{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01597444089456869, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003194888178913738, 'mean_word_length': 5.991071428571429, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evidence for validity of a survey to measure the learning environment for professionalism

Background: With the emphasis on professionalism in academic health settings, including recently added accreditation requirements for US medical schools, there is a need for a valid and feasible method to assess the learning environment for professionalism. Aim: This article describes the development and investigation of the validity of a brief measure, the learning environment for professionalism (LEP) survey, designed to assess medical student perceptions of professionalism among residents and faculty during clinical rotations. Method: Two successive cohorts of third-year medical students completed the 22-item LEP survey at the conclusion of clerkship rotations, providing a total of 902 responses for scale reliability and principal components factor analysis, as well as assessment of changes in scores over time and correlations with a related clerkship evaluation item. Results: The internal structure of the LEP survey was consistent with intended goals to assess both positive and negative professionalism behaviors. Acceptable internal consistency, sensitivity to change over time, and positive relationships between LEP scores and a concurrent measure of professionalism were observed. Conclusions: Use of the instrument could help identify clinical learning environments for professionalism that represent either best practices or areas in need of improvement, assess the impact of professionalism initiatives, and help satisfy accreditation requirements.