{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015587529976019185, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.423076923076923, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Three Dangers for the International Criminal Court: A Critical Look at a Consensual Project

This article argues that criticism of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has been unduly abandoned to realists and conservatives. Instead, it proposes the contours of a more radical critique of the ICC that takes aim of some of its unquestioned liberal assumptions, including its claimed a-political character and its formalism. It argues that contemporary international criminal justice imports wholesale a number of outdated domestic criminological constructs and that its universalist cosmopolitanism is precarious, if not dangerous. It concludes that a new generation of "experts in horror" will only deliver on some of the promises of international criminal justice by shunning some of the hubris that has become associated with it.