{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03415154749199573, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03415154749199573, 'mean_word_length': 4.89937106918239, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Abdominal sonography versus peritoneal lavage in shock site diagnosis in polytrauma].

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and abdominal sonography (AS) were prospectively evaluated in emergency room diagnostics of blunt abdominal trauma in 106 multiple injured patients (ISS 40 pts). The incidence of intraabdominal lesions was 38.7%. 82 DPL and 64 AS were performed. In 45 patients both procedures were done, in 19 patients only AS and in 37 patients only DPL. The over-all accuracy of DPL and AS was 95% and 88%, respectively. Sensitivity was 91 vs. 74%, specificity 98 vs. 95%. The combined use of both procedures increased accuracy to 98%. We conclude that AS is the initial screening method for the detection of intraabdominal lesions in multiple injured patients. In any case of negative AS and hemodynamic instability or ambiguous AS, DPL should be performed immediately to improve diagnostic accuracy without delaying treatment.