{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03368421052631579, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014210526315789474, 'mean_word_length': 5.212418300653595, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
In-vitro fit of experimental full-arch restorations made from monolithic zirconia.

PURPOSE
Fabrication inaccuracies can compromise the fit of large-span monolithic zirconia restorations. Sintering distortion is a particular problem. This study aimed to assess the fit of full-arch restorations made from mono lithic zirconia for different abutment configurations.


METHODS
To quantify fit inaccuracies created during the fabrication of experimental large-span restorations, an in-vitro model with eight abutment teeth was equipped with strain gauges. Ten 14-unit restorations were made from monolithic zirconia and seated on the model in turn. For each of the ten restorations, measurements were taken for three different abutment configurations-polygonal, quadrangular, and unilaterally shortened. Strains exerted during seating were recorded in the anterior-posterior and buccal-palatal directions, and the resulting horizontal forces (rhF) were calculated along with the respective abutment deflection (ad). Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests at a significance level of 0.05.


RESULTS
All restorations could be seated on the multi-abutment model. The restorations exhibited fabrication misfits, tending to be too wide. Mean rhF/ad were largest for the quadrangular configuration (16.8±2.9 N/0.065 mm) and smallest for the polygonal configuration (13.6±4.5 N/0.053 mm). The largest rhF/ad were measured on abutments of the unilaterally shortened configuration, with a maximum deflection of 0.126 mm. For two of three configurations, rhF/ad were significantly larger for the distal abutments than for the other abutments.


CONCLUSIONS
Even if milling and sintering procedures are optimum, misfit-induced horizontal forces cannot be avoided. Because of the natural tooth mobility, however, the fit of full-arch restorations made from monolithic zirconia might be clinically acceptable.