{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.053691275167785234, 'fraction_numerical': 0.052572706935123045, 'mean_word_length': 5.126712328767123, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The cost-effectiveness of different approaches to exercise and corticosteroid injection for subacromial pain (impingement) syndrome.

OBJECTIVES
To determine whether physiotherapist-led exercise intervention and ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid injection is cost-effective when compared with standard advice and exercise leaflet and unguided injection in patients with subacromial pain (impingement) syndrome.


METHODS
An incremental cost-utility analysis using patient responses to the five-level EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was undertaken from a health care perspective alongside a 2x2 factorial randomised trial with 256 participants over a 12-month follow-up period. Uncertainty was explored through the use of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.


RESULTS
The cost-utility analysis indicated that physiotherapist-led exercise was associated with an incremental cost of £155.99 (95% CI: 69.02-241.93) and 0.031 (95% CI: -0.01-0.07) additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £5,031 per QALY gained and an 85% chance of being cost-effective at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained compared with the advice and exercise leaflet. Ultrasound-guided injection was associated with an incremental cost of £15.89 (95% CI: -59.36-109.86) and 0.024 (95% CI: -0.02-0.07) additional QALYs, an ICER of £662 per QALY gained and a 83% chance of being cost-effective at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained compared with unguided injection.


CONCLUSION
Physiotherapist-led exercise was cost-effective compared with the advice and exercise leaflet, and ultrasound-guided injection was cost-effective when compared with unguided injection.


CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
ISRCTN, http://www.isrctn.com, ISRCTN42399123.