{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019522776572668113, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.27891156462585, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A guide to conducting a task analysis of psychotherapeutic change

Abstract The epistemological and methodological underpinnings of task analysis are discussed and the steps and concrete procedures for its implementation are described and exemplified in a task analysis of the resolution of unfinished business. Task analysis, a method for studying the process of change, consists of two main phases: a discovery-oriented phase based on rational–empirical model building and a validation phase based on hypothesis testing. The goals of the approach are to (a) build an observationally based model of how therapeutic change occurs for a particular type of affective–cognitive problem, (b) validate the model of change, and (c) relate the process of change to outcome. Benefits and strengths of the approach are presented and factors that have impeded the use of this approach in the study of change processes are discussed.