{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03312392918332382, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019988577955454025, 'mean_word_length': 5.302158273381295, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Clinical Impact of Camera-Based Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients With Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

Rationale and ObjectivesF18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET) studies have clinical value in suspected recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer cases. Because this modality is not accessible for many patients, a camera-based FDG (CB-FDG) coincidence imaging was suggested as an alternative. Although inferior in resolution to a dedicated PET system, it can make FDG studies available to more patients. We assessed the clinical value of CB-FDG in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. MethodsThe disease stage and treatment approach in 83 patients were twice determined by an oncologist and a surgeon, first based on the patient’s records and blind to CB-FDG findings and then with the inclusion of FDG results in the decision-making analysis. ResultsOn a lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity of CB-FDG was 95% and the specificity was 81% compared with 88% and 64%, respectively, for computed tomography. Adding FDG findings led to disease-stage alteration in 47 patients (57%), upstaging in 35 (42%), and downstaging in 12 (15%). FDG localized the tumor sites in 21 of 26 patients (81%) with suspected clinical recurrence and a negative conventional imaging workup. In 8 patients, FDG ruled out viable tumor tissue suggested by other modalities. The oncologist’s suggested treatment approach was altered in 54% of the patients and the surgeon altered the decision on operability in 28%. ConclusionCB-FDG assessment has clinical value for both staging and selecting treatment in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer and can be considered an alternative to an nonaccessible dedicated PET system.