{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010014306151645207, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.60377358490566, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Mobility and Work Satisfaction: A Discussion of the Use and Interpretation of Mobility Models

Two different models for studying the effects of intergenerational occupational mobility on three types of work satisfaction are compared and discussed. The interpretive consequences of using one model rather than another are considered. The analysis shows that mobility, whether studied by the interaction or additive models, is not significantly related to satisfaction with earnings. The additive model can predict a significant relationship between mobility and satisfaction with the kind of work done and overall work satisfaction and is preferable to the interaction model on grounds of simplicity.