{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027742749054224466, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03026481715006305, 'mean_word_length': 5.223529411764706, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
NUCLEUS AND MARGIN OF ZUNI CLAUSE TYPES

For many years it was the practice of scientists to conduct studies of the cultural life of a tribal people without any appreciable reference to the language spoken by the members ofthat culture. Such was the case with regard to the Zuni Indian culture of Western New Mexico. Once an ethnological investigation was begun at Zuni, and information concerning the material culture of the Zunis began to appear in print, it was fifty years before any extensive study of the language was undertaken. Ruth Bunzel's collection of texts (1932a, 1932b, 1933, 1934) and her grammar (1934) remained the only sizable corpus of Zuni language material in print until 1954, when Stanley Newman began publishing his analyses of Zuni language data. His preliminary works (1954, 1955) and his dictionary (1958) became the necessary stimulus to turn the attention of other scholars to Zuni linguistic analysis. Willard Walker's publication of portions of his doctoral dissertation (1966), joined with Newman's early works just cited and his grammar (1965), provided a fairly complete treatment of the phonology and morphology of Zuni. Nevertheless, despite the now imposing body of published Zuni linguistic material, the area of Zuni syntactic structure was referred to only in general terms. Accordingly, Julian Granberry began work on a doctoral dissertation (1967), in which he dealt expressly with the syntactic structure of Zuni phrases, clauses, and sentences. Cranberry's treatment, however, left the areas of transitivity and modality virtually untouched.