{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029003457707591475, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022346080404603397, 'mean_word_length': 4.847314423657211, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Uptake of early infant diagnosis in Thailand’s national program for preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission and linkage to care, 2008–2011

Introduction Early infant diagnosis (EID) has been a component of Thailand's prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programme since 2007. This study assessed the uptake, EID coverage, proportion of HIV-exposed infants receiving a definitive HIV diagnosis, mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) rates and linkage to HIV care and treatment. Methods Infant polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing data from the National AIDS Program database were analyzed. EID coverage was calculated as the percentage of number of HIV-exposed infants receiving ≥1 HIV PCR test divided by the number of HIV-exposed infants estimated from HIV prevalence and live-birth registry data. Definitive HIV diagnosis was defined as having two concordant PCR results. MTCT rates were calculated based on infants tested with PCR and applied as a best-case scenario, and a sensitivity analysis was used to adjust these rates in average and worst scenarios. We defined linkage to HIV care as infants with at least one PCR-positive test who were registered with Thailand's National AIDS Program. Chi-squared tests for linear trend were used to analyze changes in programme coverage. Results For 2008 to 2011, the average EID coverage rate increased from 54 to 76% (p<0.001), with 65% coverage (13,761/21,099) overall. The number of hospitals submitting EID samples increased from 458 to 645, and the percentage of community hospitals submitting samples increased from 75 to 78% (p=0.044). A definitive HIV diagnosis was made for 10,854 (79%) infants during this period. The adjusted MTCT rates had significantly decreasing trends in all scenarios. Overall, an estimated 53% (429/804) of HIV-infected infants were identified through the EID programme, and 80% (341/429) of infants testing positive were linked to care. The overall rate of antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation within one year of age was 37% (157/429), with an increasing trend from 28 to 52% (p<0.001). Conclusions EID coverage increased and MTCT rates decreased during 2008 to 2011; however, about half of HIV-infected infants still did not receive EID. Most HIV-infected infants were linked to care but less than half initiated ART within one year of age. Active follow-up of HIV-exposed infants to increase early detection of HIV infection and early initiation of ART should be more widely implemented.


Introduction
In 2014, an estimated 150,000 children under 15 years of age died of HIV-related causes worldwide [1]. HIV infection can be especially lethal for young children; mortality approaches 35% in the first year of life and 53% by two years, if untreated [2]. To reduce infant morbidity and mortality, the recently released WHO policy brief recommends antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation for all HIV-infected infants and children [3], while the 2010 and 2014 Thai HIV treatment guidelines recommend immediate ART only in all HIV-infected infants less than one year of age regardless of CD4 count [4,5]. Early infant diagnosis (EID) of HIV may benefit infants and their families by promoting early infant access to HIV treatment, improving infant health, reducing early mortality [6Á8], providing opportunities to link HIV-positive mothers and other family members with HIV to care during infant follow-up visits, and by providing reassurance to families of uninfected infants [9]. At the programme level, EID can help determine the effectiveness of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programmes and support perinatal HIV elimination efforts [10].
Thailand's national guidelines for PMTCT of HIV recommend HIV counselling and testing for all pregnant women, initiating triple highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for all HIV-positive pregnant women regardless of CD4 count (WHO Option B from 2010 [4] and WHO Option B plus from 2014 [5]), infant antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis for four weeks, counselling to encourage mothers to refrain from breastfeeding with the substitution of formula feeding for 18 months for all HIV-exposed infants and EID with HIV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at one to two months and four to six months. For infants with a positive PCR test result, guidelines recommend that a confirmatory PCR test be performed as soon as possible and that all HIV-exposed children also receive HIV antibody testing at 18 months of age regardless of PCR test results [4]. A national survey conducted in 2008 revealed that only 68% of infants born to HIV-positive mothers were tested at least one time for HIV and only 56% received confirmation of HIV diagnosis [11]. Data about linkage of HIV-infected infants to HIV care and treatment are not available.
Implementing EID programmes is challenging because of the cost and complexity of collecting, transporting and testing biological samples and returning test results to providers and caregivers in a timely manner. EID services are currently available free of charge for all Thai infants (age B12 months old) in all public and private hospitals under Thailand's Universal Health Coverage (UC) Program (906 public health hospitals and 45 private hospitals). The 15 laboratory networks that perform PCR testing are geographically distributed in order to service the entire country (Figure 1b and c). A standardized and low-cost in-house conventional PCR has been optimized for the predominant HIV strains circulating in Thailand (CRF01_AE) using whole blood (WB) samples and dried blood spot (DBS) samples [12Á14].
This study evaluated the Thailand National EID Program by examining changes in EID uptake and coverage over time, as well as changes in the proportion of HIV-exposed infants receiving a definitive HIV diagnosis and HIV-infected infants being linked to care and treatment services. This study also reports on mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) rates among PCR-tested infants and adjusted MTCT rates using sensitivity analysis, and compares trends during Thailand's use of different PMTCT regimens (initially WHO Option A, which changed to WHO Option B in 2010).

Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study. We used the Thailand National AIDS Program (NAP) database to identify infants who received PCR testing between 2008 and 2011. Registration in the NAP database allows HIV-infected children to receive free, lifelong HIV treatment and care consistent with national HIV treatment guidelines in hospitals under the UC Program.

Data collection
An online, centralized NAP database is maintained by the Thai National Health Security Office (NHSO) and used for managing national funds for HIV prevention, treatment and care. Information about each person who receives HIV treatment and care services is recorded in the database, and each person is given a unique national identification number (NID). Hospital staff enter data about infants (aged 0 to 12 months) born to (or suspected to have been born to) HIV-positive mothers in UC Program hospitals when a PCR test is requested. Test results are entered by laboratory staff who perform the HIV DNA PCR tests in the 15 laboratory networks. If infants or children receive a diagnosis of HIV infection, either by PCR or by HIV antibody test, they are registered in the NAP database and a unique NAP number is assigned, enabling them to receive HIV treatment and care in the UC system.
Study data related to EID, linkage to HIV care, ART initiation and CD4 count testing dates and results were abstracted from the NAP database using encrypted NAP and NID numbers. HIV-exposed infant data (month and year of birth, NID, date of HIV PCR testing request and facility that sent samples) were linked with HIV PCR test results. To determine national EID programme coverage, the number of HIV-exposed infants born each year was estimated using estimates of annual HIV prevalence among women delivering with and without antenatal care, as reported by the Ministry of Public Definitions EID uptake was defined as the number of HIV-exposed infants who received at least one PCR test in the NAP database. EID coverage was defined as the number of HIV-exposed infants that received at least one PCR test in the NAP database divided by the estimated number of HIV-exposed infants born in the same year. Definitive HIV infection was defined as two concordant positive PCR test results and noninfection as two concordant negative PCR test results. Presumptive HIV infection was defined as one positive PCR test result and presumptive noninfection as one negative PCR test result. Infants who had a negative first PCR test result and a positive second test result were included in the presumptive HIVinfected category. Infants who had only one negative PCR test result at age less than 30 days or who had conflicting PCR results (i.e. positive and then negative or indeterminate) were defined as inconclusive and excluded from the MTCT rate analysis.
Linkage to care was defined as infants with at least one positive PCR test result who were registered in the NAP database, since registration was an entry point to care and treatment under the UC Program. We calculated the proportion of infants with at least one positive PCR test who received a CD4 count and initiated ART within six months and one year of age as of December 30, 2012 (i.e. approximately 15 months after last birth in the study cohort). Lapse time in ART initiation was calculated for each PCR-positive child by subtracting their age (in months) at last PCR test result from their age (in months) at ART initiation.

Analysis
Infant age at first and second PCR testing was calculated using the date of birth and dates of blood collection. Because actual birth dates are kept confidential by the NHSO and only month and year of birth are recorded, calculations are based on the 15th of the month. In order to adjust the national MTCT rates to include infants who did not access EID services, we did a sensitivity analysis using three scenarios.
In the best-case scenario, we assumed that the MTCT rates in the EID and non-EID groups were the same, as such the MTCT rate was equal to the PCR test positive rate. In a second scenario, we used an estimated weighted average analysis; the proportion of women receiving HAART, dual ARV, single ARV or no ARV was multiplied by the MTCT rate determined in a national survey conducted in Thailand in 2008 (2.0% MTCT rate with HAART, 3.9% with dual ARVs, 9.5% with single ARV [11] and 12.0% with no maternal ARVs). Due to the unavailability of data about women who received HAART from 2009 to 2011, we estimated the proportion of women receiving HAART, dual, single or no ARV using MTCT rates from surveys (2008)  In the worst-case scenario, we assumed that non-EID infants had a higher risk of MTCT as a result of suboptimal PMTCT interventions [18] and used MTCT rates from prior Thai survey data. We assumed 5% of infants received no interventions and had a MTCT rate of 37% [18], 80% received partial/single or dual ARV and had a 9.5% MTCT rate [11], and 15% received triple ARV with a 2.0% MTCT rate [11]. The average MTCT rate of 9.8% in the worst-case scenario was   (Figure 1a). Hospitals providing EID services were distributed throughout the country, with an increasing number of hospitals in remote areas distant from the regional PCR laboratories providing EID services in 2011. This increase corresponded with an increase in the number of hospitals using DBS samples (Figure 1b and c).   Table 2). Of 429 infants with at least one PCR-positive test result, 341 (80%) were registered in NAP, and 241 (56%) initiated on ART at any age by the time of data analysis (Figure 4a). Of infants with at least one PCR positive, the proportion initiating ART before one year of age increased from 28% (33/119) in 2008 to 52% (47/90) in 2011 (pB0.001) ( Figure  4b). There was a decrease in the median age at ART initiation (from 11.7 months in 2008 to 7.0 months in 2011, p00.05) and the age at first CD4 count testing (from 8.3 months in 2008 to 6.6 months in 2011, p 00.04). The median lapse time in ART initiation also decreased from 7.2 to 3.8 months (pB0.001) during the period of analysis (Figure 4c).

Discussion
This study analyzed data from a well-established national programme database that can link HIV-exposed and infected infants throughout the whole HIV care cascade and demonstrated that the EID programme in Thailand increased uptake and coverage (54 to 76%) between 2008 and 2011. The availability of DBS sample collection has improved access to EID, demonstrated by the increasing number of hospitals, especially community hospitals, using DBS. The MTCT rate in Thailand has declined to approximately 2 to 3% in recent years, positioning Thailand to achieve, in the near future, the World Health Organization's goal of MTCT elimination. However, the programme should prioritize EID service uptake, and strengthening of the HIV treatment and care cascade, among HIV-infected infants. Early initiation of ART in infants is important to reduce morbidity and mortality [2] and may also prevent the establishment of HIV and integration of HIV DNA in reservoir sites [19], which may allow a subsequent      ART interruption period, thus preserving future treatment options [20]. This study found that the age at first PCR test was older than that recommended in national guidelines, and rates of ART initiation in HIV-infected infants within one year of age were relatively low. EID services should be expanded to cover all HIV-exposed infants, including two PCR tests for definitive diagnosis, in accordance with national guidelines. Poor compliance with infant ART guidelines may be due to its complexity, the delayed rollout of the guidelines, lack of healthcare provider's confidence in starting ART in young infants [21], infants being lost to follow-up or having died before HIV diagnosis [22] and limited availability of paediatric ARV formulations [23]. In addition, delays in the EID process, including the return of HIV test results to caretakers [24] and the requirement for a paediatrician to initiate therapy, may also contribute to late ART initiation [21]. However, low ART initiation rates before 2011 may be also due to the ART initiation criteria in national guidelines at the time, while improvement was observed after the revision of the guidelines [25]. PCR testing at birth may play an important role in detecting in utero HIV infection, reducing loss to follow-up, improving early ART and saving infants from AIDS-related death [26]. In response to these study findings, the Thai MOPH has established an active follow-up and management system for HIV-positive pregnant women and their exposed infants, to improve EID programme coverage, linkage to care and early ART initiation in HIV-infected infants. Training in case management for early identification and infant ART initiation was conducted throughout the country in 2013 to 2014. The revised national guidelines in 2014 recommend earlier PCR testing: at birth (where feasible), at one month and at two to four months, and recommend ART initiation as soon as possible if PCR-positive infants are identified [5]. These changes are expected to improve EID coverage, lead to earlier ART initiation and reduce the leakage of HIV-infected infants from the HIV treatment cascade.
In order to validate progress towards MTCT elimination and evaluate programme effectiveness, reliable estimates of the MTCT rate must be made. The number of positive PCR test results over a specified time period can provide a good estimate of the MTCT rate, especially with the increasing coverage of PCR testing in a predominantly non-breastfeeding population like Thailand. However, MTCT rates estimated using PCR test results may underestimate the true MTCT rate. Children who did not receive a PCR test were more likely to have mothers who received suboptimal ANC and ARV regimens than those who did have a PCR test; thus, in these individuals, a higher risk of MTCT could be expected [18]. In order to account for unknown factors, this study used sensitivity analysis with adjusted scenarios to determine best-and worst-case scenarios of MTCT rates in Thailand.

Strengths and limitations
Using population-based routine programme data that are mandatory for healthcare cost reimbursement allows longitudinal follow-up of HIV-exposed infants from EID access through the continuum of HIV diagnosis, treatment and care. Data from this system cover the majority of HIV-exposed infants born, availing a robust data set for evaluating national PMTCT programme effectiveness.
The results of this study are subject to several limitations. These data were obtained from a database that was designed for routine HIV programme management; therefore, it is possible that human error occurred during data entry. We may have underestimated the number of HIV-exposed infants because an estimated 5% of infants born each year in Thailand are not registered with the national birth registration system [27]. The EID coverage rate may be underestimated since non-Thai infants can be registered with the national birth registration system and access EID services through special programmes that were not included in the NAP database. Using interpolation data for ARV used by HIV-positive pregnant women may have overestimated MTCT rates if the increase in HAART uptake was not linear. A separate Thai MOPH survey reported that the uptake of HAART regimens by HIV-positive pregnant women were 27% in 2008 and 73% in 2011 (unpublished data), while the interpolation estimates were 29% in 2008 and 66% in 2011. To avoid the possibility of a false PCR negative result before one month of age, we excluded infants who had only one negative PCR test result before one month of age. This may have overestimated the MTCT rates in PCR-tested infants. The adjusted MTCT rates in the weighted average and worst-case scenarios may be overestimated due to use of MTCT rates from prior studies when HAART prescription was based on CD4 rates less than 200 cell/ml. Transmission rates during that period may have been higher in these immunocompromised mothers. Infants lost to follow up may have died from HIV-related causes that could not be captured in this database. This may have led to an underestimated MTCT rate. Finally, this study did not include HIV incidence in pregnant women in the MTCT rate estimation because of low HIV seroconversion rates during pregnancy found in an earlier study [28]. Repeated HIV testing during the third trimester is routinely done in Thailand.

Conclusions
This study found an increase in national EID programme uptake and coverage over time, improvement in national PMTCT programme effectiveness as evidenced by decreasing MTCT rates and a high proportion of overall linkage to HIV  care among infants with positive PCR test results. There remain, however, a substantial number of infants with a positive HIV diagnosis who were not initiated on ART within one year of age. In response to these findings, the Thai MOPH is implementing an active case management programme to more effectively identify infants at risk of HIV exposure, provide EID services and improve linkages to care and early ART towards the goal of MTCT elimination.