{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020599250936329586, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012172284644194757, 'mean_word_length': 5.37910447761194, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Patient monitoring programs in oncology pharmacy practice: A survey of oncology pharmacists in Atlantic Canada

Background There has been a dramatic increase in new drug approvals in oncology, consisting of both small molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. However, Health Canada approval for many of the new agents was based on single randomized trials consisting of only a few hundred patients. As more patients get treated with these newer agents, there is the potential for new and discrete toxicities. Pharmacists are in an ideal position to identify, monitor, manage, and even preempt future events, given their close proximity to the patient. However, the extent of pharmacists’ involvement in formal patient programs is unknown. To address this knowledge gap, a survey of oncology pharmacists practicing in Atlantic Canada was conducted. Methods A structured mailing strategy was adopted as recommended by Dillman (1978). Standardized data collection forms were electronically mailed to 60 oncology pharmacists. Survey items consisted of respondent demographic information, practice setting, the existence of a formal patient monitoring program managed, and if patients are contacted by telephone following the completion of their anticancer cycle. Results Overall, 31 completed surveys were received, for an overall response rate of 50%. Respondents had a median age of 42 and a median of 18 years’ (range 1 to 25) professional experience as a pharmacist. Only 18 of the 31 (58%) respondents indicated that there was a formal monitoring and call back program managed by pharmacy available at their institution. For those without such programs, the main reasons were due to staffing issues and lack of adequately trained clinical personnel. Overall, 100% of respondents would favor the development of a formal monitoring program in hospitals with a high volume of anticancer drug prescribing. Conclusions Even though the number of new anticancer drugs being introduced into clinical pharmacy practice is increasing, formal patient monitoring and patient call back programs are not universal in Atlantic Canada hospitals.