{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02633969118982743, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004541326067211626, 'mean_word_length': 4.989130434782608, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Porous polyethylene sheet implant with a barrier surface: a rabbit study.

Soft tissue adhesion to the porous polyethylene sheet implant (PPSI) raises the concern of postoperative extraocular motility disturbance after orbital blowout fracture repairs using PPSI. A PPSI with a barrier surface (PPSI-B) has been developed to reduce adhesion between soft tissue and the implant. Six PPSI-B and six conventional PPSI were implanted under the scalps of three New Zealand white rabbits. The implants were harvested at 2-, 4-, and 20-week intervals. Clinical and histologic comparisons were made between PPSI-B and PPSI with regard to adhesion at the soft tissue-implant interface. Clinically, PPSI-B demonstrated less adhesion between soft tissue and implant compared with the conventional PPSI. Both types of implants demonstrated a complete fibrovascular ingrowth by 2 weeks. Because PPSI-B causes less adhesion at the soft tissue-implant interface, consideration should be given to the use of PPSI-B in repairs of orbital blowout fractures in which extraocular muscle is exposed to the implant surface.