{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024539877300613498, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011247443762781187, 'mean_word_length': 5.846153846153846, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[The clinico-echographic agreements and disagreements in oculo-orbital lesions. The feasibility of the examination methods].

The authors present a study made in the period November 1987-1989 on 108 subjects examined clinically echographic and also with some other investigation methods (radiology, laboratory with radio-tracers). There are presented the results obtained on structures of pathology (strokes, primary or metastatic intraocular tumours, medical diseases of the ocular globe). The concordance and disagreement between the results obtained using the investigation with ultrasounds and the clinical investigation completed with some other investigation methods is expressed in the level of fiability of the echographic method (on structures of diseases and generally). The confirmations are justified by: the intraoperative diagnosis, the postoperative evolution, the therapeutical test and also by the histopathological exam in the cases in which this was affected.