{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020250723240115717, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0028929604628736743, 'mean_word_length': 4.580645161290323, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Bias and uncertainty in heart rate variability spectral indices due to the finite ECG sampling frequency.

Spectral analysis of the heart rate variability is becoming a usual tool as a marker of the autonomic nervous system. The final output of the spectral analysis is a set of indices that are always estimators due to technical limitations. In this work, the bias and the uncertainty in the VLF, LF, HF and LF/HF indices due to the finite sampling frequency of the ECG are analysed. The results indicate that for low sampling frequency (125 Hz), the bias and uncertainty in the HF and LF/HF indices can blur the results of the analysis, especially if the RR time series has low variability. The HF index is overestimated and, accordingly, the LF/HF index is underestimated. Then, results from RR time series with low sampling frequency must be used with care. The uncertainty of the spectral indices is proportional to the inverse of the sampling frequency and the bias is proportional to the inverse of the square sampling frequency.