{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013086150490730643, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013086150490730643, 'mean_word_length': 5.244897959183674, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Analysis of Electronic Evidence as an Evidence Tools in Criminal Case Post Decision of Constitutional Court Number: 20/PUU-XVI/ 2016

The position of electronic evidence after the enactment of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, in cases of criminal acts of Information and Electronic Transactions it is as separate evidence, namely electronic evidence which is an extension of the types of valid evidence stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code while in cases outside criminal acts of Information and Electronic Transactions, electronic evidence is only located as evidence. The strength of evidence from electronic evidence obtained is not in the context of law enforcement and not at the request of law enforcement officials after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 20/PUU-XIV/2016 is not having the power of proof both as evidence and evidence except electronic evidence that is public.