{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03747397640527411, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025676613462873005, 'mean_word_length': 5.084388185654008, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Two Age-Estimation Techniques for Cougars

Abstract Age estimation in wildlife is crucial for population assessment and management decision-making. Estimation errors may reduce the efficacy of management programs or potentially result in poor management decisions. Our objective was to compare aging techniques (gum-line measurement and cementum annuli analysis) for Cougars (Puma concolor) using harvest data collected during 2006–2010 in Oregon. Differences in paired age estimates (cementum annuli estimate minus gum-line recession estimate) had 95% confidence limits of −0.28 and −0.06. Linear regression showed a relatively high level of agreement (<1.0-y difference) between the 2 aging techniques considered for individuals ≥1-y and ≤17-y old. The slope suggests that each 1 y increase in estimated age using cementum annuli analysis adds 1.03 y to the predicted estimated age using gum-line measurements. Disparity between estimates increases with age. Individuals estimated to be 1-y old using x (cementum annuli counts) are predicted to be 1.09-y old using y (gum-line measurements), and individuals estimated to be 12-y old using x are predicted to be 12.42-y old using y. The use of >1 age-estimation technique, implementation of standardized protocols (if not currently in place), and additional training to potentially increase consistency and reduce bias among observers will be beneficial for Cougar management.