{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028508109197139114, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018938249219300898, 'mean_word_length': 5.315521628498728, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 3, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Anaesthesia in Elective Surgery and its Outcome

INTRODUCTION 
Anaesthesia is classified into two main techniques general anaesthesia (GA) in which gaseous and/or intravenous drugs achieve central neurological depression, and regional anaesthesia, in which drugs are administered directly to the vicinity of spinal cord or nerves to locally block afferent and efferent nerves. 
The anaesthesiologist is the medical specialists who can evaluate the risk associated with the anaesthesia discuss these risks with the patient and surgeon to manage them intraoperative. Now a day anesthesia is no longer limited to the operation room but it a perioperative care . The presence of comorbid conditions in surgical patients is significant factors in preoperative morbidity and mortality risk assessment . The current practices in anesthesia include complete valuation of risks, control costs, allocate resources, and postpone surgery until interventions improve risk .


Introduction
Anaesthesia is classified into two main techniques general anaesthesia (GA) in which gaseous and/or intravenous drugs achieve central neurological depression, and regional anaesthesia, in which drugs are administered directly to the vicinity of spinal cord or nerves to locally block afferent and efferent nerves. [1] The anaesthesiologist is the medical specialists who can evaluate the risk associated with the anaesthesia discuss these risks with the patient and surgeon to manage them intraoperative. Now a day anesthesia is no longer limited to the operation room but it a perioperative care. [2] The presence of comorbid conditions in surgical patients is significant factors in preoperative morbidity and mortality risk assessment. [3] The current practices in anesthesia include complete valuation of risks, control costs, allocate resources, and postpone surgery until interventions improve risk. [4] The risks of fatal or life threatening events are increased several fold in the patients with comorbidities after major surgery. Systemic comorbidities such as pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic and metabolic diseases and cancers which modify treatment tolerance and influence short-term prognosis. [5] Various instruments have been developed to assess the effect of comorbidities on patient survival after surgery. [6] For head and neck cancers Adult Comorbidity Evaluation Index (ACE-27) has been widely validated. [7] Aims and Objectives Aim of this prospective study was to determine the frequencies of comorbidities in elective surgical patients operated in our hospital and its effects on the outcome of anaesthesia and identify variables for future studies.

Material and Methods
This is an observational, prospective study of a crosssection. Adult patients >18 years were selected for the study who were posted for the elective surgery. Study was carried out in the department of anaesthesia CCM Medical College and hospital from Feb 2018 to May 2018.
Written consent was taken from the patients who were included in the study. The protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethical Committees. All comorbidities of the patients were recorded and also ensured they were controlled and fit for anesthesia and surgery. Patient's demographic data like age, sex, medications, presence and type of comorbidities were recorded in a standardized format. Other information was retrieved from the patients' medical record. For hypertensive patients antihypertensive were continued till morning of the surgery except amlodipine which was omitted on the morning of surgery because of significant drop of blood pressure as reported by some authors. For diabetic patients on insulin infusion up to morning of surgery was given.
Intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications were recorded in a separate data collection form. Various parameters were monitored like continuous electrocardiogram, heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure, and arterial oxygen saturation. Hypertension defined as diastolic pressure >110 mmHg or systolic pressure >140 mmHg and hypotension defined as systolic arterial blood pressure of 80 mmHg or less .The patients were also followup for 24 hours postoperatively and record of adverse effect was kept like vomiting, shivering, pain etc.

Statistical Analysis
The data were analysed using Windows Excel 2013. Results are represented in means ± standard deviation and using tables. Z test was used to determine the difference of

Results
There were 694 elective surgeries during the study period, however only 124 patients were included in the study. Out of 124 selected patients 51 patients were having comorbidities. In our study rate of patients with comorbidities was found to be 124/51 (41.12%)  Maximum patients with and without co morbidities were operated in general surgery department in both group percentage was 47%. In orthopaedic department patients without comorbidities operated were 28 (22.58%) while Patients with co-morbidities was 11 (21.57%). In department of Gynaecology patients without and with comorbidities were 27 (21.77%) and 10 (19.61%) respectively. In ENT department patients without and with comorbidities were 10 (8.06%) and 6 (11.76%) respectively.  Hypertension was observed in 2 (1.61%) and 5 (9.80%) cases in without comorbidities and with co-morbidities respectively. Tachycardia and nausea was observed each in 1 (0.81%) and 3 (5.88%) cases without comorbidities and with co-morbidities respectively. Vomiting was seen in 2 (1.61%) and 5 (9.80%) cases without comorbidities and with co-morbidities respectively Hypotension was not observed in any case without comorbidity while in patients with comorbidities it was 4 (7.84%). Delayed recovery was observed in 2 (1.61%) and 1 (1.96%) of the cases without comorbidities and with co-morbidities.

Discussion
Risk assessment is necessary to compare outcomes, postpone surgery until risk factors are improved or to take the decision not to perform the surgery or unfit for anaesthesia when the risk is very high. [10] Disease-specific comorbidity measures have a advantage but the outcome may not be as predicted as proposed in a study of conceptual models in health services. [11] The presence of comorbidity is a major prognostic factor but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. So it is worthwhile to identify the single diseases contributing to the risk of complications so that predisposing factors for post-operative morbidity can be avoided. [12] Comorbidities associated with surgical pathologies in our study was 41.13% which was quite higher as compared to the study by Eyelade O. et al [13] in which they observed the rate of 27.3% , while Soyannwo OA.et al [14] observed 9.2 % comorbidities. The reason may be due to increased prevalence of diabetes and hypertension in India which was shown to be 7.5% (95% CI, 7.3%-7.7%) and 25.3% (95% CI, 25.0%-25.6%), respectively in a study. [15] Hypertension was the most common comorbidity in this study similar results were shown by Haq ZA etal. [16] in their study, also in a study at Africa hypertension was the commonest comorbid condition. [17] All the patients were well controlled with medications for their comorbid conditions, 10 surgeries were postponed due to patients with uncontrolled hypertension so as to reduce the perioperative risk. Also inprean aesthetic check-up other parameters were checked like electrolyte, urea, creatinine, an electrocardiogram to exclude other organ damage.
We observed statically significant hypotension, hypertension, and tachycardia in patients with comorbidities. In the course of anaesthetic management of patients with hypertension, the continuation of antihypertensive medication throughout the preoperative period was done to reduce the risk of uncontrolled hypertension still in 5 (9.8%) cases with comorbidities hypertension was observed preoperatively .Some authors have reported severe postoperative hypotension with use of amlodipine. [18] Due to increase in the prevalence of hypertension in our area patients with comorbidities as diabetes was high in our study.
Diabetes mellitus is the second common comorbidity identified. Altered gluco regulation is an established risk factor predisposing to various complications such as impaired wound healing, endothelial dysfunction, postoperative sepsis, in surgical patients. Sometimes there may be diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state. Stress during surgery and anaesthesia might aggravate the pre-existing deranged gluco regulation and may precipitate severe hyperglycaemia which leads to postoperative morbidity and mortality. [19] Anaesthesia and surgery cause metabolic stress which will release of the catabolic hormones epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, glucagon and growth hormone. Insulin secretion and action are however inhibited. [20] In our study sixteen (31.37%) patients were having diabetes as comorbidity. Preoperative glycemic control was achieved by insulin infusion. This infusion is also useful in low resource setting area. [21] In our study we observed that most of the patients with adverse effects had general anaesthesia. Some authors have recommended the use of local or regional anaesthesia in patients with comorbidities to avoid the polypharmacy of general anesthesia. [22] However in regional anaesthesia complication like hypotension was observed in patients with comorbidities.
Significant difference was observed between adverse effects in patients with comorbidities and without comorbidities. Statistically significant difference was observed in hypertension, tachycardia, and nausea and vomiting.

Conclusion
In our study hypertension is the commonest comorbidity. The presence of comorbidity has influences on the adverse effects of anaesthesia in this study. Our sample size was small so further studies are required to be carried out to determine the impact of comorbidity in patients.