{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01787487586891758, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005958291956305859, 'mean_word_length': 5.545454545454546, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On the Differentiation of Cognitive Reflection-Impulsivity

This investigation concerned the problems of confounding style and ability and generalizability in the case of indicators of cognitive reflection-impulsivity. On the basis of an interactional perspective, a number of simple assumptions about response latency and accuracy in cognitive tasks of reflection and impulsivity are developed and tasted in a sample of 46 male adolescents, aged 14 to 17 yr. The results show that the tempo variable and reasoning ability can account for a considerable portion of the inter-individual differences in accuracy. From the viewpoint of general psychology the response latency proves to be partially task-dependent, from the viewpoint of differential psychology it is a partial characteristic of persons and, probably, the real style indicator. The view that cognitive reflection represents a task-specific, problem-oriented adaptation of the conceptual tempo or intensity of alternatives-scanning is supported.