{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02640845070422535, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0035211267605633804, 'mean_word_length': 5.890909090909091, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Revaluing Industrial Heritage: Participatory Governance in Urban’s Forestry Heritage and Historical Bridge Conservation

Abstract Due to political reform and the shifting values of heritage, Taiwan’s industrial heritage attracts much more attention in the past decade. Additionally, there is not only an expectation of reusing industrial heritage for the purpose of the economy but a perspective of seeing it as the barrier to urban progress. As Lowenthal (2005) notes, (Lowenthal, The Past is a Foreign country.) heritage is further corrupted by being politicised, commoditised and popularised. The idea of participatory governance has also permeated gradually into Taiwan’s industrial heritage issues. In recent times, these progressive views have received greater attention with calls for bringing citizenship to the core of the participatory agenda. The comparative study which explores the Chiayi Forestry Park and Taipei Zhongzheng Bridge, respectively aims to better understand the participatory governance process on conserving industrial heritage by conducting Osmani’s Three-Gap Analysis (Osmani, “Participatory Governance.”).