{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04201471138262062, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029630553131363504, 'mean_word_length': 5.18611825192802, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Inhibition of the Polyamine System Counteracts β-Amyloid Peptide-Induced Memory Impairment in Mice: Involvement of Extrasynaptic NMDA Receptors

In Alzheimer's disease (AD), the β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) has been causally linked to synaptic dysfunction and cognitive impairment. Several studies have shown that N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptors (NMDAR) activation is involved in the detrimental actions of Aβ. Polyamines, like spermidine and spermine, are positive modulators of NMDAR function and it has been shown that their levels are regulated by Aβ. In this study we show here that interruption of NMDAR modulation by polyamines through blockade of its binding site at NMDAR by arcaine (0.02 nmol/site), or inhibition of polyamine synthesis by DFMO (2.7 nmol/site), reverses Aβ25–35-induced memory impairment in mice in a novel object recognition task. Incubation of hippocampal cell cultures with Aβ25–35 (10 µM) significantly increased the nuclear accumulation of Jacob, which is a hallmark of NMDAR activation. The Aβ-induced nuclear translocation of Jacob was blocked upon application of traxoprodil (4 nM), arcaine (4 µM) or DFMO (5 µM), suggesting that activation of the polyamine binding site at NMDAR located probably at extrasynaptic sites might underlie the cognitive deficits of Aβ25–35-treated mice. Extrasynaptic NMDAR activation in primary neurons results in a stripping of synaptic contacts and simplification of neuronal cytoarchitecture. Aβ25–35 application in hippocampal primary cell cultures reduced dendritic spine density and induced alterations on spine morphology. Application of traxoprodil (4 nM), arcaine (4 µM) or DFMO (5 µM) reversed these effects of Aβ25–35. Taken together these data provide evidence that polyamine modulation of extrasynaptic NMDAR signaling might be involved in Aβ pathology.


Introduction
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most frequent form of dementia in the elder population [1]. It is characterized by a progressive decline of cognitive function and accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles, formed by phosphorylated tau protein and senile plaques formed by amyloid-b-peptide (Ab) accumulation [2]. Recent evidence suggests that the toxic effects of Ab may be mediated, in part, by activation of extrasynaptic NMDARs [3,4], although the mechanisms by which Ab induces synaptic and memory impairment are not fully understood.
Polyamines, such as spermidine and spermine, are aliphatic amines that function as positive modulators of NMDAR. They bind at the lower lobe of the N-terminal domain of the GluN1 and GluN2B dimer interface, modulating agonist binding [5]. Upregulation of the polyamine system has been reported both in post-mortem analysis of AD's brain and in vitro studies. Polyamine levels were found increased in memory-related brain areas, like temporal cortex and frontal lobe [6,7]. Also, addition of Ab peptide to neuronal cell cultures increases polyamine levels, leading to NMDAR activation [8,9]. In addition, increased ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity and immunostaining were reported in the brain of Alzheimer's disease patients AD and ADlike conditions [10,11]. Although up-regulation of polyamine system in AD and AD-like conditions were reported, it is unclear whether these alterations are linked to Ab-induced synaptic dysfunction and cognitive decline.

Ethics Statement
All animal experimentation reported in this study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee -Comissão de É tica no Uso de Animais (process number 0206) and performed in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for animal experimentation [12], the Policies on the Use of Animals and Humans in Neuroscience Research, revised and approved by the Society for Neuroscience Research.

Behavioral experiments
3.2.1. Subjects. Adult male Swiss mice (n = 163), approximately 12 weeks old (30-40 g), provided by the Animal Center of Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, were used for the behavioral experiments. They were housed 4 to 8 in plastic nontransparent cages, with free access to water and food (Guabi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), under controlled 12 h/ 12 h light-dark cycle (lights on at 07:00) conditions and temperature (24uC). Behavioral experiments were conducted in a sound-attenuated and air-regulated room, where the animals were habituated 1 hour prior to experiments. All possible means were applied to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used.
In all behavioral experiments, in order to deliver the treatments directly to the mice brain, Ab 25-35 , Ab  , spermidine, traxoprodil, arcaine and DFMO, were administered through intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) route, according to Dalmolin and coworkers [14]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isofluorane (nasal route) until full anesthesia was achieved. The microinjections were performed using a Hamilton 10 ml syringe connected to a specially made 28-gauge stainless steel needle with 3 mm in length. The needle was inserted directly through the skin and skull into the lateral ventricle, targeted by visualizing an equilateral triangle between the eyes and center of skull to locate bregma, then inserting the needle 1 mm laterally to this point. This avoids the use of unnecessary force since the needle penetrates at the suture line of the skull plates. Compounds were injected in a volume of 3 ml over a 5 sec period, followed by a 10 sec delay to allow diffusion and prevent backflow. All injections were performed by an experimenter well trained in this technique. When co-administered (spermidine and arcaine), drugs were injected using a polyethylene tube attached to the Hamilton syringe. A bubble of 1 cm kept the drugs apart and an interval of approximately 30 seconds separated each drug injection.
3.2.3. Novel Object Recognition Task. Novel object recognition task was performed in a 30630630 cm wooden chamber with walls painted black, the front wall made of Plexiglas and the floor covered with ethyl vinyl acetate sheet. A light bulb, hanging 60 cm above the behavioral apparatus, provided constant illumination of about 40 lux, and an air-conditioner provided constant background sound isolation. The objects used were plastic mounting bricks, each of them with different shapes and colors, but same size. Throughout the experiments objects were used in a counterbalanced manner and animals showed no preference for any of the objects. Chambers and objects were thoroughly cleaned with 30% ethanol before and after each animal was test.
Six days after Ab [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] or Ab  injection the novel object recognition task was performed according to Wang and coworkers [15], with minor modifications. The task consisted of habituation, training and testing sessions, each of them lasting 8 minutes. In the first session, mice were habituated to the behavioral apparatus, with no objects, and then returned to their home cages. Twentyfour hours later, training session took place, where animals were exposed to two equal objects (object A), and the exploration time was recorded with two stopwatches. Exploration was recorded when the animal touched or reached the object with the nose at a distance of less than 2 cm. Climbing or sitting on the object was not considered exploration. Immediately after training the animals were randomly assigned to the following groups: vehicle (PBS 3 ml), traxoprodil (0.002-0.2 nmol/site), arcaine (0.02-0.2 nmol/ site) or spermidine (2 nmol/site). DFMO (0.27-27 nmol/site) was given 1 hour prior training. Doses used were based on previous work [16,17,18] and dose-effect curves ( Figure 1B, 1D, 1E). Figure 1A, 2A and 2B display a time-line with treatments and administration time. The test session was carried out 24 hours after training, when mice were placed back in the behavioral chamber and one of the familiar objects (i.e. object A) was replaced by a novel object (i.e. object B). The time spent exploring the familiar and the novel object was recorded. The discrimination index was then calculated, taking into account the difference of time spent exploring the new and familiar objects, ([(T novel -T familiar )/(T novel + T familiar )] 6100 (%)), and used as a memory parameter. Experiments and data analysis were conducted by an experimenter blind to treatment conditions.

In vitro experiments
3.3.1 Primary hippocampal cell culture. Hippocampal primary cultures were prepared as described previously [19] using 19 days old Wistar rat embryos (Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, breeding stock). Cells were plated in a density of 40.000 cells per 18 mm coverslips, grown in 1 ml of neurobasal medium (NB, Gibco) supplemented with B27 (Life Technologies) and 200 mM L-glutamine. Cells were kept in a humidified 95% air, 5% CO 2 incubator at 37uC with no further change.

Extrasynaptic NMDAR-induced Jacob nuclear
accumulation. In order to assess extrasynaptic NMDAR activation and subsequent Jacob protein accumulation in the nucleus, assays were performed according to Behnisch and coworkers [20]. This protocol effectively induces non-phosphorylated Jacob accumulation in the nucleus, with concomitant reduction of Jacob levels at the dendritic shaft [21].  Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer (rabbit antipan-Jacob 1:350) and incubated overnight at 4uC. After PBS washing, cells were incubated with fluorescent Alexa fluor 488 tagged secondary antibody (1:1000; Molecular probes) for 60 min. Thereafter the cells were stained with DAPI (1:1000, 10 min) in PBS and mounted on slides with Mowiol.
3.3.3. Analysis of dendritic spine density and morphology. In order to perform analysis of dendritic spines morphology, hippocampal primary cultures were transfected with eGFP expressing plasmid at 7/9 DIV using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies). Briefly, 1.8 mg of eGFP-N1 plasmid (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) was mixed with 3 ml Lipofectamine 2000 in 200 ml of NB, incubated for 30 min, added to the neurons and incubated at 37uC in 5% CO 2 for additional 60 min. Next, NB medium containing transfection mix was exchanged with conditioned NB and kept for additional 2 weeks at 37uC in 5% CO 2 .
At DIV 21, cells were incubated with Ab 25-35 (10 mM) for 24 hours. Two hours prior to 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde fixation, traxoprodil (4 nM), arcaine (4 mM) or DFMO (5 mM) were mixed in the culture media. GFP expressing cultured neurons were washed, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 minutes washed with PBS and mounted on the slides with Mowiol. Drug concentration and application duration were chosen based on previous work [8,9] For dendritic spines density and morphology experiments, one to three dendritic segments (20 mm), distal and proximal from soma of each neuron were used, and analysis was performed using NeuronStudio software 0.9.92 [22]. Spines were defined as protrusions that could be differentiated from the dendritic shaft and restricted to those that were visible in the xand y-axes.
Quantification of nuclear accumulation of Jacob was performed as previously described [19]. Briefly, images were open on Image J software and the nuclear region of interest (ROI) was defined using the threshold from the DAPI staining. Nuclear Jacob immunoreactivity was measured as mean grey values (arbitrary units in pixel intensity). Data plotted in the graphs were normalized relative to control group.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Version 5.01. Values are given as mean 6S.E.M. One-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) test, depending on the experiment. Values of P,0.05 were considered significant.

Blockade of the polyamine binding site at NMDAR or inhibition of polyamine synthesis reverses Ab 25-35induced memory impairment
In order to test whether inhibition of the polyamine system counteracts memory impairment induced by Ab injection, mice injected with Ab 25-35 , or its inverted sequence were treated with traxoprodil, a GluN2B antagonist of NMDAR, arcaine, an antagonist of the polyamine binding site at NMDAR, or DFMO, a polyamine synthesis inhibitor. We found no significant difference in the amount of time that animals of all groups spent exploring both objects in the training session, indicating no biased exploration of the objects (data not shown). However, during the test session, Ab 25-35 -injected mice performed worse than controls in the novel object recognition task, as shown by a decrease in the discrimination index when compared to control (P,0.05, Fig. 1C,  1E, 1G). Of note, novel object recognition it is an interesting task in the study of Alzheimer's cognitive decline, since impairment of recognition memory is one of the first cognitive deficits present in AD patients [23].
Administration of traxoprodil (0.02 nmol/site) in naive mice significantly reduced the discrimination index for the novel object when compared to control (One-way ANOVA, F (3,15) = 6.736, P, 0.01 Fig. 1B). Administration of a dose of traxoprodil that had no effect in control mice (0.002 nmol/site) restored memory of Ab 25-35 -injected mice, as indicated by a higher discrimination index when compared to the vehicle treated-Ab 25-35 -injected group in the test session (Two-way ANOVA, F (1,16) = 6.303, P,0.05, Fig. 1C).
Since both arcaine and DFMO rescued memory deficits in mice injected with Ab 25-35 , the next set of experiments was designed to assess whether the co-administration of spermidine could reestablish the memory impairment induced by Ab 25-35 injection, after it had been reversed by arcaine or DFMO. Spermidine (2 nmol/ site), administrated immediately after training in arcaine-treated animals, significantly reduced the discrimination index (Two-way ANOVA, F (1,22) = 72.09, P,0.0001, Fig. 2B). In a second experiment, mice injected with Ab 25-35 received DFMO 1 hour prior to training and then immediately after training spermidine was administered. This protocol reversed the ameliorative effect of DFMO on memory of mice injected with Ab 25-35 (Two-way ANOVA, F (1,23) = 69.39, P,0.0001, Fig.2B). This data suggest that spermidine levels can influence whether learning is acquired or not by Ab 25-35 -injected mice.
The in vivo protocol included treatment 7 days after Ab injection, was designed in order to modulate memory consolidation in Ab 25-35 -injected mice and to test therapeutic potential. The behavioral data suggest that Ab 25-35 -injected animals, despite possible neurodegeneration, were capable to acquire new memories, as depicted in Figures 1C, 1E, 1G, 2A, 2B.
Dendritic spines are dynamic structures, and changes in their density and morphology, which can take place in minutes [24,25], might underlie the memory improvement effect seen on the behavior experiments. Moreover, since long-term memory storage relies on structural plasticity [26], we designed an in vitro protocol that could mimic the in vivo approach used.
Blockade of the polyamine binding site at NMDAR with arcaine also attenuated the effect of Ab 25-35 application on dendritic spine morphology and number. Application of arcaine for two hours significantly blocked the Ab-induced reduction spine number (Two-way ANOVA, F (1,115)

Blockade of the polyamine binding site at NMDARs or inhibition of polyamine synthesis abolish Ab 25-35induced Jacob nuclear accumulation
Extrasynaptic NMDAR activation has been shown to mediate nuclear translocation of Jacob, which is followed by dephosphorylation of CREB, stripping of synaptic contacts, a simplification neuronal cytoarchitecture and eventually cell death [19]. Previous studies suggest that application of Ab 1-42 drives Jacob into the nucleus and that this depends upon activation of extrasynaptic GluN2B containing NMDARs [3]. To test whether inhibition of polyamine system also can block nuclear accumulation of Jacob induced by Ab [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] , hippocampal neurons in culture were stimulated according to previously published protocols [20] and the nuclear accumulation of Jacob was determined by immunocytochemistry.

Discussion
Changes in polyamine system were reported both in AD and AD-like conditions [6,7,8,9,11,27]. This is the first report showing that inhibition of this system can counteract the memory impairment induced by Ab injection in mice. Using behavioral and cellular readouts we could show that inhibition of the polyamine system counteracts the deleterious effect of Ab [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] on memory formation of mice tested in the novel object recognition task. Inhibition of the polyamine system also reversed the reduction in dendritic spine density changes in dendritic spine morphology induced by Ab. Moreover, blockade of the polyamine binding site at NMDARs reversed the Ab-induced increase in nuclear translocation of Jacob, a marker of Ab-induced extra-synaptic NMDAR activation [3]. We propose that Ab [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] injection increases ODC activity [9], which then results in increased spermidine and spermine levels, enhanced activation of extrasynaptic NMDAR by polyamines, spine pathology and memory impairment.
Polyamines, like spermidine and spermine, are modulators of NMDAR. The binding site resides in the dimer interface formed by the lower lobes of GluN1/GluN2B N-terminal domains. This GluN1/GluN2B dimer can be found in two different states, a desensitized and an active state. Binding of polyamines stabilizes the dimer in the active state, thus favoring agonist binding [5,28]. In this study we could show that inhibition of the polyamine system reversed the memory impairment of Ab 25-35 -injected mice, a model of AD-like cognitive deficit [29]. Both traxoprodil and arcaine, antagonists of the GluN2B NMDAR subunit and the polyamine binding site at NMDAR, rescued memory deficits of Ab-injected mice in the novel object recognition task. Of note, polyamine levels were found increased in the temporal cortex of AD patients [6,7], a brain area that is involved in processing of episodic memory, one of the first cognitive function impaired in AD [30]. We also found that spermidine administration, in arcaine-or DFMO-treated Ab 25-35 -injected animals restored the Ab-induced memory impairment. Taken together, these data suggest that a polyaminergic modulation impacts learning in Ab 25-35 -injected animals and inhibition of ODC enzyme activity, through DFMO administration, indeed reversed the memory impairment of Ab 25-35 -injected mice. ODC is the rate-limiting enzyme in the polyamine pathway, and its activity is tuned by both polyamine levels and antizyme activity. Antizyme is a regulatory protein that binds to ODC and forms an inactive complex [31]. Mä kitie and coworkers [27] reported increased immunoreactivity of antizyme inhibitor (AZIN) in the hippocampus of AD patients, which may explain the increased ODC activity found in the brain of AD patients [11]. Indeed, AZIN and NMDA receptors were shown to be co-localized in hippocampal neurons [27], suggesting that AZIN regulates glutamatergic signaling, possibly by controlling local production of polyamines.
While glutamatergic dysfunction has been implicated in the etiology of AD, memantine, the only FDA-approved NMDAR antagonist for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD, has limited success [32]. Memantine is a low affinity NMDAR channel blocker with strong voltage dependency and rapid unblocking kinetics [33]. This profile would allow to prevent the tonic pathological extrasynaptic NMDAR activation, while sparing physiological transmission [34,35]. However, memantine's lack of selectivity over NMDAR, like antagonism of a7 nAChR [36,37], might hamper its effectiveness in the treatment of AD. Thus, modulation of allosteric GluN2B NMDAR sites, e.g. polyamine binding site, could be a preferred strategy on the quest for AD's disease-modifying therapies. Allosteric modulation would confer several advantages: specific modulation of receptor subunits (like the GluN2B antagonist traxoprodil); allosteric modulators do not compete with physiological agonists and allosteric antagonism spare biological patterns of receptor activity [38,39].
Several studies have shown that impairment of synaptic plasticity induced by Ab peptide relies on NMDAR activation [40,41,42]. The location of this receptor might account for the toxic effects of its activation, once different compartmentalized signaling cascades are activated after synaptic or extrasynaptic NMDARs stimulation [43]. Activation of extrasynaptic NMDARs leads to translocation of Jacob to the nucleus, which is followed by reduction in dendritic spine density and simplification of dendritic tree [19,21]. Ab 1-42 oligomers induce nuclear accumulation of Jacob and this translocation was blocked by the GluN2B antagonist ifenprodil [3]. Likewise, we found increased nuclear Jacob immunoreactivity upon spermidine or Ab [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] application in hippocampal cell cultures. The effect was abolished upon inhibition of the polyamine system and application of the GluN2Bantagonist traxoprodil, suggesting a similar mechanism like after application of Ab 1-42 .
In AD, the reduction in synapses and dendritic spine number is strongly correlated with cognitive decline [44,45] and changes in dendritic spine morphology are correlated with cognitive function. Thus, both spine loss and spine morphology changes may affect memory of Ab 25-35 -injected mice. The incubation of hippocampal cell cultures with Ab 25-35 significantly reduced dendritic spine density and induced a reduction in mature spines (mushroom spines) and an increase in non-functional spines (stubby spines). Inhibition of the polyamine system, either by blockade of the polyamine binding site of NMDARs or inhibition of polyamine synthesis counteracted the deleterious effects of Ab 25-35 on dendritic spine number and morphology. Therefore, polyamines, through its action on NMDARs located at extrasynaptic sites could be involved in the loss of synaptic contacts and simplification of neuronal morphology that ultimately would lead to memory impairment.
We have shown that Ab [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] induced stripping of synaptic contacts, probably via stimulation of extrasynaptic NMDAR, a mechanism known to induce cell death [19,46]. While we have no evidence to support the induction of neuronal cell death in the protocols used in this study, it has been suggested that early AD's cognitive impairment occurs in the absence of cell death [3,47], mainly through disruption of synaptic transmission. Rönicke and coworkers [3] have shown that Ab oligomers can induce synaptic contacts retraction and reduction of spontaneous network activity in cultured neurons without inducing cell death. Furthermore, it has been shown that sublethal concentrations of Ab oligomers can impair long-term potentiation (LTP) induction [3,42] enhance long-term depression (LTD) [48]. Noteworthy, Ab-induced synaptic alterations results in disruption of neuronal network function [47,49]. Disruption of normal cross-laminar cortical processing coincides with a decline of contextual fear learning [50], indicating that weakening of synaptic contacts might result in immediate disturbance of cognitive function. Together, these data suggests that, rather than cell death, synaptic transmission and structural plasticity disturbance might be pivotal to acute Ab 25-35 memory impairment.
Here, we reported that inhibition of polyamine system counteracted the Ab 25-35 -induced cognitive deficit in mice. Noteworthy, once established, both the memory impairment and the alterations in the neuronal morphology induced by Ab [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] were properly reversed by blockade of polyamine binding site at the NMDAR, possibly located at extrasynaptic sites, suggesting that modulation of this system might represent an attractive target for pharmacological interventions.