{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022119815668202765, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.144736842105263, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cultural creative economy and urban competitiveness: How one matters to the other

ABSTRACT This article has built a two-way analytical framework to investigate the interrelationship between the cultural creative economy (CCE) and urban competitiveness. Through operationalizing urban competitiveness into urban economic performance, urban development capacity, and urban attractiveness, this article reviews different CCE-based urban development strategies. The empirical results indicate that CCE development is related to all three aspects of urban competitiveness variables, while human capital has the largest explanatory power on both the cultural creative occupations’ concentration and cultural creative industries (CCI) output. The sectoral structure (arts, media, and design) matters in the analysis, implying that scholars should further focus on sub-CCIs in the future research. The variables have different extents of influence on the occupational concentration and industrial output data, which implies that these two different approaches should be considered distinctly.