{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05337361530715005, 'fraction_numerical': 0.031554212823095, 'mean_word_length': 4.559701492537314, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
P1011Electrophysiological trends in Wolff-Parkinson-White patients: a 33 years follow-up study


 
 
 The Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome can be associated with sudden cardiac death, therefore risk assessment (RA) with electrophysiological (EP) testing (EPT) is mandatory to identify patients (pts) requiring catheter ablation (CAb). Our retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the variability of EP parameters during follow-up of WPW pts and the reliability of trans-esophageal EPT (TEEPT) for RA, evaluation of treatment efficacy, and EP follow-up of untreated athletes/pts.
 
 
 
 Data of 335 WPW pts, studied with TEEPT between 1985 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Anterograde effective refractory period (ERP) of accessory pathways (AP) and of the atrioventricular node, Wenckebach point, shortest preexcited RR intervals (SPERRI) during atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or atrial pacing (At-P) and inducibility of supraventricular arrhythmias were assessed, at rest (supine and standing) and during effort. An AP was defined at high arrhythmogenic risk (HAR) if the anterograde AP-ERP and/or SPERRI (in AF or At-P) were ≤240 ms at rest or ≤200 ms during effort test. All patients were followed-up as outpatients or telephonically, as clinically required.
 195 pts (17% female) were included, having exhaustive clinical information, two or more TEEPT and exhaustive clinical follow-up until late 2018. Time-evolution of EP parameters was evaluated, using parametric and non-parametric tests, as appropriate.
 
 
 
 Median age at first TEEPT was 20 years (IQR 16–29 years). Median follow- up was 44.3 months (IQR 16.4–122.9 months). Two pts (both identified at HAR and scheduled for surgery when ablation was unavailable) died suddenly, at rest. No other serious arrhythmic complication occurred, during the FU. Out of 19 pts (9.7% - Group A) showing enhanced AP conductivity at follow-up (mean ERP/SPERRI shortening: 30.8 ms, range 10–80 ms), 4 pts were found at HAR and underwent CAb.
 176 pts (90.3% – Group B) showed a stable or impaired (25% under pharmacological treatment) AP conductivity during the follow-up. Their mean ERP/SPERRI increase was 39.7 ms (range 0–130 ms). Group A pts were significantly younger (20 vs 28 years old; 88% of Group A pts were <30 years old) and more frequently male (94.1% vs 80.6%). A non-significant trend toward Group A was found for antero-septal APs (35% Group A vs 15.4% Group B).
 
 
 
 TEEPT is a safe, non-invasive tool to stratify arrhythmogenic risk of WPW pts. Our data suggest that a watchful waiting is safe for low to moderate risk pts. Younger males with an antero-septal Kent bundle may deserve a more intensive EP follow-up. Aggressive therapy should be considered as mandatory only for symptomatic HAR pts, taking into account complications, risk/benefit ratio and pts' preferences. In other cases, medical therapy and watchful observation could be applied safely under periodical TEEPT, as appropriate.
