{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.035175879396984924, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.795454545454546, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Practical usefulness of atypical endometrial cell categories within the new classification of endometrial cytology when applied to conventional smears

Endometrial cytology has been widely used as a screening tool in Japan. Traditionally, a three‐tier reporting system, consisting of ‘negative’, ‘suspicious’ and ‘positive’ categories, has been used. However, a more descriptive system, the New Terminology in Endometrial Cytology (NTEMC), which is based on the Bethesda System for uterine cervical cytology, was introduced recently. The objective of this study was to validate the NTEMC criteria.