{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03290401428974335, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010905330450314938, 'mean_word_length': 5.447272727272727, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
SAPHO—a diagnosis to consider in patients with refractory costochondritis

Background: SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) is a rare, heterogeneous, self‑ limited disease of unknown etiology. It involves progressive bone and joint damage, and skin and bone lesions may occur at different times in the course of the disease. Skin lesions are characterized by neutrophil dermatosis. Its man‑ agement is empirical and mainly symptomatic, and nonsteroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs are the first‑line treatment. Case presentation: Forty‑seven‑year‑old female presented with a 7‑year history of costochondral pain. It had pro‑ gressive onset, chronical course, with no other associated symptoms, and no other joint involvement. She was treated with intermittent NSAID (nonsteroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs), which provided only partial pain relief; there was bilateral tender swelling of the sternoclavicular region, the skin over the sternoclavicular area was slightly erythe‑ matous, but there were no other skin lesions, and based on imaging findings, a diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome was established. The patient received an infusion of zoledronic acid with subsequent complete resolution of her chest wall symptoms, and completely improved after 3 days. Conclusions: This case is considered atypical presentation of SAPHO syndrome, without skin changes, long‑term persistence of refractory symptoms, and the diagnosis was established by imaging, with complete resolution after zoledronic acid infusion. SAPHO is a differential diagnosis in patients with chronic costochondritis. Therapeutic failure to NSAID is a key to its diagnostic suspicion. Also, early diagnostic suspicion is associated with better outcomes.


Background
SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) is a rare self-limited disease of unknown etiology; it can last for 4 to 5 years on average. Its presentation is heterogeneous and overlaps with other conditions, most often occurs in young and middle-aged persons, and also involves progressive bone and joint damage [1][2][3]. Skin and bone lesions may be present at different times. Skin manifestations include signs of neutrophilic dermatoses such as palmoplantar pustulosis (most common), psoriasis vulgaris, severe acne, and hidradenitis suppurativa [1]. Regarding bone involvement, most commonly affected sites are sternoclavicular junction, followed by spine and sacroiliac joints [2]. Diagnosis is established on the basis of at least one of the following criteria: (1) multifocal osteitis with or without skin symptoms; (2) sterile acute/chronic joint inflammation with either pustules or psoriasis of palms/soles, or acne, or hidradenitis suppurativa; (3) and/or sterile osteitis and any of the above skin manifestations [4]. Also, lab tests are not useful for diagnosis [1].
There is limited evidence for management which is empirical and mainly symptomatic. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) are the first-line treatment; alternative options include intra-articular or systemic corticosteroids, doxycycline, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine, ciclosporin, and leflunomide [1,3]. Bisphosphonates have been reported effective for transient pain relief and partial or complete remission over time [5]. And, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents and anakinra have been reported effective in case series or reports of refractory SAPHO [6]. SAPHO syndrome is rare by itself. However, we present a case whose clinical characteristics and management make it different from what has been described to date, including atypical manifestations, without skin changes, and long-term persistence of refractory symptoms, in whom the diagnosis was reached after suggestive imaging findings, achieving complete resolution after zoledronic acid infusion.

Case description
We report the case of a 47-year-old female, who presented to the rheumatology clinic with a 7-year history of costochondral pain. It had progressive onset, chronical course, with no other associated symptoms, and no other joint involvement. She had been treated for costochondritis or Tietze syndrome with intermittent NSAID (diclofenac, 50 to 150 mg daily), which provided only partial pain relief. She had no other significant past medical history. On exam, there was bilateral tender swelling of the sternoclavicular region ( Fig. 1). Examination of peripheral joints was unremarkable. The skin over the sternoclavicular area was slightly erythematous, but there were no other skin lesions. Serum CRP (C-reactive protein) was normal, and the patient tested negative for RF (rheumatoid factor) and HLAB27 (human leukocyte antigen B27). 99m Tc (technetium-99m) bone scintigraphy showed the characteristic bullhead sign of tracer uptake in the sternoclavicular region (Fig. 2). A computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax demonstrated osteolysis and hyperostosis at the sternoclavicular junction (Fig. 3). Based on these findings, a diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome was established. The patient received an infusion of zoledronic acid with subsequent complete resolution of her chest wall symptoms and completely improved after 3 days.

Discussion
Some characteristics of this case are striking and deserve to be analyzed in the light of current knowledge; one of the characteristics that make it unique is the therapeutic response to zoledronic acid; also, it presented multifocal without skin changes and persistence of refractory symptoms longer than 5 years, and imaging was required to establish the diagnosis. On the other hand, some of its usual characteristics included that it was a woman older than 40 years, with osteitis in the anterior thoracic wall and without initial response to NSAID. All of the above shows us that we cannot always expect typical findings in this entity and that we must have a high index of clinical suspicion.
The term SAPHO was introduced by Chamot et al. in the late 1980s to describe a syndrome characterized by the combination of chronic inflammatory osteoarticular lesions and neutrophilic skin eruptions [7,8], but similar associations had been reported in the literature going back to the 1960s [9]. Synovitis and osteitis in SAPHO predominantly affect the anterior chest wall (68-83%), spine (19-66%), and sacroiliac joints (13-40%) [10]. The symphysis pubis, long bones, and temporomandibular joints are less frequently involved. Peripheral arthritis may occur in up to one third of patients, typically affecting the knees or wrists [10]. Joint and bone inflammation in SAPHO manifest clinically as pain, swelling, and stiffness. The osteitis in SAPHO is sterile and may involve the cortex and the medulla, often adjacent to involved joints. Bone inflammation may result in the development of lytic lesions as well as formation of new bone causing bony prominence (hyperostosis) and joint ankylosis. Palmoplantar pustulosis (46-60%) and severe acne (5-39%) are the most common skin manifestations in SAPHO [10]. Psoriasis vulgaris, hidradenitis suppurativa, pyoderma gangrenosum, and sweet syndrome are less frequently found. The skin disease in SAPHO may develop before, concomitantly with or after the osteoarticular disease features in roughly equal proportions [11]. Importantly, patients with SAPHO do not always present with all of the features defining the syndrome. In two large case series, 19/120 (15.5%) and 14/71 (19.7%) SAPHO patients had no skin lesions at all [11,12].
Incomplete presentations of the SAPHO syndrome, in particular when typical skin findings are absent, may be confused with other entities such as costochondritis resulting in delayed or missed diagnosis. Costochondritis is characterized by anterior chest wall pain without local swelling that is reproduced by palpation of the involved costosternal joints. In 90% of patients, more than one joint is affected, typically at the level of the second through fifth rib. Involvement of the second or third costochondral junction with local swelling is called Tietze syndrome. Costochondritis may result from chest wall trauma, chronic cough, or sports-related overuse injury, but most commonly is idiopathic. Women older than 40 are frequently affected. The majority of costochondritis cases will resolve over the course of 1 year. Long-term persistence of symptoms (7 years in our patient) should be considered a red flag suggesting an alternative diagnosis [13]. Sternoclavicular swelling is also atypical for simple costochondritis.
Imaging studies are important in making a diagnosis of SAPHO. Radiographs are typically normal early on but can show osteolytic lesions with or without sclerotic margins, joint erosions, or ankylosis at later stages. Whole-body 99m Tc scintigraphy is particularly useful. The bullhead sign is a characteristic pattern of high tracer uptake in the sternocostoclavicular region, with the manubrium sterni representing the skull and the sternoclavicular joints and adjacent clavicles forming the horns [14]. This configuration is virtually pathognomonic for SAPHO. While sensitivity is not 100%, a bullhead may be present in SAPHO patients who do not have anterior chest wall symptoms, and whole-body bone scintigraphy may reveal clinically silent lesions elsewhere. CT scanning may demonstrate bone erosions, joint space narrowing, ligament ossifications, subchondral sclerosis, and periosteal new bone formation at affected sites.
NSAID are typically used as first-line drugs in SAPHO patients but do not sufficiently control pain in half of the patients. Other treatment options include colchicine, corticosteroids, DMARD such as methotrexate and sulfasalazine, and bisphosphonates [5]. Randomized controlled drug trials have not been performed in SAPHO. However, efficacy of bisphosphonate therapy has been documented by multiple case reports. Most of these patients were treated with pamidronate, but other bisphosphonates including zoledronic acid, as in our patient, may work equally well [5]. TNF (tumor necrosis factor) inhibitors have been used in refractory cases but may exacerbate cutaneous manifestations [6].

Conclusion
SAPHO is an important differential diagnosis in patients with chronic costochondritis. Persistence of symptoms and poor response to treatment with NSAID should raise suspicion for this diagnosis even in the absence of the typical skin features. Bisphosphonates are an alternative to be considered in refractory cases. Also, considering a SAPHO diagnosis may permit treating the patient more effectively, as documented in this case report.