{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010217113665389528, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.984732824427481, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Demonstration of the Quantitative Differences Between Class M and Class A Deformation Behaviors Within the Composite Model

The composite model of plastic deformation is used to model steady-state and transient deformation at constant stress in both class M and class A materials, pure aluminum and Al-Mg, respectively. This has been done by representing the kinetics of deformation in the soft region for pure class M behavior in terms of thermally activated glide over localized obstacles and pure class A behavior in terms of viscous glide. The model correctly describes the characteristic features of class A behavior in contrast to class M behavior, namely the trend towards a third power strain rate - stress law in the steady state and inverted behavior in the transient stage