{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025936599423631124, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011527377521613832, 'mean_word_length': 5.261261261261262, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Dialogism and interpretation: reading Papadiamantis’ A Dream Among the Waters

The twentieth century has been the century of interpretation, representing at the same time its celebration and its devaluation. It opens with Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams (1900) and Nietzsche’s statement that there are no facts but only interpretations and ends up in the early 1960s with Susan Sontag’s attack on interpretation and her dramatic appeal for an ‘erotics of art’ in place of a hermeneutics. However polemical Sontag’s attitude might seem, she is not the only one who expresses this kind of distrust toward interpretation. Others too talk about the ‘crisis’ of interpretation or its transgression.