{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016286644951140065, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0010857763300760044, 'mean_word_length': 5.358620689655172, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Protein Folding from the Perspective of Chaperone Action

Predicting the three-dimensional (3D) functional structures of proteins remains an important computational milestone in molecular biology to be achieved. This feat is hinged on a clear understanding of the mechanism which proteins use to fold into their native structures. Since Levinthal's paradox, there has been a lot of progress in understanding this mechanism. Most of the earlier attempts were caught between assigning either hydrophobic interactions or hydrogen bonding as the dominant folding force. However, a consensus now seems to be emerging about hydrogen bonding being a stronger force. Interestingly, a view from chaperone action may further throw some light on the nature of the folding mechanism. Thus the very mechanisms which prevent protein aggregation and misfolding, could help us have a better understanding of the folding mechanism itself.