{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03282828282828283, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005892255892255892, 'mean_word_length': 5.225130890052356, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluating models of healthcare delivery using the Model of Care Evaluation Tool (MCET)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Our aim was to provide the outcome of a structured Model of Care (MoC) Evaluation Tool (MCET), developed by an FAANP Best-practices Workgroup, that can be used to guide the evaluation of existing MoCs being considered for use in clinical practice. Multiple MoCs are available, but deciding which model of health care delivery to use can be confusing. This five-component tool provides a structured assessment approach to model selection and has universal application.


METHODS
A literature review using CINAHL, PubMed, Ovid, and EBSCO was conducted.


CONCLUSIONS
The MCET evaluation process includes five sequential components with a feedback loop from component 5 back to component 3 for reevaluation of any refinements. The components are as follows: (1) Background, (2) Selection of an MoC, (3) Implementation, (4) Evaluation, and (5) Sustainability and Future Refinement.


IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
This practical resource considers an evidence-based approach to use in determining the best model to implement based on need, stakeholder considerations, and feasibility.