{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033532934131736525, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005988023952095809, 'mean_word_length': 5.53125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Linear programming versus quadratic programming in robots' repetitive redundancy resolution: A chattering phenomenon investigation

This paper investigates and compares the linear performance index and its linear-programming (LP) formulation for online redundancy resolution of redundant robot arms, which takes repetitive-motion-planning (RMP) as an example. The LP-based RMP scheme is then applied and tested based on three different types of robot-arm models, i.e., PUMA560, PA10, and a four-link planar robot arm. Computer-simulation results show that the linear performance index and its LP-based redundancy-resolution scheme could achieve the RMP purpose but it may cause a chattering phenomenon, as compared to the more successful quadratic performance index and its quadratic programming (QP) based scheme for redundant robots.