{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04041720990873533, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04302477183833116, 'mean_word_length': 4.647058823529412, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On the Pless-construction and ML decoding of the (48, 24, 12) quadratic residue code

We present a method for maximum likelihood decoding of the (48,24,12) quadratic residue code. This method is based on projecting the code onto a subcode with an acyclic Tanner graph, and representing the set of coset leaders by a trellis diagram. This results in a two level coset decoding which can be considered a systematic generalization of the Wagner rule. We show that unlike the (24,12,8) Golay code, the (48,24,12) code does not have a Pless-construction which has been an open question in the literature. It is determined that the highest minimum distance of a (48,24) binary code having a Pless (1986) construction is 10, and up to equivalence there are three such codes.