{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017766497461928935, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01015228426395939, 'mean_word_length': 5.7988505747126435, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Hearing preservation following suboccipital removal of acoustic neuromas

Advances in the diagnosis and intraoperative management of acoustic neuromas have greatly reduced the incidence of neurologic deficits following their removal. Ninety‐three patients underwent acoustic tumor removal during a 4½‐year period, and hearing preservation was attempted in 20 cases. Hearing was preserved in 65% of the entire series, and excellent results were obtained in tumors less than 1.5 cm. No patient with a tumor greater than 1.5 cm had serviceable hearing preserved when total tumor removal was performed. Two patients, one with neurofibromatosis and one with an acoustic neuroma in an only‐hearing ear, had planned partial tumor removal with preservation of hearing. Preoperative auditory brainstem response results were not predictive of postoperative hearing preservation. Intraoperative auditory brainstem response monitoring demonstrated that loss of wave V consistently correlated with loss of hearing postoperatively, whereas persistence of wave V (with a latency prolongation not exceeding 3.00 ms) was predictive of successful hearing preservation regardless of latency increases.