{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015828677839851025, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0148975791433892, 'mean_word_length': 5.107954545454546, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The idea of public constitutional order and the a constitutional judge in protecting it

This paper focuses on the notion that constitutional rules are not all equal in terms of the values they express; some even are of great value compared to other rules. Moreover, there is a kind of substantive hierarchy among constitutional rules. So that the rules relating to the type of governance system in the state and its political, economic, and social philosophy, as well as rules related to fundamental rights and freedoms which they have a higher value compare to other constitutional rules, which encouraged the constitutional legislator while creating the constitution to stipulate that it is not possible to amend the constitutional provisions of a higher value. Consequently, the competent authority to amend the constitution needs to respect these rules and avoid taking any action that would jeopardize these constitutional rules and undermine the wisdom of their existence. Journal of University of Raparin نیڕەپار یۆكناز یراڤۆگ E-ISSN: 2522 – 7130 P-ISSN: 2410 – 1036