{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024077046548956663, 'fraction_numerical': 0.038523274478330656, 'mean_word_length': 5.36734693877551, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Preliminary Evidence for Diurnal Fluctuations in Visual Imagery

In a repeated measures design, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ; Marks, 1973) was administrated to 10 participants each half hour in a single day between 8:00 and 20:00. The questionnaire was also administrated on four consecutive days following the original administration at 8:00, 14:00 and 20:00. These results were then fitted to a model with the superposition of two cosinusoidal functions. An analysis of the results suggested the coexistence of ultradian and circadian cycles in the determination of the vividness of visual imagery.