{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03078677309007982, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029646522234891677, 'mean_word_length': 4.8533333333333335, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 1, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Sharper Picture of the Moon's Bombardment History From Gravity Data

Some large impact basins on the Moon are covered with younger basalts, making it hard to determine their age by crater counting. Evans et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JE005421) use Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory gravity data to identify buried craters larger than 90 km and construct a relative chronology for the impact basins. This relative chronology is broadly consistent with the degree to which the basins have relaxed: Older basins tend to be more relaxed. Pre‐Nectarian basins are likely saturated, so the roughly constant measured crater density does not require a brief formation interval. Some of the results of Evans et al. (2018) are at odds with other determinations; for example, they suggest that Imbrium could be older than Crisium, and Serenitatis as young as Imbrium.