{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.049079754601226995, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0392638036809816, 'mean_word_length': 5.634146341463414, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Claims about Frames: Practitioners' Assessment of the Utility of Reframing

a multiple-perspectives approach can be applied to a study of organizations and management. The most significant recent statement of this approach is to be found in Bolman and Deal (1991) and their use of the concept of &dquo;reframing organizations&dquo; using structural, human resource, symbolic, and political perspectives. Despite a continuing debate at an epistemological and methodological level over the approach (Reed, 1990) and an ongoing debate about paradigm commensurability in management theory (Aldrich, 1992), the use of reframing can be found in a range of recent management writings including Frost, Moore, Louis, Lundberg, and Martin (1991), Lundberg ( 1990), Marx and Hamilton (1991), Spencer (1990), and Watson (1986).