{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04285714285714286, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024285714285714285, 'mean_word_length': 5.144736842105263, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of strength and endurance training on metabolic risk factors in healthy 40–65‐year‐old men

This study compared 21 weeks of combined high‐intensity strength and endurance training with endurance or strength training only on metabolic risk factors in 40–65‐year‐old men. The healthy men (n=63) were randomized into endurance (E), strength (S), combined strength and endurance training (SE) and control (C) groups. S and E trained two times a week and SE 2+2 times a week. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly both in E (−6±8 and −4±6 mmHg) and in S (−9±8 and −5±7 mmHg), but not in SE or C (P=0.003 for the difference in the changes of SBP between the groups). The changes in serum glucose and insulin during an oral glucose tolerance test did not differ between the groups. Only E decreased serum fasting insulin levels (−17±27%, P=0.013). Minor changes were observed in blood lipids and lipoproteins in all groups. Both endurance and strength training can modestly improve metabolic health even in relatively lean older men with normal glucose tolerance. Combined strength and endurance training did not produce complementary benefits on metabolic risk factors. Combined training is effective in improving body composition and cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, however, which is likely to decrease the risk of future metabolic and cardiovascular disease.