{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.005263157894736842, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010526315789473684, 'mean_word_length': 5.088, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Did Hindu Succession Act Indeed Outcast Mitakshara Coparcenary

Through this paper an attempt has been made to understand and review the true nature of the changes brought in by the legislature through the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and later by the Amendment Act of 2005. It is an attempt to answer to the question whether it was the intention of the legislature to abandon completely the Mitakshara Coparcenary concept and replace it by intestate succession. The paper argues that the despite the abrogation of the principle of survivorship the Act has retained the institution of the coparcenary within itself in a manner slightly different from the Mitakshara concept of coparcenary protecting the interest of the daughters of the coparcener in particular.