{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024667931688804556, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003795066413662239, 'mean_word_length': 5.063218390804598, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Note on Measuring Inclusive Growth and the Inclusiveness of Growth

This article makes three basic contributions: (a) review an already existing measure of ‘inclusive growth’ derived from a measure of inclusiveness (an increase which is assumed to be associated with inclusive growth) and show that this is one among a class of an infinite number of possible measures; (b) identify two drawbacks associated with the class of measures of ‘inclusive growth’ mentioned in (a) and come up with a measure of inclusive growth which is not associated with one of these drawbacks and (c) propound a measure of inclusiveness of growth which allows the researcher the room to partition an income-ordered population into blocks so that he/she can concentrate on inter-block inequality in growth rates of per capita income and neglect intra-block inequality (note that the formulation of this measure allows the researcher to partition the population into blocks in any way which he/she wants to) in growth rates of individual incomes. JEL Classification: D30, D31