{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03018867924528302, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0037735849056603774, 'mean_word_length': 5.321428571428571, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cooperating Distributed Grammar systems: A Comparison of Generavite Power

Cooperating Distributed Grammar systems have been introduced for describing multi-agent systems by means of formal grammars and languages. There are currently a lot of variations that differ by generative power. This article is focused on summarize definitions of selected CD grammar systems (homogenous, hybrid, and teams) and comparison of their generative power among themselves and against to languages of other systems, e.g. E0L/ET0L, CF, CS, and RE.