{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03887005649717514, 'fraction_numerical': 0.031864406779661014, 'mean_word_length': 5.295874822190612, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 6, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Abstract: Comparing the Utility of Head and Facial Computed Tomography (CT) Scans in Identifying Operative Facial Fractures

METHODS: Subjects undergoing craniosynostosis surgery between 2004 and 2015 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). Outcomes were compared between two exposure groups, those undergoing treatment at a high-volume institution (>40 cases per year), and those undergoing treatment at a low-volume institution (40 cases per year). Primary outcomes were: any complication, prolonged length of stay, and increased total cost.


INTRODUCTION:
The relationship between hospital/surgeon characteristics and operative outcomes and cost are being scrutinized increasingly. In patients with craniosynostosis specifically, the relationship between hospital-volume and outcomes has yet to be characterized.

METHODS:
Subjects undergoing craniosynostosis surgery between 2004 and 2015 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). Outcomes were compared between two exposure groups, those undergoing treatment at a high-volume institution (>40 cases per year), and those undergoing treatment at a low-volume institution (40 cases per year). Primary outcomes were: any complication, prolonged length of stay, and increased total cost.

RESULTS:
Over thirteen thousand patients (N=13,112) from 49 institutions met inclusion criteria. In multivariate regression analyses, subjects treated in high-volume centers were less likely to experience any complication (OR 0.764, p<0.001), were less likely to have an extended length of stay (OR 0.624, p<0.001), and were less likely to have increased total cost (OR 0.596, p<0.001). Subjects undergoing strip-craniectomy in high-volume centers were also less likely to have any complication (OR 0.708, p=0.018), or increased total cost (OR 0.51, p<0.001). Subjects undergoing midvault reconstruction in high-volume centers were less likely to experience any complications (OR 0.696, p=0.002), have an extended length of stay (OR 0.542, p<0.001), or have increased total cost (OR 0.495, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION:
In hospitals performing a highvolume of craniosynostosis surgery, subjects had significantly decreased odds of experiencing a complication, prolonged length of stay, or incurring increased total cost, when compared to those undergoing treatment in low-volume institutions.

Monday, October 9, 2017
to determine if head scans alone are sufficient, or whether dedicated facial scans are required to identify fractures.

METHODS: All operative facial trauma over a 16
year period (1998 -2013) at a single institution was reviewed. Patients were categorized based on the imaging modality (head or face scan) used to evaluate their facial fractures, excluding those receiving a single imaging study. Fracture patterns seen were categorized and patients receiving both scan types were grouped based on whether the results were identical. Demographic information was compared between the groups. Further analysis was performed for the group with non-identical results to determine the difference in the type and quantity of fractures captured by each scan.

RESULTS:
A total of 307 patients were identified who underwent operative repair of traumatic facial fractures and received both face and head CT scans. 106 patients (35%) had findings which differed between the scans, while 201 patients (65%) had identical findings in each scan. No difference between the groups was observed with respect to age, length of hospital stay, gender, or insurance status. No difference was observed with most mechanisms of injury, except motorcycle accidents. For the 106 patients with differing results between the scans, the facial CT scans identified a clinically and statistically significant 40.6% more nasal fractures, 33% more midface fractures, 28.3% more zygoma fractures, 4.7% more frontal sinus fractures and 36.8% more orbital fractureall of which were operative and would have been missed by standard head CT scan. In aggregate, a total of 151 fractures would have been missed in these patients by head scan alone.
CONCLUSION: A significant number of operative facial fractures were identified on dedicated facial imaging, when compared to standard head CT scan in about one third of patients. Dedicated facial CT scans should be strongly considered for patients with a suspicion for facial trauma by history and physical exam.