{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.041586073500967116, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009671179883945842, 'mean_word_length': 5.0852941176470585, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ablating the ischemia-reperfusion injury in non-heart-beating donor kidneys.

BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to determine if allopurinol (AL) and/or trifluoperazine (TFP) added to the Belzer machine preservation solution (MPS) improves the function of non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) canine kidneys.


METHODS
Anesthetized canines underwent bilateral dissection of the renal vessels, obtaining baseline flow. After removing one kidney (heart-beating donor [HBD]), the dog was exsanguinated. After remaining in situ for 120 min (30-min warm ischemia time, 90-min cold ischemia time), the second kidney was removed (NHBD), flushed, biopsied, and weighed. The kidneys were machine-perfused separately for 20 hr, and pressure, flow, and resistance were measured serially. The kidneys were randomly assigned to a perfusate group (G): G1=MPS, G2=MPS+TFP, G3=MPS+AL, and G4=MPS+TFP+AL. Kidneys were implanted separately into a single recipient dog. Flow, resistance, and urine output were measured serially for 4 hr. Blood and urine samples and kidney biopsies were then obtained. All measurements were standardized to 100 g of kidney weight.


RESULTS
HBD kidneys functioned better than NHBD kidneys in all groups, as expected. Although perfusate G1 was the most effective solution for HBD kidneys, the TFP additive (perfusate G2) more effectively reversed the vasospastic effects of ischemia/reperfusion for NHBD than the MPS solution (G1) with or without other additives. In HBD kidneys, the addition of AL resulted in the best creatinine clearance; however, AL was less effective than MPS alone in NHBD kidneys. TFP+AL together were completely ineffective in preserving renal function, regardless of whether the kidneys were from HBD or NHBD.


CONCLUSIONS
MPS+TFP more effectively protected renal function against reperfusion injury in the NHBD than MPS alone, AL, or AL+TFP. AL exerts a salutary effect on creatinine clearance in HBD but not in the NHBD. The TFP and AL combination should not be used together with the MPS in machine preservation of kidneys.