{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024346257889990983, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.568047337278107, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluation of multicasting schemes based on joint multiple description and network coding

This paper considers a multicast scenario and compares the average reception quality obtained when combining multiple description coding (MDC) and network coding (NC). Plain (single description) network coding (NC-SDC) serves as reference. In the considered scenario, a single source is multicast to several receivers with various channel conditions. Contrary to a NC-SDC scheme, unable to recover the coded packets when not enough combinations of packets have been received, NC of MDC packets allows a more progressive quality improvement with the number of received packets, and a reduction of the effect of the quantization noise when MDC is performed via frame expansion before quantization. Considering a probability distribution for the bit transition probability during transmission to any user in the multicast group, the expected signal-to-noise ratio is evaluated. Performance comparisons are made for various error distributions, field sizes, and MDC methods (via frame expansion and correlating transform).