{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03156384505021521, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011477761836441894, 'mean_word_length': 4.768595041322314, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reply to “ A Review of Creating a Memory of Causal Relationships ”

In Pazzani (1990), I present a theory of learning that integrates explanation-based, theory-driven, and similarity-based methods. The goal of this research is to qualitatively model how differences in prior knowledge can account for differences in learning rates and to explain how this prior knowledge might be acquired and stored in memory (cf. Schank 1982). Cohen (this issue) does a commendable job of summarizing Creating a Memory of Causal Relationships. Here, I would like to clarify some issues that were raised in the review and one that was not mentioned. In particular, this reply will focus primarily on three points: