{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02680565897244974, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005956813104988831, 'mean_word_length': 5.620689655172414, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Group treatment of secondary erectile dysfunction.

The effects of three group treatment formats on 20 men with secondary erectile dysfunction and their partners were contrasted. After a comprehensive medical and psychological screening, each couple was assigned to one of three treatment groups (Communication Technique Training, Sexual Technique Training, Combination Treatment) or to one of two control groups (Attention-Placebo, No-Treatment). Couples in the three treatment groups and the attention-placebo group participated in their respective formats in twice-weekly sessions for a total of 20 hours. The no-treatment control group received sex education and treatment after a 5-week waiting list period. All three treatment groups fostered substantial gains so that between-format differences were not statistically significant. Subject variables which predicted success/experience ratio gains included age of the male partner, perceived level of relationship adjustment, and the male partner's success/experience ratio prior to treatment. Eighty-one percent of the treated men reached the criterion of 80% or greater success/experience ratio (successful penetration and subsequent ejaculation) at the 6-month follow-up. Good nocturnal tumescence prior to treatment was correlated with a better treatment outcome than poor tumescence.