{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02577319587628866, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.580508474576271, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Occupational asthma: clinical phenotypes, biomarkers, and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW
This review focuses on new findings in the clinical and inflammatory aspects that can help to better identify the different phenotypes of work-related asthma and the development of specific biomarkers useful in diagnosis and follow-up.


RECENT FINDINGS
Studies on phenotyping of occupational asthma, a subtype of work-related asthma, have mainly compared the clinical, physiological, and inflammatory patterns associated with the type of agent causing occupational asthma, namely, high-molecular-weight and low-molecular-weight agents. Most of this research has found that patients with occupational asthma due to high-molecular-weight agents have an associated presence of rhinitis, conjunctivitis, atopy, and a pattern of early asthmatic reactions during specific inhalation challenge. The inflammatory profile (blood eosinophils, sputum cell count, or exhaled nitric oxide) may be similar when occupational asthma is caused by either type of agent. In some studies, severity of asthma and exacerbations have been associated with exposure to low-molecular-weight agents. The most reliable biomarkers in diagnosis and follow-up are eosinophilia in induced sputum and exhaled nitric oxide.


SUMMARY
There are several phenotypes, characterized by its pathogenesis and inflammatory profile. Avoidance of the causative agents does not warrant complete recovery of occupational asthma. Treatment with biologic agents may be considered in severe occupational asthma.