{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015527950310559006, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.323529411764706, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Language of Residential Exclusion

The author addresses the conflictual nature of space and territory–and that control over space is a very clear signifier of power relations in society–by examining events in Cape Town and Farmingville, New York. The fact that these settings have seemingly little to nothing in common conveys the central theme of this paper: attempts at residential exclusion are consistent across space and time, and the rationale behind exclusion, while often seemingly based on ethnic and/or racial grounds, should be rooted in the spatial inequality that is a feature of property relations within capitalist societies.