{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022304832713754646, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0037174721189591076, 'mean_word_length': 4.698412698412699, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Question of Style in Educational Management

The management style of an individual may be defined as the characteristic way in which he goes about his managerial task, assessed over the longer term, in a specific organisation, by those who work with him. A great deal of space in the organisation and management literature has been devoted to this subject. Many celebrated models have been produced, although some of the work in this field remains less well known than it deserves to be. The visible property which these studies have in common has been presented as the ’two-factor theory’ (Paisey, 1975). The total behavioural output of an individual in the course of his managerial work is conceived as being directed towards and expressing a concern for either production or persons. There is the possibility, however, that a simultaneous emphasis to both may be given. In other words, the two-factor theory postulates that individuals as managers are preoccupied with getting work done, or in looking after the people who are doing that work, or in both. The purpose .