{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02109704641350211, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.275132275132275, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Judicial Approach in Enforcing Human Rights through PIL

Public Interest litigation (PIL) in Indian judiciary is very pertinent for those who find it very difficult to gain access to justice because of poverty, technicalities of law, rule of locus standi or for some other reason. There is constant change in the approach of the judiciary with regard to the main concerns of the PIL jurisdiction and its causes and consequences. During the earlier years of the advent of PIL jurisdiction, the main concern was for the problem of the poor, but this has, during the later period, changed into developmental concerns for the upper and middle classes. This developmental concern is invariably expressed as a concern for the environment, sustainable development, corruption in public life, public morals, public health, education, etc., and addressing these problems may also incidentally and marginally benefit the poor. Moreover, this developmental and environmental concern is expressed/shown as a concern for all, including the poor and downtrodden sections of society. This change in judicial attitude has been conditioned by predominant social and political priorities and ideologies.