{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023017902813299233, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0034100596760443308, 'mean_word_length': 4.811881188118812, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Double-lumen esophagus: formation of a new lumen or septation of the existing one?

Presented here are two cases in which two esophageal lumens were identified at endoscopy. One patient had a history of antireflux surgery and both patients had received esophageal dilations. Both patients have done poorly with standard esophageal dilation and are not considered likely to gain from surgery. The mechanism of formation of the second lumen is not certain in Case 1, but in Case 2 a self-contained perforation appears to be the likely mechanism. There is no clear definition of "double-lumen esophagus" in the literature. The term is used at times interchangeably with esophagogastric fistula. We propose that the phrase "double-lumen esophagus" is a morphologic description and should be used only when the two lumens are of nearly equal diameter. The term "fistula" should be used whenever that is the likely mechanism. Hence, Case 1 of our report is the true double-lumen esophagus, while Case 2 is an esophagogastric fistula. Since patients do poorly with standard dilation, newer endoscopic modalities may have a role in the management of these rare but difficult cases.