{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02181818181818182, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.3538461538461535, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Varieties of Antisemitism: History, Ideology, Discourse (review)

of relevant sources for his study, although this effort is somewhat undermined by a bibliography that jumps from L to S with no intervening entries. One apparent omission that might have informed the discussion on Belgian bureaucratic behavior is the work of Nico Wouters; Fraser also might have made fruitful comparisons to recently published analyses of Dutch mayors’ and civil servants’ behavior, for example the work by Peter Romijn. Nevertheless, this detailed analysis does raise important questions about the extent to which civil servants, lawyers, and other members of the elite actively colluded with Nazi wishes, and serves to undermine some of the more obvious but widely-held myths about resistance in Belgian society during the Second World War.