{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018777292576419215, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.293956043956044, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
PUBLIC CONTROL OVER THE ACTIVITIES OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THE JUDICIARY

The article describes the general characteristics of public control over the activities of public servants in the judiciary. The concepts of «public control» and «public service in the judiciary» are studied. Based on these approaches, the proposed scientifically sound definition is proposed. The normative and legal basis for exercising public control over the judiciary in Ukraine is indicated. The peculiarities of such activity are determined. Scientific provisions on the forms of public control over public servants in the judiciary are studied, including the following: sociological and statistical surveys, public hearings, public examination of acts of public authorities and their projects, publications in the press, radio, television, online publications Internet; public examination, public participation in the work of collegial authorities, inspection of the activities of any organization or responsible person, analysis of citizens' appeals, results of activities, etc. It is concluded that high-quality and effective activity of the judiciary is the key to the development of a democratic, legal and social society and the state. However, in order to ensure a high level of work of this branch of government, in particular public servants in the judiciary, it is advisable to have an institution of public control, which aims to verify the objectivity and transparency of the system through various techniques and measures. It is argued that public control is in no way an instrument of coercion, with its help it is impossible to control, to order the judiciary to take certain actions. Of particular importance in this area is the issue of consolidating organizational forms of such control, but today it is not regulated by law, which necessitates the development and adoption of a special legislative act on the activities of public control entities and forms of such activities. It is determined that the issue of consolidating organizational forms of such control is of special importance in this area, but today it is not regulated by law, which necessitates the development and adoption of a special legislative act on the activities of public control entities and forms of such activities.