{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017595307917888565, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007820136852394917, 'mean_word_length': 5.206060606060606, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Geriatric nutrition assessment: comparison of a screening tool to a dietitian assessment.

A priority in nutrition care is early identification of patients at risk of developing nutrition disorders. Simple identification measures such as nutrition screening on admission must be demonstrated to be as effective as the more lengthy traditional nutrition assessment. This study compares a nutrition screen to a clinical assessment in a geriatric setting. Seventy-two consecutive admissions to a geriatric assessment unit were both screened and individually assessed by different staff dietitians. Results of the assessment and the screen corresponded in classifying those at nutrition risk 92% of the time and those not at nutrition risk 77% of the time. The screen was found to be highly sensitive (88%) and specific (83%). A geriatric nutrition screen that has a high degree of agreement with a lengthier assessment may be a useful tool for the clinical practitioner in early identification of patients at nutritional risk.