{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01488095238095238, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.078313253012048, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Implications of early apoptosis of infected cells as an important host defense.

Apoptosis is widely recognized as being a host defense against viral infections, since viruses require live cells. There has been increasing acceptance of the view that apoptosis is also a defense against other intracellular pathogens and even against pathogens that adhere to host cells. An implication of apoptosis being a host defense is a need to reassess to what extent the cell death at infection sites may constitute a protective host response. A concept stressed here is that infected cells are a hazard to other cells and to the individual, so the benefits of early apoptosis are emphasized. Therefore, promoting the survival of infected cells, even though still functional, may carry risks. A further consideration is the possibility that the apoptotic stimulus of nutrient restriction may be acting in infection-induced anorexia to promote apoptosis of infected cells, thereby serving as a non-specific host defense.