{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04601769911504425, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01415929203539823, 'mean_word_length': 4.984126984126984, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Twin pregnancies: accuracy of first-trimester abdominal US in predicting chorionicity and amnionicity.

A first-trimester transabdominal ultrasound (US) study was performed on twin pregnancies to determine the utility of US in predicting chorionicity and amnionicity. Among 85 dichorionic-diamniotic (DC-DA) twin pairs, a thick membrane was present in 78 (92%). Four of the DC-DA cases without a thick membrane had two distinct placental sites, allowing 82 DC-DA pregnancies (96%) to be predicted. Among 16 monochorionic-diamniotic (MC-DA) twin pairs, a thin membrane was present in 14 (88%). None of the four monochorionic-monoamniotic (MC-MA) cases had an identifiable membrane. The lambda sign had no value in this evaluation and was actually misleading, while a thick membrane or the identification of two separate placentas was always predictive of DC-DA twinning. However, a thin membrane, while usually predictive of an MC-DA pregnancy, did not exclude a DC-DA gestation. When no membrane is present, an MC-MA gestation is probable; however, a diamniotic pregnancy may still be present, and further evaluation is suggested.