{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03714859437751004, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.875862068965517, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
DIFFERENT NOTIONS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN RUSSIA

Budget expenses should be justified and ensure economic growth, i.e. give an economic effect, which is advisable to measure comprehensively with a number of interrelated indicators. Scientists and practitioners use concepts such as economic efficiency, effectiveness, profitability, price-quality, cost-result. Understanding the significance, frequency and actual use of these indicators in assessing the effectiveness of budget expenditures is the goal of this study. The method of reviewing scientific articles and normative documents is used as a reflection of the actual use of indicators of efficiency, effectiveness, profitability, price-quality, cost-result. The conditional rating of the use of performance indicators in relation to budget expenditures looks like this: efficiency (as the most frequent), effectiveness, quality, price (used less often), cost-result, price-quality, profitability (practically not used).