{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018541409147095178, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004944375772558714, 'mean_word_length': 5.183206106870229, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Two Methods of Intravenous Administration of Morphine for Postoperative Pain Relief

Morphine sulphate was used for the control of pain following major abdominal surgery for a period of three days either as patient-controlled or continuous infusion. The two groups of patients were comparable with regard to patient and operation details, duration of infusion, pain scores and complications. The only significant difference was a reduced dose requirement of morphine in the patient-controlled analgesia group (P < 0.005). Some possible explanations for this finding are given. It is suggested that a properly supervised continuous infusion of morphine is as good as patient-controlled administration. There was a negative correlation between the age of the patient and the dose of morphine used.