{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031108597285067874, 'fraction_numerical': 0.026018099547511313, 'mean_word_length': 5.16376306620209, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Improving cellularity and quality of liquid‐based cytology slides processed from pancreatobiliary tract brushings

Cytology has been reported to have suboptimal sensitivity for detecting pancreatobiliary tract cancer in biliary tract specimens partly as a result of low specimen cellularity and obscuring noncellular components. The goal of this study was to determine if the use of a glacial acetic acid wash prior to processing would increase the cellularity and improve the quality of ThinPrep® slides when compared to standard non‐gyn ThinPrep processing. Fifty consecutive pancreatobiliary tract specimens containing 20 ml of sample/PreservCyt® were divided equally for standard non‐gyn ThinPrep (STP) and glacial acetic acid ThinPrep processing (GATP). A manual drop preparation was also performed on residual STP specimen to determine the number of cells left in the vial during STP processing. Twenty‐six (52%) specimens had more epithelial cell groupings with the GATP methodology while 19 (38%) had equivalent cellularity with both methods. The STP method produced more epithelial cell groupings in 5 (10%) of the specimens. Of the 26 specimens that had less cells with the STP method, 14 (54%) had ≥50 cell groupings on the manual drop slide processed from the residual STP specimen suggesting that many cells remain in the vial after STP processing. The GATP method was preferred in 25 (50%) of the specimens, the STP method in 5 (10%), while both methodologies provided similar findings in the remaining 20 (40%) of specimens. The data from this study suggests that the GATP method results in more cells being placed on the slide and was preferred over the STP method in a majority of specimens. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010;38:627–632. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.