{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0291501976284585, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03162055335968379, 'mean_word_length': 5.490384615384615, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to compare images obtained with a self-scanning, flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology with conventional screen-film radiographs and to evaluate the possibility of radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.


SUBJECTS AND METHODS
One hundred twenty patients were examined prospectively using a conventional screen-film system (speed, 400; detector dose, 2.5 microGy) and a prototype digital amorphous silicon detector (simulated speed, 400 and 800, n = 120; simulated speed, 1600, n = 40). The resulting 400 images were evaluated independently by six radiologists using a subjective five-point preference scale that rated overexposure, underexposure, contrast resolution, spatial resolution, and soft-tissue presentation. Image quality was ranked on a scale from 0 to 10 according to subjective criteria. Statistical significance of differences was determined using Student's t test and confidence intervals (95% confidence level).


RESULTS
Comparison of conventional radiographs with digital images revealed a statistically significant preference for the digital system for soft-tissue presentation (speed 400 and 800) and visualization of osteoarthrotic changes (speed 400). A small but statistically significant preference for conventional images was found with respect to contrast and spatial resolution when digital speed was 800 or 1600; and the visibility of arthrosis at digital speed 1600, osteolysis at digital speed 800 and 1600, and fractures at digital speed 1600.


CONCLUSION
The amorphous silicon-based system with a simulated speed of 400 provided images equivalent to screen-film radiographs. For clinical tasks such as routine follow-up studies, assessment of instability, or orthopedic measurements, a radiation dose reduction of up to 75% may be possible.