{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03433922996878252, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01768990634755463, 'mean_word_length': 4.901840490797546, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Structural Context of Rural Poverty in Mexico: A Cross-State Comparison

Poverty is still widespread in Mexico. In 1970, 40% of the dwellings had only one room, 41% had dirt floors, and 39% of the households reported that they did not use milk in the week previous to the census. In rural Mexico, which is the focus of this paper, the percentages were 53%, 70%, and 60%, respectively. The regional context of poverty has been described and to some extent analyzed. On the basis of the work of Whetten, Yates, GonzalezCasanova, and Wilkie, we know that the northern states, with their higher levels of urbanization, industrialization, and commercial agriculture, are better off than the southern states with their poor agriculture and large Indian populations that do not participate in the national structure.' We also know that the gap between the northern states, particularly those with industry and commercial agriculture, and the rest is widening.2 But