{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024721878862793572, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.328125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An An Integrated Automatic-Grading and Quality Measure for Assessing Programming Assignment

Programming teachers very often assess their students' submissions solely from their correctness, sometimes with the help of an automated-grading platform. This approach is arguably effective and efficient at the same time. Unfortunately, this single-dimension assessment approach narrows the students' perspective on a high-quality solution to just a working solution. In the real world setting, a solution should be maintainable with minimal cost. Maintainability is closely related to code quality. In this paper, we present a web-based tool that would help the teachers to assess the students' submissions from both correctness and quality in one place. In this tool, we integrate GitHub Classroom and SonarQube.