{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014657980456026058, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.089108910891089, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
TOMS Policy Statement: The Rights of Program Authors in the Evaluation of Programs

A number of papers submitted to TOMS involve the objective evaluation and comparison of related algorithms. These are quite valuable papers and the editors encourage them, especially if they involve widely used algorithms. Such evaluations inevitably lead to negative remarks about some programs and, in turn, to unhappiness on the part of the programs' authors. The purpose of this statement is to provide guidelines for authors of such evaluation papers and to ensure the protection of certain rights of the authors of programs.