{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03344768439108062, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00686106346483705, 'mean_word_length': 5.078125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Bevacizumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a monoclonal antibody in a sea of small molecules

Several years ago, the oncologist was limited to a narrow scope of immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Within the past 5 years, however, a total of 6 targeted agents have been approved for the treatment of this disease. The abundance of novel therapies has introduced a new dilemma for the oncologist – namely, how can one make evidence-based choices amongst available agents? Recently, two Phase III studies (AVOREN and Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] 90206) assessed the activity of 1st-line therapy with bevacizumab in combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-alfa) as compared to IFN-alfa alone. Both trials demonstrated a significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) with bevacizumab, with no benefit in overall survival (OS). Herein, the implications of these data are assessed in the context of data reported from other recent pivotal trials in mRCC. Methods to resolve areas of clinical equipoise in the treatment of mRCC (i.e., comparative trial designs and biomarker analyses) are also proposed.