Will the Liberals or the Conservatives Start a Civil Unrest?

“…mainstream right is a bit different. It’s not as well organized, for a start. The vast majority of right-of-center Americans aren’t actually very interested in politics, because they’re focused on work and family. When right-wingers do get annoyed about a political issue they’re less likely to do anything about it, for the same reason – they’re busy getting on with their lives. On the other hand, if they do get pushed hard enough that they decide to take action, they’re a lot more capable of creating some serious unrest. A lot of that is down to the simple fact that the right has more guns than the left, and tend to know how to use them.”

Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling, text and outdoor

Editor’s Note: This article is written by Giurgi C. and does not necessarily reflect this website’s options and beliefs, but it portrays some scenarios that are likely to happen.

Prepping is a safeguard against a whole range of possible scenarios, and everyone has their own opinions about what’s most likely to happen and what would be the biggest threat. There’s one thing pretty much everyone can agree on, though, and that’s that widespread civil unrest is going to bring on a social collapse, at least in the affected areas and maybe right across the country.

Who’s likely to cause this civil unrest, though? Does anyone have the ability to throw large parts of the USA into chaos? We’ve all seen often enough how local issues can spark unrest in a neighborhood or even a small city, but could the same happen on the scale of a county, a state, the whole Midwest or Atlantic seaboard?

Yes it could, and the most likely way it’s going to happen is that some incident upsets politically active people – not just in the town where it happens, but across the state or the country – so much they decide enough is enough, and try to bring about a radical change. That’s happened hundreds of times throughout history, in all sorts of countries – and while the USA is unique in many ways, it’s not unique enough to be immune from the threat of mass civil unrest.

Experts don’t argue about whether unrest could happen in the USA. It could; that’s a done deal. What they do argue about is where it’s most likely to come from. Any part of the political spectrum can be pushed into rebellion but for that to happen to the majority who’re pretty much in the center, things really have to be bad. More usually, when unrest happens it comes from either the right or left. It doesn’t always come from people who could be labeled as extremists either – often it’s people who’re identifiable to one side of center, but not particularly hard line.

Left or Right: Who Wants to Fight?

Listen to anyone on the left and they’ll tell you that the biggest threat of civil unrest comes from heavily armed groups on the “far right” or “alt-right”. On the other hand, speak to anyone on the right and they will say that the real danger is the organized and violent flash mobs of Antifa and other “far-left” groups. Are they both correct, or is one – even both – wrong?

There’s no doubt that left and right both have extremes who’re more than willing to use violence. There aren’t a lot of them on either side though, so it’s unlikely they could directly cause widespread civil unrest. What they might be able to do is cause enough trouble to provoke a backlash from the mainstream on the other side, and that really could become civil unrest.

Thanks to the media it’s right-wing extremists who get the most attention, but in fact, their numbers are very small. There are neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups in the USA, but most of them are tiny and too disorganized to cause any serious trouble. There have been lone wolf terrorists on the American far right, with Timothy McVeigh being the most notorious. They’re sometimes capable of committing serious atrocities, but mass civil unrest is beyond them.

Left-wing extremists are more numerous, unfortunately. The largest extreme left group in the USA right now is Antifa – but, with an estimated 15,000 hardcore members, even Antifa isn’t big enough to create civil unrest at a national level. Law enforcement could put down an Antifa uprising inside a couple of days. The far left might not like that, but it’s still a fact.

Related: America’s Vulnerability When it Comes to Internal Crises: US Now vs. US Then

The mainstream menace?

But what about the mainstream left – the tens of millions of Americans who see themselves as on the left of the spectrum, but reject extremist positions like Marxism? Could they reduce the country to chaos? Yes, they could.

Mainstream leftists don’t have the enthusiasm for violence that groups like Antifa are notorious for, but they do have an endless appetite for getting involved in causes. Any perceived “injustice”, from border control to employment policies, is likely to attract a horde of protesting lefties. Usually, nothing much happens beyond legitimate political protest, but sometimes things can get out of control.

If there’s a large protest movement, and its members feel they’re not being taken seriously, tempers can rise. If the people who’re getting angry are well enough organized this is where civil unrest can break out – and the problem is that large parts of the left are very well organized. This end of the political spectrum is closely linked to labor unions and a large, interlocking network of pressure groups; they’re very good at spreading messages, exploiting social media and getting people mobilized.

Many on the left also don’t have a lot of respect for the society we live in. They would like to see it “reformed” into something that fits their ideas better, and this attitude makes it easy for them to justify breaking the law. That’s why left-wing protests are prone to violence and looting; if everything you see around you is a symbol of oppression and inequality, it’s tempting to lash out.


On the other hand, if the right does get pushed hard enough that they decide to take action, they’re a lot more capable of creating some serious unrest. A lot of that is down to the simple fact that the right has more guns than the left, and tend to know how to use them. Any large, heavily armed, combat-effective insurgency in the USA would pretty much have to come from the right; the left just doesn’t have many people with those sort of skills.

Related: Surviving Martial Law: What To Do If It Hits Your Town

Where’s the danger?

Both liberals and conservatives have the potential to create mass civil unrest if they decide they want to. That shouldn’t be a surprise; people are people, whatever they believe, and while some belief systems seem to encourage violence in their followers any of us can be pushed to rebellion by the right factors.

If conservatives rose up that would be more disruptive, and more dangerous to the government. Firstly, conservatives are more heavily armed; secondly, they have an inbuilt respect for law and order, so for them to start overthrowing society they have to be very angry.

Realistically, though, the political left is the main threat when it comes to civil unrest. They’re organized, they get upset easily and there are a lot of them. Most unrest in western countries is caused by leftist groups, and the USA Is just as vulnerable as anywhere else. Our citizens might be better armed to protect themselves, but mass action by the left could still tear society apart in a hurry. If that happens, all the systems we rely on in everyday life will soon fall apart across the whole area affected by the disorder – and, unless you’re prepared for that, you’re in for a pretty hard time.


You may also like:

Get prepared with Ready Network: readypackbigHAMRadio500

The Trojan Horse! Wake Up You Idiots in Washington!

Barry Obama and his demonrats say it is “not the American way to put a religious test on admitting refugees from Syria.”

Common sense tells us it is stupid to bring anyone from Syria or Iraq  (any place in the Middle East) while we are fighting terrorism!  Since the politicians, especially the democrats, have little if any common sense, I suggest they read the story of the Trojan Horse and then pass a law that we keep out these refugees. They have no commonality with the West!(Note: If we need more workers in the USA, I’ll take the Mexicans. In most cases we share a common religious heritage and they are hard working, for the most part, decent people!) 

Most ignore the fact that the Koran (Quoran) has 109 passages that tells the followers of Islam to “lay quietly, until the time is right to slay the infidel!”  Most people do not know that of these so called “refugees” 70% are men of military age.  The solution will follow this message from my Marine veteran friend Dominic:

DominicOrsatti@aol.com   (SENT BEFORE THE PARIS ATTACK)



First, Saudi Arabia says it will not take in the refugees because they are infiltrated with terrorist!  Meanwhile the Saudis laugh at the gullibility of the West.  Therefore, Saudi Arabia should be required to take in the women and children refugees. Less chance of active terrorists with women, since that is their fear!  They have more than enough space and facilities to do this.

Second, all of the military age (14 to 60) men that make up the bulk of these refugees should be segregated on military bases in Europe. For the USA contingent of refugees, send them to Gitmo!  There they will be trained to go back to their countries and fight. If they are not willing to fight for their own countries they will never be an asset to America!  Only stupid or destructive Americans and Europeans want them in their countries!

Third, in all of the current Islamic communities in the West, a draft for all military age men between 17 and 48 years of age should be made mandatory. If they are of fighting age they should be trained to fight for their country of ancestrial origin.  If they lack the physical ability to fight, they can be trained to be medical personal and cooks for their fighting brothers!

Finally, the story of the Trojan Horse should be taught to all Westerners!  The similarity to that story and the current infiltration of “faux refugees” should be emphasized!

Feel free to copy and paste this blog and send it to your congress people in the District of Corruption. If you wish send it to your friends as well!


Advertisement:  Get your FREE Gold savings account.  Go to: http://abundantgoldmine.com

As ISIS runs rampant an increasingly popular George W. Bush is vindicated

I liked “W” because he wasn’t the smooth co-artist like most politicians. Unfortunately, his brother Jeb appears to be what I don’t like about politicians.  My choice among the RepublICANs is Dr. Ben Carson.  Most don’t give him a chance, but you can believe he is the best of the lot!


Former President George W. Bush has been enjoying something of a revival in recent months. First there came the news that Bush polls better than the man who replaced him, Barack Obama. Friday, Gallup reported that fewer people than ever view the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as mistakes. No wonder, as Hot Air reported, when Bush opined that we need boots on the ground to settle with ISIS, heads all over the planet nodded silently in agreement. After all, boots on the ground were what finally won the Iraq War during the surge, a victory that President Obama so casually threw away with both hands.

 President George W. Bush

Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images

Of course, all the boots on the ground don’t have to be American. The Kurds and certain of the Sunni tribesmen who have not yet been irrevocably alienated by Obama are certainly willing to fight. Given arms and support, they would do so with alacrity. It is not outside the realm of possibility that, also given arms and support, Jordanian and Egyptian troops could add muscle to an anti-Isis coalition. Throw in some American special operators and lots of air power and the days of the Islamic State would be numbered. If Bush were to, by some miracle, become president again, they would be.

We have an inkling that Bush was not as despised as the media would have us believe several years ago when those “Miss Me Yet?” posters started to show up with the former president’s smiling visage. Many predicted that Bush, who left office under a cloud, would in short order become a modern day Truman, only fully appreciated when time and the incompetence of his successor highlighted how good the country had it when he was in charge. That development has come true.

The man made happiest by this development, besides George Bush, is his younger brother Jeb, who also wants to become president. The Bush name may not be as much as a burden as many have thought.


Jeb might be a nice person, but he is also just another politician!  Ben Carson, is a genius of a man, and can undo all of the crap Obama is leaving behind-especially the degeneration of race relations in the USA! Ben is not another smooth talking, run of the mill politicians!  If you haven’t done so yet, check him out and you will see that he is the best choice.

`What’s Changed Since the Marines Defeated the Muslims at “the shores of Tripoli.”



The barbarians are still at the gate!

Subject: “Shores of Tripoli” Nothing like a little fresher note from history to remind us how little things have changed!

Why the Marine Hymn Contains the Verse “To the Shores of Tripoli” Muslim pirates of the past:

Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago, the United States had declared war on Islam, and Thomas Jefferson led the charge! 

At the height of the eighteenth century, Muslim pirates were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic.

They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms. Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart breaking letters home, begging their government and family members to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors demanded.
These extortionists of the high seas represented the Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers – collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast – and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic.
Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. Merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain. When the U.S. Declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France. However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets.
Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy. Beginning in 1784, seventeen years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became America’s Minister to France. That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States, rather than engaging them in war.
In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments. Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.
In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.
Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over twenty percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800.
Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming. That changed everything. 
Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States. Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit. Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thugery for long enough, decided that is was finally time to meet force with force.
He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget. Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. Ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to “cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify.”
When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the might to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli. The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years, and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line “to the shores of Tripoli” in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as “leathernecks” for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships.
Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply. America had a tradition of religious tolerance, the fact that Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen. A religion based on supremacism, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers was unacceptable to him. His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States.
This should bother every American. That Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged, Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities. Ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah, public schools are pulling pork from their menus, on and on in the newspapers….
It’s death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America. By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our own culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife, and helping to further the Islamists agenda. Sadly, it appears that today’s America would rather be politically correct than victorious.
Any doubts, just Google – Thomas Jefferson vs the Muslim World 

I don’t know who wrote this piece, but I found it to be very interesting. Not much has changed, has it?

His  (Jefferson’s)  greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States. I bet he never expected to see one running the White House!

Al — Maybe you’ve seen my comments in the news… at the South Carolina National Security Action Summit, I offered a blunt assessment of the Iranian nuclear talks.

The deal President Obama is negotiating with Iran is an unprecedented surrender by the United States.

Now, liberals are slandering me in the news for speaking the truth. What do you think?

If you agree that any deal with Iran that allows them to continue their nuclear program is a surrender by the United States, then click here now and pledge your support by making a donation of $10 or more to John Bolton PAC.

I’ll use every dollar to launch an all-out-assault on Obama’s defeatist foreign policy.

I’m not going to give the liberal left — especially Barack Obama, John Kerry, and Hillary Clinton — the last word at this critical point in our nation’s history. I’m asking for you to take a stand with me against their embarrassment of a foreign policy. Click here now to pledge your support.

Al, I’ve never been one for mincing words when it comes to protecting the security of America.

I will do absolutely anything to ensure that America is safe and strong, even if it means speaking the truth no matter how badly the liberals wished I remained silent.

I will not apologize for this.

I promise you: I will continue to speak out as boldly as I can against Obama’s rotten foreign policy, especially this bogus deal with Iran.

Are you with me? Or do you agree with the liberal media that thinks that if we give Iran a nuclear program they will be a happy friend to the United States and Israel? Click here now if you’re behind me.

Make the pledge today. I refuse to be silent on this, and I urge you to do the same.

For America,

John Bolton
Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations

John Bolton PAC

Face Book Conversations with a Fellow Vet and High School Buddy!

  • Bill: Obama is not destroying America. It’s millions of uninformed citizens who have either voted against their own best interests, or not voted at all. Fear & hatred do not a democracy make. Monarchy & communism have failed – democracy next? We the peeps better get off our asses.
  • Representing AmVets Chapter 18, Orange County, California.  Thanks to a solid man, General Westmoreland!
  • Lili & Al: True Bill! Democracy fails when the lazy realize they can vote benefits for themselves, using money generated by the productive. The USA is there now! Too bad. I wish it could have lasted a lot longer than 239 years! I’m sorry for our kids, but guess we had our great life!
  •       575920_406055302774651_475600526_n
  • Lili & Al: Regarding “Obama is not destroying America” maybe you read the same article from Europe-I can only paraphrase it: ‘The USA will be able to repair the damage done by Obama if he leaves office on schedule. However, can the USA stand so many gullible (deceived) people that voted for him twice?’
  •      True Comparison
Lili & Al:  One last thought: Lili came from communist Yugoslavia, which was the least autocratic of the commie countries. True, her family had to use trickery to escape, but it was not as hostile to the West as Russia & E Germany, etc.. Despite it’s “Compassionate Communism” her experiences growing up in Serbia were very similar to her observations in Obama’s America. I have no hate or fear towards the (?progressive/regressive?) people that gave us Barry O, or towards Barry O and his cabal (or should I say Junta) either! I’ve had 50 borrowed years that God allowed me to have, filled with joy, pleasure, service and love! Any regrets I have are for the future generations of America! Too bad they don’t have any idea what they are in for! If they did they would heed your advice, “We the peeps better get off our asses.”
1934 Prophecy

Similar to how our arrogant president holds his chin!
Similar to how our arrogant president holds his chin!


2015 is 1984!
Big Brother Barry is watching us!
Featured Image -- 875

Political Posters for Patriots!

What the Press is Afraid to Print: Showing Barrys Most Embarrassing Moment!

The Rest of the Story: What the Media Didn’t Show Us Of BO’s Embarrassment!

Originally published 6 Jan 2014

Updated Jan 7, 2015 to support our friends at “ObamaScare” the newest blog for stopping the dictator-El Duce Obama!

Taking selfies and flirting with the PM… Carrying on like this at a funeral? What class… and now Moochie is staying behind in Hawaii while the Prez and kiddies come back… here are the pictures the media won’t show us…
click the link below if the pictures do not show below:
The cowardly media only showed this!The cowardly media only showed this!BO's photo kept hidden1 BOsHiddn2 BOsHiddn3 BOsHiddn4 BOsHiddn5 BOsHiddn6

Oh, yes! Just discovered-Michelle delivers the “coup de grace”

10 comments: (of many)

Whitehall said…

What would have Reggie done?
8:45 PM

carlito said…

I pity the fool.
10:45 PM

Anonymous said…

Whatta goof!
12:04 AM

Anonymous said…

Late Night should be slamming this mini-series out of the comedy park.What a clown!
7:04 AM

Business News Australia said…

He’s having a blast.
8:16 AM

Anonymous said…

“He’s having a blast.”And clearly, Mooch is NOT. Even with all the dolling up she’s had done in the past few years, she reverts to that Bulldog- Aunt Esther look when she’s pissed at Barry. He acts like a 5-year-old, she like his angry mommy.
8:31 AM

Valentine Smith said…

It’s O’s wife who looks like the jerk not… er, ahm, oh well…him too.
5:11 PM

Anonymous said…

Dear Lord, it was a funeral service. I went to more than a few as a kid and the old man would have kicked my ass had I behaved without solemnity and maturity, and respect.
10:40 PM

Anonymous said…

Clowns to the right of me, clowns to the left, here I am stuck in the middle with you.
9:17 AM

Anonymous said…

For a narcissist, every moment is a photo op
1:46 PM
WHAT ARE THE MEDIA AFRAID OF-OR ARE THEY ALL CO-OPTED?  With the power of DC  (District of Corruption) they could crush me in a second and no damage would be done, because I’m just this little old, veteran with no real support!  However, as the press found strength when AP and one of their own were attacked by Obama, all of the worlds press ran to their assistance!  LOOK GUYS, I know you are afraid of this guy, but come on, at least show the truth!



  1. This is not a trick question. There is no right answer. In light of ISIS it is an interesting thing to consider.
  2. I was against Bush going into Iraq while it was contained by air; and while Afghanistan was not fully won! How about you?
  3. Do you feel that despite wishing we didn’t go into Iraq too soon, once General Petreus and the troops won it, we needed to keep a residual force there?
  4. Why can’t the Obama administration call “Muslim terrorists” what they are?
  5. To win a war you need to identify the enemy and know it by name! Is it ISIS, ISL, IS, or IScream (no not ice cream)!


  1.  WHO WAS THE IDIOT that decided it was OK to bring Ebola to a continent where it was not present and not a problem?
  2. Is the argument against a travel ban from Ebola infested countries to the USA valid?
  3. a)Then why have more than 30 countries enforced such a ban.
  4. b)The arguments against such a ban are contradictory, inane and obviously political bull-hockey!


  1. Voter id laws are necessary-The people claiming they cannot get  voter ID card have no trouble getting a “Players Card” for their nearest casino.
  2. Too stupid to get an ID to vote; you are too stupid to vote.
  3. DemocRATs demanded ID’s to attend their convention, but don’t want ID’s for voting!
  4. Some say there is little evidence of voter fraud? Maybe they never heard of “Chicago voting.”
  5. Can we assume the demonrats have perfected the system of “Chicago voting” nationwide?
  6. ONLY DEMOCratS claim it is naughty to ask for a voter ID! Is it that only the dems are cheaters or to stupid to got an ID?