{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015776699029126214, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.818181818181818, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Strategy for the protein identification of human proteome expression profile: selection of searching database].

Widely used method of protein identification for high-throughout proteome expression profile studies was database-dependent, so the selection of databases for the protein identification was very important. Despite the deficiency of available human protein databases, the complementarity of human proteins could be got mainly from human genome but not from the protein databases of other organisms. According to the comparison of the current protein databases from different aspects, IPI was recommended for the basic identification for the studies of human proteome expression profile, and other human protein or nucleic acid databases were needed for the complementary identification and novel protein mining.