{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0637915543575921, 'fraction_numerical': 0.06229410002994909, 'mean_word_length': 4.901060070671378, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Comparison of clinical effects of two anterior cervical decompression with fusion on treating two segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy].

OBJECTIVE
To explore the clinical effects of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF) in treating adjacent two-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).


METHODS
The clinical data of 37 patients with adjacent two segment CSM treated from January 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, including 15 males and 22 females, aged from 43 to 69 years old with an average of 54.6 years. The patients were divided into ACDF group (group A, n=17) and ACCF group (group B, n=20) according to the different surgery. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded;the Cobb angle and cervical curvature in the cervical fusion segments before surgery and 1, 12 months after surgery were observed;Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was used to evaluate the surgical efficacy, and the postoperative complications were analyzed.


RESULTS
All patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months with an average of 18.5 months. Operation time and intraoperative blood loss in group A were (106.3±22.6) min, (52.2±26.4) ml, respectively, while were (115.6±16.8) min, ( 61.7±20.7) ml in group B. There was no statistically significant in operation time between two groups(P>0.05);intraoperative blood loss in group B was larger than group A(P<0.05). The preoperative and postoperative 1 and 12 months, cervical curvature and Cobb angle of cervical fusion segment in group A were (11.28±1.40)°, (17.56±1.90)°, (16.64±1.80)° and (4.93±4.20) °, (9.44±2.60)°, (9.25±2.80)°, respectively, and in group B were (10.59± 1.20)°, (16.26±2.10)°, (15.76±2.50)° and (4.75±3.90)°, (7.98±2.10)°, (7.79±3.00)°. The cervical curvature and Cobb angle in all cervical fusion segments at 1, 12 months after surgery were obviously improved, and group A recovered more significantly than group B (P<0.05). The JOA scores in group A were 9.46±1.70, 11.56±1.40, 14.86±1.20 before operation and 1 and 12 months after operation, and group B were 9.11±1.50, 11.40±1.30, 15.12±1.60, respectively. The postoperative JOA scores of the two groups were significantly improved (P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups at the same time (P>0.05). At the final follow up, in group A, dysphagia occurred in 2 cases, cage displacement in 1 case, and no titanium plate screw loose was found;and in group B, dysphagia occurred in 4 cases, titanium mesh collapse in 2 cases, titanium plate screw loose in 1 case.


CONCLUSION
Two types of anterior cervical decompression and fusion for the treatment of two segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy can effectively decompress and improve the Cobb angle and cervical curvature of the affected vertebra. The ACDF surgical procedure can directly removethe compressive thing at intervertebral level, which will lead to little vertebral body damage and favorably recovered cervical curvature. The ACCF surgical procedure has a large operation space, which can easily remove the posterior vertebral osteophyte and the calcified posterior longitudinal ligament. Long-term follow-up shows that ACDF and ACCF have good surgical procedures, mature technology, and close efficacy.