{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027522935779816515, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009174311926605505, 'mean_word_length': 5.613636363636363, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
DETERMINING THE COGNITIVE PORTS OF ENTRY AMONGST THE POST-TRAUMATIC STATES: TREATMENT IMPLICATIONS

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is one of a range of trauma responses and has claimed the most therapeutic attention, but other post-traumatic states are probably, collectively, as common and produce a comparable level of functional impairment. It is suggested that in accordance with the cognitive theory of emotional disorders (Alford & Beck, 1997) the post-traumatic states are distinguished by differing cognitive content. Further, it is suggested that PTSD clients have particular information processing biases and those with a chronic form of the condition have a cognitive profile similar to those with a personality disorder. The differing cognitive architecture amongst the post-traumatic states suggests different treatment focii (Scott & Stradling, 2001).