{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018210609659540775, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.771689497716895, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Second Nature and Recognition: Hegel and the Social Space

Abstract In this article I intend to show the strict relation between the notions of "second nature" and "recognition". To do so I begin with a problem (circularity) proper to the theory of Hegelian and post-Hegelian Anerkennung. The solution strategy I propose is significant also in terms of bringing into focus the problems connected with a notion of "space of reasons" that stems from the Hegelian concept of "Spirit". I thus broach the notion of "second nature" as a bridge-concept that can play a key role both for a renewal of the theory of Anerkennung and for a rethinking of the "space of reasons" within the debate between Robert Brandom and John McDowell. Against this background I illustrate the novel ties introduced by the dialectical conception of the relation between first and second nature developed by Hegel and the contribution this idea can make to a revisited theory of recognition as a phenomenon articulated on two levels. I then return to the question of the space of reasons to show the contribution the renewed conception of recognition as second nature makes to the definition of its intrinsic sociality as something that is not in principle opposed to a sense of naturalness.