{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.700892857142857, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Adjusted time-varying population attributable hazard in case–control studies

Population attributable fraction is a widely used measure for quantifying the disease burden associated with a modifiable exposure of interest at the population level. It has been extended to a time-varying measure, population attributable hazard function, to provide additional information on when and how the exposure's impact varies over time. However, like the classic population attributable fraction, the population attributable hazard is generally biased if confounders are present. In this article, we provide a natural definition of adjusted population attributable hazard to take into account the effects of confounders, and its alternative that is identifiable from case–control studies under the rare disease assumption. We propose a novel estimator, which combines the odds ratio estimator from logistic regression model, and the conditional density function estimator of the exposure and confounding variables distribution given the failure times of cases or the current times of controls from a kernel smoother. We show that the proposed estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal with variance that can be estimated empirically from the data. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed estimators perform well in finite sample sizes. Finally, we illustrate the method by an analysis of a case–control study of colorectal cancer. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.