{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01713197969543147, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005076142131979695, 'mean_word_length': 5.112403100775194, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The "Glass Ceiling" And The Phenomenon Of "Scissors", Women In Academia

The article presents the persistence of the phenomenon of gender inequality towards women in academia. The question is why despite the integration of women in academia; only a few of them are in senior academic research positions. The answer is that there is no change in the social structure and power relations between men and women; Women are oriented towards socialization to study of non-scientific subjects, and therefore fewer women attend to the faculties of the natural sciences, more than that women who succeed in integrating into academia do not receive assistance or relief that can help them complete academic tasks because of their absence to the corresponding of family commitment. In addition it was found that women are excluded from information and social networks about new jobs and opportunities in the academic market (Mandel, 2013), these reasons make it difficult for women to develop careers in academia. Not appreciating the qualitative research makes it difficult for women to recognize their academic abilities. The result is the departure of some of the women from academia, which entails damage and loss for the society and the academia in the inability to express the feminine qualities and experiences that can contribute to new standards and gender innovation. The solution is in the hands of the academia which must establish new regulations against discrimination of women and affirmative action for women's. © 2018 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.UK