{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05251312828207052, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04426106526631658, 'mean_word_length': 4.487654320987654, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
National cattle evaluation system for combined analysis of carcass characteristics and indicator traits recorded by using ultrasound in Angus cattle.

The objectives were to 1) evaluate genetic relationships of sex-specific indicators of carcass merit obtained by using ultrasound with carcass traits of steers; 2) estimate genetic parameters needed to implement combined analyses of carcass and indicator traits to produce unified national cattle evaluations for LM area, subcutaneous fat depth (SQF), and marbling (MRB), with the ultimate goal of publishing only EPD for the carcass traits; and 3) compare resulting evaluations with previous ones. Four data sets were extracted from the records of the American Angus Association from 33,857 bulls, 33,737 heifers, and 1,805 steers that had measures of intramuscular fat content (IMF), LM area (uLMA), and SQF derived from interpretation of ultrasonic imagery, and BW recorded at the time of scanning. Also used were 38,296 records from steers with MRB, fat depth at the 12th to 13th rib interface (FD), carcass weight, and carcass LM area (cLMA) recorded on slaughter. (Co)variance components were estimated with ASREML by using the same models as used for national cattle evaluations by the American Angus Association. Heritability estimates for carcass measures were 0.45 +/- 0.03, 0.34 +/- 0.02, 0.40 +/- 0.02, and 0.33 +/- 0.02 for MRB, FD, carcass weight, and cLMA, respectively. Genetic correlations of carcass measures from steers with ultrasonic measures from bulls and heifers indicated sex-specific relationships for IMF (0.66 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.52 +/- 0.06) and uLMA (0.63 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.78 +/- 0.05), but not for BW at scanning (0.46 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.40 +/- 0.07) or SQF (0.53 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.55 +/- 0.06). For each trait, estimates of genetic correlations between bulls and heifers measured by using ultrasound were greater than 0.8. Prototype national cattle evaluations were conducted by using the estimated genetic parameters, resulting in some reranking of sires relative to previous analyses. Rank correlations of high-impact sires were 0.91 and 0.84 for the joint analysis of MRB and IMF with previous separate analyses of MRB and IMF, respectively. Corresponding results for FD and SQF were 0.90 and 0.90, and for cLMA and uLMA were 0.79 and 0.89. The unified national cattle evaluation for carcass traits using measurements from slaughtered animals and ultrasonic imagery of seed stock in a combined analysis appropriately weights information from these sources and provides breeders estimates of genetic merit consistent with traits in their breeding objectives on which to base selection decisions.