{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.08353609083536091, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0267639902676399, 'mean_word_length': 4.436123348017621, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Should we use the rate-adaptive AV delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacing?

AIMS
Recommendations for programming the rate-adaptive AV delay in CRT.


METHODS AND RESULTS
In cases of continual biventricular pacing, the optimal AV delay in CRT (AVD(opt)) is the net effect of the pacemaker-related interatrial conduction time (IACT), duration of the left-atrial electromechanical action (LA-EAC(long)), and the duration of the left-ventricular latency period (S(V)-EAC(short)). It can be calculated by AVD(opt) = IACT+LA-EAC(long)-S(V)-EAC(short). We measured these three components in 20 CRT-ICD patients during rest and submaximal ergo metric exercise (71 +/- 9 W) resulting in a 22.5 +/- 9.6 bpm rate increase. IACT and S(V)-EAC(short) did not reveal significant differences. LA-EAC(long), however, varied significantly by -10.7 +/- 16.1 ms (P = 0.008) during exercise. In contrast to AVD(optVDD), there was a significant difference in AVD(optDDD) of -8.8 +/- 14.5 ms (P = 0.014) between the resting and submaximal exercise conditions. In DDD pacing, AVD(opt) was shortened by 2.6 ms/10 bpm.


CONCLUSION
In consideration of the findings of the studies performed to date, the rate-adaptive AV delay should be deactivated.