{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.043512658227848104, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013449367088607595, 'mean_word_length': 5.293532338308458, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Relative Importance of Residual Renal Function and Convection in Determining Beta-2-Microglobulin Levels in High-Flux Haemodialysis and On-Line Haemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND
Convective blood purification improves beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)M) removal and may delay the onset of dialysis-related amyloidosis. We assessed the differential effects of high-flux haemodialysis (HD) and on-line haemodiafiltration (HDF) on plasma beta(2)M levels, given the enhanced convective capability of HDF.


METHODS
We measured pre-dialysis beta(2)M levels in 297 patients in a programme employing both high-flux HD and HDF, then analysed the relationship of beta(2)M to modality and other variables.


RESULTS
Independent determinants of plasma beta(2)M levels were residual renal function, age, HD vintage, and C-reactive protein load, but not the patient's predominant modality (high-flux HD or HDF). Patients with KRU levels <0.5 ml/min had significantly higher beta(2)M levels than patients with KRU between 0.5 and 1 ml/min.


CONCLUSIONS
Residual renal function is of overriding importance as a determinant of beta(2)M levels in HD patients and may supersede enhanced convective clearance by HDF. Beneficial effects extend to very low levels of residual renal function.