{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.046811945117029866, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04116222760290557, 'mean_word_length': 4.876777251184834, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 4, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Surgery for lung cancer in the elderly.

In order to assess the appropriateness of lung cancer surgery in the elderly and determine optimal subjects and resection procedure, 75 patients operated on in 1976-1996 at age > or =75 years (including 13 > or =80) were followed up. The operations included limited resection (8), lobectomy (47), bilobectomy (10) and pneumonectomy (10) and were judged to be radical in 59 cases (79%). Perioperative mortality was 9% and morbidity 29%, including 21% major complications. Cumulative 5-year survival was 32%, in stages IA-IIB 27-41%, and cancer-related survival 61-79%. Mortality did not differ significantly between resection types, but morbidity did. Nor did mortality, morbidity or survival differ between the age groups 75-79 and > or =80 years. In stage I cancer there was no significant difference in survival or cancer-related survival after lobectomy vs limited resection. We conclude that age, even >80 years, is not incompatible with curative resection. Lobectomy is the treatment of choice, but a less radical resection may be advisable if there is comorbidity. If more extensive resection is performed, the individual surgical risk must be weighed against the potential long-term benefit.