{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027833001988071572, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003976143141153081, 'mean_word_length': 4.929411764705883, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Shape and motion reconstruction with additional data

This paper describes and compares two techniques for jointly estimating the shape and motion of a 3D body using 1D orthographically projected range data. In the first technique, we use only range data; in the second, we add range-rate and change-in-phase information. We compare the two techniques, and show that unexpectedly, augmenting the range data with range-rate and change-in-phase information does not seem to improve the estimation quality.