{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03394495412844037, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.163841807909605, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Protest and survive

child into the world was seen as an unparalleled act of creation, and by analogy, the very process of weaving was seen as a metaphor for creation. And here the Matrixial model begins to take form within the exhibition narrative. For rather than dwelling on existing psycho-analytic models of the relation between symbol formation (ie substitution) and creativity which are based on lack, absence, and separation or complete assimilation, the emphasis instead is on acceptance of the individual nature of the Other, and '...an ethics of exchange, acceptance and connection.' This model suggests a prenatal relation of reciprocal contact, 'the most intimate and the most unknown meeting in a profound alliance of difference' in the borderline zone of the psycho-corporeal. Rather than 'reading' motifs as a symbols, or the carpets and cloths simply as artefacts or objects, they become 'events in weaving', narratives of (inter)subjectivity and creativity: 'at the borderline/ of consciousness, codifying a prelinguistic knowledge and ethics drawn from female experience.