{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024390243902439025, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002613240418118467, 'mean_word_length': 4.803030303030303, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cities in Ruins: The Politics of Modern Poetics by Cecilia Enjuto Rangel (review)

from memory of the cultural production of what Conley names (despite substantial amounts of debating and scholarly criticism from the past three decades) “the Golden Age,” the book reflects it quite precisely (256). If, on the other hand, the search for the Siglo del Otro can include as much an incorporation of modern and postmodern signs, references, and methods in early modern criticism, and vice versa, there is much work to be done, and this volume is one good step in that direction. This important collection of essays argue for a more detailed study of the correspondences between memory, landscape, place, space, and theater as signs of early modern and postmodern times, to which I add, as signs of the importance of such early modern times for the study of both modern and postmodern texts and contexts. Spectacle and Topophilia opens up the way for other scholars and readers to continue dwelling in this relation, and to consider the sense of place and spectacle as elements that signify and make new and various kinds of sense in the Hispanic world.