{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02607494387843205, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013987221550682093, 'mean_word_length': 4.874239350912779, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL TIME IN TURBULENT JET MODELLING FOR GAS DISPERSION SIMULATION

ABSTRACT – The CFD model combines transport phenomena and numerical mathematics to solve physical problems. Although numerical modelling of flow scenarios is the cutting edge of flow modelling, there seems to be room for improvement. This paper proposes an approach for enhancing computation of turbulent jet as far as processing time is concerned. The methodology is based on an equivalent diameter and velocity profile calculated downstream the jet orifice. The novel model DESQr (Diameter of Equivalent Simulation for Quick Run) shows good agreement with experimental data and a significant computational time reduction is observed. Findings are also compared with commercial (ANSYS CFX) CFD tool.


INTRODUCTION
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has more recently been applied in various industrial scenarios. The chemical industry, in particular, has major interest in flow modelling as it is of crucial important in all stages of design.
Simulation time is an important point to be considered in any CFD case. More recently the utilisation of LES (Large Eddy Simulation) and RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes) approach has played an important role in engineering. The benefits of the former outweigh the computational time when RANS cannot provide reliable results, particularly when significant gradient are present. Having said that, LES is computationally expensive for the industry standards where quick responses are demanded.
The current research is focused on the modification of the low momentum LES code (namely FDS-Fire Dynamic Simulator) in order to deal with jet scenarios in an accurate manner and faster than traditional approaches. A novel jet model DESQr (Diamenter of Equivalent Simulation for Quicker Run) is proposed.
Findings are compared with experimental data and ANSYS CFX and good agreement is observed with significant computational time reduction.

METHODOLOGY
The framework of FDS based on Large Eddy Simulator (LES) developed by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for prediction of fire behaviour was considered. The code solves numerically mass, momentum, energy and mixture fraction equations alongside Smagorinsky sub-grid models (Mcgrattan et al, 2010 a, b).

DESQr -Diameter of Equivalent Simulation for Quick Run
The idea behind the method is fairly simple. It relies on the new boundary conditions based on isentropic jet release to be modelled downstream the jet orifice.
The updated model diameter ( ) is presented in equation 1. It is a function of the distance from the jet leak ( ), mass flow rate and the centreline velocity. It has been adapted from Benintendi (2010).
In the equation above is the mass flow rate at jet exit, is the specific mass of the air in a normal conditions of temperature and pressure and is the entrainment coefficient. Tate (2012) reports a large value for the entrainment coefficient for axisymmetric jets. For axisymmetric jets in a non-stratified and stagnated ambient fluid the entrainment coefficient is 0.08 ± 0.029 (Matulkca, 2014). The value of 0.05 was used in the current work.
In order to verify the model previously discussed, an investigation of turbulent jet velocity behaviour was performed. The computation domain is shown in Figure 1. Furthermore, the diameter estimation using DESQr model is applied, reducing considerably the elapsed time simulation of the turbulent jet. The simulation of air jet leaked from a nozzle ( ) of 2.7 mm and 340 m/s exit velocity ( ) was performed in a rectangular box of 20 mm length, 20 mm width and 500 mm height. Velocity monitor points were distributed in the centre of the computational domain in accordance with the experiment conducted by Birch et al. (1987).
Figure 2 (a) shows a sketch of the jet pattern observed by Birch et al (1987). Figure 2 (b) illustrates the modelled region proposed in this work. Two distances downstream the jet leak were considered (95 mm and 190 mm). As a result two regions were modelled as shown in Figure 2 (b). Thus, new boundary conditions namely, the jet nozzle becomes and the exit velocity, are considered in the numerical simulation. As the potential core extends up to ⁄ = 0.6 for sonic jets (Chuech, 1989) monitoring points were adjusted accordingly to consider the very first recording velocity immediately after the release.
The simulations comprising 0.025 million of cells were performed on a computer with 3.40GHz, core i7 and 8 GB of RAM.

RESULTS
Figure 3 (a) shows the jet centreline velocity decay for experimental data, FDS (original model) and ANSYS CFX code. It is clearly shown in Figure 3 (a) that the simulations satisfactorily reproduce the experimental data, having a significant initial drop and a smooth decay at the end. Figure 3 (b) shows the elapsed FDS simulation time. The simulation took approximately 51 hours to complete when using FDS original model.  Analysis of Figure 5 (a) also shows good agreement with experimental data when considering the distance of 190 mm from the jet leak. Further improvement in an elapsed simulation time is achieved, as shown in Figure 5

CONCLUSIONS
A novel jet model for numerical simulation of turbulent jet has been proposed. The model has been implemented in FDS (Fire Dynamic Simulator) framework. Comparison with experimental data ensured good agreement. The findings have also been compared with commercial ANSYS CFX and good agreement was also observed.
The model also reduced the computational time significantly. There seems to be a very good indication that a promising approach has emerged. Further assessment is necessary to verify the application of the model when calculating flammable gas cloud volumes as well as toxic cloud volumes.