{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014792899408284023, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.099099099099099, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Emission Control: Is it Efficient to Change Location?

The authors of several leading undergraduate textbooks on environmental economics use a MD-MAC model to graphically show and explain emission control. Their analysis, however, is site specific with an individual emission source using a least cost strategy to abate its emissions at a specific location. In this paper I expand the traditional textbook model with a graphical representation of the net gain to society when an emission source changes its venue. Specifically, I use my analysis to evaluate various emission control policies in terms of whether or not an individual policy will bring about the efficient move.