{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014405762304921969, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.892561983471074, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The practice of neuroimaging within a neurology office setting.

Imaging is an essential tool in the diagnosis and management of neurologic disorders, yet its adoption in the clinical neurology setting is limited. Perceived cost barriers and political pressures have caused undue apprehension for a community of experts that otherwise plays a leadership role in solving complex neurologic puzzles. Some private practice neurologists have integrated advanced imaging services into a comprehensive neuroservices model, demonstrating its plausibility together with a recipe for success. The purpose of this article is to explore the advantages, disadvantages, and considerations for integrating imaging into an outpatient neurology clinic. Clinical and business advantages are weighed against financial, regulatory, and political risks.