{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020380434782608696, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004076086956521739, 'mean_word_length': 5.665158371040724, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Localizing the epileptogenic zone.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Epilepsy surgery is the therapy of choice for 30-40% of people with focal drug-resistant epilepsy. Currently only ∼60% of well selected patients become postsurgically seizure-free underlining the need for better tools to identify the epileptogenic zone. This article reviews the latest neurophysiological advances for EZ localization with emphasis on ictal EZ identification, interictal EZ markers, and noninvasive neurophysiological mapping procedures.


RECENT FINDINGS
We will review methods for computerized EZ assessment, summarize computational network approaches for outcome prediction and individualized surgical planning. We will discuss electrical stimulation as an option to reduce the time needed for presurgical work-up. We will summarize recent research regarding high-frequency oscillations, connectivity measures, and combinations of multiple markers using machine learning. This latter was shown to outperform single markers. The role of NREM sleep for best identification of the EZ interictally will be discussed. We will summarize recent large-scale studies using electrical or magnetic source imaging for clinical decision-making.


SUMMARY
New approaches based on technical advancements paired with artificial intelligence are on the horizon for better EZ identification. They are ultimately expected to result in a more efficient, less invasive, and less time-demanding presurgical investigation.