{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03078677309007982, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02394526795895097, 'mean_word_length': 5.271428571428571, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Tracking Eye Movements during CT Interpretation: Inferences of Reader Performance and Clinical Competency Require Clinically Realistic Procedures for Unconstrained Search.

920 radiology.rsna.org Radiology: Volume 283: Number 3—June 2017 We agree that such choice may lead to an underestimation of late recurrence. Hence, one must probably read “a minimum of 12.4% recurred” rather than “12.4% of the aneurysms recurred.” Another well-known difficulty in long-term study is to clearly describe outcome results, especially when such results derive from surrogate imaging biomarkers rather than clinical events. In table E2, we express the results obtained during the follow-up before repeat treatment, whereas table 2 expresses results after repeat treatment of grade 3 and some grade 2 aneurysms. We thank Dr Shi for offering the possibility to clarify and improve readability.