Judging a Book by its Quirk Words


pedro-lastra https://unsplash.com/photos/v6Sy3kyBROE










How about an example?

linnea-sandbakk https://unsplash.com/photos/X0rn9-ZpQsU

Here is my quirk list for a certain book. From it, can you deduce:

  • which language the book was originally written in (not English)?
  • what is the overall thrust of the subject matter or its undertone?

(Answers and analysis below.)

Band 4 contains the more common words, Band 2 the least common and therefore least likely to be recognised on average—although that classification can be deceptive. Sometimes a word that “would be unknown to most people” in Band 2 is what you think it is (e.g temeritous means full of temerity) and sometimes an “obvious” word is included in my quirk list because of its secondary meaning (e.g. historiate not as in to narrate history, but as in to decorate an illuminated manuscript with depictions of people, animals, or narrative scenes).

Band 4:

albumen, aliment, anthropometry, auricular, basilisk, benzoin, carillon, convolvulus, dilatory, encyclical, ephemeris (emepherides), firebrand, grape-shot, guano, lepidopteran, mastic, patrimony, phthisis, plaint, respire, turpitude

Band 3:

antiphrasis, auto-da-fé, basso profondo, Carlovingian, cataplasm, ciborium, cortège, enlace, erethism, frangipani, gastralgic, gateau, girandole, historiate, Languedocian, monstrance, mucilaginous, opuscule, ordure, palaeographer, palingenetic, plantigrade, tenebrous, trebuchet

Band 2:

adonize, brodequin, chancography, chiromancer, Corybant, empyreuma, exorable, galvanoplasty, lactescent, oliban, pulverulence, rutilant, temeritous

Just glancing through, you might notice the preponderance of borrowings from a certain language.

Indeed: auto-da-fé, brodequin, Carlovingian, cortège, gateau, girandole, Languedocian, oliban, trebuchet, come from or through the French, which makes it likely the book was originally written in French (it was).

Getting at the book’s themes requires having a vague idea of which sphere of life the words belong to. Here are some groupings:

  • auto-da-fé, ciborium, encyclical, monstrance (ecclesiastical),
  • ephemeris, chiromancer, Corybant, basilisk (mystical/mythical),
  • firebrand, patrimony (political), and trebuchet, grape-shot (war),
  • mucilaginous, ordure, guano (unpleasantness), and cataplasm, phthisis (illness),
  • albumen, aliment, gastralgic, gateau, lactescent (food-related),
  • empyreuma, erethism, lepidopteran, palingenetic, plantigrade, respire (biology),
  • benzoin, frangipani, mastic, oliban (perfumes).

Am I right, you’re not thinking Romance or Children’s or Science Fiction? And it’s unlikely to be a Dictionary because the quirk list would be more varied. What else? A research paper on life in medieval France? But the vocabulary is too modern for that, indeed with a bit of luck you might end up thinking fin de siècle, which would lead you to Decadent Movement or a similar idea, and that would be about as far you could go.

The title of the book is Tarantula’s Parlour and Other Unkind Tales by Léon Bloy (1846–1917). It is an anthology of short stories that are part social satire, part drama, part mystery, part horror with strong religious undertones.

Of the above words, turpitude best describes the thrust of Bloy’s stories. Grotesque is a close second:

In the face, she resembled a fried potato rolled in grated cheese. Her hands inclined one to think that she had “dug up her great-grandmother,” as a Scandinavian proverb puts it.
In sum, her person exhaled the odour of the sixth-floor landing of a twentieth-rate furnished lodging-house.

(Translation by Brian Stableford.)

Judging a book by a quirk list is the opposite of judging a book by the significant words that appear most frequently. I remember reading about an experiment where a book’s words would be alphabetised, and you’d skim-read the whole three-hundred or so pages, from A to Z, to get a sense of its content (reference, anyone?).

Seemingly useless.

Until you realise that whole pages of lips, eyes, touch, hands, finger probably mean you’re reading Romance, and that whole passages of sea-related words mean you’re reading a romance set by the sea, and that the multiple croissants and gateaux and the repeating name of a town in Normandy means one of the characters is a baker and the plot is set in France, and the clothing words tells you in which era, etcetera, etcetera.

Both the recurring significant words and the quirk words are examples of extremes: the former are the foundation of any book, the latter are the frills. And, like with any building, where you can tell what’s being built by looking at the foundations or what’s been built by looking at the gables, these two word groups outline the book’s setting. (They don’t tell you what the façade looks like or what’s inside, i.e. the sentence structure or the plot.)

pierre-chatel-innocenti https://unsplash.com/photos/5ASZ_qxS9dQ

Perhaps I have been unfair to Bloy by presenting him through such a “difficult” quirk list. Let me rectify that.

I enjoyed his writing for its colourful language (indebted to the Symbolists, the Naturalist, the Decadents in general), even though the stories often centred on the unkindest cuts between friends and family, between those standing and those on their knees, between the hopeful and the hopeless. Despite that hideous quirk list, Bloy manages to speak of flowers and light and the imagination in softer tones. For example take the following quotes:

  • Like convolvulus, the flowers of his soul only bloomed in the shade.
  • I shall become as complete a stranger as the unknown drama sleeping in the limbo of a novelist’s imagination.
  • One had, in any case, a bag full of fruits that resemble stars, picked by the handful in the luminous forest, and one did not doubt the human species.
  • Her heart had been cultivated like a kitchen garden of limited extent, in which the smallest strips were calculated for the cooking-pot: no useless flowers whose frivolous brightness brings no profit; at the very most a few pansies or violets bordering the beans and salad vegetables, in order not to exile poetry completely.

So the writing is refined, even if the messages are brutal.

Ultimately, Tarantula’s Parlour studies our untamed, baser impulses, which we (pretend to) strive to reign in. As such, Bloy shows up human nature, and it’d be a shame to dismiss him and turn away. After all, you have to know what the Devil looks like before you can smite him.

Author: A Quiver of Quotes


Questions? Comments? Reading recommendations? Let me know.


WordPress.com Logo


Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s