{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023192360163710776, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004092769440654843, 'mean_word_length': 5.016393442622951, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Decomposed phrasal constructions



In this paper I suggest an interface level of semantic representations, that on the one hand
corresponds to morpho-syntactic entities such as phrase structure rules, function words and
inflections, and that on the other hand can be mapped to lexical semantic representations that one
ultimately needs in order to give good predictions about argument frames of lexical items. This
interface level consists of basic constructions that can be decomposed into five sub-constructions
(arg1-role, arg2-role ... arg5-role). I argue in favour of phrasal constructions
in order to account for altering argument frames and maybe also coercion without having to use
lexical rules or multiple lexical entries.