{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04326123128119801, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0033277870216306157, 'mean_word_length': 4.574074074074074, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Work(s) of Samuel Richardson (review)

be her retirement, a place into which he must never intrude. The dining room is designated the only common ground, the only room in which they may meet to discuss . . . their relationship. It is not surprising, then, that the dining room becomes the scene ofmost of this couple's contentions, and that absence from meals should immediately assume symbolic importance" (p. 72). Frega's best interpretations, like those of a good psychoanalyst, turn on Richardson's wonderful and endless minutiae, and in this she is surely faithful to the demands of the text.