{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016867469879518072, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002891566265060241, 'mean_word_length': 5.718446601941747, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Palliative subtotal vertebrectomy with anterior and posterior reconstruction via a single posterior approach.

OBJECT
Laminectomy for the treatment of spinal metastatic disease is ineffective. Total spondylectomy requiring both anterior and posterior operations may cause undue morbidity in patients with a limited life expectancy. The authors demonstrate the technique, feasibility, and success of subtotal vertebrectomy that is followed by anterior and posterior reconstruction via a simple posterior approach. Although this remains a palliative procedure, it provides circumferential decompression and spinal stabilization by using rigid hardware.


METHODS
The authors present a review of nine of 43 consecutive patients with spinal metastatic disease who underwent operation in a 42-month period. Via a single midline posterior approach, the authors performed single-stage circumferential decompression of the theca followed by anterior and posterior reconstruction. Anterior support is provided by a methylmethacrylate reconstruction retained with Steinmann pins. Posterior reconstruction is achieved by placement of rigid hook or pedicle screw and rod instrumentation. Eight of the nine patients died of progression of underlying disease. All patients remained pain free until days before they died. Except for a patient with paraplegia who did not recover, all other patients remained ambulatory. Despite radio-, chemo-, and steroid therapy, there were no wound infections or breakdowns. One patient underwent reoperation because of a technical error.


CONCLUSIONS
Use of the near-total vertebrectomy followed by anterior and posterior reconstruction from T2 to L3 by using a single midline posterior approach spares the patient, who has a limited life expectancy, the operative risks associated with thoracotomy or thoracoabdominal approaches. The authors restrict the procedure for use in patients with extensive bony disease, noncontiguous spinal involvement, visceral metastases, other contraindications to a transcavitary procedure, and those with advanced age.