{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014925373134328358, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002296211251435132, 'mean_word_length': 5.556390977443609, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Should we stop performing nuclear medicine procedures?

Biomedical research in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging has led to considerable developments. However, many techniques introduced about 50 years still represent the most important part of the daily workload of nuclear medicine departments. They reflect the high impact of our speciality on the referring physicians. Moreover, these techniques are now well standardized, and numerous guidelines have been produced for adults as well as for children. This should have led to an optimal situation with high-quality examinations and a high level of agreement in the interpretation of results. What really happens in daily practice is worrying, however, as several recent interobserver reproducibility studies have altered the confidence in the robustness of several procedures that were previously well validated.