{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014473684210526316, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.237704918032787, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Review: Mock Kings in Medieval Society and Renaissance Drama

decrease in the intensity of the method of reading. Here textual archaeology and reception theory can usefully come together to explore how reading was internalised. The editor's final chapter further underlines the connections between literature and history, partly in terms of the potential utility of literary theory but also in terms of methodological common ground. The revival or regeneration of narrative in history a desirable gaol in Burke's view could be served by the adoption of the novelist's strategy of orchestrating multiple narratives. The single, linear narrative part of the traditional paradigm of history Burke and all contributors to this volume are convinced has had its day.