{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.038413491567770144, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029356652092442224, 'mean_word_length': 4.942486085343228, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Current lipid-lowering approach and LDL target achievement in very high-risk patients: in-hospital results of a high-volume primary percutaneous coronary intervention tertiary center


 
 
 Type of funding sources: None.
 
 
 
 Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-accepted causal risk factor for atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease. Several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown that lipid-lowering therapies reduce cardiovascular events and have a positive effect in reducing vulnerable plaques. In particular, the recommended target for LDL-C has become more and more stringent, moving to 1.4 mmol/l (55 mg/dl) for very high-risk patients. According to the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines, the current paradigm for lipid management favors a stepwise approach consisting of early initiation of high-intensity statin, followed by subsequent addition of ezetimibe, and ultimately a consideration of PCSK9 inhibitor treatment if LDL-C levels remain elevated.
 
 
 
 We recruited 307 patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to December 2020. Baseline LDL-C concentration and prescribed hypolipemiant treatment at hospital admission and discharge were registered. Therefore, we included all consecutive patients identified as very-high cardiovascular risk, according to 2019 ESC guidelines. We stratified our population through variables independently associated with non-attainment of LDL-cholesterol such as hypertension, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, clinical manifestations of ACS, number of main vessels treated, and complexity of the atherosclerotic disease.
 
 
 
 274 patients were included. Mean age was 69,9 years (SD 11,4), 20,8 % were women, 23,7 % had diabetes, 16,4 % had PAD and 32,1 % suffered from valvular disease, mainly with mitral regurgitation or aortic stenosis no more than mild or moderate. Of 25.1% with a previous history of acute myocardial infarction, the 33,3% of whom didn’t have statin therapy pre-ACS index (p =0,001). At admission, medium cholesterol levels of patients that underwent previous coronary revascularization (25,5% of the total population) were 84,21 ± 31,2 mg/dL, not in range according to both 2016 and 2019 ESC guidelines. At discharge, 77,37 % of all the patients included received only statin therapy VS 22,63% with statin plus ezetimibe. In the subpopulation of patients with recurring ACS events with LDL pre-admission > 100 mg/dL,despite high dose statin, only 25% of this population were discharged adding ezetimibe (VS 75% who kept on the treatment of high dose statin without up-titration).
 
 
 
 Management of dyslipidemia is frequently suboptimal and the gap between guidelines and clinical practice for lipid management across Europe has been exacerbated by the 2019 guidelines. A greater utilization of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies is likely needed to reach the LDL-C optimal target. A correct stratification of the risk class would help to identify, in a personalized perspective of treatment, patients at very high risk that would take advantage of more aggressive therapy to reach the lowest target of LDL-C ("the lower is better").
