{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04189636163175303, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009922822491730982, 'mean_word_length': 4.858064516129033, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 1, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
D. H. Lawrence's "Lady": A New Look at "Lady Chatterley's Lover, and: The Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Volume 3: October 1916-June 1921 (review)

the prose does not simply theorize the world portrayed in the fiction. Instead, it expresses certain aspects of a larger outlook that, as his critical study demonstrates, the novels and stories present with a different emphasis. Despite their many differences, all three critics agree on two points. If, in Stephen Miko's phrase, Lawrence's career is a progression "toward Women in Love" followed by a dispersion of energies, their relative silence on this novel is striking. Perhaps it yielded less to their particular psychological approaches. On the other hand, whether the critics stress genital primacy, or the dark side of motherhood, or the loving sensibility, they all cordially admire the later Lawrence for finally acknowledging male tenderness in love.