{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03125, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.503759398496241, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Enhancing Refugee Protection in the Asia-Pacific Region: Lack of a Normative Protection Framework

Nevertheless, in some theatres serious thought has clearly been given to the necessity for regimes that integrate (initially, in theory; in practice, we shall see) norms, political mechanisms, and programs of action and oversight in scenarios which engage multiple actors, each with its own area of responsibility and obligation. This context poses new and exciting opportunities, in which, as James Brierly once cautioned, international lawyers will need to beware the ‘‘tyranny of phrases.’’ For we must consider that failure to remove blinkers, to think beyond the rule, to kickstart political processes (repeatedly if necessary), can contribute to perpetuating the unresolved, and so leave the refugee and the displaced to the mercy of yet greater catastrophes.