{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0262597586941093, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0035486160397444995, 'mean_word_length': 4.949367088607595, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Time-frequency analysis of linear and nonlinear otoacoustic emissions and removal of a short-latency stimulus artifact.

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) are commonly recorded as average responses to a repetitive click stimulus. If the click train has constant polarity, a linear average results; if it contains a sequence of clicks of differing polarity and amplitude, a nonlinear average can be calculated. The purpose of this study was to record both protocols from the same set of ears and characterize the differences between them. The major features of CEOAEs were similar under both protocols with the exception of a region spanning 0-5 ms in time and 0-2.2 kHz in frequency. It was assumed that the signal derived from the linear protocol was contaminated by stimulus artifact, and so a simple procedure was used--involving high-pass filtering and time-windowing--to remove components of this artifact. This procedure preserved the short-latency, high-frequency responses; it also produced a marked similarity in the time-frequency plots of recordings made under the two protocols. This result means it is possible to take advantage of the better signal-to-noise ratio of the linear data compared to its nonlinear counterpart. Additionally, it was shown that CEOAEs recorded under the linear protocol appear to be less dependent on the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs).