{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.040880503144654086, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007337526205450734, 'mean_word_length': 5.773049645390071, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Oxidation of cyclohexane by high-valent iron bispidine complexes: tetradentate versus pentadentate ligands.

The iron-bispidine-catalyzed oxidation of cyclohexane with H(2)O(2), where either a tetradentate or a pentadentate bispidine ligand is coordinated to the iron center, yields up to 35% cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone (alcohol/ketone ratio of up to 4). Product distribution (including (18)O labeling studies), kinetic isotope effects, and the ratio of tertiary/secondary alcohols with adamantane as a substrate (tertiary/secondary) suggest that (i) H abstraction by a ferryl complex is the rate-determining step and that the emerging cyclohexyl radical is short-lived, (ii) there is a parallel reaction involving oxidation by OH radicals, and (iii) there are considerable differences in the reaction pathways between the tetradentate and pentadentate ligand catalyst. These interpretations are fully supported by a DFT-based computational analysis.