{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013215859030837005, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.548780487804878, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparative Study on Quality Awards

This study tries to compare quality awards; which are known as one of the research interests in quality management sector. In the first part we focused on Malaysian quality award, aim to introduce it as one of the successful quality awards systems. Than in the next phase of the paper we try to review the joint points and differences of the quality awards. Last section of this paper concludes the comparative study.