{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014684287812041116, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00881057268722467, 'mean_word_length': 5.373831775700935, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Observations on the International Court of Justice's November 26, 1984 Judgment on Jurisdiction and Admissibility in the Case of Nicaragua v. United States of America

We agree with the suggestion in your editorial that the jurisdictional decision of the International Court of Justice in Nicaragua's case against the United States should be carefully considered by American international lawyers. We believe, however, that your editorial does not devote adequate attention to the reasons of the President for discontinuing participation in the case. We also take strong exception to your conclusion that none of the Court's jurisdictional findings is insupportable in fact or law.