{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.008818342151675485, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.843373493975903, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Meaningful Composite Benefit Measures

The structure of composite benefit measures that provide an overall ranking of alternatives for the system analyst is investigated. These composite benefit measures are functions of individual benefit measures, and the individual benefit measures may give conflicting rankings of the various alternatives. A functional form for the composite benefit measure is identified that is symantically meaningful and avoids scaling problems. In addition a method for estimating coefficients in this composite benefit measure is outlined.