{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03792851932895697, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021152443471918306, 'mean_word_length': 5.471698113207547, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Metallic neurosurgical implants: Evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5‐Tesla

The purpose of this study was to use ex vivo testing to determine the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety aspects for seven different metallic neurosurgical implants in association with the 1.5‐T MR environment. Ex vivo testing was performed using previously‐described techniques for the evaluation of magnetic field interactions (deflection angle and torque), heating (gel‐filled phantom and fluoroptic thermometry; 15 minutes of MRI at a specific absorption rate [SAR] of 1.4 W/kg), and artifacts (using T1‐weighted, spin‐echo and gradient‐echo pulse sequences). None of the metallic implants displayed interactions with the magnetic field. The highest temperature change was +0.6°C for the representative implant that was evaluated. Artifacts were relatively minor. The lack of magnetic field interactions and negligible heating indicate that MR procedures may be conducted safely in patients with these neurosurgical implants using MR systems with static magnetic fields of 1.5‐T or less. Furthermore, these implants may be considered for use in interventional MR procedures insofar as the MR safe qualities and relatively small artifacts would likely be desirable for such procedures. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;14:295–299. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.