Venera 4

Venera 4
Venera 4 (MMA 2011) (1).JPG
Venera 4 model
Mission typeVenus lander and flyby spacecraft
OperatorGSMZ Lavochkin
COSPAR ID1967-058A
SATCAT no.02840
Mission duration127 days
Spacecraft properties
Spacecraft4V-1 [1]
ManufacturerGSMZ Lavochkin
Launch mass1106 kg
Dry mass377 kg
Start of mission
Launch date12 June 1967, 02:40 GMT [2][3]
RocketMolniya 8K78M
Launch siteBaikonur, Site 1/5
End of mission
Last contact18 October 1967, 04:34 GMT
Orbital parameters
Reference systemHeliocentric
Perihelion altitude0.71 AU
Aphelion altitude1.02 AU
Period293 days
Venus impact (failed landing)
Impact date18 October 1967, 04:34 GMT
Impact site19°N 38°E﻿ / ﻿19°N 38°E﻿ / 19; 38 (Eisila region)
The Soviet Union 1968 CPA 3623 stamp (Venera 4 Space probe).jpg  

Venera 4 (Russian: Венера-4 meaning Venera 4), also designated 4V-1 No.310 was a probe in the Soviet Venera program for the exploration of Venus. The probe comprised an entry probe, designed to enter the Venus atmosphere and parachute to the surface, and a carrier/flyby spacecraft, which carried the entry probe to Venus and served as a communications relay for the entry probe.

In 1967, it was the first successful probe to perform in-place analysis of the environment of another planet. Venera 4 provided the first chemical analysis of the Venusian atmosphere, showing it to be primarily carbon dioxide with a few percents of nitrogen and below one percent of oxygen and water vapors. While entering the atmosphere it became the first spacecraft to survive entry into another planet's atmosphere.[4] The station detected a weak magnetic field and no radiation field. The outer atmospheric layer contained very little hydrogen and no atomic oxygen.[citation needed] The probe sent the first direct measurements proving that Venus was extremely hot, that its atmosphere was far denser than expected, and that it had lost most of its water long ago.


A model of the 1-meter diameter landing capsule of Venera 4 on display at the Memorial Museum of Cosmonautics in Moscow.

The main carrier spacecraft 4 stood 3.5 metres (11 ft) high, its solar panels spanned 4 metres (13 ft) and had an area of 2.5 square metres (27 sq ft). The carrier spacecraft included a 2 metres (6 ft 7 in) long magnetometer, an ion detector, a cosmic ray detector and an ultraviolet spectrometer capable of detecting hydrogen and oxygen gases. The devices were intended to operate until entry into the Venusian atmosphere. At that juncture, the station was designed to release the probe capsule and disintegrate. The rear part of the carrier spacecraft contained a liquid-fuel thruster capable of correcting the flight course. The flight program was planned to include two significant course corrections, for which purpose the station could receive and execute up to 127 different commands sent from the Earth.[5]

The front part of the carrier spacecraft contained a nearly spherical landing capsule 1 metre (3 ft 3 in) in diameter and weighing 383 kilograms (844 lb). Compared to previous (failed) Venera probes, the capsule contained an improved heat shield that could withstand temperatures up to 11,000 °C (19,800 °F). Instead of the previous liquid-based cooling design, a simpler and more reliable gas system was installed.[6] The durability of the capsule was checked by exposing it to high temperatures, pressures, and accelerations using three unique testing installations. The heat resistance was checked in a high-temperature vacuum system emulating the upper layers of the atmosphere.[7] The capsule was pressurized up to 25 atmospheres. (The surface pressure on Venus was unknown at the time. Estimates ranged from a few to hundreds of atmospheres).[8] Finally, it was subjected to accelerations of up to 450 g in a centrifuge. The centrifuge test caused cracking of electronic components and cable brackets, which were replaced shortly before launch. The timing for the launch was rather tight, so as not to miss the launch window — the days of the year when the path to the destination planet from Earth is energetically least demanding.[citation needed]

The capsule could float in case of a water landing. Considering the possibility of such a landing, its designers made the lock of the capsule using sugar;[5][7][9] it was meant to dissolve in liquid water, releasing the transmitter antennas. The capsule contained a newly developed vibration-damping system, and its parachute could resist temperatures up to 450 °C (723 K).[7]


The capsule was equipped with a rechargeable battery with a capacity sufficient for 100 minutes of powering the measurement and transmitter systems. To avoid becoming discharged during the flight to Venus, the battery was kept charged using the solar panels of the carrier spacecraft. Before the launch, the entire Venera 4 station was sterilized to prevent possible biological contamination of Venus.[6]


Two nominally identical 4V-1 probes were launched in June 1967. The first probe, Venera 4, was launched on 12 June by a Molniya-M carrier rocket flying from the Baikonur Cosmodrome.[2] A course correction was performed on 29 July when it was 12 million km away from Earth; otherwise, the probe would have missed Venus. Although two such corrections had been planned, the first one was accurate enough and therefore the second correction was canceled. On 18 October 1967, the spacecraft entered the Venusian atmosphere with an estimated landing place near 19°N 38°E﻿ / ﻿19°N 38°E﻿ / 19; 38.[5] The second probe, Kosmos 167, was launched on 17 June but failed to depart low Earth orbit.[10]


Radar altimeter[]

The altitude of the Venera probe relative to the surface was measured using a radar altimeter operating at 770 MHz. The altimeter had an integer ambiguity of 30 km: that is, the same radar signal would be given at an altitude of X, X plus 30 km, X plus 60 km, etc.[12] (an effect known as "aliasing"). At the time the distance of the cloud tops above the surface was not known, and due to this ambiguity, the first radar return, now believed to be at an actual altitude of about 55 kilometres (34 mi), was initially misinterpreted as 26 kilometres (16 mi). Therefore, based on the misinterpreted radar results, the Soviet team initially announced the probe descended to the surface.[13][14] This result was quickly dismissed as inconsistent with the planetary diameter measured by radar,[15][16] and the pressure readings by the capsule were much lower than predicted by the recently developed models of the Venus atmosphere.[6][7]


For the first time, in situ analysis of the atmosphere of another planet was performed and the data sent back to Earth; the analysis included chemical composition, temperature, and pressure. The measured ratio of carbon dioxide to nitrogen of about 13 corrected the previous estimates so much (an inverse ratio was expected in some quarters) that some scientists contested the observations. The main station detected no radiation belts; relative to Earth, the measured magnetic field was 3000 times weaker, and the hydrogen corona was 1000 times less dense. No atomic oxygen was detected. All the data suggested that water if it had been present, had leaked from the planet long before. This conclusion was unexpected considering the thick Venusian clouds. Because of the negligible humidity, the sugar lock system, employed on Venera 4 in case of a water landing, was abandoned in subsequent Venus probes.[6][5]

The mission was considered a complete success, especially given several previous failures of Venera probes.[6] Although the Venera 4 design did allow for data transmission after landing, the Venera 3–6 probes were not built to withstand the pressures at the Venusian surface. The first successful soft landing on Venus was achieved by Venera 7 in 1970.[17]

See also[]


  1. ^ Wade, Mark. "Venera 1V (V-67)". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Retrieved 9 November 2019.
  3. ^ "Venera 4". NASA Space Science Data Coordinated Archive. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  4. ^ Siddiqi 2018, p. 1.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Harvey, Brian (2007). Russian planetary exploration. Springer. pp. 98–101. ISBN 978-0-387-46343-8.
  6. ^ a b c d e f "Venera 4". NPO Lavochkina (in Russian). Retrieved 19 October 2020.
  7. ^ a b c d Ulivi & Harland 2007, pp. 55–56.
  8. ^ Vakhnin, V. M. (1968). "A Review of the Venera 4 Flight and Its Scientific Program". J. Atmos. Sci. 25 (4): 533–534. Bibcode:1968JAtS...25..533V. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1968)025<0533:AROTVF>2.0.CO;2.
  9. ^ Photo of the lock. novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru, 18 February 2005.
  10. ^ "Cosmos 167". NASA Space Science Data Coordinated Archive.
  11. ^ Ulivi & Harland 2007, p. 63.
  12. ^ Mitchell, Don P. (2003). "Plumbing the Atmosphere of Venus". Mentallandscape. Retrieved 8 December 2017.
  13. ^ Reese, D. E.; Swan, P. R. (1968). "Venera 4 probes atmosphere of venus". Science. 159 (3820): 1228–30. Bibcode:1968Sci...159.1228R. doi:10.1126/science.159.3820.1228. JSTOR 1723876. PMID 17814841. S2CID 32723831.
  14. ^ Vakhnin, V. M. (1968). "A Review of the Venera 4 Flight and Its Scientific Program". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 25 (4): 533–534. Bibcode:1968JAtS...25..533V. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1968)025<0533:AROTVF>2.0.CO;2.
  15. ^ Ash, M. E.; Campbell, D. B.; Dyce, R. B.; Ingalls, R. P.; Jurgens, R.; Pettengill, G. H.; Shapiro, I. I.; Slade, M. A.; Thompson, T. W. (1968). "The case for the radar radius of venus". Science. 160 (3831): 985–7. Bibcode:1968Sci...160..985A. doi:10.1126/science.160.3831.985. PMID 17768889. S2CID 128460735.
  16. ^ Eshleman, V. R.; Fjeldbo, G.; Anderson, J. D.; Kliore, A.; Dyce, R. B. (1968). "Venus: Lower atmosphere not measured". Science. 162 (3854): 661–5. Bibcode:1968Sci...162..661E. doi:10.1126/science.162.3854.661. PMID 17736042. S2CID 24923659.
  17. ^ Siddiqi 2018, p. 3.

Cited sources[]