{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02922077922077922, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0016233766233766235, 'mean_word_length': 5.664864864864865, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Occupant Monitoring in Automated Vehicles: Classification of Situation Awareness Based on Head Movements While Cornering

We tested whether head-movements under automated driving can be used to classify a vehicle occupant as either situation-aware or unaware. While manually cornering, an active driver’s head tilt correlates with the road angle which serves as a visual reference, whereas an inactive passenger’s head follows the g-forces. Transferred to partial/conditional automation, the question arises whether aware occupant’s head-movements are comparable to drivers and if this can be used for classification. In a driving-simulator-study (n=43, within-subject design), four scenarios were used to generate or deteriorate situation awareness (manipulation checked). Recurrent neural networks were trained with the resulting head-movements. Inference statistics were used to extract the discriminating feature, ensuring explainability. A very accurate classification was achieved and the mean side rotation-rate was identified as the most differentiating factor. Aware occupants behave more like drivers. Therefore, head-movements can be used to classify situation awareness in experimental settings but also in real driving.