{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.058624577226606536, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04565952649379933, 'mean_word_length': 5.184668989547038, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Prognostic Significance of Elevated D-Dimer for Survival in Patients with Sarcoma

BackgroundElevated levels of D-dimer, a marker for the systemic activation of the clotting and fibrinolysis, are frequently observed in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancy. We examined the prognostic significance of baseline plasma D-dimer levels for predicting survival in sarcoma. MethodsThe study comprised of 45 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for inoperable, high-risk for relapse, or metastatic disease. Plasma D-dimer levels was measured before chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for association between plasma D-dimer levels and baseline clinical characteristics in predicting survival. ResultsD-dimer levels were elevated to ≥500 ng/mL in 53% (24 of 45 patients). Six of 45 patients (13%) developed VTE. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median survival for patients with VTE, metastatic disease, progression on chemotherapy, or D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL was shorter (log-rank test, P=0.012, 0.001, 0.034, and 0.015, respectively). The mortality rate for patients with D-dimer ≥500 ng/mL was higher (P<0.0001) than those with <500 ng/ml for both metastatic (100% vs. 62.5%) and nonmetastatic (58% vs. 31%) groups [median follow-up; 60 mo (range, 9 to 106 mo)]. Using stepwise proportional hazard model, D-dimer levels and metastasis status were independent significant predictors for survival [hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals), 4.24 (1.88-9.60), and 3.28 (1.42-7.58), respectively]. ConclusionsElevated D-dimer levels have independent significant prognostic value for survival in sarcoma patients with both metastatic and nonmetastatic disease and may help identify high-risk patients for treatment decisions.