{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019758507135016465, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006586169045005488, 'mean_word_length': 5.514285714285714, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Radiographic Evaluation of Two Different Designs for Treatment of Mandibular Bilateral Free End Saddle with Osseo-integrated Implants

Purpose: Thegoal of this study was to evaluate radiographically two different designs for mandibular free end saddle with osseointegrated implants. Materials and Method: Ten lower Kennedy class I partially edentulous patients were selected to receive implant at the second molar area, then patients were divided into 2 groups according to the implant superstructures either (extra-coronal attachment or bar attachment). Patients of both groups receive removable partial denture of the same design. Patients were followed up for 0, 3, 6 and 9 months clinically. Results: Showed statistical difference between the 2 designs. Conclusion: It could be concluded that Tooth-implant supported partial denture may be reasonable and simple solution for Kennedy class I partial denture.