{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016494845360824743, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008247422680412371, 'mean_word_length': 4.884848484848485, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparative study of the growth of Listeria monocytogenes in defined media and demonstration of growth in continuous culture.

A basic requirement for physiological studies with Listeria monocytogenes is a chemically defined medium that supports growth of the bacterium in batch and continuous culture. A number of such media have been devised but comparative studies of their efficiency are few and none has been used in continuous culture. Six of the media were compared for their ability to sustain sequential growth of L. monocytogenes in static and aerated batch culture with glucose as sole carbon source. The most suitable, judged on the basis of ease of preparation, growth rate and yield, was that of Trivett and Meyer (1971). This medium was shown to support growth of L. monocytogenes NCTC 7973 in continuous culture in a chemostat. A lytic phenomenon, noted with the same strain under anaerobic conditions and in batch culture in the chemostat, is discussed.