{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011824324324324325, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.308510638297872, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An empirical look at the consequences of oppression actions in Singapore

ABSTRACT Oppression actions in Singapore have been the subject of empirical research in light of the possibility that the use of ‘commercial unfairness’ as the test for oppression in Singapore has favoured plaintiffs to the extent that businesses have been damaged by successful or even unsuccessful oppression suits. The findings, however, only prove that the complexity of oppression actions has increased. Consideration should still be given to whether some form of contractarianism ought to guide this area of law.