{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05170239596469105, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018915510718789406, 'mean_word_length': 5.728813559322034, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Case of generalized morphea with the manifestation of diffuse systemic cutaneous sclerosis without sclerodactyly

Figure 1. Clinical presentation at admission and histopathological findings. (a,b) The trunk and extremities showed diffuse scleroderma with erythema, slight scale, pigmentation and telangiectasia, while (c) the face showed no findings of note. (d) No sclerodactyly or Raynaud’s phenomenon was found. (e) Neither was splinter hemorrhage found in his nail fold. (f) Histopathology showed scleroderma in the dermis and subcutaneous tissue (hematoxylin–eosin [HE], original magnification 940) and (g) thickened collagen bundles were found in the higher magnification (9100). (h) There were no inflammatory changes in the fascia (HE, 940) even (i) in the higher magnification (9100).