{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013477088948787063, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0026954177897574125, 'mean_word_length': 5.754545454545455, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Why correctly identifying maternal condition in perinatal death classification systems is crucial: a commentary

Ending preventable perinatal deaths is high on the global health agenda. In addressing this priority it is imperative that quality data, related to perinatal mortality, is consistently collected and reported. However, variability in the methods used to classify and report perinatal deaths has been a long-standing global challenge. A recent systematic review found over 81 different systems used worldwide to classify perinatal deaths. Different reporting systems impede the ability to compare and understand estimates and cause of death leading to confusing decisions regarding which prevention strategies are most appropriate.