{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020815264527320035, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.073684210526316, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The White Devil (review)

subtle changes in choreography, it gradually takes on a sense of sacramental transformation that both delights and moves us deeply. Wilson examines the vow of commitment in this scene, deconstructing the emotional energy of love and the promise of this enduring commitment into a theatrical exploration of motion in time and space. “I do” is transformed into the motion of constructing the wall that is both productive and repetitive. Veiled behind this repetitive action is the promise of a domestic security and stability; yet, the action also possesses the potential for tedium. The brick wall is a creation of beauty and strength, but walls have the potential to restrict space and limit movement too. Is Wilson suggesting that the state of marriage, building a productive life together, is fragile and therefore vulnerable to transformation into a destructive, labor-intensive struggle? As we watch this scene twice, we are made increasingly aware of Wilson’s study of time and space, how precisely he uses these elements to reveal the architecture and construction of his craft, which informs our relationship to meaning.