{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02066532258064516, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014112903225806451, 'mean_word_length': 5.465798045602606, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pathway‐specific use‐dependent dynamics of excitatory synaptic transmission in rat intracortical circuits

Information processing in neuronal networks is determined by the use‐dependent dynamics of synaptic transmission. Here we characterize the dynamic properties of excitatory synaptic transmission in two major intracortical pathways that target the output neurons of the neocortex, by recording unitary EPSPs from layer 5 pyramidal neurons evoked in response to action potential trains of increasing complexity in presynaptic layer 2/3 or layer 5 pyramidal neurons. We find that layer 2/3 to layer 5 synaptic transmission is dominated by frequency‐dependent depression when generated at fixed frequencies of > 10 Hz. Synaptic depression evolved on a spike‐by‐spike basis in response to action potential trains that possessed a broad range of interspike intervals, but a low mean frequency (10 Hz). Layer 2/3 to layer 2/3 and layer 2/3 to layer 5 synapses were incapable of sustained release during prolonged, complex trains of presynaptic action potential firing (mean frequency, 48 Hz). By contrast, layer 5 to layer 5 synapses operated effectively across a wide range of frequencies, exhibiting increased efficacy at frequencies > 10 Hz. Furthermore, layer 5 to layer 5 synapses sustained release throughout the duration of prolonged, complex spike trains. The use‐dependent properties of synaptic transmission could be modulated by pharmacologically changing the probability of release and by induction of long‐term depression. The dynamic properties of intracortical excitatory synapses are therefore pathway‐specific. We suggest that the synaptic output of layer 5 pyramidal neurons is ideally suited to control the neocortical network across a wide range of frequencies and for sustained periods of time, a behaviour that helps to explain the pivotal role played by layer 5 neurons in the genesis of periods of network ‘up’ states and epileptiform activity in the neocortex.