{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02900107411385607, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008592910848549946, 'mean_word_length': 5.753623188405797, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Occupational Identity Status, Occupational Preference, and Field Dependence in Maori and Pakeha Boys

Occupational identity status was assessed, using Marcia's (1967) interview method, in Maori (Polynesian) and Pakeha (White) high-school boys. Marcia's method is based on Erikson's (1950) conception of the adolescent stage of ego development, identity v. identity diffusion. More Maoris than Pakehas were occupational identity diffusions: they were not committed to an occupation and had not seriously contemplated possible occupations. More Pakehas than Maoris were identity achievers: they were committed to an occupation which they had chosen after serious examination of several alternative occupations. The two ethnic groups differed in IQ and socioeconomic status, but identity status was not related to these variables. Field dependence and occupational preference were related to identity status but not ethnic background.