{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01171605789110958, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.54054054054054, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Inmate Supervisory Style

Abstract This exploratory study examines the inmate supervisory styles of women and men working as correctional officers in two medium security state prisons. In-depth interviews concerning hypothetical incidents are utilized to explore the approaches of officers toward inmates. Findings indicate that officers of both genders perceive women to have a unique style of supervision. Men officers viewed their female counterparts as less aggressive, more lenient, and too friendly with inmates. Women correctional officers see themselves as adopting a more personalized, service-oriented approach to inmates. Data from the hypothetical incidents reveals that both genders respond similarly in confrontational situations with inmates. Where differences are present, they are much different than the literature and the officers in the present study surmised. Women tended to be strict and assert their authority while male officers were more likely to talk things out with the inmate. Findings suggest that training may neutralize the influence of gender in inmate supervision. Any differences in styles may be attributed to ongoing problems with acceptance by male coworkers and the pressure felt by women correctional officers to prove themselves. Further research is needed to confirm these findings using a larger comparative sample and through direct observation of correctional officers and their interactions with inmates.