


A new report has been released by Catherine Herridge (one of my favorite reporters) stating that Fox News has obtained the draft of a letter from former FBI director James Comey. The letter in question is his infamous “exoneration statement” of Hillary Clinton the summer before the election. The one that let her off the hook, so to speak. This is the one that said between the lines that if anyone else had done this, they would be in jail, but since it’s Clinton, no biggie.

This is the Fox News report about the situation:

Trending: The 15 Best Conservative News Sites On The Internet

FBI Director James Comey began drafting that letter regarding Hillary Clinton’s email investigation months before conducting several key interviews, including speaking to Clinton herself. According to Herridge, the letter has previous drafts that were edited carefully to make the situation seem less bad than it was. Almost as if it were a “matter,” not a case. Which was the intent all along. The letter shows the two ways in which the FBI edited the statement to lessen the accusations against the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The FBI agent who edited the letter was Peter Strzok.

One edit determined that the private Clinton server had not been hacked, despite evidence to the contrary and language used in previous drafts. “In an early draft, Comey said it was ‘reasonably likely’ that ‘hostile actors’ gained access to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email account. That was changed later to say the scenario was merely ‘possible.'” That is pretty damning and definitive. If we would have only known about this before the election, I think people could have made a much more informed decision about who to vote for. In fact, as I understand it from Herridge and others reporting on this, we actually have proof that five different foreign entities hacked that private server. I’m pretty sure among the five is China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.

A second edit basically dismissed the entire “matter” at hand, the one Clinton was being investigated over in the first place. “Another edit showed language was changed to describe the actions of Clinton and her colleagues as ‘extremely careless’ as opposed to ‘grossly negligent.’ This is a key legal distinction.” You bet it’s a key legal distinction. Look, we all know there are people in prison right now for doing one tenth of what Hillary did as Secretary of State. She is corrupt to the core, the absolute worst pile of human trash there could possibly be. ‘Extremely careless’ is not a crime, however, ‘grossly negligent’ is. That is why they changed the designation.

The edits also showed that references to specific potential violations of statutes on “gross negligence” regarding classified information and “misdemeanor handling” were removed. The final statement also removed a reference to the “sheer volume” of classified information discussed on email. There were “repeated edits to reduce Secretary Clinton’s culpability in mishandling classified information.”

We are losing faith in our institutions. The FBI, CIA, NSA, Department of Justice and the Federal Reserve can all go screw themselves for all I care. It has turned us into a banana republic style, kangaroo court wielding, joke of a system. I say we let it crash and burn and start all over again with liberty in mind. Of course that won’t happen, so all of this is in need of a political enema.


Just look at the kind of people he is up against. It’s not like the President is the most politically savvy guy out there and sometimes he says and does what he wants, not what we want. Like I said, I hope the whole system crashes and burns, so a part of me wants to see how this will all play out. But typically, when you let that happen, it doesn’t end well. So, the other part of me hopes that Trump is strong enough to stop this before it does take everything and everyone down with it into chaos.


Terresa Monroe-Hamilton


Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!