{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01574074074074074, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001851851851851852, 'mean_word_length': 5.431547619047619, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
EXPLICATION AND IMPLICATION WHEN DUBBING ENGLISH FILMS INTO UKRAINIAN

The work is devoted to the analysis of the features of the dubbing process of
English films into Ukrainian; special attention is paid to peculiarities of lexical
semantics in the translated variants. The work is of experimental character: the
total time of the researched material is 3000 minutes.
Among the established factors of pragmatic adaptation in the process of the
film translation the most important one is the capability to reflect socio-cultural
realities of the English-speaking community in the Ukrainian language. The adequacy and quality of the translation must produce the same communicative effect on the Ukrainian-speaking audience, which is aimed at the English-speaking
audience. An adequate translation preserves speech behavior, political and economic realities.
Special attention is paid to the use of explication and implication techniques
in the translation practice of dubbing. Both types of translation techniques are
used in English-Ukrainian patterns. The explication of a word’s semantics can
be structural or contextual. By structural explication we mean the introduction
of additional word forms, caused by grammatical and sociocultural factors. In
Ukrainian translations, there is a tendency for the widespread use of explication,
in order to adequately reflect the meaning of communicative units and preserve a
pragmatic impact on the audience.
The implication is rarely used in Ukrainian film-texts; it is caused not only
by the need to synchronize the lipsing of the original and the translation, but also
by the absence of certain cognitive phenomena in the national culture consciousness of the Ukrainians.
The undoubted advantage in the palette of the Ukrainian dubbing of communicative means is associated with the traditions of the Ukrainian dubbing school, 
which is characterized by the greatest flexibility in observing national stereotypes,
the maximum domestication of other peoples’ realities. The Ukrainian actor,
when portraying a foreigner, imposes serious restrictions on his own manner of
reproducing the Ukrainian communicative system.