{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019741837509491267, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009111617312072893, 'mean_word_length': 5.429268292682927, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Synthesizing Data to Classify and Risk Assess Vegetation Types for Regulations in Inland New South Wales Australia

From 1998, land-use regulations in New South Wales Australia referred to risk status of plant community types and abiotic landscapes. Lacking was a uniform vegetation classification for 77% of NSW comprising the inland arid, semi-arid and cropping agricultural zones: regions that contain patchy floristic plot data. In response, 562 plant communities, mainly at levels 8 in the IVC, were classified by synthesizing plot-based analyses, qualitative descriptions, maps, extensive field checks, new field samples and peer review. Qualitative information was vital to complete a thorough classification. Each type was assigned a risk category based on six risk assessment criteria developed prior to IUCN RLE. Occurrences in protected areas were audited and related to original extent yielding a protected area/adequacy code. Results were used in land change assessment tools and contributed to the listing of 40 threatened ecological communities under biodiversity laws. Two mapping methods attained different levels of reliability. Applying risk criteria to coarse versus fine levels in typologies can produce different results. Mid-to fine level global hierarchies best suit ecosystem risk assessment.