{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017871649065800164, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002437043054427295, 'mean_word_length': 5.190954773869347, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
CCF analysis for new reactor designs

Abstract Common Cause Failures (CCF) have been an issue of safety consideration in nuclear safety since a long time. For the design of the European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) probabilistic safety goals in conjunction with the limit set by CCF on failure probability that can be achieved by redundancy led to the requirement to fulfil vital safety functions by functionally diverse systems. The probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) which was performed for EPR takes into account CCFs which are modelled using the beta-factor model of the European Utility Requirements (EUR). The PSA shows that the probabilistic safety goal for core damage frequency – CDF < 10−5/year – is met with sufficient margin. In addition to the modelling of CCF in the PSA a deterministic CCF analysis is being performed. It is a safety function based approach on component level analysing frontline and backup systems with respect to common components or type identical components. It ensures that diverse safety functions are fulfilled by systems being sufficiently diverse including all necessary support systems. Components are identified where further diversification or additional defences against CCF are required.