
Written by Mike James   
Monday, 30 January 2017




I'm not going to go over all of the reasons why app stores are bad, but they certainly restrict our freedom as programmers. If you programmed in the era of the PC or before you could be a member of the last generation of programmers to know the freedom to create any program you care to think of.

What is more, there is evidence that App stores also seem to restrict the freedom of the end user. 

Google has just banned an ad-blocker called AdNauseam from the Chome Web Store as from the start of the year.

As this is a Chrome plugin Google can disable any copies already installed in Chrome - that is the ban is retrospective. This ability to remove an application is supposed to be a protection mechanism for users, allowing malware that has just been detected to be removed from existing installations. However, in this case AdNauseam isn't malware and users might well want to keep using it. 

You might well think, why the fuss?

Or you might think that as Google is an advertising company why would it ban an adblocker which would block its own ads?

Also as Google doesn't block other adblockers, why this one?

The statement on the AdNauseam site gives some clues:


The main clue is in the statement "hides and clicks every tracking ad that it identifies". It basically attempts to hide the user in a blizzard of machine generated clicks. Of course, these clicks are recorded by Google or any ad agency as potentially valid user clicks and this results in the advertiser being billed, Google getting paid and handing out a tiny proportion to the publisher for doing all the work. Sounds good from everyone's point of view apart from the advertisers. If this behaviour spread then it would eventually poison Google's business as advertisers would no longer trust that a click was a click. 

So how did Google justify the ban?


It goes on to nail the nature of the problem very nicely:


Notice the important point - this application has been removed because it goes against Google's business model. If you think that this is true then there is cause for concern. A condition like "apps must not damage Googe's potential revenue" might not be very acceptable.

It also raises the question of why Google doesn't ban ad blockers in general - after all they very much impact Google's bottom line? Perhaps Google fears a public outcry if they blocked something so popular. The AdNauseam team has submitted an updated description of the addin, which it claims meets the objections, and argues that Google should reinstate the app . This seems unlikely to happen.

The last word goes to the AdNauseam team:



More Information

AdNauseam banned from the Google Web Store



The Word Robot Invented 100 Years Ago

We are now very familiar with robots - machines that posses artificial intelligence and perform tasks that humans find arduous or simply unattractive. What you might not know is that word robot comes  [ ... ]

Microsoft Application Inspector Open Sourced

Microsoft has open sourced Application Inspector, a tool that you can use to check open source components before you use them to see what they really do and whether there are any unusual or worrying f [ ... ]

More News





or email your comment to: comments@i-programmer.info

Last Updated ( Monday, 30 January 2017 )