{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02669902912621359, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0048543689320388345, 'mean_word_length': 4.851063829787234, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Accurate Self-Assessment, Autonomous Ignorance, and the Appreciation of Disability

In their thoughts commentaries on our essay, 
“Knowing your own strength: Accurate 
self-assessment as a requirement for personal 
autonomy,” George Agich, Ruth Chadwick, and 
Dominic Murphy (2004) provide both criticisms 
and insights that give us a context in which to 
clarify further our claim that one’s autonomy is 
impaired when one is unable to appreciate whether 
one has the capacities required for tasks one is 
undertaking. We focus on two issues: the extent 
to which our account of autonomy suggests a 
problematically “externalist” or “objective” approach 
and the issue of whether our talk of 
accurate self-assessment entails an overdemanding 
requirement that one know numerous facts 
about oneself to count as autonomous.