{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03581267217630854, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01652892561983471, 'mean_word_length': 5.0220994475138125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Open-ended questions in surveys of patients' satisfaction with family doctors

Objective: To compare replies to open-ended and closed questions about patient satisfaction with family doctors. Methods: Two centres of primary health care in Białystok in northeast Poland were chosen. A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to 1000 people (500 from each centre) aged 18 years and over, randomly selected from the practices. Possible responses to the one closed question were: very good, good, bad, very bad or difficult to say. Replies to two open-ended questions were categorized as positive, neutral, negative or ambivalent. Results: The response rate was 57.9%. There were some discrepancies between the closed-question response and the open-ended question replies. Some of those who replied good or very good to the closed question expressed negative views in response to the two open-ended questions (14.0% and 12.4%). Conclusions: Answers to open-ended questions add value to a patient satisfaction survey by providing information that answers to closed questions may not elicite.