{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01245674740484429, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.63302752293578, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Features of Applying by Staff of Internal Affairs Bodies Separate Measures of Ensuring Procedures in Cases of Administrative Offenses

At the present time, an analysis of legal regulation and the practice of using administrative coercive measures by law enforcement agencies is gaining ground, as sound enforcement of the norms of administrative legislation is important in identifying the degrees of efficiency, implementation of goals and measures of ensuring the procedures in cases of administrative offences, as well as the general state of legality in the field of public administration. In spite of the fact that the police officers are authorized to apply various measures of ensuring the procedures in cases of administrative offences, the most high-demand ones are examination of motor vehicles, banishment from motor vehicle driving, alcohol testing, medical alcohol testing. Compliance with the procedural order of application of the specified measures, correct drawing up procedural documents, is a guarantee of an objective examination of the case of administrative offence and bringing the law-breaker to responsibility established by the law. At the same time, the sphere of application of the measures noted observes both certain drawbacks of the acting administrative legislation and imperfection of law enforcement practice, which hinders implementing the goal of maintaining legitimacy in the sphere of public administration.