{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009628610729023384, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.3304347826086955, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The inclusion of violations in risk models

Abstract This paper describes two case studies characterising wider experience that illustrate the effect of including violations and non-compliance upon risk assessment models. It provides suggestions on what forms of violations can be included in risk assessment models and which should be excluded. It suggests other approaches that compensate for the limitations of risk modelling in this regard and it also draws out practical lessons not only about risk assessment but also about some of those practical influences that could entirely compromise a well-intended but ‘theoretical’ risk model that does not benefit from practical insights and knowledge of the system in question.