{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03035782261134374, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021459840121811954, 'mean_word_length': 4.46748178980229, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION AND PHYSIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF DISTRICT DERA GHAZI KHAN PUNJAB, PAKISTAN

The study area is located in the arid section of Punjab province, Pakistan. The accessibility of freshwater is the main problem in this area. The area is mainly flat and alluvial deposits are present down to 800 m. The groundwater is not fit for drinking because of its salinity. Hence, it is essential to mark the transition between fresh water and saltwater. Resistivity models were used to locate freshwater areas. The saltwater areas are between 10 and 30 m deep. Salt flats and clayrich deposits are visible on resistivity maps and were identified by low resistance values. After linking resistivity data and maps, it is determined that the south portion of the area has a freshwater aquifer, especially at a depth of 200 m. At this depth, the quality of water is very good, regardless of its mild salinity in some areas. The margin between salty and freshwater is set to no degree. This is dependent upon the recharge and usage of an aquifer. Groundwater pollution poses a severe threat to the city’s residents. Results from the physio-chemical analysis of the water samples confirm the presence of arsenic in excessive amounts in water samples and are outside the limits set by the WHO and NDWQS. Just two out of 10 samples are within the limits for safe drinking water. The results of this research are valued for groundwater management and the installation of tubular wells in freshwater areas for households and irrigation purposes.


Introduction
Water is the most significant entity for life. Various social activities such as farming, industry, and many others depend on water. In underdeveloped nations like Pakistan, water contamination is a major problem. The local population has little access to fresh and clean drinking water (Amin et al., 2017). The population growth not only increased the demand for pure water, but it also increased the input of industrial and domestic sewage in the waterways, which had a huge impact on the water system. Some sub-level industries play their part in creating jobs for the residents of the surrounding city. Fertilizers and pesticides are used to improve the fertility of the land, and to some extent, they are also liable for the pollution of the aquifer. The contamination of water has become a serious problem for the community as this is the root of many health issues. The WHO reports that 85% of Pakistanis do not have access to safe drinking water (Azizullah et al., 2011). The main reservoirs of the nation are extremely affected by industrial waste, farming, and high natality, (Walsh, 2000).
Heavy metals, pesticides, harmful chemicals, and urban waste are all sources of the contamination of water. In Pakistan, the inadequate dumping of industrial waste has a major impact on groundwater (Qadir et al., 2008). Groundwater is the chief source of water for innumerable uses. Around one-third of people use the groundwater for their daily life (Zurbrugg, 2002). Drinking polluted water causes serious health issues, such as kidney stones, hepatitis, and stomach disorders. In Pakistan, 20 to 40 percent of all patients are hospitalized for consuming polluted water, and 33% of annual deaths are due to diseases contracted through contaminated water (Hutton, et al., 2007). The purpose of our research is to characterize freshwater zones, as well as establish hydrostratigraphy of the subsurface. The important part of this research was to bring out samples of water from the research area and carry out laboratory analyses to find out different physiochemical parameters of the water.
Dera Ghazi Khan is a significant district in southern Punjab. The area of southern Punjab is 13,740 km 2 , which is a thin strip of very dry land. There are steep hills to the south of DG Khan and the rivers are often dry. In the rainy season, floods are originated from these steep hills. In summer, the temperature rises up to 50°C. Geographically, Dera Ghazi Khan is significant because it connects the four provinces. The aquifer mainly consists of alluvial fans prograding into the study area. Sediments mainly consist of lacustrine silts interbedded by fluvial sands and gravels. The grain size of these filling sediments vary from very coarse alluvial fan gravels and river deposits with very high hydraulic conductivity to very fine lacustrine silt of very low hydraulic conductivity. Thus, the lithology and geomorphology of the sediments and deposition environment play a significant role in the development of clastic fluvial aquifers and their hydraulic properties, such as hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity (Bowling et al., 2005). The main goal of the research is to study diverse varieties of minerals in the water. After the data came from assessments, 2D models were created to meet the goals.

Geology of the Study Area
The research area is part of a tectonically active area of the Indian plate. The Indian plate is still converging 36 mm per year beneath the Eurasian plate as a result of compression in the southwest part of the Himalayan Sulaiman fold, which formed a thrust belt in the middle Indus Basin. Along the east-west trending of the Sulaiman fold-and-thrust belt, tectonic activities occur (Asim et al., 2014). The length of this fold-and-thrust belt is up to 300km. The Sulaiman fold-and-thrust belt shows great compression and, due to this, it's quite narrow (see Figure 1). Tectonically, it is an active zone as the southern and eastern boundary of the Sulaiman belt is marked by Indus River deposits. The western margin of the belt is the suture zone that contains Ophiolites (Ahmad and Abbas, 1979).
Strata of Triassic to more recent age are found in the Sulaiman fold-and-thrust belt. Rock which is older than Triassic age is not exposed and not yet drilled. The youngest rocks which are found in the Sulaiman fold belt belong to the Siwaliks group. In the south and east edge of the belt, the Siwaliks group of recent age is present, whereas older rocks are located on the western side. Also, rocks of Permian age are present near Kalat (Asim et al., 2014). A significant unconformity is present between the Cambrian and Permian age. Boulders and sandstone show the condition of the basin in the Per-  To understand reservoir potential, the conceptual model of the research area is shown in Figure 3. It is considered a semi-confined aquifer and shows the freshwater zone in the study area. Generally, a semi-confined aquifer mainly contains sand, silt, and clay, having moderate to high aquifer hydraulic conductivity. The good water storage potential of the aquifer might depend on the frequency of rainfall and probable recharge conditions in that area.. The present conceptual model shows the freshwater zone in the study area.

Material and Method
An electrical resistivity survey was carried out in the field to create vertical resisitivity models (VES) in IPI-2WIN software. Contour maps were created by Surfer software. The resistivity of various rocks and soils is diverse and depends upon porosity, grain size, permeability, shape, pore structure, orientation, and material compaction (Friedman, 2005). In the electrical resistivity technique, pore water plays a significant role. The data for research work was acquired with CG5 Terameter in district Dera Ghazi Khan between December 17th to 27th. A total of 11 points were taken using the Schlumberger arrangement from 1.5 to 250 meters using half electrode spacing (AB/2). The base map of the study area is shown in Figure 4. The specific resistance decreases with dissolved solids. The apparent resistivity of the subsurface is derived from the formula shown in Equation 1 (Varnavina et al., 2015).

ρa = KV/I
(1) where: I = current, V = voltage, K = geometric factor whose value changes as electrode spacing are changes.

Electrical Resistivity Survey
During the investigation of electrical resistivity, the electric current flows through the subsurface with two current electrodes. With the help of this method, we can classify areas of fresh and saltwater. This is extensively used in diverse groundwater and lithological settings where the salinity of the water varies (Mabrouk et al., 2019). This technique is based upon Ohm's law. The mathematical representation of Ohm's law shown in Equation 2 (Chernov et al., 1993): where: V = potential difference (potential difference between the two electrodes), I = current (electrical charge current through any crosssection), the unit of current is ampere (A), R = resistance (the materials' ability to resist electric current motion). The resistivity of a geological layer is linked to many electrical parameters and petrophysical properties like the physical and chemical features of the pore-fluid, the mineral alignment in the sediments, sediment porosity, permeability and the degree of saturation (Ginzburg

VES Modelling
All the VES points are modeled with the IPI2WIN software (Zananiri et al., 2006). The apparent resistivity appears in small-scale circles. The black dark curve shows the apparent resistivity and the red colored curve represents an error between the apparent and bestmatched resistivity data. The lateral extension of the blue line represents the breadth of the layer (see Figure  5). The horizontal axis corresponds to the current electrode distance (AB/2) in meters and the upright axis corresponds to the apparent specific resistance (MN / 2) in ohmmeters (Muhammad and Khalid, 2017).

Resistivity data and Lithology Calibration
The resistivity values tell us about the lithology that is present underground. The values of the same lithologies are dissimilar because of the water level. The conductiv-

Laboratory Analysis
The collected samples from the field were analyzed in a GSP (Geological Survey of Pakistan) laboratory. Physical parameters such as pH, electric conductivity and total dissolved salts were determined with the help of an electro-chemical analyzer on the spot, while anions including As, Mg, K, Na and chloride were determined using a spectrophotometer HACH (DR2800). The standard values for groundwater pollutants are illustrated in Table 3.

Results and discussion
Various resistivity models were prepared from the resistivity data of the study area to effectively obtain the targets of this research work. 2D models are generated and given below along with the interpretation of results. Figure 6A shows the resistivity graph at 10 m below the groundwater level. Clay and silt exist in the northern segment of the study area. According to the resistivity field data, there is silt and sand in the southward segment. The east and west are also covered by clay and sand. Therefore, we can estimate that clay, silt, sand, and gravel will appear at a depth of 10 m. The 25 m resistivity model Figure 6B shows very small deviations compared to the 10 m resistivity model Figure 6A. On the north side of the model Figure 6B, there is a low specific resistivity and a horizon of saltwater is indicated. The southern and western side of the Figure 6B show a freshwater aquifer. In the northern zone of 50 m depth, there is a deep freshwater zone and the lithology consists of clay and silt. The northwest and southeast parts of the model show a small area of saltwater (see Figure 6C). The presence of freshwater aquifers in the area are shown in the south and west part of the model. On the north side of the map, a saltwater horizon is found. Silt and clay can be seen in the south of the model.
The resistivity graph at a depth of 100 m is shown in Figure 6D. The model indicates a freshwater aquifer is spread all over the map. Clay, silt, and sand are present at a 100 m depth according to resistivity data. For freshwater, 100 m depth is sufficient for a tube well (Chakraboti et al., 2008). Fewer smaller resistivity values were because of clays and silt. The extreme resistivity at 100 m depth was 68 Ωm because of the presence of clay and silt, and this denotes the best zone for an aquifer in the study area.
Resistivity models at levels of 150 m, 200 m, and 250 m depth are displayed in Figures 6 E, F, and G. The largest value of a resistivity model of a depth of 150 m

Resistivity (Ω.m) Type of material Remarks
Resistivity less than 20 Clay-silt Unsaturated zone Resistivity greater than 20 Sand-Gravel Unsaturated zone Resistivity less than 150 Sand-Gravel Saturated zone Resistivity less than 20 Clay-silt Saturated zone Resistivity less than 30 Shales Saturated zone Resistivity less than 10 Saline sediments Saturated zone

Physiochemical Analysis
Different physio-chemical parameters of water were analysed, such as pH, electric conductivity, total dissolved salts, sodium, potassium, chloride, arsenic and magnesium. The water samples collected in DG Khan were collected from many discrete locations across the city. A filter system was installed at the end of a landfill. Samples collected from these landfills affect the quality of the water below. Numbers were assigned to these collected samples from 1-10. Samples were collected in polyethylene (PE) bottles. Locations were defined by Geographic Positioning System (GPS) within latitude 30° and longitude 72° specified coordinates for Pakistan as shown in Table 2.
Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik i autori (The Mining-Geology-Petroleum Engineering Bulletin and the authors) ©, 2021, pp. 47-57, DOI: 10.17794/rgn.2021.3.4 was 44Ω.m ( Figure 6E). Freshwater aquifers are shown on the north and south parts of the model. Towards the north and southeast of the model, the low resistivity layer indicates a saltwater area. Apart from that low resistivity area, the 150 m deep study area has freshwater aquifers. Figure 6F shows the resistivity model of the 200 m depth level. At a 200 m depth, approximately all of the study area has a fresh water zone. Due to less resistivity, we can expect that both clay and sandy dust will exist at this level. The small low resistivity horizon shows the saltwater zone. So, it has the potential to be the best freshwater aquifer. Figure 6G shows a resistivity model at 250m for the saline and freshwater aquifer where 48 Ωm was the highest resistivity value at 250 m depth. The resistivity model indicates that there is a very great freshwater potential at a 250 m depth Figure 6G. Clays and sandy silt are existing as a lithology. A less resistive zone is present at a 250 m depth. With the comparison of resistivity at a depth of 200 m, the resistance value is almost the same. It can be concluded here that at a depth of 200 m, freshwater aquifers are more valuable than freshwater at a depth of 250 m because, at a depth of 200 m, the salt surface is less than those at 250 m.
The results of physico-chemical data from the 10 sites of DG Khan City, with maximum, minimum, mean values are shown in Table 5, and water sample results are shown in Table 6. The electrical conductivity (EC) values vary from 3100 μS/cm to 8000 μS/cm with an average of 6315 μS/cm from 10 samples. Figure 7a shows the results of EC, in which all the samples show higher values that represent high salinity in the soil. As per the WHO and the NDWQS, the quality of water used for drinking should be between pH 6.5 and 8.5. The average pH value in our samples was 7.705, which represents alkaline in nature. All the samples lie within the WHO range as can be seen in Figure 7b. The maximum TDS value for drinking water should not exceed 1000 mg / l (Al-Shaibani, 2008; Shahab et al. 2018). All the samples are above the safety limits for TDS (see Table 4). There is a direct relationship between EC and TDS, that is why TDS was calculated using the mathematical relation presented in Equation 3. Thirumalini and Joseph (2009) defined the relation as: where; k e -correlation factor whose value varies between 0.55 and 0.8. The environment of dissolved elements present in the water samples depends on the physical structure of the rocks as well as chemical configuration, along with the pH value in the vicinity of the aquifers (Sajil et al.,

2014; Zaheer et al., 2017).
The TDS values from all 10 samples range from maximum to minimum i.e. 3050 mg/l to 1200 mg/l respectively with an average of 2415 mg/l, which is not fit for potable water, but it can be used for irrigation purposes. Figure 7c shows the concentration of TDS in the graph. The concentration of Na + ions varies between 440 to 830 mg/l while Mg + ions have concentration ranges between 10 and 25 mg/l. The average values for Na + and Mg + were very low, i.e. 675 and 17.4 mg/l respectively. All groundwater samples have a concentration of Na + higher than the WHO limit, as shown in Figure 7d. The average Na + concentration in all samples is 675, which is so high that it can cause many diseases such as chronic congestive, heart failure and ill effects, etc. On the other hand, Mg + ranges normally, i.e. 17.4 is the average range of Mg + , which is less than the WHO desirable standard, as shown in Figure 8b.
The concentrations of Clions are in the range between 0.6 to 328.4 mg/l, with an average of 50.3 mg/l shown in Figure 5a. According to WHO standards, the allowable limit of Clis up to 250 mg/l. Only one of the samples shows higher values from the desirable range. Other samples show a very low value of chlorine in the water. The potassium concentration in all samples ranges from 11.6 to 16.8 mg/l, with an average of 14.58 mg/l, as shown in Figure 8c. The recommended concentrations of K + in daily requirements are up to 3000 mg (Edition, 2011). The standard WHO limit for K + is 5.2mg/l. All the samples lie above the WHO standard.
The analysis of drinking water is extremely important as it may indicate the origin of a serious illness. The tests for arsenic (As) were only carried out with various heavy metals. Sample #6 showed the lowest arsenic (As) with values of 0.63 mg/l and sample #1 shows the maximum arsenic (As) value of 11.87 mg/l. The mean value of all the collected samples is 3.54 mg/l) and the range of values specified by international quality standards are not greater than 0.01 mg/l. Figure 8d shows the arsenic concentration in all samples.

Graph comparison
Out of all these samples, only sample #6 and sample #10 were recommended as drinking water, as the measured values of pH, TDS, and EC are within the limits of WHO and NDWQS. The cross-plot lies between EC (μS/cm), TDS (ppm), and pH, as shown in Figure 9.
This cross-plot tells the same scenario, just sample #6 and #10 fall within the WHO and NDWQS allowable limits. The second cross-plot is among Na (mg/L), K (mg/L) and As (mg/L) (see Figure 10). The cross-plot illustrates the same situation, only samples #6 and #10 are within the acceptable limits of the WHO and NDWQS limits.

Conclusion
The groundwater perspective of the study area was concluded from the interpretation of the resistivity data. The main freshwater aquifers are on the north and east part of the study area. The eastern and western sections contain a freshwater aquifer, but it is in the region of a low resistivity area with saltwater. The resistivity models of the study area show the quality of the subsurface aquifer at different depths. The most probable depth for freshwater is 200 m throughout the region. Within a depth of 200 m, the salt surface is very small, even at a depth of 250 m, the salt surface is greater than at a depth of 200 m.
After reviewing the results of analysis of the water samples, such as electrical conductivity (EC), TDS, pH, and concentrations of heavy metals, it is concluded that the water quality in the entire region is well above the safety limits of the WHO and the NDWQS. The average arsenic concentration is 3.6 mg/l while it should not be higher than 0.01 mg/l, according to the WHO limit values. The interpretations of the sample collected from the landfill are far too frightening as the arsenic concentration is around 11.87 mg/l. Only 2 samples (sample #6 and sample #10) are somewhat within safe limits and meet potable quality standards. This is an alarming condition, as high-quality drinking water is not available in most parts of the city.
It is recommended that a groundwater survey must be carried out every five years under the observation of the Pakistan council of research in water resources to assess the quality of the groundwater. It is suggested that a vertical electrical probe should be used to increase the accuracy of the results. Saltwater dominates in areas up to 40 m deep, therefore it is advisable to drill wells to a depth of 50 m or more to the freshwater aquifer. The results of the water samples showed an alarming water quality situation for the entire area. The filter system installed at the landfill must be shut down immediately, as the arsenic concentration is alarming. The municipal government should establish a separate water data collection unit. Decision-makers should be allowed to make wise and courageous decisions to affect water quality.