{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0320981634974809, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010970258410531447, 'mean_word_length': 5.453592029365495, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Hornblendite delineates zones of mass transfer through the lower crust

Geochemical signatures throughout the layered Earth require significant mass transfer through the lower crust, yet geological pathways are under-recognized. Elongate bodies of basic to ultrabasic rocks are ubiquitous in exposures of the lower crust. Ultrabasic hornblendite bodies hosted within granulite facies gabbroic gneiss of the Pembroke Valley, Fiordland, New Zealand, are typical occurrences usually reported as igneous cumulate hornblendite. Their igneous features contrast with the metamorphic character of their host gabbroic gneiss. Both rock types have a common parent; field relationships are consistent with modification of host gabbroic gneiss into hornblendite. This precludes any interpretation involving cumulate processes in forming the hornblendite; these bodies are imposter cumulates. Instead, replacement of the host gabbroic gneiss formed hornblendite as a result of channeled high melt flux through the lower crust. High melt/rock ratios and disequilibrium between the migrating magma (granodiorite) and its host gabbroic gneiss induced dissolution (grain-scale magmatic assimilation) of gneiss and crystallization of mainly hornblende from the migrating magma. The extent of this reaction-replacement mechanism indicates that such hornblendite bodies delineate significant melt conduits. Accordingly, many of the ubiquitous basic to ultrabasic elongate bodies of the lower crust likely map the ‘missing’ mass transfer zones.


Results
Granulite facies two-pyroxene-hornblende gabbroic gneiss (pale rock, Fig. 1a), with ubiquitous garnet granulite reaction zones (Fig. 1b), is the main rock type exposed [7][8][9] . The gneissosity is defined by elongate clusters of pyroxene and hornblende within a plagioclase matrix. All minerals display evidence of dynamic recrystallisation including undulose extinction, presence of subgrains and a bimodal grain size distribution. Reaction zones are directly associated with felsic dykes which cut the gabbroic gneiss forming a distinct rectilinear grid pattern (Fig. 1b). In reaction zones, garnet grains partially to completely pseudomorph the gneissosity (Fig. 2a) 7,8 . This grid pattern of garnet granulite reaction zones provides unique markers. Reaction zones may be traced from the  gabbroic gneiss (Fig. 1b) across a narrow (2-7 m wide) transition zone (Fig. 1c) into 30-40 m wide bodies of hornblendite (Fig. 1c,d) that are hosted by the gabbroic gneiss (Fig. 1a). The garnet granulite reaction zones change along strike into garnet trains variably surrounded by plagioclase (red arrow, Fig. 1c) or hornblende (white arrow, Fig. 1c) and are continuous with garnetite stringers (< 5 cm wide) in the hornblendite (Fig. 1c,d).
Hornblendite bodies have highly irregular boundaries (dark rock, Fig. 1a), and may contain patches rich in clinozoisite (Fig. 1c,d) and/or large euhedral garnet (< 10 cm across). Within the hornblendite, stringers of garnetite occur in a grid pattern (Fig. 1d) closely resembling the pattern made by garnet granulite reaction zones in the gabbroic gneiss. Garnetite stringers are locally folded and/or dismembered. Metre-scale areas of pegmatitic plagioclase-hornblende-garnet occur within the hornblendite with euhedral mineral grain sizes up to 10 cm (Fig. 1e).
The narrow transition zone between the host gabbroic gneiss and hornblendite bodies is characterised by large garnet grains (< 10 cm across) surrounded by thin plagioclase rims, i.e. leucosome consistent with limited in situ partial melting of the host gneiss (< 0.5 cm across; yellow arrows, Fig. 1c). Across the transition zone, the gneissic foliation and garnet granulite reaction zones progressively change orientation to become subparallel to the boundary of the hornblendite bodies (Fig. 1c).
The continuity and progressive modification of the garnet granulite reaction zones in the host gabbroic gneiss, to garnetite stringers in the hornblendite, link the two contrasting rock types. In the following, the igneous character of the hornblendite bodies is contrasted with the metamorphic character of the host gabbroic gneiss.

Discussion
The igneous nature of the hornblendite unit is supported by the following features: (i) high mode of one or two minerals (hornblende ± clinozoisite or garnet) with unimodal grain size distribution and interlocking euhedral grain shapes; (ii) interstitial minor phases (plagioclase) with low dihedral angles, representing pseudomorphs of former melt 10,11 ; (iii) presence of domains exhibiting a shape preferred orientation of hornblende and clinozoisite grains while lacking microstructures typical of crystal plastic deformation; (iv) presence of small pockets rich in plagioclase and biotite, of approximate granodioritic composition 12 ; and (v) minor pegmatitic domains with very coarse, randomly oriented, interlocking euhedral grains. These characteristics are not only typical for an igneous ultrabasic rock but are also consistent with a cumulate origin. In contrast, the gabbroic gneiss that hosts the hornblendite (Fig. 1a) has tectono-metamorphic features such as a gneissic foliation, evidence of crystal plastic deformation at the grain scale, and well-studied metamorphic reaction textures 8,[13][14][15] .
The presence of a body with typical igneous character within a high-grade metamorphic gneiss, without a structural break, requires that the former is younger than its metamorphic host. The classic interpretation here would involve intrusion of the hornblendite into the metamorphic gneiss, for example as a dyke. However, this is inconsistent with the highly irregular boundaries of the hornblendite, and the mineral assemblage would require an unusual ultrabasic composition of the intruding body. Importantly, the physical continuity and progressive modification of metamorphic microstructures and assemblage of the garnet granulite reaction zones into the igneous microstructures and assemblage of the garnetite stringers precludes any interpretation involving dyke-like intrusion of the hornblendite bodies. Consequently, this focuses attention on the processes that can explain these intriguing relationships.
A viable option to explain both the field and petrographic relationships involves the modification (reaction replacement) of the host gabbroic gneiss to form hornblendite as a consequence of channeled high melt flux through the lower crust. In this case, the continuity of the pre-existing garnet granulite reaction zones and their modified counterparts (i.e. garnetite stringers) is explainable by extensive melt-rock interaction due to flux of an externally-derived hydrous silicate melt that is in disequilibrium with the gneiss it migrates through. Consequently, the hornblendite bodies represent "imposter cumulates" that delineate channels of mass transfer.
A model is proposed, in which the gabbroic gneiss and garnet granulite reaction zones in the host rock are progressively replaced during melt-rock interaction by hornblendite (± clinozoisite) and garnetite, respectively. The interaction involves (i) flux of an externally-derived hydrous silicate melt, (ii) dissolution (grain-scale magmatic assimilation) of host gneiss plagioclase and pyroxene, and (iii) crystallization of hornblende (± clinozoisite) and garnet from the migrating magma during channelized melt flow (Fig. 3). Two main stages in the development of hornblendite bodies can be distinguished, encompassing (i) melt flux of an externally-derived hydrous silicate melt in a high-strain zone, causing chemical and mineral assemblage modification of the host rock (metasomatism) due to extensive melt-rock interaction, and (ii) armored channelized melt flux with little further interaction (Fig. 3). The partial to complete reaction-replacement of host gneiss plagioclase and pyroxene in the first stage closely resembles the production of hornblendite from clinopyroxenite cumulate rocks documented in other arc settings 16 , where clinopyroxene-melt reaction produces hornblende as later melts are inferred to have ascended through the cumulate pile. A similar dissolution mechanism is proposed here, whereby hydrous silicate melts capable of precipitating hornblende (± clinozoisite) and garnet are fluxed through 30-40 m wide zones of lower crust (Fig. 3, stage 1). A reactive infiltration instability process is invoked, where one or more phases (plagioclase and pyroxene in this case) dissolve to enhance porosity and permeability, which enhances flow of the externally-derived hydrous silicate melt, and focuses porous flow within the channel [17][18][19] .
Scientific RepoRts | 6:31369 | DOI: 10.1038/srep31369 The localized strain observed within and at the margins of the hornblendite bodies suggest porous melt flow was facilitated and/or enhanced by localized deformation 20-23 which also increases the porosity and permeability of the melt flux zone. As the high melt flux event progresses, the minerals within the host rock that are in disequilibrium with the melt are completely dissolved via grain-scale magmatic assimilation. The crystallization of new phases (mainly hornblende) from the migrating melt locally produces an unreactive conduit. As a result, the channel becomes chemically armored and a large volume of melt can be transported through the channel without any further physical or chemical fingerprint (Fig. 3, Stage 2). Similar chemically isolated or armored conduits, where little to no reaction occurs between the migrating magma and surrounding rock, have been identified in a less hydrous and more mafic system in the mantle [17][18][19]24 . For this scenario, migration processes are well documented in experiments 25,26 and numerical models [27][28][29] . As our system wanes and the conduit cools, final crystallization produces minerals with small dihedral angles (Fig. 2d,f) and pockets of melt crystallize to form fine-grained biotite, hornblende, garnet and rutile in small plagioclase-rich domains (Fig. 2e), similar to the 'nanogranite' inclusions of Cesare et al. 30 . The mineral assemblage and modes in these domains are consistent with the fluxing melt being of intermediate (granodiorite) composition. In the final stages, pegmatitic garnet, plagioclase and hornblende crystallize (Fig. 1e).
Experimental research 31 shows that hornblende, clinozoisite, biotite, plagioclase and granodioritic magma are stable between T = ~675-720 °C and 8-11 wt.% H 2 O at 8 kbar. These conditions correspond to temperature estimates of metamorphism in high-P shear zones in the valley 14 , suggesting the lower crust was at appropriate P-T conditions for a migrating granodioritic melt to dissolve plagioclase and pyroxene of the host rock via grain-scale magmatic assimilation and crystallize the observed mineral assemblage of the hornblendite bodies. The migration of intermediate composition magma through the lower crust of a magmatic arc is likely to be common.
Our model indicates the protolith to an ultrabasic rock, ubiquitous in the lower crust, does not necessarily have to form by cumulate processes or intrusion of unusually basic to ultrabasic magmas. These rocks may in fact be the geological expression of localized channels of melt flux in the lower crust. While initially reactive, these channels soon armor melt migration from chemical modification during global redistribution of matter through the crust and are likely to be important for transport of metals to sites of economic concentration.
The conclusion that an ultrabasic body can form by flux of an externally-derived melt and melt-rock interaction, rather than cumulate processes, invites a reevaluation of the significance of basic to ultrabasic bodies in exposures of lower crust, emphasizes their importance in delineating zones of mass transfer, and therefore may help resolve the cryptic pathways of melt migration at depth.

Methods
Petrographic analysis of polished thin sections used a petrographic microscope in combination with the Virtual Petrographic Microscope 32 and ImageJ v1.48a, along with back-scatter electron (BSE) imaging performed on a Carl Zeiss IVO scanning electron microscope (SEM; high vacuum, 30 kV accelerating voltage; Geochemical Analysis Unit, Macquarie University).