{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.007743362831858407, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014380530973451327, 'mean_word_length': 5.418439716312057, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Hip and knee replacement as a relative contraindication to laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection.

PURPOSE
We investigated the effect of lower extremity joint prostheses on subsequent laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
We reviewed the records and pathology studies of 5 patients who underwent laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection subsequent to total hip or knee replacement from 1990 through 1995.


RESULTS
Four of the 5 laparoscopic operations were complicated, 3 were unsuccessful in obtaining bilateral pelvic lymph nodes and 2 required conversion to an open procedure. Examination of the lymph nodes revealed sinus histiocytosis in the 4 cases in which nodal tissue was removed.


CONCLUSIONS
The increased risk of complications in certain patients with lower extremity joint prostheses may contraindicate attempted laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection.