{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02643171806167401, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007709251101321586, 'mean_word_length': 5.356643356643357, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Influence of Group Norms on Representatives' Behavior in Intergroup Negotiations: The Role of Standing and Need to Belong

In a computer-mediated negotiation experiment (N = 107), it is investigated how and why intragroup characteristics, such as a competitive or cooperative group norm and a negotiator's standing within the own constituent group, interplay with personality to influence the behavior of a group representative in intergroup negotiations. Applying insights from the social identity approach (specifically self-categorization theory), we argue and show that for negotiators with a low standing in their group (but not for those with a high standing), their dispositional need to belong (Baumeister & Leary, 1995) is related to their motivation to be accepted by their group, which in turn influences the degree to which they act upon group norms when negotiating on behalf of their group.