{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016918967052537846, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.386363636363637, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparative study of dynamic mesh updating methods used in the simulation of fluid-structure interaction problems with a non-linear free surface

Abstract This paper compares the performance of three mesh movement algorithms: Laplacian smoothing, linear spring analogy and torsion spring analogy for a fluid mesh update in staggered fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations with a non-linear free surface. The mesh updating schemes are applied to simulate three representative cases of the above-stated dual moving boundary problem. The performances of the algorithms are gauged on the basis of their ability to delay the initiation of a complete remesh of the fluid domain while maintaining solution accuracy. To satisfy this dual objective, the mesh-updating algorithm should not only prevent mesh failure but should also maintain well-shaped triangles. The reasons for the failure of different schemes are explained and suitable modifications are suggested/implemented to enhance thier performance. It is shown that these modifications prove to be very successful in improving the effectiveness of the algorithms.