{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014720314033366046, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001962708537782139, 'mean_word_length': 5.144578313253012, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The lead-based paint abatement repair and maintenance study in Baltimore: historic framework and study design.

The tragedy of lead paint exposure for young children has continued in this country for over a century, despite widespread knowledge of the danger of lead additives. During the first half of the 20th century, while almost every other country in the western world was banning the use of lead in interior house paint, the paint companies in the United States were promoting its use. The paint companies’ promotion included advertising which made children a central element of their campaigns even though lead’s potentially devastating effects on the development of young children were well known. The problem stems from the fact that although lead in interior house paint improves durability, when taken internally, it may affect the central nervous system leading to neurobehavioral problems and learning deficiencies in young children. The lead in paint gets to children in several ways: from chips of paint