{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.045372050816696916, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02631578947368421, 'mean_word_length': 4.93010752688172, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy of fleroxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in men with culture-proven chancroid.

Chancroid is linked to the spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in East Africa. Effective, easily administered therapy is a priority for the control of Haemophilus ducreyi. The efficacy of a single oral dose of fleroxacin, 400 mg, was compared to a 3-day oral course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), 160/800 mg, twice daily for the treatment of chancroid in 98 HIV-1-seronegative men in Nairobi, Kenya. No differences were noted between the two groups with respect to demographic characteristics, sexual behavior, and clinical characteristics. Culture-proven failure occurred in 1 (3%) of 36 fleroxacin-treated patients and in 11 (30%) of 37 TMP-SMZ-treated patients (P = .005). Fleroxacin, as a single oral dose, is an effective treatment for culture-proven chancroid in patients who are HIV-1 seronegative. TMP-SMZ is no longer predictably effective due to the recent emergence of resistance to both sulfonamides and to trimethoprim.