{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026572187776793623, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005314437555358724, 'mean_word_length': 5.174863387978142, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Homo assumptus at St. Victor: Reconsidering the Relationship between Victorine Christology and Peter Lombard’s First Opinion

A THE YEAR 1270, Thomas Aquinas began composing the Tertia Pars of his Summa Theologiae, which treats of Christ the Savior. Here, after an opening question on the "fittingness of the Incarnation," he delves into a detailed consideration of the mode of the union of humanity and divinity in the Incarnate Word. In the sixth article of his second question, which inquires "whether the human nature was united to the Word of God accidentally," he reviews the ancient Christological heresies of Eutychianism and Nestorianism before explaining that "some more recent masters, thinking to avoid these heresies, through ignorance fell into them." 1 Summarizing the first position set forth in book 3 of Peter Lombard's Sentences (which modern scholars know as the homo assumptus theory), Thomas continues: "For some of them conceded one person of Christ, but proposed two hypostases or two supposita, saying that a certain man, composed of soul and body, was from the beginning of his conception assumed by the