{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030524220305242204, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021234240212342402, 'mean_word_length': 5.417021276595745, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Osseointegration of Sandblasted or Anodised Hydrothermally-Treated Titanium Implants: Mechanical, Histomorphometric and Bone Hardness Measurements

The improvement of the implant-bone interface is still an open problem in the long-term mechanical stability of cementless fixed implants. Mechanical, histomorphometric and bone hardness measurements were performed in sheep femoral cortical bone implants at 8 and 12 weeks from surgery to compare in vivo the osseointegration of titanium screws (Ø 3.5 mm × 7 mm length) with two different surface treatments: sandblasting with 70–100 μm HA followed by acid etching with HNO3 (Group A) and Ca-P anodization followed by a hydrothermal treatment (Group B). No significant differences were found for maximum push-out force and interfacial strength between groups at both experimental times. No significant difference was observed for Bone Ingrowth between groups at both experimental times, while the Affinity Index of Group B was significantly higher (7.5%, p<0.05) and lower (10.2%, p<0.05) than that of Group A at 8 and 12 weeks, respectively. Finally, a significant increase in bone microhardness measured within 200 μm from the interface and inside the thread depth of Group A was observed between the two experimental times (p<0.05). In conclusion, present findings show that osseointegration may be accelerated by adequate surface roughness and bioactive ceramic coating such as current tested treatments which enhance bone interlocking and mineralization.