{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026954177897574125, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.405172413793103, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Whitehead's doctrine of objectification and Yogācāra Buddhism's theory of the three natures

Many scholars have pointed out that Mahayana Buddhism has much in common with twentieth-century cosmology in its emphasis on the relativity of nature. For instance, figures such as Schterbatsky and Murti have translated the main concept of Buddhism, pratityasamutpada in Sanskrit, as 'relativity' pointing to a direct analogy to relativity physics. However, in response to these scholars, Kenneth Inada, a chief translator of Nagarjuna's texts into English, warns us against the overstatement of this interpretation. Inada describes the sense in which the analogy of the main principle of Buddhism to 'relativity' theory can be made. He writes that: