{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03577817531305903, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005366726296958855, 'mean_word_length': 5.588235294117647, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
NINCDS-ADRDA criteria were not able to exclude frontotemporal dementia

Description of test and diagnostic standard A neurologist applied the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria for probable AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥ 24 points and deficits in memory and ≥ 1 other cognitive domains defined by the criteria statement [ie, orientation, language, praxis, attention, perception, problem solving, activities of daily living, and social function]). The neurologist was blind to results of the diagnostic standard, which was pathological confirmation of AD or FTD.