{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031133250311332503, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007471980074719801, 'mean_word_length': 5.184615384615385, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Normalizationofphonetic keyword search scores

As shown in [1, 2], score normalization is of crucial importance for improving the Average Term-Weighted Value (ATWV) measure that is commonly used for evaluating keyword spotting systems. In this paper, we compare three different methods for score normalization within a keyword spotting system that employs phonetic search. We show that a new unsupervised linear fit method results in better-estimated posterior scores, that, when fed into the keyword-specific normalization of [1], result in ATWV gains of 3% on average. Furthermore, when these scores are used as features within a supervised machine learning framework, they result in additional gains of 3.8% on average over the five languages used in the first year of the IARPA-funded project Babel.