{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05644302449414271, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03301384451544196, 'mean_word_length': 4.592261904761905, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Abstract 14327: Tricuspid Valve Annular Area Correlations and Determinants in Healthy Controls and Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation


 Introduction:
 Concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) repair during mitral valve (MV) surgery based on annular dilation rather than the degree of regurgitation (TR) has been shown to be beneficial and is supported by the guidelines.
 
 
 Hypothesis:
 Assess the correlations between tricuspid and mitral annular areas (TVA and MVA, respectively) indexed to body surface area (BSA) measured by cardiac computed tomography (CT), and identify the determinants of the TVA in normal and diseased states.
 
 
 Methods:
 We included 50 consecutive controls (no valvular heart disease undergoing coronary CTA), 50 primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) patients referred for robotic repair, and 25 functional MR (FMR) patients referred for percutaneous therapy, without significant associated TR (≤2+ TR). We used dedicated CT software (Aquarius, TeraRecon) to perform the annular measurements. A mid-diastolic phase acquisition (~70%) was used
 
 
 Results:
 Patients with FMR were older (median age [25th, 75th] = 70 years [63,77.5] vs. 55 [48,59] in PMR and 48 [38,55] in controls), had more clinical comorbidities, and lower ejection fraction (32% [23,40] vs. >60% in both other groups). TVA was significantly correlated to MVA in controls (r≥0.5; p<0.001), as well as in patients with PMR and FMR. (Figure 1). Table 1 shows the univariate correlations and multivariate determinants of the TVA. In the multivariate analysis, the MVA, RA area, and LVEDV were the independent predictors of TVA. Interestingly, the MVA was the most important predictor (β= 0.420, p<0.001).
 
 
 Conclusion:
 In individuals without valvular heart disease and in patients with severe MR (PMR and FMR) with ≤ 2+ TR, the TVA was largely determined by the MVA.
 
 
 
 
 
 
