{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03278688524590164, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.074626865671642, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Commercial Bank Leverage Factor in U.S. Asset Prices

I present novel results on a commercial bank leverage factor that drives U.S. asset prices with important implications for both the time-series and the cross-section of returns. To motivate these findings, I modify the recovery rate of assets in a disaster model to include aggregate credit growth as an additional macroeconomic risk factor. It turns out there is a positive relationship between the postulated "resilience" of an asset and the stage of aggregate credit recovery. The intuition is behavioral in nature: credit expansions (contractions) breed investor overoptimism (pessimism), asset "resilience" increases (decreases) and the risk-premium decreases (increases). Additional implications in the cross-section are generated by the interaction of the credit cycle with the stock-specific recovery rate. The commercial bank leverage factor has a larger effect on small-, less profitable-, and value-stocks. A simple buy-and-hold strategy of the market index at short- and medium-horizons illustrates how investors can earn significantly higher excess returns and Sharpe ratios in recoveries and early stages of an expansion as opposed to credit booms.