{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03924570575056012, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01549663928304705, 'mean_word_length': 4.856330636343757, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Regulatory Effect of INMAP on Centromere Proteins: Antisense INMAP Induces CENP-B Variation and Centromeric Halo

CENP-B is a highly conserved protein that facilitates the assembly of specific centromere structures both in interphase nuclei and on mitotic chromosomes. INMAP is a conserved protein that localizes at nucleus in interphase cells and at mitotic apparatus in mitotic cells. Our previous results showed that INMAP over-expression leads to spindle defects, mitotic arrest and formation of polycentrosomal and multinuclear cells, indicating that INMAP may modulate the function of (a) key protein(s) in mitotic apparatus. In this study, we demonstrate that INMAP interacts with CENP-B and promotes cleavage of the N-terminal DNA binding domain from CENP-B. The cleaved CENP-B cannot associate with centromeres and thus lose its centromere-related functions. Consistent with these results, CENP-B in INMAP knockdown cells becomes more diffused around kinetochores. Although INMAP knockdown cells do not exhibit gross defects in mitotic spindle formation, these cells go through mitosis, especially prophase and metaphase, with different relative timing, indicating subtle abnormality. These results identify INMAP as a model regulator of CENP-B and support the notion that INMAP regulates mitosis through modulating CENP-B-mediated centromere organization.


Introduction
Normal cell proliferation depends on a whole intact spindle because the accurate segregation of the replicated genome from paired sister chromatids requires the biorientation of chromosomes on the spindle. Errors in the choreography of these processes can lead to aneuploidy or genomic instability, leading to cell death or disease [1,2]. Centromeres are key chromosomal structures responsible for the correct distribution and assortment of the newly replicated chromosomes from parent cells to daughter cells, and they regulate the chromosome traction dynamics of the spindle during mitosis and meiosis [3][4][5]. After all chromosomes have converged onto the equatorial plate, each pair of sister chromatids is separated and pulled to the opposite poles of the mitotic cell [6].
A three-layer physical structure on centromeres, the kinetochore, which includes inner, middle and transient (outer) domains (plates), contains more than 80 types of proteins [7,8]. Mitosin/ CENP-F is located in the outer plate [9,10], and CENP-E is localized primarily to the fibrous corona of kinetochores during prometaphase and metaphase [11]. CENP-E and Mitosin/CENP-F play significant roles in kinetochore attachment to spindle microtubules [12][13][14]. There are other spindle checkpoint proteins, such as MAD1, MAD2, BUBR1 and CDC20, in the outer plate [15,16]. Furthermore, checkpoint control proteins also involve other CENPs, such as CENP-A and CENP-B, as both Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 2 (PARP-2) can interact with CENP-A, CENP-B and Bub 3, a protein that plays a role in the inhibition of anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C) by forming a complex with BUB1 under the condition of spindle-assembly checkpoint activation [17,18]. These findings imply that certain CENPs act as guardians to ensure normal cell division.
Previously, CENP-A, CENP-B and CENP-C were together defined as the pre-kinetochore complex on which the kinetochores assembled in human cells [19]. CENP-B is a highly conserved centromere protein, specifically located at the middle domain of the centromere. It has a DNA binding domain (DBD) within the N-terminal 125-amino acid residue region [20] that binds to 17-bp chromatin DNA repeat units, CENP-B boxes, which widely appear in a-satellite repeats (171 bp each) within human centromeric and pericentromeric DNA sequences [19,21,22]. CENP-B and another constitutive centromere protein, CENP-A, are spatially very close (,10 nm) to each other, and CENP-A can serve as a centromeric specialized histone 3 variant, forming a heterodimer with histone H4 in mammalian cells [23]. CENP-C and CENP-T/W also have DNA binding features [24,25]. CENP-E only localizes to active centromeres and whose knockout is embryonically lethal with disorganized/disordered chromosome segregation [26]. Recent research has shown that CENP-C and CENP-T/W, not CENP-A and CENP-B, act as a type of mediator between the centromeric chromatin platform (constitutive centromere-associated network) and the Knl1-Mis12-Ndc80 complex network, which is beneficial in constructing a bridge between the inner and outer kinetochore [27][28][29]. Up to date, there is limited evidence of direct interaction between CENP-A and any of other CENPs [30], and however CENP-B can interact with CENP-C. These data imply that CENP-B most likely participates in more subtle activities than simple kinetochore assembly.
The absence of CENP-B in cells does not distinctly affect cell division [31], while CENP-B-null mice appear normal but have lower body and testis weights for at least 10 weeks [32]. CENP-A and CENP-B expressions correlate with a clinical phenotype of systemic sclerosis [33]. This implies CENP-B has pivotal functions, as was found over ten years ago, for cell growth and chromosome segregation [34], but may somehow generate a slow influence on cellular and developmental physiology.
INCENP (inner centromere protein), one significant component of CPC (chromosomal passenger complex) [35], contributes to correct chromosome segregation by regulating kinases and spindle assembly [36,37]. In CPC, INCENP functions as a scaffold-like component, regulating Aurora B kinase and Survivin (an apoptosis inhibitor) [38]. In this complex, Aurora B kinase, the catalytic subunit of CPC, acts as a sensor for the status of attachment of kinetochores to microtubules. Attachment correction and mitotic checkpoint activation are elicited when the phosphorylation of Aurora B targets erroneously attached kinetochores [39]. Recently, researchers have suggested that INCENP also acts as a platform for kinase crosstalk at centromeres, which enables Polo (a key cell cycle kinase that promotes stable microtubule attachment) and Aurora B (a detachment promoter) to achieve a balance in correcting the mis-attachment of microtubules [40].
Inevitably, the functional regulation of the centromere/kinetochore intermolecular relationship and especially the related proteins' modification influences cellular life broadly. Abnormal cell cycle progression is always related to abnormal mitotic apparatus. Disruption of some mitotic regulators causes drastic phenomena while others show mild effects in the cells. For instance, CENP-H RNAi cells do not show mitotic arrest, although chromosomes align aberrantly [41]. The CENP-B deficient mice appear normal, but their reproduction is dysfunctional with abnormal sexual organ weight. Knockout also causes agedependent reproductive deterioration in R1 and W9.5 Cenpb null females and complete reproduction incompetence in C57 background Cenpb null mice [32]. These findings imply that some gene deficiencies that only display mild cellular changes may lead to hysteretic effects on growth or development.
INMAP is an interphase nucleus/mitotic apparatus protein involved in spindle formation and cell cycle progress we discovered a few years ago. Its over-expression in HeLa cells leads to spindle defects, mitotic arrest and polycentrosome/multinucleus formation with growth inhibition [42], but a high level of INMAP in normal cells represses the gene transcription of tumor suppressor p53 and transcription activator AF-1 [43]. However, how cell growth will be affected by INMAP knockdown or what will happen afterward remains undetermined. To further explore the function of INMAP and identify the linkage between this important spindle protein and centromere structure/function, we used the Tet-off system and analyzed certain centromere proteins through immunofluorescence and immunoblotting techniques.

MTT assay
Four thousand cells were seeded in every well of tissue culture plates. According to the time course, 5 mg/ml MTT (3-[4,5dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) was added into each well and incubated with the cells for 4 h at 37 uC; then 100 ml lysis solution (10% SDS +0.1% NH 4 Cl) was added into each well and incubated for 4 h or overnight at 37 uC to solubilize the formazan products. Absorbance values were measured at 570 nm with a 550 microplate reader (BIO-RAD, USA). Blank values, indicating the absorbance of MTT and lysate solution only, were subtracted from all samples.

Giemsa's staining
Cells were rinsed with PBS three times, fixed in 100% methanol for 30 minutes and washed in tap water. A fresh solution of 10% Giemsa stain was prepared in distilled water. Cells were stained for 30 minutes in the dark before rinsing with tap water and thoroughly drying using blotting paper.

Western blot analysis
Total protein extracts of HeLa cells or Tet-off HeLa cells were loaded onto 12% gels, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane for 3 h at 300 mA. The membrane with transferred polypeptides was immersed in PBST (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20) with 5% skim milk at room temperature (RT) for 1 h and then probed with monoclonal antibodies according to manufacturers' protocols. After washing three times with PBST, the membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h, and then proteins were detected using an ECL chemiluminescence kit and Kodak BioMix films.

Indirect immunofluorescence
Cells grown on coverslips were washed with PBS three times and fixed with 1.6% paraformaldehyde at RT for 10 min, followed by permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 at RT for 10 min. After washing another three times with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 20 mM glycine and blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 10 min at 37uC, the coverslips were incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h at 37uC. The cells were then washed another three times (5 min each) in PBST and incubated for 1 h at 37uC with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:50) or goat antirabbit IgG (1:50). These cells were washed again three times with PBST and counterstained with DAPI.

Microscopic and image analysis
Images of fluorescent cell nuclei were acquired with a ZEISS Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope LSM700 (ZEISS, Germany) equipped with a 406 Plan-Neofluar oil immersion lens (NA = 1.30). Laser power was adjusted to maximize the dynamic range of each sample. For multiple-staining samples, the adjustable spectral window of fluorescence collection was set for each channel with a singly colored control sample so that crosscontamination among channels was avoided. Statistical analyses were performed by the Shapiro-Wilk test and the independentsamples T test using SPSS 16.0 software.

His-Tagged protein expression and Pulldown
INMAP was cloned into the pET30a (+) vector (Invitrogen, USA). The resulting construct was transformed into the bacterial strain BL21 (TransGen Biotech, China) for expression. His-tagged protein was purified on Ni 2+ beads (GE, USA) from BL21 lysates. For His Pulldown assays, Ni 2+ beads with INMAP were incubated with HeLa cell extract for 2 h, isolated by centrifugation, washed, and eluted by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer.

Immunoprecipitation
After HeLa cells were transfected transiently for 24 h, cells were washed with PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP-40) containing protease inhibitors (0.1 mg/ml aprotinin, 10 mg/ml each of leupeptin, chymostatin and pepstatin) for 5 min on ice. Protein extracts were clarified by centrifugation for 15 min at 13,000 g at 4 uC. For immunoprecipitation, the extracts were incubated with antibodies against Flag overnight at 4 uC, followed by adding Protein A/G plus-Sepharose (TransGen Biotech, China) and incubating for 4 h at 4uC. After centrifuging for 1 min at 4uC, the pellets were washed five times with 500 ml of cell-lysis buffer while keeping on ice. Washed pellets of protein complexes were resuspended in 40 ml SDS sample buffer, vortexed, boiled, centrifuged for 30 s, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

INMAP localizes at dot structures in nucleus and interacts with CENP-B
Our pervious experiments showed that INMAP is located at mitotic apparatus (spindle, centromere and centrosome) in mitotic cells and we also determined that INMAP is located at nucleus in interphase [42] but it is not clear that how INMAP regulates mitosis. In this study, we tested INMAP and CENP-B localization in HeLa cells and found that they can both localize in nucleus and form dot structural pattern ( Figure 1A) and in some circumstances INMAP focus overlapped CENP-B ( Figure S1), which implied that they may have interaction condition. To test our hypothesis, we found INMAP can interact with CENP-B by Pulldown and immunoprecipitation experiment ( Figure Figure 2A). Moreover, to validate the INMAPs-Tet-Off cell strain, we tested for hygromycin gene by PCR ( Figure S2B).
After that, we detected the centromere phenotype reflected by special centromeric components ( Figure 2B and Figure S3). We found that INMAPs-Tet-Off cells showed distinct halo-like staining of CENP-B, which we termed centromeric halo (C-halo), as well as a diffuse signal around the nucleus by immunofluorescence. By careful observation of the C-halo, it appears that a portion of CENP-B is neither 'assembled' onto the centers of centromeres nor migrates far away from centromeres, while another portion scatters all over the interphase nucleus/mitotic cytoplasm ( Figure 2B). We performed statistical analysis on the Chalo-containing nuclei/cells and normal nuclei/cells of both the ordinary HeLa cells and INMAPs-Tet-Off cells ( Figure 2C). The number of C-halo-containing INMAPs-Tet-Off cells was significantly greater than that of ordinary HeLa cells (n = 3, P,0.001). We also compared the area of centromeric CENP-B fluorescent dots (focused fluorescence centers plus haloes) between normal HeLa cells and INMAPs-Tet-Off cells ( Figure 2D). The area of the fluorescent dots in INMAPs-Tet-Off cells was wider than that of control as the CENP-B became diffused when INMAP knockdown.
This phenomenon implies that the centromeres became abnormal and unstable due to the inhibition of INMAP but that this change did not result in immediate disaster. There was also no significant difference in the cell morphology between the control and INMAPs-Tet-Off cells after tetracycline removal and culturing for 24 h ( Figure S2C).
However, INMAPs-Tet-Off cells grew more slowly than controls, becoming significant after six days by MTT assay (p, 0.05, n = 4) ( Figure 2E). The result implied that the growth of INMAPs-Tet-Off cells was not immediately inhibited after INMAP was knocked down and that the effect of INMAP silence was a slow process. On the seventh day, the INMAPs-Tet-Off cells began to grow faster than the controls with the loss of cellular contact inhibition. After the seventh day, living cell numbers of all the groups decreased accompanied by rampant cell death ( Figure 2E). From the sixth to seventh day, it seems that INMAPs-Tet-Off cells exhibited contact inhibition despite not reaching the same cell density as the control cells. In other words, INMAPs-Tet-Off cells cannot tolerate the 'normal' cell destiny. We think the moderately retarding cell proliferation attributed to the abnormal CENP-B when INMAP was inhibited.

INMAP knockdown promotes N-terminal cleavage of CENP-B and CENP-BCT localizes out of nucleus
To explore the C-halo phenomenon and its significance, we further tested two inner centromeric proteins, INCENP and CENP-B, by immunoblotting ( Figure 3A). Interestingly, the INCENP expression level in INMAPs-Tet-Off cells did not display deviation from the control cells, nor did its molecular weight. Unlike INCENP, CENP-B displayed two molecular weight bands: one of 80 kDa, the same as the control, and the other of 60 kDa, a truncated CENP-B protein not detected in the control. To further determine how the CENP-B 60-kDa variant affected the centromere, we analyzed the structure of CENP-B, which has a known DNA-binding domain and a putative DNA-binding domain in its N terminus and a CENP-B dimerization domain in its C terminus ( Figure 3B). Because the antibody we used recognizes the C terminus of CENP-B, we can infer that the 20-kDa truncation occurs at the N-terminus (aa1,135) involving both the known and the putative DNA-binding domains. Thus, we transiently transfected and expressed full-length CENP-B (80 kDa) and a CENP-B variant (CENP-BCT) lacking the 135-aa fragment into HeLa cells to observe the phenotype. Surprisingly, the fulllength exogenous CENP-B can co-localize with the endogenous CENP-B on centromeres, while truncated exogenous CENP-B (CENP-BCT) was dispersed out of nucleus. The endogenous CENP-B could not be found in the nucleus both ( Figure 3C and S4). We also made the analysis of the proportion of cells with CENP-B locating at nucleus in transfected CENP-B (92%), CENP-BCT (11.3%) and normal cells (100%) ( Figure 3D). Transfected CENP-BCT cells significantly had fewer cells with CENP-B in nucleus, and even if CENP-BCT enters nucleus, it can not form the dot structure of centromeres.

INMAP knockdown does not affect the overall structure layout of spindles
We also tested spindle status in INMAPs-Tet-Off cells ( Figure 4A). However, we did not find any notable abnormality on spindles. We also performed statistical analyses of the various mitotic phases of INMAPs-Tet-Off cells to determine whether INMAP silence could affect mitosis. Interestingly, the proportion of the various mitotic phases of INMAPs-Tet-Off cells dramatically changed compared with the control. The quantity of metaphase cells accounted for 46.63%, much more than the prophase (27.15%), anaphase (16.72%) and telophase (9.51%) percentages, respectively.

Discussion
In the present study, we found INMAP and CENP-B are both localized in nucleus and INMAP can interact with CENP-B (Figure 1). When INMAP was over-expressed in HeLa cells, it caused multiple polar spindles [42]. When INMAP expression was inhibited in INMAPs-Tet-Off cells, there did not displayed significant difference in cell growth from the control and INMAPs-Tet-Off cells until the sixth day ( Figure 2E). INMAP deficiency also affected chromosome separation during mitosis. Specifically, the percentage of INMAPs-Tet-Off cells was lower than the control in prophase while higher in metaphase ( Figure 4B). These findings implied that INMAP functions importantly and its silence, different from its over-expression [42], shows a retard mode that must be involved in subtle modulation.
Some centromere proteins affect not only the processivity of spindles [44] and the depolymerizing activity of microtubules [45] but also the recovery from spindle damage [46]. As a constitutive centromere protein, human CENP-B connects with a-satellite DNA at CENP-B boxes and maintains the intact centromeres [47]. To explain why the INMAPs-Tet-Off cells displayed a delayed pattern of slowed growth after INMAP inhibition, we analyzed their spindles and centromeres. We discovered variation in the CENP-B spatial pattern ( Figure 2B) and molecular weight ( Figure 3A), though not any dramatic spindle deficiency/disorder was detected by indirect immunofluorescence for a-tubulin ( Figure 4A). Specifically, CENP-B could no longer stably localize on centromeres, and instead, it partly encircles centromeres, forming a relatively diffuse and nebula-like structure, centromeric halo/C-halo. With C-halo formed, a portion of relatively diffuse CENP-B collected around the dense CENP-B signal center, as though it had migrated away from the center without being degraded. In the images, it is easy to distinguish the centromeres in INMAPs-Tet-Off cells that 'swell' compared to those in control cells. This scene becomes more outstanding when we look at the mitotic phase. Although we can see some CENP-B signal background scattered in the control cells (or in nuclei at interphase), the 'halo' is more pronounced in INMAPs-Tet-Off cells. Therefore, it is obvious that CENP-B was affected by INMAP silence and reflected the changed centromere organization. This change was accompanied by the molecular weight variation of CENP-B; in INMAPs-Tet-Off cells, CENP-B not only expressed the original 80-kDa form but also generated a 60-kDa form ( Figure 3A).
CENP-B contains sites that are highly sensitive to proteases, and among them is the one at which the whole molecule can be cleaved by proteolysis such that the DNA binding domain (125 amino acid region from N-terminus) is separable from the dimerizing activity domain (a 20-kDa fragment at the C-terminus) [20]. INMAP silence may activate certain proteases through an unknown mechanism to cleave the N-terminal 20-kDa peptide from CENP-B. Because of this cleavage, the CENP-B dimers can form with intact dimerizing domains, while a region of the Nterminus with the DNA binding domain is lost, rendering CENP-B unable to attach to DNA. This hypothesis suggests that the CENP-B-DNA complex become loose and unstable, leading to a C-halo pattern around the centromeres ( Figure 2B).
As far as the C-halo is concerned, it is true that no immediate dramatic events have been implied in INMAPs-Tet-Off cells, but there is no reason to ignore the cytophysiological reaction just because of its tardiness. Let's connect a weather phenomenon in the mind ( Figure S5). When a halo appears around the moon, it is likely that the next day will be windy. It is not beyond logic or reason that cells grow in a delayed inhibitory pattern in response to INMAP silence. We constructed a model to explain the C-halo phenotype based on the above discussion ( Figure 5). The 60-kDa CENP-B variant, lacking the N terminus, led to the C-halo formation. This functional variation may lead to new insights. Previous studies revealed that a 17-bp motif termed 'CENP-B box' furnishes alphoid repeat monomer binding sites for CENP-B proteins, which plays a crucial role in the formation of the specified structure and/or function of the centromere [21], and further studies revealed a 'fold-back' mode by which CENP-B, with its N-terminal binding domain, associates with chromatin a-DNA at its CENP-B boxes; at C-termini, pairs of CENP-B molecules are dimerized [48]. The relevant studies indicated that tandem 5'-GA:GA-3' mismatches are responsible for the enhanced stability of the fold-back structures formed by the Drosophila centromeric dodeca-satellite; other centromeric DNA sequences, such as the AAGAG satellite of Drosophila and the mammalian CENP-B box sequence, contribute to the formation of special intramolecular hairpins [49]. CENP-B also functions as a centromeric structural factor for establishing a unique centromere-specific pattern of nucleosome positioning [50]. CENP-B null mice have lower body and testis weights [51], but they are viable with no other apparent abnormalities [52], and interestingly for us, they are mitotically and meiotically normal [51]. As for the molecular forms, we found both 80-kDa CENP-B and its 60-kDa  variant in INMAPs-Tet-Off cells, but the level of the former was considerably lower than that of the latter ( Figure 3A), while they existed as a larger total quantity in INMAPs-Tet-Off than in control cells. This finding implied that, after INMAP silence, the cells are able to generate a certain sum of compensatory CENP-B to overcome the deficit from protein cleavage, in spite of the limitation caused by abnormal gene expression, and as a result, the amount of 80-kDa CENP-B plus its 60-kDa variant in a INMAPs-Tet-Off cell exceeds the total CENP-B in a cell.
Just like the aureoles forming the lunar halo ( Figure S5), the centromeric haloes were also accompanied by diffuse centromeresurrounding protein in our experiment because a portion of chromatin was free from CENP-Bs, and the'idle'CENP-B variants would scatter in the interphase nucleus/mitotic cytoplasm ( Figure 5). How silenced INMAP contributes to the centromeric structural variation through the truncation of CENP-B and what signaling pathway it functions through are new topics we will explore in the near future.
Although we transiently transfected and expressed a 60-kDa CENP-B (CENP-BCT) lacking the N-terminal DNA binding domain, we did not find the C-halo phenotype in these cells. This result proves that the C-halo caused by INMAP silence depends on the cleavage of the preexistence of mature CENP-B proteins in nuclei / centromeres. As the exogenous vector translated a mutant CENP-B lacking the DNA binding domain, it will not necessarily enter nuclei to locate in the centromeres, and we only observed it out of nuclei ( Figure 3C and S4).
Researchers revealed that many CENPs, such as CENP-A, Mis12, CENP-C, CENP-H and CENP-I, are all localized in a core domain of the centromeric chromatin [4]. These CENPs, when associated with CENP-B, maintain centromeric stability and function. Moreover, we also tested INCENP in this study and found that INMAP silence did not affect the INCENP expression or its molecular weight, indicating that the centromere inner structure may be intact to a certain degree, because INCENP is a scaffold-like component in CPC and a platform for kinase crosstalk at centromeres and contributes to achieving a balance in correcting microtubule mis-attachment [40]. This finding can explain why truncated CENP-B and the C-halo phenomenon influenced cells with a delayed growth inhibition mode.
The relationship of INMAP with other centromere structural proteins and the pathway by which it regulates the centromere structure and chromosome separation are questions worth answering. These studies may reveal new insights into mitotic regulation and the CENP-B-mediated centromere organization.  Figure S5 The moon in the sky at a clear night and a cloudy night. C-halo is like the lunar halo in the night. Left: the moon appears in the sky at a clear night without clouds or wind. A clear outline of the moon can be observed. This situation is analogous to the centromere in the normal nucleus. Right: the moon appears in the sky at a cloudy or windy night. Many halolike clouds or fog appears near the moon. This situation predicts a rainy or foggy subsequent day. The centromere in the INMAPs-Tet-Off cells is similar to this type of moon, and CENP-B fluorescent signal is similar to the lunar halo around the centromere. The halo also predicts some non-dramatic events in the cell, e.g., the cell grows slowly. (TIF)