{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03284072249589491, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012315270935960592, 'mean_word_length': 4.860576923076923, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[The ultrasensitive determination of TSH permits the prediction of the response to TSH in the TRH test].

A new ultrasensitive TSH immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) using two monoclonal antibodies is now able to distinguish between euthyroid and hyperthyroid patients. The aim of this study was to compare data given by ultrasensitive basal TSH (IRMA) and by the response of TSH to TRH test considered until now as the more reliable test in case of mild or atypical hyperthyroidism. Basal plasma TSH levels were determined in euthyroid (n = 80), hyperthyroid (n = 30), hypothyroid (n = 14) and pituitary deficient patients (n = 8) before and 30 minutes after a TRH test (250 micrograms i.v.). A close linear correlation was found between basal and post-stimulative TSH levels. Normal TSH response ranged from 2 to 22 uU/ml. The sensibility and the specificity of these two parameters appeared comparable in the case of primary dysthyroidism; on the contrary basal TSH levels were not sufficient for the diagnosis of central hypothyroidism. In conclusion, excepted for pituitary deficiency, basal plasma TSH (IRMA) levels are accurate and sufficient in the evaluation of the thyroid function and make the TRH-test useless.