{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022022022022022022, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004004004004004004, 'mean_word_length': 5.578947368421052, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
More than just morbidity and mortality – quality of recovery and long‐term functional recovery after surgery

Traditional surgical outcome measures include minor and major complications, hospital length of stay and sometimes longer‐term survival. Each of these is important but there needs to be greater emphasis on patient‐reported outcome measures. Global measures of a patient's quality of recovery, avoidance of postoperative morbidities, early hospital discharge to home (without re‐admission) and longer term disability‐free survival can better define postoperative recovery. A patient's recovery pathway can be mapped through the immediate days or weeks after surgery with documentation of morbidity using the postoperative morbidity survey and/or a quality of recovery score, days alive and at home up to 30 days after surgery and then longer term disability‐free survival using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 scale. These can be used to define quality of recovery after surgery.