{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026997840172786176, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0032397408207343412, 'mean_word_length': 4.904458598726115, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The metabolic cost of changing speeds is significant and may affect preferred walking speeds

In daily life, people seldom walk at exactly constant speeds. Most walking over a day is performed in short bouts [1]. Thus, it is of interest to measure the cost of changing speed. Minetti and co-workers [3] measured the cost of changing speeds but with non-inertial treadmill speed changes or stepfrequency control. Here, we measure the metabolic cost of changing speeds to better quantify the relative contribution of changing-speed versus constant-speed walking costs. Human preferring walking speeds are found to be close to energetically optimal speeds [4]. The cost of changing speeds may cause a change in preferred walking behavior, in some situations. We test this by measuring the walking speed for a range of short-distance bouts, for which acceleration-deceleration constitutes a significant fraction of the total bout.