{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02796271637816245, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008655126498002663, 'mean_word_length': 5.210743801652892, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Beer and Revolution: The German Anarchist Movement in New York City, 1880–1914, by Tom Goyens

and unemployment insurance as distinct and unrelated. Yet women’s right to work, which both protective labor law and social custom restricted, limited women’s access to the welfare state and made women more vulnerable to labor market risk and less able to politically contest inequality. As Kessler-Harris notes, ‘gendered limits’ on social rights, especially the right to work, ‘rendered the participatory potential of social citizenship problematic’ (p. 263). This insight, as Kessler-Harris argues, is central to, not peripheral from, working-class history in the twentieth century and helps explain persistent inequality not just in gender but also in race and class terms. In the introduction to Gendering Labor History, Alice Kessler-Harris argues that practitioners of labor and working-class history need to revisit some of their basic assumptions about the singularity of class identity and politics. Integrating gender history, the history of culture and the welfare state into labor history and bringing interdisciplinary and comparative perspectives to the field has only enriched its contributions to the understanding of national and global history in general. In this sense, the book stands as a rather gentle and understated polemic about the importance of gender analysis not only to labor history but to ‘the search for new forms of global cooperation and justice in human rights’ (p. 15).