{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03106508875739645, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010355029585798817, 'mean_word_length': 4.641666666666667, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
COTORSION THEORIES AND SPLITTERS Rüdiger Göbel and Saharon Shelah

Let R be a subring of the rationals. We want to investigate self splitting R-modules G that is Ext R(G,G) = 0 holds and follow Schultz [22] to call such modules splitters. Free modules and torsion-free cotorsion modules are classical examples for splitters. Are there others? Answering an open problem by Schultz [22] we will show that there are more splitters, in fact we are able to prescribe their endomorphism R-algebras with a free R-module structure. As a byproduct we are able to answer a problem of Salce [21] showing that all rational cotorsion theories have enough injectives and enough projectives.