{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0192, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.850467289719626, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Elohist in Recent Literature

In comparison to the Yahwist, the Priest, and Deuteronomy, the Elohist has often been the orphan of the Pentateuch. The small number of E passages and hence the paucity of information regarding background and purpose have contributed to the neglect of E. However, within the past ten years or so E has received more than passing attention, although the other Pentateuchal strands still remain the focus of scholarly writing.’ It is the purpose of this article to review such attention, to indicate where the principal emphases lie, and thus to suggest the thrust of future scholarly writing.