{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021791767554479417, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01694915254237288, 'mean_word_length': 5.048780487804878, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Default Patterns in Seven EU Countries: A Random Forest Approach

Abstract This study uses the relatively new “random forest” (RF) approach, which is based on decision-tree analysis by combining the results of a large set of decision trees. RFs have so far been little used for default prediction but offer an interesting alternative to well-established default prediction techniques. Based on accounting data from 945,062 observed European firms from seven countries in 2010 and 1,019,312 firms in 2011, we provide evidence on the country-specific default patterns. Because of the strong imbalance of the data sets with regard to the solvency status, standard RF implementations have to be modified to allow the estimation of realistic default propensities. We find that by far most accurate out-of-sample default propensities can be obtained for Italy followed by Portugal and Spain and the least accurate for the UK and Finland. The debt ratio, rate of return on sales, dynamic gearing ratio, and the rate of return on assets are found to be the most important variables for default prediction. The variable importance rankings are rather country specific, pointing to heterogeneity in the default patterns across the countries studied.