{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02040816326530612, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.037037037037037, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
CHRONIC ENDOMETRITIS IN PATIENTS WITH REPEATED IMPLANTATION FAILURES:EPIDEMIOLOGY, ETIOLOGY, PATHOGENESIS AND OVERCOMING INFERTILITY

Recent evidence indicates that the endometrium plays a much more important role in successful implantation and clinical pregnancy than many other recognized factors. Chronic endometritis (CE) is associated with negative reproductive outcomes, including repeated implantation failures. Streptococcus spp., Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus spp., Corynebacterium and Mycoplasma / Ureaplasmaspp are currently considered the main pathogens of CE. This disease disrupts the architectonics of the endometrium at different levels: first of all, CE promotes changes in the population of immunocompetent cells and, therefore, contributes to the disruption of the local immune response in the endometrium at the time of implantation. Antibiotic treatment for CE improves implantation rates and decreases abortion rates, although there are no well-designed prospective studies to support this conclusion. Considering the insufficient effectiveness of antibiotic therapy for CE, especially in cases of resistance of pathogens, or in the case of viral chronic endometritis, it is necessary to develop schemes with additional use of drugs that affect other etiopathogenetic pathways of development and maintenance of CE. An example of such a treatment can be cytokine therapy, which requires further study regarding the efficacy and safety in CE therapy.