{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020555767034640272, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010277883517320136, 'mean_word_length': 5.069284064665127, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Objective Changes in Brow Position, Superior Palpebral Crease, Peak Angle of the Eyebrow, and Jowl Surface Area after Volumetric Radiofrequency Treatments to Half of the Face

BACKGROUND Radiofrequency application through a proprietary device has recently been used for facial tissue tightening. Uniform volumetric heating of the dermis is created by passage of electrical current, while protection of the epidermis is maintained by concurrent cryogen cooling. OBJECTIVE To objectively quantify the effectiveness of volumetric radiofrequency application on the face, we treated 10 patients on the left side of the face with radiofrequency and evaluated the changes in brow position, superior palpebral crease, angle of the eyebrow, and jowl surface area. METHODS Uniform treatments were applied at 134 J/cm2 to the left side of the forehead and 1 cm past midline, at 115 J/cm2 to the left side of temple and cheeks, and at 97 J/cm2 to the left side of the jaw line and inferior postauricular surface. Patients were evaluated at monthly intervals up to 3 months with digital photography. Morphologic changes were evaluated with the “measuring tool” and “angle tool” of the Mirror Suite imaging system for aligned frontal-view photographs (for eyebrow position, superior palpebral crease elevation, and eyebrow angle changes) and the “outline tool” for aligned oblique-view photographs (for jowl surface area changes). RESULTS At the end of 3 months on the side that was treated, patients exhibited on average 4.3 mm of brow elevation and 1.9 mm of superior palpebral crease elevation along the midpupillary line and an average of 2.4 mm of brow elevation along the lateral canthal line. There was no significant improvement of brow elevation along the lateral canthal line on the contralateral side. The peak angle of the ipsilateral eyebrow became slightly more acute by an average of 4.5° after treatments. Moreover, the jowls on the lower part of the face, displayed a mean decrease of 22.6% in surface area after treatments. The nontreated side displayed a lack of eyebrow angle and jowl surface area changes. CONCLUSIONS The application of radiofrequency to the face provides quantifiable changes. The brow along the midpupillary line is elevated to a greater degree than the lateral brow. This is consistent with acute angle changes seen in the eyebrow. Improvements in the lower part of the face with radiofrequency application can be quantified by demonstrating a decrease jowl surface. Moreover, these measurement techniques can be useful tools for evaluating other treatment parameters with radiofrequency application.