{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02575107296137339, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02017167381974249, 'mean_word_length': 4.9012658227848105, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Matas "barn", Robin Plantation (16SL66), St. Landry Parish, Louisiana-history and archaeology of a nineteenth century milk house

The Robin Plantation Site (16SL66) is located on the left descending bank of Bayou Teche, near the town of Arnaudville, Louisiana. The siteowned by the Michael and Myra Matasconsists of 14.14 acres of land, a main house, the barn, a circa 1945 barn, an overseers house and two above-ground cistern bases.
The primary goal of this thesis was to determine the age and function of Room 1 of the barn. The barn in its present form consists of two rooms separated by a breezeway: Room 1 of piece-sur-piece construction and Room 2 of post-on-sill construction. As noted, the focus of this thesis is on Room 1.
Room 1 was originally constructed as a separate building and later incorporated into the barn. It is a finely constructed, securely built, piece-sur-piece structure with beaded molding and wooden floor. These architectural details suggest that Room 1 did not originally function as an animal shelter.
A series of research questions were posed to determine the age and function of Room 1. Archival, archaeological and architectural investigations were conducted to answer these questions. Archival research did not reveal the function of Room 1. However, archival evidence and the architectural details of Room 1 suggest that it was constructed concomitantly with the Matas Main House between 1812 and 1815.
Room 1 could have served any of several functions including: a residence, office, storehouse or milk house. Archaeological investigations were inconclusive as to the function of Room 1. However, the author concluded from these investigations that Room 1 most likely did not function as a residence, office or storehouse. Architectural comparisons were made between Room 1 and other piece-sur-piece buildings with known functions located in Louisiana to further support the archaeological evidence that it did not function as a residence, office or kitchen. Room 1 shared many similarities with one of these buildings, the Rosedown Milk House. The building was then compared both archaeologically and architecturally to other milk house sites and structures, respectively. The author concluded that Room 1 was a milk house constructed between 1812 and 1815 through those investigations.