{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025336500395882817, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011876484560570071, 'mean_word_length': 4.851851851851852, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Below-knee amputation for ischaemic gangrene. Prospective, randomized comparison of a transverse and a sagittal operative technique.

In a prospective, randomized study a comparison was made of the results of primary below-knee amputation for ischaemic gangrene carried out by two methods: In 47 cases by the transverse technique with a long posterior musculo-cutaneous flap and in 41 cases by the sagittal technique using equally large medial and lateral musculo-cutaneous flaps--in both instances followed by 2 weeks in a half-open plaster cast with extended knee. The sex ratio and age distribution were the same in both groups. Minor differences in the vascular condition between the groups, assessed by the duration of rest pain, pulsation findings, extent of gangrene, and frequency of diabetes, wholly or partially equalized each other. The course of healing was the same in both groups, primary healing being attained in 38 per cent and 41 per cent, respectively (0.70 less than P less than 0.80). There was also no difference between the results as regards limb fitting, ambulation, occupational, or social status. It is concluded that the choice between the two methods can be based merely upon surgical skill and the ischaemic changes in the lower leg.