{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022540983606557378, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.582857142857143, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Unfolding Mozi's Standard of Sound Doctrine

This essay revolves around a careful assessment of Hui-chieh Loy's essay ‘Justification and Debate: Thoughts on Moist Moral Epistemology’. There is much to appreciate in Loy's analysis of the standard of sound doctrine in the ‘Against Fatalism’ chapters of the Mozi, but a close reading of Loy's essay reveals problematic aspects in his approach along both hermeneutic and logical lines. For one, he groups Mozi's tests of the standard of sound doctrine in a way that does not square well with how they are grouped in the primary text. I call this the problem of alignment. Secondly, he conflates the notions of standard and test. I refer to this as the problem of implementation insofar as such conflation causes the tests to be implemented in a way that they did not seem to be intended to be by Mozi, that is, each on its own as constituting sound doctrine instead of taking them all together as the indicator of sound doctrine.