{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013755158184319119, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.732283464566929, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
MODULARITY AND THE MAPPING FROM THE LEXICON TO THE SYNTAX

One consequence of the SSH is that an argument is saturated in the syntax even if it is pari of a lexical item, regardless of the differences in opacity between words and phrases. Another consequence of the SSH is that an implicit argument is categorially present äs a pro in an A-position whether or not it is realized äs an adjunct, and whether or not it is subject to semantic restrictions. Specific constructions in Italian are considered here, including deverbal compounds, causatives and middles. It is shown that certain properties of these constructions escape the realm of the SSH. I propose an alternative hypothesis, based on the assumption that the grammar