{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01668520578420467, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004449388209121246, 'mean_word_length': 5.2682926829268295, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ten Years After the ADA Amendment Act (2008): The Relationship Between ADA Employment Discrimination and Substance Use Disorders.

OBJECTIVE
Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability. This article explores how the courts have dealt with provisions limiting these protections for persons with substance use disorders. Specifically, the ADA allows employees with substance use disorders to be held to the same standards as other employees, suggesting that employers may not be required to provide reasonable accommodations. Moreover, employees "currently engaging in the illegal use of drugs" are excluded from ADA coverage.


METHODS
This article reviewed all published federal appellate court opinions involving cases in which a substance use disorder was the basis for a claim of employment-related discrimination in violation of the ADA.


RESULTS
In 26 cases identified, the lower courts ruled in favor of the employer 25 times, and the appellate courts reversed four of these rulings. The cases highlight three important limitations of ADA protections for persons with substance use disorders: the dilemma of needing to prove that one's substance use disorder limits major life activities while simultaneously arguing that one is qualified for the job; expansive interpretations of "current" drug use and the period of sobriety needed to qualify for ADA protections; and restrictions on the extent to which a qualifying disability can serve as a legal excuse for substance use-related misconduct.


CONCLUSIONS
The protections afforded by the ADA for individuals with substance use disorders are restricted by what appears to be the statute's moralizing on drug and alcohol use and those who use these substances.