{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03854875283446712, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018140589569160998, 'mean_word_length': 5.225352112676056, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Anatomy of Bioethical Consultations

In 1979 Edmund Pellegrino published his important essay “The Anatomy of Clinical Judgments,” which sketches what he takes to be essential elements of clinical judgment so as he puts it, to develop “a right healing action for a particular patient” (173). In order to fulll the goals of medicine,1 he argues, it must be recognized that clinical decisions are, strictly speaking, “not universalizable.”