{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.040142933171139664, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02364479586406143, 'mean_word_length': 5.169793621013133, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Prognostic value of total bilirubin in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text


Introduction
Despite substantial improvements in reperfusion therapy, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a life-threatening disease worldwide. [1,2] AMI is traditionally divided into ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The prognosis of patients with AMI is still poor, particularly in the STEMI cases. [3] Therefore, early predictionof morbidityand mortalityis warrantedto guidetreatment in these patients.
Biomarkers are frequently used to predict adverse outcomes in AMI patients. [4] Bilirubin is the final product of heme catabolism in the systemic circulation. Clinically, bilirubin is routinely applied for assessment of liver function. Bilirubin is known to be an important endogenous antioxidant. [5] Lower bilirubin level was associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. [6,7] By contrast, serum bilirubin level increase acutely after AMI/PCI, peaking 21 h after coronary intervention. [8] AMI patients with higher total bilirubin level had a worse prognosis. [9][10][11] However, the use of serum total bilirubin level for predicting the MACEs and long-term mortality is conflicting. [12,13] Furthermore, the magnitude of the prognostic value of total bilirubin varied considerably across studies.
To the best of our knowledge, no previous meta-analysis has evaluated the prognostic role of serum total bilirubin among AMI patients. We, therefore, conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of higher serum total bilirubin level in patients with AMI, in terms of MACEs, cardiovascular death, and allcause mortality risk.

Search strategy
Two authors independently searched PubMed and Embase databases from their inception to April 15, 2018. Search keywords used were as follows: "bilirubin" AND "AMI" OR "acute coronary syndrome" AND "death" OR "mortality" OR "major adverse cardiovascular events" OR "prognosis". Language was restrained as English. Additionally, the reference lists of relevant articles were manually searched to identify any additional articles. This meta-analysis was reported according to the checklist of the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. [14] Ethical approval was not required because the present study only used the study level data

Study selection
Studies satisfying the following inclusion criteria were included: 1. full-text observational studies that evaluated the association of serum total bilirubin level with the prognosis of AMI patients; 2. outcome of interests were MACEs, cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality; and 3. presented multivariate-adjusted risk estimate on the association between total bilirubin and prognosis for the higher versus the lower total bilirubin level.
Studies were excluded if: 1. the study population was non-AMI patients or specific type of AMI; 2. conference abstract, reviews or letters; and 3. multiple publications adopting the same population.

Data extraction and quality assessment
The following information was independently extracted by 2 authors: surname of the first author, publication year, geographical location, study design, study population, sample size, mean age or age range at baseline, percentage of men, proportion of diabetes or hypertension, total bilirubin cut-off level, number of outcome event, fully multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), length of follow-up, and adjustment for potential confounders. A third reviewer was consulted to resolve the differences between the 2 authors in the data abstraction. The methodological quality of the selected studies was evaluated using a nine-star Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). [15] Study quality was examined on the selection, comparability, exposure, and outcomes assessment. Overall, studies scoring 7 or above indicated good quality.

Data synthesis and analysis
Multivariate-adjusted risk estimates for the higher versus lower total bilirubin level were used for meta-analysis. HR and OR were assumed to approximate the same measure of the risk ratio (RR). Heterogeneity was assessed by the I 2 statistic and Cochrane Q test. If statistically significant heterogeneity was observed (P value of Cochrane Q test <.1 or I 2 statistic>50%), we chose a random effect model. Otherwise, a fixed-effect model was applied. To explore heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of AMI (STEMI versus total AMI) and follow-up duration (in-hospital versus follow-up). To explore the reliability of the pooled effect sizes, sensitivity analysis was conducted by omitting individual studies at each turn. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 12.0 (StataCorp, TX).

Search results and study characteristics
We identified 295 potential articles in Pubmed and Embase databases. No additional articles were identified by reviewing the reference lists. After scanning the titles and abstracts, 263 articles were removed. After reviewing the full-text articles, 26 articles were further excluded mainly due to they did not report the outcome of interest or population was not restricted to AMI patients. Finally, 6 studies [12,13,[16][17][18][19] were included in the metaanalysis. The flow chart of the study selection process is presented in Figure 1. Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of the included studies. These studies were conducted in Turkey, [16,17] Germany, [12] USA, [19] China, [13] and South Korea. [18] Four studies [12,[16][17][18] enrolled STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 2 studies included patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. Sample sizes varied from 536 to 7467, with a total of 14,554 AMI patients. The mean age of patients ranged from 56.8 to 64.2 years, and the percentage of men ranged from 71.9% to 82.3%. Mean follow-up duration was up to 26.2 months. According to the 9-star NOS scale, 4 studies achieved high-quality score of 7 (Supplemental Table S1, http://links.lww.com/MD/C756).

Total bilirubin and MACEs
Three studies [12,17,18] reported the in-hospital MACEs as an outcome and one study [19] provided data on follow-up MACEs. As shown in Figure 2, AMI patients with higher serum total bilirubin level had an increased risk of MACEs (RR 1.65; 95% CI 1. 25-2.19) in a random effect model. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (I 2 = 62.9%; P = .029). A leaveout 1 study sensitivity analysis did not substantially change the combined effect (Data not shown). Stratified analysis by followup duration indicated that higher serum total bilirubin significantly increased both in-hospital MACEs (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.34-2.60) and follow-up MACEs (RR 1.26; 95% CI 1.05-1.51). Moreover, subgroup analysis by the type of myocardial infarction showed that the prognostic value of higher total bilirubin was stronger in the STEMI patients undergoing PCI (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.34-2.60) than all type of AMI patients (RR 1.26; 95% CI 1.05-1.51).

Total bilirubin and cardiovascular mortality
Three studies [16,18,19] reported cardiovascular mortality as an outcome. As shown in Figure 3, AMI patients with higher serum total bilirubin level was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 2.12; 95% CI 1.24-3.64) in a random effect model, with significant heterogeneity across the studies (I 2 = 71.4%; P = .030). Sensitivity analysis by removing individual studies at each time did not substantially alter the pooled risk estimate (Data not shown). Stratified analysis by follow-up duration showed that the prognostic value of higher total bilirubin was stronger for inhospital cardiovascular mortality (RR 2.82; 95% CI 1.83-4.36) than the follow-up cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.45; 95% CI 1.14-1.85).

Total bilirubin and all-cause mortality
Two studies [18,19] reported the all-cause mortality as an outcome. As shown in Figure 4, AMI patients with higher serum total bilirubin level was not associated with an increased risk of allcause mortality (RR 1.31; 95% CI 0.75-2.28) in a random effect model. The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 = 67.7%; P = .045). Stratified analysis by follow-up duration     revealed that the prognostic value of total bilirubin was not significant in both 30-day and long-term all-cause mortality.

Publication bias
The funnel plot is potentially unreliable for less than the recommended arbitrary minimum number of 10 studies included, [20] we, therefore, did not construct the funnel plot to explore publication bias.

Discussion
The current meta-analysis suggests that higher serum total bilirubin level is independently associated with an increased risk of MACEs and cardiovascular mortality in patients with AMI. AMI patients with higher serum total bilirubin had an approximately 65% and 2.12-fold greater risk of MACEs and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. However, higher serum total bilirubin was not associated with an increased risk of allcause mortality risk during follow-up. Bilirubin has anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and vasodilatory functions. [21] The prognostic value of serum bilirubin is different from CAD and AMI patients. In contrast, increased risk of CAD in individuals with low serum total bilirubin level. [22] For stable CAD patients, increased serum total bilirubin was associated with a better prognosis. [6,13] Accordingly, experimental data obtained in animal models also supported the protective effects of bilirubin. Chronically increased bilirubin protected from cardiac reperfusion injury. [23] Increased cardiac bilirubin could improve postischemic myocardial function. [24] Administration of bilirubin reduced infarct area in a rat coronary ischemia/reperfusion model. [25] In light of these evidence, bilirubin plays a potential protective role in cardiovascular disease. [26] While in AMI patients, elevated total bilirubin level was correlated with high burden thrombus [9] and coronary atherosclerosis, [10] and angiographic coronary noreflow. [17] Also, AMI patients with higher total bilirubin had a lower in stent restenosis risk than those with lower total bilirubin. [27] Myocardial heme oxygenase-1 enzyme activity was significantly increased in response to acute infarction. [8] Elevated bilirubin level could be mainly caused by stress-induced heme oxygenase enzyme activation in AMI patients. Above findings suggests that bilirubin is a protective factor during chronic elevation in relatively stable CAD patients, whereas acute elevation may be a marker of disease severity.
The exact mechanisms underlying the association between total bilirubin level and adverse outcomes in AMI patients are unclear. Bilirubin is a potent antioxidant under physiological conditions. [28] Increased bilirubin level may be a compensatory mechanism in response to oxidative stress. Impaired perfusion of liver induced by low cardiac output is another important cause of increased bilirubin level. [29] Additionally, bilirubin could exert an effect on the blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk. [30] Circulating bilirubin level may be considered as a surrogate biomarker of cardiac dysfunction and poor hepatic perfusion.
Nevertheless, high serum total bilirubin level may simply reflect the AMI severity. [31] Therefore, bilirubin effects could have confounded by poor cardiac function after AMI. Regardless of whether elevated bilirubin is a surrogate marker of AMI severity or an independent prognostic factor for the adverse prognosis, careful attention is needed for clinicians.
There are several limitations in this meta-analysis. First, total bilirubin was only determined at a single time point and could not reflect the changes during the time of the hospital stay and follow-up. Second, different cut-off values of the serum total bilirubin level were reported in the analyzed studies, and we failed to establish an optimal threshold of total bilirubin in this metaanalysis. Third, inability to perform the publication bias test due to small number of studies included in the analyses and also results of subgroup analysis may be unreliable. Fourth, there were significant between-study heterogeneity and differences in study design, clinical settings, follow-up duration, and types of AMI could contribute to the heterogeneity. Fifth, lack of reporting other medications that may have changed not only the prognosis but the level of bilirubin itself. Finally, bilirubin is likely representing a surrogate marker of MI severity, and therefore, revealing the potential protective effects is almost impossible by the retrospective analysis.

Conclusions
AMI patients with higher serum total bilirubin level significantly increased risk of MACEs and cardiovascular mortality but not all-cause mortality risk. However, interpretation of the current findings should be with caution because the prognostic value of bilirubin can be confounded by cardiac dysfunction after AMI.