{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015961138098542677, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.885714285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Drones Are Bringing the Warzone to a Theater Near You

According to Frank La Rue, former United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Opinion, the right to information is an enabler of other human rights because access to information is necessary to give effect to other rights. In the case of drones, for families and communities affected by drone strikes, access to information regarding why a loved one and member of a community was injured or killed is essential. Yet, this need for information is inherently reactive. The right to information becomes most relevant and necessary ex post facto in order to redress human rights violations already committed. Peace—both negative peace and positive peace together—is the ultimate enabler of human rights. Negative peace can be thought of as the absence of direct physical violence, including war. Positive peace can be thought of as the achievement of social justice through the elimination of all forms of structural violence. Peace is proactive in that it permits access to all of the rights to which we are entitled as humans, while also seeking to promote the full realization of our human rights. Without both negative and positive peace, we have neither access to all of our human rights, nor the ability to fully realize them. Therefore, in the simultaneous absence of negative and positive peace, individuals and communities are denied their right to human rights.