{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029173419773095625, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.505263157894737, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An Alternative to the Fisher and Pearson Methods for Combining Tests of Significance

Independently Fisher and K. Pearson suggested similar methods for combining probability integrals from independent tests of significance. These methods (a) can lead to anomalous results, (b) are not sensitive to hypotheses alternative to the hypothesis under test, and (c) are biased. An alternative method, free of these limitations, is proposed. Combined probabilities from the Fisher, Pearson, and proposed methods are compared against results obtained from traditional analyses, and the proposed method is found to be superior.