{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01875, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.0125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Right to an Open Future Concerning Genetic Information

primary importance placed on the child’s interests in the ACMG ES/GS scenario. Furthermore, the potential for increased knowledge relevant to parental health that arises in the WGS context is absent in conventional hypothesisdriven genetic testing. Therefore, we believe that both the ACMG ES/GS and AAP/ACMG statements are consistent with the best interests of the child and are not in ethical tension with one another.