{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015455950540958269, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.352941176470588, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Contextualising Australian Theology: An Enquiry into Method

Recent efforts to contextualise Australian theology need to be the subject of critical dialogue between Catholic and Protestant theologians. In a spirit of postmodernity, the author critiques the methodology of Tony Kelly's A new imagining, and then moves on to propose elements of an alternative methodology which draws upon the theology of Karl Barth. A recent work by Norman Habel, This land is mine, promises a rich contextual reflection, and the method here proposed is applied to theological issues emerging from this study to outline a way forward for Australian contextualising.