{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05424769703172978, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0383828045035824, 'mean_word_length': 5.226114649681529, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Primary cutaneous neuroendocrine tumor (atypical carcinoid) expressing KIT and PDGFRA with myoepithelial differentiation: a case report with immunohistochemical and molecular genetic studies.

Primary cutaneous neuroendocrine tumors (NET) except for Merkel cell carcinoma have rarely been reported. Herein reported is a very unique case of primary cutaneous NET with immunohistochemical markers of myoepitheliomas. A 47-year-old woman presented a tumor measuring 0.8x0.9x0.6 cm of the face. The tumor was excised completely with wide margins. Morphologically, the tumor was located in the dermis, and the tumor was composed of epithelioid cells arranged in trabecular, sinusoidal, rosette, ribbon-like, and cord-like patterns. Focal areas show tubular formations. The tumor cells were homogenous, and their nuclei showed hyperchromasia but no apparent histological features of malignancy were seen. The stroma was very scant. No invasive features were seen. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were strongly positive for cytokeratin (CK) 34BE12, CD5/6, CK14, NCAM (CD56), p63, and KIT (CD117), and moderately positive for CK AE1/3, p53, chromogranin, synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), PDGFRA, CA19-9, and Ki-67 antigen (labeling index=23%). The tumor cells were negative for CK CAM5.2, CK7, CK8, CK18,CK19,CK20, EMA, vimentin, CEA, HMB45, S100 protein, α-smooth muscle antigen, desmin, CD34, GFAP, neurofilaments, CD99 (MIC2), CD45, CD57, ErbB2, TTF-1, MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6. Mucins examined by d-PAS and Alcian blue techniques were negative. A genetic analysis using PCR-direct sequencing method in paraffin sections identified no mutations of KIT (exons 9, 11, 13 and 17) and PDGFRA (exons 12 and 18) genes. Imaging modalities including CT and MRI identified no tumor in the body. The clinicians thought that the tumor was cured. She was a sailor and immediately visited other countries; therefore the follow-up could not be done.