{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02127659574468085, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005984042553191489, 'mean_word_length': 4.788461538461538, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
In situ Acid Resistance of in vivo Formed White Spot Lesions

Thin sections of natural enamel lesions, so–called white spots (WS), and areas of sound enamel (SEn) adjacent to the WS were exposed to an intraoral environment for 2 weeks. Thin sections of WS samples, clamped in a PMMA holder, were microradiographed before and after exposure to intraoral conditions. Acid resistance was evaluated by lesion depth and mineral changes during the cariogenic challenge. The results show that there were statistically significant differences in lesion depth, mineral loss and mineral volume percent at the surface before and after the intraoral cariogenic challenge at least at p<0.05, except for a change in mineral volume percent at the surface of WS samples. This exception indicates that no mineral change occurred in the surface layer of WS. The fact of 2.8 and 1.8 times higher ratios of SEn over WS of mean changes in lesion depth and mineral loss data, respectively, seems to indicate a quantitative difference in acid resistance level of WS lesions compared with the areas of SEn. Regarding the site of mineral changes, a distinctive feature of WS samples is that mineral loss occurs at the bottom of lesions. In contrast, areas of SEn produce a typical subsurface type of lesions. From this in situ study, it can be concluded that the surface of WS samples was apparently much more acid–resistant (at least approximately 2 times) than the areas of SEn that received a similar intraoral acid challenge.