{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017201834862385322, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0022935779816513763, 'mean_word_length': 5.191489361702128, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluation of Self-Editing Based on Behaviors-for-Attention for Desktop Manipulation Videos

In this paper, we discuss a user interface issue with regard to automatic video editing based on the speaker's intentions. In our experiments, the subjects used previously developed video capturing system to employ 4 types of editing methods by making 3 types of presentations. Subjective evaluation revealed that the editing method that used behaviors-for-attention obtained a good score for a presentation in which the subject was provided with specific instructions regarding the tasks to be performed. In the case of a presentation without a scenario, an editing method using a footswitch and a posture obtained a higher score. It can be concluded that a combination of both behavior-based and footswitch-based editing would provide a good environment for content acquisition