{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025542168674698794, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007228915662650603, 'mean_word_length': 5.2342342342342345, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Specificity and sensitivity of betaAPP in head injury.

INTRODUCTION
Beta-amyloid precursor protein (betaAPP) expression has been found in traumatic brain injury, hypoxia, ischemia and infection which affect axonal transport. Although betaAPP is a sensitive marker for detecting axonal damage, it has become non-specific for a particular type of injury. The aim of this study was to identify a difference in the pattern, distribution and intensity of betaAPP expression in head injury compared to hypoxic/ischemic insults.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirteen primary head injury and 12 primary hypoxic/ischemic cases were selected. The anterior and posterior parts of corpus callosum, internal capsule (basal ganglia), middle cerebellar peduncles (cerebellum) and pons were examined and stained immunohistochemically for betaAPP antibody. A computerized system of image analysis was used to examine the intensity (strength of staining) and density (area fraction) of betaAPP.


RESULTS
Significant differences were observed in the overall intensity and density of betaAPP expression (p < 0.05) and in all 5 brain regions in cases of head injury compared to the hypoxic/ischemic group (p < 0.05). Positive staining for betaAPP was found in all regions in all cases of head injury, however, 4 out of 12 cases of hypoxia/ischemia were positive for betaAPP. One case expressed positivity in all 5 regions, 2 cases exhibited positivity in the pons alone, with only 1 case exhibiting immunoreactivity in the posterior corpus callosum and internal capsule. Differences in the pattern of betaAPP expression identified a predominantly granular pattern with a dirty background seen in hypoxia/ischemia, while fusiform swellings, beaded and thick filaments with clear background were observed in head injury.


CONCLUSION
There are differences in the pattern, distribution and intensity of betaAPP in head injury compared to hypoxia/ischemia. These could be due to pathophysiological differences. The results may be helpful in differentiating head injury from hypoxia in medicolegal cases.