{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022871664548919948, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0241423125794155, 'mean_word_length': 5.852173913043479, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Lateral C1-2 puncture for cervical myelography. Part II: Recognition of improper injection of contrast material.

The interpretation of cervical metrizamide myelography requires specific anatomic considerations, particularly when the lateral C1-2 puncture technique is employed. Fresh unfixed cervical spine specimens were injected with a mixture of metrizamide and methylene blue. Radiologic examinations of these specimens were compared with a retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive unselected cervical myelograms obtained by lateral C1-2 puncture during the years 1979-1980. Epidural, subdural, subpial, dentate ligament, and spinal cord injections may be encountered when the lateral C1-2 puncture for myelography is employed; possible artifacts from such injection are discussed.