{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024277456647398842, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006936416184971098, 'mean_word_length': 5.055944055944056, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Small Market Professional Journal: How Idiosyncrasy Informs the Future and Why It Matters

On February 12, 2008, the Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences voted on a resolution presented by the Provost’s Committee on Scholarly Publishing, which may have far-reaching impact on scholarly communication if it is rigorously applied. Then again, it may prove to be yesterday’s news. The key clause states, “Each Faculty member grants to the President and Fellows of Harvard College permission to make available his or her scholarly articles and to exercise the copyright in those articles. In legal terms, the permission granted by each Faculty member is a nonexclusive, irrevocable, paid-up, worldwide license to exercise any and all rights under copyright,” with the key means of executing the policy to be posting on a repository managed by the Harvard Libraries.