{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03277439024390244, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0007621951219512195, 'mean_word_length': 4.448132780082988, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Is a Graft a Graft? That Is the Question!

Is an FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) graft in the hands of one doctor the same as an FUE graft in the hand of another? Or for that matter, is what is claimed to be a follicular unit the same in anyone's hand? Do grafts that come from FUTs (Follicular Unit Transplantation), FUEs, FITs (Follicular Isolation Technique) or MUGs (Multi-family Unit Grafting) have a common thread so that the public can understand the arcane language we have created? Should we define things like: the risks of hair loss in each particular graft as it is related to its harvesting technique, the damage to the donor area that is intrinsic to the procedure or technique used, or the risks of buried grafts with an FUE procedure? When we feel the need to market our skills, should we (a) disclose the basis by which we promote how wonderful we think we are, and if so (b) should we tell the patient whether we met our criteria for the 'procedure' that we performed on him/her? How do we deal with the differences between FUT's and MUGs? Does it really matter what we call what we do, or do we just call it all "hair transplants"? These issues were important when the transition was made from mini-micrografting to FUT, but are now even more relevant with the increasing interest in FUE. (1)