{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032568072610784836, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025093432995194873, 'mean_word_length': 4.696048632218845, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Follow-Up STIS Spectroscopy of Three Candidate Tidal Disruption Events

Large amplitude, high luminosity soft X-ray flares were detected by the ROSAT All-Sky Survey in several galaxies with no evidence for Seyfert activity in their ground-based optical spectra. These flares had the properties predicted for a tidal disruption event by a central supermassive black hole: soft X-ray spectrum, time-scale of months, and large X-ray luminosity (10^42 - 10^44 ergs s^-1). In order to evaluate the alternative hypothesis that these flares could have been some form of extreme AGN variability, we obtained follow-up optical spectroscopy of three of the flaring galaxies a decade later with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) and a narrow slit to search for or place stringent limits on the presence of any persistent Seyfert-like emission in their nuclei. Two of the galaxies, RX J1624.9+7554 and RX J1242.6-1119, show no evidence for emission lines or a non-stellar continuum in their Hubble Space Telescope (HST) nuclear spectra, consistent with their ground-based classification as inactive galaxies. They remain the most convincing as hosts of tidal disruption events. NGC 5905, previously known as a starburst H II galaxy due to its strong emission lines, has in its inner 0."1 a nucleus with narrow emission-line ratios requiring a Seyfert 2 classification. This weak Seyfert 2 nucleus in NGC 5905, which was masked by the many surrounding H II regions in ground-based spectra, requires a low level of prior non-stellar photoionization, thus raising some uncertainty about the nature of its X-ray flare, which may or may not have been a tidal disruption event. The absence of both broad emission lines and nuclear X-ray absorption in NGC 5905 also characterizes it as a ``true'' Seyfert 2 galaxy, yet one that has varied by more than a factor of 100 in X-rays.