{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028768699654775604, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023014959723820484, 'mean_word_length': 4.76158940397351, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Erratum: ANTHONY S. CHEKE JULIAN P. HUME (2018) The Réunion Fody and Sonnerat's Shrew and the validity of scientifically naming animals described without physical types. Zootaxa, 4382: 592-600.

We presume that the revisers for the 1999 Code did not anticipate further naming of taxa from old accounts, and thus did not see that their new rule could lead in such cases to patently absurd designations of non-existent types, never collected or preserved. We therefore recommend that for acts of naming relating to old accounts when making a preserved specimen was not the norm, the ICZN waive this rule by an amendment, ideally retrospective, such that species named by those unaware of the rule are not invalidated wholesale, or subject to time-consuming individual rule-suspension cases. We suggest that Article 16 of the Code be amended as follows (new text in bold):