{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015748031496062992, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004724409448818898, 'mean_word_length': 5.625, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Practice guidelines for management of infants and children with fever without source (FWS)

While recognizing that the "Guidelines for Management of Fever Without Source"1 are the result of a remarkable retrieval of information and a sophisticated statistical analysis leading to an admirable and helpful aid in decision making, I cannot help but observe that >90% of such decisions are made by practicing physicians outside the medical center without a supervising academician at hand. Because these are clinical guidelines, is it possible that nonacademic clinicians could have contributed to making the guidelines even more helpful?