{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020988194140795804, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.101333333333334, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On John Rawls’ theory of justice

The political processes that took place in the world after the Second World War required a new philosophi-cal understanding, since the utilitarian approach, which dominated the Anglo-American political tradition for a long time, could not fully fulfill this task. John Rawls, from whom the revival of political philosophy began, proposed his own version of the solution of the accumulated theoretical problems, which met the social and po-litical demands of his time. Moreover, Rawls was practically the first to put justice at the center of political and philosophical thought. The problem of justice has been the subject of attention of philosophers since Antiquity, however, the doctrine of justice was the components of social and moral teachings in general, while traditionally the main issue for political philosophy was the question of power, its political organization and legitimacy. The purpose of the article is a scientific analysis of the political and philosophical legacy of John Rawls. Rawls dem-onstrated that the political organization of power is derived from how we understand ethical norms and what norms (rules) we are guided by in social interaction, therefore the main issue of political philosophy is not the question of power, but the question of justice. In addition, he was convinced that political freedom is closely re-lated to equality. The methodological basis included the dialectical method, a group of general scientific methods of cognition – the method of analysis and synthesis, the structural method, as well as private scientific ones - formal legal and comparative legal methods. It is concluded that Rawls’ theory of justice had a decisive influence on the political philosophy of the twentieth century, the development of which largely took place on the basis of criticism or reception of his ideas. Today we are witnessing the beginning of a break with the tradition of which Rawls is the spokesman and which assumes that the political is based on the possibility of consensus and ethical agreement. However, the current development of political philosophy is also closely related to the rethinking of Rawls’ legacy, which we see, in particular, in the development of so-called “imperfect” political theories.