{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03467799009200283, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025477707006369428, 'mean_word_length': 5.701421800947867, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An evaluation of the SPIFE® 3000 semi‐automated gel electrophoresis system for the identification of hemoglobin variants and comparison of relative electrophoretic mobilities with manual gel electrophoresis methods

Laboratory identification of hemoglobin (Hb) variants can involve multiple techniques. The use of semi‐automated instruments that perform gel electrophoresis and staining, such as the SPIFE® 3000 electrophoresis system, can greatly reduce the labor required for these commonly used techniques. We performed a comparison of the method involved in SPIFE® 3000 system with those of manual gel electrophoresis. A total of 22 540 samples were analyzed using the SPIFE® 3000, and compared with mobilities on cellulose acetate and citrate agar gels using standard manual methods. The results were compared using relative electrophoretic mobilities (REM). Of the 191 Hb variants identified, only 13 had REM that differed from manual electrophoresis when analyzed using the SPIFE® 3000 system. One variant (Hb O‐Indonesia) showed different mobility on both acid and alkaline gels, two (Hb E, Hb Sunshine Seth) on alkaline gel only, and 10 (Hbs N‐Baltimore, N‐Seattle, O‐Arab, Shelby, Summer Hill, Tak, Hasharon, M‐Iwate, Q‐Iran, and Setif) on acid gels only. The SPIFE® 3000 semi‐automated electrophoresis system produces similar results when compared with those of standard manual electrophoresis methods.