{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03273427471116817, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014120667522464698, 'mean_word_length': 4.860902255639098, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Adult day care centres in British Columbia: client characteristics, reasons for referral and reasons for non-attendance.

This paper discusses a 1989 study of new admissions to 22 adult day care centres in British Columbia and compares it to similar studies in the U.S. The B.C. study investigated clients' characteristics, reasons for referral to the centres, and why some referrals did not attend. Of the new admissions, 63% were female and 30% lived alone. Compared to those in American studies, B.C. clients were older and more likely to live with a spouse. The primary medical conditions of B.C. clients were related to diseases of the circulatory system. As for daily activities, 58% could not bathe without supervision and 43% required assistance with dressing. Some 37% were unable to prepare their own meals; 31% needed help with housekeeping and 62% with shopping. The proportion of clients with mental diseases (38%) was similar to that in American adult day care centres. The three most common reasons for referring clients to adult day care centres were: to assist those who were socially isolated; to give family caregivers some respite; and to give clients emotional help. Perceptions varied as to why referred clients did not attend: for continuing care staff there were psychosocial factors; for adult day care staff it was related to characteristics of the service delivery system; and clients themselves cited functional, physical and operational factors (e.g., problems related to hearing and vision, transportation or physical barriers).