{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026954177897574125, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008086253369272238, 'mean_word_length': 4.944, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
UNKNOWN REVIEWERS, 1972

Two hundred eighty-six unnamed and unpaid assistants have reviewed one or more of the manuscripts received by Pediatrics during the past year. Our readers can judge the contribution of these reviewers only from a single aspect: the final form of the (one in three) papers that is published. Two other contributions of reviewers remain unseen: (1) their attention to that larger group of submissions as carefully reviewed as those accepted; and (2) the instructive and constructive comments for which so many authors (of papers which met either fate) have expressed their gratitude. The Editors and Editorial Board, who have relied so much upon them, are grateful for the work of those named below, in all its aspects: