{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016504126031507877, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003000750187546887, 'mean_word_length': 5.233644859813084, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Literature review: a critical update

Sexual relationships, are related to couple relationships as well as quality of the communication in that relationship. If the individual is not in a relationship the treatment paradigms can be applied although the outcome may well be difficult to assess. Sexual functioning may be one aspect of the sexual relationship and yet the satisfaction with it may lead to a number of problems especially if the vicious cycle in the relationship is set up. Within the couple/sexual relationship satisfaction with the relationship, love, stability and commitment are important components. It has been shown that the stability within the relationship is related to sexual satisfaction (Sprecher, 2002). Interestingly, sexual satisfaction had stronger links with relationship quality for men than for women. The relationships between mood and sexual satisfaction and other psychosocial factors is a relatively under researched area. The sexual dysfunction per se will also affect quality of life and other co-morbid factors. In this review some of the themes followed include the role of mood, culture, age and quality of couple relationships. Not only physiological and psychological causes of sexual dysfunction will lead to different stresses but varying stressors may influence one more than the other.