{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027645376549094377, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.818181818181818, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The study of the future, social forecasting, mutations: Semiotic challenges and contributions

Abstract The research fieldwork dedicated to trend analysis and foresight/forecast scenarios building, represents an unusual raid in an area where economic and social sciences have invested many efforts. Nevertheless, the semiotic dimension of this subject is not sufficiently thorough; many issues are at stake: – the definition criteria of the corpus;– the selection of trend signals, the selection criteria;– the narrative framework of scenarios;– the deep logic permitting to describe the relationships between the trends and to trace their evolution;– the prevision as mutation logic, anticipation exercise, simulation activity;– the different application contexts of the anticipation science. We are going to investigate this area of analysis, for its relevance in post-Greimassian studies, for its interface with social sciences, as well as for its relevance for the legitimacy of semiotics in contemporary discussions of innovation and evolution.