{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03470031545741325, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00473186119873817, 'mean_word_length': 4.669642857142857, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Use of Executed Prisoners As a Source of Organ Transplants in China Must Stop

The statement by G.M. Danovitch, M.E. Shapiro and J. Lavee that ‘The use of executed prisoners as a source of organ transplants in China must stop’ (1) cannot be disputed. However, the strategies they suggest to achieve this goal sound like a policeman approach that is unlikely to appeal to Chinese colleagues and politicians amenable to change. Another disturbing point is that the authors forget that Western democracies too, including the United States, used prisoners as ‘donors’ only a few decades ago, thus limiting their moral authority (2–4).