{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014144271570014143, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005657708628005658, 'mean_word_length': 5.2105263157894735, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Commons debates Warnock report.


 Four months after the July 1984 publication of the Warnock Committee's report on human reproduction, debate on its proposals began in Britain's House of Commons. Although the report was concerned with artificial insemination as well as with in vitro fertilization, it was the latter that received the most attention from the MPs. Many were concerned about recommendations that experimentation on human embryos in the early stages of development be allowed. While some Members argued against restrictive legislation and in favor of a more flexible licensing authority, others expressed their beliefs that research on embryos should be closely regulated or banned outright.
