{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022922636103151862, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0071633237822349575, 'mean_word_length': 4.923728813559322, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On a Game-Theoretic Approach to a Scientific Language

This contribution gives an outline of a game theoretic foundation of the logical structure inherent to the language of a science. Game theoretic approaches to a language were considered and developed by several authors. In this volume Saarinen [10] examines the game theoretic semantics due to Hintikka and the dialog-game semantics due to Lorenzen. In the following I shall not re-examine the approaches by Hintikka [11 and Lorenzen [5]. However, some remarks about Lorenzen's semantics are necessary since the game theoretic approach considered here is essentially based on the idea of Lorenzen to use dialog-games for a foundation of logic.