{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011840688912809472, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.158940397350993, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Using developer interaction data to compare expertise metrics

The expertise of a software developer is said to be a crucial factor for the development time required to complete a task. Even if this hypothesis is intuitive, research has not yet quantified the effect of developer expertise on development time. A related problem is that the design space for expertise metrics is large; out of the various automated expertise metrics proposed, we do not know which metric most reliably captures expertise. What prevents a proper evaluation of expertise metrics and their relation with development time is the lack of data on development tasks, such as their precise duration. Fortunately, this data is starting to become available in the form of growing developer interaction repositories. We show that applying MSR techniques to these developer interaction repositories gives us the necessary tools to perform such an evaluation.