{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010196649672250545, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0014566642388929353, 'mean_word_length': 5.87, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Modular Tibial Augmentations in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Proximal tibial bony deficiencies are not uncommon in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Modular tibial augmentations were introduced to address these deficiencies. Alterations in strain distribution as a result of medial wedge and block augmentations were evaluated for a modular total knee arthroplasty system in 6 fresh frozen anatomic specimen tibias. Full-field strain patterns were examined using photoelastic coating methods, and high strain regions were evaluated using strain gage rosette techniques. The total knee arthroplasty installations were tested in static physiologic axial and torsional load configurations. The relative effects of sequential wedge and block augmentations compared with the nonaugmented case were statistically analyzed. There were no overall statistical differences in the 3 treatments in terms of maximal (principal) strains. A secondary analysis that evaluated specific location and load pattern combinations established several minor statistical differences along with insights into the manner in which each construct loads the proximal tibia. Although metal wedge augmentation commonly is used, block augmentation seems to be an appropriate alternative from a strain distribution standpoint in cases in which the block geometry better approximates the bony defect.