{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01452513966480447, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008938547486033519, 'mean_word_length': 5.945736434108527, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Relational Transactional Analysis Supervision

This article presents a working model for a relational approach to supervision and integrates a number of supervisory ideas and approaches within a transactional analysis framework. Supervisory styles and approaches are identified and considered alongside Erskine's (1982/1997) stages of supervisee development. The author discusses how to approach the supervisory work through a contemporary relational lens and offers an outline of how he uses contracts within transactional analysis supervision. He describes two approaches to working at the teach/treat boundary and distinguishes between traditional and relational approaches. A diagrammatic representation of the supervisor-supervisee relationship is offered to support the supervisor in working at this boundary. Finally, a case example illustrates the application of these ideas in practice.