{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.048864418444597386, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04679972470750172, 'mean_word_length': 4.048611111111111, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
117 A Systematic Review Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Hem-O-Lok Clips and Endoloops In Securing the Base of The Appendix During Laparoscopic Appendicectomy


 
 
 One of the crucial steps of laparoscopic appendicectomy is to secure the base of appendix. A variety of techniques for stump closure have been described as Endoloops(Vicryl or PDS), Hem-o-lok clips, intracorporeal suturing and endoscopic staplers.
 
 
 
 A detailed literature survey using Pubmed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was carried out to extract studies conducted between 1990 and 2020. A total of 14 studies- 3 randomized controlled trials & 11 comparative studies enrolling 2098 (1030 in HL & 1068 in EL group) patients were included in the final analysis comparing Hem-o-lok versus endoloops for closure of appendiceal base. Outcome measures were Operative time, Cost benefit, Post-operative complications, and length of hospital stay.
 
 
 
 The average time of operation was significantly shorter in the HL group (SMD -0.79; 95% CI -1.03 – 0.56; z = 6.61; p < 0.00001). HL was found to be more cost-effective. (SMD -5.00; 95% CI-7.00 – 3.00; z = 4.90; p < 0.00001). However, no statistical difference was found between both the groups when comparing mean postoperative length of hospital stay & post-operative.
 
 
 
 Based on the results of the above study, applying Hem-o-lok clips seems to be a safe, effacious and cost-effective way of securing the base of appendix.
