{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019230769230769232, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011538461538461539, 'mean_word_length': 5.2023809523809526, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Commentary: Why measuring clinical change at the individual level is challenging but crucial – commentary on Jensen and Corralejo (2017)

Jensen and Corralejo highlight that most mental health intervention research focuses on the group level rather than individual level. They looked at parent-reported outcomes for up to 24 children and found that individual-level findings appear to tell a less positive story than the more traditional group-level finding. They call for more reporting of outcomes at individual level.