{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.059727711901624944, 'fraction_numerical': 0.043039086517347384, 'mean_word_length': 4.610837438423645, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Electrophysiologic study of the effects of aminophylline and metaproterenol on canine myocardium.

Aminophylline and beta-adrenergic agonists are widely used in the treatment of obstructive lung diseases. It has been suggested that combined aminophylline and beta-agonist therapy may promote the development of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. The effects of these agents in combination on myocardial conduction and tissue refractoriness have not been documented. We evaluated the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous aminophylline and inhaled metaproterenol on canine myocardium. Aminophylline produced significant decreases from baseline in the AH interval (85 +/- 6.5 [SD] to 63 +/- 4.1 ms [p less than 0.02]), Wenckebach cycle length (WCL) (226 +/- 8.7 to 182 +/- 5.8 ms [p less than 0.02]), and ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) (166 +/- 6.0 to 148 +/- 4.9 ms [p less than 0.01]). Metaproterenol produced similar results, except metaproterenol significantly decreased the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) from 152 +/- 6.6 to 130 +/- 3.2 ms (p less than 0.02), an effect not seen with aminophylline alone. Metaproterenol also produced significantly greater reductions in AH interval and WCL, as well as a greater increase in heart rate than aminophylline did. When compared with aminophylline alone, combined metaproterenol and aminophylline therapy produced significantly greater reductions in the AH interval (63 +/- 4.1 versus 48 +/- 1.2 ms for combined therapy [p less than 0.01]), HV interval (32 +/- 1.2 versus 28 +/- 2.0 ms for combined therapy [p less than 0.02]), WCL (182 +/- 5.8 versus 150 +/- 7.1 ms for combined therapy [p less than 0.02]), and VERP (148 +/- 4.9 versus 132 +/- 2.0 ms for combined therapy [p less than 0.02]). We conclude that both aminophylline and metaproterenol significantly enhance AV nodal and His-Purkinje conduction. Metaproterenol produced significant changes in both atrial and ventricular tissue refractoriness. Metaproterenol produced significantly greater changes than aminophylline alone, and inhaled metaproterenol combined with intravenous aminophylline produced greater changes in AV nodal and His-Purkinje conduction and ventricular refractoriness than did aminophylline alone in a canine model.