{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03412616339193381, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03722854188210962, 'mean_word_length': 5.245161290322581, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Canopy composition influencing plant patch dynamics in a Brazilian sandy coastal plain

Competition and predation have often been referred to as key forces regulating community structure. However, in the last decade great attention has been paid to the structuring role of positive interactions between plants, which occur when the presence of one species enhances fitness, survival or growth of another (Bruno et al. 2003, Callaway et al. 2002). Positive and negative interactions are unlikely to occur separately in nature (Brooker & Callaghan 1998, Holmgren et al. 1997), and the overall importance of positive interactions on community structure tends to be higher in resource-poor environments (Callaway et al. 2002). Moreover, this balance can be subjected to spatial and temporal shifts (Callaway 1998, Morris & Wood 1989, Tielbörger & Kadmon 1997) linked with plant ontogenetic development and/or changes on resource availability (see Callaway & Walker 1997).