{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015189873417721518, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.277777777777778, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparative study of porous medium CFD models for flow diverter stents: Advantages and shortcomings

In computational fluid dynamics, there is a high interest in modeling flow diverter stents as porous media due to its reduced computational loads. One of the main difficulties of such models is proper parameter setup. Most authors assume flow diverter's wire screen as an isotropic and homogeneous medium, while others proposes anisotropic configurations, yet very little is discussed about the effect of these assumptions on model's accuracy. In this paper, we compare the effect of different models on hemodynamics in relation to their parameters. The fidelity and efficiency of the different models to capture wire screen effect on fluid flow are quantitatively analyzed and compared.