{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023728813559322035, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.929577464788732, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Carbohydrate Force Fields in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Protein-Carbohydrate Complexes.

In this paper, we present the results of molecular dynamics simulations aimed at critical comparison of classical, biomolecular force fields (FFs) in the context of their capabilities to describe the structural and thermodynamic features of carbohydrate-protein interactions. We have considered the three main families of FFs (CHARMM, GROMOS, and GLYCAM/AMBER) by applying them to investigate the seven different carbohydrate-protein complexes. The results indicate that although the qualitative pattern of several structural descriptors (intermolecular hydrogen bonding, ligand dynamic location, etc.) is conserved among the compared FFs, there also exists a number of significant divergences (mainly the patterns of contacts between particular amino acid residues and bound carbohydrate). The carbohydrate-protein unbinding free energies also vary from one FF to another, displaying diversified trends in deviations from the experimental data. The magnitude of those deviations is not negligible and indicates the need for refinement in the currently existing combinations of carbohydrate- and protein-dedicated biomolecular force fields. In spite of the lack of explicit functional terms responsible for the corresponding intermolecular forces, all tested FFs are capable of adequately reproducing the CH-π interactions, crucial for carbohydrate-protein binding.