{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018032786885245903, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003278688524590164, 'mean_word_length': 5.672131147540983, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Surfactant adsorption onto cellulose surfaces.

The adsorption of the cationic surfactant, hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, C16TAB, onto model cellulose surfaces, prepared by Langmuir-Blodgett deposition as thin films, has been investigated by neutron reflectivity. Comparison between the adsorption of C16TAB onto hydrophilic silica, a hydrophobic cellulose surface, and a regenerated (hydrophilic) cellulose surface is made. Adsorption onto the hydrophilic silica and onto the hydrophilic cellulose surfaces is similar, and is in the form of surface aggregates. In contrast, the adsorption onto the hydrophobic cellulose surface is lower and in the form of a monolayer. The impact of the surfactant adsorption and the in situ surface regeneration on the structure of the cellulose thin films and the nature of solvent penetration into the cellulose films are also investigated. For the hydrophobic cellulose surface, intermixing between the cellulose and surfactant occurs, whereas there is little penetration of surfactant into the hydrophilic cellulose surface. Measurements show that solvent exchange between the partially hydrated cellulose film and the solution is slow on the time scale of the measurements.