{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05429864253393665, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04355203619909502, 'mean_word_length': 5.1, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The mechanism of inactivation of lipoxygenases by acetylenic fatty acids.

The inactivation of soybean lipoxygenase by 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid was studied in detail. The inactivation was found to be time-dependent and irreversible. A kinetic scheme, based on the assumption of a rapid inactivation of the enzyme-product complex, yielded a Km value for 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid of 1.3 microM, which is about a tenth of that described for arachidonic acid, and a reaction constant k+2 of 0.006s-1, which is four orders of magnitude lower. The reasons for these differences are discussed. Several types of experimental evidence indicate that the first step of the enzyme inactivation is the conversion of 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid via a lipoxygenase reaction: (a) the conversion of radioactively labelled methyl ester of 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid to other products; (b) the oxygen requirement of the inactivation; (c) the competitive protective effect of linoleic acid; (d) the similarity of the activation energy for both the dioxygenation of linoleic acid and the enzyme inactivation by 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid; (e) the formation of one mole methionine sulfoxide/mole enzyme during the reaction with 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid, similar to the suicidal reaction of reticulocyte lipoxygenase with 13LS-hydroperoxy-linoleic acid. These results, as well as the lack of covalent binding of 14C-labelled 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid methyl ester, contradict the allene mechanism postulated by others [D.T. Downing, D.G. Ahern, and M. Bachta (1970) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 40, 218-223; K.H. Gibson (1977) Chem. Soc. Rev. 6, 489-510]. It is assumed that the susceptible methionine is located at the active centre of the enzyme.