{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01794616151545364, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.070422535211268, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of transient state and steady state exciton–exciton annihilation rates based on Förster-type energy transfer

We investigated differences between the transient state and steady state exciton–exciton annihilation rates based on Förster-type energy transfer. The exciton–exciton annihilation rate of an organic semiconductor is usually determined by transient state photoluminescence measurements using a pulsed laser or steady state photoluminescence measurements using a continuous wave laser. However, it is unclear that the respective annihilation rates determined by their rate equations are the same. In calculations with platinum-octaethylporphyrin (PtOEP) parameters, Monte Carlo simulations gave two different annihilation rates for the transient state and the steady state. The analytical models based on Förster-type energy transfer also showed the same result. These results indicate that the exciton–exciton annihilation rates in transient state and steady state are distinguished.