{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021505376344086023, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.178423236514523, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Keyless Covert Communication via Channel State Information

We consider the problem of covert communication over a state-dependent channel when the Channel State Information (CSI) is available either non-causally, causally, or strictly causally, either at the transmitter alone, or at both transmitter and receiver. Covert communication with respect to an adversary, called “warden,” is one in which, despite communication over the channel, the warden’s observation remains indistinguishable from an output induced by innocent channel-input symbols. Covert communication involves fooling an adversary in part by a proliferation of codebooks; for reliable decoding at the legitimate receiver, the codebook uncertainty is typically removed via a shared secret key that is unavailable to the warden. In contrast to previous work, we do not assume the availability of a large shared key at the transmitter and legitimate receiver. Instead, we only require a secret key with negligible rate to bootstrap the communication and our scheme extracts shared randomness from the CSI in a manner that keeps it secret from the warden, despite the influence of the CSI on the warden’s output. When CSI is available at the transmitter and receiver, we derive the covert capacity region. When CSI is only available at the transmitter, we derive inner and outer bounds on the covert capacity. We also provide examples for which the covert capacity is positive with knowledge of CSI but is zero without it.