{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04384574749075541, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011093502377179081, 'mean_word_length': 5.109677419354838, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pharmacokinetic interactions between chloroquine, sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine and their bioequivalence in a generic fixed-dose combination in healthy volunteers in Uganda.

BACKGROUND
A pre-packaged fixed-dose formulation of chloroquine (CQ) and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (S/P) combination (Homapak) is widely used for the treatment of falciparum malaria in Ugandan children. It is however a product whose pharmacokinetics and interactions have not been studied.


OBJECTIVES
To explore possible pharmacokinetic interactions between CQ and S/P during co-administration, and to determine their bioavailability in the locally made Homapak compared to the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) made formulations.


METHODS
Thirty-two adult healthy volunteers were randomized into four groups and given single oral doses of fixed-dose CQ+S/P combination (Homapak), or GMP formulations of S/P (Fansidar), CQ (Pharco), or their combination. Plasma samples were followed for 21 days, analysed by HPLC-UV methods, with pharmacokinetic modeling using the WinNonlin software.


RESULTS
Sulfadoxine in Homapak was more rapidly absorbed (ka = 0.55 h(-1)) than in Fansidar + CQ (ka = 0.27 h(-1), p=0.004), but not more than S in Fansidar alone group (ka = 0.32 h(-1), p=0.03). No significant differences were observed in the other pharmacokinetic parameters of S, P and CQ when given together or separately. The relative bioavailability of CQ and S in Homapak showed bioequivalence to reference formulations.


CONCLUSIONS
There were no pharmacokinetic interactions between CQ, S and P when the compounds were given together, however, more investigations would be needed to explore this further. Compared with GMP made drugs, both S and CQ are bioequivalent in Homapak, the Ugandan made fixed-dose formulation. Furthermore, the absorption of S was more rapid which could be advantageous in malaria treatment.