{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02231237322515213, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.767123287671233, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Viewpoints for requirements definition

This paper is a survey of the current viewpoint-oriented requirements approaches and a description of an alternative object-oriented viewpoint-based approach. The paper sets out a case for a multiple viewpoint-oriented approach in requirements definition and, using a simple case study, examines the viewpoint approach adopted by three requirements methodologies. The paper concludes by proposing an alternative object-oriented viewpoint-based approach.