{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.044444444444444446, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001851851851851852, 'mean_word_length': 5.039106145251397, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
TERRESTRIAL ANALOGS FOR LUNAR SCIENCE AND EXPLORATION: A SYSTEMATIC

Summary: The planning of a range of future hu-man activities on the Moon requires the use of terres-trial analogs to help these activities be as safe, produc-tive, and cost-effective as possible. We discuss key features of a systematic approach to selecting terres-trial analogs for lunar exploration operations planning. Introduction: A terrestrial analog for a planetary body may be defined as an environment, feature, proc-ess, or activity on Earth, outdoors or indoors, repre-sentating, or relevant to, one or more aspects of an environment, feature, process, or activity on that planetary body [1] . Terrestrial analogs for the Moon are needed to serve all four fundamental functions of analogs: to help i) learn, ii) test, iii) train, and iv) engage [2]. While the overarching goals of analog campaigns are to help re-tire risk, maximize productivity, and minimize pro-gram costs, they are also key to engaging the public, students, local experts, and international partners. Selecting Lunar Analog Sites: