{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02516940948693127, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.544303797468355, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Work–life balance and welfare

Objectives: An online survey and focus groups were conducted, providing qualitative information on the work–life balance of psychiatrists and trainees in Australasia. Methods: An invitation to participate in an anonymous online welfare survey was emailed to all the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists trainees, Fellows, and Affiliates. Following this, nine focus groups were held across Australia and New Zealand. Results: Responses received were thematically analysed. The emergent patterns are presented in this report. Conclusions: Our research suggests that work–life balance can be subjectively and objectively measured. There are phases of good and bad work–life balance, depending on stage of career and other commitments. Work–life balance may be an indicator of the health of individuals and organisations. Due to its complexity, with intrinsic and extrinsic factors involved, solutions are unlikely to be simple. Further studies are needed to substantiate our findings.