{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022540983606557378, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.397379912663755, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: Labor-Management Relations: Fairness, Collective Bargaining, and Incomes Policy

resolution intervention techniques employed by the Massachusetts committee are, to some degree, also part of the set of tools used in other jurisdictions on an ad hoc basis. As a result, the diversity of intervention techniques employed by theJLMC and its staff, and the very nature of the JLMC structure, provide a valuable framework for seeking to improve public sector impasse resolution techniques. Readers will find that the author's task of describing and evaluating the JLMC's intervention techniques is a difficult one, given the flexible and, at times, nebulous nature of the interventions. Confronted with this problem, the book is well organized and written. The book is in parts redundant, but this does not detract from its readability. This book would be of considerable value to practicing neutrals and administrative agency staff members. The practical nature of the content provides a useful framework for understanding the broader scope of labormanagement conflict and diverse dispute resolution approaches. For the practitioner, much can be gained from the Massachusetts experiment, even without adopting the JLMC concept. And for the academic audience, the book provides a scholarly study of the dynamics of impasse resolution with an opportunity to examine and assess impasse resolution systems in terms other than "chilling" and "narcotic" effects.