{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026604068857589983, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.153846153846154, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Accommodationism, Structuralism, and Superstructuralism

Post Keynesians object to Milton Friedman's notion of a "helicopter drop" of money. I think their objections are appropriate. Basil Moore asserts the central bank just holds the line on interest rates, and accommodates everything. How does it do this? What are the asset transactions (T-account entries) between the central bank and the private sector that accomplish this injection of reserves? Moore never specifies this, which leads one to think that there may be a helicopter in the background. If the central bank buys assets from the private banks, then balance sheets will be