{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04601479046836483, 'fraction_numerical': 0.027937551355792935, 'mean_word_length': 5.151515151515151, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A multisite performance study comparing the reading of immunohistochemical slides on a computer monitor with conventional manual microscopy for estrogen and progesterone receptor analysis.

A multisite study was conducted to assess the performance of the Aperio digital pathology system (Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA) for reading estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) slides on a computer monitor. A total of 520 formalin-fixed breast tissue specimens were assayed at 3 clinical sites for ER and PR (260 each). Percentage and average staining intensity of positive nuclei were assessed. At each site, 3 pathologists performed a blinded reading of the glass slides using their microscopes initially and later using digital images on a computer monitor. Comparable percentages of agreements were obtained for manual microscopy (MM) and manual digital slide reading (MDR) (ER, percentage of positive nuclei with cutoffs: MM, 91.3%-99.0%/MDR, 91.3%-100.0%; PR, percentage of positive nuclei with cutoffs: MM, 83.8%-99.0%/MDR, 76.3%-100.0%). Reading ER and PR slides on a computer monitor using the Aperio digital pathology system is equivalent to reading the slides with a conventional light microscope.