{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014705882352941176, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00267379679144385, 'mean_word_length': 5.3474576271186445, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An Examination of the Impact of Drizzle Drops on Satellite-Retrieved Effective Particle Sizes

In general, cloud effective droplet radii are remotely sensed in the near-infrared using the assumption of a monomodal droplet size distribution. It has been observed in many instances, especially in relatively pristine marine environments, that cloud effective droplet radii derived from satellite data often exceed 15 m or more. Comparisons of remotely sensed and in situ retrievals indicate that the former often overestimates the latter in clouds with drizzle-size droplets. To gain a better understanding of this discrepancy, this paper performs a theoretical and empirical evaluation of the impact of drizzle drops on the derived effective radius.