{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025477707006369428, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0021231422505307855, 'mean_word_length': 4.7560975609756095, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Prone positioning acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

I read with great interest the editorials of my esteemed colleagues regarding the Apronet study (1). This study aimed at making a picture of the use of prone position (PP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the current time and to explore the reasons to not proning these patients. I thank Journal of Thoracic Disease ( JTD ) for providing me the opportunity to share some comments with them.