{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02192448233861145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00243605359317905, 'mean_word_length': 5.088888888888889, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Landscapes for compact cities

the compact city form, even in developed economies, relates to the repercussions that high urban density can have on the quality of life, such as a reduced sense of community, inadequate urban amenities, a feeling of crowdedness, and a decline in psychological health.2 Denser developments also seem to contribute to higher levels of exposure to environmental pollution.3 Perhaps the most intuitively understood and widely-recognized problem of a compact urban form is that densification is also accompanied by a reduction of open space. The logic is obvious: in a finite land area, more land set aside for buildings and infrastructure, especially under conditions of high land cost, simply means less land for parks, plazas, woodlands, and other forms of green and open spaces in the city.