{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.00872093023255814, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.18562874251497, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Practical Approach To Using Simulation To Analyze The Effects Of A Non-poisson Stream On Traffic In A Switch

In this article, we investigate the effects that offering preferential treatment to a particular trafflc stream has on analyzing the pegormanee of a telecommunications switch. These effects arise in any telecommunications switch where some trafflc is given priority over others for outgoing trunks. The mechanism most commonly used is a queue or buffer that holds the call until an idle trunk is found or until a timer goes off and an attempt to seize a trunk is reinitiated. Analysis of the pe$ormance of the switch and the effects of the priority treatment mechanism can range from a simple application of common formulas from Queueing Theory to a complicated process where simulation is the only accurate method. Specifically, this article describes a situation that removes analytical analysis from practicality and shows the difference in performance between using simplifying analytical assumptions and simulation.