{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016788321167883213, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006569343065693431, 'mean_word_length': 5.347222222222222, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Calman, venous surgery and the vascular trainee.

BACKGROUND
Surgical training in Great Britain is undergoing inevitable changes to accommodate the processes of Higher Surgical Training. Junior surgeons have long argued that their training experiences have been haphazard or without satisfactory supervision. With the advent of changes following the Calman Report and the implementation of the Vascular Surgical Society recommendations, we have audited the venous surgical experience of vascular trainees in Great Britain.


METHODS AND RESULTS
Questionnaires were sent to 90 vascular surgical trainees achieving an overall 76.7% response rate (n = 69). Just under half of the trainees had spent more than 12 months on a pure vascular firm. The majority of trainees had received formal training in sapheno-femoral junction ligation and sapheno-popliteal junction ligation. However, several areas of training were deemed insufficient at both the junior and senior trainee levels. Very few trainees gain instruction on deep venous surgery and the techniques of microsclerotherapy.


CONCLUSIONS
Despite the participation of trainees in specialised vascular units, current training schedules fail to cover the field of venous surgery adequately. Training by vascular specialists needs greater focus and should be tailored to the trainee's experience on entry to their firm.