{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021222839818089943, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006568974229408792, 'mean_word_length': 5.018237082066869, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A method for automating data collection from a double‐ring infiltrometer under falling head conditions

Estimating soil hydraulic properties, such as infiltration rate and hydraulic conductivity, is important for understanding hydrological processes such as rainfall and irrigation partitioning. Current infiltrometers can require considerable operator input to limit the number of readings that can be simultaneously performed. Therefore, the objective of this work was to develop a simple double‐ring infiltrometer for automated data collection under falling head conditions. The design consisted of 15.2‐cm tall inner‐ and outer‐rings of 14.6 and 33.0 cm in diameter, respectively. The inner‐ring was held in the centre of the outer‐ring by a small pipe that also served as a handle. A small hole was drilled 3.8 cm from the bottom of each ring and a slightly larger hose passed through both holes. One hose end led into the inside of the inner‐ring and the opposite end to the outside of the outer‐ring. A pressure transducer was attached to the outside end of the hose. A datalogger was used to record the transducer output. This design was compared in‐situ to a constant head method using a Mariotte bottle system on two distinct soils and tested on four different soil series ranging in textural class from a loamy sand to a clay. Soils had been fallow prior to this work for at least 2 years, except the loamy sand which had a 5‐year‐old Bahia grass (Paspalum notatum) stand. Although there were some differences between the two approaches, values estimated with the proposed method had less variability. This method allows a single user to collect multiple readings. Collected data can be used to estimate quasi‐steady state and cumulative infiltration, and in situ hydraulic conductivity of saturated soil. The proposed procedure could be beneficial when multiple readings of soil hydraulic properties are required, such as when characterizing soil spatial variability.