{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02674591381872214, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01634472511144131, 'mean_word_length': 4.912280701754386, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Fame, Fortunes and Future of the ‘Rump of the Common Law’: Conspiracy to Defraud and Australian Law (Part 2)

Part 1 of this article ((2000) 64 Journal of Criminal Law 508) indicated that while a persistent feature of the English legal landscape, conspiracy to defraud is highly complex and elusive of outcome. This is perhaps inevitable in the current, equally complex, global financial landscape. This second contribution looks at the echoes of the English developments in Australian law, the commonalities to the case scenarios and to the complications to the law, and the ways in which Australian developments may inform or be informed by English law in the future.