{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01607717041800643, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012861736334405145, 'mean_word_length': 5.483333333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Measurement of gastric emptying by octanoate metabolism

Purpose of reviewSince its introduction just over 10 years ago, there have been a number of studies that have used the octanoate breath test to assess gastric emptying. Although use of the method is on the increase (the number of gastric emptying studies published on PubMed using the octanoate breath test has doubled between the periods 1997–2000 and 2001–2004 compared with a drop of approximately 20% in the use of scintigraphy over the same periods), the methodology has not achieved universal acceptance, primarily because it can provide results comparable to established techniques only indirectly. Recent findingsRecent methods for overcoming this difficulty are reviewed, including modified methods for breath test interpretation and the application of the related saliva test. The latter promises to be useful as a non-invasive proxy for established techniques, such as scintigraphy, for further validation of the breath test. Recent applications of octanoate-based methods are briefly considered. SummaryA novel approach detailed in this review for breath test interpretation, where the bicarbonate pool is modelled as a single compartment, could prove useful for obtaining breath test gastric emptying parameters that are directly comparable with those obtained from the gold standard, gamma scintigraphy. In combination with the saliva test, this could add credence to use of the octanoate breath test as a clinically accepted diagnostic tool, in addition to its potential in research.