{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015097690941385435, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.331460674157303, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Modelling weld bead geometry using neural networks for GTAW of austenitic stainless steel

Abstract The authors analyse the importance of different weld control parameters on the weld pool geometry of gas tungsten arc welding using an online feature selection technique that suggests weld voltage and vertex–angle pair as more important than the weld voltage and torch speed pair. Using the selected features multi layer perception and radial basis function networks are developed for prediction of bead width, penetration depth, and bead area. With cross-validation the authors have extensively studied the performance of composite models (one model for all outputs) and individual models (one model for each output). The individual models are found to work better than composite models. Usually, radial basis function networks are found to work better than the multi layer perception networks. To assess the influence of weld control parameters the authors have studied the performance of both networks using different combination of inputs. Overall, the performance of the proposed models is found to be quite satisfactory.