{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013761467889908258, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009938837920489297, 'mean_word_length': 5.48019801980198, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Removal of Ventricular Shunts

Background: Although most patients with an implanted ventriculoperitoneal shunt device will require cerebrospinal fluid diversion over the course of their lifetime, there appears to be a small number of patients that are shunt independent and may benefit from shunt removal. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 661 patients with hydrocephalus treated over a 10-year period at a single institution. In 10 patients, a systematic shunt weaning protocol was attempted before removal of the cerebrospinal fluid shunt. Results: Ten patients underwent an attempt at shunt removal. Seven of these patients were successfully weaned and 3 were not. The indications to attempt shunt removal for the 7 patients that were successfully weaned were recurrent complications and infections requiring multiple shunt externalizations and revisions in 4 patients, asymptomatic shunt disconnection in 2 patients, and symptomatic overdrainage in 1 patient. None of the patients that were successfully weaned had a history of shunt failure resulting in ventriculomegaly. Two of the 3 patients who failed shunt weaning attempts had a history of shunt failure that resulted in ventriculomegaly. Conclusion: A small number of patients with shunted hydrocephalus may benefit from removal of their shunt.