{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02033132530120482, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009789156626506024, 'mean_word_length': 5.54679802955665, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cutaneous granular cell angiosarcoma

The majority of cutaneous angiosarcomas display typical architectural features of irregular anastomosing vascular channels in the dermis and subcutis. Nuclei are usually hyperchromatic and pleomorphic but die volume of cytoplasm of the neoplastic cells is often small. Diagnosis can be made readily on an adequate biopsy. We recently experienced difficulty diagnosing an angiosarcoma composed predominantly of cells with abundant granular cytoplasm. We were able to compare the present case with sections obtained from the only other reported example. The architectural expression of an anastomosing vascular pattern in areas of tumor, combined with the positive staining for Factor VIII‐related antigen (FVIIIRAg) and Ulex europaeus agglutinin‐1 (UEA1) enabled us to make a diagnosis of angiosarcoma. The tumor failed to stain for the other endothelial markers (CD31 and CD34) which were positive in the original case. A marker for lysosomes (CD68) stained the granules in both cases. The granular cell variant of cutaneous angiosarcoma is very rare. Diagnosis is possible by recognizing the typical anastomosing neoplastic vascular channels at the periphery of the lesion, and by use of a combination of lectin (UEA1) and immunohistochemical (FVIIIRAg, CD34 and CD31) endothelial markers.