{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020140105078809107, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.831632653061225, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Some New and Serious Challenges to Psychiatric Research

Dr. Gorman is deputy director of the Now York SlMe Psychiatric Institute and professor of clinical psychiatry at the Columbia School of Physicians and Surgeons, NY. Currently, there exist three important challenges to psychiatric research that many in our community are already Involved in or will encounter at some point in the near future. The first is a challenge that I believe we have won, although the opposing side may not agree. Therefore, it requires our eternal vigilance. I am referring to the animal rights movement. The second is a much more satisfying challenge. Its resolution will surely strengthen, if not revolutionize, research into mental disorders as we enter the next century. Here, I allude to the venture proposed by Dr. Steven Hyman, the new director of the National Institute of Mental Health. Dr. Hyman contends that we must critically evaluate our work thus far in psychiatric research. The third challenge returns us to something unpleasant. It arises from a meanspirited collection of lawyers who believe that psychiatric research must be stopped, period.