{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019933554817275746, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01079734219269103, 'mean_word_length': 5.409574468085107, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Microsurgical penile revascularization in patients with pure arteriogenic erectile dysfunction].

BACKGROUND
We report the results of microscopic penile revascularization in patients with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction.


METHODS
One patient with localized obstruction of the common penile artery underwent the Michal II penile revascularization, 13 patients underwent the Furlow-Fisher procedure, and 5 patients underwent the Hauri procedure. The mean age was 33.0 years and the mean follow-up period was 32 months (4-80 months). Eight patients were tobacco smokers, one patient was over 50 years old. Surgery was considered successful when the patients had a permeable anastomosis and were able to achieve satisfactory erection resulting in normal sexual intercourse.


RESULTS
All surgery was successful except for one patient who had undergone the Furlow-Fisher procedure. In Spite of antithrombotic therapy, graft occlusion occurred in two patients. Post operative glans hypervascularity occurred in two patients.


CONCLUSION
Penile revascularization surgery is a highly effective treatment for selected patients. There is a need for further study of graft occlusion and glans hypervascularity.