{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03298774740810556, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.475609756097561, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Does a Longer Usage Mean Flow Experience? An Evaluation of Learning Experience with Curriculum Sequencing Systems (CSS)

This article reports on a study concerning an optimal learning experience by curriculum sequencing systems (CSS) that is being frequently used in adaptive e-learning systems design. In doing so, we first implemented a CSS application – ‘IT-Tutor’ to teach tertiary students vis-à-vis ‘Computer Network’ – using ‘dynamic sequencing approach (DSA)’. Next, we evaluated the usage of IT-Tutor through Csikszentmihalyi’s flow experience theory, in order to project their learning experience. This empirical study showed that, to some extent, CSS with DSA provided learners with a better learning experience against static-time lined learning path, and the usage pattern generated from this rather different learning experience would be a possible learning outcome that counts. Further, in the experimental context, learning with DSA can be seen to promote learning motivation and ambitious behaviours rather than the other learning environments.