{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03779840848806366, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015915119363395226, 'mean_word_length': 5.261410788381743, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Knowledge acquisition after Helping Babies Survive training in rural Tanzania.

BACKGROUND
While the effectiveness of Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) training in Tanzania has been reported, no published studies of Essential Care for Every Baby (ECEB) and Essential Care for Small Babies (ECSB) in this setting have been found. This study compared knowledge before and after HBB, ECEB and ECSB training in Tanzania.


METHODS
Training was provided to future facilitators (n=16) and learners (n=24) in Tanzania. Using standardized multiple-choice questions, knowledge was assessed pre- and post-HBB and ECEB courses for both learners and facilitators, while ECSB assessment was conducted with facilitators only. A >80% score was considered to be a pass. Paired t-tests were used for hypothesis testing.


RESULTS
Knowledge significantly improved for both facilitators and learners on HBB and ECEB (p<0.001) and for facilitators on ECSB (p<0.001). After training, learners had difficulty identifying correct responses on one HBB item (21% incorrect) and three ECEB items (25-29% incorrect). After training, facilitators had difficulty identifying correct responses on five ECSB items (22-44% incorrect).


CONCLUSIONS
Training improved knowledge in Tanzania, but not sufficiently for feeding, especially for low birthweight babies. Targeted training on feeding is warranted both within the Helping Babies Survive program and in preclinical training to improve knowledge and skill to enhance essential newborn care.