{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015182186234817813, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012145748987854251, 'mean_word_length': 5.030487804878049, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Revisiting the Need for Reform in the Disclosure of Tests and Raw Test Data to the Courts: The 2002 APA Ethics Code Has Not Solved Our Dilemma

ABSTRACT Lees-Haley and Courtney (2000) published an article on the state of psychologists ' practices with respect to the disclosure of tests and raw test data and called for reforms created by a joint committee of the American Bar Association and the American Psychological Association (APA). It was posited that psychologists' unwillingness to provide raw data to the courts was resulting in damage to their professional reputations, undermining their credibility as professional scientists acting in good faith, and ultimately contrary to the best interests of consumers. Since that time, the APA has promulgated a new set of ethical guidelines that speak to these issues in different language. This article serves to renew our recommendation for reform concerning the release of raw data to the courts consistent with the 2002 Ethics Code.