{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03317781233799896, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012441679626749611, 'mean_word_length': 5.411960132890365, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
FUNCTIONAL AND SEMANTIC CHARACTERS OF AN ADDRESS IN UKRAINIAN AND FRENCH

The vocative function of an address being the basic one is supplemented and
modified by a number of other functions actualized in communication, i.e. the
phatic one (establishing and developing the contact with the addressee), the status one (reflecting the status responsibility of the communicants), the emotional
and attitudinal one (characterizing the addressee and the attitude of the speaker
towards the uttered information). Such modification explains the polyfunctional
character of the address in communication.
All units of address, just like the components of the addressing functional
field, are polysemantic and polysemy comprises every type of an address. According to the communicative tasks the following functions can be stated within
the vocative one: nominative (naming the addressee), deixis (identifying the addressee), vocative proper (attracting the addressee’s attention).
The field model of addresses’ semantic structures allows to research standard
and nonstandard vocatives. The standard addresses form the nucleus of the semantic field under research and characterize stability of their application in one
of the above-mentioned functions. 
Nonstandard vocative lexemes (1 % of the total amount of the experimental
material) can play the role of an address under certain circumstances. They form
semantically heterogeneous (conditioned by a situation) group, located in the periphery area of the semantic field of addresses.
The addresses that include anthroponyms form the most widely used group
(64,5 % in Ukrainian and 68,1 % in French), the second place belongs to the addresses with appellatives (34,6 % and 29,9 %, correspondingly). As to the composition of appellatives in the status and role addresses they comprise 36,4 % in
Ukrainian and 34,9 % in French. Attitudinal addresses reach 63 % and 65,1 %,
correspondingly.