{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019157088122605363, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.127272727272727, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Complex decision‐making for percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with coronary artery bypass grafting: Use of FFR in multivessel lesion selection

Patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) frequently experience accelerated or recurrent angina. When multiple intermediate coronary stenoses are found at coronary angiography, the cardiologist is confronted by a dilemma in deciding which stenoses are responsible for the patient’s symptoms. Herein, we present a case of chronic, recurrent angina in a patient with severe native vessel CAD, prior CABG procedure, and percutaneous coronary interventions requiring a multilesion physiologic assessment of complex anatomy to select the appropriate lesion for treatment.