{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021413276231263382, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0032119914346895075, 'mean_word_length': 5.448275862068965, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of stimulus interval and foreperiod duration on temporal synchronization.

Temporal synchronization with isochronous, auditory stimuli was investigated by having three subjects tap to clicks immediately, following a random foreperiod. Eleven different stimulus intervals ranging from .1 seconds to 4.5 seconds were presented randomly. A four factor (foreperiqd, interval size, signal position, subjects) analysis of variance on the logarithms of the variances of the responses about each signal and about the mean response indicated that foreperiod had no significant effect'.' Interval size and signal position were the most important factors. Variance increased as a . function of interval size, but diverged increasingly from random responding. Relative error decreased as a function of interval size. Analysis of reaction times to the first signal demonstrated a dependency on the interval between that signal and the nexti