{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019099590723055934, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002728512960436562, 'mean_word_length': 5.016393442622951, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinimetrics corner: the Global Rating of Change Score (GRoC) poorly correlates with functional measures and is not temporally stable

Abstract The Global Rating of Change Score (GRoC) is a frequently used outcome measure that is used independently to measure improvements in a patient’s condition or as an anchor for other outcomes measures. The tool has been criticized for recall bias, biases in administration, and for poor reliability over time. Our findings, captured from a sample of patients with shoulder impingement, suggest that all these concerns are of merit. Our results show poor correlation of the GRoC with functional measures after 2 and 3 weeks and decay of the associative stability of the GRoC from week to week.