{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018484288354898338, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.891304347826087, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Emperor's New Legal Education Theory

Had Hans Christian Andersen been a legal academic, he may well have opted for a different setting for his enlightening fairytale - The Emperor's New Clothes - teaching us about pretentiousness, hypocrisy, and collective denial. While some would argue that the academic world in general is a particularly fertile ground for such types of behaviour, I am here only raising the question of whether the tendency of legal academics writing on education theory is in some part motivated by such behaviour.