{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02266666666666667, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0033333333333333335, 'mean_word_length': 5.7309417040358746, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Social Movements in the Balkans. Rebellion and Protest from Maribor to Taksim

monolithic Croat and Bosniak narratives. She persuasively shows that the process of how the citizens of Mostar interpret competing public narratives is a complex and messy one. While some individuals reaffirmed canonical historiographies as they changed, others refrained from simply overwriting previous experiences by taking on the new, nationalist narratives. People’s different experiences and life courses significantly affected the evolution of their historical understanding (5). Third, Palmberger focuses on the interplay between personal memories and memory politics in a way that is seldom found in the literature on memory and nationalism in Bosnia. She argues that public discourses are a ‘powerful foil against whose backdrop people’s narratives are constructed’ (17), effectively demonstrating that individual understandings of the past consist of intermingled narratives of autobiographical memories, second-hand pasts in the form of narratives bestowed on them by older family members, as well as the public, institutionalized ways of addressing historical themes (29). And finally, Palmberger applies methodological creativity to capture people’s narratives on contentious and sensitive topics, while striving to avoid exposure to bias (for example, by inviting participants to act as historical tour guides of their city). The result is a robust example of a well-executed qualitative multimethod study.