{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04353932584269663, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0028089887640449437, 'mean_word_length': 5.423423423423423, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Unsupervised classification of voltammetric data beyond principal component analysis.

In this study, we evaluate different apoproaches to unsupervised classification of cyclic voltammetric data, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA), t-distributed Stochastic Neighbour Embedding (t-SNE), Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) as well as neural networks. To this end, we exploit a form of transfer learning, based on feature extraction in an image recognition network, VGG-16, in combination with PCA, t-SNE or UMAP. Overall, we find that t-SNE performs best when applied directly to numerical data (noise-free case) or to features (in the presence of noise), followed by UMAP and then PCA.