{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02113022113022113, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0004914004914004914, 'mean_word_length': 6.069444444444445, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Speech variability: A cross-language study on acoustic variations of speaking versus untrained singing.

Speech production variability introduces significant challenges for existing speech technologies such as speaker identification (SID), speaker diarization, speech recognition, and language identification (ID). There has been limited research analyzing changes in acoustic characteristics for speech produced by untrained singing versus speaking. To better understand changes in speech production of the untrained singing voice, this study presents the first cross-language comparison between normal speaking and untrained karaoke singing of the same text content. Previous studies comparing professional singing versus speaking have shown deviations in both prosodic and spectral features. Some investigations also considered assigning the intrinsic activity of the singing. Motivated by these studies, a series of experiments to investigate both prosodic and spectral variations of untrained karaoke singers for three languages, American English, Hindi, and Farsi, are considered. A comprehensive comparison on common prosodic features, including phoneme duration, mean fundamental frequency (F0), and formant center frequencies of vowels was performed. Collective changes in the corresponding overall acoustic spaces based on the Kullback-Leibler distance using Gaussian probability distribution models trained on spectral features were analyzed. Finally, these models were used in a Gausian mixture model with universal background model SID evaluation to quantify speaker changes between speaking and singing when the audio text content is the same. The experiments showed that many acoustic characteristics of untrained singing are considerably different from speaking when the text content is the same. It is suggested that these results would help advance automatic speech production normalization/compensation to improve performance of speech processing applications (e.g., speaker ID, speech recognition, and language ID).