{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032803180914512925, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011928429423459244, 'mean_word_length': 5.3734177215189876, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Race, Research, and Urban Education

The need to advance knowledge about policy, leadership, curriculum, pedagogy, teacher education and education more broadly has never been more pressing. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in the first few months of 2020, literally brought educational systems in the United States and abroad to an unpredictable pause. COVID-19 has negatively affected the lives of communities all over the world. Spatial, sociological dimensions of conceptualizing urban education include micro-level analyses of space - smaller, dialogic communities such as schools or classrooms that advance particular ways of knowing in urban education. Meso-analyses may examine contexts that are broader than micro-analyses such as districts, collections of schools or even state level that provide analytic tools to describe places of studying and theorizing. Macro-level analyses and naming might be used, perhaps, in conceptualizing “big” data projects in urban education. © 2021 Taylor & Francis.