{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022494887525562373, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.447368421052632, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reply to Comment Submitted by Murnick et al. on "Intracavity OptoGalvanic Spectroscopy Not Suitable for Ambient Level Radiocarbon Detection".

Recently Murnick et al. commented on our article "Intracavity OptoGalvanic Spectroscopy is not suitable for ambient level radiocarbon detection", stating that the methodology and conclusions we derived were incorrect. We completely disagree with the comments submitted by Murnick et al. and a detailed response to their comments is included here.