{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017094017094017096, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00811965811965812, 'mean_word_length': 5.193121693121693, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Anorectoplasty in children in Papua New Guinea.

The posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) procedure for the definitive repair of children with imperforate anus was described in 1982. Unfortunately, surgeons in Papua New Guinea (PNG) have until recently not had the opportunity of being trained in the technique. Through the Medical Officer, Nursing and Allied Health Sciences Training Project (MONAHP) and Pacific Islands Project (PIP) of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 65 Papua New Guinean children with an anorectal anomaly have undergone a repair, in conjunction with training of the surgical staff and medical students. A new technique for the management of a prolapsed colostomy has been developed and a protocol for management of PSARP patients postoperatively has been formulated. Patients referred to the paediatric surgical visiting teams were diagnosed and treated according to the stage their management had reached. Patients with a low anomaly were treated by a cutback procedure, those with a colostomy and a high lesion were managed by a PSARP and those with failed previous surgery were managed with a redo anorectoplasty, often without a covering colostomy. Data were collected on the patients treated and, where possible, the patients were followed during subsequent visits. 65 patients with an anorectal anomaly were treated, of whom 6 were treated with a cutback and 43 had a primary repair of a major anomaly. 5 of these 43 involved an abdominoperineal procedure. 19 children had redo surgery, 3 of whom had a second operation by the senior author, due to failure of initial postoperative management; 1 of these was for a failure to carry out the postoperative dilatations and 2 were due to poorly controlled constipation in the early postoperative period. A protocol for the postoperative dilatations was developed using shaped candles. Major complications were uncommon, in particular infections were rare despite the relative lack of facilities. However, difficulties with outpatient follow-up resulted in problems that could have been avoided. A large number of anorectal anomalies have been successfully treated as part of the MONAHP and PIP projects with local surgeons learning the technique. A protocol for follow-up and a technique for the management of colostomy prolapse have been developed.