{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018808777429467086, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.517647058823529, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The relationship between subjective and objective assessments of sacral neuromodulation effectiveness in patients with urgency‐frequency

Global response assessment (GRA) has been used to evaluate patients' perceptions of treatment effectiveness. However, few studies have scrutinized the relationship between GRAs and objective voiding diary outcomes data. This study explores the relationship between self‐reported symptom‐specific GRA responses and objective changes in frequency, urgency and pelvic pain in patients with urgency‐frequency with or without pelvic pain after implantation of a prosthetic sacral nerve stimulation device.