{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04571240105540897, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03515831134564644, 'mean_word_length': 4.693203154337214, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Inorganic-Organic Hybrid Ru(II) Complexes and Their Application in Selective Hydrogenation

Novel Ru(II) complex-based hybrid inorganic-organic materials immobilized via a diamine co-ligand site instead of the conventional diphosphine ligand have been prepared. The complexes were prepared by two different methods: sol-gel and surface modification techniques. The structures of the desired materials were deduced by several available physical measurements like elemental analyses, infrared, FAB-MS and 1H-, 13C- and 31P-NMR spectroscopy. Due to a lack of solubility the structures of xerogel 3 and modified 4 were studied by solid state 13C-, 29Si- and 31P-NMR spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy and EXAFS. These materials were stable enough to serve as hydrogenation catalysts. Selective hydrogenation of functionalized carbonyls in α,β-unsaturated compounds was successfully carried out under mild conditions in a basic medium using these complexes as catalysts.


Introduction
It has been shown that complexes containing a "Ru-(P-P)" (P-P = diphosphine) core per ruthenium atom are efficient catalysts in several chemical reactions [1][2][3][4][5]. As a result, several ruthenium complexes containing this motif were synthesized and their properties were studied by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques [6,7]. Stereo-, regio-and enantioselective ruthenium-catalysis lies at the heart of current developments in pharmaceutical, agrochemical and cognate industries [8][9][10]. Recently ruthenium(II) complexes with diphosphine and diamine ligands were successfully tested as homogenous catalysts in hydrogenation of unsaturated ketones [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. One of the prime concerns of industry and academia is how to transfer the active homogenous catalysts to the heterogeneous phase [20][21][22][23]. The two major problems in this field have been first that under the conditions commonly required for effective catalysis, ligand exchange reactions lead to leaching of the metal centers from the matrix, in addition to the synthetic difficulties [20][21][22][23].
The use of functionalized multidentate ligands with anchoring groups instead of the classical monodentate ones might limit the leaching problem, but few such ligands have been described, probably because of their difficult preparation, specially when the complexes were supported by the phosphine ligands site [20][21][22][23].
Our conceptual methodology was to take a homogeneous system of known catalytic behavior and, by performing suitable modifications, to tether this catalyst on silica supports, covalent anchoring of metal complexes on such surfaces being a topic of considerable interest in catalysis [20,22]. The desired hybrid materials are able to combine the advantages of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis: the catalyst becomes easily separable from the reaction products and it can be reused in several runs without an essential loss in the activity due to the leaching problem [23][24][25][26].
In this work we used a bidentate diphosphine ligand and diamine co-ligand with Si(OMe) 3 anchoring groups; the presence of this group enables the immobilization of the ruthenium(II) complexes through simple a sol-gel process using HSi(OEt) 3 as cross-linker. Another approach to achieve stable materials is to covalently bind the ligands, via the methoxy groups, to the well known silica surface instead of a sol-gel material through surface modification. [1][2][3][4] Our approach to the preparation of the stationary phase catalysis system is shown in Scheme 1. The precursor compound trans-Cl 2 Ru(dppp) 2 (1) was obtained by a substitution reaction starting from Cl 2 Ru(PPh 3 ) 3 and dppp in dichloromethane [4,14]. Complex 2 was prepared by treating 1 with equimolar amounts of [3-(2-aminoethyl)-aminopropyl]trimethoxysilane in dichloromethane; in order to confirm this ligand exchange the reaction was monitored by 31 P-NMR. One of the dppp ligands was replaced by one of the diamine ligands [4,14], giving a yellow product which were collected in excellent yield. It is soluble in chlorinated solvents such as chloroform or dichloromethane and nonsoluble in polar or non-polar solvents like water, methanol or diethyl ether and n-hexane. By condensation of 2, which contains a trimethoxysilane functional group, with 10 equivalents of HSi(OEt) 3 in THF/water under sol-gel conditions the xerogel 3 was prepared in good yield. In another route 2 was modified using ProntoSIL 120-5 Si (5µm) as support in toluene to produce 4. The yield of the immobilized complexes 3 and 4 was very good, but the hybrid materials were not soluble in any solvent.

NMR and IR spectroscopic investigations
The structure of complexes 1 and 2 described herein has been deduced from elemental analyses, infrared, FAB-MS and 1 H-, 13 C-, H, H-COSY and 31 P-NMR spectroscopy. Due to lack of solubility the structures of 3 and 4 were determined by solid state 13 C-, 29 Si-and 31 P-NMR spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and EXAFS.
Confirmation of the formation of 3 and 4 was obtained by NMR. Liquid 31 P-NMR and solid state 31 P-CP/MAS-NMR measurements for both 2 and the interphased Ru(II) complexes in the hybrid xerogel 3 and surface modified 4 support the formation of the expected structural complexes whose formulae are shown in Scheme 1. The use on an asymmetric diamine caused loss of the C 2 axis resulting in a splitting of the 31 P resonance into AX patterns, as illustrated in Figure 1. The phosphorous chemical shifts and the 31 P-31 P coupling constants (J pp = 35.5 Hz) suggested that the dppp ligand was positioned trans to the diamine, with trans dichloro atoms, to form the kinetically favored trans-Cl 2 Ru(II) isomer [14,27], while the thermodynamic favored cis-Cl 2 Ru(II) isomer [28,29] was not detected according to the 31 P-CP/MAS-NMR data. The 31 P-MAS-NMR spectra of the xerogel 3 and modified material 4 are presented together to elucidate the structural nature and integrity of the ruthenium(II) supported complexes. The 31 P-MAS NMR spectrum of the modified 4 complex is presented together with the liquid 31 P-NMR spectrum of 2 ( Figure 1). In the case of 4 ( Figure 1a) relatively broad resonances centered at 33.5, 40.1, 46.5, 51.9 ppm were observed. Fortunately, even in the presence of the line broadening the chemical shifts of 4 can be assigned, which support the formation of the expected trans Cl 2 Ru(II) isomer in the solid state as in liquid state ( Figure 1b) and the Ru-P bond seemed to not be affected during the grafting; free ligand was not detected ( p = -21.8 ppm) and other chemical shifts corresponding to coordination of phosphine to another species are also not recorded.
Examination of the 13 C-CP-MAS-NMR spectrum of the modified solids along with the solution phase spectrum of the corresponding molecular precursor led to the conclusion that the organic fragments in 3 and 4 remained intact during the grafting and subsequent workup without measurable decomposition ( Figure 2). The absence of the methoxy groups at  C = 50.8 ppm after the immobilization processes in 3 and 4, compared by 2, were the major differences noted between spectra, which supported the immobilization of the desired hybrid Ru(II) complexes. The total disappearance of (CH 3 O) 3 Si groups in 3 (Figure 2b), compared by 2 (Figure 2b), provides good confirmation of a sol-gel process gone to full completion. Solid-state 29 Si-NMR provided further information about the silicon environment and the degree of functionalization [30]. In all cases, the organometallic/organic fragment of the precursor molecule was covalently grafted onto the solid, and the precursors were, in general, attached to the surface of the polysiloxane (as in 3) or mesoporous oxide by multiple siloxane bridges (as in 4) as evidenced in Figure 3. The presence of T m sites in case of xerogel 3 (with m = 2 and 3) in the spectral region of T 2 at  Si = -57.8 ppm and T 3 at  Si = -67.1 ppm as expected, and no peaks belonging to Q silicon sites were detected, as in Figure 3a. Peaks assignable to Q 3 at  Si = -101.9 ppm and Q 4 at  Si = -109.5 ppm silicon sites of the silica framework in addition to T 3 at  Si = -67.1 ppm were discernible in modified 4, as seen in Figure 3b. The IR spectra of the complexes 2-4 in particular show four sets of characteristic absorptions in the ranges 3,336-3,319, 3,268-3,215, 3,178-3,165, and 275-254 cm -1 , which can be assigned to NH 2 , amine-CH, phosphine-CH and RuCl stretching vibrations, respectively.

EXAFS measurement of xerogel 3
One of the most powerful methods to obtain interatomic distances of amorphous materials is extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (EXAFS). The xerogel 3 was chosen as an example to determine the bond lengths between the metal center and the coordinating atoms of the ligand. The k 3 weighted EXAFS function of xerogel 3 can be described best by six different atom shells. The first intensive peak in the corresponding Fourier transform (Figure 4a) is mainly due to the nitrogen atoms. Chlorine and phosphorus atoms were found in the case of the most intense peak. For the most intense peak of the Fourier Transform, two equivalent phosphorus, two nitrogen atoms and two chlorine atoms with Ru-P, Ru-N and Ru-Cl bond distances of 2.26, 2.19 and 2.41 Å, respectively, were found (Figure 4b and Table 1). These results reveal a good agreement between the experimental and the calculated functions.

Catalytic activity of complexes 2-4 in the hydrogenation of ,ß-unsaturated carbonyl compounds.
The catalytic activity of the desired hybrid ruthenium(II) materials 2-4, was carried out using ,ßunsaturated carbonyl compounds in 2-propanol as solvent, and the chosen ,ß-unsaturated carbonyl compounds allowed us to study the selectivity of the catalysts. Three different outcomes of the hydrogenation process are to be expected (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2. Hydrogenation of ,ß-unsaturated carbonyl compounds possibilities.
The Ru(II) complexes have been tested as catalyst precursors for hydrogenation under mild conditions: 2 bar hydrogen pressure, six equivalents of KOH, 35 o C and with a molar substrate to catalyst (S/C) ratio of 1,000:1. The hydrogenation results are summarized in Table 2. As expected RuCl 2 (dppp) 2 1 was completely inactive in the hydrogenation of unsaturated ketones under the above reaction conditions ( Table 2, trial 1), which was traced back to the absence of the diamine. All the trials of precursor 2 showed more than 99% activity and hydrogenation selectivity towards the C=O group in the presence of a C=C group with high TOF, ( Table 2, trials 2-4). In the absence of KOH co-catalyst and under identical conditions the active precursor 2 became totally inactive ( Table 2, trials 2 and 5), which supports the idea that the role of the co-catalyst is to activate the catalyst by forming the ruthenium(II) hydride intermediate [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].
All of the other ruthenium(II) precursors 3 and 4 display high conversion ratios and selectivity ~ 95% in the hydrogenation of the target substrates (Table 2, trials 6-11). Expected constant decrease in the turnover frequencies (TOFs) and the conversions were observed by comparing the homogenous 2 with the heterogeneous 3 and 4 precursors.

General procedure for the preparation of the complex 2
3-(2-Aminoethyl)aminopropyl]trimethoxysilane (0.035 mL, 0.55 mmol, 10% excess) was dissolved in dichloromethane (10 mL) and the solution was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 1 (500 mg, 0.50 mmol) in dichloromethane (10 mL) within 5 min. The mixture was stirred for ca. 2 h at room temperature while the color changed from brown to yellow. After removal of any turbidity by filtration (P4), the volume of the solution was concentrated to about 5 mL under reduced pressure. Addition of diethyl ether (40 mL) caused precipitation of a solid, which was filtered (P4). After recrystallization from dichloromethane/n-hexane, complex 2 was obtained in analytically pure form.

General procedure for sol-gel processing of xerogel 3
Compound 2 (300 mg, 0.235 mmol) and HSi(OMe) 3 (10 equivalents) in methanol (10 mL) were mixed together. The sol-gel took place when a THF/water mixture (4 mL, 1:1 v/v) was added to the solution. After 24 h stirring at room temperature, the precipitated gel was washed with toluene and diethyl ether (50 mL of each), and petroleum ether (40 mL). Finally the xerogel was ground and dried under vacuum for 24 h to afford after workup 500 mg of 3 as a pale yellow powder. 31 29 Si CP/MAS NMR:  = -67.1 ppm (T 3 ), -57.2 ppm (T 2 ).

General procedure for surface modified material 4
Compound 2 (0.300 mg, 0.235 mmol) dissolved in CH 2 Cl 2 (50 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of ProntoSil 120-5 Si (5 mm) (0.5 g) in dry toluene (50 mL) and stirred at 25 °C for 2 h to allow the diffusion of the molecular precursor into the pore channels. The reaction mixture was then refluxed for 24 h. After filtration, the unreacted ruthenium precursor was removed by thoroughly washing the solid twice with toluene then CH 2 Cl 2 (25 mL each). Finally, the resulting solid was dried in vacuo (~ 0.40 atm) at 30 °C to afford 620 mg of 4 as a pale white powder. 31 29 Si-CP/MAS-NMR:  = -67.1 (T 3 ) and -57.2 (T 2 ), -101.9 ppm (Q 3 ) and -109.5 ppm (Q 4 ).

General procedure for the catalysis studies
The respective matrix of diamine(dppp)ruthenium(II) supported complexes, (100 mg, 6% Ru) was placed in a 250 mL pressure Schlenk tube, a calculated amount of KOH (0.06 mmol, 10 equivalents) was added as co-catalyst, then trans-4-phenyl-3-butene-2-one (60 mmol, 1000 equivalents) was added. The solid mixture was magnetically stirred and warmed during the evacuation process to remove oxygen and water. Subsequently the Schlenk tube was filled with argon and 2-propanol (80 mL). The mixture was vigorously stirred, degassed by two freeze-thaw cycles, and then sonicated for 30 min (this is important to increase the homogeneity of the mixture). Finally the reaction mixture was pressurized with H 2 (2 bar) after flushing with H 2 three times. The reaction mixture was vigorously and magnetically stirred at 35 °C for 112 h. During the hydrogenation process samples were taken from the reaction mixture to check the course of the reaction. The samples were inserted by a special glass syringe into a gas chromatograph and the reaction products compared with authentic samples.

Conclusions
Four new complexes were prepared by a novel, fast, easy, one step ligand exchange technique and characterized. The presence of T-silyl functions on the diamine co-ligand backbone enable the hybridization of these complexes in order to support them on a polysiloxane matrix through sol-gel or surface modification processes. When the polymeric complexes presented in this investigation were tested as catalysts for the hydrogenation of unsaturated ketones, they showed high degree of stability and activity as well as an excellent degree of carbonyl hydrogenation selectivity under mild conditions.