{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03255813953488372, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013953488372093023, 'mean_word_length': 5.473684210526316, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Methodological Issues in Chinese Studies. Edited by Amy Auerbacher Wilson, Sidney Leonard Greenblatt, and Richard W. Wilson. [New York: Praeger, 1983. 136 pp.]

) 126-27). Similarly, Teiwes uses his analytic framework to argue Hu Yaobang will be especially vulnerable after Deng passes from the scene. Some readers may dispute certain of Teiwes' interpretations. For example, Teiwes states bureaucratic links will eclipse guanxi when the old revolutionary elite departs from the political stage, an argument this reviewer found stimulating, but unconvincing, since guanxi develop and are maintained in bureaucratic institutions as well as in less institutionalized settings. But, aside from such quibbles, readers of The China Quarterly will certainly need to consider seriously Teiwes' contributions towards the understanding of contemporary Chinese politics.