{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01973164956590371, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.044444444444444, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Social and pedagogical technologies of religious identity development: discursive analysis

In this article social and pedagogical technologies of religious identity development in modern Orthodox Christianity are analysed. It is offered to consider the basic discourses used in religious life (philosophical and theological, art, political, mythological and ideological) as stages of religious identity development. Different discourses influence the notion to various extents. A standard set of discourses (philosophical and theological, art) forms standard and confessional belief. Some forms of discourse like art, mythological, ideological, and political discourses make folklorized identity, while mythological, ideological, political and art discourses form marginal religious identity, the latter being the basis of extremist and terrorist ideas dissemination. in modern society. The mechanism of folklorized and marginal religiousness is developed thanks to the social metonymy which represents a social process during which a replacement of some complicated social phenomenon takes place. It means that some main complex social phenomena are replaced by simpler ones. Social metonymy is widespread in the sphere of religious practice and religious identity.