{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013657056145675266, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009104704097116844, 'mean_word_length': 5.168224299065421, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Dimensions of Inequality and Public Policy in the States

IN A PAIR of innovative articles first published in 1969, Thomas R. Dye introduced income inequality to the literature on policy outcomes in states.' This introduction was important because a major element of political theory concerns the effects of economic inequality. In fact, those who believe that a power elite controls political institutions put major emphasis on the political consequences of differences in economic advantage. But this interest is hardly new. Political theorists as diverse as Madison2 and Marx have written at length about the effects of inequalities of economic condition.3