{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.041425818882466284, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029865125240847785, 'mean_word_length': 4.497354497354498, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Diagnostic evaluation of creatine kinase-2 mass and creatine kinase-3 and -2 isoform ratios in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

The diagnostic efficacy of creatine kinase (CK) isoforms (CK-3 and CK-2) was compared with measurement of CK-2 mass concentrations for the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Serial serum samples drawn from 76 patients with confirmed MI and 55 non-MI patients were used for determining CK-2 mass concentrations and the MM3/MM1 (CK-3 isoforms) and MB2/MB1 (CK-2 isoforms) ratios. We compared the diagnostic utility of each by receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve and likelihood ratio analyses. Our results indicate that all three tests were ineffective within the first 4 h after the onset of chest pain. All three were most effective at 4-18 h after onset, but both CK-3 and CK-2 isoform ratios were less effective than CK-2 mass concentrations in the next 6-h period (18-24 h). In the critical time between 3 and 6 h, the diagnostic performance of all three was comparable.