{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03195488721804511, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.614906832298137, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Myth: parenteral ketorolac provides more effective analgesia than oral ibuprofen.

Acute pain is an extremely common presenting symptom to the emergency department (ED), making it imperative that emergency physicians provide adequate, safe and cost-effective analgesia. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often first-line treatments for moderate to severe pain. Physicians can choose between intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) ketorolac and an oral NSAID. The mechanism of action (reversible inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis at the level of cyclooxygenase) is identical irrespective of the route the medication is given. Despite the similar pharmacodynamics, many physicians believe that parenteral ketorolac is more efficacious, despite a greater cost and a more invasive route of administration. To investigate this myth (i.e., that parenteral ketorolac provides greater analgesic effect than an oral NSAID), we conducted a review of the literature, with specific focus on ibuprofen as the prototypical — and least expensive — oral NSAID.