{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019963702359346643, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.202247191011236, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Tribunal de las Aguas: A Minor Jurisprudence, Not Jurisprudentially Minor

Abstract This Article examines Spain’s Tribunal de las Aguas de Valencia as a minor jurisprudence, a unique form of justice, and transparent and communal due process. I couch my study in the history of the court and contrast it with the Inquisition tribunal that shared its geographic jurisdiction. I argue the Tribunal exemplifies Goodrich’s version of a minor jurisprudence, but for the Tribunal’s ability to survive monarchical control and remain true to its community.