{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014469453376205787, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001607717041800643, 'mean_word_length': 5.1683168316831685, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Hypothetical, Academic and Premature Challenges

1. It might be considered that the primary function of the courts is to resolve disputes or issues which have arisen in particular factual circumstances. However, circumstances do arise when the courts are asked to rule on issues which may be based on hypothetical facts or where there is no longer a dispute of practical relevance. There are understandable practical constraints, not the least that court time and resources are finite and, unsurprisingly, judges tend to consider that their efforts should be directed principally to what are issues of practical relevance.