{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030013642564802184, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017735334242837655, 'mean_word_length': 5.406113537117904, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The value of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of icterus and cholestasis.

We studied the reliability of the clinical assessment and the discriminatory value of different symptoms and signs in diagnosing obstructive and non-obstructive diseases causing icterus and/or cholestasis. During a period of two-and-a-half years, clinical assessment done by both physicians-in-training and by senior physicians was completed for 266 patients, and the usefulness of different symptoms and signs was tested in 220 of these. Clinical assessment was found to be a reliable method in distinguishing between obstructive and non-obstructive conditions causing icterus, with the sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 86%. In cases of anicteric cholestasis, the sensitivity and specificity of clinical assessment were 74% and 80%, respectively. Abdominal pain and abdominal tenderness were significantly (p less than 0.01) associated with obstructive diseases, whereas an enlarged liver, fever and excessive consumption of alcohol were associated with non-obstructive diseases (p less than 0.01, p less than 0.05, p less than 0.05, respectively). Itching, vomiting, intolerance to fatty foods, previous cholecystectomy, abdominal tumour and clinical icterus had no discriminatory value. Clinical evaluation is a reliable method in the diagnostic workup of a patient with icterus or anicteric cholestasis, and it is still of crucial importance in directing further investigations.