{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01834862385321101, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.826666666666667, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A postscript to a taxonomy of models

When I originally prepared the article several issues ago, I had the uncomfortable feeling that I was missing a compact, well-structured system of model classification. It was one which would immediately inform the reader of the highlights of the model used in the paper he was reading. That classification system is included here (the underscoring indicates the elements of the model in question).