{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024342105263157894, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.882352941176471, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Mapping Québécois Sexual Nationalism in Times of ‘Crisis of Reasonable Accommodations’

The language of gender equality and sexual emancipation has become increasingly pivotal to Western immigration and integration governmentality, giving rise to a new brand of nationalism in which women's rights and gay-and-lesbian rights are deemed core civilisational values of the West, while migrant communities, particularly Muslims, are cast as menacing them. Operating through a reconfigured Orientalism and the rhetoric and politics of ‘clash of civilisations’, these collusions come with serious national and international consequences and should be analysed not only as a new inflection of contemporary racism, in an era boisterously declared committed to diversity though anti-multiculturalist and post-racial, but also in their connections with neo-liberalism that links biopolitics to geopolitics and made marketable a range of social movements such as feminism and gay and lesbian activism. Expanding on a critical framework inspired by postcolonial feminist and queer anti-racist writings, this paper uncovers the ways in which gender and sexuality have become a key mode through which technologies of racialised governmentality come into existence via discourses of ‘feminism vs. multiculturalism’, ‘secularism’ and ‘human rights’, during the recent Québécois ‘reasonable accommodation crisis’, which was seemingly about the extent to which minority religious accommodation should be practiced, hence ‘not about race’.