{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01779935275080906, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.585106382978723, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Metabolic effects of a low‐pressure tourniquet system compared with a high‐pressure tourniquet system in arthroscopic anterior crucial ligament reconstruction

Background: Bloodless field is an integral part of orthopedic surgery. Use of tourniquet is associated with a risk of skeletal muscle ischemia and reperfusion injury. The purpose of this prospective, open‐randomized study was to determine if the use of a tourniquet system using low pressure, with a wide, curved cuff connected to a microprocessor pump is safer than a standard tourniquet system with a narrow, straight cuff using higher inflation pressures.