{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030201342281879196, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009228187919463088, 'mean_word_length': 5.448648648648649, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Adsorption of Ethylenediamine (EDA) on Montmorillonite Saturated with Different Cations—V. Ammonium- and Triethylammonium-Montmorillonite Ion-Exchange, Protonation and Hydrogen-Bonding

On NH4- as well as on (C2H5)3NH-montmorillonite EDA was adsorbed in protonated form. The extent of protonation depended on the relative basicities and concentrations of the interacting compounds. In the systems exposed to EDA vapor a proton transfer process took place. A similar mechanism, involving probably a water molecule which remained associated with the EDAH+ ion, occurred on air-drying (C2H5)3NH-montmorillonite treated with aqueous EDA, whereas no adsorption was observed when the suspension was washed. On the contrary EDA added, in quantities not exceeding the CEC, to a suspension of NH4-montmorillonite was adsorbed almost exclusively as EDAH22+ ion. This is explained in terms of ion-exchange between NH4+ and EDAH+ present in aqueous medium and protonation of the second amine function through the dissociation of water molecules near the clay surface.Hydrogen-bonding between protonated and neutral EDA was observed when the extent of adsorption was higher than the extent of protonation.