{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019721577726218097, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.959677419354839, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Academic uroradiology: the future.

Radiologic education, research, and the practice of radiology will be of the highest quality in the future if academic departments stress organ-system subspecialization while continuing to integrate and interface with technique-based specialists. Planning should begin now to effect an orderly progression to an organ-system-based subspecialty structure for radiology training in general and for uroradiology specifically. Uroradiologists should remain as central consultants to their clinical counterparts, working collaboratively with urologists in clinical endeavors of mutual relevance. More fellowships in uroradiology should be offered that attempt to incorporate all imaging methods and procedures into the curriculum. These issues are addressed in the context of patient care, service, education, and cost containment.