{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015849056603773583, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.46829268292683, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Efficacy of non-fumigant nematicides against Meloidogyne javanica as affected by soil temperature under pasteurized and natural soil condition.

BACKGROUND
Biotic and abiotic factors such as microbes and soil temperature can affect nematicide efficacy. Two experiments were conducted to test the effect of three soil temperatures on the efficacy of non-fumigant nematicides (fluopyram, fluensulfone, oxamyl and fluazaindolizine) against Meloidogyne javanica in pasteurized and natural soil in planta.


RESULTS
The results showed that all tested nematicides were more efficacious in pasteurized than in natural soil. Temperature affected the nematicides differently with no effect of soil temperature on oxamyl and fluazaindolizine while fluopyram and fluensulfone had greater efficacy at higher soil temperatures.


CONCLUSION
Temperature effects were noted for some but not all non-fumigant nematicides. Fluopyram and fluensulfone were less effective when applied in cold soil, whereas oxamyl and fluazaindolizine were not affected by soil temperature. While all nematicides resulted in almost complete control of M. javanica in pasteurized soil, this was not the case in natural soil, and much more root damage and nematode reproduction was noted in the latter. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.