{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024746906636670417, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0011248593925759281, 'mean_word_length': 5.641791044776119, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Comparative Paradigm of Western ∗ and Soviet Bureaucracies

NO discussion on western conceptions of bureaucratic organisation can proceed without reference to Weber's analysis. 1 To Weber, all technologically great modern states are invariably based upon a bureaucratic structure. In his view point, all organisational systems-political or nonpolitical-are functionally related to the development of the money economy. He, however, submits that the fully developed 'bureaucratic mechanism' compares with 'other organisations' exactly as does the 'machine with the non-mechanical' modes of production. He contends that the manifold tasks of development or management of public affairs in a complex industrial society are susceptible to rational human control through a huge apparatusbureaucracy. As a type of bureaucracy, the large corporations are only matched by the public bureaucracy.