{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01899335232668566, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001899335232668566, 'mean_word_length': 4.576719576719577, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[History of the medical indication of induced abortion. A historical contribution to the discussion of a current problem].


 Of all the religious injunctions against abortion, the most effective one over time has been the belief that God is the giver of life and that therefore abortion constitutes an attack on Divine Will. The question of when the soul enters the embryo is, under that view, of secondary importance. 2 schools of thought, each with a large body of supporting literature, have developed on the subject, however; 1 is that life is created complete and by Divine impulse, and the other that the soul enters the body after its creation as a continuing act of Divine creation. Writers supporting the latter view tend to agree that only God knows or can know the moment of the soul's entrance, and furthermore that it probably occurs quite soon after conception. In any case, a doctor can respect his own religious principles with regard to abortion but does not have the right to condemn those of his colleagues who hold different views.
