{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02176278563656148, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007616974972796518, 'mean_word_length': 5.615107913669065, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reprioritizing current research trends in medical education: A reflection on research activities in Saudi Arabia

Abstract Background: There are numerous national efforts to determine and develop research priorities of medical education in Saudi Arabia. These priorities were first proposed in 2010 by “Dr Al-Khuli’s Chair for Developing Medical Education in Saudi Arabia”. The proposed priority domains were: curriculum, students, faculty, and quality assurance and accreditation. Aim: To investigate publications in medical education at the national and international levels in areas relating to these proposed priorities. Methods: Electronic search within PubMed database for papers relating to each domain of priority was conducted at national and international levels in the last three years, using the same keywords as the priority domains, but only confined to undergraduate medical education. Results: Out of 3145 articles retrieved when searching with keyword as broad as “undergraduate medical curriculum” only 81 articles worldwide and 3 articles from Saudi Arabia were dealing with curriculum related issues as a whole. Further search on the sub-domains “effective strategies to manage undergraduate curriculum” and “undergraduate medical education models”, resulted in the retrieval of few articles worldwide and none from Saudi Arabia. At the national level, there were 63 publications from Saudi Arabia that were either course (topic)-specific or could not be classified under the four domains specified by Dr Al-Khuli’s Chair. Conclusion: Research activities in medical education in Saudi Arabia in the last 3 years showed diversity and lack of focus in the research priorities. Efforts of academic and research centers should continue to monitor and encourage these activities toward achieving the recommended priorities.