{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018582243633860976, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.890995260663507, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Transferring the Territorial Cohesion Ideal of Integrated Polycentric Development in the Light of Peripheralisation – Insights from Romania

In this article I explore the transfer of the territorial cohesion ideal of integrated polycentric development from the European Union’s (EU) institutional core towards the peripheral places of a Romanian region. The literature review explores the emergence of polycentric development as an attempt of reconciling divergent EU-wide spatial visions of growth and cohesion. I also explore the institutional particularities that shape the transfer of territorial cohesion in South-Eastern EU Member States. Drawing on Mark Bevir’s and Rod Rhodes’ “Decentered Governance Approach”, I design a conceptual framework to analyse this transfer through an actor-centered bottom-up perspective. My empirical material draws on qualitative research (policy document analysis and semi-structured expert interviews) conducted at the local, regional, and national levels. My analysis highlights the decision-making practices that underpin the making and implementing of urban and regional development policies. It examines the key substantive and governance narratives that underlie integrated polycentric development. I conclude the paper by highlighting the dominance of the concentrated growth development paradigm and make the case for territorial development concepts that are more sensitive to issues of peripheralisation.