{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026362038664323375, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005272407732864675, 'mean_word_length': 5.129032258064516, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
LETTER TO THE EDITORS

Last year in the summer issue of this journal, Khandker et al. (3) published the results of an interesting modeling study following the cost-effectiveness of various strategies for detecting cases of colon cancer. In addition to the baseline alternative, the authors investigated eight different screening strategies and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness of these eight strategies. Table 1 contains the results of their study in terms of cost and effectiveness as well as incremental cost-effectiveness (see Table 3, Khandler et al.).