{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03795066413662239, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02340290955091714, 'mean_word_length': 5.1796875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Desire to Die Statements in the Era of Voluntary Assisted Dying: An Audit of Patients Known to a Victorian Consultation-Liaison Palliative Care Service

Objectives: In the new era of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) legislation in Australia, this study aimed to explore (1) underlying reasons for desire to die statements (DTDSs), (2) clinician responses to DTDSs and (3) whether DTDSs were a true request for VAD. Methods: Clinical audit using an existing prospectively collected quality assurance database, supplemented by electronic medical records. Patients known to a consultation-liaison palliative care service who expressed a DTDS between October 2019 and September 2020 were included. Results: Forty-one patients were included; 29 (71%) were male, 29 (71%) had a malignancy and 31 (76%) expressed a DTDS more than once. Uncontrolled psychological symptoms were present more often than physical (n = 30 vs 19 [73% vs 46%]), yet physical symptoms were addressed more frequently than psychological (80% vs 63% of the time). Based on available data, the VAD assessment process was commenced by 7 patients, and death by VAD occurred for 2 patients. Conclusions: In our study, DTDSs were complex, multi-layered requests that more commonly reflected psychological rather than physical suffering. Though VAD is now legally possible, a DTDS was not always synonymous with a request for VAD. Key to responding to these requests are high levels of clinician confidence and communication skills. Training in this area remains critical for the experience of both patients and clinicians.