{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020260492040520984, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009406657018813314, 'mean_word_length': 5.5545023696682465, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Unconventional Gas Geochemistry—An Emerging Concept after 20 Years of Shale Gas Development?

Geochemical studies of gases from low-permeability reservoirs have raised new questions regarding the chemical and stable isotope systematics of gas hydrocarbons. For instance, the possibility of thermodynamic equilibrium is recurrently in discussion. However, it is not clear whether there is anything “unconventional” in the way these systems continue to be studied. Using molecular and stable carbon isotope data from North American unconventional and conventional reservoirs, this research has applied two parameters that well describe key transformation stages during gas generation. The δ13C of ethane and the C2/C3 ratio increase from baseline values (<1%Ro, prominent kerogen cracking) until a first inflexion at 1.5%Ro. The same inflexion leads to 13C depletion of ethane and a rapidly increasing C2/C3 ratio as hydrocarbon cracking becomes prominent. The transition between these two stages is proposed to be a crossover from equilibrium to non-equilibrium conditions. There is no evidence for these characteristics to be limited to low-permeability reservoirs. Unconventional gas geochemistry should represent an approach that acknowledges that chemical and isotope distributions are not ruled by only one mechanism but several and at specific intervals of the thermal history.