{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015731515469323543, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002097535395909806, 'mean_word_length': 4.834862385321101, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Capitalism and Health

arranged by the various rubrics Frobenius used, most dealing with material culture and economic production while a few on social structure are also found. Data on art and religion are interwoven with discussions of objects. References are provided to the iconographic material which makes up the remaining two-thirds of the volume. The scheme provides for easy reference, helping the reader to finding his bearings in the jungle of the notes of Frobenius. This is a genuine text edition. Critical commentary about the remarks of Frobenius was abandoned because this would lead to a massive work, retracing much of the ethnography for this wide area. The data are precious to archaeologists, art historians, anthropologists and historians in the way any edition of original sources is. The book reminds one of a site report by an archaeologist. But here the report deals with objects and people observed and the 1907 book provides a framework (as well as more drawings) for putting these notes in perspective. Apart from a few notes on precolonial history, always precious when recorded at such an early date, the data strike me as a particularly rich for an historian of economic production, thanks to the richness of detail offered here. Moreover, these data allow for the confident exploitation of other large museum collections of the period and area. Data on ritual and the use of charms, equally rich, are almost unique in their concrete character and should appeal to students of changing mentalites. Needless to say, museum curators and students of the arts and architecture will find this a treasure trove. The Frobenius Institute and Dr Klein are to be commended for the considerable effort they have expended to make these data available to scholars. One can only wish that their example be followed elsewhere and that more raw notebooks of ethnographers be made accessible.