{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04309715120525932, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0029218407596785976, 'mean_word_length': 4.805084745762712, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.

PURPOSE
To study the effect of three mammography target-filter combinations on contrast and dose.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
With screen-film sensitometry, the contrast of a calcification target embedded in simulated breast tissue was measured for three target-filter combinations--molybdenum-molybdenum (Mo-Mo), molybdenum rhodium (Mo-Rh), and rhodium-rhodium (Rh-Rh)--as a function of x-ray tube potential, breast thickness, and breast composition. The corresponding average glandular tissue doses were also determined.


RESULTS
Contrast and dose decreased with increasing kilovolt peak with all three target-filter combinations. Contrast was highest for Mo-Mo and lowest for Rh-Rh for images exposed with a low kilovoltage (< 29 kVp). For thick or radiographically dense phantoms, the contrast produced with Mo-Mo was less than or equal to that produced by the other two x-ray spectra when a higher kilovoltage (> or = 29 kVp) was selected. Average glandular dose was greatest for Mo-Mo and lowest for Rh-Rh for all phantom thicknesses, breast compositions, and tube potentials studied.


CONCLUSIONS
For the thick or dense breast, the alternative target-filter selections can achieve contrast comparable to or better than that obtainable with Mo-Mo while using a smaller dose.