{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02806824435883324, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01651073197578426, 'mean_word_length': 6.046511627906977, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Continent urinary diversion and low-rectal anastomosis in patients undergoing exenterative procedures for recurrent gynecologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to review the complications associated with continent urinary diversion and associated procedures in patients with gynecologic malignancies.


METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent construction of a continent urinary conduit between October 1991 and October 1998 on the Gynecology Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.


RESULTS
Thirty-three patients were identified, of whom 22 underwent total pelvic exenteration, 8 underwent anterior exenteration, and 3 underwent urinary diversion procedures only. Complications associated with the urinary diversion procedure included ureteral strictures (2), pouch leakage (2), mild hydronephrosis, (6), pyelopnephritis (2), nocturnal incontinence (5), and difficulty with self-catheterization (2). Additional procedures performed concomitantly with continent urinary diversion and exenteration included pelvic reconstruction (18), low-rectal anastomosis (13), and intraoperative radiation therapy (9). The most significant morbidity was seen in patients undergoing concomitant low-rectal anastomosis, in whom the rate of anastomotic leaks was 54% (7 of 13 patients).


CONCLUSIONS
Continent urinary diversion can successfully be accomplished at the time of exenteration in patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies. The rate of major complications related to the urinary diversion is small and most complications can be managed nonsurgically. The greater than 50% rate of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing concomitant low-rectal anastamosis suggests that such anastomosis should not be undertaken in this group of patients.