{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02354480052321779, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.6521739130434785, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Risk and Vulnerability Assessment Using Cybernomic Computational Models: Tailored for Industrial Control Systems

In cybersecurity, there are many influencing economic factors to weigh. This paper considers the defender-practitioner stakeholder points-of-view that involve cost combined with development and deployment considerations. Some examples include the cost of countermeasures, training and maintenance as well as the lost opportunity cost and actual damages associated with a compromise. The return on investment (ROI) from countermeasures comes from saved impact costs (i.e., losses from violating availability, integrity, confidentiality or privacy requirements). A measured approach that informs cybersecurity practice is pursued toward maximizing ROI. To this end for example, ranking threats based on their potential impact focuses security mitigation and control investments on the highest value assets, which represent the greatest potential losses. The traditional approach uses risk exposure (calculated by multiplying risk probability by impact). To address this issue in terms of security economics, we introduce the notion of Cybernomics. Cybernomics considers the cost/benefits to the attacker/defender to estimate risk exposure. As the first step, we discuss the likelihood that a threat will emerge and whether it can be thwarted and if not what will be the cost (losses both tangible and intangible). This impact assessment can provide key information for ranking cybersecurity threats and managing risk.