{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014598540145985401, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0008110300081103001, 'mean_word_length': 5.494736842105263, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Assessment of the Socioeconomic Status of Depressed Regions

Under conditions of economic crisis, it is very difficult to identify objectively the regions in need of targeted state assistance. The authorities at both the federal level and in the constituent entities of the Federation must have the most trustworthy information possible on the socioeconomic situation in the regions for this purpose. Western statistical specialists feel that microeconomic indicators are more reliable and that macroeconomic ones are less so in a directive planned economy, and vice versa in a market economy.1 But Russian experience testifies that both the macro- and microeconomic indicators of official statistics are not completely reflective of the actual situation during the period of reforms. Quantitative assessments of the socioeconomic status of the region prove inadequate because distorted information on the potential of the territories, production volumes in monetary terms, the real tax base, the income of enterprises, the standard of living of the population, and the like do not permit suitable decisions to be made. High-quality, expert, and logically interpreted assessments are required for objective and full-fledged analysis.