{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021052631578947368, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.6875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The mathematical constraint of the counterexample of Goldbach's strong conjecture

In this paper, we have demonstrated a proof that the Counterexample of Goldbach's strong conjecture is impossible in two steps: First, we reformulated Goldbach's strong conjecture using the subtraction connotation. Second: the mathematical Constraint that must be fulfilled in any even number has been deduced to be that even number a Counterexample of Goldbach's strong conjecture. Then we demonstrated that any counterexample would fulfill this mathematical Constraint. It will either contradict the theorem of infinite prime numbers or contradict the Prime Number Theorem. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that there is no counterexample to Goldbach's strong conjecture. With the absence of a counter-example, Goldbach's strong conjecture would be a true conjecture