{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03636363636363636, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023863636363636365, 'mean_word_length': 4.720779220779221, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
General physicians do not take adequate travel histories.

BACKGROUND
Our aim was to document how often travel histories were taken and the quality of their content.


METHODS
Patients admitted over 2 months to acute medical units of two hospitals in the Northwest of England with a history of fever, rash, diarrhea, vomiting, jaundice, or presenting as "unwell post-travel" were identified. The initial medical clerking was assessed.


RESULTS
A total of 132 relevant admissions were identified. A travel history was documented in only 26 patients (19.7%). Of the 16 patients who had traveled, there was no documentation of pretravel advice or of sexual/other activities abroad in 15 (93.8%) and 12 (75.0%) patients, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
There needs to be better awareness and education about travel-related illness and the importance of taking an adequate travel history.