{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020442930153321975, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.25531914893617, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[The validity and evidentiary value of expert opinion].

The author demonstrates that the description of the degree of validity of the knowledge drawn by the expert using the category 'probability' is topical for a forensic examination. The necessity to distinguish between a supposition of the expert and a conclusion of a probabilistic nature made by the expert is proved on the example of a forensic medical examination. The analysis of categorical, probabilistic (probable), and conjectural conclusions of the expert and their evidentiary value in the legal procedures are presented.