{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025675675675675677, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021621621621621623, 'mean_word_length': 4.975806451612903, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Solomos after Alexiou: a critical study

I am writing this at the very end of 1998, the bicentenary of Solomos’s birth. Stylianos Alexiou’s controversial selective edition of Solomos’s works, published in 1994, provided a new boost to Solomos studies, and in this survey I propose to discuss work published on Solomos since that date. Dimitris Angelatos conveniently published a survey of Solomos studies from 1964 to 1991. Angelatos’ survey is descriptive rather than critical, and — for non-specialists at least — is insufficiently explicit about such matters as the dispute between Yorgos Veloudis and Louis Coutelle; but at least it lists studies published over a period of a quarter of a century, with some indication of their content.