{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028935185185185185, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0023148148148148147, 'mean_word_length': 4.924657534246576, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Jonathan Boucher: Loyalist in Exile by Anne Y. Zimmer (review)

Even before the Loyalists were rediscovered in the •96os, Jonathan Boucher was no stranger to revolutionary scholars. There were few characteristics usually associated with Toryism for which Boucher could not be used as a convenient example. He was English-born; an Anglican minister, active in the movement for an American bishop; a political conservative at best, a Filmerite, at worst; and last, but probably not least, the author of both an autobiography and a history of the revolution that made him easily quotable in passing by scholars little interested in Loyalists for their own sake. Thus, unlike most Loyalists, Boucher was not consigned to oblivion. But, as Anne Zimmer notes, he paid a heavy price for this notice: his position on almost all matters has been distorted or misunderstood.