{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019464720194647202, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004866180048661801, 'mean_word_length': 5.141791044776119, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Towards a General Argumentation System based on Answer-Set Programming

Within the last years, especially since the work proposed by Dung in 1995, argumentation has emerged as a central issue in Artificial Intelligence. With the so called argumentation frameworks (AFs) it is possible to represent statements (arguments) together with a binary attack relation between them. 
The conflicts between the statements are solved on a semantical level by selecting acceptable sets of arguments. An increasing amount of data requires an automated computation of such solutions. 
Logic Programming in particular Answer-Set Programming (ASP) turned out to be adequate to solve problems associated to such AFs. 
In this work we use ASP to design a sophisticated system for the evaluation of several types of argumentation frameworks.