{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015927189988623434, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004550625711035267, 'mean_word_length': 5.330935251798561, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Can societal impact of scientific work be measured in the process of re-accreditation of higher education institutions and public scientific institutes in Croatia?

In this paper we present an approach to measuring the societal impact of scientific research. Our proposed methodology is based on the theory of productive interaction (Spaapen and van Drooge, 2011). The methodology was tested on the reports produced in the process of the expert evaluation of public higher education institutions (HEIs) at universities and public research institutes in Croatia. For the purpose of quantitative assessment, we have developed a conceptual framework and analyzed the narrative texts of reports based on recognising codified interactions. Finally, we discuss our results in the context of the research area of the Republic of Croatia in the fields of social sciences and biomedicine.