{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0187207488299532, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0031201248049922, 'mean_word_length': 5.294117647058823, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Response factors in the choice of reference ear in ABLB.

Response patterns and the limits of loudness judgement accuracy were explored in a clinical presentation of the alternate binaural loudness balance (ABLB) procedure, and compared across the two methodological alternatives of using the better or poorer ear as reference ear. It was found: 1) that in the range of judgement uncertainty, responses were strongly influenced by stimulus presentation order; 2) that the magnitude of the range of uncertainty was similar across both methodologies. A suggested clinical procedure which controls for these effects is presented as an Appendix.