{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04260450160771704, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03697749196141479, 'mean_word_length': 5.84065934065934, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Imaging Features and Clinical Detection

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVESMammographie findings and method of detection of 52 cases of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common breast carcinoma, are reported. METHODSPreoperative mammograms and clinical records of all patients with ILC not associated with a second mammary carcinoma (other than lobular carcinoma in situ) from 1979–1991 at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTSAbnormal mammographie findings were present in 48/52 (92%) and included irregular spiculated masses (33/52, 63%), asymmetric densities (7/52,13%), architectural distortion (5/52, 10%), microcalcifications (2/52, 4%), and well circumscribed masses (1/52, 2%). The mean mammographie diameter was 2.1 cm. The tumor was most often best visualized in the craniocaudal projection. At the time of diagnosis, 54% of women had coexistent suggestive breast physical findings and 35% had metastatic carcinoma in axillary lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONSThe infrequency of microcalcifications in pure ILC may hinder mammographie detection and contrasts markedly with ductal carcinoma. Mammography and breast physical examination play complementary roles in the detection of ILC.