{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.036936936936936934, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008108108108108109, 'mean_word_length': 5.221288515406163, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Acetylcholinesterase and the ADH-dependent transport of water in the amphibian bladder].

It was found that acetylcholine (ACh) at the concentration of 10(-3) M inhibited ADH-stimulated water transport through the wall of amphibian urinary bladder. This effect was suggested to be caused by an interaction of ACh with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) rather than by a stimulation of the M- or N-cholinoreceptor. The inhibitory action of ACh was completely suppressed in the presence of various AChE inhibitors (physostigmine, proserine, armine, Gd-42, acridine-iodmethylate), while an inhibitor of butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), AD-4, failed to affect it. In accord with this observation the activity of AChE (but not of BuChE) was demonstrated in the urinary bladder epithelium. Since, in addition to the hydrosmotic effects of pituitrine, 8-arginine-vasopressin or oxytocin, ACh blocked also effects of forskolin or cyclic AMP, one may conclude that it acts at some post-cyclic AMP production stage. AChE-dependent inhibition of the ADH-stimulated water transport decreased significantly when the serosal pH was raising from 7.2 to 8.0, but was augmented by serosal acidification (pH 6.8), whereas such pH alterations did not affect the activity of the epithelium AChE. The effect of ACh under consideration was suppressed by adding amiloride (10(-4) M) to the serosal solution. Similarly, the ACh effect was blocked by an inhibitor of Ca-dependent K+ channels, 4-aminopyrdine, which in addition prevented the inhibition of the ADH-stimulated water transport by the serosal acidification. It was noteworthy that some other K+ channel blockers (Ba2+, Cs+, tetraethylammonium, apamine, quinine) did not affect either the water transport or the antipituitrine effect of ACh. In conclusion, we suggest that the inhibitory action of ACh on the ADH-stimulated water transport in the urinary bladder is mediated through the intracellular acidification resulting from ACh interaction with AChE. It is unlikely that the acidification is merely a consequence of the ACh hydrolysis, rather the ACh-AChE interaction induces directly an increase in the proton conductivity of the basolateral membrane of the urinary bladder epithelium.