{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0213903743315508, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.6117647058823525, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Triple Helix Relations as Consensus-Building Arenas: Regulating Mechanisms and Political Design

Due to their high level of complexity, triple-helix relations can be regarded as consensus-building arenas. As self-regulated structures integrated by autonomous but interdependent actors (individuals and organizations), triple helix systems must reach consensual agreements and collectively make decisions on important matters, such as the nature of the problems that they will address and the way to solve them but also about the very rules for making decisions.