{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03045112781954887, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02368421052631579, 'mean_word_length': 5.619402985074627, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Abstract 289: Probing the non-enhancing component of glioblastoma: Targeting what is left behind

While genomic profiling and therapeutic selection support individualized GBM treatment, such therapeutic decision-making is usually made with reference to tumor obtained from the enhancing core region. GBM is known to be heterogeneous and exhibits a high resistance to standard therapies. To address whether non-enhancing tumor (representing the majority of tumor left behind after surgery) shows distinct genomic characteristics and therapeutic targets compared to the enhancing tumor core, we performed genome-wide exome-sequencing and RNA-sequencing for 12 patients with matched enhancing region and at least one non-enhancing region. Non-enhancing biopsies show a surprisingly high level of tumor content, with a median of 28% tumor cells and 6 of the 22 samples having greater than 50% tumor cells. Cognate non-enhancing and enhancing specimens demonstrated overall concordance in therapeutically actionable alterations (single nucleotide variants) and copy number alterations. However, non-enhancing regions were not genetically identical and did reveal additional and distinct variants compared to enhancing cores. For example, the non-enhancing region of patient 1 showed two nonsense NF1 mutations (R1534X; R2517X) while the enhancing region showed an NF1 frameshift mutation (F1247fs). Clonality analysis by LumosVar also indicated that 7 out of 12 patients harbored dissimilar cellular prevalence patterns between enhancing and non-enhancing regions. In addition, comparison of alternative polyadenylation between enhancing and non-enhancing regions uncovered distinct 39 UTR usage: e.g. SGMS2 and TOB1 tended to have longer 39 UTR in enhancing regions whereas longer 39 UTR of SYNPO and NOS1AP were prevalent in non-enhancing regions. We posit that the enhancing component of glioblastoma probably underrepresents the genomic alterations in patients9 tumors. Given non-enhancing tumor is left behind after surgical debulking, genomic profiling of this region would potentially reveal more accurate tumor vulnerabilities and lead to more effective therapy. Supported by a grant from the Ben & Catherine Ivy Foundation. Citation Format: Sen Peng, Rebecca Halperin, Harshil Dhruv, Sara Byron, Christophe Legendre, Joanna Phillips, Michael Prados, Michael Berens, Nhan Tran. Probing the non-enhancing component of glioblastoma: Targeting what is left behind [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 289.