{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016467065868263474, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005988023952095809, 'mean_word_length': 5.623762376237623, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pedagogical Innovation : Between Social Reality and Technology

Pedagogical innovation often arises in response to the pressures faced by the modern university (Pelletier, 2009). However, despite it being at the heart of professorial practice, it is not easy for a professor to integrate an innovation into their teaching in a university that is strongly committed to research. This qualitative study explores the types of pedagogical innovation put forward by professors at the Université de Montréal and reveals seven distinctive pedagogical innovation categories. The results suggest that pedagogical innovation hinges on two aspects: social reality and technology.