{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04333552199606041, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01772816808929744, 'mean_word_length': 4.884169884169884, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Feasibility study by a single-blind randomized controlled trial of self-management of mobility with a gait-speed feedback device by older persons at risk for falling

ABSTRACT This single-blind randomized pilot study explored feasibility and safety of a self-management fall prevention program, hypothesizing that older persons can comply with this program, while it does not result in more (injurious) falls, or a decrease in mental wellbeing as an adverse effect of being focused on falls prevention. Eighty-six persons, community-dwelling or home for the aged (mean age 80.3 years [SD: 6.3], 56 women (65.1%)) participated. The intervention group measured their gait speed by using the Mobility Feedback Device (MFD) weekly for 6 months. The control group was monitored for the outcomes without an intervention. Change scores involving health perception and mental wellbeing (Medical Outcomes Study 20-item short form (MOS-20)) were compared between groups. Feasibility was assessed by drop-out rate and compliance to measure gait speed. Safety was assessed by fall incidence during follow-up. MOS-20 decreased significantly in the control group (p = 0.024) but remained stable in the intervention group. Drop-out rate was low (9.3%), and compliance was good. Fall incidence was the same for both groups (p = 0.155). The self-management fall prevention program is feasible and safe in a community-dwelling and home for the aged population, making it worthwhile to further explore self-management fall-prevention studies.