{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.035398230088495575, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006436041834271922, 'mean_word_length': 4.980769230769231, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Influence of an "Open Door Policy" on Ward Climate: Impact on Treatment Quality].

OBJECTIVE
To compare the ward atmosphere, safety, therapeutic hold, and patients' coherence on recently opened (1 year), opened (4 years) and open (> 20 years) psychiatric wards in a longitudinal naturalistic study design. The question was if a patient shift from formerly locked to open wards might deteriorate the ward atmosphere on the open and opened wards.


METHODS
Ward atmosphere on two recently opened (n = 2), opened (n = 2) and open (n = 2) wards was examined using the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES) in a follow-up study after 4 years. Structural as well as clinical data were extracted.


RESULTS
Global ward atmosphere, safety, and patients' coherence on the recently opened wards was significantly increased; on always opened wards and long-term opened wards it remained unchanged. Coercive measures and discharges against medical advice decreased during the open door process.


CONCLUSION
Opening locked psychiatric wards can help to establish a positive therapeutic atmosphere without changing the therapeutic climate on the other already open wards. A better ward atmosphere might be connected with a better therapeutic quality.