{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0444104134762634, 'fraction_numerical': 0.027565084226646247, 'mean_word_length': 4.787610619469026, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
"Restructuring" and Functional Structure

1.Introduction. In what follows I would like to show how the articulated functional structure of the clause suggested in Cinque (1999) may shed new light on the “restructuring” phenomenon (Rizzi 1976a,b; 1978) and perhaps afford a deeper understanding of it. In the past 25 years, numerous analyses have been proposed to explain why certain phenomena which are otherwise clause-bound (such as Clitic Placement – see (1)) appear to be able to span over two clauses when the matrix verb is either a modal, an aspectual or a motion verb and the complement is non-finite (see the ‘climbing’ of the clitic in (2)): 1