{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024786324786324785, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006837606837606838, 'mean_word_length': 5.449035812672176, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Study on Droplet Impact and Spreading and Deposition Behavior of Harvest Aids on Cotton Leaves.

The deposition and spreading of pesticide droplets on the surface of plants is a severe challenge to precise pesticide application, which directly affects the pesticide utilization rate and efficacy. Cotton harvest aids are widely used in machine-picked cotton but the effect of formulation and concentration on the droplet behavior and defoliation effect of cotton defoliants is not clear. To clarify the influence of formulation and concentration on the droplet behavior of cotton defoliants, four formulations (suspension concentrate (SC), water dispersible granule (WG), oil dispersion (OD), and wettable powder (WP)) of cotton defoliants were used to prepare different concentrations of harvest aid solutions, according to the spraying volume. The physicochemical properties, droplet impact, and spreading and deposition behavior were studied. The results indicated that the four kinds of harvest aids have good physicochemical properties and can be wet and spread on cotton leaves. The surface tension of the high-concentration harvest aid solution (the spraying volume was less than 1.2 L/667 m2) was increased, which increased the contact angle and reduced the adhesion tension, adhesion work, and the spreading area. Once the harvest aid solution systems impacted the cotton leaves, it could spread to the maximum in a short time (10 ms). The field experiment showed that the droplet spectrum of harvest aids changed slightly, the coefficient of variation (CV) did not exceed 50%, and the defoliation rate was better when the spraying volume was 1.5 L/667 m2. The correlation and principal component analysis showed that the spraying volume (concentration) and coverage were negatively correlated with the defoliation rate, while the viscosity, diffusion factor, and spreading rate were positively correlated with the defoliation rate. Overall, the use of appropriate spraying volume application in cotton fields can improve the performance of spray, increase the effective deposition and wetting spread of defoliants on cotton leaves, further reduce the dosage of defoliants, and improve pesticide utilization. These results can provide a theoretical basis for the scientific preparation and spraying of cotton harvest aid solutions.