{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018305439330543932, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.996865203761756, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Human Trust of Autonomous Agent Varies With Strategy and Capability in Collaborative Grid Search Task

Trust is an important emerging area of study in human-robot cooperation. Many studies have begun to look at the issue of robot (agent) capability as a predictor of human trust in the robot. However, the assumption that agent capability is the sole predictor of human trust could underestimate the complexity of the problem. This study aims to investigate the effects of agent-strategy and agent-capability in a visual search task. Fourteen subjects were recruited to partake in a web-based grid search task. They were each paired with a series of autonomous agents to search an on-screen grid to find a number of outlier objects as quickly as possible. Both the human and agent searched the grid concurrently and the human was able to see the movement of the agent. Each trial, a different autonomous agent with its assigned capability, used one of three search strategies to assist their human counterpart. After each trial, the autonomous agent reported the number of outliers it found, and the human subject was asked to determine the total number of outliers in the area. Some autonomous agents reported only a fraction of the outliers they encountered, thus coding a varying level of agent capability. Human subjects then evaluated statements related to the behavior, reliability, and trust of the agent. The results showed increased measures of trust and reliability with increasing capability. Additionally, the most legible search strategies received the highest average ratings in a measure of familiarity. Remarkably, given no prior information about capabilities or strategies that they would see, subjects were able to determine consistent trustworthiness of the agent. Furthermore, both capability and strategy of the agent had statistically significant effects on the human’s trust in the agent.