{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0210727969348659, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.785714285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Interscapes: Provisional Systems for the Interior

Culture The growing phenomenon of personalization in product design centers on issues of the interface between culture and technology. Not unlike Banham’s body stylist, the new consumer exploits increasing exibility in both scale and use to embed personal and cultural protocols into the technology, thus blurring a product’s identity as a brand through its reconguration as a personal item. Interior architecture participates in a similar logic. Not unlike the provisional rhythms of the fashion, movie, and music industries, seasonal identity shifts characterize store, club, exhibition, and hotel lobby design, positing a potential spatial and programmatic interface between culture and technology. Architecture participates in a similar logic. Not unlike the provisional rhythms of the fashion and music industry, seasonal identity and user shifts characterize boutique and hotel lobby design, positing it as a potential spatial and programmatic interface between culture and technology.