{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01990049751243781, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.921568627450981, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Macroeconomic Perspective on Border Taxes

ABSTRACT:The debate on corporate tax reform in the United States has included arguments for a border-adjustment tax that would effectively raise the tax on imported inputs and provide a subsidy to exports. This policy is equivalent to other uniform border taxes, such as a combined import tariff and export subsidy, and a uniform value-added tax and payroll subsidy. In this paper, I argue that, contrary to popular arguments, such taxes are not neutral in either the short run or the long run, and they have significant consequences for international trade.