{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016423357664233577, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014598540145985401, 'mean_word_length': 5.614457831325301, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Equal Employment Opportunity: Legal Issues and Societal Consequences

MITCHELL SHERMAN LEGAL ISSUES T original intent of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was to provide equal employment opportunities to all groups by specifically forbidding an employer from limiting, classifying or segregating employees in such a way that would deprive any individual of employment opportunities. Nathan Glazer (1975) eloquently argues that one of the central values within this society, composed of a complex pattern of ethnic groups, has been universalism. America: