{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.053475935828877004, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04144385026737968, 'mean_word_length': 4.35, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reply from Ian D. Loram, Constantinos N. Maganaris and Martin Lakie

Our recent work showed for the first time the in vivo movements of gastrocnemius and soleus during quiet stance (Loram et al. 2005a, b). The observational data that we presented, including cross correlations (Loram et al. 2005a, Figs 3A and B and 4), frequency domain relationships (Loram et al. 2005a, Fig. 5A, B, D and E; Loram et al. 2005b, Fig. 2), power spectra (Loram et al. 2005b, Fig. 3) and time locked averaging (Loram et al. 2005b, Figs 5–9) show unequivocally the relationships between muscle length, CoM angle and EMG in standing. These facts do not depend on any closed versus open loop assumptions. The criticism solely concerns our interpretation and conclusions.