{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009102730819245773, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005201560468140442, 'mean_word_length': 5.260162601626016, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Teaching anatomy; a clinicians view.

The General Plan Anatomy as defined by the Netherlands Association of Anatomists and published in the European Journal of Morphology in 1999 is a good starting point for discussion between anatomists and clinicians to define what is indispensable anatomical knowledge for a competent physician. The plan to teach anatomy within a clinical context and to relate form and structure on function makes learning anatomy more attractive and will have a greater appeal for the student. The list of discipline-related objectives is too extensive for a general practitioner whereas parts of this list are too limited for related medical specialists. Teaching anatomy and teaching clinical sciences and expertise must become more integrated.