My Photo

The Out Campaign

Atheist Blogroll

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 05/2005

« Why Religion Is Like Fanfic | Main | How I Write Porn »


Laura Upstairs

AIDS denialists, sigh...


So what's Duesberg's excuse? He was around in the '80s and must remember what it was like.

Greta Christina

"So what's Duesberg's excuse?"

Straight-up Galileo Fallacy, I'm assuming.

Also he's a douchebag.


Duesberg's excuse is that it's his only way to get any recognition in his field.

I love to argue, but there are some things that I resent even being asked to argue about: evolution vs. "intelligent design", Holocaust denial, the 9/11 "truthers", people who believe that the world is run by extraterrestrial reptoids disguised as Jews....

And then there's these people. I am old enough to remember the first days of AIDS, albeit barely. I was in high school when ACT/UP was hitting the streets, and the full force of all the death in the gay communities didn't really touch me. But I did become aware of sex and death at the same time, and how closely those two could be linked. I also remember AZT, and how people could die from that faster than from the disease itself.

And maybe it's that memory that resonates somewhere deep in the collective memory of the HIV-deniers, rather than the horror of the die-offs. After all, we got screwed once by the pharmacy companies, why should we trust them now?

But I think that there's something else pushing the HIV deniers. I think the attraction of conspiracies like this is much the same as the attraction of believing in gods and devils as the source of disease, even when the evidence tells you otherwise. Which, really, would you like to believe? That AIDS is the result of deliberate, calculated malice motivated by greed? Or that it arose accidentally out of inchoate forces of nature alternately working against and with one another?

The former option may be horrible, but it's not as scary as the latter for most people. It at least implies that there's a controlling force behind all this horror and pain and death, and if only we can overcome the malice focusing that force for evil, then we can control it ourselves -- for good.

The latter is, to most people, a horrible thing that they don't want to deal with: there was no meaning, right or wrong, behind the pain and deaths of those people. It was not malice on the part of nature, but just the way things happen.

Conspiracy theories are the mythology of the modern era. They're the way that people impose order on a world that seems out of control. The hateful, omnipotent powers that they invent might be scary, but not as terrifying as chaos.


Thanks for sending me the link Greta, it's a great essay and raises an important point about a source of denialism. I've linked you from denialism blog.

Tony P

It is sad that we're going to see the epidemic of HIV and AIDS happen all over again because people forget their history.

I lived through it in the late 80's. It was horrible and I lost 3 good friends to the disease.

Another friend of mine has lost dozens of friends.

But it'll happen again because people in the U.S. seem to have the memory span of a gnat.

The Ridger

I was 7 when the Sabin vaccine was licensed for use, and we - my brothers and sisters and I - went to the local elementary school to stand in line for hours to get one of those magic sugar cubes. I was too young to really understand polio - my brother, who was 13, remembers the fear much better than I. But what I do remember - so clearly for such an early memory - is the emotions of all those mothers standing in the hot sun on the playground waiting in line - the overwhelming gratitude and relief and joy. My little brother was 4 and remembers nothing of those days.

You're absolute right about memory and the lack thereof.

Chris is also right about why people love conspiracy theories, I think; random is so hard to deal with.


I posted a link to this on my LiveJournal. Wonderful essay!

Jane Know

Great article. Coincidentally, I was just thinking about writing an article on the same subject. But now I don't have to. :-)


Very good post Greta.

What is relaly unconscionable is people like South African president Thabo Mbeki who promote bogus cures for AIDS and who publicly question and cast doubt on HIV being the cause of AIDS. Especially for the people in his own country who might not know any better, when they hear such nonsense from an authority figure such as him, the consequences can be deadly.

Jon Berger

I've got to say, whatever you may think about the morals, ethics, and business practices of so-called Big Pharma, there's this little pill I take every day, and when I take it, my blood pressure goes down to normal. That's pretty fuckin' amazing, when you think about it. I put a little piece of crunchy stuff in my mouth, swallow it, and poof, I have normal blood pressure, and will therefore have the opportunity to die of something other than a heart attack or a stroke. My parents, both of whom had chronic hypertension from about age 30, lived to 86 and 92 due to this class of wonder drugs. I really appreciate this. Honestly. Thank you, pharmaceutical industry. It's just very hard for me to think about all the bad stuff they do -- which they do, and I don't mean to say that I'm unaware of it -- without also thinking that some of the good stuff they do is pretty miraculous.

To say nothing about the fact that they solved a scientific puzzle that's been around even longer than the one about turning lead into gold: they invented an actual, functional, working aphrodisiac. Well, semi-functional; it only works for men. But still, damn. Humanity has been working on this one since about 3,000 B.C., and within my lifetime, we did it. Jokes about Bob Dole and Mycoxafailin and so forth notwithstanding, that's pretty cool, in the grand scheme of things.


Chris: what you're describing is called the "just world" view. It's quite pernicious because it implies that bad things only happen to bad people (or to good people who lapse). It's also the cause of the belief that if people just "lived in harmony with nature" or "got closer to the land" life would be so much better; it views "nature" as a nurturing mother.

Jon: no aphrodisiacs (substances that create sexual desire) have yet been invented. ED drugs don't make men horny; they just make the "plumbing" respond better to already-existing sexual desire.


It's hard to believe that people actually do deny that HIV is real. I missed out on the 80's epidemic - I was fairly young, and it simply was not an issue in rural NH given that the number of homosexuals there could have fit in one bar. Oh, yeah, we did actually all fit in one bar. But I dated a couple of guys - one who found out he was HIV pos (thank god for condoms) and another who had it and told me up front after a few dates. It's been over 15 years now since I was with them, so they're quite possibly gone now (I lost touch wnen I moved across country) but I will never forget Shawn... he had just made an AIDS quilt for his father when he found out and he had to think about making one for himself.

So denialists, don't fool yourselves. Really. The Earth isn't flat, the sun does not revolve around the Earth, and Republicans really DO NOT have your best interests in mind. No Santa either.



Great article!
Thanks for sending the links. What a horrible disease!

Timothy B

I remember living in San Francisco years ago and constantly being bombarded with denialist propaganda through Act Up San Francisco, after they jumped the shark from AIDS activism. What is sad is that many of those people from ACT UP SF are now dead because they refused these meds which have helped to prolong and improve life for many, many people.
Sad that people would rather listen to them than to reason..

Greta Christina

Too true, Timothy. And what's really, *really* sad is that ACT UP San Francisco didn't used to be a denialist group. ACT UP San Francisco used to be the people lying in the streets demanding treatment: demanding shorter trials for drugs, demanding lowered prices on drugs, demanding that the drugs be tested on women as well as men, etc. The hijacking of ACT UP San Francisco by AIDS denialists is a fucking tragedy.


Yeah, we should have kicked the denialists out when we had the chance. But it turned out that there was no room in our process to eject insane, abusive members. And boy is that a lesson learned the hard way.


It's heartening to see somone put this out on the table. As an AIDS survivor, I know the drugs are really lifesavers. The combinations have also improved dramatically, offering a much better quality of life, and much better effectiveness. However, they are far too expensive. Thanks for the thoughtful column!


I used to work for Duesberg, back in the late '80s and very early '90s. He is indeed a douchebag, though that is insulting a perfectly useful tool, IMO. He's a peacock and a man of small stature with over-grandiose ideas about himself. While I worked for him, his wife divorced him and keyed his Mercedes with obscene words. He drove at least one secretary to the brink of suicide (not me, though I was in tears often enough), and my husband to scream "fuck you!" into the phone when he called looking for the location of a file at 8am on a Saturday morning. He's racist, sexist, and homophobic and gives his fellow Germans a bad name (used to tell racist jokes in German in front of me, assuming I couldn't understand him--I'm white, BTW, so he probably thought I'd "naturally" agree with him). I spent nearly three years of my life working for the man, reading and re-reading every word he wrote, and in that time he never convinced me of the validity of his "theories," which are all "gedunkenexperiments"--thought experiments and "literature reviews." His research field is carcinogenesis, and he's never done a lick of actual HIV research (laboratory or clinical) in his life, AFAIK. Anyone who believes his poppycock is a fool and not to be trusted, IMNSHO.

Thanks for a good post. (Over here via The Rotund and RioIriri's post in "The Fatosphere".)

Fausto Intilla


The key to creating a vaccination lies in knowing which parts of the pathogen to target with which antibodies. A new study by David Heckerman and colleagues from Massachusetts General Hospital, publishing in PLoS Computational Biology, has come up with a way to match pathogens to their antibodies.
At the core of the human immune response is the train-to-kill mechanism in which specialized immune cells are sensitized to recognize small peptides from foreign pathogens (e.g., HIV). Following this sensitization, these cells are then activated to kill cells that display this same peptide. However, for sensitization and killing to occur, the pathogen peptide must be "paired up" with one of the infected person's other specialized immune molecules--an HLA (human leukocyte antigen) molecule. The way in which pathogen peptides interact with these HLA molecules defines if and how an immune response will be generated.
Heckerman's model uses ELISpot assays to identify HLA-restricted epitopes, and which HLA alleles are responsible for which reactions towards which pathogens. The data generated about the immune response to pathogens fills in missing information from previous studies, and can be used to solve a variety of similar problems.
The model was applied to data from donors with HIV, and made 12 correct predictions out of 16. This study, says David Heckerman, has "significant implications for the understanding of...vaccine development." The statistical approach is unusual in the study of HLA molecules, and could lead the way to developing an HIV vaccine.
Citation: Listgarten J, Frahm N, Kadie C, Brander C, Heckerman D (2007) A statistical framework for modeling HLA-dependent T cell response data. PLoS Comput Biol 3(10): e188. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030188
Note: This story has been adapted from material provided by Public Library of Science.

Fausto Intilla


I find this stuff really depressing. I joined ACT/UP in 1990 in Norman, Oklahoma. I remember back then all the rednecks who sincerely believed that AIDs was spontaneously created by two gay men having sex and that straight people were immune. It still makes me sad.

Denialists flabbergast me. MY inner paranoid conspiracy theorist wants to scream that denialists are plants by right-wing agenda groups because misinformation is an excellent way to murder your political opponents. More rationally though, I suspect denialists are a degeneration of the idea that drug companies aren't looking for a 'cure' because continual regiment for the rest of your life is more profitable.

Still. It makes me very sad. I feel like we somehow failed in providing HIV/AIDS education back in the early 90s. Putting myself at physical risk by standing up and debating the CCC (Campus Crusade for Christ) when they presented mis-information about the risk of 'safer-sex' now seems like it was pointless. :(

Rachel Waghorn

I just have a few things to say.
Would I be wrong in assuming that doctors, scienists and drug companies lie. Years ago when we here of polio, measles, even ebola virus etc.... How do these diseases really measure up to what we have today? Should we always believe a doctors diagnosis? Just because they say we have something wrong with us, doesn't mean we have to believe them and use there prescribed treatment. This here is when you get a second, third maybe even fourth opinion. Example : You have tonsilitis? Take these pills. Could these simple pills "penicilin" contain cancer causing agents in themselves? Or maybe something else?
How did people get over the common cold years ago? How did they get over tonsilitis? Did they all die?
Don't you see. You have been made blind by your own narrow mindedness. Open your eyes, rise to the challenge? Think with your own mind and not the TV or newspapers antics about bullshit!! You might actually learn something.
And whatever happened to the cure for AIDS? We are supposed to have it available by 2010 but hey... They said that back in 2002 and have we heard a peep since? NO!! We as humans create our own diseases. Of course we can cure it!! The world is run by people who are out to kill, hurt and intimidate. It's about Power.. Playing God, as they say? Please think before you make your final judgements.

Greta Christina

Thank you for sharing, Rachel.


I have a friend who spent most of her teenage years feeling like crap. Many of her concerns were dismissed by her doctor, who ignored how she really felt and what sorts of treatments were working. She decided to take matters into her own hands and went on a low-sugar diet. Which turned out to work, since most of her problems stemmed from her untreated type II diabetes.
All well and good - until she decided to become a raw-foods only vegan, on the grounds that conventional medecine had done nothing but fail her so she might as well throw it out completely in favour of so-called "alternative therapies". She's constantly sick, even more tired than before she cut sugar out, and generally listless.
In short - no, doctors aren't always right, but discarding scientific inquiry entirely will fix nothing.


Rachel - You have the legal right to refuse medical treatment. You don't even have to go to doctors at all if you don't want to. Just don't blame them when you're dying.

Timothy (TRiG)

Ben Goldacre is fascinating (as usual) on this subject.




Nikki B.

Wonderful. Amazing essay. Horrible how so many people can be so freaking unaware of how horrible the world is becoming. Must be because of the Republican-run media.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe/ Donate to This Blog!

Books of mine

Greta on SSA Speakers Bureau


Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Powered by Rollyo

Some Favorite Posts and Conversations: Atheism

Some Favorite Posts and Conversations: Sex

Some Favorite Posts: Art, Politics, Other Stuff