{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04227794894815238, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029851659899202188, 'mean_word_length': 4.698837209302326, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 29, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Novel ABC Transporter Associated with Fluconazole Resistance in Aging of Cryptococcus neoformans

Cryptococcus neoformans causes meningoencephalitis in immunocompromised individuals, which is treated with fluconazole (FLC) monotherapy when resources are limited. This can lead to azole resistance, which can be mediated by overexpression of ABC transporters, a class of efflux pumps. ABC pump-mediated efflux of FLC is also augmented in 10-generation old C. neoformans cells. Here, we describe a new ABC transporter Afr3 (CNAG_06909), which is overexpressed in C. neoformans cells of advanced generational age that accumulate during chronic infection. The Δafr3 mutant strain showed higher FLC susceptibility by FLC E-Test strip testing and also by a killing test that measured survival after 3 h FLC exposure. Furthermore, Δafr3 cells exhibited lower Rhodamine 6G efflux compared to the H99 wild-type cells. Afr3 was expressed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADΔ strain, which lacks several drug transporters, thus reducing background transport. The ADΔ + Afr3 strain demonstrated a higher efflux with both Rhodamine 6G and Nile red, and a higher FLC resistance. Afr3-GFP localized in the plasma membrane of the ADΔ + Afr3 strain, further highlighting its importance as an efflux pump. Characterization of the Δafr3 mutant revealed unattenuated growth but a prolongation (29%) of the replicative life span. In addition, Δafr3 exhibited decreased resistance to macrophage killing and attenuated virulence in the Galleria mellonella infection model. In summary, our data indicate that a novel ABC pump Afr3, which is upregulated in C. neoformans cells of advanced age, may contribute to their enhanced FLC tolerance, by promoting drug efflux. Lastly, its role in macrophage resistance may also contribute to the selection of older C. neoformans cells during chronic infection.


Introduction
Cryptococcus neoformans is an opportunistic yeast that infects immunocompromised individuals, causing meningoencephalitis. The most recent global data estimates that cryptococcosis affects approximately 223,100 people annually, resulting in 181,100 fatalities. Globally, this invasive fungal infection is the cause of 15% of all AIDS-related deaths [1]. The standard treatment includes amphotericin B (AMB) and 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) as induction therapy, followed by prolonged treatment with fluconazole (FLC) for maintenance therapy [2]. In countries with limited resources, however, FLC monotherapy is used as an alternative treatment. High mortality, treatment failure, and fluconazole resistance have been described in association with FLC monotherapy [3][4][5].
FLC is a triazole that inhibits lanosterol 14α-demethylase, an enzyme encoded by the ERG11 gene, which is a rate-limiting step for ergosterol biosynthesis [6,7]. Azole resistance

Strains and Media
C. neoformans strains H99 and ∆afr3, ∆afr1, and ∆afr2 mutants were cultured in synthetic media (SM; 1.7 g yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (BD, Frankin Lakes, NJ, USA), 1 g drop out mix (USBiological Life Sciences, Salem, MA, USA), 4 mL ethanol, 5 g (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 3.3 g NaCl, 20 g glucose). Calorie restriction synthetic media was prepared as follows: CR, 1.7 g yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (BD, Frankin Lakes, NJ, USA), 1 g drop out mix (USBiological Life Sciences, Salem, MA, USA), 4 mL ethanol, 5 g (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 3.3 g NaCl, 0.5 g glucose. The ∆afr3 strain was derived from the Madhani knockout collection, which is managed by the Fungal Genetics Stock Center. The ∆afr1 and ∆afr2 strains were gifted by Dr. Kwon-Chung Lab [14]. The mutant S. cerevisiae strains were cultured in complete supplement medium without uracil (CSM-Ura (MP Bio, Irvine, CA, USA); 20 g galactose, 1.7 g YNB, 5 g (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 0.77 g CSM-Ura). S. cerevisiae AD∆ strain, in which several ABC transporters and the URA3 locus were deleted, was previously described [20]. The AD∆ strain and pYES2 plasmid were obtained as a gift from Dr. Theodore C. White at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. All strains used in this study are maintained as 30% glycerol stocks and stored at −80 • C for future use.

Construction of S. cerevisiae Strain Expressing Efflux Pumps
First, RNA was extracted from exponentially growing H99 cells using the RNAeasy Plus kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer's guidelines. Next, 250 ng of RNA was converted to cDNA using the Verso cDNA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a 20 µL reaction. AFR3 was amplified from the cDNA using oligos that partially overlapped with the pYES2 plasmid (Table S1), using a thermocycler (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). AFR3 was amplified from cDNA instead of gDNA, due to the presence of introns that could lead to aberrant splicing. The forward oligonucleotide was designed to contain 40 bp homologous sequence of GAL1 promoter (primer AFR3 + pGAL1 F), while the reverse oligonucleotide was designed to contain 40 bp homologous sequence of CYC1 terminator (primer AFR3 + CYC1 tt R). The plasmid contains a URA3 auxotrophic selection marker. pYES2 was first digested with HindIII and then transformed into AD∆ strain with the addition of the AFR3 cassette, as previously described [21]. The AD∆ strain lacks seven ABC transporters (∆yor1, ∆snq2, ∆pdr10, ∆pdr11, ∆ycf1, ∆pdr5, and ∆pdr15), a transcription factor (∆pdr3), and the URA3 gene (∆ura3). Homologous recombination was used to integrate the AFR3 cassette into pYES2. Undigested plasmid pYES2 without the cassette was transformed into AD∆ for positive control. Transformants were selected on CSM-Ura agar plates after incubation at 30 • C for 4 days. To screen for proper integration, 12-15 colonies were selected and replicated into fresh selective plates three consecutive times. Transformants were confirmed by plasmid extraction with the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and PCR for the AFR3 cassette, using oligonucleotides that amplified the whole gene sequence (primers AFR3 F and AFR3 R) (Table S1, Figure S1A). Expression was measured using the RNAeasy Plus kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to extract RNA from AD∆ and AD∆ + Afr3 and RNA was converted to cDNA using the Verso cDNA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA was diluted 1:5 and analyzed with qPCR analysis (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using the Power Sybr Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer's protocols (primers qPCR Afr3 F and qPCR Afr3 R, Table S1). The housekeeping gene encoding β-actin (primers Sc ACT1 F and Sc ACT1 R) was used as an internal control (Table S1). Furthermore, samples were sent for sequencing to ensure that the AFR3 sequence did not undergo mutations.
Construction of the catalytically inactive Afr3 mutant lacking the nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) was performed by amplifying AFR3 from H99 cDNA without the first 835 bp (primers NBD + pGAL1 F and AFR3 + CYC1 tt R) (Table S1). Transformation and confirmation of transformants (Figure S1B) were performed as described above, employing the same primers used for construction. Afr3-GFP construction for the cellular localization analysis proceeded in two stages. First, the GFP sequence was amplified from the pFA-6A-GFP plasmid (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA; primers GFP F and GFP R), employing oligonucleotides that partially overlapped with the pYES2 plasmid GAL1 promoter and CYC1 terminator. A Hind III restriction site was also added at the 5 end of GFP. Transformation and transformants selection were performed as described above. The pYES2-GFP plasmid was extracted from AD∆ cells and digested with Hind III. AFR3 was amplified from H99 cDNA (primers AFR3 + pGAL1 F and AFR3 GFP R), using oligonucleotides that partially overlapped with the GAL1 promoter and the GFP sequence. The oligonucleotides were designed in such a way that the Afr3 stop codon was removed. Transformation, selection, and confirmation were performed as described above (primers AFR3 F and GFP R) (Table S1 and Figure S1C).

Isolation of Old C. neoformans Strains
Isolation of 10-generation-old C. neoformans cells was performed following the previously published protocol [22]. Briefly, the cells from the strains H99, ∆afr1, and ∆afr3 were incubated overnight at 37 • C in SM media. The next day, the overnight cultures were washed 3 times with 1× PBS and were diluted 1:50 times. The diluted cells were then exponentially grown for 6-8 h. After the exponential growth, the cells were washed 3 times with 1× PBS and counted with a hemocytometer. Then, 10 8 cells from each strain were labeled with 8 mg/mL sulfosuccinimidyl-6-[biotin-amido] hexanoate (Sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-Biotin, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 30 min at room temperature (RT). The labeled cells were then washed 3 times in 1× PBS and the washed cells were grown in fresh SM media for 5 generations (12-15 h). After 5-generation cell growth for each strain, the cells were washed 3 times with 1× PBS and labeled with 100 µL of streptavidin microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) at a final concentration of 10 8 cells/mL. The streptavidin labeling was carried out for 15 min at 4 • C. The labeled cells were washed 3 times with 1× PBS to remove any unbound streptavidin. The biotin-streptavidin labeled 5 generation cells were then separated by passing the mixed population through AutoMACS ® Pro Separator (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The positively labeled cells were retained in the column attached to the magnet in the pro-separator machine. These cells were retrieved once the magnetic field was removed. These 5-generation old cells were then further grown in fresh SM media for another 5 generations (12-15 h). The grown cells were again washed and passed through AutoMACS ® Pro Separator (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) to retrieve the 10 generation old cells. The purity of the population was verified by microscopy. As a control, the young generation cells, washed off from the magnetic columns, from the second separation were used.

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined as per a previously published protocol [23]. Briefly, the C. neoformans strains were cultured overnight at 37 • C, and cells were adjusted to 10 5 cells/well. FLC was 2-fold serially diluted in a flat-bottom 96-well plate (Corning Costar, Corning, NY, USA), with a starting FLC concentration of 64 µg/mL. The plates were incubated at 37 • C for 4 days and the OD 600 was measured (SpectraMax i3x, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). A row with no drugs was used as a growth control, while a row with no cells was used as a contamination control in the MIC assay. MICs were defined as the minimum drug concentration that inhibits 80% of the cell growth (MIC 80 ). The assay was performed in triplicate. For analysis of MICs under CR, the same conditions were performed, in which the cells were cultured in synthetic media with 0.05% glucose. FLC E-Test was also performed to determine FLC susceptibility. Then, 10 6 C. neoformans and 10 7 S. cerevisiae cells were plated in YPD media for C. neoformans and CSM -Ura media with 2% galactose for S. cerevisiae containing the FLC E-Test strip (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France) and incubated at 37 • C or 30 • C for 4 days.
FLC killing assay was performed using the previously published protocol [24]. Briefly, the young and the 10 generation-old cells were isolated as described above. After isolation, the cells were washed 3 times with 1× PBS and 10 4 cells per well were seeded in 96 well plates (Corning Costar, Corning, NY, USA) containing FLC at concentrations of 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, and 3.125 µg/mL. Cells were also plated in wells containing no drug. Next, the 96 well plates were incubated at 37 • C for 3 h without shaking. After incubation, the cells were diluted 50 times and plated in YPD agar plates. The agar plates were incubated for 48 h and the colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted. The assay was performed in triplicate. Percent killing was analyzed by the following formula: % killing = CFUs in no drug well − CFUs in drug well CFUs in no drug well × 100

Rhodamine 6G Efflux Assay
Rhodamine 6G assay was performed as previously described [25]. Briefly, 5 × 10 7 C. neoformans and 3 × 10 7 S. cerevisiae cells were starved for 2 h in a phosphate buffer saline (PBS; pH 7.4) buffer at room temperature. Rhodamine 6G (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to a final concentration of 10 µM and the cells were incubated at 37 • C or 30 • C for 30 min. Following the incubation, cells were washed 3× in PBS, and efflux was initiated by the addition of 2% glucose. Samples were collected at 0 min, 10 min, 20 min, and 30 min timepoints, and fluorescence of the supernatants was measured at 525 nm excitation and 555 nm emission wavelengths. The experiment was performed independently on three different days.

Nile Red Assay
Briefly, the cells from AD∆ and AD∆ + Afr3 were grown in the CSM-Ura media. After growth, 10 7 cells were used for the Nile Red assay. First, the cells were washed in PBS 3 times and then starved for 2 h in PBS to get rid of any residual glucose. After starvation, Nile red was added to the cells at a final concentration of 7 µM. The efflux was initiated after the addition of 2% glucose to the starved cells. Accumulation of Nile red was measured using a fluorescence plate reader (SpectraMax I3, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) at 0 min and 30 min using the excitation wavelength of 553 nm and emission of 636 nm. Accumulation was calculated in percentage. More accumulation of the dye at the end of 30 min period signifies lesser efflux. The assay was conducted in triplicate.

Cellular Localization
Cellular localization of Afr3 was determined utilizing the Afr3-GFP construct transformed into the S. cerevisiae AD∆ strain and an AD∆ strain transformed with the empty pYES2 plasmid as control. Cells were grown overnight in CSM-Ura media containing 2% galactose and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were washed and resuspended in water. They were then mounted into slides using Vectashield Antifade Mounting Medium (Vector Labs, Newark, CA, USA) with coverslips. Cells were visualized on an inverted/DIC Zeiss Axiovert 200M microscope with an Ax-ioCam HRm camera (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), as previously described [26]. GFP imaging was performed using an excitation wavelength of 470 ± 20 nm and an emission wavelength of 525 ± 25 nm. Z stacks were analyzed and images were deconvoluted with the fast iterative method using AxioVision 4.8 software (V 4.8, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

Replicative Life Span (RLS)
The RLS was determined by microdissection, as outlined elsewhere [22]. Briefly, 20-30 naïve cells were isolated and arrayed in a straight line in SM plates. Every time a mother cell budded (1-2 h), the daughter cell was separated using a 25 µm needle (CoraStyles, Talent, OR, USA) under a tetrad dissection Axioscope A1 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at 250× magnification. After each budding event, the plates were incubated at 37 • C. The RLS was determined by the number of times the mother cell buds before dying (24 h without a budding event).

Galleria Mellonella Infection
Galleria mellonella infection was performed as previously described [27]. G. mellonella larvae were obtained from Vanderhorst Wholesale Inc. (St. Mary's, OH, USA). C. neoformans cells were washed and diluted to 10 6 cells/mL in PBS. The worms were injected with 10 µL of the cell suspension and PBS was used as a negative control. Twenty worms were used for each group. Survival of the worms was observed for a week. Retention of C. neoformans cells in the hemolymph of Galleria larvae was analyzed as an independent experiment. The worms were injected with 5 × 10 4 C. neoformans cells and the hemolymph was extracted after 24 h. The samples were plated in YPD agar plates and the CFU was counted after 48 h incubation at 37 • C.

Growth Curve
Growth curves for H99, ∆afr3, ∆afr1, and ∆afr2 strains were performed in 96-well flat-bottom plates, in which 0.1 OD 600 cells were used in triplicate for each strain. The growth curve was carried on for 72 h in a SpectraMax i3x (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) at 37 • C with shaking.

Expression Analysis
Strains were grown overnight in their respective media. For pump compensation analysis, H99, ∆afr3, and ∆afr1 were grown overnight in SM media. AFR3 expression in low glucose was performed in H99 cells grown overnight in SM and calorie restriction low glucose media. Finally, for pump analysis under FLC treatment, we grew H99 overnight in SM media, followed by a 2 h treatment under 32 µg/mL of FLC of 10 7 cells. For 10-generation C. neoformans quantification, we isolated young and old H99 cells, where we quantified AFR1, AFR2, and MDR1 expression. RNA was extracted using the RNAeasy Plus kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer's guidelines. Next, RNA was quantified using a Biospectrophotometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), in which an absorbance ratio (A260/A280) of 2.0 or higher was considered good quality RNA. Then, 250 ng of RNA was converted to cDNA using Verso cDNA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a 20 µL reaction. cDNA was diluted 1:5 with RNase/DNase-free water (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA). qPCR expression analysis (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was performed using Power Sybr Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. The oligonucleotides used to analyze gene expression of AFR1 and AFR3 are described in Table S1. House-keeping gene ACT1 was used as an internal control. Data were normalized and calculated using the 2 −∆∆CT method, as previously described [28].

Macrophage-Mediated Killing Assay
Macrophage-mediated killing assay was performed according to the previously published protocol [18]. Briefly, 5 × 10 4 cells of J774A.1 murine macrophage cell line were seeded in 96 well plates (Corning Costar, Corning, NY, USA) in DMEM (Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) media containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10% NCTC (Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1% non-essential amino acids, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The 96 well plates were incubated at 37 • C with 5% CO 2 for 24 h. After incubation, the cells were activated with LPS and IFNγ as described previously. In a separate tube, young and old C. neoformans cells were opsonized for 30 min at 37 • C with 18b7 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), which binds to the C. neoformans capsule. The opsonized C. neoformans cells were then added to the 96 well plates containing the activated macrophages at an MOI of 1:1. The plates were incubated for 1 h at 37 • C with 5% CO 2 to allow phagocytosis. After phagocytosis, all wells were washed 3 times with 1× PBS to remove the non-phagocytosed C. neoformans cells. After washing, half of the wells of macrophages were lysed using sterile water, and C. neoformans cells were plated in YPD to determine the number of C. neoformans cells phagocytosed (time 0). Next, to the other half of macrophage-containing wells, fresh DMEM media was added. The macrophages along with the phagocytosed C. neoformans cells were incubated for another 1 h at 37 • C with 5% CO 2 . This was carried out to analyze macrophage-mediated killing of young and old C. neoformans cells. After 1 h of killing, the wells were washed 3 times with 1× PBS. The macrophages were then lysed and the surviving C. neoformans cells were plated in YPD agar plates. YPD plates were then incubated at 37 • C for 48 h and CFUs were counted. The assay was performed in triplicate. Macrophage-mediated killing was calculated as follows: % macrophage-mediated killing = CFU post phagocytosis at time 0 − CFU a f ter 1 h killing CFU post phagocytosis at time 0 × 100

Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). The specific analyses are described in the figure legends. The coefficient of variation (CV) is calculated by dividing de standard deviation (SD) by the mean of the strain (CV% = SD/mean × 100).

Afr3 Is Similar to Other ABC Transporters
Based on the amino acid sequence, CNAG_06909 exhibits 29% and 26% identity to Afr1 (CNAG_00730) and Afr2 (CNAG_00869), respectively, with a high query coverage of above 85% (Table 1). Protein sequence identity between Afr1 and Afr2 is 38%, which is comparable to the identity of the CNAG_06909 transporter with either Afr1 or Afr2. Furthermore, CNAG_06909 contains an ABC transporter domain, while Afr1 contains two domains. Afr2, similarly to Afr1, also contains two ABC transporter domains. Performing an alignment and analysis employing the NCBI Blast Tool exhibits high similarity between the ABC transporter domain of Afr3 (CnAFR3) and the two domains of Afr1 (CNAFR1.1 and CnAFR1.2; 46% positives, 25% identities, and 53% positives, 35% identities, respectively) ( Figure 1). Based on the similarity with Afr1 and Afr2, and the below characterized functional overlap, we have renamed the CNAG_06909 gene AFR3 and the protein Afr3. Given the known role of ABC transporters in mediating azole resistance in fungal cells, we assessed FLC susceptibility in H99 and ∆afr3 with standard methods with slight modifications. First, we performed a FLC E-Test strip analysis on SM media plates, in which ∆afr3 displayed a lower MIC than H99 (0.75 µg/mL vs. 4 µg/mL) (Figure 2A). It is noteworthy that the ∆afr3 mutant lacked heteroresistance, whereas individual colonies grew at higher MIC in the wild-type H99, consistent with heteroresistance. Next, we explored whether AFR3 was overexpressed during FLC treatment. After a 2h FLC treatment, AFR3 did not show an increase in expression when compared to H99 cells without treatment ( Figure 2B).

The Afr3 Efflux Pump Is Important for C. neoformans FLC Tolerance
Given the known role of ABC transporters in mediating azole resistance in fungal cells, we assessed FLC susceptibility in H99 and Δafr3 with standard methods with slight modifications. First, we performed a FLC E-Test strip analysis on SM media plates, in which Δafr3 displayed a lower MIC than H99 (0.75 µ g/mL vs. 4 µ g/mL) (Figure 2A). It is noteworthy that the Δafr3 mutant lacked heteroresistance, whereas individual colonies grew at higher MIC in the wild-type H99, consistent with heteroresistance. Next, we explored whether AFR3 was overexpressed during FLC treatment. After a 2h FLC treatment, AFR3 did not show an increase in expression when compared to H99 cells without treatment ( Figure 2B).
Given that augmented ABC transporter-mediated efflux of FLC is the main mechanism of how ABC pumps mediate FLC resistance in C. neoformans, we explored efflux pump activity of Δafr3. The fluorescent dye Rhodamine 6G was added to C. neoformans cells and the cellular efflux was initiated by the addition of glucose, followed by fluorescence measurement in the supernatant. These data demonstrated that Δafr3 exhibited lower efflux than the wild-type in all three time points (10, 20, and 30 min; p < 0.001) (Figure 2C), indicating that Afr3 is a relevant efflux pump.
FLC MIC analysis under low glucose media (0.05% glucose) was performed because such conditions are encountered by C. neoformans in vivo. These data showed that both strains increased FLC tolerance under low glucose, with no difference between the H99 and Δafr3 strains, indicating that Afr3 is not responsible for the increase in FLC tolerance observed under low glucose conditions ( Figure 2D). Of note, the FLC MIC80 was the same for H99 and Δafr3 in a broth microdilution assay. These data were further supported by the expression analysis of AFR3 under low glucose, in which the AFR3 levels were not significantly increased ( Figure 2E). Possible pump compensation between Afr3 and Afr1 Given that augmented ABC transporter-mediated efflux of FLC is the main mechanism of how ABC pumps mediate FLC resistance in C. neoformans, we explored efflux pump activity of ∆afr3. The fluorescent dye Rhodamine 6G was added to C. neoformans cells and the cellular efflux was initiated by the addition of glucose, followed by fluorescence measurement in the supernatant. These data demonstrated that ∆afr3 exhibited lower efflux than the wild-type in all three time points (10, 20, and 30 min; p < 0.001) ( Figure 2C), indicating that Afr3 is a relevant efflux pump.
FLC MIC analysis under low glucose media (0.05% glucose) was performed because such conditions are encountered by C. neoformans in vivo. These data showed that both strains increased FLC tolerance under low glucose, with no difference between the H99 and ∆afr3 strains, indicating that Afr3 is not responsible for the increase in FLC tolerance observed under low glucose conditions ( Figure 2D). Of note, the FLC MIC 80 was the same for H99 and ∆afr3 in a broth microdilution assay. These data were further supported by the expression analysis of AFR3 under low glucose, in which the AFR3 levels were not significantly increased ( Figure 2E). Possible pump compensation between Afr3 and Afr1 was also studied. AFR1 expression was measured in the ∆afr3 strain, while AFR3 expression was measured in the ∆afr1 strain to test for upregulation. Upregulation of AFR1 in an ∆afr3 strain would indicate that there is increased production of Afr1 to compensate for the lack of Afr3, and vice-versa. No upregulation was observed in this analysis, which indicates no compensation between Afr1 and Afr3 ( Figure S2). 12.5 µ g/mL: 37 vs. 79%; p < 0.01). The H99 wild-type data corroborate the data previously published for the RC2 strain [19]. The percentage FLC killing of older Δafr3 cells, however, was higher than the killing of 10-generation H99 cells (Δafr3 O vs. H99 O; FLC 25 µ g/mL: 35 vs. ~0%, FLC 12.5 µ g/mL: 37 vs. 6%; and FLC 6.25 µ g/mL: 38 vs. ~0%; $ p < 0.05), indicating that the presence of the Afr3 efflux pump may contribute to age-associated FLC tolerance, but is not the only factor. (A) C. neoformans ∆afr3 is more sensitive to FLC than H99 in an FLC E-Test in a YPD plate; (B) H99 cells that underwent FLC treatment with 32 µg/mL for 2 h (checkered blue/white bar) do not increase expression of AFR3 and AFR1 compared to H99 wild-type (blue bar); (C) ∆afr3 (red line) decreases efflux compared to H99 (blue line) in a Rhodamine 6G assay. Statistical analysis was performed with multiple unpaired Student's t-test, *** p < 0.001; (D) FLC tolerance observed under CR conditions (SM 0.05% glucose) (H99 CR: dark blue line, ∆afr3 CR: dark red line) is independent of Afr3 presence, as shown by the susceptibility under normal conditions (SM 2% glucose) (H99: blue line, ∆afr3: red line); (E) expression of AFR3 is not increased under CR conditions (checkered blue bar) when compared to normal glucose conditions (blue bar); (F) the ∆afr3 young cells (∆afr3 Y, blue bar) are more susceptible to FLC killing than H99 young cells (H99 Y, red bar). Furthermore, ∆afr3 old cells (∆afr3 O, checkered blue bar) lose FLC killing tolerance when compared to H99 old cells (H99 O, checkered red bar). Statistical analysis was performed with multiple unpaired Student's t-test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, and $ p < 0.05; error bars represent the standard deviation between biological triplicates.

S. cerevisiae Expression of Afr3 Increases Drug Efflux and Resistance
To exclude compensation by other ABC transporters when the Afr3 pump is deleted, we expressed Afr3 in the S. cerevisiae AD∆ strain, which lacks all seven of the main ABC transporters, thus reducing background transport. We expressed Afr3 in the pYES2 plasmid under a GAL1 promoter ( Figure 3A) that permits the expression of Afr3 only in the presence of galactose. The AD∆ cells expressing Afr3 were called AD∆ + Afr3, while AD∆ transformed with an empty vector was employed as the control.
Since Afr3 is an ABC transporter, we sought to evaluate the efflux activity of the S. cerevisiae strains at 30 • C. First, we performed a Rhodamine 6G efflux assay, in which the efflux was increased in the AD∆ + Afr3 strain when compared to AD∆ after 30 min (p < 0.001) ( Figure 3B). Similarly, a Nile Red Assay was performed, in which cells were incubated with Nile Red, and glucose was added to initiate transport. The percentage of Nile Red accumulation inside the fungal cells was quantified by measuring the fluorescence after 30 min. AD∆ + Afr3 exhibited decreased intracellular Nile Red accumulation when compared to the AD∆ control strain (73% vs. 100%; p < 0.01) ( Figure 3C).
Since the expression of plasma membrane proteins can alter membrane permeability, we constructed an Afr3 mutant protein that lacks the nucleotide-binding domain (NBD). This mutant is catalytically dead, since ATP cannot bind to it due to the absence of NBD. The AD∆ cells expressing the NBD mutant did not show a statistical difference in Nile Red accumulation from the AD∆ control at 30 • C. However, the Nile Red accumulation in the NBD mutant significantly differed from the accumulation in the AD∆ + Afr3 strain (p < 0.05) ( Figure 3C). This demonstrates that the effect observed by Afr3 expression is not due to membrane alterations.
Lastly, we tested the effects of Afr3 expression on drug resistance. We performed an FLC E-Test strip analysis on galactose media plates at 30 • C, in which the expression of Afr3 rendered the cells more resistant to FLC (MIC = 0.064 µg/mL) in comparison to the AD∆ control, which showed an MIC marginally lower than the detectable threshold of the assay (MIC < 0.016 µg/mL) ( Figure 3D). The present data confirm the findings in C. neoformans, in which Afr3 presents relevant activity as an efflux pump that contributes to FLC resistance.

Figure 3. Afr3 Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Increases Efflux and FLC Resistance. (A)
Schematic diagram of Afr3 expression in S. cerevisiae ADΔ strain. The pYES2 plasmid contains a URA3 auxotrophic marker gene, a 2µ origin of replication, a GAL1 promoter, and a CYC1 terminator. Hind III was used as the cloning site between the GAL1 promoter and CYC1 terminator. AFR3 (CNAG_06909) cassette was inserted in this cloning site when transformed into S. cerevisiae ADΔ strain. The transformation was confirmed through plasmid PCR, qPCR for AFR3 expression, and sequencing of the AFR3 cassette. The figure was designed with BioRender. All subsequent experiments were performed at 30 °C; (B) ADΔ + Afr3 (orange line) shows increased efflux when compared to ADΔ (green line) when measured employing the Rhodamine 6G dye; (C) ADΔ + Afr3 (orange bar) has lower intracellular accumulation of Nile Red when compared to control ADΔ (green bar). A catalytically inactive NBD mutant of Afr3 (yellow bar) does not show a statistical difference

Figure 3. Afr3 Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Increases Efflux and FLC Resistance.
(A) Schematic diagram of Afr3 expression in S. cerevisiae AD∆ strain. The pYES2 plasmid contains a URA3 auxotrophic marker gene, a 2µ origin of replication, a GAL1 promoter, and a CYC1 terminator. Hind III was used as the cloning site between the GAL1 promoter and CYC1 terminator. AFR3 (CNAG_06909) cassette was inserted in this cloning site when transformed into S. cerevisiae AD∆ strain. The transformation was confirmed through plasmid PCR, qPCR for AFR3 expression, and sequencing of the AFR3 cassette. The figure was designed with BioRender. All subsequent experiments were performed at 30 • C; (B) AD∆ + Afr3 (orange line) shows increased efflux when compared to AD∆ (green line) when measured employing the Rhodamine 6G dye; (C) AD∆ + Afr3 (orange bar) has lower intracellular accumulation of Nile Red when compared to control AD∆ (green bar). A catalytically inactive NBD mutant of Afr3 (yellow bar) does not show a statistical difference in Nile Red accumulation from AD∆; (D) a FLC E-Test strip assay shows that expression of Afr3 increases the strain resistance to FLC (MIC of 0.064 µg/mL vs. <0.016 µg/mL); (E) S. cerevisiae AD∆ cells expressing AFR3-GFP show protein expression by means of GFP fluorescence. Brightfield and epifluorescence images were obtained that were later superimposed; (F) AFR3 expression in AD∆ is 425-fold higher (orange bar) than the control (green bar) as measured by qPCR. Error bars represent the standard deviation between biological triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed with multiple unpaired Student's t-test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Afr3 Localizes at the Cell Surface
To further understand the function of Afr3, we introduced a C-terminally tagged AFR3-GFP cassette into the S. cerevisiae AD∆ cells using the pYES2 plasmid. Fluorescence levels were assessed using an inverted/DIC Zeiss Axiovert microscope on both strains under the same exposition and superposed to brightfield images. Our results demonstrated that GFP fluorescence is higher in the AD∆ + AFR3-GFP cells when compared to the AD∆ control ( Figure 3E). This suggests that the Afr3 protein is expressed in AD∆, consistent with the AFR3 expression data of AD∆ and AD∆ + Afr3 cells, which demonstrate a 425-fold increase in expression ( Figure 3F).
The AD∆ + AFR3-GFP strain also allows for the visualization of Afr3 localization within the fungal cell. Z stack images reveal fluorescence at the cell surface, suggesting localization in the plasma membrane, which is consistent with the Afr3 efflux pump function (Figure 4). White arrows indicate regions with surface localization of Afr3, which were universally distributed and focal in other cells. In addition to the surface localization, images revealed punctate and network-like localization of Afr3 within the cytoplasm. Although it is not clear if this cytoplasmic localization is correlated to a specific organelle, this sub localization could indicate a potential secondary function of Afr3.
in Nile Red accumulation from ADΔ; (D) a FLC E-Test strip assay shows that expression of Afr3 increases the strain resistance to FLC (MIC of 0.064 µ g/mL vs. <0.016 µ g/mL); (E) S. cerevisiae ADΔ cells expressing AFR3-GFP show protein expression by means of GFP fluorescence. Brightfield and epifluorescence images were obtained that were later superimposed; (F) AFR3 expression in ADΔ is 425-fold higher (orange bar) than the control (green bar) as measured by qPCR. Error bars represent the standard deviation between biological triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed with multiple unpaired Student's t-test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Afr3 Localizes at the Cell Surface
To further understand the function of Afr3, we introduced a C-terminally tagged AFR3-GFP cassette into the S. cerevisiae ADΔ cells using the pYES2 plasmid. Fluorescence levels were assessed using an inverted/DIC Zeiss Axiovert microscope on both strains under the same exposition and superposed to brightfield images. Our results demonstrated that GFP fluorescence is higher in the ADΔ + AFR3-GFP cells when compared to the ADΔ control ( Figure 3E). This suggests that the Afr3 protein is expressed in ADΔ, consistent with the AFR3 expression data of ADΔ and ADΔ + Afr3 cells, which demonstrate a 425-fold increase in expression ( Figure 3F).
The ADΔ + AFR3-GFP strain also allows for the visualization of Afr3 localization within the fungal cell. Z stack images reveal fluorescence at the cell surface, suggesting localization in the plasma membrane, which is consistent with the Afr3 efflux pump function ( Figure 4). White arrows indicate regions with surface localization of Afr3, which were universally distributed and focal in other cells. In addition to the surface localization, images revealed punctate and network-like localization of Afr3 within the cytoplasm. Although it is not clear if this cytoplasmic localization is correlated to a specific organelle, this sub localization could indicate a potential secondary function of Afr3. White arrows point to localization within fungal cells. Images were obtained through the generation of ten Z stacks, six of which are represented in this image.

Afr3 Affects Cryptococcal Virulence
Next, we assessed if Afr3 plays a role in virulence. First, we documented that the mutant strain exhibited no growth defect at 37 °C when compared to the wild type ( Figure  S3). Next, we analyzed phagocytosis and macrophage killing of Δafr3 and compared the percentages to the H99 wild type. These data indicated that the phagocytosis of Δafr3 was comparable to that of H99. However, murine J774 macrophages more successfully killed the Δafr3 mutant strain after phagocytosis when compared to H99 wild-type (64% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.01) ( Figure 5A). Last, the virulence of the mutant strain was assessed in a G. mellonella infection model. The larvae infected with the Δafr3 strain exhibited increased survival when compared to the larvae infected with H99 (8 vs. 6 d median survival, p < White arrows point to localization within fungal cells. Images were obtained through the generation of ten Z stacks, six of which are represented in this image.

Afr3 Affects Cryptococcal Virulence
Next, we assessed if Afr3 plays a role in virulence. First, we documented that the mutant strain exhibited no growth defect at 37 • C when compared to the wild type ( Figure S3). Next, we analyzed phagocytosis and macrophage killing of ∆afr3 and compared the percentages to the H99 wild type. These data indicated that the phagocytosis of ∆afr3 was comparable to that of H99. However, murine J774 macrophages more successfully killed the ∆afr3 mutant strain after phagocytosis when compared to H99 wild-type (64% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.01) ( Figure 5A). Last, the virulence of the mutant strain was assessed in a G. mellonella infection model. The larvae infected with the ∆afr3 strain exhibited increased survival when compared to the larvae infected with H99 (8 vs. 6 d median survival, p < 0.0001), indicating that the Afr3 pump plays a role in virulence ( Figure 5B). These data are further supported by the lower number of C. neoformans cells circulating in the hemolymph of larvae infected with ∆afr3 after 24 h when compared to CFU from the hemolymph of larvae infected with H99 (29 vs. 52% cells retained, p < 0.05) ( Figure 5C). These data support the notion that Afr3 is also important for C. neoformans virulence. 0.0001), indicating that the Afr3 pump plays a role in virulence ( Figure 5B). These data are further supported by the lower number of C. neoformans cells circulating in the hemolymph of larvae infected with Δafr3 after 24 h when compared to CFU from the hemolymph of larvae infected with H99 (29 vs. 52% cells retained, p < 0.05) ( Figure 5C). These data support the notion that Afr3 is also important for C. neoformans virulence.

Afr3 Affects Cryptococcal Replicative Life Span
Given that Afr3, as well as Afr1 and Afr2, are overexpressed in 10-generation old cells, we first investigated whether Afr1, Afr2, and Afr3 affect RLS. The RLS of Δafr3, Δafr1, and Δafr2 were determined by micro-dissection and the total number of divisions the respective mutant and wild-type C. neoformans cells undergo before their death is recorded. These experiments showed that loss of AFR3 had a moderate prolongevity effect and extended the median RLS by 29% compared to the wild-type H99 strain (22 vs. 17, p < 0.001) ( Figure 6). In contrast, loss of AFR1 and AFR2 did not alter the RLS (15 and 17 median RLS, respectively). The RLS of Δafr1 and Δafr2 mutants exhibited high variability, whereas RLS of Δafr3 was characterized by lower stochasticity. The coefficient of variation measures the amount of variation between individual cells within the strain data set. H99 showed 35% of variation between individual cells, while Δafr3 had only 14% variation, in accordance with its lower stochasticity. The mutant strains Δafr1 and Δafr2 had a much higher variation, with 55% and 65%, respectively.

Afr3 Affects Cryptococcal Replicative Life Span
Given that Afr3, as well as Afr1 and Afr2, are overexpressed in 10-generation old cells, we first investigated whether Afr1, Afr2, and Afr3 affect RLS. The RLS of ∆afr3, ∆afr1, and ∆afr2 were determined by micro-dissection and the total number of divisions the respective mutant and wild-type C. neoformans cells undergo before their death is recorded. These experiments showed that loss of AFR3 had a moderate prolongevity effect and extended the median RLS by 29% compared to the wild-type H99 strain (22 vs. 17, p < 0.001) ( Figure 6). In contrast, loss of AFR1 and AFR2 did not alter the RLS (15 and 17 median RLS, respectively). The RLS of ∆afr1 and ∆afr2 mutants exhibited high variability, whereas RLS of ∆afr3 was characterized by lower stochasticity. The coefficient of variation measures the amount of variation between individual cells within the strain data set. H99 showed 35% of variation between individual cells, while ∆afr3 had only 14% variation, in accordance with its lower stochasticity. The mutant strains ∆afr1 and ∆afr2 had a much higher variation, with 55% and 65%, respectively.

Discussion
This paper describes a novel ABC transporter in C. neoformans, which can efficiently efflux Rhodamine 6G and Nile Red, two fluorescent dyes used to determine the function

Discussion
This paper describes a novel ABC transporter in C. neoformans, which can efficiently efflux Rhodamine 6G and Nile Red, two fluorescent dyes used to determine the function of efflux pumps, and render C. neoformans cells more resistant to FLC. The present study was initiated because in 10-generation-old cells [15], which are more tolerant to FLC, the AFR3 gene is markedly upregulated, similarly to the upregulation of AFR1 and AFR2 genes. Based on the similarities with known C. neoformans efflux pumps, Afr1 (CNAG_00730, 29.29% identity), Afr2 (CNAG_00869, 26% identity), and Pmr5 (CNAG_06348, 25% identity), as well as ABC transporters from the environmental fungi Ustilago trichophora (41.35% identity), Lasallia pustulata (54.27% identity), and Saitozyma podzolica (73.22% identity), these data characterize Afr3 as member of the conserved family of ABC transporters.
Overexpression of efflux pumps, leading to decreased cellular drug concentration, is a major mechanism of drug resistance [29]. During treatment of chronic cryptococcosis, this can lead to persistence of infection, despite appropriate treatment, which translates into failure to clear the fungal cells [30]. Deletion of AFR3 resulted in increased sensitivity to FLC in the E-Test strip analysis and increased CFU killing when higher FLC concentrations were used. However, ∆afr3 did not exhibit differences in FLC sensitivity using the standard MIC 80 assay. E-Test and microdilution methods do not always yield the same results [31], and agreement between these two tests can vary 70-96% of the time [32]. It is conceivable that the observed difference could be due to "trailing growth", a phenomenon where fungal cells exhibit reduced but persistent growth at FLC concentrations above the MIC. This effect is more commonly observed when microdilution methods are performed [33] because in liquid assays, slow growth of subpopulations may eventually dominate [34]. Interestingly, the E-Test assay indicated a lower formation of heteroresistant colonies in the ∆afr3 mutant strain when compared to H99. Heteroresistance signifies the presence of a sub-population that manifests higher FLC tolerance when compared to the majority of the population [35,36]. Loss of heteroresistance was also observed with the deletion of AFR1 [14]. However, the role that Afr3 plays in heterotolerance mechanisms is still to be determined.
Furthermore, the decreased Rhodamine 6G efflux, which mimics alterations in drug accumulation, corroborates the function of Afr3 as an efflux pump. Transcription data also suggest that there is no compensation by the other main efflux pump Afr1. Afr1 is the most well-characterized ABC transporter in C. neoformans. Deletion of AFR1 increases drug susceptibility to FLC, which is substantiated by data from a mouse infection model that indicates that Afr1 also plays a role in FLC resistance and fungal virulence [13,35,37]. Single deletions of Afr2 and Mdr1 did not influence susceptibility to FLC, which was only observed in a triple-deletion of Afr1, Afr2, and Mdr1 [14]. Compensatory upregulation of the transporters by qPCR in the ∆afr3 and ∆afr1 mutant strains was evaluated to assess if the lack of Afr3 would be compensated by Afr1. The data did not indicate overexpression of any transporter when the other was deleted.
Heterologous protein expression in yeast model systems, such as S. cerevisiae, has enabled functional analysis of specific proteins and has been previously employed to study efflux pumps in a variety of fungi [6,20,38]. Interestingly, Afr3 effectively exports both Rhodamine 6G and Nile Red out of the mutated S. cerevisiae strain, whereas the Afr1 pump only exports Nile Red and not Rhodamine 6G efflux [14]. This suggests that Afr3 and Afr1 differ in their substrate specificity. In S. cerevisiae, AFR3-GFP localized to the cell surface, as well as the cytoplasm. Based on Afr3's six transmembrane domains, we propose that Afr3 may be expressed in membranes of organelles in the cytoplasm. ABC transporters of Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, S. cerevisiae, and Aspergillus fumigatus [37][38][39][40] have been shown to localize in the membranes of mitochondria and the vacuole [41,42]. Future studies are necessary to analyze the subcellular localization of Afr3, especially during aging, since Afr3 expression negatively affects the replicative life span.
Both drug resistance and heteroresistance have been linked to increased virulence [35]. The decreased cryptococcal virulence of ∆afr3 in a Galleria mellonella survival model sup-ports this notion. The efflux pumps may not only play a role in FLC efflux but also contribute to detoxification of the cell by extruding metabolites and other toxic components [43]. Accumulation of toxic metabolites can lead to a loss of cell fitness and impact fungal virulence. Other fungal pumps, including Atm1, a mitochondrial ABC pump in C. neoformans, Mlt1, a vacuolar ABC transporter in C. albicans, and AbcB, an efflux pump of A. fumigatus, have been shown to impact virulence [40][41][42]. Efflux pump-dependent detoxification has been associated with a loss of lifespan in S. cerevisiae [17]. Instead, we documented a small increase in RLS of the ∆afr3 strain and a loss of lifespan stochasticity, which was not observed in ∆afr1 and ∆afr2. This could indicate that Afr3 has a role in stress response.
Exposure to stress, such as glucose deprivation, leads to an increase in FLC tolerance, as the change is only transient and does not become intrinsic to the strain [26]. Low glucose conditions lead to the increased pump activity of Afr1 [26]. In contrast, AFR3 deletion did not affect the enhanced FLC tolerance under glucose starvation, nor did we observe upregulation of AFR3. C. neoformans can achieve resistance to FLC by the duplication of chromosome 1 and rarely chromosome 3 in response to prolonged exposure to FLC. Chromosome 1 is most commonly duplicated, increasing the copy number of genes ERG11 and AFR1 [44]. The observed increased FLC tolerance in low glucose growth conditions, however, is not associated with a change in the gene copy number of AFR1 or AFR2. [26]. AFR3 is located on chromosome 3 and preliminary analysis show that the gene copy number was unchanged under low glucose stress [14,26]. Afr3, as well as the other characterized ABC transporters (Afr1, Afr2, and Mdr1), are upregulated in 10-generations old cells. Additionally, the results from the modified killing assay showed that deletion of AFR3 in older cells leads to a partial loss of resistance, indicating that Afr3 could aid in the FLC tolerance observed in 10-generation cells.
In summary, these data identify a novel ABC transporter that contributes to FLC tolerance in C. neoformans older cells. This ABC transporter promotes drug efflux from the fungal cell, influencing the susceptibility to treatment and the virulence of the cryptococcal cells. Our data encourage further efforts to understand its role in relation to other efflux pumps and which mechanisms the aging cells employ to increase drug resistance.
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8070677/s1; Figure S1: Confirmation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Transformants; Figure S2: Pump Compensation between Afr1 and Afr3; Figure S3: Growth Curves; Table S1: List of Primers.  Data Availability Statement: All data required to understand this article are presented in the study or the Supplemental Materials. Any raw data further requested will be provided from the corresponding author.