{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02181208053691275, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.56043956043956, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Review: Cinematic Projections: The Analytical Psychology of C.G. Jung and Film Theory

The major difference Hockley draws with Lacanian-based psychoanalysis is that, while it emphasised an irrevocably split subject, Jung attributes a positive and therapeutic function to the traces of the unconscious. Rather than symptoms of psychical pathologies, Hockley wants to read films as narratives of growth. He emphasises the commonalities of unconscious mental process, rather than the specificities of gender, ethnicity or history which form the central components of most contemporary film analysis.