{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02443280977312391, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0034904013961605585, 'mean_word_length': 6.16875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Stepwise versus Concerted Reductive Elimination Mechanisms in the Carbon–Iodide Bond Formation of (DPEphos)RhMeI2 Complex

Reductive elimination is the key bond formation process of organometallic reactions. Goldberg and co-workers recently revealed an unprecedented competition of parallel stepwise reductive elimination pathways for the carbon–iodide bond formation of (DPEphos)RhMeI2 complex. To understand the controlling factors that differentiate the concerted and stepwise pathways, we performed density functional theory (DFT) calculations to elucidate the mechanistic details. The competing stepwise pathways were identified as the anionic and zwitterionic stepwise pathways. The anionic pathway involves the direct SN2 attack of the external iodide anion to the methyl group, leading to the observed carbon–iodide bond formation. Alternatively, heterolytic Rh–I bond cleavage generates the cationic (DPEphos)RhMeI+ intermediate, and the subsequent SN2 attack of the iodide anion to the methyl group occurs via the zwitterionic transition state. In comparison with the stepwise reductive elimination pathways, the classic concerted pa...