{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032362459546925564, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03317152103559871, 'mean_word_length': 5.154228855721393, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Structure factor model for understanding the measured backscatter coefficients from concentrated cell pellet biophantoms.

Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient (BSC) measurements were performed on K562 cell pellet biophantoms with cell concentrations ranging from 0.006 to 0.30 in the 10-42 MHz frequency bandwidth. Three scattering models, namely, the fluid-filled sphere model (FFSM), the particle model (PM), and the structure factor model (SFM), were compared for modeling the scattering from an ensemble of concentrated cells. A parameter estimation procedure was developed in order to estimate the scatterer size and relative impedance contrast that could explain the measured BSCs from all the studied cell concentrations. This procedure was applied to the BSC data from K562 cell pellet biophantoms in the 10-42 MHz frequency bandwidth and to the BSC data from Chinese hamster ovary cell pellet biophantoms in the 26-105 MHz frequency bandwidth given in Han, Abuhabsah, Blue, Sarwate, and O'Brien [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 4139-4147 (2011)]. The data fitting quality and the scatterer size estimates show that the SFM was more suitable than the PM and the FFSM for modeling the responses from concentrated cell pellet biophantoms.