{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026282051282051282, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007051282051282051, 'mean_word_length': 5.294354838709677, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Autologous Collagen Matrix (ACM): Lower Pole Support With a Supero‐Anterior Capsular Flap in Secondary Subpectoral Breast Augmentation

Background: Secondary aesthetic breast surgery is a complex and challenging scenario. It requires the surgeon to identify contributing factors, provide patient education, make a further management plan, and optimize the conditions for a favorable result. Various techniques have been described in literature but the rate of reoperation is still high. The first author has been using a supero‐anterior capsular flap with a neopectoral subcapsular pocket and an implant change in these cases. Objectives: To review the patient characteristics, indications, and early results of using part of the existing implant capsule for secondary subpectoral breast augmentations. Methods: All patients who underwent secondary breast augmentation, over a period of 2 years by the first author (P.M.), using the supero‐anterior capsular flap technique were included. The technique involves dissection of a new subpectoral pocket and uses the existing implant capsule as an internal brassiere. Results: A total of 36 patients were operated by this technique. Of these, 17 patients had developed a complication while 19 patients wanted a change in size only. At a mean follow up of 10.2 months, there was no bottoming out, double bubble, or capsular contracture. Conclusions: This reliable technique provides stable results as shown by low rate of complications with the existing follow up. Level of Evidence: 4 Figure. No caption available.