{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030006978367062107, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004884856943475227, 'mean_word_length': 5.45945945945946, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Adolescent Body Mass Index data: what differences result using different reference standard curves?].

Childhood and adolescent obesity prevalence rates have steadily increased both in industrialised and developing countries in the last years. Data from literature show that BMI is an acceptable indicator to assess overweight and obesity also in children and adolescents. Different reference standard curves for BMI exist: the percentiles of Rolland-Chacherà, Luciano, the National Center for Health Statistics, Cole and Cacciari. Nevertheless, different cut off points are used by the authors to identify underweight, overweight and obesity. The aim of the present study was to investigate what differences can emerge when comparing adolescent BMI using different references standard curves. Five hundreds and thirty-five adolescent subjects, aged 15.4 +/- 0.7 years, were recruited in Aosta Valley (Northen Italy). BMI was calculated according to the following equation: BMI = weight/height2 (kg/m2). The data obtained were distributed according to BMI percentiles and than compared with references standard curves. The comparison shows different results especially when underweight, overweight and obesity are identified. In conclusion, it can be asserted that BMI is an useful indicator to assess adiposity (overweight and obesity) in adolescent, but one should be cautious when comparing results based on different references.