{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03982576228998133, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017423771001866834, 'mean_word_length': 4.722419928825623, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of aberration and flare on lithographic performance of SFET

The effects of aberration and flare on the lithographic performance of the EUV small-field exposure tool (SFET) were evaluated. Simulation results indicated that the effect of aberration on the image contrast of line-and-space (L&S) patterns should be small. In exposure experiments, 26-45-nm L&S patterns were successfully fabricated under annular illumination (σ=0.3/0.7). A key factor limiting resolution should be resist performance. Simulation results also indicated that the astigmatic aberration could produce a focal shift of about 60 nm between horizontal and vertical L&S patterns. The experimentally obtained focus shift agreed well with the simulation results. Dense 32-45-nm contact-hole (C/H) patterns were also successfully fabricated under annular illumination (σ=0.3/0.5). Due to astigmatic aberration, the C/H patterns were deformed at defocused positions, but they were almost circular at the best focus position. The flare of the projection optics measured by the Kirk method was 11% over a flare range of 1-100 μm. The effects of the 11% flare were evaluated using dark- and bright-field 32-nm L&S patterns. It was found that the top loss and line-width roughness (LWR) of the resist were larger for bright-field than for dark-field patterns. To reduce the impact of flare, we need EUV resists that are more robust with regard to flare. A comparison of the measured point spread function (PSF) of the flare and the calculated PSF revealed good agreement for long-range flare but some difference for short-range flare.