{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030473135525260625, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022453889334402566, 'mean_word_length': 5.117647058823529, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
EFFECT OF PRE-OPERATIVE SUB-LINGUAL MISOPROSTOL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN ON CAESAREAN OPERATION BLOOD LOSS.

BACKGROUND
Caesarean operation remains the most common abdominal surgery in women and has immense benefits to both mother and baby when employed. Haemorrhage, however, remains the greatest challenge associated with its outcome.


OBJECTIVE
To compare the effectiveness of pre-operative sub-lingual misoprostol with intravenous oxytocin administered after delivery of the neonate in minimising blood loss at Caesarean operation.


DESIGN
A prospective study.


RESULTS
The mean blood loss was significantly lower in misoprostol group compared to oxytocin group (517.32mls versus 621.22mls; p = 0.005). The drop in haematocrit was significantly lower in misoprostol group than the oxytocin group, (400 μg-misoprostol versus oxytocin: 1.88 versus 3.04; p = 0.0001). Side effects of chills, shivering and pyrexia were noted more with the use of misoprostol.


CONCLUSION
Pre-operative sub-lingual misoprostol is more effective than intravenous infusion of oxytocin in reducing blood loss at Caesarean section operation. However, occurrence of transient side effects of chills, shivering and pyrexia were noted more with use of misoprostol.