{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021646646646646648, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007007007007007007, 'mean_word_length': 5.269019607843137, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Spontaneous Hip Dislocation Complicating the Management of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Arising Within a Plexiform Neurofibroma

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most common inherited neurological disorders. It can cause plexiform neurofibromas, leading to diffuse enlargement of a nerve or nerves within the body. There are benign in general, however, can cause significant symptoms due to their size, including bony erosion, pain, and joint instability. Unfortunately, they also have the capacity to become malignant by internal transformation into a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). The case presented here is a 27-year-old male with NF1 that was followed for years with a pelvic girdle plexiform neurofibroma whose course was complicated by transformation to MPNST and a spontaneous hip dislocation. He underwent excision, Girdlestone procedure, chemotherapy, and radiation. Unfortunately, he subsequently developed lung metastases and is part of a clinical trial with an MDM2 inhibitor and pembrolizumab.


Introduction
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a one of the most common inherited neurological disorders caused by a mutation in the neurofibromin gene [1][2][3][4]. Plexiform neurofibromas are unencapsulated nerve sheath tumors that cause diffuse enlargement of a nerve or nerves in a body region. They are found in 40-50% of NF1 patients [5][6][7]. They are benign but may cause symptoms due to pain, large size, surrounding tissue overgrowth, bony erosion, and joint instability. More ominously, plexiform neurofibromas may develop an area of malignant degeneration, a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) within them [6,8,9]. We present a case of a patient with NF1 who developed an MPNST in a pelvic girdle plexiform neurofibroma whose management was complicated by spontaneous hip disarticulation. Collaboration between the multidisciplinary NF and sarcoma teams helped optimize the management.

Case Presentation
This 27-year-old male NF1 patient was being followed in the NF clinic with known plexiform neurofibromas in the left submandibular region and right pelvis/hip girdle. He developed symptoms of lumbosacral plexopathy with right sciatica and ankle weakness and intermittent urinary retention. His previously stable pelvic tumor was reimaged and found to have increased in size from 15 × 12 cm 2 to 19 × 15 cm 2 ( Figure 1). These images demonstrate an intra-articular/periarticular lesion that leads to a shallow acetabulum, resulting in the femoral head's dislocation.
On PET imaging, it had a central area of necrosis with a surrounding high SUV region suggestive of an MPNST ( Figure 2). These images demonstrate areas of intense FDG avidity within the pelvic mass suggestive of malignant transformation. Much less avid and patchy FDG uptake of the neurofibroma can also be seen in the acetabulofemoral joint region.
A biopsy confirmed a grade 3/3 MPNST. Given its size and location, neoadjuvant treatment was recommended prior to attempted surgical resection. Just prior to his scheduled admission for chemotherapy, he developed severe, acute right hip pain. Imaging revealed a fracture-dislocation of the hip ( Figure 3).

FIGURE 3: AP X-ray of the pelvis.
This image shows superior subluxation of the right femoral head in the acetabulofemoral joint. Noted is the shallow nature of the right acetabulum compared to the contralateral side.
The initial concern was for a pathologic fracture, but on review of new and old imaging, it was felt to be due to chronic changes from the plexiform neurofibroma combined with hip girdle weakness from his MPNSTrelated lumbosacral plexopathy.
He was placed in tibial pin traction and subsequent hip abduction bracing. He was given two cycles of chemotherapy (doxorubicin/ifosfamide) followed by six weeks of inpatient radiation therapy (57.5 Gy, IMRT) to the pelvic region with sparing of the remainder of the plexiform neurofibroma. He had a complicated hospital course but eventually was discharged to a rehabilitation center. One month later, he underwent operative intervention targeting complete resection of the malignant, internal pelvic component of the tumor with sparing of the benign neurofibroma where it exited the pelvis. His postoperative course was complicated by a pelvic hematoma that resolved without intervention and worsening of his lumbosacral plexopathy with a complete foot drop.
He was transferred back to the rehabilitation center but suffered multiple hip dislocations. This limited his recovery, and after discussion of treatment options, the patient underwent a Girdlestone procedure, which is an excision arthroplasty of the hip, two months after his MPNST resection. He recovered well and ultimately was able to ambulate with a walker. There was no evidence of malignancy in the hip specimen.
Unfortunately, 17 months after the Girdlestone procedure and 2 years after the initial MPNST diagnosis, he developed lung metastases. He failed treatment with a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel with pancytopenia and the disease progressed. Currently, 2.5 years after the initial MPNST diagnosis, he is enrolled in a clinical trial with an MDM2 inhibitor and pembrolizumab.

Patient age Genetics Symptoms Treatment
Rafaelian et al. [  The imaging studies in our patient revealed a shallow acetabulum and dysplastic changes in the pelvis. These changes in association with the hip girdle and extremity weakness caused by the MPNSTinduced lumbosacral plexopathy led to the fracture of the superior acetabulum and dislocation.
Recognition of these entities as the cause of the dislocation as opposed to a pathological fracturedislocation was critical in this case. Direct MPNST involvement of the hip would have made this a nonsurgical case, and the patient would have received palliative therapy alone. Differentiating the benign plexiform neurofibroma from MPNST in the radiated treatment field was also crucial as radiation of the benign tumor could lead to a secondary area of malignant degeneration [3].
Options for management of his hip dislocation were limited; a hip replacement was not an option due to the chronic dysplastic changes coupled with the hip girdle weakness. The Girdlestone procedure provided significant pain relief and allowed him to ambulate with a walker. As expected, there was no evidence of malignancy in the hip pathological specimen. Understanding the nature of plexiform neurofibromas and the potential tissue changes associated with them is important for clinicians treating patients who harbor them. In this case, the management was optimized via close collaboration with the multidisciplinary neurofibromatosis and sarcoma treatment teams.

Conclusions
In conclusion, we present the case of a 27-year-old male with NF1 that was followed for years with a pelvic girdle plexiform neurofibroma whose course was complicated by transformation to MPNST and a spontaneous hip dislocation. He underwent excision, Girdlestone procedure, chemotherapy, and radiation. It is critical to be aware of the potential of neurofibroma to malignantly transform and cause further pathology, such as hip dislocation. Finally, a multidisciplinary team is crucial to optimize patient management.

Additional Information Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.