{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03012633624878523, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006802721088435374, 'mean_word_length': 5.477987421383648, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Transcriptional noise and the evolution of gene number.

Several proposals are made to explain the apparent increase in complexity of certain lineages during evolution. The proposals (not made in this order) are: (1) that gene number is a valid measure of biological complexity; (2) that gene number has not increased continuously during evolution, but has risen in discrete steps; (3) that two of the biggest steps occurred at the transition from prokaryotes to eukaryotes and the transition from invertebrates to vertebrates; (4) that these steps were made possible by 'systemic' changes in the way that genetic information is managed in the genome; (5) that the ability to silence inappropriate promoters is the primary limitation on gene number; (6) that the invention of nucleosomes (and perhaps the nuclear membrane) facilitated the evolution of eukaryotes from prokaryotic ancestors; (7) that the spread of low density methylation throughout the genome facilitated the evolution of vertebrates from invertebrate ancestors.