{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01556420233463035, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.831858407079646, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Experiments at the Intersection of Experimental History, Technological Inquiry, and Conceptually Driven Analysis: A Case Study from Early Nineteenth-Century France

The paper examines differences of styles of experimentation in the history of science. It presents arguments for a historization of our historial and philosophical notion of experimentation, which question the common view that experimental philosophy was the only style of experimentation in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It argues, in particular, that experimental history and technological inquiry were accepted styles of academic experimentation at the time. These arguments are corroborated by a careful analysis of a case study, which is embedded in a comparative historical overview.