{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016591251885369532, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0030165912518853697, 'mean_word_length': 5.707070707070707, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
RESOURCE SHARING: PRIORITIES, CONFLICTS AND RISING EXPECTATIONS

The purpose of this paper is to describe in general the economic realities of resource sharing, the place of resource sharing in the scholarly information structure, and the con flicts which arise in setting priorities for our collections and services.1 Resource sharing has many components, including interlibrary loan and reciprocal access and borrowing ar rangements.2 Conflicts can arise from the ownership versus access debate, the cost of access, inadequate bibliographic control, and inconsistency of supply. Discussed here will be interlibrary loan in particular with emphasis on the issues