{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.036605657237936774, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.423423423423423, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Relevance of Regimes

The title of my remarks today -"the relevance of regimes" -is in fact a conclusion, for regimes do shape the behaviour of states. By buttressing the rule of international law, they bring order to an otherwise anarchic Hobbesian world. To elaborate, however, we must answer some basic questions, including -what are their goals, who sets these goals, who is a member, why do states join, why do they comply, what happens if they do not comply, and how does the regime change over time? And finally, are we better off with regimes than without them? This is no small challenge.