{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03066812705366922, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004381161007667032, 'mean_word_length': 4.748427672955975, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of English and French versions of a dichotic auditory perception test (SSW) on normal bilingual subjects.

Young adult, normal-hearing, Canadian-French Ss (5 M, 5 F) from Montreal were matched for sex, age, and education with 10 Canadian-English Ss. Each S self-rated his receptive and expressive abilities in his non-native language. Then, all were given a new French and a standard English version of the SSW test. After controlling for second-language ability as a covariate, ANOVA showed performance significantly worse in the second language and in the dichotic condition. French Ss performed better on the non-dichotic condition of the English SSW than did English Ss on the French version. This study suggests that the new Canadian-French version of the SSW test is comparable in difficulty to the original English EC tape, but cautions against clinical use of SSW tasks with second-language Ss.