{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011764705882352941, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.606796116504855, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Recent studies of the actions of cholinomimetic drugs on adrenergic nerves and their implications for the cholinergic link hypothesis.

This review analyzes the results of recent studies of the actions of cholinomimetic drugs on adrenergic nerve terminals and their implications for the cholinergic link hypothesis. Thus far, evidence suggests that the only possible action of endogenous acetylcholine (ACh) present near noradrenaline (NA) stores is an inhibition of the release of NA from the adrenergic nerve terminals and that NA is released only when the action of acetylcholinesterase is inhibited. Nicotinic agents have been shown to act on adrenergic nerve terminal membranes, a finding that casts doubt on the proposed intraneuronal cholinergic sites for the action of endogenous ACh. Evidence also indicates that the mode of adrenergic neurone blocking action of bretylium and guanethidine is independent of the proposed cholinergic process in NA release. Current findings do not support the proposal that nicotinic agents in higher concentrations interfere with adrenergic neurotransmission. It is therefore concluded that nicotinic agents, in causing the release of NA from adrenergic nerve terminals, are merely exhibiting a pharmacological action and not mimicking the physiological function of ACh, as proposed by the cholinergic link hypothesis.