{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.034137291280148425, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019109461966604825, 'mean_word_length': 5.500150738619234, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
New Technologies for Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

Despite tremendous advances in therapy and prevention, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and its complication heart failure, are the leading causes of death worldwide [1-3]. Therefore, translational research and basic science becomes necessary to discover the novel mechanisms responsible for cardiovascular repair during athero-thrombosis which results in to AMI [4-6]. The inflammatory tissue in the myocardium and the intensity of neuro-humoral dysfunction after AMI are important determinants of complications as well as subsequent healing process. The increase in leucocytes; neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes in the myocardium contribute to the clearance of dead cells from the myocardial tissues while activating reparative pathways necessary for myocardial remodeling [5,7]. The thinning of the wall occurs due to apoptosis of cardiomyocyte with triggering of ventricular dilation and subcellular remodeling, leading to left ventricular dysfunction [7-9]. The underlying mechanisms appear to be increase in cortisol and vasopressin causing neuro-humoral dysfunction and oxidative stress, leading to inflammation and apoptosis [8-10].


Introduction
Despite tremendous advances in therapy and prevention, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and its complication heart failure, are the leading causes of death worldwide [1][2][3]. Therefore, translational research and basic science becomes necessary to discover the novel mechanisms responsible for cardiovascular repair during athero-thrombosis which results in to AMI [4][5][6]. The inflammatory tissue in the myocardium and the intensity of neuro-humoral dysfunction after AMI are important determinants of complications as well as subsequent healing process. The increase in leucocytes; neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes in the myocardium contribute to the clearance of dead cells from the myocardial tissues while activating reparative pathways necessary for myocardial remodeling [5,7]. The thinning of the wall occurs due to apoptosis of cardiomyocyte with triggering of ventricular dilation and subcellular remodeling, leading to left ventricular dysfunction [7][8][9]. The underlying mechanisms appear to be increase in cortisol and vasopressin causing neuro-humoral dysfunction and oxidative stress, leading to inflammation and apoptosis [8][9][10].
Activation of angiotensin II signalling in different brain sites; the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM), and area postrema (AP) may cause increased cardiac contractility with worsening of HF [8].The increase in angiotensin II signalling in the brain, enhances sympathetic nerve activity through actions on both central and peripheral sites during chronic HF. Stem cell therapy to target these brain areas may be an important technology to benefit patients with HF. Advances in new technology are; delivery of anti-inflammatory hormones thereby reducing arterial wall inflammation by using it in the form of liposomal glucocorticoid carrier [7]. The lipid nanoparticles are used to deliver siRNA antagonistic to the C-C chemokine type 2 pro-inflammatory receptor, and HDL nanoparticles examined to deliver simvastatin to inhibit monocyte recruitments [12][13][14]. In percutaneous coronary interventions, nanotechnology has demonstrated potential benefits by stent coating, gene therapy and stem cells [15][16][17][18]. They have been studied for their ability to release drugs as well as promote healing and reduce the rate and extent of restenosis [11]. This selected review aims to examine the role of new technologies in the management of CAD

Utility and Necessity of New Technologies
Current methods of treatment for heart failure after myocardial infarction are limited to palliation without any cure. Conventional surgical interventions such as coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary interventions are only able to partially restore myocardial function. There is only a minor improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction due to reperfusion injury after these interventions [1][2][3]. The ultimate goal of cardiac repair is to regenerate functionally viable myocardium after myocardial infarction to prevent cardiac death. Identification of the innovative factors is essential in cardiac healing as well as in improving endothelial function of the coronary vasculature via using specialized pro-resolving mediators because the emerging factors provide the key molecular signals for the activation of the reparative cells in both endothelium and myocardium [7,11,[12][13][14][15]. There have been several advancements in the technological care of CAD in the last 3 decades. Of these technologies, stents, gene therapy, stem cells, drug delivery and 3-D printing are most important ( Figure 1). Robotic angioplasty and coronary bypass grafting are also emerging to improve the clinical results.

Stents for Coronary Angioplasty
Stents are used in coronary thrombosis to allow patency of the vessel in patients with CAD. In an animal model, gelbased nanoparticles combined with anti-proliferative and antiapoptotic agent rapamycin, were studied, which were found to re-endothelialize injured arteries and reduce hyperplasia [15]. Research in drug delivery has shown promise in treating cardiac diseases by using smart nanoparticles such as a pH-dependent delivery of antioxidants [16]. In clinical studies, nano-sized hydroxyapatite coating for controlled release of sirolimus, an immune-suppressive drug coated stent, revealed satisfactory findings [17]. A new gene-eluting metal stent fabricated by bio-inspired surface modification with hyaluronic acid and deposition of DNA/PEI polyplexes has also been developed for clinical use [17]. Similarly, the release of sirolimus was studied using carbon nanoparticle coated stents with consistent drug release, as reported in an in-vitro study [18]. A comparison of the sirolimus-releasing stents with pitavastatin nanoparticle-eluting stents revealed that latter were found to be more efficient in terms of faster endothelial healing while being comparable in other parameters [22].

3/7
reveal that liposome encapsulated alendronate (a bisphosphonate) can reduce restenosis and neo-intimal formations [39]. Polycaprolactone was found to be an effective carrier for nitric oxide to prevent restenosis [24]. Similarly, paclitaxel (antimitotic drug) in the form of albumin-based nanoparticles have shown to have significant anti-proliferative and restenosis effects without significant toxicity even when administered systemically [11,25,26]. The nanoparticles in these cases were either used to improve cell membrane permeability (alendronate) or binding capacity to the targeted tissues (paclitaxel) [1,24,25]. Polymeric stent coatings in the form of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) were proven to have a controlled release of the drug paclitaxel (nanocoatings-64) and polyethylene glycol was proven to reduce platelet adhesion [24]. It has been reviewed that nano-modifications can also help scientists in targeting specific delivery of medications such as collagen IV, chondroitin sulfate, tissue factor, or stents [7].
The promotion of healing by inducing endothelialization of the stent is also possible by nanotechnology in the form of nanofibrous matrix because it can attract endothelial cells, polyhedral oligomericsilsesquioxanepoly-(carbonate-urea) urethane which improve adherence and proliferation of human endothelial cells [7,11]. Other healing promoting agents are peptide amphiphilenanofiber coating, for promotion of endothelial cell adhesion and magnetic nanoparticles that cause preferential movement of cells towards the stent [7,11,[24][25][26][27] (Figure 1). Nanotechnology also has potential applications in finding synthetic alternatives for coronary artery bypass grafts. Researchers have studied the potential of electro-spunnanosized fibrous scaffolds, which may prove to be an alternative synthetic graft for coronary artery bypass graft procedures [7,11]. Another area to choose technology may be targeting drug-eluting stents via gene therapy, because gene eluting stents can be used to overcome restenosis, in-stent thrombosis, and delayed endothelialisation [28,29]. In this connection, multiple nano-coatings in the form of hyaluronic acid as a vehicle for pDNA, nanobiohybrid hydrogel, a Tat peptide and DNA, and poly lactic-coglycolic acid nanoparticles as vehicle for PDGF receptor-β antisense RNA, have been studied in animal models and have shown promising results [30].
The gene targets have been studied extensively are; antisense oligonucleotide, chitosan-plasmid DNA, Akt1 siRNA, vascular endothelial growth factor, prostacyclin synthase, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase [28]. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging of acute thrombosis has become possible to visualize thrombininhibiting perfluorocarbon nanoparticles that provide a novel strategy for the treatment by using modular, multifunctional micelles [19,20]. In an experiment in hyper-cholesterolemic mice, targeted nanoparticles containing the pro-resolving peptide Ac2-26 has been reported to protect against advanced atherosclerosis [21]. Recently, activation of angiotensin II signaling in different brain sites such as the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), rostral ventrolateral medulla RVLM), and area postrema (AP) has been found to increase the release of norepinephrine, oxidative stress, and inflammation leading to increased cardiac contractility [8,9]. It is possible that blocking angiotensin II type 1 receptors decreases sympathetic nerve activity and cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex when therapy is administered to the PVN. The administration of an angiotensin receptor blocker by injection into the AP activates the sympatho-inhibitory baroreflex indicating that receptor blockers act by increasing parasympathetic activity. In chronic HF, in peripheral regions, angiotensin II elevates both norepinephrine release and synthesis and inhibits norepinephrine uptake at nerve endings, which may contribute to the increase in sympathetic nerve activity [8][9][10]. Of all above technologies, stem cell therapy is most important because it is being used for treatment of both, myocardial dysfunction as well as for CAD.

The Stem Cells
Of all technologies that are in way for the managements of CAD, stem cells therapy is most interesting along with stenting. It has been suggested to repair myocardial damage and increase blood supply in ischemic conditions of the heart, thereby reversing the effects of CAD [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In this respect, both vascular growth factors and stem cells have generated a lot of interest as a mode of treatment in patients with CAD [31]. Such therapies aim to improve the blood supply to ischemic areas of the heart by stem cells, as well as promote cardiac cell regeneration (Figure 1). Stem cells provide benefits in one of two ways: by a direct effect of the stem cells, or by paracrine factors secreted by these stem cells [32]. Studies using hematopoietic cells; mononuclear cells and endothelial progenitor cells for various forms of CAD have been contradictory, although some studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect in these patients [33][34][35][36]. A new alternative is the creation of induced pluripotent stem cells, for which adult cells are transformed into pluripotent stem cells, similar to embryonic stem cells, but cancer may be an adverse effect [32,37,38].
There is physiological and metabolic evidence that many tissues and cells in the body have intrinsic regenerative potential and undergoes constant turnover throughout adult life [39][40][41][42]. It has also been demonstrated that the heart possesses cardiac stem cells that could be responsible for the intrinsic regeneration and turnover throughout adult life [42]. There is physiological cardiac remodeling in response to endurance exercise training in all cardiac cells [43]. These cells are greater in the apices of the atrium and ventricles and are known to be involved in tissue homeostasis [44][45][46]. The reparative potential of these cells is limited, especially in conditions with extensive damage such as myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure [44][45][46][47][48]. There is also an interest to develop and inject multiple stem cells that can communicate with each other, named as a cardio-cluster which are cocktails of cells that include cardiac progenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells and fibroblasts. They have the potential to promote cardiac cell regeneration in disease states where cell function is reduced such as CAD [49].
The stem cells studied in clinical research are ranged from bone marrow to adipose tissue to skeletal muscle stem cells. Bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells are the most readily available cells for transplantation in the body. They are easy to identify based on their cell surface markers and can be isolated from the bone marrow [32]. However, their therapeutic potential is low since the harvested cells contain a multitude of cells with a small proportion of stem cells [35,39]. The bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells are found in even lower concentrations than that of mononuclear cells thus requiring several weeks of maturation with different growth factors in the laboratory, prior to therapy. The adipose derived stem cells can be surgically harvested from adipose tissues. They are more abundant in comparison to the bone marrow-derived cells. This drastically reduces the time and cost involved in laboratory procedures to culture them for clinical use [39]. The pluripotent stem cells have a high potential for transformation. Although embryos represent the most obvious source of stem cells, their use has ethical concerns and is in debate.
Additionally, these cells could potentially face rejection when transplanted to a recipient. However, it is possible to reprogram adult cells and transform them into pluripotent cells which have similar properties as embryonic stem cells, thereby being called induced pluripotent stem cells. These cells can be auto-transplanted and therefore would not be rejected but may predispose cancer [37,41]. In view of the risk of teratomatous changes, this area requires more research before they can be considered safe for human trials. Another interesting source of stem cell are cardiac stem cells [42][43][44]. The clinical data for stem cell therapy is in its early days with reported literature covering both non-randomized and randomized trials [50][51][52]. There is improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) function following injection of mononuclear stem cells in patients with MI within three months. Improvement in exercise capacity, reduced mortality and scar tissue are shown in a 5-year follow up [50]. Several other studies showed similar effects following treatments with mononuclear stem cells after myocardial infarction [36]. An earlier meta-analysis reported an improvement in LVEF function by 2.99% following bone marrow stem cell transplantation in patients after MI [51].
However, the meta-analysis did not include recent studies that reported no improvement in left ventricular function [33,34]. In patients suffering from chronic ischemic heart disease, there is reported evidence towards improved cardiac function following the use of bone marrow derived-stem cells [52]. There have been several trials that have studied the clinical efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells. They have reported an improvement in cardiac function and relative safety in the use of mesenchymal stem cells [53][54][55][56]. Cardiac derived stem cells have also undergone clinical testing and have shown promising results with an improvement in LVEF [57], an improvement in the left ventricular mass that was viable [58,94], improved quality of life [57], reduced scar mass, improved and safety of the procedure [57,58] due to better regional contractility [59]. In a meta-analysis, a critical evaluation of clinical evidence on the safety and efficacy of autologous adult bone marrow-derived stem/progenitor cells has been examined as a treatment for chronic CAD and congestive heart failure [4]. This meta-analysis included, 38 randomised controlled trials involving 1907 participants; 1114 cell therapy, 793 controls.
Twenty-three trials were at high or unclear risk of selection bias. Treatment with stem cells, was associated with significant decline in the incidence of long-term mortality (≥ 12 months) (risk ratio (RR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.87; among 491 participants. Cell therapy was also associated with a long-term reduction in the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.97; among 345 participants. The incidence of arrhythmias (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.99; among 82 participants was also decreased with this treatment. However, there was no evidence that cell therapy has any influence on the risk of rehospitalisation for heart failure (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.09; among 375 participants, or composite incidence of mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and/or rehospitalisation for heart failure (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.08; among 141 participants = 141, or long-term left ventricular ejection fraction when measured by magnetic resonance imaging (mean difference -1.60, 95% CI -8.70 to 5.50; among 25 participants [4]. The authors suggested that there is low quality evidence indicating that treatment with bone marrow-derived stem/progenitor cells reduces mortality and improves left ventricular ejection fraction over short-and long-term follow-up and may reduce the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction and improve chronic CAD and CHF. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as event rates were generally low, leading to a lack of precision.
Interestingly, some patients treated with cardiac stem cells, 10-14 months after myocardial infarction may have similar therapeutic benefit as someone treated earlier, suggesting that cardiac stem cells could be beneficial in chronic ischemia patients [32,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. However, it should be noted that the observed clinical benefit was less than the expected clinical benefit based on prior in vitro and animal studies [32]. Stem cell therapy continues to be a promising treatment modality for CAD. The experimental and clinical studies have shown promising results. However, further research is needed to understand the exact mechanisms of action and the ideal source of stem cells to derive optimum benefit and to further our understanding. Several challenges such as long-term safety and route of administration, have to be overcome. However, the direction of current research looks promising.

3-D Printing
There are other technologies such as 3-D Printing Cardiac conditions often need 3-D imaging like magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography, and 3-D echography to diagnose and treat myocardial damage and athero-thrombosis. Although these images are in 3-D but they are viewed on a 2-D computer screen or films which could be sufficient for some cardiac procedures. However, the current imaging modalities are not effective for more complex interventions. It seems that 3-D printing has a potential role in CAD because it overcomes these limitations as well as allow for complete visualization, tactile sense, education and surgical planning as well as simulation [60]. It needs additive manufacturing of a model using 3-D data from imaging modalities. It has been observed that 3-D printing could be more effective in planning and treating complex situations (bifurcation lesions) that require stent placement. Radiologists and scientists are trying to see the full potential of 3-D printing, because in cardiology it has tremendous potential in the treatment of congenital defects, cardiac tumors,
These models can be used in a pulsatile flow loop environment, not only to visualize and understand complex flow patterns but also to simulate interventions [63]. It is possible to visualize 3-D printed heart with coronary arteries by this technology, for examination of the extent of occlusion and stenosis in CAD. Compared to imaging and treatment modalities, 3-D printed models are also useful in CAD research [63]. Models of tissue engineering are examined to fabricate stem cells along with extracellular matrix (tissue printing) for implantation in the body. In vitro studies have been successful in tissue printing cardiac cells in different scaffolds. The implantation of printed tissue in epicardial tissues showed beneficial effects including decline in adverse remodeling and improved perfusion in the models of myocardial infarction.
In brief, it seems that nanotechnology has led to an interesting and promising direction in the treatment of CAD and CHF. It has valuable potential in delivering drugs that are otherwise limited by their pharmacokinetics. Its applications in stent and gene therapy are potentially useful for future therapeutics based on these modalities. Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish potential evidence to support the use of these newer technologies for therapy of CAD. This needs to be carried out with potential collaboration between researchers, engineers, biomedical engineers, nanotechnologist and physicians. and clinicians.