{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.047619047619047616, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03240596019589455, 'mean_word_length': 4.781927710843373, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 4, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 2, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 2, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Assessment on anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain antibodies among CoronaVac-vaccinated Indonesian adults

The immunogenicity of CoronaVac among Indonesian adults at the academic premises was investigated. Two doses of CoronaVac vaccine induced a complete seroconversion on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) naïve adults with titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies ranging from 9.1 to 151.9 U/mL. The median value was lower than the one observed in recovered adults with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (38.7 vs. 114.5 U/mL). Nonetheless, 93.6% of the vaccinated adults, in contrast to 76.5% of the recovered adults, displayed inhibition rates above the cut-off to block RBD-angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 binding. This suggests that two doses of CoronaVac were immunogenic and likely to be protective among Indonesian adults.

days after the second dose [1]. The second group consisted of 34 recovered patients with mild COVID-19 cases. All subjects served self-isolation at their houses during the infection. None of the recovered adults had been vaccinated prior to the blood collection. Their blood samples were collected 34 until 164 days after being diagnosed with COVID-19, i.e., during the first 6 months after the diagnosis. The final group consisted of 24 adults without any prior history of COVID-19 infection and have not received any COVID-19 vaccination (i.e., the control group). No history of COVID-19 infection was supported by negative/non-reactive results upon prior screening using antigen-or antibody-detecting rapid diagnostic test. Subjects from all groups were bled once in April 2021 to obtain sera samples ( Table 1). The sera samples were subsequently aliquoted into multiple tubes and frozen at -80°C until tested. Two commercially available assays were used in this study. First, the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay (Roche, Basel, Schweiz), an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, was used to measure titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies (including immunoglobulin G). Briefly, this assay was performed by an independent laboratory, according to the manufacturer's instruction by using the Cobas e 411 analyzer (Roche). The cut-off was at 0.8 U/mL, in which value below 0.8 U/mL was considered as non-reactive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibody. Second, the GenScript SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (sVNT) assay (GenScript, Singapore), an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), was used to measure functionality of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies to block any interaction between RBD of the virus and ACE2 human cell-surface receptor. Briefly, the ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer's instruction by comparing the sera samples to the provided positive and negative controls. The percentage of inhibition was calculated by measuring the difference in the amount of labelled RBD between test versus control samples. The cut-off ratio for inhibition rate was at 20%, in which value below 20% was considered as no inhibition. Data analyses and visualization were performed using GraphPad Prism ver. 9.1.2 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
By using the Elecsys assay to quantify anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies in serum (Fig. 1A), both vaccinated (31 out of 31; 100%) and recovered (28 out of 34; 82.4%) groups were observed to have the antibodies, in contrast to the control group as baseline (0 out of 24; 0%). Pertaining to the vaccinated group, the titers ranged from 9.1 to 151.9 U/mL. In contrast, titers in the recovered group were more varied, ranging from 0.4 (consid-ered non-reactive as below the cut-off) to 512 U/mL. This suggested that in most subjects, two doses of CoronaVac vaccine induced lower titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies than mild cases of COVID-19 (p=0.0107). Nonetheless, a higher rate of seroconversion was achieved by CoronaVac vaccination than by SARS-CoV-2 infection (100% versus 82.4%). In addition, 28 out of those 31 vaccinated adults were routinely monitored for titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies (14, 42, and 70 days after the 2nd dose) as they served in the CO-VID-19 reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) team (unrelated to this study). The finding was reassuring as the vaccination-induced antibodies persisted during the routine screening (Fig. 1B).
The sVNT assay was used to assess functionality of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies in serum to block the interaction between RBD and ACE2 (Fig. 1C). By using the cut-off at 20%, majority sera samples from the vaccinated (29 out of 31; 93.6%) and recovered (26 out of 34; 76.5%) groups were able to inhibit the RBD-ACE2 interaction. In contrast, almost no sera sample from the control group demonstrated an inhibitory activity (one out of 24; 0.04%). Despite the median value of inhibition rate in the recovered group was higher than the one in the vaccinated group, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.4664). Fourteen out of 31 vaccinated adults displayed inhibition rates above 50%, hence their sera samples were further analyzed through serial dilution (final dilution at 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160). As shown in Fig. 1D, at 1:40 dilution, 14 out of 14 samples (100%) still had inhibition rates above 20%. However, there were only six out 14 samples (42.9%) and two out of 14 samples (14.3%) had inhibition rates above 20% at 1:80 and 1:160 dilution rates, respectively. This profound declining trend was likely due to lower titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies post-vaccination, as the Spearman's correlation indicated a strong correlation between titer and functionality of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies (Spearman's rho=0.9103, p<0.0001) (Fig. 1E). However, a caution must be given as the R 2 value was only 0.5470, suggesting that 45% of the variability in inhibition rates could not be explained by the titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies.
As prior mentioned, the vaccinated adults in this study were SARS-CoV-2 naïve subjects, hence could explained the low titers of induced antibodies. This finding was in line with a preprint result from Chile [4], reporting that after the Coro-naVac vaccination, the SARS-CoV-2 naïve subjects produced lower neutralizing antibody response than the previously seropositive adults. In addition, our finding was supported by https://www.ecevr.org/ https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2022.11.1.116 other studies [1,4], reporting that average levels of neutralizing antibodies in the recovered adults were higher than those in CoronaVac-vaccinated healthy adults. Nonetheless, it is important to mention that the neutralizing antibody responses in previously seropositive individuals could be further boosted by two doses of CoronaVac vaccines [4], providing a merit of using CoronaVac vaccine to protect against symptomatic COVID-19.
There are limitations to our study. First, it was a small observational study as total analyzed subjects were 89. This was partly due to a limited vaccine's supply and the national prioritization strategy on selecting subjects to be vaccinated. Before April 2021, the vaccination was prioritized for elderlies and health care personnel, including those worked in the COhttps://www.ecevr.org/ https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2022.11.1.116 VID-19 RT-qPCR laboratory services. In addition, the blood collection was only performed if the vaccinated individuals already reached 28 days or more after the 2nd dose. Hence, it was difficult to find eligible vaccinated adults to participate in this study. Second, we could not exclude a possibility of asymptomatic cases in the control group. We screened eligible adults by performing a short interview with each candidate and checking their COVID-19 screening results with antigenor antibody-detecting rapid diagnostic test in the past month. Only subjects with no history of COVID-19 and negative/nonreactive results would be recruited into the control group. Nonetheless, our results on anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies demonstrated that no seroconversion observed in the control group. Thus, titers and inhibition rates observed in the control group could be used as the baseline values. Third, it is elusive whether our findings could be applied against more infectious variants of SARS-CoV-2, in particular the variant Delta (B.1.617.2). It has been reported that the variant Delta was more resistant to neutralization by some monoclonal antibodies toward RBD and N-terminal domain of SARS-CoV-2 as well as by two doses of Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccine [5]. A preprint result from Thailand suggested a similar finding, in which CoronaVacvaccinated subjects had a much reduced neutralizing capacity against the variant Delta [6]. As two doses of CoronaVac only induced relatively low titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies, it is likely that CoronaVac-vaccinated individuals will require a booster. It is important to note, however, that Tcell responses could be equally important and protective upon SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination [7,8]. Thus, the neutralizing levels of humoral immune response should not be interpreted as the only parameter of a successful COVID-19 vaccination.
In conclusion, we observed that the CoronaVac vaccine induced anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies in healthy adults. Despite two doses of CoronaVac vaccine generated relatively low titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies, serum from majority of vaccinated adults could block the RBD-ACE2 binding. This suggests that the CoronaVac vaccination was immunogenic and likely to be protective among Indonesian adults.