{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023712737127371274, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.623318385650224, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: What Would Animals Say If We Asked the Right Questions?

conceptualizations of the idea of the nation. Arguably, when grappling with questions of membership and belonging in societies characterized by migration-related diversity, progressive understandings of home might also be framed in national terms. But this requires seeing the nation also in the plural, rejecting essentializing and static ideas of the nation. Emerging scholarship at the intersections of nationalism studies, migration studies, and political geography (see, for example, Marco Antonsich and Tatjana Matejskova) proposes exactly this: that given the empirical realities we know, where plural belonging is possible (though contested and often experienced as problematic), questions of membership within the ‘we’ of the nation could also be approached in plural ways, especially in empirical research. Finally, the intersections of home and belonging are also discussed in material ways, among other honing in on migrants’ houses built in countries of origin. Processes of house building in areas of emigration are clear articulations of homemaking across transnational social space, which both materially and relationally reveal migrants’ complex search for home. As is shown, continued engagement with migrant houses in emigration contexts can yield insights both into the homemigration nexus and the ways in which (plural) belonging and membership can find their places within this nexus.