{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.06418746816097809, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04533876719307183, 'mean_word_length': 4.793510324483776, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Association of Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations and Apolipoprotein(a) isoform with Coronary Artery Disease Stratification in Han Chinese.

BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations, apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoform, and coronary artery disease (CAD) stratification in Han Chinese.


METHODS
Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the association between Lp(a) concentrations, apo(a) isoform and CAD stratification. Lp(a) concentrations and apo(a) isoforms were combined with other risk factors to establish the optimal prediction model of CAD risk.


RESULTS
Individuals with the top quarter of Lp(a) concentrations had more than a two-fold higher risk of stable CAD and three-fold higher risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared with those in the bottom quarter. This association was no longer significant after adjustment for apo(a) isoforms in stable CAD (OR 2.198, 95% CI 0.991 - 4.875, p = 0.053), but remained significant in the ACS (OR 3.583, 95% CI 1.278 - 5.614, p < 0.05). Individuals with small apo(a) isoforms had more than a two-fold higher risk of stable CAD and almost three-fold higher risk of ACS compared with those carrying larger apo(a) isoforms; however, this association was significantly alleviated after adjustment for Lp(a) concentrations (OR 2.133, 95% CI 0.964 - 4.742, p = 0.098; OR 2.642, 95% CI 1.032 - 5.833, p = 0.298, respectively). A combination of Lp(a) concentrations and apo(a) isoforms with other risk factors was the optimal prediction model of CAD risk (AUC 0.800, 95% CI 0.752 - 0.848, p < 0.001).


CONCLUSIONS
Elevated Lp(a) concentrations and small apo(a) isoforms were significant risk factors for CAD stratification, and their effects on CAD risk were mediated by each other. Combined application of Lp(a) concentrations and apo(a) isoform with conventional risk factors could aid in the assessment and prediction of CAD.