{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02881236823612087, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011946591707659873, 'mean_word_length': 4.836065573770492, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Systematic use of the RAM nasal cannula in the Yale–New Haven Children’s Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a quality improvement project

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the RAM nasal cannula (NC) with different modes of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Methods: A single center prospective, observational study of infants placed on RAM NC. A small trial (Study 1) was completed in 16 infants on NIV via the RAM NC over a 48-h period to create Summary Statement recommendations. Next, over a 10-month period (Study 2), data were prospectively collected for the outcome of all infants receiving respiratory support with the RAM NC. Outcomes were compared between different modes of NIV and whether the recommendations were followed. Results: The Study 2 population consisted of 88 infants of whom 67 infants received nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (NCPAP) and 21 received nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) via the RAM NC. The NIPPV group tended to be younger, smaller and stayed on the RAM NC longer. The overall success rate in weaning off the RAM NC, if our guidelines were followed, was 63%. Conclusion: RAM NC use with NIV was well tolerated in the neonatal population with the use of our guidelines. We speculate that use of our guidelines will lead to a more systematic use of the RAM NC in the NICU.