{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009085009733939001, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.823008849557522, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN IN VIVO ABSORPTION AND FLUORESCENCE EXCITATION SPECTRA IN NATURAL SAMPLES OF PHYTOPLANKTON

The fluorescence excitation spectrum of live phytoplankton cells represents the portion of light absorbed that has been effectively transferred to chlorophyll a of photosystem II, whereas light absorbed by photoprotective pigments will not lead to fluorescence. Therefore, the in vivo fluorescence excitation spectrum of phytoplankton has been used as a proxy for the action spectrum of phytoplankton in computations of primary production in the ocean. The distribution of chlorophyll a between photosystems, as well as variations in the pathway of energy inside the photosynthetic membrane, can also influence the fluorescence excitation spectrum. In this study, we investigated the contribution of photoprotective pigments to the differences found between in vivo absorption and fluorescence excitation spectra of phytoplankton measured during two cruises: one from Las Islas Canarias to Nova Scotia and another in the Labrador Sea. A comparison of normalized fluorescence excitation and absorption spectra showed high variability in the difference between absorption and fluorescence in the blue region of the spectrum for samples from the two cruises. This difference was not entirely correlated with the concentration of photoprotective carotenoids. In this paper, results are interpreted in terms of differences in pigment composition and known patterns of energy distribution in the photosystems of different algal groups.