{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03775510204081633, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025510204081632654, 'mean_word_length': 5.147335423197492, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 6, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 3, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Is the Presence or Absence of Tumour Necrosis a Significant Predictor of Survival in Renal Cell Cancer?

Objective: Currently when renal cancer pathology is assessed the presence or absence of necrosis is simply reported. It has been suggested that a presence or absence response ignores heterogeneity and a classification based on the extent of necrosis involvement would aid prognostic value in cancer-specific survival. The aim of this study was to determine whether a quantitative assessment of tumour necrosis would provide additional prognostic information. Methods: We studied the pathological features and cancer-specific survival of 47 patients with renal cancer undergoing surgery with curative intent. A quantitative assessment of tumour necrosis was compared to the presence or absence of necrosis. Results: Tumour necrosis was present in 27 of 47 cases. A simple assessment of the presence or absence was not associated with cancer-specific survival (p = 0.052). When assessed quantitatively, tumour necrosis was associated with decreased cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001). A 2-tiered assessment, <25% and >25% involvement of necrosis, was further utilised and shown to predict cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, using this 2-tiered assessment of <25% and >25% involvement of necrosis was retained as a significant independent factor for cancer-specific survival (HR 11.84, 95% CI 3.81–36.75, p < 0.001). Conclusion: A simple assessment of the presence/absence of tumour necrosis is reported to be a prognostic factor in renal cell cancer. In this study, the presence/absence was not shown to be a significant prognostic marker of cancer-specific survival. However, a more accurate quantitative assessment of tumour necrosis, whereby a 2-tiered response is still utilised, but basing this on <25% and >25% involvement of necrosis was statistically significant and independent in predicting cancer-specific survival.