{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.038331454340473504, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.124137931034483, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Sparks, Insanity, and Fireworks

The certified “psychograph” of Marx, Arnold Kllnzli, believed to have found in Adorno's philosophy a fruitful object for his own trade and adroitly posed the pseudo- Socratic rhetorical question, whether Adorno does not simply provide “the self-justification of paranoia on a high philosophical level.” The analysis — insofar as it can be called an analysis — latches on to one particular quotation from Adorno that apparently proves Kunzli's point: “Dialectics cannot stop… at the concepts of healthy and sick. Once it has recognized the prevailing universal…as sick — in the literal sense, as characterized by paranoia or pathological projection — it proceeds to take as indications of recovery only that which it itself treats as sick, misguided, paranoid, or even ‘insane’; thus today, as in the Middle Ages, only fools tell their masters the truth.”