{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.056579783852511126, 'fraction_numerical': 0.05530832803560076, 'mean_word_length': 4.503496503496503, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Combination of narrow band imaging (NBI) and autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) in the assessment of central lung cancer].

OBJECTIVE
To assess the diagnostic value of narrow-band imaging(NBI) in the diagnosis of central lung cancer.


METHODS
Patients (n = 153) suspected of having lung cancer underwent white light bronchoscopy(WLB), NBI and autofluorescence bronchoscopy(AFB) in turn. At least 3 biopsies in each case were taken from sites visualized as lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of NBI, AFB and combination of NBI and AFB were compared.


RESULTS
There were 106 male (69.3%) and 47 female patients (30.7%). By NBI, 91 and 62 cases were positive and negative respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of NBI were 63.5% (87/137) and 75.0% (12/16) respectively. By AFB, 140 and 13 cases were positive and negative respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of AFB were 94.2% (129/137) and 87.5% (5/16) respectively. By NBI combined with AFB, 133 and 20 cases were positive and negative respectively, the sensitivity and specificity being 95.6% (131/137) and 87.5% (14/16) respectively. The difference of specificity between NBI plus AFB and AFB alone was significant (P < 0.01), but the difference of sensitivity between NBI plus AFB and AFB alone(P > 0.05) was not. The difference of specificity between NBI plus AFB and NBI alone was significant (P < 0.01), but the P value of specificity between NBI plus AFB and NBI was 0.03.


CONCLUSION
Combination of NBI and AFB could increase the specificity of lung cancer diagnosis compared to AFB alone.