{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019592476489028215, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013322884012539185, 'mean_word_length': 5.414572864321608, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Nonspecific nuclear uptake of anti-MUC1 aptamers by dead cells: the role of cell viability monitoring in aptamer targeting of membrane-bound protein cancer biomarkers.

Most aptamers targeting cell-expressed antigens are intended for in vivo application, however, these sequences are commonly generated in vitro against synthetic oligopeptide epitopes or recombinant proteins. As these in vitro analogues frequently do not mimic the in vivo target within an endogenous environment, the evolved aptamers are often prone to nonspecific binding. The presence of dead cells and cellular debris further complicate aptamer targeting, due to their high nonspecific affinities to single-stranded DNA. Despite these known limitations, assessment of cell viability and/or the removal of dead cells is rarely applied as part of the methodology during in vivo testing of aptamer binding. Furthermore, the extent and route(s) by which dead cells uptake existing aptamers remains to be determined in the literature. For this purpose, the previously reported aptamer sequences 5TR1, 5TR4, 5TRG2 and S22 - enriched against the MUC1 tumour marker of the mucin glycoprotein family - were used as model sequences to evaluate the influence of cell viability and the presence of nontarget cell-expressed protein on aptamer binding to the MUC1 expressing human cancer cell lines MCF-7, Hs578T, SW480, and SW620. From fluorescence microscopy analysis, all tested aptamers demonstrated extensive nonspecific uptake within the nuclei of dead cells with compromised membrane integrities. Using fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS), the inclusion of excess double-stranded DNA as a blocking agent showed no effect on nonspecific aptamer uptake by dead cells. Further nonspecific binding to cell-membrane bound and intracellular protein was evident for each aptamer sequence, as assessed by southwestern blotting and FACS. These factors likely contributed to the ∼120-fold greater binding response of the 5TR1 aptamer to dead MCF-7 cells over equivalent live cell populations. The identification of dead cells and cellular debris using viability stains and the subsequent exclusion of these cells from FACS analysis was identified as an essential requirement for the evaluation of aptamer binding specificity to live cell populations of the cancer cell lines MCF-7, Hs578T and SW480. The research findings stress the importance of dead cell uptake and more comprehensive cell viability screening to validate novel aptamer sequences for diagnostic and therapeutic application.