{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01811248808388942, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.898876404494382, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Reality of God and the Denial of God

As far as I can see, the one point of certainty in the present theological situation is unanimity about the sense of confusion and disorientation that prevails. Almost overnight, well-wrought systems of theological thought, distinguished by profundity of insight and rooted in extensive experience, have been set aside in favor of various forms of "instant theology" which, though responsive in some cases to current issues, are prompted more by the interests of journalists than by those of theologians. A culture informed mainly by mass media can make no exceptions. Instant communication is the objective, and only those who can resolve the problem of God simply and engagingly qualify as theological thinkers. This observation is intended as a candid report of where all of us actually find ourselves; it is by no means an attempt on the part of a philosopher to draw an invidious comparison, especially since (as is no secret) contemporary philosophers are less than clear about their aims and methods.