{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024793388429752067, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04224058769513315, 'mean_word_length': 4.647668393782383, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Suture or graft? Changing trends in melanoma wound closure.

The method of wound repair following excision of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma has been assessed in a consecutive series of 256 melanomas of the trunk and limbs between 1972 and 1986. Excision margins of 1, 2 and 3-5 cm were used according to clinical assessment of tumour thickness. Primary closure was the preferred method of wound repair and split skin grafting when it could not be achieved. 30% of wounds were closed primarily between 1972-81, rising to 54% between 1982-86. This change has been partly due to an increase in the number of thin lesions, but also due to improved surgical technique. Simple interrupted suture was used between 1972-81. In 1982 a multilayer subcutaneous and subcuticular prolene suture was introduced as an improved method of direct closure, and led to a reversal in the ratio of grafting to primary closure. This technique is particularly beneficial for wounds with excision margins of 2 and 3 cm. Complication rates have been lower for primary suture (4%) than split skin graft (12%).