What does it take to eradicate a disease?

Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, immunizes Ishaka Bashiru against polio at Bini Community Health Post in Nigeria. See more staying healthy pictures.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Eradicating a disease is difficult, to say the least. It’s so complicated, in fact, that it's only been accomplished once, with smallpox. Smallpox was wiped from the face of the Earth in 1977, proving that, though extremely difficult, reducing the incidence of a disease to zero is possible.

Better yet, we're on the verge of success No. 2. Guinea worm disease, also known as dracunculiasis, is contracted from drinking stagnant water containing a tiny water flea infected with the larvae of the Guinea worm. These larvae mate inside a person's stomach, producing female worms that can grow upwards of 3-feet (.91 meters) long. After a year, the worm begins tunneling its way out through the person's skin -- an agonizing and traumatic process. To reduce the discomfort, people frequently submerge themselves in a nearby river or other water source, which causes the worm to release its larvae into the water. The cycle begins again.


In 1986, approximately 3.5 million people in Africa and Asia were infected with the disease. In 2009, the number of cases had reduced to just 3,000. In other words, the problem of Guinea worm disease is almost solved, and millions of lives are healthier and happier for it.

But how does one know if a disease like Guinea worm can be eradicated? Read on to find out.


What decides if a disease is eradicable?

After smallpox was eradicated in the 1970s, a swarm of activity followed in hopes of wiping out handfuls of other illnesses. Unfortunately, this just isn't possible. To clear up any confusion, The Carter Center, a nonprofit organization that aims to promote human rights, established the International Task Force for Disease Eradication. This task force set about identifying the factors that decide whether a disease can be eradicated. It pinpointed two main criteria: science and political will.

In terms of science, it comes down to researchers understanding the disease. This includes knowing:


  • whether animals can carry the disease.
  • how easy it is to diagnose, since some diseases remain dormant for years in a person's body without any signs or symptoms.
  • whether an effective, safe, inexpensive, long-lasting and easily deployed intervention is available.
  • if the disease can be eliminated from one specific geographic area before trying to eliminate the disease on a wider scale.

For example, while there's no medicine or vaccine for Guinea worm disease, the best way to prevent people from contracting it is through education. This involves preventing people from drinking water that contains the larvae and teaching people to filter their drinking water using a type of cloth that removes the fleas.

As for political will, it takes mass cooperation to eradicate a disease, including understanding the true burden or impact of the disease; the financial costs; and whether it can be combined with other interventions.

After reviewing and studying diseases, The Carter Center's Task Force for Disease Eradication decided that the following diseases could be eradicated:

  • Poliomyelitis (polio)
  • Dracunculiasis (Guinea worm)
  • Measles
  • Mumps
  • Rubella
  • Lymphatic filariasis
  • Cysticercosis

Eradication versus Elimination versus Control

President Jimmy Carter and wife Rosalynn pass out an insecticidal bed net, which prevents malaria, in the remote village of Afeta in southwest Ethiopia.
The Carter Center

You now know that not all diseases can be eradicated. But, that doesn't mean they can't all be managed to a certain extent. Most diseases can be eradicated, eliminated or controlled. Here's how to differentiate them.

  • Eradication is the complete annihilation of a disease due to methodical efforts. True eradication usually involves eliminating the microbe itself or completely preventing its occurrence in nature.
  • Elimination is the process of stopping the spread of a disease in a country or continent or other restricted area, such as an island. It's also possible to stop people from contracting a disease while the microorganism remains alive in nature, such as with neonatal tetanus.
  • Control is a method for reducing the frequency of a disease, but has to be an ongoing effort.

In the end, achieving the lofty goal of total disease eradication is difficult, rarely possible and costly. But when achieved, it can save and improve millions of lives. Just look to Guinea worm disease for inspiration. Hundreds of millions of dollars and decades after the effort to eradicate began, Guinea worm is now found in only four African countries: Sudan, Ghana, Mali and Ethiopia. That means only 3,190 cases left to cure. May the countdown begin.


Related Articles

More Great Links


  • Hopkins, Donald R., "The Allure of Eradication." Global Health Magazine. Summer 2009. (Oct. 4, 2010).
  • Staub, Emily. Public relations at the Carter Center. Personal correspondence. (Oct. 4, 2010).
  • The Carter Center. "Guinea Worm Disease Eradication: Countdown to Zero." 1999. (Oct. 4, 2010)http://www.cartercenter.org/health/guinea_worm/mini_site/index.html
  • Dowdle, Walter R., "Principles of Disease Eradication." The Centers for Disease Control. Dec. 31, 1999. (Oct. 4, 2010).
  • The Carter Center. "International Task Force for Disease Eradication." 2010. Oct. 6, 2010)http://www.cartercenter.org/health/itfde/index.html
  • Dowdle, Walter R., "Principles of Disease Eradication." The Centers for Disease Control. Dec. 31, 1999. (Oct. 4, 2010).http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su48a7.htm