{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04354032833690221, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04568165596002855, 'mean_word_length': 5.043103448275862, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparative study of hysteroscopic electrocoagulation and vaginal operation in the treatment of cesarean scar diverticulum

Objective To compare the clinical effect of hysteroscopic electrocoagulation and vaginal operation in the treatment of cesarean scar diverticulum. Methods Clinical data of 30 patients with cesarean scar diverticulum in Zhuhai Maternal and Child Health Hospital from 2012 to 2014 were selected. 14 cases treated by hysteroscopic electrocoagulation were selected into electrocoagulation group,16 cases treated by laparoscopy combined with vaginal operation were selected into vaginal operation group.The operation time,blood loss,hospital stay,and menstrual period recovery rates 2 months and 6 months after the operation were compared. Results The operation time [( 31. 50 ± 7. 03) min]and blood loss [( 4. 25 ± 1. 39) m L]of electrocoagulation group were less than that of vaginal operation group[( 75. 38 ± 10. 88) min,( 16. 25 ± 7. 44) m L]( P 0. 05). The menstrual period recovery rate after 6 months of vaginal operation group [93. 8%( 15 /16) ]was higher than electrocoagulation group [64. 3%( 9 /14) ]( P 0. 05). Conclusion With shorter operation time and less blood loss during the operation,hysteroscopic electrocoagulation is preferred for cesarean scar diverticulum patients with recent fertility requirements,while vaginal operation has a better long- term effect.