{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05632502308402586, 'fraction_numerical': 0.030470914127423823, 'mean_word_length': 5.376470588235295, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparative next-generation sequencing of adeno-associated virus inverted terminal repeats.

The inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of adeno-associated virus (AAV) are notoriously difficult to sequence owing to their high GC-content (70%) and palindromic sequences that result in the formation of a very stable, 125 bp long, T-shaped hairpin structure. Here we evaluate the performance of two widely used next-generation sequencing platforms, 454 GS FLX (Roche) and MiSeq Benchtop Sequencer (Illumina), in analyzing ITRs in comparatively sequencing linear amplification-meditated PCR (LAM-PCR) amplicons derived from AAV-concatemeric structures. While our data indicate that both platforms can sequence complete ITRs, efficiencies (MiSeq: 0.11% of sequence reads; 454: 0.02% of reads), frequencies (MiSeq: 171 full ITRs, 454: 3 full ITRs), and rates of deviation from the derived ITR consensus sequence (MiSeq: 0.8%-1.3%; 454: 0.5%) did differ. These results suggest that next-generation sequencing platforms can be used to specifically detect ITR mutations and sequence complete ITRs.