{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02464788732394366, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01056338028169014, 'mean_word_length': 5.540229885057471, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Can the standard gamble and rating scale be used to measure quality of life in rhinoconjunctivitis? Comparison with the RQLQ and SF‐36

Background: With interest in health economics growing, it is important to know whether utilities may be used to measure health‐related quality of life in patients with rhinoconjunctivitis. The objective was to compare the validity and measurement properties of disease‐specific versions of the standard gamble and rating scale with those of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and the Short‐Form 36 (SF‐36).