{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014545454545454545, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0018181818181818182, 'mean_word_length': 6.243421052631579, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparison of various adhesive composite restorations in the posterior regions.

UNLABELLED
The evolution of adhesive materials has revolutionized posterior restorative techniques, contributing to the progressive abandonment of traditional metallic materials. The considerable progress in the field of adhesive dentistry and composite resin technology, together with patients' increasing aesthetic demands, are radically modifying the modern conservative approach to the restoration of the posterior regions. This article will discuss the indications and fundamental stages of three posterior restoration techniques using composite materials.


LEARNING OBJECTIVES
This article discusses the indications for posterior composite restorations and outlines the procedures followed to ensure aesthetic results. Upon reading this article, the reader should: 1) Understand the variety of conservative composite options the clinician can utilize to meet a patient's aesthetic and biological expectations. 2) Become familiar with the indications for using different composite treatment plans and materials.