{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024498886414253896, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.5307262569832405, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cardiac disease: hemodynamic advantage of the abdominal wall retraction method.

We examined the use of an abdominal wall retraction method instead of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with cardiac disease to prevent the hemodynamic deterioration associated with pneumoperitoneum. Eight patients with cardiac diseases, mainly valvular or coronary artery diseases, underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under hemodynamic monitoring. Five patients without cardiac disease served as controls. As hemodynamic parameters, heart rate, mean systemic arterial pressure (mAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and cardiac index (CI) were measured. The patients with cardiac disease showed significantly elevated mPAP and PCWP compared with the control group under pneumoperitoneum, and one patient showed critically decreased CI due to increased tricuspid regurgitation under pneumoperitoneum. These changes, however, were resolved on the abdominal wall retraction. There was no major perioperative complication. This abdominal wall retraction method is, therefore, favorable for patients with underlying cardiac disease to minimize the hemodynamic deterioration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.