{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05053191489361702, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0549645390070922, 'mean_word_length': 4.589108910891089, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Loblolly pine regeneration and competing vegetation 5 years after implementing uneven-aged silviculture

The effects of three basal areas (9.2, 13.8, and 18.4 m2/ha), maximum diameters (30.5, 40.6, and 50.8 cm), and site indices (≤24.6, 24.7–27.4, and ≥27.5 m at 50 years) on establishment and development of loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.) regeneration and competing vegetation were determined on 81 permanent, 0.20-ha plots in south Arkansas and north Louisiana. Plots were harvested to the designated basal areas, maximum diameters, and a q-factor of 1.2 using the single-tree selection method during 1983 (a bumper seed year) and 1985 (a seed year failure); this necessitated including the year of harvest as a fourth variable. Pine regeneration and competing vegetation were evaluated 4 or 5 years after treatment. Models were developed to predict the number and percent stocking of pine seedlings and saplings and the percent coverage of competing vegetation. Fit indices ranged from 0.21 to 0.52 for pine regeneration and from 0.15 to 0.73 for coverage of competing vegetation. Pine regeneration was generally greatest f...