{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0121580547112462, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.487684729064039, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Hepatofugal Portal Blood Flow in Hepatic Cirrhosis

A variety of indirect techniques has been claimed to provide evidence of spontaneous reversal of portal blood flow in hepatic cirrhosis but the existence of the phenomenon has been doubted by some who do not accept the validity of the indirect evidence. There are few reports of the demonstration of hepatofugal portal flow by selective hepatic arteriography, which is the only acceptable technique. We report three patients with histologically confirmed cirrhosis in whom hepatofugal portal blood flow was unequivocally demonstrated by arteriography, in whom no surgical portosystemic shunt had been performed and in whom there was no evidence of the Budd-Chiari Syndrome or hepatoma, situations accepted as associated with reversed portal blood flow. Theoretical considerations suggest that shunt surgery for bleeding esopha-geal varices should not be ruled out on the grounds of hepatofugal portal flow. However, end-to-side portacaval anastomosis and distal splenorenal shunt might predispose to the early redevelopment of esophageal varices when reversed portal flow is present. Side-to-side portacavai and conventional splenorenal shunts might be preferable in having less effect on hepatic parenchymal perfusion than when orthograde portal flow is the case.