{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0205761316872428, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.239316239316239, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Women’s Bodies and the Making of Sex in Seventeenth-Century England

Histories of sexual difference have dated the invention of modern sex, with its binary opposition of male and female, to the eighteenth century: before then, following the models of classical medicine, sexual difference was contingent on humors and somewhat flexible. This piece argues that the social context of sexual difference modifies this narrative. In early modern England, the corporeal and social side of sex anchored female bodies firmly to their domestic, cultural, and economic context. The contingency of anatomical sex was offset by a rigid patriarchal landscape and a world of pervasive touch whereby women’s bodies were overseen by other women.