{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024893314366998577, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.253333333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A case for malware that make antivirus irrelevant

Most security researchers realize that the effectiveness of antivirus software (AV) is questionable at best. However, people in the general public still use it daily, perhaps for a lack of better alternatives. It is well-known that signature-based detection technique used in almost all commercial and non-commercial AV cannot be completely effective against zero-day malware. Many evaluations conducted by renowned security firms confirm this. These evaluations often employ sophisticated malware, involve elaborated scheme, and require more resources than what is available to an average person to replicate. This paper investigates the creation of simple zero-day malware that can comprehensively exploit hosts and protractedly evade the installed AV products. What we discovered is alarming, but illuminating. Our malware, written in a high-level language using well-documented APIs, are able to bypass AV detection and launch full-fledged exploits similar to sophisticated malware. In addition, they are able to stay undetected for much longer than other previously reported zero-day malware. We attribute such success to the unreadiness of AV products against malware in intermediate language form. On a positive note, a firewall-like AV product that, to a certain extent, incorporates behavioral-based detection is able to warn against our malware.