{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029723991507430998, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004246284501061571, 'mean_word_length': 5.465753424657534, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Response to ‘Postpartum hemorrhage and blood transfusion among parturients with scarred uterus—the evidence is there’

We would like to thank Levin and Rottenstreich [1] for their interest in and comments on our study "Blood transfusion following intended vaginal birth after cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean section in women with a prior primary cesarean: A population-based record linkage study" [2]. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.