{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027285129604365622, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.273504273504273, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Is Foundation Content an Archaic Educational Construct? Yes!

Education. Its purpose is to provide a vehicle for the expression of contrasting views on controversial topics in social work education. Our goal is to illuminate important debates and explore the diverse perspectives that are shaping social work education. In each feature, two or more individuals are invited to comment on a topic about which they have differing viewpoints. Each commentator is given an opportunity to make a brief rebuttal. In this issue, Roberta R. Creene (Professor, Indiana University) and Frank R. Baskind (Dean, School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University) address the question: Is foundation content an archaic educational construct?