{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021333333333333333, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.587719298245614, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Print capitalism or patronage, propaganda, and policing: The emergence of printing and the periodical press in Bohemia

Over the last twenty years, the theoretical perspectives of Benedict Anderson and Ernest Gellner have played a large role in discussions of the origins and development of nationalism. In each of their conceptions is not only the now famous and widely agreed upon notion that “nationalism engenders nations,” and that nations “imagine” themselves into existence, but also that such development is inherently connected with underlying economic developments associated with the rise of capitalism and industrialization. For each of these theorists, communication plays a central role, a defining function, in the rise of nationalism.