{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030894308943089432, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.512195121951219, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clarithromycin versus furazolidone for naïve Helicobacter pylori infected patients in a high clarithromycin resistance area

The increase in antibiotic resistance makes the eradication of Helicobacter pylori more difficult. Considering the limitations of the application of susceptibility‐guided therapy, it is important to find an effective empirical regimen. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost‐effectiveness of clarithromycin‐based bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy (C‐BQT) and furazolidone‐based bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy (F‐BQT) in naïve H. pylori positive patients.