{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01311680199875078, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.565573770491803, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reconstruction of doses from radionuclide inhalation for nuclear power plant workers using air concentration measurements and associated uncertainties.

This paper presents a case study to illustrate the influence of parameter uncertainties on calculating an internal radiation dose of one actual nuclear plant worker, alias Mr. X, as well as the utility of air sampling for internal dose reconstruction. Input probability distributions for air concentrations of radionuclides were derived from empirical air measurements taken by fixed area air samplers. The total internal dose was calculated by multiplying radionuclide intake by dose conversion factors in Monte-Carlo simulations. There is significant variability in dose conversion factors and uncertainty in the estimated concentrations of radionuclides in the air to which Mr. X was exposed. The high variability and uncertainty of the model parameters contributed to large ranges of predicted internal doses for Mr. X. Two-dimensional Monte-Carlo simulations were conducted to separate contributions of the uncertainty and variability. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine which of the input parameters contributed most to uncertainty in internal dose estimates. Our analysis suggests that the uncertainty resulting from use of general air surveys contributes more to the internal dose ranges than the variability from DCFs and other population-derived parameters. Reduction of the uncertainty in reconstructed internal dose can be achieved by using personal air sampling and/or individual bioassays and regular whole-body counting.