{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019955654101995565, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02106430155210643, 'mean_word_length': 4.679245283018868, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparison of two-level designs to estimate all main effects and two-factor interactions

ABSTRACT We compare cost-efficient alternatives for the full factorial 24 design, the regular 25-1 fractional factorial design, and the regular 26-1 fractional factorial design that can fit the model consisting of all the main effects as well as all the two-factor interactions. For 4 and 5 factors we examine orthogonal arrays with 12 and 20 runs, respectively. For 6 factors we consider orthogonal arrays with 24 as well as 28 runs. We consult complete catalogs of two-level orthogonal arrays to find the ones that provide the most efficient estimation of all the effects in the model. We compare these arrays with D-optimal designs found using a coordinate exchange algorithm. The D-optimal designs are always preferable to the most efficient orthogonal arrays for fitting the full model in all the factors.