{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.038565996740901685, 'fraction_numerical': 0.026615969581749048, 'mean_word_length': 4.86624203821656, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Analysis of the impact of a medication reconciliation tool on the hospital-community interface.

OBJECTIVE
To analyse the impact of a medication reconciliation tool (MRT), which contains information on all the treatments a patient is receiving upon admission as well as intra-hospital therapeutic adjustments and the rationale behind them, on the transmission and quality of the follow-up of prescribing recommendations outside the hospital setting.


METHODS
The MRT involved the prescriptions of patients who were aged 75 and over, who were admitted to a geriatric short-stay unit, and who were referred to a general practitioner (GP) upon discharge. Drug discrepancies (DD) and polypharmacy after an intra-hospital medication reconciliation and at the time of renewing the out-patient prescription (one month after discharge) were measured. Satisfaction among GPs was investigated.


RESULTS
The medication lists of 173 patients (1242 drugs; median eight drugs/day) were reconciled, optimised, and communicated using the MRT to the 89 GPs of the 103 patients who returned home. Intra-hospital reconciliation identified 779 DDs (4.6 ± 2.3), of which 39.0% were additions to treatment that had been overlooked. After the discharge prescription was renewed, only 1.6 ± 1.6 DDs were measured. Between admission, discharge, and repeat prescription, polypharmacy was reduced from 83.2% to 74.6% and 67.7% (p < 0.05). Despite a 31.5% response rate to the postal questionnaire, 79.3% of physicians thought the MRT facilitated continuity of care and 75.5% wanted it to be rolled-out more widely.


CONCLUSION
This study shows that the MRT is a useful tool and of interest for documenting the process of intra-hospital therapeutic optimisation and with regard to the rapid transmission and follow-up of recommendations by partners in the community.