{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022099447513812154, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.913043478260869, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A formal definition of priority in CSP

The process models of Ada and occam are formally based on the CSP process algebra. However, for fine-tuning real-time performance, they include “prioritized” constructs that have no counterparts in CSP. These constructs therefore lack any formal definition, a situation that leaves room for misunderstandings. We extend CSP with a formal definition of the notion of priority. The definition is then used to assess the transputer implementation of priority in occam and the definition of priority in Ada.