{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04473902236951118, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01739850869925435, 'mean_word_length': 4.618604651162791, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Electroconvulsive Therapy in Severe Manic Patients

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of moderate-dose bifrontal (BF) with low-dose bitemporal (BT) electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the treatment of patients with severe mania. Methods: In a parallel, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 28 patients with severe mania admitted to a university hospital were assigned randomly to moderate-dose BF (n = 14) and low-dose BT (n= 14) ECT. The primary outcome measures included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Results: All patients received at least 6 sessions of ECT. The 2 groups did not show any difference in their baseline MMSE or YMRS scores (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the MMSE scores of the BF compared with the BT group after both the sixth ECT (P < 0.05) and final ECT treatments (P < 0.05). Young Mania Rating Scale scores did not differ between the 2 groups after either the sixth or the last ECT sessions (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Moderate-dose BF ECT was as effective as BT ECT but was associated with fewer cognitive side effects in the treatment of patients with severe mania.