{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05103806228373702, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02249134948096886, 'mean_word_length': 5.154255319148936, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Use of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Dementia-Related Agitation: A Case Series

Objectives This naturalistic prospective observation study examines the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in treating dementia-related agitation. Methods Patients with dementia-related agitation who received ECT were compared with patients with the same condition who did not receive ECT using Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)—nursing home version, and Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI). Outcomes were compared between ECT-treated and non–ECT-treated patients. Results A total of 9 patients were included in the study. Six received ECT, and 3 did not. Patients in the ECT and non–ECT-treated groups had comparable baseline scores (CMAI, P = 0.880; NPI, P = 0.814; and CGI, P = 0.445). The CMAI, NPI, and CGI scores were lower on final assessment in both groups with no statistically significant difference (CMAI, P = 0.771; NPI, P = 0.243; and CGI, P = 0.519). Conclusions Electroconvulsive therapy should be considered as a treatment option in the management of severe treatment refractory dementia-related agitation.