{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02195945945945946, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0033783783783783786, 'mean_word_length': 5.376344086021505, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparing EM3: Predelivery maintenance model with its industrial correspondence

To successfully conduct postdelivery maintenance, organizations must be actively involved in the predelivery maintenance phase. For this, they need a predelivery maintenance process model. Right now, there are only two such models and they are still in their infancy. In this paper, we compare one of them, the EM3 Predelivery/Prerelease model, to its corresponding predelivery process at AMIS Software. The comparison has helped us evaluate the model in an industrial context and extend it with new activities.