{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012211668928086838, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005427408412483039, 'mean_word_length': 5.648648648648648, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Critical Evaluation of Prostate Carcinoma Imaging

Since accurate clinical staging is the ideal presupposition for any therapeutic decision in prostate cancer (PC), the aim of this paper is to review sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the imaging techniques routinely used to diagnose and stage PC. They are highly important parameters for selecting patients in whom the disease is confined to the prostate and who may benefit from radical surgery. This is particularly important when considering the high incidence of progression in patients with extracapsular disease or positive surgical margins and that 40–60% of patients with a clinically confined disease have extracapsular involvement shown at the histological examination.