{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016028495102404273, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007123775601068566, 'mean_word_length': 4.793814432989691, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The parameters of commitment: the German literary intelligentsia on the eve of the Third Reich

Sartre’s description of the mission of the politicized writer was written in 1947, and reflects both an optimism born out of the spirit shown by intellectuals within the French resistance movement to the occupying Germans in the latter stages of the Second World War, and a hope that this newly acquired sense of moral responsibility would be continued into the post-war period. The passages quoted above show Sartre at his most voluntaristic, as he eloquently argues for the right of the writer to impose his or her vision of political freedom upon the world. His writings of this period can be seen as a high-point in a tradition that reaches back at least as far as Zola, whose decision to enter the political arena in defence of Dreyfus in 1896 proved to his contemporaries that the writer was capable of crossing that traditional boundary between decorative belles lettres and moral action.’ Sartre’s model of the l’homme engagé has not, of course, been restricted to French culture. Indeed, one of its characteristics has