{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.06096311475409836, 'fraction_numerical': 0.06557377049180328, 'mean_word_length': 4.2926829268292686, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Grading of small hepatocellular carcinomas (≤2 cm): correlation between histology, T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging.

OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the capacity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to determine the histological grade of small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in liver cirrhosis in comparison with T2 weighted imaging.


METHODS
51 cirrhotic patients with 63 histologically proven HCCs ≤2 cm underwent abdominal MRI, including DWI (b-values 50, 400 and 800 s mm(-2)) and T2 weighted sequences. HCCs were classified into well-differentiated HCCs (n = 37) and moderately differentiated HCCs (n = 26). Relative contrast ratios (RCRs) between the lesions and the surrounding liver were performed and compared between the two groups for T2 weighted images, each b-value and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare RCRs in T2 and diffusion-weighted images.


RESULTS
We found significant differences in RCRs between well-differentiated vs moderately differentiated HCCs for b = 50, 400 and 800 s mm(-2) and T2 weighted images (1.35 ± 0.36 vs 1.86 ± 0.62; 1.35 ± 0.38 vs 1.82 ± 0.60; 1.27 ± 0.30 vs 1.74 ± 0.53; 1.14 ± 0.18 vs 1.43 ± 0.28, respectively; p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed in ADC and ADC RCR (1.05 ± 0.19 vs 0.99 ± 0.15 and 1.1 ± 0.22 vs 1.09 ± 0.23; p = 0.16 and p = 0.82, respectively). No significant difference was found in the areas under the ROC curve for RCRs of T2 weighted images and every DWI b-value (p = 0.18).


CONCLUSION
The RCR measurement performed in DWI 50, 400 and 800 b-values and T2 demonstrated a significant difference between well-differentiated and moderately differentiated small-sized HCCs. Furthermore, no difference was shown by using either ADC or ADC RCR.


ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
DWI with RCR measurement may be a valuable tool for non-invasively predicting the histological grade of small HCCs.