{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017793594306049824, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.9020979020979025, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Warden: A Classic Case of the Double-Blind Dilemma

one that will be considered in this paper is the prevalence of the double-bind dilemma in correctional decisions. By this I mean that correctional administrators are often forced to make decisions in which there are unresolvable dilemmas. No matter what decision is made in these situations, there are losses and problems associated with it. Sometimes double-bind dilemmas are the result of cross-pressures in which a decision favoring one interest group or public will be seen as harmful and therefore opposed by other interest groups and publics. Other times, the dilemmas are conditioned by incompatibilities in the structure or functions of the correctional system, such as the old custody versus treatment dilemma. In this paper, a number of these dilemmas will be briefly outlined.