{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017447199265381085, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005509641873278237, 'mean_word_length': 5.488095238095238, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Quantifying Mask Leakage and Effectiveness for Public Health Messaging


 The purpose of this study is to compare masks (non-medical/fabric, surgical, and N95 respirators) on filtration efficiency, differential pressure, and leakage with the goal of providing evidence to improve public health messaging. Masks were tested on an anthropometric face filtration mount comparing both sealed and unsealed. Overall, surgical and N95 respirators provided significantly higher for filtration efficiency and differential pressure. Leakage comparisons are one of the most significant factors in mask efficiency. Higher weight and thicker fabric masks had significantly higher filtration efficiency. The findings of this study have important implications for communication and education regarding the use of masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and other respiratory illnesses specifically the differences between sealed and unsealed masks. One-Sentence Summary: The type and fabric of facial masks and whether a mask is sealed or unsealed has a significant impact on the effectiveness of a mask.