{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030211480362537766, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022155085599194362, 'mean_word_length': 4.9879518072289155, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[For a better estimation of the prevalence of intestinal parasitism in the Tunis region].

The prevalence of intestinal parasitism is generally based on the results of a single stool specimen which probably underestimates the real situation. In order to propose a coefficient for correction, we examined three stool specimens taken from 112 asymptomatic children. Intestinal parasites other than Enterobius vermicularis were detected in 29 subjects (26%). For those specimens that tested positive, 41% of children had infection detected in all three stool specimens; 21%--in two specimens and 38%--in only one. If we assume that the sensitivity of three stool specimen examinations is 100%, then the calculated sensitivity of one examination is equivalent to 68%. This gives an underestimation of the prevalence of 32%. This underestimation is not homogenous for all species. As regards Giardia intestinalis it is 35%, but for other species it would have to be calculated from a larger sample.