{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029382957884427033, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02056807051909892, 'mean_word_length': 5.2317073170731705, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Five Methods for Detection of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamases in Gram Negative Enteric Bacteria

The presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in 55 isolates of Gram negative enteric bacteria isolated from lower respiratory tract infections, was investigated by using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI method which showed that 41.8% of the isolates produced this type of βlactamases, and that Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were the most producing species with a production rate of 61.1%, followed by Escherichia coli isolates 43.75%. Five confirmatory methods were used to detect these enzymes: ceftazidime agar method, double-disk synergy method, combination disk method, modified 3D extract method and enzymatic disks method. The study indicated that ceftazidime agar method was the best method in detecting extended-spectrum β-lactamases as it gave a detection rate of 95.7%, followed by the double-disk synergy method with a rate of 87%, then enzymatic disks method with a rate of 73.9%.