{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.040943789035392086, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03608605135322693, 'mean_word_length': 5.134042553191489, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 4, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The PRAME and WT1 Transcripts Constitute a Good Molecular Marker Combination for Monitoring Minimal Residual Disease in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Abstract 3853 Background With the incorporation of more aggressive therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), more myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients fall into a status of minimal residual disease (MRD). The sensitive molecular markers are required to monitor MRD and predict relapse. The Wilms9 tumor gene (WT1) is now a widely accepted molecular marker of MDS. However, WT1 itself could not fully meet the demands because a subset of MDS patients does not overexpress WT1, and the increase of WT1 expression compared with the normal control of MDS patients was mainly within 2-log. We wondered if the preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME) gene could supplement WT1. Methods The PRAME and WT1 transcript levels were simultaneously measured in 312 bone marrow samples collected from newly diagnosed MDS patients and 27 samples from non-malignant cytopenia patients. Bone marrow samples from 14 MDS patients after their disease progression were also detected. To evaluate the value of combined detection of WT1 and PRAME transcripts, one hundred and eleven BM samples collected from 17 MDS patients during their treatment were tested them simultaneously (chemotherapy alone: 1 patient; HSCT:16 patients). Bone marrow samples from six MDS patients and five normal controls were sorted into the blasts (CD34+), nucleated erythrocytes (CD71+), immature myeloid cells (CD33+CD34-), and lymphocyte (CD45+high, low SSC) fractions by flow cytometry and measured the PRAME and WT1 transcript levels, respectively. We had previously established that the upper limits of the PRAME and WT1 transcript levels tested in normal bone marrow samples were 0.28% and 0.50%, respectively. Results None of the 27 non-malignant cytopenia patients overexpressed PRAME (median 0.085%, range 0.01%-0.28%) and WT1 (median 0.095%, range 0.0089%-0.36%). Both WT1 and PRAME were commonly overexpressed in MDS. Both the overexpression frequency and the >1-log increase expression frequency of PRAME were similar to those of WT1 (74.4 % vs 77.6%; 51.6% vs 49.0%; p >0.05), and 88.1% of the patients overexpressed at least one marker. Moreover, the frequencies of PRAME expression with higher degrees of increase were significantly higher compared with those of WT1 expression (>2-log increase: 30.8% vs 3.8%; >3-log increase: 9.0% vs 0%; all p p Conclusion The combined detection of WT1 and PRAME transcripts in newly diagnosed MDS patients could find more suitable and sensitive molecular marker for them compared to detecting WT1 alone. The PRAME and WT1 transcripts constitute a good molecular marker combination for monitoring minimal residual disease in MDS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.