{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02546916890080429, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005361930294906166, 'mean_word_length': 5.118852459016393, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Zeeman splitting in the diffuse interstellar medium–The Milky Way and beyond

Abstract We begin with a brief review of Zeeman-splitting fundamentals and the importance of circular polarization, i.e. Stokes V. We then turn to modern results in several areas, emphasizing the diffuse interstellar medium in the Galaxy. The median field in the Cold Neutral Medium is determined from HI absorption lines and is about 6 μG; the magnetic and turbulent pressures are comparable. Using HI emission lines the field has been mapped in several areas: the field reverses across the Orion Molecular Cloud; the 3-d field structure has been determined in the ρ Oph region; and in regions having shock-like morphology the field is generally stronger, strong enough to limit further compression. We briefly present new field measurements for: photo-dissociation regions at the edges of HII regions, determined from carbon recombination lines; Ultra Luminous Infrared Galaxies, from OH megamasers; and the 3C 286 damped Lyman-α absorption system, determined from the 21-cm line in absorption. We show the sidelobe response of the Green Bank Telescope, which is surprisingly severe and makes the telescope less than optimum for Zeeman-splitting measurements of HI emission lines. Finally, we compare two techniques for determining field strengths, i.e. Zeeman splitting and the Chandrasekhar-Fermi method, and show why the latter usually gives higher field strengths – and sometimes unrealistically high fields.