Over the past few months I've appeared on some radio talk shows and once or twice in those shows' dedicated chat rooms, discussing my books. One question that seems to recur whenever I am interviewed about my Weapon Hypothesis for the Great Pyramid is, Does it still work? Could it be reactivated by someone? or variations on that theme.

Usually my answer on those occasions has been something like this: "No, for the simple reason that many of the internal components of the machine/weapon are missing, either through removal or destruction." That, unfortunately, is the short answer, the sort of answer one gives under the time constraints of talk shows.

The "long answer" is somewhat different, and answering it requires the care of a soldier or warship negotiating a cunningly laid mine field. And like everything else in the Weapon Hypothesis, it is a highly speculative answer. In a nutshell, what remains of the Great Weapon at Giza, the current Great Pyramid, is but a shell, a part of that awesome and very ancient machine. As Dunn and I have pointed out, it is naturally resonant to the Schumann cavity resonance of the earth. This means that, in some sense, it is still functioning.

Since it stands, like many other megalithic structures, at a crucial "nodal" point on the well-known "world grid", we may speculate a bit as to what sorts of functions it may still be exhibiting. Recall that noted scientist and inventor Buckminster Fuller performed a series of experiments with balloons in water, balloons which had been coated with special paints. These were then submerged in water tanks and bombarded by waves of various frequencies, with the result that certain interference patterns arose on the surface of the balloons, patterns much like the celebrated "world grid". The patterns were caused by the standing waves set up in the water and balloons, suggesting that a similar "standing wave" phenomenon might underlie the phenomenon of the world grid. If so, we then recall the similar experiments of Tesla to establish whether or not the earth itself was capable of sustaining such standing waves. The answer, of course, was yes, but this raises the problem: standing waves require regular and regulated input of pulses in order to establish them. Could this be one surviving function of the Pyramid? Possibly, but no known mechanism currently exists in the structure to indicate it might be the source of such standing waves and their resulting grid patterns on the earth's surface.

But the shell of the machine is still there, and if various reports of people who have visited it are true, it is still doing something, from interferring with electrical equipment on airplanes, to giving off pale blue glow in some conditions, to giving people strange states of consciousness and "visions" (only recall Napoleon Bonaparte's strange visitation to the structure, an experience he refused to talk about).

This last reported phenomenon - that of having altered emotions or states of consciousness - might itself be a clue to one ongoing function. As I outline in the third book of the Giza Death Star trilogy, The Giza Death Star Destroyed, one aspect of the type of "scalar" physics it might have utilized would have involved a heavy reliance or influence upon consciousness. No less than Lt. Col. Tom Bearden (US Army, Ret), and long-time proponent and researcher of "scalar" physics, has indicated the strong connection to consciousness of this type of physics, and the ability of scalar physics to effect and/or alter various states of consciousness and biological well- or ill-being. This is highly speculative, to be sure, but it is worth mentioning: might all the reports of "channeled messages" and "higher consciousness" that so often make the rounds in alternative literature stem not from some exotic, "extra-terrestrial" or even "spiritual" source, but from a far more mundane, though no less exotic, a terrestrial source? Might it stem from the shell of an ancient machine and weapon, still quietly functioning in ways we can scarcely imagine?

As for reactivating the machine and restoring it to its ultimate planet- and region-busting potential, the short answer remains: No, it is not possible, unless its original builders, or someone who had preserved their original knowledge and technological sophistication, were to reconstitute its missing components, reinstall them, and refurbish the Pyramid itself to its original state. (My thanks to Sesh Heri, and to Kelly K. for bringing some of these points to my attention.)


  1. The interesting thing about a pyramid, if it is true that it is functioning as a “horn”, is that the “high impedance” end is pointed toward the cosmos. A horn, whether electrical or mechanical, takes energy input in a high-energy-low-motion-per-particle mode and redistributes the energy over a larger number of (air) particles and results in less per-particle energy and greater individual particle motion. This is roughly analogous to an electrical transformer, of which the Tesla coil is a family member. Electrical power that is high in voltage and low in current is in high impedance mode. Tesla noted during his experimentation with his namesake transformers that the primary seemed to work better when a non-uniform coil radius was used. I used the term non-uniform rather than helical, as a helix does not necessarily diminish in outside diameter. A helix that follows the form of a conic section would. Tesla used a primary that would start with, say, a first turn diameter of 12 inches, followed by 10 on the second, 8 on the third and so on. It is interesting to speculate on whether the same physics would be in play in solid materials that were hosting non-electrical energy. What happens when energy is inserted along the pyramid base in electro-acoustic (piezoelectric) (8Hz) form when measured at the apex? Could the impedance at the tip be sufficiently high to cause transcendental effects, time/space distortions?

  2. Dr. Farrell,

    Speaking of piezoelectric transducers, they are the subject of interest that sparked one of my first insights and theories about higher dimensions. I’m an electronics guy, and electrical theory abounds with concepts about electrical signals from differing sources being combined in a single “wire” and the resultant cancellation and additions of the combined signals (Fourier theory). At the time, I was reading about SAW (Surface Acoustic Wave ) filter theory, where complex filter response curve shapes can be created in quartz wafers by carefully designed internal reflections. While superficially this is what seems to happen, it is common”‘knowledge” that matter/energy (one and the same according to Einstein) can neither be created or destroyed. For signals of opposite phase to “zero” to nothing, therefore is impossible. For it to seem to do so, would require shifting the resultant to another dimensional orientation where it is simply not electrical anymore. To me, it doesn’t seem like too much of a stretch to suggest that acoustic excitation of huge limestone blocks, which do have piezoelectric properties like quartz, at the proper frequency and insertion vector, could create standing waves capable of scalar effects, i.e. antigravity, to occur. This notion came to me in primitive form independently years ago, but my reading of Bearden, and some of your material have reinforced and sophisticated my initial thoughts. I remain spellbound as to what all of this (re)developing technology portends. Thank you for the fine work you do.

  3. I notice that the pyramids on Mars are not four sided. I had speculated
    that there might be something about Earth that makes the four sided
    form necessary, and on Mars the other side counts.

    But in Serbia and in Bosnia, there are overgrown three sided pyramids.
    the Serbian one is connected with wierd wizard legends and black magic.

    I doubt these represent importation of Egyptian technology and practices,
    because they are not four sided. All the Egyptian pyramids are four sided,
    aren’t they?

    There is also a pyramid in Australia, dismissed as a local farmer’s work, but
    in the 1800s Gympie Gold Rush it was the object of tear down for building
    purposes, which would have reduced it a lot. Some cover up seems evident,
    probably to avoid the idea that the Aborigines could have had anything to do
    with it.

  4. About the physical attributes of the Giza Pyramids

    TUBA. A Tuba is an acoustic musical instrument. With the lips, a low power vibration is created at the mouth-piece, the vibrations travel through the “waveguide” of the tubing, and emerge as a greatly amplified and coherent blast of sound.

    Think of the Pyramids as TUBAS with the “mouth-piece” at the apex.

    The Ancients used the form as a “waveguide” and other amplification techniques inside, to pump large volume and highly amplified sound waves into the Earth.

    The opposite side of the Earth from the Pyramids, on the inside, is a parabolic dish. It functions just like the satellite dish receiver for the TV. The sound waves are reflected and FOCUSED into a, once again, hugely amplified coherent acoustic wave form that can be calculated to “hit” any place on the Earth’s surface in the direction of wave-travel.

    Pump enough energy into the “mouth-piece,” top of the pyramid, and you can destroy matter in the target zone from the inside -out.

    3 Pyramids operating at the same time produces interference zones between, with harmonics that once again amplifies the power of the acoustic waves.

    Sound makes Brown’s gas. Prove it to yourself by reviewing the video at:

    Sound created CAVITATION releasing the power of the VACUUM.

    Use piezoelectric transducer on a sphere of water to make Brown’s Gas real cheap.

    Since it stands, like many other megalithic structures, at a crucial “nodal” point on the well-known “world grid”,”

    Question. In the event of a crustal displacement, would this take it off of
    the nodal point? or just put it on a new one? I suppose that would depend
    on whether or not the grid is surface only or mostly, or whether it is based
    more deeply, and the surface position of grid lines and nodes reflects the
    deeper point(s) of origin.

    1. Good questions, but I think the crustal displacement idea, notwithstanding Einstein’s endoresement of Hapgood’s idea, is a bit much. THe nodal points arise as intersections of standing waves, so it would have to be the wave configuration itself that changes.

      1. IF such a displacement occurred, would it disrupt the wave
        configuration, slide along underneath or past it in some way,
        leaving the wave pattern intact, but the locations on earth
        it paralleled to different than now, or would it travel with the
        crust, changing its relationship only to the core, not to the
        earth’s surface?

  6. Joseph P. Farrell

    Thanks for your comment Whiteacre, and thanks for visiting my website! Of course, you’re quite correct to make this observation. A coil IS a helix, so no, the analogy I was trying to draw fails on that point. While it’s difficult for me to recall exactly what my process of reasoning was when I drew the analogy so many years after writing the book, I believe that my point was to draw the analogy to Tesla’s experiments and to how his coils functioned as wave guides to an “electro-acoustic” wave that moved over the surface of his coils, rather than through the wound helix. So I suppose that the best way of putting it is that I was trying to draw an analogy rather than an actual identity or correspondence. I write more on this analogical way of thinking in the Giza Death Star Destroyed.
    One final idea strikes me as I’m writing this, and that it that IF – and it is a mighty BIG if – we ARE looking at some sort of scalar “Tesla” technology in the Great Pyramid, then its builders may have discovered that a helical design for a “coil” made of non-linear materials was not necessary. THAT idea, though, is a stretch.
    THanks again for the excellent observation!

  7. I’ve read ‘Giza Death Star’ and ‘GDS Deployed’ and am acquiring ‘GDS Destroyed’. So I am intrigued, obviously. Yet, this is the least persuasive thing I have read: that the courses of the Great Pyramid correspond to the geometry and function of an induction coil. A coil is a helix, the courses of the GP, as far as we know, are parallel slices of limestone. How can the geometry be two things at once?

Comments are closed.