{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021592442645074223, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004048582995951417, 'mean_word_length': 4.936, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparisons of Explicit and Implicit Finite Element Methods for Sheet Metal Forming

Sheet metal forming is one of the most commonly practiced fabrication processes in industry. Numerical simulations of the complex parts are possible by finite element method in the past thirty years. The most important problem of the simulation is the reliability of the model. Static implicit method (SI) and dynamic explicit method (DE) were used to simulation sheet metal forming process. It was found that simulation speed in dynamic explicit software has large effect on the simulation results. The best simulation speed is 5~10 m/s. Compared with the simulation and experimental results of thickness, draw-in and CPU time, the DE method is preferred.