{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014563106796116505, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.21608040201005, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Dependence of Spatial Distribution of Excitement of Receptors on Their Stiles-Crawford Effect

The spatial distribution of excitement of receptors depends on the magnitude of amplitude of light integrated over the wavefront passing through the pupil as conditioned by the receptor's acceptance lobe. Because the peripheral zones of the pupil are less efficient in eliciting visual excitation than the pupil's centre, otherwise known as Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind (SCE I), the spatial distribution of excitement of receptors will differ depending on their Stiles- Crawford effect. Assuming the funneling of light into the receptors through a single entering aperture the SCE I is integrated into the calculation of retinal diffraction images, in the manner of an apodization effect. And, in the absence of aberrations, the pupil apodization is chosen twice as narrow as suggested by the SCE I to compute modulation in the retinal light distributions. But using coherent illumination, a periodic target of rectangular profile and incorporating SCE I as pupil apodization we got a result where neither the intensity nor the modulation changes indicating absence of SCE I for a full pupil admitting a single coherent beam.