{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013024602026049204, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.348623853211009, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Case Study of using WikiWinWin into Bug Negotiation

In order to make well-considered solutions to software bugs, it is necessary for stakeholders to negotiate collaboratively. In traditional ways of making bug decisions, it not only lacks efficient tool to support the negotiation process which might lead to inadequate negotiation, but also cannot preserve the negotiation records as the experience for future development. In this paper, the WikiWinWin was applied into industrial bug negotiation as a case study to get better solutions. The comparison would be conducted between solutions after being negotiated and the original solutions to prove the improvement brought by WikiWinWin.