{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016548463356973995, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.317164179104478, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Stress and Strain Rate Evolution During the Finite Strain Deformation of a Weak Ferropericlase Grain by Diffusion Creep: Implications for Shear Localization in the Lower Mantle

We investigate the finite deformation of a weak inclusion embedded in a strong matrix. The goal is to understand the possible causes for shear localization that would explain the presence of geochemical heterogeneity in the Earth's lower mantle. The weak phase in the lower mantle is ferropericlase (Fp), and the strong phase is bridgmanite (Br). We herein consider deformation by diffusion creep for which some supporting evidence is available. When an inclusion deforms by diffusion creep, deformation itself modifies its geometry and stress distribution. The modified stress distribution in turn leads to strain‐dependent rheological properties due to the changes in diffusion path length and the stress gradient that drives diffusion flux. We investigate the evolution of deformation of a weak inclusion (i.e., Fp‐like weak grain embedded in Br‐like strong matrix) using the Eshelby theory (for stress and strain rate fields) combined with a theory of diffusional mass transport caused by the gradient in the normal stress within the inclusion. We found that finite strain leads to a significant strain weakening under simple shear deformation but not under axial deformation. Since diffusion creep is thought to be a dominant mechanism of the lower mantle rheology, the results of the present study provide a basis for investigating the nature of shear localization and its important implication for the preservation of geochemical heterogeneity and the distribution of seismic anisotropy in the lower mantle.