{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03644158628081458, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.719424460431655, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (S-ICD) Electrode Fracture: Follow-up, Troubleshooting and Evaluation

Introduction: The subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) and its electrode were developed to avoid long-term complications of transvenous leads in the vasculature. Methods: We report a case of unexpected, inappropriate S-ICD shocks due to oversensing of high amplitude, non-physiologic, electrical noise artifacts that were not preceded by high impedance alerts or sensing electrogram noise detections. Results: Following explant, high-magnification, X-ray imaging of the S-ICD electrode demonstrated partial fracture of the distal sensing conductor located near a short radius bend in the electrode at the electrode-header interface. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of a potential for fatigue failure fracture of the S-ICD electrode. Recommendations for systematic S-ICD follow-up and troubleshooting are discussed.