{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019002375296912115, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.115942028985507, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
THE MAIN CRITERIA FOR THE QUALITY OF COURT DECISIONS

The article discusses the main indicators of the quality of judicial acts such as legality, validity, consistency, correctness. The author points out the difference between the validity and legality of court decisions. It explains the inadmissibility of using slang, local dialects in a court decision, which lead to a negative perception of judicial acts by society.