{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05157232704402516, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0389937106918239, 'mean_word_length': 4.9588014981273405, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Accuracy of pulse oximetry to estimate HbO2 fraction of total Hb during exercise.

The accuracy of two pulse oximeters (Ohmeda 3700 and Biox IIa) was evaluated during cycle ergometer incremental exercise in 10 healthy subjects. The exercise protocol began at 30 W with the power output being increased 15 W.min-1 until volitional fatigue. Ear and finger probe pulse oximetry measurements of available hemoglobin (%Spo2) were compared with arterial oxyhemoglobin fraction of total hemoglobin (%HbO2) measured directly from arterial blood samples using a CO-oximeter. To provide a wide range of %HbO2 values, four subjects exercised under hypoxic conditions [inspired partial pressure of O2 (PIo2) = 107 Torr], while the remaining six subjects exercised under normoxic conditions (PIo2 = 150 Torr). Because carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO) or methemoglobin (MetHb) is not measured by pulse oximeters, %HbO2 was corrected for HbCO and MetHb and expressed as percent arterial O2 saturation of available Hb (%Sao2). Small and insignificant differences (P greater than 0.05) existed between SpO2 (all 3 instruments) and %SaO2 at the lowest work rate and the highest power output achieved. Regression analyses of %SpO2 vs. %SaO2 produced correlation coefficients of r = 0.82 [standard error of the estimate [(SEE) = 1.79], r = 0.89 (SEE = 1.48), and r = 0.93 (SEE = 1.14) for the Biox IIa, Ohmeda 3700 (ear), and the Ohmeda 3700 (finger) pulse oximeters, respectively. We conclude that pulse oximetry, within the above limits of accuracy, is useful in estimating %SaO2 during exercise in healthy subjects.