{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026385224274406333, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011213720316622692, 'mean_word_length': 5.242798353909465, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Testing lyoequivalency for three commercially sustained-release tablets containing diltiazem hydrochloride.

In vitro release kinetics of three commercially available sustained release tablets (SR) diltiazem hydrochloride were studied at pH 1.1 for 2 h and for another 6 h at pH 6.8 using the USP dissolution apparatus with the paddle assemble. The kinetics of the dissolution process was studied by analyzing the dissolution data using five kinetic equations: the zero-order equation, the first-order equation, the Higuchi square root equation, the Hixson-Crowell cube root law and the Peppas equation. Analyses of the dissolution kinetic data for diltiazem hydrochloride commercial SR tablets showed that both Dilzacard and Dilzem SR tablets released drug by Non-Fickian (Anomalous transport) release with release exponent (n) equal to 0.59 and 0.54, respectively, which indicate the summation of both diffusion and dissolution controlled drug release. Bi-Tildiem SR tablets released drug by super case II (n = 1.29) which indicate zero-order release due to the dissolution of polymeric matrix and relaxation of the polymer chain. This finding was also in agreement with results obtained from application of zero-order and Hixson-Crowell equations. A dissolution profile comparative study was done to test the lyoequivelancy of the three products by using the mean dissolution time (MDT), dissimilarity factor f1 and similarity factor f2. Results showed that the three products are different and not lyoequivalent.