{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023543990086741014, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004956629491945477, 'mean_word_length': 5.362204724409449, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Application of Multiple Comparison Procedures on an Individual’s Innovative Behavior

In this paper, we have discussed the widely used multiple comparison procedures (MCPs) and compared them on the basis of management data for testing individual or employee innovation and work life imbalance of individuals along with their limitations and advantages. This study, for the first time in Pakistan is a distinctive attempt to look at an individual's innovative behavior in the universities situated in the three provinces, Punjab, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa using ANOVA and MCPs. Furthermore, with stratified sampling technique, the total target population was 80 M. Phil and Ph.D. scholars, out of which only 59 questionnaires were returned. Lastly, counter arguments are further discussed in the research.