{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020233463035019456, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008560311284046693, 'mean_word_length': 5.15311004784689, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Understanding the effects of wrong-path memory references on processor performance

High-performance out-of-order processors spend a significant portion of their execution time on the incorrect program path even though they employ aggressive branch prediction algorithms. Although memory references generated on the wrong path do not change the architectural state of the processor, they can affect the arrangement of data in the memory hierarchy. This paper examines the effects of wrong-path memory references on processor performance. It is shown that these references significantly affect the IPC (Instructions Per Cycle) performance of a processor. Not modeling them can lead to errors of up to 10% in IPC estimates for the SPEC2000 integer benchmarks; 7 out of 12 benchmarks experience an error of greater than 2% in IPC estimates. In general, the error in the IPC increases with increasing memory latency and instruction window size.We find that wrong-path references are usually beneficial for performance, because they prefetch data that will be used by later correct-path references. L2 cache pollution is found to be the most significant negative effect of wrong-path references. Code examples are shown to provide insights into how wrong-path references affect performance.