{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.039886039886039885, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.415384615384616, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Critical Reading of "The Right Tool for the Right Job"

Doing a critical reading of a paper presented at a conference you did not attend is a somewhat disembodied experience. Writing about your impressions doesn't help matters: "I wonder if they cleared that up at the conference?" I mutter to myself. Or, "I'm sure they expanded on that in Ottawa."