{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012658227848101266, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006329113924050633, 'mean_word_length': 5.663157894736842, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of Signalling and Feedback on the Comprehension of Reconstructed Text

64 college students reconstructed two scrambled 26-sentence passages, one based primarily on semantic content and the other on episodic content. Assistance was provided in the form of feedback and three signalling sentences. There were statistically significant main effects favoring the semantic passage for recall and for concordance with the original order. There were no effects for signalling. However, a qualitative analysis of sentence clustering suggested that feedback and signalling were differentially more effective for the semantic passage.