{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05161290322580645, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012903225806451613, 'mean_word_length': 4.826291079812207, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: III. Theological — Historical Studies: Luther's Doctrine of the Two Kingdoms

One finds in Althaus numerous themes which are likely to appear wherever Luther's theology may be treated: fideism, the "theology of the cross'; (contrasted with the "theology of glory"), civil righteousness, the bondage of the will, the priesthood of all believers, simul justus et peccstor, the communion of saints, soul-sleep, etc. On the person of Christ Althaus sees Luther in agreement with Chalcedon but finds the distinctive emphasis to be that "the Father's heart and will are present in Christ" (Ch. 16). On the work of Christ Althaus finds in Luther both satisfaction (Anselm) and conquest (Aulen] (Ch, 171. On justification through faith Luther contains, contrary to Karl Holl, both the imputed or declarative and the transformative dimensions (Ch. 18). Luther is quoted as differing from Augustine's view that man could, if helped by the Holy Spirit, fulfil the law, by denying any possible .justification according to the law (p. 121). Luther seems to have used the term "concupiscence" more broadly than had Augustine (p. 155), but it is doubtful that Althaus is right in assuming that Augustine was a clear-cut traducianist (p. 160).