{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05249841872232764, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04174573055028463, 'mean_word_length': 4.399317406143345, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of probucol on neointimal thickening in a stent porcine restenosis model.

Restenosis after stent deployment remains a major clinical problem. Antioxidants have been proposed as a promising strategy against restenosis. We tested the antioxidant probucol for its efficacy against neointimal hyperplasia in porcine coronary arteries after stent implantation. Probucol was then tested in vivo in 8 coronary arteries of 4 pigs (1000 mg/day orally beginning 7 days before stenting) and was compared to placebo (10 coronary arteries, 5 pigs) 28 days after stenting. Quantitative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) revealed 38.8 +/- 4.0 versus 40.1 +/- 3.0% area stenosis in the probucol versus control group. Histopathologic assessment showed that probucol had no beneficial effect on inhibiting the neointimal proliferative response in stent lesions compared to placebo (2.35 +/- 0.26 versus 2.88 +/- 0.25 mm(2)), despite similar injury scores (1.20 +/- 0.12 versus 1.28 +/- 0.14). An edge segment (axially 2-mm proximal to the stent margins) was assessed by IVUS. Remodeling index, which is a good marker of constrictive remodeling, was defined by the ratio of the vessel area in the lesion site (stent edge) to the vessel area in the proximal reference site (6-mm proximal to the stent margins). The remodeling index was significantly larger in the probucol group that in the placebo group (1.18 +/- 0.10 versus 0.90 +/- 0.06, P = 0.0012). In conclusion, probucol reduced constrictive remodeling at the edge of the implant but did not inhibit the tissue response within the stent.