{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02363896848137536, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015759312320916905, 'mean_word_length': 4.5, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Simple suture with or without proximal gastric vagotomy for perforated duodenal ulcer

To assess the results of proximal gastric vagotomy (PGV) in the definitive treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers, a prospective study was carried out comparing PGV in association with omental patch suture (PGV + S) with the simple omental patch suture procedure (S). The PGV + S series consisted of 38 consecutive patients with perforated duodenal ulcer and the S series consisted of 38 survivors of a similar series of 41 consecutive patients. Surgical mortality was zero in the PGV + S series. The patients were followed up for 1 to 7 years. No cases of dumping or diarrhoea were observed. Thirty‐three patients in the PGV + S series (87 per cent) were classified as Visick grade I and only two (5 per cent) as Visick grade IV. In contrast, 11 patients (29 per cent) were Visick grade I and 22 (58 per cent) were Visick grade IV in the S series. Recurrent ulcer was detected endoscopically in 58 per cent of the patients who had been treated with simple suture and in only 5 per cent after suture plus PGV. PGV is a safe operation with a negligible morbidity rate and with a significant rate of effective control of ulcer disease. Depending on the general condition of the patient and on the surgeon's skill, it appears preferable to treat not only the acute perforation but also the ulcer disease by PGV.