{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03713355048859935, 'fraction_numerical': 0.026058631921824105, 'mean_word_length': 5.2693877551020405, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Proposal to Revise the Histopathologic Grading System of Early Oral Tongue Cancer Incorporating Tumor Budding

The World Health Organization (WHO) grading system has a low prognostic value for early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma; greater prognostic power has been shown with tumor budding analysis. In this study, we combined tumor budding analysis with histopathologic grading according to WHO 2017. In our proposal, a revised grade I tumor is defined as a “well differentiated cohesive tumor”; revised grade II as a “moderately differentiated and/or slightly dissociated tumor”; and revised grade III as a “poorly differentiated and/or dissociated tumor.” We evaluated the prognostic value of this proposed grading system in a multicenter cohort of 311 cases of early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. The proposed grading system showed significant prognostic value in multivariable analysis for disease-specific survival with a hazard ratio of 3.86 and a 95% confidence interval of 1.36-10.9 (P=0.001). For disease-free survival, the proposed grading system showed good predictive power in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-4.27; P=0.009). The conventional WHO grading system showed a low prognostic value for disease-specific survival and disease-free survival (P>0.05). In conclusion, the prognostic power of the WHO histopathologic grading improved significantly with incorporation of tumor budding. Our proposed grading system can be easily included in pathology reports.