{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03816889894988367, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016474878953656544, 'mean_word_length': 5.454545454545454, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Directed nickel-catalyzed regio- and diastereoselective arylamination of unactivated alkenes

Few methods have been reported for intermolecular arylamination of alkenes, which could provide direct access to important arylethylamine scaffolds. Herein, we report an intermolecular syn-1,2-arylamination of unactivated alkenes with arylboronic acids and O-benzoylhydroxylamine electrophiles with Ni(II) catalyst. The cleavable bidentate picolinamide directing group facilitates formation of stabilized 4-, 5- or 6-membered nickelacycles and enables the difunctionalization of diverse alkenyl amines with high levels of regio-, chemo- and diastereocontrol. This general and practical protocol is compatible with broad substrate scope and high functional group tolerance. The utility of this method is further demonstrated by the site-selective modification of pharmaceutical agents.

Introduction C-C and C-N bonds are two of the most omnipresent bonds in nature, and arylamination of ole ns represents a powerful and attractive synthetic tool for the simultaneous introduction of vital aryl and amino groups across alkenes to enable the rapid increase in molecular complexity from abundant and readily available materials. [1][2][3][4] Intramolecular arylamination with an alkene acceptor tethered to either the aryl halide or active nitrogen functionality using transition-metal catalysts has been developed for the synthesis of nitrogen-containing cycles. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In comparison, intermolecular arylamination providing access to arylethylamine-based acyclic molecules is particularly di cult and remain rare, owing to their high entropic cost and the problems of controlling the chemoselectivity of multicomponent reactions. [15][16][17][18][19][20] The arylethylamine scaffold existed in many bioactive molecules and pharmaceuticals, such as dopamine agonists. [21][22] Only a few methods have been reported for the synthesis of this important motif via 1,2/2,1-arylamination of alkenes. Liu and coworkers disclosed an enantioselective Cu-catalyzed 2,1-arylamination of terminal styrenes using the N-uoro-N-alkylsulfonamide as the amine reagent via a radical process. [15] In 2018, Stephenson demonstrated a two-component photocatalytic 2,1-arylamination of vinyl arenes with arylsulfonylacetamides as the bifunctional reagents. [16] For the more challenging arylamination of unactivated alkenes with low reactivity, reduced polarization and high tendency, the directing group strategy have been utilized to address the issues. Recently, Engle achieved an anti-2,1arylamination of 8-aminoquinoline tethered alkenyl carbonyls with aryl iodides and nitrogen nucleophiles via aminopalladation (Fig. 1a). [18] After the pioneering work, this group reported a Ni-catalyzed 1,2carboamination of alkenes with organozinc nucleophiles and O-benzoylydroxylamine (N-O) electrophiles in a syn-addition (Fig. 1b). [19] However, the arylzinc reagent underwent arylamination with low e ciency. In this context, it is highly desirable to develop a new protocol to enable regio-and stereoselective 1,2arylamination of unactivated alkenes in terms of e ciency, alkene and amine substrate scope, functional group tolerance.
Inspired by the exibility of the coordinating directing group, we anticipated that the Ni-Ar species could be generated by transmetalation with arylboron reagents with a Ni(II) catalyst under the assistance of a bidentate directing group. Subsequent 1,2-migratory insertion followed by a sequential electrophilic amination reaction will yield the arylamination product. [34][35][36][37][38][39] Critical to the success of this process, the reaction must be initiated by a transmetalation step to form the Ni-Ar species, which is rarely reported and challenging because of the fact that most of three-component difunctionalization reactions utilizing arylboron reagents were initiated by oxidative addition with electrophiles to Ni(0) catalyst, thus furnishing products that incorporate electrophile at the terminal position and aryl at the internal position. Herein, we reported a new approach for the 1,2-arylamination of unactivated alkenes under practical and easily handled Ni(II) catalytic system with commercial available arylboronic acids and readily prepared Obenzoylhydroxylamines with excellent regio-and diastereocontrol (Fig. 1c). Under the assistance of picolinamide (PA) directing group, [40][41][42] diverse alkenyl amines could be converted into valuable 1-aryl-2,n-diamines, a common structure found in a number of natural products and pharmaceuticals (Fig. 1d).
This new protocol was compatible with terminal and internal alkenyl amines of different chain lengths, a broad range of primary and secondary amine sources, and exhibited excellent functional group tolerance.

Results
Evaluation of reaction conditions. To check the feasibility of the above scenario, we started this investigation of Ni-catalyzed arylamination of homoallylic amine substrate 1a containing a PA directing group with phenylboronic acid and piperidino benzoate as coupling partners (Table 1). After extensive optimization, we were pleased to nd that the reaction in the presence of NiBr 2 ·DME as the catalyst and K 3 PO 4 in tert-butanol at 80 °C gave the desired 1,2-arylamination product 2a as a single regioisomer in 80% isolated yield, accompanying with ≈5% unreacted alkene and trace amounts of hydroarylation byproduct (entry 1). Ni(COD) 2 also catalyzed the reaction in moderate yield (entry 2), while NiCl 2 or NiBr 2 catalyst did not form any product (entry 3). Replacement of nucleophile PhB(OH) 2 by PhBpin led to a slight lower yield (entry 4). The use of DMF solvent led to essentially no desired product (entry 5), while use of dioxane or i PrOH solvent provided a lower yield (entries 6-7). Inferior results were obtained when using other bases instead of K 3 PO 4 (entries 8-10), or conducting the reaction at 50 °C (entry 11). Benzoyl protected homoallylic amine and N-methylated picolinamide were subjected to the standard conditions, and both reactions did not occur, indicating that the pyridine N(sp 2 ) and N-H moiety were both indispensable in this transformation. It merits to mention that, the putative 8-aminoquinoline-masked 3butenoic acid, [43][44][45][46][47] which was widely used in alkene difunctionalization, did not afford any product under the optimized conditions. Substrate scope. With the identi ed conditions in hand, we rst sought to de ne the scope of the arylboronic acid partner (Fig. 2). In general, arylboronic acids bearing a wide range of electronically varied substituents reacted to produce the desired products in good yields. A variety of functional groups were accommodated well, including ethers (2b-c), dimethylamine (2h), tri uoromethyl (2i), uoro (2j), chloro (2k) and bromo (2l). Notably, sterically hindered ortho-substituted arylboronic acid showed slightly increased reactivity, reacted to afford the desired product in very good yield (2d). In addition, arylboronic acids containing iodide, alkene, aldehyde and ketone (2m-p), which can be further derivatized, were also amenable to this reaction.
Subsequently, we examined the N-O electrophile scope of the reaction using PhB(OH) 2 as the nucleophilic component (Fig. 3). The reactivities of disubstituted amine sources were rstly investigated in the arylamination, diethylamine and N-methylbenzylamine could be introduced under the optimized conditions (3a-b). In addition to acyclic amines, cyclic amines containing a series of heterocyclic scaffolds, including morpholine (3c), thiomorpholine (3d), piperazine (3e), ester group (3f), and acetal group (3g), which are prevalent in biologically active molecules, were competent substrates. Sevenmembered hexamethyleneimine was also tolerated, affording the desired product 3h. The scope of monosubstituted amine transfer agents for the synthesis of secondary amines were explored, which usually led to a dramatic drop in reaction e ciency. [48][49] To our delight, sterically hindered secondary alkylamines are accessible with O-benzoylhydroxylamines derived with tertiary alkyl group (3i-l). However, no reaction occurred when primary-or secondary-alkyl-substituted amine transfer agents were used.
After evaluation of electrophile and nucleophile scope, we turned our attention to the scope of alkene substrates (Fig. 4). The α-substituted homoallylamine was rst tested under the standard conditions, the terminal alkene bearing alkyl-or aryl-substitution at the α-position proceeded smoothly to afford the arylamination products (4a-b) in moderate yields with high diastereoselectivity. The relative stereochemistry of the diastereomer of 4b was established by X-ray crystallographic analysis, with the trans orientation of α and γ substituents. This result established the relative stereochemistry of two stereocenters remote from one another, which has been shown to be di cult. n-Butyl-substituted homoallylamine at the β-position could also be tolerated in the reaction but with lower diastereoselectivity (1.9:1, 4c), and a more sterically bulky group led to a lower yield (4d). 1,1-Disubstitued alkene was also tolerated and successfully afforded desired product containing a quaternary center (4e). We then explored alkene substrates that are typically challenging in alkene carboamination. Gratifyingly, Z-or Einternal substrates could be e ciently converted into the syn-diastereomer under the optimized conditions (4f-l), which was consistent with our proposed mechanism. Both diastereoisomers were accessible based on the cis/trans con guration of the alkene substrate (4f and 4g), suggesting the alkene does not undergo isomerization in the Ni-catalyzed process. In addition, phenyl-, benzyl-, and isopropyl-substituents were well tolerated in the reaction. In light of the success in developing a regioselective arylamination of homoallylamines, we continued our survey by applying the protocol to PA protected allylic and bishomoallylic amines. To our delight, the reaction of allylamine with phenylboronic acid and piperidino benzoate under the optimized conditions furnished the arylamination product in moderated yield, with only a single regioisomer was detected by GC-MS analysis. Moreover, a variety of terminal and internal bishomoallylamines underwent arylamination to regioselectively provide δ-amino benzenepentanamine products. Likewise, both transand cis-internal alkenes were effective in this reaction, delivering the desired product with excellent diastereoselectivity. We assumed that four and six membered nickelacycles were formed and can be stabilized in the catalytic system. Synthetic potential. We next performed the gram-scale reaction to illustrate the synthetic utility of this methodology (Fig. 4a). The reaction of 1a with phenylboronic acid and morpholine benzoate on a 5 mmol scale afforded 3c in 80% yield. We were able to remove the PA directing group with NaOH in EtOH at 100°C , and the primary amine 5 could be generated in nearly quantitative yield. This methodology was also applied to the late-stage modi cation of complex, phamaceutically relevant compounds, as shown in Fig.   4b. Arylboronic acid and O-benzoylhydroxylamine derived from feno brate and loratadine independently underwent arylamination, affording corresponding desired products (6a and 6b).
Mechanistic consideration. To elucidate the mechanism, we rst conducted the radical clock experiment (Fig. 5a). When the prepared alkene substrate 1b was subjected to standard reaction conditions, only cyclopropane remained product 4s was formed in 64% yield, implying that the cyclopropylmethyl radical intermediate known to ring rupture might not be generated in the catalytic cycle. The effect of radical inhibitors was next examined (Fig. 5b). As it turned out, the arylamination was not largely inhibited by the addition of TEMPO or BHT. This suggested that the arylamination probably did not involve a radical process, although the possibility of radical formation followed by a fast recombination with Ni within the solvent cage cannot be rulled out.
Regarding redox manifolds of Ni catalysis, Ni 0 /Ni II and Ni I /Ni III catalytic systems were considered as two possible pathways (Fig. 6). In Pathway A, a Ni(II) species 7 was generated from Ni(0) species and Obenzoylhydroxylamine via oxidative addition. Transmetalation followed by migratory insertion of the alkene into the Ni-carbon bond would form 8, which could yield the product by reductive elimination.
However, we consider this pathway to be less likely because the selective insertion into the Ni-C rather than Ni-N bond was suspicious and the energy barrier of reductive elimination of Ni II amido species is too high under similar catalytic system based on DFT calculations (>50 Kcal/mol). [50] An alternative pathway in which the alkene inserted into the Ni-N bond precedes transmetalation and C-C reductive elimination was also considered unlikely, because it would involve formation of thermodynamically unfavored larger nickelacycles, especially for bishomoallylic amine substrates (seven-membered nickelacycles).
Alternatively in Pathway B, the reaction was initiated by a Ni(I) species (I), [51][52] which was formed probably from comproportionation between NiBr 2 and Ni(0) species. [53][54] After further transmetalation with arylboronic acids and ole n migratory insertion, nickel-alkyl species (III) was generated. The species stabilized by bidentate PA directing group underwent oxidative addition with the aminating reagent much faster than protonation with the alcohol solvent or β-hydride elimination, forming Ni III amido species IV, which was believed to be able to undergo facile reductive elimination. [55][56][57][58] Finally, the active Ni(I)-X catalyst I was regenerated, and the desired product was furnished through the subsequent ligand exchange with the alkene substrate.

Discussion
In summary, we have disclosed a new methodology for the regio-and diastereoselective intermolecular arylamination of unactivated alkenes with base-metal catalyst and readily available reagents under simple conditions. The removable bidentate PA auxiliary facilitated formation of stabilized 4-, 5-or 6membered nickelacycles and enabled the difunctionalization of both terminal and internal alkenyl amines, leading to the concomitant introduction of important aryl groups and structurally diverse amino groups into the C=C bonds with good functional group compatibility. Interestingly, the reaction of αsubstituted terminal alkenes led to the formation of trans-isomeric products with high levels of diastereoselectivity, in which two stereocenters were remote from each other. Our protocol was suitable for large-scale synthesis and the synthetic utility of this method was further demonstrated by the latestage modi cation of pharmaceutical agents. The expansion of this strategy to the synthesis of drug and natural product and other electrophiles for alkene difunctionalization is currently under way in our lab.

Methods
General Procedure for the Ni-Catalyzed Arylamination of Alkenyl Amines. In an argon-lled glovebox, NiBr 2 •DME (0.03 mmol, 15 mol%), K 3 PO 4 (0.6 mmol, 3.0 eq), alkene substrate (0.2 mmol, 1.0 eq), appropriate amine benzoate electrophile (0.4 mmol, 2 eq), appropriate aryl boronic nucleophile (0.6 mmol, 3.0 eq), t-BuOH (2 mL) were added to a 10 mL schlenk ask. The reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 24 h and the resulting solution was concentrated in vacuum. The crude product was puri ed by column chromatography on alumina gel with a mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane as eluent. The conditions for ash chromatography and data for characterization of the products are listed below.
Page 13/16   Mechanistic investigations. a Radical clock experiment. b Radical trapping experiment.