{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.035207823960880194, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017114914425427872, 'mean_word_length': 5.0, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
RF shielding materials for highly-integrated PET/MRI systems

Integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) into a simultaneous device calls for adaptations of the radio frequency (RF) shielding concept. Conventional PET module housings fully encase the entire PET detector to reduce mutual interference. Excluding passive components, i.e. scintillators, from the housings, offers integration advantages, e.g. by reducing the overall housing volume or utilizing bigger scintillators. However, locating the scintillator outside of the RF shielding requires an optically transparent RF shielding interface between the scintillators and the photodetector to close the aperture. Therefore, a careful evaluation and selection of RF materials is essential to ensure an excellent PET/MRI system performance. To this end, we examined 10 materials (coated glasses, coated foils, meshes). The shielding effectiveness (SE) was evaluated at 100 and 300 MHz. PET performance was tested for single event registration and coincident events by integrating the material into the PET detector stack between the digital silicon photomultiplier photodetector array and one-to-one coupled scintillator. We determined photon attenuation (PA), energy resolution (dE/E), and coincidence resolving time (CRT) and compared to reference measurements for each material group. MRI compatibility was assessed by analyzing the material influence on the main magnetic field (B0) homogeneity. The coated glasses and foils exhibited SEs of up to 25 dB at 300 MHz. Both had a PA < 23% with dE/E and CRT comparable to the reference measurements, and no measurable impact on the B0 field was registered. The meshes exhibited higher SEs up to 56 dB, but also a PA > 58% with a higher impact on dE/E and CRT. Only one mesh affected B0 homogeneity. Overall, we recommend the coated foil HS 9400 for integration concepts as it exhibited a good performance with SE = 25 dB, PA = 22%, resulting in a PET performance of dE/E = 12% and CRT = 274 ps.