{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013333333333333334, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.321052631578947, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On logistic Box–Cox regression for flexibly estimating the shape and strength of exposure‐disease relationships

The shape of the relationship between a continuous exposure variable and a binary disease variable is often central to epidemiologic investigations. This article investigates a number of issues surrounding inference and the shape of the relationship. Presuming that the relationship can be expressed in terms of regression coefficients and a shape parameter, we investigate how well the shape can be inferred in settings which might typify epidemiologic investigations and risk assessment. We also consider a suitable definition of the median effect of exposure, and investigate how precisely this can be inferred. This is done both in the case of using a model acknowledging uncertainty about the shape parameter and in the case of ignoring this uncertainty and using a two‐step method, where in step one we transform the predictor and in step two we fit a simple logistic model with transformed predictor. All these investigations require a family of exposure‐disease relationships indexed by a shape parameter. For this purpose, we employ a family based on the Box–Cox transformation.