{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0338409475465313, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015228426395939087, 'mean_word_length': 5.32620320855615, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparative analysis between RQ‐PCR and digital‐droplet‐PCR of immunoglobulin/T‐cell receptor gene rearrangements to monitor minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ‐PCR) is a standardized tool for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). The applicability of this technology is limited by the need of a standard curve based on diagnostic DNA. The digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) technology has been recently applied to various medical fields, but its use in MRD monitoring is under investigation. In this study, we analysed 50 ALL cases by both methods in two phases: in the first, we established analytical parameters to investigate the applicability of this new technique; in the second, we analysed MRD levels in 141 follow‐up (FU) samples to investigate the possible use of ddPCR for MRD monitoring in ALL patients. We documented that ddPCR has sensitivity and accuracy at least comparable to those of RQ‐PCR. Overall, the two methods gave concordant results in 124 of the 141 analysed MRD samples (88%, P = 0·94). Discordant results were found in 12% borderline cases.