{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0196078431372549, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004901960784313725, 'mean_word_length': 4.753521126760563, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Commentary: Gentrification, Segregation and the Vocabulary of Affluent Residential Choice

When I began my doctoral work, on 
gentrification in London, I was fuelled by a desire 
to measure what was largely an invisible 
social problem. Household displacement had 
barely been tackled as an issue and, as for 
public policy, the idea had entered neither 
the vocabulary or psychology, except perhaps 
through well-known texts on the impacts of 
dislocation through slum clearance, such 
as that by Young and Willmott (1964).The almost total 
influence of gentrification in many centralcity 
areas suggests that any displacement 
that could be achieved has already occurred 
and that this has already left many boroughs 
and neighbourhoods as high-income enclaves, 
often with a remnant scattering of 
public housing.