{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028285465622280244, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0195822454308094, 'mean_word_length': 4.940568475452197, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 2, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Mapping loci causing susceptibility to anal atresia in pigs, using a resource pedigree.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE
Very little information on the genetic background for anal atresia (anorectal malformations; AA) in humans has been described. A strikingly similar natural anomaly occurs in piglets. The authors have used this as an animal model for various research purposes. The affected piglets were treated surgically soon after birth, raised, and used for breeding. The authors have generated a resource pedigree segregating for this naturally occurring nonsyndromal AA and describe here the first attempt to map susceptibility loci by marker analysis.


METHODS
A pig pedigree with a high incidence of AA has been established by selective breeding using 3 probands from the Landrace and Large White breeds. It has been maintained by intrafamilial crossing for more than 15 years. A backcross pedigree has now been generated by mating 4 AA females to an unaffected male from the Chinese Meishan breed. F(1) animals were both intercrossed and backcrossed to affected AA animals. A genome scan was carried out using the F(0), F(1), and affected backcross progeny. Ninety-two microsatellite loci were analyzed using fluorescently labelled primers and an ABI377 sequencer. Linkage analysis was done with the CRI-MAP 2.4 software.


RESULTS
Crossing affected parents increased the incidence of abnormalities from 30% to 61.9%. All 39 F(1) pigs were unaffected. In the F(1) intercross, only 3 of 205 (1.5%) were affected, whereas 42 of 523 (8.0%) backcross progeny were affected. The marked difference in the incidence of affected progeny in the F(1) intercross and in the backcross indicates the presence of multiple genes causing AA. The genome scan showed suggestive evidence for the presence of a susceptibility locus on pig chromosome 15 (lod score 2.7 for a pig microsatellite marker SW2072).


CONCLUSIONS
The results clearly show that AA has a oligogenic or polygenic background. The genome scan showed one suggestive locus causing AA on pig chromosome 15. The long-term goal is to identify causative genes for this malformation by comparative positional candidate cloning. This study provides, for the first time, linkage mapping of nonsyndromal anorectal malformations with a polygenic inheritance.