{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.044444444444444446, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.540983606557377, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: Psychology in Legal Contexts: Applications and Limitations

This should not be read as a dismissal of the entire volume; there are some interesting essays, some provocative ones, and some informative ones. (There are also some irrelevant ones which seem to have arisen from the "I'm-doing-abook-and-why-don't-you-write-me-a-chapter-on-whateveryou-want" school of editing.) The problem lies in what appears to be missing from the volume entirely: any thought as to how psychology may be employed in the courtroom in any and all aspects of public interest or civil rights law. This omission is the shocker, and is the memory that lingers on after the book is read.