{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012797074954296161, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.306666666666667, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Discrepancies in diagnoses of neuroepithelial neoplasms

Valid and reliable diagnoses of disease are key both to meaningful epidemiologic and clinical investigations and to decision‐making about appropriate treatment. One previous study highlighted the lack of precision in diagnosing primary brain tumors in a neuropathology referral practice. The current study explores diagnostic discrepancies in a population‐based adult glioma series by hospital of origin, specialty training of the original diagnosing pathologist, and clinical significance.