{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017651052274270197, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006788866259334691, 'mean_word_length': 4.7578125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
BOOK REVIEWS FOR VOLUME 68

I am honored to assume responsibility for the 2005 and 2006 issues of The Journal of Wildlife Management ( JWM). I understand the substantial effort that all authors put into the research, analysis, and manuscript processes, and promise that every submission will be treated with the utmost professionalism. In this editorial I want to outline several substantial changes that have been implemented in how we process manuscripts, the variety of submissions that are now possible, and specific keys I will emphasize when reviewing a manuscript. First I want to acknowledge Jerry Keir, Director, Great Basin Institute of the University of Nevada, Reno, who graciously offered office space and assistance in identifying individuals to serve as JWM staff. My editorial assistants, Carly Johnson, John Simhula, and Cory Jacobs, are learning the ropes rapidly; Massey Mayo helped us get started and is now off to law school. Next I want to thank all of the outgoing Associate Editors who are still processing manuscripts, and welcome and thank all of the new AEs who have agreed to help us process manuscripts. I invite all readers to scan the inside front cover of each issue of JWM to acknowledge the great effort all of the editors and staff are expending to bring you this journal. It always amazes me how some of the most active researchers and teachers I know are willing to serve as AEs or frequent referees— you are the core of our profession.