{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013738959764474975, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008832188420019628, 'mean_word_length': 5.035502958579881, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Investigative analysis of repudiation attack on MANET with different routing protocols

Volume 2, Issue 3 May – June 2013 Page 356 Abstract: In this paper we present an investigative analysis of Repudiation attack that arrives at the application layer in mobile ad-hoc network. Most of the research work in MANET is focused on network layer attack analysis because most attacks can be identified and its effect can be neutralized on network layer itself. But some attacks bypasses the network layer and reaches to affect the application layer .In this paper, we also implemented different routing protocols for the analysis and compare them using performance parameters like Throughput, Delay & Load. In order to suggest the most efficient routing protocol under the influence of repudiation attack, we use this comparative study. In this comparative study we found that AODV protocol is better if we consider Throughput and Delay as performance parameter and DSR is better if we consider Load as performance parameter.