{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015647226173541962, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008534850640113799, 'mean_word_length': 4.915966386554622, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Commentary on JAMA article by Hujoel et al.

A recent publication by in the April 28, 2004, issue of JAMA raises concern since it suggests that exposure to dental x rays during pregnancy could be responsible for human fetal growth retardation. Furthermore, the article could have a negative impact on the dental care of pregnant women who might fear the effect of dental radiography on their developing embryo. In our initial discussions, John Boice and I decided to communicate our concerns to the scientific and medical community. Boice has published a recent letter concerning the Hujoel paper. The Hujoel publication has very serious deficiencies. This Forum presents analyses of these deficiencies.