{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02145214521452145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.389473684210526, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Political Philosophy as Practical Philosophy: A Response to “Political Realism”

must be shown to be supported by or compatible with sources of normativity derived from the practice of politics. The realist answer is typically contrasted with the view that political philosophy’s normative orientation has (in the words of two recent opponents of realism) ‘its ineliminable roots in morality’. In recent years, an increasingly complex debate has unfolded around these two positions, with much of the current focus on whether political realism ultimately collapses back into the position it seeks to reject.