{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014891179839633447, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003436426116838488, 'mean_word_length': 5.198581560283688, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Could Defense Accelerator Be A Windfall for Science?

This article describes the possible ramifications of a decision about the production of tritium by Energy Secretary Hazel O`Leary. Sources indicate a two-pronged strategy will be proposed: spending $5 million a year to study the possibility of buying and converting a commercial nuclear reactor and nearly $50 million to begin developing a giant tritium producing accelerator - the APT or Accelerator Production of Tritium. The decision will provide years of APT development work for Los Alamos National Laboratory, but will disappoint backers of a huge special-purpose reactor to be built in South Carolina and proposed as a alternative tritium source. In addition the possibility of a giant new accelerator could offer some dangerous consolation for researchers still becoming the loss of the Advanced Neutron Source.