{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024320457796852647, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002861230329041488, 'mean_word_length': 5.086956521739131, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On reconciliation and respect, justice and the good life

That the German publication of Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics would generate a different set of concerns than those voiced by the book’s Anglo-American critics should come as no surprise.1 So far the latter have focused on my analysis of Rawls and the extent to which my claim that the ’original position’ reflected the standpoint of the ’generalized other’ was justified.2 A different set of objections have been voiced by feminist theorists, and in particular by Iris Young, who has argued that the procedure of ’moral reversibility’ and ’taking the standpoint of the other’ which I advocate