{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03296703296703297, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.6911764705882355, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
WORLD-SECTIONING AND LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY

The problem of world-sectioning arises when we approach the systematic organization of the vocabulary of a language. This approach can be carried out in different ways. One can start either from objects or things (H. Schuchardt), or from concepts (J. Trier, L. Weisgerber, B. L. Whorf). To the object-approach, an inventory of 'things' is essential, and these things are correspondingly nominated in the language. Things are primary and stable while words are secondary and "move around the things". All changes in the life and history of words are connected with and predetermined by corresponding changes in things. Therefore, the study of word history must be based on the history of things. The analyser does not aim at tying together numerous 'witty conclusions' but at finding out a maximum number of related facts. These are the main points of the object-approach. As for the conceptapproach, we can see that linguistic facts are very often made to fit some 'witty conclusions' which result in new, even 'wittier' conclusions. As the problem is more complicated here, we should clear up some details. The source of the conceptual field theory may be traced back to W. von Humboldt, who considered language to be independent of man, governing and directing his thought. Language lies between man and "die innerlich und äusserlich auf ihn einwirkende Natur. Er umgiebt sich mit einer Welt von Lauten, um die Welt von Gegenständen in sich aufzunehmen und zu bearbeiten. Diese Ausdrücke überschreiten auf