{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019230769230769232, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005244755244755245, 'mean_word_length': 5.366666666666666, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli‐Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally‐sighted young adults

Contrast sensitivity (CS) has been proposed as a potential method for patients to assess their vision at home. The CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test is meant to be performed easily in the clinic or at home. The purpose of this study was to determine the intra‐visit coefficient of repeatability of the CamBlobs2 compared with the near Pelli‐Robson test, and the limits of agreement between these two tests on normally‐sighted subjects.