{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023367149207796648, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013450359056195144, 'mean_word_length': 4.98091342876619, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Counter Radicalization Analysis in Efforts to Prevent the Spread of Radical Ideology in Indonesia

Terrorism is a product of the radicalization process, the massive effects of radicalization of IS ideology have resulted in an increase in the threat of terrorism in Indonesia. Factually, the increase in the threat of terrorism in Indonesia can be seen from the large number of victims who fell, namely as many as 35 police died and 67 police were injured in an effort to fight terrorism in the 2014 to 2015. From a total of 171 terrorism acts that have been successfully revealed. During 2000 to 2015, there were 1,064 suspected terrorists who had been arrested. Meanwhile, as many as 408 Indonesians are in Syria to join IS. Indonesia alone there were around 543 people identified as core groups, 246 identified as support groups, and 296 identified as IS sympathizers. The fact that after the establishment of National counterterrorism agency (BNPT) in 2010 which replaced the role of the Counter Terrorism Coordination Desk (DKPT) apparently there were various acts of terrorism and radical radicalization processes in Indonesia. Support and bai'at simultaneously and massively that occurred in various provinces in Indonesia seemed to successfully open our eyes that radicalization as a process is actually being and continues to happen to the people of Indonesia. And this indirectly creates a big question mark about the BNPT prevention program that has been done so far. Therefore, this study was made to find out and conduct an in-depth analysis of how the implementation of counter-radicalization programs carried out by the Directorate of Prevention of BNPT in an effort to prevent the spread of radical ideology in Indonesia. The method in this paper is qualitative research by interview and observation with the stake holders related to counter-radicalization programs carried out by the BNPT and Detachment 88 AT the National Police. The fact finding that the implementation of the counter-radicalization program policy by the Directorate of Prevention of BNPT is carried out with the suitability and compliance between policy direction and policy implementation in the form of offline or online strategy programs. The offline strategy by the BNPT Prevention Directorate was conducted by procuring programs for seminars, workshops and training activities for BNPT partners, both government agencies, NGOs, and community leaders who were members of the Counter Terrorism Coordination Forum (FKPT). And this is done by BNPT formally, and directly without undercover and third-party intermediaries. The online strategy by the Directorate of Prevention of BNPT is carried out by means of media literacy involving the Media Literacy Task Force, the Peace Media Center (PMD) as managers (coordinators, evaluators, analysts), content formulators, and implementing activities through website, social media, media electronics, and or print media. The content presented contains an image of the government's perspective through BNPT, but now there is a website that is managed by a third party in collaboration with PMD and the Directorate of Prevention of BNPT as an effective counter-narrative media. Even so, this program has just been implemented and certainly requires a process and time to get optimal results. The impact of counterradicalization policies and programs from the Directorate of Prevention of BNPT is still not in accordance with the formulated vision that is "prevention of terrorism in a whole, protecting the dignity of the nation and free from violence". The indicator that marks the non-fulfillment of the vision of the Prevention Directorate is the fact that radical radicalization of offline ideology is still occurring both offline and online by radical terrorist groups in Indonesia, especially IS. In addition, acts of terror continue to occur in Indonesia until now.


Introduction
Terrorism is a product of the radicalization process, the massive effects of radicalization of IS ideology have resulted in an increase in the threat of terrorism in Indonesia.
The implementation of the deradicalization strategy and the counterradicalization strategy implemented by BNPT since 2010, must face the test of massive mobilization and radicalization flows in the form of narrative propaganda launched by phenomenal and terrible terrorist groups which are al-Qaeda, namely ad-Dawla al -Ilamiyyah fi al-Iraq wa as-Sham (Daesh, or "Islamic State of Iraq and as-Sham," ISIS or "Islamic State," IS). This global terrorist group managed to take advantage of the Arab Spring situation, Sunni-Shi'a conflict in Syria, and the vulnerability of Iraq after the occupation of the Allied forces led by the United States as a stage and the reason for the rise of establishing the Islamic Khilafah in June 2014 and conducting propaganda so that Muslims throughout the world supports the Islamic State (IS) and commits Bai'a al-Baghdadi as caliph. In fact, this group ordered its followers to cancel bai'at against their respective state governments and fight all who disagreed with them in order to achieve the goal of establishing an IS branch in their respective areas of struggle.
Factually, the increase in the threat of terrorism in Indonesia can be seen from the large number of victims who fell, namely as many as 35 police died and 67 police were injured in an effort to fight terrorism in the 2014 to 2015. From a total of 171 terrorism acts that have been successfully revealed. During 2000 to 2015, there were 1,064 suspected terrorists who had been arrested. Meanwhile, as many as 408 Indonesians are in Syria to join IS. Indonesia alone there were around 543 people identified as core groups, 246 identified as support groups, and 296 identified as IS sympathizers. The fact that after the establishment of National counterterrorism agency (BNPT) in 2010 which replaced the role of the Counter Terrorism Coordination Desk (DKPT) apparently there were various acts of terrorism and radical radicalization processes in Indonesia. Support and bai'at simultaneously and massively that occurred in various provinces in Indonesia seemed to successfully open our eyes that radicalization as a process is actually being and continues to happen to the people of Indonesia. And this indirectly creates a big question mark about the BNPT prevention program that has been done so far.

Problems
1. How is the implementation of the counter-radicalization program by the Directorate of Prevention of BNPT in an effort to prevent the spread of radical ideology? 2. What is the impact of the implementation of the counterradicalization program by the Directorate of Prevention of BNPT in an effort to prevent the spread of radical ideology?

Terms of reference
Islamic state (IS) Ustadz Dr. Ali Musri Semjan Putra, MA in As-Sunnah magazine about the heresy of IS ideology and the chronology of the formation of IS, it is known that the chronology of the formation of ad-Dawla al-Islamiyyah fi al-Iraq wa as-Sham (Daesh, or "Islamic State of Iraq and as -Sham, "ISIS or" Islamic State, "IS) was initiated by Jordan-born terrorist Abu Musab al Zarqawi (Ahmed Fadeel al Nazal Al Khalayeh). Zarqawi, a mujahidin who fought against the United States in Afghanistan, was a member of Al-Qaeda, which after returning from Afghanistan to Iraq in 2004, later changed the name of his group to Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) or Al-Qaeda branch in Iraq. Zarqawi's involvement in three major attacks on the US military caused him to be killed in 2006 by US airstrikes. Before Zarqawi was killed, he announced through a recording of the formation of the "Majlis Syura Mujahidin" chaired by Abdullah Rasyid al-Baghdadi. Their goal is to form a "Majlis Syura Mujahidin" to anticipate the separation between various groups of fighters scattered in various parts of Iraq. After Zarqawi was killed, Ideology is an idea or an idea. The word ideology itself was created by Antoine Dstutt de Tracy in the late 18th century to define ideas. Ideology can be considered as a comprehensive vision, about how to see things. Ideology in the Arabic perspective, is a term that can be translated as Mabda, which etymogogically mabda is mashdar mimi from the word bada'a (start), yabda'u (starting), bad'an (beginning), and mabda'an ( starting point). In terms of terminology, ideology means fundamental thinking that is built on the branch of thought (Ahmad, 2004: 84).
While Radical comes from Latin, namely radix and or radicis, which means root. In the Big Indonesian Dictionary (1990), radical means very demanding change. While radicalism has the meaning as an understanding or flow or extreme attitude of a political school that wants social or political change or renewal in hard or drastic ways