{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.375796178343949, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Community Genetics: A Bridge between Clinical Genetics and Public Health

Clinical genetics and public health differ in their subjects; in who takes the initiative; in their aims, methods and outcome measures, and therefore in their ability to handle sensitive issues. They are seemingly incompatible. Nevertheless, they can be reconciled in community genetics. Community genetics combines the best from clinical genetics and public health. It shares with clinical genetics its aim of empowerment, its methods of information and support, its outcome measures and its possibility to handle sensitive issues. It has in common with public health its subjects; the origin of its initiatives, and non-reproductive prevention. In general, communities can be defined at different levels: geographically, linguistically, socially or genetically. Genetic communities can also be defined at different levels: on the basis of common heritage, on the basis of common practice, or on the basis of common problems.