{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023972602739726026, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01598173515981735, 'mean_word_length': 5.1328671328671325, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Highlights of this issue

We start these Highlights with a perspective on psychiatry. In 2012, The World Health Organization developed its QualityRights initiative, together with an accompanying Tool Kit. It sought to translate international human right standards – in particular, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) – into practice. In 2019, training material was published to support the initiative, but the negative portrayal of psychiatry is a cause of concern raised in an editorial by Hoare and Duffy (pp. 240–242). They argue that psychiatrists implement coercive practices as a last resort, after a careful weighing of the risks and benefits and extensive discussion with the individual receiving treatment and their family. Although the QualityRights initiative has a lot going for it, the finer points may need to be more subtly nuanced.