{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028708133971291867, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006379585326953748, 'mean_word_length': 5.469072164948454, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Giorgio Agamben's “Cenobitic Communism” and the Limits of Posthumanism

Contemporary cultural theory has been overtaken with a posthumanist concern for the “biopolitical” or the definition and organization of “life.” Life, in the posthumanist turn, is re-defined as “postlife,” or as that which breaks with enlightenment and scientific attempts to contain life and actively resists categorization, conceptualization, and theorization. This essay is a critique of the “postlife” theories of the posthumanist turn, which have come to dominate both cultural theory and popular culture. Through a close reading of Giorgio Agamben's (2013) The Highest Poverty, alongside an analysis of the film Her (Jonze et al. 2013), I argue that what passes for a concern with the boundaries and treatment of life is, in actuality, a displacement of the fundamental cause of the heightening contradictions of global capitalism, namely, the exploitation of labor. By turning the contradictions of the social into the consequences of a political apparatus determined at the level of ideas, posthumanist theories of life dematerialize the causes of inequality and in their place substitute a reality without materiality and thus without any true potential for transformation.