{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009389671361502348, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.441860465116279, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Representational Limitations and Improvements in Building Information Modeling

This paper discusses advantages and limitations of different representation types, illustrated with examples from current commercial Building Information Modeling applications. There is still a potential benefit in more thoroughly adapting additional representations to access and manage project data.The paper presents arguments to adapt a hybrid approach, where multiple representations should form a series of interfaces to interact with a building model. Inspiration is derived from software applications not associated with Building Information Modeling.