{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013133208255159476, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001876172607879925, 'mean_word_length': 5.2823529411764705, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Measuring Teaching Matters What Different Ways of Looking at Student Results Tell Us About Teacher Effectiveness

States are redesigning their educator effectiveness systems to provide more information and more support to improve teaching. In the process, they increasingly look beyond the most basic and historically most common view of measuring student performance: how many students “passed” the State test in a given year. A number of States now require an objective measure of student growth to be part of teacher evaluations.1