{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.008393285371702638, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.0071942446043165, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Market Abuse and Private Enforcement

The normative background of market abuse rules is a complex issue to be addressed by any legal system. The interrelation between the procedural autonomy of Member States and the principle of effectiveness at the European level adds another difficult parameter to the equation. The aim of this article is to analyse the new European framework of market abuse rules and its consequences on the national legal systems with regard to private enforcement. We claim that the private enforcement of market abuse rules is affected by the legal nature of the new provisions, so that – when taking into account the principle of effectiveness and the current stage of development of European law – any affected individual should be able to enforce the market abuse rules against other violating individuals.