{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01910828025477707, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.418367346938775, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Ethics of Testimony: A Genealogical Perspective

this paradigm of witnessing-as-experiential knowledge is eyewitness testimony about the New World. Early modern European eyewitness accounts of the Americas are habitually put forth (following the examples of critics such as Pagden, Greenblatt and Campbell) as an index of the new epistemological prestige of first-hand experience, a prestige that supposedly attended both the birth of modern empirical science and the consolidation of the modern subject. An oft-cited character in this narrative is Bartolome de Las Casas, the Dominican friar who accompanied Columbus on his