{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017849073655671035, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005648441030275644, 'mean_word_length': 5.472222222222222, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
New Editor-in-Chief Introductory Comments.

It is an honor for me to havebegun my 5-year term as Editor-in-Chief of the Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology in January 2016. I wish to thank the outgoing editor, Robert McCaffrey, his associate editors, and each of the editorial board members and ad hoc reviewers for all of the time and effort they put into making the journal a success. Mike Schoenberg will be serving ACN’s Deputy Editor, and we would like you to join us in welcoming the journal’s new Associate Editors: Jacobus Donders, Philip Fastenau, Laura Flashman, Cynthia Kubu, and Marc Norman. The core mission of Archives is not going to change. The new editors and I will maintain our commitment to publish clinically relevant scientific research through original empirical articles and brief empirical reports as well as keeping abreast of the latest developments through clinical case studies, invited commentaries, and book reviews. Archives is the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychology (NAN) and will continue to serve as the mechanism for disseminating position papers and meeting abstracts from NAN. Furthermore, we aim to be the first outlet that authors consider to publish neuropsychological clinical research. Additionally, the editors and I intend to expand the scope of Archives by encouraging more submissions focusing on the diversity of neurological conditions found in neuropsychological practice and the latest relevant findings in clinical neurology and the neurosciences that underlie common neurobehavioral disorders. There are plans to devote at least one issue each year to a special topic that is relevant to clinical neuropsychologists. For example, we are already working on a special issue on civil capacity assessment, under guest editorship of George Demakis with contributions from respected authors in that field, to be published later this year. Beyond these special topic issues, the editors and I are also planning to allocate some recurring special sections within issues devoted to relevant topics, such as integrated care teams or sports neuropsychology. For example, there are plans to include a special section on integrated care teams two to three times a year which will include articles and reference lists devoted to examining the settings, services provided, practice issues, remuneration, and impact of neuropsychologists’ participation in integrated care teams with respect to patient care and health outcomes. This special section would highlight outcome studies illustrating the clinical benefits and cost-savings associated with inclusion of neuropsychologists in integrated care teams. The journal from time to time will also invite respected authors to submit shortened versions of cutting edge topics adapted from their workshop presentations at the NAN annual conference. One of the first papers discussing cutting edge topics from the 2015 NAN conference is a paper on creativity and the brain by Dr. Kenneth Heilman that is to be published in this, or an immediately upcoming, issue. Since abstracts are the most frequently read portion of published papers, we are adopting a structured format for Abstracts for all empirical papers beginning January 2016. Structured abstracts ensure readers and researchers are provided with critical information that is needed to practice evidence-based neuropsychology. The journal now requires authors to specify the Objectives, Methods, Results, and Conclusions of each empirical work. This structured abstract format will assist readers to find articles that are scientifically sound and relevant to their practices and allow for more precise computerized literature searches for clinicians and researchers. Many biomedical and health research journals have begun to implement the use of reporting guidelines in their instructions to authors and checklists for reviewers. Reporting guidelines have been developed for the most common types of research studies submitted to neuropsychology journals (e.g., observational studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral health interventions, and qualitative studies) to improve the accuracy, transparency, and completeness of published papers. Reporting guidelines specify a minimum set of items that submitted manuscripts need for a complete and clear account Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 31 (2016) 195–196