{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02723915050784857, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013850415512465374, 'mean_word_length': 5.793103448275862, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Structured identification of response options to address environmental health risks at the Agbogbloshie electronic waste site

Electronic waste (e‐waste) is a growing problem across low‐ and middle‐income countries. Agbogbloshie (Accra, Ghana) is among the world's largest and most notorious e‐waste sites, with an increasing number of studies documenting a range of environmental health risks. The present study aimed to provide national, regional, and international stakeholders with a summary of expert opinion on the most pressing problems arising from e‐waste activities at Agbogbloshie, as well as suggested solutions to address these problems. Structured interviews were performed between April and September 2015 that used a Logical Framework Approach as a scoping exercise to gauge problems and benefits of e‐waste recycling, and the Delphi methodology to identify response options. Stakeholders (n = 19) from 15 institutions were interviewed with 2 rounds of a Delphi Poll: open‐ended interviews followed by an electronic questionnaire in which experts ranked various proposed response options based on health, environmental, social, and economic benefit and feasibility. The goal was to prioritize potential interventions that would address identified problems at Agbogbloshie. Experts identified the most beneficial and feasible options in decreasing rank order as follows and prefaced by the statement “it is recommended that”: 1) there be further research on the health effects; 2) e‐waste workers be given appropriate personal protective equipment; 3) the Ministry of the Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation re‐visit Ghana's Hazardous Waste Bill; 4) e‐waste workers be involved in the planning process of interventions and are be kept informed of any results; and 5) there be increased education and sensitization on hazards related to e‐waste for both workers and the general public. These solutions are discussed in relation to ongoing dialogue at the international level concerning e‐waste recycling interventions, with strengths and weaknesses examined for the Ghanaian context. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:980–991. ©2017 SETAC