{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0208078335373317, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.146616541353383, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
THE CHESHIRE CAT OF SOCIAL MEDIA: VALUES IN PLATFORM POLICIES

Value is fundamental for social media platforms, not only in the
 economic sense but also in the sense of normative principles like community and free speech.
 Policy documents are pivotal sites for the expression of values and present a public-facing
 account of the roles and responsibilities assigned to various actors, including individual
 users, third parties, governments and social media corporations. While prior research has
 examined the construction of individual values such as privacy and transparency in platform
 policies, there has been no holistic account of the values invoked in these documents.
 Combining a dictionary-based analysis with a qualitative content analysis, we present the
 first comprehensive study of the values presented in the policy documents of five major
 social media platforms: Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, and TikTok. Our analysis
 reveals that policy documents invoke a large number of values that seemingly point to
 conflicting priorities and commitments. However, these values can be organized in four
 overarching principles that were consistent across platforms: community, expression,
 privacy, and improvement. Each principle assigns responsibility for the enactment of these
 values and by that allows platforms to limit their ethical responsibility for executing the
 values they publicly promote. Values can thus be described as the “Cheshire cat” of social
 media platform policies – they look magical, but once touched, may assume a different shape,
 pop up in an alternative location, or even disappear.