{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018970189701897018, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0018066847335140017, 'mean_word_length': 5.441860465116279, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Sequence stratigraphy: a revolution without a cause?

Abstract The paper presents personal reflections on the origins and utility of sequence stratigraphic models. These focus on two questions: (1) does sequence stratigraphy represent a revolution in our understanding of the stratigraphic record, and (2) does it provide a new means of global correlation? The first question is answered in the affirmative, at least insofar as sequence stratigraphy enables us to integrate a wide range of data and interpretations across a huge range of spatial and temporal scales. The recognition of the importance of stratal surfaces has led to a greater understanding of the response by sedimentary to climatic, tectonic and eustatic changes. But it has yet to be shown that eustatic signals can be detected unequivocally in the stratigraphic record. Therefore this ‘new global stratigraphy’, based on the premise that sequence boundaries are primarily controlled by eustatic changes, is not yet a reality. Testing this hypothesis is beyond the resolution of current biostratigraphic and chronostratigraphic techniques.