{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025267249757045675, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0184645286686103, 'mean_word_length': 5.0588235294117645, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Outcome of patients presenting with preauricular sinus in a tertiary centre--a five year experience.

We reviewed the recurrence rate and possible factors influencing recurrence of preauricular sinus after excision. Seventy-one patients with 73 preauricular sinuses seen at our centre from year 2000 to 2005 were reviewed in this study. The overall recurrence rate was 14.1%. Twelve sinuses needed to be drained for an abscess prior to a definitive surgery. Different modalities used in demonstrating the sinus tract between methylene blue alone and probing together with methylene blue, showed different outcomes, which were statistically significant with a p value of < 0.05(chi-square test). A preauricular sinus with a previous history of infection or actively infected during the definitive surgery may have a higher tendency of recurrence. Meanwhile demonstrating the sinus tract by probing with lacrimal probe/sinus probe followed by injection of methylene blue reduces the recurrence rate (p < 0.05 with chi-square test).