{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017578125, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.34375, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Lindahl's Confusing Marginal Utility Theory

This paper proves that Lindahl has confused cost with benefit. He viewed public good as benefit and people will fight to take a larger share of the good. This paper proves that his model could not accommodate the public good, but the cost of the good. When a person has to take up the burden of cost sharing, his utility is negatively affected, so his marginal utility is a positive function of the spending. This paper proves that they will fight to shun the burden.