{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.07644444444444444, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024888888888888887, 'mean_word_length': 4.816537467700258, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Chirality of a 1,10-bisacetoxymitosene compound. Impact on reductive activation, DNA interstrand cross-linking and antitumour activity.

The absolute configuration at the C-1 position of a 1,10-bisacetoxymitosene (WV15) appears to be important for enzymatic reduction, DNA interstrand cross-linking and in vitro antitumour activity of this compound. DNA cross-linking by the (-)-(S)-enantiomer of WV15 upon reduction with sodium dithionite (Na2S2O4) was more efficient than cross-linking by the (+)-(R)-enantiomer. Also, following enzymatic two-electron reduction by DT-diaphorase or one-electron reduction by xanthine oxidase, (-)-(S)-WV15 was more efficient in DNA cross-linking than (+)-(R)-WV15. However, the difference in cross-linking efficiency was less than upon chemical reduction, and in the case of enzymatic reduction that higher amount of DNA cross-links formed by (-)-(S)-WV15 can be explained by more efficient enzymatic activation of this enantiomer as compared to (+)-(R)-WV15. The enantiomeric preference upon chemical reduction can be explained by a second chemical reduction of DNA-bound WV15, which presumably does not occur upon enzymatic reduction. (-)-(S)-WV15 appeared to be more active than its (+)-(R) counterpart in A204 and L1210 tumour cell lines, with (+)-(R)/(-)-(S) toxicity ratios as high as 200 and 68, respectively. In Chinese hamster V79 cell lines, toxicity of the enantiomers was measured under oxic and hypoxic conditions. The oxic/hypoxic toxicity ratios of (+)-(R)-and (-)-(S)-WV15 in the Chinese hamster V79 cell line were 5.5 and 2.4, respectively. These different oxic/hypoxic toxicity ratios may indicate that different reducing enzymes are involved in the activation of the enantiomers. Generally, in biological systems, different activities of (+)-(R)- and (-)-(S)-WV15 appear not to be caused by different intrinsic cross-linking capacities of the enantiomers, but by more efficient enzymatic activation of (-)-(S)-WV15, as compared to (+)-(R)-WV15. The (-)-(S)-enantiomer of WV15 appears to be more active both in in vitro tumour models and in DNA cross-linking assays, and therefore the absolute configuration of mitosenes is indicated to be important for the antitumour activity of these compounds.