{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024622716441620333, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003177124702144559, 'mean_word_length': 6.974683544303797, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Immunohistochemical analysis of the poorly differentiated stomach adenocarcinoma with medullary growth pattern

Poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma with medullary features (poor medullary) is distinguished by a propensity for hepatic metastasis. To classify it antigenically, we compared it to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with scirrhous growth pattern (poor scirrhous), well and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (differentiated adenocarcinoma), and normal gastric mucosa (foveolar and deep epithelium) using immunohistochemistry with antibodies against CEA, AFP, NSE, and Lewis‐type antigens. Lewisb antigen was significantly associated with differentiated adenocarcinoma and foveolar epithelium, although Lewisx antigen was significantly expressed in poor medullary, poor scirrhous, and deep gland epithelium. From the viewpoint of expression of Lewisa, there was no significant differentiation between poor medullary and differentiated adenocarcinoma, but it was definite between poor scirrhous and differentiated adenocarcinoma. Therefore, we conclude that in antigenic expression, poor medullary carcinoma is allied with differentiated adenocarcinoma rather than poorly differentiated scirrhous carcinoma. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.