{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027156549520766772, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004792332268370607, 'mean_word_length': 5.7005347593582885, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of breast cancer classification models on Wisconsin dataset

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death for women worldwide. Cancer can be discovered early, lowering the rate of death. Machine learning techniques are a hot field of research, and they have been shown to be helpful in cancer prediction and early detection. The primary purpose of this research is to identify which machine learning algorithms are the most successful in predicting and diagnosing breast cancer, according to five criteria: specificity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, and F1 score. The project is finished in the Anaconda environment, which uses Python's NumPy and SciPy numerical and scientific libraries as well as matplotlib and Pandas. In this study, the Wisconsin diagnostic breast cancer dataset was used to evaluate eleven machine learning classifiers: decision tree, quadratic discriminant analysis, AdaBoost, Bagging meta estimator, Extra randomized trees, Gaussian process classifier, Ridge, Gaussian nave Bayes, k-Nearest neighbors, multilayer perceptron, and support vector classifier. During performance analysis, extremely randomized trees outperformed all other classifiers with an F1-score of 96.77% after data collection and data analysis.