{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02901023890784983, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017064846416382253, 'mean_word_length': 5.046391752577319, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Correction to "Relationship Between the Rorschach and the MMPI-2 in a Swedish Population: A Replication Study of the Effects of First Factor Related Test Interaction Styles"

In this article Rorschach response style scores were calculated correctly utilizing z-transformed scores. However, the formula was incorrectly based on separate z scores for CF and C, instead of a single z score for CF + C. The effect of this error on the Rorschach response style factor scores was minimal, with r = .998 between the two versions. However, the small difference nevertheless moved one patient out of the discordant Rorschach–MMPI response style classification. With respect to the study results, most of the corrected correlations were within .02 of the initially reported findings. The exceptions were several coefficients in Table 2. A corrected version of the table is below, with changes greater than .02 shown in italicized font. Table 2 now also shows significant differences between correlations. This information had been accidentally lost in the initial publication process. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 80(1), 113 Copyright © 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.