{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023529411764705882, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001384083044982699, 'mean_word_length': 5.342105263157895, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Heterogeneity of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B as a function of growth stage: implications for surveillance of foods

Staphylococcus aureus was grown in a fermentor under controlled conditions of pH, oxygenation, and temperature, while the higher-molecular-weight products of its growth were continuously removed across ultrafiltration membranes. These products were examined by single and double gel diffusion and immunoelectrophoresis against a variety of available anti-enterotoxin B antisera. All antisera examined were polyvalent for S. aureus antigens. However, two electrophoretically distinct proteins were the major reactants with the antisera. One of these was present in early- to mid-log-phase cultures. After mid-log growth was achieved, both were present but in continuously changing proportions. This observation was repeated with a variety of growth conditions and media. A significant part of the physicochemical heterogeneity of enterotoxin B observed over the past 20 years is thus correlated with the growth phase of the organism. Taken together, these facts are used to argue for a two-step rationale for the detection of food-borne staphylococcal disease: (i) screening for a presumptive hazard by analysis for any antigen, toxin, or enzyme of S. aureus in a foodstuff and (ii) confirmation of the hazard by identifying the presence of an enterotoxin using a combination of physicochemical and serological techniques.