{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013147718484145398, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0015467904098994587, 'mean_word_length': 5.994594594594594, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction and perianesthetic heat transfer.

Heat transfer between the core and its environment in normothermic and slightly hypothermic situations is determined largely by the influence of vasomotion on convection. Tonic vasoconstriction, the normal barrier to heat loss from the core, is impaired upon induction of anesthesia. The resulting dilation of the arteriovenous shunts leads to redistribution of heat from the core to the periphery, diminishing the temperature gradient between the two compartments. With reemergence of thermoregulatory vasoconstriction at core temperatures near 34 degrees C, the core and the periphery are again separated, with metabolic heat being largely constrained to the core. Under normal conditions of mild thermal stress, thermoregulatory vasoconstriction is thus able to protect core temperature by reducing cutaneous heat transfer and functionally isolating the peripheral and core thermal compartments. Consequently, anesthetic-induced alterations in vasomotor tone is one of the major factors influencing core temperature in patients who are not actively cooled or warmed. In contrast, thermoregulatory tone is insufficient to prevent core temperature perturbations in patients undergoing vigorous cutaneous cooling or warming.