{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022727272727272728, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01652892561983471, 'mean_word_length': 4.837349397590361, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Restoring Authenticity and Naiveté to Aubanel and Zani

To date there has been only one article published in English on the nineteenth-century Provençal poet Théodore Aubanel (Calin). Aubanel is considered to be the finest of the lyric poets of the Felibrige, the nineteenth-century renaissance movement of which he, Joseph Roumanille, and Frédéric Mistral are the main figures. Mistral, who won the Nobel Prize for literature in 1904, was certainly the most talented of the Provençal writers of the time: Mirèio is a classic of world literature, and his Tresor dóu Felibrige is still considered to be the most authoritative of the dictionaries of the Occitan dialects. Roumanille, older than Mistral by 12 years and Aubanel by 1 1 , was an organizer and a guide for the group ofyoung poets who joined forces in Avignon in the early 1850s. Aubanel's LaMióugrano entre-duberto, published in 1860, was second only to Mirèio among the publications of the early Felibrige.