{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025573192239858905, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007054673721340388, 'mean_word_length': 5.236263736263736, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparative Study of Three Land Evaluation Systems by using a Geographic Information System (GIS) under Mediterranean Condition

Background: The purpose of this work consists of doing a comparative study of three Land Capability Classification (LCC), Storie, National Institute of Irrigation and Drainage Institute (INSID) by applying them to the region of the Oriental Mitidja (Rouiba-Algeria). Methods: A geographic information system for the region in question was carried out, with a view to developing different thematic maps and allowing the comparison of these three evaluation systems, thanks to a database that has been created for this purpose.
Result: The system adapted by INSID has given rise to lower evaluation results compared to the two other systems, because 99.99% of the total agricultural ability by the LCC, 97% Apt for agriculture. By Storie while only 48% of the total area is fit for agriculture according to INSID. Statistical results have shown the existence of a significant difference between the three land evaluation systems. However, the correlation is significant between the INSID and STORIE system.
