{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03889943074003795, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005218216318785579, 'mean_word_length': 6.272413793103448, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Scientific Co-Creation as Method for Development of Creative Competence in Future Educators

The article presents the experience of organizing scientific co-creation as a method for development of creative competence in future educators. Study model is described, which consists of a combination of components: target, methodological, content, organizational and resultative. The study objective was the organization of scientific cocreation as a method for development of creative competence in future educators. The methodological component is characterized by its approaches (competence-based, systemic activity, hermeneutic) and principles (of openness, continuity, flexibility, comprehension, dialogue, dominance of the other co-creator, reflexivity and metaphor). The content component is represented through scientific research essence of the subjects “Fundamentals of Research Activity” and “Development of Educator's Creative Competence in Scientific Co-Creation”. The organizational components reflect the implementation of scientific co-creation method via continuous (monitoring and dialogue) and consecutive (“encounter”, comprehension, deliberation, activity) phases, which are methodologically grounded in key provisions of hermeneutic approach. The study was based on participation of students enrolled in the education program 44.03.01 Pedagogic Education (academic bachelor's course), academic profile Preschool Education, a total of 89 students. By using reproductive, heuristic, research and reflexive methods, as well as particular forms and means (junior researcher's portfolio and author's tool “Creative Diary”), we have obtained the following results. Positive changes were detected at all levels of creative competence (low, medium, high) among students of the groups (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3), while trends toward higher levels of development for each component of creative competence were observed at the same time (inherently creative, communicative, team competences and personal qualities (motivation to succeed, intellectual curiosity, risk tolerance, self-starter quality).