{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03728070175438596, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02456140350877193, 'mean_word_length': 5.018469656992084, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reduction of Pacing Output Coupling Capacitance for Sensing the Evoked Response

SPERZEL, J., et al.: Reduction of Pacing Output Coupling Capacitance for Sensing the Evoked Response. Sensing of the intracardiac evoked response (ER) after a pacing stimulus has been used in implantable pacemakers for automatic verification of capture. Reliable detection of ER is hampered by large residual afterpotentials associated with pacing stimuli. This led to the development of various technological solutions, like the use of triphasic pacing pulses and low polarizing electrode systems. This study investigated the effect of reducing the coupling capacitance (CC) in the pacemaker output circuitry on the magnitude of afterpotential, and the ability to automate detection of ventricular evoked response. A CC of 2.2 μF and four different blanking and recharge time settings were clinically tested to evaluate its impact on sensing of the ventricular ER and pacing threshold. Using an automatic step‐down threshold algorithm, 54 consecutive patients, aged 70 ± 10 years with acutely (n = 27) or chronically (n = 27) implanted ventricular pacing leads were enrolled for measurement testing. Routine measurements, using a standard pacing system analyzer (PSA), were (mean ± SD) impedance 569 ± 155 Ω, R wave amplitude baseline to peak 9.8 ± 3.7 mV and threshold 0.9 ± 0.7 V at 0.4‐ms pulse width. This new capture verification scheme, based on a CC of 2.2 μF and recharge/blanking timing setting of 10/12 ms, was successful in 52 patients which is equivalent to a success rate of 96%. In a subgroup of 26 patients implanted with bipolar ventricular leads (10 chronic, 16 acute), data were collected in unipolar (UP) and bipolar (BP) pace/sense configurations. Also, ER signals were recorded with two different band‐pass filters: a wider band (WB) of 6–250 Hz and a conventional narrow band (NB) of 20–100Hz. WB sensing from UP lead configuration yielded statistically significant larger signal to artifact ratios (SAR) than the other settings (P < 0.01). A dedicated unipolar ER sensing configuration using a small output capacitor and a wider band‐pass filter enables adequate automatic capture verification, without any restrictions on pacing lead models or pacing/sensing configurations.