{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032504780114722756, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022944550669216062, 'mean_word_length': 5.238095238095238, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reexamining Outcomes of the Primary Care Residency Expansion.

Academic Medicine, Vol. 90, No. 12 / December 2015 1582 Reexamining Outcomes of the Primary Care Residency Expansion To the Editor: Chen and colleagues present a compelling analysis of the Primary Care Residency Expansion (PCRE) program, but their findings do not align with their conclusion: “(A)n approach to primary care residency training expansion that relies on time-limited grants is unlikely to produce sustainable growth of the primary care pipeline.”