{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02016498625114574, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.461538461538462, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Two calibration models for compensation of the individual elements properties of self-emitting displays

In this paper, we examine the applicability limits of different methods of compensation of the individual properties of self-emitting displays with significant non-uniformity of chromaticity and maximum brightness. The aim of the compensation is to minimize the perceived image non-uniformity. Compensation of the displayed image non-uniformity is based on minimizing the perceived distance between the target (ideally displayed) and the simulated image displayed by the calibrated screen. The S-CIELAB model of the human visual system properties is used to estimate the perceived distance between two images. In this work, we compare the efficiency of the channel-wise and linear (with channel mixing) compensation models depending on the models of variation in the characteristics of display elements (subpixels). It was found that even for a display with uniform chromatic subpixels characteristics, the linear model with channel mixing is superior in terms of compensation accuracy.