{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01607142857142857, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.841463414634147, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Use of automatic static perimetry for the diagnosis of visual analyzer lesion in neurosurgical patients].

Emphasis is laid on how important to use clinical perimetry in the diagnosis of visual disturbances that are common in neurosurgical pathology. The authors compare kinetic perimetry with automatic static one. They consider the advantages of computerized perimetry used in patients with chiasmocellular diseases in visual analyzerlesion in the cerebral hemispheres, in congestive optic disks, anterior optic ischemic neuropathy, and visual dysfunctions.