{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018953752843062926, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.407766990291262, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Is Jamaica’s anti-money laundering regime effective?


Purpose
This paper aims to assess the effectiveness of Jamaica’s anti-money laundering regime.


Design/methodology/approach
The research is based on secondary sources. Existing laws and reports of relevant agencies were reviewed.


Findings
The effectiveness of Jamaica’s anti- money laundering regime is compromised by weak implementation of the regulations. The real estate sector and the legal profession remain vulnerable to money laundering. Some features of the economy allow criminals to circumvent the regulations.


Research limitations/implications
The research is based on qualitative analysis because of the absence of data to compute quantitative measures of effectiveness.


Practical implications
Strong enforcement is required for effective control of money laundering. Furthermore, investigation of money laundering needs to be pro-active and not dependent solely on suspicious transactions reports in countries where corruption is prevalent.


Social implications
Weak money laundering control can contribute to social instability by allowing criminals to gain significant economic power and influence.


Originality/value
No other study has highlighted the factors undermining the effectiveness of anti-money laundering regulations in Jamaica.
