{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.038880248833592534, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02177293934681182, 'mean_word_length': 5.2459546925566345, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
It's not just the Southeast - geographically pervasive racial disparities in Neisseria gonorrhoeae between Non-Hispanic Black and White US females.

BACKGROUND
Spatial analyses of gonorrhea morbidity among females often highlight the southeastern US but may not provide information on geographic variation in the magnitude of racial disparities; such maps also focus on geographic space, obscuring underlying population characteristics. We created a series of visualizations depicting both county-level racial disparities in female gonorrhea diagnoses and variations in population size.


METHODS
We calculated county- and region-level race-specific relative rates (RelR) and between-race rate differences (RD) and rate ratios (RR) comparing gonorrhea case rates in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) vs non-Hispanic White (NHW) females. We then created proportional symbol maps with color representing counties' RelR/RD/RR category and symbol size representing counties' female population.


RESULTS
Gonorrhea rates among NHB females were highest in the Midwest (718.7/100,000) and West (504.8), rates among NHW females were highest in the West (74.1) and Southeast (72.1). RDs were highest in the Midwest (654.6 excess cases/100,000) and West (430.7), while RRs were highest in the Northeast (12.4) and Midwest (11.2). Nearly all US counties had NHB female rates ≥3x those in NHW females, with NHB females in most highly populated counties experiencing ≥9-fold difference in gonorrhea rates.


CONCLUSIONS
Racial disparities in gonorrhea were not confined to the Southeast; both relative and absolute disparities were equivalent or larger in magnitude in areas of the Northeast, Midwest, and West. Our findings help counter damaging regional stereotypes, provide evidence to refocus prevention efforts to areas of highest disparities, and suggest a useful template for monitoring racial disparities as an actionable public health metric.