{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015706806282722512, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002617801047120419, 'mean_word_length': 5.215447154471545, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Factors governing the stickiness of cribellar prey capture threads in the spider family Uloboridae

The surface of a cribellar prey capture thread is formed of thousands of fine, looped fibrils, each issuing from one of the spigots on an oval spinning plate termed the cribellum. This plesiomorphic capture thread is retained by members of the family Uloboridae, in which its stickiness differs among genera. An examination of five cribellar thread features in nine uloborid species shows that only the number of fibrils that form a thread explains these differences in thread stickiness. Neither the physical features of these fibrils, nor the manner in which they are combined to form threads differs among species. Threads produced by orb‐weaving species contain fewer fibrils than those produced by species that build reduced webs. Relative to spider weight, the number of fibrils that form a cribellar thread is greatest in simple‐web species of the genus Miagrammopes, less in triangle‐web species of the genus Hyptiotes, and least in orb‐weaving species representing five genera. A transformational analysis shows that change in the number of cribellum spigots is directly related to change in the stickiness of cribellar thread. This direct relationship between the material invested in a cribellar thread and its stickiness may have been a limiting factor that favored the switch from the dry cribellar threads of uloborids to the adhesive capture threads produced by other orb‐weaving families. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.