{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02, 'mean_word_length': 5.035175879396985, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 1, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Erratum: Quantitative evaluation of the clinical efficacy of attention bias modification treatment for anxiety disorders

The article to which this Erratum refers was published inDepression and Anxiety 32(6): 383–391 (https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22344). An error occurred in Table 1 of the published article. Specifically, the 95% confidence intervals depicted in this table are all of the same size. We now tracked down the origin of this error, which resulted from our estimation of the variance of d based on the four studies that provided information allowing calculation of variance and then entered the mean of these variances for all studies when producing our Table 1. Instead, a more accurate way should have been to first estimate the magnitude of the correlation (r) between preand posttreatment values and then use this estimate to calculate the variance of d for each study individually (see formula).When reports on pre–post correlations weremissing, we used correlations from other studies with the same type of population and measure. Alternatively, if such proxy was not available, we used the mean r (rather thanmean variance) based on the four studies that reported the needed data.