{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017391304347826087, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0020460358056265983, 'mean_word_length': 5.392156862745098, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
United Nations Competence in the West Bank and Gaza Strip

A LAWFUL and effective decision taken to resolve the Middle East crisis must consider the basic principles of the Charter of the United Nations, particularly those of self-determination, security and territorial integrity of States, and those relating to human rights as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It would appear that a viable peace plan might be effected through the United Nations, an authoritative arena, which could secure the adequate participation of the controlling entities and of the larger community. Within the historical context of the area, the United Nations responsibility for the West Bank and Gaza Strip is special. The fact that individual and group peace efforts have not been marked by notable success and have often resulted in rigidification of the positions of the interested entities makes even more urgent the ultimate United Nations responsibility towards the inhabitants of territories that have not yet achieved self-government. It would appear time for the United Nations to reassert its responsibility towards the inhabitants of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, non-self-governing territories under Chapters XI and XII of the Charter. The doctrine and the institution of international trusteeship, and the administration of non-selfgoverning territories, following the mandate system of the League of Nations, were primarily aimed at serving internationally supervised development of mandated territories and other non-self-governing territories, leading to their independence. There is nothing to prevent its employment in regard to territories which become non-self-governing due to changes in political boundaries. Indeed, the concern for the maintenance of peace and security, a fundamental objective mentioned in Article 1(1) of the Charter and specified again with regard to trusteeships in Article 76(a), is a compelling argument for