{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014025245441795231, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.900826446280992, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinical roles in clinical biochemistry: a national survey of practice in the UK – Comment

In the May issue of the Annals, we published a paper entitled ‘Clinical roles in clinical biochemistry: a national survey of practice in the UK’. One of our readers has drawn our attention to the uneven cartographic representation of the ACB regions in the associated map of the United Kingdom. We are happy to acknowledge that this was the case and to accept the assurance of the authors that this was completely unintentional. The Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine strives to ensure full and equal representation of all regions and the Annals of Clinical Biochemistry wishes to reflect this.