{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024967148488830485, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01576872536136662, 'mean_word_length': 5.096, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Capital Accumulation On a World Scale and the Necessity of Imperialism

occur separately, these two questions in fact address much the same issue. The controversy between Luxemburg (1913), Lenin (1917), and such social democrats as Hobson (1902) and Kautsky, which peaked around World War I, centered on the question of whether or not imperialism was a necessary condition of the capital accumulation process (and thus on whether or not capitalism could function without imperialism), or fundamentally a policy (which could be changed without abolishing capitalism altogether). At the heart of this early debate was the question of capital accumulation on a world scale and the role of imperialism in this process. In the last few years there has been a renewed