{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013232514177693762, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.463917525773196, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
La altura histórica de Polo en la filosofía

The historical height of a thinker and a current of philosophy is measured by the cognitive acts that it mainly exercises and by the real acts it discovers. Neither are unrestricted, but we can always exercise more first and discover more of the latter. Polo has discovered the hierarchy of one and the other and has put hierarchical order among the various preceding thinkers. This places him at the top of the history of philosophy, but since it does not close, how can we continue?