{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020579268292682928, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.097297297297297, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Investigation of the relationship between classical and nonclassical ultrasound nonlinearity parameters and microstructural mechanisms in metals.

This research studies two nonlinear ultrasound techniques: second harmonic generation and nonlinear resonant ultrasound spectroscopy, and the relationship to microstructural mechanisms in metals. The results show that there is a large change in both the classical, β, and nonclassical, α, ultrasound nonlinearity parameters in response to three specific microstructural mechanisms: precipitate growth in and along the grain boundaries, dislocations, and precipitate pinned dislocations. For example, both β and α increase with the growth of the precipitate radii (precipitate-pinned-dislocations). Additionally, both β and α increase when there is a growth of precipitates in and along the grain boundaries. As expected, β and α decrease when there is a removal of dislocations in the material. The relationship between β and α, and the microstructural mechanisms studied provide a quantitative understanding of the relationship between measured nonlinearity parameters and microstructural changes in metals, helping to demonstrate the possibility of using these two independent, but complementary, nonlinear ultrasound procedures to monitor microstructural damage.