{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033093525179856115, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01223021582733813, 'mean_word_length': 4.944444444444445, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Curing kinetics of a photo-polymerized dental sealant.

PURPOSE
To evaluate the effect of using a variety of light-curing sources on the extent (monomer conversion) and rate of cure of a light-cured dental sealant.


METHODS
Infrared spectroscopy recorded real-time polymerization of a self-cured and a light-cured sealant when the latter was exposed using manufacturer's recommendations [quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH)] for 20 seconds as well as to other light sources: high intensity QTH, plasma arc light (PAC), and second-generation blue light emitting diode (LED) units. Specimens were heated to 37 degrees C and the degree and rate of conversion were recorded at each second for 300 seconds. Conversion extent and rate were compared among light units as well as to the self-curing product. Five replications for each test condition were performed.


RESULTS
After 300 seconds, self-curing product conversion was equivalent to all light-exposed specimens. The self-cured rate of cure was significantly lower than all light-cured scenarios. The high intensity QTH light provided equivalent conversion as conventional 20-second QTH exposure (control) in only 10 seconds. The PAC light required similar exposure time as conventional QTH treatment. Second-generation blue LED units reached conversion similar to control in only 10 seconds, while one light required only 5 seconds' exposure.