{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0288659793814433, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006185567010309278, 'mean_word_length': 4.855421686746988, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Electrodynamics : A Second Reply to Hunter

In O(3) symmetry electrodynamics the field tensor is governed by a nonAbelian Stokes Theorem, as in any non-Abelian gauge theory. The comments on the B component of this field tensor by Hunter in this Issue address B as if it were a U(1) symmetry field, governed by the ordinary Stokes Theorem, and are therefore sequentially erroneous, because there is a basic misunderstanding of the nature of O(3) electrodynamics inherent in the article.