{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.034552845528455285, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005420054200542005, 'mean_word_length': 5.449781659388647, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Automatic speechreading of impaired speech

We investigate the use of visual, mouth-region information in improving automatic speech recognition (ASR) of the speech impaired. Given the video of an utterance by such a subject, we first extract appearance-based visual features from the mouth region-of-interest, and we use a feature fusion method to combine them with the subject’s audio features into bimodal observations. Subsequently, we adapt the parameters of a speaker-independent, audio-visual hidden Markov model, trained on a large database of hearing subjects, to the audio-visual features extracted from the speech impaired videos. We consider a number of speaker adaptation techniques, and we study their performance in the case of a single speech impaired subject uttering continuous read speech, as well as connected digits. For both tasks, maximum-a-posteriori adaptation followed by maximum likelihood linear regression performs the best, achieving a word error rate relative reduction of 61% and 96%, respectively, over unadapted audio-visual ASR, and a 13% and58%relativereductionoveraudio-onlyspeaker-adapted ASR. In addition, we compare audio-only and audio-visual speaker-adapted ASR of the single speech impaired subject to ASR of subjects with normal speech, over a wide range of audio channelsignal-to-noiseratios. Interestingly,for the small-vocabulary connected digits task, audio-visual ASR performance is almost identical across the two populations.