{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04179254783484391, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02920443101711984, 'mean_word_length': 4.826979472140763, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 4, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Comparative study of the treatment of prostatic adenoma: laser photocoagulation versus endoscopic resection].

OBJECTIVE
Resection of the prostate using a Nd YAG laser is designed to destroy benign prostatic hyperplasia responsible for bladder neck obstruction. This technique is currently under investigation.


PATIENTS AND TECHNIQUE
A total of 56 patients, with a minimal follow-up of 6 months and presenting indications for endoscopic resection of the prostate were treated by TULIP [22] or VLAP [34] laser coagulation. The objective and subjective results were compared to a group of patients [30] treated by endoscopic resection during the same period. Results are expressed as the percentage of patient responding to treatment in terms of objective (peak flow rate > 15 ml/s with improvement > 30% or between 12 and 15 ml, but improvement > 50%) and subjective parameters (IPSS < 7 and improvement > 30% or between 7 and 10, but improvement < 50%).


RESULTS
With a minimal follow-up of 6 months, the objective response rates were 55.5% (TULIP), 84.6% (VLAP) and 83.2% (TURP), while the subjective response rates were 55.5% (TULIP), 92.3% (VLAP) and 83.3% (TURP). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laser group (2.1 VLAP and 3.3 TULIP; 4.93 TURP). In the TULIP group, 3 patients were incontinent and 4 developed chronic prostatitis. At 6 months, 4 patients in the VLAP group and 6 patients in the TULIP group had to undergo a complementary TURP.


CONCLUSION
These results indicate that laser photocoagulation is effective in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The VLAP technique appears to be better adapted to this indication. The benefit of VLAP will be more clearly demonstrated by the randomized study currently underway, provided the length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and cost-effectiveness ratio are taken into account. In contrast, the TULIP system is associated with numerous complications which appear to be unacceptable.