{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013634426927993182, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.671497584541063, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Research Management Committee as strategic device for Implementation Research


 
 
 Implementation Research (IR) are particularly useful in identifying whether when an intervention does not succeed, this is because the intervention was ineffective in the new scenario or if a good intervention was poorly implemented. In order to do this, it is important to establish evaluation strategies capable of provide feedback and encourage learning and incorporation of changes. However, the best strategies for this are not clear yet.
 
 
 
 Despite the existence of references with clear definitions of the outcomes for IR, it is still unclear what are the best strategies for the stakeholders’ participation in these outcomes evaluation. By identifying that, the framework of participatory research could contribute to the choice of these strategies. We sought to retrieve some of the devices already used in other research to test whether they would be able to respond to the assumptions of IR. The chosen device was the Research Management Committee (RMC) which has its use evaluated by a qualitative study with focus group and the data review of the minutes of meetings held by the RMC.
 
 
 
 The RMC functioned as a space where members of the research team, managers and workers from the services where the intervention occurred could meet systematically to plan, monitor and make adaptations in the IR. Besides its success as a tool for accessing outcomes, the RMC has also proved to be an important strategy to promote the increasing of acceptability, adoption, penetration and sustainability.
 
 
 
 The RMC was an important promoter of the participation for the stakeholders in several aspects of the research; made possible the evaluation and monitoring of the meaning and feasibility of the research in the field of study from the point of view of those who live the experience of daily work and care; and favored access to the outcomes of IR in a transversal and organic way.
 
 
 
 The RMC is a strategic device for Implementation Research and configures a possibility to make the research a more dialogic and potentially transformative process. Besides its success as a tool for accessing outcomes, the RMC has also proved to be an important strategy to promote the increasing of acceptability, adoption, penetration and sustainability.
