{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04364326375711575, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04174573055028463, 'mean_word_length': 4.902985074626866, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluation of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program in The Medical City based on Joint Commission on Infant Hearing (JCIH) 2007 Position Statement Quality Indicators

Objective : The objective of this study is to evaluate the newborn hearing screening program in The Medical City based on the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) 2007 Position Statement Quality Indicators. 
Methods: 
Study Design: Cross - Sectional Survey 
Setting:           Tertiary Private Hospital 
Participants : All newborns who underwent newborn hearing screening in The Medical City for the year 2015. 
Results: Of 2,010 patients delivered in the hospital in year 2015, 1,986 (98.8%) were screened.  Among the 59 babies with initial “refer” results, 15 (25.42%) “referred” a second time while 24 (40.68%) “passed” the rescreening. Twenty (33.89%) did not undergo rescreening (10 were classified as dropouts, while another 10 did not undergo rescreening for various reasons. Of those who “referred” during rescreening, only 9 (60%) had further evaluation done with ABR/ASSR. Among these, 4 (26.66%) had hearing loss and proceeded with the appropriate monitoring and management while 5 (33.33%) had normal hearing. 
Conclusion : The current newborn hearing screening program in the Medical City was able to reach JCIH 2007 quality indicators for screening but not for confirmation of hearing Loss. All patients with hearing loss were managed with early rehabilitation. 
Keywords: Newborn hearing screening, otoacoustic emission test, auditory brainstem response test, auditory steady state response test