{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02478134110787172, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015063168124392614, 'mean_word_length': 6.003401360544218, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An evaluation of partner notification for HIV infection in genitourinary medicine clinics in England

Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a standardized HIV partner notification programme within genitourinary medicine clinics in England. Design:A prospective survey of HIV partner notification activity over a 12-month period. Setting:Nineteen genitourinary medicine clinics in England. Patients and participants:A total of 501 eligible HIV-positive patients (either newly diagnosed or with whom partner notification had not been undertaken previously) seen during the study period. Main outcome measures:The numbers of partners named by patients, and the number of contacts notified, counselled and HIV-tested. Results:Information on overall partner notification activity was obtained by reviewing available medical records of 471 patients; 353 (75%) had discussed partner notification with a health-care worker during the study period and 197 (42%) had undertaken partner notification. Detailed information on outcomes was obtained for only 70 patients who named 158 contacts as being at risk of acquiring HIV. Although 71 (45%) contacts were eventually notified, only 28 were subsequently seen in participating clinics. Almost all contacts (n = 27) requested HIV counselling and testing, and five were diagnosed HIV-positive. Patient referral was the most popular notification method chosen. Conclusions:This study illustrates some of the practical difficulties that limit HIV partner notification within genitourinary medicine clinics. These include health-care workers' misgivings about undertaking partner notification, insufficient locating information to identify contacts, and migration of newly diagnosed patients, which prevents continuity and completion of notification. Nevertheless, HIV partner notification uncovered previously undiagnosed HIV infections. Further work needs to be undertaken in staff training and policy implementation if higher rates of partner notification and outcome measurements are to be achieved.