{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04642166344294004, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014506769825918761, 'mean_word_length': 4.594594594594595, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Alarm to Peter in Mark's Gospel

When we consider Mark’s account of the cock-crowing which confirmed the denial of Peter, we are immediately faced with a difficult textual problem: does Mark record two cock-crowings or, like the other three evangelists, does he record only one? The question is of particular importance because it is highly probable that Mark’s account is in fact the actual report of Peter himself. The textual problem involves three verses in Mark’s fourteenth chapter: v.30 (did the word 6Cs appear in the original text?), v.68 (did the words KiL ikhiKTwf ifi5vQ<v appear in the original text? ) , and v.72 (did the words ~K Ó~BJT&dquo;poV and lls appear in the original text?). The verdict has been variously given, although the United Bible Societies’ edition of the Greek N.T. may present some kind of consensus of modern opinion. Here the words 61j in v.30 and cK df,ur6pov in v.72 have been included in the text, while the letter &dquo;C&dquo; in the apparatus indicates &dquo;that there is a considerable