{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04791666666666667, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0020833333333333333, 'mean_word_length': 5.1210191082802545, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The moral identity picture scale (MIPS): Measuring the full scope of moral identity

ABSTRACT Morality is core to people’s identity. Existing moral identity scales measure good/moral vs. bad/immoral, but the Theory of Dyadic Morality highlights two-dimensions of morality: valence (good/moral vs. bad/immoral) and agency (high/agent vs. low/recipient). The Moral Identity Picture Scale (MIPS) measures this full space through 16 vivid pictures. Participants receive scores for these two dimensions and for four moral roles: hero, villain, victim, and beneficiary. Self-identified heroes are more empathic, villains more narcissist, victims more depressed. People generally see themselves as heroes, but there are group differences. For example, Duke MBA students self-identify more as villains. Data reveals that the beneficiary role is ill-defined, collapsing the two-dimensional space of moral identity into a triangle anchored by hero, villain, and victim..