{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018726591760299626, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016229712858926344, 'mean_word_length': 6.097345132743363, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Study of electrophoretic mobility of urinary lysozyme in the differential diagnosis of chronic glomerulonephritis and chronic pyelonephritis].

Different electrophoretic mobility of urine lysozyme was established in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis and chronic pyelonephritis during electrophoresis in 12% polyacrylamide gel (gel pH 4.3, electrode buffer pH 4.0). The examination of 128 patients has shown that anode position of lysozyme in electrophoretic tubes is observed in 95% of patients with chronic pyelonephritis, and its anode position in 92% of patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. A method of urine lysozyme electrophoresis under the above conditions was proposed as a noninvasive method of differential diagnosis of chronic glomerulonephritides and chronic pyelonephritides.