{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031031031031031032, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001001001001001001, 'mean_word_length': 5.369426751592357, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A structural transition in d(AT)n.d(AT)n inserts within superhelical DNA.

We have constructed plasmids carrying d(AT)n.d(AT)n inserts of different lengths. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis patterns show that an increase in the negative superhelicity of these DNAs brings about a structural transition within the inserts, resulting in a reduction of the superhelical stress. However, this reduction corresponds to the expected values neither for cruciform nor the Z form. Those DNA topoisomers in which the structural transition had occurred proved to be specifically recognizable by single-strand-specific endonuclease S1, with the cleavage site situated at the centre of the insert. These data, as well as kinetic studies, suggest that the cloned d(AT)n.d(AT)n sequences adopt a cruciform rather than the Z-form structure. We discuss plausible reasons of the discrepancy between the observed superhelical stress release and that expected for the transition of the insert to the cruciform state.