{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04251386321626617, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.705263157894737, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Teaching Top-Down ASIC/SoC Design vs Bottom-Up Custom VLSI

In the fast paced world of IC design, companies strive for ways to create competitive, robust designs, while delivering speedy time-to-market results. A top-down design flow provides a fast, results oriented design methodology, but, at most Universities, the strong legacy of the Mead/Conway approach has lead to custom methods being the default way to teach students VLSI design. This paper discusses some experiences with teaching a top-down System-on-a- Chip (SoC) design class.