{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.034856700232378, 'fraction_numerical': 0.037955073586367155, 'mean_word_length': 5.181818181818182, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Antinociceptive and Motor-Blocking Action of Epidurally Administered IQB-9302 and Bupivacaine in the Dog

Background and Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the antinociceptive and motor-blocking effects of epidurally administered IQB-9302 (C18 H26N2O. HCl) and bupivacaine in the dog. Methods Twelve adult female Beagle dogs were used. Each animal received 3 concentrations (0.25%, 0.50%, and 0.75%) of either IQB-9302 (n = 6) or bupivacaine (n = 6) by means of a chronic epidural catheter. The nocifensive and motor-blocking status were determined at regular intervals before (baseline) and after drug administration. Results Epidurally administered IQB-9302 caused a more potent nocifensive and motor-blocking action than bupivacaine. The duration of complete nocifensive block was the longest with IQB-9302, whereas the duration of dermatome nocifensive block was similar for both drugs. The nocifensive to motor block ratio was significantly higher with IQB-9302. Conclusions IQB-9302 produced an anesthetic action similar to that of bupivacaine, although the former drug induced a slightly more potent nocifensive block. Nocifensive and motor block duration are very similar with IQB-9302, whereas bupivacaine induces a more prolonged motor block without nocifensive block.