{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01680672268907563, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.884393063583815, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Augmenting understanding of the relationship between situation awareness and confidence using calibration analysis

The present study represents a preliminary examination of the relationship between situation awareness (SA) and confidence within a distributed information-sharing environment using the calibration methodology. The calibration methodology uses the indices of calibration, resolution and over/under-confidence to examine the relationship between the accuracy of the responses and the degree of confidence that one has in these responses, which leads to a measure of an operator's meta-SA. The results of this study revealed that, although the participants were slightly overconfident in their responses, overall they demonstrated good meta-SA. That is, the participants' subjective probability judgements corresponded to their pattern of SA response accuracy. It is concluded that the use of calibration analysis represents a better methodology for expanding our understanding of the relationship between SA and confidence and ultimately how this relationship can impact decision-making and performance in applied settings than can be achieved by examining SA measures alone.