{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02748414376321353, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012684989429175475, 'mean_word_length': 4.780487804878049, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Tight bound on Johnson's algorithm for Max-SAT

We present a new technique that gives a more thorough analysis on Johnson's classical algorithm for the maximum satisfiability problem. In contrast to the common belief for two decades that Johnson's algorithm has performance ratio 1/2, we show that the performance ratio is 2/3, and that this bound is tight. Moreover we show that simple generalizations of Johnson's algorithm do not improve the performance ratio bound 2/3.