{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026690391459074734, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0071174377224199285, 'mean_word_length': 5.2555555555555555, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Wide ureters, a dilemma in diagnosis.

In his article “Radiology now” Dr. Flower (1977) discusses a subject which is presently the focus of a considerable amount of interest in urological, nuclear medicine and radiological circles, and he rightly emphasises the point that excretion urography in this condition gives a static, anatomical assessment of what is a dynamic situation. However, we would disagree with the statement that “Radioisotope renography often does little more than the urogram in establishing whether there is poor drainage from the kidneys”.