{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012084592145015106, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010070493454179255, 'mean_word_length': 5.412903225806452, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Issues of the Legal Regulation of the Procedure for Bringing to Administrative Liability for the Violation of the High-Alert Mode in Conditions of the Pandemic of the New Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19)

The article analyzes the procedure for imposing to administrative responsibility under article 3.18.1 of the Code of Administrative offenses of Moscow for violation of the high-alert regime. The article deals with problematic issues of compliance with the constitutional rights of citizens who are imposed to administrative responsibility in the case of automated recording of an offense using the city video surveillance system and face recognition technologies It is made a reasoned conclusion about inadmissibility of objective accusation and illegality of distribution of the order of attraction to administrative responsibility, established in part 3 of article 28.6 of the Code of Administrative offenses of the Russian Federation, the offense that are not provided by federal laws.