{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013227513227513227, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.340782122905028, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On Issue of the Concept Other Control Measures

The article examines approaches to defining the concept other control measures carried out by tax authorities. The opportunities of making such arrangements are envisaged in the RF Tax Code. The tax authorities powers in carrying out other control measures in the Code are not specified together with the fact that not specified are the content and consequences of these measures, except the responsibility for non-performance of the requirements. In practice, the tax authorities carry out other control measures in the process of pre-testing analysis in selecting taxpayers for the on-site tax audit. Carrying out other control measures increases the possibilities of monitoring legal compliance in taxes, levies and insurance contributions of the tax authorities but creates certain inconveniences and additional costs, problems with contractors for taxpayers. The contractors are requested to present the documents about the taxpayer, while the requirements do not always specify the transactions to be controlled, instead they indicate the number of the contract or the tax period.