{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012779552715654952, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.598214285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Basic Designs for Estimation of Genetic Parameters

Students often ask why we use h rather than h to refer to heritability. You can blame Sewall Wright for this, as he used h to denote the correlation between breeding and phenotypic values within an individual. Recalling that the square of the correlation is the total fraction of variation accounted by a variable leads to the universal use of h. Indeed, whenever we speak of heritability, we always refer to h and never to h. To see that h is indeed the correlation between breeding and phenotypic values within an individual, note from the definition of a correlation that