{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02034587995930824, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007121057985757884, 'mean_word_length': 4.754385964912281, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A questionnaire study of situations and response styles in anxiety: a pilot study.

A pilot study is described in which an anxiety questionnaire, combining both the manifestations of anxiety and the situations which might evoke anxiety, was distributed to a group of 60 neurotic patients and a group of 60 non-patients, both groups being dichotomized by sex. The results indicated that neurotics as a group endorsed significantly more items on both parts of the scale, and also indicated greater severity, than did the normal group. A sex difference was apparent for the neurotic group but not for the normal group. Chi-square analysis revealed that a number of items on both parts of the scale discriminated normal and neurotic respondents at a high level of confidence (P < 0·01), although the relative importance of the items in terms of rank-ordering was very similar for all groups. The implications of the present findings are discussed with regard to future work on the scale.