{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03467406380027739, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011095700416088766, 'mean_word_length': 4.869918699186992, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Use It—and Keep It, Longer, Probably: A Reply to Salthouse (2006)

In this article, I call into serious question Salthouse's (2006) conclusions evaluating and disparaging the validity of the “use it or lose it” hypothesis regarding mental exercise and mental aging. I do so, in some part, by using data not discussed by Salthouse. The core of my argument relies heavily on a critical assessment of the conclusions that Salthouse derived from both his theoretical reasoning and his review of the literature. The more judicious conclusion I reach is that, although the whole story regarding cognitive function and aging is not known, at some level and to some degree, “using” it often delays the eventuality of “losing” it.