{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023709902370990237, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.252525252525253, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cognitive‐behavioural stress management does not improve biological cardiovascular risk indicators in women with ischaemic heart disease: a randomized‐controlled trial

Objectives.  Psychosocial factors, such as stress and vital exhaustion, are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, and women report more psychosocial ill‐being after an acute myocardial infarction than men. We have earlier shown that a cognitive‐behavioural intervention in women with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) improved psychosocial well‐being. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the improvement in psychosocial well‐being is associated with an improvement in biochemical indicators of cardiovascular risk.