{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02177068214804064, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0043541364296081275, 'mean_word_length': 6.040816326530612, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Distinction between genotypes of Lupinus species by sodium dodecyl sulphate‐gel electrophoresis and by capillary electrophoresis

Effective distinction was achieved among a wide range of lupin grain samples by either sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)‐gel electrophoresis or capillary electrophoresis, based on grain‐protein composition. Capillary electrophoresis was faster (< 1 h) and provided slightly greater distinction between the samples. On the other hand, SDS‐gel electrophoresis could provide a greater throughput of samples in a 24 h period. Either technique could be used successfully to distinguish between lupin species and cultivars for taxonomic analysis or seed identification.