{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02324294410625346, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009407858328721638, 'mean_word_length': 5.23448275862069, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Structure of Cysteine- and Glycine-rich Protein CRP2

Members of the cysteine- and glycine-rich protein family (CRP1, CRP2, and CRP3) contain two zinc-binding LIM domains, LIM1 (amino-terminal) and LIM2 (carboxyl-terminal), and are implicated in diverse cellular processes linked to differentiation, growth control, and pathogenesis. Here we report the solution structure of full-length recombinant quail CRP2 as determined by multi-dimensional triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy. The structural analysis revealed that the global fold of the two LIM domains in the context of the full-length protein is identical to the recently determined solution structures of the isolated individual LIM domains of quail CRP2. There is no preference in relative spatial orientation of the two domains. This supports the view that the two LIM domains are independent structural and presumably functional modules of CRP proteins. This is also reflected by the dynamic properties of CRP2 probed by15N relaxation values (T 1,T 2, and nuclear Overhauser effect). A model-free analysis revealed local variations in mobility along the backbone of the two LIM domains in the native protein, similar to those observed for the isolated domains. Interestingly, fast and slow motions observed in the 58-amino acid linker region between the two LIM domains endow extensive motional freedom to CRP2. The dynamic analysis indicates independent backbone mobility of the two LIM domains and rules out correlated LIM domain motion in full-length CRP2. The finding that the LIM domains in a protein encompassing multiple LIM motifs are structurally and dynamically independent from each other supports the notion that these proteins may function as adaptor molecules arranging two or more protein constituents into a macromolecular complex.