{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025790349417637273, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0008319467554076539, 'mean_word_length': 6.118343195266272, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cervical insufficiency, amniotic fluid sludge, intra-amniotic infection, and maternal bacteremia: the need for a point-of-care test to assess inflammation and bacteria in amniotic fluid

Abstract Acute cervical insufficiency is frequently associated with subclinical intra-amniotic inflammation and intra-amniotic infection. Amniotic fluid analysis has been recommended prior to the placement of a cervical cerclage given that preexisting infection is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. We report a case for which commonly available laboratory tests—amniotic fluid Gram stain, white blood cell count, and glucose concentration—did not detect either intra-amniotic inflammation, diagnosed by elevated amniotic fluid interleukin-6, or intra-amniotic infection, diagnosed by cultivation. Following cerclage placement, the patient developed clinical chorioamnionitis and bacteremia and experienced a spontaneous mid-trimester pregnancy loss. This case illustrates the need for a rapid and sensitive point-of-care test capable of detecting infection or inflammation, given recent evidence in support of treatment of intra-amniotic infection and intra-amniotic inflammation with antimicrobial agents.