{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02017054772056412, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006723515906854706, 'mean_word_length': 5.42, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Age‐dependent effects of bed rest in human skeletal muscle: exercise to the rescue

In recent past, the prescription of bed rest was common practice in medical care, being indicated to patients with a wide range of health conditions. Despite lack of empirical evidence, it was believed that reducing metabolic demand could facilitate recovery by favouring delivery of oxygen and metabolic resources to the malfunctioning body site/organ. However, overwhelming evidence from clinical trials proved the contrary by showing that even short periods of bed rest can lead to serious complications including loss of cardiovascular and muscle function, both associated with poor outcomes (Creditor, 1993). Deterioration of skeletal muscle capacity (i.e. loss of muscle mass and strength) is one of the first manifestations and is particularly worrying in older individuals, who are more prone to hospitalization and less physically active than the young. It therefore becomes important to understand whether the effects of bed rest differ between young and older individuals, so that therapeutic strategies can be tailored to each particular age group. Although it is assumed that older individuals experience exacerbated muscle loss after bed rest, the study by Tanner et al. (2015) in The Journal of Physiology reports the first direct comparison between age groups. The authors aimed to verify age-dependent differences in muscle loss, protein synthesis and catabolic signalling in response to a 5 day bed rest protocol, and potential rescue by a rehabilitation programme. Well-controlled protocols complemented by molecular analyses make the study attractive, but some limitations deserve attention. Young (18–35 years old) and older (60–75 years) adults of both sexes and matched for baseline characteristics were recruited and underwent five continuous days of bed rest, in a protocol designed to simulate hospitalization procedures. This strategy brings the protocol closer to a clinical scenario; however, the good health status of participants impedes full extrapolation of the findings, mainly because hospitalized patients have additional health complications that may influence skeletal muscle response. On the other hand, a healthy cohort excludes the interference of confounding factors contributing to muscle loss. X-ray absorptiometry revealed significant loss of leg lean mass and 16% reduction in knee extensor strength in older volunteers after bed rest, while young participants displayed preserved values. Muscle protein synthesis after amino acid ingestion was disrupted after bed rest only in older subjects. This is consistent with results on skeletal muscle mass and strength, and helps explain the different response between groups. Although the young cohort appeared to be protected in this short bed rest protocol when compared to the older group, several studies employing longer resting periods demonstrated skeletal muscle loss in young adults (LeBlanc et al. 1992). Overall, these findings indicate that the time course of muscle disuse is delayed in younger individuals. In a second arm of the study, the authors aimed to investigate the effects of a rehabilitation programme starting after bed rest. High-intensity eccentric exercise sessions followed by protein supplementation were performed every other day under supervision. In follow-up examinations after rehabilitation, muscle mass returned to pre-bed rest levels in older individuals and was increased above baseline in the young cohort. This might be explained by the fact that the latter did not experience muscle loss after bed rest and not necessarily by different responses in young and older groups to the rehabilitation programme. Isometric strength post-rehabilitation returned to baseline in both groups. Although the authors interpret the observed muscle recovery as an effect of the exercise programme, this conclusion would have been further supported by including a control group not receiving the exercise intervention after bed rest. This comparison would account for the effects of muscle reloading (‘reambulation’), when individuals return to spontaneous ambulatory activity. In fact, muscle recovery after 4 months of bed rest was observed in young subjects within 8 weeks of reambulation, without exercise training (LeBlanc et al. 1992). However, since older adults have an impaired ability to regain muscle tissue after disuse (Suetta et al. 2013), the interpretation by Tanner et al. is certainly plausible. However, direct evidence will be required to allow for a robust conclusion regarding the effects of exercise. A particular strength of the study is the evaluation of intracellular signalling. While extensive evidence in animal models of muscle unloading is available, human data are scarce, making this study an important contribution to the literature. To gain insights on key molecules involved in protein turnover, Tanner et al. evaluated several targets in vastus lateralis biopsies collected before and after bed rest and rehabilitation. Their data demonstrate for the first time that increases in MAFBX expression and LC3II/I ratios, well accepted markers of protein degradation, are more pronounced in older compared with young volunteers after bed rest. While nutrient-induced protein synthesis was blunted only in older participants post-bed rest, mTORC1 signalling displayed a similar response between groups, suggesting that the time span between mTORC1 signalling and manifestations in protein synthesis is shorter in older adults. Therefore the accelerated muscle loss observed in the older group probably resulted from a combination of reduced nutrient-induced protein synthesis and increased protein degradation. The study is associative by necessity and extrapolation of causal mechanisms is derived from studies in rodents. In this regard, the so-called ‘atrogenes’ MAFBX and MURF1 attract special attention because mice lacking these factors display attenuated muscle atrophy upon catabolic stimuli or ageing (Hwee et al. 2014), raising the hypothesis that inhibiting