{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030798845043310877, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004812319538017324, 'mean_word_length': 5.190476190476191, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Assessment of commercial test kits for identification of spring viraemia of carp virus.

Two test kits for the identification of spring viraemia of carp virus (SVCV), one an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a rabbit polyclonal antiserum, and the other an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) using a mouse monoclonal antibody, were assessed for specificity using a range of virus isolates. The test viruses were selected from 4 recently described genogroups of piscine rhabdoviruses: Genogroup I (SVCV), Genogroup II (grass carp rhabdovirus), Genogroup III (pike fry rhabdovirus) and Genogroup IV ('tench rhabdovirus'). The test viruses included SVCV isolates from all 4 subgroups of Genogroup I. The ELISA was non-specific for these viruses and did not distinguish between SVCV and isolates from the other 3 Genogroups. However, the IFAT was too specific and detected SVCV isolates from only 1 of the 4 SVCV subgroups. Reliance on these test kits alone could result in misidentification of this OIE notifiable disease.