{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.060109289617486336, 'fraction_numerical': 0.05027322404371585, 'mean_word_length': 4.4523809523809526, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Comparison of local recurrence of rectal cancer after two radical operations using total mesorectal excision].

OBJECTIVE
To compare the difference in local recurrence Dixon and Miles groups after total mesorectal excision.


METHODS
One hundred and seventy-three patients with rectal cancer were divided into two groups (Dixon group, 123 patients; Miles group 50 patients). Total mesorectal excision was made according to Heald's method.


RESULTS
The local recurrence in the Dixon and Miles groups was 4.8% (6/123) and 18.0% (9/50) respectively (P < 0.05), and in the Miles group before and after 1997 was 36.8% (7/19) and 6.5% (2/31) respectively (P < 0.05), 4.8% in LRR (P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in the local recurrence between the two groups (P > 0.05).


CONCLUSION
Total mesorectal excision is an important factor reducing local recurrence after radical operation for rectal cancer.