{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.008255933952528379, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.542857142857143, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Arianism of Eusebius of Nicomedia

Somewhere behind the outcome of a major doctrinal controversy there is always a loser, a figure destined usually for either oblivion or a maligned name. And if ever a man has been marked as villain within the Christian record it is surely Eusebius of Nicomedia whose role during the years pre. ceding and following the council of Nicaea has been consistently described in the blackest and most uncomplimentary terms. He was a leading figure in what many have called the anti-Nicene reaction, a movement of eastern bishops who for one reason or another felt unable to accept the main decisions of the council. And because he had shown sympathy to Arius and had used his own increasingly powerful connections in the imperial court to harass the great Athanasius there was no abuse too harsh or too unfair which could not be hurled at him by those who had come to regard the conclusions of the council as the standard of orthodoxy. _