{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03530952961247867, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03997075310748233, 'mean_word_length': 4.845948352626892, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 3, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 6, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Deformation recorded in polyhalite from evaporite detachments revealed by 40Ar ∕ 39Ar dating

Abstract. The Salt Range Formation is an extensive evaporite sequence in northern
Pakistan that has acted as the primary detachment accommodating Himalayan
orogenic deformation from the north. This rheologically weak formation forms
a mylonite in the Khewra Mine, where it accommodates approximately 40 km
displacement and is comprised of intercalated halite and potash salts and
gypsiferous marls. Polyhalite [K2Ca2Mg(SO4)4⚫2H2O] grains taken from potash marl and crystalline halite samples are used as geochronometers to date the formation and identify the closure temperature of the mineral polyhalite using the 40Ar/39Ar step-heating laser and furnace methods. The diffusion characteristics measured for two samples of polyhalite are diffusivity (D0), activation energy (Ea), and %39Ar. These values correspond to a closure temperature of
ca. 254 and 277 ∘C for a cooling rate of 10 ∘C Myr−1.
40Ar/39Ar age results for both samples did not return any reliable
crystallisation age. This is not unexpected as polyhalite is prone to
40Ar* diffusion loss and the evaporites have experienced numerous phases of deformation resetting the closed K/Ar system. An oldest minimum heating step age of ∼514 Ma from sample 06-3.1 corresponds relatively well to the established early Cambrian age of the formation. Samples 05-P2 and 05-W2 have measured step ages and represent a deformation event that partially reset the K/Ar system based on oldest significant ages between ca. 381 and 415 Ma. We interpret the youngest measured step ages, between ca. 286 and 292 Ma, to represent the maximum age of deformation-induced recrystallisation. Both the youngest and oldest measured step ages for samples 05-P2 and 05-W2 occur within the time of a major unconformity in the area. These dates may reflect partial resetting of the K/Ar system from meteoric water infiltration and recrystallisation during this non-depositional time. Otherwise, they may result from mixing of Ar derived by radiogenic decay after Cambrian precipitation with partially reset Ar from pervasive Cenozoic deformation and physical recrystallisation.



Introduction
Diagenesis of evaporites from marine brines is initiated by the precipitation of specific minerals in sequence based on the composition of the parent brine with increasing salinity. Initially carbonates [CaCO3] precipitate, followed by gypsum [CaSO4] in penesaline brines, halite in supersaline brines and eventually bittern salts (K-Mg-salts) (Warren, 2006). Bittern 30 https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2021-16 Preprint. Discussion started: 28 May 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. salt precipitation is a complex paragenetic process whereby the evolving brine chemistry and precipitate solubility define the terminal assemblage with any hydrological influx causing back reactions and alteration during or post lithification (Hardie, 1984(Hardie, & 1990Warren, 2006). The sedimentation of laterally extensive and thick evaporite deposits require hyper-arid climates with extreme evaporation, tectonically isolated basins with optimal hydrogeology to restrict brine refreshing and dissolution (Warren, 2006). An ancient example of a thick, laterally extensive evaporite containing significant quantities of 35 bittern salts is the Salt Range Formation in northern Pakistan (Jaumé and Lillie, 1988;Richards et al. 2015). It is comprised of a thick crystalline halite intercalated with bands of potash marl overlain by a gypsiferous marl and gypsum-dolomite (Ghazi et al., 2012). The Salt Range Formation acts as a detachment horizon for the distal foreland fold-thrust belt of the South Potwar Basin, which is a being driven by Himalayan orogenic deformation (far field stresses) and gravity gliding (near field stresses) (Jaumé and Lillie 1988, Davis and Lillie 1994, Richards et al. 2015. Ages of the Salt Range Formation are 40 poorly constrained with trilobite trace fossils in the directly overlying Khewra Sandstone establishing the upper boundary as early Cambrian and the Precambrian metasedimentary basement rocks of the Indian Shield forming the lower boundary (Gee, 1989;Khan et al., 1986;Schindewolf and Seilacher, 1955).
Polyhalite is a bittern salt, forming as both a primary precipitate but more commonly as a diagenetic secondary phase during back reaction of gypsum with a K-Mg-SO4 brine (Hardie, 1990;Warren, 2006). It is one of the primary potash (K-bearing) 45 salts applicable to K/Ar, or its derivative, 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology (e.g., Leitner et al. 2014). Since the initial investigation of 40 Ar abundance in K-bearing evaporite minerals (Aldrich and Nier, 1948) many studies have used a range of minerals as geochronometers (Reiners et al., 2017). Extensive work on Miocene samples of polyhalite, kainite, and in particular langbeinite from the Carpathian foredeep basin to determine depositional age, of primary langbeinite, and recrystallisation ages after major tectonic events (Leost et al., 2001;Wójtowicz et al. 2003) using both K-Ar and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar radioisotopic 50 dating. Similarly, polyhalite and langbeinite from the Castile and Salado Formations in southeast New Mexico, respectively, have been used with some success yielding ages of deposition and deformation (Brookins et al., 1980;. While langbeinite is a more robust potash mineral, being less susceptible to later alteration and Ar diffusion, polyhalite is potentially a useful geochronometer with dates recovered from diagenetic and deformed polyhalite samples from the Haselgebirge Formation, a major evaporite detachment in the Northern Calcareous Alps (Leitner et al., 2013). 55 In this study, we use the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar step heating process in an attempt to date grains of polyhalite from two samples from the Khewra Mines in the Salt Range, Pakistan. We also establish the Ar diffusion parameters and associated closure temperature of polyhalite in the K/Ar isotopic system. Though these results are semi-quantitative, they are contextualised with the structural history of the host formation to form a speculative interpretation of deformation history.   Plateau, by the Khari Murat Fault (KMF) and Soan Backthrust (SB) in Fig. 1. The Potwar Plateau is a distal foreland foldthrust-belt (FTB) that is thrust southward over a thick evaporite detachment, the Salt Range Formation (Davis and Lillie, 1994;Jaume and Lillie, 1988). At the southern extent of the Potwar Plateau, the Salt Range Thrust (SRT) has displaced Precambrian to Eocene sedimentary rocks over Quaternary sediments of the Punjab Plain (Jaswal, 1997;Yeats et al., 1984).
The SRT has allowed the southward transposition of nearly undeformed overburden and resulted in a critical taper wedge 80 with a frontal angle of <1˚ (Jaume and Lillie, 1988). The Salt Range forms the southerly expression of the Himalayan orogeny. The range results from thrust ramping over a pre-existing basement normal fault, driven by a combination of both near (gravity gliding) and far field (continent continent collision) stresses (Davis and Lillie, 1994;Jaume and Lillie, 1988;Lillie et al., 1987). Recent seismic activity indicates that the Salt Range Thrust is active, and moves at a rate of 3mm/yr, though slip is typically aseismic owing to the rheological weakness of the basal evaporites (Haq et al., 2013;Satyabala et al., 85 2012).

Stratigraphy
The oldest rocks in this region are the Precambrian crystalline basement of the Indian Shield with the nearest exposure in the Kirana Hills, 80 km south of the Salt Range ( Fig. 2A) (Gee, 1989). These are unconformably overlain by evaporites of the Salt Range Formation that formed in a restricted basin environment (Jaswal et al., 1997). The Salt Range Formation has 90 three members: the Billianwala Salt, which is comprised of massive crystalline halite and sometimes banded with layers of potash marl, the Sahwal Marl, which is a red marl with some gypsum, and the Bandarkas Gypsum, which is a red marl containing both crystalline and non-crystalline folded and sheared gypsum ( Fig. 2B) (Richards et al., 2015). Conformably above this are Cambrian marine sedimentary rocks of the Jhelum Group, predominantly consisting of maroon fine-grained sandstones and shales (Ghazi et al., 2012). These are first unconformably overlain by Permian tillites, sandstones, siltstones, and shales of the Nilawahan Group (Khan et al., 1986), then by Paleocene to Eocene fossiliferous 100 carbonates and shales (Ghazi et al., 2012). Miocene to Quaternary units of the Rawalpindi and Siwaliks Groups form a six km thick syntectonic molasse resulting from erosion of the forming Himalayas ( Fig. 2A) (Grelaud et al., 2003).
Two samples taken from the Billianwala Member of the Salt Range Formation were collected from a mine wall within Khewra Mine (Fig. 1B). A detailed compositional and structural analysis of these samples is presented in Richards et al. (2015). 105 Sample SRLR-05 was taken from the massive crystalline halite and consists of 95% pure halite (NaCl) with pink orange inclusions and bands comprised of carnalite (MgCl2.KCl.6H2O) and polyhalite (2CaSO4.MgSO4.K2SO4.H2O) (Fig. 3A).

Methodology
Polyhalite grains were separated by gently crushing the sample, then washing for 30 sec in distilled water to dissolve and 115 remove any halite. Halite was carefully removed before irradiation as Cl produces interference 38Ar affecting the calculated ages (Esser et al., 1997;Leitner et al., 2013). As polyhalite is hydrous and only semi-soluble the grains do not experience alteration with such short contact when washed (Marcel et al., 2017). Once separated the polyhalite grains were loaded into aluminium disks, 1.9cm diameter and 0.3cm depth, and bracketed by small wells containing nuetron-fluence monitors. One sample (SRLR06-2.2) underwent irradiation with the Fish Canyon sanidine (FCs) as a neutronfluence monitor (28.294 ± 120 0.037 Ma, 1σ error; Renne et al., 2011). All other grains were irradiated with GA-1550 biotite (99.738 ± 0.100 Ma; 1σ error; Renne et al., 2011). The discs were Cd-shielded (to minimize undesirable nuclear interference reactions) and irradiated for 40 h in the Oregon TRIGA reactor in a central position. The mean J-value computed from standard grains within the small pits is 0.01082100 ± 0.00001623 to 0.01086400 ± 0.00002600, which is determined as the average and standard deviation of J-values of the small wells. Mass discrimination was monitored using an automated air pipette and provided a mean value of 125 1.003236 (±0.05%) per dalton relative to an air ratio of 298.56 ± 0.31 (Lee et al., 2006). The correction factors for interfering isotopes were ( 39 Ar/ 37 Ar)Ca = 7.60 × 10−4 (±1.2%), ( 36 Ar/ 37 Ar)Ca = 2.70 × 10−4 (±0.74%) and ( 40 Ar/ 39 Ar)K = 7.30 × 10−4 (±12.4%). These 40 Ar/ 39 Ar analyses were conducted at the Western Australian Argon Isotope Facility at Curtin University.
The grains were step-heated using a 110 W Spectron Laser Systems, with a continuous Nd-YAG (IR; 1064 nm) laser rastered over the sample for 1 min to ensure that all the gas has been extracted and a homogenised temperature was reached 130 across the samples. The gas was purified in a stainless steel extraction line using one GP50 and two SAES AP10 getters. Ar isotopes were measured in static mode using a MAP 215-50 mass spectrometer (resolution of ~450; sensitivity of 4 × 10−14 mol/V) with a Balzers SEV 217 electron multiplier. The data acquisition was performed with the Argus programme written by M.O. McWilliams and was run under a LabView environment. The raw data were processed using the ArArCALC software (Koppers, 2002) and ages were calculated using the decay constants recommended by Renne et al. (2011). 40 Ar 135 blanks range from 1 × 10−16 to 2 × 10−16 mol and were monitored every third step; calculated age data are presented with 2σ errors.
Contemporaneous step-heating experiments were run using the above methods to determine the diffusion kinetics of polyhalite. Using arrhenius plots, based on arrhenius law calculations describing the first order kinetic loss of a diffusant as a function of temperature, we can determine the closure temperature (Tc) of the mineral system (Dodson, 1973;Reiners et al., 140 2018). For detailed analytical methods and calculations for measuring diffusion see Reiners et al., 2018. ln ( 2 ) = ln ( R is the gas constant, Ea is the activation energy, D is the diffusion coefficient, a is the diffusion size, T is the temperature. 145 Using the linear relationship (Eq. 1.) we can plot the array of step-heating data ln(D/a 2 ) as a function of inverse temperature to determine Ea and D0/a 2 from the slope and intercept respectively (Reiners et al., 2018). We calculated closure temperature by weighted linear regression using Isoplot 3.7 (Ludwig, 2003) with D0/a 2 calculated assuming spherical geometry and analysed sample size. All results are reported at 2σ errors (95% confidence).

40 Ar/ 39 Ar age dating
Polyhalite single crystals, polycrystals and grain aggregates taken from larger samples underwent step-heating 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age dating. A summary of results for all nine samples presented in Table. 1 include calculated plateau ages, isochron ages, K/Ca ratios, and oldest and youngest step ages.
Apparent age spectra plots display the apparent ages for each step of the experiment and are calculated representing a 155 percentage of cumulative 39 Ar released with the last step resulting in 100% 39 Ar released from the sample. Stacked below each age plot are the K/Ca ratios. Stacked apparent age and K/Ca spectrum plots are presented in Figs. 4 and 5. These results have been separated based on the quality and interpretability of the data with Fig. 4 presenting analytically valid data from which interpretations can be drawn. Erroneous data with high analytical errors that we consider invalid for interpretation are presented in Fig. 5. 160 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology results are presented with age spectra plots; for geological significance to be assigned to these results the apparent ages and plateau ages should overlap within 2σ error confidence. Generally, a plateau age is calculated when at least 3 consecutive steps have overlapping apparent ages and at least 70% of total 39 Ar released from the sample and with mini-plateau age containing between 50 and 70% of the total 39 Ar released. As the calculated ages of all samples only returned one plateau age with significant errors, precise ages of the formation are unable to be derived. However, the 165 qualitative information regarding the minimum age of crystallisation and maximum age of diffusion loss or recrystallization can be derived from the present results (see discussion by Jourdan, 2012). As such the oldest and youngest step ages are presented in Table. 1, with the oldest step age reflecting a minimum age of primary crystallization and the youngest step age reflecting the maximum age of deformation and Ar diffusion loss.  No plateau ages are calculated for the apparent age spectra plots in Fig. 4. All three plots (05-P2, 05-W2, 06-2.1) show a 175 stepped diffusion profile of increasing age with cumulative 39 Ar released. The initial and final steps in these apparent age plots converge around similar ages representing the youngest and oldest significant ages for their respective samples, these ages are presented in Table. 1. Similarly, the K/Ca ratios form a flat profile indicating simple diffusion with Ar generation from a single domain. Normally, it is considered unwise to attempt to derive too much information from poor, strongly perturbed 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age 185 spectra quality data is not considered presentable; however, we have included it here to attempted to derive as much as information as we reasonably could, in part due to the limited 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology data on polyhalite in the literature.
Sample 06-1.2 returned a plateau age of 202 Ma with 86% 39 Ar released across seven steps with large analytical uncertainty (±121 Ma) and mean square of weighted deviates (MSWD) of 0.64. This plateau age is not geologically significant due to the large uncertainty. As no other samples returned plateau ages much of our analysis is limited to the oldest and youngest 190 step ages, however, only ages with relatively small uncertainty are selected. For example, Sample 06-4.2' has a youngest step age of 160 ± 1330 Ma and oldest step age of 204 ± 754 Ma; neither of these ages hold any meaning so are disregarded and the nearest step age of sufficient precision is selected. These data are presented in Table. 1.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2021-16 Preprint. Discussion started: 28 May 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. samples 06-1.2, 06-2.1, 06-2.2, 06-3.2, 06-4.2, 06-4 (Fig. 6). Samples 06-2.1, 06-3.1, 210 06-3.2 have ratios between 0.77 -0.82 and are similar to the '05' samples. The remaining '06' samples form a second population with drastically smaller K/Ca ratios between 0.0017 and 0.02. Typically, inverse isochron diagrams are created as a secondary age calculation and to assist with measuring the value of trapped 40 Ar/ 36 Ar (McDougall and Harrison, 1999). Isochron plots of these data are not presented here as they do not add any additional value as most data points plot along the X-axis and do not form a mixing line to allow for age calculation.

Closure Temperature
Separate step-heating experiments were performed to determine the closure temperature of Ar in polyhalite. Arrhenius plots 220 measuring diffusion of 39 Ar for samples 05 and 06 are presented in Fig. 7.

Discussion
The purpose of this work is using 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology to determine a depositional or resetting age for the polyhalite in the Salt Range Formation as well as establishing the closure temperature for the mineral polyhalite. The Salt Range Formation has an upper age constraint of early Cambrian, from trilobite and brachiopod fossils in the overlaying Khewra Formation. It also rests unconformably over the Precambrian basement of the Indian Shield (Khan et al., 1986). Our step 235 heating experiments did not return plateau ages, with all the samples exhibiting apparent age profiles typical of single domain diffusion; the one sample that did return a plateau age is invalid due to unacceptably high errors.
Of the nine samples that underwent step-heating analysis, six were determined to be of insufficient quality for any interpretation. Samples 06-1.2, 06-2.2, 06-4.2, and 06-4.2' contained significant analytical errors. Coincidentally these samples coincide with the 2nd population of grains in Fig. 6 with K/Ca ratios much lower than the other samples. We 240 suspect the analytical errors associated with these samples may correspond to the overall low K values. Samples 06-2.1 and 06-3.2 also exhibit step-heating profiles typical of single domain diffusion. The lack of convergence of early and late steps to an apparent age of any significance results in vaguely interpretable spectral plots of unknown significance (Fig. 5).
Observations of halite boudins within the mylonitic potash marl, from which the '06' samples were taken, indicate that the marl layers acted as fluid flow pathways within the much thicker massive crystalline halite units (Richards et al., 2015). 245 These bands of potash marl have the highest percentage K-Mg salts within the formation (Fig. 3B); ultimately this results in a higher likelihood of dissolution, back reaction, altered brine chemistry, and recrystallisation (Warren, 2006). This process of dissolution and recrystallisation may partially or wholly reset the closed K-Ar isotopic system by untrapping the daughter decay products; consequently, the age calculations based on isotope ratios will reflect the younger deformation / recrystallisation age or an incorrectly calculated age between the depositional and recrystallisation ages if dissolution is 250 partial (Jourdan, 2012;McDougall and Harrison, 1999).

Diffusion characteristics of polyhalite
Our experiments on the diffusion parameters for polyhalite have resulted in Ea between 285 -322 KJ/mol and D0 between 2.62E+07 -1.33E+10. Linear regression of these parameters returned in calculated closure temperatures (Tc) between 281 -296 °C for a cooling rate of 10°C/Ma. Argon diffusion characteristics and Tc for commonly dated minerals are presented in 255 Table 2 below. In comparison to other Ar datable minerals polyhalite sits at the lower end of the closure temperature range but have relatively higher activation energies (Ea). A more detailed list of argon diffusion characteristics can be found in Baxter (2010).

Thermal stability and dehydroxilation of polyhalite
Dehydroxilation in a mineral occurs during heating above a mineral specific temperature resulting in the loss of the hydroxyl group (OH). This phenomenon is pertinent to incremental heating experiments involving hydrous minerals, which may 265 undergo irreversible structural and morphological phase changes inherently altering the active diffusion mechanism and subsequently derived kinetics (Cassata and Renee, 2013;Gaber et al., 1988;Harrison et al., 2009;Lee et al., 1991;Thern et al., 2020). As such, volume diffusion kinetics derived from minerals undergoing phase changes may be measuring the original mineral, a new phase or mineral, or a composite of both depending on when this phase change occurs.
Polyhalite is known to dehydrate with the following first order reaction between 280˚ to 360˚ at pressures between 0.5 and 270 6.1 bars from heating experiments (Nathans, 1963). ( 4 ) 4 • 2 2 → 2 ( 4 ) 3 + 4 + 2 2 Further, thermal experimentation by Wollmann et al. (2008) identified the dehydration characteristics of polyhalite and its 275 analogues with dehydration onset at 255 ˚C and peaking at 343˚ ˚C for polyhalite and onset between 185 -311 ˚C for the various analogues. The specific thermal decomposition reactions observed by Fischer et al. (1996) and expanded upon by Xu et al. (2016) show polyhalite dehydrates into anhydrite, two solid solution langbeinite-type phases with different Ca/Mg ratios, and water vapor between 237 -343 ˚C. This is accompanied by a 5.8% mass loss associated with water vapor removal (Xu et al., 2016). 280 2 2 ( 4 ) 4 • 2 2 → 2 2− ( 4 ) 3 + 2 2− ( 4 ) 3 + 4 + 2 2 Upon heating to 646 ˚C the two langbeinite phases combine to a single-phase triple salt (Xu et al, 2016). 285 2 2− ( 4 ) 3 + 2 2− ( 4 ) 3 → 2 ( 4 ) 3 The polyhalite unit cell parameters have been established by Wollman et al. (2008) and the variation of these as a function of temperature by Xu et al. (2016). These thermal experiments are conducted at atmospheric conditions or with variations to pressure so it is unknown whether polyhalite decomposition will differ from these results as minerals have displayed lower 290 phase transformation temperatures in vacuo (Vasconcelos et al., 1994c). While the combined effect of geological conditions (temperature, lithospheric pressure, water volume) on these reactions is unknown, the dihydroxylation temperature of polyhalite presented here, 237 -343 ˚C, is around our calculated Tc 281 -296 ˚C. This indicates polyhalite is Ar retentive below its phase transformation temperature in vacuo, which impedes accurate calculation of diffusion kinetics and closure temperatures with this method. As such, our calculated diffusion characteristics and closure temperatures are only semi-295 quantitative, representing a first attempt at measuring the diffusion kinetics of polyhalite. Conducting hydrothermal diffusion experiments would serve as a great alternative and may alleviate the hydroxilation issue. Hydrothermal diffusion experiments increase the thermal stability range of a mineral before decomposition onset allowing for higher analytical temperatures to be reached (e.g. Baldwin et al., 1990;Giletti, 1974;Harrison et al., 2009). Unfortunately, this approach was not possible during this study. It would make an ideal continuation of this work on expanding our understanding of the 300 diffusion parameters of polyhalite and its applicability to future geochronological work. (2) (3) (4)

Age Interpretations
While it is impossible to determine the initial deposition age of an evaporite sequence with no known lower boundary without a plateau age from 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology, we can derive an oldest age of precipitation or alteration. Samples 06-3.1 returned an oldest apparent step age of 514 ± 3 Ma; we attribute this age to represent a minimum age, probably not so far 305 from the time at which this polyhalite grain precipitated. This age may represent the depositional age of precipitation from a surface brine; however, we believe it is more representative of precipitation during lithification as polyhalite is most commonly a secondary evaporite occurring as a back reaction (Warren, 2006).
The oldest apparent step ages for samples 05-P2 and 05-W2 (381 ± 1 Ma and 415 ± 1 Ma respectively) are significantly lower than the youngest age of the Salt Range Formation of ca. 514 Ma from our step heating experiment on sample 06-3.1 310 or from the stratigraphically constrained base Cambrian age. As such, these samples must have experienced conditions capable of significantly resetting the K/Ar decay system. For the majority of minerals this occurs when the mineral is heated beyond its closure temperature. However, as polyhalite is a chemical precipitate, percolating fluids of the correct composition are capable of dissolving and re-precipitating new minerals (Warren, 2006). As polyhalite forms from precipitation or alteration rather than magmatic crystallisation it is most likely these minerals formed well below the closure 315 temperature, effectively locking both K and Ar with insignificant post-formation diffusion. For these samples, whether alteration is thermally derived or purely recrystallisation, we can establish that the oldest apparent step ages represents a minimum age at which these new polyhalite grains first formed. The youngest significant ages for these two samples constrain the age of termination of these alteration processes. The youngest significant ages-286 ± 1 Ma for sample 05-W2 and 292 ± 10 Ma for sample 05-P2-provide a maximum age for the recrystallization of a second generation of polyhalite, or 320 for an heating event that partially reset the first generation of polyhalite.
Placed in geological context these dates correspond with the time of the unconformity between the middle Cambrian sequence of the Baganwalla Formation and the early Permian glacio-fluvial to shallow marine sediments of the Tobra Foramtion (Khan and Khan, 1979;Khan et al., 1986). It is tempting to suggest that these ages reflect recrystallisation by circulating meteoric fluids during this non-depositional time, possibly with glacial meteoric water having infiltrated the 325 evaporites around the time of rifting and break-up of the northern Gondwana border.
However, collision between the Indian and Eurasian plates is ongoing with crustal movement rates estimated to be ~3 mm/y (Satyabala et al. 2012). Numerous <4.9 Mw earthquakes in the region and neotectonic features within the Salt Range Thrust indicating that the location where these samples were collected is currently active (Haq et al. 2013). Combining this information with the youngest calculated step age of 62 ± 15 Ma, and the observation of the extreme microscopic 330 deformation in the mylonite (Richards et al. 2015), we can speculate on the nature of the interaction between the Ar system and recrystallization. 1. Stress-induced recrystallisation experienced by these samples is only ever partial, with intracrystalline domains preserved that remain unrecrystallised, else only the most recent deformation events to reset the system should be recorded in the Ar system. 335 2. If total recrystallisation has occurred, but the Ar system isn't fully reset, then recrystallisation retains Ar despite the host crystal structure's recrystallisation. This would suggest little to no fluid is present during recrystallisation.
3. Deformation events resulting in deformation and recrystallisation may have heterogeneously affected the Salt Range Formation with some grains (e.g. those in boudins), preserving different microstructural and isotopic records.
4. The samples analysed were only recrystallised at this age while others may have experienced more recent 340 deformation resetting its closed Ar system but were not analysed.
Fitting with most historic 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age dating studies of potash salts, the results presented in this study display significantly younger ages of formation than their known upper limit of base Cambrian age. We suggest that later deformation events are the primary cause of this open system behaviour, rather than a result of prolonged thermally-induced diffusion. Located within a tectonically active setting, with evidence for recent (0.4 -2.1 Ma) to currently active movement nearby, and hosted 345 in, or close to evaporate mylonites, these samples have experienced, at least partial, grain boundary migration and recrystallisation (Yeats et al., 1984;Jaswal et al., 1997;Haq et al., 2013). However, microstructural work by Richards (2021) ascertain that even in heavily deformed evaporites, earlier microstructures are preserved, suggesting that these intracrystal domains may retain radiogenic Ar and preserve older ages.

Conclusions 350
The 40 Ar/ 39 Ar step heating geochronology performed on these nine samples was partially successful. Despite being unable to determine significant plateau ages to reliably date the evaporites of the Salt Range Formation, we can speculate on a few key points regarding the deformation history of these evaporites. The combined apparent age spectra and K/Ca plots for samples 05-P2, 05-W2, and 06-3.1 exhibit profiles consistent with pure diffusion kinetics from a single domain and are interpreted to represent the following: 355 • The oldest step age, 514 ± 3 Ma, for sample 06-3.1 is a maximum age for diagenetic precipitation. As polyhalite is rarely formed as a primary evaporite, we believe this likely represents the age at which backreactions during lithification have precipitated polyhalite.
• The youngest and oldest step ages: 286 ± 1 Ma -415 ± 1 Ma for sample 05-W2 and 292 ± 1 Ma -380 ± 1 Ma for sample 05-P2 are interpreted to represent a complex mixing age between diagenetic formation in the 360 Cambrian and partial resetting as a result of stress induced recrystallisation. Both the oldest and youngest step ages for samples 05-W2 and 05-P2 occur during the unconformity between the Cambrian Baghanwala Formation and the Permian Tobra Formation (Fig. 2A). Circulating meteoric fluids during this non-depositional https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2021-16 Preprint. Discussion started: 28 May 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. time and continuing during the Permian may have contributed to the dissolution and recrystallisation of the Salt Range Formation evaporites. We believe the complete physical reconstitution of the formation due to extensive 365 deformation during the Cenozoic exhibits a greater control in resetting the K/Ar system and thus is more likely.
Diffusion experiments on two samples from the Salt Range, Pakistan have resulted in closure temperatures between 281 and 296 °C at a cooling rate of 10°C/Ma. To our knowledge this is the first experiment to determine a closure temperature for the mineral polyhalite. Due to polyhalite dehydroxilation and its impact on Ar diffusion kinetics these experimentally derived parameters are only semi-quantitative and must be taken with a grain of salt. As such, they serve only as a first pass on 370 polyhalite diffusion kinetics and cannot be used for geochronological works with any precision.
Hydrothermal diffusion experiments on polyhalite make an ideal next step in this work by assessing the diffusion parameters of the mineral at higher temperatures before the thermal decomposition begins. Similarly understanding the timing between phase transformation and Ar diffusion in the new crystal structure will be essential in understanding Ar degassing mechanics in both polyhalite and langbeinite. Furthermore, developing our understanding of the link between polyhalite 375 recrystallisation and Ar diffusion is key to the application of Ar geochronology to deformed evaporite units.
The practical use of 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology on polyhalite is in its infancy. Despite the difficulty of using the mineral as a geochronometer, further understanding of its diffusion kinetics will clarify its potential for use in geological interpretations and develop our understanding of the thermal history of K-bearing evaporite formations.