{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016105417276720352, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.358139534883721, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Modelling canopy reflectance with spectral invariants.

ABSTRACT: The concept of using spectral invariants to describe the scattering and absorption processes in a vegetation canopy has been developed for application to remote sensing studies in recent years. It has been shown that an average ‘recollision probability’ can describe the main impacts of structure on directional-hemispherical scattering and transmission, and there has been some indication that this might provide a useful route to modelling canopy reflectance. In this paper, we examine how an existing formulation of canopy reflectance and transmittance describes radiometric behaviour as a function of scattering order. We note that the assumptions underlying the model break down for moderate to high leaf area index (LAI), and show that this leads to a poor description of scattering as a function of interaction order. This leads to the model parameters losing any direct biophysical meaning, becoming ‘effective’ terms. It is shown that it is useful to maintain the direct meaning of the parameters, as this potentially simplifies the modelling of bi-directional fluxes and the dependence of parameters on zenith angle and leaf scattering asymmetry. We propose a new formulation that maintains the small number of parameters in the original model but better describes the scattering behaviour.