{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05752961082910321, 'fraction_numerical': 0.10829103214890017, 'mean_word_length': 4.97979797979798, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Correction to “Evidence for a modest undercount bias in early historical Atlantic tropical cyclone counts”

[1] In the paper ‘‘Evidence for a modest undercount bias in early historical Atlantic tropical cyclone counts,’’ by Michael E. Mann et al. (Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L22707, doi:10.1029/2007GL031781) the last sentence of paragraph 16 in section 3 should read as follows. [2] Our analyses consequently suggest the average pre1944 undercount to be between 0.5 and 2, with a most likely value of 1.2. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 34, L24704, doi:10.1029/2007GL032798, 2007