{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.038944723618090454, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01507537688442211, 'mean_word_length': 4.770531400966184, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and definition of tumor volumes in radiation treatment planning in non-small cell lung cancer.

7574 Background: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) /computed tomography (CT) has a potential improvement for staging and radiation treatment (RT) planning of various tumor sites. But from a clinical standpoint, the open questions are essentially the following: to what extent does PET/CT change the target volume? Can PET/CT reduce inter-observer variability in target volume delineation? We analyzed the use of FDG-PET/ CT images for staging and evaluated the impact of FDG- PET/CT on the radiotherapy volume delineation compared with CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) candidates for radiotherapy. Intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes was also observed.


METHODS
Twenty-three patients with stage I-III NSCLC were enrolled in this pilot study and were treated with fractionated RT based therapy with or without chemotherapy. FDG-PET/CT scans were acquired within 2 weeks prior to RT. PET and CT data sets were sent to the treatment planning system Pinnacle through compact disc. The CT and PET images were subsequently fused by means of a dedicated radiation treatment planning system. Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) was contoured by four radiation oncologists respectively on CT (CT-GTV) and PET/CT images (PET/CT-GTV). The resulting volumes were analyzed and compared.


RESULTS
For the first phase, two radiation oncologists outlined together the contours achieving a final consensus. Based on PET/CT, changes in TNM categories occurred in 8/23 cases (35%). Radiation targeting with fused FDG-PET and CT images resulted in alterations in radiation therapy planning in 12/20 patients (60%) by comparison with CT targeting. The most prominent changes in GTV have been observed in cases with atelectasis. For the second phase was four intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes. The mean ratio of largest to smallest CT-based GTV was 2.31 (range 1.01-5.96). The addition of the PET data reduced the mean ratio to 1.46 (range 1.12-2.27).


CONCLUSIONS
PET/CT fusion images could have a potential impact on both tumor staging and treatment planning. Implementing matched PET/CT reduced observer variation in delineating tumor volumes significantly with respect to CT only. [Table: see text].