{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012763596004439512, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004439511653718091, 'mean_word_length': 5.4163701067615655, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Directorate for Trade and Consumer Cooperation in 1946-1950: Interaction of Central and Local Authorities (Tyumen region)

The article is devoted to the historical experience of interaction between the Main Directorate for Trade and Consumer Cooperation under the Council of Ministers of the USSR (Glavukoop) and subordinate bodies, in particular, as an example of a senior inspector of the Main Directorate for Trade and Consumer Cooperation of the Tyumen Region. On the basis of archival materials introduced into scientific circulation for the first time, organizational and legal issues of creating both central and local governing and control bodies over the activities of cooperative organizations, their structure and composition are considered. The documents used in the work reveal the specifics of the activities of various types of cooperative associations in the Tyumen region, as well as their cooperation with representatives of the controlling authorities of the central government, reflect the psychological and social mood of the workers of these associations. It is noted that the peculiarities of the interaction between the cooperative workers of the region and the staff of the senior inspector were the latent rejection of the former by the state apparatus because of their passivity in work and the open hostility of the cooperative workers in relation to the new state structure. The analysis of the main directions of state regulation in the activities of cooperation is given in the article. The interaction of the senior inspector’s apparatus with control bodies is presented, their activities are summarized, and the effectiveness of state policy in relation to cooperative organizations of the Tyumen region and the extent of “shadow” operations in cooperation is assessed.