{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03194103194103194, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.9489051094890515, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[The ideal image and sex role norms in the Giessen Test].

This study was intended to test the assumption whether the ideal-image measure within the Giessen-Test reflects the specific personality as hypothesized by psychoanalytic theory or a general norm-orientation. To test this assumptions the items of the Giessen-Test were transformed an submitted to random samples of in- and out-patients. The results clearly indicate that the ideal-image as measured by the Giessen-Test is a general norm-orientation and consists of the dimensions "social-acknowledgement" and "capability of binding". Within the second dimension there seems to be a gender difference. Additional analysis of variance and Cronbachs alpha indicate that differences between in- and out-patients are the result of a possible "curative effect".