{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01415929203539823, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007079646017699115, 'mean_word_length': 4.66, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Refining Personal Jurisdiction in the United States

IN the years since 1977 the United States Supreme Court has addressed the permissible reach of state court jurisdiction' in a number of important decisions. In so doing, it has provided reconsideration and refinement to an area of the law then governed by the general test of International Shoe Co. v. Washington that "in order to subject a defendant to a judgment in personam, if he be not present within the territory of the forum, he have certain minimum contacts with it such that the maintenance of the suit