{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028930817610062894, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005660377358490566, 'mean_word_length': 5.364, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Design and control of a micro ball-balancing robot (MBBR) with orthogonal midlatitude omniwheel placement

Ball-balancing robots (BBRs) are endowed with rich dynamics. When properly designed and stabilized via feedback to eliminate jitter, and intuitively coordinated with a well-designed smartphone interface, BBRs exhibit a uniquely fluid and organic motion. Unlike mobile inverted pendulums (MIPs, akin to unmanned Segways), BBRs stabilize both fore/aft and left/right motions with feedback, and bank when turning. Previous research on BBRs focused on vehicles from 50cm to 2m in height; the present work is the first to build significantly smaller BBRs, with heights under 25cm. We consider the unique issues arising when miniaturizing a BBR to such a scale, which are characterized by faster time scales and reduced weight (and, thus, reduced normal force and stiction between the omniwheels and the ball). Two key patent-pending aspects of our design are (a) moving the omniwheels to contact the ball down to around 20 to 30 deg N latitude, which increases the normal force between the omniwheels and the ball, and (b) orienting the omniwheels into mutually-orthogonal planes, which improves efficiency. Design iterations were facilitated by rapid prototyping and leveraged low-cost manufacturing principles and inexpensive components. Classical successive loop closure control strategies are implemented, which prove to be remarkably effective when the BBR isn't spinning quickly, and thus the left/right and fore/aft stabilization problems decompose into two decoupled MIP problems.