{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01757944557133198, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014874915483434753, 'mean_word_length': 5.351931330472103, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Diaphragm activation with intramuscular stimulation in dogs.

We studied in 10 supine anesthetized dogs diaphragm contraction produced by electrical activation with intramuscular electrodes surgically implanted in the ventral surface of the diaphragm and compared this with activation of the ipsilateral phrenic nerve (C5, 6, and 7) before it entered the thorax. Repetitive 40-Hz pulse trains with supramaximal current stimulus were used after hyperventilation of the animals to apnea. A single intramuscular electrode within 1 to 2 cm of the site of phrenic nerve entry into the diaphragm produced a mean transdiaphragmatic pressure of 12.0 cm H2O +/- 0.97 SE and mean tidal volume of 0.27 L +/- 0.04 SE. Mean values observed with phrenic nerve stimulation were not statistically different, and both electrode systems produced equivalent outward abdominal motion and upper rib cage paradox, as monitored by inductive plethysmography. There was no difference in gas exchange during stimulation with a single hemidiaphragm electrode and mechanical ventilation compared at the same tidal volume and respiratory rate. Blockade of neuromuscular transmission with curare eliminated intramuscular and phrenic nerve stimulation proportionately, suggesting that activation of the diaphragm is dependent in both cases on the phrenic nerve. This technique does not entail manipulation of the phrenic nerve and may have clinical application as an alternative technique for diaphragm pacing.