{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010256410256410256, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.168421052631579, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Some examples of how to deal with causality computationally in several disciplines

Causality is not a rigid entailment between antecedent and consequence. Sometimes this link is defined by vague syntactical patterns that lead as a result an imperfect causal relation. In this paper we explore the role of causality when certain linguistic structures, detected automatically by a program suited for this task, are present into a sentence. A set of examples belonging to different text genres are analysed to test the presence of imperfect causal sentences in different literary genres.