{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02437027707808564, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01322418136020151, 'mean_word_length': 5.052210365853658, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Management of Myasthenia Gravis During Pregnancy: A Report of Eight Cases

Abstract Background The clinical course of myasthenia gravis (MG) during pregnancy is highly variable and unpredictable. The management of MG in pregnancy has not been standardized. Methods Eight cases of MG in pregnancy, who were treated and gave birth in our hospital between 2004 and 2012, were retrospectively reviewed. Results In three patients, MG deteriorated during pregnancy. Three patients discontinued their medication for MG during their pregnancy, and the other five patients continued on corticosteroid or pyridostigmine. None of the infants showed any congenital abnormalities. Interestingly, there was a trend towards lower birth weight in infants born to women who had an exacerbation of MG during pregnancy. One patient who had unstable MG before pregnancy and voluntarily discontinued the medication for MG at the beginning of pregnancy, experienced MG exacerbation at the 30th week of pregnancy and gave birth prematurely to an infant with transient neonatal MG at the 34th week. The other seven patients had uneventful full-term pregnancy. Conclusion Women with unstable MG should postpone pregnancy to avoid potential risk of MG exacerbation and adverse effects on the fetus. Medication for MG should not be stopped abruptly during pregnancy, particularly for women with unstable MG. MG during pregnancy should be closely monitored and properly controlled.


Abstract: Background:
The clinical course of myasthenia gravis (MG) during pregnancy is highly variable and unpredictable. The management of MG in pregnancy has not been standardized. Methods: Eight cases of MG in pregnancy, who were treated and gave birth in our hospital between 2004 and 2012, were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In three patients, MG deteriorated during pregnancy. Three patients discontinued their medication for MG during their pregnancy, and the other five patients continued on corticosteroid or pyridostigmine. None of the infants showed any congenital abnormalities. Interestingly, there was a trend towards lower birth weight in infants born to women who had an exacerbation of MG during pregnancy. One patient who had unstable MG before pregnancy and voluntarily discontinued the medication for MG at the beginning of pregnancy, experienced MG exacerbation at the 30th week of pregnancy and gave birth prematurely to an infant with transient neonatal MG at the 34th week. The other seven patients had uneventful full-term pregnancy. Conclusion: Women with unstable MG should postpone pregnancy to avoid potential risk of MG exacerbation and adverse effects on the fetus. Medication for MG should not be stopped abruptly during pregnancy, particularly for women with unstable MG. MG during pregnancy should be closely monitored and properly controlled.
Keywords: myasthenia gravis, neonatal myasthenia gravis, pregnancy, delivery, treatment, thymectomy Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College.

Clinical course of MG during pregnancy and puerperium
In five of the patients, MG remained stable during pregnancy. The contribution of medication to stabilize MG in pregnancy seems inconclusive. Discontinuation of low dosage medication for MG (patient #2 and #8) or small reduction (patient #6) of prednisone or anticholinesterase inhibitors did not appear to adversely affect the course of MG during pregnancy. However, patient #3, who reduced the dosage of prednisone at the beginning of pregnancy, developed exacerbation of MG at the 24 th week of pregnancy. The anticholinesterase inhibitor, pyridostigmine, was added to keep her MG in control during the remaining period of pregnancy. She became critically ill six days after caesarean section due to lung infection and MG deterioration, and was transferred to intensive care unit and treated with prednisone at 60 mg/d plus pyridostigmine at 240 mg/d accompanied by intravenous injection of immunoglobulin at 175 g/d for 5 days. She recovered gradually and her MG remained stable thereafter.
Patient #7 had remitting MG prior to pregnancy, and remained stable, free of medication, during the pregnancy. However, she experienced MG deterioration one month after delivery. She was then treated with oral 2 Case presentation

Status and management of MG before pregnancy
Eight pregnant women with MG were treated and gave birth at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of our hospital between 2004 and 2012. The patients were diagnosed with MG at the hospital's Department of Neurology. The patients underwent regular examinations during pregnancy and postpartum period by both obstetricians and neurologists in our hospital.
The mean age of the patients was 27.5 years (21-31 years). All the patients were primigravida. The mean prior duration of MG was 8.1 years (3-18 years). Prior to pregnancy, one patient was in remission, six patients had stable MG, and one had unstable MG and had been recommended to postpone pregnancy. The patients were treated with common therapies for MG including thymectomy, immunosuppressant drugs and oral anticholinesterase agents. Five patients underwent thymectomy before pregnancy. Two patients were taking oral pyridostigmine 120-180 mg/d alone. The remission patient had been treated with oral pyridostigmine 60-300 mg/d when she was diagnosed with MG, and became stable after 3 months of medication. She stopped the medication voluntarily one year after the onset of MG and remained asymptomatic before pregnancy. The status and management of MG prior to pregnancy of the 8 patients is illustrated in Table 1. full-term pregnancies. Three patients delivered by caesarean section. Patient #5 had caesarean section due to exacerbation of MG associated with preterm labor. Caesarean section was performed on patient #3 and #4 for obstetric reasons. Although patient #3 had MG deterioration at the 24 th week of pregnancy, she had a full-term pregnancy and gave birth to a healthy infant. Neonatal MG (NMG) was seen only in the premature baby whose mother had unstable MG prior to pregnancy and who experienced exacerbation of MG exasperation during pregnancy, while the other 7 infants were healthy. The average birth weight of the infants whose mothers experienced MG deterioration was 2717 ± 89 g, which is lower than those whose mothers with stable MG status (3310 ± 227 g), suggesting that women who experience exacerbation of MG during pregnancy tend to give birth to infants with lower birth weight. The data were summarized in Table 3.

Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study
pyridostigmine at 60 mg/d and the dosage was reduced to 30 mg/d after her MG condition became stable. Patient #5 had unstable MG prior to pregnancy and conceived accidentally. This patient voluntarily discontinued her medication for MG at the 6 th week of pregnancy. Her MG deteriorated at the 30 th week of pregnancy and she gave birth prematurely at 34 th week of pregnancy. Her baby exhibited transient neonatal myasthenia gravis (NMG). Both the mother and the infant were promptly treated and recovered well. The summary of the clinical course of MG of all the patients is presented in Table 2.

The effects of MG on pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcome
Excepting patient #5 who had preterm labor due to exacerbation of MG, the other 7 patients had uneventful   [8]. However, in our study, all the patients who developed exacerbation during pregnancy or puerperium had a history of MG longer than 10 years, and the patients who had short duration of MG (patient #1 and #2) remained stable during pregnancy and puerperium. Although the number of patients in our study is too small for any statistical analysis, we believe that the length of MG duration might not be a good predictor of the course of disease during pregnancy or puerperium. The standard therapies for MG include thymectomy and pharmacological interventions such as immunosuppressant and acetylcholine esterase inhibitors. Reports about the effects of thymectomy on the course of MG during pregnancy show inconsistent conclusions. Roth et al. have found that women who undergo thymectomy prior to pregnancy have a better course of MG during pregnancy and postpartum period than those who do not [17]. On the contrary, Hoff et al. reported that thymectomy prior to pregnancy did not affect the clinical course of MG during pregnancy, but significantly reduces the risk of NMG [18]. In our study, the rate of exacerbation (33%, 1/3) among the patients who did not undergo thymectomy before pregnancy was similar to those who did (40%, 2/5), suggesting that thymectomy prior to pregnancy might not decrease the risk of exacerbation during pregnancy and puerperium.
Data on the safety of pharmacological treatment for MG during pregnancy are still lacking. Corticosteroid drugs such as prednisolone and prednisone are thought to present little teratogenic risk to the fetus [19], and only a slight increase in incidence of cleft palate has been reported (<1%) [20]. Pyridostigmine, which is an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor, is generally considered safe during pregnancy when used at the appropriate dosage [14,21]. Only one case of microcephaly due to high dose of pyridostigmine use in the mother has been reported [22]. In our study, some patients (patient #1 and #4) needed continue on prednisone or pyridostigmine during pregnancy, and in other patients either the medication was discontinued (patient #2, #5, and #8) or the dosage of medication was reduced (patient #3 and #6). Regardless of the medication regimens during pregnancy, all infants born to our patients exhibited no congenital abnormalities. Our finding indicates that prednisone (10-20 mg/d) and pyridostigmine (60-180 mg/d) may be safe for both mother and fetus when used appropriately.
We believed that sudden withdrawal of relatively high dosage of immunosuppressive medication during

Patient follow-up
All the mothers and their babies came back to follow-up visit regularly. MG condition of all the mothers is stable now and all the babies are healthy.

Clinical course of MG during pregnancy and puerperium
The clinical course of MG during pregnancy is highly variable and unpredictable. Consistent with the most reported deterioration rate of MG during pregnancy [7][8][9], we observed 37.5% (3/8) of patients experienced exacerbation of MG during pregnancy. It is thought that MG exacerbation usually occurs during the first trimester and puerperium, while improvement of symptoms likely occurs during the second and third trimester due to normal immunosuppressive changes in late pregnancy [15]. However, we found that MG exacerbation occurred in the second, third, and puerperium in our patients, further supporting the high variation in MG during pregnancy.
Prediction of MG exacerbation during pregnancy is challenging. The clinical state of MG before pregnancy usually is not of value in predicting the exacerbation or remission of the disease during pregnancy. For example, patient #3 in our study, who had MG for 10 years and was stable prior to pregnancy, experienced deterioration at the 24 th week of pregnancy. Patient #7 who had remitting MG prior to pregnancy developed MG exacerbation during puerperium, although her MG remained stable during pregnancy. Thus, stable or remitting MG before pregnancy does not appear to reduce the possibility of exacerbation during pregnancy or puerperium. Interestingly, our study suggests that women who have unstable MG before pregnancy and who discontinue medication for MG during pregnancy could be at higher risk of severe MG deterioration. In our study, patient #5 who had unstable MG prior to pregnancy not only failed to follow the recommendation to postpone pregnancy, but also voluntarily discontinued the medication for MG. Her MG deteriorated in the third trimester, leading to preterm delivery of an NMG infant. Hence, it appears that patients with unstable MG should delay pregnancy to avoid the risk of severe MG exacerbation.
In addition, it has been suggested that high risk of mortality during pregnancy is associated with shorter prior duration of MG, while women with longer than 7 years from onset of MG tend to have a lower risk of to healthy mothers. However, we found that women with MG exacerbation during pregnancy appeared to have infants with lower birth weight than those who without MG exacerbation during pregnancy. Thus, for the benefit of the fetus, we recommend that women with MG should have their MG under control during pregnancy.
In summary, the course of MG during pregnancy is highly variable and unpredictable, thus, decisions should be very caution in the treatment of women with MG contemplating pregnancy or with presentation during pregnancy. The status of MG during pregnancy should be monitored closely. The management of MG during pregnancy should not be altered abruptly. We strongly recommend that women with unstable MG postpone pregnancy to avoid potential severe MG deterioration and adverse effects on the fetus. pregnancy should be avoided for women with MG, particularly for women with unstable MG prior to pregnancy, which could cause severe exacerbation due to the restoration of immunological reaction to AchR. Our study presented a case of unstable MG prior to pregnancy (patient #5) with a sudden withdrawal of prednisone (40 mg/d) and pyridostigmine (30 mg/d) at the beginning of pregnancy. She experienced MG deterioration in the third trimester, resulting in preterm delivery of a NMG infant. Based on this case, we suspect that the exacerbation might be associated with the sudden withdrawal of corticosteroid medication during pregnancy. Nevertheless, we do recommend adjusting the dosage and dose interval throughout the pregnancy since the ongoing physiological changes during pregnancy may inhibit the absorption of any oral medication. The dosage of medication of MG during puerperium should be restored to the dosage that effectively stabilizes the MG before pregnancy.
Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are used as short-term treatments for impending and manifest myasthenic crisis and in patients with significant respiratory or bulbar dysfunction [23]. With MG patients during pregnancy, both plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin therapies have been proven to be effective, safe and well tolerated [24]. In the current study, patient #3 recovered with prednisone, pyridostigmine and immunoglobulin.

The effects of MG on pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcome
We found that 88% (7/8) of our patients had uneventful fullterm pregnancy, suggesting that MG might not adversely affect pregnancy even if MG exacerbation occurs. The rate of NMG in our study was 12.5% (1/8), which is within the range (9%-30%) reported by others [3,11]. Although it has been demonstrated that the severity of maternal MG and the antibody titer of the mothers do not correlate with the occurrence of NMG [25], in our study the only NMG infant was born to the mother who had unstable MG prior to pregnancy and experienced MG exacerbation in the third trimester, suggesting that women with unstable MG might pose increased NMG risk to the fetus if they become pregnant. In addition, Wen et al. have found that there is no significant difference in the risk of having infants with low birth weight between women with and without MG [5]. Similarly, our study shows that the average birth weight of the infants in our study (3088 ± 178 g) is fairly close to the average birth weight of Chinese infants (3230 g) born