{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01934984520123839, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003869969040247678, 'mean_word_length': 4.931192660550459, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Impact of Levee Openings on Storm Surge: A Numerical Analysis in Coastal Louisiana

The existence of the Mississippi River (MR) and Tributaries’ levees in coastal Louisiana could block storm surge and cause surge setup in adjacent basins. In order to reduce storm surge amplification caused by these barriers, one possible solution is to build “floodways” through the mainstem MR levees to allow surge during tropical events to cross. The primary purpose of this study is to examine if these floodways/openings can help reduce storm surge in adjacent basins. Using Hurricane Isaac (2012) as an example, a pre-validated Delft3D-based hydrodynamic model was applied to study the effect of levee openings on storm surge. Model results and flux analysis show that these levee openings were not effective in reducing storm surge in Barataria Basin and Breton Sound due to the complex interaction between the cross flow from the surge and the MR flow. During Isaac, the MR water could be diverted to Barataria and/or Breton, which resulted in an increase in storm surge, essentially defeating the primary objective of the levee openings. Overall, the impact of levee openings at the selected locations on storm surge reduction in adjacent basins of coastal Louisiana was minor and very limited.