{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028217481073640742, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0027529249827942187, 'mean_word_length': 5.956937799043062, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Single-Phase Convection in Additive Manufactured Versus Traditional Metal Foams


 Metal foams have been often used for thermal management due to their favorable characteristics including high specific surface area (SSA), high thermal conductivity, and low relative density. However, they are accompanied by shortcomings including the significant contact resistances due to attachment method, as well as the need for characterization of foam parameters such as pore diameter and SSA. Additive manufactured (AM) metal foams would eliminate the substrate/foam thermal resistance, decrease the need for pre-usage characterization, and allow for tailoring structures, while also taking advantage of the characteristics of traditionally manufactured foams. A commercial, aluminum foam (nominally 5 pores per inch (PPI), 86.5% porosity) was analyzed using X-ray microcomputed tomography, and a custom-designed metal foam based on the cell diameter and porosity of the commercial sample was subsequently manufactured. Reduced domain computational fluid dynamics/heat transfer (CFD-HT) models were compared against experimental data. Postvalidation, the flow behavior, effect of varying attachment thermal conductivities, and thermal performance were numerically investigated, demonstrating the usefulness of validated pore-scale models, as well as the potential for improved performance using AM metal foams over traditionally manufactured foams.