{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02615062761506276, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008368200836820083, 'mean_word_length': 5.510204081632653, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
P‐190L: Late‐News Poster: Universal Evaluation of Stereoscopic 3‐D Displays

Recently, various types of stereoscopic three‐dimensional (3‐D) displays have been developed and commercialized. with this increased public awareness and interest in 3‐D displays, the need is rapidly emerging for a universal method to quantitatively compare the various technologies' ability to confer a sense of depth to viewers. In recent years, a number of methods for comparison have been suggested such as crosstalk, visual fatigue, and subjective measures of image quality; however, these methods fail to directly assess the various displays' ability to confer a sense of depth to the user solely on the basis of disparity information. This paper will outline a universal quantitative evaluation of stereoscopic 3‐D display technologies that enables one to quantitatively compare stereoscopic 3‐D displays in terms of their ability to confer a sense of depth to the viewer.