{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027818448023426062, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007320644216691069, 'mean_word_length': 5.333333333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of Modeling and Audience on an Aversive Task

Using magnitude of self-administered shock as the aversive task, 90 female undergraduate volunteer subjects were exposed to one of three conditions: (1) no-model condition in which a subject was asked to self-administer an electric shock; (2) model condition wherein a subject witnessed a young female graduate student self-administer increasingly stronger shocks; and (3) model + audience condition in which a non-evaluative audience witnessed the model condition. Analysis of variance indicated that neither model nor presence of an audience combined with a model affected willingness to self-administer higher levels of shock.