{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03868103994927077, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0057070386810399495, 'mean_word_length': 6.044642857142857, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Graphitic Carbon as Durable Cathode‐Catalyst Support for PEFCs

Long‐term deterioration in the performance of PEFCs is attributed largely to reduction in active area of the platinum catalyst at cathode, usually caused by carbon‐support corrosion. It is found that the use of graphitic carbon as cathode‐catalyst support enhances its long‐term stability in relation to non‐graphitic carbon. This is because graphitic‐carbon‐supported‐Pt (Pt/GrC) cathodes exhibit higher resistance to carbon corrosion in‐relation to non‐graphitic‐carbon‐supported‐Pt (Pt/Non‐GrC) cathodes in PEFCs during accelerated stress test (AST) as evidenced by chronoamperometry and carbon dioxide studies. The corresponding change in electrochemical surface area (ESA), cell performance and charge‐transfer resistance are monitored through cyclic voltammetry (CV), cell polarisation and impedance measurements, respectively. The degradation in performance of PEFC with Pt/GrC cathode is found to be around 10% after 70 h of AST as against 77% for Pt/Non‐GrC cathode. It is noteworthy that Pt/GrC cathodes can withstand even up to 100 h of AST with nominal effect on their performance. X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy and cross‐sectional field‐emission scanning electron microscopy (FE‐SEM) studies before and after AST suggest lesser deformation in catalyst layer and catalyst particles for Pt/GrC cathodes in relation to Pt/Non‐GrC cathodes, reflecting that graphitic carbon‐support resists carbon corrosion and helps mitigating aggregation of Pt‐particles.