{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03027681660899654, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01124567474048443, 'mean_word_length': 5.5, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Treatment of painful bladder syndrome and pelvic organ prolapse: highlights of the 4th international consultation on incontinence, july 5-8, 2008, paris, france.

The purposes of the 4th International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI), attended by medical professionals with interest in all aspects of incontinence, were to (1) review the current state of knowledge on incontinence; (2) standardize response criteria and recommendations for clinical research on incontinence; (3) validate standard international instruments to evaluate incontinence in collaboration with the major associations involved in the field of incontinence; and (4) propose a widely accepted strategy for the practical diagnostic and therapeutic management of incontinence according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. 
 
Twenty-three committees were formed. Each committee was charged with a specific topic to assess what we know, what we think we know, what we do not know, and what we need to know. The consultation’s methodology follows evidence-based principles, defined in collaboration with the Oxford and Cochrane groups. Here we report on 3 of these committees.