{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033151680290644865, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007720254314259764, 'mean_word_length': 5.40406976744186, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
SECRETARY OF ENERGY ADVISORY BOARD

1. DOE, through a program jointly established and managed by the NNSA and the Office of Science, should lead the program and investment to deliver the next class of leading edge machines by the middle of the next decade. These machines should be developed through a co-design process that balances classical computational speed and data centric memory and communications architectures to deliver performance at the 1-10 exaflop level, with addressable memory in the exabyte range. 2. This program should be executed using the partnering mechanisms with industry and academia that have proven effective for the last several generations of leadership computing programs. The approximate incremental investment required is $3B over 10 years. This would include a roadmap of DOE acquisitions, starting with the CORAL program. Such a roadmap would focus industry on key system level deliverables. 3. DOE should lead, within the framework of the National Strategic Computing Initiative (NSCI), a codesign process that jointly matures the technology base for complex modeling and simulation and data centric computing. This should be part of a jointly tasked effort among the agencies with the biggest stake in a balanced ecosystem. 4. DOE should lead a cross-agency U.S. Government (USG) investment in “over-the-horizon” future high performance computing technology, including hardware, software, applications algorithms, operating systems, data analytics and discovery tools, agent based modeling, cognitive computing, neurosynaptic systems, and other forward looking technologies, including superconducting computing. 5. DOE should lead the USG efforts to invest in maintaining the health of the underlying balanced ecosystem in mathematics, computer science, new algorithm development, physics, chemistry, etc., but also including Independent Software Vendors (ISVs), the open source community, and other government entities. 6. The Path Forward requires operating in, and investing for, three timeframes and technology plateaus: (1) The greater Petascale timeframe (the next five years), (2) The Exascale timeframe (the next five to 10 years), and (3) Beyond Exascale.