{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027230590961761298, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005214368482039398, 'mean_word_length': 5.74609375, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Impact of Autonomy-Framed and Control-Framed Implementation Intentions on Snacking Behaviour: The Moderating Effect of Eating Self-Efficacy.

BACKGROUND
Autonomy-supportive implementation intention exercises have been shown to facilitate goal-directed behaviour (Koestner et al., ). The current study explored whether eating self-efficacy moderated the impact of autonomy-framed versus control-framed implementation intentions to reduce high-calorie snack intake.


METHODS
The study employed a randomised prospective design, involving two waves of data collection conducted in 2016. At Time 1, UK participants (N = 300) completed an online questionnaire which asked them to report their snacking behaviour over the previous 7 days. Participants were subsequently asked to form either an autonomy-framed implementation intention or a control-framed implementation intention. Seven days later, participants reported their consumption of high-calorie snacks and completed a measure of eating self-efficacy.


RESULTS
Hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that eating self-efficacy moderated the effects of implementation intention framing. Autonomy-framed implementation intentions had a greater impact on the avoidance of snacking for high eating self-efficacy participants than did control-framed implementation intentions. In contrast, for low eating self-efficacy participants, control-framed implementation intentions had more impact than did autonomy-framed implementation intentions.


CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest that if implementation intentions to promote healthy diet are to be effective, the role of eating self-efficacy should be considered, and the design of interventions adapted accordingly.