{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.07927087749046206, 'fraction_numerical': 0.05765154726579059, 'mean_word_length': 4.6324582338902145, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Evaluation of refractory monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis with ambulatory urodynamics monitoring and conventional urodynamics].

Objective: To explore the clinical value of ambulatory urodynamics monitoring (AUM) in the diagnosis and treatment of children with refractory monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (RMNE) by comparing the urodynamic parameters of AUM with those of conventional urodynamics (CUD). Methods: A total of 40 children (22 males and 18 females) diagnosed with RMNE in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from May 2017 to September 2019 were collected. They were aged 9-16 years, and their frequency of nocturnal bed-wetting was≥2 times per week. CUD and one sleep cycle AUM were performed, respectively. Then, the urodynamic parameters were recorded and analyzed. Results: Five of the 40 children dropped out of the study because of the poor compliance. The age of children with RMNE was(12.6±2.1)years old, the ratio of male to female was 19∶16, and the severity of enuresis (enuresis frequency) was(4.2±1.7) times per week. Compared to the CUD group, the bladder compliance (BC) [(28.4±7.7) ml/cmH2O vs (23.6±6.1) ml/cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa)] and maximum detrusor pressure (Pmax.det) [(44.6±9.1) cmH2O vs (36.8±8.3) cmH2O] in the AUM group were significantly higher (P<0.05). The maximum flow rate (Qmax) [(19.6±7.2) ml/s vs (20.9±5.4) ml/s] and post void residual (PVR) [(9.5±5.7) ml vs (10.9±5.3) ml] between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). Detrusor overactivity (DO) was detected in 27 cases (77.1%) during AUM and in 16 cases (45.7%) during CUD; the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Among them, 15 cases (42.9%) with DO were detected both in CUD and AUM, while 12 (34.3%) with DO were not detected in CUD. For the 15 cases with DO detected by both CUD and AUM, the frequency [(3.1±1.0) times/h vs (2.4±0.8) times/h] and maximum value of DO [(22.9±4.5) cmH2O vs (19.2±4.0) cmH2O] in the AUM group were both higher than those in the CUD group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Bladder dysfunction can be diagnosed in children with RMNE using AUM. Furthermore, AUM is more accurate than CUD in evaluating BC, Pmax.det, DO, and other parameters. For children with RMNE and with unsatisfactory CUD results, further AUM examination is recommended to clarify the etiology.