{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015444015444015444, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.224, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Passive Synthesis and Life

Post-structuralism in its many forms has, more than any other movement in thought, interrogated the inherent problem of passive synthesis. For Deleuze, the task of philosophy properly speaking does not lie in accepting an already diVerentiated world of subjects and objects, but in thinking the powers, forces or desires that synthesize worlds prior to any act or agent. For Derrida, the transcendental legacy which deconstruction both inherits and problematizes must also move beyond activity and passivity to the di Ú érance which borders any such distinct terms. In addition to this shared problem of passive synthesis, Derrida and Deleuze also explore the corporeal imaginary through which the border between active and passive has been thought.