Image - lorenjavier, Flickr

When you hear about the great attractions of Walt Disney World, rides like the Haunted Mansion, Splash Mountain, the Twilight Zone: Tower of Terror, or Spaceship Earth easily come up naturally in conversation. Or, alternatively, if you're told stories of the thrilling and unique attractions of Disney's Animal Kingdom, specifically, you're likely most aware of experiences like Expedition Everest or Kilimanjaro Safaris.

And yet, for some reason, when discussing the signature attractions at Walt Disney World, Animal Kingdom's Dinosaur seems to regularly fall through the cracks. You won't see it on many best-of lists. You won't have as hard a time finding a Fastpass+ reservation for it, even at the busiest times. You won't have to follow a racing horde of people at rope drop attempting to be the first to fill the Time Rovers' deceptively comfortable seats each day. It's just not that kind of attraction.

But once you ride it, it's hard not to be left wondering why in the world that is the case. It truly does not make sense. Dinosaur looks like a major E-Ticket attraction. Dinosaur feels like a major E-Ticket attraction. It has all of the ingredients you'd expect from a smash hit, and yet it seems to fall just on the tier below – ultimately, I'd argue, rendering it criminally underrated.

Looking at it for a while, I'd say these are a few of the reasons why Dinosaur doesn't quite get the accolades it so richly deserves. 

4. The ride system

Image: Disney

In 1995, Disneyland opened a groundbreaking new attraction called the Indiana Jones Adventure. Not only did this particular ride give Indy fans a real, fully-realized attraction to enjoy, it also introduced the world to a new ride system called the Enhanced Motion Vehicle (EMV). The concept was pretty simple: Essentially, take a motion simulator, similar to what you'd find on Star Tours, and mount it to a moving car. The result is a highly-customizable roving vehicle capable of simulating all sorts of rough surfaces without any real wear and tear on the hardware. It was pretty genius, all things considered.

And, quickly, Indiana Jones Adventure was received by theme park fans rather warmly, with all praising its ingenuity and creative storytelling.

Drawing on the success of that attraction, Imagineers decided to bring the ride over to Walt Disney World, albeit in a shiny new wardrobe.

Disney's Animal Kingdom opened in 1998, and Dinosaur was among the opening day attractions (then known as Countdown to Extinction). But, while it was again received warmly, it wasn't greeted with the same intense level of fan devotion seen on the other coast.

Now, there are a handful of reasons for this, ranging from the lack of an Indiana Jones-level brand for guests to connect with to the fact that the ride is, essentially, a photocopy of the original gussied up with a new coat of paint. But above all else, I think its the ride's innovative system that keeps guests from rapturous praise.

Animal Kingdom is filled with the real – or the seemingly real – far more than any other Disney park. There are real animals all around, engaging with guests both up close and at a distance. And, more than any other ride, Dinosaur is a contrived fiction: You aren't traveling through time. You aren't meeting dinosaurs. Heck, the road you're traveling over isn't even rough. I think all of these factors combine to alienate guests just a bit from the attraction experience, heightening the theatricality of the attraction and, ultimately, limiting their ability to appreciate it on a higher level than a simple thrill ride. With Animal Kingdom living in a world of veracity, anything breaking that illusion seems secondary.

3. The name

And then there's that name: Dinosaur. If you applied this naming logic to other Disney attractions, Central Florida would be filled with rides such as, “Ghost,” “Communication,” “Elevator,” and “Ellen.” It boggles the mind that this was not only thought up, but approved at various levels of the company until the point that it now is the accepted name of this particular attraction.

But that wasn't always the case. When it first opened, Dinosaur was known as “Countdown to Extinction,” and it has never quite been the same since it was rechristened.

In 2000, coinciding with the release of the film (ahem) Dinosaur, Disney decided to rebrand their two-year-old attraction to work in concert with the movie. While the film was successful in its original theatrical release, it has not maintained a particularly prominent place in popular culture – thus limiting any affect the brand synergy would ordinarily have on excited theme park goers. And so, the result is an attraction name that, to most, sounds like Disney thought it up at 5 o'clock on a Friday with everyone in the meeting itching to get home early.

And that's a shame. The original name, Countdown to Extinction, is as evocative and foreboding a name as you'll find anywhere at Walt Disney World. The word “countdown” suggests a quick pace and frantic feeling, while“extinction” reminds us of the stakes of our ride – our own survival.

Nowadays, the name of the ride doesn't quite set the proper tone, and considering how much of Disney's storytelling relies on slowly giving guests chunks of information, it's a wasted opportunity not to give the ride a better moniker. 



While I agree that this ride is underrated, and I always make it a point to ride it, I think the last point in the article is the main reason it doesn't succeed to the point it otherwise would. The choices of lighting seem overdone to me. I have always found that it is TOO dark to fully enjoy the ride. You can't see any of the details of the land that is created (and maybe they don't want you to see the plants and landscapes because they're not well done?) and that's part of the experience for me. In the end, I feel like I'm riding a loud, dark, bouncy ride and can't really get an appreciation for whatever details may exist. Using Big Thunder Mtn as an example, there are plenty of details that exist on that ride, and even though you're flying past them, you can still see them - even at night. With Space Mountain, the whole idea is to feel like you're flying around in the darkness of space, so there's no reason for it to have any light. I would think Dinosaur might be more successful if it had lighting similar to Pirates of the Caribbean, or even Haunted Mansion. As it stands, it's hard to really appreciate it as anything other than a loud, dark, bouncy ride with a neat story but little visual enhancement of that story. It's so dark, it's almost up to the rider to imagine what is happening.

In reply to by Jon Landis (not verified)

Jon nailed it. In Indy you have that incredible open hall with the bridge and the huge skull face. Dinosaur lacks that. I feel like I'm on a desk chair being whirled around in the dark and randomly stopped (hard) and shown a quick scene and then lights out and I'm twirled again. If I didn't know better I would think that the size of the show building was a quarter of it's actual size. This ride could be extremely good (and I do like it for what it is.)

I love this ride. I loved it more when it was called Countdown to Extinction because it did seem a little more sinister and wild. I heard when they changed the name, they also toned down the intensity of the ride. However, I still call it CTE when I go there.
I've been on Indiana Jones and think that's an awesome ride too. I love the detail and the story. What's kind of nest is to try to figure out in CTE where you would be at in IJ.
Overall though, this ride is one of the best at AK.

Perhaps I'm spoiled by living close enough to Disneyland to be more familiar with the California parks than the Orlando ones. But I had my first visit to the Orlando parks last year and went into Dinosaur knowing nothing about the attraction. It wasn't until I reached the load station that I said to myself, "Ah, Indiana Jones type ride vehicles." and felt I was in for a good experience. What a let down I had. It wasn't until I got home that I discovered that basically the track layout for Dinosaur is pretty much the same as Indiana Jones that I felt the Disney customers of Orlando would be far better served if they just gutted Dinosaur and replicated the Indiana Jones counterpart. But then you'd run into the problem of it being in the wrong park. Maybe the whole experience is cheapened by the fact the rest of the dinosaur themed land is filled with are dinosaur themed county fair quality attractions. In any case I did give Dinosaur a second go through last November before my bi-coastal annual pass expired and sadly it still felt like a cheap Indiana Jones knockoff.

In reply to by Ryan Cameron (not verified)

Gutted the attraction? Why??? WHY not just keep this attraction, and use some of the space over at Hollywood studios for an Indiana Jones attraction?

View More Comments

Add new comment

About Theme Park Tourist



Find Out More About Us...

Plan Your Trip


You can even print them.

Start Planning Now...