{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01291248206599713, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.4036697247706424, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Teachers, Race, and Intelligence

A.G. DAVEY is Senior Lecturer in Social Psychology at the University of Bradford. How is it that intelligence tests which were introduced into educational selection procedures to further equality of opportunity are now the subject of egalitarian protest? In part, the responsibility lies with those educators who were swept along with the politics of education and used the tests to process children into socially sanctioned categories. The greater part of the responsibility lies with the psychologists who offered the educators a concept of intelligence as a relatively fixed capacity constituting an inalienable difference between one social group and another.