{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01556420233463035, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.518987341772152, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Plural Pasts, Presents, and Futures of Postqualitative Inquiry: Two Questions for the Field

What is the Work of History in Postqualitative Research? and Who is Seated at the Table? This brief invited commentary focuses on these two questions generated from the articles in David Carlson’s special issue about the postqualitative turn in qualitative inquiry. These questions aim to ask those interested in postqualitative inquiry to thoughtfully consider the work of making the multiple in postqualitative inquiry.