{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04409857328145266, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02204928664072633, 'mean_word_length': 5.074803149606299, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Double‐Masked, Placebo‐Controlled Evaluation of Timolol in a Gel Vehicle

We evaluated a topical formulation of timolol in an anionic heteropolysaccharide gellan gum (Gelrite). Fifty-five white patients with ocular hypertension entered a double-masked, placebo-controlled, four-period, incomplete block crossover study. After washout of any ocular hypotensive medications, the intraocular pressure of both eyes of all patients was measured at 0 (09:00 h), 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h (diurnal baseline). Patients were then randomized to receive, at 2-week intervals, one drop of each of four of the six treatments in one eye (0.008% timolol gel, 0.1% timolol gel, placebo gel, 0.008% timolol solution, 0.1% timolol solution, and placebo solution). Fellow eyes received the appropriate placebo. As measured by least-squares means, adjusted for the unmedicated baseline diurnal values, there was a clear dose-response, with the 0.1% treatments being more effective ocular hypotensive agents than the 0.008% treatments, which in turn were more effective than the placebo treatments. Within each concentration at several observation points, the gel formulation elicited a 1–2-mm Hg greater efficacy than the solution. Gel-treated subjects had a greater incidence of blurred vision. We conclude that formulation of timolol with a gel may increase efficacy, and thus duration of action. This may possibly allow use of a lower concentration of timolol or a reduced frequency of instillation. Further evaluation in chronic dosing studies is justified.