{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01828681424446583, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0009624639076034649, 'mean_word_length': 5.341463414634147, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Implementing Management by Objectives

Jay L. Chronister is director of the center for higher education at the University of Virginia. Previously he served as an assistant professor of higher education and assistant dean of the school of general studies at the University of Pittsburgh. He holds an Ed.D. in higher education from the University of Pittsburgh and a masters in counselor's education from Penn State University. While the term "accountability" may go the way the term "relevance" has gone because of overuse, the implications of the concept of accountability will dictate actions of institutions of higher education well into the future. A general treatment of the implications of accountability for higher education has been presented by Mortimer,' and specific implications of accountability for the community college have been represented by Roueche, Baker, and Brownell.2 The critical factor in accountability which has implications for institutional management is the accent upon the results of institutional activities.