{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028938906752411574, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02572347266881029, 'mean_word_length': 5.486111111111111, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparative study between standard Back Propagation and Resilient Propagation on snake identification accuracy

Identifying types of snakes is crucial for appropriate anti-venom administration. We developed a Snake Bite Diagnosing System based on standard Back Propagation and Resilient Propagation Neural Networks. These systems were capable in differentiating between venomous and non-venomous snakes. The accuracy of both systems were analyzed and compared. The post development comparative studies revealed that the Resilient Propagation technique yielded 83.33%, 90.00% and 90.00% respectively for mean squared error, number of epoch and parameter setting. Whereas the Standard Back Propagation produced 85.00%, 88.30% and 86.87% respectively. High accuracy in both systems enables early identification of type of snake and immediate specific anti-venom can be administered. Hence, reduces the rate of morbidity and mortality.