{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0351493848857645, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005272407732864675, 'mean_word_length': 4.816326530612245, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Myths of the Scientific Historian

influence ideas in them, and vice versa. Gunnell understands this, for he often qualifies his claim about the crucial importance of the difference of the orders of discourse with disclaimers like: "My claim, again, is not that, in either principle or practice, metapractices have no first-order consequences, but rather that one cannot assume that they do or should have such consequences" (p. 202). This last statement is hard to disagree with, but doesn't seem a very large payoff given the arduous route this book takes. —Brian Fay