{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04512820512820513, 'fraction_numerical': 0.055384615384615386, 'mean_word_length': 4.4525139664804465, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Great Commandment Pericope and Q

In this essay, the author talks about the existence of a Q-variant of the Markan great commandment pericope. He considers three points in this essay: the Luke' s editorial activity in 10:25-28, the minor agreements between Mt 22:34-40 and Lk 10:25-28, and the possibility of Mark's knowledge of this Q passage and his use of it in 12:28-34. The author proceeds cautiously to indicate whether the evangelists is either present or absent in the Q pericope. The pericope became the final discussion while Jesus, during the last days of his public life, was walking in the temple. It appears impossible to explain adequately Lk 10:25-28 and Mt 22:34-40 without the postulate of a second source, a text which is different from Mk 12:28-34. The two texts, Q 10:25-28 and Mk 12:28-34, apparently deal with the same incident. The author feels that Mark radically edited Q. Keywords: commandment pericope; Jesus; Luke; Mark; Q pericope; Q-variant