{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020780856423173802, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013853904282115869, 'mean_word_length': 5.182879377431907, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells in renal allografts: correlation with long-term graft function and acute rejection.

BACKGROUND
The interpretation of a cellular infiltrate as cytotoxic or tolerogen represents an unsolved challenge in current transplantation. The so-called regulatory CD4+ CD25+ T-cells which express the FOXP3 gene have received increasing interest with respect to this question. The existing studies concerning the role of FOXP3+ Tregs for transplant tolerance yielded contradictory results.


METHODS
We examined the numbers of the FOXP3+ Tregs in two groups of renal allograft biopsies both showing cellular infiltration, but either without (n=29) or with signs of acute cellular rejection (n=26), by means of immunofluorescence and correlated the amount of FOXP3+ Tregs to renal function at the time of biopsy and after 1 and 2 years of follow up.


RESULTS
The number of FOXP3+ Tregs within infiltrates in non-rejecting biopsies did not correlate with renal function after 1 and 2 years. There were no significant differences in the numbers of FOXP3+ Tregs between biopsies with or without borderline infiltrates. Increased numbers of FOXP3+ Tregs were not associated with an ameliorated severity of graft rejection and did not correlate with outcome after the rejection episode and renal function after 1 and 2 years.


CONCLUSIONS
The identification of the FOXP3+ regulatory cells within the allograft cannot be considered as an appropriate marker for the interpretation of infiltrates as cytotoxic or tolerogenic or as a prognostic marker for later transplant function.