{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02342786683107275, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029593094944512947, 'mean_word_length': 5.198473282442748, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Equality & Revolution: Women’s Rights in the Russian Empire, 1905–1917 (review)

constant tension between the rhetoric of emancipation and traditional patriarchy. Thus, the example of criminology illustrates the unevenness of the Soviet project from the very beginning and the challenges of truly bringing equality to all citizens. While much work since the 1980s and 1990s has been done on the Stalin period, this study constitutes part of a new body of research that investigates early Soviet society, professions, and gender order. Kowalsky argues for an extension of what Sheila Fitzpatrick calls the “cultural revolution” back to the early 1920s. Moreover, this book is a compelling example of using the category of gender to expose ideological tensions rooted in the tsarist era that continued after 1917.