{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023465703971119134, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01444043321299639, 'mean_word_length': 5.453488372093023, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Experimental Turn and Ordinary Language

Following the publication of Words and Things, Ernest Gellner’s 1959 polemic against what Bertrand Russell described in his laudatory preface as ‘the linguistic philosophy now in vogue at Oxford’, the cluster of philosophers under attack placed a stronger emphasis on the multiplicity of their diverse aims, methods, and viewpoints (cf. Mehat 1963, part I). Those leading the relatively new movement in experimental philosophy have the good sense to highlight the diversity of their ambitions from the outset: