We need national capitalism


Multi-national (code: multicultural) companies screw over everybody for the sole benefit of faceless ‘rulers’.

If you pillage a tiny amount from lots of countries, they rarely figure it out in time to stop you before you move on.


If the average wage rises and companies are expected to largely train in-house again, the welfare state becomes largely unnecessary and shrinks considerably.

Incentivise the prosocial, punish the antisocial.

Visa work is a kinda serfdom anyway.

Rising costs of r-selected overpopulation will spill over into our lives in other ways too.

A unifying factor is required: race, thede, culture. Nothing less will work.

Plenty of people are ‘nice’ until they hold the whip hand.

Difficult way now, deadly way tomorrow.


Competition between the r-selected isn’t good for us either, more workers to compete with.

And would-be ‘immigrants’ i.e. permanent colonial invaders.

R-populations never stop rising.

Nature culls eventually but at what cost?
Pandemic? War?

Thhe Malthusian trap doesn’t discriminate.

These people are savage (incest, rape, murder aside).

And tear one another down for the slightest advantage

This is a myth of central bank fiat.

We must dismantle globalism by replacing it. Without replacement, we flounder and fail.

Step 1: active passive resistance i.e. do not fund your replacement.

Step 2: put down roots, help local. But go Galt (read Enjoy the Decline for pointers, Thought Prison to stay sane, The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics to know the enemy’s gameplan).

Step 3: skills and this includes MOOCs, any form of communication basically.

I see no other way.

I was going to post this years ago but decided to see if the news pointed to this as the inevitable Adapt or Die.

around this time: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/video-stage-zero-of-white-advocacy/

Lefties lie and pretend like they care about workers while importing their replacement to starve them and also introduce their child’s rapist. It’s like a new Ottoman Empire rising in the West, frankly. They had sex slaves too.

The capitalist actually cares because they’re natural nationalists and capitalism has lifted millions out of poverty thus far.

We still pay foreign aid. Cut all soft colonialism, to zero.

R-types invest in other r-types preferentially.

They will not reciprocate your Pathological Altruism (another great book), ever.
Their national IQs don’t magically go up, either.

Do not ignore the majority of the population for the Left’s attempt at a ‘gender war’.

Averages matter. The invaders can swarm you. This affects us all.

Their populations will continue to become denser and with global transportation, a huge disease vector for us.

There isn’t enough food to feed everyone. The arable land doesn’t exist on this planet and what we have is being eroded by greedy idiots or polluted by lazy practices (pig deaths). Food security is national security.

Prices won’t stop going up.


Resources are finite.

Demographics is destiny.

The bigger the rise, the harder the fall. Panic, stupidity and open borders do not mix.

Deport the ones here (weebs too, if they resist) or expect to be outbred, outvoted and generally outgunned.

We are already a minority and with losing what little power we have now, it’ll get worse.

Suck it up.

You can’t fuck or breed your way out of this. There’s just too many of them.

We need to stay sustainable from a food perspective anyway.

But hey, at least they’ll be around to spit on our graves!

White people are literally a minority, get over it SJWs: http://www.prb.org/pdf13/2013-WPDS-infographic_MED.pdf

The civilization right now is an illusion unless we re-purpose what we have (IQ, ingenuity, culture) into strong foundations.

How? No idea. Not a clue. But national capitalism is the system that would work.

The greatest gain goes to those who do it successfully first.

Spoiler: that’s why China is irrationally stoking patriotic sentiment in the citizens.

Communists will subvert nationalism if you let them.

You won’t be a Party member of Patriarchy without a family.

Fascism, historically

Funny to see illiterate Americans make assumptions about what ‘fascism’ is.


(she says, linking to wikipedia)

Plot twist: women (and poor men) were empowered as citizens.

Politically, the Manifesto calls for:

  • Proportional representation on a regional basis;
  • Voting for women (which was then opposed by most other European nations);

Scientists in power is a fascist view.

In labor and social policy, the Manifesto calls for:

  • The quick enactment of a law of the state that sanctions aneight-hour workdayfor all workers;
  • Aminimum wage;
  • The participation of workers’ representatives in the functions of industry commissions;
  • Reorganization of the railways and the transport sector;
  • Revision of the draft law on invalidity insurance;
  • Reduction of the retirement age from 65 to 55.

Fascists are just socialists that give a damn about your vices and private life.

In military affairs, the Manifesto advocates:

  • Armaments factories are to be nationalized;
  • A peaceful but competitive foreign policy.

In finance, the Manifesto advocates:


The religious should support being poor, because they want to be holy.

We have state-funded religious schools. In the 21st century.

  • Revision of all contracts for military provisions;

These early positions reflected in the Manifesto would later be characterized by Mussolini in the Doctrine of Fascism as “a series of pointers, forecasts, hints which, when freed from the inevitable matrix of contingencies, were to develop in a few years time into a series of doctrinal positions entitling Fascism to rank as a political doctrine differing from all others, past or present.”[3]

The Marxist root of sociology

Why isn’t sociology considered a science, unlike psychology?

Apparently this isn’t common knowledge and here we are.



Max Weber is the most scientific of the trio and he wrote about Protestant capitalism, next comes Durkheim’s work although it is frequently over-applied from intellectual dishonesty. Sociology has limited scope because-


This is true for matters such as national culture (and fits into Weber’s work) but you can easily see how a claim in bad faith on other subjects can be made if everything is subjective and needn’t be proven.
What has psychology done?
Developed observational/behavioural and social psychologies to sweep up whatever is objectively testable.

The other two have no entries on that site.




It’s very personality psychology and values-based.

Compared to Marx who confused his revenge fantasies with prophecies.
Marx was right about classes and the suffering of the poor but wealth was not the enemy. Status cannot be evenly distributed, even if money is. A political party with no leader struggles, look at OWS.

Video: The story of your enslavement

10/10 would share again. Shop around.

[read after]

Molyneux is the only redpill that hasn’t shamed himself with degeneracy.

Breath of fresh air.

The question you’re not allowed to ask:
Who are the farmers?















I posted this at the beginning of the year.


I’m not a racist but-


Tumblr can be very based.
A visual demonstration of why ad hominem and poisoning the well don’t work, also see the Trump administration.

Instead these people try to gaslight us that our realpolitik concerns are bigoted/uneducated and hence, not REAL. Politics is simply returning to its historical norm, that’s why nobody can stop it, it’s becoming local again. It’s anti-globalist, the failed experiment that led to multiculturalism and mass immigration because capitalist workers are interchangeable and fuck min. wage laws in the First World. Globalism is supranational, Global Capitalism. You think they’d give a shit about third world countries if they had banned child labour? Controlled their population of future child workers? But when they’re adults, they’re more expensive and can revolt, better send them to Europe. They got no factories there. Fuck the First World poor, let’s be like China and enslave our children or cause the prole workers to commit suicide rather than put together Tracy’s iPhone so she can protest capitalism, Starbucks in hand. ‘omg your problems aren’t real u loser. sad!’


The K-shift is exposing them like a storm exposes worms.

This, after Hillary Clinton used the term in a major speech.

That one slip of a searchable term might’ve handed Trump the White House.

Do you really think Democrats have the level of political engagement or attention to watch those whole speeches? The MSM redpilled against itself. At this point, they’re just making shit up because reporting reality is too hard.

That’s when you feign a sucker punch to the face but swiftly kick them in the nuts. Obvious!

the art of war is deception, young  shitlords sithlords

it’s based on-

it’s based

If racism is possible against the global minority of white people, it can’t be used to guilt trip because it’s no longer exclusive, like an EBT card.

Nobody else has made this connection to globalism yet, I’m the first.

Ask: Who pays the people guarding the borders?

Even the reddest Commie will listen to the economic argument therein. Globalism pits the poor of every country against one another in a war for profit for pigs.

As for me?

I set up the dominoes to watch them fall, dude.


If I can do a little good with my god-tier destruction abilities, yippy kai yay.

I’m not here for celebrity, I’m here to change history.

How can I cut them in such a way that it’ll still hurt in fifty years’ time?
Verbal shivs are legal and I find that racist. Bitchy putdowns are homosexual art.
Memes are education for the morally and verbally impaired.


ah yes toast drinking damon ian nodding

Who suspects the girl? Sexist bitches.

Every time I hear something terribly untrue about my kind, assuming I’m azure-pilled;


literally me

hide teh power level

soon baby


Why are lefties protesting Trump?

It’s nice to see ones capable of forming a sentence, other than reeee.

from leftist-daily-reminders.tumblr.com/post/155208709988/how-is-a-general-strike-effective-as-a-protest

By not working, not attending classes, and refusing to consume or buy anything, you are making a statement that you reject your current material conditions. If a strike of large enough scope is achieved, it will remind the ruling class and the working class who the driving force of the system really is (the workers, since without them the wheels can’t turn), and would act as the opening salvo of a larger resistance movement. A general strike on January 20 won’t stop Trump from being President or topple capitalism – but it will create a symbol for people to rally behind, build momentum for the larger resistance, and rob Trump’s inauguration of all dignity and legitimacy.

>implying management isn’t a skilled form of labour

The big spanner in Communism.

If anyone could start a factory and run it successfully, the workers would just start their own. But that’s capitalism, isn’t it, kids?

Instead, it looks like adult babies are throwing their rattle out the pram because they didn’t get their way. Securing Trump a second term from anyone who actually has to go to work, and can’t afford to protest democracy with a mob. Protesting is a mob action. It’s anti-democratic, because why is your group any more deserving of an opinion? That’s the issue with modern leftism.

Also, robots.


It’s impossible to strike a job you don’t have.

It’s impossible to strike a job taken overseas, locally.

It’s impossible to run a strike of citizens with illegals.

It’s impossible for the low IQ to have any kind of employment prospects in the coming high IQ future of society. Someone’s getting fucked. Punch your Trump card now and save yourselves.

shrug lol toldyaso fuck you bateman


You overplayed the best possible hand.

Classic liberals committed cultural suicide and now they’re going down after it.
You got what you wanted, idiots. China is rubbing its hands. India switching on its global IT division. All cos you wanted to be lazy, a little more time off and a little more pay. Ironically, you won’t retire now. Ever.

You have a right to the fruit of your labour. There is no transfer of property than productivity.

You are signing a permit to use the machines to provide a fixed outcome, aka employment contract. You do not own the machines. The person who purchased them, owns the machines. Engels never got rid of his factories, did he?

If you urinate in a public park, you do not own the park.
If you use a computer in the library, you do not own the library.
If you work a machine, you do not own the factory.

Property is 9/10 of the law, retards.

What you describe is technically rape, also a civil matter in the definition of theft, the forcible seizure of property. As for the criminal, if there is no property, there is no crime such as rape, since we own our bodies, primarily, including our labour.