{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0519159456118665, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024721878862793572, 'mean_word_length': 4.436241610738255, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
F + (H2O)2 reaction: the second water removes the barrier.

In light of controversy concerning the classical barrier for the F + H2O → HF + OH reaction, higher level theoretical methods are applied. Both aug-cc-pV5Z CCSD(T) and cc-pVQZ full CCSDT methods predict a low classical barrier of about 2 kcal/mol. For the analogous water dimer reaction, the presence of the second water molecule erases this barrier entirely. An entrance complex F···(H2O)2 is found lying 7.3 kcal/mol below separated F + (H2O)2. A barrier follows this complex on the reaction coordinate, but lying 3.1 kcal/mol below the reactants. There is also an exit complex HF···H2O3 lying 11.0 kcal/mol below the separated products HF + H2O3. Thus the reactions of atomic fluorine with the water monomer and dimer are qualitatively different.