{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015220700152207, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0076103500761035, 'mean_word_length': 4.771929824561403, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Article 57 Court experts

A Court expert provides evidence that may be employed by the Court if its knowledge, including the level of knowledge gained from the evidence produced by the submissions of the parties and the evidence submitted by them, is not sufficient to reach a decision. Legally, it is classed as part of the sequence of all evidence in the case (Art 53(1) UPCA), and does not have a higher status than other evidence available to the Court or the technical explanations provided in the pleadings by the parties or their oral submissions together with demonstrations merely because the evidence of that expert has been employed by the Court.