{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0360257868790292, 'fraction_numerical': 0.035730838916276916, 'mean_word_length': 5.113858835651726, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 3, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Genetic Variations among Different Variants of G1-like Avian Influenza H9N2 Viruses and Their Pathogenicity in Chickens

Since it was first discovered, the low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) H9N2 subtype has established linages infecting the poultry population globally and has become one of the most prevalent influenza subtypes in domestic poultry. Several different variants and genotypes of LPAI H9N2 viruses have been reported in Egypt, but little is known about their pathogenicity and how they have evolved. In this study, four different Egyptian LPAI H9N2 viruses were genetically and antigenically characterized and compared to representative H9N2 viruses from G1 lineage. Furthermore, the pathogenicity of three genetically distinct Egyptian LPAI H9N2 viruses was assessed by experimental infection in chickens. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that the H9N2 virus of the Egy-2 G1-B lineage (pigeon-like) has become the dominant circulating H9N2 genotype in Egypt since 2016. Considerable variation in virus shedding at day 7 post-infections was detected in infected chickens, but no significant difference in pathogenicity was found between the infected groups. The rapid spread and emergence of new genotypes of the influenza viruses pinpoint the importance of continuous surveillance for the detection of novel reassortant viruses, as well as monitoring the viral evolution.


Introduction
Influenza A viruses are widely distributed among wild birds, which are considered natural reservoirs for avian influenza viruses (AIVs). Migratory birds can spread different AIV subtypes along their flyways. The low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) H9N2 subtype is one of the most commonly circulating LPAI viruses in poultry worldwide [1]. The LPAI H9N2 virus was initially isolated from turkeys in Wisconsin, USA, in 1966 [1]. Since then, this subtype has continued to circulate in poultry populations in several countries, resulting in significant economic loss for the poultry industry [2,3]. In addition to their circulation in birds, sporadic transmission to humans have been reported with LPAI H9N2 viruses in Bangladesh, China, Egypt, and Pakistan [4], posing a threat to public health. To date, LPAI H9N2 viruses have evolved into multiple genotypes and lineages, mainly in Southeast Asia and the Middle East [5]. The LPAI H9N2 viruses of the lineage G1 are the most dominant among domestic poultry and circulate mainly in countries of the Middle East. Influenza A viruses can undergo reassortment when two viruses co-infect the same host cell and exchange their gene segments, leading to the emergence of new subtypes/genotypes [6]. There are several pieces of evidence of natural reassortment involving LPAI H9N2 viruses, and this subtype was involved in the emergence of wellknown reassortant viruses, including the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 subtype, the H7N9, and H10N8 subtypes, all known to cause infection in humans [7,8].
In Egypt, LPAI H9N2 was first reported in a quail farm in 2011 (quail/V3413/2011) and spread rapidly to infect several domestic poultry, including chickens, ducks, and turkeys in different locations in Egypt. The virus showed a close phylogenetic relationship to G1-like viruses [9]. Over the past 10 years, LPAI H9N2 viruses have continued to hit Egyptian poultry farms, causing considerable losses for the poultry industry [1,5]. The virus continued to evolve, and a new antigenically distinct variant was found in quail in 2014 (quail/2014 variant) [10]. In the same year, a novel LPAI H9N2 virus variant was detected in pigeons in Egypt as a result of natural reassortment between wild birdlike AIVs (PB2, PB1, PA, NP, NS) and an Egyptian H9N2/2011 virus (HA, NA, M) [11]. Later, in 2014-2015, the pigeon H9N2 virus underwent another natural reassortment event with an Egyptian virus in late 2014, sharing only PB2, PB1, PA, and NS [12]. LPAI H9N2 co-infection with other AIVs (e.g., H5N1 and H5N8), as well as other pathogens (e.g., infectious bronchitis virus), was also reported [13]. In late 2017-2018, a novel reassortant, HPAI H5N2 virus emerged with 7 genes of the Egyptian LPAI H9N2 virus and only the HA gene from the Egyptian HPAI H5N8 virus [12,14]. These documented examples of reassortment events, including the Egyptian H9N2 LPAI viruses, highlight the importance of continuous genomic and pathogenic monitoring of this virus subtype.
In this study, we aimed to genetically and antigenically characterize different Egyptian LPAI H9N2 genotypes detected in birds in Egypt since 2011 and assess their pathogenesis. Our data emphasize the importance of genetic and pathogenic monitoring of evolving LPAI H9N2 viruses.

Viruses and Virus Isolation
Four LPAI H9N2 virus strains were retrieved from the virus bank at the reference laboratory for quality control on poultry production at the Animal Health Research Institute-Egypt (RLQP-AHRI). The virus strains were selected based on the nucleotide sequence of their HA gene segment, as described in our previously targeted surveillance study conducted in 2017-2020 [15]. They were collected during 2017-2018 from vaccinated chicken farms and are hereafter named ch/CAD74/2017, ch/v1172/2018, ch/v1410/2018, and ch/v584/2018 (as detailed in Table S1). Virus propagation and titration were performed via intra-allantoic virus inoculation into specific pathogen-free (SPF) embryonated chicken eggs (ECE) at 9-11 days old embryos, according to the OIE manual [16]. All isolated virus stocks in this study were screened for other viruses, such as HPAI H5, infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), Newcastle disease virus (NDV), and infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) by real-time RT-PCR [17][18][19].

Genetic and Phylogenetic Analysis
Viral RNA was extracted using the Easypure viral RNA/DNA extraction kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China), according to the instruction manual. The extracted RNA was aliquoted and stored at −20 • C. The RT-qPCR was performed using the extracted RNA within 1-5 days from the extraction time.
Whole-genome amplification of the four selected H9N2 viruses was performed using forward and reverse primers for each gene fragment, as described previously [20]. The fragments were amplified using the Easyscript one-step RT-PCR kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). The amplified products were size separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified from the gel using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The purified products were then used for sequencing reactions using the BigDye terminator kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by purification using DyeEx The nucleotide sequences were then edited and aligned using Geneious Prime 2021.1.1 (https://www.geneious.com) based on the multiple sequence alignment tool, MAFFT (Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform). Sequences generated in this study were submitted to the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) database under accession numbers EPI1941118-25 and EPI1941139-63.
All available Egyptian H9N2 sequences (until October 2021), in addition to other representative viruses required, were retrieved from the public database (NCBI). Phylogenetic analysis was conducted by employing a maximum likelihood methodology based on the Akaike criterion after selecting the best fit modes using IQ-tree software version 1.1.3 [21]. Trees were finally viewed and edited using FigTree v1.4.4 software (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) (accessed on 5 October 2021) and Inkscape 1.1.

Ethical Approval
Three weeks old white Leghorn chickens were purchased from Nile SPF Farm, Kom Oshiem, Fayom, Egypt, and raised at RLQP-AHRI. Birds were kept in isolation units with daily feed and water. Bird experiments were legally approved by the Committee of Ethics of Animal Experiments at the AHRI, Egypt, under the protocol number AHRI-0249 and performed in strict accordance with the AHRI welfare and ethics guidelines. Infection experiments were performed in isolators at biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) animal facility. The study was performed in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines https://arriveguidelines. org/arrive-guidelines (accessed on 2 March 2021).

Pathogenicity and Transmission
Three Egyptian LPAI H9N2 virus variants with different genetic constitutions ( Figure 1 Briefly, three groups of 3 weeks old chickens (10 in each group) were individually inoculated via the ocular-nasal route with 200 µL of EID50 = 10 7 /mL of the selected virus variants. In addition, a negative control group of 10 birds was inoculated with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). At 1 day post-infection (dpi), two sentinel chickens were introduced to each infected group to assess virus transmission. Chickens were monitored daily for clinical signs and mortality until 11 dpi. Cloacal (CL) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs were collected at 1, 2, 4, 7, and 11 dpi. In addition, two chickens from each group were euthanized at 2, 4, and 7 dpi, and trachea, lung, spleen, pancreas, intestine (Ileocecal junction), kidney, and bursa of Fabricius were obtained for virus detection. The tissue samples were homogenized and centrifuged, and the supernatants were collected.
Collected swabs and tissues were tested against influenza A virus M gene by RT-qPCR. Standard curves were created against a quantified reference virus to measure the virus concentration in the collected samples. Obtained data was analyzed and visualized using the ggplot2 package in R Version 4.0.2 [22,23]. Furthermore, the p-value for comparison between different groups was calculated by two-way ANOVA in RStudio version 1.4.1106, followed by a Tukey multiple pairwise comparison.
For histopathological examination, half of each trachea, lung, intestine, pancreas, spleen, bursa, and kidney was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and processed by paraffin embedding techniques [24]. The scoring of histopathology was accomplished according to Landmann et al., 2021 [25]. Briefly, each organ was collected from birds in each group at 2, 4, and 7 dpi. Organs were examined for the different parameters shown in Tables S2 and S3, at five randomly selected microscope fields in each slide. Each field was evaluated according to the severity of histopathological lesion and scored from 0 to 3 using the following definition: 0 = no changes, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. All scores were compared between groups, and statistically significant differences in severity between groups in each organ at each day of organ collection were assessed by one-way ANOVA.

Genetic and Antigenic Characterization
The whole-genome sequences of four Egyptian LPAI H9N2 virus variants were obtained for molecular characterization. The sequences were compared to other representative Egyptian LPAI H9N2 virus variants retrieved from the NCBI GenBank

Antigenic Characterization
Three viral antigens were generated and prepared from ch/V1172/2018, ch/V1410/2018, and ch/CAD74/2017 through inactivation with beta-propiolactone (BPL) at a concentration of 1:1000. The inactivated antigens were loaded on Montanide ISA 70 VG oil adjuvant (Seppic, France). A total volume of 500 µL of each antigen, containing 7 log2 (2560 HAU/dose), was inoculated subcutaneously into three 4-weeks old SPF chickens. A booster dose was administered after 2 weeks, blood samples were collected, and polyclonal antisera were retrieved 3 weeks later.
The prepared antigens and antisera of the viruses in our study were tested for antigenicity against homologous viruses and other LPAI H9N2 virus variants representing different sub-lineages of G1. The panel of cross antigenicity test included three recent Egyptian H9N2 virus variants and three earlier circulating Egyptian strains (quail/113413V/2011, quail/V864/2014, and ch/FAO-SL5/2015), which were prepared previously [10], as well as three antigens and antisera of various H9N2 genetic sub-lineages that Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie kindly supplied from Italy (ch/Iran/10VIR/2008-G1/B, ch/KSA/VIR/2008-G1/A and mallard/Italy/2005: wild bird lineage) ( Table S4). The antisera were heat-inactivated at 56 • C for 30 min, then a cross hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay was applied on the different sera and antigens, according to the OIE manual for three successive repeats. Antigenic cartography analysis was performed using AntigenMap 3D server (https://sysbio.missouri.edu/AntigenMap, accessed on 15 May 2021) [26].

Genetic and Antigenic Characterization
The whole-genome sequences of four Egyptian LPAI H9N2 virus variants were obtained for molecular characterization. The sequences were compared to other representative Egyptian LPAI H9N2 virus variants retrieved from the NCBI GenBank A switch from glutamine to leucine in position 226 (Q226L) is associated with increased mammalian-like terminal sialic acid affinity [27]. The NA in all sequenced isolates revealed no markers of oseltamivir antiviral resistance and harbor 119E, 198D, 222I, 274H, and 292R, as reported in previously described Egyptian LPAI H9N2 viruses [28]. Molecular screenings of PB2, PB1, PA, M, and NS discloses the avian-like profile. The PB2 of the recent Egyptian H9N2 virus variant (from 2015) carries 627 E (associated with lower virulence in mammalian cells [29]), as compared to 627V in previous variants. Analysis of the M2 protein showed 27I, associated with amantadine resistance [30], in all sequenced isolates in this study, compared to 27V present in previously described Egyptian LPAI H9N2 viruses.  Figure S1a-c,f). These results suggest that the EGY-2 (pigeon-like) group has been the most commonly circulating LPAI H9N2 genotype in Egypt since 2016 (Figure 1). groups. Viral shedding in cloacal swabs was detected at 2 dpi in the ch/V1172/2018 infected group (positive samples, n = 4) and starting from 4 dpi in quail/14864V/2014 (n = 2) and quail/113413V/2011 (n = 6) ( Figure 3A,B), where the latter two continued till 7 dpi. In the second group of sentinel chickens, the virus was detected in both oropharyngeal and cloacal swab samples, starting from 1 dpi to 7 dpi. No virus was detected in the oropharyngeal or cloacal swab samples collected at 11 dpi in any of the groups. None of the infected birds showed any clinical signs of respiratory disease. All swabs collected from the negative control group were PCR negative. Virus RNA was detected in all collected organs in all infected groups (trachea, lung, spleen, pancreas, intestine (Ileocecal junction), kidney, and bursa of Fabricius), as shown in Figure S2.

Pathogenicity and Transmission in Chickens
Chickens were challenged with three of the four Egyptian LPAI H9N2 virus variants (ch/V1172/2018, quail/14864V/2014, and quail/113413V/2011) by oculonasal inoculation. Virus was detected in the oropharyngeal swab samples, starting from 1 dpi until 7 dpi in all groups. Viral shedding in cloacal swabs was detected at 2 dpi in the ch/V1172/2018 infected group (positive samples, n = 4) and starting from 4 dpi in quail/14864V/2014 (n = 2) and quail/113413V/2011 (n = 6) (Figure 3a,b), where the latter two continued till 7 dpi. In the second group of sentinel chickens, the virus was detected in both oropharyngeal and cloacal swab samples, starting from 1 dpi to 7 dpi. No virus was detected in the oropharyngeal or cloacal swab samples collected at 11 dpi in any of the groups. None of the infected birds showed any clinical signs of respiratory disease. All swabs collected from the negative control group were PCR negative. Virus RNA was detected in all collected organs in all infected groups (trachea, lung, spleen, pancreas, intestine (Ileocecal junction), kidney, and bursa of Fabricius), as shown in Figure S2.
Histologically, a normal architecture was observed in all negative control birds. However, in the infected birds, variable microscopic lesions were observed in examined organs at 2 dpi, and the severity of the lesions increased with time progression (Figures Histologically, a normal architecture was observed in all negative control birds. However, in the infected birds, variable microscopic lesions were observed in examined organs at 2 dpi, and the severity of the lesions increased with time progression (Figures S3-S7 and Tables S3 and S4). All inoculated groups showed tracheal lesions that varied from mild tracheitis to severe necrotic lesions, which were observed early in the quail/14864V/2014 and quail/V3413/2011 infected groups ( Figure S3). A similar pattern was seen in the intestines that displayed mild to moderate inflammation in early infection, then the severity progressed to severe enteritis and lymphocytic infiltration with vacuolation of the epithelial lining, ending with degeneration ( Figure S4). Moreover, marked pathological alterations were observed in lungs ( Figure S5) and spleen ( Figure S6) in all three groups. Early prominent lesions of the bursa of Fabricius ( Figure S7) were observed in the quail/113413V/2011 infected group, and this was characterized by marked lymphocytic depletion, while the two other groups showed milder alterations with time progression in the bursa. Statistically significant differences in severity scores (p-value ≤ 0.05) at different time points between groups infected with the different viruses were found mainly in bursa, trachea, and spleen (Table S3). However, none of the organs had consistent differences in severity scores between groups throughout the experiment period. progression in the bursa. Statistically significant differences in severity scores (P-value ≤ 0.05) at different time points between groups infected with the different viruses were found mainly in bursa, trachea, and spleen (Table S3). However, none of the organs had consistent differences in severity scores between groups throughout the experimen period.

Cross Antigenicity
According to the antigenic (antibody) reactivities, the virus variants could be divided into two groups (Figure 4)

Cross Antigenicity
According to the antigenic (antibody) reactivities, the virus variants could be divided into two groups ( Figure 4) (B) Figure 3. Virus shedding of LPAIV H9N2 infected chickens. Oropharyngeal (A) and cloacal (B) swabs were sampled at indicated days post-infection (dpi) and tested by RT-qPCR. Individual results of detected RNA copy numbers are given as EID50 equivalents. Circle indicates primary chicken and triangle indicates secondary/contact chickens.

Cross Antigenicity
According to the antigenic (antibody) reactivities, the virus variants could be divided into two groups ( Figure 4)

Discussion
Avian influenza viruses of the subtype H9N2 continue to cause economic losses to poultry production worldwide and have become the dominant enzootic subtype in chicken farms in several countries [1]. In mid-2011, LPAI H9N2 virus was detected in a

Discussion
Avian influenza viruses of the subtype H9N2 continue to cause economic losses to poultry production worldwide and have become the dominant enzootic subtype in chicken farms in several countries [1]. In mid-2011, LPAI H9N2 virus was detected in a quail farm for the first time in Egypt and, in a short time, affected several poultry farms all over Egypt [5]. Several reports have demonstrated increased pathogenicity of LPAI H9N2 in chickens, mainly accompanied by co-infection with other viruses or bacterial pathogens [31]. Furthermore, LPAI H9N2 virus variants have been involved in reassortment events with both wild bird virus strains and strains from domestic poultry [11,32]. In the last 10 years, the phylogenetic analyses of Egyptian LPAI H9N2 virus strains have revealed clustering into three groups (a-c) within the G1-B sub-lineage [33]. Intra-and inter-subtypic reassortment have been documented within the Egyptian H9N2 virus variants [11,14,32]. The variation in antigenicity and pathogenicity among those different genotypes of Egyptian H9N2 has been unclear. Therefore, we aimed to genetically and antigenically characterize candidate strains of different genotypes detected in Egypt and determine their pathogenicity.
Our results revealed that the LPAI H9N2 virus variants that harbor the PB2, PB1, PA, and NS gene segments from the pigeon/2014 H9N2 strain have been circulating since 2014 and have become the dominant H9N2 genotype circulating in Egypt from 2016 to 2021 (Figures 1 and 2). None of the infected chickens showed any symptoms of respiratory disease, but virus shedding was detected up to 7 dpi in all infected groups (although no virus was detected at 11 dpi). No statistically significant difference in virus shedding between the infected groups was found. However, a considerable variation in virus shedding at day 7 dpi was detected, where the quail/14864V/2014 showed an increased virus shedding in both tracheal and cloacal swabs at 7 dpi. The LPAI viruses are described as mainly targeting the respiratory tract, limitedly targeting the gastrointestinal tract, and usually associated with poor cloacal virus shedding in infected chickens [34,35]. It was noticed that there are different patterns in cloacal shedding among the infected groups, where the ch/V1172/2018 virus produced earlier cloacal virus shedding at 2 dpi to 4 dpi compared to the other two viruses, which started CL virus shedding on 4 dpi till 7 dpi. Variation in the virus shedding onset and the duration of virus shedding was described in previous studies with LPAI viruses [35,36].
This indicated the ability of the Egyptian LPAI H9N2 variants to infect both the respiratory and the digestive tract. A previous study revealed that other H9N2 virus variants of the Y439-like lineage could be detected until 7 dpi intranasally in infected chickens with no clinical signs [37]. Normal histological architecture was observed in all birds in the negative control group. Variable microscopic lesions were observed in infected organs at 2 dpi, and the severity increased with time progression. All infected groups showed variable tracheal lesions that varied from mild tracheitis to severe necrotic lesions, which was observed early in the groups infected with quail/14864V/2014 and quail/113413V/2011. Moreover, marked pathological alterations were observed in lungs of all groups, but no difference in intensity between groups was noticed. In addition to the ability of H9N2 virus variants to induce infection in the respiratory and digestive tracts, the lymphoid organs were also affected. Bursa and spleen suffered from lymphocytic depletion and degenerative reactions with different degrees of severity among the infected groups. Additionally, the inoculated virus was detected in both organs until 7 dpi. The impact of H9N2 on the lymphoid tissues has been reported previously both in the Egyptian strains and various strains related to other lineages [38,39]. Our antigenic characterization of both the current and the 2011-like variants revealed that they are still antigenically homologous. On the contrary, the quail/14864V/2014 is still antigenic heterogeneous compared to the other Egyptian variants, as shown in previous studies [10,11].
Our study extends the current understanding of the genetic and pathogenic characteristics of LPAI H9N2 virus variants in Egypt. Thus, it is essential to strengthen the surveillance of AIV in both wild and domestic poultry coupled with whole-genome sequencing to continue detailed monitoring of the virus evolution and to detect novel reassortant influenza viruses.

Data Availability Statement:
The nucleotide sequences generated in this paper have been deposited into a public database: Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) database under accession numbers shown in Table S1.