{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03372319688109162, 'fraction_numerical': 0.031903833658219624, 'mean_word_length': 4.235034013605442, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
New Spherical Gamma-Ray and Neutron Emitting Sources for Testing of Radiation Detection Instruments

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has developed new gamma-ray and neutron emitting sources for testing radiation detection systems. These radioactive sources were developed for testing of detection systems in maritime applications. This required special source characteristics.


Introduction
NIST designed and built a new type of radioactive source for testing of detection systems in maritime applications. These new sources, designed for testing of radiation detection instruments, need to have specific characteristics that differ from the previous NIST source design for testing of radiation detection systems against different ANSI/IEEE standards for homeland security applications [1,2,3,4]. These new radioactive sources need to meet more demanding requirements due to the environment in which detectors must be tested. For example, as one of the uses includes testing in maritime environments the sources need to float, in case that the sources accidentally fall overboard, and withstand salt water environments without corrosion. Other requirements for these sources include knowing the spectral shape and the angular uniformity of the source emission. Four new gamma-ray emitting sources were built to include 57 Co, 60 Co, 137 Cs and 133 Ba. The 57 Co and 133 Ba sources were designed such that their spectral shape has minimal distortion relative to the emission of a point source. For the 137 Cs and 60 Co sources, the spectral shape of point sources was modified to simulate that of 137 Cs density gauges and 137 Cs and 60 Co gamma-ray beam irradiators inside their closed shielding. In addition, a neutron-emitting 252 Cf source as specified in several ANSI/IEEE standards [2,3,4] for testing of radiation detection instruments used in homeland security applications was mounted inside a 15 cm (6 inch) diameter aluminum sphere so that the source will float in water.

Source Design Considerations
These radioactive test sources are designed to meet the following requirements: 1. The photon emission rate of the main gamma ray line must be within 20 % of a specified value during the time of use of the source.
2. The photon emission rate of the main gamma ray line must be as spherically uniform as practical. The design goal is to have the photon emission rate of the main gamma ray line be within 10 % (preferably within 5 %) of the average value at the polar angle θ = 90° for all angles from θ = 0 to θ = 135°. The angle θ is measured relative to the top of the sphere, opposite end from the mounting stem, of the designed radioactive source. Therefore, θ = 90° corresponds to the direction perpendicular to the stem while θ = 180° corresponds to the direction parallel to the stem (See Fig. 1).
3. The low-energy part of the photon spectrum must have a shape similar to a specified type of radioactive source (e.g., density gauges, irradiators.) 4. The sources must float in water, must be highly visible, and must be easily retrievable from the water.
5. The sources must be rugged, shock resistant, and not adversely affected by salt water or other substances that they may contact (e.g., gasoline, oils, etc.). The source geometry must not be affected by its orientation, source components should not move inside when mounted in different orientations.
6. The sources must be securely sealed, yet be accessible so that the radioactive material can be removed and reloaded.

Source Design Measurements
In order to simulate the gamma-ray emission from a density gauge or an irradiator, a 37 MBq (1 mCi) 137 Cs vial (1 mL glass vial) was shielded by different types and amounts of materials. Spectra from three different density gauge models and several NIST irradiators were acquired. Density gauge measurements were performed using a high purity germanium (HPGe) detector (diameter = 47 mm, length = 38 mm, absorbing layer = 1.27 mm aluminum). The measurements of the density gauges were performed at 65 cm from the source container. The irradiator and 137 Cs vial measurements were performed using a HPGe L-detector (diameter = 55.2 mm, length = 57.9 mm, absorbing layer = 1.27 mm aluminum, end cap to detector distance = 3 mm). Figure 2 shows a subset of the spectra acquired for the density gauges and one of the irradiators together with the 137 Cs vial shielded by steel or lead  in addition to 6 mm of aluminum. The spectra are normalized to the area of the 662 keV peak. Table 1 lists the density gauges measured. The 137 Cs irradiator measurements were performed at 5.5 m from the source. The irradiator activity was approximately 3.5 GBq (94 Ci) shielded by approximately 15 cm (6 inches) of lead. All measurements were performed at a distance such that the dead time was less than 2 %; this minimizes random summing.
Spectra for the 137 Cs vial were acquired for different shielding materials and thicknesses; the source-to-detector distance was 2.2 m. Several measurements were performed for different steel thicknesses to study the effect on the spectral shape for 137 Cs. Results are shown in Fig. 3. Similar measurements were performed for different thicknesses of lead (3.1 cm, 2.5 cm, 1.7 cm and 1.0 cm) plus 6 mm of aluminum. Results for the 3.1 cm and 1 cm lead thickness measurements are shown in Fig. 4.
From these measurements it was concluded that the best way of matching the spectral shape of a 137 Cs irradiator and a density gauge is by adding a thickness of approximately 1 cm of lead and 6 mm of aluminum to a 137 Cs point source. For the 60 Co source, similar measurements were performed to simulate the spectral shape produced by irradiators. There are several 60 Co irradiators at NIST but due to irradiator location (some of the irradiators are too close to one another) there were only two for which a clean spectrum could be obtained. One of the irradiators is a high intensity therapy level beam irradiator (referred to as B024) and the other is food irradiator (referred to as GC45). The therapy level beam irradiator (B024) is a 500 TBq (13.5 kCi) 60 Co source (reference date: November 24, 1999) shielded by approximately 23 cm (9 inches) of lead. The HPGe measurements were performed at 1.66 m from the irradiator. The GC45 irradiator is a 29 TBq (777Ci) 60 Co source (reference date: August 1, 2001) shielded by 25 cm (10 inches) of lead. The HPGe measurements were performed at 62 cm from the irradiator. In order to simulate the gamma-ray emission in the low energy region from an irradiator, a 37 MBq (1 mCi) 60 Co vial was shielded by different types of materials as well as different amounts of shielding. These measurements were performed at 2.2 m from the source (see Figs. 5 and 6).      From these measurements it was concluded that the spectra of 60 Co irradiators are best reproduced or simulated by adding a shield of approximately 5 cm (2 inches) of steel and 6 mm of aluminum to a 60 Co point source.
The 57 Co and 133 Ba sources were designed to produce a gamma emission rate equivalent to a bare source activity of 1.67 MBq (45 μCi) and 11.1 MBq (300 μCi) respectively. Therefore, 57 Co and 133 Ba point sources were mounted inside thin aluminum holders. The 252 Cf source was designed to produce a neutron emission rate of 2 × 10 4 s -1 as specified in Ref. [2].

Source Construction
The 57 Co and 133 Ba point sources are made by drying a solution onto glass fiber filter paper 14 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick. This filter paper is then mounted in a 0.3 cm thick aluminum holder shaped to have a uniform gamma-ray emission between 0° and ± 135°. The holder was then mounted inside a 0.15 cm thick aluminum stem welded inside a 0.3 cm thick 15 cm (6 inch) diameter aluminum sphere that is welded shut. The sphere has a 10 cm (4 inch) long aluminum stem attached to hold the source during testing.
In the 137 Cs source, the radioactive material is contained in a welded cylinder made out of platinumiridium. The cylinder has a 137 Cs activity of 185 MBq. The cylinder is mounted inside a 1 cm thick lead absorber that is shaped in such a way as to produce a spherically uniform photon emission rate for the 662 keV gamma-rays. The lead absorber is then mounted inside a 0.15 cm thick aluminum stem welded inside a similar 15 cm diameter aluminum sphere that is welded shut.
The 60 Co source was built using cobalt pellets that were irradiated in the NIST reactor. The pellets are 2 mm in diameter and 2 mm long. Each pellet contains approximately 28 MBq of 60 Co. This was achieved by irradiating the cobalt pellets (99.99 + % purity) for 4 hours in a thermal neutron flux of ≈ 3 × 10 13 s -l cm -2 .
The pellets are then mounted inside a stainless steel rod with a 0.38 cm wall thickness. This rod is then mounted inside a stainless steel sphere that is 4.8 cm in radius. This stainless steel sphere is then mounted inside a 0.3 cm thick 10 cm (4 inch) diameter aluminum sphere that is in turn mounted inside a 0.3 cm thick 25 cm (10 inch) diameter aluminum sphere that is welded shut.
The 252 Cf source is built using a very small Cf 2 O 3palladium wire. The wire is 2 % californium oxide, 98 % palladium and is encapsulated in a stainless steel cylinder with an outside diameter ≈ 5.5 mm, an inside diameter of ≈ 4 mm, an outside length of ≈ 12 mm and an inside length of ≈ 6 mm. This cylinder is mounted inside another steel cylinder such that the total wall thickness is 1 cm. This cylinder is then mounted inside a similar 15 cm diameter aluminum sphere that is welded shut.  pails with locking rings and security seals. The test source in each pail hangs from a slide-in bracket bolted to the underside of the steel cover. The lid and bracket are heavy enough to form a mounting base that may be suitable where vibration or other displacement forces are not a factor.
The 10 cm × 10 cm × 0.6 cm (4 inch × 4 inch × 0.25 inch) flange on the stem has 4 holes for mounting purposes. The spacing of the holes is 7.6 cm (3 inches), center-to-center. Also available are 15 cm × 15 cm (6 inch × 6 inch) slide-in mounting brackets (similar to the slide-in brackets in the pail) that can be bolted to other fixtures.

Source Characterization
Initially, three identical sets of the gamma-ray emitting sources and two sets of the 252 Cf sources were built and calibrated. Results summarized here are for the first set of sources referred to as Set A. Sources were characterized based on dose rate, gamma-ray emission rate, angular distribution and spectral shape. Table 2 gives a summary of the dose rate and emission rate measurements for each of the sources. For the gammaray emitting sources, the gamma-ray emission rates and  angular distribution measurements (shown in Figures  12 to 19) were performed using the HPGe L-detector. The main components of uncertainty for the gammaray emission rate measurements are the HPGe detection efficiency, the emission rate variability for the y-axis rotation, the source-to-detector distance and the counting statistics.
The gamma-ray emission rate R(E) is calculated from the acquired energy spectrum using Eq. (1) (1) where N(E) is the number of counts in the full-energy peak, T is the measuring time, ε(E) is the full-energypeak efficiency and C i are the correction factors. The decay correction from the calibration source reference time to the middle of the run time is C d , given by Eq. (2) (2) where λ is the decay constant ln(2)/T 1/2 , T 1/2 is the halflife and T is the time interval over which the source decays, corresponding to the real (or run) time. The dead time for the gamma-ray measurements was kept below 2 % to avoid pulse pile-up effects.   Fig. 12. Spectrum for 57 Co source (Set A) a 90°.       The uncertainty of the emission rate is obtained using uncertainty propagation and assuming that all measured quantities are independent. The uncertainty for the full-energy-peak efficiency is given by (3) where σ N , σ T , σ ε , σ λ are the uncertainties associated with the quantities N (E), T, ε (E), λ , respectively, assuming that the only correction made is due to source decay. The additional main components of uncertainties, the emission rate variability for the y-axis rotation and the source-to-detector distance, were added in quadrature with the other uncertainty components. Efficiency uncertainties range from 0.8 % to up 1.8 %; the uncertainty associated with the emission rate for the y-axis of rotation ranges from 0.3 % to up 1.6 % and source-to-detector distance uncertainty range from 0.3 % to up 0.5 %.
For the neutron source, the angular distribution measurements were performed using the integration mode of an Eberline ASP-2e survey meter 2 equipped with a Helium-3 counter tube embedded in a 20 cm diameter polyethylene sphere. The integration time was one hour or more. The main component of uncertainty for the angular distribution ratio measurements is the counting statistics, the uncertainty for these measurements is 2.5 %. The emission rate calibration procedure and associated uncertainties for the 252 Cf source are described in Ref. [5]. Figure 1 shows the angles of rotation for the angular distribution measurements. The source spectrum at θ = 90° is shown below for each of the test sources (except 252 Cf) in Figures 12, 14, 16 and 18. For all spectra, the background was subtracted. The angular distribution of the photon emission rate for the main gamma ray relative to θ = 90° is also shown in Figs figures have a coverage factor of k = 1. From these measurements it can be observed that the gamma-ray emission rates are within ± 10 % from θ = 0° to θ = 135°. The different points at θ = 90° represent the source emission when the source is rotated around the stem. The observed variations of the emission rate with the angle of rotation around the stem can be due to variations in the material thicknesses of the source, changes in source-to-detector distance during measurements and asymmetry of the source mount within the sphere. Variations are larger for the 137 Cs (1.6 %) and the 57 Co (1.5 %) sources, this is expected due to the complicated shape of the lead absorber in the 137 Cs source (see Fig. 9) and the low energy photopeak for 57 Co. The 60 Co and the 137 Cs sources are also plotted together with the irradiators and density gauges, as applicable, in Figs. 21 and 22. Variation in the emission rates between sets is less than 5 %. The emission rates variation around θ = 90°f or all sets are within the associated uncertainty. For all three sets (two sets for 252 Cf) the emission rates are within 10 % of the average value at the polar angle θ = 90° for all angles from θ = 0 to θ = 135°, see Figs. 23 to 25 and Fig. 27. The emission rate for the 137 Cs source as a function of angle from θ = 0 to θ = 135° is the only one that was purposely changed in order to obtained a more uniform angular distribution, see Fig. 26. For this source several measurements were performed by rotating it around the y-axis for θ = 135° to check for asymmetries close to the stem position.

Conclusions
Three sets of radioactive sources (two sets for 252 Cf) were designed and built at NIST that meet the requirement for testing radiation detection systems in maritime environments. These sources can also be used for testing systems in less demanding environments (i.e., land).