{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01609517144856543, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.299559471365638, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: General and Applied Toxicology

enduring legal classification as beings without rights or value and defined only in the sense of being human property, a definition that is incompatible with the Christian doctrine that animals are God's creatures. In addition to raising the same objections as he has raised to other forms of animal exploitation, Linzey adds the observation that transgenic procedures, which are based on the similarity between the genetic material of different species, challenge species integrity and thus imply the lack of an absolute distinction between animals and humans. The line of reasoning that follows can therefore reach the conclusion that no moral argument can be advanced against making humans the subjects of genetic engineering and other scientific procedures. Christian antivivisectionists, hunt saboteurs, vegetarians/vegans and opponents of genetic engineering will certainly welcome the vindication of their life choices that they can draw from this book. Those who do not hold all of these viewpoints, but who subscribe to the Christian faith, need to develop a theological basis for their opposition which gives these issues the same depth of treatment as that afforded by Andrew Linzey. Whichever way the discussions go, one thing is clear: mainstream theology needs to consider the inter-relationships not only of the Holy Trinity, but also of another trinity God-man-animal.