{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02385752688172043, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012768817204301076, 'mean_word_length': 5.254201680672269, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Clinical effect of digital impression combined with all-ceramic denture on restoration of 60 patients with dental defects].

PURPOSE
To analyze the clinical effect of digital impression combined with all-ceramic denture restoration on patients with dental defects.


METHODS
A study was conducted on 120 patients with dental defects admitted to Dongfeng Stomatological Hospital from June 2018 to June 2020. The two groups of patients were randomly divided into digital imprinting modules and silicone rubber imprinting modules using a random number table method. There were 60 cases in each group. The silicone rubber imprint module used traditional silicone impression combined with all-ceramic denture restoration, while the digital imprint module used digital impression combined with all-ceramic denture restoration.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed. Gingival index (GI), periodontal index (PI) before dental restoration, during dental restoration and 6 monthes after dental restoration were compared. The adjacent surface contact conditions, occlusion and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. SPSS 22.0 software package was used for statistical analysis.


RESULTS
The two groups of patients selected grade A and grade B for the evaluation of the restoration when the restoration was completed. The number of patients who chose grade A for the digital imprint module was more than that of the silicone rubber imprint module,but there was no significant difference(P＞0.05). Six months after the tooth was worn, GI and PI indexes of the two groups of patients increased. GI and PI indexes of the silicone rubber stamping module were significantly higher than those of the digital stamping module(P＜0.05). When dental restoration was completed and 6 months after the tooth was replaced, the pass rate of contact between the adjacent surfaces of the imprinting module patients was significantly higher than that of the silicone rubber imprinting module(P＜0.05). When dental restoration was completed, the occlusion of the digital imprinting module patients was significantly better than that of the silicone rubber imprinting module(P＜0.05). Six months after wearing the denture, there was no significant difference in occlusion between the two groups of patients(P＞0.05). When dental models of the two groups of patients were taken, the incidence of adverse reactions in patients with digital imprints was significantly lower than that of silicone rubber imprints(P＜0.05).


CONCLUSIONS
The use of digital impressions combined with all-ceramic restorations to repair patients with dental defects can effectively improve the treatment effect, improve prognostic GI and PI indexes of the patients, increase the pass rate of the adjacent surface contact and occlusion of the tooth, and reduce the process of dental restoration. The incidence of adverse reactions are minimal, with good prognostic effects. It is worthy of clinical application.