{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026405451448040886, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0017035775127768314, 'mean_word_length': 5.351351351351352, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Self-Regulation, Reception and Ridicule in Hölderlin’s Hyperion

Hyperion's characteristic" tone can be described: lyrical beauty combined with paradoxical and often contradictory general formulations, frequently "in the form of exclamations; the latter reveal an unmistakable pathos, which serves to personalize, relativize, and critically undermine often quasi-philosophical claims of the epistolary narrator and protagonist of Hyperion. These features can be joined to produce an altered perspective on both novel and protagonist: situations that Hyperion narrates with profound pathos may appear comical, or at least come close to it, depending on the reader's willingness to read between the lines of what is told. This potential for comedy has often been overlooked by readings that seek to normalize the work within well-known (and rather earnest) paradigms like the Bildungsroman. Hyperion's lyricism also has the potential to undercut the comic elements: it is easy to be taken in by his rhetorical talents, by the beauty and rhythm of the text, its obvious craft. The lyrical-philosophical side of the text makes a powerful claim for its own autonomy. And H61lder-