{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014008620689655173, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008620689655172414, 'mean_word_length': 5.451388888888889, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Alternative forms of care for unaccompanied refugee minors: a comparison of US and Australian experience

One of the most vulnerable categories of Indochinese to enter refugee camps and subsequently be accepted for permanent resettlement by Western countries are children unaccompanied by their parents. After their arrival in resettlement countries, providing suitable long-term care arrangements has proved a difficult challenge. This has been due to these countries’ limited previous experience with unaccompanied minors in general, and their total lack of experience with unaccompanied Indochinese minors in particular, prior to the end of the Vietnam war in 1975. Given the lack of experience and very limited time for planning, it is not surprising that, during the late 1970s, care arrangements for unaccompanied minors were developed largely on an ad hoc basis in countries accepting them for resettlement. Many types of