{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.039943938332165384, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029782761037140854, 'mean_word_length': 4.71, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of complex cardiac rehabilitation on physical activity and quality of life during long-term follow-up after surgical correction of congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND
Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CCR) is an important element of the comprehensive management of grown-up congenital heart disease (GUCH) patients after surgical correction of congenital heart disease (CHD) but access to this treatment is still limited. We still lack Polish guidelines on CCR, including controlled training in young adults several years after surgical correction of CHD.


AIM
To assess the effect of a CCR program on physical capacity, exercise tolerance, quality of life, and severity of depressive symptoms in GUCH patients long-term after surgical correction of CHD.


METHODS
We studied 57 CHD patients (30 females, 27 males, mean age 23 ± 3.4 years) at least 12 months after surgical correction of a ventricular septal defect (VSD) or ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD II). All patients were offered a CCR program, and 31 of them participated (rehabilitation group [Reh]) and 26 refused (non-rehabilitated group [NReh]). All patients underwent baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using a cycloergometer and a ramp protocol with an initial load of 20 W followed by 10 W load increments per minute. Psychological evaluation included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Euro QoL 5D questionnaire to evaluate quality of life. Patients were reassessed 30 days after the initial evaluation using the same investigations.


RESULTS
During CPET, all patients reached peak exercise intensity at the level of 15-17 in the Borg scale without complications. Resting HR was lower in the Reh group (74 ± 8 bpm) compared to the NReh group (81 ± 14 bpm). During CPET, patients in the Reh group reached significantly higher peak HR and percent maximum HR. Workload increased nonsignificantly (144 W vs. 124 W, p = 0.121), while duration of exercise and peak oxygen consumption was significantly longer in the Reh group compared to the NReh group (14 min vs. 11 min, p = 0.001; and 27.5 mL/kg/min vs. 23 mL/kg/min, p = 0.003, respectively). Patients in the NReh group showed non significantly higher severity of depressive symptoms compared to the Reh group, as evaluated using BDI at 30 days (mean score 4.8 vs. 2.2, respectively, p = 0.59). In contrast, subjectively and objectively rated quality of life was significantly higher in the Reh group compared to the NReh (score 89 vs. 74.4, p < 0.01; and 94 vs. 83, p < 0.01, respectively).


CONCLUSIONS
Implementation of a CCR program improves physical capacity, exercise tolerance, and quality of life and reduces depressive symptoms in patients late after surgical correction of CHD. Introduction of such programs seems reasonable as a supplement to the holistic care for GUCH patients.