{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03062200956937799, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024880382775119617, 'mean_word_length': 5.680511182108626, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Clinical analysis of carotid artery stenting with severe stenosis and extracranial distortion under proximal protection technique].

Objective: To investigate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of endovascular reconstruction of the carotid artery with severe stenosis and extracranial distortion under proximal protection. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 21 patients with severe carotid stenosis and extracranial distortion who were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2011 and August 2017, of which 16 patients were symptomatic stenosis with acute ischemic stroke. All the patients were treated with carotid artery stenting under (CAS) proximal protection technique, and assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) before the treatment and hospital discharge. The clinical outcome and vascular morphology were followed-up regularly after the treatment. Results: Twenty-one patients were successfully completed the CAS procedure under the proximal protection technique, the average blocking time was 241.0 (232.5-261.0) seconds. Nine patients received 1block attempt, 6 patients received 2 block attempts, and the other 6 patients received 3 block attempts. Three patients experienced transient ischemic attack (TIA) during the procedure, the maximum duration of TIA was 10 minutes. In 16 patients with symptomatic stenosis, there were no significant differences in NIHSS score before CAS procedure and hospital discharge (P>0.05). The residual stenosis rate of the carotid artery after stenting was(13±6)%, compared with preoperative (87±16)%, which appeared a significant difference (t=19.948, P<0.05). All the patients had no adverse events such as myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemic stroke and death in the follow-up period. Restenosis was assessed in 6 patients by DSA or CTA and no restenosis was found. Conclusion: Endovascular reconstruction of the carotid artery with severe stenosis and extracranial distortion under proximal protection technique has been proven as a safe and effective therapy.