{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02119907254057635, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016561775422325273, 'mean_word_length': 5.125760649087221, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Cross-sectional study of school integration of asthmatic children in a general population sample].

AIMS
Asthma is one of the most frequently encountered chronic illnesses in children. The aim of the present study was to investigate the problem of integration of asthmatic subjects at school by assessing the reactions of parents and teachers, and also by considering the medical aspects.


POPULATION AND METHODS
A cross-sectional random study was carried out during autumn 1994 including 4,251 primary school children aged between five and 14 years, and including teachers from 188 classes and 26 schools in Grenoble and its inner suburbs. The first screening questionnaire was completed by the parents, and data on 3,799 children were obtained; from this, 191 currently asthmatic children were identified. One hundred and forty-six parents of the identified asthmatics subsequently answered a second questionnaire on the severity of the illness and its effects on school attendance and educational activities. The 186 teachers from the schools involved were interviewed about their knowledge of the disorder, and about what they knew of the treatment and management of asthmatic children in school.


RESULTS
It was found that the cumulative prevalence of asthma amounted to 7.6%, and that the prevalence over the previous 12-month period was 4.3%. Sixteen percent of the asthmatic children reported an asthma-associated school absence of more than six days during the six preceding months. In 45.2% of cases, physical exercise was responsible for an asthmatic attack, but premedication was used in only 21% of cases. Nine percent of the children had obtained a medical certificate which exempted them from participating in sports activities and physical exercise. Seventy-three percent of the parents had informed the teachers of their child's illness, but the information communicated was incomplete. It was found that the teachers did not have a thorough knowledge of the disorder, but that many of them (92.7%) would appreciate further information on the subject and on its management. Eighty-three percent of the teaching staff were unaware that the ministerial circular No. 93-248 of 22 July 1993 had been issued on the proposed management of chronic disorders at school, advocating a combined effort on the part of the parents, the child's physician, the school doctors and the teachers in setting up a concerted plan of action.


CONCLUSIONS
This study has demonstrated that the school integration of asthmatic children remains problematical both as regards treatment and the pursuit of indoor and outdoor school activities. Integration could be improved by using parent-doctor-teacher liaison forms, thereby maintaining closer communication regarding the child's needs. When this is not sufficient, an individualized asthma management plan could be introduced in collaboration with the parents, doctors and teachers, which might result in improved treatment and integration of asthmatic children in school.