{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01827485380116959, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.130208333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Some Psychophysiological and Pharmacological Correlates of a Developmental, Cognitive and Motivational Theory a

Publisher Summary This chapter describes some psychophysiological and pharmacological correlates of a developmental, cognitive, and motivational theory. Studies of event-related potentials (ERPs) can probe a level of neural organization that has behavioral meaning. ERP experiments—thereby, encourage us to formulate, precisely, the design problems that are solved by the behaving brain, and to translate these design statements into a formal language that is powerful enough to explain how behavioral, physiological, and pharmacological processes are related. Many learning subjects are minimal adaptive predictors who only learn about relevant cues. Several constellations of properties arise in the thought experiment because, it concludes that several design principles work together to correct errors and test hypotheses about codes that satisfy the stability–plasticity (SP) criterion. The thought experiment requires only some general properties from these constellations for its completion. The mechanisms that subserve these general properties can be specialized in many ways to accomplish specific tasks without destroying the general properties. The thought experiment suggests the minimal general purpose machinery needed to generate SP codes.