{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017687074829931974, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.513274336283186, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Editorial Comment to Robotic removal of eroded vaginal mesh into the bladder

with the open approach, which might overcome operative costs. In a setting of mesh erosion, the transperitoneal robotic approach provided easier dissection of planes and facilitated closure of the bladder wall. However, these types of lesions are usually complex, and need to be evaluated individually for better definition of surgical plan. In this particular case, there was minimal inflammation and no vaginal or ureteral orifices involvement, which made it suitable for robotic use. In cases of expected major adhesions, such as patients with previous abdominal surgeries, laparoscopic transvesical or open approaches might provide better visualization.