{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020151133501259445, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.794871794871795, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Examining Audit Committees in the Corporate Governance of Public Bodies

Abstract Public bodies have adopted corporate governance regimes from the private sector assuming that accountability and performance will be improved. This paper analyses audit committees in a local public body context, NHS foundation trusts (FTs). Audit committees play a key role in enhancing governance. FTs follow the recommendations made by Monitor, their independent regulator. FTs, however, appear to adapt the role of the audit committee to meet the accountability needs of the wider stakeholders of public hospitals. Audit committees assure (vertical) financial accountability, and also provide assurance along horizontal lines of accountability to local communities, professional bodies and other stakeholders.