{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02664298401420959, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014209591474245116, 'mean_word_length': 5.44, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of sulfide structure on enantioselectivity in catalytic asymmetric epoxidation of aldehydes: mechanistic insights and implications.

Bridged bicyclic sulfide 1 was originally found to provide high levels of asymmetric induction in sulfur ylide-mediated epoxidations. This sulfide possesses chirality in the [2.2.1] thioether moiety and the [2.2.1] camphor-derived carbocyclic moiety. To determine whether the optimal sulfide had been used, a diastereomer of sulfide 1 in which the stereochemistry of the [2.2.1] carbocycle was reversed (sulfide 5) was prepared and studied as an epoxidation catalyst. This diastereomer gave considerably lower levels of asymmetric induction than the original sulfide 1. From computational and x-ray studies it was found that sulfide 5 gave rise to a more hindered ylide, which reacted more reversibly with aldehydes leading to lower enantioselectivity. Conditions that reduced reversibility were also tested and high enantioselectivities were returned for sulfide 5 (similar to sulfide 1). The implications for the synthesis of chiral sulfides for asymmetric epoxidations are discussed.