{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02595797280593325, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.48, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An experimental study of renewal-older-first garbage collection

Generational collection has improved the efficiency of garbage collection in fast-allocating programs by focusing on collecting young garbage, but has done little to reduce the cost of collecting a heap containing large amounts of older data. A new generational technique, older-first collection, shows promise in its ability to manage older data.This paper reports on an implementation study that compared two older-first collectors to traditional (younger-first) generational collectors. One of the older-first collectors performed well and was often effective at reducing the first-order cost of collection relative to younger-first collectors. Older-first collectors perform especially well when objects have queue-like or random lifetimes.