{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03665987780040733, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.72093023255814, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
["Enmeshed in stories". The story concept as experiential practice of arms moriendi].

The way we deal with death and dying in the world of high-tech medicine has shifted from interpretation to action. One's own dying has become professionalized and delegated to doctors. Against this backdrop, what does the "story concept" proposed by D. Ritschl provide us in terms of rehabilitating the art of dying or "Ars Moriendi"? Can it be considered a category for reflection about death and dying?