{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0084985835694051, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.042735042735043, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Change and Continuity in Criminal Justice Research: A Perspective from NILECJ

a series of recent criticisms of the role of the NILECJ and the receptiveness of both NILECJ and the new administration to major changes in this area. While these changes represent a genuine departure from both the objectives for research and the assumptions underlying research of the past decade, they also reflect a commitment to the principle of continuity in research, both in the sense of building on the body of knowledge developed in that decade, and in the sense of reuniting the research supported by the federal government with the older and continuing tradition of academic research in criminology and criminal law.