{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02297794117647059, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.918478260869565, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Human rights in the context of the postomoderial legal review

Natural-legal concepts characterize human rights as the manifestation of the values of human existence and the manifestation of objective needs. However, one should not ignore the fact that the understanding of the genesis and essence of human rights was evaluated extensively on the basis of two anti-ethical positions, and positivist approach to the understanding of human rights was a certain antipode. Under the conditions of the legitimate legal understanding, the concepts of the state and the law dominate the concept of human rights, whereas in the second sense, the dominant is the individual and his natural rights. The modern concept of human rights must be based on the modern (postmodern) philosophy of man, taking into account all the latest developments in human knowledge. Ignoring them, or refusing them, is the path to «false» law, a kind of degradation, a road to the past, devoid of a humanistic dimension, which is understood as a renunciation of a person, a betrayal of it, to which it deserves nothing.