{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018563357546408393, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012510088781275222, 'mean_word_length': 4.959134615384615, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The effectiveness of the seal obtained with carbon fiber posts and composite cores is still unclear. Both 3-step dental adhesives and self-etching adhesive primers have been suggested as adhesive systems.


PURPOSE
This confocal microscopic study evaluated the microleakage of teeth endodontically treated and restored with fiber posts and composites with 3 adhesive systems.


MATERIAL AND METHODS
A total of 72 human mandibular premolars were endodontically treated and divided into 6 groups of 12 teeth each. The first 3 groups were treated with an endodontic sealer containing zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) and restored with temporary filling materials containing ZOE. The last 3 groups were treated with ZOE-free materials. Post spaces were prepared in the root canals. The first group treated with ZOE-based materials was restored with fiber posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement and composite cores without adhesive. The other 2 groups of ZOE-treated teeth were restored with fiber posts cemented with All Bond 2 and Panavia 21 dental adhesives, respectively. The last 3 groups were restored with fiber posts cemented with All Bond 2, Panavia 21, and Panavia Fluoro cement, respectively. The teeth were loaded intermittently at 2 cycles per second in a moist environment and, after 300,000 cycles, immersed in a solution of Rhodamine B dye for 48 hours. A confocal microscope was used to observe the teeth. The ratio between the length of the interfaces observed and the length of the dye penetration was evaluated. Two teeth from each group acted as controls and were not subjected to dynamic loads.


RESULTS
All resin cement groups leaked significantly less than the group cemented with zinc phosphate cement. No statistically significant difference was found between the microleakage of teeth treated with ZOE-based and non-ZOE-based materials. Teeth restored with All Bond 2 dental adhesive leaked significantly less than those restored with Panavia cement.


CONCLUSION
The 3-step dental adhesive (All Bond 2) resulted in a better marginal seal than that obtained with the self-etching primers (Panavia 21 and Panavia F). The use of endodontic sealers and temporary filling materials containing ZOE had no detrimental effect on the marginal seal of carbon fiber post/composite resin core restorations.