{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026108075288403157, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0230722525804493, 'mean_word_length': 4.7421602787456445, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Satellite remote sensing of total ozone column (TOC) over Pakistan and neighbouring regions

Total ozone column (TOC) obtained from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board the Aura satellite was utilized to examine the spatio-temporal distribution of atmospheric ozone over Pakistan and adjoining regions of Afghanistan, India, and Iran for October 2004 to March 2014. This region has not yet been evaluated in greater detail. A yearly spatial averaged value of 278 ± 2 DU was found over the region. A decadal increase of 1.3% in TOC value over study region was observed for the first time. Large spatial and temporal variability of TOC was found over the study region. Elevated ozone columns were observed over the regions with high NO2 and CO concentrations. Analysis indicated that Srinagar city has the highest averaged value of 290 ± 3 DU whereas Jodhpur city showed the highest increasing trend of 1.9% per decade. A monthly averaged maximum value of 289 ± 8 DU and a minimum of 264 ± 5 DU were found during April and November, respectively, over the region. January showed a decreasing trend of −0.8% and February exhibited the highest increasing trend of 5.1% per decade. Forward trajectory analysis showed the possibility of ozone transport from eastern parts of the study region towards the Indian Ocean (Bay of Bengal) through the subtropical jet stream creating low values at higher meridians in October. TOC data deduced from OMI and the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder were compared to check the level of correlation and the results showed significant correlation (r = 0.75) and an acceptable average relative difference of 4.2%.