{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025278810408921933, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017843866171003718, 'mean_word_length': 5.83248730964467, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Women in Prison and Secure Psychiatric Settings: Whose Needs, Whose Dangerousness?

Since Feminism & Psychology was first published in 1991, it has featured articles by researchers and practitioners who have debated and theorized how the psychosocial needs of women are based on western male-derived and genderand culturally neutral theorization and practice. Feminists and critical writers have long argued that gendered attitudes and assumptions are implicated in the disadvantaged structural, social and material conditions in which women find themselves in relation to men. These have implications for women’s well-being as a social group and are exacerbated for women further minoritized through cultural, sexual, class and age identifications and needs (Chesler, 1972; hooks, 1981). More recently, there has been an emphasis on forms of interpersonal and statesexualized violence against, and violation of women – particularly physical, emotional and sexual abuse and neglect. These are identified as significant social and political issues for women across dimensions of class, communities and cultures by academics (Dobash and Dobash, 1998) and national and international governmental institutions (Department of Health, 2000; World Health Organization, 2002) Statutory psychiatric and criminal justice systems are not neutral but under-