{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04253262445625906, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02319961333977767, 'mean_word_length': 5.369230769230769, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
How to estimate aortic characteristic impedance from magnetic resonance and applanation tonometry data?

Objectives: Compare seven previous methods for the estimation of aortic characteristic impedance, which contributes to left ventricle pulsatile load, from phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and applanation tonometry data. Methods: We studied 77 healthy (43 ± 16 years) individuals and 16 hypertensive (61 ± 9 years) patients, who consecutively underwent ascending aorta CMR and carotid tonometry, resulting in flow and pressure waveforms, respectively. Characteristic impedance was semi-automatically estimated in time domain from these latter waveforms, using seven methods. The methods were based on the following: methods 1–4, magnitudes at specific times; method 5, early-systolic up-slope; method 6, time-derivatives peak; and method 7, pressure-flow loop early-systolic slope. Results: Aortic characteristic impedance was significantly increased in hypertensive patients when compared to elderly controls (n = 32) with a similar mean age of (59 ± 8 years) when using methods based on 95% of peak flow, up-slopes, and derivatives peaks (P < 0.05). When considering healthy individuals, impedance indices were significantly correlated to central pulse pressure for all methods (P < 0.005). Finally, characteristic impedance was correlated to the frequency-domain reference values (r > 0.65, P < 0.0001), with a slight superiority for the same three methods as above (r > 0.82, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: This is the first study demonstrating phase-contrast CMR and tonometry usefulness in aortic characteristic impedance temporal estimation. Methods based on 95% of peak flow, as well as those based on derivative peaks and up-slopes, which are fast and independent of curve preprocessing, were slightly superior. They can be easily integrated in a clinical workflow and may help to understand the complementarity of this pulsatile index with other CMR aortic geometry and stiffness measures in the setting of left ventricle-aortic coupling.