{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02710413694721826, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.801652892561983, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.

The restoration of Class V cavities with composite resin when the cervical cavity margin extends onto the root surface poses a special problem with regard to marginal seal. The use of glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement (GIC) linings has not overcome this problem completely. The efficacy of a new light-cured GIC lining was tested in vitro, as was the use of a modern dentine-bonding agent. The light-cured GIC lining afforded a reliable marginal seal but the efficacy of the dentine-bonding agent related to the time of finishing of the composite restoration.