{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013776337115072933, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.588235294117647, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On the location of the center of mass for parts with shape variation

The shape and center of mass of a part are crucial parameters to algorithms for planning automated manufacturing tasks. As industrial parts are generally manufactured to tolerances, the shape is subject to variations, which, in turn, also cause variations in the location of the center of mass. Planning algorithms should take into account both types of variation to prevent failure when the resulting plans are applied to manufactured incarnations of a model part. We study the relation between variation in part shape and variation in the location of the center of mass for a part with uniform mass distribution. We consider a general model for shape variation that only assumes that every valid instance contains a shape PI while it is contained in another shape PE. We characterize the worst-case displacement of the center of mass in a given direction in terms of PI and PE. The characterization allows us to determine an adequate outer approximation of the locus of the center of mass. We also show that the worst-case displacement is small if PI is convex and fat (that is, not long and thin) and the distance between the boundaries of PE and PI is bounded.