{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013544018058690745, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.075342465753424, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The multiple functions of formal aids to decision making in public agencies

Examines how the value to a decision-maker of formal, quantitative decision aids changes as the setting shifts from the program level to senior executives and, ultimately, to external groups to which the decision-maker is accountable. Examples drawn from the use of research and development project selection models in the US Department of Energy are used to illustrate the various meanings that `use' of such models can have in a public agency, and how a public agency's accountability to the office of management and budget and the Congress affects the ways its program managers use formal project selection models. A discussion is presented of how changes in the administration in power and differences in the technical competence among agency oversight groups might affect the use of formal decision aids.