{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04932182490752158, 'fraction_numerical': 0.036991368680641186, 'mean_word_length': 4.965686274509804, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Use of Variational Autoencoders with Unsupervised Learning to Detect Incorrect Organ Segmentations at CT.

Purpose
To develop a deep learning model to detect incorrect organ segmentations at CT.


Materials and Methods
In this retrospective study, a deep learning method was developed using variational autoencoders (VAEs) to identify problematic organ segmentations. First, three different three-dimensional (3D) U-Nets were trained on segmented CT images of the liver (n = 141), spleen (n = 51), and kidney (n = 66). A total of 12 495 CT images then were segmented by the 3D U-Nets, and output segmentations were used to train three different VAEs for the detection of problematic segmentations. Automatic reconstruction errors (Dice scores) were then calculated. A random sampling of 2510 segmented images each for the liver, spleen, and kidney models were assessed manually by a human reader to determine problematic and correct segmentations. The ability of the VAEs to identify unusual or problematic segmentations was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and compared with traditional non-deep learning methods for outlier detection. Using the VAE outputs, passive and active learning approaches were performed on the original 3D U-Nets to determine if training could decrease segmentation error rates (15 CT scans were added to the original training data, according to each approach).


Results
The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detecting problematic segmentations using the VAE method was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.92) for kidney, 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.95) for liver, and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.82) for spleen. The VAE performance was higher compared with traditional methods in most cases. For example, for liver segmentation, the highest performing non-deep learning method for outlier detection had an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.90) compared with 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.95) using the VAE method (P < .05). Using the information on problematic segmentations for active learning approaches decreased 3D U-Net segmentation error rates (original error rate, 7.1%; passive learning, 6.0%; active learning, 5.7%).


Conclusion
A method was developed to screen for unusual and problematic automatic organ segmentations using a 3D VAE.Keywords: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms, Segmentation, CT© RSNA, 2021.