{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024752475247524754, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00935093509350935, 'mean_word_length': 5.124579124579125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Real-Time Load Prediction Control for Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle

The development of hydrogen energy is an effective solution to the energy and environmental crisis. Hydrogen fuel cells and energy storage cells as hybrid power have broad application prospects in the field of vehicle power. Energy management strategies are key technologies for fuel cell hybrid systems. The traditional optimization strategy is generally based on optimization under the global operating conditions. The purpose of this project is to develop a power allocation optimization method based on real-time load forecasting for fuel cell/lithium battery hybrid electric vehicles, which does not depend on specific working conditions or causal control methods. This paper presents an energy-management algorithm based on real-time load forecasting using GRU neural networks to predict load requirements in the short time domain, and then the local optimization problem for each predictive domain is solved using a method based on Pontryagin’s minimum principle (PMP). The algorithm adopts the idea of model prediction control (MPC) to transform the global optimization problem into a series of local optimization problems. The simulation results show that the proposed strategy can achieve a good fuel-saving control effect. Compared with the rule-based strategy and equivalent hydrogen consumption strategy (ECMS), the fuel consumption is lower under two typical urban conditions. In the 1800 s driving cycle, under WTCL conditions, the fuel consumption under the MPC-PMP strategy is 22.4% lower than that based on the ECMS strategy, and 10.3% lower than the rules-based strategy. Under CTLT conditions, the fuel consumption of the MPC-PMP strategy is 13.12% lower than that of the rule-based strategy, and 3.01% lower than the ECMS strategy.