{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015267175572519083, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001272264631043257, 'mean_word_length': 4.962121212121212, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Organization and the Artist

The stereotypes of the creative artist and the organization man are so different that many would argue that there will always be colossal conflict and a communication chasm between the two. The solitary artist, who resists any kind of fetters on his imagination, is not a natural partner for the bureaucrat, who invents and implements restraining rules and regulations. Yet artists are dependent on organizations for the display and sale of their creations. The composer needs the orchestra, the painter the museum, and the actor the theatre. Indeed, the artist has perhaps been even more dependent than the rest of us on large organizations for survival throughout history, as a perusal ofthe patterns of patronage identified by Arnold Hauser proves. 1