@article {7501, title = {The Connecticut River Flow Restoration Study: A watershed-scale assessment of the potential for flow restoration through dam re-operation}, year = {2018}, month = {06/2018}, institution = {the Nature Conservancy, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and University of Massachusetts Amherst.}, address = {Northampton, MA. ​}, abstract = {

To evaluate current operations and develop operational alternatives, three model frameworks were used. The Connecticut River Unimpaired Streamflow Estimator (CRUISE) is a model developed by the U.S. Geological Survey to estimate unimpaired streamflow at any perennial stream location within the watershed. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Hydrologic Engineering Center{\textquoteright}s Reservoir Simulation Model (HEC-ResSim) is a rule-based operations model that was used to simulate the operations of 73 major reservoirs throughout the watershed. The Connecticut River Optimization Modeling Environment (CROME) is a goal- based linear programming optimization model developed by the University of Massachusetts Amherst. The CROME model searches all potentially optimal combinations of flow release strategies among 54 dams in the watershed to find the one that best matches a desired system state given an objective function, such as provision of prescribed streamflows, maintenance of reservoir storage targets, generation of revenue from hydroelectric production, or allowance of water for municipal supply. The objective function used to represent ecological value in the CROME model was related to minimizing the deviations between operational flow and estimated natural flow, given {\textquotedblleft}acceptable deviations{\textquotedblright} that were developed from expert-elicited ecological flow recommendations.\ 

}, keywords = {Connecticut River, dam removal, flow, restoration}, url = {https://www.nae.usace.army.mil/Portals/74/docs/Topics/CTRiver/CT-River-FlowRestorationStudy-June2018.pdf}, author = {Kennedy, Katie and Lutz, Kim and Hatfield, Christopher and Martin, Leanna and Barker, Townsend and Kennedy, K and Palmer, Richard N. and Detwiler, Luke and Anleitner, Jocelyn and Hickey, J} }