{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04152005629838142, 'fraction_numerical': 0.045038705137227304, 'mean_word_length': 4.4903474903474905, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Does use of a trauma checklist increase discharges from the emergency department?

Introduction Emergency department (ED) discharge is appropriate for patients with minor traumatic injuries. The objective of this study is to determine if use of a trauma checklist increases identification of patients with minor trauma who are safe for discharge. Methods Data were collected on trauma patients evaluated between 1 April 2015 and 31 January 2016 in two groups before and after introduction of a trauma checklist. The two groups were compared using age, mechanism of injury, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) using unpaired Student t-tests and Fisher’s exact test. Results A total of 841 trauma patients were included; 197 prior to the introduction of the checklist and 644 afterwards. Following the implementation of the trauma checklist, significantly more patients were discharged from the ED (18.2% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.0004). Discharged patients in the pre- and post-checklist groups had similar ISS (1.93 ± 1.49 vs. 1.87 ± 1.90, p = 0.90) and were of similar age (35.27 ± 11.06 vs. 41.99 years ± 18.20, p = 0.17). There was no increase in ‘bounce-backs’ to the ED in the post checklist group despite a significantly higher rate of discharge. Conclusion Use of a trauma checklist allows for better identification of those trauma patients who are safe to discharge from the ED and widespread use may decrease healthcare costs.