{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024636765634870498, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013897662665824383, 'mean_word_length': 5.260869565217392, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The relative order of helical propensity of amino acids changes with solvent environment

A model peptide of sequence Ac‐Y‐VAXAK‐VAXAK‐VAXAK‐NH2, where X is substituted with one of nineteen amino acids (P excluded), was synthesized and titrated with methanol to study helical propensity as a function of solvent environment. The CD spectra of these peptides are largely random coil in 2 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) and show a conformational change to α‐helix with increasing methanol content. Singular value decomposition was used to correct the CD spectra for the absorbing side chains of W, Y, F, C, and M, and this correction can be substantial. With correction both W and F become good helix formers. The free energy for helix propagation was calculated using the Lifson‐Roig statistical model for each of the nineteen amino acids at each point in their titration. The results show that the rank order of helical propensity for the nineteen amino acids changes with solvent environment. This result will be particularly important if proteins undergo hydrophobic collapse before secondary structures are formed, because amino acids can then see different solvent environments as the secondary structures are formed. Related amino acids are found to have interesting correlations in the shape of their titration curves. This finding provides one explanation for the limiting 70% accuracy in predicting secondary structure from sequence, since the helical propensities used are calculated for an average solvent environment. Proteins 2000;39:132–141. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.