{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0283657917019475, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007620660457239628, 'mean_word_length': 5.137662337662338, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children: indications, the procedure, outcomes, short and long-term complications].

BACKGROUND
Feeding through tubes placed in the intestine is a useful way of nutritional support in a patient who is unable to eat but has a well functioning gastrointestinal system. Till 1980, the acceptable technique to place a gastrostomy tube was surgical. However, in the past twenty years percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has replaced surgical gastrostomy in most settings.


GOALS
In this study we explored the indications, the age of the patients, the conditions in which the procedure took place and its outcome in children. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of this method in children.


METHODS
The data was gathered retrospectively according to information found in the files and a questionnaire the parents answered. Fifty-two children from the Tel Aviv Medical Center and from the Sheba Medical Center who underwent a PEG procedure were studied. The data gathered from the study included age, gender, origin, sequence of the procedure, indications, place, performers, complications and the effectiveness of the method according to parents' satisfaction and weight of the patient. In addition, the following parameters were studied: type of anesthesia, sort of antibiotics that were provided, number of cases in which enteral nutrition was given permanently or temporarily, type of formula that was given and the way it was introduced, number of failures and fundoplications.


RESULTS
Mean age of the children was 5.4 years. Ninety six percent of the procedures succeeded. The most common indications were failure to thrive (35%) and neurological disorders. In 56% of cases the performer was a gastroenterologist alone. When the procedures were performed by gastroenterologists, a lower rate of complications was seen than with a gastroenterologist and a surgeon (20.8% vs. 52.6% accordingly). In 57% of the children there were no complications observed. In addition, most of the complications which were observed were minor (abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting and reflux).


CONCLUSIONS
According to this study we concluded that PEG is a minimally invasive technique, associated with a low rate of severe complications and provides significant support for children who need enteral nutrition.