{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030303030303030304, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.451219512195122, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Response to commentaries

I feel fortunate for the distinguished and diverse group of commentators that the editors of Neuro-Psychoanalysis have chosen to address my article, “Is There a Drive to Love.” Their original and intellectually rewarding perspectives on love, drive, attachment, and the desired relationship between psychoanalysis and the neurosciences have enriched my thinking about these issues. In responding to them, I consider in sequence the two major concepts discussed in my original paper: “drive” and “love.”