{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020179372197309416, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.084656084656085, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Differentiating the Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology of Macrolide and Ketolide Antibiotics.

This is a review of the macrolide and ketolide field focusing on differentiating the pharmacodynamics and especially the toxicology of the macrolides and ketolides. We emphasize the diversity in pharmacodynamics and toxicity of the macrolides and ketolides, resulting from even small structural changes, which makes it important to consider the various different compounds separately, not necessarily as a class. The ketolide, telithromycin, was developed because of rising bacterial macrolide resistance, but was withdrawn post-approval after visual disturbances, syncope, Myasthenia Gravis and hepatotoxicity were noted. These diverse adverse effects could be attributed to inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Solithromycin, a later generation ketolide, was effective in treating bacterial pneumonia but it was not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration owing, in part, to its structural similarity to telithromycin. This mini-perspective describes that structurally similar macrolides/ketolides have clearly mechanistically distinct effects. Understanding these effects could help in developing and securing regulatory approval of a new macrolide/ketolide that is active against macrolide-resistant pathogenic bacteria.