{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05317324185248713, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.261261261261262, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Are we limited to a mere relative reality

According to H. Poincare, only the purport of physical laws (P) and the geometry (G) combined as a whole  can describe nature (N). Equally well, the expression (N r )=(G r )+(P r )  symbolically describes the relative reality as we understand it.  The question that needs to be answered, is: Can we reverse engineer, by logical deduction, an alternate set of physical laws (P a ) if (G a ) is set to an Euclidean geometry? This talk investigates if an alternative reality (N a ) is physically possible that correctly describes the observed.