{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04352611881624053, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02616599050224864, 'mean_word_length': 4.7386753293629305, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 6, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Carbon, Nutrients and Methylmercury in Water from Small Catchments Affected by Various Forest Management Operations

: Forest management activities in boreal and hemiboreal environments have been found to increase the concentration of carbon, nutrients, and methylmercury (MeHg) in runoff water, thus contributing to environmental quality issues. We evaluated carbon, nutrient, and MeHg concentrations in water at eight small, forested catchments on organic soils in Latvia, subject to ditch cleaning and beaver dam removal. These management-induced disturbances were classiﬁed into a major, minor, or no disturbance classes. The concentrations of dissolved organic carbon and total nitrogen were elevated in disturbed catchments (both major and minor) compared to the catchments with no disturbance. The concentrations of MeHg in the water displayed a clear seasonal variation with higher concentrations in spring and summer, but there were no signiﬁcant differences in MeHg concentrations between catchments with major, minor, and no disturbances. However, the higher concentrations of SO 42 − in the disturbed catchments compared to those undisturbed may promote MeHg formation if the conditions become more reduced further downstream. While most former studies of forest management effects on water quality have focused on forest harvest, our research contributes to the currently rather scarce pool of data on the impact of less-studied management operations, such as ditch cleaning and beaver dam removal, on carbon, nutrient, and MeHg concentrations in runoff water.


Introduction
The transformation towards a more circular, bio-based economy relying on renewable resources will increase the demand for bioenergy and likely cause alterations in land-use practices, including the intensification of forestry [1]. The forest area in Nordic and Baltic countries accounts for more than one third of the whole EU28 forest area, and Sweden, Finland, Estonia, and Latvia especially have major forest-based economic activities [2]. The importance of the forest sector, combined with the EU Green Deal and related environmental goals, one of them being water resource protection, calls for even stronger emphasis on environmental quality issues, including the identification and filling of the remaining knowledge gaps.
The main concerns connected to the impact of land management practices including forestry on water quality are related to the increase in concentrations and runoff of carbon (e.g., [3,4]), nutrients (e.g., [5][6][7][8][9][10]), and mercury (Hg) (e.g., [11][12][13][14][15]). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) plays a key role in the biogeochemistry and ecology of surface waters, and its transport from terrestrial to aquatic ecosystems is primarily related to runoff and DOC Sweden revealed short-term increases in THg and MeHg concentrations immediately after the operations [59]. Those effects were most probably related to erosion that occurred during ditch cleaning operations [59]. More knowledge is therefore needed on whether ditch cleaning can cause more long-lasting changes in THg and MeHg concentrations.
Because of incomplete coverage and deviating results of studies performed so far, the magnitude of possible forest operation effects on Hg and MeHg contamination in freshwater and their variability among different types of forest landscapes remain unclear [12,13]. Most forestry effect studies have focused on forest harvesting, and there is a need for additional knowledge on how water quality, including the concentration of MeHg, is influenced by various kinds of forest management activities that aim to increase water drainage, such as ditch cleaning and beaver dam removal. Moreover, data on Hg and MeHg in water in the Baltic States are scarce, and a better understanding of the processes underlying catchment MeHg production is needed. To address some of these concerns, this study sought to characterize the spatial and temporal (seasonal) distribution of water chemistry, including MeHg in runoff water from small forest catchments with different forest management activities in organic soils in Latvia. We hypothesized that watercourses with major disturbance from drainage system maintenance and beaver dam removal will have increased concentrations of nutrients, DOC, and MeHg, although these activities generally lower the groundwater level.

Sampling Sites
The study was conducted in the eastern part of Latvia (Figure 1), in experimental forests of the Kalsnava Forest district. In the area, for the period 2018−2019, the mean annual precipitation was 636 mm (monthly average rainfall pattern for longer period was calculated from 2007 to 2019, Figure S1). The mean annual air temperature was 6.6 • C, the minimum mean monthly temperature was −8.7 • C (February 2018), and the maximum mean monthly temperature was 19.2 • C (July 2018). Part of the area was drained for forestry purposes in the 1960s, with additional drainage carried out in the 1980s. There is a dense drainage ditch network in the area. The bedrock is sand of varying roughness, covered with peat. The botanic composition of peat is rather uniform, with 75%-80% sedge peat and 20%-25% woody peat [60]. At 1.5-2.0 m soil depth Phragmites peat was found. In 2008, mean density of peat in all layers was 0.15 kg L −1 [60]. The peat layer is thicker than 20 cm over 46.0% of the area of the studied catchments (total area 1601.5 ha). Despite the peat layer, due to the confined aquifer discharge, water in the area has higher pH values than might be expected. During the study, no soil flooding due to storm events was recorded. However, beavers are active in the area and beaver ponds have been found in the catchments of sites 3 and 8. The dominant tree species are Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), and birch (Betula sp.) (40.0%, 32.5% and 16.1% of the area of the studied catchments, respectively). The main forest management system is uniform regeneration felling. The share of clear-felled compartments currently varies from 0% to 6.2% of the catchment area. Part of the study area (including sampling site 3) is located in a protected area, a floodplain mire of the river Veseta. Characteristics of the drainage system catchments corresponding to each sampling site are summarized in Table A1 in the Appendix A.
In total, eight sampling points were selected in the watercourses, representing various management alternatives and severities of disturbance (Table 1). In the context of this study, disturbance was considered an intervention that caused alterations in the streambed of studied ditches or watercourses, e.g., drainage system maintenance and beaver dam removal. Sites with no disturbance had no documented management history for at least last 15 years. Sites with major disturbances had undergone either ditch cleaning or complete beaver dam removal within the last 3-5 years. Ditch cleaning was carried out once in 2016 using an excavator, by completely removing the layer of vegetation within the ditches and restoring their initial depth. The beaver dam at site 5 was completely removed manually in August 2017. In sites with minor disturbances, partial ditch cleaning or partial beaver dam removal had been carried out to ensure the water flow, but most of the sediment remained intact during the operation. All management actives in major and minor disturbed sites aimed to increase the drainage capacity. In total, eight sampling points were selected in the watercourses, representing various management alternatives and severities of disturbance (Table 1). In the context of this study, disturbance was considered an intervention that caused alterations in the streambed of studied ditches or watercourses, e.g., drainage system maintenance and beaver dam removal. Sites with no disturbance had no documented management history for at least last 15 years. Sites with major disturbances had undergone either ditch cleaning or complete beaver dam removal within the last 3-5 years. Ditch cleaning was carried out once in 2016 using an excavator, by completely removing the layer of vegetation within the ditches and restoring their initial depth. The beaver dam at site 5 was completely removed manually in August 2017. In sites with minor disturbances, partial ditch cleaning or partial beaver dam removal had been carried out to ensure the water flow, but most of the sediment remained intact during the operation. All management actives in major and minor disturbed sites aimed to increase the drainage capacity.

Water Sampling and Chemical Analyses
Water samples for analysis of general chemistry were taken once a month during the period from November 2018 to December 2019. Water for MeHg analysis was sampled four times in four different seasons: on 21 November 2018 (autumn, AU), on 14 February Each bottle was rinsed with deionized water and stream water before sample collection. Grab-samples were taken from the ditches by carefully sinking the bottle below the water level. Single-use plastic gloves were worn during sampling. Water samples were placed in a cold box on ice to be transported to the laboratory. Before sampling, the water temperature, optical dissolved oxygen (ODO) content, and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) were measured in the ditches using a YSI ProDSS multiparameter water quality meter.
All water chemistry analyses, except for MeHg, were performed in the Forest Environment Laboratory at the Latvian State Forest Research Institute "Silava". The pH was The MeHg content in water samples was determined at the Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR", Latvia. The MeHg concentration in unfiltered water was measured using gas chromatography (GC, Thermo Scientific Trace 1300, Waltham, MA, USA) by the inductively coupled plasma-mass-spectrometry (ICP-MS) method (Thermo Scientific iCAP RQ, Waltham, MA, USA) according to BIOR-T-012-199-2019/1. The standard reference material used was methylmercury(II) chloride (PESTANAL ® , analytical standard, Sigma 33368, Darmstadt, Germany), and the typical recovery for spiked samples was 85%-110%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.1 ng L −1 . Water samples below the LOD were replaced by half of the LOD (0.05 ng L −1 ).
In addition to the water concentration of MeHg, the MeHg/DOC ratio (in ng MeHg/mg DOC) was evaluated. As DOC is well known to be the dominant ligand for aqueous MeHg, the DOC-normalized measure of MeHg could be considered a proxy for elevated net MeHg formation and a more robust measure than MeHg concentrations alone [15].

Statistical Analysis
To account for the correlation between repeated measurements, linear mixed models were used to evaluate the impact of the treatments (groups of management-induced disturbance) on water chemistry. By including 'sampling site' as a random categorical factor, it accounted for the dependence of the data within a catchment. Sampling occasions were used as the repeated structure (AR(1)) with catchment as the subject. Correlations between selected water chemistry variables were tested with Spearman's ρ using a significance level of p < 0.05.
Multivariate methods were used to find major correlates for the MeHg concentrations. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted for water chemical variables to identify groups of variables contributing the most to the variance between different level of management-induced disturbances.
Chemical variables (water and sediments) and catchment information variables (X) were used to explain the variance of annual mean MeHg concentration (Y) in partial least squares (PLS) regressions. PLS regression is a useful multivariate method for dealing with chemical variables which are linearly related to each other, as this method is robust against intercorrelations among X-variables. In PLS, X variables are ranked according to their relevance in explaining Y, commonly expressed as variables important for projection (VIP values). X variables with VIP values exceeding 0.5 were used in PLS regression, and VIP values exceeding 1.0 are considered as important X variables [61][62][63].
All statistical analyses were carried out using R [64]. Figures 2 and 5 were prepared using R package 'ggplot2', Figure 3 was prepared using package 'factoextra', but Figure 4 was prepared using package 'corrplot' and 'Hmisc'.

Temporal Variation in Water Chemistry
The temporal variation in water chemistry revealed seasonal variation for most water physicochemical parameters. However, the seasonal variation in DOC concentrations were quite low for most of the sites, and the difference between the highest and lowest concentrations over the seasons, within each of the sites, varied between 2.8 and 25.1 mg L −1 . As the sampling sites are located in forests with organic soils, DOC concentrations were considerably high across most of the eight sites. The spatial variation of DOC across the eight sites was higher than the seasonal variation and ranged between 11.4 and 47.4 mg L −1 (Table A2, Figure 2).
The difference between the highest and lowest NO 3 − -N concentration over the seasons, within each of the sites, varied between 0.3 and 6.1 mg L −1 . The highest mean NO 3 − -N concentrations were found in winter (1.1 ± 0.2 mg L −1 ), but the spatial variation of NO 3 − -N concentration across the sites varied up to 6.4 mg L −1 . The highest mean SO 4 2− -S concentrations were found in spring (3.3 ± 0.2 mg L −1 ), and the difference between the highest and lowest concentrations over the seasons, within each of the sites, varied between 2.0 and 4.6 mg L −1 . The spatial variation of SO 4 2− -S across the sites was higher than the seasonal variation and ranged between 0.6 and 6.3 mg L −1 (Table A2, Figure 2). The mean water pH was 7.74 ± 0.03, and a slightly lower mean pH was observed in the winter season (7.59 ± 0.03).
High MeHg concentrations, up to 4.05 ± 0.81 ng L −1 , were detected during the summer season (Site 6), but the annual mean MeHg concentration in water samples ranged up to 1.36 ± 0.91 ng L −1 (Site 6, Figure 3). If the MeHg concentration in water samples in different seasons was compared, the highest mean MeHg concentrations were found in spring (0.76 ± 0.10 ng L −1 ) and summer (0.68 ± 0.50 ng L −1 ). Furthermore, the MeHg concentration in water samples in spring and summer was statistically significantly higher than those in autumn and winter (p = 0.018) in all sampling sites. A positive correlation between the MeHg concentration and water temperature (ρ = 0.42, p = 0.015) confirmed the importance of temperature for the net methylation of Hg. However, the spatial variation of MeHg concentrations across the eight sites was slightly higher than the seasonal variation.
The MeHg/DOC ratio ranged from 0.001 ng mg −1 to 0.146 ng mg −1 . The highest mean MeHg/DOC ratio was found in spring (0.037 ± 0.005 ng mg −1 ), and the lowest mean MeHg/DOC ratio was found in winter (0.006 ± 0.002 ng mg −1 ), but significant differences in the MeHg/DOC ratios between seasons were not found (p = 0.23). The difference between the highest and lowest NO3 − -N concentration over the seasons, within each of the sites, varied between 0.3 and 6.1 mg L −1 . The highest mean NO3 − -N concentrations were found in winter (1.1 ± 0.2 mg L −1 ), but the spatial variation of NO3 − -N concentration across the sites varied up to 6.4 mg L −1 . The highest mean SO4 2− -S concentrations were found in spring (3.3 ± 0.2 mg L −1 ), and the difference between the highest MeHg concentration and water temperature (ρ = 0.42, p = 0.015) confirmed the importance of temperature for the net methylation of Hg. However, the spatial variation of MeHg concentrations across the eight sites was slightly higher than the seasonal variation. The MeHg/DOC ratio ranged from 0.001 ng mg −1 to 0.146 ng mg −1 . The highest mean MeHg/DOC ratio was found in spring (0.037 ± 0.005 ng mg −1 ), and the lowest mean MeHg/DOC ratio was found in winter (0.006 ± 0.002 ng mg −1 ), but significant differences in the MeHg/DOC ratios between seasons were not found (p = 0.23).

Effects of Management-Induced Disturbances on Water Chemistry
The concentrations of DOC, TN, NO3 − -N, TP and SO4 2− -S were higher in disturbed sites (Sites 4-8) than in undisturbed sites (Sites 1-3) (Figure 2). By contrast, the ORP values were higher in undisturbed sites than in disturbed ones. The pH value and concentrations of NH4 + -N, PO4 3− -P, Cl − , ODO, and TSS neither differed significantly between management

Effects of Management-Induced Disturbances on Water Chemistry
The concentrations of DOC, TN, NO 3 − -N, TP and SO 4 2− -S were higher in disturbed sites (Sites 4-8) than in undisturbed sites (Sites 1-3) (Figure 2). By contrast, the ORP values were higher in undisturbed sites than in disturbed ones. The pH value and concentrations of NH 4 + -N, PO 4 3− -P, Cl − , ODO, and TSS neither differed significantly between management groups when the disturbed (Sites 4-8) versus the undisturbed (Sites 1-3) sites were compared nor when the sites were divided into three management groups: major (Sites 5 and 6), minor (Sites 4, 7 and 8), and no (Sites 1-3) disturbance.
Although the highest MeHg concentrations (both individual values and annual mean values) were observed in Site 6 (major disturbance), there were neither statistically significant differences in MeHg concentration in water between disturbed and undisturbed sites nor between the three management groups (p = 0.46 and p = 0.26, respectively) ( Figure 2). Similarly, the MeHg/DOC ratios neither differed statistically significantly between disturbed and undisturbed sites (p = 0.85) nor between the three management groups (p = 0.47).
Water in watercourses under different levels of management-induced disturbance exhibited different physico-chemical parameters leading to a clear distinction between them in the PCA analysis ( Figure 3). Two principal components (i.e., PC1 and PC2) explained a total of 46.9% of the variability. PC1 accounted for 27.6% and PC2 for 19.3% of the explained variability. Sites with major and minor disturbances were characterised by higher concentrations of most measured elements, except for ORP, compared with undisturbed sites.

Correlations between Water Physico-Chemical Parameters
DOC concentrations in water were positively correlated with TP (ρ = 0.60 = 0.55) and TN concentration (ρ = 0.47) and negatively with water ORP (ρ = −0 4). NO3 − -N concentrations were positively correlated with TN concentration and negatively correlated with water temperature (ρ = −0.55). PO4 3− -P concentr positively correlated with TP (ρ = 0.73), DOC (ρ = 0.55), TN (ρ = 0.47), TSS (ρ NH4 + -N (ρ = 0.37) concentrations. MeHg concentrations in water were posit lated with pH (ρ = 0.60) and SO4 2− -S (ρ = 0.57) concentrations and water temp 0.42). There was no significant correlation between MeHg and DOC concentra ter (ρ = 0.14).  A PLS model revealed that the variation in annual mean water MeHg concentration between the sites was explained by several sediment chemistry parameters (inorganic carbon content and pH (VIP > 1.2)) and water chemistry parameters (ODO, SO 4 2− -S concentrations and water pH (1.0 < VIP > 1.2)) ( Figure 5). The PLS model including these parameters as well as those with a VIP > 0.5 (MeHg/THg in sediments, EC in water, the share of spruce forest in the catchment, the salinity in water and the density of ditches) had a goodness of fit (R 2 ) of 0.87 and a goodness of prediction (Q 2 ) of 0.75, indicating a strong model. The only variable with a negative relation to the MeHg concentration was the MeHg/THg ratio in sediments, but the VIP of this variable was below 1.0, and thus it was not that influential in the model ( Figure 5).
between the sites was explained by several sediment chemistry parameters (inorganic carbon content and pH (VIP > 1.2)) and water chemistry parameters (ODO, SO4 2− -S concentrations and water pH (1.0 < VIP > 1.2)) ( Figure 5). The PLS model including these parameters as well as those with a VIP > 0.5 (MeHg/THg in sediments, EC in water, the share of spruce forest in the catchment, the salinity in water and the density of ditches) had a goodness of fit (R 2 ) of 0.87 and a goodness of prediction (Q 2 ) of 0.75, indicating a strong model. The only variable with a negative relation to the MeHg concentration was the MeHg/THg ratio in sediments, but the VIP of this variable was below 1.0, and thus it was not that influential in the model ( Figure 5).

Discussion
This paper presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first study where forest management effects on MeHg concentrations in runoff water have been evaluated in the Baltic countries. Earlier forest management studies from a global perspective have mainly been conducted on upland soils (mainly podsols) (e.g., [65][66][67][68][69]) or rather acidic peatland soils (e.g., [70]). This study was instead conducted on soils dominated by peat but with a water pH that was slightly alkaline, mainly due to Ca-and Mg-rich confined aquifer discharge

Discussion
This paper presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first study where forest management effects on MeHg concentrations in runoff water have been evaluated in the Baltic countries. Earlier forest management studies from a global perspective have mainly been conducted on upland soils (mainly podsols) (e.g., [65][66][67][68][69]) or rather acidic peatland soils (e.g., [70]). This study was instead conducted on soils dominated by peat but with a water pH that was slightly alkaline, mainly due to Ca-and Mg-rich confined aquifer discharge characteristic for the area [71,72]. The water pH varied within a relatively narrow range from 7.6 to 8.0, showing a seasonal pattern with the highest pH values in the period from May to July. A similar seasonal pattern has been observed in Finnish peatland forests [73]. In contrast to studies which revealed increases in water acidity after DNM (e.g., [74]), in our sites, water pH did not differ significantly between management groups.
The most commonly reported and pronounced effects of DNM are changes in DOC, either decreases (e.g., [29,55,59,[75][76][77]) or non-significant impacts (e.g., [74,78]), as well as elevated concentrations of TSS (e.g., [29,55,74,75,79]). DOC concentrations in our undisturbed reference catchments (mean 18.3 mg L −1 ) were at the same level as the values measured in peatland forests in Fenno-Scandinavia. For example, Nieminen et al. [29] present mean DOC values ranging from 11.2 to 27.1 mg L −1 in control catchments of their study, while Joensuu et al. [73] report a slightly higher mean DOC concentration in old ditch networks, 27.1 mg L −1 . The concentrations of DOC were, on average, 13.6 mg L −1 (or 43%) higher in catchments with major disturbances compared with those in undisturbed sites. By contrast, most DNM studies indicate significantly decreased runoff DOC concentrations in DNM-treated areas [54], even up to 30% during the first two years after DNM [59]. One of the dominant processes that may explain the lower DOC concentrations after DNM in many of the former studies could be the lowering of the water table followed by decreased water flow in close contact with surface soil layers rich in easily released organic matter [75]. Water flow paths through deeper mineral layers could instead trap organic matter on the positively charged mineral soil particles. If the ground water level has not been so much affected by the DNM, the DOC concentrations may not drop. DNM has been found to lower the ground water levels more in soils with shallow peat compared to sites with thicker peat layers [80]. Furthermore, if the ground water levels were low already before the DNM, or in the reference catchments, that could explain the lack of any reducing effect on DOC concentrations in watercourses after the DNM [54]. Neither of these explanations seems to fit in our catchments as the peat was not that thick and the flow paths in the disturbed catchments were flowing also through mineral layers, at least during periods and in parts of the catchments. However, the special feature of all the catchments included in this study is the confined aquifer discharge resulting in vertical flow paths, causing water in both the disturbed and reference sites to pass through the mineral soils. This may be one reason why we have not detected lower DOC levels in the DNM sites compared to the reference sites. A lower water table and improved aeration can also accelerate the oxidation of organic matter and result in increased loss of carbon as CO 2 into the atmosphere and as DOC into waterbodies (e.g., [81]). Furthermore, the physical disturbance caused by DNM could increase DOC by erosion and soil compaction. In our systems, increased decomposition and/or erosion after DNM may have been the dominant processes, as the DOC concentrations were higher in ditch-cleaned catchments than in reference catchments. In general, this is likely caused by site-specific factors that cause some sites to be more sensitive to forestry operations than others, as well as a variation in the performance of forestry operations and mitigation measures between sites.
The impacts of DNM on different forms (total, organic, inorganic) and species (dissolved, particulate) of N and P have been found to vary, from no or minor increases in concentration (e.g., [29,55,76]) to clearly increasing concentrations of N and P (e.g., [55,74,76,77]). In this study the concentration of NO 3 − -N and TP in water were higher in disturbed catchments compared to undisturbed, even though sediments of the undisturbed sites contained higher concentrations of organic carbon and nutrients. This indicates that sediment chemistry is not necessarily dominant in influencing water chemistry, unless physical disturbance and mobilization of TSS and dissolved elements takes place. Elevated nutrient concentrations after forest management can contribute to eutrophication (e.g., [23,29]). However, concentrations in our catchments were relatively low, and the elevated leaching of nutrients from disturbed catchments are unlikely to cause eutrophication of recipient water bodies. Furthermore, the major component of TP is biologically unavailable. In our sites, concentrations of NH 4 + -N and PO 4 3− -P, which are more available for biological uptake, did not differ significantly between management groups. In addition, water flow paths and possible dilution along them could have an effect on element concentrations in water. However, flow measurements were not done in this study.
The annual mean concentrations of MeHg in undisturbed reference catchments in this study (0.27 ± 0.10 ng L −1 ) were in a similar range to those in other studies from Northern Europe, slightly above those from south-middle Norway (0.09-0.18 ng L −1 ) [52] and southern Finland (0.15 ng L −1 ) [11], similar to those from north-east of Sweden (0.24 ng L −1 ) [65], and much below those reported in studies from southern Sweden (up to 3.8 ng L −1 ) [67] and on drained peatland in Finland (up to 1.8 ng L −1 ) [70]. Several previous studies found that Hg and MeHg concentrations in water and biota correlate positively with several landscape (catchment) characteristics, such as the percentage of wetlands in the catchment and percentage of forest cover in the catchment [82,83], and short-term hydrologic changes are important in controlling the delivery of Hg to waterbodies [84][85][86]. In our study, site 8 had the smallest share of forest cover and drained peatland. However, these differences were not clearly reflected in water chemistry, including MeHg concentrations (Figure 3). Similarly, on a European scale, Bravo et al. (2018) highlighted the large, non-systematic spatial variability in MeHg concentrations in stream systems (0.0078-0.159 ng L −1 ) [87]. The rate of Hg methylation is linked to factors controlling the abundance and activity of sulphate-reducing bacteria and other microorganisms capable of methylating Hg, such as a suboxic microenvironments, the availability of sulphate (electron acceptor), high-quality organic matter (electron donor), inorganic Hg and temperature [88]. Similar to our findings, several studies indicated significant seasonal patterns with the concentration of MeHg peaking during summer [65,67], suggesting the importance of temperature for the net methylation of Hg. The intensification of Hg methylation processes during the warmest periods (spring and summer) is also marked by a higher MeHg/DOC ratio in this study. At the same time, the precipitation amount was rather high during the summer period (Supplementary Material, Figure S1), which could cause a dilution of MeHg.
During forest management, there are many processes and activities that can affect the cycling of Hg. The operation of forest machinery driving can cause erosion and compaction (e.g., [11,14,[89][90][91]), and tree removal can raise the ground water table and enhance water saturation of soils, which stimulates MeHg formation by Hg-methylating microbes [92][93][94]. As a result of these processes, elevated MeHg concentrations [15,65,67,69,91] or MeHg/TOC (total organic carbon) ratios [66] have been detected in Fennoscandia after forest harvesting activities. Reservoir creation by wetland restoration and beaver dams could also increase MeHg formation [50,[95][96][97]. Our study focused on the impact of less-studied management operations, such as ditch cleaning and beaver dam removal. Although these activities can cause soil erosion and driving damage that has been found to increase Hg and MeHg in runoff water, these activities aim to drain the soils and thereby decrease soil water saturation. This could be a reason for the lack of forest management effects on MeHg in the present study.
The concentrations of MeHg in water were positively correlated with the SO 4 2− -S concentration, indicated by both correlation and PLS analyses. This is consistent with findings by Bergman et al. (2012) and Braaten et al. (2020), who concluded that MeHg concentrations in surface waters are related to S dynamics, and the SO 4 2− concentration is an important control of MeHg formation [98,99]. However, while the concentrations of SO 4 2− were higher in disturbed catchments, those of MeHg were not. With elevated SO 4 2− concentrations, there is a risk that MeHg formation may be promoted downstream if the water conditions become more reduced, such as in a beaver dam or other type of impoundment.

Conclusions
Initial insights into MeHg variation in water at eight small, forested catchments with organic soils in Latvia (hemiboreal conditions) characterized by different managementinduced disturbances to the watercourse revealed elevated carbon and nitrogen concentrations in the disturbed compared with undisturbed catchments. There was no significant difference in the concentrations of MeHg or the MeHg/DOC ratio between disturbed and undisturbed catchments, but SO 4 2− concentrations were elevated in disturbed catchments. Due to the relation between MeHg formation and SO 4 2− , as indicated from both this study and former studies, there is a risk that elevated SO 4 2− concentrations in disturbed catchments could promote MeHg formation if the water turned into a more reduced environment downstream. Forest management disturbance, ditch cleaning, and beaver dam removal activities aim to drain soils and lower ground water levels. These results are thereby a valuable contribution to the quite sparse literature on the effects of ditch cleaning on water quality.   * Information on DOC concentration in water during autumn season is not available.