{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017321016166281754, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.568181818181818, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Near-Term Feasibility of Alternative Jet Fuels

This report discuses the results of a study on the use of alternative fuel in civil aviation. The study used the near-term production potential, compatibility with existing infrastructure and aircraft, near-term production costs, greenhouse gas emissions, the relative merit of using the fuel in aviation versions ground transportation, emissions affecting air quality and life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions to compare potential alternative jet fuels. Alternative jet fuels that could be commercially available in the next ten years from mainly North American sources were the primary focus. Benefits gained from producing and utilizing alternative jet fuels yielded economic benefits from production that generalized to all petroleum users, including civil aviation, whether or not the fuel was utilized in aviation.