{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01876675603217158, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.024193548387097, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Understanding Albright: A Revolutionary Etude

“It is impossible for men to judge the inner motives of any superior acquaintance.” William Foxwell Albright In a still valid survey of one hundred years of biblical research, Herbert F. Hahn offers the following status quaestionis: Interpretation of the Bible in the present day has reached a point of crisis. A seeming return to the age-old emphasis on the doctrinal content of Scripture and its essential unity throughout the sacred books—a return to traditionalism which nevertheless denies that it is a step backward—has dominated recent discussion of biblical interpretation.… The crisis grows out of a loss of confidence in the historical approach on the part of many who formerly favored it.