{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023543990086741014, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.11453744493392, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Protein-protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation

Robust Perfect Adaptation (RPA) is a ubiquitously-observed signalling response across all scales of biological organisation. A major class of network architectures that drive RPA in complex networks is the Opposer module – a feedback-regulated network into which specialised integral-computing ‘opposer node(s)’ are embedded. Although ultrasensitivity-generating chemical reactions have long been considered a possible mechanism for such adaptation-conferring opposer nodes, this hypothesis has relied on simplified Michaelian models, which neglect the presence of protein-protein complexes, and which are now widely acknowledged to make inaccurate predictions of signalling responses. Here we develop complex-complete models of interlinked covalent-modification cycles with embedded ultrasensitivity: explicitly capturing all molecular interactions and protein complexes. Strikingly, we demonstrate that the presence of protein-protein complexes thwarts the network’s capacity for RPA in any ‘free’ active protein form, conferring RPA capacity instead on the concentration of a larger protein pool consisting of two distinct forms of a single protein. Furthermore, compared to predictions by simplified models, the parametric requirements for RPA in this protein pool are much more severe, and RPA generally obtains over a narrower range of input stimuli. These surprising results raise fundamental new questions as to the biochemical requirements for adaptation-conferring Opposer modules within complex cellular networks.