{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013303769401330377, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.366197183098592, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Revisiting the Epistemic Regress of Dispositions


 Pandispositionalists have not refuted the charge that their ideology precludes knowledge of the external world. Their replies boil down to the claim that some dispositions (viz introspectively accessible properties of epistemic subjects) can be detected without the mediation of their effects. But this reply is ineffective if the regress is restated in terms of mind-independent domains of science.