{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017027863777089782, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.3522727272727275, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Detecting Mistakes or Finding Misconceptions ? Diagnosing MorphoSyntactic Errors in Language Learning

Diagnosing morphosyntactic errors in a language learner’s utterance can substantially profit from a direct treatment of morphological regularities if wordform-internal relationships are integrated into the general constraintbased model of correctness. The paper describes model structures for a range of selected problems from different inflected languages, namely German, Russian and Bulgarian, and discusses the additional diagnostic capabilities, which are made available by a description, which is based on morphemes instead of full-forms.