{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02320185614849188, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005413766434648105, 'mean_word_length': 5.994594594594594, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Structural Model of Achievement Motives, Performance Approach and Avoidance Goals, and Performance among Norwegian Olympic Athletes

A structural model of achievement motives, performance approach and avoidance goals, and performance was applied and tested among 136 Norwegian Olympic level athletes. Achievement motives, competitive behavior over time, performance approach goal-clarity, and performance-avoidance goals were assessed, and elite performance observed. Analysis indicated that the motive to achieve success is positively correlated with competitive behavior over time (a long-term goal), whereas the motive to avoid failure is positively associated with performance avoidance goals. Both long-term competitive behavior goals and performance approach goal-clarity were positively correlated with elite performance whereas the performance-avoidance goal was negatively correlated with performance. When the proximal influences of goals are controlled, the achievement motives are not significantly related to performance. In this structural model, motives and goals shared 32% of the variance with the performance measure, whereas a more complicated model including goals, sex, and a triple interaction of sex and motives shared 42% of the variance with the performance measure.