{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04644616467276566, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025334271639690358, 'mean_word_length': 4.974789915966387, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Anti-viral therapy in chronic HBV infection: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND/AIMS
Current treatment of HBV chronic infection is based on interferon (IFN) or nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NUCs). Seroconversion and resistance rates were evaluated in 135 HBV patients treated with NUCs alone or NUCs+IFN, during the period 1999-2009.


METHODOLOGY
Twenty-seven patients were treated with lamivudine (LAM group), 62 with LAM+IFN for 12 months, followed by lamivudine alone (LAM+IFN group). Patients developing lamivudine resistance were added adefovir (add-on) or switched to entecavir. The remaining 46 naive patients received entecavir (ETV group).


RESULTS
HBsAg loss was 0% in the LAM and ETV groups, while it reached 8% in the LAM+IFN group. HBe/anti-HBe seroconversion was 20% with NUCs alone but reached 66.6% with NUC+IFN. In the LAM group, resistance was 74% to lamivudine, 47% to adefovir (add-on) and 20% to entecavir (switch). In the LAM+IFN group, resistance to lamivudine was significantly lower in the first 24 months of treatment, reaching 72% by 84 months. In the ETV group, no virological breakthrough was observed.


CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest a higher percentage of HBe/anti-HBe seroconversion in patients treated with NUCs+IFN as compared to the data reported in the literature when administering interferon or NUCs alone, and substantially confirm the literature data on NUCs resistance.