{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03076923076923077, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0024291497975708503, 'mean_word_length': 5.274111675126903, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Testing two models describing how methylome-wide studies in blood are informative for psychiatric conditions.

AIM
As the primary relevant tissue (brain) for psychiatric disorders is commonly not available, we aimed to investigate whether blood can be used as a proxy in methylation studies on the basis of two models. In the 'signature' model methylation-disease associations occur because a disease-causing factor affected methylation in the blood. In the 'mirror-site' model the methylation status in the blood is correlated with the corresponding disease-causing site in the brain. MATERIALS, METHODS & RESULTS: Methyl-binding domain enrichment and next-generation sequencing of the blood, cortex and hippocampus from four haloperidol-treated and ten untreated C57BL/6 mice revealed high levels of correlation in methylation across tissues. Despite the treatment inducing a large number of methylation changes, this correlation remains high.


CONCLUSION
Our results show that, consistent with the signature model, factors that affect brain processes (i.e., haloperidol) leave biomarker signatures in the blood and, consistent with the mirror-site model, the methylation status of many sites in the blood mirror those in the brain.