{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04340836012861737, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03054662379421222, 'mean_word_length': 4.513274336283186, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Diagnostic Imaging in Disasters: A Bibliometric Analysis

OARM and CARM cases. Results: A total of operated cases under both C ARM and O ARM were 327 (Cervical-211, Dorsal-61, Lumbar-55). Mean time O-ARM required was x hours (range 2 hours 45 minutes to 12 hours). Mean time required for C-ARM was x hours (range 1 hour 10 minutes to 9 hours). Conclusion: From the comparative study, both techniques resulted in accurate screw placement; images acquisition with the O ARM was consistently faster than with the C ARM. Additionally, radiation exposure to health care professionals (including nurses) was less with the O ARM.