{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01415929203539823, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.431818181818182, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The psychiatrist as informed consent technician: a problem for the professions.

Psychiatric consultation in general medical settings is a valuable corollary to the work of other health care professionals. In various contexts, such consultation can be debased, however, to the point that the psychiatrist is serving as a technician rather than as a consultant in relation to several aspects of the informed consent process. The authors identify five inappropriate models of psychiatric consultation and review the proper approach to obtaining true informed consent.