{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012594458438287154, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0016792611251049538, 'mean_word_length': 6.180722891566265, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comment: Career guidelines promote neurologist satisfaction

Maintaining satisfaction among neurologists is an important and pressing issue in today's research environment for faculty retention and career fulfillment. Investigators often receive rigorous scientific training during fellowships and residency; however, little guidance is available regarding how and when to approach career advancement once faculty positions are achieved. This is compounded by the fact that these complex processes are often combined with multifaceted demands such as establishing successful research programs and securing funding, meeting academic and clinical requirements, and balancing work and personal responsibilities.1 The resulting struggle for career progression and lack of contentment across faculty positions has prompted rising numbers of investigators to leave academic research.2

Developing ways to overcome these issues is warranted, and many investigators traditionally rely on the expertise and guidance of a more senior mentor. Expert mentoring offers much beyond just typical scientific training, including advice on establishing goals, how and when to navigate promotional tracks and …