{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030680728667305847, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011505273250239693, 'mean_word_length': 5.404907975460123, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Substitute Consent in Women with Psychosis

When treating patients with schizophrenia, substitute consent for treatment is often needed because of the patient’s decisional incapacity. The goal of this article is to illustrate the potential problems involved in surrogate decision-making in a mental health service for women. A composite case vignette that highlights these issues is presented. The vignette was developed based on files from a women’s clinic for psychosis and a selective literature review. The quality of the relationship between marriage partners and the possibility of pregnancy, motherhood, and child custody disputes all complicate the ethics of next- of-kin surrogate decision-making. The concept of “best interests” (the mother’s or the child’s) is not straightforward. A related ethical issue is whether/when to disclose psychiatric information to spouses. It is hoped that this paper will engender further discussion in medicine, cultural studies, ethics, and the law. (Journal of Psychiatric Practice 2014;20:491–497)