{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029723991507430998, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014861995753715499, 'mean_word_length': 5.042735042735043, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Partitioning the total seatback reaction force amongst the lumbar spine motion segments during simulated rear-impact collisions

Purpose. This study aimed to determine how the seatback force is distributed across lumbar spine motion segments during a simulated low-velocity rear-impact collision with and without the application of mechanical lumbar support. Methods. A ferroresistive pressure-sensing system was used during simulated rear-impact collisions (ΔV = 7.66 km/h). Total seatback reaction force was derived from pressure recordings as the product of calibrated pressure outputs and sensel areas. The three-dimensional position of the pressure mat and the lumbar spinous processes were tracked and then used to extract the seatback force that was applied to the lumbar motion segments. Results. On average, 77% (637 N) and 53% (430 N) of the total seatback force was applied directly to the lumbar spine with and without lumbar support, respectively (p < 0.001). In addition to four of five individual motion segments bearing a greater force with lumbar support (p < 0.029), the distribution of the total lumbar force was found to be significantly different between support type conditions. Conclusions. Although lumbar supports can alter the magnitude and distribution of shear force applied to the lumbar spine during low-velocity rear-impact collisions, they do not appear to elevate the injury risk.