{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010498687664041995, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.0, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Accreditation Strategies: Some Internal Strategies for Choosing Accreditation

The last Accreditation Actions column focused on external strategies for organizations choosing accreditation status. Readers were promised in that column that this column would focus on the internal strategies for choosing accreditation status. When an organization decides to undertake the accreditation process, there are many factors that contribute to this decision. There are also some nice benefits to the organization in addition to the primary benefit of achieving national accreditation status and expanding contract and service provision opportunities. Here are some of the internal decision-making strategies that support seeking to achieve national accreditation status.