{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017695099818511795, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009981851179673321, 'mean_word_length': 5.743119266055046, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Gender Diverse Representation in Patient Simulation: A Scoping Review

Purpose Despite recent advocacy for transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) health competencies in medical education, there is little guidance on how to represent diverse gender identities for clinical skills training. Published literature is one of few resources available to inform educators’ decisions, so this study aims to summarize how medical education scholarship portrays TGNB identities in patient simulation. Method This scoping review used PRISMA guidelines with search strings encompassing diverse gender identities and patient simulation. This search was completed in July 2021, and all years of publication were included. The authors completed a 3-tiered review to identify relevant studies and then extracted data to summarize how TGNB patients were portrayed and training outcomes. Results After screening 194 total articles, 44 studies met the criteria for full review. Of these, 22 studies involved TGNB simulated patient cases. Within these, 15 (68%) reported the specific gender identities represented in the patient case, revealing mostly binary transgender identities. Sixteen studies (73%) reported the gender identities of all actors who portrayed the patient. The identities of all patients and actors matched in only 10 articles (45%), indicating that most programs portray TGNB identities with cisgender or unspecified standardized patients. Nearly all studies reported desirable learner outcomes. Several noted the advantage of authenticity in recruiting TGNB actors and the need to achieve more accurate representation of TGNB patients. Conclusions Educators are increasingly representing TGNB identities in clinical skills training. These results show a lack of nonbinary representation and discrepancies between TGNB patient cases and standardized patient identities. These data also suggest that simulation programs need and desire better recruitment strategies within TGNB communities. Because TGNB communities are not a monolith, reporting out and analyzing gender identities of simulation cases and people hired to portray TGNB patients helps ensure that TGNB care is taught effectively and respectfully.