{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016867469879518072, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0012048192771084338, 'mean_word_length': 4.935714285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Alan Dordoy and Mary Mellor's "Ecosocialism and Feminism"

“Materialist feminists,” as Dordoy and Mellor define them, affirm some of the most important insights of recent ecofeminist thought.1 For example, they agree with the many ecofeminists who have pointed out that the oppression of women and the quest to dominate the natural world are interrelated. They share a conception of labor and exploitation that goes beyond traditional concerns of the left with wage labor and the extraction of surplus value. They adopt the ecofeminist view that the existing economic order must be understood as a continuation not only of the history of capitalism but also of the history of patriarchy. And finally, they decry the prevailing neglect of the central role of women and the natural world in the shaping the history of human society.