{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025306122448979593, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0024489795918367346, 'mean_word_length': 5.55614973262032, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reactivity to mental stress and cold provocation during long-term treatment with metoprolol, propranolol or hydrochlorothiazide.

In a study aimed at comparing the effects of beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics on responses to stressful provocations, 45 essential hypertensives (WHO I-II) were treated with either the selective beta-blocker metoprolol (METO), the non-selective beta-blocker propranolol (PROP) or hydrochlorothiazide (HTZ) for 6 months. Blood pressure, heart rate and plasma catecholamines were measured in connection with a mental stress test and a cold pressor test before and during therapy. All drugs reduced outpatient blood pressure similarly, but beta-blockade reduced blood pressure and heart rate levels more efficiently at rest and during stress in the laboratory. Heart rate reactivity to stress was reduced mostly by beta-blockade during mental stress. Blood pressure and sympatho-adrenal reactivity were unchanged by therapy. Stress reactivity failed to predict antihypertensive responses. The results suggest that beta-blockade may be more effective than diuretic treatment in reducing blood pressure levels and cardiac workload as assessed by the rate pressure product in stressful situations.