{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04568527918781726, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03190717911530094, 'mean_word_length': 4.897435897435898, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of the Efficacy of Three Progestins in the Treatment of Simple Endometrial Hyperplasia without Atypia

Aim: To evaluate the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) with different progestins. Methods: Eighty-two women with simple EH without atypia were included. Patients were offered oral progestagens and were randomized to one of three options for 3 months: medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, 10 mg/day), lynestrenol (LYN, 15 mg/day) and norethisterone (NET, 15 mg/day) for 10 days per cycle. Patients were reevaluated after treatment. Women diagnosed with proliferative and nonatypical EH at the second curettage were offered the same progestins for another 3 months. The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of women requiring further treatment. Results: Of the 82 women, 46 (56.1%) received MPA (23.2%), LYN (13.4%) and NET (19.5%) therapy for another 3 months at the end of the first 3 months of treatment. The patients receiving MPA showed resolution in 36.7% of the cases versus 37% in the NET group. The highest resolution rate (56%) was observed in the LYN group, although there was no statistically significant difference between progestins regarding the proportion of women requiring further treatment (χ2 = 2.608; p = 0.271). Conclusion: It seems that the efficacies of oral progestins are similar at these dosages in simple EH without atypia.