{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03783102143757881, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012610340479192938, 'mean_word_length': 5.616666666666666, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Emerging Case Law on Extra Duty Contracts: Implications and Guidelines for Practicing School Administrators

Extra duty assignments for teachers rarely led to litigation prior to the 1980s. However, a study of recent extra duty cases indicated that the number and variety of cases are increasing. Cases were grouped into six categories: (1) contracts, (2) staffing patterns, (3) tenure, (4) demotion and stigma, (5) due process, and (6) collective bargaining agreements. Conclusions were that supplemental contracts are becoming common, extra duties should be assigned equitably, tenure does not accrue to extra duty positions, teachers’ associations are becoming involved in making extra duty assignments, and school boards must establish clear policies related to teachers’ extra duties.