{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.048589341692789965, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03879310344827586, 'mean_word_length': 5.007058823529412, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Neurophysiologic Actions and Neurological Consequences of Veratridine on the Rat Sciatic Nerve

Background: The quest for a drug that would provide analgesia with minimal motor deficiency, through the selective inhibition of impulses in small‐diameter fibers, was brightened by a previous report of veratridine's C‐fiber‐selective actions on the isolated rabbit vagus nerve. The goal of the present research was to demonstrate the same actions on rat sciatic nerve in vitro and to observe the functionally differential blockade in the rat in vivo. Methods: Sciatic nerves were removed from rats, mounted in a recording chamber, wherein a 1‐cm length of the ensheathed nerve was superfused with the plant alkaloid veratridine (2 micro Meter) in bicarbonate‐buffered Liley's solution, and the compound action potential (CAP) was stimulated supramaximally to give A‐ and C‐fiber elevations. Onset, steady‐state, and recovery from veratridine effects were assayed for a range of stimulus frequencies. Open‐field behavior and quantitative neurological assessments of proprioception, motor function, and nociception were tested in 15 trained rats after injection near the sciatic nerve of 0.1 ml veratridine at 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0 mM each plus epinephrine (1:200,000). Results: Veratridine inhibited the C‐fiber component of the CAP in a frequency‐dependent manner. At 0.1 Hz the CAP was 65% of the control amplitude, 50% at 0.5 Hz, and 40% at 5 Hz. A‐fiber elevations were unattenuated at stimulus frequencies as high as 50 Hz. Steady‐state inhibition was reached 5 min after drug administration, and recovery from the effects was 30% complete by 15 min of drug washout. Proprioception, measured as a “hopping” or “placing” reaction, was inhibited dose dependently by maximum degree and for durations of, respectively, 0.5 mM, 61%, 180 min; 0.7 mM, 100%, 360 min; and 1 mM, 100%, 420 min. Extensor postural thrust, as a measure of motor function, was inhibited by and for 0.5 mM, 77%, 240 min; 0.7 mM, 99%, 390 min; and 1 mM, 100%, 420 min. Analgesia, as a prolonged withdrawal latency to a noxious thermal stimulus, had the following profile: 0.5 mM, 10%, 30 min; 0.7 mM, 52%, 150 min; and 1 mM, 66%, 150 min. Conclusions: Despite the fact that veratridine gave a C‐fiber preferential blockade in the isolated sciatic nerve, heightened analgesia over motor block was not achieved in vivo. Indeed, just the opposite occurred. If preferential C‐fiber blockade also occurs in vivo, then its traditionally expected correlation with analgesia must be re‐examined.