{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03169443315725315, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017472572125152377, 'mean_word_length': 5.4619422572178475, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Patients' views on the professional behaviour of family physicians.

BACKGROUND
Patient satisfaction is an important part and a measure of the quality of health care. Patient satisfaction with family physicians was studied within the project 'Analysis of Transition of Health Care System in Croatia'.


OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to explore patient satisfaction with family physicians through evaluation of some characteristics of physician behaviour. The specific goals of this study were to determine whether there were differences in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with physician behaviour with regard to some sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents.


METHODS
The study group consisted of 1217 respondents: 479 (39.4%) men and 738 (60.6%) women. Medical students interviewed the respondents 'face-to-face' immediately after their consultation with the physician. An anonymous questionnaire was created providing answers to 10 questions on patient satisfaction. Data on sociodemographic characteristics and the reason for encounter of the respondents were also collected.


RESULTS
The average positive rating over 10 questions on patient satisfaction was 85.3%. There was a statistically significant difference in age distribution between geographic areas (P < 0.001). Differences in answers were found regarding sex, age, educational level (P < 0.001) and reason for encounter (P < 0.01). Two factors were obtained by factor analysis: the first could be called physician's competence/expertise estimated by respondents, and the other physician's empathy evaluated by respondents. The respondents were divided into two groups based on the reason for encounter as a criterion for discriminant analysis: acute (symptoms and complaints, injuries; n = 553) and other reasons (n = 664). The discriminant function obtained was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Younger respondents, regardless of sex, whose reason for encounter was an acute condition, were less satisfied with the physician's expertise, agreeableness during the consultation, physician's interest in what they were saying and physician's friendliness.


CONCLUSION
Considering the difficulties present in the health systems of countries in transition, the results of our study were surprisingly encouraging, showing that the respondents were satisfied with the physician's behaviour and that the physicians fulfilled the basic elements of professional behaviour.