{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03459821428571429, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022879464285714284, 'mean_word_length': 4.765273311897106, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of microwave ablation and multipolar radiofrequency ablation, both using a pair of internally cooled interstitial applicators: Results in ex vivo porcine livers

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) and multipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in ex vivo porcine livers, in both cases using a pair of internally cooled interstitial applicators. Materials and methods: MWA was performed on ex vivo porcine livers (n = 60) using a pair of simultaneously powered, internally cooled shaft interstitial antennae. Four power settings were used: 50 W, 60 W, 70 W and 80 W (n = 15 per setting). Multipolar RFA was also performed on ex vivo porcine livers (n = 30), also using a pair of simultaneously powered, internally cooled shaft interstitial bipolar applicators. This was performed for two applicator types T30 (3 cm length) and T40 (4 cm length) at a manufacturer prescribed power of 60 W and 80 W, respectively (n = 15 per applicator). Spacing between the two probes was 2 cm in all cases. Each power setting was applied for 15 ablations for 10 min each. The long-axis diameter (Dl), short-axis diameter (Ds) and the ratio Ds/Dl for each ablation were measured. Temperature data were recorded at 10 positions. Temperature curves were recorded at 3 locations, as well as the time required for the temperature to rise to 50°C. Results: Dl and Ds for all the power settings of MWA were significantly larger than that of both kinds of multipolar RFA (P < 0.05). The rates of temperature to rise to 50°C in all the MW ablations power settings were significantly faster than those in both multipolar RF ablations. Conclusion: MWA by the simultaneous application of double antennae may be more advantageous for treating larger liver tumour than multipolar RFA.