{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022108843537414966, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.472527472527473, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Kierkegaard, sus seudónimos y el personaje conceptual de Deleuze y Guattari

The reading of Kierkegaardian pseudonyms as “conceptual characters” is a common place in literary hermeneutics, based on the reflections of Deleuze and Guattari. In this essay we intend to make a reading that transcends their categories of interpretation, based on the guidelines themselves Kierkegaard’s reading about his pseudonyms, but at the same time, we will save some elements of Deleuze and Guattari’s reflections to see how it can enrich the notion of “conceptual character” for Kierkegaardian studies.