{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019883040935672516, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00935672514619883, 'mean_word_length': 6.074380165289257, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Articles of Significant Interest Selected from This Issue by the Editors

Preharvest produce safety is challenging due to environmental factors that are difficult to modify. However, modifying in-field management practices may be a more feasible tool to minimize contamination risks. Strawn and colleagues (p. 7618 –7627) used fieldcollected data and statistical modeling to quantitatively identify which field-level management practices were associated with foodborne pathogen contamination in produce fields. Manure application, reported wildlife, worker activity, irrigation, soil cultivation, and buffer zone presence were identified as significant risk factors for Salmonella or Listeria monocytogenes contamination. These findings will assist growers in the implementation of preventive controls that may reduce the risk of preharvest contamination.