{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015932023366967606, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004779607010090282, 'mean_word_length': 5.474226804123711, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Influence of Hydrothermal Sealing on the High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of the Anodized 6082 Aluminum Alloy

For aluminum alloys, anodizing is a common electrochemical surface treatment to allow for protection against corrosion and wear. The produced conversion layers are first sealed in industrial processes to further enhance the corrosion protection by closing the coating surface pores. In their lifetime, anodized components often undergo cyclic loadings. However, despite the relevance of a sealing treatment, there is a lack of systematic studies regarding its influence on the fatigue behavior of anodized aluminum components. In this work, a 6082-aluminum alloy was anodized in sulphuric acid and the effect of the anodizing treatment with and without further hydrothermal sealing on the fatigue strength was investigated. The thickness and Martens hardness of the coatings were determined and the coating appearance in non-sealed and sealed conditions was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy prior to and after cyclically loading at R = −1. The fatigue strength was significantly decreased by the anodizing treatment, when compared to the bare substrate. However, hydrothermal sealing had a positive influence as the anodized and sealed condition attained a fatigue strength in the range of the bare aluminum. Distinct differences regarding the coating appearances, thickness, and hardness were not observed when comparing the non-sealed and the sealed conditions. After fatigue loading, numerous pronounced radial cracks were present in the anodic coating, but the number of cracks were significantly lower for the hydrothermally sealed coating. Fatigue failure occurred due to propagation of one crack from the coating towards the substrate, resulting in single-point crack initiation, which was similar to the fatigue fracture behavior of the bare aluminum substrate.