{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031446540880503145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.21875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Measuring quality of life in a reformed health system.

"Quality of life" encompasses functional status, access to resources and opportunities, and sense of well-being. It offers a useful perspective on the value of health care, especially for chronically disabling conditions, including chronic mental illness. At least three major quality-of-life outcome assessment frameworks are available: general quality of life, health-related quality of life, and disease-specific quality of life. Choice of a framework must be driven by the intent of the services. For persons with chronic, disabling conditions, a general quality-of-life perspective is most appropriate, one that accounts not only for direct health outcomes but also for the potential social and economic effects of medical disability.