{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010752688172043012, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.687022900763359, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Finding a proper role for human judgement in the examination system.

In this paper we extend the discussion in the background paper, to consider some potential applications of the Thurstone method of Paired Comparisons. Because the analysis is modeled at the level of individuals rather than of groups it is much more powerful than the old method. There are two parts to it which may be called The Model and The Misfit. The model part constructs a single scale showing the relative value of all the scripts included, while the misfit part allows investigation of any effect that may perturb that common scale. Together they constitute a general system within which comparative data can be used to construct and validate any set of assessments.