{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01637107776261937, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.220338983050848, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Theorising care: attentive interaction or distributive justice?

A main reason for the slow advance of a political theory of care is the conceptual differences between two strands of approaching care. Ethico-political approaches of care ask how to better perform supportive interactivities. They aim to bring the traditional concept of justice
 out of the centre to achieve room for other normative viewpoints such as attentiveness. The welfare-resourcing strand asks who provides support and how the fact of its performance is linked with society’s unjust social structures. These researchers believe that making attentive
 interaction more central is likely to hinder a fairer distribution of needs-meeting activities, not help it.