{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015086206896551725, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.917197452229299, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
AUTHORITY TO DISPOSE OF NATURE USERS: SOME PROBLEMS

The article analyzes the authority to dispose as an element of the subjective right to natural resources usage. The methods of disposal provided by the legislation of the Republic of Belarus are analyzed, such as voluntary refusal to exercise the nature usage right, restricting access to a natural resource plot provided for use, attracting other persons to use it on the basis of a civil law contract, providing land plots for lease or sublease, etc. It is concluded that it is necessary to systematize, within the framework of the sectoral nature resource legislation, the rights of users of natural resources to transfer part of their powers to other persons. The author notes that in the future it is not only possible, but also necessary to expand the authority to dispose of nature users, including through the development of the institution of secondary nature usage.