{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015862068965517243, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.448888888888889, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Constructions Containing Designations of Parts of the Body in Lithuanian

Substantives denoting parts of the body constitute among other designations of inalienables a semantically well defined class. It has been shown in many languages that their obvious semantic properties are coupled with characteristic behaviour. Substantives ofthat class often occur in constructions which are either exclusively typical for them or which are shared by other classes of substantives denoting inalienably possessed appurtenance (e. g. articles of clothing). Marking of inalienability does not necessarily manifest itself in separate expressions, of possession. Rather, it is the whole phrase that is affected by the inalienability feature, whose presence may condition among others a specific form of one or several of the phrase constituents, such as the verb, the object, the attribute etc. The existence in Lithuanian of several separate constructions which occur typically with parts of the body and other inalienables has been known for long, although they were usually treated as unrelated phenomena. Other, less obvious ones, are still being described in Lithuanian syntax without due attention to the nature of their constituents, a fact often causing difficulties, especially in the description of verb complementation. In our study we shall attempt to present the various constructions and to define their specific employ. We have limited ourselves to