{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01978565539983512, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0008244023083264633, 'mean_word_length': 4.62037037037037, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Seamless Phase II/III Design with Sample-Size Re-Estimation

A main objective in clinical trials is to find the best treatment in a given finite class of competing treatments and then to show superiority of this treatment against a control treatment. Traditionally, the best treatment is estimated in a phase II trial. Then in an independent phase III trial, superiority of this treatment, estimated as best in the first trial, is to be shown against the control treatment by a size α test. In this paper we investigate a competing adaptive two-stage test procedure for a seamless phase II/III trial. We assume that the variance is unknown and include therefore the calculation of the total sample size based on the first-stage-variance estimation. We derive formulae for the expected number of patients. These formulae depend on the unknown variance only, not on the other unknown parameters. Using a prior for the unknown variance, we can determine the two-stage test procedure of size α and power 1 − β that is optimal in that it needs a minimal number of observations. The results are illustrated by a numerical example that indicates the superiority of the adaptive procedure over the traditional approach.