{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01663798049340218, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.656488549618321, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Postbuckling and nonlinear free vibration of size-dependent prestressed FG nanobeams resting on elastic foundation based on nonlocal Euler-Bernoulli beam theory

Abstract Vibrations of micro/nanobeams that are subjected to initial stresses due to mismatch between different materials or thermal stresses are important in some devices. The present study is an attempt to present nonlinear free vibration of simply supported size-dependent functionally graded (FG) nanobeams resting on elastic foundation and under precompressive axial force. It is assumed that the material properties of FG materials are graded in the thickness direction. The partial differential equation of motion, which is simplified into an ordinary differential equation using the Galerkin method, is derived based on Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, von Karman geometric nonlinearity, and Eringen’s nonlocal elasticity theory. The final ordinary differential equation is solved using the variational iteration method. The effects of geometrical parameters, small-scale parameter, elastic coefficient of foundation, precompressive axial force, and neutral axis location on dimensionless nonlinear natural frequencies are investigated. In this study, the buckling and postbuckling behavior of FG nanobeams and the effect of neutral axis location on buckling behavior are investigated as well. Results show that the effects of small scale on FG nanobeam frequencies change with the aspect ratio, the values of radius of gyration, and the values of compressive axial force. It is also found that the influence of neutral axis location on the nonlinear fundamental frequency of prestressed FG nanobeams is more than that of prestressed FG nanobeams resting on elastic foundation.