{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03640256959314775, 'fraction_numerical': 0.032119914346895075, 'mean_word_length': 5.0, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Anomia in Rural Women: A Longitudinal Comparison of Two Measures

3-yr. longitudinal interview data for 58 rural women support the greater reliability and stability of the nine-item Robinson and Shaver (1973) instrument than the original Srole (1956) Anomia instrument. Three-year test-retest correlations were .56 and .45, respectively. These suggest adequate stability for research purposes. Both measures indicated a low degree of alienation for these rural women.