{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024108003857280617, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008678881388621022, 'mean_word_length': 5.0701754385964914, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Languages’ Impact on Emotional Classification Methods

There is currently a lack of research concerning whether Emotional Classification (EC) research on a language is applicable to other languages. If this is the case then we can greatly reduce the amount of research needed for different languages. Therefore, we propose a framework to answer the following null hypothesis: The change in classification accuracy for Emotional Classification caused by changing a single preprocessor or classifier is independent of the target language within a significance level of p= 0.05. We test this hypothesis using an English and a Danish data set, and the classification algorithms: Support-Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, and Random Forest. From our statistical test, we got a p We define this area as cross-languagetalic-value of 0.12852 and could therefore not reject our hypothesis. Thus, our hypothesis could still be true. More research is therefore needed within the field of cross-language EC in order to benefit EC for different languages.