{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017587939698492462, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.9476744186046515, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Network Structure of Occupations: Fragmentation, Differentiation, and Contagion

Occupational structure is commonly viewed as either hierarchical or organized around stable classes. Yet, recent studies have proposed to describe occupational structure as a network, where the mobility of workers demarcates boundaries. Moving beyond boundary detection, this article develops occupational networks as a dynamic system in which between-occupation exchange is shaped by occupational similarities and occupational attributes are in turn responsive to mobility patterns. The authors illustrate this perspective with the exchange networks of detailed occupations. Their analysis shows that the U.S. occupational structure has become more fragmented. The division was in part associated with the emerging importance of age composition, as well as of quantitative, creative, and social tasks. The fragmentation reduced wage contagion and therefore contributed to a greater between-occupation wage dispersion. These results indicate that occupational attributes and mobility are coconstitutive and that a network perspective provides a unifying framework for the study of stratification and mobility.