{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023187459177008492, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007838014369693011, 'mean_word_length': 5.0773809523809526, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Modern biomaterials as hemostatic dressings in kidney nephron sparing surgery (NSS)--murine model. A preliminary report].

INTRODUCTION
Kidney cancer is now days, one of the main problems in oncological urology. More frequent cases detection of this type of cancer and the implementation of modern methods of treatment, involves the public and good diagnostic radiological imaging methods. Approximately 40% of renal tumors are detected clinically as a changes in T1N0M0 stage. This means that in these patients, surgery can be performed using the method of nephron sparing surgery (NSS), far from consisting the implementation of radical nephrectomy. Unfortunately, despite the saving nature of this type of treatment, NSS methods are associated with local recurrence of tumor formation. Another problem is intra operative bleeding, that's why in order to stop this negative process surgeons currently use hemostatic dressings. Potentially and clinically significant solution could be a combination of this two main problematics points of concern, through the use of modern biomaterials coated on oncostatic substances as a haemostatic dressings, to the prevention of tumor recurrence.


AIM OF THE WORK
The aim of this work, was to present preliminary report of the use of advanced biomaterials, as haemostatic dressings in an experimental technique of nephron sparing surgery on an murine model.


MATERIAL AND METHODS
In the experiment we use two types of biomaterials and the standard haemostatic dressing used in the nephron sparing surgery (NSS) as a control. We use a polycaprolactone biomaterial obtained by electrospinning. As a second type of biomaterial, we use a homogeneous material with a structure similar to wool, also obtained from medical polycaprolactone by electrospinning. As an murine (in vivo) model in the study, we use 10 C57BL/J mice (with the local ethical committee permission). 8 mice were used in the present study, 2 mice were constituted as a separate control for obtaining the bleeding data. Kidney melanoma cells were implanted under the C57B1/J B16 mouse kidney fibrous capsule, one week before NSS. After 3 weeks the animals were sacrificed for comparison of hemostatic dressings function.


RESULTS
Used biomaterials fulfilled their role as a hameostatic dresings. The material (Type I) was convenient and good for suturing. Haemostatic action times were as follows: (Type I) - 30 seconds. (Type III) - 50 seconds. In the control group were also observed, a proper hemostatic function after 30 seconds. In sectional observation was also found in 3 kidneys section preparation samples, a local tumor recurrence and metastasis to the other tissues of the abdomen.


CONCLUSION
The tested biomaterials fulfill their hemostatic effect on kidney after NSS, without any significant difference acording to a standard hemostatic dressing used clinically. This data may be a potential factor for use in further studies to determine their continued relevance in the prevention of local tumor recurrence after nephron sparing surgery.