{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016795865633074936, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0006459948320413437, 'mean_word_length': 6.171296296296297, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Dissecting the components of quinine accumulation in Plasmodium falciparum

Although quinine, the active ingredient of chinchona bark, has been used in the treatment of malaria for several centuries, there is little information regarding the interactions of this drug with the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. To better understand quinine's mode of action and the mechanism underpinning reduced responsiveness, we have investigated the factors that contribute to quinine accumulation by parasites that differ in their susceptibility to quinine. Interestingly, passive distribution, in accordance with the intracellular pH gradients, and intracellular binding could account for only a small fraction of the high amount of quinine accumulated by the parasites investigated. The results of trans‐stimulation kinetics suggest that high accumulation of quinine is brought about by a carrier‐mediated import system. This import system seems to be weakened in parasites with reduced quinine susceptibility. Other data show that polymorphisms within PfCRT are causatively linked with an increased verapamil‐sensitive quinine efflux that, depending on the genetic background, resulted in reduced quinine accumulation. The polymorphisms within PfMDR1 investigated did not affect quinine accumulation. Our data are consistent with the model that several factors, including acidotropic trapping, binding to intracellular sites and carrier‐mediated import and export transport systems, contribute to steady‐state intracellular quinine accumulation.