoNTA TCs 1-3 was 24%, 27% and 67%, respectively. Treatmentrelated AEs reported in any BoNTA TCs were hematuria (14%, 3/21), autonomic dysreflexia (10%, 2/21), urinary retention (5%, 1/21), urinary bladder hemorrhage (5%, 1/21) and epididymitis (5%, 1/21), which were also localized to the urinary tract, except for autonomic dysreflexia and epididymitis. One patient with spontaneous voiding in the BoNTA group used CIC during the study period, as this patient's PVR urine volume at week 2 of TC 1 was 457.3 mL, showing an increase of 382.3 mL from baseline. In this patient, the PVR urine volume dropped below 200 mL at week 36.
Three events of autonomic dysreflexia occurred in two patients. The events were considered related to the injection procedure, as they occurred on the day of study treatment or the following day. The patients' neurological injury levels were T1 or below, and neither patient received general anesthesia during treatment administration. Most AEs reported during the study period were mild or moderate in severity. No death or treatment discontinuation was reported. No significant changes or findings were detected by clinical laboratory tests, monitoring of vital signs, ultrasonographic observation of the bladder and kidney or 12-lead electrocardiogram recording, although urinalysis results showed between-group differences associated with the urinary tract infections reported. No seroconversions for neutralizing antibodies against BoNTA were reported.

Discussion
In the treatment of NDO, primary goals are to protect the upper urinary tract by lowering intravesical pressure and increasing bladder capacity, and improve QOL by reducing incontinence. 14,15 These parameters were improved by treatment with  BoNTA 200 U in the present study. At week 6 after the first dose, the BoNTA group showed numerically greater improvements than the placebo group in the primary and secondary end-points associated with NDO symptoms. These results were in line with those observed in the randomized trials carried out mainly in Europe and North America. [7][8][9] The proportion of patients with a positive response on the TBS at week 6 was higher in the BoNTA group as compared with the placebo group. Because TBS is an instrument used to measure overall patient perceived outcome after treatment, the positive response on the TBS suggests that the QOL of patients was improved. In addition, repeated treatment with BoNTA showed a tendency toward improvements in the UI reduction and TBS, although the number of patients was limited. From a safety perspective, BoNTA 200 U was tolerated well, with AEs localized primarily to the urinary tract in both the double-blind and open-label phases. These results closely resemble those obtained in the randomized trials carried out mainly in Europe and North America, which did not enroll patients with SCI and neurological injury level of C5 to C8. [7][8][9] Because the present study allowed enrolment of those patients, general anesthesia had to be used in patients with SCI in thoracic spinal cord 6 or above, as these patients were considered to have a relatively high risk of autonomic dysreflexia. [16][17][18] Actually, general anesthesia was used to prevent autonomic dysreflexia in one patient with a neurological injury level of C6 in the BoNTA group (TC 1) and three patients with neurological injury level of T1 or below in the placebo group (one patient in TC 1, and two patients in TCs 1 and 2). In these patients, autonomic dysreflexia did not occur during the injection procedure, although three events of autonomic dysreflexia were reported in the patients with neurological injury level of T1 or below who did not receive general anesthesia. These findings suggest that general anesthesia was effective in reducing the risk of autonomic dysreflexia. In addition, spinal anesthesia might also be used to prevent autonomic dysreflexia, 19 and future investigations on its usefulness are warranted.
One limitation of the present study was that careful interpretation was required because of the small sample size due to difficulties with recruitment. In addition, no patients with MS were analyzed. However, given that BoNTA improved symptoms and urodynamic parameters in patients with SCI and MS in the trials carried out mainly in Europe and North America, 20 and that ethnic differences are unlikely to occur in the response to BoNTA, the favorable results with SCI patients in the present study suggest that BoNTA might be effective in Japanese patients with MS as well.   .38) †A positive treatment response was defined as a score of either 1 (greatly improved) or 2 (improved). Missing data due to any reason were regarded as non-response until week 12 after first treatment. Statistics were to be missing when the number of responders was too low/high to estimate the value.
In conclusion, intradetrusor injections of BoNTA 200 U reduced the number of UI episodes and improved urodynamic parameters in Japanese NDO patients who had UI refractory to anticholinergics and/or b 3 -adrenergic receptor agonists. The treatment was well tolerated, and most AEs were mild or moderate. The results of this trial suggest that BoNTA might be a useful option for Japanese NDO patients who cannot be managed adequately with other drugs due to ineffectiveness and/or intolerability.