{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03703433429415843, 'fraction_numerical': 0.030941000474331376, 'mean_word_length': 4.926054054054054, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Intradomain Cleavage of Inhibitory Prodomain Is Essential to Protumorigenic Function of Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) in Vivo*

Invasive cancers use pericellular proteolysis to breach the extracellular matrix and basement membrane barriers and invade the surrounding tissue. Proinvasive membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) is the primary mediator of proteolytic events on the cancer cell surface. MT1-MMP is synthesized as a zymogen. The latency of MT1-MMP is maintained by its N-terminal inhibitory prodomain. In the course of MT1-MMP activation, the R108RKR111↓Y112 prodomain sequence is processed by furin. The intact prodomain released by furin alone, however, is a potent inhibitor of the emerging MT1-MMP enzyme. Evidence suggests that the prodomain undergoes intradomain cleavage at the PGD↓L50 site followed by the release of the degraded prodomain by furin cleavage that finalizes the two-step activation event. These cleavages, only if combined, cause the activation of MT1-MMP. The significance of the intradomain cleavage in the protumorigenic program of MT1-MMP, however, remained unidentified. To identify this important parameter, in our current study, we used the cells that expressed the wild-type prodomain-based fluorescent biosensor and the mutant biosensor with the inactivated PGD↓L50 cleavage site (L50D mutant) and also the cells with the enforced expression of the wild-type and L50D mutant MT1-MMP. Using cell-based tests, orthotopic breast cancer xenografts in mice, and genome-wide transcriptional profiling of cultured cells and tumor xenografts, we demonstrated that the intradomain cleavage of the PGD↓L50 sequence of the prodomain is essential for the protumorigenic function of MT1-MMP. Our results emphasize the importance of the intradomain cleavages resulting in the inactivation of the respective inhibitory prodomains not only for MT1-MMP but also for other MMP family members.

(MT-MMPs) are distinguished from soluble MMPs by an additional transmembrane domain and a short cytoplasmic tail (MT1-, MT2-, MT3-, and MT5-MMP) or by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor (MT4-and MT6-MMPs) (6,7). There is compelling evidence that MT1-MMP functions as a proinvasive factor (8 -10). MT1-MMP is the primary mediator of proteolytic events on the cell surface (11). MT1-MMP is directly involved in the pericellular proteolysis of the ECM proteins, activation of soluble MMPs, and cleavage of adhesion and signaling cell receptors (12)(13)(14). Although MT1-MMP is ubiquitously expressed, its activity is elevated in metastatic malignancies (15), a cause of mortality and morbidity in cancer patients.
MT1-MMP is synthesized de novo as a latent proenzyme (16). Proteolytic removal of the N-terminal prodomain is required for the proenzyme conversion into the functionally active MT1-MMP enzyme. It is established that in the course of the secretion pathway of the MT1-MMP proenzyme through the cell compartment the R 108 RKR 111 2Y 112 prodomain sequence is processed by furin (17,18). We demonstrated, however, that the intact prodomain released by furin alone is a potent inhibitor of the emerging MT1-MMP enzyme. Evidence suggests that the activation of cellular MT1-MMP represents a stepwise process (19,20). In this stepwise process, the PGD2L 50 sequence of the prodomain "bait region" is cleaved intracellularly either by MMPs, which are distinct from MT1-MMP, or by autocatalysis if cellular MT1-MMP is overexpressed. Intradomain cleavage results in the activation intermediate commencing from the N-terminal Leu 50 . Furin proteolysis then follows to complete both the degradation and removal of the residual prodomain sequence, thus transforming the activation intermediate into the mature, proteolytically active MT1-MMP enzyme commencing from the N-terminal Tyr 112 (13,21,22).
We used mutagenesis to inactivate the PGD2L 50 cleavage site in the prodomain and to generate the MT1-MMP L50D mutant that was processed by furin alone. Because of its continuing non-covalent association with the intact inhibitory prodomain, the L50D mutant enzyme appeared functionally silenced (20). These earlier biochemical studies shed light on the mechanistic aspects of MT1-MMP activation. The functional significance of these mechanistic findings to malignancy, however, remained unidentified.
Here, we provide evidence that the PGD2L 50 interdomain cleavage of the prodomain is a decisive parameter for exposing the protumorigenic function of MT1-MMP. If the interdomain cleavage is inactivated by the L50D mutation and, as a result, the prodomain is released by furin cleavage alone, the protumorigenic function of cellular MT1-MMP is significantly reduced in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Antibodies, Reagents, and Cells-Reagents were from Sigma unless indicated otherwise. The V5 and Golgin-97 monoclonal antibodies were from Invitrogen. A rabbit polyclonal Ki-67 antibody was from NeoMarkers. A rabbit antibody against human type I collagen was from Novus Biologicals. A murine monoclonal GFP antibody was from Biopioneer. Breast carcinoma MCF7 and fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells were obtained from the ATCC (Manassas, VA). Highly metastatic breast carcinoma MDA-MB-435/melanoma M14 cells (M4A4 clone) (23) were a gift from Virginia Urquidi (University of California, San Diego, CA). Cells were routinely grown in DMEM, 10% FBS.
To construct the fluorescent biosensors, monomeric red fluorescent protein 1 (called RFP in the text below) (25) was inserted between Ser 24 and Leu 25 of the prodomain construct. Enhanced green fluorescent protein (called GFP in the text below) was then fused with the C-terminal Val 107 of the prodomain and followed by the MT1-MMP 509 -582 sequence including the transmembrane domain and the cytoplasmic tail. As a result, the biosensor constructs did not include the R 108 RKR2Y 112 furin cleavage site. The specific primers are listed in Table 1. MCF7, HT1080, and MDA-MB-435 cells were transfected with the biosensor constructs in the pLenti6/V5-D-TOPO vector.
Biosensor Imaging in Cells-Cells were grown on glass coverslips for 16 -18 h, fixed for 10 min using 4% p-formaldehyde, and analyzed using an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope with an attached MagnaFire camera (Olympus). For the observation of the green GFP fluorescence of the biosensor, a 470 -490-nm excitation filter and a 520-nm barrier filter were used. For the observation of the red RFP fluorescence of the biosensor, we used a 530 -550-nm excitation filter and a 590-nm barrier filter.
For the quantitative analysis of the biosensor fluorescence, the cells were plated in a well of a 96-well plate. The images

Activation of MT1-MMP in Cancer Cells
were then acquired using an Opera QEHS High Content Screening System with a 20ϫ air objective. Four fields were acquired at multiple wavelengths for each well. 4Ј,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained nuclei were imaged using a xenon lamp ( ex ϭ 365 nm) and a 450/50-nm emission filter. GFP was imaged using a 488 nm laser and a 540/75-nm emission filter. FRET was monitored simultaneously using a 600/40-nm emission filter. RFP was imaged using a 561 nm laser and a 600/40-nm emission filter. A special image analysis protocol was developed using PerkinElmer Life Sciences Acapella 2.0 HCS software (supplemental Fig. S1). DAPI-stained nuclei were detected using the Acapella "nucleus detection B" algorithm. Cell bodies and the cytoplasm were detected using DAPI images and the Acapella "cytoplasm detection A" algorithm. Multiple parameters including cell count per well and well average of cell-by-cell metrics, nucleus area, total intensity of the nuclei, average intensity of the nuclei, nucleus roundness, average cell intensity for GFP and RFP channels, total cell intensity for GFP and RFP channels, average cytoplasm intensity for GFP and RFP channels, and total cytoplasm intensity for GFP and RFP channels were extracted from the nucleus, cytoplasm, and cell masks. An average cell intensity of the GFP and RFP channels and a GFP-RFP intensity ratio were also calculated.
In Vivo Tumorigenicity Assay and Immunohistochemistry-MCF7-MT1, MCF7-L50D, and MCF7-E240A cells (1 ϫ 10 7 each) were resuspended in 0.1 ml of ice-cold DMEM containing 3 mg/ml Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and injected in the mammary fat pad of athymic female BALB/c nu/nu 4-week-old mice (eight mice/group). Tumor xenograft growth was monitored weekly by caliper measurements of two perpendicular diameters of xenografts (D 1 and D 2 ). Tumor volume was calculated by the following formula: /6(D 1 ϫ D 2 ) 3/2 . In 10 weeks, animals were sacrificed according to the National Institutes of Health guidelines. Tumors were excised free of connective tissue, washed in ice-cold PBS, and cut. Certain tumor portions were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. Sections (7 m) were stained with hematoxylineosin (H&E). In addition, tumor portions were freeze molded in Optimum Cutting Temperature (OCT) compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Torrance, CA) and freeze sectioned. The sections (Ͼ10 m) were stained with the primary antibodies followed by the species-specific secondary antibodies conjugated with green Alexa Fluor 488 or red Alexa Fluor 594 (Molecular Probes). Nuclear DNA was stained with DAPI. The H&E slides were scanned using a ScanScope microscope slide scanner. The fluorescence images were acquired using an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope with an attached MagnaFire camera (Olympus).
Additionally, a portion of tumor xenografts was extracted in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% deoxycholate, 1% IGEPAL, pH 7.4 supplemented with protease inhibitor mixture set III, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 mM EDTA. The solubilized material was separated from the pellet by centrifugation at 14,000 ϫ g for 30 min. The protein concentration was then equalized among the extracts (1 mg/ml). Aliquots of supernatants (10 g of total protein each) were separated using gradient 4 -12% Bis-Tris acrylamide gels (Invitrogen) and analyzed by Western blotting with the Ki-67 and V5 antibodies. To determine the status of MMP-2, the samples were also analyzed by gelatin zymography using 0.1% gelatin, 10% acrylamide gels. The purified MMP-2 proenzyme was used as a control.
Genome-wide Transcriptional Profiling of Cultured Cells and Xenograft Tumors-Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells and xenograft tumors using TRIzol reagent and purified using the RNeasy columns (Qiagen). The RNA purity was estimated by measuring the A 260/280 and the A 260/230 ratios. The integrity of the RNA samples was validated using an Experion automated electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad). The samples were processed further by the Microarrays-QPCR Core facility at the Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute. The samples of total RNAs (500 ng) were labeled using an Illumina RNA Amplification kit (Ambion). The obtained labeled copy RNA samples (1,500 ng) were hybridized 18 h at 58°C to a HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip Array (Illumina) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The array targets more than 47,000 probes derived from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Reference Sequence (NCBI) RefSeq Release 38 (November 7, 2009) and other sources. BeadChips were then washed and developed using FluoroLink streptavidin-Cy3 (GE Healthcare). BeadChips were scanned using an Illumina Bead Array Reader. The raw data were processed using Feature Extraction software version 10.5. The initial analysis and normalization to the median were performed using Gene-Spring GX software (Agilent). Differentially expressed mRNAs with signal intensities higher than 2-fold over the background standard deviation were filtered by t test with p Ͻ 0.05. Only the statistically significant data (p Ͻ 0.05) were used to calculate gene expression ratios in the samples. The individual genes with a 2-fold difference in their expression levels were analyzed using Ingenuity software IPA 9.0 (Ingenuity Systems) and Next-Bio knowledge databases to determine the regulatory and signaling pathways. The gene expression data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession number GSE28655.
In addition, the expression levels of MT1-MMP and Ki-67 were examined in the cells and tumors by RT-PCR. The forward and reverse primers for the amplification of MT1-MMP were 5Ј-GCCATGCAGAAGTTTTACGG-3Ј and 5Ј-CTTGG-GGGTGTAATTCTGGA-3Ј, respectively. The forward and reverse primers for Ki-67 were 5Ј-CCACACTGTGTCGTCG-TTTG-3Ј and 5Ј-CCGTGCGCTTATCCATTCA-3Ј, respectively. Human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)-specific primers were used as a control. RT-PCR analysis was performed using the OneStep RT-PCR system (Qiagen). The 25-l reactions each included total RNA (100 ng) and the respective primers (0.6 M). After the completion of the first strand synthesis, RT-PCRs (30 cycles) were performed using denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min. The products were separated using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.

MT1-MMP in Cancer Cells-Earlier studies by us and others
have revealed that enforced expression of MT1-MMP leads to its multiple, cell surface forms (26 -28). These forms of MT1-MMP include the 63-kDa proenzyme, 54-kDa enzyme, and 39 -45-kDa degradation products. Autoproteolysis releases the N-terminal catalytic domain portion of MT1-MMP from the cell surface. The residual C-terminal 39 -45-kDa fragments represent the membrane-tethered, catalytically inactive, degraded MT1-MMP (27).
In the study reported here, we used MCF7-MT1, MCF7-L50D (the prodomain mutant with the inactivated intradomain cleavage site) (20), and MCF7-E240A cells, which expressed catalytically inactive MT1-MMP with the mutated active site Glu 240 (26). The MT1-MMP constructs were tagged with a C-terminal V5 tag. To measure the levels of cellular MT1-MMP, the cells were surface-labeled using membrane-impermeable biotin. The cell surface biotin-labeled proteins were then isolated from the cell lysates using streptavidin beads. The biotin-labeled cell surface proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with the V5 antibody (Fig. 1).
Consistent with the previous observations by us and others, both the 54-kDa enzyme and degraded species of MT1-MMP were detected in the cell surface samples. Minor levels of the degraded MT1-MMP species were observed in the MCF7-L50D cell surface samples. In MCF7-L50D cells, MT1-MMP autoproteolysis was repressed, and as a result, the levels of the 54-kDa MT1-MMP enzyme on the cell surface were increased. Autoproteolysis leading to degraded MT1-MMP was not recorded in MCF7-E240A cells (Fig. 1).
Intradomain Cleavage of MT1-MMP Prodomain in Cancer Cells-To corroborate the role of the PGD2L 50 cleavage in the processing of the prodomain, we constructed the prodomainbased fluorescent biosensor red fluorescent protein-prodomain-green fluorescent protein (RFP-PRO-GFP). This biosensor includes the signal peptide of MT1-MMP followed by RFP (red), the prodomain, GFP (green), the transmembrane domain, and cytoplasmic tail of MT1-MMP ( Fig. 2A). To prevent the cleavage of the biosensor by furin, the furin cleavage site was not included in the construct.
Because of the additional absorption peak ( abs ϭ 503 nm) of the RFP spectra (25), the emission of GFP ( em ϭ 507 nm) is greatly reduced in the intact biosensor. Following the prodomain cleavage and RFP dissociation, the green GFP fluorescence becomes readily visible. The analysis of the fluorescence spectra of the individual GFP ( ex ϭ 488 nm; em ϭ 507 nm) and RFP domains ( ex ϭ 584 nm; em ϭ 607 nm) clearly indicated that both fluorescent moieties were properly folded in the intact biosensor and that they functioned normally and as expected (supplemental Fig. S1). We also analyzed the traffick-ing to and the presentation of the biosensor at the cell surface. For this purpose, HT1080 cells expressing the RFP-PRO-GFP construct were cell surface-biotinylated. Biotin-labeled proteins were pulled down using streptavidin beads. The pulldown results demonstrated that both the intact full-length and the cleaved biosensor species were presented at the cell surface. Both forms of the biosensor were also detected in the total cell lysate. The band intensity clearly indicated that the cleavage of the biosensor takes place primarily inside the cell rather than at the cell surface (supplemental Fig. S1).
In addition, we constructed the RFP-L50D-GFP mutant biosensor that was resistant to cleavage by MMPs including MT1-MMP (Fig. 2). In HT1080, MCF7, and MDA-MB-435 cancer cells, the RFP-PRO-GFP biosensor was readily processed in the Golgi compartment. Because several individual MMPs rather than MT1-MMP alone can contribute to the PGD2L 50 intradomain cleavage (20) and because MCF7 cells synthesize at least several individual MMPs including MT2-MMP, MT3-MMP, MT4-MMP, and MT6-MMP (29), it is not surprising that the RFP-PRO-GFP biosensor was cleaved in these cells. In turn, the RFP-L50D-GFP mutant biosensor remained unprocessed, leading to red fluorescence alone in the cells. These data confirmed the importance of the PGD2L 50 cleavage in the initiation of the prodomain degradation. Our results clearly demonstrate that this cleavage takes place intracellularly and in the course of the secretion pathway of the MT1-MMP prodomain mimic and that this cleavage is independent of and additional to furin cleavage of the prodomain.
Physiological Significance of Intradomain Cleavage-There is a consensus among scientists that MT1-MMP activity is essential for tumor growth in vivo. To assess the importance of  the intradomain processing of the prodomain in the tumorigenic program of MT1-MMP in vivo, MCF7-MT1, MCF7-L50D, and MCF7-E240A cells were orthotopically xenografted into immunodeficient mice (Fig. 3A). The size of the developing tumors was measured at 1-week intervals for 10 weeks. Following a 4-week lag period, MCF7-MT1 xenografts acquired a growth rate that far exceeded that of the MCF7-L50D tumors. The MCF7-L50D cells formed small tumors that reached a ϳ25-mm 3 volume at week 4 and then ceased growing. At week 10 postimplantation, there was a 20-fold size difference between MCF7-MT1 tumors and MCF7-L50D tumors (Fig. 3B). MCF7-E240A cells did not form detectable tumors.
Histological analysis of tissue sections stained with H&E demonstrated the presence of the undifferentiated dense cancerous tissue with inflammatory lymphocyte infiltration and desmoplastic reaction resulting in tumor stroma in MCF7-MT1 tumors (Fig.  3C). In turn, the acinus-like structures of the clustered cancerous cells were observed in MCF7-L50D tumors. There was no detect-able cancerous tissue at the fat pad inoculation site in MCF7-E240A xenografts. Overall, MCF7-MT1 tumors appear to be comparable with the murine mammary tumor virus-polyoma virus middle T-antigen-induced, spontaneous, fast growing mammary tumors in mice (30). Murine mammary tumor virus-polyoma virus middle T-antigen tumors also show high tumor cell density and inflammatory lymphocyte infiltration (31), and they also express high levels of MT1-MMP activity (10).
Immunostaining of tumor sections with the V5 antibody confirmed the presence of high levels of MT1-MMP immunoreactivity in both the MCF7-MT1 and the MCF7-L50D xenografts (Fig. 4). Immunostaining with the type I collagen antibody corroborated the presence of the dense collagen bundles within the MCF7-MT1 tumor stroma. Similar bundles were absent in the MCF7-L50D xenografts. Notably, type I collagen, a substrate for the MT1-MMP collagenolytic activity, largely accumulated at a distance from the MT1-MMP-expressing cancer cells in the tumor stroma, which is formed by the infiltrating host (murine) connective tissue cells. A high growth rate of MCF7-MT1 xenografts correlated with the high nuclear Ki-67 immunoreactivity, a marker for cell proliferation. In contrast, reduced levels of the Ki-67 immunoreactivity were observed in MCF7-L50D tumors. As detected by Western blotting, the enhanced Ki-67 immunoreactivity correlated with the high expression of Ki-67 in MCF7-MT1 tumors (Fig. 5A). In turn, the levels of Ki-67 in MCF7-L50D tumors were significantly lower compared with those observed in the cultured cells including MCF7-L50D, MCF7-MT1, MCF7-E240A, and original MCF7 cells.
To corroborate the repression of cell proliferation/cell cycle events in MCF7-L50D xenografts, we performed genome-wide transcriptional profiling of xenograft tumors and corresponding cultured cells (supplemental Table S1). Tumor tissue pre-dominantly free from the contaminating host tissue (as judged by H&E staining) was used for the transcriptional profiling.
To identify the affected regulatory pathways, the gene profiling results were analyzed further using Ingenuity software. A subset of these results is shown in Fig. 6A. The analysis clearly indicated that as compared with MCF7-L50D cultured cells the genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle were repressed the most significantly in MCF7-L50D tumor xenografts relative to other pathways. Thus, a total of 71 cell cycle-related genes were affected in all of the cell and tumor samples combined. From these 71 genes, 49 genes (69%) were affected in MCF7-L50D tumor as compared with MCF7-L50D cells (Fig. 6B and supplemental Table S2). From these 49 affected genes, 33 genes (67%) were down-regulated. The top 20 down-regulated cell cyclerelated genes are shown in Table 2.
The RT-PCR results also demonstrated low levels of Ki-67 in MCF7-L50D tumors relative to the MCF7-L50D cells. MT1-MMP and GAPDH were used as controls in these RT-PCR experiments (Fig. 6C). Further analysis of the differentially expressed genes using Ingenuity software readily identified the cell cycle network as the primary gene network affected in MCF7-L50D tumors relative to the MCF7-L50D cells (Fig. 6D).
The down-regulation of cell cycle genes explains both the reduced Ki-67 immunoreactivity and slow growth of MCF7-L50D tumors. The repression of cell cycle genes was less prominent in MCF7-MT1 tumors as compared with MCF7-MT1 cells. The cell cycle genes were not significantly affected in the other cell samples we analyzed (Fig. 6B). There was also an up-regulation of 11 and nine apoptosis genes in MCF7-L50D and MCF7-MT1 xenograft tumors, respectively, as compared with the corresponding cells (Table 3).
Because the presence of the cellular MT1-MMP activity is critical for the activation of MMP-2, gelatin zymography was performed to identify the status of MMP-2 in tumors (Fig. 5C). The latent MMP-2 proenzyme alone was detected in the extracts of the normal mammary fat pad tissue and MCF7-E240A xenografts. In MCF7-L50D tumors, MMP-2 was largely represented by the proenzyme. In turn, MCF7-MT1 and murine mammary tumor virus-polyoma virus middle T-antigen tumors exhibited high levels of the active enzyme of MMP-2 and also minor, residual levels of the MMP-2 proenzyme. According to the Western blotting analysis of the tumor extracts, the V5-tagged proenzyme and the enzyme of MT1-MMP were observed in MCF7-MT1 xenografts. Importantly, comparable levels of the MT1-MMP enzyme alone were present in MCF7-MT1 and MCF7-L50D tumors. These observations are consistent with the presence of the functionally inert MT1-MMP enzyme that remained inhibited by its non-covalently associated, intact prodomain in MCF7-L50D tumors. Overall, our data suggest that the PGD2L 50 site cleavage of the prodomain is required for the functional, protumorigenic activity of MT1-MMP in the orthotopic MCF7 tumor xenografts in mice.

DISCUSSION
The protumorigenic MT1-MMP activity stimulates cell migration and invasion, usurps tumor growth control, and contributes to malignant transformation and incipient cancer (32,  33). MT1-MMP is synthesized as a latent proenzyme. For the active enzyme to emerge, the MT1-MMP proenzyme requires proteolytic removal of the N-terminal inhibitory prodomain. Cleavage of the R 108 RKR 111 2Y 112 motif by furin plays a vital role in the prodomain removal (17,34). However, the intact prodomain released by furin cleavage alone retains its inhibitory capacity and remains non-covalently associated with the emerging enzyme (19,20). To inactivate the excised inhibitory prodomain and to liberate the processed active enzyme species from inhibition by the prodomain, MT1-MMP adopted a stepwise mechanism.
The first step of the stepwise activation of MT1-MMP involves the intracellular processing of the PGD2L 50 sequence of the prodomain bait region (19,20). This cleavage destroys the prodomain structure, generates the activation intermediate, and initiates the further intradomain cleavages. The remaining C-terminal portion of the prodomain is then removed by furin. These events when combined result in the active MT1-MMP enzyme. The insertion of the MCF7-L50D mutation inactivates the PGD2L 50 cleavage site in the prodomain. As a result, the intact, full-length mutant prodomain liberated by the furin cleavage alone functions as an inhibitor of the emerging MT1-MMP enzyme.
Our current experimental results directly support this hypothesis. Thus, the cellular wild-type MT1-MMP, but not the inert E240A mutant and the L50D prodomain mutant, underwent the extensive intracellular self-proteolysis in MCF7 cells. Our experiments using the RFP-and GFP-tagged fluorescent biosensors also clearly demonstrated the prodomain cleavage in mammary carcinoma MCF7 and MDA-MB-435/melanoma M14 cells (23) and fibrosarcoma HT1080 cancer cells.
Our tumor xenograft studies in mice that used MCF7 cells with enforced expression of the wild-type MT1-MMP and the L50D and E240 mutant constructs directly confirmed this suggestion. Although the expression of the wild-type MT1-MMP in MCF7 cells resulted in rapidly proliferating cancer cells and seemed to usurp tumor growth control, the L50D mutation in the prodomain did not efficiently support MCF7 cell proliferation and as a result inactivated the tumorigenic potential of the proteinase to levels that were comparable with the catalytically inactive E240A MT1-MMP mutant. These data correlate well with our earlier findings that MCF7 cells can be made more tumorigenic if MT1-MMP expression is increased (35,36).
The immunostaining and biochemical analyses confirmed that MCF7-L50D cells expressed the MT1-MMP mutant enzyme in tumors. In contrast with the wild-type MT1-MMP, the L50D enzyme could not activate MMP-2, an activation target of MT1-MMP. We conclude that because of its inhibitory complex with the non-covalently associated, intact prodomain (excised by furin cleavage alone), the L50D mutant was largely functionally inactive in MCF7 cells.
Obviously, the multistep activation mechanism requires the action of at least two distinct proteinases rather than a single proteinase. This mechanism leads to both inactivation and then release of the inhibitory prodomain, thereby making the catalytic domain of the emerging enzyme available for proteolytic activity. It is highly likely that the multistep activation mechanism is not unique for MT1-MMP alone, but instead, this multistep activation leading to the prodomain degradation is common for the membrane type MMP subfamily and also for other members of the MMP family (19,20).