{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03974706413730804, 'fraction_numerical': 0.028906955736224028, 'mean_word_length': 5.087912087912088, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Comparative study of heparin and a very low molecular-weight heparin in hemodialysis in chronic renal insufficiency].

In the course of dialysis sessions, we have compared the antithrombotic effect of two heparinization regimens: low molecular weight heparin (CY 222, mean molecular weight: 2,500, Institute Choay, France): 90 anti-Xa units/kg bodyweight as a bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion of 1,000 anti-Xa units/hour (regimen 1); or 300 anti-Xa units/kg as a bolus injection (regimen 3), with a standard heparinization regimen (100 IU/kg regimen 2). Eight patients received the 3 regimens successively. Factor IIa and factor Xa inactivation was measured by a method that uses chromogenic substrates. The frequency of adverse effects, ultrafiltration rates, creatinine and BUN clearances of the 3 regimens were similar, whereas dialyser blood loss was higher in the first regimen. At the dose of 300 anti-Xa units of CY 222 (regimen 3), inactivation of factor Xa was similar to Xa inhibition reached through the conventional treatment (regimen 2) but IIa inhibition was less pronounced.