{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016553067185978577, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.840909090909091, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Insertion of Laryngeal Mask AirwayTM for a paediatric orthopaedic case with coincidental cleft palate

that the child was free from all foreign bodies, she was reversed and returned safely to her parents in recovery. This case highlights the risk of toys and other childhood paraphernalia to the paediatric airway. An oropharyngeal foreign body apparently adherent to the posterior pharyngeal wall, as in this case, is certainly uncommon and it is hoped that there will be greater awareness of the risks that such objects pose to the curious infant. We feel that such cases demand a team approach and alternative routes of management should be considered in advance in case ‘plan A’ fails. Despite the successful outcome to this case, we do have concern at the initial management of this case with an inter-hospital transfer of an ‘at risk airway’. In our opinion, this type of case warrants management at the hospital of presentation as unnecessary transfers are not only time consuming, but also increase risk to the patient.