{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02745792736935341, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.531791907514451, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Higher Meta-cognitive Ability Predicts Less Reliance on Over Confident Habitual Learning System

Many studies on human and animals have provided evidence for the contribution of goal-directed and habitual valuation systems in learning and decision-making. These two systems can be modeled using model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) algorithms in Reinforcement Learning (RL) framework. Here, we study the link between the contribution of these two learning systems to behavior and meta-cognitive capabilities. Using computational modeling we showed that in a highly variable environment, where both learning strategies have chance level performances, model-free learning predicts higher confidence in decisions compared to model-based strategy. Our experimental results showed that the subjects’ meta-cognitive ability is negatively correlated with the contribution of model-free system to their behavior while having no correlation with the contribution of model-based system. Over-confidence of the model-free system justifies this counter-intuitive result. This is a new explanation for individual difference in learning style.