{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.036585365853658534, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004878048780487805, 'mean_word_length': 5.547872340425532, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Steps toward Healing: False Memories and Traumagenic Amnesia May Coexist in Vulnerable Populations

Child abuse is surely the most agonizing psychological issue of our time. We decry the tendency to polarize around the either-or dichotomy of "recovered versus false memories," when both are likely to occur. Memory researchers seem to generalize from the mild, one-shot stressors of the laboratory to the severe repeated traumas reported by abused populations, an inferential leap that is scientifically dubious. Naturalistic studies show (a) some post-traumatic memory impairment (not just forgetting, but difficulty remembering in spite of repeated efforts); (b) dissociativity, such as emotional numbing, detachment, and the like; but also (c) increased suggestibility (Spiegel & Cardena, 1991). About 20% of the normal population is highly suggestible, and in these individuals it is trivially easy to show suggested amnesia, detachment, perceptual blocking, etc., as well as to suggest dramatically false memories. It is therefore vital to assess suggestibility and dissociativity in traumatized populations. Adult survivors of abuse may show both more false "memories" and more "false forgetting" than the normal population.