{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026080286371771927, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013040143185885963, 'mean_word_length': 5.150943396226415, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Erratum: Assessing coral reef condition indicators for local and global stressors using Bayesian networks

1. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that “Missing data that could not be temporally imputed from time series data at the same location were handled through structural expectation‐ maximization (Conrady and Jouffe 2015)” (page 170). The statement has been corrected to “Missing data that could not be imputed from time series data at the same location were handled through structural expectation‐maximization (Conrady and Jouffe 2015).” 2. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that “However, LiveCoral was the only indicator examined for the minimum mean values on the TMA curves and was not considered for the maximum mean values” (page 172). The statement has been corrected to “However, LiveCoral was the only indicator examined for the minimum mean values on the TMA curves and was not considered for the maximum mean values for stressor relationships.” 3. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that “Only PopBleach or ColBleach candidate models exceeded 70% total precision” (page 172). The statement has been corrected to “Only PopBleach or ColBleach candidate models exceeded 70% total precision with the exception of one LiveCoral model.” 4. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that “For Southeast Asia, acidification threat and LiveCoral had the highest SDE and this relationship also has the highest MI and KLD” (page 178). The statement has been corrected to “For Southeast Asia, acidification threat and LiveCoral had the highest SDE and this relationship also has the highest MI and KLD for that region.” 5. All CDT abbreviations should be spelled out throughout the paragraph that starts at the end of the first column with the sentence “In Southeast Asia the lowest (negative) SDE value was for LiveCoral and CDT” (Page 178) as “coastal development threat,” not abbreviated as CDT. 6. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that “The DE TMA uses the model to allow other variables to covary and therefore is a useful means to assess associations with the model given the relationships that were identified by the machine learning algorithms” (page 179). The statement has been corrected to “The DE TMA uses the model to allow nonconfounder variables to covary and therefore is a useful means to assess associations with the model given the relationships that were identified by the machine learning algorithms.” 7. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that “The LiveCoral values were always selected for the negative linear relationships or minimum mean values for DE or TE curves” (page 180). The statement has been corrected to “The LiveCoral values were always selected for the negative linear relationships or minimum mean values for DE or TE curves for the stressor relationships.” 8. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that “Coastal development threat and DeadCoral had negative associations for all measures except for direct effects measures in Australia and the Indian Ocean, but these relationships were nonlinear” (page 184). The statement has been corrected to “Coastal development threat and DeadCoral had negative associations for all measures except for the Pacific and direct effects measures in the Atlantic, but these relationships were mostly nonlinear.” 9. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that “The lowest total precisions were found for LiveCoral for all data and Southeast Asia and LCI for all data” (page 185). The statement has been corrected to “The lowest total precisions for final models were found for LiveCoral for all data and Southeast Asia, and LCI for all data.” 10. In Table 1, the following errors have been corrected as: