{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028052805280528052, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018151815181518153, 'mean_word_length': 4.836538461538462, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Arthroplasty Revision for Aseptic Failure. Our Experience

35 cases of arthroplasty revision are reviewed with mean follow-up time of 56 m. (range 24 to 107), by clinical and radiographic study. The results were satisfactory, having only one case of secondary failure (2.8%), also in comparison with other studies. The reason of this probably lies in the adaptability of our technique: in fact we use without preconcepts both cement and cementless fixations with many types of stems and cotyles; this allows us to obtain a stable fixation also taking in consideration the bone characteristics of each case.