{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.059854014598540145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04452554744525548, 'mean_word_length': 4.506024096385542, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Vaginal hysterectomy in non-prolapsed uterus].

INTRODUCTION
There is an increasing number of methods available for removing the uterus, but no multicentre, randomised, clinical trials are available to show which type of operation ensures the best outcome for the patient. The charts of 207 vaginal hysterectomies were reviewed in this descriptive study. The aim was to examine whether vaginal hysterectomy might be an alternative for a group of patients.


MATERIAL AND METHODS
Only patients with a previous, vaginal birth were entered in the study (four patients had not given birth). A uterus weight of 500-600 g was the upper limit set by our group for the use of the vaginal route. Patient characteristics, data from the operations, complications, and histological examinations of the uterus were analysed.


RESULTS
The mean operation time was 61 min (95% CI 58-64 min), range 25-115 min. The difference between preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin was 1.1 mmol/l (95% CI 1.0-1.2 mmol/l). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.9 days (95% CI 2.7-3.1 days). The complications were 1) febrile morbidity; 17 (8%) (95% CI 4-12%); 2) urinary tract injury, 3 (2%) (95% CI 0-3%); 3) unforeseen need for major surgery (including conversion to abdominal hysterectomy), 3 (2%) (95% CI 0-3%).


DISCUSSION
In some patients, vaginal hysterectomy is a good alternative.