{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.039337474120082816, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025534851621808144, 'mean_word_length': 5.1440677966101696, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Antibiotic therapy and staphylococcal skin infections in a tropical malarial zone (Guyana). Practices in conventional and exceptional situations.

A problem of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus skin infections emerged in the French armed forces in 2004, in a malaria-endemic areas. The high incidence rate led us to evaluate military staff practices. This was a cross-sectional survey of doctors and nurses deployed as officers in French Guyana since 2006. The definition of skin and soft-tissue infection came from the criteria for epidemiological surveillance of the armed forces. We studied the management of antibiotic therapy and its related difficulties. In all, 47 officers responded. At the Military Medical Center (MMC), 23.4% of respondents routinely prescribed antibiotics, compared with 36.2% when stationed in the jungle (p<0.05%). Complication led 68.1 of staff to prescribe antibiotic prescriptions at the MMC, compared with 46.8% in the jungle (p<0.05%). Finally, 22.5% of those at MMC prescribed antibiotic coverage of surgical drainage, compared with 14.8% in the jungle (p<0.05%). Pristinamycin and fusidic acid were the preferred antibiotics. Two-thirds of the staff reported difficulties in jungle management. This first study indicates the need for an update of military medical recommendations. Personnel training must continue to enable them to provide appropriate aggressive management in the current endemic context.