{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015873015873015872, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.041916167664671, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An enhanced approach for the progressive mean control charts: A discussion and comparative analysis

Recently, a new double progressive mean (DPM) control chart has been proposed in the literature of statistical process control. In the said proposal, an important term is missing in the variance expression of the DPM statistic that affects the detection ability of the proposed chart. In this study, we have derived and provided the correct version of the said variance along with its corresponding control limits. The run length profiles of the DPM chart are investigated, and the results are updated for the new version of the limits. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis between DPM and progressive mean charts based on the different choices of the design parameter is also included in this study. It is revealed that the revised version offers even more efficient outcomes than the previous ones. In addition, a real dataset application is also presented for practical considerations of the refined version.