{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021660649819494584, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0036101083032490976, 'mean_word_length': 4.716494845360825, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Kenya—The Parliamentary Record

The real advantage of this volume, however, is that it presents such an array of factual material that the reader is forced to organize and interpret it in his own mind. Many questions, both broad and specific, come to mind. One or two in the area of trade and economics are particularly striking. How, for example, does one assess the relationship between the chronology of the growth of Shoan preponderance on the one hand and the rerouting of the southern and south-western trade of Ethiopia on the other? The Shoan victory over Gojam (1882), the role of Harrar (particularly because of the delayed construction of the railway), and the necessity for a fixed capital have perhaps not been sufficiently emphasized as factors in the shift of the bulk of the trade from the northern route through Gojam, to the route through Shoa. Another question which emerges as needing special attention is the extent of the economic influence and relative roles of Italy in the north and England in the east and south-west, during the last years of Menelik's reign and the Regency period.