{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03286807744259343, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03782080144079244, 'mean_word_length': 5.459302325581396, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Endodontic considerations of survival rate for autotransplanted third molars: a nationwide population-based study.

AIM
To investigate whether the timing of root canal treatment (primary aim) or other endodontic parameters (secondary aim) are associated with the survival probability of autotransplanted third molars, using a nationwide population-based database.


METHODOLOGY
A total of 1811 third molars autotransplanted between 2000 and 2013 met the inclusion criteria and were followed until the end of 2016. The teeth were classified into three groups on the basis of timing between root canal treatment and the autotransplantation: preoperative, extraoral, and postoperative treatment groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between the timing of root canal treatment and the risk of tooth extraction after autotransplantation.


RESULTS
Of the 1811 autotransplanted third molars, 462 were extracted, yielding a 17-year survival probability of 0.578. The survival probability of autotransplanted teeth that received postoperative root fillings after 17 years was 0.583, which was significantly higher than the 0.434 and 0.566 for teeth that received preoperative and extraoral root fillings, respectively (P = 0.0013). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, teeth that received postoperative root fillings were associated with a significantly lower tooth extraction hazard ratio (HR) compared with those that received extraoral root fillings (adjusted HR, 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.78) and those that received preoperative RCT (adjusted HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.19-3.82). Furthermore, the use of a rubber dam during postoperative root filling was associated with a significantly lower extraction rate after autotransplantation (adjusted HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.69).


CONCLUSIONS
Postoperative root canal treatment resulted in a significantly lower extraction rate than did preoperative or extraoral root canal treatment among autotransplanted third molars during a mean follow-up period of 8.33 years. Rubber dam use is recommended during postoperative root canal treatment to improve the outcomes of autotransplantation.